Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Sep 18;15(9):e0239442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239442

Increased risk of developing dental diseases in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome—A secondary cohort analysis of population-based claims data

Chi-Jou Chuang 1,2, Chia-Wen Hsu 3, Ming-Chi Lu 2,4,*, Malcolm Koo 5,6,*
Editor: Frédéric Denis7
PMCID: PMC7500664  PMID: 32946501

Abstract

Background

Although it is known that patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) have impaired dental conditions, incidence rates and incidence rate ratios of various dental diseases in these patients are not clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and prevalence of dental diseases in patients with pSS, and to evaluate the risk of common dental diseases in these patients.

Methods

A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted using the data from the Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 709 patients with newly diagnosed pSS between 2000 and 2012 were identified to form the pSS cohort. A comparison cohort of patients without pSS was assembled based on frequency matching for sex, 5-year age interval, and index year at a ratio of 10:1. All participants were followed until the end of the follow-up period or when the outcome of interest occurred. The incidence of dental caries, pulpitis, gingivitis, periodontitis, oral ulceration, and stomatitis were calculated using multiple Poisson regression models.

Results

A significantly higher prevalence (74.6% vs. 63.0%, P = 0.001) and frequency (median 5.37 vs. 1.45 per year, P < 0.001) dental visits were observed in patients with pSS compared with patients in the comparison cohort. The risk of dental caries (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1.64, P < 0.001), pulpitis (aIRR 1.42, P < 0.001), gingivitis (aIRR 1.43, P < 0.001), periodontitis (aIRR 1.44, P < 0.001), oral ulceration (aIRR 1.98, P < 0.001), and stomatitis (aIRR 2.06, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in patients with pSS.

Conclusions

In this nationwide, population-based cohort study, a higher prevalence and frequency of dental visits were found in patients with pSS. Patients with PSS had increased risk of six most common dental disorders, including dental caries, pulpitis, gingivitis, periodontitis, oral ulceration, and stomatitis. Rheumatologists should remain vigilant for the dental health of patients with pSS.

Introduction

Primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) is chronic autoimmune disease characterized by an abnormal immune response to salivary and lacrimal gland resulting in dry mouth and dry eye [1,2]. Decreased salivary gland function can lead to oral dryness, which is a major clinical characteristic of patients with pSS. Saliva is a complex fluid containing various proteins, lipids, electrolytes, immunoglobulin A, hormones, and buffers [3]. The main functions of saliva include balancing the oral microbiota, providing lubrication and protection of the oral mucosa and tongue, facilitating carbohydrate digestion in the mouth, providing acid-base buffering and mineral salts, acting as a physical obstacle, and involving in wound healing mediated by epidermal growth factor (EGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [4]. Therefore, decrease salivary gland secretion can cause various dental disorders in patients with pSS.

Several studies have shown that patients with pSS have a high prevalence of dental caries, oral ulceration, or poor gingival and periodontal condition [5,6]. However, the overall dental condition and incidence rate ratio (IRR) for the development of common dental disorders in patients with pSS, compared with patients without pSS, remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this secondary cohort study was to compare the frequency and percentage of dental visits between patients with and without pSS using the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) [7], which is a nationwide, population-based database containing comprehensive medical service utilization records of over 99% of Taiwan’s 23-million population. In addition, the incidence rates for the top six most common diagnoses of dental disorders in patients with and without pSS, as well as their IRRs were calculated.

Materials and methods

Identification of the pSS cohort and a comparison cohort

This is a secondary cohort study using claim data from Taiwan's NHIRD. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of the Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taiwan (No. B10104020). The NHIRD files contain de-identified secondary data, the need for informed consent from individual subjects was waived.

Using the 2000−2012 catastrophic illness datafile, a subset of the NHIRD, patients with pSS were identified based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision, clinical modification (ICD-9-CM) code 710.2. In Taiwan, pSS is classified as a catastrophic illness, and patients with pSS can apply for a certificate from the National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA). The certification is issued to these patients after their medical records, serological, pathological, and imaging reports were approved by the NHIA, according to the European Study Group on Classification Criteria for Sjögren's Syndrome [8,9]. Approved patients are exempted from copayments for health care expenses incurred for the treatment of their catastrophic illness. In this study, the application date of the catastrophic illness certificate was defined as the index date for the pSS. Patients between the ages of 20 to 80 years on the index date were included in the study.

A comparison cohort was assembled from a random sample of the outpatient datafile of the 2000 Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID 2000), which contains health claims data, from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2012, for one million beneficiaries randomly sampled from all health insurance enrollees of the NHIRD in 2000. In the present study, 10 patients were selected, based on frequency matching for sex, 5-year age interval, and index year, for each patient with pSS to form comparison cohort.

A number of diseases were identified and evaluated as potential confounding variables in this study, and they included hypertension (ICD-9-CM codes: 401, 402, 403, 404, and 405), diabetes mellitus (ICD-9-CM codes: 250.0, 250.1, 250.2, 250.3, 250.4, 250.5, 250.6, and 250.7), congestive heart failure (ICD-9-CM code: 428), chronic pulmonary disease (ICD-9-CM codes: 49x, 500−505, and 506.4), malignancy (ICD-9-CM codes: 14x, 15x, 16x, 170−179, 18x, 190−198, 200−203, 204−208, 199.1, and 199.0), dyslipidemia (ICD-9-CM code: 272), coronary artery disease (ICD-9-CM codes: 414.01 and 414.00), myocardial infraction (ICD-9-CM codes: 410 and 412), peripheral vascular disease (ICD-9-CM codes: 443.9, 441 and 785.4), cerebrovascular disease (ICD-9-CM code: 43x), dementia (ICD-9-CM code: 290), musculoskeletal disorders (ICD-9-CM codes: 710 except 710.0, 714, 717, 720, and 725), peptic ulcer disease (ICD-9-CM codes: 531−534), chronic kidney disease (ICD-9-CM codes: 586, 585, 588.8, and 588.9), and liver disease (ICD-9-CM codes: 571.2, 571.4, 571.5, 571.6, 456.0, 456.1, 456.2 and 572). These diseases were defined by three outpatient visits within 90 days that occurred within one year prior to the index date.

Identification of dental diseases

Both the pSS cohort and the comparison cohort were followed until our study events had occurred or when the end of the follow-up period had reached. We collected data of dental visits up to 90 days after the index date. First, we reviewed all the dental diseases of patients with pSS using ICD-9-CM codes and selected the top six most common dental diseases based on the frequency of dental visits for further analysis. The dental diseases evaluated included (1) dental caries (ICD-9 code: 521.0), (2) pulpitis (ICD-9 code: 522.0), (3) gingivitis (ICD-9 codes: 523.0, 523.1, and 523.2), (4) periodontitis (ICD-9 codes: 523.3, 523.4, 523.5, and 523.8), (5) oral ulceration (ICD-9 code: 528.2) and (6) stomatitis (ICD-9 code: 528.0). The incidence rates and incidence rate ratios of each of these six outcomes of interest in patients with pSS and controls were calculated. The follow-up duration used for the calculation of person-years was obtained by subtracting the date when the outcome of interest occurred with the index date. Patients who were diagnosed with the outcome of interest within 90 days before the index date were excluded from the study.

Statistical analysis

The basic characteristics between the pSS cohort and the comparison cohort were compared using Chi-square test, t-test, or non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test, as appropriate. The prevalence and frequency of the overall dental diseases and each of the six specific dental diseases between the pSS cohort and the comparison cohort were compared using Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U-test, respectively. As the data for the number of visits were not normally distributed, they are presented as median and interquartile range, in addition to mean and standard deviation.

The incidence rate per 1,000 person-years was calculated for the pSS cohort and the comparison cohort. IRRs for the outcome variables were calculated using Poisson regression models (i.e., generalized linear models with a Poisson log-linear link function and person-years as the offset variable), with and without adjusting for the potential confounding variables, including age, sex, socioeconomic status, geographical region, and comorbidities. Additional subgroup analyses were also performed with stratification by sex, and age groups (20–55 and > 55 years). A two-tailed P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Basic characteristics and comorbidities of patients in the pSS cohort and the comparison cohort

The basic characteristics and comorbidities of the 709 patients in the pSS cohort and 7090 patients without PSS in the comparison cohort were shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the two cohorts with respect to sex and age. The socioeconomic status as estimated by insurance premium level and the geographic region were significantly higher in the pSS cohort.

Table 1. Basic characteristics of the Sjögren’s syndrome cohort and the comparison cohort (N = 7799).

Variable n (%) P
Sjogren’s syndrome cohort 709 (9.1) comparison cohort 7090 (90.9)
Sex > 0.999
    Male 79 (11.1) 790 (11.1)
    Female 6300 (88.9) 630 (88.9)
Age interval at entry, years > 0.999
    20−54 384 (54.2) 3840 (54.2)
    > 55 325 (45.8) 3250 (45.8)
Mean age (standard deviation), years 53.1 (13.6) 53.1 (13.6) > 0.999
Median (interquartile range), years 53.0 (44−63) 53.0 (44−63)
Salary grades for insurance (n = 7789) < 0.001
    ≤ 19,000 327 (46.3) 3786 (53.5)
    19,001−24,000 235 (33.3) 2208 (31.2)
    ≥ 24,001 144 (20.4) 1089 (15.4)
Geographic region (n = 7534) < 0.001
    Northern 367 (54.0) 4223 (61.6)
    Central 176 (25.9) 1061 (15.5)
    Southern 129 (19.0) 1423 (20.8)
    Eastern 8 (1.1) 147 (2.1)
Comorbidities
Hypertension 62 (8.7) 547 (7.6) 0.330
Diabetes 15 (2.1) 340 (4.8) 0.001
Congestive heart failure 3 (0.4) 35 (0.5) 0.797
Chronic pulmonary disease 17 (2.4) 147 (2.1) 0.566
Cancer 14 (2.0) 125 (1.8) 0.685
Dyslipidemia 25 (3.5) 220 (3.1) 0.538
Coronary artery disease 4 (0.6) 24 (0.3) 0.338
Prior myocardial infarction 0 (0.0) 6 (0.1) 0.438
Peripheral vascular disease 3 (0.4) 4 (0.1) 0.002
Cerebrovascular disease 8 (1.1) 106 (1.5) 0.438
Dementia 1 (0.1) 21 (0.3) 0.458
Musculoskeletal diseases 48 (6.8) 43 (0.6) < 0.001
Peptic ulcer disease 31 (4.4) 181 (2.6) 0.005
Chronic kidney disease 9 (1.3) 72 (1.0) 0.525
Liver disease 20 (2.8) 88 (1.2) 0.001

Socioeconomic status was estimated by insurance premiums based on salary. Low: < 19,000 New Taiwan dollars (NT$); middle: 19,001−24,000; and high: > 24,000.

P values were obtained by Chi-square test for categorical variables and t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables, as appropriate.

We also compared the prevalence of comorbidities between the pSS and the comparison cohort. Patients with pSS showed a significantly higher proportion of peripheral vascular diseases, peptic ulcer diseases, musculoskeletal diseases, and liver diseases, but a significantly lower proportion of diabetes mellitus, compared with those in the comparison cohort.

Frequency, proportion, and common causes of dental visits

There was a higher prevalence (74.6% vs. 63.0%, P < 0.001) and frequency (medium 5.37 vs. 1.45 per year, P < 0.001) of dental visits in patients with pSS compared with those without (Table 2). We analyzed the causes of dental visit in patients with pSS and selected the six most common dental diseases for further analysis. Table 2 shows the prevalence and frequency of six top most common dental diseases including dental caries, pulpitis, gingivitis, periodontitis, oral ulceration, and stomatitis. The prevalence and frequency of dental visits for all six dental diseases were significantly higher in the pSS cohort compared with the comparison cohort.

Table 2. The prevalence and frequency of dental disorders in the Sjögren’s syndrome cohort and the comparison cohort (N = 7799).

Variable n (%) P
Sjögren’s syndrome cohort 709 (9.1) Comparison cohort 7090 (90.9)
Dental visits
    Prevalence (%) 529 (74.6) 4465 (63.0) < 0.001
    Number of visits, median (IQR) (per year) 5.37 (0.00−20.89) 1.45 (0.00−9.10) < 0.001
    Number of visits, mean (SD) (per year) 19.53 (37.88) 9.50 (20.68)
Dental caries (ICD-9-CM 521.0)
    Prevalence (%) 443 (62.5) 3563 (50.3) < 0.001
    Number of visits, median (IQR) (per year) 1.71 (0.00−8.25) 0.15 (0.00−3.41) < 0.001
    Number of visits, mean (SD) (per year) 8.16 (18.99) 3.76 (8.60)
Periodontitis (ICD-9-CM 523.3, 523.4, 523.5, 523.8)
    Prevalence (%) 440 (62.1) 3581 (50.5) < 0.001
    Number of visits, median (IQR) (per year) 1.25 (0.00−6.49) 0.15 (0.00−3.11) < 0.001
    Number of visits, mean (SD) (per year) 6.68 (14.22) 3.59 (9.29)
Pulpitis (ICD-9-CM 522.0)
    Prevalence (%) 241 (34.0) 1776 (25.0) < 0.001
    Number of visits, median (IQR) (per year) 0.00 (0.00−1.33) 0.00 (0.00−0.10) < 0.001
    Number of visits, mean (SD) (per year) 2.26 (6.90) 1.05 (3.24)
Gingivitis (ICD-9-CM 523.0, 523.1, 523.2)
    Prevalence (%) 263 (37.1) 2049 (28.9) < 0.001
    Number of visits, median (IQR) (per year) 0.00 (0.00−1.58) 0.00 (0.00−0.52) < 0.001
    Number of visits, mean (SD) (per year) 1.94 (4.84) 1.17 (3.89)
Oral ulceration (ICD-9-CM 528.2)
    Prevalence (%) 166 (23.4) 890 (12.6) < 0.001
    Number of visits, median (IQR) (per year) 0.00 (0.00−0.00) 0.00 (0.00−0.00) < 0.001
    Number of visits, mean (SD) (per year) 1.25 (4.40) 0.48 (2.46)
Stomatitis (ICD-9-CM 528.0)
    Prevalence (%) 113 (15.9) 483 (6.8) < 0.001
    Number of visits, median (IQR) (per year) 0.00 (0.00−0.00) 0.00 (0.00−0.00) < 0.001
    Number of visits, mean (SD) (per year) 0.76 (2.76) 0.25 (1.88)

ICD-9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision, clinical modification; IQR: Interquartile range; SD: Standard deviation.

P values were obtained by Chi-square test for comparison of prevalence and Mann-Whitney U-test for comparison of medians of number of visits.

Risk of developing dental caries and pulpitis in patients with pSS

Table 3 showed the incidence rates and IRRs for developing dental caries and its complication, pulpitis, in the pSS cohort and the comparison cohort, with and without stratification by sex and age group. Overall, the pSS cohort showed a significantly higher incidence rate of developing dental caries (adjusted IRR 1.64, 95% CI: 1.47−1.84, P < 0.001) compared with the comparison cohort. Both male and female patients with pSS had a significantly higher risk of developing dental caries (adjusted IRR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.00−2.03, P = 0.047 and adjusted IRR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.48−1.88, P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, the risk of developing dental caries in pSS patients was significantly higher in both the 20−55 years age group (adjusted IRR 1.84, CI: 1.59−2.13; P < 0.001) and > 55 years age group (adjusted IRR 1.43, CI: 1.19−1.72, P < 0.001) compared with those in the comparison cohort. The risk of developing dental caries in pSS patients was significantly higher with a diseases duration of ≤ 5 years (adjusted IRR 1.50, CI: 1.33−1.68; P < 0.001) when compared with the comparison cohort. However, it was not significantly higher in those with a disease duration of > 5 years (adjusted IRR 1.28, CI: 0.80−2.06, P < 0.001) when compared with the comparison cohort.

Table 3. Incidence rates and incidence risk ratios of dental caries and pulpitis in the Sjögren’s syndrome cohort and the comparison cohort.

Disorder (ICD-9-CM) Group Sjögren’s syndrome cohort Comparison cohort IRR (95% CI) Adjusted IRR (95% CI)
No. of patient Person-years IR No. of patient Person-years IR P P
Dental caries (523.X)
Overall 358 1243 288.01 3135 17400 180.17 1.60 (1.43−1.78) < 0.001 1.64 (1.47−1.84) < 0.001
Sex
male 38 164 231.71 349 2019 172.86 1.34 (0.96−1.87) 0.086 1.43 (1.00−2.03) 0.047
female 320 1079 296.57 2786 15381 181.13 1.64 (1.46−1.84) < 0.001 1.67 (1.48−1.88) < 0.001
Age group, years
20−55 222 579 222 1911 9168 208.44 1.84 (1.60−2.11) < 0.001 1.84 (1.59−2.13) < 0.001
> 55 136 664 136 1224 8232 148.69 1.38 (1.16−1.64) < 0.001 1.43 (1.19−1.72) < 0.001
Disease duration, years
≤ 5 338 737 458.62 2861 9531 300.18 1.53 (1.36−1.71) < 0.001 1.50 (1.33−1.68) < 0.001
> 5 20 506 39.53 274 7869 34.82 1.14 (0.72−1.79) 0.583 1.28 (0.80−2.06) 0.312
Pulpitis (522.0)
Overall 220 2256 97.52 1694 24981 67.81 1.44 (1.25−1.66) < 0.001 1.42 (1.22−1.64) < 0.001
Sex
Male 18 302 59.60 193 2794 69.08 0.86 (0.53−1.40) 0.551 0.86 (0.51−1.43) 0.554
female 202 1954 103.38 1501 22187 67.65 1.53 (1.32−1.77) < 0.001 1.51 (1.29−1.76) < 0.001
Age group, years
20−55 143 1214 117.79 1035 14262 72.57 1.62 (1.36−1.93) < 0.001 1.70 (1.41−2.04) < 0.001
> 55 77 1042 73.90 659 10719 61.48 1.20 (0.95−1.52) 0.127 1.10 (0.86−1.42) 0.443
Disease duration, years
≤ 5 184 956 192.47 1433 10689 134.06 1.44 (1.23−1.67) < 0.001 1.37 (1.17−1.62) < 0.001
> 5 36 1300 27.69 261 14292 18.26 1.52 (1.07−2.15) 0.019 1.62 (1.13−2.34) 0.009

CI: Confidence interval; ICD-9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision, clinical modification; IR: Incidence rate per 1,000 person-years; IRR: Incidence rate ratio.

aIRR adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, geographic region, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, cancer, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, prior myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, rheumatologic disease, peptic ulcer disease, chronic kidney disease, and liver disease.

For the development of pulpitis, the pSS cohort showed a significantly higher incidence rate of developing pulpitis (adjusted IRR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.22−1.64, P < 0.001) compared with the comparison cohort. In the stratified analysis, only female patients with pSS had a significantly increased risk (adjusted IRR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.29−1.76, P < 0.001). The risk of developing pulpitis in pSS patients was significantly elevated only in the 20−55 years age group (adjusted IRR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.41−2.04, P < 0.001). The risk of developing pulpitis was significantly higher in pSS patients compared with the comparison cohort, regardless of whether their disease duration was ≤ 5 years or > 5 years (adjusted IRR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.17−1.62, P < 0.001 and adjusted IRR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.13−2.34, P = 0.009, respectively).

Risk of developing gingivitis and periodontitis in patients with pSS

Table 4 shows the incidence rates and IRRs for developing gingivitis and its severe form, periodontitis, in the pSS cohort and the comparison cohort, with and without stratification by sex and age group. Patients in the pSS cohort had a significantly higher incidence of developing gingivitis compared with the comparison cohort (adjusted IRR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.24−1.65, P < 0.001). Only female patients with pSS had a higher risk of developing gingivitis (adjusted IRR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.24−1.67, P < 0.001). In addition, the 20−55 years age group patients with pSS showed a significant higher risk of developing gingivitis (adjusted IRR 1.56, 95% CI: 1.31−1.87, P < 0.001). The risk of developing gingivitis was significantly higher in pSS patients compared with comparison cohort, regardless of whether their disease duration was ≤ 5 years or > 5 years (adjusted IRR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.19−1.63, P < 0.001 and adjusted IRR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04−2.07, P = 0.028, respectively).

Table 4. Incidence rates and incidence risk ratios of gingivitis and periodontitis in the Sjögren’s syndrome cohort and the comparison cohort.

Disorder (ICD-9-CM) Group Sjögren’s syndrome cohort Comparison cohort IRR (95% CI) Adjusted IRR (95% CI)
No. of patient Person-years IR No. of patient Person-years IR P P
Gingivitis (523.0x, 523.1x, 523.2x)
Overall 237 2262 104.77 1887 24980 75.54 1.39 (1.21−1.59) < 0.001 1.43 (1.24−1.65) < 0.001
Sex
male 25 283 88.34 204 2824 72.24 1.22 (0.81−1.85) 0.344 1.29 (0.82−2.02) 0.269
female 212 1979 107.12 1683 22157 75.96 1.41 (1.22−1.63) < 0.001 1.44 (1.24−1.67) < 0.001
Age group, years
20−55 155 1175 131.91 1197 13982 85.61 1.54 (1.30−1.82) < 0.001 1.56 (1.31−1.87) < 0.001
> 55 82 1087 75.44 690 10998 62.74 1.20 (0.96−1.52) 0.114 1.22 (0.96−1.55) 0.101
Disease duration, years
≤ 5 195 922 211.50 1555 10298 151.00 1.40 (1.21−1.63) < 0.001 1.39 (1.19−1.63) < 0.001
> 5 42 1340 31.34 332 14682 22.61 1.39 (1.01−1.91) 0.046 1.47 (1.04−2.07) 0.028
Periodontitis (523.3x, 523.4x, 523.5x, 523.8x)
Overall 339 1308 259.17 3084 17090 180.46 1.44 (1.28−1.61) < 0.001 1.44 (1.28−1.62) < 0.001
Sex
male 37 145 255.17 364 1890 192.59 1.32 (0.94−1.85) 0.106 1.46 (1.02−2.09) 0.038
female 302 1163 259.67 2720 15200 178.95 1.45 (1.29−1.63) < 0.001 1.43 (1.26−1.62) < 0.001
Age group, years
20−55 198 719 275.38 1841 9344 197.02 1.40 (1.21−1.62) < 0.001 1.40 (1.20−1.63) < 0.001
> 55 141 589 239.39 1243 7746 160.47 1.49 (1.25−1.78) < 0.001 1.52 (1.27−1.82) < 0.001
Disease duration, years
≤ 5 308 761 404.73 2812 9297 302.46 1.34 (1.19−1.50) < 0.001 1.29 (1.14−1.46) < 0.001
> 5 31 547 56.67 272 7793 34.90 1.62 (1.12−2.35) 0.011 1.75 (1.18−2.57) 0.005

CI: Confidence interval; ICD-9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision, clinical modification; IR: Incidence rate per 1,000 person-years; IRR: Incidence rate ratio.

Adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, geographic region, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, cancer, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, prior myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, rheumatologic disease, peptic ulcer disease, chronic kidney disease, and liver disease.

For the development of periodontitis, patients in the pSS cohort had a significantly higher incidence of developing periodontitis compared with the comparison cohort (adjusted IRR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.28−1.62, P < 0.001). Both male and female patients with pSS showed a significantly increased risk of developing periodontitis (adjusted IRR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.02−2.09, P = 0.038 and adjusted IRR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26−1.62, P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, patients with pSS in both age groups showed a significant higher risk of developing periodontitis (adjusted IRR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.20−1.63, P < 0.001 and adjusted IRR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.27−1.82, P < 0.001, respectively). The risk of developing periodontitis in pSS patients was significantly higher compared with comparison cohort, regardless of whether their diseases duration was ≤ 5 years or > 5 years (adjusted IRR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.14−1.46, P < 0.001 and adjusted IRR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.18−2.57, P = 0.005, respectively).

Risk of developing oral ulceration and stomatitis in patients with pSS

Table 5 shows the incidence rates and IRRs for developing oral ulceration and its related condition, stomatitis, in the pSS cohort and the comparison cohort, with and without stratification by sex and age group. Patients in the pSS cohort exhibited a significantly higher incidence of developing oral ulceration compared with those in the comparison cohort (adjusted IRR 1.98, 95% CI: 1.65−2.38, P < 0.001). Only female patients with pSS had a significantly increased risk of developing oral ulceration (adjusted IRR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.68−2.46, P < 0.001). In addition, patients with pSS in both age groups showed a significant higher risk of developing oral ulceration (adjusted IRR 2.11, 95% CI: 1.64−2.71, P < 0.001 and adjusted IRR 1.87, 95% CI: 1.44−2.44, P < 0.001, respectively). The risk of developing oral ulceration in pSS patients was significantly higher compared with the comparison cohort, regardless of whether their disease duration was ≤ 5 years or > 5 years (adjusted IRR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.56−2.34, P < 0.001 and adjusted IRR 1.62, 95% CI: 1.09−2.40, P = 0.016, respectively).

Table 5. Incidence rates and incidence risk ratios of oral ulceration and stomatitis in the Sjögren’s syndrome cohort and the comparison cohort.

Disorder (ICD-9-CM) Group Sjögren’s syndrome cohort Comparison cohort IRR (95% CI) Adjusted IRR (95% CI)
No. of patient Person-years IR No. of patient Person-years IR P P
Oral ulceration (528.2)
Overall 157 2608 60.20 855 29655 28.83
2.09 (1.76−2.48) < 0.001 1.98 (1.65−2.38) < 0.001
Sex
Male 16 308 51.95 95 3321 28.61 1.82 (1.07−3.08) 0.027 1.51 (0.85−2.69) 0.155
Female 141 2300 61.30 760 26333 28.86 2.12 (1.77−2.54) < 0.001 2.04 (1.68−2.46) < 0.001
Age group, years
20−55 85 1492 56.97 442 17258 25.61 2.22 (1.76−2.81) < 0.001 2.11 (1.64−2.71) < 0.001
> 55 72 1117 64.46 413 12397 33.31 1.93 (1.51−2.49) < 0.001 1.87 (1.44−2.44) < 0.001
Disease duration, years
≤ 5 125 1018 122.79 635 10471 60.64 2.02 (1.67−2.45) < 0.001 1.91 (1.56−2.34) < 0.001
> 5 32 1590 20.13 220 19183 11.47 1.76 (1.21−2.54) 0.003 1.62 (1.09−2.40) 0.016
Stomatitis (528.0)
Overall 100 2730 36.63 471 30722 15.33 2.39 (1.93−2.96) < 0.001 2.06 (1.64−2.61) < 0.001
Sex
male 9 332 27.11 65 3409 19.07 1.42 (0.71−2.86) 0.321 1.02 (0.45−2.32) 0.959
female 91 2398 37.95 406 27313 14.86 2.55 (2.03−3.20) < 0.001 2.23 (1.74−2.84) < 0.001
Age group, years
20−55 49 1598 30.66 250 17916 13.95 2.20 (1.62−2.98) < 0.001 1.90 (1.37−2.66) < 0.001
> 55 51 1132 45.05 221 12806 17.26 2.61 (1.93−3.54) < 0.001 2.29 (1.65−3.17) < 0.001
Disease duration, years
≤ 5 82 985 83.25 374 10555 35.43 2.35 (1.85−2.98) < 0.001 1.97 (1.52−2.56) < 0.001
> 5 18 1745 10.32 97 20166 4.81 2.14 (1.30−3.55) 0.003 1.86 (1.06−3.23) 0.029

CI: Confidence interval; ICD-9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth revision, clinical modification; IR: Incidence rate per 1,000 person-years; IRR: Incidence rate ratio.

Adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status, geographic region, hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, cancer, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, prior myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, rheumatologic disease, peptic ulcer disease, chronic kidney disease, and liver disease.

For the development of stomatitis, patients in the pSS cohort also exhibited a significantly higher incidence of developing stomatitis compared with those in the comparison cohort (adjusted IRR 2.06, 95% CI: 1.64−2.61, P < 0.001, respectively). Only female patients with pSS had a significantly increased risk of developing oral ulceration (adjusted IRR 2.23; 95% CI: 1.74−2.84, P < 0.001). In addition, patients with pSS in both age groups showed a significant higher risk of developing stomatitis (adjusted IRR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.37−2.66, P < 0.001 and adjusted IRR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.65−3.17, P < 0.001, respectively). The risk of developing stomatitis in pSS patients was significantly higher compared with the comparison cohort, regardless of whether their disease duration was ≤ 5 years or > 5 years (adjusted IRR 1.97, 95% CI: 1.52–2.56, P < 0.001 and adjusted IRR 1.86, 95% CI: 1.06–3.23, P = 0.029, respectively).

Discussion

Although it is well known that patients with pSS have impaired dental conditions [10], findings from this study confirmed that these patients had not only an increased risk of developing various common dental diseases, including dental caries, pulpitis, gingivitis, periodontitis, oral ulceration, and stomatitis compared with patients with pSS, but also provided overall as well as sex- and age group-stratified incidence rates and incidence rate ratios. Patients with pSS showed an increased risk of developing dental caries regardless of sex and age group, whereas, its complication, pulpitis, only female and younger patients showed an increased risk. This finding is consistent with previous studies [11,12]. The development of dental caries and its complication, pulpitis can be attributed to the decreased saliva flow and changes in saliva component resulting in a dramatic change of the oral microflora [13]. On the other hands, there are conflicting reports regarding whether patients with pSS have an increased risk of developing periodontitis [6,14,15]. Our findings supported that patients with pSS had an increased risk of developing periodontitis regardless of sex and age group. For gingivitis, only female and younger patients with pSS showed an increased risk compared with patients without pSS. The pathogenesis and mechanisms of periodontitis and pSS are highly complex, and free fatty acids, especially palmitic acid might play a role [16]. Since decreased saliva can impair its lubrication function, the risk of developing stomatitis and oral ulceration was expected to increase. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated this issue. Our study showed that the risk of developing stomatitis and oral ulceration was significantly higher in female patients with pSS, and both in younger and older age groups.

An increased risk of developing common dental diseases, including dental caries, pulpitis, gingivitis, periodontitis, oral ulceration, and stomatitis in patients with pSS could lead to difficulty in speaking, chewing, and swallowing. These dental diseases can eventually lead to early teeth loss in patients with pSS, resulting in the need for removable prostheses. However, hyposalivation in patient with pSS can affect the retention of removable prostheses because saliva is necessary to create adhesion, cohesion, and surface tension for denture retention [17]. As a result, proper digestive and nutrient extraction functions may be impaired in these patients. In addition, chronic periodontitis might be associated with an increase in the risk of developing a number of systemic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal diseases, colorectal cancer, diabetes, insulin resistance, Alzheimer's disease, and rheumatoid arthritis [18,19]. Therefore, it is crucial to prevent the development dental diseases and their sequel. Currently, muscarinic agonists (pilocarpine hydrochloride and cevimeline hydrochloride) are commonly used to increase saliva section for controlling oral dryness [2], but the protective effect of these agents on dental caries and periodontitis was still equivocal [20]. Topical fluoride can effectively decrease dental caries in patients with pSS [21]. Regular dental visits to receive professional dental cleaning and oral hygiene instructions should be encouraged in patients with pSS [22] to lower the incidence of dental diseases in these patients.

A few limitations of this study should be mentioned. First, the sample size for male patients with pSS was relatively small (n = 79), which might be insufficient to show the differences in IRRs between male patients with and without pSS. Second, the analyses relied on the claim-based NHIRD and therefore, those who did not use dental services were not included. Third, detailed serology data and clinical severity of dry mouth were lacking in patients with pSS, and therefore these variables could not be adjusted in our analyses. It is known that the salivary flow is significantly reduced with a longer duration of pSS [23]. Nevertheless, we found that the IRRs for pulpitis, gingivitis, periodontitis, oral ulceration, and stomatitis were similar between a disease duration of ≤ 5 years and > 5 years in patients with pSS compared with those in the comparison cohort. In fact, the IRR for of dental caries was not significantly elevated in pSS patients with a disease duration longer than 5 years. The development of these dental diseases is highly complex. Although xerostomia may be an important factor, other physical, biological, environmental, behavioral, and lifestyle factors can also play critical roles in the pathogenesis of different dental diseases [24].

In conclusion, we found that patients with pSS showed a higher risk for developing various common dental diseases, including dental caries, pulpitis, gingivitis, periodontitis, oral ulceration, and stomatitis. Rheumatologists should remain vigilant for the dental health of patients with pSS.

Acknowledgments

This study is based in part on data from the National Health Insurance Research Database provided by the National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare and managed by the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan. The interpretation and conclusions contained herein do not represent those of the National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare or the National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan.

Data Availability

Due to legal restrictions imposed by the government of Taiwan in relation to the “Personal Information Protection Act”, data cannot be made publicly available. Requests for data can be sent as a formal application to the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/np-2497-113.html).

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Fox RI. Sjögren's syndrome. Lancet. 2005;366:321–31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66990-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mariette X, Criswell LA. Primary Sjögren's syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:931–9. 10.1056/NEJMcp1702514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vivino FB, Bunya VY, Massaro-Giordano G, Johr CR, Giattino SL, Schorpion A, et al. Sjögren's syndrome: An update on disease pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment. Clin Immunol. 2019;203:81–121. 10.1016/j.clim.2019.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mathews SA, Kurien BT, Scofield RH. Oral manifestations of Sjögren's syndrome. J Dent Res. 2008;87:308–18. 10.1177/154405910808700411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fox PC, Bowman SJ, Segal B, Vivino FB, Murukutla N, Choueiri K, et al. Oral involvement in primary Sjögren syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1592–601. 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Antoniazzi RP, Miranda LA, Zanatta FB, Islabão AG, Gustafsson A, Chiapinotto GA, et al. Periodontal conditions of individuals with Sjögren's syndrome. J Periodontol. 2009;80:429–35. 10.1902/jop.2009.080350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.National Health Insurance Administration. National Health Insurance in Taiwan 2017–2018 Annual Report. Available from https://www.nhi.gov.tw/DL.aspx?sitessn=293&u=LzAwMS9VcGxvYWQvMjkzL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNjEwNi8yMDE3LTIwMTjlhajmsJHlgaXlurfkv53pmqrlubTloLHngI%2fopr3mqpQucGRm&n=MjAxNy0yMDE45YWo5rCR5YGl5bq35L%2bd6Zqq5bm05aCx54CP6Ka95qqULnBkZg%3d%3d
  • 8.Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Moutsopoulos HM, Balestrieri G, Bencivelli W, Bernstein RM, et al. Preliminary classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome. Results of a prospective concerted action supported by the European Community. Arthritis Rheum. 1993;36:340–7. 10.1002/art.1780360309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, Moutsopoulos HM, Alexander EL, Carsons SE, et al. Classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:554–8. 10.1136/ard.61.6.554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bolstad AI, Skarstein K. Epidemiology of Sjögren's syndrome-from an oral perspective. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2016;3:328–36. 10.1007/s40496-016-0112-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pedersen AM, Bardow A, Nauntofte B. Salivary changes and dental caries as potential oral markers of autoimmune salivary gland dysfunction in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. BMC Clin Pathol. 2005;5:4 10.1186/1472-6890-5-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Christensen LB, Petersen PE, Thorn JJ, Schiødt M. Dental caries and dental health behavior of patients with primary Sjögren syndrome. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59:116–20. 10.1080/000163501750266684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhou Z, Ling G, Ding N, Xun Z, Zhu C, Hua H, et al. Molecular analysis of oral microflora in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome by using high-throughput sequencing. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5649 10.7717/peerj.5649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Le Gall M, Cornec D, Pers JO, Saraux A, Jousse-Joulin S, Cochener B, et al. A prospective evaluation of dental and periodontal status in patients with suspected Sjögren's syndrome. Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83:235–6. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lugonja B, Yeo L, Milward MR, Smith D, Dietrich T, Chapple IL, et al. Periodontitis prevalence and serum antibody reactivity to periodontal bacteria in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a pilot study. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43:26–33. 10.1111/jcpe.12485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shikama Y., Kudo Y., Ishimaru N., & Funaki M. Potential role of free fatty acids in the pathogenesis of periodontitis and primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Turner M, Jahangiri L, Ship JA. Hyposalivation, xerostomia and the complete denture: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:146–50. 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bui FQ, Almeida-da-Silva CLC, Huynh B, Trinh A, Liu J, Woodward J, et al. Association between periodontal pathogens and systemic disease. Biomed J. 2019;42:27–35. 10.1016/j.bj.2018.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen HH, Huang N, Chen YM, Chen TJ, Chou P, Lee YL, et al. Association between a history of periodontitis and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide, population-based, case-control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1206–11. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hsu CY, Hung KC, Lin MS, Ko CH, Lin YS, Chen TH, et al. The effect of pilocarpine on dental caries in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: a database prospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:251 10.1186/s13075-019-2031-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Xin W, Leung KC, Lo EC, Mok MY, Leung MH. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of fluoride varnish in preventing dental caries of Sjögren's syndrome patients. BMC Oral Health. 2016;16:102 10.1186/s12903-016-0296-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zero DT, Brennan MT, Daniels TE, Papas A, Stewart C, Pinto A, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for oral management of Sjögren disease: Dental caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147:295−305. 10.1016/j.adaj.2015.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Olate S, Muñoz D, Neumann S, Pozzer L, Cavalieri-Pereira L, de Moraes M. A descriptive study of the oral status in subjects with Sjögren's syndrome Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:1140–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet. 2007;369:51–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Frédéric Denis

24 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-05093

Increased risk of developing dental diseases in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome– a secondary cohort analysis of population-based claims data

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Koo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 08 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Frédéric Denis, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We noticed you have some minor occurrence(s) of overlapping text with the following previous publication(s), which needs to be addressed:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04705-z

In your revision ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the Methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: As the aim of your study is to objectify side effects of pSS on oral health, you need to describe more precisely the salivary role : -buffer power

-physical obstacle

-hydration, lubrication

-Monitoring of oral microbiota,

-Tank of ions and minérals salts,

-Healing with EGF and VEGF.

You also need to emphasize on the prevention's problematic as it's difficult to provide a good oral restauration with removable denture when there is a lack of saliva.

By the end, as clinical expression of xerostomia should be different between two patients who suffer of pSS, there is a missing data, you need to objective the clinical severity of dry mouth.

Reviewer #2: Chuang et al are addressing dental disease in the context of Sjögren’s syndrome.

Major comment: No correction for multiple comparisons has been performed.

Minor comments: As the authors address risk factor of dental disease, they may address specifically the effect of treatment for Sjögren’s syndrome (e.g. did MTX-treated patients had more stomatitis? Does treatment affect the risk at all?). They may further address the effect of disease duration, since diagnosis and the one of extraglandular disease on the risk for dental disease.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Frédéric Denis

7 Sep 2020

Increased risk of developing dental diseases in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome– a secondary cohort analysis of population-based claims data

PONE-D-20-05093R1

Dear Dr. Koo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Frédéric Denis, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Frédéric Denis

10 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-05093R1

Increased risk of developing dental diseases in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome– a secondary cohort analysis of population-based claims data

Dear Dr. Koo:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Frédéric Denis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers Comments.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    Due to legal restrictions imposed by the government of Taiwan in relation to the “Personal Information Protection Act”, data cannot be made publicly available. Requests for data can be sent as a formal application to the Health and Welfare Data Science Center, Department of Statistics, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (http://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/np-2497-113.html).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES