Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Immunol. 2020 Apr 20;40(4):619–624. doi: 10.1007/s10875-020-00772-z

Failure to Prevent Severe Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in Chronic Granulomatous Disease

Mark Parta 1, Dianne Hilligoss 2, Corin Kelly 2, Nana Kwatemaa 2, Narda Theobald 2, Christa S Zerbe 2, Steven M Holland 2, Harry L Malech 2, Elizabeth M Kang 2
PMCID: PMC7507116  NIHMSID: NIHMS1619786  PMID: 32314173

Abstract

Purpose

Haploidentical related donor (HRD) transplantation was performed in 7 recipients with chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) who had no matched-related or unrelated donor.

Methods

Peripheral blood cell (PBC) products were used with a conditioning regimen consisting of low-dose cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, total body irradiation, and busulfan. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide and sirolimus. Recipients were ages 14–26 years, and 3 had severe infections active at transplant.

Results

All 7 recipients achieved full engraftment with complete donor chimerism early in the post-transplant period. Acute GVHD occurred in all cases and was grade 3 or steroid refractory in 3. Two patients with steroid-refractory GVHD died. Three patients with severe infectious complications active at transplant, 1 Nocardia pneumonia and 2 extensive invasive fungal infections), survived and were cured of their infection at last follow-up. Bacterial disease occurred post-transplant in all recipients, and viral infections/reactivation were common, including 4 cases of BK virus–associated hemorrhagic cystitis.

Conclusions

Seven patients with CGD achieved rapid and full-donor engraftment from HRDs utilizing PBCs and a conditioning regimen with PTCy and sirolimus GVHD prophylaxis. However, the incidence of grade 3 and steroid-refractory GVHD was high and led to 2 deaths. Patients with active infections at transplant had successful transplant courses and were cured of their disease. Although there was an initial success with this regimen, the cumulative experience does not support its use in CGD due to an unacceptable rate of severe GVHD.

Keywords: Chronic granulomatous disease, haploidentical, graft-versus-host disease, post-transplant cyclophosphamide


Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is a phenotypically complex primary immunodeficiency. Immunologically first characterized by neutrophil dysfunction mediated by genetic changes in the phox reactive oxygen intermediate generating system, CGD is associated with an increased risk of infection but also non-infectious inflammatory disease, often involving the gastrointestinal tract; hematopoietic cell transplantation can be curative [1].

The severe and life-threatening manifestations of CGD can be cured by hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Multiple protocols now exist to achieve engraftment and avoid graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Since there is no association with an antileukemic benefit in this non-malignant disease, avoiding GVHD is a priority. With increasing acceptance of HCT, the requirements for suitable donors are a barrier that can now be overcome by the use of “non-traditional” donors, especially haploidentical donors (HRDs). The predictable risks of rejection and GVHD from HRDs can be attenuated by manipulation of the graft (T cell depletion), or more generally applicable, the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), as pioneered in hematologic malignancy transplantation at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions [2]. Our institution began HRD HCT using PTCy in 2016 in patients with GATA2 and DOCK8 deficiency [3, 4].

We previously reported on our first experience in CGD with HRD HCT and PTCy in a single patient with a severe, refractory fungal infection as the indication for transplantation [5]. We continued to transplant for refractory infection and inflammatory bowel disease, and here report the results of seven patients, with an unacceptable incidence of severe/steroid-refractory gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD that has led us to modify this approach in HCT for CGD.

Methods and Patients

Data Collection

This study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of HRD HCT using PTCy, and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. This study was independently monitored for safety and data accuracy (Clinical Trials. gov. number, NCT02282904).

The following pretransplant data were collected: age at transplant, bone marrow biopsy, CGD genetic characteristics, and disease phenotype. The transplant data collected consisted of donor source with either peripheral blood cells (PBC) or bone marrow (BM), HLA match, busulfan area under the curve (AUC) based on a test dose of busulfan, total busulfan dose/kg weight of recipient, CD34+ and CD3+ donor cells infused per kg recipient weight, myeloid and CD3+ cell chimerism at day 100, time after transplant in months, GVHD prophylaxis, incidence of acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD and cGVHD), and current status including the presence or absence of continued immunosuppression.

Methods

A busulfan test dose was performed to inform the conditioning regimen. HCT was performed with peripheral blood stem cells and conditioning with fludarabine days − 6 through − 2, (30 mg/m2 × 5), intravenous once daily busulfan on days − 4, − 3, and − 2, with levels on day − 4 to provide a measured AUC to inform changes in the day − 2 dose to achieve total AUC 4000–6000 min × μMol/L, cyclophosphamide 14.5 mg/kg × 2, days − 6 and − 5, and total body irradiation (200 cGy, day − 1) conditioning with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg days 3 and 4) and sirolimus GVHD prophylaxis.

Hemorrhagic cystitis prevention was in accordance with institutional BMT consortium “Supportive Care Guidelines: Hemorrhagic Cystitis Prevention with High-Dose Cyclophosphamide” at http://intranet.cc.nih.gov/bmt/education/supportive-care.shtml.

Haploidentical donors had HLA compatibility representing a minimum match of 5/10 loci. If more than one haploidentical donor was available, each donor was evaluated for overall health, age, ABO match, cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus, etc., to select the best donor.

Patients

The study was designed to enroll 10 patients with no HLA matched-related or unrelated donor and disease of sufficient severity to justify the risk of HCT. Patients ages 2–65 were eligible.

HLA antibody screens were performed, with ABO typing and KIR typing (at the investigator’s discretion), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serologies for donor and recipient were performed.

Supportive Care

Standard guidelines for supportive care established at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center for patients undergoing allogeneic HCT were used. These guidelines agree with international guidelines for preventing infectious complications among HCT recipients.

Results

Patients and Transplant Outcomes

Seven patients, ages 14–26 years, were transplanted between November 2014 and December 2016 (Table 1). All patients had a history of mixed infectious and inflammatory conditions. All patients but one (patient 2, Table 1) had inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) requiring various intensities and durations of immunosuppression. The indications for transplantation were extensive active infection in 3 (one Nocardia, one Aspergillus nidulans, one Scedosporium apiospermum), and refractory inflammatory disease, especially colitis, in 4. One patient had protein-losing enteropathy (PLE), one extensive dermatitis, and one discoid lupus. Patient 7 had undergone an experimental expanded cord blood transplant as a child which failed.

Table 1.

Recipients, indications for transplantation, conditioning, and cell dose

Age/sex CGD type Clinical disease Manifestations of CGD present at transplant/pretransplant CRP (mg/L) and immunosuppression Busulfan AUC min × microm/L TNC (109) Cd 34+ cells/kg (106) CD3+ cells/kg (107)
14/M XL (p91-phox) Infection/protein-losing enteropathy, colitis Protein-losing enteropathy and Nocardia pneumonia/2.90, prednisone 7.5 mg daily and mesalamine DR 400 mg every 8 h 2461 31.5 7.98 16.89
26/F P67 (NCF-2) Infection A. nidulans pneumonia and osteomyelitis/17.10, none 3610 92.4 9.24 9.31
24/M P47 (NCF-1) Infection, colitis, and dermatitis Colitis and dermatitis/5.00, prednisone 20 mg daily, and mesalamine DR, 1200 mg twice daily 3828 50.3 9.84 21.5
16/M XL (p91-phox) Infection, colitis, cystitis, recurrent fever, and headaches Colitis, bladder disease/12.60, prednisolone 5 mg twice daily 3619 91.0 15.9 20.5
14/M XL (p91-phox) Infection and colitis S. apiospermum pneumonia and pericarditis, Colitis/5.90, prednisone 5 mg daily, and sulfasalazine 500 mg daily 3008 27.6 12 14.9
22/F XL (p91-phox) carrier Infection (Nocardia), colitis Colitis and discoid lupus/5.40, azathioprine 150 mg daily, mesalamine 1.2 g every 12 h, prednisone 15 mg daily, and hydroxychloroquine 200 mg daily 3349 105 10.5 14.1
19/M XL (p91-phox) Infection and colitis Colitis/6.60, mesalamine DR 1200 mg twice daily, and prednisone 7.5 mg twice daily 4250 55.2 9.85 12.32

CGD chronic granulomatous disease, CRP high-sensitivity comprehensive C-reactive protein, AUC area under the curve, TNC total nucleated cell dose, XL X-linked, DR delayed release: A. nidulans, Aspergillus nidulans; S. apiospermum, and Scedosporium apiospermum

All products were peripheral blood cells (PBC). The median busulfan AUC was 3446 min × microm/L (IQR 3008–3828). Cell products contained total nucleated cells median 64.7 × 109 (IQR 31.5–92.4,), CD34+ cells median 10.8 × 106/kg, (IQR 9.24–12), and CD3 15.6 × 107/kg (IQR 12.32–20.5). Patients with active infections at transplant received 2–5 granulocyte transfusions starting at neutropenia through the evidence of neutrophil recovery.

Pretransplant inflammatory disease was characterized by a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein within the week prior to transplantation and immunosuppression related to inflammatory bowel disease (Table 1).

All patients engrafted, with persistent evidence of full chimerism throughout the measured period. Neutrophil engraftment occurred at median day 19 (IQR 15–22) and platelets at median day 34 (IQR 17–31).

Five patients survived with median follow-up of more than 3 years (Table 2). All patients had grade 2 or higher acute GVHD; one patient had Grade 3 aGVHD of the skin. Two of these 5 also developed mild cGVHD.

Table 2.

Transplant donor, engraftment, complications, and outcome

Age/sex Donor (age), HLA match, and ABO compatible Engraftment day/granulocyte transfusion days Myeloid/CD3+ cell chimerism aGVHD grades/cGVHD severity Viral reactivation/intervention Post-transplant infections Follow-up or cause of death/interval
14/M Father (33), 8/10, yes PMN 15, platelets 14/5 and 11 100/≥ 97% from first assessment Grade 2 acute GI/no EBV/none Grade 2 HC with BK viruria C. difficile-associated diarrhea Resolved Nocardia pneumonia 18 months, persistent PLE, cure/> 3 years
26/F Mother (45), 10/10, yes PMN 21, platelets 23/9, 10, 12, 13, and 14 100/≥ 98% from first assessment Grade 2 acute GI, grade 1 skin/no CMV/preemption EBV/none S. aureus sternal wound infection Aspergillus infection resolved 11 months, Cure/> 3 years
24/M Brother (18), 8/10, yes PMN 17, platelets 31 100/100% at all points Grade 2 acute skin and grade 1 GI/yes, mild-limited EBV/none Grade 1 HC with BK viruria C. difficile-associated diarrhea Cure > 3 years
16/M Father (43), 5/10, yes PMN 12, platelets 19 100/100% at all points Grade 3 skin, GI/ mild CMV/preemption EBV/none Grade III HC with BK viruria A. fumigatus pneumonia
E. coli bacteremia
B. fragilis bacteremia
Cure > 2 years
14/M Father (34), 6/10, yes PMN 24, platelets 17/9, 21 100/100% at all points Grade 2 GI EBV/none CMV colitis/treatment S. mitis bacteremia Resolved fungal pneumonia/pericarditis 12 months, cure > 4 years
22/F Father (53), 5/10, yes PMN 20, Platelets 29 96–100%, 98–100% Steroid-refractory GI EBV/none Disseminated adenovirus K. pneumoniae/E.coli pneumonia Death day 131
19/M Father (52), 3/6, yes PMN 22, platelets 107 100/100% At all points Liver steroid- refractory GI EBV PTLD/rituximab CMV/preemption Grade III HC with BK viruria E. faecium bacteremia Nocardia/Enterobacter pneumonia Rhizopus sp. pneumonia Death day 316

HLA human leukocyte antigen, PMN polymorphonuclear leukocytes, aGVHD acute graft-versus-host disease, cGVHD chronic graft-versus-host disease, GI gastrointestinal, EBV Epstein-Barr virus, CMV cytomegalovirus, PTLD post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, HC hemorrhagic cystitis,C. difficile Clostridioides difficile, S. aureus Staphylococcus aureus, A. fumigatus, Aspergillus fumigatus, E. coli Escherichia coli, B. fragilis Bacteroides fragilis, S. mitis Streptococcus mitis, K. pneumoniae Klebsiella pneumoniae, E. faecium Enterococcus faecium, PLE protein-losing enteropathy

Two patients died, both as a result of steroid-refractory GVHD, one complicated by disseminated adenovirus disease. Both of these patients had severe and refractory IBD prior to transplantation.

Transplant Complications

Viral reactivation occurred in all cases. One case of EBV reactivation led to preemptive therapy with rituximab without evidence of disease. Preemptive therapy for CMV was used in 2 cases. One patient had CMV colitis with concomitant lower GI GVHD and was treated with a prolonged course of antiviral therapy with resolution. Hemorrhagic cystitis associated with BK viruria was present in 4 cases, and in 2 cases was Grade 3. Disseminated adenovirus disease with pneumonia led to death in one patient as noted above with steroid-refractory GVHD after combined anti-CD25 (basiliximab) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (infliximab) antibody treatment.

Bacterial infections complicated all cases, including Clostridioides difficile–associated colitis in 2 cases and bacteremias with enteric/mucosal organisms in 4 cases. All were successfully treated without apparent influence on clinical outcome. Patient 1, who had Nocardia pneumonia as the immediate indication for transplantation, had no pulmonary complication or progression of disease during transplantation.

Invasive molds (A. nidulans and S. apiospermum) refractory to standard therapies were the indications for transplantation in 2 cases and in neither case was there progression of disease during the transplant. One patient with severe GVHD had multiple new pulmonary nodules during the course of treatment of GVHD, with culture of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid that yielded Aspergillus fumigatus, which was successfully treated. One patient with steroid-refractory GVHD had a culture from BAL that grew a Rhizopus species, without clear association with a radiographic lesion, and there was no discernible progression of pulmonary disease.

Discussion

The need for alternative donors in CGD parallels the progression of disease to the degree that HCT becomes a necessary therapy in patients with complications that do not respond to standard therapies for infection and inflammation. We adapted a transplant protocol utilizing haploidentical donors and a conditioning regimen similar to that pioneered at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and adapted to other congenital immunodeficiencies (DOCK8 deficiency and GATA2 deficiency) at the Clinical Center of the NIH.

The results of this transplantation protocol were unsatisfactory. Although engraftment was essentially complete in the CD3+ and myeloid compartments early after transplant, all patients experienced acute GVHD, severe in 3/7 cases, and steroid refractory with subsequent death in 2. This degree of GVHD varies from that reported in our previous experience using a similar regimen in DOCK8 and GATA2 deficiency [3, 4]. Whether these results are due to transplantation in CGD, to changes in the regimen (the use of PBCs or sirolimus GVHD prophylaxis), or to a combination of these and other factors is difficult to ascertain. The most severe outcomes, steroid-refractory GVHD and death, occurred in patients who had the most severe CGD-associated IBD.

The small sample size and the possible relationship between the severity of pretransplant IBD and outcomes complicate this analysis. Prior to this experience, we did not have a formal severity scale related to IBD that would allow us to provide an adequate quantitative rather than qualitative assessment. It is clear from the series that the patients transplanted for active infection (patients 1, 2, and 5 in Table 1) had qualitatively less severe or even absent IBD, and that the two patients who died with steroid-refractory GVHD had chronic and severe disease requiring multiple immunosuppressive regimens over the course of many years. IBD has been associated with high-grade GVHD, and the scale of responses here, with death from steroid-refractory GI GVHD in the two patients with the most chronic and severe manifestations prior to transplant, would support the association [6]. To approach this with appropriate caution, we have added several evaluations, including consultation with a gastroenterologist, the Crohn Disease Activity Index, corticosteroid and other immunosuppressant doses, and endoscopic evaluation of colitis (simplified endoscopic score of Crohn Disease), to provide a composite severity evaluation of IBD pretransplant and will exclude patients with severe disease from the initial stages of an HRD protocol.

The first patient transplanted has been previously reported, and the justification for that alternative donor transplant was a fungal infection in an anatomic distribution that threatened the patient’s life (pericarditis). Both this patient, one with extensive Nocardia pneumonia and a third with chronic, destructive A. nidulans pneumonia and osteomyelitis had successful engraftment. Their GVHD and immunosuppressive therapy did not impede the cure of these underlying infections. The ability to transplant through medically refractory infectious diseases is a notable result and has been replicated in our conventional donor experience (manuscript in preparation).

With this discordance between early and complete engraftment and unacceptable outcomes related to GVHD, the need for an alternative method using mismatched donors remains. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide is an established agent to facilitate haploidentical donor transplantation and has marked advantages in terms of its availability. An increased incidence of infectious complications (especially viral infections) has been noted, but as in our experience, these have not produced unacceptable outcomes clearly attributable to viral reactivation [7]. In our series, only disseminated adenovirus disease after T cell- and TNF-depleting therapy contributed to a fatal outcome.

This is the largest published experience with HRD transplant in CGD, and should serve as a note of caution to single patient case reports, our own as well as others [8, 9]. HCT with PTCy led to complete engraftment in patients with CGD, but unacceptable levels of GVHD with 2 deaths out of 7 recipients. We are modifying our transplantation approach for haploidentical donors by initially excluding recipients with severe inflammatory bowel disease. Our interpretation of these outcomes is that the intensity of the regimen and rapid full engraftment may have contributed to the unacceptable rates of GVHD. The conditioning regimen will be modified to eliminate pretransplant cyclophosphamide and fludarabine and replace those agents with what we believe to be a lower-toxicity regimen based on scheduled moderate dose distal and proximal low-dose alemtuzumab, in order to decrease inflammatory disease that may contribute to an environment hostile to engraftment and to provide improved GVHD prophylaxis along with the continued use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide. This approach will allow us to assess the comparative intensity related to engraftment and the probable inverse relationship with GVHD, reverting to a standard consideration in transplantation for non-malignant disease in which failure of engraftment is preferable to GVHD, certainly with the mortality demonstrated with the regimen described here. As transplantation for CGD becomes a preferred treatment, the need for alternative donors continues to increase, justifying these attempts to achieve the standard goal of successful engraftment without severe complications and mortality.

Acknowledgements

This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the following components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH): National Cancer Institute, NIH, under Contract No. HHSN261200800001E; and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease under Intramural Project #1-ZAI-AI000989. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government. This research was supported (in part) by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research; and (in part) by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Footnotes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study under IRB-approved NIH Protocol #s 94-I-0073, 05-I-0213 and/or 15-I-0007.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Connelly JA, Marsh R, Parikh S, Talano JA. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic granulomatous disease: controversies and state of the art. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2018;7(suppl_1):S31–S9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Luznik L, O’Donnell PV, Symons HJ, Chen AR, Leffell MS, Zahurak M, et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(6):641–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Freeman AF, Shah NN, Parta M, Su HC, Brofferio A, Gradus-Pizlo I, et al. Haploidentical related donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for DOCK8 deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016;4(6):1239–42 e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Parta M, Shah NN, Baird K, Rafei H, Calvo KR, Hughes T, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for GATA2 deficiency using a busulfan-based regimen. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24(6):1250–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Parta M, Hilligoss D, Kelly C, Kwatemaa N, Theobald N, Malech H, et al. Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide in a patient with chronic granulomatous disease and active infection: a first report. J Clin Immunol. 2015;35(7):675–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sorror ML, Martin PJ, Storb RF, Bhatia S, Maziarz RT, Pulsipher MA, et al. Pretransplant comorbidities predict severity of acute graft-versus-host disease and subsequent mortality. Blood. 2014;124(2): 287–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fayard A, Daguenet E, Blaise D, Chevallier P, Labussiere H, Berceanu A, et al. Evaluation of infectious complications after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide following reduced-intensity and myeloablative conditioning: a study on behalf of the Francophone Society of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54(10):1586–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Regueiro-Garcia A, Farina-Nogueira S, Porto-Arceo JA, Couselo-Sanchez JM. Haploidentical stem cell transplantation in a boy with chronic granulomatous disease. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2018;46(4):385–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou L, Dong LJ, Gao ZY, Yu XJ, Lu DP. Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for a case with X-linked chronic granulomatous disease. Pediatr Transplant. 2017;21(1). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES