Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Sep 10;5(4):436–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jsamd.2020.09.005

Application of carbon nanomaterials in human virus detection

Hamide Ehtesabi 1
PMCID: PMC7509950

Abstract

Human-pathogenic viruses are still a chief reason for illness and death on the globe, as epitomized by the COVID-19 pandemic instigated by a coronavirus in 2020. Multiple novel sensors have been invented because diseases must be detected and diagnosed as early as possible, and recognition methods have to be carried out with minimal invasivity. Sensors have been particularly developed focusing on miniaturization by the use of nanomaterials for fabricating nanosensors. The nano-sized nature of nanomaterials and their exclusive optical, electronical, magnetical, and mechanical attributes can enhance patient care through the use of sensors with minimal invasivity and extreme sensitivity. Amongst the nanomaterials utilized for fabricating nano-sensors, carbon-based nanomaterials are promising as these sensors respond better to signals in various sensing settings. This review provides an overview of the recent developments in carbon nanomaterial-based biosensors for viral recognition based on the biomarkers that arise from the infection, the nucleic acids from the viruses, and the entire virus. The role of carbon nanomaterials is highlighted by the improvement of sensor and recognition functionality. The Dengue virus, Ebola virus, Hepatits virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), influenza virus, Zika virus and Adenovirus are the virus types reviewed to illustrate the implementation of the techniques. Finally, the drawbacks and advantages of carbon nanomaterial-based biosensors for viral recognition are identified and discussed.

Keywords: Virus, Carbon, Nanomaterial, Sensor, Viral recognition, Graphene

1. Introduction

Viral pollution of resources is one of the major causes of diseases leading to several hundred thousands of demises per annum. Such health-related problems continue to be unsolved as is evinced by a plethora of individuals that suffer from multiple diseases. Currently, the incidence of infective diseases that can importantly affect human life has risen outstandingly. A number of communicable diseases influence a lot of individuals and continuously cause substantial health issues [1]. Viruses are obligatory intracellular parasites that require the host cell system and resources for replication and propagation. Mammalian cells have developed defense machineries elaborately for detecting and inhibiting viral reproduction. This, in turn, has resulted in emerging viral strains being able to manipulate and subvert host immune reactions, leading to a boosted virus-mediated pathogenesis [2]. These human-pathogenic viruses are still a chief reason for illness and death on the globe, as epitomized by the COVID-19 pandemic instigated by a coronavirus in 2020. In the absence of primary diagnostics, it is not possible to adequately and promptly make proper disease treatments. Sensitive, specific and rapid diagnostic tests not only provide the basis towards effectual therapies but also have a major contribution to prevent the transmission of infective diseases [3].

The approach conventionally applied to detect viruses is the cell/tissue culture process, in which permissive cells are inoculated with a virus or a deactivated virus solution. The method creates cytopathic impacts and, subsequently, comprises titration of a 50% tissue culture infectious dose of the virus into the tissue culture. Although virus titration with the observed cytopathic impacts has a protracted history as the golden rule in research of detecting viruses, still several multiple drawbacks continue to exist [4]. For virus detection, a manifold of studies has applied alternative approaches to the conventional cytopathic impacts technique. Electron Microscopy, Serological Methods and Nucleic Acid based approaches are the major alternative techniques [5]. The polymerase chain reaction, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction are utilized for the detection of viruses. Whereas key clinical laboratories propose sensitive and specific tests, these are time-taking and laborious, expensive and rely on complex devices and skilled operators. Fig. 1 presents the “ASSURED” criteria according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and addresses the infectious disease control needs. Based on that, research has focused on novel detection components to promote detection in biosensing [6] as there is a need for rapid diagnosis and improvements in biosensor technologies with more selectivity, stability, and cost-effectiveness.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), POC tests that address infectious disease control needs, especially for the developing countries, should follow “ASSURED” criteria.

Multiple novel sensors have been invented because diseases must be detected and diagnosed as early as possible and recognition methods have to be carried out with minimal invasivity. Sensors have been particularly developed focusing on miniaturization by the use of novel materials for fabricating sensors. The interesting characteristics of nanomaterials are illustrated in their combined advantages of a tiny size with an extreme increase in the surface area, rendering them a tremendous potential for versatile applications [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. The nano-sized nature of nanomaterials and their exclusive optical, electronic, magnetic, and mechanical attributes can enhance patient care through the use of sensors with minimal invasivity and extreme sensitivity. Amongst the nanomaterials utilized for fabricating nano-sensors, carbon-based nanomaterials are promising as these sensors respond better to signals in various sensing applications [[11], [12], [13]]. In addition to their high surface area, carbon-based nanomaterials are biocompatible materials and are advantageous in terms of simplicity, rapidity, and sensitivity rendering them a high position to be considered in up-to-date technologies for viral recognition [14]. To the extent of authors’ knowledge, no review can be found concerning the use of carbon nanomaterial structures for viral sensing and detection. The present paper, therefore, reviews existing carbon nanomaterial-based biosensors for viral recognition at the level of the virus type. Dengue virus, Ebola virus, Hepatits virus, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), influenza virus (H5N1 and H1N1), Zika virus and Adenovirus are the virus types reviewed here and presented in Fig. 2 . The review is divided according to the analyte type into three main groups based on what could be detected from the virus: the biomarkers that arise from the infection, the nucleic acids from the viruses and the entire virus. The role of carbon nanomaterials is highlighted in the improvement of the sensor and recognition functionality.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Carbon nanomaterial applications for the detection of different human viruses.

2. Carbon nanomaterials for diagnostic applications

As an amply occurring element, carbon is widely applied in scientific and technological areas. It is possible to synthesize a variety of carbon allotropes by changing the combinations of sp, sp2, and sp3 hybridization and an array of carbon structures and nanostructures has been presented up to the present time [15]. The specifications of carbon nanomaterials are exclusive, including high electrical conductivity and chemical stability as well as a vast functional surface area [16,17]. This section discusses the specifications of carbon nanomaterials for diagnostic applications.

2.1. Carbon nanomaterials

The three major classes of carbon nanostructures, viz. zero, one and two–dimensional, are widely used in biosensing. For example, carbon dots and graphene quantum dots fall into the class of zero-dimension carbon nanostructures. Nanotubes comprise one-dimensional carbon nanostructures. Graphene and its derivatives are two-dimensional carbon nanostructures with fascinating specifications [15]. Carbon and graphene quantum dots (CDs and GQDs), denoted as zero-dimensional (0D) nanomaterials, have gained increasing ground in the past years. Their exclusive electronic, fluorescent, photoluminescent, chemiluminescent and electrochemiluminescent features are those providing them with sensing potentiality [[18], [19], [20], [21]]. Other merits of CDs include simple synthetic paths, cost-effective synthesis, inexpensive preparatory materials, water-solubility, low toxicity level, chemical stability and facile functionalization. CD-based sensors and biosensors function by different modes of action, namely: fluorescence quenching, static quenching, dynamic quenching, energy transfer, inner filter effect (IFE), photo-induced electron transfer (PET) and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) [22]. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are carbon molecules with a cylindrical hollow structure whose walls are made by sheets of sp2-hybridized carbon. Two main types of CNTs are: single walled CNTs (SWCNTs) and multi walled CNTs (MWCNTs), with the former composed of a sole layer of graphene and diameters in the range of 0.7–1.4 nm, whereas their length can vary from a few hundred nm up to several μm. MWCNTs comprise multiple concentric cylinders of rolled-up graphene sheets forming tubes with diameters up to 100 nm [[23], [24], [25]]. CNTs are interesting options for electrochemical sensing applications. The electronic specifications need to be taken into consideration in the manufacture of CNT-based electrodes as an essential factor in the electron transfer rate. The CNT modified electrodes are primarily advantageous owing to their minor diameter and long length allowing their plugging into an analyte, their electro-activity being apparently similar to or better than all other carbon-based electrodes and the high surface area of the nanotube modified electrodes [26]. By definition, graphene is a single-atom-thick sheet of hexagonally arrayed, sp2-bonded carbon atoms that occurs inside a carbon material construct. The thickness of a graphene film with 100 μm of lateral size is regarded as a stack of carbon planes joined together by van der Waals forces that act over a distance of ca. 0.335 nm. Graphene possesses notable thermal and electrical conductivity and a striking mechanical strength. In particular, it has the potential for sensing because of its exceptionally high conductivity and vast surface area. The charge transfer and electronic features of graphene result from its exclusive electronic band structure. Particularly, graphene is an available nanomaterial that possesses a vast surface area (2630 m2/g) by which it can directly interact with a variety of biomolecules [[27], [28], [29], [30]]. As excellent members of the graphene family, graphene-derived materials, such as graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO), are widely used as biosensors, the applications of which are greatly influenced by their faults, dysfunctions and chemical functionalization on their surfaces. GO, a result of chemical exfoliation and oxidation of layered crystalline graphite (normal or synthetic), is a single atom carbon layer in which both surfaces have undergone modification with oxygen bearing functional groups. Despite the fact that GO, similar to grapheme, is a 2-D carbon material, its features highly differ from those of graphene. It is characterized by a plethora of exclusive chemical, optical, and electronic specifications. GO is not capable of absorbing visible light, possesses a low electric conductance relative to that of graphene and exhibits a considerably greater chemical reactivity. There are a lot of epoxide, carboxyl and hydroxyl groups on the basal plane and edges of GO, showing a high potential for binding with biomolecules through covalent, electrostatic, and hydrogen interplays [31,32]. With a wide utilization, RGO is typically manufactured by oxidizing/exfoliating graphite to GO, after which it is reduced to graphene through various chemical, thermal or electrochemical paths. The likely different features of fabricated RGO in terms of defects (vacancies and holes) and carbon to oxygen ratio (C/O) depend on the applied reduction procedure, which has a critical contribution to the electrochemical features of the material. In comparison to graphene, there is even a small number of functional groups on the RGO surface enabling chemical functionalization for immobilization of the molecular receptors onto its surface. Within the last decade, the development of RGO-based sensors have aimed at detecting a variety of intended analytes owing to their brilliant electrochemical features and electrocatalytic functions [[33], [34], [35]].

