Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 23.
Published before final editing as: Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Mar 23;211:107964. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107964

Longitudinal Associations between Marijuana and Cigar Use in Young Adults

Jennifer Cornacchione Ross 1, Erin L Sutfin 1, Cynthia Suerken 2, Stephannie Walker 1, Mark Wolfson 3, Beth A Reboussin 2
PMCID: PMC7508868  NIHMSID: NIHMS1578844  PMID: 32251920

Abstract

Background

We assess the longitudinal associations between marijuana and cigar (little cigars and cigarillos [LCCs] and large cigars) use on subsequent initiation of marijuana and cigar use.

Methods

Data are from a cohort study of 2,189 young adults recruited in fall 2010 from 11 colleges in the Southeast. We used discrete-time survival analysis to examine whether ever use of marijuana at baseline (spring 2011, freshman year) predicted initiation of LCCs and large cigars and whether ever use of these cigar products predicted initiation of marijuana use across 10 waves of data collection (2011–2018).

Results

The sample was 65.3% female, 83.6% White, 5.9% Hispanic, and 61.8% had college-educated mothers. At baseline, 70% reported never using LCCs, 71% reported never using large cigars, and 74% reported never using marijuana. Ever use of marijuana at baseline was associated with an increased risk of LCC initiation (Incident rate ratio [IRR]=1.6, 95%CI=1.0, 2.5) but not large cigar initiation. Ever use of LCCs (IRR=1.4, 95%CI=1.1, 1.8) and ever use of large cigars (IRR=1.3, 95%CI=1.1, 1.8) at baseline both predicted initiation of marijuana use.

Conclusions

Our findings support growing evidence that marijuana and LCCs are strongly associated and use of one substance predicts use of the other. In contrast to studies of adults, we also found that young adults who have tried large cigars may be at increased risk for subsequent marijuana use. These findings highlight the need to consider each product as a potential gateway of the other when developing interventions for young adults.

Keywords: marijuana, cigars, cigarillos, tobacco, young adults

1. Introduction

Although cigarette smoking rates have declined among young adults, the use of cigars, including little cigars and cigarillos (LCCs) and large cigars, remains common, particularly among young adults. According to the 2013–2014 Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health survey, among young adults ages 18–24, current use of cigars is 14.1%; 5.9% traditional cigars, 10.7% cigarillos, and 3.5% little cigars (Kasza et al., 2017). Similarly, marijuana use is highly prevalent among young adults and increasing. Rates of current marijuana use from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health increased significantly from 17.3% in 2002 to 22.1% in 2017 (Azofeifa, 2016; Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, 2018). Similarly, use of marijuana has increased among young adults, with daily or almost daily use increased from 14.5% in 2002 to 21.9% in 2017 (Azofeifa, 2016; Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, 2018).

Both products pose significant health risks. Cigar use, including large cigars and LCCs, causes several types of cancers, heart disease, lung disease, and nicotine addiction (Chang et al., 2015), and their smoke contains harmful constituents, such as tobacco-specific nitrosamines, ammonia, and carbon monoxide (Baker F et al., 2000; Hoffmann and Hoffmann, 1998). Additionally, marijuana has important acute and long-term health effects, such as impaired short-term memory and motor impairment, reduced educational attainment, addiction, chronic bronchitis, respiratory problems, and increased risk of chronic psychosis disorders (Volkow et al., 2014).

There is strong evidence of that young adults co-use cigars (large cigars and LCCs) and marijuana (Schauer et al., 2016; Strong et al., 2018). Research has shown that 50.1% of established young adult cigar users (large cigars and LCCs) also report past 30-day marijuana use (Strong et al., 2018). In addition, 20.6% of past 30-day adult marijuana users report past 30-day cigar use (large cigars and LCCs) compared to 4.2% of non-marijuana users (Schauer et al., 2016). Studies show that rates of co-use are highest among young adults; 13.7% of young adults report past month co-use. Despite lower rates of co-use among adults ages 26–34, rates are increasing among this age group (6.6% to 8.0% 2003–2012) (Schauer et al., 2015). Co-use can also mean concurrent use (i.e. use at the same time). Blunts are a common mode of concurrent use. Blunts are hollowed out cigars filled with marijuana). Rates of blunt use among current marijuana users are also highest among those 18–24 (60.4% vs 43.0% for 25–34 year olds) (Schauer et al., 2016). Although users may not perceive they are using tobacco when smoking a blunt, blunts may expose marijuana users to residual nicotine in the wrapper and therefore the propensity for tobacco use (Bélanger et al., 2013; Patton et al., 2005; Rosenberry et al., 2017; Schauer et al., 2017, 2016).

Nicotine may reinforce and enhance the effects of marijuana and vice versa (behaviorally, cognitively, and pharmacologically), but research is limited (Ramo et al., 2013, 2012; Viveros et al., 2006). Understanding the reasons for co-use of marijuana and tobacco is important because co-use has been shown to be associated with additive health effects (Badiani et al., 2015; Meier and Hatsukami, 2016; Rooke et al., 2013; Strong et al., 2018), higher levels of dependence, and lower intentions to quit and less successful cessation attempts for both marijuana and tobacco (Peters et al., 2012; Ramo et al., 2013, 2012; Schauer et al., 2017; Strong et al., 2018). As marijuana becomes legalized in more states and increasingly accepted across the U.S. (Hartig and Geiger, 2018), it will be important to monitor the impact of potential increases in marijuana use on the prevalence of cigar use and the underlying reasons for co-use of both.

A few studies have characterized cross-sectional patterns of marijuana and cigar co-use (Cohn et al., 2016; Soldz et al., 2003). However, there is limited research to examine their longitudinal associations. In one 4-year longitudinal study, it was found that marijuana use predicted past month LCC use among adults ages 18–34, but did not predict past month large cigar use; similarly, any cigar use did not predict past month marijuana use (Cohn et al., 2018). It is also important to examine the role that marijuana and cigars have on initiation of one another. Initiating cigars may serve as an introduction to nicotine, increasing the potential for addiction and lifelong tobacco use (DiFranza and Wellman, 2005; McMillen et al., 2012). Further, initiation of marijuana can lead to long-term use and health consequences (Fairman et al., 2019; Patrick et al., 2016; Volkow et al., 2014). A better understanding of the role that marijuana use has on cigar use initiation as well as the role that cigar use has on marijuana initiation is needed to inform the development of appropriate interventions to prevent initiation, and, ultimately, regular consumption of nicotine and marijuana. Our study adds to the literature by assessing the influence of marijuana and cigar use on the initiation of the other in a large cohort of young adults followed for 8 years.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Data were collected from 2010–2018, representing 11 waves of online survey data collection, from the Assessment of the College Experience (ACE) Study (previously referred to as the Smokeless Tobacco Use in College Students study) (Spangler et al., 2014; Wolfson et al., 2015). Students from 11 colleges and universities participated in this study. Seven of the colleges were in North Carolina and four were in Virginia; nine were public and two were private; five were in rural communities, four in suburban communities, and two in urban communities (Wolfson et al., 2014). Undergraduate enrollment ranged from about 4,000 to just over 23,000. In fall 2010, a tobacco screener survey was emailed to all first-year students at these colleges. A total of 10,528 students completed the screener. A subsample from the screener survey was invited to participate in a cohort study. Lifetime smokeless tobacco users, current smokers, and males were oversampled. There were 4902 eligible students who were invited to participate in the longitudinal cohort study of which 3146 (64.2%) completed the baseline (Wave 1) survey. Because the mode of contact was via email and data collection was web-based, every effort was made to contact participants each wave regardless of their academic status (e.g. no longer enrolled in college, moved to a different state) or participation in previous waves. Surveys were completed in the spring of 2011 (Wave 2, n=2520), fall 2011 (Wave 3, n=2459), spring 2012 (Wave 4, n=2507), fall 2012 (Wave 5, n=2516), fall 2013 (Wave 6, n=2500), fall 2014 (Wave 7, n=1855), fall 2016 (Wave 8, n=1966), spring 2017 (Wave 9, n=1896), fall 2017 (Wave 10, n=1914), spring 2018 (Wave 11, n=1927) and fall 2018 (Wave 12, n=1960). Through Wave 6, we retained approximately 80% of the original cohort (65.4% completed all 6 waves and 75.5% completed 5 or more). Wave 7 was the first post-college wave for most participants. Through Wave 12, after 8 years of data collection, we have retained 62.3% of the original cohort. The study protocol was approved by the Wake Forest School of Medicine Institutional Review Board, and additional privacy protection was provided by obtaining a Certificate of Confidentiality from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In the current study, we use Wave 2 (spring 2011) as our baseline because questions for cigar use did not differentiate between large cigars and LCCs until Wave 2.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Tobacco use

At each wave, participants were asked whether they had ever smoked each of the following tobacco products: little cigars or cigarillos (LCC), large cigars, waterpipe tobacco, e-cigarettes or other vaping devices, cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco (SLT). They were considered current users of a product if they reported using it at least once in the past 30 days. Similarly, at each wave participants were considered ever users of these products if they reported ever trying the product.

2.2.2. Marijuana use

Marijuana use was measured by asking participants if they had ever used marijuana. If yes, they were then asked to select how may days they had used it out of the last 30 (range: 0–30). Those reporting using at least one day in the past 30 days were considered current users. We did not ask participants about modes of marijuana consumption (e.g., blunts, edibles) until Wave 10.

2.2.3. Demographics

Demographic characteristics included sex (male, female), race (coded as White vs. Non-White), ethnicity (coded as Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic), and mother’s highest level of education as an indicator for socioeconomic status (coded as at least a college degree vs. less than a college degree).

2.2.4. Other behaviors

We asked participants at baseline whether they were a member of Greek life during college (coded as member or pledge vs. not). We also assessed religiosity at baseline (coded as attend religious services at least 2x/month vs. less than 2x/month). We asked about past 30-day alcohol drinking, with data from this question being used in every wave reported in this manuscript.

2.3. Analyses

A series of discrete-time survival analysis models were fit to examine 1) the impact of baseline ever marijuana use on time to first LCC use among never cigar users, 2) the impact of baseline ever marijuana use on time to first large cigar use among never cigar users, 3) the impact of baseline ever LCC use on time to first marijuana use among never marijuana users, and 4) the impact of baseline ever large cigar use on time to first marijuana use. “First use” was defined as the first wave after baseline at which the participant reported ever using the product. Models controlled for sex, race, ethnicity, mother’s education, Greek society membership, religiosity, past 30-day alcohol use, and past 30-day use of other tobacco products (e-cigarette, waterpipe, SLT, cigarettes). Models including LCC as a predictor or outcome additionally adjusted for past 30 day large cigar use and vice-versa. Past 30-day use variables were included as time-varying covariates while other variables were treated as time-constant factors. Participants could have gaps in waves of participation, in which case person-periods of unknown risk were not included in the analyses. Analyses were performed using PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC in SAS V9 to account for the complex sampling design, specifically oversampling of lifetime smokeless users, current smokers and males and the sampling of individuals nested within-schools. Results were reported as incident rate ratios (IRR). The IRR is the incidence rate of the outcome in those with the exposure of interest during the time at risk divided by the incidence rate in those without the exposure.

3. Results

The sample was 65.3% female, 83.6% White, 5.9% Hispanic, and 61.8% had college-educated mothers. At baseline (spring 2011, freshman year), 70% of the sample reported never using LCCs, 71% reported never using large cigars, and 74% reported never using marijuana. See Table 1 for demographic, behavioral, and tobacco use characteristics.

Table 1.

Baseline Demographic, Behavioral, and Tobacco Use Characteristic By Ever Use of Marijuana, LCCs, and Large Cigars

Baseline Ever Marijuana Use Baseline Ever Little Cigar and Cigarillo Use Baseline Ever Large Cigar Use Total
Yes N=736 No N=1453 Yes N=935 No N=1254 Yes N=918 No N=1271 N=2189
Age 18.5 (0.03) 18.6 (0.02) 18.6 (0.03) 18.6 (0.02) 18.6 (0.03) 18.5 (0.02) 18.6 (0.02)
Sex
 Male 396 (40.7) 713 (32.6) 542 (48.7) 567 (28.8) 605 (56.8) 504 (25.7) 1109 (34.7)
 Female 340 (59.3) 740 (67.3) 393 (51.3) 687 (71.2) 313 (43.2) 767 (74.3) 1080 (65.3)
Race
 White 651 (88.8) 1202 (81.8) 808 (85.1) 1045 (83.0) 821 (89.3) 1032 (81.2) 1853 (83.6)
 Non-White 85 (11.2) 251 (18.2) 127 (14.9) 209 (17.0) 97 (10.7) 239 (18.7) 336 (16.4)
Hispanic
  Yes
   No
58 (9.1)
678 (90.9)
80 (4.8)
1373 (95.2)
66 (7.5)
869 (92.5)
72 (5.2)
1182 (94.8)
58 (7.1)
860 (92.9)
80 (5.5)
1191 (94.5)
138 (5.9)
2051 (94.1)
Past 30 day use
 Marijuana 615 (78.2) NA 471 (45.3) 144 (9.4) 444 (41.7) 171 (11.3) 615 (20.1)
 Little cigars and cigarillos 202 (24.2) 119 (5.0) 321 (33.3) NA 242 (22.6) 79 (4.8) 321 (9.9)
 Large cigars 149 (15.8) 100 (4.4) 206 (19.8) 43 (2.0) 249 (25.1) NA 249 (7.3)
 Cigarettes 341 (32.9) 176 (6.2) 408 (32.0) 109 (5.0) 388 (31.2) 129 (5.6) 517 (13.1)
 Waterpipe 221 (26.7) 124 (5.6) 274 (25.6) 71 (4.8) 249 (23.9) 96 (5.8) 345 (11.1)
 E-cigarettes 32 (3.0) 19 (0.7) 38 (2.7) 13 (0.7) 40 (3.0) 11 (0.6) 51 (1.3)
 Smokeless tobacco 87 (7.4) 62 (1.8) 124 (9.2) 25 (0.8) 130 (9.7) 19 (0.6) 149 (3.3)
 Alcohol 698 (93.7) 743 (46.0) 799 (82.1) 642 (48.1) 799 (83.7) 642 (47.8) 1441 (58.2)
Ever Use
 Marijuana NA NA 548 (54.5) 188 (13.5) 518 (51.3) 218 (15.2) 736 (25.7)
 Little cigars and cigarillos 548 (63.2) 387 (18.3) NA NA 688 (68.3) 247 (14.1) 935 (29.8)
 Large cigars 518 (57.9) 400 (19.1) 688 (66.5) 230 (13.1) NA NA 918 (29.1)
SES
 Mom less than college degree 266 (37.0) 556 (38.5) 370 (39.3) 452 (37.7) 330 (34.6) 492 (39.6) 822 (38.1)
 Mom at least college degree 470 (63.0) 897 (61.5) 565 (60.7) 802 (62.3) 588 65.4) 779 (60.4) 1367 (61.8)
Greek Affiliation 167 (23.5) 209 (12.8) 183 (19.6) 193 (13.9) 200 (22.0) 176 (13.0) 376 (15.6)
Attend religious service 2x+ per month 100 (14.0) 498 (37.7) 169 (19.9) 429 (36.6) 171 (20.8) 427 (36.1) 598 (31.6)

Note. Cells are N (%) except for Age, which is M (SD)

Among those never having tried LCCs or large cigars at baseline, ever use of marijuana at baseline was associated with an increased risk of LCC initiation (IRR=1.6, CI=1.01, 2.5) but not large cigar initiation (IRR=1.2, CI=0.8, 1.8) in fully adjusted models. Among those never having tried marijuana at baseline, ever use of LCCs (IRR=1.4, CI=1.1, 1.9) and ever use of large cigars (IRR=1.3, CI=1.1, 1.8) at baseline both predicted initiation of marijuana use in fully adjusted models (Table 2).

Table 2.

Multivariable Discrete-Time Survival Analysis

Predictor Marijuana Initiation
IRR (95% CI)
Marijuana Initiation
IRR (95% CI)
LCC Initiation
IRR (95% CI)
Large Cigar Initiation
IRR (95% CI)
Ever LCC Use at Baseline 1.40 (1.1, 1.8)
Ever Large Cigar Use at Baseline 1.3 (1.1, 1.8)
Ever Marijuana Use at Baseline 1.6 (1.01, 2.5) 1.2 (0.8, 1.8)
Demographics
Female vs. Male 1.2 (1.1, 1.4) 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) 0.80 (0.6, 1.0) 0.5 (0.4, 0.6)
Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic 0.8 (0.5, 1.3) 0.8 (0.5, 1.3) 1.1 (0.8, 1.4) 0.7 (0.5, 0.9)
Non-White vs. White 1.9 (1.1, 1.5) 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) 1.3 (0.9, 1.8) 1.04 (0.8, 1.3)
Mom college educated 1.2 (0.9, 1.4) 1.1 (0.9, 1.4) 0.9 (0.7, 1.2 1.2 (0.9, 1.6)
Greek affiliation (member or pledge) 0.8 (0.6, 1.03) 0.8 (0.6, 0.9) 1.2 (0.7, 1.9) 1.7 (1.3, 2.3)
Attends religious services at least 2x month 0.6 (0.5, 0.8) 0.6 (0.5, 0.8) 0.8 (0.7, 1.04) 0.7 (0.5, 0.9)
Time-Varying Covariates
Past 30-day drinking 6.6 (4.3, 10.1) 6.7 (4.5, 10.1) 2.5 (1.5, 4.0) 2.8 (2.1, 3.9)
Past 30-day cigarette use 1.9 (1.3, 2.9) 1.9 (1.3, 2.9) 2.0 (1.2, 3.5) 1.9 (1.3, 2.9)
Past 30-day e-cigarette use 1.8 (0.9, 3.3) 1.8 (0.9, 3.3) 3.0 (1.8, 5.0) 2.5 (1.5, 4.0)
Past 30-day waterpipe use 2.2 (1.7, 2.9) 2.2 (1.6, 2.9) 2.8 (1.5, 5.3) 1.8 (1.2, 2.8)
Past 30-day smokeless use 0.8 (0.5, 1.2) 0.8 (0.5, 1.3) 2.8 (0.9, 8.0) 3.2 (1.3, 7.9)
Past 30-day large cigar or LCC use 1.3 (0.9, 1.9) 1.3 (0.70, 2.3) 5.3 (3.8, 8.0)a 4.6 (2.4, 8.6)b

Note. Bold values are statistically significant.

a

Past 30 day large cigar use predicted LCC initiation

b

Past 30-day LCC use predicted large cigar initiation

We also found demographic factors associated with initiation of LCCs, large cigars, and marijuana in fully adjusted models (see Table 2). In the model of LCC use predicting marijuana initiation, females were more likely than males to initiate marijuana (IRR=1.2, CI 1.1, 1.4), and non-Whites were more likely than Whites to initiate marijuana (IRR=1.3, CI 1.1, 1.5). Those who reported attending religious services at least twice per month were less likely than those who attended religious services less frequently to initiate marijuana (IRR=0.6, CI 0.5, 0.8). We also found that past 30-day users of cigarettes (IRR=1.9, CI 1.3, 2.9) and waterpipe tobacco (IRR=2.2, CI 1.7, 2.9) were more likely to initiate marijuana compared to nonusers of those products. Similarly, past 30-day users of alcohol were more likely to initiate marijuana (IRR=6.6, CI 4.3, 10.1).

In the model of large cigar use predicting marijuana initiation, the same covariates predicted marijuana initiation as they did in the LCC model, with the exception of Greek Life participation. Those who participated in Greek Life during college were less likely to initiate marijuana compared to those who did not participate (IRR=0.8, CI 0.6, 0.9).

In the model of marijuana use predicting LCC initiation, females were less likely than males to initiate LCCs (IRR=0.8, CI 0.6, 1.0). Past 30-day users of cigarettes (IRR=2.0, CI 1.2, 3.5), e-cigarettes (IRR=3.0, CI 1.8, 5.0), waterpipe tobacco (IRR=2.8, CI 1.5, 5.3), and large cigars (IRR=5.5, CI 3.8, 8.0) were more likely to initiate LCCs compared to nonusers of those products. Similarly, past 30-day users of alcohol were more likely to initiate LCCs compared to those who did not use alcohol in the past 30 days (IRR=2.5, CI 1.5, 4.0).

In the model of marijuana predicting large cigar initiation, the same covariates that predicted initiation of LCC use also predicted initiation of large cigar use, with the exception of four covariates. Hispanics were less likely to initiate large cigar use compared to non-Hispanics (IRR=0.7, CI 0.5, 0.9). Those who participated in Greek Life during college were more likely to initiate large cigars compared to those who did not participate (IRR=1.7, CI 1.3, 2.3). Religiosity also served as a protective factor, with those attending religious services at least twice per month being less likely to initiate large cigars compared to those who attended fewer than 2x per month (IRR=0.7, CI 0.5, 0.9). Finally, those who used SLT in the past 30 days were more likely to initiate large cigars than those who did not use SLT in the past 30 days (IRR=3.2, CI 1.3, 7.9).

4. Discussion

Overall, we found a strong longitudinal association between marijuana use and use of LCCs and large cigars. Consistent with the study of Cohn et al. (2018) in a national sample of 18–34 year olds, we found that marijuana use at college entry predicts later LCC use, even after adjustment for sociodemographics and other tobacco product and alcohol use. However, in contrast to Cohn et al. 2018, we found that young adults who reported having tried LCCs or large cigars were at increased risk for subsequent marijuana use. The lack of findings for large cigars in Cohn et al. may be due to differences in the study populations. Our study assesses a cohort of students as they are entering college whereas Cohn et al. (2018) follows a nationally representative sample of adults ages 18–34 at study entry. Prior studies have found that large cigar use is more common among affluent and college-educated populations (Cohn et al., 2016; Richardson et al., 2013), which more closely reflects our study population. Marijuana use predicting later LCC use but not large cigar use may be due to product characteristics of LCCs compared to large cigars. Qualitative research findings have shown that LCCs are sometimes used to enhance marijuana smoking through blunts, creating a unique flavor profile from the LCC flavor in combination with the marijuana flavor as well as providing an extra buzz (Jolly, 2008; Sterling et al., 2015). It is possible that LCC use may have been initiated while also using marijuana. Many large, premium cigars are tobacco flavored, so it is unlikely that these more high-end products, which cost more money, are used as blunts compared to flavored LCCs, which are cheaper (Corey et al., 2018).

We also found in our four models that use of alcohol and other tobacco products was associated with initiation of LCCs, large cigars, and marijuana. Past month cigarette smoking, waterpipe tobacco smoking, and alcohol use were all associated with initiation of LCCs, large cigars, and marijuana. We also found that past month LCC use predicted initiation of large cigar use, and vice versa. Past month e-cigarette use predicted LCC and large cigar initiation, but not marijuana initiation. Finally, past month SLT use predicted large cigar initiation, but not LCCs or marijuana. These findings are consistent with other research that has found that the majority of marijuana users also use tobacco or use certain tobacco products as a vehicle to use marijuana (Sterling et al., 2016; Strong et al., 2018; Sutfin et al., 2014). Research has also found that those who co-use marijuana and tobacco are less likely to report intentions or attempts to quit smoking tobacco because of their reinforcing effects on each other (Agrawal et al., 2012; Strong et al., 2018). This further enforces the importance of considering use of both marijuana and tobacco use when developing interventions.

We found additional demographic factors associated with initiation of marijuana, LCCs, and large cigars. Females were more likely than males to initiate marijuana use, but less likely to initiate LCCs and large cigar. This finding is similar to previous research showing that female tobacco users are more likely than male tobacco users to use other substances (e.g., marijuana) (Conway et al., 2018; Goodwin et al., 2017). Non-Whites were more likely than Whites to initiate marijuana use, but no association was found for race and large cigar initiation. Findings were marginally significant for LCCs with non-Whites more likely to initiate LCC use. The lack of significance may reflect our small sample of non-Whites. Those who were Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic were less likely to initiate large cigar use, but no association was found for initiation of LCCs or marijuana. These findings reflect the relative prevalence estimates found in other studies, extending the body of knowledge for LCC and large cigar initiation (Kasza et al., 2017; Strong et al., 2018). Interventions should consider these factors to target these at-risk populations, including through public education efforts, such as communication campaigns, where messages can be tailored to different demographic groups that are at most risk. No relationship was found for socioeconomic status (mother’s education) for initiation of LCCs, large cigars, or marijuana. This finding contrasts with other research, which has found that those with lower socioeconomic status are more likely to be users of tobacco and other substances, but may reflect our higher SES sample (Pacek et al., 2018; Wang, 2018). Studies have shown that peer characteristics, familial substance use, and juvenile delinquency are also associated with substance use during young adulthood (Redonnet et al., 2012). Further research is needed to determine if these or other traits play a role in current young adult marijuana and cigar use and how they may facilitate initiation of different products.

Furthermore, we found participation in social organizations to be associated with initiation. In our study, we found a strong association between Greek life and use of large cigars in fully adjusted models. Overall, the prevalence of both LC and LCC use was higher among those involved in Greek life than those who were not (Table 1). This is consistent with common stereotypes of fraternity houses in particular. However, we also found that those participating in Greek life were less likely to smoke marijuana than those not involved in Greek life. This finding is in contrast to studies which have found a positive correlation between Greek life and marijuana use (McCabe et al., 2018, 2005; O’Brien et al., 2018). However, other studies have also found marijuana use to be lower among those involved in Greek Life (Phillips et al., 2017). It is possible that those involved in Greek Life are more likely to smoke large cigars for celebratory events, such as new member initiation. Use of marijuana might also lead to punishment such as being expelled from their fraternity or sorority, so those in Greek life may be more likely to avoid marijuana use. Also, our findings demonstrate that religiosity may be a protective factor for marijuana and large cigar use. This finding is consistent with existing literature on tobacco and substance use (Hodge et al., 2007; Park et al., 2017). Participation in organizations likely leads to engaging in behavior to conform to the norms of the group, whether it be increased or decreased likelihood of substance use (Cialdini and Goldstein, 2004). Use of large cigars and LCCs in our study may be reflective of social influences and the availability and propensity to use multiple substances in contrast to reasons for use of large cigars and LCCs in the larger population.

There were some limitations to this study. First, this was not a nationally-representative sample which limits generalizability of our findings to primarily White, college-educated populations. However, a strength of this study is the extensive follow-up (8 years) of a group of young adults. Second, our analysis based initiation on reports of ever use between assessments and may reflect regular use or experimentation. However, this allowed us to include participants in the models who had gaps in their assessments. Future research should consider whether marijuana and cigar use impact sustained use or frequency of use. Similarly, we examined the effect of baseline use of marijuana and cigars on initiation rather than continued or sustained use of marijuana and cigars on initiation. We might expect this approach would underestimate the effects. We also did not assess mode of marijuana consumption when assessing initiation. Thus, it is possible that when initiating cigars or marijuana, they may have been used together at the same time (e.g., blunts). Thus, we are unable to determine if participants initiated a product or substance while using the other. Finally, the other substance use predictors in our models are wave specific reflecting use at the time of assessment so that their associations with initiation are cross-sectional rather than longitudinal.

This study used a longitudinal cohort of young adults to assess the association between marijuana and cigar use on initiation of marijuana and cigar use. Both LCCs and large cigars at college entry predicted subsequent use of marijuana and suggest that interventions or messaging strategies on college campuses need to target the harms associated with both cigar use and marijuana use. These findings also emphasize the importance of monitoring whether legalization of marijuana could lead to an uptake of LCCs potentially through a different pathway and the need to develop interventions that emphasize the potential harms of co-use.

Highlights.

  • Examined cigar and marijuana use in college students followed into young adulthood.

  • Cigar product use was associated with marijuana initiation.

  • Marijuana use was associated with little cigar/cigarillo initiation.

  • Marijuana use was not associated with large cigar initiation.

Acknowledgments

Role of Funding Source

Research reported in this manuscript was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01CA141643. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

No conflicts declared.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Agrawal A, Budney AJ, Lynskey MT, 2012. The co-occurring use and misuse of cannabis and tobacco: a review. Addiction 107, 1221–1233. 10.1111/j.13600443.2012.03837.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Azofeifa A, 2016. National Estimates of Marijuana Use and Related Indicators — National Survey on Drug Use and Health, United States, 2002–2014. MMWR Surveill. Summ 65 10.15585/mmwr.ss6511a1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Badiani A, Boden JM, De Pirro S, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Harold GT, 2015. Tobacco smoking and cannabis use in a longitudinal birth cohort: Evidence of reciprocal causal relationships. Drug Alcohol Depend. 150, 69–76. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker F, Ainsworth SR, Dye JT, et al. , 2000. Health risks associated with cigar smoking. JAMA 284, 735–740. 10.1001/jama.284.6.735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bélanger RE, Marclay F, Berchtold A, Saugy M, Cornuz J, Suris J-C, 2013. To What Extent Does Adding Tobacco to Cannabis Expose Young Users to Nicotine? Nicotine Tob. Res 15, 1832–1838. 10.1093/ntr/ntt063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, 2018. Reports and Detailed Tables From the 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed Tables. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chang CM, Corey CG, Rostron BL, Apelberg BJ, 2015. Systematic review of cigar smoking and all cause and smoking related mortality. BMC Public Health 15, 390 10.1186/s12889-015-1617-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, 2004. Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol 55, 591–621. 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohn A, Johnson A, Ehlke S, Villanti AC, 2016. Characterizing substance use and mental health profiles of cigar, blunt, and non-blunt marijuana users from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health. Drug Alcohol Depend. 160, 105–111. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohn AM, Johnson AL, Fryer CS, Villanti AC, 2018. Marijuana use predicts onset of current little cigar use in a national sample of US young adults. Drug Alcohol Depend. 190, 235–241. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Conway KP, Green VR, Kasza KA, Silveira ML, Borek N, Kimmel HL, Sargent JD, Stanton CA, Lambert E, Hilmi N, Reissig CJ, Jackson KJ, Tanski SE, Maklan D, Hyland AJ, Compton WM, 2018. Co-occurrence of tobacco product use, substance use, and mental health problems among youth: Findings from wave 1 (2013–2014) of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study. Addict. Behav 76, 208–217. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Corey CG, Holder-Hayes E, Nguyen AB, Delnevo CD, Rostron BL, Bansal-Travers M, Kimmel HL, Koblitz A, Lambert E, Pearson JL, Sharma E, Tworek C, Hyland AJ, Conway KP, Ambrose BK, Borek N, 2018. US Adult Cigar Smoking Patterns, Purchasing Behaviors, and Reasons for Use According to Cigar Type: Findings From the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013–2014. Nicotine Tob. Res 20, 1457–1466. 10.1093/ntr/ntx209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. DiFranza JR, Wellman RJ, 2005. A Sensitization—Homeostasis Model of Nicotine Craving, Withdrawal, and Tolerance: Integrating the Clinical and Basic Science Literature. Nicotine Tob. Res 7, 9–26. 10.1080/14622200412331328538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fairman BJ, Furr-Holden CD, Johnson RM, 2019. When Marijuana Is Used before Cigarettes or Alcohol: Demographic Predictors and Associations with Heavy Use, Cannabis Use Disorder, and Other Drug-related Outcomes. Prev. Sci 20, 225–233. 10.1007/s11121-018-0908-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin RD, Pacek LR, Copeland J, Moeller SJ, Dierker L, Weinberger A, Gbedemah M, Zvolensky MJ, Wall MM, Hasin DS, 2017. Trends in Daily Cannabis Use Among Cigarette Smokers: United States, 2002–2014. Am. J. Public Health 108, 137–142. 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hartig H, Geiger A, 2018. About six-in-ten Americans support marijuana legalization, Fact Tank. Pew Research Center. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hodge DR, Andereck K, Montoya H, 2007. The Protective Influence of Spiritual-Religious Lifestyle Profiles on Tobacco Use, Alcohol Use, and Gambling. Soc. Work Res 31, 211–219. 10.1093/swr/31.4.211 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffmann D, Hoffmann I, 1998. Chemistry and toxicology, in: Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph: Cigars: Health Effects and Trends. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, pp. 55–104. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jolly DH, 2008. Exploring the use of little cigars by students at a historically black university. Prev. Chronic. Dis 5, A82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kasza KA, Ambrose BK, Conway KP, Borek N, Taylor K, Goniewicz ML, Cummings KM, Sharma E, Pearson JL, Green VR, Kaufman AR, Bansal-Travers M, Travers MJ, Kwan J, Tworek C, Cheng Y-C, Yang L, Pharris-Ciurej N, van Bemmel DM, Backinger CL, Compton WM, Hyland AJ, 2017. Tobacco-Product Use by Adults and Youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014. N. Engl. J. Med 376, 342–353. 10.1056/NEJMsa1607538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McCabe SE, Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Kloska DD, 2005. Selection and socialization effects of fraternities and sororities on US college student substance use: a multi-cohort national longitudinal study. Addiction 100, 512–524. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01038.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McCabe SE, Veliz P, Schulenberg JE, 2018. How Collegiate Fraternity and Sorority Involvement Relates to Substance Use During Young Adulthood and Substance Use Disorders in Early Midlife: A National Longitudinal Study. J. Adolesc. Health, Adolescent and Young Adult Male Health 62, S35–S43. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.09.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McMillen R, Maduka J, Winickoff J, 2012. Use of emerging tobacco products in the United States. J. Environ. Public Health 2012, 989474. 10.1155/2012/989474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier E, Hatsukami DK, 2016. A review of the additive health risk of cannabis and tobacco co-use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 166, 6–12. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. O’Brien F, Simons-Morton B, Chaurasia A, Luk J, Haynie D, Liu D, 2018. Post-High School Changes in Tobacco and Cannabis Use in the United States. Subst. Use Misuse 53, 26–35. 10.1080/10826084.2017.1322983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pacek LR, Copeland J, Dierker L, Cunningham CO, Martins SS, Goodwin RD, 2018. Among whom is cigarette smoking declining in the United States? The impact of cannabis use status, 2002–2015. Drug Alcohol Depend. 191, 355–360. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.01.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Park CL, Masters KS, Salsman JM, Wachholtz A, Clements AD, Salmoirago-Blotcher E, Trevino K, Wischenka DM, 2017. Advancing our understanding of religion and spirituality in the context of behavioral medicine. J. Behav. Med 40, 39–51. 10.1007/s10865-016-9755-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Patrick ME, Bray BC, Berglund PA, 2016. Reasons for Marijuana Use Among Young Adults and Long-Term Associations With Marijuana Use and Problems. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 77, 881–888. 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Patton GC, Coffey C, Carlin JB, Sawyer SM, Lynskey M, 2005. Reverse gateways? Frequent cannabis use as a predictor of tobacco initiation and nicotine dependence. Addiction 100, 1518–1525. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01220.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Peters EN, Budney AJ, Carroll KM, 2012. Clinical correlates of co-occurring cannabis and tobacco use: a systematic review. Addiction 107, 1404–1417. 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03843.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Phillips KT, Lalonde TL, Phillips MM, Schneider MM, 2017. Marijuana use and associated motives in Colorado university students. Am. J. Addict 26, 830–837. 10.1111/ajad.12640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ramo DE, Delucchi KL, Hall SM, Liu H, Prochaska JJ, 2013. Marijuana and Tobacco Co-Use in Young Adults: Patterns and Thoughts About Use. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 74, 301–310. 10.15288/jsad.2013.74.301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ramo DE, Liu H, Prochaska JJ, 2012. Tobacco and marijuana use among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review of their co-use. Clin. Psychol. Rev 32, 105–121. 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Redonnet B, Chollet A, Fombonne E, Bowes L, Melchior M, 2012. Tobacco, alcohol, cannabis and other illegal drug use among young adults: The socioeconomic context. Drug Alcohol Depend. 121, 231–239. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Richardson A, Rath J, Ganz O, Xiao H, Vallone D, 2013. Primary and Dual Users of Little Cigars/Cigarillos and Large Cigars: Demographic and Tobacco Use Profiles. Nicotine Tob. Res 15, 1729–1736. 10.1093/ntr/ntt053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rooke SE, Norberg MM, Copeland J, Swift W, 2013. Health outcomes associated with longterm regular cannabis and tobacco smoking. Addict. Behav 38, 2207–2213. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.01.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rosenberry ZR, Schauer GL, Kim H, Peters EN, 2017. The Use of Flavored Cigars to Smoke Marijuana in a Sample of US Adults Co-using Cigarettes and Marijuana [WWW Document]. [Google Scholar]
  38. Schauer GL, Berg CJ, Kegler MC, Donovan DM, Windle M, 2016. Differences in Tobacco Product Use Among Past Month Adult Marijuana Users and Nonusers: Findings From the 2003–2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Nicotine Tob. Res 18, 281–288. 10.1093/ntr/ntv093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schauer GL, Berg CJ, Kegler MC, Donovan DM, Windle M, 2015. Assessing the overlap between tobacco and marijuana: Trends in patterns of co-use of tobacco and marijuana in adults from 2003–2012. Addict. Behav 49, 26–32. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.05.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Schauer GL, Rosenberry ZR, Peters EN, 2017. Marijuana and tobacco co-administration in blunts, spliffs, and mulled cigarettes: A systematic literature review. Addict. Behav 64, 200–211. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Soldz S, Huyser DJ, Dorsey E, 2003. The cigar as a drug delivery device: youth use of blunts. Addiction 98, 1379–1386. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00492.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Spangler J, Song E, Pockey J, Sutfin EL, Reboussin BA, Wagoner K, Wolfson M, 2014. Correlates of smokeless tobacco use among first year college students. Health Educ. J 0017896913513746. 10.1177/0017896913513746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sterling KL, Fryer CS, Nix M, Fagan P, 2015. Appeal and Impact of Characterizing Flavors on Young Adult Small Cigar Use. Tob. Regul. Sci 1, 42–53. 10.18001/TRS.1.1.5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sterling KL, Fryer CS, Pagano I, Fagan P, 2016. Little Cigars and Cigarillos Use Among Young Adult Cigarette Smokers in the United States: Understanding Risk of Concomitant Use Subtypes. Nicotine Tob. Res 18, 2234–2242. 10.1093/ntr/ntw170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Strong DR, Myers MG, Pulvers K, Noble M, Brikmanis K, Doran N, 2018. Marijuana use among US tobacco users: Findings from wave 1 of the population assessment of tobacco health (PATH) study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 186, 16–22. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.12.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sutfin EL, Song EY, Reboussin BA, Wolfson M, 2014. What are young adults smoking in their hookahs? A latent class analysis of substances smoked. Addict. Behav 39, 1191–1196. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.03.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Viveros M-P, Marco EM, File SE, 2006. Nicotine and cannabinoids: Parallels, contrasts and interactions. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev 30, 1161–1181. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Volkow ND, Baler RD, Compton WM, Weiss SRB, 2014. Adverse Health Effects of Marijuana Use. N. Engl. J. Med 370, 2219–2227. 10.1056/NEJMra1402309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang TW, 2018. Tobacco Product Use Among Adults — United States, 2017. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep 67 10.15585/mmwr.mm6744a2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wolfson M, Pockey JR, Reboussin BA, Sutfin EL, Egan KL, Wagoner KG, Spangler JG, 2014. First-year college students’ interest in trying dissolvable tobacco products. Drug Alcohol Depend. 134, 309–313. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.10.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wolfson M, Suerken CK, Egan KL, Sutfin EL, Reboussin BA, Wagoner KG, Spangler J, 2015. The role of smokeless tobacco use in smoking persistence among male college students. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 41, 541–546. 10.3109/00952990.2015.1078345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES