This cross-sectional study evaluates opioid prescribing patterns from 2009 to 2018 in a network of community health centers that frequently treat low-income patients in the US.
Key Points
Question
Are there prescribing patterns for opioid medications in safety-net clinics?
Findings
In this cross-sectional study of 3 227 459 opioid prescriptions abstracted from electronic health records of patients treated at a network of community health centers between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018, the number of prescriptions per 100 primary care patients decreased 73.7% from 110.8 in 2009 to 29.1 in 2018. Other metrics of opioid use decreased to a similar degree.
Meaning
Opioid prescribing in a large network of community health centers decreased from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018, which likely reflects a mix of federal, state, and local policies and initiatives directed at reducing harms associated with increased opioid prescribing in the early 2000s.
Abstract
Importance
Understanding opioid prescribing patterns in community health centers (CHCs) that disproportionately serve low-income patients may help to guide strategies to reduce opioid-related harms.
Objective
To assess opioid prescribing patterns between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018, in a network of safety-net clinics serving high-risk patients.
Design, Setting, and Participants
Cross-sectional study of 3 227 459 opioid prescriptions abstracted from the electronic health records of 2 129 097 unique primary care patients treated from 2009 through 2018 at a network of CHCs that included 449 clinic sites in 17 states. All age groups were included in the analysis.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The following measures were described at the population level for each study year: (1) percentage of patients with at least 1 prescription for an opioid by age and sex, (2) number of opioid prescriptions per 100 patients, (3) number of long-acting opioid prescriptions per 100 patients, (4) mean annual morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per patient, (5) mean MME per prescription, (6) number of chronic opioid users, and (7) mean of high-dose opioid users.
Results
The study population included 2 129 097 patients (1 158 413 women [54.4%]) with a mean (SD) age of 32.2 (21.1) years and a total of 3 227 459 opioid prescriptions. The percentage of patients receiving at least 1 opioid prescription in a calendar year declined 67.4% from 15.9% in 2009 to 5.2% in 2018. Over the 10-year study period, a greater percentage of women received a prescription (13.1%) compared with men (10.9%), and a greater percentage of non-Hispanic White patients (18.1%) received an opioid prescription compared with non-Hispanic Black patients (9.5%), non-Hispanic patients who self-identified as other races (8.0%), and Hispanic patients (6.9%). The number of opioid prescriptions for every 100 patients decreased 73.7% from 110.8 in 2009 to 29.1 in 2018. The number of long-acting opioids for every 100 patients decreased 85.5% during the same period, from 22.0 to 3.2. The MMEs per patient decreased from 1682.7 in 2009 to 243.1 in 2018, a decline of 85.6%.
Conclusions and Relevance
In this cross-sectional study, the opioid prescribing rate in 2009 in the CHC network was higher than national population estimates but began to decline earlier and more precipitously. This finding likely reflects harm mitigation policies and efforts at federal, state, and clinic levels and strong clinical quality improvement strategies within the CHCs.
Introduction
Opioid-related morbidity and mortality in the US have been well documented.1,2 This problem began with and continues to be propelled by opioid prescriptions from medical settings, with nearly half of these prescriptions generated from primary care clinics.3,4 Although opioid prescribing has declined steadily since 2011, prescription rates remain historically high with enough opioids dispensed for 1 in every 2 individuals in the US in 2018.5
Although the opioid epidemic affects all demographic groups, individuals from low-income communities are at highest risk for opioid-related adverse outcomes, including hospitalization and fatal overdose.5,6,7,8 Despite this increased risk, less is known about prescribing patterns in these communities. Most studies that have described prescribing trends relied on insurance claims data from managed care systems and retail pharmacies,9,10,11,12,13,14 sources that are likely to undercount unemployed and uninsured individuals, precisely those individuals most likely to have opioid-related adverse outcomes. Nationally, community health centers (CHCs) provide a disproportionate amount of care to the poor, the publicly insured, and the uninsured.15 As a consequence, CHC data are likely an ideal source of information concerning opioid prescribing patterns in low-income populations.
The aims of this study were to assess opioid prescribing patterns overall and stratified by patient demographic characteristics using electronic health record (EHR) data from a large network of CHCs from 2009 to 2018 and to explore how these patterns might differ from national population opioid prescription patterns.
Methods
This study was approved by the Oregon Health & Science University Institutional Review Board. The institutional review board waived the requirement for patient informed consent because only deidentified data were used. This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies.
Data Sources, Study Design, and Population
We abstracted data from the OCHIN (not an acronym) network’s ambulatory EHR between January 1, 2009 (when OCHIN implemented a defined vocabulary system for prescriptions), and December 31, 2018. OCHIN is the nation’s largest network of CHCs (federally qualified health centers, county health department clinics, and not-for-profit clinics), including 449 clinics in 17 states (California, Oregon, Washington, Ohio, Wisconsin, Alaska, North Carolina, Indiana, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, Texas, Massachusetts, Florida, Utah, Georgia, and New Mexico), that provide care to all individuals regardless of insurance status. The OCHIN clinics share a common EHR (EPIC; EPIC Systems Corporation) that facilitated data retrieval from across health systems and states.
We summarized each study year separately, creating 10 cross-sectional assessments of prescribing patterns within OCHIN clinics. For each of the years in the 10-year study, we included all patients who had at least 1 visit with a primary care clinician at an ambulatory clinic during the respective calendar year (Table 1, eTable 1, and the eFigure in the Supplement). All age groups were included.
Table 1. Geographic Distribution of OCHIN Study Population Over Time.
| Year | No. (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | Oregon | Other statesa | All statesb | |
| 2009 | 49 659 (33.00) | 89 446 (59.40) | 11 390 (7.60) | 150 495 (100.00) |
| 2010 | 84 417 (36.30) | 125 715 (54.00) | 22 664 (9.70) | 232 796 (100.00) |
| 2011 | 112 093 (32.80) | 164 734 (48.20) | 64 598 (18.90) | 341 425 (100.00) |
| 2012 | 125 098 (29.30) | 195 869 (45.90) | 106 005 (24.80) | 426 972 (100.00) |
| 2013 | 142 203 (28.60) | 215 192 (43.30) | 139 696 (28.10) | 497 091 (100.00) |
| 2014 | 198 577 (33.30) | 233 913 (39.20) | 164 576 (27.60) | 597 066 (100.00) |
| 2015 | 256 757 (36.00) | 239 403 (33.50) | 217 412 (30.50) | 713 572 (100.00) |
| 2016 | 263 860 (32.20) | 238 346 (29.10) | 316 931 (38.70) | 819 137 (100.00) |
| 2017 | 274 300 (31.90) | 231 659 (27.00) | 353 592 (41.10) | 859 551 (100.00) |
| 2018 | 269 658 (32.50) | 218 102 (26.30) | 343 101 (41.30) | 830 861 (100.00) |
Number of states included in this column changed with time (eTable 1 and the eFigure in the Supplement).
eTable 1 in the Supplement lists the included states for each year.
Definitions and Variables
Medication prescribing records contain EPIC-generated medication IDs in addition to text fields containing the medication name, generic name, form, and pharmaceutical class. We searched the generic name field for all opioid medications that can be ordered with a prescription in outpatient settings in the United States (eTable 2 in the Supplement). We included medications with a pharmaceutical class of analgesic and excluded those with class of expectorant, antitussive, antidiarrheal, and all that were not oral or transdermal in form. We excluded buprenorphine with the exception of 2 forms that have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for pain (Butrans and Belbuca). Prescription order data included the ordering date, patient ID, prescriber ID, medicine name, strength (eg, 5 mg), number of units (eg, 30 tablets), and number of authorized refills. Refills were counted in the same year or quarter as the initiating prescription. We defined long-acting formulations as those that included the terms extended release or long acting in their generic name or form fields as well as methadone tablets and transdermal formulations. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) conversion reference table, 16 we calculated the morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) for each prescription as the product of the medication strength, number of units, number of refills, and the relevant conversion factor.
Using the cohort year as the unit of analysis, we calculated several measures of opioid prescribing for each year of the study: (1) percentage of patients who received at least 1 prescription for an opioid by age and sex, (2) number of opioid prescriptions per 100 patients, (3) number of long-acting opioid prescriptions per 100 patients, (4) mean annual MME per patient, (5) mean MME per prescription, (6) number of chronic opioid users, and (7) number of high-dose opioid users. We defined chronic opioid users as patients who were prescribed within any calendar quarter 160 or more opioid pills (short acting or long acting), 90 or more long-acting pills, or any methadone pills or fentanyl patches. Prescription instructions were found to be unreliable in EHR data because many were composed of free text that could not be categorized, complicating the calculation of a daily dose. Therefore, we defined high-dose users as those individuals among chronic opioid users with a mean of more than 90 MMEs/d through any quarter of a calendar year.
Patient health insurance status and income relative to the federal poverty level (FPL) were defined at the patient’s index visit in the study period. Several of our parameters were designed to duplicate those in the CDC 2019 Annual Surveillance Report of Drug-Related Risks and Outcomes5 and a recent description of trends in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).17
Statistical Analysis
We used descriptive statistics to summarize the overall patterns and patterns stratified by age and sex in opioid prescribing at CHCs in 17 states for each year from 2009 to 2018 among the OCHIN primary care population. Analysis was conducted using R, version 3.6.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
Results
Our study population consisted of 2 129 097 patients, including 1 158 413 female patients (54.4%) (mean [SD] age, 32.2 [21.1] years). A total of 3 227 459 opioid prescriptions were abstracted from the electronic health records. From 2009 to 2018, the OCHIN network grew from 150 495 patients in 3 states (California, Oregon, and Washington) to 830 861 patients in 15 states (Alaska, California, Georgia, Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin) (Table 1 and eTable 1 in the Supplement). Demographic characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 2. Over the 10-year study period, a total of 2 129 097 unique patients were included, of whom 257 848 (12.1%) had received 1 or more opioid prescriptions. The percentage receiving an opioid prescription was higher among women (13.1%) than men (10.9%). Non-Hispanic White patients received far more opioid orders (18.1%) than non-Hispanic Black patients (9.5%), non-Hispanic patients who self-identified as other races (8.0%), and Hispanic patients (6.9%), which supports previous reports.18 Similarly, there were fewer Spanish-speaking individuals with an opioid prescription (6.7%) compared with English-speaking individuals (14.0%). Uninsured patients had higher rates of receiving opioid prescriptions (13.5%) vs those who were publicly or privately insured (both 11.7%). The rate of opioid use did not differ by income categories, with 12.5% of individuals with an income greater than 138% of the FPL and 12.6% of individuals with an income less than or equal to 138% of the FPL.
Table 2. Patient Demographic Characteristics.
| Total | No. (%) | % Of category receiving an opioid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCHIN primary care patients, 2009-2018 | Distribution of OCHIN patients with an opioid order | ||
| No. (%) | 2 129 097 (100) | 257 848 (100) | 12.1 |
| Sex | |||
| Female | 1 158 413 (54.4) | 151 738 (58.8) | 13.1 |
| Male | 968 930 (45.5) | 105 927 (41.1) | 10.9 |
| Othera | 1754 (0.1) | 183 (0.1) | 10.4 |
| Income relative to FPLb | |||
| ≤138% | 1 260 571 (59.2) | 158 658 (61.5) | 12.6 |
| >138% | 269 627 (12.7) | 33 722 (13.1) | 12.5 |
| Unknown | 598 899 (28.1) | 65 468 (25.4) | 10.9 |
| Race/ethnicityc | |||
| Hispanic | 660 909 (31.0) | 45 820 (17.8) | 6.9 |
| Non-Hispanic | |||
| White | 877 355 (41.2) | 158 693 (61.5) | 18.1 |
| Black | 321 599 (15.1) | 30 654 (11.9) | 9.5 |
| Other | 107 103 (5.0) | 8563 (3.3) | 8.0 |
| Unknown | 162 131 (7.6) | 14 118 (5.5) | 8.7 |
| Type of insuranced | |||
| Private | 301 994 (14.2) | 35 436 (13.7) | 11.7 |
| Public | 1 236 875 (58.1) | 144 603 (56.1) | 11.7 |
| Uninsured | 474 708 (22.3) | 64 254 (24.9) | 13.5 |
| Unknown | 115 520 (5.4) | 13 555 (5.3) | 11.7 |
| Primary language | |||
| English | 1 560 317 (73.3) | 217 773 (84.5) | 14 |
| Spanish | 407 867 (19.2) | 27 449 (10.6) | 6.7 |
| Other | 117 978 (5.5) | 9003 (3.5) | 7.6 |
| Unknown | 42 935 (2.0) | 3623 (1.4) | 8.4 |
Abbreviation: FPL, federal poverty level.
Unknown or nonbinary sex.
FPL was taken from patient's first encounter, where non-null, during study period.
Patient-reported race and ethnicity. Patients identified as Hispanic if they self-reported being Hispanic in the electronic health record or reported Spanish as their primary language.
Type of health insurance was taken from a patient’s first encounter during study period.
Between 2009 and 2018, there was a 67.4% decline in the proportion of OCHIN patients of all ages who received an opioid prescription, with 15.9% receiving an opioid prescription in 2009 vs 5.2% receiving such a prescription in 2018 (Table 3). This rapid decline varied by age, with the largest decline occurring for patients younger than 15 years (−93.8%) and the smallest occurring for those 65 years or older (−54.7%). For those older than 19 years, the rate of decline was 42% between 2012 and 2016 alone. Although rates of decline were similar between male and female patients overall (−67.7% and −67.0%, respectively), the rates differed by age group. In particular, the rates of decline among female patients were greater than in male patients who were 65 years or older (−55.9% vs −51.7% respectively) and for those in the 20- to24-year age group (−83.5% vs −78.8%).
Table 3. Percent of OCHIN Patients With an Opioid Prescription by Age and Sexa.
| Age group, y | Sex | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | % Change, 2018 vs 2009 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-14 | Total | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.37 | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.04 | −93.8 |
| Male | 0.68 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.53 | 0.39 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.04 | −94.6 | |
| Female | 0.66 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.05 | −92.9 | |
| 15-19 | Total | 3.7 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.83 | 0.51 | −86.5 |
| Male | 3.3 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.75 | 0.46 | −86.3 | |
| Female | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.90 | 0.54 | −86.3 | |
| 20-24 | Total | 10.1 | 10.7 | 9.4 | 8.4 | 8.6 | 6.9 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 1.8 | −82.3 |
| Male | 8.7 | 10.4 | 9.4 | 9.0 | 8.8 | 7.1 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 1.8 | −78.8 | |
| Female | 10.7 | 10.8 | 9.4 | 8.2 | 8.5 | 6.9 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 2.8 | 1.8 | −83.5 | |
| 25-34 | Total | 16.2 | 15.9 | 14.8 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 11.6 | 8.8 | 6.6 | 5.1 | 3.7 | −77.3 |
| Male | 16.4 | 15.9 | 15.5 | 13.8 | 13.9 | 11.7 | 8.5 | 6.6 | 4.9 | 3.4 | −79.0 | |
| Female | 16.1 | 15.8 | 14.4 | 13.0 | 12.9 | 11.5 | 8.9 | 6.7 | 5.2 | 3.8 | −76.3 | |
| 35-44 | Total | 23.0 | 22.0 | 19.1 | 17.8 | 17.6 | 15.6 | 12.3 | 9.4 | 7.4 | 5.6 | −75.4 |
| Male | 22.4 | 22.0 | 18.6 | 17.6 | 17.5 | 15.2 | 11.9 | 9.0 | 7.1 | 5.3 | −76.1 | |
| Female | 23.4 | 21.9 | 19.4 | 17.9 | 17.6 | 15.9 | 12.6 | 9.7 | 7.6 | 5.8 | −75.0 | |
| 45-54 | Total | 31.2 | 29.9 | 26.3 | 24.1 | 23.4 | 20.8 | 16.7 | 13.2 | 10.6 | 8.3 | −73.3 |
| Male | 30.2 | 29.1 | 25.4 | 23.5 | 22.5 | 19.9 | 15.7 | 12.4 | 10.0 | 7.9 | −73.8 | |
| Female | 32.0 | 30.5 | 26.9 | 24.5 | 24.0 | 21.5 | 17.4 | 13.8 | 11.0 | 8.7 | −72.9 | |
| 55-64 | Total | 30.9 | 29.1 | 26.8 | 25.5 | 25.1 | 22.7 | 19.1 | 16.1 | 13.3 | 11.3 | −63.4 |
| Male | 30.2 | 28.0 | 25.8 | 24.9 | 24.4 | 22.0 | 18.6 | 15.6 | 12.8 | 10.7 | −64.6 | |
| Female | 31.5 | 29.9 | 27.6 | 26.0 | 25.6 | 23.2 | 19.5 | 16.5 | 13.6 | 11.8 | −62.4 | |
| ≥65 | Total | 26.9 | 25.4 | 24.6 | 23.8 | 24.1 | 23.0 | 19.8 | 16.2 | 13.3 | 12.2 | −54.7 |
| Male | 22.4 | 21.3 | 21.0 | 20.5 | 20.8 | 19.9 | 17.5 | 14.7 | 12.2 | 10.8 | −51.7 | |
| Female | 29.8 | 28.1 | 27.0 | 26.0 | 26.4 | 25.1 | 21.3 | 17.2 | 14.1 | 13.1 | −55.9 | |
| All ages | Total | 15.9 | 15.2 | 14.1 | 13.5 | 13.6 | 12.2 | 10.0 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 5.2 | −67.4 |
| Male | 14.7 | 14.0 | 12.9 | 12.5 | 12.6 | 11.2 | 9.1 | 7.3 | 6.0 | 4.7 | −67.7 | |
| Female | 16.8 | 16.1 | 15.0 | 14.2 | 14.3 | 13.0 | 10.6 | 8.4 | 6.9 | 5.5 | −67.0 |
Age group total rows include patients with unknown or nonbinary sex.
As shown in Table 4, the number of prescriptions per 100 patients decreased by 73.7% (from 110.8 in 2009 to 29.1 in 2018). Similarly, the number of long-acting opioid prescriptions per 100 patients declined from 22.0 in 2009 to 3.2 in 2018 (85.5% decline). A mean of 243.1 MMEs were prescribed for each OCHIN patient in calendar year 2018, an 85.6% decline from 1682.7 MMEs in 2009. Moreover, the mean MME per opioid prescription steadily decreased 50.4% from 1759.0 in 2009 to 873.3 in 2018. Chronic opioid users represented 8.1% of all OCHIN patients in 2009 and 1.9% of all OCHIN patients in 2018. In the same period, the proportion of high-dose users diminished from 2.2% to 0.3%.
Table 4. Trends in Opioid Prescribing.
| Year | No. of prescriptions per 100 primary care patients | MME | Opioid use among OCHIN primary care patients, No. (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any analgesic opioid | Long-acting analgesic opioids | Per person annually | Mean per prescription (95% CI) | Chronic users | High-dose users | |
| 2009 | 110.8 | 22.0 | 1682.7 | 1759.0 (1743.6-1774.4) | 12 193 (8.1) | 3368 (2.2) |
| 2010 | 110.4 | 20.4 | 1691.7 | 1793.7 (1780.5-1806.9) | 17 580 (7.6) | 4659.0 (2.0) |
| 2011 | 96.1 | 16.3 | 1388.5 | 1692.8 (1681.7-1703.8) | 23 654 (6.9) | 5491.0 (1.6) |
| 2012 | 85.7 | 13.7 | 1144.0 | 1560.0 (1550.6-1569.4) | 26 794 (6.3) | 5691.0 (1.3) |
| 2013 | 84.6 | 12.0 | 1016.7 | 1406.0 (1397.9-1414.1) | 29 735 (6.0) | 5815.0 (1.2) |
| 2014 | 72.3 | 9.1 | 783.1 | 1219.4 (1212.8-1226) | 31 201 (5.2) | 5506.0 (0.9) |
| 2015 | 51.3 | 6.4 | 520.6 | 1071.8 (1066.3-1077.4) | 26 457 (3.7) | 4348.0 (0.6) |
| 2016 | 42.5 | 5.1 | 406.8 | 1007.8 (1002.8-1012.8) | 24 026 (2.9) | 3688.0 (0.5) |
| 2017 | 35.0 | 4.1 | 313.5 | 940.5 (935.7-945.3) | 20 809 (2.4) | 3182.0 (0.4) |
| 2018 | 29.1 | 3.2 | 243.1 | 873.3 (868.7-878) | 15 985 (1.9) | 2250.0 (0.3) |
Abbreviation: MME, morphine milligram equivalent.
Discussion
Opioid prescribing in a large network of CHCs decreased between 2009 and 2018. In 2009, the national opioid problem was being recognized as an epidemic.19,20 At that time, the OCHIN system of safety-net clinics had rates of opioid prescribing that were as high as or higher than the CDC’s national estimates and the VHA population estimates (Figure). Nationally, it was estimated that 79.5 opioid prescriptions were written for every 100 Americans in 2009, totaling 733 MMEs per capita.5 In the OCHIN population, 110.8 opioid prescriptions were written per 100 patients, with 1682 MMEs per person for the same year.
Figure. OCHIN and National Opioid Annual Prescribing Trends.
CDC indicates Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; MMEs, morphine milligram equivalents; VHA, Veterans Health Administration.
OCHIN prescribing rates peaked earlier and subsequently declined faster than most other epidemiologic descriptions of opioid prescribing. In this study, most OCHIN opioid prescribing measures had peaked at least by 2009, the first year for which data were available, the only exception being the MME per capita, which plateaued in 2009-2010 and declined thereafter. Nationally, most prescribing parameters peaked in 2012.5,21 A similar analysis of the VHA system demonstrated that opioid prescribing peaked in 2012 with subsequent decline.17 It should be noted that all of these measures show opioid prescribing was decreasing well before the CDC’s prescribing guidelines were promulgated in 2016.22,23
Similar to the CDC national estimates, female patients received more prescription opioids than male patients across nearly all age groups, although the magnitude of the difference in the OCHIN population was not as great as in national data. Previous studies have shown that patients with Medicaid13,24,25 and Medicare26 insurance are prescribed more opioids than those with commercial insurance. Within the CHC network, however, although the uninsured received more opioid prescriptions, little difference was found between those with public vs private insurance. Nor was a difference found between those with an income level that was 138% higher or lower than the FPL. Given that CHC populations are greatly weighted to publicly and uninsured individuals with far fewer commercially insured individuals (only 14.2% in this study), it is likely that patients with commercial insurance played a smaller role in the prescribing habits of clinicians.
The most marked observation in comparing OCHIN opioid prescribing patterns with other descriptions of prescribing patterns is the steep downward trajectory in OCHIN clinics. From their peaks in 2009 (OCHIN) and 2012 (national estimate5) through 2018, the number of prescriptions per 100 OCHIN patients declined 73.7% compared with 36.7% nationally.5 Similarly, between 2010 and 2018, OCHIN MMEs per capita declined 85.6%, whereas national trends decreased by 44.4%.5 Estimates show that the percentage of VHA patients receiving an opioid prescription decreased 24% (21.2% [2012] to 16.1% [2016]) between 2012 and 201617; in the same years, OCHIN rates for those older than 19 years old decreased 42%.
Several hypotheses might explain the precipitous decline in prescribing rates in OCHIN CHCs. As in all populations, the decline in prescribing rates reflects federal, state, and local efforts to mitigate the harms from increased prescribing that had become apparent by 2009,27,28 with depictions of opioid harms becoming more prevalent in the national media.29
The difference may also reflect the nature of our national system of CHCs. Patient populations at CHCs generally have more physical and mental health comorbidity15,30,31 and have a lower income compared with the general population.15 Despite this complexity, CHCs surpass private clinics in many quality metrics,15,32,33 and there may be a heightened clinician awareness and attention to opioid quality initiatives in CHCs compared with private clinics. For example, in April 2011 the medical director of the Health Department of Multnomah County (MCHD) in Oregon became concerned that their clinical opioid prescribing rates might be contributing to new state public health data demonstrating rising opioid overdose and mortality (personal communication with Amit Shah, MD, January 24, 2020, medical director of MCHD in 2011). The MCHD leadership team developed several criteria for ascertaining when harm of opioid use might outweigh benefit, and required that records of patients meeting these criteria be reviewed by an opioid oversight committee. The criteria included, but were not limited to very high doses, coprescribing with benzodiazepine drugs, aberrant medication behavior, and suicidality. More than 400 cases were reviewed, and advice was communicated to all clinicians in the county health department, with a subsequent decrease found in their opioid prescribing rates.
Another possible explanation is that economically disadvantaged patients are less empowered to resist clinician-initiated tapers in their opioid dosing. A recent analysis of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data by Olfson et al34 found that individuals with an income level lower than 100% of the FPL had the fastest decrease in opioid use from 2014 through 2016 compared with other income groups.
Limitations
This study has limitations. First, the EHR data contain orders for prescriptions, and it is not possible to ascertain whether these orders were picked up by patients; therefore, the actual use of the opioids may have been overestimated. Second, the OCHIN population is disproportionately represented by West Coast states and may not be characteristic of all national CHCs or overall national population estimates. Third, the inclusion criteria required patients to have had an ambulatory encounter in the years they were counted, creating potential denominator differences compared with national population estimates, but this criterion is similar to that of a VHA study.17 Similarly, because of growth in the OCHIN network, there may have been changes in the study population denominator that biased our findings. For example, if patients added in later years were at lower risk for opioid use, this might have contributed to the prescribing declines that we observed.
Conclusions
This retrospective, longitudinal, cross-sectional study of opioid prescribing in a large network of CHCs found an early and sharp reduction in opioid prescribing despite the greater complexity and lower income of CHC populations. These declines likely reflect earlier local efforts and clinical quality initiatives in CHCs to mitigate harms from overprescribing opioids. Further studies are needed to determine what specific policies and measures were most effective in these efforts.
eTable 1. Representation of states other than California and Oregon by year
eFigure. Prescribing metrics distinguished by Oregon, California, and Other States
eTable 2. List of included analgesic opioids with number and percentage
References
- 1.Jalal H, Buchanich JM, Roberts MS, Balmert LC, Zhang K, Burke DS. Changing dynamics of the drug overdose epidemic in the United States from 1979 through 2016. Science. 2018;361(6408):eaau1184. doi: 10.1126/science.aau1184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Von Korff MR, Franklin G. Responding to America’s iatrogenic epidemic of prescription opioid addiction and overdose. Med Care. 2016;54(5):426-429. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Levy B, Paulozzi L, Mack KA, Jones CM. Trends in opioid analgesic-prescribing rates by specialty, US, 2007-2012. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(3):409-413. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Olsen Y, Daumit GL, Ford DE. Opioid prescriptions by U.S. primary care physicians from 1992 to 2001. J Pain. 2006;7(4):225-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019 Annual surveillance report of drug-related risks and outcomes—United States: surveillance special report. Accessed December 30, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/pubs/2019-cdc-drug-surveillance-report.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bauer LK, Brody JK, León C, Baggett TP. Characteristics of homeless adults who died of drug overdose: a retrospective record review. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(2):846-859. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Davis MA, Lin LA, Liu H, Sites BD. Prescription opioid use among adults with mental health disorders in the United States. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017;30(4):407-417. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Song Z. Mortality quadrupled among opioid-driven hospitalizations, notably within lower-income and disabled white populations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(12):2054-2061. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Boudreau D, Von Korff M, Rutter CM, et al. . Trends in long-term opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(12):1166-1175. doi: 10.1002/pds.1833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Campbell CI, Weisner C, Leresche L, et al. . Age and gender trends in long-term opioid analgesic use for noncancer pain. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(12):2541-2547. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.180646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Deyo RA, Smith DH, Johnson ES, et al. . Opioids for back pain patients: primary care prescribing patterns and use of services. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(6):717-727. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.100232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.García MC, Heilig CM, Lee SH, et al. . Opioid prescribing rates in nonmetropolitan and metropolitan counties among primary care providers using an electronic health record system—United States, 2014-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(2):25-30. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6802a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sullivan MD, Edlund MJ, Fan MY, Devries A, Brennan Braden J, Martin BC. Trends in use of opioids for non-cancer pain conditions 2000-2005 in commercial and Medicaid insurance plans: the TROUP study. Pain. 2008;138(2):440-449. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Von Korff M, Saunders K, Thomas Ray G, et al. . De facto long-term opioid therapy for noncancer pain. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(6):521-527. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318169d03b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.National Association of Community Health Centers Community health center chartbook. Accessed January 23, 2020. http://www.nachc.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Community-Health-Center-Chartbook-FINAL-1.28.19.pdf
- 16.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Data resources—oral MMEs. 2018. Accessed January 23, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/resources/data.html
- 17.Hadlandsmyth K, Mosher H, Vander Weg MW, Lund BC. Decline in prescription opioids attributable to decreases in long-term use: a retrospective study in the Veterans Health Administration 2010-2016. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(6):818-824. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4283-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Anderson KO, Green CR, Payne R. Racial and ethnic disparities in pain: causes and consequences of unequal care. J Pain. 2009;10(12):1187-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chou R, Ballantyne JC, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, Miaskowski C. Research gaps on use of opioids for chronic noncancer pain: findings from a review of the evidence for an American Pain Society and American Academy of Pain Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Pain. 2009;10(2):147-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Office of National Drug Control Policy Epidemic: responding to America's prescription drug abuse crisis. Accessed November 11, 2016. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/issues-content/prescription-drugs/rx_abuse_plan.pdf
- 21.Guy GP Jr, Zhang K, Bohm MK, et al. . Vital signs: changes in opioid prescribing in the United States, 2006-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(26):697-704. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6626a4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bohnert ASB, Guy GP Jr, Losby JL. Opioid prescribing in the United States before and after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2016 opioid guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(6):367-375. doi: 10.7326/M18-1243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. JAMA. 2016;315(15):1624-1645. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.1464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Romanelli RJ, Ikeda LI, Lynch B, et al. . Opioid prescribing for chronic pain in a community-based healthcare system. Am J Manag Care. 2017;23(5):e138-e145. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wachino V. Best practices for addressing prescription opioid overdoses, misuse and addiction. 2016. Accessed January 23, 2020. https://www.medicaid.gov/federal-policy-guidance/downloads/cib-02-02-16.pdf
- 26.Jeffery MM, Hooten WM, Henk HJ, et al. . Trends in opioid use in commercially insured and Medicare Advantage populations in 2007-16: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2018;362:k2833. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Office of National Drug Control Policy National drug control strategy. 2011. Accessed January 23, 2020. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/ondcp/ndcs2011.pdf
- 28.Wen H, Schackman BR, Aden B, Bao Y. States With prescription drug monitoring mandates saw a reduction in opioids prescribed to medicaid enrollees. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(4):733-741. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Leinwand D. Deadly abuse of methadone tops other prescription drugs. USA Today February 12, 2007. Accessed August 12, 2020. https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-02-12-methadone_x.htm
- 30.Bruckner TA, Singh P, Snowden LR, Yoon J, Chakravarthy B. Rapid growth of mental health services at community health centers. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019;46(5):670-677. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00947-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huguet N, Angier H, Hoopes MJ, et al. . Prevalence of pre-existing conditions among community health center patients before and after the Affordable Care Act. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019;32(6):883-889. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.06.190087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Goldman LE, Chu PW, Tran H, Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Federally qualified health centers and private practice performance on ambulatory care measures. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(2):142-149. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.02.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oronce CIA, Fortuna RJ. Differences in rates of high-value and low-value care between community health centers and private practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(4):994-1000. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05544-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Olfson M, Wang S, Wall MM, Blanco C. Trends in opioid prescribing and self-reported pain among US adults. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020;39(1):146-154. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
eTable 1. Representation of states other than California and Oregon by year
eFigure. Prescribing metrics distinguished by Oregon, California, and Other States
eTable 2. List of included analgesic opioids with number and percentage