Skip to main content
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases logoLink to Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases
. 2020 May 20;5(3):117–123. doi: 10.1159/000507626

Milk Exosomes Prevent Intestinal Inflammation in a Genetic Mouse Model of Ulcerative Colitis: A Pilot Experiment

Wolfgang Stremmel a,*, Ralf Weiskirchen b, Bodo C Melnik c
PMCID: PMC7506232  PMID: 32999884

Abstract

Background

Milk is rich in nutrients and anabolic mediators rendering it essential for postnatal growth and metabolic programming. However, in adults, excessive consumption of milk is controversial as civilization disorders such as diabetes or prostate cancer may be promoted. A cytoprotective effect of milk could be utilized in inflammatory conditions, that is, chronic colitis.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of bovine milk exosomes on intestinal inflammation in a genetic mouse model of ulcerative colitis.

Methods

Intestinal-specific kindlin 2 knockout (KO) mice were exposed for 4 days to tamoxifen for induction of an ulcerative colitis phenotype. At the same time 4 other kindlin 2 KO mice were exposed to 33 μg/g cow milk derived exosomes in PBS by oral gavage. Both groups were compared to untreated wild-type controls.

Results

Milk exosomes prevented the appearance of a severe ulcerative phenotype. The macroscopic colitis score dropped from a mean of 3.33 in untreated mice to 0.75 index points (p < 0.01) in exosome-treated mice, which included significant improvement of the subscores of stool improvement and colon weight and length. Treated mice featured a noninflamed appearance of the intestinal mucosa.

Key Message

Milk exosomes have cytoprotective/anti-inflammatory activity in a genetic mouse model of ulcerative colitis. The mechanisms behind this need to be elucidated. This pilot study needs verification before a therapeutic strategy is developed.

Keywords: Colitis, Genetic mouse model for colitis, Inflammation, Milk exosomes, Therapy

Introduction

Milk of all mammalian species contains bioactive extracellular vesicles (EVs) [1, 2]. Among them, a special class of nanovesicles are exosomes (30–100 nm), which are derived via the endosomal route from mammary gland epithelial cells and secreted into the alveolar lumen [3]. They play a key role in epigenetic regulation for metabolic and immunological programming [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Bioactive milk exosomes contain and deliver microRNAs, mRNAs, and long noncoding RNAs, transforming growth factor-β, and a variety of unique proteins and lipids which are protected by the exosome lipid bilayer membrane [11, 12, 13, 14]. Milk exosomes are, thus, extremely resistant against the harsh degradative conditions in the gastrointestinal tract [15, 16, 17] but can be taken up by intestinal epithelial cells [5, 18]. A substantial fraction of them reaches the systemic circulation of the milk consumer, as shown in rodents and humans [19, 20, 21]. Whether nonabsorbed exosomes also act from the luminal side is not elucidated. Recent evidence indicates that milk exosomes play a critical role for intestinal maturation and function in humans and rodent models [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. It has been demonstrated in murine models that human, bovine, and porcine milk exosomes support intestinal cell growth [22, 23, 24], attenuate LPS-induced apoptosis [25], prevent intestinal endothelial cell damage [26, 27], enhance goblet cell numbers and mucin production [28], modify bacterial growth, and promote intestinal microbiota [29, 30]. Accumulating evidence indicates that milk exosomes exert barrier-protective and anti-inflammatory effects in rodent models of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and NEC in human infants [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32]. NEC exhibits severe tight-junction defects as shown in rodent models and human neonates [33, 34, 35]. As defective tight junctions are also reported in humans with ulcerative colitis (UC) [36, 37, 38], we became interested in the potential therapeutic usefulness of milk exosomes for the treatment of UC. For this purpose, we investigated the effects of oral exposure of bovine milk exosomes in an established genetic mouse model of UC [39]. This UC model, which operates by disruption of the tight-junction barrier between intestinal mucosal cells, employs a tamoxifen-inducible intestinal-specific deletion of intestinal expression of kindlin 2, resulting in a severe UC phenotype [39, 40].

Kindlin 2 as adapter protein for integrin β1 serves at the lateral side of mucosal cells for the establishment of tight junctions. As a consequence of kindlin 2 deletion, tight junctions are broken, the intercellular space is enlarged, cells become cuboidal, and crypt diameters are distended [39]. Functionally, phosphatidylcholine (PC) secretion to apical mucus was shown to be disturbed and invasion of microbiota to be facilitated. These are all also typical features in human ulcerative colitis [39]. Eventually, severe mucosal inflammation occurs. The difference of this mouse model in comparison to the human disease is (1) its rapid and severe phenotype and (2) that not only a hemorrhagic colitis but also an ileitis manifests. In previous studies, therapeutic strategies with topical PC supplementation as well as a luminally acting phospholipase inhibitor were shown to be effective [39, 40].

Materials and Methods

Exosome isolation from commercial cow milk was performed as described [41]. In brief, 10-mL milk was diluted with an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged at 4°C for 30 min at 2,000 g. The supernatant was centrifuged for 45 min at 12,000 g. The supernatant was then centrifuged for 2 h at 110,000 g. After that, the pellets were resuspended in PBS and pooled. After filtration through a 0.22-μm filter, the suspension was again centrifuged for 70 min at 110,000 g and the resuspended pellet once more centrifuged for 70 min at 110,000 g. The final pellet was resuspended in 200-μL PBS. The collected samples of 5 preparations yielded a protein concentration of 1.1 ± 0.3 mg protein/mL.

Characterization of exosomes employed EXOCET as an exosome quantification kit (Exocet 96A-1-SBI; System Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). It revealed a 79.8 ± 6.9% recovery of exosomes in the purified pellet compared to the original milk source. Within the enriched pellet suspension, Western blotting [42] revealed a dose-dependent signal of the enriched pellet suspension using antibodies to CD9 (PA5-85955), ADAM10 (PA5-28161) (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a dilution of 1:500. Anti-β-actin (AC15, Sigma) at a dilution of 1:100,000 served as loading control.

Characterization of the UC Phenotype in Genetic Mouse Models

Animal studies followed the “ARRIVE” guidelines and were approved by the Heidelberg ethics committee (Ref-# 35-9185.81/6123/10 and 6284/11) (Ref-# S-211/2010). Tamoxifen-inducible, villin-Cre-dependent, kindlin 2 intestine-specific knockout mice were a gift of R. Faessler (Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Munich) and propagated after embryonic transfer in the animal facilities of the University of Heidelberg [39, 40]. Mutant kindlin 2(−/−) mice received LasVendi Rod 18 complete diet (Soest, Germany) ad libitum and were kept in conventional caging with ABBEDD LT-E-001 (Vienna, Austria) bedding at 22°C, with a 12-h/12-h light/dark cycle. Mutant mice (12-week-old mice with a comparable body weight of 30 ± 2 g) were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected at 9:00 a.m. with 0.2 mg tamoxifen daily for up to 4 days before being sacrificed 1 day later. Ileal mucosal cells were isolated [43] and characterized by Western blotting using antibodies to mouse kindlin 2, to ensure complete depletion in the mutant mice [39, 40]. As control, 12-week old wild-type mice were used. All mice were male of a C57BL/6 background obtained from Charles River.

Evaluation of Disease Activity

Quantitative evaluation of the UC phenotype was performed in resected gut segments and included the macroscopic colitis score with determination of the subscores total colon weight (including stool content), length, and stool appearance [39, 40].

Treatment of Mutant Mice with Milk Exosomes

The same disease activity parameters were assessed when the mutant mice were treated with the exosome suspension daily in 200 μL PBS (1 mg protein/mL) or just 200 μL PBS (control) by oral gavage during the 4 days after start of tamoxifen treatment [39, 40] to assess improvement of the UC phenotype. The application by oral gavage − using a 6.5-cm 18G × 2″ flexible elastic tube (9918; Cadence Science, Cranston, RI, USA) − ensures that the full dose of exosomes is provided to the small intestine. The dosage of 33 μg/g body weight corresponds to the amount of exosomes in 7.1 mL milk. This excessive amount overpowers the absorptive capacity and, thus, due to functional malabsorption a substantial fraction enters the colonic lumen.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 4.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences between groups were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple groups were compared by 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc test. Data are presented as means ± SD, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The intestinal mucosa-specific kindlin 2(−/−) mice showed − as expected − a severe inflammatory phenotype as it was observed in 2 preceding studies [39, 40]. This was compared to kindlin 2(−/−) which were treated with tamoxifen and simultaneously with milk exosomes. Here exosomes prevented the inflammation (Fig. 1, upper panel). This is also seen at stool consistency (Fig. 1, lower panel). Untreated and exosome-treated kindlin 2(−/−) mice were compared to wild-type mice in regard to the macroscopic appearance of stool as well as colon weight and length (Fig. 2). The total macroscopic colitis score of these 3 parameters showed a mean drop from 3.33 to 0.75 index points (p < 0.01).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Macroscopic appearance of opened ileal and colonic segments and stool samples. Depicted are specimens of 4 animals each of tamoxifen-induced intestinal-specific kindlin 2(−/−) mice in the absence (left panels) and presence (right panels) of simultaneous oral administration of bovine milk exosomes for 4 days.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Stool score, colon weight with fecal content, colon weight score, colon length, and colon length score. Mean and standard deviations for each parameter are given for wild-type animals (WT) and kindlin 2(−/−) mice with (+Ex) or without (−Ex) milk exosome treatment (n = 4 in each group). Scores for stool (0 = normal, 1 = loosely shaped, 2 = amorphous, 3 = diarrhea, +1 = for blood), colon weight (0 = <10%, 1 = <10–50%, 2 = >50–100%, 3 = >100–150%, 4 = >150% weight gain compared to the wild-types' mean), and colon length (0 = <5%, 1 = 5–14%, 2 = 15–24%, 3 = 25–35%, 4 = >35% shortening compared to the wild-types' mean) were arbitrary defined. The p values for comparing 2 groups (wild-type vs. kindlin 2(−/−) or kindlin 2(−/−) without treatment versus kindlin 2(−/−) with treatment) were calculated with unpaired t test.

The data of Figures 1 and 2 indicate that milk exosomes protect against intestinal inflammation.

Discussion

Previous epidemiological studies examining milk and dairy products and the development of Crohn's disease or UC are sparse and showed conflicting results. Some investigations report that a higher intake of milk is associated with a moderately increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease [44, 45], whereas others find an inverse association or none [46, 47, 48, 49, 50]. In comparison to individuals that do not consume milk, the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort including 401,326 participants reported that individuals consuming milk had significantly reduced odds of Crohn's disease (OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.65) and nonsignificantly reduced odds of UC (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.49–1.47) [51]. Notably, pasteurized fresh milk in contrast to fermented milk products such as yoghurt contains bioactive milk exosomes [52].

We observed an anti-inflammatory effect of milk exosomes in our murine model of UC. As demonstrated, macroscopic colitis scores decreased significantly after the exposure of milk exosomes including stool consistency.

A shortcoming of this pilot study is the small number of animals and the lack of opportunity to support the obvious macroscopic findings with histology and quantitative biochemical measurements, for example, TNFα, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p40, and mucin 2. Therefore, the anti-inflammatory mechanism of milk exosomes is still elusive. However, 3 major modes of action are conceivable:

Low mucus PC content is due to disturbed tight-junction barrier [37, 38, 39, 40] and causes insufficient translocation of PC from systemic lipoproteins to the luminal side of mucosal cells. The reduced surface hydrophobicity allows attack of microbiota to induce mucosal inflammation [53, 54]. This may be counterbalanced by the transfer of milk exosome-derived PC [55]. This conception is supported by clinical improvement of colitis by topical application of PC in UC patients [56, 57, 58] and in genetic UC models [39]. Furthermore, inhibition of the ectophospholipase activity of the microbiota by ursodeoxycholate-lysophosphatidylethanolamide (UDCA-LPE) prevented the colitis in this murine UC model [40][59].

Another mode of action may concern inadequate production of mucin 2 (MUC2) as MUC2-deficient mice exhibit clinical and cellular features of active UC [60]. Remarkably, improvement of goblet cell activity and MUC2 production has been reported in an experimental model of NEC by application of bovine milk exosomes [28]. Mucus does not only form a nonspecific physical barrier, but constrains the immunogenicity of gut antigens by delivering tolerogenic signals [61].

Finally, microRNAs of milk exosomes may improve inflammation and intestinal barrier function. Micro­RNA-148a and microRNA-21 are 2 major signature microRNAs of cow's milk [62], which target Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase 1 (ROCK1) [63, 64]. Notably, microRNA-21 increases the expression level of occludin via ROCK1 suppression and, thus, stabilizes the intestinal barrier [65]. On the other hand, ROCK1 overexpression is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) [66, 67]. Moreover, microRNA-148a and microRNA-21 inhibit DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) [68], an oncogene which is also overexpressed in CRC [69, 70, 71]. Indeed, incubation of CRC cells (Lim 1215) with human milk exosomes increased the cellular content of microRNA-148a [5], and addition of milk exosomes to normal intestinal cells (CRL 1831) significantly decreased DNMT1 expression [5, 24]. Three large meta-analyses came to the conclusion that milk consumption but not the consumption of fermented milk products, where exosomal microRNAs including microRNA-21 are depleted [52], has a protective effect against the development of CRC [72, 73, 74].

Although this pilot study proved a beneficial effect of milk exosomes in a model of UC, long-term oral application of milk exosomes may bare the risk of other diseases of civilization such as prostate cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus [9, 75, 76, 77]. Nevertheless, oral exosome administration may be a promising new approach for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases as it has recently been confirmed by autologous exosome transfer in a murine colitis model [78].

Statement of Ethics

Animal studies followed the “ARRIVE” guidelines and were approved by the Heidelberg ethics committee (Ref-# 35-9185.81/6123/10 and 6284/11) (Ref-# S-211/2010).

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources

There was no external funding source for this work.

Author Contributions

W.S. and B.C.M. created the hypothesis, W.S. performed the experiments, and B.C.M. contributed in the introduction and discussion with his knowledge about milk exosome biology. R.W. performed the statistics and generated Figure 2. W.S., R.W., and B.C.M. had access to the data of the study, contributed to writing of the manuscript, and read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Simone Staffer (Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany) for her technical assistance. The authors also thank R. Faessler (MPI, Munich) for providing the conditional kindlin 2 knockout mice.

References

  • 1.Benmoussa A, Laugier J, Beauparlant CJ, Lambert M, Droit A, Provost P. Complexity of the microRNA transcriptome of cow milk and milk-derived extracellular vesicles isolated via differential ultracentrifugation. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103((1)):16–29. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alsaweed M, Lai CT, Hartmann PE, Geddes DT, Kakulas F. Human milk miRNAs primarily originate from the mammary gland resulting in unique miRNA profiles of fractionated milk. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20680. doi: 10.1038/srep20680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alsaweed M, Lai CT, Hartmann PE, Geddes DT, Kakulas F. Human milk cells contain numerous miRNAs that may change with milk removal and regulate multiple physiological processes. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17((6)):E956. doi: 10.3390/ijms17060956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Melnik BC, John SM, Carrera-Bastos P, Schmitz G. Milk: a postnatal imprinting system stabilizing FoxP3 expression and regulatory T cell differentiation. Clin Transl Allergy. 2016;6:18. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0108-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Golan-Gerstl R, Elbaum Shiff Y, Moshayoff V, Schecter D, Leshkowitz D, Reif S. Characterization and biological function of milk-derived miRNAs. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61((10)):1700009. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201700009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Melnik BC, Schmitz G. MicroRNAs: milk's epigenetic regulators. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;31((4)):427–42. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zempleni J, Aguilar-Lozano A, Sadri M, Sukreet S, Manca S, Wu D, et al. Biological activities of extracellular vesicles and their cargos from bovine and human milk in humans and implications for infants. J Nutr. 2017;147((1)):3–10. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.238949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zempleni J, Sukreet S, Zhou F, Wu D, Mutai E. Milk-derived exosomes and metabolic regulation. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2019;7:245–62. doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Melnik BC. Milk exosomal miRNAs: potential drivers of AMPK-to-mTORC1 switching in β-cell de-differentiation of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Metab. 2019;16:85. doi: 10.1186/s12986-019-0412-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zeng B, Chen T, Xie MY, Luo JY, He JJ, Xi QY, et al. Exploration of long noncoding RNA in bovine milk exosomes and their stability during digestion in vitro. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102((8)):6726–37. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pieters BC, Arntz OJ, Bennink MB, Broeren MG, van Caam AP, Koenders MI, et al. Commercial cow milk contains physically stable extracellular vesicles expressing immunoregulatory TGF-β. PLoS One. 2015;10((3)):e0121123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Reinhardt TA, Lippolis JD, Nonnecke BJ, Sacco RE. Bovine milk exosome proteome. J Proteomics. 2012;75((5)):1486–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Reinhardt TA, Sacco RE, Nonnecke BJ, Lippolis JD. Bovine milk proteome: quantitative changes in normal milk exosomes, milk fat globule membranes and whey proteomes resulting from Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. J Proteomics. 2013;82:141–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tomé-Carneiro J, Fernández-Alonso N, Tomás-Zapico C, Visioli F, Iglesias-Gutierrez E, Dávalos A. Breast milk microRNAs harsh journey towards potential effects in infant development and maturation. Lipid encapsulation can help. Pharmacol Res. 2018;132:21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Benmoussa A, Lee CH, Laffont B, Savard P, Laugier J, Boilard E, et al. Commercial dairy cow milk microRNAs resist digestion under simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions. J Nutr. 2016;146((11)):2206–15. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.237651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liao Y, Du X, Li J, Lönnerdal B. Human milk exosomes and their microRNAs survive digestion in vitro and are taken up by human intestinal cells. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017;61((11)):1700082. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201700082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kahn S, Liao Y, Du X, Xu W, Li J, Lönnerdal B. Exosomal microRNAs in milk from mothers delivering preterm infants survive in vitro digestion and are taken up by human intestinal cells. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2018;62((11)):e1701050. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201701050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wolf T, Baier SR, Zempleni J. The intestinal transport of bovine milk exosomes is mediated by endocytosis in human colon carcinoma Caco-2 cells and rat small intestinal IEC-6 cells. J Nutr. 2015;145((10)):2201–6. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.218586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baier SR, Nguyen C, Xie F, Wood JR, Zempleni J. MicroRNAs are absorbed in biologically meaningful amounts from nutritionally relevant doses of cow milk and affect gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, HEK-293 kidney cell cultures, and mouse livers. J Nutr. 2014;144((10)):1495–500. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.196436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Manca S, Upadhyaya B, Mutai E, Desaulniers AT, Cederberg RA, White BR, et al. Milk exosomes are bioavailable and distinct microRNA cargos have unique tissue distribution patterns. Sci Rep. 2018;8((1)):11321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29780-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Betker JL, Angle BM, Graner MW, Anchordoquy TJ. The potential of exosomes from cow milk for oral delivery. J Pharm Sci. 2019;108((4)):1496–505. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hock A, Miyake H, Li B, Lee C, Ermini L, Koike Y, et al. Breast milk-derived exosomes promote intestinal epithelial cell growth. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52((5)):755–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gao HN, Guo HY, Zhang H, Xie XL, Wen PC, Ren FZ. Yak-milk-derived exosomes promote proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells in an hypoxic environment. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102((2)):985–96. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Reif S, Elbaum Shiff Y, Golan-Gerstl R. Milk-derived exosomes (MDEs) have a different biological effect on normal fetal colon epithelial cells compared to colon tumor cells in a miRNA-dependent manner. J Transl Med. 2019;17((1)):325. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-2072-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Xie MY, Hou LJ, Sun JJ, Zeng B, Xi QY, Luo JY, et al. Porcine milk exosome MiRNAs attenuate LPS-induced apoptosis through inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB and p53 pathways in intestinal epithelial cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67((34)):9477–91. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Miyake H, Lee C, Chusilp S, Bhalla M, Li B, Pitino M, et al. Human breast milk exosomes attenuate intestinal damage. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020;36((2)):155–63. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04599-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gao R, Zhang R, Qian T, Peng X, He W, Zheng S, et al. A comparison of exosomes derived from different periods breast milk on protecting against intestinal organoid injury. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019;35((12)):1363–8. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04562-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li B, Hock A, Wu RY, Minich A, Botts SR, Lee C, et al. Bovine milk-derived exosomes enhance goblet cell activity and prevent the development of experimental necrotizing enterocolitis. PLoS One. 2019;14((1)):e0211431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Le Doare K, Holder B, Bassett A, Pannaraj PS. Mother's milk: a purposeful contribution to the development of the infant microbiota and immunity. Front Immunol. 2018;9:361. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhou F, Paz HA, Sadri M, Cui J, Kachman SD, Fernando SC, et al. Dietary bovine milk exosomes elicit changes in bacterial communities in C57BL/6 mice. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019;317((5)):G618–24. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00160.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pisano C, Galley J, Elbahrawy M, Wang Y, Farrell A, Brigstock D, et al. Human breast milk-derived extracellular vesicles in the protection against experimental necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2020;55((1)):54–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.09.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang X, Yan X, Zhang L, Cai J, Zhou Y, Liu H, et al. Identification and peptidomic profiling of exosomes in preterm human milk: insights into necrotizing enterocolitis prevention. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2019;8:e1801247. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201801247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bein A, Eventov-Friedman S, Arbell D, Schwartz B. Intestinal tight junctions are severely altered in NEC preterm neonates. Pediatr Neonatol. 2018;59((5)):464–73. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Clark JA, Doelle SM, Halpern MD, Saunders TA, Holubec H, Dvorak K, et al. Intestinal barrier failure during experimental necrotizing enterocolitis: protective effect of EGF treatment. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;291((5)):G938–49. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00090.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ravisankar S, Tatum R, Garg PM, Herco M, Shekhawat PS, Chen YH. Necrotizing enterocolitis leads to disruption of tight junctions and increase in gut permeability in a mouse model. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18((1)):372. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1346-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Schulzke JD, Ploeger S, Amasheh M, Fromm A, Zeissig S, Troeger H, et al. Epithelial tight junctions in intestinal inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1165:294–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tan Y, Guan Y, Sun Y, Zheng C. Correlation of intestinal mucosal healing and tight junction protein expression in ulcerative colitis patients. Am J Med Sci. 2019;357((3)):195–204. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Das P, Goswami P, Das TK, Nag T, Sreenivas V, Ahuja V, et al. Comparative tight junction protein expressions in colonic Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and tuberculosis: a new perspective. Virchows Arch. 2012;460((3)):261–70. doi: 10.1007/s00428-012-1195-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stremmel W, Staffer S, Schneider MJ, Gan-Schreier H, Wannhoff A, Stuhrmann N, et al. Genetic mouse models with intestinal-specific tight junction deletion resemble an ulcerative colitis phenotype. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11((10)):1247–57. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stremmel W, Staffer S, Stuhrmann N, Gan-Schreier H, Gauss A, Burger N, et al. hospholipase A2 of microbiota as pathogenetic determinant to induce inflammatory states in ulcerative colitis: therapeutic implications of phospholipase A2 inhibitors. Inflamm Intest Dis. 2018;2((3)):180–7. doi: 10.1159/000486858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Théry C, Amigorena S, Raposo G, Clayton A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological fluids. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2006;30((1)):3.22.1–29. doi: 10.1002/0471143030.cb0322s30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stremmel W, Staffer S, Gan-Schreier H, Wannhoff A, Bach M, Gauss A. Phosphatidylcholine passes through lateral tight junctions for paracellular transport to the apical side of the polarized intestinal tumor cell-line CaCo2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1861((9 Pt A)):1161–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dawson JR, Bridges JW. Xenobiotic metabolism by isolated intestinal epithelial cells from guinea-pigs. Biochem Pharmacol. 1979;28((22)):3299–305. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(79)90125-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shoda R, Matsueda K, Yamato S, Umeda N. Epidemiologic analysis of Crohn disease in Japan: increased dietary intake of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and animal protein relates to the increased incidence of Crohn disease in Japan. Am J Clin Nutr. 1996;63((5)):741–5. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/63.5.741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang ZW, Ji F, Teng WJ, Yuan XG, Ye XM. Risk factors and gene polymorphisms of inflammatory bowel disease in population of Zhejiang, China. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17((1)):118–22. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sakamoto N, Kono S, Wakai K, Fukuda Y, Satomi M, Shimoyama T, et al. Dietary risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter case-control study in Japan. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11((2)):154–63. doi: 10.1097/00054725-200502000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kurata JH. Dietary and other risk factors of ulcerative colitis. A case-control study in Japan. Epidemiology Group of the Research Committee of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Japan. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1994;19((2)):166–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bernstein CN, Rawsthorne P, Cheang M, Blanchard JF. A population-based case control study of potential risk factors for IBD. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101((5)):993–1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Abubakar I, Myhill DJ, Hart AR, Lake IR, Harvey I, Rhodes JM, et al. A case-control study of drinking water and dairy products in Crohn's disease: further investigation of the possible role of Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165((7)):776–83. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwk067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jantchou P, Morois S, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Carbonnel F. Animal protein intake and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: the E3N Prospective Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105((10)):2195–201. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Opstelten JL, Leenders M, Dik VK, Chan SS, van Schaik FD, Khaw KT, et al. Dairy products, dietary calcium, and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: results from a European Prospective Cohort Investigation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22((6)):1403–11. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yu S, Zhao Z, Sun L, Li P. Fermentation results in quantitative changes in milk-derived exosomes and different effects on cell growth and survival. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65((6)):1220–8. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Stremmel W, Ehehalt R, Staffer S, Stoffels S, Mohr A, Karner M, et al. Mucosal protection by phosphatidylcholine. Dig Dis. 2012;30((Suppl 3)):85–91. doi: 10.1159/000342729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Braun A, Schönfeld U, Welsch T, Kadmon M, Funke B, Gotthardt D, et al. Reduced hydrophobicity of the colonic mucosal surface in ulcerative colitis as a hint at a physicochemical barrier defect. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26((8)):989–98. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1190-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ortega-Anaya J, Jiménez-Flores R. Symposium review: the relevance of bovine milk phospholipids in human nutrition-evidence of the effect on infant gut and brain development. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102((3)):2738–48. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Stremmel W, Merle U, Zahn A, Autschbach F, Hinz U, Ehehalt R. Retarded release phosphatidylcholine benefits patients with chronic active ulcerative colitis. Gut. 2005;54((7)):966–71. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.052316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Stremmel W, Ehehalt R, Autschbach F, Karner M. Phosphatidylcholine for steroid-refractory chronic ulcerative colitis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147((9)):603–10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-9-200711060-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Karner M, Kocjan A, Stein J, Schreiber S, von Boyen G, Uebel P, et al. First multicenter study of modified release phosphatidylcholine “LT-02” in ulcerative colitis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in mesalazine-refractory courses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109((7)):1041–51. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Stremmel W, Staffer S, Fricker G, Weiskirchen R. The bile acid-phospholipid conjugate ursodeoxycholyl-lysophosphatidylethanolamide (UDCA-LPE) disintegrates the lipid backbone of raft plasma membrane domains by the removal of the membrane phospholipase A2. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20((22)):E5631. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wenzel UA, Magnusson MK, Rydström A, Jonstrand C, Hengst J, Johansson ME, et al. Spontaneous colitis in Muc2-deficient mice reflects clinical and cellular features of active ulcerative colitis. PLoS One. 2014;9((6)):e100217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shan M, Gentile M, Yeiser JR, Walland AC, Bornstein VU, Chen K, et al. Mucus enhances gut homeostasis and oral tolerance by delivering immunoregulatory signals. Science. 2013;342((6157)):447–53. doi: 10.1126/science.1237910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chen X, Gao C, Li H, Huang L, Sun Q, Dong Y, et al. Identification and characterization of microRNAs in raw milk during different periods of lactation, commercial fluid, and powdered milk products. Cell Res. 2010;20((10)):1128–37. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zheng B, Liang L, Wang C, Huang S, Cao X, Zha R, et al. MicroRNA-148a suppresses tumor cell invasion and metastasis by downregulating ROCK1 in gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17((24)):7574–83. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhang J, Ying ZZ, Tang ZL, Long LQ, Li K. MicroRNA-148a promotes myogenic differentiation by targeting the ROCK1 gene. J Biol Chem. 2012;287((25)):21093–101. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.330381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Liu Z, Li C, Chen S, Lin H, Zhao H, Liu M, et al. MicroRNA-21 increases the expression level of occludin through regulating ROCK1 in prevention of intestinal barrier dysfunction. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120((3)):4545–4. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zucchini C, Martinelli M, De Sanctis P, Rodia MT, Mattei G, Ugolini G, et al. Possible gender-related modulation by the ROCK1 gene in colorectal cancer susceptibility. Pathobiology. 2015;82((6)):252–8. doi: 10.1159/000439405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhu QD, Zhou QQ, Dong L, Huang Z, Wu F, Deng X. MiR-199a-5p inhibits the growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer cells by targeting ROCK1. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2018;17:1533034618775509. doi: 10.1177/1533034618775509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Pan W, Zhu S, Yuan M, Cui H, Wang L, Luo X, et al. MicroRNA-21 and microRNA-148a contribute to DNA hypomethylation in lupus CD4 + T cells by directly and indirectly targeting DNA methyltransferase 1. J Immunol. 2010;184((12)):6773–81. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0904060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Foran E, Garrity-Park MM, Mureau C, Newell J, Smyrk TC, Limburg PJ, et al. Upregulation of DNA methyltransferase-mediated gene silencing, anchorage-independent growth, and migration of colon cancer cells by interleukin-6. Mol Cancer Res. 2010;8((4)):471–81. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Huang C, Liu H, Gong XL, Wu L, Wen B. Expression of DNA methyltransferases and target microRNAs in human tissue samples related to sporadic colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep. 2016;36((5)):2705–14. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Guo Y, Wang M, Jia X, Zhu H, Zhi Y, Yuan L. Wnt signaling pathway upregulates DNMT1 to trigger NHERF1 promoter hypermethylation in colon cancer. Oncol Rep. 2018;40((2)):1165–73. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Aune D, Lau R, Chan DS, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Kampman E, Norat T. Dairy products and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Ann Oncol. 2012;23((1)):37–45. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ralston RA, Truby H, Palermo CE, Walker KZ. Colorectal cancer and nonfermented milk, solid cheese, and fermented milk consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2014;54((9)):1167–79. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2011.629353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Vieira AR, Abar L, Chan DSM, Vingeliene S, Polemiti E, Stevens C, et al. Foods and beverages and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, an update of the evidence of the WCRF-AICR Continuous Update Project. Ann Oncol. 2017;28((8)):1788–802. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Lu W, Chen H, Niu Y, Wu H, Xia D, Wu Y. Dairy products intake and cancer mortality risk: a meta-analysis of 11 population-based cohort studies. Nutr J. 2016;15((1)):91. doi: 10.1186/s12937-016-0210-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Melnik BC, Schmitz G. Exosomes of pasteurized milk: potential pathogens of Western diseases. J Transl Med. 2019;17((1)):3. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1760-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Brouwer-Brolsma EM, Sluik D, Singh-Povel CM, Feskens EJM. Dairy product consumption is associated with pre-diabetes and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in the Lifelines Cohort Study. Br J Nutr. 2018;119((4)):442–55. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517003762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yang C, Zhang M, Sung J, Wang L, Jung Y, Merlin D. Autologous exosome transfer: a new personalized treatment concept to prevent colitis in a murine model. J Crohns Colitis. 2019 doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz184. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES