Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2020 Sep 16;6(9):e04919. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04919

Geographical origin impact on volatile composition and some quality parameters of virgin olive oils extracted from the “Ayvalık” variety

Didar Üçüncüoğlu a,, Dilek Sivri-Özay b
PMCID: PMC7502349  PMID: 32995614

Abstract

"Ayvalık" is one of the prominent olive cultivar used for producing virgin olive oil (VOO) in Turkey. In this study, 215 olive samples of "Ayvalık" were harvested from 14 different locations in North Aegean Region of Anatolia by hand-picking during three consecutive crop seasons. The early harvested cold press VOO samples were produced at lab-scale and the quality indices (free acidity, peroxide value and spectral absorption at 232, 266, 270 and 274 nm), induction time, colour values, fatty acid and volatile profiles were determined in order to examine changes on composition of the "Ayvalık" olive oils based on their growing area. Characteristically, it was found that volatile fraction of "Ayvalık" VOOs composed of aldehydes (29.72), terpene (12.68), alcohol (11.65), benzene ringed compound (4.71), ketone (3.49), organic acid (2.87), ester (1.84), furan (0.96) compounds on average percentage. It was highlighted with this research 61.84–87.36% of aldehydes, 0.00–91.11% of ketones, 0.00–46.11% of esters, and 34.53–92.06% of alcohols were generated only by lipoxygenase pathway. As a conclusion, Ayvalık VOOs had different chemical composition based on geographic origin. Therefore, it was considered that this work is so promising to directly accelerate that the number of geographic indicated VOOs linked to "Ayvalık" cultivar.

Keywords: Food science, Virgin olive oil, Food analysis, Volatile compounds, Oxidative stability, Fatty acid composition, Agriculture, Ayvalik olive cultivar, Natural product chemistry


Food science; Virgin olive oil; Food analysis; Volatile compounds; Oxidative stability; Fatty acid composition; Agriculture; Ayvalik olive cultivar; Natural product chemistry

1. Introduction

The consumption of virgin olive oil (VOO) all over the world has reached a rising trend due to its high nutritional value and functional compounds such as monounsaturated fatty acid, tocopherols, phenolics and sterols. The presence of these bioactive constituents in VOO is directly influence on its oxidative stability, shelf life and sensory properties (Hernáez et al., 2019; Sanaeifar and Jafari, 2019). Numerous epidemiological and clinical studies approved that Mediterranean diet covering regular consumption of VOO reduce the incidence of metabolic disorders such as heart disease, stroke and Type-II diabetes (Corominas-Faja et al., 2018; Soto-Alarcon et al., 2018; Tsartsou et al., 2019).

The olive oils, extracted from Olea europaea L. fruit, can be classified as extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), virgin olive oil (VOO) and lampant olive oil (LOO) depending on its chemical (i.e. free acidity, peroxide value, UV absorptions) and sensorial (i.e. odor, taste, color, appearance) quality according to the European Union regulations (EEC, 2016).

Turkey is the third olive producer of the world (FAOSTAT, 2020). "Ayvalık" (Edremit Yağlık) is the eminent olive cultivar (cv.) which utilized for oil production in Turkey. Ayvalık cv. is a quarter of the olive trees in Aegean Region (TURKPATENT, 2020). However, this cultivar is more widespread in North Aegean Region; it was started to grown in other parts of Anatolia such as Antalya, Mersin, and Adana recently (Naskali, 2016). Therefore, several researchers focused on "Ayvalık" oils quality and purity parameters. Classifying geographic origins of "Ayvalık" VOOs topic was examined before several researchers based on fatty acid profile (Dıraman et al., 2011; Oğraş et al., 2016; Ucuncuoglu, 2019) and phenolic profiles (Alkan et al., 2012). To the best of current knowledge, there was no research about geographical discrimination based on volatile profile and quality parameters of "Ayvalık" VOOs in Turkey.

Sensorial profile (aroma) is a crucial quality parameter for EVOO and depends on volatile and semi-volatile fractions. The volatile fraction of VOO is principally generated from the degradation pathways of linoleic and linolenic acids by various enzymes, mainly lipoxygenase. These reactions release when malaxation starts after crushing. Generally, positive notes and desired volatiles occur by this pathway. The other volatiles can be formed by direct fatty acid metabolism, as well as by sugar fermentations or amino acid conversion. The former reactions produce linear acids (i.e. acetic acid), alcohols (i.e. ethyl alcohol), esters (i.e. ethyl acetate) and ketones (i.e. propanone). The latters can generate branched esters, aldehydes, alcohols and acids etc. The desirable aroma compounds are attributed to C6 and C5 volatiles, including aldehydes, esters, alcohols, hydrocarbons, furan and ketones. There are some other volatile generation pathways caused from lipid oxidation mechanisms, microbial fermentation reactions or damaged olive fruit, which gives defective or off-flavours to VOO ketones (Kalua et al., 2007; Boskou, 2012).

The volatile profile of VOO and its sensorial descriptions affects the consumer preferences and so rural economy. Therefore, volatile compounds previously used for registering "Geographical Indications" such as Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) and Protected Geographical Indications (PGI) by several authorities (Barbieri et al., 2019). A geographical indication is a quality-sign correspond with a specific producing method, and its quality characteristics linked with its geographical origin or growing area. Regarding olive oils, the EU Regulation has made a labelling with geographical origin information compulsory (Likudis, 2016). The main goal of this study was to contribute to the creation of a comprehensive "Ayvalık" VOOs database via examining chemical composition of VOOs harvested from 14 different growing areas in Northern Aegean region during three consecutive crop seasons. The graphical abstract was shown at Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Graphical abstract.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials and sample modelling

The olive samples belongs to "Ayvalık" cv. (n: 215) were harvested from 14 different geographic origins of North Aegean Region at early stages (4th week of October-1st week of November) of maturation during three consecutive harvest year by hand-picking. The number of sample at first harvest on-year was 76, at second harvest off-year was 37 and at third harvest on-year was 102.

Edremit (GO1), Gömeç (GO2), Ayvalık (GO3), Havran (GO4) and Burhaniye (GO5) were the sub-locations from Balıkesir; Ayvacık (GO6), Merkez (GO7) and Ezine (GO8) were the sub-locations from Çanakkale; Bergama (GO9), Bornova (GO10) and Dikili (GO11) were the sub-locations from İzmir, and finally, Akhisar (GO12), Kırkağaç (GO13) and Saruhanlı (GO14) were the sub-locations from Manisa cities. Geographic origins of monocultivar olives and number of samples were detailed in Table 1 and shown at Figure 2. The mathematical coordinates of the investigated geographic area was between 26-27° East Longitudes and 38–40° North Latitudes.

Table 1.

Geographic origins and sample numbers of monocultivar olives (Ayvalık cv.).

Code Geographic Origins First
Harvest Year (On-Year)
Second
Harvest Year (Off-Year)
Third
Harvest Year (On-Year)
Total
GO1 Balıkesir-Edremit 9 19 15 43
GO2 Balıkesir-Gömeç 6 3 9 18
GO3 Balıkesir-Ayvalık 9 2 9 20
GO4 Balıkesir-Havran 8 1 5 14
GO5 Balıkesir-Burhaniye 9 3 8 20
GO6 Çanakkale-Ayvacık 9 - 11 20
GO7 Çanakkale-Merkez - 2 - 2
GO8 Çanakkale-Ezine 9 2 9 20
GO9 Izmir-Bergama - - 6 6
GO10 Izmir-Bornova - - 3 3
GO11 Izmir-Dikili 6 3 13 22
GO12 Manisa-Akhisar 11 2 5 18
GO13 Manisa-Kırkağaç - - 3 3
GO14 Manisa-Saruhanlı - - 6 6
Total 76 37 102 215

Edremit (GO1), Gömeç (GO2), Ayvalık (GO3), Havran (GO4) and Burhaniye (GO5) were the sub-locations from Balıkesir; Ayvacık (GO6), Merkez (GO7) and Ezine (GO8) were the sub-locations from Çanakkale; Bergama (GO9), Bornova (GO10) and Dikili (GO11) were the sub-locations from İzmir, and finally, Akhisar (GO12), Kırkağaç (GO13) and Saruhanlı (GO14) were the sub-locations from Manisa cities.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Geographic origins of monocultivar (Ayvalık cv.) olives. GPS Coordinates: 38°1′17.73″-40°10′9.06″ North Latitudes and 26°10′49.96″-27°58′16.10″ East Longitudes.

Approximately 5 kg olives were harvested and were immediately transported to the laboratory in the mesh-bags. The leaves were removed and the healthy olives were washed to obtain oil samples using a laboratory scale physical extraction unit (HAUS Centrifuge Technologies, Aydin, Turkey) including a crusher, a malaxer and a centrifuge without any delay. Malaxation process was performed for 30 min at 25 °C. A vertical centrifuge (3000 rpm, 2 min) was used for solid-liquid phase separation. Samples were passed through cotton filter and stored at + 4 °C till analysis.

Every VOO sample was divided into three amber bottles (50 ml) without any headspace on each. The first bottle was used for only volatile and fatty acid profile analysis; the second was used for other chemical analyses. The last bottle was kept in the fridge to be used if necessary.

2.2. Methods for determining quality parameters

Free acidity (as % oleic acid), peroxide value (as meq active O2/kg oil), K232 and K270 values were determined according to IOC (2015a, 2015b; 2016). Fatty acid profile was determined according to IOC method. Fatty acids methyl esters (FAMEs) were prepared according to COI/T.20/Doc. No. 24 (IOC, 2001) and they were analysed by gas chromatography (Thermo Scientific, Trace™ Ultra Gas Chromatograph, Waltham, USA) equipped with a 100 m long capillary column (0.25 mm id, 0.20 μm film thickness) and a flame ionization detector (FID).

2.3. Methods for determining colour indices and oxidative stability

L, a∗ and b∗ values were measured with Minolta Spectrophotometer (CM-3600d, Japan) as lightness, red-green and blue-yellow colour. Induction period was measured with the Rancimat 743 (Metrohm, Basel, Switzerland) apparatus at 120 °C with a continuous airflow of 20 L.h−1 passing through the oil samples. Induction time (as hour) is defined at the point of rapid change in the rate of oxidation resulting in a sharp inflection point on the oxidation curve.

2.4. Method for determining volatile profile

Volatile compounds were determined using 50/30μm thickness DVB/CAR/PDMS three-phase fiber (2 cm) with DHS-SPME (Supelco Co., Bellefonte, CA, USA), GC-MS (Thermo Scientific GC, DSQ II Series Single Quadruple GC/MS, Waltham, MA, USA). TR Wax MS 60 capillary column (60 m × 0.32 mm i.d. × 0.5 μm thickness) was coupled to GC. 4-methyl-2-pentanol (Aldrich, Germany) was used as an internal standard. VOO (3 g) was added to a 15 ml vial with 1.5 ppm internal standard. The vial was then closed with a polytetrafluoro ethylene (PTFE) septum. The fibre was exposed for 30 min at 40 °C, after 30 min at 40 °C for equilibration time. Thermal desorption time was 5 min for injection. The temperature was set at 40 °C for 10 min, followed by an increase of 3 °C min-1 up to 240 °C, and then held for 15 min. The injector was kept at 240 °C. Helium was used as carrier gas (1.0 mL.min−1). The scanning mass range varied from 50 to 550 m/z. Mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV. All measurements were triplicated. Before use, the fiber was conditioned at 260 °C for 1 h. Moreover, a blank test (both empty vial and fiber) was carried out before every run-day to prevent the release of undesirable compounds. The identification of volatile compounds was performed by comparing their retention time with NIST and Wiley library tools, and by checking mass isotope distributions.

2.5. Data processing

Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS (version 23, IBM SPSS Statistics Inc. Chicago, IL) statistical software using One-way ANOVA method. Differences among all groups were determined by Duncan test at 95% confidence level.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Quality parameters, colour indices & oxidative stability

It was determined that free acidity values were altered between 0.3% and 0.6%; peroxide values 3.0 and 10.1; K232 values 1.6 and 2.1; and, K270 values 0.1 and 0.2 among the samples (Table 2). Quality parameters data obviously suggested that all investigated samples in this study were "extra virgin" category according to IOC (2015a). GO2 and GO11 were significantly different in terms of free acidity; GO4 and GO14 in terms of peroxide value; GO11 in terms of K232; GO8, and GO11 & GO14 in terms of K270 (P ≤ 0.05).

Table 2.

Quality parameters, color indices & oxidative stability (induction period) of Ayvalık VOOs.

Locations Free Acidity Peroxide Value K232 K270 L∗ a∗ b∗ Induction Period
GO1 0.5 ± 0.02 abc 9.2 ± 0.60 ab 2.0 ± 0.06 a 0.2 ± 0.01 abc 32.9 ± 0.41 b 1.2 ± 0.07 a 8.2 ± 0.40 abc 7.2 ± 0.34 ab
GO2 0.6 ± 0.04 a 8.7 ± 0.60 abc 2.0 ± 0.10 a 0.2 ± 0.01 abc 32.5 ± 0.77 b 1.2 ± 0.17 a 7.5 ± 0.91 bc 6.1 ± 0.39 b
GO3 0.4 ± 0.04 bcde 7.8 ± 0.53 abc 2.1 ± 0.05 a 0.1 ± 0.01 bcd 33.2 ± 0.58 b 0.8 ± 0.10 ab 9.8 ± 0.80 ab 6.8 ± 0.68 ab
GO4 0.3 ± 0.03 de 10.1 ± 0.75 a 2.0 ± 0.06 a 0.2 ± 0.01 abc 32.8 ± 0.42 b 0.8 ± 0.14 ab 7.8 ± 0.75 abc 7.0 ± 0.44 ab
GO5 0.4 ± 0.04 abcde 8.7 ± 0.58 abc 2.1 ± 0.10 a 0.2 ± 0.01 ab 33.6 ± 0.51 b 1.0 ± 0.15 ab 8.8 ± 0.58 abc 8.3 ± 0.60 ab
GO6 0.4 ± 0.03 cde 8.4 ± 0.77 abc 1.8 ± 0.07 ab 0.1 ± 0.01 bcd 31.6 ± 0.60 b 0.7 ± 0.10 ab 6.9 ± 0.68 bc 8.4 ± 0.99 ab
GO7 0.4 ± 0.03 abcd 8.9 ± 0.86 ab 2.1 ± 0.19 a 0.1 ± 0.01 bcd 32.1 ± 0.54 b 1.0 ± 0.08 ab 8.6 ± 0.56 abc 5.8 ± 0.56 b
GO8 0.6 ± 0.04 ab 9.1 ± 1.29 ab 2.0 ± 0.00 a 0.2 ± 0.00 a 36.1 ± 0.10 a 0.6 ± 0.04 b 10.9 ± 0.54 a 5.7 ± 0.68 b
GO9 0.3 ± 0.02 de 9.0 ± 0.50 ab 1.9 ± 0.08 a 0.1 ± 0.01 cd 32.4 ± 0.62 b 1.1 ± 0.11 ab 8.6 ± 0.66 abc 7.2 ± 0.62 ab
GO10 0.5 ± 0.05 abc 6.0 ± 0.72 bcd 2.0 ± 0.08 a 0.1 ± 0.01 bcd 31.3 ± 0.58 b 0.9 ± 0.13 ab 8.3 ± 1.10 abc 7.3 ± 0.39 ab
GO11 0.3 ± 0.07 e 6.0 ± 0.72 bcd 1.6 ± 0.02 b 0.1 ± 0.01 d 28.8 ± 0.82 c 0.6 ± 0.08 b 3.9 ± 1.39 d 7.4 ± 1.30 ab
GO12 0.4 ± 0.03 abcde 8.0 ± 0.67 abc 2.0 ± 0.09 a 0.2 ± 0.01 abc 33.3 ± 0.46 b 0.8 ± 0.12 ab 8.9 ± 0.56 abc 8.1 ± 0.29 ab
GO13 0.5 ± 0.04 abc 5.5 ± 0.75 cd 2.1 ± 0.07 a 0.1 ± 0.01 cd 31.4 ± 0.74 b 1.0 ± 0.16 ab 6.5 ± 1.13 cd 8.4 ± 1.79 ab
GO14 0.3 ± 0.04 de 3.0 ± 0.73 d 1.8 ± 0.05 ab 0.1 ± 0.01 d 32.2 ± 0.26 b 1.1 ± 0.15 ab 11.0 ± 0.54 a 9.5 ± 1.12 a

The values were expressed as mean ± standard deviations. Means within a column with different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05). Free acidity was given as % g oleic acid; peroxide value as meq active O2/kg oil; induction period as hour, respectively.

Induction period, is an indicator of oxidative stability, changed in a wide range from 5.7 to 9.5 h and GO2, GO7, GO8 and GO14 had different oxidative stability (P ≤ 0.05). The lowest induction period was measured at GO8 and the highest was at GO14. GO7 and GO8 were classified with lower induction period from the other geographic origins (Table 2).

L∗ values (lightness) were changed from 28.8 to 36.1, a∗ values (redness) 0.6 to 1.2, and b∗ values (yellowness) 3.9 to 11.0 indicating that colours altered from green to light yellow. GO8 and GO11 were differed in terms of L∗ values, GO1 & GO2 and GO8 & GO11 in terms of a∗ values, GO8 & GO14, and GO11 in terms of b∗ values (Table 2). Even though colour is not regarded as an important quality characteristic for VOOs, it has a great effect on consumer acceptance. Our results were in agreement with both regulations for EVOO and reported studies (Kıralan and Bayrak, 2013; Toker et al., 2016; Guclu et al., 2016) before related to "Ayvalık" EVOOs except b∗ values.

In this study, it was found that the major fatty acids were oleic (61–70%), palmitic (12–16%), linoleic (10–16%), stearic (2–4%) and palmitoleic (1–3%) acids, respectively. Previously reported researches (Andjelkovic et al., 2009; Gurdeniz et al., 2010; Dıraman et al., 2011) showed that Ayvalık VOOs had 60–77% oleic, 10–19% palmitic, 8–17% linoleic, 2–4% stearic and 0.5–2% palmitoleic acids, respectively. According to C18:1 content, it was observed that two main cluster, one of them includes GO3, GO9, GO10, GO11, GO13 and GO14 origins which had 67–69% oleic acid. The other group was heavily contained 61–64% oleic acid. The most distinct origins were GO5 and GO14 by palmitic acid. GO10 had the lowest and GO8 had the highest linoleic acid percentage. GO1, GO2, GO9 and GO10 origins were significantly distinguished among others in terms of palmitoleic acid content (P ≤ 0.05). Fatty acid compositions of "Ayvalık" VOOs were presented in Table 3. It was shown a good (P ≤ 0.05) statistic description concerning each geographical origin (Table 3). For example, among Balıkesir sub-locations, GO1 and GO2 were characterized by the lowest C16:1 and the highest C18:0 contents. Moreover, GO3 was separated from the others based on the lowest saturated fatty acids such as C16.0 (12.5%) and C18:0 (2.3%), and the highest C18:1 (67.5%) and C18:3 (0.9%) contents. GO6 origin was the only different sub-location among Çanakkale based on both arachidic and eicosanoic fatty acids. Among Izmir sub-locations, GO10 was distinguished by myristic and eicosanoic acids, and GO11 by palmitoleic and margaric acids statistically. GO12 was also statistically varied among Manisa sub-locations in terms of C16:0, C17:1, C18:1 and C18:2.

Table 3.

Fatty acid composition of Ayvalık VOOs.

Locations C14:0 C16:0 C16:1 C17:0 C17:1 C18:0 C18:1 C18:2 C18:3 C20:0 C20:1 C24:0
GO1 0.0 ± 0.00bcd 15.2 ± 0.28ab 1.4 ± 0.21b 0.1 ± 0.01ab 0.2 ± 0.01ab 3.7 ± 0.21ab 62.8 ± 0.52c 15.0 ± 0.25ab 0.6 ± 0.03bc 0.4 ± 0.01bcd 0.3 ± 0.01bc 0.1 ± 0.01ab
GO2 0.0 ± 0.01a 15.1 ± 0.14ab 1.2 ± 0.20b 0.2 ± 0.01a 0.2 ± 0.00a 4.2 ± 0.07a 62.9 ± 0.54c 14.7 ± 0.29abc 0.5 ± 0.03bc 0.4 ± 0.00bcd 0.3 ± 0.01ab 0.1 ± 0.00abc
GO3 0.0 ± 0.00d 12.5 ± 0.02d 2.1 ± 0.00a 0.1 ± 0.00c 0.1 ± 0.00f 2.3 ± 0.01e 67.5 ± 0.06a 13.6 ± 0.03bcde 0.9 ± 0.02a 0.4 ± 0.01d 0.3 ± 0.00ab 0.1 ± 0.00d
GO4 0.0 ± 0.00bcd 14.7 ± 0.31bc 2.1 ± 0.08a 0.1 ± 0.00bc 0.1 ± 0.00def 2.7 ± 0.09de 64.3 ± 0.46bc 14.4 ± 0.26abcd 0.6 ± 0.02bc 0.4 ± 0.01bcd 0.3 ± 0.00ab 0.1 ± 0.00cd
GO5 0.0 ± 0.00bc 16.2 ± 0.38a 2.4 ± 0.11a 0.2 ± 0.01ab 0.2 ± 0.01bcd 2.3 ± 0.03e 62.3 ± 0.28c 14.8 ± 0.33abc 0.6 ± 0.04bc 0.4 ± 0.02bcd 0.3 ± 0.01ab 0.1 ± 0.00abcd
GO6 0.0 ± 0.01b 14.9 ± 0.26ab 2.2 ± 0.17a 0.1 ± 0.01bc 0.1 ± 0.01def 3.6 ± 0.18ab 63.0 ± 0.59c 14.7 ± 0.45abc 0.5 ± 0.03bc 0.4 ± 0.02cd 0.2 ± 0.01d 0.1 ± 0.01bcd
GO7 0.0 ± 0.00bcd 15.9 ± 0.27ab 2.1 ± 0.24a 0.1 ± 0.01c 0.1 ± 0.01cde 3.4 ± 0.13bc 61.2 ± 0.44c 15.4 ± 0.52ab 0.7 ± 0.04b 0.4 ± 0.02ab 0.3 ± 0.02ab 0.1 ± 0.01bcd
GO8 0.0 ± 0.00cd 15.4 ± 0.13ab 2.2 ± 0.15a 0.1 ± 0.00bc 0.2 ± 0.01abcd 3.5 ± 0.15ab 61.2 ± 0.44c 15.9 ± 0.34a 0.5 ± 0.03bc 0.5 ± 0.01ab 0.3 ± 0.01ab 0.1 ± 0.00abcd
GO9 0.0 ± 0.00bc 14.5 ± 0.14bc 1.4 ± 0.14b 0.1 ± 0.00bc 0.1 ± 0.00cde 2.5 ± 0.20e 67.0 ± 0.94ab 12.7 ± 0.50defg 0.6 ± 0.02bc 0.4 ± 0.02abc 0.2 ± 0.01d 0.1 ± 0.01abcd
GO10 0.0 ± 0.00d 13.4 ± 0.01cd 1.1 ± 0.01b 0.1 ± 0.00bc 0.2 ± 0.00bcd 3.3 ± 0.02bcd 69.4 ± 0.36a 10.8 ± 0.34g 0.6 ± 0.01b 0.5 ± 0.00a 0.3 ± 0.00a 0.1 ± 0.00abc
GO11 0.0 ± 0.01bc 12.6 ± 0.25d 2.7 ± 0.06a 0.2 ± 0.00a 0.2 ± 0.04abcd 2.7 ± 0.26de 67.1 ± 1.02ab 13.0 ± 0.80cdef 0.6 ± 0.08b 0.5 ± 0.04a 0.2 ± 0.01cd 0.1 ± 0.01abcd
GO12 0.0 ± 0.00bcd 14.5 ± 0.43bc 1.4 ± 0.21a 0.1 ± 0.00bc 0.2 ± 0.01abc 3.4 ± 0.12bcd 63.9 ± 1.04c 14.3 ± 0.64abcd 0.6 ± 0.05bc 0.4 ± 0.01bcd 0.3 ± 0.01ab 0.1 ± 0.01abcd
GO13 0.0 ± 0.00bc 12.8 ± 0.02d 1.4 ± 0.21a 0.1 ± 0.00c 0.1 ± 0.00ef 2.8 ± 0.02cde 68.8 ± 0.20a 11.5 ± 0.17fg 0.5 ± 0.01bc 0.4 ± 0.00cd 0.3 ± 0.00bc 0.1 ± 0.00a
GO14 0.0 ± 0.01bcd 12.2 ± 0.01d 1.4 ± 0.21a 0.1 ± 0.00bc 0.1 ± 0.01def 3.6 ± 0.06ab 67.9 ± 0.01a 12.0 ± 0.03efg 0.5 ± 0.01c 0.4 ± 0.01bcd 0.3 ± 0.00ab 0.1 ± 0.01ab

C14:0 (myristic acid), C16:0 (palmitic acid), C16:1 (palmitoleic acid), C17:0 (margaric acid), C17:1 (margoleic acid), C18:0 (stearic acid), cis-C18:1 (oleic acid), C18:2 (linoleic acid), C18:3 (linolenic acid), C20:0 (arachidic acid), C20:1 (eicosanoic acid), C22:0 (behenic acid), C24:0 (lignoceric acid). The values were expressed as mean ± standard deviations. Means within a column with different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05). trans-C18:1 & C22:0 are not given at table due to statistically meaningless difference (P > 0.05).

3.2. The profile of volatile aroma compounds

LOX pathway includes hydroperoxide lyase, alcohol dehydrogenase, alcohol acyltransferase and isomerase enzymes which causes C5 and C6 compounds generation, in particular. Moreover, hexanal, hexan-1-ol and hexyl acetate were formed by 13-hydroperoxides of linoleic acid; cis-3-hexenal, cis-3-hexen-1-ol, cis-3-hexenyl acetate, trans-2-hexenal and trans-2-hexen-1-ol were formed by 13-hydroperoxides of linolenic acid; 2-pentanal, 2-penten-1-ol, 1-penten-3-ol, 1-penten-3-one and some other pentenyl radicals were occurred by 13-alkoxy radicals during LOX pathway. These specific compounds can be chemically grouped as aldehydes, ketones, esters and alcohols. Furthermore, these LOX products can be heavily attributed with green and fruity aroma of VOOs. Green and fruity (positive notes) odour descriptions could characterize the early stage harvesting, fresh-high quality olive fruit, and well-processing and storing conditions. The other fatty acids (both saturated and unsaturated) and nitrogen contained compounds catabolism, and biodegradation reactions linked autoxidation, thermal oxidation or microbial fermentation could be create negative notes, such as waxy, oily, winey, vinegary, musty, fermented, creamy, soapy, tallow, fried, cheesy, ethereal or mushroom-like. In this study, volatile compounds identified and quantified for "Ayvalık" VOOs. GC-MS data showed the presence of total 125 different volatile constituents in the samples. Table 4 cited that the chemical formula and generation mechanisms of volatiles, which were categorized as aldehydes, alcohols, acids, esters, ketones, terpenes, benzenoids, furans and hydrocarbons in Table 5, and their odour/flavour descriptions (Ridolfi et al., 2002; Kalua et al., 2007; Boskou, 2012; Kesen et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2016; Song and Liu, 2018; Aparicio-Ruiz et al., 2018; Genovese et al., 2018; Abbatangelo et al., 2019; flavornet.org; pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, The Good Scents Company Information System TGSC, 2020).

Table 4.

Isolated volatile compounds from Ayvalık VOOs, generation pathways and sensorial descriptions.

Compound Chemical Formula Flavour/ Odour Description Generation Pathway/Source
ethanol C2H6O winey, vinegaryc,d Anaerobic fermentationd
1-hexen-3-ol C6H14O woody, green planth Plant metabolitek
1-penten-3-ol C5H10O wet soilb 13-alkoxy radicalsk
1-butanol C4H10O solventk microbial fermentation through the butanoate metabolic pathwayk
1-heptanol C7H16O fragrantk Nature of some essential oilsk
1-pentanol C5H12O green-fruityb Plant metabolitek
trans-2-penten-1-ol C5H10O pungent, bitterb 13-alkoxy radicals and isomerisationk
cis-2-penten-1-ol C5H10O green-fruityb 13-alkoxy radicalsk
cyclopentanol C5H10O unpleasant notesd Hydroxyl pathwayk
6-methylhepten-5-en-2-ol C8H16O Sweet, oily, green, corianderk Plant metabolitek
1-hexanol C6H14O green-appleb;
fruity, pungent, bitterd; grass, floral, aromaticf
13-hydroperoxides, LA metabolism, LOX
ADH activity on C6 aldehydesd
trans-3-hexen-1-ol C6H12O fruity, softb;
astringent, bittere
Isomerisationd,k
cis-3-hexen-1-ol C6H12O greenb 13-hydroperoxides, LnA metabolism, LOXd
trans-2-hexen-1-ol C6H12O green-bananab α-LnA metabolism,
Isomerisation, LOXd
cis-2-hexen-1-ol C6H12O Green, leafy, fruityk Isomerisationd,k
1-octene-3-ol C8H16O mushrooma; moistness-humidityd; mouldye Derivation from oct-1-en-3-one and short chain fatty acidsd
3-methylheptan-1-ol C8H18O citrusk Plant metabolitek
1-octanol C8H18O Waxy, green, citrus, aldehydic and floral with a sweet, fatty, coconut nuancek Plant metabolitek
benzene methanol C7H8O Sweet, floral, fruity with chemical nuancesk Plant metabolitek
benzeneethanol C8H10O Sweet, floral, fresh and bready with a rosey honey nuancek Plant metabolite;
An antimicrobial, antiseptic and disinfectantk
1-hexadecanol C16H34O Waxy, clean, greasy, floral, oilyk reduction of palmitic acidk
butyraldehyde C4H8O Pungent, cocoa, greenk reductase using p-nitrobenzaldehydek
2-methyl propanal C4H8O Fresh, aldehydic, floral, green, pungentk Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolitek
2-propenal C3H4O fruity, almond, cherryk xenobiotic metabolite and a herbicidek
2-methyl butanal C5H10O unpleasant notesd;
musty, rummy, nutty, cereal, caramellic, fruityk
plant metabolite, Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolitek
3-methylbutanal C5H10O unpleasant notesd;
fruity dry green chocolate nutty leafy cocoak
plant metabolite, Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolitek
pentanal C5H10O almond, malte;
winey, fermentedk
Protein kinase catalytic activityk
hexanal C6H12O green, appleb,e; fruity, pungent, bitterd;
grasse
HPL activity on 13-hydroperoxides, LA metabolism, LOXd
trans-2-pentenal C5H8O unpleasant notesd;
green plant, grassyh
Autoxidationd;
13-alkoxy radicalsk
cis-3-hexenal C6H10O fresh, green, herba,g HPL activity on 13-hydroperoxides, LnA metabolism, LOXd
heptanal C7H14O citrus, fatty, rancide;
green, grassy, clover cilantrok
lipid oxidationk
trans-2-hexenal C6H10O fruity, pungent, bitterd;
green, apple-like, almond, cut-grassf
α-LnA metabolism,
Isomerisation, LOXd
octanal C8H16O lemon, fatty, greene;
waxy, citrus, fruityk
plant metabolitek
trans-2-heptenal C7H12O unpleasant notesd;
soap, fat, almonde
monounsaturated fatty acid catabolism with -oxo groupk
nonanal C9H18O fat, citrus, greene;
fatty, waxy, pungentg
reduction of the carboxy group of nonanoic acidk
trans, trans-2,4-hexadienal C6H8O ripe-fruitb; Sweet, green, waxy, aldehydic with fresh melon nuancesk polyunsaturated fatty acid catabolismk
trans, 2-octenal C8H14O unpleasant notesd; fatty, citrus, peel, spicy, cucumberk antifungal agent
trans, trans-2,4-heptadienal C7H10O unpleasant notesd;
fatty, green, oily, greasyk
Autoxidationd
decanal C10H20O fatty, soapyh;
orange, peel, soap, tallowj
reduction of the carboxy group of capric acid (decanoic acid)k
trans, 2-nonenal C9H16O unpleasant notesd; tallowj;
Green, cucumber, aldehydic, fatty with a citrus nuancek
monounsaturated fatty acid catabolism with -oxo groupk
trans, 2-tridecenal C13H24O Aldehydic, citrus-Iike fatty, green and creamyk plant metabolitek
cis/trans, 2-decenal C10H18O soapy, fattyh; tallowj;
waxy, fatty, earthy, coriander, mushroom, green with a pork fat nuancek
Nature of some essential oilsk
trans, trans, 2,4-nonadienal C9H14O unpleasant notesd
fattyh; melon, waxyk
Lipid oxidationk
2-undecenal C11H20O olive, fattyh;
roasted, mango, waxy, citrus peel,k
Lipid oxidationk
trans, trans, 2,4-decadienal C10H16O unpleasant notesd;
fatty, solventh;
fried, waxy, oilyj,k
Lipid oxidationk
methyl benzene C7H8 - environmental pollution indicator & from insecticidesk
ethyl benzene C8H10 - environmental pollution indicator & from insecticidesk
xylene C8H10 Plastic, geraniumk from insecticides and pharmaceuticalsk
propyl benzene C9H12 - Simple form of phenylpropanoid lignin skeletonk
1,2,3-trimethyl benzene C9H12 - a neurotoxin and a plant metabolite; methylation of toluene and xylenesk
1,2,4-trimethyl benzene C9H12 - a neurotoxin and a plant metabolite; methylation of toluene and xylenesk
styrene C8H8 Sweet, balsamic, floral, plastick a plant metabolite and a mouse metabolite, an acyclic olefink
1,2,5-trimethyl benzene C9H12 - derivatization of benzene ring; oxidation of methyl groupsk
vanillin C8H8O3 Vanilla, sweet, spicy, phenolick a plant metabolite, an antioxidant and an anticonvulsantk
trans-α-bergamotene C15H24 woody, warmk a plant metabolitek
ethyl acetate C4H8O2 winey, vinegaryc,d;
sticky, sweetf
Anaerobic fermentationd
butyl acetate C6H12O2 sweet, ripe banana, tutti frutti, tropical and candy-like with green nuancesk Derivation of butan-1-olk
ethyl propionate C5H10O2 fruityc; etherial, fruity, sweet, winey, bubble gum, apple and grape nuancesk Derivation of ethanolk
hexyl acetate C8H16O2 fruityc 13-hydroperoxides, LA metabolism, LOXd
methyl heptanoate C8H16O2 pepper, sweet, fruit, green, orris, waxy, floral, berryk methylation of heptadecanoic acidk
methyl octanoate C9H18O2 waxy, green, sweet, orange, aldehydic, vegetable, herbalk Formal condensation of the carboxy group of octanoic acid with the hydroxyl group of methanolk
octyl formate C9H18O2 fruity, rose, orange, waxy, cucumberk Derivation of octan-1-olk
ethyl octadecanoate C20H40O2 waxyk Formal condensation between the carboxy group of octadecanoic (stearic) acid and the ydroxyl group of ethanol; a plant metabolitek
methyl nonanoate C10H20O2 winey, waxy, green celery and pear, with an unripe fruit nuancek formal condensation of methanol and nonanoic acidk
2-hydroxy methyl benzoate C8H8O3 Sweet, creamy, vanilla-like, spicy, woodyi Nature of fruiti
cis-3-hexene-1-ol acetate C8H14O2 banana-like, green, fruity, floral, esterf 13-hydroperoxides, LnA metabolism, LOX,
AAT activity on C6 alcoholsd
Hexanoic acid, 1-methylethyl ester C9H18O2 fruity, pineapple, berryk a plant metabolitek
2-pentyl furan C9H14O fruity, green, earthy, beany, vegetablek Aspergillus fumigatus infections; catabolic reactionsk
2-ethyl furan C6H8O sweet, burnt, earthy, maltyk a constituent of numerous plant speciesk
octane C8H18 gasolinei Xenobiotici
1,1-dimethyl-2-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-cyclopropane C9H16 - fragmentationk
decane C10H22 - fragmentationk
2-ethyl, 6-methyl, 1,5-heptadiene C10H18 - fragmentationk
3-ethyl, 1,5-octadiene C10H18 - a plant metabolitek
4,8-dimethyl, 1,7-nonadiene C11H20 - a constituent of aromatic oilsk
4,5-dimethyl, 2,6-octadiene C10H18 - fragmentationk
2-methyl, 6-methylene, 2-octene C10H18 - fragmentationk
trans-3-octadecene C18H36 - fragmentationk
3-carene C10H16 Citrus, sweet, terpenic, fir needlek Dimerization of C5 moleculesd; a plant metabolitek
docosane C22H46 waxyk a plant metabolite k
tetracosane C24H50 - a plant metabolite k
squalene C30H50 floralk olive metabolitek
pentacosane C25H52 waxyk a plant metabolite k
galangin C15H10O5 bitterk 7-hydroxyflavonol with additional hydroxy groups; an antimicrobial agent; a plant metabolitek
2-propanone C3H6O solvent, ethereal, apple, peark occurs naturally in plants, trees, forest fires, vehicle exhaustk
2-butanone C4H8O ethereal, fruity, camphoraceousk a bacterial metabolitek
2-pentanone C5H10O Sweet, fruity, ethereal, wine, banana, woodyk a plant metabolite k
3-pentanone C5H10O sweetb; ethereal, acetonek Triatoma brasiliensis, Triatoma infestans infections
4-methyl, 2-pentanone C6H12O Sharp, solvent-like with green, herbal, fruity and dairy nuancesk -
1-penten-3-one C5H8O sweet, strawberry, pungency, metallicb,c,d;
green, strawberry, sharpf
Prolonged contact with metal surfaced;
13-alcoxy radicalsk
2-heptanone C7H14O wet soilc Fungal activityc
2-octanone C8H16O unpleasant notesd;
musty, ketonic, cheesy, earthy, dairy
Lipid oxidationd
2-pentadecanone C15H30O Fatty, spicy, floralk a plant metabolite k
5-ethyl-(5h)-furan-2-one C6H8O2 Spicyk a plant metabolite k
6-methyl, 5-heptene-2-one C8H14O green-fruity, grasse a plant metabolite k
5-methyl, 4-hexene-3-one C7H12O - a plant metabolitek
acetic acid C2H4O2 winey-vinegaryc,d Anaerobic fermentationd
propanoic acid C3H6O2 unpleasant notesd;
rancid, soya, pungente
Anaerobic fermentationd
butanoic acid C4H8O2 unpleasant notesd
rancid, soya, pungente
Anaerobic fermentationd
hexanoic acid C6H12O2 oilyh Caproic acid is found naturally in various plantk
heptanoic acid C7H14O2 Cheesy, waxy, sweaty, fermented, pineapple, fruityk a C7, straight-chain fatty acid that contributes to the odour of some rancid oilsk
octanoic acid C8H16O2 Fatty, waxy, rancid, oily, cheesyk an antibacterial agent; a conjugate acid of an octanoatek
nonanoic acid C9H18O2 Waxy, dirty and cheesy with a cultured dairy nuancek herbicide; antifungalk
octadecanoic acid C18H36O2 Odourless, mild, fatty, waxyk Nature of some essential oilsk
6-octadecenoic acid C18H34O2 - Nature of some essential oilsk
cis-9-octadecenoic acid C18H34O2 Fatty, vegetable oilk Nature of some essential oilsk
trans-9-octadecenoic acid C18H34O2 - Nature of some essential oilsk
α-copaene C15H24 sweet, fruityh; woody, spicy, honeyk a plant metabolitek
zingiberene C15H24 floralh; spicy, fresh, sharpk a plant metabolitek
δ-curcumene C15H24 herbal k a plant metabolitek
α-Sesquiphellandrene C15H24 floralh a plant metabolitek
trans- caryophyllene C15H24 wood, oak, drya a plant metabolitek
funebrene C15H24 cedarwood, woodyk a plant metabolitek
β- himachalene C15H24 - a plant metabolitek
valencene C15H24 mint, orange blossomh a plant metabolitek
α-muurolene C15H24 Herbal, woody, spicyk a plant metabolitek
α-farnesene C15H24 floral, green plant, herbh Natural coating material of fruits for defencing against to fungal attacki
cadidene C15H24 wood, fragrant, flowerya a plant metabolitek
bisabolene C15H24 balsamic, woodyk a plant metabolitek
α-pinene C10H16 pine, fragrant, fresha; woody, herbal, spicy, tropicalk Dimerization of C5 moleculesd; a plant metabolitek
β-myrcene C10H16 balsamica Dimerization of C5 moleculesd; a plant metabolitek
limonene C10H16 sweet, citrusa Dimerization of C5 moleculesd; a plant metabolitek
trans-ocimene C10H16 herba Dimerization of C5 moleculesd; a plant metabolitek
α-terpinene C10H16 lemon, wooda Dimerization of C5 moleculesd; a plant metabolitek
linalool C10H18O lilac, lavenderf Phenolic-protein interactionsf

LOX: lipoxygenase enzymatic pathway; LA: Linoleic acid; LnA: Linolenic acid. HPL: hydroperoxide lyase; ADH: Alcohol dehydrogenase; AAT: alcohol acetyl transferase. aSong and Liu (2018); bRidolfi et al. (2002); cFEMA (2020); dBoskou (2012); eAparicio-Ruiz et al. (2018); fGenovese et al. (2018); gKalua et al. (2007); hKesen et al. (2013); iAbbatangelo et al. (2019); jZhu et al. (2016); k web sites (flavornet.org; pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; TGSC Information System).

Table 5.

Volatile profiles of Ayvalık VOOs, %.

Codes Aldehydes
Ketones
Esters
Alcohols
Organic Acid Terpene Benzene Ringed Furan Ringed Hydrocarbons
Total by LOX Total by LOX Total by LOX Total by LOX
GO1 28.40 h 78.14 H 4.03 d 46.17 H 0.71 j 46.11 A 15.01 c 62.64 F 3.21 e 8.53 h 2.36 m 0.73 h 37.02 e
GO2 30.03 g 84.82 C 3.57 e 43.59 J 1.28 g 2.91 L 13.76 e 62.61 F 3.29 d 11.15 g 2.79 i 1.35 c 32.78 g
GO3 31.19 e 76.32 I 3.10 f 34.09 L 0.82 i 42.46 C 13.72 f 60.92 G 6.61 b 5.70 k 10.40 a 1.25 d 27.22 h
GO4 23.94 j 81.32 G 9.48 a 33.04 M 0.31 k 23.08 D 26.71 a 57.78 H 2.81 f 6.89 i 10.30 b 0.54 j 19.03 i
GO5 23.28 k 78.12 H 2.51 j 42.18 K 0.85 i 4.54 I 15.20 b 48.63 K 2.55 g 14.58 d 7.76 c 0.53 j 32.74 g
GO6 31.19 e 61.84 L 3.11 f 52.28 F 0.69 j 6.55 H 12.86 g 62.94 E 2.79 f 4.15 l 2.46 l 1.14 e 41.61 d
GO7 35.00 d 72.89 J 2.31 k 73.95 C 2.50 c 4.32 J 13.99 d 52.24 I 8.54 a 12.99 e 2.67 j 3.75 a 18.23 j
GO8 7.50 m 83.41 E 0.43 m 0.00 N 0.02 l 0.00 N 8.05 k 65.92 D 0.70 i 0.32 n 2.56 k 0.09 k 80.32 a
GO9 27.62 i 83.51 D 1.87 l 74.32 B 0.92 h 3.01 K 12.20 h 38.73 L 2.00 h 2.51 m 4.53 f 1.06 f 47.30 b
GO10 35.77 c 65.87 K 3.02 g 44.21 I 2.04 d 11.86 F 5.80 l 85.42 B 4.52 c 32.48 b 4.45 g 0.01 l 11.90 l
GO11 21.20 l 87.36 A 2.61 i 68.85 D 1.37 f 1.47 M 2.24 n 50.28 J 0.28 j 38.14 a 1.10 n 0.00 l 33.06 f
GO12 30.90 f 82.44 F 2.69 h 55.87 E 1.78 e 44.98 B 10.13 i 34.53 M 2.08 h 6.14 j 3.58 h 0.67 i 42.04 c
GO13 47.45 a 86.66 B 5.31 b 46.97 G 6.04 b 10.84 G 8.22 j 76.11 C 0.00 k 12.45 f 5.24 e 0.87 g 14.41 k
GO14 42.65 b 83.43 E 4.85 c 91.11 A 6.49 a 12.66 E 5.18 m 92.06 A 0.74 i 21.53 c 5.67 d 1.48 b 11.42 m

LOX: lipoxygenase enzymatic pathway, Standard Deviations ≤0.2.

Means within a column with different letters are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).

Aldehydes were found the most abundant volatiles in "Ayvalık" VOOs. The aldehyde compounds (n:24) were detected with a total concentration of 11.77 ppm. The terpenes (n:18) were detected in a total amount of 8.08 ppm. So, terpenes were determined as the second abundant volatile group of "Ayvalık" VOOs. The alcohols (n:21) were isolated; however not all of them was generated by LOX reactions. Their concentration was 7.07 ppm. The benzene ringed compounds (n:10) were identified with a total amount of 2.83 ppm. 11 ketone, 11 acid, 12 ester, and 3 furan compounds were defined by approximately 1.63, 1.74, 0.71 and 0.23 ppm, respectively. Guclu et al. (2016) reported for Ayvalık VOOs obtained from different growing area (Mersin province) in Turkey that 6.3 ppm aldehyde, 6.2 ppm alcohol, 2.3 ppm terpene, 0.2 ppm ester, 0.002 ppm butanoic acid presence.

With another perspective, isolated organic volatile compounds namely, aldehydes, ketones, esters, alcohols, acids, terpenes, benzene and furan ringed contents, and straight hydrocarbons were totally found in this study that 100.38 ppm for GO1, 57.43 ppm for GO2, 81.62 ppm for GO3, 18.6 ppm for GO4, 135.09 ppm for GO5, 36.36 ppm for GO6, 41.39 ppm for GO7, 55.43 ppm for GO8, 50.67 ppm for GO9, 86.67 ppm for GO10, 42.92 ppm for GO11, 20.57 ppm for GO12, 13.74 ppm for GO13 and 12.17 ppm for GO14 growing areas, respectively. For "Ayvalık" VOOs, it could be seen from Figure 3a that aldehydes and alcohols were the most detected volatile group generated by LOX. At the same time, ester and ketone concentration were obviously varied between geographical origins. C5 and C6 aldehydes, ketones, alcohols and esters produced by LOX pathway gains to VOO fresh-green notes (cut grass, unripe fruit, almond), green-fruity notes (green, sweet, strawberry, herbal), green-fruity notes (leaf, grass, bitter, banana), fruity-floral notes (sweet, banana-tomato, flowery, species), respectively (Table 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Volatile profiles of Ayvalık VOOs; a) total amount (ppm) of volatiles b) total percentage of volatiles generated via LOX pathway.

As also shown at Figure 3b, GO1 and GO3 had well-balanced odour based on LOX volatiles. There were no ketone and ester compounds in volatile fraction of GO8 formed by LOX even any harvest year. Moreover, a little ester content was isolated from GO2, GO9 and GO11. The highest content of aldehydes was detected at GO11, the highest content of ketones at GO14, the highest content of esters at GO1, the highest content of alcohols at GO14 geographical origin. Most of terpene compounds stem from olive fruit as a plant metabolite (Table 4). In this study, the highest terpene contents were defined at GO11 and GO10 respectively (Table 5). These volatile compounds attributed with woody, herbal, spicy, sharp and floral odours (Table 4). It was characteristically found that "Ayvalık" VOOs contains 7.50–47.45% aldehydes, 0.32–38.14% terpenes, 2.24–26.71% alcohols, 1.10–10.40% benzene ringed compounds, 0.43–9.48% ketones, 0.00–8.54% organic acids, 0.02–6.49% esters, 0.00–3.75% furans. The rest of those had contained straight chain-hydrocarbons and some other fragmentation products. It was also observed that 61.84–87.36% of aldehydes, 0.00–91.11% of ketones, 0.00–46.11% of esters and 34.53–92.06% of alcohols were generated only by LOX pathway among investigated harvest seasons (Table 5).

4. Conclusions

A notable and comprehensive data set was generated including quality indices, oxidative properties, fatty acid and volatile profiles of “Ayvalık” VOOs by this presented research. 125 different volatile compounds were isolated and amounts were calculated. Their generation mechanisms were chemically defined. Aldehydes, terpenes and alcohols were found the most three abundant volatile groups. Overall high-quality “Ayvalık” VOOs can be described as full of positive attributes such as fresh, green, fruity, flowery notes. The major fatty acids were oleic, palmitic, linoleic, stearic and palmitoleic acids, respectively. Quality parameters and profile of fatty acids and volatiles isolated from “Ayvalık” EVOO showed a strong link with its geographical roots. It was expected that by this way, a rapid acceleration in the number of new geographical registrations, which is one of the most competitive economic strategies for value-added VOOs, linked “Ayvalık” variety.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Didar Üçüncüoğlu: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Dilek Sivri-Özay: Conceived and designed the experiments; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Funding statement

This work was financially supported by the Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies (TAGEM,) Research & Development Project (R&D 12–26), Turkey. The volatile analysis were funded by Hacettepe University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (Project, 1933), Turkey.

Competing interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

References

  1. Abbatangelo M., Nunez-Carmona E., Duina G., Sberveglieri V. Multidisciplinary approach to characterizing the fingerprint of Italian EVOO. Molecules. 2019;24:1457. doi: 10.3390/molecules24081457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkan D., Tokatli F., Ozen B. Phenolic characterization and geographical classification of commercial extra virgin olive oils produced in Turkey. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2012;89:261–268. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andjelkovic M., Acun S., Van Hoed V., Verhé R., Van Camp J. Chemical composition of Turkish olive oil-Ayvalik. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2009;86:135–140. [Google Scholar]
  4. Aparicio-Ruiz R., Garcia-Gonzalez D.L., Morales M.T., Lobo-Prieto A., Romero I. Comparison of two analytical methods validated for the determination of volatile compounds in virgin olive oil: GC-FID vs GC-MS. Talanta. 2018;187:133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barbieri S., Bendini A., Toschi T.G. Recent amendment to product specification of Brisighella PDO: focus on phenolic compound and sensory aspects. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2019;121:1800328. [Google Scholar]
  6. Boskou D. InTech Book; 2012. Olive Oil-Constituents, Quality, Health Properties and Bioconversions, Chapter II: Olive Oil Composition: Volatile Compounds; pp. 17–46. [Google Scholar]
  7. Corominas-Faja B., Cuyas E., Lozano-Sanchez J., Cufi S., Verdura S., Fernandez-Arroyo S., Borras-Linares I., Martin-Castillo B., Martin A.G., Lupu R., Nonell-Canals A., Sanchez-Martinez M., Micol V., Joven J., Segura-Carretero A., Menendez J.A. Extra-virgin olive oil contains a metabolo-epigenetic inhibitor of cancer stem cells. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39(4):601–613. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgy023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dıraman H., Saygı H., Hışıl Y. Geographical classification of Turkish virgin olive oils from Aegean region for two harvest years based on their fatty acid profiles. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2011;88:1905–1915. [Google Scholar]
  9. EEC Regulation 2095 Amending regulation of EEC No: 2568/91. Offic. J. Eur. Commun. 2016;326:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAOSTAT . 2020. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home Retrieved from. (Accessed June 2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. FEMA . 2020. The Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association of the United States, The Flavor Ingredient Library.https://www.femaflavor.org/flavor-library Retrieved from. [Google Scholar]
  12. Genovese A., Yang N., Linforth R., Sacchi R., Fisk I. The role of phenolic compounds on olive oil aroma release. Food Res. Int. 2018;112:319–327. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guclu G., Sevindik O., Kelebek H., Selli S. Determination of volatiles by odor activity value and phenolics of cv. Ayvalik early-harvest olive oil. Foods. 2016;5:46–59. doi: 10.3390/foods5030046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gurdeniz G., Ozen B., Tokatli F. Comparison of fatty acid profiles and mid-infrared spectral data for classification of olive oils. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2010;122:218–226. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hernáez A., Valussi J., Perez-Vega A., Castener O., Fito M. Olive oil and health effects. In: Merillion J.M., Ramawat K., editors. Bioactive Molecules in Food, Reference Series in Phytochemistry. Springer; Cham: 2019. pp. 1071–1096. [Google Scholar]
  16. International Olive Council, IOC . 2001. Preparation of the Fatty Acid Methyl Esters from Olive Oil and Olive Pomace Oil. COI/T.20/Doc No.24. [Google Scholar]
  17. International Olive Council, IOC . 2015. Trade Standard Applying to Olive Oils and Olive Pomace Oils. COI/T.15/NC No: 3/Rev: 8. [Google Scholar]
  18. International Olive Council, IOC . 2015. Method of Analysis Spectrophotometric Investigation in the Ultraviolet COI/T20/Doc. No. 19/Rev.3. [Google Scholar]
  19. International Olive Council, IOC . 2016. Determination of Peroxide Value COI/T.20/Doc. No: 35. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kalua C.M., Allen M.S., Bedgood D.R., Bishop A.G., Prenzler P.D., Robard S.K. Olive oil volatile compounds, flavour development and quality: a critical review. Food Chem. 2007;100:273–286. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kesen S., Kelebek H., Sen K., Ulas M., Selli S. GC-MS-Olfactometric characterisation of the key aroma compounds in Turkish olive oils by application of the aroma extract dilution analysis. Food Res. Int. 2013;54:1987–1994. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kıralan M., Bayrak A. Oxidative and antiradical stabilities of two important virgin olive oils from Ayvalik and Memecik olive cultivars in Turkey. Int. J. Food Prop. 2013;16:649–657. [Google Scholar]
  23. Likudis Z. Intech Open Book Series, Chapter 10. 2016. Olive oils with protected designation of origin (PDO) and protected geographical indication (PGI) pp. 175–190. [Google Scholar]
  24. Naskali E. Kitapevi Press; 2016. Türkiye’de yetişen zeytin çeşitlerinin özellikleri ve coğrafi dağılışı; pp. 37–80. [Google Scholar]
  25. Oğraş Ş., Kaban G., Kaya M. The effects of geographic region, cultivar and harvest year on fatty acid composition of olive oil. J. Oleo Sci. 2016;65(11):889–895. doi: 10.5650/jos.ess15270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ridolfi M., Terenziani S., Patumi M., Fontanazza G. Characterization of the lipoxygenases in some olive cultivars and determination of their role in volatile compounds formation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002;50:835–839. doi: 10.1021/jf0109118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sanaeifar A., Jafari A. Determination of the oxidative stability of olive oil using an integrated system based on dielectric spectroscopy and computer vision. Inf. Process. Agric. 2019;6(1):20–25. [Google Scholar]
  28. Song H., Liu J. GC-O-MS technique and its applications in food flavor analysis. Food Res. Int. 2018;114:187–198. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Soto-Alarcon S.A., Valenzuela R., Valenzuela A., Videla L.A. Liver protective effects of extra virgin olive oil: interaction between its chemical composition and the cell-signaling pathways involved in protection. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. - Drug Targets. 2018;18(1):75-84. doi: 10.2174/1871530317666171114120552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. The Good Scents Company Information System, TGSC . 2020. Providing Information for the Flavor, Fragrance, Food and Cosmetic Industries.http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/search2.html Retrieved from. (Accessed June 2020) [Google Scholar]
  31. Toker C., Aksoy U., Ertaş H. The effect of fruit ripening, altitude and harvest year on volatile compounds of virgin olive oil obtained from the Ayvalik variety. Flavour Fragrance J. 2016;31:195–205. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tsartsou E., Proutsos N., Castanas E., Kampa M. Network meta-analysis of metabolic effects of olive-oil in humans shows the importance of olive oil consumption with moderate polyphenol levels as part of the mediterranean diet. Front. Nutr. Clin. Nutr. 2019;6:6. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. TURKPATENT, Turkish Patent and Trademark Authority. 2020. https://www.ci.gov.tr/ Retrieved from. (Accessed June 2020) [Google Scholar]
  34. Ucuncuoglu D. Mass spectroscopic evaluation of virgin olive oils (VOOs) fatty acid profile in terms of cultivar, geographical origin, extraction and packaging Type. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2019;7(5):783–788. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhu H., Wang C.S., Shoemaker C.F. Volatile constituents in sensory defective virgin olive oils. Flavour Fragrance J. 2016;31:22–30. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES