Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2020 Sep 18;88(10):e00352-20. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00352-20

Differential Induction of Type I and III Interferons by Staphylococcus aureus

Adeline Peignier a, Paul J Planet b,c,d, Dane Parker a,
Editor: Victor J Torrese
PMCID: PMC7504949  PMID: 32690637

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of bacterial pneumonia, and we have shown previously that type I interferon (IFN) contributes to the pathogenesis of this disease. In this study, we screened 75 S. aureus strains for their ability to induce type I and III IFN. Both cytokine pathways were differentially stimulated by various S. aureus strains independently of their isolation sites or methicillin resistance profiles. These induction patterns persisted over time, and type I and III IFN generation differentially correlated with tumor necrosis factor alpha production.

KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, pneumonia, lung, host-pathogen interactions, type I interferon, type III interferon, VISA, vancomycin

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of bacterial pneumonia, and we have shown previously that type I interferon (IFN) contributes to the pathogenesis of this disease. In this study, we screened 75 S. aureus strains for their ability to induce type I and III IFN. Both cytokine pathways were differentially stimulated by various S. aureus strains independently of their isolation sites or methicillin resistance profiles. These induction patterns persisted over time, and type I and III IFN generation differentially correlated with tumor necrosis factor alpha production. Investigation of one isolate, strain 126, showed a significant defect in type I IFN induction that persisted over several time points. The lack of induction was not due to differential phagocytosis, subcellular location, or changes in endosomal acidification. A correlation between reduced type I IFN induction levels and decreased autolysis and lysostaphin sensitivity was found between strains. Strain 126 had a decreased rate of autolysis and increased resistance to lysostaphin degradation and host cell-mediated killing. This strain displayed decreased virulence in a murine model of acute pneumonia compared to USA300 (current epidemic strain and commonly used in research) and had reduced capacity to induce multiple cytokines. We observed this isolate to be a vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strain, and reduced Ifnb was observed with a defined mutation in walK that induces a VISA phenotype. Overall, this study demonstrates the heterogeneity of IFN induction by S. aureus and uncovered an interesting property of a VISA strain in its inability to induce type I IFN production.

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is a versatile bacterium, found as a commensal in 20% to 60% of the population, and it is also responsible for a variety of clinical manifestations, ranging from skin and soft-tissue infections to invasive diseases such as bacteremia, pneumonia, and sepsis (1, 2). Since its emergence in the 1960s, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has globally disseminated and has become a major cause of bacterial infections in health care and community settings (3). MRSA strains are often also resistant to several other antibiotic classes, which has significant implications for current and future treatments. Furthermore, individuals colonized with MRSA have an increased risk of subsequent infection and are an important source of person-to-person transmission (4). Notably, in the United States 613,210 S. aureus-related hospitalizations were recorded in 2014, 58% of which were caused by MRSA strains (5).

Type I and type III interferon (IFN) responses are induced during S. aureus infection and contribute to pathogenesis in murine models of acute pneumonia (69). In humans, type I IFNs are composed of 17 subtypes, including 13 subtypes of IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-ε, IFN-κ, and IFN-ω, that all signal through a common receptor, IFNAR (10). Type III IFNs are composed of 4 members, IFN-λ1, IFN-λ2, IFN-λ3, and IFN-λ4, that also all signal through a shared receptor, IFNLR (11, 12). Despite their different receptors, many of the signals leading to type I and type III IFN transcription overlap (13, 14). However, the kinetics of induction of their downstream genes differ. Induction of type I IFN-stimulated genes (ISG) peaks early and then declines, whereas type III IFN induces a more sustained response (15, 16).

Previous studies by our group have shown that type I IFN activation in response to S. aureus is not limited to a single receptor (6, 7). Comparison of the epidemic isolate of MRSA, USA300, along with a clinical isolate identified differential activation of the pathway (7). This difference in cytokine induction was linked to recognition of specific bacterial components, namely, DNA and peptidoglycan, through different pathogen recognition receptors (PRR) (6, 7). It was also observed that a strain with a greater propensity to undergo autolysis induced stronger type I IFN signaling (6). However, the extent of type III IFN signaling by S. aureus strains was not determined.

In this study, we report the heterogeneity of type I and type III IFN induction capacities among S. aureus clinical isolates. We identify and characterize a strain that displays reduced type I IFN induction while preserving type III IFN signaling. We show that the inability of this strain to induce type I IFN is associated with increased vancomycin resistance that reduces bacterial autolysis and protects the bacterium from host cell killing.

RESULTS

S. aureus strains can induce a broad range of interferon levels.

Our prior work identified two distinct S. aureus strains that differentially induce type I IFN production in various cell types (6, 7). To have a better understanding of the global IFN responses induced by S. aureus strains in eukaryotic cells, we measured the type I (IFN-β) and type III (IFN-λ) IFN responses induced by S. aureus USA300 (commonly used in research) and compared them to those induced by a panel of 75 S. aureus clinical isolates. We also monitored tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels as a general readout for inflammation. We observed that the intensity of type I and type III IFN responses varied significantly from strain to strain (Fig. 1A; see also Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Interestingly, strains that induced a strong cytokine response for one type of interferon did not necessarily induce a significant response for the other type, suggesting differential induction pathways. These data demonstrated that interferon induction is not a conserved response between strains of S. aureus.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Type I and III interferons are differentially induced in BMDCs by various S. aureus clinical isolates. BMDC were stimulated with a panel of 75 S. aureus strains for 24 h. Cytokines were quantified in the supernatant by ELISA, and concentrations were normalized to cytokine production induced by USA300 stimulation. (A) Heat map showing the mean IFN-β and IFN-λ concentrations induced by S. aureus strains (n = 5 for each strain). (B to D) IFN-λ, IFN-β, and TNF-α levels (respectively) induced by S. aureus strains grouped by their body isolation site (AD site, n = 13; blood, n = 8; nares, n = 11; perianal, n = 6; skin, n = 6; pneumonia, n = 12; wound abscess, n = 2). (E to G) IFN-λ, IFN-β, and TNF-α levels induced by S. aureus strains in relation to their methicillin resistance profile (MRSA, n = 37; MSSA, n = 23). Each dot represents a strain. Data are shown as the pooled means ± standard errors of the means (SEM) from at least 2 independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using Kruskal-Wallis test (B to D) or Mann-Whitney test (E to J). *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001.

As bacteria can upregulate or downregulate specific factors to adapt to environmental conditions, we tested if the body site from which clinical strains were isolated could have an impact on the induction of these cytokines. We sorted the clinical strains into 7 distinct categories based on their body isolation sites and compared the levels of IFN-β, IFN-λ, and TNF-α produced by each group (Fig. 1B to D). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for either cytokine. We also looked at the relationship between clonal complexes and IFN induction but did not find any significant correlation (data not shown). Methicillin resistance has been linked to the production of factors that may affect the general stress response of certain Gram-positive bacteria (4, 17, 18). We separated the clinical isolates based on their methicillin resistance profiles and compared their levels of cytokine induction (Fig. 1E to G). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups for both types of IFN, but methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains induced more TNF-α than methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains (median concentration of TNF-α induced by MRSA was 0.798 and by MSSA was 1.008; P < 0.01) (Fig. 1G).

While type I and type III IFN are recognized by distinct receptors, their induction relies on many common pathogen recognition receptors and transcriptional regulators (1923). Therefore, it is expected that their expression is linked. However, as shown in Fig. 1A, strains that induced a strong response for one type of interferon did not necessarily induce a significant response for the other type. We decided to examine these cytokine elicitation patterns in more detail by comparing the induction results for each pair of cytokines throughout the population. TNF-α and IFN-β inductions were positively correlated (Spearman rs = 0.333, P = 0.009, rs2 = 0.110; Fig. S2A), while TNF-α and IFN-λ induction were negatively correlated (Spearman rs = −0.405, P = 0.0014, rs2 = 0.164; Fig. S2B). This suggests that strains that induced higher levels of IFN-β also induced a stronger TNF-α response, whereas strains that induced higher levels of IFN-λ induced a lower TNF-α response. Finally, IFN-λ and IFN-β induction patterns did not show any significant correlation (Spearman rs = −0.197, P = 0.3611, rs2 = 0.014; Fig. S2C). As type I and type III IFN have distinct kinetics of induction (24), we selected 6 representative strains and quantified their patterns of type I and type III IFN induction in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDC) at different time points (Fig. S2D). After 24 h, IFN-λ and IFN-β induction patterns of the selected strains did not show any significant correlation (Spearman rs = −0.1857, P = 0.3256, rs2 = 0.034; Fig. S2D), consistent with the previous observation (Fig. S2C). However, after 48 h, a positive correlation of IFN-λ and IFN-β induction patterns was observed (Spearman rs = 0.488, P = 0.006, rs2 = 0.238; Fig. S2D), corroborating prior experiments (25).

Strain 126 displays a constitutively dampened type I interferon response despite localizing to the same subcellular compartment as USA300.

Our results suggest that over time, the induction of type I and type III interferon is linked. However, in our screen of clinical isolates, we observed that when BMDC were exposed to strain number 126, lower IFN-β levels were produced compared to those of USA300 despite analogous levels of IFN-λ (Fig. S1). This defect could be the result of impaired cytokine induction or degradation. To answer this question, we analyzed the induction of Ifnb mRNA by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) and found that cells stimulated with 126 induced 15-fold less Ifnb (P ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 2A) than USA300. We also investigated if this decrease in type I IFN was due to differences in induction kinetics between the strains. Levels of IFN-β produced by BMDC after incubation with both strains were measured over time (Fig. 2B). USA300 induced stable production of IFN-β for the first 24 h and then dropped by 59% at 48 h. In contrast, IFN-β induction by 126 was significantly reduced compared to that of USA300 (92 to 98% decrease at each time point) (Fig. 2B). Meanwhile, both strains induced similar levels of IFN-λ for 24 h before levels triggered by 126 dropped at 48 h (Fig. 2C). Both strains induced similar levels of TNF-α throughout the experiment, indicating equivalent capacities to induce inflammation (Fig. 2D).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Strain 126 localizes in the same cellular compartment as USA300 but induces reduced cytokine production. (A) BMDC were stimulated with USA300 (n = 6) or 126 (n = 6). Induction of Ifnb mRNA was analyzed by qRT-PCR after 2 h. (B to D) IFN-β, IFN-λ, and TNF-α levels were quantified by ELISA from the supernatant of BMDC stimulated with either USA300 (n = 5) or 126 (n = 5) after 4, 16, 24, or 48 h. (E and F) AF647-labeled USA300 (n = 6) or 126 (n = 6) was incubated with BMDC. After 5 or 30 min, fluorescence was quantified by flow cytometry (in APC channel). Levels of phagocytosis were determined by the percentage of AF647-positive cells (E) and by the mean fluorescence intensity of the AF647-positive cells (F). Statistical significance was assessed using 2-way RM-ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple-comparison test. (G) AF647-labeled S. aureus (green) was visualized inside BMM after 30 min in the presence of AF555 LAMP-1 (red) and DAPI (blue). Data are representative of 2 independent experiments. (H and I) BMDC were incubated with USA300 or 126 in the presence of LysoLive pH-sensor green. After 2 h, fluorescence was observed by flow cytometry. Endosomal acidification was determined by the percentage of FITC-positive cells (H) and by the mean fluorescence intensity of the FITC-positive cells (I). Data are shown as one representative graph from at least 2 independent experiments (control, n = 2; USA300, n = 3; 126, n = 3). All other data are shown as the pooled means ± standard errors of the means (SEM) from at least 2 independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed using Mann-Whitney test for the qRT-PCR experiment, 2-way RM-ANOVA test followed by Sidak’s multiple-comparison test for the kinetics and phagocytosis experiments, and unpaired Student's t test for the endosomal acidification experiment. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001.

The cellular location of bacteria influences their capacity to activate type I IFN signaling (6, 7, 26). To ascertain if the difference in signaling between the strains was due to differential uptake, we quantified phagocytosis by using flow cytometry. We observed that 126 was phagocytosed 40% more than USA300 after 30 min (P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 2E). Furthermore, the cells containing 126 displayed a significantly increased mean fluorescent intensity (MFI; 2.2-fold higher, P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 2F), suggesting more 126 than USA300 bacterial cells occupied each mammalian cell. As a control, no statistically significant difference in MFI was observed between the bacterial strains (data not shown), indicating equivalent dye labeling. These results suggest that although both strains can be phagocytosed by mammalian cells, 126 was more readily phagocytosed than USA300. To determine if the subcellular location of the strains was different, we performed confocal microscopy on cells infected with AF647-labeled USA300 or 126 for 30 min and stained for LAMP-1, a lysosome-endosome protein (Fig. 2G). We found that both strains colocalized with LAMP-1-positive compartments within the cell, suggesting that both strains were found in the endosomes. Although both strains were localized to the same compartment, they may be processed or handled differently by the host cell. To determine if endosomal acidification was altered by 126, we used LysoLive pH-sensor (Marker Gene), a fluorescent dye that concentrates in acidic organelles. No significant differences in acidification were observed between cells stimulated by either strain (Fig. 2H and I). These data identify an S. aureus strain that constitutively triggers low levels of IFN-β production. The cause of this dampened induction was not related to the localization of the bacteria within the cell, since both strains were found to be directed to the late endosomes whose pH was unaltered.

Strain 126 is resistant to autolysis and cell wall digestion.

In a previous study, we observed that increased IFN-β induction was related to enhanced release of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) via bacterial autolysis (7). Given strain 126 has limited ability to induce type I IFN signaling, we hypothesized that the autolysis profile of strain 126 would be reduced. To test this, we subjected USA300 and 126 to an autolysis assay and observed that, over time, the optical density (OD) of 126 had only decreased by 25.5% versus 56.47% for USA300 (P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 3A). We sought to determine if the decreased autolysis displayed by 126 could also translate into decreased sensitivity to lysostaphin. Lysostaphin is an endopeptidase capable of cleaving pentaglycine bridges located in the cell wall of staphylococci, leading to rapid lysis of bacteria (27). To answer this question, we determined the lysostaphin MICs for both strains. We found that the lysostaphin MIC of USA300 in a microtiter plate assay was 62.5 ng/ml compared to 125 ng/ml for 126 (P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 3B). We also conducted bacterial viability tube assays with a range of lysostaphin concentrations. At 0.12 μg/ml, we observed over 1,500-fold more viable 126 bacteria than USA300 (P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 3C). Consistent with the enhanced resistance to lysostaphin, 126 was also more resistant to host cell killing. In our extracellular killing assay using BMDC, we observed that while USA300 had 12% of the initial inoculum remaining after 4 h, 126 had proliferated to reach 183% of the initial inoculum (P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 3D). These data indicate 126 has a more resilient cell wall that, with reduced autolysis, prevents release of cellular contents to activate type I IFN.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Low-IFN-β-inducing strain displays increased resistance to autolysis and lysostaphin. (A) Autolysis assay (USA300, n = 3; 126, n = 3). (B and C) Lysostaphin MICs of USA300 (n = 6) and 126 (n = 6) were determined by bacterial growth inhibition (B) and dilution plating (C). Statistical significance was assessed using 2-way RM-ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple-comparison test. (D) BMDC were incubated with USA300 (n = 6) or 126 (n = 6). Bacterial survival was determined after 4 h. Statistical significance was assessed using unpaired Student's t test. (E to H) BMDC were stimulated with USA300 (n = 6) or 126 (n = 6), and cytokines were quantified in the supernatant by multiplex ELISA after 24 h. Results are presented as a heat map of mean normalized concentrations (E) or mean IL-1β, IL-10, and MIP-1β concentrations and SEM (F to H). Statistical significance was assessed using unpaired Student's t test. All results are representative of at least 2 independent experiments. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001.

We explored further the diminished capacity of 126 to activate the host response and whether this was limited to type I IFN. BMDC were stimulated with USA300 and 126 for 24 h and cytokines quantified by multiplex enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We observed that USA300 induced an overall stronger cytokine response than 126 (Fig. 3E and Fig. S3). Proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (77.79% reduction; P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 3F) and IFN-γ (70.84% reduction; P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 3G) were reduced. This was also the case for anti-inflammatory cytokines; IL-10 was reduced by 57.26% (P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 3G). Several other cytokines were also decreased in response to 126 compared to wild-type (WT) USA300 (Fig. S3). Only one cytokine was induced at a statistically significant higher level by 126 than USA300: macrophage inflammatory protein 1β (MIP-1β) (Fig. 3H) was 58.89% higher (P < 0.05). These results suggest that the increased resistance to cellular damage and killing of 126 prevents its degradation and release of products that activate the innate immune response.

Strain 126 has reduced virulence in vivo.

Strain 126 displays increased resistance to cellular degradation as well as dampened ability to induce specific cytokine responses. These factors suggest an increased ability to evade immune defenses in vivo. However, type I IFN signaling has been shown to be deleterious in the context of S. aureus respiratory infections (6, 7). As 126 induces a diminished IFN-β response, it could also be cleared more readily by the host. To test this, we compared the virulence of 126 to USA300 in our model of acute pneumonia. After 24 h of infection, we observed a 5-fold reduction in bacterial burden in the bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) (P ≤ 0.01) and 54-fold less 126 bacteria in lung tissue (P < 0.0001) than USA300 (Fig. 4A and B). This decreased bacterial burden of strain 126 was also accompanied by a significant decrease in neutrophil and monocyte numbers in the airway (59.90% and 42.33% decrease, respectively, P ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 4C and D). We also observed decreased numbers of Ly6C-negative monocytes and natural killer cells (Fig. 4E and F), while all other cell populations were unchanged between the two strains (Fig. S4A to E). To determine if these differences in cellular recruitment were specific to 126 or just a by-product of its enhanced clearance, we infected mice for 4 h with either USA300 or 126. Even at this early time point, enhanced clearance of 126 was evident, being 13.6-fold less in BALF (P ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 4G) and 8.2-fold less in the lung (P ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 4H). At this 4-h time point, no differences were observed in any of the airway cell populations (Fig. 4I to L and Fig. S4F to J). These data show that 126 is more readily cleared than USA300 and evokes a reduced host response in vivo due to its rapid clearance.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Strain 126 displays decreased virulence in vivo. Mice were inoculated intranasally with 107 CFU of either USA300 (n = 14) or 126 (n = 15), and the response to infection was assessed 24 h later. Bacteria were enumerated from the BALF (A) and lung homogenates (B) by dilution plating. (C to F) Cell populations were determined using flow cytometry analysis from BAL samples. Statistical analyses were performed using a Mann-Whitney test. (G to L) Mice were infected intranasally with 107 CFU of either USA300 (n = 5) or 126 (n = 6) for 4 h. Bacterial burdens in the BALF (G) and lung homogenates (H) were quantified by dilution plating. (I to L) Cell populations were determined using flow cytometry analysis from BAL samples. Each dot represents a mouse. All data are shown as the pooled means ± SEM from at least 2 independent experiments. Dashed lines mark cell numbers in naive mice. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann-Whitney test. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001.

VISA strains are low inducers of type I IFN.

Vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strains are known to have a thickened cell wall that prevents diffusion of vancomycin as well as a reduction in autolytic activity (28, 29). Based on our data, we hypothesized that the phenotype of 126 could have enhanced resistance to vancomycin. The vancomycin MIC of 126 was found to be 4 μg/ml, consistent with it being a VISA strain (30), compared to 2 μg/ml for USA300. We confirmed this result using a MIC plate strip test (Etest) and again observed 126 to possess increased resistance to vancomycin, with a MIC of 6 μg/ml, compared to USA300 at 2 μg/ml (Fig. 5A). To determine if lower IFN-β induction was unique to 126 or common to all VISA strains, we incubated BMDC with a panel of VISA strains for 24 h and quantified cytokines in the supernatant. All VISA strains showed a statistically significant reduction in IFN-β levels compared to USA300 (between 2- and 33-fold less than USA300, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 5B). While we observed some variations in TNF-α production (Fig. 5D), all VISA strains induced levels of IFN-λ similar to those of USA300 (Fig. 5C).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus strains have dampened IFN-β induction. (A) Vancomycin sensitivity profiles were evaluated using E tests. Arrows indicate the lowest antibiotic concentrations inducing growth inhibition. (B to D) BMDC were stimulated with a panel of 7 vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus strains at an MOI of 10 for 24 h (USA300, n = 5; 126, n = 5; VISA 1 to 7, n = 6). Cytokines were quantified in the supernatant by ELISA, and concentrations were normalized to cytokine production induced by USA300 stimulation. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. (E) IFN-β levels were quantified by ELISA from the supernatant of BMDC stimulated with either NRS384 (n = 6), NRS384 WalKG223D (n = 6), or mock PBS (n = 6) after 24 h. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student's t test. (F and G) BMDC were stimulated with NRS384 (n = 3) or NRS384 WalKG223D (n = 3). Induction of Ifnb (F) and Tnf (G) was analyzed by qRT-PCR after 2 h. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired Student's t test. (H) Autolysis assay expressed as percentage of starting OD600 after 3 h (NRS384, n = 4; NRS384 WalKG223D, n = 4). Statistical significance was assessed using unpaired Student's t test. (I) Lysostaphin inhibition of NRS384 (n = 4) and NRS384 WalKG223D (n = 4) was determined by bacterial growth inhibition. (J) BMDC were stimulated with a panel of vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus strains (VSSA) (n = 7) or with a panel of vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus strains (VISA) (n = 8) at an MOI of 10 for 24 h. Interferon β production was quantified in the supernatant by ELISA. Each dot represents a strain. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann-Whitney test. (K) Relationship between IFN-β induction and autolysis susceptibility (percentage of starting OD after 3 h) (n = 20). Each dot represents a strain (VISA and VSSA included). (L) Relationship between IFN-β induction and lysostaphin sensitivity (OD600 after 16 h of exposure to lysostaphin [62.5 ng/ml]) (n = 20). Each dot represents a strain (VISA and VSSA included). Data are shown as the pooled means ± SEM from at least 2 independent experiments. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001.

WalK is the transmembrane sensor histidine kinase component of a well-conserved two-component regulatory system, WalKR, essential for bacterial survival and involved in regulating peptidoglycan synthesis (3133). In S. aureus, mutations in the walKR locus are associated with a vancomycin-intermediate resistance phenotype (34). A single-nucleotide change in walK or walR is sufficient to develop a VISA phenotype, thickened cell wall, reduced autolysis, and diminished virulence (35). As further evidence that VISA strains have a reduced capacity to induce type I IFN signaling, we studied a mutant in WalK, WalKG223D, which exhibits reduced autophosphorylation/phosphotransfer (35). We incubated BMDC with S. aureus NRS384 (WT to mutant) or NRS384 WalKG223D for 24 h and quantified the amount of type I IFN produced by the cells. We found that the WalKG223D strain triggered significantly lower production of IFN-β (61.23% reduction compared to the WT, P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 5E), and this was also seen at the transcriptional level, with a 49% reduction in Ifnb expression (P ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 5F). However, no significant changes in mRNA levels of Tnf were observed (Fig. 5G). We also found that NRS384 WalKG223D was significantly less susceptible to autolysis and lysostaphin degradation than its wild-type counterpart (Fig. 5H and I). To test if this observation could be applied to a more general population, we compared the levels of IFN-β induced by a panel of vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus strains (VSSA) and a panel of VISA strains. We detected a significant reduction in IFN-β production by BMDC when the cells were exposed to VISA strains compared to that for VSSA strains (P ≤ 0.01) (Fig. 5J). We also analyzed the relationship between IFN-β induction and autolysis and lysostaphin susceptibility across both VSSA and VISA strains and found a significant correlation between decreased type I IFN induction and autolysis and lysostaphin resistance (Fig. 5K and L). To confirm the relationship between autolysis and IFN-β induction, we used an atl mutant, USA300 JE2 atl::erm, defective in the major autolysin, and its wild-type counterpart, USA300 JE2. We incubated each strain with BMDC and measured the amount of Ifnb mRNA they induced after 2 h (Fig. S5). The autolysis mutant displayed a significant decrease in Ifnb induction compared to that of the WT strain, indicating that autolysis plays a role in type I IFN induction. These results suggest that impaired ability to induce IFN-β production is a common feature of VISA strains and correlates with increased resistance to autolysis.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we provide evidence linking enhanced resistance to vancomycin, as observed in VISA strains, and reduced type I IFN production. This phenomenon was identified through a screen of S. aureus isolates of diverse backgrounds showing that activation of this pathway is not homogeneous among the species.

We started our study by examining a panel of S. aureus clinical isolates for their ability to induce IFN-β and IFN-λ and observed a heterogeneity of induction of both cytokines among the strains. Given the contributing role for interferon signaling in the pathogenesis of S. aureus pneumonia (69), we had expected that certain isolates had inherently higher induction capacities, but this spectrum of induction was evident across all sample groups. IFN-β induction appeared to positively correlate with TNF-α induction, whereas IFN-λ induction followed the opposite trend. IFN-β and IFN-λ induction did not show any correlation for the first 24 h of the experiment but showed a positive correlation after 48 h. This supported previous observations that indicated a common path of induction for type I and type III IFN signaling, as well as differences in kinetics between IFN-β and IFN-λ (2125). However, we did observe a disconnect between type I and type III IFN signaling, such that the strain we focused on, 126, still induced IFN-λ while not inducing IFN-β. A cytosolic DNA sensor, Ku70, has been shown to induce type III IFN signaling preferentially over type I IFN signaling in the context of HIV infection (36). This induction has also been shown to be STING dependent (37). It could be that the two strains, due to their different induction properties, activate signaling through different innate receptors. S. aureus is typically phagocytosed and degraded in the phagolysosomes; however, occurrences of phagosomal and cytosolic persistence have been described (38, 39). Given the enhanced resilience of strain 126, as seen in lysostaphin sensitivity and host cell killing, this could justify the recognition of the bacterium by cytoplasmic sensors and, therefore, the privileged induction of type III IFN signaling.

While IFN-β induction varied across VSSA strains, the VISA isolates tested in this study displayed a reduced propensity to activate the type I IFN response. VISA strains are characterized by a thickened cell wall, reduced autolysis, and diminished virulence (40, 41). The cell wall changes consist of an accumulation of d-Ala-d-Ala targets due to decreased cross-linking of peptidoglycan, increased proportion of nonamidated muropeptides, and decreased alanylation of teichoic acid. As a result, the cell wall is strengthened and vancomycin binding sites are reduced (4244). This feature could also act to prevent degradation of the bacterial cell. Although we showed that strain 126 localized within the mammalian cell in a location similar to that of USA300, the kinetics at which it is degraded are likely to be slower, as indicated in our killing assay. The decreased autolysis by 126 would also lead to a reduction in release of cell wall fragments capable of activating the immune response. Autolytic activity has been shown to release extracellular DNA (45, 46) and peptides from peptidoglycan (47), both ligands that we have shown to lead to activation of type I IFN signaling by S. aureus through TLR9 and NOD2 (6, 7). It has also been observed by other groups that resistance to lysozyme can inhibit activation of type I IFN signaling (48). USA300 is resistant to lysozyme degradation, with 126 expressing less of the peptidoglycan O-acetyltransferase A that contributes to resistance (data not shown), indicating we were observing a separate mechanism behind decreased interferon activation.

VISA strains have been associated with differential cell adherence, division, biofilm formation, and virulence, leading to other phenotypes, such as growth as multicellular aggregates instead of regularly shaped and well-separated cocci (40). If the bacterial cells are not found as distinct entities but rather as microbial clusters, this could explain why increased phagocytosis was observed for 126 compared to USA300. We observed strain 126 to also have decreased virulence in vivo, which is characteristic of VISA isolates (41). However, in this context, in vivo attenuation cannot directly be assigned to the VISA phenotype. Vancomycin susceptibility along with the differing cell wall properties may be only one of the many factors that differ between the strains. One element of the immune response that would benefit the host would be the decreased type I IFN. As we have shown before, type I IFN signaling contributes to pathogenesis (6, 7). The reduced activation of this pathway by 126 could contribute to its improved clearance due to decreased host immunopathology.

In this work, we show association between VISA strains, reduced autolytic activity, and decreased IFN-β induction. While dampened type I IFN signaling was consistent across all the VISA isolates tested in this study, some VSSA strains, such as strains 121, 122, and 125, also displayed a reduced ability to activate this pathway. An expanded panel of strains quantified for vancomycin susceptibility would need to be tested before a significant correlation can be drawn between induction of type I IFN and vancomycin susceptibility. It is likely that mutations of the bacterial cell wall will have effects on IFN induction. As such, other perturbations of cell wall synthesis, such as inhibition of transpeptidase activity, are likely to affect autolysis (49) and IFN responses. These could explain the reduced type I IFN induction observed for some of the VSSA strains in this study. On the same note, VISA strains can result from mutations of several genes, including walKR, graSR, clpP, or sarA (29). We were able to demonstrate that inactivation of the kinase WalK leads to reduced activation of type I IFN along with reduced autolysis and lysostaphin sensitivity. Further investigation is required to determine if these genetic modifications impact IFN induction in similar ways.

While it is now appreciated that bacterial pathogens can activate type I IFN signaling, less is known about the general capacity to activate the pathway within a given species. We show here that S. aureus exhibits a wide spectrum of type I and III interferon induction magnitudes, showing that activation of interferon signaling is not a universally conserved phenomenon. We focused on a unique strain that had limited type I IFN-inducing properties and identified it as being a VISA strain, further showing this to be a general property of VISA isolates. Lack of type I IFN induction was associated with increased resistance to lysostaphin and host cell killing and decreased autolysis and in vivo virulence. A better understanding of the triggers and mechanisms by which S. aureus mediates these host responses will educate any potential future immunomodulatory treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.

The S. aureus strains used in this study are summarized in Table 1. BEI Resources strains were provided by the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (NARSA) for distribution by BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH. S. aureus strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 37°C with shaking. Experiments were performed with bacteria in exponential growth phase (at an OD600 of 1). Vancomycin MICs were evaluated by the MicroScan Gram-positive panel (Beckman Coulter). Extended glycopeptide susceptibilities were determined with vancomycin Etest strips (bioMérieux) at 37°C.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains used in this studya

No. in this study Strain Source/reference Isolation site Sensitivity profile
Ridom spa type MLST type
Methicillin Vancomycin
USA300 USA300 FPR3757 51 Laboratory strain MRSA VSSA NA NA
502A 502A 7 Laboratory strain MSSA VSSA NA NA
2 USA300 LAC 52 Laboratory strain MRSA NA NA NA
4 Newman 53 Laboratory strain NA NA NA NA
5 USA500 54 Laboratory strain NA NA NA NA
6 MW2 55 Laboratory strain NA NA NA NA
7 N315 56 Laboratory strain NA NA NA NA
USA300 Je2 57 Laboratory strain MRSA NA NA NA
USA300 Je2::atl 57 Laboratory strain MRSA NA NA NA
41 PP1759 This study CF isolate, sputum NA NA NA NA
42 PP1771 This study CF isolate, sputum NA NA NA NA
43 PP1772 This study CF isolate NA NA NA NA
44 PP1775 This study CF isolate NA NA NA NA
45 PP1779 This study CF Isolate, BAL NA NA NA NA
46 PP1840 This study CF isolate, BAL NA NA NA NA
47 PP1842 This study CF isolate NA NA NA NA
48 PP1843 This study CF isolate NA NA NA NA
49 PP1844 This study CF isolate, BAL NA NA NA NA
50 PP1761 This study CF Isolate, sputum NA NA NA NA
51 112-538 This study Skin MRSA NA t008 ST8
52 254-28 This study Skin MRSA NA NA ST8
53 66-752 This study Skin MRSA NA t008 ST8
54 226-8 This study Skin MRSA NA NA ST8
55 19-327 This study Skin MRSA NA t008 ST8
56 218-12 This study Skin MRSA NA NA ST8
57 88-316 This study Skin MRSA NA NA ST8
58 241-64 This study Skin MRSA NA NA NA
59 58-895 This study Skin MRSA NA t008 ST8
60 225-39 This study Skin MRSA NA NA ST8
74 3-179 This study AD site MSSA NA t021 ST30
75 5-176 This study Nares MSSA NA t334 NA
76 6-196 This study Nares MSSA NA t1892 NA
77 15-662 This study AD site MSSA NA t002 ST5
78 15-663 This study Perianal MSSA NA t1309 ST672
79 16-658 This study Nares MSSA NA t922 NA
80 28-205 This study Nares MRSA NA t064 NA
81 31-921 This study Nares MSSA NA t002 ST5
82 34-234 This study Nares MSSA NA t026 NA
83 34-236 This study AD site MSSA NA t026 ST45
84 43-378 This study Nares MSSA NA t177 NA
85 43-384 This study AD site MSSA NA t177 ST81
86 53-253 This study Perianal MSSA NA t189 NA
87 53-257 This study Nares MSSA NA t216 ST59
88 63-121 This study AD site MRSA NA t008 ST8
89 68-549 This study AD site MRSA NA t008 NA
90 81-903 This study AD site MSSA NA t228 NA
91 81-904 This study Perianal MSSA NA t148 ST72
92 81-906 This study Nares MSSA NA t216 ST87
93 97-727 This study AD site MSSA NA t002 ST5
94 97-729 This study Perianal MSSA NA t1577 ST30
95 103-348 This study Perianal MRSA NA t008 NA
96 107-603 This study Nares MSSA NA t688 NA
97 107-604 This study Perianal MSSA NA t688 ST5
98 130-858 This study Nares MRSA NA t002 ST8
114 626, NRS382 BEI Resources Blood MRSA VSSA t002 ST5
115 CA-263, NRS647 BEI Resources Blood MRSA VSSA NA ST8
116 MN-095, NRS703 BEI Resources Blood MRSA VSSA NA ST8
117 96758, NRS383 BEI Resources Blood MRSA VSSA t018 ST36
118 95938, NRS385 BEI Resources Blood MRSA VSSA t064 ST8
119 MRSA 18 M342506 BEI Resources Wound abscess MRSA VSSA NA NA
120 CA-347, NRS648 BEI Resources Blood MRSA VSSA NA NA
121 1045, NRS387 BEI Resources Wound MRSA VSSA t088 ST5
122 CM05 BEI Resources Tracheal aspirate MRSA VSSA NA NA
123 MRSA177 BEI Resources Skin MRSA VSSA NA NA
124 P1V44, NRS272 BEI Resources Sputum MRSA VSSA t770 ST247
125 NRS127 BEI Resources Sputum MRSA VSSA t002 ST5
126 HIP07930, NRS22 BEI Resources Blood MRSA VISA t266 ST45
127 MRSA M1277 BEI Resources Blood MRSA NA NA NA
128 No. 315, NRS209 BEI Resources Trachea MRSA VSSA t051 ST247
129 HFH-30522 BEI Resources Sputum MRSA NA NA NA
130 MRSA M0055 BEI Resources Sputum MRSA NA NA NA
131 A980592, NRS157 BEI Resources Necrotizing pneumonia MSSA VSSA t3379 ST22
132 CA-78, NRS659 BEI Resources Lung fluid MRSA VSSA t008 ST8
133 MN-113, NRS704 BEI Resources Pleural fluid MRSA VSSA NA ST5
134 TN-74, NRS739 BEI Resources Pleural fluid MRSA VSSA NA ST8
135 MRSA M0001 BEI Resources Sputum MRSA NA NA NA
136 MRSA M0108 BEI Resources Bronchoalveolar lavage MRSA NA NA NA
VISA 1 160013, NRS283 Ricardo Russo Blood MRSA VISA t018 ST36
VISA 2 HIP10540, NR-45901 Ricardo Russo Unknown MRSA VISA t451 ST8
VISA 3 LY-1999 0620-0 Ricardo Russo Blood MRSA VISA t037 ST372
VISA 4 HIP09740, NRS51 Ricardo Russo Bile MRSA VISA t242 ST5
VISA 5 HIP07920, NRS21 Ricardo Russo Blood MRSA VISA t064 ST8
VISA 6 HIP5827, NRS3 Ricardo Russo Peritonitis MRSA VISA t062 ST5
VISA 7 HIP09433, NRS27 Ricardo Russo Cerebral spinal fluid MRSA VISA t004 ST45
NRS384 NRS384 35 Laboratory strain NA VSSA NA NA
NRS384 WalKG233D NRS384 WalKG233D 35 Laboratory strain NA VISA NA NA
a

NA, not available; CF, cystic fibrosis; AD, atopic dermatitis.

Autolysis assays were performed in phosphate-buffered saline with Triton X-100 (0.2%) and incubated at 37°C without shaking. Lysis was determined as the decrease in OD600 over time and indicated as a percentage of the initial OD. For lysostaphin assays, bacterial pellets were resuspended in LB containing specific lysostaphin concentrations and incubated in microplates at 37°C with shaking for 16 h. Lysostaphin MICs were determined as the lowest concentration at which bacterial growth was inhibited.

Mammalian cell culture and assays.

Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDC) and bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM) were generated from the bone marrow of WT C57BL/6J mice and differentiated in RPMI medium containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, penicillin-streptomycin, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (20 ng/ml) or macrophage colony-stimulating factor (20 ng/ml), respectively, at 37°C and 5% CO2 in sterile petri dishes for 7 days. BMDC were stimulated with S. aureus (multiplicity of infection [MOI], 10) for 4, 16, 24, or 48 h for cytokine quantification by ELISA and 2 h (MOI, 100) for RNA experiments. Phagocytosis assays were performed with AF647-labeled (AF647 carboxylic acid succinimidyl ester; Life Technologies) S. aureus (MOI, 10) for 5 and 30 min. Killing assays used S. aureus (MOI, 10)-stimulated BMDC 4 h after infection, supernatants were collected, and bacterial concentrations were assessed by serial dilution plating on LB agar plates. Endosomal acidification assays were performed with S. aureus (MOI, 10)-stimulated BMDC in the presence of LysoLive pH-sensor green (Marker Gene Technologies) for 2 h.

Animal studies.

Male and female 6- to 8-week-old C57BL/6J mice were used for this study. Mice were intranasally infected with 2 × 107 to 5 × 107 CFU of S. aureus while under anesthesia. Mice were euthanized 4 or 24 h after infection, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected by instilling 3× 1 ml PBS into the trachea. Lungs were harvested and passed through a 40-μm cell strainer with 400 μl PBS to obtain a single-cell homogenate. BALF and lung homogenates were used to enumerate bacterial counts through dilution plating on BBL CHROMagar Staph aureus plates (Becton, Dickinson).

Flow cytometry.

Cells from BALF and lung homogenates underwent red blood cell lysis and were incubated with fluorescently labeled antibodies against specific cell surface markers: phycoerythrin (PE)-Cy7-labeled anti-CD11b (M1/70), BV605-labeled CD11c (N418), AF700-labeled CD45 (30-F11), AF647-labeled Siglec-F (E50-2440; BD Biosciences), BV650-labeled NK1.1, BV510-labeled CD103 (2E7), allophycocyanin-Cy7-labeled MHCII (M5/114.15.2), peridinin chlorophyll protein-Cy5.5-labeled anti-Ly6G (1A8), PE-Texas Red Ly6C (AL-2; BD Biosciences), PE-labeled CD200R (OX-110), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled MARCO (ED31; Bio-Rad), and BV421-labeled CD86 (GL-1). Antibodies were from BioLegend unless otherwise stated. The gating strategy for the flow cytometry panel is outlined in Table 2. Uniform dyed microspheres, Dragon Green (Bangs Laboratories, Inc.), were used for cell counting. Data were collected by flow cytometry using a Fortessa cytometer (Becton, Dickinson), and results were analyzed using FlowJo v.10.

TABLE 2.

Pneumonia model flow cytometry panel

Cell type Surface markers
Neutrophils CD45+ Ly6C+ CD11b+ MHCII Ly6G+
Alveolar macrophages CD45+ Ly6C SiglecF+ CD11c+ CD11b
Interstitial macrophages CD45+ Ly6C SiglecF CD11b+ CD11c+ MHCII+
Ly6C+ monocytes CD45+ Ly6C+ CD11b+ MHCII Ly6G
Ly6C monocytes CD45+ Ly6C SiglecF CD11b+ CD11c+ MHCII
NK cells CD45+ NK1.1+
Eosinophils CD45+ Ly6C SiglecF+ CD11b+ CD11c
Plasmacytoid dendritic cells CD45+ Ly6C+ CD11b CD11c+ MHCII+
CD103 dendritic cells CD45+ Ly6C SiglecF CD11b MHCII+ CD103+
CD11b dendritic cells CD45+ Ly6C+ CD11b+ MHCII+ CD11c+

RNA analysis.

RNA was isolated using the E.Z.N.A. total RNA kit (Omega Biotek), followed by DNase treatment using DNAfree (Life Technologies). cDNA was synthesized using the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems). qRT-PCR was performed using Power SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) in a Quantstudio 6 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems). Samples were normalized to β-actin.

Cytokine quantification.

Cytokine levels were quantified using ELISA to IFN-β (PBL Interferon), IFN-λ (R&D Systems), and TNF-α (BioLegend). The cytokine 32-plex Discovery assay was performed by Eve Technologies.

Microscopy.

Differentiated BMM were deposited on glass coverslips at the bottom of 24-well plates and allowed to attach for 16 h. Bacteria were labeled with AF647 for 30 min. Excess dye was removed by washing in PBS 5 times. Labeled bacteria were incubated with BMM (MOI, 10) at 37°C for 30 min. Cells were then washed with PBS, fixed, and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm buffers (Becton, Dickinson). LAMP-1 was detected with primary LAMP-1 rat antibody (DSHB) and secondary AF555-labeled anti-rat antibody (Life technologies). Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images were captured with a Nikon A1R confocal microscope.

Statistical analyses.

Statistical tests were chosen according to the study design. For experiments with one dependent variable, comparing 2 samples with no repeated measure, regular unpaired Student’s t tests were used unless assumption of normality was violated (Shapiro Wilk test, P < 0.05), in which case Mann-Whitney tests were used. For experiments with one dependent variable, comparing more than 2 samples, with no repeated measures, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison tests were used unless the assumption of normality was violated (Shapiro Wilk test, P < 0.05), in which case Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison tests were used. For experiments with 2 dependent variables comparing more than 2 samples, with no repeated measures, 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison tests were used. For experiments with 2 dependent variables comparing more than 2 samples, with repeated measures, 2-way repeated measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA) followed by Sidak’s multiple-comparison tests were used. For the cytokine induction pattern relationship experiment, correlation coefficients were calculated using Spearman’s r. Statistical analyses were performed with Prism software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). Determination of normality by Shapiro Wilk tests and correlation coefficients (Spearman’s r) were conducted with R, version 3.5.1 (Core Team 2013), using the R Commander interface (Fox 2005).

Ethics statement.

Animal work in this study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (50), the Animal Welfare Act, and U.S. federal law. Protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Rutgers New Jersey Medical School of Newark New Jersey.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00352-20-s0001.pdf (283KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 2
IAI.00352-20-s0002.pdf (164.7KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 3
IAI.00352-20-s0003.pdf (350KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 4
IAI.00352-20-s0004.pdf (100.9KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 5
IAI.00352-20-s0005.pdf (69.8KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Riccardo Russo for providing the VISA strains and Ben Howden and Ian Monk for the NRS384 strains, Darshini Shah for performing the vancomycin MIC test, and Tessa Bergsbaken for providing the microscopy reagents.

This work was supported by NIH R01HL134870 to D.P. P.J.P. was supported by R01AI137526.

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. 1997. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev 10:505–520. doi: 10.1128/CMR.10.3.505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Otto M. 2012. MRSA virulence and spread. Cell Microbiol 14:1513–1521. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01832.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chambers HF, Deleo FR. 2009. Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:629–641. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lee AS, de Lencastre H, Garau J, Kluytmans J, Malhotra-Kumar S, Peschel A, Harbarth S. 2018. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4:18033. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Klein EY, Mojica N, Jiang W, Cosgrove SE, Septimus E, Morgan DJ, Laxminarayan R. 2017. Trends in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus hospitalizations in the United States, 2010–2014. Clin Infect Dis 65:1921–1923. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Parker D, Prince A. 2012. Staphylococcus aureus induces type I IFN signaling in dendritic cells via TLR9. J Immunol 189:4040–4046. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Parker D, Planet PJ, Soong G, Narechania A, Prince A. 2014. Induction of type I interferon signaling determines the relative pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus strains. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003951. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pires S, Parker D. 2018. IL-1beta activation in response to Staphylococcus aureus lung infection requires inflammasome-dependent and independent mechanisms. Eur J Immunol 48:1707–1716. doi: 10.1002/eji.201847556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cohen TS, Prince AS. 2013. Bacterial pathogens activate a common inflammatory pathway through IFNlambda regulation of PDCD4. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003682. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Langer JA, Cutrone EC, Kotenko S. 2004. The class II cytokine receptor (CRF2) family: overview and patterns of receptor-ligand interactions. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 15:33–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2003.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Krause CD, Pestka S. 2015. Cut, copy, move, delete: the study of human interferon genes reveal multiple mechanisms underlying their evolution in amniotes. Cytokine 76:480–495. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prokunina-Olsson L, Muchmore B, Tang W, Pfeiffer RM, Park H, Dickensheets H, Hergott D, Porter-Gill P, Mumy A, Kohaar I, Chen S, Brand N, Tarway M, Liu L, Sheikh F, Astemborski J, Bonkovsky HL, Edlin BR, Howell CD, Morgan TR, Thomas DL, Rehermann B, Donnelly RP, O'Brien TR. 2013. A variant upstream of IFNL3 (IL28B) creating a new interferon gene IFNL4 is associated with impaired clearance of hepatitis C virus. Nat Genet 45:164–171. doi: 10.1038/ng.2521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kotenko SV, Durbin JE. 2017. Contribution of type III interferons to antiviral immunity: location, location, location. J Biol Chem 292:7295–7303. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R117.777102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wack A, Terczyńska-Dyla E, Hartmann R. 2015. Guarding the frontiers: the biology of type III interferons. Nat Immunol 16:802–809. doi: 10.1038/ni.3212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jilg N, Lin W, Hong J, Schaefer EA, Wolski D, Meixong J, Goto K, Brisac C, Chusri P, Fusco DN, Chevaliez S, Luther J, Kumthip K, Urban TJ, Peng LF, Lauer GM, Chung RT. 2014. Kinetic differences in the induction of interferon stimulated genes by interferon-alpha and interleukin 28B are altered by infection with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 59:1250–1261. doi: 10.1002/hep.26653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bolen CR, Ding S, Robek MD, Kleinstein SH. 2014. Dynamic expression profiling of type I and type III interferon-stimulated hepatocytes reveals a stable hierarchy of gene expression. Hepatology 59:1262–1272. doi: 10.1002/hep.26657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Beceiro A, Tomas M, Bou G. 2013. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence: a successful or deleterious association in the bacterial world? Clin Microbiol Rev 26:185–230. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00059-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Poole K. 2012. Bacterial stress responses as determinants of antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2069–2089. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stanifer ML, Pervolaraki K, Boulant S. 2019. Differential regulation of type I and type III interferon signaling. Int J Mol Sci 20:1445. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Peteranderl C, Herold S. 2017. The impact of the interferon/TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand signaling axis on disease progression in respiratory viral infection and beyond. Front Immunol 8:313. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ank N, Iversen MB, Bartholdy C, Staeheli P, Hartmann R, Jensen UB, Dagnaes-Hansen F, Thomsen AR, Chen Z, Haugen H, Klucher K, Paludan SR. 2008. An important role for type III interferon (IFN-lambda/IL-28) in TLR-induced antiviral activity. J Immunol 180:2474–2485. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Durbin RK, Kotenko SV, Durbin JE. 2013. Interferon induction and function at the mucosal surface. Immunol Rev 255:25–39. doi: 10.1111/imr.12101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kotenko SV, Gallagher G, Baurin VV, Lewis-Antes A, Shen M, Shah NK, Langer JA, Sheikh F, Dickensheets H, Donnelly RP. 2003. IFN-lambdas mediate antiviral protection through a distinct class II cytokine receptor complex. Nat Immunol 4:69–77. doi: 10.1038/ni875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lazear HM, Schoggins JW, Diamond MS. 2019. Shared and distinct functions of type I and type III interferons. Immunity 50:907–923. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Marcello T, Grakoui A, Barba-Spaeth G, Machlin ES, Kotenko SV, MacDonald MR, Rice CM. 2006. Interferons alpha and lambda inhibit hepatitis C virus replication with distinct signal transduction and gene regulation kinetics. Gastroenterology 131:1887–1898. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.09.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pandey S, Kawai T, Akira S. 2014. Microbial sensing by Toll-like receptors and intracellular nucleic acid sensors. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7:a016246. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kumar JK. 2008. Lysostaphin: an antistaphylococcal agent. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 80:555–561. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1579-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Howden BP, Peleg AY, Stinear TP. 2014. The evolution of vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogenous-VISA. Infect Genet Evol 21:575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.03.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McGuinness WA, Malachowa N, DeLeo FR. 2017. Vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Yale J Biol Med 90:269–281. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.CLSI. 2006. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 16th informational supplement CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dubrac S, Bisicchia P, Devine KM, Msadek T. 2008. A matter of life and death: cell wall homeostasis and the WalKR (YycGF) essential signal transduction pathway. Mol Microbiol 70:1307–1322. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Martin PK, Li T, Sun D, Biek DP, Schmid MB. 1999. Role in cell permeability of an essential two-component system in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 181:3666–3673. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.12.3666-3673.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bisicchia P, Noone D, Lioliou E, Howell A, Quigley S, Jensen T, Jarmer H, Devine KM. 2007. The essential YycFG two-component system controls cell wall metabolism in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 65:180–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05782.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hu Q, Peng H, Rao X. 2016. Molecular events for promotion of vancomycin resistance in vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol 7:1601. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Monk IR, Shaikh N, Begg SL, Gajdiss M, Sharkey LKR, Lee JYH, Pidot SJ, Seemann T, Kuiper M, Winnen B, Hvorup R, Collins BM, Bierbaum G, Udagedara SR, Morey JR, Pulyani N, Howden BP, Maher MJ, McDevitt CA, King GF, Stinear TP. 2019. Zinc-binding to the cytoplasmic PAS domain regulates the essential WalK histidine kinase of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat Commun 10:3067. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10932-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang X, Brann TW, Zhou M, Yang J, Oguariri RM, Lidie KB, Imamichi H, Huang D-W, Lempicki RA, Baseler MW, Veenstra TD, Young HA, Lane HC, Imamichi T. 2011. Cutting edge: ku70 is a novel cytosolic DNA sensor that induces type III rather than type I IFN. J Immunol 186:4541–4545. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sui H, Zhou M, Imamichi H, Jiao X, Sherman BT, Lane HC, Imamichi T. 2017. STING is an essential mediator of the Ku70-mediated production of IFN-lambda1 in response to exogenous DNA. Sci Signal 10:eaah5054. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aah5054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grosz M, Kolter J, Paprotka K, Winkler A-C, Schäfer D, Chatterjee SS, Geiger T, Wolz C, Ohlsen K, Otto M, Rudel T, Sinha B, Fraunholz M. 2014. Cytoplasmic replication of Staphylococcus aureus upon phagosomal escape triggered by phenol-soluble modulin α. Cell Microbiol 16:451–465. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fraunholz M, Sinha B. 2012. Intracellular Staphylococcus aureus: live-in and let die. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:43. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sieradzki K, Tomasz A. 2003. Alterations of cell wall structure and metabolism accompany reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in an isogenic series of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 185:7103–7110. doi: 10.1128/jb.185.24.7103-7110.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cameron DR, Lin YH, Trouillet-Assant S, Tafani V, Kostoulias X, Mouhtouris E, Skinner N, Visvanathan K, Baines SL, Howden B, Monk IR, Laurent F, Stinear TP, Howden BP, Peleg AY. 2017. Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates are attenuated for virulence when compared with susceptible progenitors. Clin Microbiol Infect 23:767–773. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hiramatsu K, Kayayama Y, Matsuo M, Aiba Y, Saito M, Hishinuma T, Iwamoto A. 2014. Vancomycin-intermediate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2:213–224. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2014.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Spina D, Purrello S, Campanile F, Di Pietro C, Purrello M, Stefani S. 2012. Modulating activity of vancomycin and daptomycin on the expression of autolysis cell-wall turnover and membrane charge genes in hVISA and VISA strains. PLoS One 7:e29573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Peschel A, Vuong C, Otto M, Gotz F. 2000. The D-alanine residues of Staphylococcus aureus teichoic acids alter the susceptibility to vancomycin and the activity of autolytic enzymes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:2845–2847. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.10.2845-2847.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen C, Krishnan V, Macon K, Manne K, Narayana SV, Schneewind O. 2013. Secreted proteases control autolysin-mediated biofilm growth of Staphylococcus aureus. J Biol Chem 288:29440–29452. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.502039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bao Y, Zhang X, Jiang Q, Xue T, Sun B. 2015. Pfs promotes autolysis-dependent release of eDNA and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Med Microbiol Immunol 204:215–226. doi: 10.1007/s00430-014-0357-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kluj RM, Ebner P, Adamek M, Ziemert N, Mayer C, Borisova M. 2018. Recovery of the peptidoglycan turnover product released by the autolysin Atl in Staphylococcus aureus involves the phosphotransferase system transporter MurP and the novel 6-phospho-N-acetylmuramidase MupG. Front Microbiol 9:2725–2725. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kaplan A, Ma J, Kyme P, Wolf AJ, Becker CA, Tseng CW, Liu GY, Underhill DM. 2012. Failure to induce IFN-beta production during Staphylococcus aureus infection contributes to pathogenicity. J Immunol 189:4537–4545. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Antignac A, Sieradzki K, Tomasz A. 2007. Perturbation of cell wall synthesis suppresses autolysis in Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for coregulation of cell wall synthetic and hydrolytic enzymes. J Bacteriol 189:7573–7580. doi: 10.1128/JB.01048-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.National Research Council. 2011. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, 8th ed National Academies Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, Lin F, Lin J, Carleton HA, Mongodin EF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F. 2006. Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 367:731–739. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68231-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Rieg G, Mehdi S, Perlroth J, Bayer AS, Tang AW, Phung TO, Spellberg B. 2005. Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles. N Engl J Med 352:1445–1453. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Duthie ES, Lorenz LL. 1952. Staphylococcal coagulase; mode of action and antigenicity. J Gen Microbiol 6:95–107. doi: 10.1099/00221287-6-1-2-95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Roberts RB, de Lencastre A, Eisner W, Severina EP, Shopsin B, Kreiswirth BN, Tomasz A. 1998. Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 12 New York hospitals. MRSA Collaborative Study Group. J Infect Dis 178:164–171. doi: 10.1086/515610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Baba T, Takeuchi F, Kuroda M, Yuzawa H, Aoki K, Oguchi A, Nagai Y, Iwama N, Asano K, Naimi T, Kuroda H, Cui L, Yamamoto K, Hiramatsu K. 2002. Genome and virulence determinants of high virulence community-acquired MRSA. Lancet 359:1819–1827. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08713-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Okonogi K, Noji Y, Kondo M, Imada A, Yokota T. 1989. Emergence of methicillin-resistant clones from cephamycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 24:637–645. doi: 10.1093/jac/24.5.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fey PD, Endres JL, Yajjala VK, Widhelm TJ, Boissy RJ, Bose JL, Bayles KW. 2013. A genetic resource for rapid and comprehensive phenotype screening of nonessential Staphylococcus aureus genes. mBio 4:e00537-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00537-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1
IAI.00352-20-s0001.pdf (283KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 2
IAI.00352-20-s0002.pdf (164.7KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 3
IAI.00352-20-s0003.pdf (350KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 4
IAI.00352-20-s0004.pdf (100.9KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 5
IAI.00352-20-s0005.pdf (69.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES