The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed weaknesses in health and care systems and global public health responses, some of which can be addressed through data and digital science. The Riyadh Declaration on Digital Health was formulated during the Riyadh Global Digital Health Summit, Aug 11–12, 2020, a landmark forum that highlighted the importance of digital technology, data, and innovation for resilient global health and care systems.
Our panel of 13 experts articulated seven key priorities and nine recommendations (panel ) for data and digital health that need to be adopted by the global health community to address the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic and future pandemics.
Panel. Recommendations from the Riyadh Global Digital Health Summit.
-
1
Implement data-driven and evidence-based protocols for clear and effective communication with common messaging to build citizens' trust
-
2
Work with global stakeholders to confront propagation of misinformation or disinformation through social media platforms and mass media
-
3
Implement a standard global minimum dataset for public health data reporting and a data governance structure tailored to communicable diseases
-
4
Ensure countries prioritise digital health, particularly, improving digital health infrastructure and reaching digital maturity
-
5
Enable health and care organisations by providing the necessary technology to collect high-quality data in a timely way and promote sharing to create health intelligence
-
6
Cultivate a health and care workforce with the knowledge, skills, and training in data and digital technologies required to address current and future public health challenges
-
7
Ensure surveillance systems combine an effective public health response with respect for ethical and privacy principles
-
8
Develop digital personal tools and services to support comprehensive health programmes (in disease prevention, testing, management, and vaccination) globally
-
9
Maintain, continue to fund, and innovate surveillance systems as a core component of the connected global health system for rapid preparedness and optimal global responses
The first priority is for the health and care sectors to adopt applied health intelligence (HI). HI represents a systematic approach and comprehensive methodology applied to the collection, linkage, analysis, and use of appropriate health data. HI is used for the surveillance, monitoring, and improvement of population and patient outcomes, and for assessing the efficiency and effectiveness of policies, programmes, and services.1
The second priority relates to interoperable digital technology and for this technology to be scaled up and sustainable. Digital health tools and services require a secure, trusted flow of data with scalability and interoperability support. The advent of commercial cloud computing services and distributed systems has paved the way for scalable, cost-effective service provision.
The third priority is to support the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI). Use of AI in health systems demands rapid access to various data types, often not possible in health-care settings with slow data flows.2 AI also requires vast amounts of high-quality data to achieve acceptable accuracy and validity. Health-care organisations and systems need to provide the necessary technology to collect and share high-quality data.
Effective communication about public health crises and risk is the fourth priority. Such communication requires an understanding of risk and the timely dissemination of information; seamless digital integration of case reports and deaths; and effective data visualisation tools such as map-based dashboards.3 Effective communication to change knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours mandates the systematic exploration of diverse digital channels and the innovative design of digital tools for citizen engagement.4
The fifth priority concerns health data governance, quality, policy, regulation, and use. Passively generated digital location data from mobile phones and internet services provide crucial information about human mobility and interactions.5 However, ethics and privacy are essential and must be adhered to when using these ubiquitous data. Projections about disease epidemics require human mobility and interaction data that are aggregated in time and space to reconstruct population-level behaviour.6
The sixth priority relates to the quality and effectiveness of digital technology for improved patient and population outcomes. Digital technologies offer many opportunities to improve the quality and effectiveness of care, patient outcomes, and population health.7 Digital health systems should be designed and implemented to maximise data quality and access for clinicians and patients and these systems should be interoperable.
The seventh priority is research and innovation. Investing in, conducting, publishing, and promoting transparent research are foundational to digital health advances that leverage data, analytics, and AI.8 It can take an average of 17 years to translate a major medical research discovery to widespread delivery.9 The competitive, commercial culture of technology revolves around disruptive innovation, iterative discoveries, and the delivery of new technologies over months, not years. To translate life-saving innovations in digital health into widespread applications, collaboration across the best of research and innovation in health and technology is essential.
The Riyadh Declaration on Digital Health is a call to action to create the infrastructure needed to share effective digital health evidence-based practices and high-quality, real-time data locally and globally to provide actionable information to more health systems and countries. Digital and data technologies have a role in promoting the coordinated development of shared global public health policies and resilient health and care systems. These technologies can support health systems and governments to perform better in future pandemics and other global health challenges. We call on state actors to ensure that digital technology and innovation become the cornerstone of a resilient global health and care system that places individual and population health at the forefront of our future endeavours.
Acknowledgments
KR is an employee of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and receives IBM stock as part of compensation; IBM was not involved in the summit discussed in this Comment. BAK was the President of the Riyadh Global Digital Health Summit hosted by the Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs. The other authors declare no competing interests. We thank Caitlin Ahern and Christian Liberty Marshall for their technical support in preparing this Comment. This Comment is published as part of the G20 Riyadh Global Digital Health Summit (Aug 11–12, 2020) activities. Saudi Arabia hosted this virtual summit to leverage the role of digital health in the fight against current and future pandemics.
References
- 1.Robeznieks A. American Medical Association; July 7, 2020. COVID-19 exposed systemic weak points. How to get it right next time.https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/public-health/covid-19-exposed-systemic-weak-points-how-get-it-right-next-time [Google Scholar]
- 2.Naude W. Artificial intelligence vs COVID-19: limitations, constraints and pitfalls. AI Soc. 2020;35:1–5. doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-00978-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang H, Cleary PD, Little J, Auffray C. Communicating in a public health crisis. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30197-7. published online Aug 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Murray CJL, Alamro NMS, Hwang H, Lee U. Digital public health and COVID-19. Lancet Public Health. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30197-7. published online Aug 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kogan NE, Clemente L, Liautaud P. An early warning approach to monitor COVID-19 activity with multiple digital traces in near real-time. ArXiv. 2020 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd6989. arXiv:2007.00756 published online July 3. (preprint) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cori A, Donnelly CA, Dorigatti I. Key data for outbreak evaluation: building on the Ebola experience. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017;372 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sittig DF, Wright A, Coiera E. Current challenges in health information technology-related patient safety. Health Informatics J. 2020;26:181–189. doi: 10.1177/1460458218814893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva: 2016. Monitoring and evaluating digital health interventions: a practical guide to conducting research and assessment.https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/mhealth/digital-health-interventions/en/ [Google Scholar]
- 9.Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104:510–520. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]