Abstract
Background:
Myelitis accompanied by a negative spinal cord MRI may lead to diagnostic uncertainty.
Objective and Methods:
We retrospectively investigated the frequency of MRI-negative myelitis (performed <6 weeks from onset) in Mayo Clinic patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-associated myelitis (2000-2019).
Results:
The initial spinal cord MRI was negative in 7/73 (10%) patients, despite severe acute disability (median EDSS, 7 [range, 4.5-8]); myelitis symptoms/signs were frequent (paraparesis, neurogenic bladder, sensory level, Lhermitte’s phenomenon). Myelitis lesions became overt at follow-up MRI in 3 patients.
Conclusions:
A negative spinal cord MRI should not dissuade from MOG-IgG testing in patients with acute/subacute myelitis.
Keywords: Demyelination, MRI, Neuromyelitis optica (NMO), T2 lesions, Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, Acute transverse myelitis
Introduction
Myelitis is a common manifestation of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-IgG-associated disorder (MOGAD) that typically results in acute severe disability, although recovery is often favorable with prompt immunotherapy.(1) Spinal cord MRI may show T2-hyperintense longitudinally-extensive (≥3 vertebral-body segments), “short” lesions, or both, that are sometimes gray matter-restricted in a linear configuration on sagittal images and/or “H”-shaped axially.(1) However, MOG-IgG-associated myelitis with negative spinal cord MRI has been reported, which could lead to diagnostic uncertainty and treatment delay.(2, 3) In this paper we investigated the frequency and characteristics of patients with MRI-negative myelitis associated to MOG-IgG.
Methods
Patients
We retrospectively identified MOGAD patients seen at Mayo Clinic (January 1, 2000-August 31, 2019) with: 1) First clinical myelitis; 2) spine MRI obtained acutely (≤6 weeks from myelitis onset); and 2) no documented spinal cord T2-abnormalities on radiology reports. MOG-IgG positivity was confirmed by fluorescence-activated-cell-sorting live cell-based-assay, as previously reported.(1) We excluded four patients with unavailable MRI and one patient with concomitant MRI brainstem abnormalities. Forty-nine patients were previously reported.(1)
MRI-negative myelitis
Two neurologists (E.S.; E.P.F.) reviewed medical records to confirm symptoms/signs exclusively explainable by myelopathy in MRI-negative patients; consensus was reached after discussion in case of disagreement.
Statistics
Wilcoxon-rank-sum and Fisher’s exact tests were used for comparisons as appropriate (JMP Pro 14.1.0).
Results
Among 73 MOGAD patients at first myelitis episode, the initial spinal cord MRI was interpreted as normal in 7 (10%). When comparing these patients to those with abnormal MRI, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients treated with immunotherapy prior to MRI between the two groups (2/7 [29%] vs 10/65 [15%]; p=0.3), while the interval (days) from myelitis onset to the first spine MRI was longer in those with normal MRI (median [range]: 10 [5-30] vs 4.5 [0-28]; p=0.01).
Patients’ characteristics
The clinical presentations of the seven patients with MRI-negative myelitis are summarized in Table 1. All tested negative for aquaporin-4-IgG.
Table 1 –
Clinical presentations in 7 patients with MRI-negative myelitis
N – Age/Sex | MOGAD clinical presentation with MRI-negative myelitis |
---|---|
1 – 35/F | • Subacute onset of mild bilateral visual deficit and retro-ocular pain. |
• About 1-2 weeks after developed urinary retention that reached maximum severity in 4 days requiring catheterization. She also complained of diffuse dysesthesia with allodynia and Lhermitte’s phenomenon. EDSS at nadir: 4.5. | |
• One week after was admitted for worsening of the retro-ocular headache. | |
• Brain and spinal cord MRI were reported as unremarkable (Figure 1; A). | |
• CSF: protein, 100 mg/dL; white blood cell count, 48/μL; no abnormal oligoclonal bands. | |
• Serum MOG-IgG was positive and was started on intravenous methylprednisolone 1g/day for 5 days with improvement of vision and myelitis. | |
2 – 38/F | • New-onset low-back pain and pain with eye-movements. |
• Two weeks after developed acute urinary retention requiring catheterization, followed by headache, visual disturbances, and worsening weakness and numbness over lower back and legs. A Lhermitte’s phenomenon was also present. Was hospitalized for trouble ambulating. EDSS at nadir: 6. | |
• Brain and spine MRI were initially unremarkable, although abnormalities were noted on follow-up spine MRI, 6 days later). EMG/NCS was normal. | |
• CSF: protein, 82 mg/dL; white blood cell count 48/μL; no abnormal oligoclonal bands. | |
• Empirically started on IVIG (x5 days) with a working diagnosis of Guillain-Barre’ syndrome with improvement of symptoms. | |
• Serum MOG-IgG was later found to be positive. | |
3 – 45/F | • Admitted after 10 days of urinary retention (requiring catheterization) and constipation along with low-back pain, progressive lower extremities numbness and weakness, reduced appetite, nausea/vomiting, headache, and short-memory impairment. He was wheelchair-bound at nadir. EDSS at nadir: 7. |
• Spinal cord MRI was unremarkable (Figure 1; B). Brain MRI 3 days later showed multifocal T2-hyperintensities involving the left thalamus, temporal pole, and corona radiata (Figure 1; E). | |
• CSF study reported to be consistent with bacterial meningitis (exact results not available). He was treated with both antibiotics and IVIG with minimal improvement, but with rehabilitation he was eventually able to walk without a gait aid two months later. | |
• MOG-IgG were found to be positive on serum during subsequent relapses. | |
4 – 47/M | • Admitted for presumed viral meningoencephalitis after 10 days of worsening headache and urinary retention requiring indwelling catheterization. |
• CSF: protein, 81 mg/dL; white blood cell count 200/μL; no abnormal oligoclonal bands. | |
• After two days, he developed confusion and bilateral leg weakness, culminating in paraplegia in <48 hours. A mid-thoracic sensory-level was present on examination. EDSS at nadir: 7.5. Brain and spinal cord MRI were negative. | |
• Two days later he showed worsening mental status and overnight fever. Repeat brain and spinal cord MRI remained negative. | |
• Further MRI imaging 6 days after onset revealed brain and spinal cord T2-abnormalities. MOG-IgG was positive on serum. | |
• The patient was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone and PLEX with benefit. | |
5 – 46/M | • Woke up with bilateral visual disturbances (complete vison loss in one eye) and orbital pain a few days after a non-specific upper respiratory illness. Over 48 hours he developed bladder and bowel dysfunction with progressive bilateral lower limb numbness, pain, weakness and gait imbalance. EDSS at nadir: 4.5. |
• CSF: protein, 52 mg/dL; white blood cell count 161/μL; no abnormal oligoclonal bands. | |
• Brain MRI revealed swelling of both optic nerves with enhancement, more prominent on the left. | |
• Two weeks after symptom onset he was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone (x5 days) with improvement of both vision and myelopathic features. Cervical and thoracic spinal cord MRI obtained during steroid treatment was unremarkable (Figure 1; C) and repeat spinal cord MRI two weeks later was also normal. | |
• MOG-IgG was subsequently found to be positive in serum. | |
6 - 45/M | • Presented after 2 weeks of right-sided visual loss (blind within 72 hours), hand and chest numbness (T10 sensory level). Received intravenous methylprednisolone (x3 days) with mild improvement. |
• After one week developed bilateral leg numbness, weakness, and urinary retention requiring catheterization. A Lhermitte’s phenomenon was present. Brain MRI showed right optic nerve enhancement. Spinal cord MRI was unremarkable (Figure 1; D). | |
• He further worsened over 48 hours until he became paraplegic. EDSS at nadir: 7.5. | |
• Repeat spinal cord MRI remained negative. Somatosensory evoked potentials revealed impaired conduction velocity localizing to the spinal cord. EMG/NCS was unremarkable. | |
• CSF: protein, 63 mg/dL; white blood cell count 4/μL; no abnormal oligoclonal bands. MOG-IgG was positive in serum. | |
• He was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone (x3 days) and PLEX with improvement. | |
• Ten days later he relapsed with optic neuritis and myelitis. Spinal cord MRI revealed an enhancing longitudinally-extensive T2-hyperintense lesion that had accompanying gadolinium enhancement. Received PLEX with improvement. | |
7 – 80/M | • Presented after 10 days of fluctuating fever, fatigue, urinary urgency and incontinence at night, and progressive spastic weakness in his legs to the point that he was unable to stand. There were no sensory symptoms although altered proprioception and pin-prick sensation was later noted on examination along with hyperreflexia and a unilateral upgoing plantar response. EDSS at nadir: 8. |
• Spinal cord MRI was normal. EMG/NCS study showed conduction block and denervation changes; the possibility of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was raised. | |
• He was empirically treated with oral corticosteroids for one month and subsequently underwent rehabilitation with clinical and EMG improvement. | |
• Somatosensory evoked potentials revealed impaired conduction velocity localizing to the spinal cord. MOG-IgG was subsequently found to be positive in serum. |
Abbreviations: CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; EDSS = expanded disability status scale-score; EMG/NCS = electromyography/nerve conduction study; IVIG = intravenous immune globulins; MOG = myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PLEX = plasma exchange.
Median age at myelitis was 45 years (range, 35-80), 3 (43%) were female, and all were Caucasian. The myelitis occurred at MOGAD presentation in all. Myelitis symptoms/signs included: sensory disturbances, 7; bowel/bladder dysfunction, 7 (requiring catheterization in 5); weakness, 6; upper motor neuron signs (spasticity, hyperreflexia, or positive Babinski), 4; trunk sensory level, 3; and Lhermitte’s phenomenon, 3. One patient had an isolated myelitis while six had other neurologic manifestations (optic neuritis, 4; headache, 4; encephalopathy, 2). Three had viral-like prodromes. Median expanded disability status scale (EDSS)-score at nadir was 7 (range, 4.5-8). Median MOG-IgG titer was 100 (range, 100-10,000). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis, available in six, revealed pleocytosis (5/6; median white cell count, 70/μL [range, 28161]) and absence of oligoclonal bands (6/6). Somatosensory evoked potentials were obtained in two patients revealing conduction delay localizable to the spinal cord in both. Two patients had normal nerve conduction/electromyography while one had conduction block and denervation changes concomitant with a spastic paraparesis confirming a myelo-neuropathy.
On MRI re-review (E.S.; K.N.K.; E.P.F.), one patient showed a subtle focal area of T2-hyperintensity on axial image (Figure 1-A). Six patients underwent spine MRI with gadolinium but none had abnormal enhancement. Myelitis lesions became overt in 3 of 6 patients who underwent follow-up MRI after a median of 6 days (range, 6-26; Figure 1-D). Brain MRI, available in five, showed concomitant abnormalities in one (Figure 1-E).
Figure 1 -. Representative examples of negative spinal cord MRI in patients with MOG-IgG-associated myelitis.
The left part of the figure shows cervical (top rows) and thoracic (bottom rows) T2-weighted spinal cord MRI images in four patients with MRI-negative MOG-IgG associated myelitis. In the first patient (A), despite a normal aspect of spinal cord parenchyma on sagittal images (A1, A3), a subtle focal area of T2-hyperintensity can be noted on axial images in the cervical spinal cord (A2, arrowhead), that was likely considered insufficient to justify symptoms severity (EDSS: 4.5) during the initial MRI review. In the second (B) and third (C) examples, spinal cord MRIs appear normal despite an EDSS of 7 and 4.5, respectively. In the fourth patient (D) with encephalomyelitis, the first (D1-D4) and second (not shown) spinal cord MRI were negative despite an EDSS of 7.5. The patient was empirically started on intravenous methylprednisolone and plasma exchange with improvement and a third MRI obtained 22 days later showed diffuse T2-hyperintense lesions in the spinal cord on both sagittal (D5, D7; arrows) and axial (D6, D8) images. In the right part of the figure (E), axial brain MRI images of the patient in B with fluid attenuated inversion recovery abnormalities in the corona radiata (E1), and mesial left thalamus (E2) that are unlikely to contribute to the myelopathic symptoms/signs.
All patients received acute immunotherapy (corticosteroids, 7; intravenous immunoglobulin, 2; plasmapheresis, 2) with improvement. Initial diagnoses assigned in the setting of MRI-negative myelitis included: bacterial/viral encephalitis, 2; Guillain-Barre syndrome, 1; and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 1. Four patients had typical MOGAD relapses including optic neuritis, encephalitis and myelitis.
Discussion
In this study of MOGAD patients at first episode of clinical myelitis, the initial spinal cord MRI was interpreted as negative in 10%, despite severe myelitis manifestations. A negative acute MRI should not dissuade from MOG-IgG testing with a subacute myelopathy.
A prior study reported a negative MRI in 1 of 28 patients (4%) with MOG-IgG-associated myelitis, not focusing on the first myelitis episode.(4) Although typically not expected with other well-defined acute/sub-acute myelitis (e.g., aquaporin-4-IgG-associated myelitis), an initially negative MRI may occur in idiopathic transverse myelitis (5%),(5) acute flaccid myelitis (5%),(6) and paraneoplastic myelopathies (35%).(7) It is also common with glycine receptor and glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 antibodies but the exact frequency is unknown.(8) Faint T2-hyperintensity is typical of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-IgG-associated myelitis and generally has accompanying brain abnormalities (e.gradial perivascular enhancement).(9) Lastly, an initially negative MRI is seen in up to 24% of cases of spinal cord infarction.(10) Spinal cord infarct would usually have a more hyperacute presentation (nadir <4-12 hours), absence of cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis, lack of brain/optic nerve involvement, and no viral-like prodrome.(1, 10)
The reason why some patients with MOGAD myelitis have negative MRI is uncertain but could relate to imaging timing (late imaging missing a transient lesion or early imaging missing an evolving lesion),(11) insensitivity of MRI to the detection of MOG-IgG-associated inflammation, a spinal meningitis without myelitis, or a functional disturbance mediated by MOG-IgG binding. The longer time to MRI in the imaging-negative group could be explained by those patients having a more slowly evolving clinical course or statistical chance in the setting of small numbers.
Patients with MOGAD myelitis may show questionable T2-hyperintensities on MRI that are in contrast to the severity of myelitis symptoms or can be interpreted as physiological variants (e.g., a faint linear T2-hyperintense on sagittal images may be difficult to discern from a prominent central canal). In uncertain cases, careful evaluation of axial images or repeat MRI after days/weeks may confirm the myelitis (Figure 1). Somatosensory evoked potentials may also help confirm the spinal cord localization, further justifying MOG-IgG testing. The abnormal electromyographic findings in one patient coexisting with a spastic paraparesis suggested a myeloradiculitis which is recognized to occur with MOGAD.(12)
Our study is limited by the retrospective nature and potential referral bias (atypical cases might be over-represented at our tertiary care center). One patient had clinical/MRI-evidence of brain involvement that could have contributed to their symptoms. However, the constellation of clinical findings (e.g., urinary retention, lower limb numbness, weakness, and spasticity/hyperreflexia), and sparing of the brainstem on brain MRI strongly supported a myelopathy.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation and the Mayo Clinic Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology that provided support through a translational clinical fellowship grant.
Funding
We would like to to acknowledge funding support from the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS113828).
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
SJP reports grants, personal fees, non-financial support and other from Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc; grants from Grifols, other from Euroimmun, grants from NIH , grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation, grants from AEA (Autoimmune Encephalitis Alliance), grants, personal fees, non-financial support and other from MedImmune, Inc.; In addition, he has a patent Patent# 8,889,102 (Application#12-678350) - Neuromyelitis Optica Autoantibodies as a Marker for Neoplasia issued, a patent Patent# 9,891,219B2 (Application#12-573942) - Methods for Treating Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) by Administration of Eculizumab to an individual that is Aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG Autoantibody positive issued, a patent GFAP-IgG pending, a patent Septin-5-IgG pending, a patent MAP1B-IgG pending, a patent Kelch-like protein 11 pending, and a patent PDE10A pending. BGW receives royalties from RSR Ltd, Oxford University, Hospices Civil de Lyon, and MVZ Labor PD Dr. Volkmann und Kollegen GbR for a patent of NMO-IgG as a diagnostic test for NMO and related disorders. He serves as a member of an adjudication committee for clinical trials in NMO being conducted by VielaBio and Alexion pharmaceutical companies. He is a consultant for Chugai Pharma and Mitsubishi Tanabe regarding potential clinical trials for NMO. EPF receives research support as a site principal investigator in a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of Inebilizumab (a CD19 inhibitor) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders funded by MedImmune/Viela Bio. ES, KNK, DD, ASL, AK, and NLZ have nothing to disclose.
Footnotes
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Mayo Clinic.
Informed consent
All patients consented to the use of their medical records for research.
References
- 1.Dubey D, Pittock SJ, Krecke KN, Morris PP, Sechi E, Zalewski NL, et al. Clinical, Radiologic, and Prognostic Features of Myelitis Associated With Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Autoantibody. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(3):301–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Macaron G, Ontaneda D. MOG-related disorders: A new cause of imaging-negative myelitis? Mult Scler. 2019:1352458519840746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Perez CA, Garcia-Tarodo S, Troxell R. MRI-Negative Myelitis Associated With Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody Spectrum Demyelinating Disease. Child Neurol Open. 2019;6:2329048X19830475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jarius S, Ruprecht K, Kleiter I, Borisow N, Asgari N, Pitarokoili K, et al. MOG-IgG in NMO and related disorders: a multicenter study of 50 patients. Part 2: Epidemiology, clinical presentation, radiological and laboratory features, treatment responses, and long-term outcome. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sechi E, Shosha E, Williams JP, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG, Keegan BM, et al. Aquaporin-4 and MOG autoantibody discovery in idiopathic transverse myelitis epidemiology. Neurology. 2019;93(4):e414–e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Van Haren K, Ayscue P, Waubant E, Clayton A, Sheriff H, Yagi S, et al. Acute Flaccid Myelitis of Unknown Etiology in California, 2012–2015. JAMA. 2015;314(24):2663–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Flanagan EP, McKeon A, Lennon VA, Kearns J, Weinshenker BG, Krecke KN, et al. Paraneoplastic isolated myelopathy: clinical course and neuroimaging clues. Neurology. 2011;76(24):2089–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hutchinson M, Waters P, McHugh J, Gorman G, O’Riordan S, Connolly S, et al. Progressive encephalomyelitis, rigidity, and myoclonus: a novel glycine receptor antibody. Neurology. 2008;71(16):1291–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sechi E, Morris PP, McKeon A, Pittock SJ, Hinson SR, Weinshenker BG, et al. Glial fibrillary acidic protein IgG related myelitis: characterisation and comparison with aquaporin-4-IgG myelitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90(4):488–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zalewski NL, Rabinstein AA, Krecke KN, Brown RD Jr., Wijdicks EFM, Weinshenker BG, et al. Characteristics of Spontaneous Spinal Cord Infarction and Proposed Diagnostic Criteria. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(1):56–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Honkaniemi J, Dastidar P, Kahara V, Haapasalo H. Delayed MR imaging changes in acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(6):1117–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sundaram S, Nair SS, Jaganmohan D, Unnikrishnan G, Nair M Relapsing lumbosacral myeloradiculitis: An unusual presentation of MOG antibody disease. Mult Scler. 2019:1352458519840747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]