Factors Affecting Menstrual Hygiene Management Practice Among School Adolescents in Ambo, Western Ethiopia, 2018: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Method Study

Abstract

Background

Menstruation is still regarded as something unclean in many parts of Ethiopia. Despite the challenges related to menstrual hygiene management, it has been routinely overlooked in the school setting. The existing evidence on menstrual hygiene management lacks objective measurement approaches. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess factors affecting menstrual hygiene management practice among school adolescents in Ambo, Western Ethiopia.

Methods

An institutional-based mixed-method cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 to 30 March 2018 with 364 high school females. A systematic random sampling and purposive sampling technique were used to select study participants. We used a self-administered questionnaire, observational checklists, and focus group discussion. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software and thematic analysis. Multiple logistic regression analyses were done. With 95% CI, P< 0.05 was considered the level of significance.

Results

The prevalence of unsafe menstrual hygiene management practice was 53.6%, and it was affected by factors including age of the females [AOR: 0.16 (0.045, 0.57), P=0.005], frequency of discussing menses [AOR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.71, P-value = 0.006], and source of information about menses [AOR: 3.75, 95% CI: 1.75, 8.00) P= 0.001]. Lack of information about how to manage menses safely and lack of sufficient WASH facility were also identified.

Conclusion

High prevalence of unsafe menstrual hygiene management in the study area implies that urgent measures are needed from the concerned body. The school environments were not female friendly for managing their menses safely highlighting that the water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities in the schools need urgent solutions.

Background

Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) is personal hygiene practices during menstruation which starts with the choice of the best sanitary materials, their proper use, disposal, and body cleanliness.¹ Menstruation is still regarded as something unclean or dirty in some societies. The seclusion of menstruating females and restrictions imposed on them in the family not to participate in a range of activities while on menses have reinforced a negative attitude toward this phenomenon.^2,3 Worldwide, nearly 52% of the female populations are of reproductive age. Despite the challenges related to menstrual hygiene management, menstrual hygiene has been routinely ignored by professionals in the education sector.⁴

In Ethiopia, like other African countries, MHM is one of the critical problems adolescent girls face while they are in school. Most schools in the country are not equipped with the basic amenities for menstrual management such as menstruation materials, places for changing menstruation materials, running water, and disposal facilities. A study conducted in the Amhara region, Ethiopia, revealed that only 35% of the school females used sanitary napkins, while 55% used homemade materials during their recent menses.⁵ Approximately 11% of girls change their menstrual clothes once a day. They commonly use rags from old clothes and use their dress tied in a knot to keep the sanitary clothes in place. Most girls rinse their rags in water without using soap, dry them under the bed, and hang them in hidden, often unhealthy places in the house or on the roof. Such practices may increase their susceptibility to infections.¹ This is mainly due to a lack of infrastructure as well as poor management of the existing facilities.⁶ The commercially available reusable sanitary pads are not affordable for many of the school females because of high cost. In addition, lack of awareness from where to access and how to use the napkins were also some of the reasons reported as factors hindering females not to use a napkin.³ The magnitude of unsafe MHM practice among females was 60% in Nekemte, Oromia regional state, 75.5% in Bahardar, Amhara regional state, 49.8% in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.^7,8

In Uganda Hennegan et al identified that nearly 90% of school girls did not meet the minimal criteria for safe MHM. Concomitantly, the rate of genital irritation, discharge, and concern of malodor is higher among poor MHM girls. In addition to missing school, poor MHM also leads to a feeling of shame, worrying that odor may disturb the class, and low self-esteem, which may result in psychological problems like depression during menses. The study conducted in Indonesia also revealed the magnitude of unsafe menstrual hygiene was 64%.^9,10

Poor menstrual hygiene and inadequate self-care are major determinants of morbidity and complications among younger females. Some of these problems include reproductive tract infections, urinary tract infections, scabies in the vaginal area, abdominal pain, absence from school, and complications during pregnancy. Baisley et al reported that using cloths or cotton wool for menstrual hygiene is the single most predictive factor for bacterial vaginosis infection.^11,12

Due to economic constraints or being taboo to ask parents for money to buy sanitary pads, females turn to transactional sex to get money for sanitary pads.¹³ Sex education is also often neglected from the school curriculum.^14,15

Proper disposal of used menstrual material is still a challenge for many countries of the world. Most females dispose of used sanitary pads or other menstrual articles into household solid waste or garbage bins.¹⁶

In general, the implementation of safe and effective MHM practice programs will contribute towards the achievement of sustainable development goals (SDG) targets in education, gender equality, reduction of maternal mortality, and water and sanitation.

A comprehensive definition of MHM was developed by the Joint Monitoring Program of the Emory University and UNICEF in 2012, defining MHM as: “Women and adolescent girls using a clean menstrual management material to absorb or collect blood that can be changed in privacy as often as necessary for the duration of the menstruation period, using soap and water for washing the body as required and having access to facilities to dispose of used menstrual management materials”.¹⁷

As per the above definition, adequate MHM would require the following main components: clean absorbents; adequate frequency of absorbent change; washing the body with soap and water; adequate disposal, privacy for managing menstruation and appropriate disposal of used absorbents.

However, the prevalence studies conducted so far on MHM practice among school female adolescents in Ethiopia focus only on the type of absorbents used, one aspect of the components of MHM, to classify MHM as good or poor, making it difficult to conclude the actual magnitude of the problem.

Therefore, this study aimed to assess practices of MHM and associated factors among high school females in Ambo city, Ethiopia by applying the UNICEF definition of the safe menstrual hygiene management. Specifically, the following questions were addressed:

1. How many high school females practiced unsafe MHM?

2. What were the underlying determinants of MHM practices among high school females?

Methods

Study Area

The study was conducted in Ambo city, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Ambo is the capital city of West Shoa Zone, located 114 km from Addis Ababa. As the data from the Ambo City Administrative education office indicates, there are three private colleges, two preparatory schools, five high schools, and seventeen primary schools in the City and Ambo woreda. There are five high schools (4 governmental and 1 private) in Ambo city. The total number of students enrolled in high school levels for the academic year 2017/18 was 5230, of which 2401 were females.

Study Design and Period

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted, and data were collected during March 1 to 30, 2018.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

All female students who had started experiencing menses were included. The participants for the quantitative study were randomly selected female students, while participants for the qualitative study were purposively selected female students.

Sample Size Determination and Sampling Procedure

The sample size was determined based on the assumption of a simple random sampling (SRS) method and using a single population proportion formula. Since we were unable to locate a similar study, we decided to take P=50%, assuming that 50% of school female adolescents were practicing unsafe MHM. With a 0.05 margin of error, the sample size was calculated as follows:

Since the source population was finite (<10,000), the sample size correction formula was applied and a 10% non-response rate was added. The final sample size was 364. The participants from each school were selected based on the proportion of female students they had. The sample size for the qualitative study (FGD) was determined based on the saturation of ideas. Accordingly, five FGD, one at each school, was conducted among school females.

Five FGD, duration 40–60 minutes each, were conducted to explore female students’ experience, challenges, and needs related to MHM. The FGD guide and observational checklists were adopted and contextualized from UNICEF’s tools developed to assess MHM in the school setting.¹⁸ A total of 36 school females participated in FGD. They were selected purposively with the help of the schools’ heads. The FGDs were tape-recorded and transcribed later. Data analysis used a thematic approach. Data from all transcripts were placed under the relevant theme where it complemented the quantitative findings.

The school observation was conducted among all the five schools using the standard checklist developed by UNICEF to assess the WASH in the school setting, and contextualized to the local setting. The observers were the investigators themselves. Initially, the investigators come together and discussed the tools i.e. observation checklists, and reached upon common understanding. Three observers were sent to each school. They fill the checklists independently and finally compiled it together. Since the checklist was clear and objectively measurable, no observer difference was reported.

Data Collection Instrument

Self-administered semi-structured questionnaires were used to collect quantitative data. The questionnaires were adapted from UNICEF’s tools developed to assess MHM in the school setting and other related literature.¹⁸ Five, diploma holding, females were recruited and trained on data collection tools and methods for two days. The questionnaire was first prepared in English and then translated into Afan Oromo and Amharic (the local languages). Observational checklists, which assess the WASH status in the schools, were also used. We used a systematic random sampling technique to select the study participants. The students’ identity number was retrieved from each school record offices and used as a sample frame.

Data Quality, Management, and Analysis

To ensure the quality of the data, first, the questionnaire was pre-tested and data collectors were trained well. A descriptive analysis was computed. Binary logistic regression was done to assess the association between dependent and independent variables. Variables associated with the dependent variable at p-value ≤0.25, and the variables that were known to have an association with dependent variables from previous studies were selected for multiple logistic regression analysis. With a 95% confidence interval (CI), statistical significance was declared at P<0.05.

Analysis of Qualitative Data

The data collected through FGD and observation was analyzed by open coding with thematic analysis approach. Four themes were separately prepared initially. They are: school females’ experience; school females need concerning MHM; awareness about MHM; and their perception about WASH facility in their school. The detail is presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Themes and Subthemes Extracted from the Focus Group Discussion Conducted Among High School Females in Ambo City, Ethiopia, 2018

Themes	Subthemes
1. Females experience	Stigma/shame Fear of sudden blood leakage School absenteeism Drown attention in the class
2. Need	Privacy at school Type of absorbents Accessibility, availability, and affordability of absorbents
3. Awareness	Lack of information about menses and MHM
4. WASH facility in the school	Lack of water facility at school Toilet cleanness, presence of door, privacy Poor Waste disposal

Outcome Variable

Menstrual hygiene management practices (safe or unsafe)

Measurements

Safe menstrual hygiene practice was measured based on the UNICEF definition of safe menstrual hygiene containing four criteria i.e. type of absorbents used, frequency of absorbent exchange, frequency of washing genitalia during menses, and disposal methods for used absorbents.¹⁷ Accordingly, the females’ menstrual hygiene practice is safe if it fulfills all of the following four criteria, otherwise, it is considered unsafe: i) If the females used safe absorbents (considered safe if they were commercially available sanitary pads or new clothes or re-usable type, used after washing with soap); ii) Changing absorbents twice or more times per 24 hours; iii) If girls wash their genitalia twice or more times per 24 hours and iv) disposed of menstruation pad by burying or burn it after use.^8,10 If the respondents fulfill the criteria on a single criterion, 1 point was given and otherwise, zero was given. Finally, the value was added up together for all four variables (criteria). Those who score four out of four were classified as safe menstrual hygiene practice and otherwise classified as unsafe.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki declaration. The ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical review board (ERB) of the College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ethiopia. The letter for support was written from the college of medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University to all selected Schools.

Before starting the data collection process, the confidentiality of the data to be collected was ensured to the participants, and both written and informed verbal consent was taken from each respondent and their families. In order to ensure the anonymity of the collected data, code number was assigned to the questionnaire, and study participation was entirely voluntary. The informed consent also included publication of anonymized responses.

Availability of Data and Material

All data generated or analyzed during this study were included in this published article and its supplementary information files are in the hands of the correspondent author and can be accessed on formal requests.

Results

In this paper, the qualitative finding is grouped under four themes and the detail of the themes is presented in Table 1. The quotes are put under the quantitative findings where it complements each other. The themes were: 1) females’ experience about menstruation and MHM, 2) females need, 3) females’ awareness towards menses and MHM practice, and 4) females’ perception and experience with school WASH facility.

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents

The response rate was 91.6%. The mean age of the participants was 16 (SD 2.25) years. Most participants were urban residents (92.9%), and single (93.8) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Socio-Demographic Characteristics of High School Females in Ambo City, 2018

Variables	Frequency	Percent (%)
Age
12–17	312	92.9
>18	24	7.1
Residence
Urban	312	92.9
Rural	24	7.1
Marital status (relationship)
Single	315	93.8
Engaged	21	6.2
Religion
Orthodox	158	47.0
Protestant	142	42.3
Others*	36	10.7
Mothers educational status
Illiterate	66	19.6
Grade 1–6	103	30.7
Grade 7–12	83	24.7
Degree and above	81	24.1
Father’s educational status
Illiterate	59	17.6
Grade 1–6	58	17.3
Grade 7–12	111	33.0
Degree and above	107	31.8

Note: *Wakefata and Muslim.

Menstrual Hygiene Management Practice and Knowledge of the School Females

The mean age at menarche was 13.9 (SD 0.71). Most (about 73%) reported that they had awareness about menses before menarche. Mothers were the leading (47%) source of information about menses. Only 31% reported that they prepared well for the first menses. Of the 336 respondents, 53.6% (95% CI: 48.5, 58.6) participants’ MHM practices were unsafe. Of the four components, the frequency of washing genitalia during menses was the most poorly managed followed by the disposal of used pads (Table 3).

Table 3.

Menstrual Hygiene Management Practice Among High School Females in Ambo City, Ethiopia, 2018

Variables	Frequency	Percent
Do you know the commercially available sanitary pad
Yes	255	75.1
No	81	24.9
Type of sanitary pad used mostly
Rag (cloth of any kind)	42	12.4
Piece of clean clothes	63	18.6
Disposable sanitary pads	218	64.3
Underwear alone	10	2.9
Frequency of sanitary pad exchange
Once per day	53	15.6
Twice per day	245	72.3
Three times and above	37	10.9
How do you manage menses at school
Used sanitary napkins	180	53.1
Left school	111	32.7
Do nothing	41	12.1
Disposing sanitary pad
In toilet	228	67.3
In dust bin	71	20.9
Open field	34	10.1
How do you clean your body during menstruation
Take bath with soap	129	38.1
Clean around genitalia with tissue paper	56	16.5
Wash genitalia area with soap	148	43.7
Frequency of cleaning genitalia
Twice a day	70	20.6
Once a day	165	48.7
Do not until the end of menses	95	28.0
Do you usually get pocket money for sanitary pad
Yes	255	75.9
No	81	24.1
Overall MHM status
Safe*	157	46.7
Unsafe	179	53.3

Note: *If it fulfills the four criteria (using safe absorbents, changing absorbents twice/day, washing genital at least twice/day and disposing of the used absorbents in the safe way/or washed with soap, dried on the sun and used it).

The respondents were asked: “how you rate your preparedness for the first menses?” with the option of not at all, well prepared, not well prepared or I do not remember. Accordingly, only 31% reported that they prepared well for the first menses while the others reported not prepared well or do not remember. About 81 (25%) of the participants do not know the existence of commercially available sanitary pads. Approximately17% of the respondents reported that the source of menses blood is organs other than the uterus like the abdomen, vagina, and or other. The respondents were also asked: “what is the cause for the menses bleeding?” and about 26% reported it is God’s curse or disease (Table 4).

Table 4.

Menstrual Hygiene Management Related Knowledge Among High School Females in Ambo City, Ethiopia, 2018

Variables	Frequency	Percent
Awareness about menses before menarche
Yes	247	72.9
No	88	26.0
The main source of information about menses
Mother	157	46.3
Teacher	96	28.3
Friends	57	16.8
Others (books, media)	23	6.8
What is the cause for menses
Hormone	235	69.3
Curse of God	80	23.6
Caused by disease	16	4.7
How much you prepared for the first menses
Not at all	136	40.1
Not well prepared	23	6.8
Prepared well	100	29.5
I do not remember	73	21.5
From where does menses blood come
Uterus	271	79.9
Other body organs (vagina, bladder, abdomen)	58	17.1
It is harmful to exercise during menses
Yes	185	54.6
No	141	41.6
Poor MHM exposes for infection
Yes	295	88.1
No	40	11.9
Menses related school absenteeism in the last 3 months
Yes	108	32.1
No	228	67.9
Why you absent from school during menses**
I cannot access sanitary pad	59	54.6
No suitable place for pad exchange	67	62

Note: **Since multiple responses are possible, the percent could be greater than 100%.

The gap in awareness about MHM was also identified during FGD. One of the focus group discussants reported as follows:

…. We have no sufficient information on how to manage menstruation and afraid to ask or discuss the issue of the menstrual cycle, we didn’t get any readable material prepared with the local language to get better information and knowledge. I, myself feel shame to ask another person about menses. It is taboo in our area to speak about menses … (Female FGD discussant)

The water, sanitation, and hygiene in the schools were poor. The toilets in the schools lack cleanness, water source, and doors for privacy. As revealed during the FGD, because of the lack of facilities at schools, many females left schools during their menses:

… If I am at home, I change my absorbents twice a day and clean my genitalia, but if I am in the school it is not comfortable because of no water even to wash my hand, the toilets are not clean, lacks a door. It is not comfortable for privacy … (FGD participant)

…. Usually, I don’t come to school during my period eve. If my period comes suddenly while I am at school, my attention becomes drown toward fear of having an accident leakage and I think that if my cloth suddenly stained with leakage of blood, the students may laugh at me. So, I prefer staying at home … (FGD participants)

Factors Associated with Unsafe Menstrual Hygiene Management

In multiple logistic regression analyses, variables including: age; religion; father’s educational status; and frequency of discussing menses with their mother were significantly associated with the dependent variable. Accordingly, compared with those aged greater or equal to 18 years, females younger than 18 years were 84% less likely to be their MHM practice was unsafe 95% CI, [AOR: 0.16 (0.045, 0.57), P=0.005]. Females whose fathers had degree-level education and above were 72% [AOR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.88, P-value = 0.03] less likely to manage their menses unsafely. Compared with those females who never discussed menses with their mother, females who frequently discussed were 70%, [AOR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.71, P-value = 0.006] less likely to manage their MHM safely (Table 5).

Table 5.

Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis on Data Collected from High School Females in Ambo City, West Shoa Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia, 2018

Variables	MHM Practice		COR with 95% CI	AOR with 95% CI	p-values
	Unsafe	Safe
Age
12–17	160	152	0.211(0.07, 0.63)	0.16(0.045, 0.57)	0.005
≥18	20	4	Ref
Residence
Urban	169	143	1.39(0.61, 3.21)	2.37(0.80, 7.06)	0.12
Rural	11	13	Ref
Religion
Orthodox	72	86	0.47(0.22, 1.00)		0.56
Protestant	85	57	0.84(0.39, 1.80)		1.001
Others*	23	13	Ref
Fathers educational status
Illiterate	22	37	Ref
Grade 1–6	38	20	3.2(1.5, 6.8)	0.46(0.15, 1.33)	0.15
Grade 7–12	69	42	2.76(1.44, 5.30)	0.28(0.10, 0.78)	0.02
Degree and above	52	56	1.5(0.8, 2.93)	0.28(0.10, 0.88)	0.03
Mothers educational status
Illiterate	31	35	Ref
Grade 1–6	60	43	1.58(0.85, 2.94)	0.8(0.31, 2.08)	0.65
Grade 7–12	54	29	2.10(1.1, 4.07)	1.56(0.50,4.85)	0.44
Degree and above	34	47	0.81(0.42, 1.57)	0.36(0.11, 1.18)	0.09
Source of information about menses
Mother	68	89	0.28(0.44, 1.27)	0.65(0.35, 1.21)	0.18
Teacher	70	26	2.6(1.4, 4.9)	3.75(1.75, 8.00)	0.001
Others**	42	41	Ref
History of sexual intercourse
Yes	10	5	1.77(0.59, 5.31)	1.14(0.31, 4.14)	0.84
No	170	151	Ref
Get permanent pocket money for pad
Yes	47	32	1.37(0.82, 2.28)	2.47(0.18, 5.18)	0.17
No	133	124	Ref
Frequency of discussing menses
Frequently	137	126	0.56(0.305,1.02)	0.30(0.13, 0.71)	0.006
Sometimes	4	11	0.19(0.052,0.67)	0.11(0.02, 0.53)	0.006
Almost Never	37	19	Ref

Notes: *Wakefata and Muslims. **Media, friends, other family members.

Discussion

In this study, it is identified that more than half of the females’ MHM practice was unsafe. This finding is lower compared with studies conducted in Bahir Dar and Nekemte, Ethiopia, and Uganda.^10,16 The difference could be due to measurement differences and study place differences. Mothers were the main source of information about menses. A similar finding was reported previously.^19,20 Of respondents, 64.3% used a sanitary pad in the current study, and this is higher compared to the previous study conducted in Bahir Dar and Wollo where only 44.9% and 33% reported using sanitary pads during the recent menses respectively.^5,8 The recent improvement in commercially available absorbent accessibility could be a reason for the difference. Mothers are the leading source of information about menses. There were gaps in information among females on how to manage their menses safely. Some of the high school females do not know the origin of menses blood. Many of the school females do not believe that the information they are accessing from different sources is enough in enabling them to practice safe MHM.

The school compounds were generally not friendly to the female students to manage their menses safely. Even though there were latrines separately for both males and females, they lack water, doors, and even dirty and not comfortable to use. These facts were confirmed by the researchers during school observation. Some of the school toilets lacked doors that were not clean and all of them had no water source.

As revealed during FGD, discussants reported that many female students do not come to school during their menses in fear of sudden blood leakage. This was evidenced by the fact that about 35% of the school female did not have access to sanitary pads during their recent menses.

More than 32% of the females used homemade alternative sanitary materials for managing their menses. The homemade alternative material reaches from old clothes/rags to clean new clothes. These old clothes may put the women at risk for infection and allergic reactions for their skin around the genitals. This finding is similar to the study conducted in Udaypur, Nepal.²¹

Compared with those aged greater or equal to 18 years, females younger than 18 years were 84% less likely to be their MHM practice was unsafe. Females whose fathers were illiterate were 3.57 times more likely to manage their menses unsafely. Compared with those females who never discussed menses with their mother, females who frequently discussed were 70% less likely to manage their MHM unsafely.

In conclusion, more than half of the high school females in the study area lack safe MHM, and the safe menses management practice was varied by the female age, frequency of discussing with mother, fathers’ level of education, and source of information about menses. Almost all the schools were not female friendly for managing their menstrual hygiene. Female students require detail information/awareness about menses, MHM, and affordable sanitary materials.

Maintaining the school toilets and equipping them with WASH needs urgent and sustainable solutions. School-age females need urgent information and skills related to menses. This can be achieved through continuous awareness creation by preparing and distributing pamphlets in local languages. Any programs working to improve the MHM should target the identified factors in their plan.

Limitation of the Study

The menstrual hygiene issue is something considered taboo in the community and too sensitive to discuss openly. This may contribute to social desirability bias. Therefore, the interpretation of this finding should consider them.

Funding Statement

Ambo University has covered the costs of data collectors and supervisors per diem. The funded organization has no role in designing the study, data collection, or manuscript preparation.

Abbreviations

AOR, Adjusted odd ration; CI, confidence interval; FGD, focus group discussion; MHM, menstrual hygiene management; SD, standard deviation; WASH, water, sanitation, and hygiene.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this work.