2.2. Diagnostic techniques based on carbon nanomaterials

As an analytic instrument, a biosensor consists of a biologically active substance that is utilized and closely combined with an apparatus that converts a biochemical signal into a measureable signal. Typically, a biosensor conformation possesses a three-component system: a bioreceptor involved in the selectiveness of the apparatus, a transducer translating the physical or chemical alteration by recognition of the analyte, and a signal-processing unit (signal output) (Fig. 3 ). Since the biomarker oftentimes has an extremely low concentration and detects diseases selectively, its sensibility and selectiveness are critically important. Further needs are its reproducibility, stability, cost-effectiveness, and disposability. Transducing components integrated commonly in the biomarker biosensor scaffold, hitherto comprise components with electrochemistry, optic or mass-sensitivity properties capable of generating quantifiable current, light or frequency signals [36,37].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of a biosensor for detection of human viruses as an analyte.

2.2.1. Electrochemical biosensors

The basis of these biosensors consists of electrochemical methods in which the analyte is sensed by determining the electric response due to the electrochemical reaction of the analyte with the surface of the functional electrode of the sensor. Analyte concentrations and sensor responses generally need to be linearly correlated in order to be applied practically. Amongst a variety of biosensors, the electrochemical biosensors show the promise that they are highly sensitive, have a high signal-to-noise-ratio, are relatively simple and have a fast response time. As carbon has a wide-ranging potential, is chemically inert and affordable, it has been for long time of interest as an electrode substance of importance in electrochemical biosensors. Despite the variable eminent features of CNs, they share attributes causing their attractiveness for the production of electrochemical biosensors including electrochemical activity, electric conductance, wide surface area, easiness of functionalization and biocompatibility. Some CNs and their derived products are able to display electrochemical responses, as they are electrochemically active, intrinsically or capably. The high electric conductance of CNs assures their function as a perfect electron transfer agent in electrochemical biosensors. A wide surface area of CNs makes it possible to assemble extra necessary elements in electrochemical biosensors. Modification of CNs is simple, which will improve and uplift the operations of CNs in electrochemical biosensors. As CNs are biocompatible, the use of CN-based instruments are facilitated in biologic areas. Owing to the above specifications, CNs can serve either as nanoprobes, depending upon their predominant electrochemical features, or as nanocarriers depending upon their additional manifold of specifications. Utilization of CNs in electroanalytical analyses allows a substantial improvement of their analytic functioning [[36], [37], [38]].

2.2.2. Optical biosensors

The basis of these sensors consists of the detection of alterations in the emanation of light upon the target-detection element interplay. Carbon nanomaterials, in particular graphene–derived products, are effective fluorescence quenching agents. In the last few years, CNTs have widely been a matter of concern for developing biosensors due to their exclusive optical features. CDs hold optical specifications with regard to optical absorption, fluorescence, chemiluminescence, electrochemiluminescence, phosphorescence, up-conversion photoluminescence and photo-stimulated electron transfer activity. CNTs are highly luminosity intensive and have outstanding features, which can ideally be used for optical biosensing. Semiconductive CNTs are able to serve as quenching agents for the fluorophores and can exhibit distinct near-infrared (NIR, wavelength ~0.8–2 μm) photoluminescence emitting from the band-gap fluorescence. GO possesses recombined electron–hole pairs positioned inside sp 2 carbon clusters imbedded inside a sp 3 matrix and displays light absorption from UV to near-infrared (NIR). The π-electrons of GO with large dislocations result in a high fluorescence quenching capability, which is helpful in optical-based biosensors. Besides, graphene is usable as a SERS substratum to improve Raman signals of absorbed biomolecules. Another type of optical biosensor is Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) that utilizes surface plasmon polaritons to probe interplays between an analyte in solution and a biomolecular detection component subjected to immobilization on the SPR sensor surface. Depending on the binding-induced refractive index alteration of the solvent near the surface, SPR biosensors can accomplish a real-time, label-free recognition for the target analyte with high sensitivity. Carbon nanomaterials are good candidates for these types of optical biosensors tools [[39], [40], [41], [42]].

2.3. Field-effect transistor (FET) biosensors

The field-effect transistor is a semiconductor instrument, where the current flows from an electrode (source) on one side to the electrode (drain) on the other side. The semiconductor channel between source and drain is controlled by the electric field generated by a voltage at a third electrode named gate, which is capacitively attached via a thin dielectric layer. The electric FET biosensor specifications can be altered by the adhesion of biomolecules onto the biosensor. CNTs can be metallic or semiconductive contingent on the helicity. Semiconductive CNTs are usable for fabricating FET-based biosensors. The electric CNTFET specifications can be altered by the adhesion of biomolecules onto the CNTs. In recent years, graphene-based FET biosensors have been of great interest as they are highly sensitive to electric disturbances and have a high carrier mobility [39,41].

3. Application of carbon nanomaterials for viral diagnosis

In this section, the recent developments in carbon nanomaterial-based biosensors for viral recognition are reviewed based on what could be detected from the virus. Detection of the antibodies that arise from the infection, detection of the nucleic acids from the viruses and detection of the entire virus are the subdivisions of this section.

3.1. Detection of the biomarkers arising from the virus infection

The dengue virus of the Flavivirus genus in the family Flaviviridae, is an arthropod-borne virus consisting of four different serotypes (DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, and DEN-4), all of which are encased, spherical viral particles with a diameter of approx. 500 Å20(?) [43]. The WHO declares dengue as a main challenging worldwide public health problem in the tropical and subtropical populations [12]. This viral infection results in a variety of pathogenic indications including febrile, fever, and hazardous life threatening situations. Hence, it is not only a major peril to the public but also a main issue for personnel healthcare. Scarce data are available regarding the pathognomonic characteristics of Dengue infection from other febrile ailments. Thus, it is critical to diagnose this viral strain in the initial phases of the disease [44]. The non-structural (NS) proteins of the dengue virus are NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B and NS5 [45]. NS1 is a secretive protein abundantly present in the acute phase of diseases linked to hemorrhagic fever. Dias et al. invented an immunosensor for the NS1 of the dengue virus on the basis of carbon nanotube-screen printed electrodes (CNT-SPE). A homogenous mixture comprising carboxylated carbon nanotubes was disseminated in carbon ink for preparation of a screen printed working electrode. Anti-NS1 antibodies were connected by a covalent link to CNT-SPE using an ethylenediamine film approach. Evaluation of the matrix effect and the performance of the tests were achieved through spiked blood serum samples yielding superb recovery levels in the outcomes. CNTs integrated into the carbon ink led to improvements in the duplicability and sensitiveness of the CNT-SPE immunosensor [46]. Silva et al. designed a sensitive nanostructured immunoelectrode according to a poly(allylamine) (PAH) sandwich for NS1 of the dengue virus. Anti-NS1 antibodies undergo immobilization on the electrode surface by a thin layer of PAH amassed on carboxylated CNTs. PAH is a cationic polymer serving as a bi-functional material for tight attachment of CNTs to the electrode surface and anti-NS1 antibodies through their Fc(?) terminal, which prevents them to be immobilized randomly. Electrochemical responses of the immunoassay are created at a controlled level by a reaction between H₂O₂ and the peroxidase enzyme coupled to the anti-NS1 antibodies. Assayed serum samples revealed an accurate and specific process as well [47]. The whole of laboratory and commercial techniques for diagnosing the Dengue Virus NS1 needs the drawing of blood for sample assays, which limits the point-of-care diagnostics and lowers the patient compliance. Instead, NS1 identification in human saliva has the potential to diagnose the Dengue Virus infection earlier. The saliva can be collected simply, non-invasively, painlessly, and inexpensively, even with a staff of minimal training. Wasik et al. offered a label-less chemiresistive immunosensor for detecting the Dengue Virus NS1 protein through a network of SWCNTs subjected to the functionalization with anti-dengue NS1 monoclonal antibodies. Sensitive and selective NS1 detection was successful in contaminated synthetic human saliva within concentration ranges of clinical relevance [48]. An electronic nanobiosensor using a SWCNT network chemiresistor transducer was functionalized with antidengue NS1 monoclonal antibodies to rapidly detect the dengue NS1. Wasik et al. discovered NS1 in a spiked adult Aedes aegypti homogenate in a sensitive and selective way over a vast dynamic scope. The biosensor has compatibility with “gold-standard” adult mosquito field-collection instructions and produces electronic data capable for storage or wireless transmission. It has, therefore, the potential for monitoring remotely and real-time [49]. Palomar et al. represented an impedimetric immunosensor for detecting the dengue virus antibody (Fig. 4 (a)). The system takes the advantage of forming CNT deposits on electrodes in a controllable and reproducible way. Their simple functionalization through electrogeneration of a polypyrrole-NHS (N-hydroxysuccinimido 11-(pyrrol-1-yl) undecanoate) film makes it possible to immobilize the Dengue Virus 2 NS1 glycoprotein, the receptor unit, on the porous CNT layer by covalent amide joining to offer the required selectivity toward the Dengue NS1 antibody. The entire fabrication stages of this immunosensor and the functionality of this system were scrutinized by impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. The resultant impedimetric dengue biosensor was examined in bovine blood plasma besides measuring conventionally under a controlled environment [50].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a) Construction steps of the impedimetric immunosensor for the dengue virus antibody detection using functional CNT. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [50]. b) Schematic illustration of the upconversion FRET-based biosensor for the detection of anti-HIV-1 gp120 antibody. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [53].

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) belongs to the genus Lentivirus within the family of Retroviridae and the subfamily Orthoretrovirinae. According to genetically characterized variations in the virus antigens, HIV is grouped into the types HIV-1 and HIV-2. The HIV genome contains two equal single-stranded RNA molecules enveloped inside the core of the viral particle [51]. CD4+ T cells are mostly targeted by HIV. Following a spreading event, HIV occupies the mucosal tissues, and during days is dispersed to the lymphoid organs. At around day 10, the virus can be detected in the circulation after which it keeps spreading at an exponential rate within the subsequent few weeks, which mostly peaks around day 30, when it is possible to detect the HIV antibody levels [52]. Developing more dependable approaches for detecting and quantifying HIV is highly interesting and worthwhile. A simple one-stage approach for preparing hydrophilic and peptide-functionalized upconversion nanoparticles was presented by Wu et al. (Fig. 4(b)). The technique was utilized for designing a biosensor to sensitively and selectively determine HIV antibodies in human serum according to FRET from the upconversion nanoparticles to the graphene oxide. The sensor is usable for anti-HIV-1 gp120 antibody sensing both in an aqueous buffer and in a serum matrix with equivalent performances, demonstrating that the biosensor is able to overcome background interference from complicated biologic samples. The sensor was employed for determining antibody concentrations in human sera [53]. The development of a GO-based fluorescence biosensing platform by Zhang et al. aimed at detecting HIV-1 protease, where fluorescent labeled HIV-1 protease substrate peptide molecules underwent a covalent linking to GO. Without the use of HIV-1 protease, fluorescein quenching was efficiently achieved by GO. On the contrary, the use of HIV-1 protease could split the substrate peptide into short segments, thereby creating fluorescence. The sensor was able to identify HIV-1 protease in human serum [54]. In the last decade, the HIV-1-related capsid protein p24 has gained ground due to the necessity for screening approaches with simplicity, rapidity, sensitivity, specificity, and affordability for diagnosing HIV infection. A competitory electrochemical immunosensor for detecting p24 in unprocessed human serum was designed as a facile and convenient device to screen serum for ahead-of-time discovery of HIV contamination. The immunodevice was employed on throw-away gold-free SWCNT-functionalized screen-printed electrodes. The competitory sensor depends upon immobilizing the target protein on the electrode surface by a chitosan/glutaraldehyde crosslinking system, capable of ensuring, under moderate settings, a strong immobilization and a good exhibition of p24 to interact with a mouse anti-p24 IgG1 [55].

Influenza viruses are among the utmost prevalent causative agents of human respiratory infections, and one of the most important ones as they induce elevated illness and fatality rates. Influenza viruses of the family Orthomyx-oviridae are encased negative-strand RNA viruses with fragmented genomes consisting of seven to eight gene fragments [56]. Of the four existing genera of this family, viz. types A, B, C and Thogotovirus, only the genera A and B are of clinical relevance for humans [57]. Fowl influenza viruses in aquatic birds function as the natural source for all identified subtypes of influenza A viruses and may be the final source of human pandemic influenza strains [58]. Influenza A viruses are further divided by antigenic classification of the hemagglutinin (HA) and NA surface glycoproteins projecting from the virion. There are 16 HA and 9 NA known subtypes [59]. A challenge is to diagnose Influenza A viruses accurately and rapidly as several strains circulate in humans and animal communities and new strains are emerging. An electrochemical immunosensor with a sandwich-type immunoassay format was fabricated for quantification of the fowl influenza virus H7 (AIV H7) with the help of silver nanoparticle-graphene (AgNPs-G) as trace label in clinical immunoassays. The instrument possesses a gold electrode covered with gold nanoparticle-graphene nanocomposites (AuNPs-G), the gold nanoparticle surface of which can additionally be subjected to modification with H7-monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). The immunoassay was done with H7-polyclonal antibodies (PAbs) that were coupled to the AgNPs-G surface (PAb-AgNPs-G). Such a technique of applying PAb-AgNPs-G for detecting antibodies presents a high signal intensification [60].

3.2. Detection of the nucleic acid from the virus

A single viral particle typically consists of either an RNA or a DNA genome. The basis of a DNA biosensor is to immobilize a single stranded oligonucleotide on a transducer surface to identify its complemental DNA sequence because of (due to?) surface hybridization. Then, the hybrid created on the electrode surface undergoes a transformation into an analytic signal through a transducer. This section covers the detection of a nucleic acid from the virus using carbon nanomaterials [61]. The genome of each serotype of the dengue virus contains ca. 11 kb of positive-sense, single-stranded RNA, encoding ten proteins. Jin et al. formulated a composite of 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) functionalized graphene oxide (APTES-GO) twined on SiO2 particles (SiO2@APTES-GO) through self-assemblage. An impedimetric biosensor was made for detecting dengue DNA and dengue RNA through hybridizing primers by a variety of oligonucleotide sequences. It was observed that the SiO2@APTES-GO electrode material could enhance the dengue RNA recognition sensitivity with selectivity and an LOD of 1 femto-Molar as opposed to both APTES-GO and APTES-SiO2. The three-dimensional structure, higher contact area, electrical specifications and the capability of fast hybridization displayed by the SiO2@APTES-GO resulted in the design of a dengue biosensor [62]. Ebola, is a seriously fatal disease mainly affecting humans and nonhuman primates. The occurrence of the Ebola virus disease (EVD) results from a viral infection belonging to the genus Ebolavirus of the family Filoviridae in the order Mononegavirales, viruses whose genome comprises a single-strand RNA with negative polarity [63,64]. Facile, facilitated tests are required to detect and manage the Ebola endemics earlier tests which are capable of detecting the virus in blood at highly little quantities. The WHO announced rapid, sensitive, safe, and simple EBOV diagnostic assays in November 2014 [[65], [66], [67]]. Wen et al. developed a GO assisted rolling circle amplification platform for simple and sensitive identification of the Ebola virus. No rolling circle amplification products were produced when the Ebola virus gene was absent, and the adsorption of the fluorescein amidate labeled recognition probe on the surface of GO resulted in quenched fluorescence of the fluorescein amidate. Adding the Ebola virus gene led to the occurrence of an amplified rolling circle, and a double-stranded DNA formed between the rolling circle amplification products and the fluorescein amidate labeled recognition probe, by which the fluorescein amidate labeled detection probe was desorbed from the GO surface associated with the fluorescence retrieval. The ebola virus gene can be identified both in aqueous and 1% serum solutions [68].

By definition, hepatitis is an inflammatory state of the liver. Oftentimes, it has a viral cause defined as viral hepatitis [69]. The hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a hepatotropic virus capable of establishing persisting and prolonged contamination in humans via immunity anergy. HBV is an encased viral DNA belonging to the Hepadnaviridae family [70]. Assays of HBV paves the ground for providing therapy and preventive instructions to positively detected people (and their contacts) and for recommending vaccination to those diagnosed negatively but of persistent risk [71]. Research is mostly focusing on the leading issues of HBV screening and diagnosing infective HBV [72]. Given the robust interplay between single-stranded DNA and graphene material, Xiang et al. have produced a simplistic but intelligent electrochemical instrument for detection of HBV-DNA with the help of a GQD modified glassy carbon electrode connected to a specific sequence of DNA molecules as probes. The probe DNA is produced such that it is complemental to the HBV-DNA. The strong coupling of the probe DNA to the GQD modified electrode surface makes it difficult for an electron to convey from the electrode to the electrochemically active species K3[Fe(CN)6]. Even so, when the target HBV-DNA is present in the assay solution, the probe DNA will attach to the target HBV-DNA rather than to GQDs. Consequently, the resultant peak currents of K3[Fe(CN)6] will elevate differently with varying concentrations of the target HBV-DNA [73]. Hepatitis C is an infective illness induced by the hepatitis C virus (HCV), which is a viral RNA of the family Flaviviridae. When HCV infection is screened by simple and rapid techniques with high sensitivity and specificity, it can assist to control the encumbrance on HCV health care globally [74]. Fan et al. established an experiment to ultra-sensitively identify HCV RNA according to the RGO nanosheets (rGONS) and hybridization chain reaction amplification technique (Fig. 5 (b)). The recognition system possesses a pair of single fluorophore-labeled hairpin probes capable of free existence in the solution in the lack of target RNA. By introducing target RNA, a robust hybridization chain reaction is triggered with the two probes which produces long nanowires having a double-stranded construct. The poor adsorption to rGONS induces the long nanowires for emitting a robust fluorescence. Additionally, the technique is selective for discriminating complemental and incompatible sequences. Lastly, the innovative technique was utilized as a HCV RNA test in biologic samples with a robust anti-interfering ability in complex settings [75]. In an introduced DNA aided magnetic rGO-copper nanocomposite (mrGO-CuNCs), copper ions can expedite the oxidation of o-phenylenediamine. The electrochemical signals of the oxidized product, 2,3-diaminobenazine, are applied for characterizing the HCV DNAs. In a critical manner, it was capable of effective discrimination of the 1b and 6 k subtypes of HCV [76]. Based on the host-and-guest interplay between cucurbit [7]uril(CB [7]) and methylene blue, a CB [7]-graphene nano-composite(CB [7]-N3-GO) is publicized to detect HCV DNA electrochemically. The introduced identification approach has the ability of discriminating the 1b and 6k subtypes of HCV and is promising in screening the blood for HCV in clinical diagnostics [77].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

a) Schematic of the proposed rGONS-HCR platform for HCV detection. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [75]. b) Illustration of the preparation of the magnetically aligned Au/MNP-CNTs on the Pt-IDE for DNA sensing channels. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [84]. c) Model depicting HIV RNA detection via a CNT RNA sensor. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [81].

The HIV genome contains two equal single-stranded RNA molecules enveloped inside the core of the viral particle [51]. A sensitive impedimetric DNA biosensor for determining the HIV-1 gene was designed by the use of electrochemical RGO (ERGO) as a sensing tool. Gong et al. manufactured the DNA biosensor by drop-coating GO on a glassy carbon electrode and by covalent immobilization of the fabricated single-stranded DNA probe onto the GO by carbodiimide chemistry. Then, GO was exposed to electrochemical reduction to produce ERGO and utilized for genosensing. The incidence of hybridizations between the surface-confined single-stranded DNA probe with the target DNA in solution for forming double-stranded DNA at the electrode surface led to changes in the negative charge in the electrode/electrolyte interface, and, in turn, to the electron transfer resistance of the electrodes towards the [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox couple. The change was utilized for impedimetric DNA biosensing. According to reported findings, the application of ERGO as an immobilization platform resulted in an efficient acceleration of the electron transfer and in an enhancement of the EIS response of the DNA biosensor. This approach excluded the need for DNA labelling, which significantly simplified the process [78]. Wang et al. produced an electrochemical biosensor on the basis of an one-stage ultrasonic manufactured graphene stabilized gold nanocluster (GR/AuNC) modified glassy carbon electrode with an exonuclease III (Exo III)-assisted target recycling amplification approach for detecting HIV DNA. GR/AuNCs have been utilized as biosensor instruments and as aptamer with a cytosine-rich base set as capture probe for constructing the biosensor. By combining the cytosine-rich capture probe, the proper conductivity and the high surfaces of GR/AuNCs, and Exo III-assisted target recycling amplification, they achieved the recognition of target HIV DNA sensitively and selectively [79]. A nanocomposite of polyaniline/graphene (PAN/GN) was formulated by reverse-phase polymerization. The nanocomposite material was dropcasted onto a glassy carbon electrode. Next, a single-stranded DNA probe for detecting the HIV-1 gene was exposed to immobilization on the modified electrode, and the negatively charged phosphate framework of the HIV-1 was coupled to the modified electrode surface through π-π∗ stacking interplays. The hybridization between the single-stranded DNA probe and the target HIV-1 formed double-stranded DNA, and the electron transfer resistance of the electrode was determined by impedimetric examinations with a [Fe(CN)6]3-/4- redox couple [80]. SWCNT-based sensors proved to be capable of optical recognition of small, free oligonucleotides in biofluids and in vivo, although proteins reduced the sensitiveness. Harvey noticed a phenomenon in which the CNT optical response to nucleic acids could be improved by denatured proteins. Mechanistic investigations revealed that hydrophobic patches of the denatured protein chain interacted with the unbound nanotube surface following hybridization, leading to improved shifting of the nanotube emission. They utilized this machinery to discover an untouched HIV in serum, giving rise to particular responses within minutes (Fig. 5(c)). The present survey foreshadows the application of carbon nanotubes to optically detect viruses at the point-of-care by measuring viral nucleic acids [81].

Influenza viruses of the family Orthomyx-oviridae are encased negative-strand RNA viruses with fragmented genomes consisting of seven to eight gene fragments [56]. The development of a microfluidic incorporated rGO transistor was also reported for recognition of the H5N1 influenza virus gene through a flow-through approach. Both the fluorescence determination and the electrical recognition were executed for evaluating the functionality of rGO transistors in a flowing environment. This microfluidic incorporated rGO transistor with its expanded capture probe immobilization technique was able to offer a tool for sensitive and stable recognition of nucleic acid and can potentially be applied for flow-through chips [82]. Jeong et al. produced a fluorometric system to detect influenza subtype viral genes by GO. A fluorescent DNA probe corresponding to the hemagglutinin gene of the influenza virus is broken by the 5′-3′ exonuclease function of Taq polymerase throughout PCR. After adding GO, the emitted fluorophore maintains its fluorescence while not being adsorbed onto GO, while the unchanged fluorescent DNA probe undergoes adsorption onto GO with quenched fluorescence. The multi-well plate system can identify 3.8 pg of the influenza viral RNA [83]. Binary-NP-decorated CNTs (bNP-CNTs) were manufactured via a facile two-stage technique and utilized as a biosensing tool (Fig. 5(b)). Gold (Au)/iron-oxide magnetic NP-decorated CNTs (Au/MNP-CNT) were employed for influenza sensing channels. The biosensing was demonstrated by initial magnetic alignment of the Au/MNP-CNTs on a Pt-interdigitated electrode, after which a thiol-group-functionalized probe DNA was connected to the Au NP surface on the bNP-CNT hybrid structure through thiol chemistry. DNA hybridization between the target influenza and probe DNA was determined for monitoring changes in electrical conductivity of the Au/MNP-CNTs. The specificity was demonstrated by differing mismatched DNA sequences, presenting specificity [84].

3.3. Detection of the entire virus

This part covers the detection of the entire virus using carbon nanomaterial. The three structural proteins of the dengue virus encoded by the genome are the membrane (M) protein, envelope (E) protein and capsid (C) protein. It was reported that a biofunctionalized tapered optical fiber based sensor with the incorporation of GO could be utilized to detect Dengue virus II E proteins. The narrowed site was amassed with GO and underwent functionalization with anti-DENV II E protein IgG antibodies for testing with various concentrations of DENV II E proteins. The sensor was found to be precise, selective, and affinitive towards E proteins [85]. Omar et al. reported the development of a SPR sensor on the basis of a self-assembled monolayer/rGO-polyamidoamine dendrimer (SAM/NH2rGO/PAMAM) thin film to identify DENV II E proteins. They then assessed the SPR sensor in terms of specific, sensitive, binding affinity and selective activities. The researchers found that variations in the sensing layer because of differing spin speed, time incubation, and concentration could provide an improved interplay between the analyte and the sensing layer. Selective activity of the SPR sensor toward the DENV II E proteins was obtained with the use of other competitors [86]. Heparins, an analogue of the heparan sulfate proteoglycans, are receptors for the dengue virus during infection of Vero cells and hepatocytes. Wasik et al. proposed an electronic biosensor based on a SWCNTs network chemiresistive transducer, which was subjected to functionalization with heparin for recognition of the entire dengue virus (Fig. 6 (a)). Recognition of the dengue virus in a viral culture supernatant is as sensitive as the corresponding viral titer in a phosphate buffer in spite of using growth media and Vero cell lysate. The biosensor exhibited sensitivity within a range of clinical relevance for humans and infected A. aegypti [87]. A report indicates a novel procedure for detecting, classifying and antibody screening of the dengue virus on the basis of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Navakul et al. discovered that the charge transfer resistance of a gold electrode covered with a GO strengthened polymer was affected by virus strains (and amount subjected to the surface?). Such a finding could explain the ability to recognize molecularly (proven?) while preparing the GO-polymer composite. This technique can demonstrate that DENV is present at an initial stage of the infectious condition. This technique could distinguish between DENV and the other sub-types, besides H5N1 [88].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

a) Functionalization schematic representation of the fabrication of the chemiresistor used for detection of Dengue virus. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [87]. b) Schematic illustration of Raman immunoassay based on GO-GNRs. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [91].

Ebola virus glycoprotein is the only protein capable of expression on the viral surface. The Ebola glycoprotein has crucial contributions to the viral entrance into cells and to the escape of the immune system. Maity et al. offered an electronic resonance frequency modulation to identify Ebola glycoprotein within a dielectric-gated rGO field-effect transistor. The sensitiveness of Ebola recognition can be considerably improved by evaluating the device electronic-resonance frequency, including its inflection frequency, in which the phase angle approaches a maximum. Utilizing charge-relaxation dynamics, a bio-FET sensing platform is achieved for healthcare and bioelectronic uses via resonance shifting [89]. In a further research, Jin et al. reported a field effect transistor based immunoassay for detecting the deactivated Ebola virus. An (equid?) antibody versus the Ebola virus glycoprotein underwent immobilization on the surface of the field effect transistor T modified earlier with RGO. The antibody versus Ebola virus was subjected to immobilization on the modified field effect transistor and the response to Ebola virus was assessed as a function of the shift of Dirac voltage. The test is specific satisfactorily and was utilized to quantize the deactivated Ebola virus in spiked serum [90].

A composite comprising GO and gold nanorods (GO-GNRs) was invented by Liu et al. for determining the trace of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) through surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (Fig. 6(b)). The antibody on the GO-GNRs couples HBsAg with a high specific activity, resulting in a brilliant selectivity. The immunoassay determines the sensitivity and selectivity of HBsAg in serum and develops the potential of GO-GNR based surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy tag to be utilized in clinically related examinations [91]. Zhao et al. manufactured a composite of graphene oxide-ferrocene-chitosan (GO-Fc-CS) and utilized it for developing an electrochemical immunosensor with a GO-Fc-CS/Au-nanoparticle layer film for HBsAg recognition. The modified layer film demonstrated not only an improved electron conductivity, but also a robust reversible redox signal for current changes, superb biocompatibility and good film-making capability to bind a plethora of antibodies. The functionality in HBsAg recognition implies that the introduced immunosensor can potentially be applied in clinical diagnostics [92]. A hybrid biosensor on the basis of a graphene resistor functionalized with self-assembled Graphene-AuNPs (Gold Nanoparticles) is established for the instantaneous recognition of HBsAg. The hybrid biosensor contains an ssDNA sequence coupled to a graphene resistor instrument through ππ stacking interplays combined with an ssDNA functionalized AuNP. The ssDNA has complemental sequences that produce the graphene-AuNP hybrid biosensor via hybridization [93]. The HCV genotype dispersal varies by region [94]. The asymmetrical and heterogeneous virion has a buoyant property and protein content to the same level as low-density lipoparticles. The core protein is amorphous and consists of the two envelope glycoproteins, E1 and E2 [95]. Valipour et al. discovered a simple green method to apply silver nanoparticle (AgNPs) and thiol GQD (GQD-SH) as the nanomaterial to detect the HCV core antigen. The AgNPs/GQD-SH was applied as a substratum to load antibodies for detecting the HCV core antigen. AgNPs were subjected to immobilization on SH groups of GQDs through the forming of the Ag–S and anti-HCV bond and were laden on the electrode surface by the interplay between the –NH2 group of the antibody and AgNPs. Riboflavin was utilized as a biologic molecule with intrinsic features as the redox probe for developing a HCV core antigen electrochemical immunosensor. This immunosensor was utilized for the analysis of a serum sample [96].

Yeh et al. described an exclusive CNT size-tunable enriched microdevice (CNT-STEM) that can effectively enrich and concentrate viruses sampled from field strains. The channel sidewall in the microdevice was prepared by mounting orders of vertical alignments of nitrogen-doped multiwalled CNTs, in which the intertubular distance between CNTs could be designed in the scope of 17–325 nm for accurate matching the size of various viruses. The CNT-STEM led to a significant improvement of LODs and virus isolation rates by at least hundred times. They used this device for identification of an emergent fowl influenza virus and a new virus strain [97]. Veerapandian et al. described the design of an electrochemical-based dual-sensor platform consisting of methylene blue-electroadsorbed GO nanostructures modified with monoclonal antibodies towards the HA proteins of H5N1 and H1N1. Bio-functional layers composed of chitosan and protein-A molecules were executed at the interface of the sensor element and the antibodies, which synergistically promoted the bio-activity of the immobilized antibodies to form the immune complex [98]. Graphene-FET detects the targets electrically with high sensitivity due to the high carrier mobility of graphene. A report by Ono et al. indicates that the sialoglycan-functionalized G-FET can selectively detect the possible pandemic virus. Initially, sialoglycan underwent modification on the graphene channel by a π-stacking cross-linker. Subsequently, the sialoglycan-functionalized G-FET was utilized to discover the target. Two lectins obtained from Sambucus sieboldiana (SSA) and Maackia amurensis (MAM) were applied as targets in place of the human and fowl influenza virus, respectively. Finally, G-FETs were used to selectively detect the targets, one is modified by the human type sialoglycan and the other by the avian-type sialoglycan [99]. Singh et al. offered a microfluidic chip incorporated with an RGO-based electrochemical immunosensor for label-free detecting an influenza virus, H1N1. Three microelectrodes were manufactured on a glass substrate by the photolithographic method, whereas the working electrode was subjected to functionalization with RGO and monoclonal antibodies specific to the virus. These chips were incorporated with polydimethylsiloxane microchannels [100]. An effective electrochemical influenza A biosensor was designed based on a graphene–gold (Au) hybrid nanocomposite modified Au-screen printed electrode, which principally works in dependence of the measured neuraminidase activity. The experimental factors, including the impacts of the bovine serum albumin inclusion and the immobilization times of fetuin A and PNA lectin, were optimized to investigate the analytical characteristics of the influenza A biosensor. The invented biosensor was utilized for detecting the actual influenza virus A (H9N2) [101]. A magnetic/plasmonic-assisted fluoro-immunoassay system is designed to detect the influenza virus by magnetic-derivatized plasmonic molybdenum trioxide quantum dots (MP-MoO3 QDs) as the plasmonic/magnetic agent and fluorescent graphitic carbon nitride quantum dots (gCNQDs) as the monitoring probe. A specific antibody towards the influenza A virus was coupled onto the surface of the MP-MoO3 QDs and gCNQDs in respective order. When influenza A virus is present, a core-satellite immunocomplex forms between the antibody-coupled nanomaterials and their interplay modulates which enhances gradually the fluorescence strength of the detecting probe with an elevation depending on the influenza virus concentrations [102]. A photoelectrochemical immunosensor with sensitivity and specificity was manufactured to analyze subgroup J avian leukosis viruses (ALV-J) according to a dual signal-on approach (Fig. 7(a)). Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) decorated graphitic carbon nitride (AuNPs/g-C3N4) as photoelectrochemical species and primary antibody against ALV-J underwent successive immobilization on the ITO electrode. An ALP-CdTe-Ab2 bio-conjugant was made by the assembly of a second antibody and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) to the CdTe quantum dots surface. The photoelectrochemical immunosensor was produced by attaching the target ALV-J and ALP-CdTe-Ab2 bio-conjugants on the electrode surface through the immune detection [103]. An electrochemical immunosensor for ALV-J was assembled on the basis of mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride (mpg-C3N4) (Fig. 7(b)). Mpg-C3N4 was utilized as the sensor scaffold to bind to the primary antibodies (Ab1). The complex of thionine and mpg-C3N4 (Th-mpg-C3N4) was manufactured to function as the electroactive probe and the carrier of secondary antibodies (Ab2). Mpg-C3N4 holds a greater specific surface area, less electrochemical resistance and plentiful active positions relative to bulk g-C3N4. Thus, the introduced electrochemical immunosensor displayed augmented detecting signals that could sensitively detect ALVs-J [104].

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

a) Schematic illustration for the fabrication of photoelectrochemical immunosensor for sensitively detecting target avian viruses based on AuNPs/g-C3N4 coupling with CdTe quantum dots and in situ enzymatic generation of electron donor. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [103] b) Schematic representation of the fabrication of the iElectrochemical Immunosensor Based on Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Detection of Subgroup J of Avian Leukosis Viruses. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [104].

The Zika virus (ZIKV) is defined as an arthropod-borne virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family comprising the Flavivirus and Hepacivirus genera. It is a positive, single-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus with a casing, rendering it a close relation to the Spondweni virus. Fast and severe detection platforms are urgently needed for the Zika virus [[105], [106], [107]]. Afsahi et al. fabricated an economical and movable graphene-enabled biosensor to recognize the Zika virus with a specific immobilized monoclonal antibody (Fig. 8 (a)). Field Effect Biosensing with monoclonal antibodies and covalent linkage to graphene allows the detection of local Zika viral antigens quantitatively and in real-time. Measurement of the Zika antigen in a simulated human serum revealed a promising diagnostic applicability. Validation of its selectivity was achieved by the Japanese Encephalitis NS1, a homologue viral antigen with potential cross-reactivity [108].

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

a) Diagram of the movable graphene-enabled biosensor to recognize Zika virus with a specific immobilized monoclonal antibody. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [108]. b) Schematic presentation of optoelectronic Fowl Based on Local Electric Field Enhancement on Graphene Quantum Dots and Gold Nanobundle Hybrid for Adenovirus Detection. Reprinted with the permission of Ref [112].

Human adenoviruses (HAdVs) are grouped in the genus Mastadenovirus. Adenoviruses are non-encased double-stranded DNA viruses infecting various human tissues [109]. The adenoviral structure consists of two main components, the exterior capsid and the interior core, where the viral dsDNA genome is enveloped together with a plethora of histone-like proteins. Viral proteases have a key contribution to the maturation by cleaving progenitor proteins for the capsid and the core. Adenoviruses are oftentimes linked to pediatric disorders of the upper respiratory tract, such as the common cold [110]. Jin et al. proposed a procedure for detecting the HAdV hexon antigen by CNT sensors. An anti-HAdV antibody was exposed to immobilization on the reverse surface of a CNT sensor. As a control, non-specific mouse IgG was subjected to immobilization on another CNT sensor. I–V(gate) curves were determined after various concentrations of recombinant HAdVs hexon antigen (were? subject) incubated with anti-HAdVs antibody-immobilised or non-specific mouse IgG-immobilised sensors. The curves revealed a positive shift that depended upon the hexon antigen concentrations in the anti-HAdV antibody-immobilised sensor, while no such a shift was noticed in the non-specific mouse IgG-immobilised sensor [111]. Template-free In situ gold nanobundles (Au NBs) were produced on an electrode for optoelectronic sensing of fowl adenoviruses (FAdVs). A Au NB film was manufactured on a carbon electrodes working area by L(+) ascorbic acid, gold chroloauric acid, and poly-l-lysine (PLL) via a modified layer-by-layer (LbL) technique. Both Au NBs and GQDs underwent conjugation with the target FAdVs specific antibodies bringing them near to one another with the adding target FAdVs via an antibody–antigen interplay(Fig. 8(b)). At close proximity, the light–matter interplay between Au NBs and QDs yields a local electric signal improvement under ultraviolet–visible light radiation allowing the recognition of extremely small concentrations of a target virus even in complicated biologic media [112].

Some of the carbon nanomaterial-based biosensors reported in the literature to detect Human Viruses are summarised in Table 1 .

Table1.

Carbon nanomaterial-based biosensor for human virus detection.

Carbon Nanomaterial Virus Target Assay Detection limit Detection range Detection platform Ref
GQD Hepatits B DNA Electrical 1 nM (10–500) nM Smart electrochemical [73]
Hepatits C Antigen Electrochemical 3 fg mL−1 (0.05–60) ng mL−1 Electrodes [96]
Fowl adenoviruses Antigen Optoelectronic 8.75 PFU/mL (10–10,000) PFU/mL Electrode [112]
CNT Dengue NS1 protein Amperometrical 12 ng mL−1 Screen printed electrodes [46]
Dengue NS1 protein Electrochemical 0.035 μg mL−1 (0.1–2.5) μg mL−1 Electrodes [47]
Dengue NS1 protein Chemiresistive [48]
Dengue NS1 protein [49]
Dengue NS1 antibody Impedimetric (10−13–10−5) g mL−1 Electrodes [50]
HIV Capsid protein p24 Electrochemical 2 pM 10 pM - 1 nM screen-printed electrodes [55]
HIV Protein optical [81]
Dengue Virus Chemiresistive transducer [87]
Influenza DNA electrical conductivity change 8.4 pM (1–10) nM Electrodes [84]
avian Influenza [97]
human adenovirus Antigen [111]
Graphene Influenza H7 Antibody electrochemical 1.6 pg/mL 1.6 × 10−3~16 ng/mL Electrodes [60]
HIV DNA Electrochemical 30 aM Electrodes [79]
HIV Gene Impedimetric 1.0 × 10−16 M (5.0 × 10−16–1.0 × 10−10) M Electrodes [80]
Hepatits B Antigen Resistance change 50 pg/ml [93]
Human and Avian influenza Sialoglycan Electrical [99]
Influenza A H9N2 Neuraminidase electrochemical 10−8 U mL−1 10−8 - 10−1 U mL−1 screen printed electrode [101]
Zika Antigen Capacitance change 450 pM [107]
GO HIV Antibody FRET [53]
HIV Protease Fluorometric 1.18 ng/mL [54]
Dengue DNA and RNA Impedimetric 1 fM Electrodes [62]
Ebola Gene Fluorometric 1.4 pM Rolling circle amplification [68]
Hepatits C DNA Electrochemical 160.4 pmol/L (0.2–10) nmol/L Electrodes [77]
influenza Gene Fluorometric Multi well plate [83]
Dengue Virus II E proteins 1 pM Tapered optical fiber [85]
Dengue DENV-2 E-proteins SPR 0.08 pM (0.08–0.5) pM [86]
Dengue Virus Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy 0.12 pfu/mL (1–2 × 103) pfu/mL Electrodes [88]
Hepatits B Antigen Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy 0.05 pg·mL−1 (1–1000) pg·mL−1 Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy [91]
Hepatits B Antigen Electrochemical 0.01 ng/mL (0.05–150) ng/mL Electrodes [92]
Influenza Virus H1N1, H5N1 HA proteins electrochemical 25–500 pM Electrodes [98]
RGO Hepatits C RNA hybridization chain reaction amplification 10 fM [75]
Hepatits C DNA electrochemical 405.0 pM 0.5–10 nM Electrodes [76]
HIV DNA Electrochemical 3.0 × 10−13 M (1.0 × 10−12–1.0 × 10−9) M Electrodes [78]
influenza virus H5N1 Gene Microfluidic Chip [82]
Ebola Glycoprotein Electronic-resonance-frequency modulation (0.001–3.401) mg/L Bio-FET sensing [89]
Ebola Glycoprotein Shift of Dirac voltage 2.4 pg mL−1 (2.4 × 10−12  - 1.2 × 10−7)g·mL−1 FET [90]
influenza virus H1N1 Virus electrochemical 0.5 PFU mL−1 (1-104) PFU mL−1 Microfluidic chip [100]
g-C3N4 Influenza (H1N1) Virus photoluminescence 0.25 pg/mL (0.001–100) ng/mL Probe [102]
Influenza (H3N2) RNA photoluminescence 45 PFU/mL (45–25,000) PFU/mL Probe [102]
J avian leukosis Virus photoelectrochemical 85 TCID50/mL - Electrode [103]
J avian leukosis Virus Electrochemical 120 TCID50/mL - Electrode [104]

4. Conclusion and future perspective

Infective diseases continue to be an ubiquitous risk to universal and public health, particularly in numerous countries and rural areas of cities. Basic causes of such severe diseases can be outlined as the scarcity of suitable analytic techniques and consequent therapeutic approaches resulting from the inadequate accessibility of consolidated and fortified healthcare equipments for diagnostics. Biosensors greatly influence, in turn, our existing analytic techniques into diagnostic approaches by rearrangement of their sensing modules for detecting viruses. Indisputably, the existing sensing equipment needs continual updating for addressing the rising challenging issues in the identification of viruses as viruses undergo quick changes and disseminate mainly from individual-to-individual, suggesting the need for urgent diagnosis in the first place. A number of such challenges can fall into biologic barricades, technological limits, and economic facets limiting their application to resource-scarce situations. Biologic barricades include specificity, low number of targets, and biologic media. Detection limit, linear dynamic range, stability, and reliability are technological limits.

Although the carbon nanomaterial-based sensor technologies are highly promising, they present many challenges in order to move from the bench to their use in the point of care. Nanotechnologies are offering new means to ease the process of diagnosis based on different platforms by performing direct detection of molecular targets in real time. Different varieties of carbon nanomaterials provide delicate and accurate platforms in this field. Considering all above mentioned benefits, we shall take some more steps to make carbon nano-sensors profitable by the appropriate selection of nanomaterials. The critical issues are the immobilization methods of the nanomaterials and biological elements to mitigate the risk of accuracy and correctness in virus detection. Another important issue is the economic aspect of the procedure. Carbon nanomaterials are cheaper than the current in use nano-biosensors such as gold. So, it seems pretty handful for investors to think about this field. And the last item we may consider is the lifetime of the assay, which may be considerable. Human beings have no choice to provide accessible, accurate, real-time, portable and reusable instruments to study viruses in high sensitivity and selectivity levels. In conclusion, developing the nanotechnologies is a scorecard in the health sector that let us to think about it more seriously in order to provide a better life. At editing my article, the world faces the COVID-19 pandemic, and it is obvious that the in-vitro diagnosis virus kit's market will face an inflection in 2020–2021.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to those who supported her, especially to the vice–presidency for research and technology, Shahid Beheshti University, G.C.

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Vietnam National University, Hanoi.

References

  • 1.Saylan Yeşeren, et al. An alternative medical diagnosis method: biosensors for virus detection. Biosensors. 2019;9(2):65. doi: 10.3390/bios9020065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chan Ying Kai, Michaela U.Gack. Viral evasion of intracellular DNA and RNA sensing. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14(6):360–373. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen Hui, et al. Point of care testing for infectious diseases. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2019;493:138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang Yu, Qu Shuxin, Xu Liming. Progress in the study of virus detection methods: the possibility of alternative methods to validate virus inactivation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2019;116(8):2095–2102. doi: 10.1002/bit.27003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Malik Yashpal Singh, Verma Atul Kumar, Kumar Naveen, Touil Nadia, Karthik Kumaragurubaran, Tiwari Ruchi, Prasad Bora Durlav, et al. Advances in diagnostic approaches for viral etiologies of diarrhea: from the lab to the field. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01957. https://doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01957 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Justino Celine IL., Freitas Ana C., Pereira Ruth, Duarte Armando C., Santos Teresa AP Rocha. Recent developments in recognition elements for chemical sensors and biosensors. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem. 2015;68:2–17. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2015.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ehtesabi H., Ahadian M.M., Taghikhani V. 76th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2014. 2014, June. Investigation of diffusion and deposition of TiO2 nanoparticles in sandstone rocks for EOR application. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen Y., Fan Z., Zhang Z., Niu W., Li C., Yang N., Chen B., Zhang H. Two dimensional metal nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2018;118(13):6409–6455. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arandian A., Bagheri Z., Ehtesabi H., Najafi Nobar S., Aminoroaya N., Samimi A., Latifi H. Optical imaging approaches to monitor static and dynamic cell-on chip platforms: a tutorial review. Small. 2019;15(28):1900737. doi: 10.1002/smll.201900737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang L., Zhou Z., Song J., Chen X. Anisotropic nanomaterials for shape dependent physicochemical and biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48(19):5140–5176. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00011A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ehtesabi H., Hallaji Z., Najafi Nobar S., Bagheri Z. Carbon dots with pH-responsive fluorescence: a review on synthesis and cell biological applications. Microchim. Acta. 2020;187(2):150. doi: 10.1007/s00604-019-4091-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ehtesabi H., Roshani S., Bagheri Z., Yaghoubi-Avini M. Carbon dots—sodium alginate hydrogel: a novel tetracycline fluorescent sensor and adsorber. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019;7(5):103419. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ehtesabi Hamide, Amirfazli Mehdi, Massah Fatemeh, Bagheri Zeinab. Application of functionalized carbon dots in detection, diagnostic, disease treatment, and desalination: a review. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2020;11(2):25017. doi: 10.1088/2043-6254/ab9191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Janire Peña-Bahamonde, Nguyen Hang N., Fanourakis Sofia K., Rodrigues Debora F. Recent advances in graphene-based biosensor technology with applications in life sciences. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018;16(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12951-018-0400-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tahriri M., Del Monico M., Moghanian A., Tavakkoli Yaraki M., Torres R., Yadegari A., Tayebi L. Graphene and its derivatives: opportunities and challenges in dentistry. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2019;102:171–185. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ehtesabi Hamide, Bagheri Zeinab, Yaghoubi-Avini Mohammad. Application of three-dimensional graphene hydrogels for removal of ofloxacin from aqueous solutions. Environ. Nanotechn. Monitor. Manag. 2019;12:100274. doi: 10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ehtesabi Hamide, Bagheri Zeinab, Eskandari Farzaneh, Mahdi Ahadian Mohammad. Molecular interaction between three-dimensional graphene aerogel and enzyme solution: effect on enzyme structure and function. J. Mol. Liq. 2018;265:565–571. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yao Bowen, Huang Hui, Liu Yang, Kang Zhenhui. Carbon dots: a small conundrum. Trends Chem. 2019;1(2):235–246. doi: 10.1016/j.trechm.2019.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Campuzano Susana, Yáñez-Sedeño Paloma, José M., Pingarrón Carbon dots and graphene quantum dots in electrochemical biosensing. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(4):634. doi: 10.3390/nano9040634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bagheri Zeinab, Ehtesabi Hamide, Hallaji Zahra, Neda Aminoroaya, Tavana Hossein, Behroodi Ebrahim, Rahimifard Mahban, Abdollahi Mohammad, Latifi Hamid. On-chip analysis of carbon dots effect on yeast replicative lifespan. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2018;1033:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bagheri Zeinab, Ehtesabi Hamide, Hallaji Zahra, Latifi Hamid, Behroodi Ebrahim. Investigation the cytotoxicity and photo-induced toxicity of carbon dot on yeast cell. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018;161:245–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Molaei Mohammad Jafar. Principles, mechanisms, and application of carbon quantum dots in sensors: a review. Analy. Methods. 2020;12(10):1266–1287. doi: 10.1039/C9AY02696G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rauti Rossana, Musto Mattia, Bosi Susanna, Prato Maurizio, Ballerini Laura. Properties and behavior of carbon nanomaterials when interfacing neuronal cells: how far have we come? Carbon. 2019;143:430–446. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schroeder Vera, Savagatrup Suchol, He Maggie, Lin Sibo, Timothy M. Swager. Carbon nanotube chemical sensors. Chem. Rev. 2018;119(1):599–663. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang Ning, Chen Xianping, Ren Tianling, Zhang Ping, Yang Daoguo. Carbon nanotube based biosensors. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2015;207:690–715. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.10.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Beitollahi Hadi, Movahedifar Fahimeh, Tajik Somayeh, Jahani Shohreh. A review on the effects of introducing CNTs in the modification process of electrochemical sensors. Electroanalysis. 2019;31(7):1195–1203. doi: 10.1002/elan.201800370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Anichini Cosimo, Czepa Włodzimierz, Pakulski Dawid, Aliprandi Alessandro, Ciesielski Artur, Samorì Paolo. Chemical sensing with 2D materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47(13):4860–4908. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00417J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Suvarnaphaet Phitsini, Pechprasarn Suejit. Graphene-based materials for biosensors: a review. Sensors. 2017;17(10):2161. doi: 10.3390/s17102161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Justino Celine IL., Gomes Ana R., Freitas Ana C., Duarte Armando C., Rocha-Santos Teresa AP. Graphene based sensors and biosensors. Trac. Trends Anal. Chem. 2017;91:53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2017.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li Dapeng, Zhang Wensi, Yu Xiaoqing, Wang Zhenping, Su Zhiqiang, Wei Gang. When biomolecules meet graphene: from molecular level interactions to material design and applications. Nanoscale. 2016;8(47):19491–19509. doi: 10.1039/C6NR07249F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dideikin Artur T., Vul Alexander Y. Graphene oxide and derivatives: the place in graphene family. Front. Phys. 2019;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2018.00149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brisebois P.P., Mohamed Siaj. Harvesting graphene oxide–years 1859 to 2019: a review of its structure, synthesis, properties and exfoliation. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2020;8(5):1517–1547. doi: 10.1039/C9TC03251G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rowley-NealeSamuel J., Randviir Edward P., Abo Dena Ahmed S., Banks Craig E. An overview of recent applications of reduced graphene oxide as a basis of electroanalytical sensing platforms. Appl. Mater. Today. 2018;10:218–226. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dreyer Daniel R., Todd Alexander D., Bielawski Christopher W. Harnessing the chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43(15):5288–5301. doi: 10.1039/C4CS00060A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cinti Stefano, Arduini Fabiana. Graphene-based screen-printed electrochemical (bio) sensors and their applications: efforts and criticisms. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;89:107–122. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pasinszki Tibor, Krebsz Melinda, Tung Thanh Tran, Losic Dusan. Carbon nanomaterial based biosensors for non-invasive detection of cancer and disease biomarkers for clinical diagnosis. Sensors. 2017;17(80):1919. doi: 10.3390/s17081919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ehtesabi H. Carbon nanomaterials for salivary-based biosensors: a review. Mater. Today Chem. 2020;17:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang Zhaoyin, Dai Zhihui. Carbon nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors: an overview. Nanoscale. 2015;7(15):6420–6431. doi: 10.1039/C5NR00585J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li Meixiu, Chen Tao, Justin Gooding J., Liu Jingquan. Review of carbon and graphene quantum dots for sensing. ACS Sens. 2019;4(7):1732–1748. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.9b00514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pirzada Muqsit, Altintas Zeynep. Nanomaterials for healthcare biosensing applications. Sensors. 2019;19(23):5311. doi: 10.3390/s19235311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhu Zanzan. An overview of carbon nanotubes and graphene for biosensing applications. Nano-Micro Lett. 2017;9(3):1–24. doi: 10.1007/s40820-017-0128-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jiang Wen-Shuai, Xin Wei, Xun Shuang, Chen Shao-Nan, Gao Xiao-Guang, Liu Zhi-Bo, Tian Jian-Guo. Reduced graphene oxide-based optical sensor for detecting specific protein. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2017;249:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hasan Shamimul, Faisal Jamdar Sami, Alalowi Munther, Ageel Al Beaiji Sadun Mohammad Al. Dengue virus: a global human threat: review of literature. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2016;6(1):1. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.175416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Eivazzadeh-Keihan R., Pashazadeh-Panahi P., Mahmoudi T., Chenab K.K., Baradaran B., Hashemzaei M., Maleki A. Dengue virus: a review on advances in detection and trends–from conventional methods to novel biosensors. Microchim. Acta. 2019;186(6):329. doi: 10.1007/s00604-019-3420-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Guzman Maria G., Gubler Duane J., Izquierdo Alienys, Martinez Eric, Halstead Scott B. Dengue infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2016;2(1):1–25. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Dias Ana Carolina M.S., Gomes-Filho Sérgio LR., Mízia MS Silva, Dutra Rosa F. A sensor tip based on carbon nanotube-ink printed electrode for the dengue virus NS1 protein. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013;44:216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Silva Mízia M.S., Ana Dias C.M.S., Silva Bárbara V.M., Gomes-Filho Sérgio L.R., Kubota Lauro T., Marília OF Goulart, Dutra Rosa F. Electrochemical detection of dengue virus NS1 protein with a poly (allylamine)/carbon nanotube layered immunoelectrode. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2015;90(1):194–200. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wasik Daniel, Mulchandani Ashok, Yates Marylynn V. Salivary detection of dengue virus NS1 protein with a label-free immunosensor for early dengue diagnosis. Sensors. 2018;18(8):2641. doi: 10.3390/s18082641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wasik Daniel, Mulchandani Ashok, Yates Marylynn V. Point-of-use nanobiosensor for detection of dengue virus NS1 antigen in adult Aedes aegypti: a potential tool for improved dengue surveillance. Anal. Chem. 2018;90(1):679–684. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Palomar Quentin, Gondran Chantal, Marks Robert, Cosnier Serge, Holzinger Michael. Impedimetric quantification of anti-dengue antibodies using functional carbon nanotube deposits validated with blood plasma assays. Electrochim. Acta. 2018;274:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Blood German Advisory Committee Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Transfus. Med. Hemotherapy. 2016;43(3):203. doi: 10.1159/000445852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Deeks Steven G., Overbaugh Julie, Phillips Andrew, Buchbinder Susan. HIV infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2015;1(1):1–22. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wu Yan-Mei, Yao Cen, Huang Li-Jiao, Yu Ru-Qin, Chu Xia. Upconversion fluorescence resonance energy transfer biosensor for sensitive detection of human immunodeficiency virus antibodies in human serum. Chem. Commun. 2014;50(36):4759–4762. doi: 10.1039/C4CC00569D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhang Youwen, Chen Xiaohan, Roozbahani Golbarg M., Guan Xiyun. Graphene oxide-based biosensing platform for rapid and sensitive detection of HIV-1 protease. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018;410(24):6177–6185. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1224-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Giannetto Marco, Costantini M., Mattarozzi Monica, Careri Maria. Innovative gold-free carbon nanotube/chitosan-based competitive immunosensor for determination of HIV-related p24 capsid protein in serum. RSC Adv. 2017;7(63):39970–39976. doi: 10.1039/C7RA07245G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Taubenberger Jeffery K., Morens David M. The pathology of influenza virus infections. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2008;3:499–522. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.154316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Blut Arbeitskreis. Influenza virus. Transfus. Med. Hemotherapy. 2009;36(1):32. doi: 10.1159/000197314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Obenauer John C., Denson Jackie, Mehta Perdeep K., Su Xiaoping, Mukatira Suraj, Finkelstein David B., Xu Xiequn, et al. Large-scale sequence analysis of avian influenza isolates. Science. 2006;311(5767):1576–1580. doi: 10.1126/science.1121586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Webster Robert G., Bean William J., Gorman Owen T., Chambers Thomas M., Kawaoka Yoshihiro. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1992;56(1):152–179. doi: 10.1128/mr.56.1.152-179.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Huang Jiaoling, Xie Zhixun, Xie Zhiqin, Luo Sisi, Xie Liji, Huang Li, Fan Qing, Zhang Yanfang, Wang Sheng, Zeng Tingting. Silver nanoparticles coated graphene electrochemical sensor for the ultrasensitive analysis of avian influenza virus H7. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2016;913:121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ozer Tugba, Geiss Brian J., Henry Charles S. Chemical and biological sensors for viral detection. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019;167(3) doi: 10.1149/2.0232003JES. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jin Seon-Ah, Poudyal Shishir, Marinero Ernesto E., Kuhn Richard J., Stanciu Lia A. Impedimetric dengue biosensor based on functionalized graphene oxide wrapped silica particles. Electrochim. Acta. 2016;194:422–430. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.116. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hasan Shamimul, Syed Ansar Ahmad, Masood Rahnuma, Saeed Shazina. Ebola virus: a global public health menace: a narrative review. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care. 2019;8(7):2189. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_297_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Malvy Denis, McElroy Anita K., Hilde de Clerck, Günther Stephan, Johan van Griensven Ebola virus disease. Lancet. 2019;393(10174):936–948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33132-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Khan Sajad, Rauf Abdur, Khan Ahsan, Rizwan Muhammad, Patel Seema, Khan Haroon, Mahasneh Adel M., Mubarak Mohammad S. Comprehensive review on ebola (EBOV) virus: future prospects. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets. 2018;18(2):96–104. doi: 10.2174/1871526517666170817100828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Couturier Céline, Wada Atsuhiko, Louis Karen, Mistretta Maxime, Benoit Beitz, Povogui Moriba, Ripaux Maryline, et al. Characterization and analytical validation of a new antigenic rapid diagnostic test for Ebola virus disease detection. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2020;14(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jacob Shevin T., Crozier Ian, Fischer William A., Hewlett Angela, Kraft Colleen S. Marc-Antoine de La Vega, Moses J. Soka et al. Ebola virus disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020;6(1):1–31. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0147-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wen Jia, Li Weisi, Li Jiaqi, Tao Binbin, Xu Yongqian, Li Hongjuan, Lu Aiping, Sun Shiguo. Study on rolling circle amplification of Ebola virus and fluorescence detection based on graphene oxide. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2016;227:655–659. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.01.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pallavi K., Sravani D., Durga S., Durga P.N., Pavan P.N.S., Babu P.S., Raviteja K. Hepatitis review on current and future scenario. J. In Silico In Vitro Pharmacol. 2017;3(1):1–5. doi: 10.4172/2469-6692.100015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Yuen Man-Fung, Chen Ding-Shinn, Dusheiko Geoffrey M., Janssen Harry L.A., Lau Daryl T.Y., Locarnini Stephen A., Peters Marion G., Lai Ching-Lung. Hepatitis B virus infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2018;4(1):1–20. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Aspinall E.J., Hawkins G., Fraser A., Hutchinson S.J., Goldberg D. Hepatitis B prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care: a review. Occup. Med. 2011;61(8):531–540. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqr136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nguyen Mindie H., Wong Grace, Gane Edward, Kao Jia-Horng, Dusheiko Geoffrey. Hepatitis B virus: advances in prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2020;33(2) doi: 10.1128/CMR.00046-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Xiang Qian, Huang Jingyun, Huang Huiyao, Mao Weiwei, Ye Zhizhen. A label-free electrochemical platform for the highly sensitive detection of hepatitis B virus DNA using graphene quantum dots. RSC Adv. 2018;8(4):1820–1825. doi: 10.1039/C7RA11945C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Warkad Shrikant Dashrath, Nimse Satish Balasaheb, Keum-Soo Song. Kim Taisun. HCV detection, discrimination, and genotyping technologies. Sensors. 2018;18(10):3423. doi: 10.3390/s18103423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fan Jialong, Yuan Liqun, Liu Qingxin, Tong Chunyi, Wang Wenmiao, Xiao Feng, Liu Bin, Liu Xuanming. An ultrasensitive and simple assay for the Hepatitis C virus using a reduced graphene oxide-assisted hybridization chain reaction. Analyst. 2019;144(13):3972–3979. doi: 10.1039/C9AN00179D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Li Jingwen, Li Yifei, Zhai Xingwei, Cao Ya, Zhao Jing, Tang Yuguo, Han Kun. Sensitive electrochemical detection of hepatitis C virus subtype based on nucleotides assisted magnetic reduced graphene oxide-copper nano-composite. Electrochem. Commun. 2020;110:106601. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2019.106601. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Jiang Ping, Li Yifei, Ju Ting, Cheng Wenbo, Xu Jianhua, Han Kun. Ultrasensitive detection of hepatitis C virus DNA subtypes based on cucurbituril and graphene oxide nano-composite. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2020:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s40242-020-9111-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gong Qiaojuan, Wang Yongdong, Yang Haiying. A sensitive impedimetric DNA biosensor for the determination of the HIV gene based on graphene-Nafion composite film. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;89:565–569. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.02.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wang Yijia, Bai Xiaoning, Wen Wei, Zhang Xiuhua, Wang Shengfu. Ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor for HIV gene detection based on graphene stabilized gold nanoclusters with exonuclease amplification. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7(33):18872–18879. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b05857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Gong Qiaojuan, Han Haixia, Yang Haiying, Zhang Meiling, Sun Xiaoling, Liang Yunxia, Liu Zhaorong, Zhang Wenchan, Qiao Jinli. Sensitive electrochemical DNA sensor for the detection of HIV based on a polyaniline/graphene nanocomposite. J. Mat. 2019;5(2):313–319. doi: 10.1016/j.jmat.2019.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Harvey Jackson D., Baker Hanan A., Ortiz Michael V., Kentsis Alex, Heller Daniel A. HIV detection via a carbon nanotube RNA sensor. ACS Sens. 2019;4(5):1236–1244. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.9b00025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chan Chunyu, Shi Jinyu, Fan Yadi, Yang Mo. A microfluidic flow-through chip integrated with reduced graphene oxide transistor for influenza virus gene detection. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2017;251:927–933. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.147. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Jeong Seonghwan, Kim Dong-Min, Song-Yi An, Dong Ho Kim, Kim Dong-Eun. Fluorometric detection of influenza viral RNA using graphene oxide. Anal. Biochem. 2018;561:66–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2018.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lee Jaewook, Morita Masahiro, Takemura Kenshin, Enoch Y., Park A multi-functional gold/iron-oxide nanoparticle-CNT hybrid nanomaterial as virus DNA sensing platform. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018;102:425–431. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.11.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kamil Yasmin Mustapha, Abu Bakar Muhammad Hafiz, Yaacob Mohd Hanif, Syahir Amir, Lim Hong Ngee, Mahdi Mohd Adzir. Dengue E protein detection using a graphene oxide integrated tapered optical fiber sensor. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 2018;25(1):1–8. doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2018.2846044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Omar N.A.S., Fen Y.W., Abdullah J., Kamil Y.M., Daniyal W.M.E.M.M., Sadrolhosseini A.R., Mahdi M.A. Sensitive detection of dengue virus type 2 E-proteins signals using self-assembled monolayers/reduced graphene oxide-PAMAM dendrimer thin film-SPR optical sensor. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59388-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wasik Daniel, Mulchandani Ashok, Yates Marylynn V. A heparin-functionalized carbon nanotube-based affinity biosensor for dengue virus. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;91:811–816. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Navakul Krongkaew, Warakulwit Chompunuch, Yenchitsomanus Pa-thai, Panya Aussara, Lieberzeit Peter A., Sangma Chak. A novel method for dengue virus detection and antibody screening using a graphene-polymer based electrochemical biosensor. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2017;13(2):549–557. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Maity Arnab, Sui Xiaoyu, Jin Bing, Pu Haihui, Bottum Kai J., Huang Xingkang, Chang Jingbo, Zhou Guihua, Lu Ganhua, Chen Junhong. Resonance-frequency modulation for rapid, point-of-care ebola-glycoprotein diagnosis with a graphene-based field-effect biotransistor. Anal. Chem. 2018;90(24):14230–14238. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Jin Xin, Zhang Hong, Li Yu-Tao, Xiao Meng-Meng, Zhang Zhi-Ling, Pang Dai-Wen, Wong Gary, Zhang Zhi-Yong, Zhang Guo-Jun. A field effect transistor modified with reduced graphene oxide for immunodetection of Ebola virus. Microchim. Acta. 2019;186(4):223. doi: 10.1007/s00604-019-3256-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Liu Minghuan, Zheng Chaohui, Cui Malin, Zhang Xiaoyan, Yang Da-Peng, Wang Xiansong, Cui Daxiang. Graphene oxide wrapped with gold nanorods as a tag in a SERS based immunoassay for the hepatitis B surface antigen. Microchim. Acta. 2018;185(10):458. doi: 10.1007/s00604-018-2989-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhao Feijun, Bai Yan, Zeng Ruosheng, Cao Liangli, Zhu Jianming, Han Guocheng, Chen Zhencheng. An electrochemical immunosensor with graphene-oxide-ferrocene-based nanocomposites for hepatitis B surface antigen detection. Electroanalysis. 2018;30(11):2774–2780. doi: 10.1002/elan.201800476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Walters F., Rozhko S., Buckley D., Ahmadi E.D., Ali M., Tehrani Z., Mitchell J., et al. Real-time detection of hepatitis B surface antigen using a hybrid graphene-gold nanoparticle biosensor. 2D Mater. 2020;7(2):24009. doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/ab734c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Manns Michael P., Buti Maria, Gane E.D., Pawlotsky Jean-Michel, Razavi Homie, Terrault Norah, Younossi Zobair. Hepatitis C virus infection. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017;3(1):1–19. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Dearborn Altaira D., Joseph Marcotrigiano. Hepatitis C virus structure: defined by what it is not. Cold Spring Harbor Persp. Med. 2020;10(1):a036822. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Valipour Akram, Roushani Mahmoud. Using silver nanoparticle and thiol graphene quantum dots nanocomposite as a substratum to load antibody for detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen: electrochemical oxidation of riboflavin was used as redox probe. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;89:946–951. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Yeh Yin-Ting, Tang Yi, Sebastian Aswathy, Dasgupta Archi, Perea-Lopez Nestor, Albert Istvan, Lu Huaguang, Terrones Mauricio, Zheng Si-Yang. Tunable and label-free virus enrichment for ultrasensitive virus detection using carbon nanotube arrays. Sci. Adv. 2016;2(10) doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1601026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Veerapandian Murugan, Hunter Robert, Suresh Neethirajan. Dual immunosensor based on methylene blue-electroadsorbed graphene oxide for rapid detection of the influenza A virus antigen. Talanta. 2016;155:250–257. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.04.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ono Takao, Oe Takeshi, Kanai Yasushi, Ikuta Takashi, Ohno Yasuhide, Maehashi Kenzo, Inoue Koichi, et al. Glycan-functionalized graphene-FETs toward selective detection of human-infectious avian influenza virus. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2017;56(3) doi: 10.7567/JJAP.56.030302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Singh Renu, Hong Seongkyeol, Jang Jaesung. Label-free detection of influenza viruses using a reduced graphene oxide-based electrochemical immunosensor integrated with a microfluidic platform. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42771. doi: 10.1038/srep42771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Anik Ülkü, Tepeli Yudum, Maher Sayhi, Nsiri Jihene, Diouani Mohamed Fethi. Towards the electrochemical diagnostic of influenza virus: development of a graphene–Au hybrid nanocomposite modified influenza virus biosensor based on neuraminidase activity. Analyst. 2018;143(1):150–156. doi: 10.1039/C7AN01537B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Achadu Ojodomo J., Kenshin Takemura, Indra Memdi Khoris, Park Enoch Y. Plasmonic/magnetic molybdenum trioxide and graphitic carbon nitride quantum dots-based fluoroimmunosensing system for influenza virus. Sensor. Actuator. B Chem. 2020:128494. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sun Bing, Dong Jing, Cui Lin, Feng Tiantian, Zhu Jiujuan, Liu Xuanhe, Ai Shiyun. A dual signal-on photoelectrochemical immunosensor for sensitively detecting target avian viruses based on AuNPs/g-C3N4 coupling with CdTe quantum dots and in situ enzymatic generation of electron donor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019;124:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.09.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Zhou Dandi, Wang Min, Dong Jing, Ai Shiyun. A novel electrochemical immunosensor based on mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride for detection of subgroup J of Avian Leukosis viruses. Electrochim. Acta. 2016;205:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Moghadam Saeed Reza Jamali, Bayrami Samaneh, Jamali Moghadam Sepideh, Golrokhi Raheleh, Pahlaviani Fatemeh Golsoorat, SeyedAlinaghi SeyedAhmad. Zika virus: a review of literature. Asian Pacific J. Trop. Biomed. 2016;6(no. 12):989–994. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.09.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Noorbakhsh Farshid, Abdolmohammadi Kamal, Fatahi Yousef, Dalili Hossein, Rasoolinejad Mehrnaz, Rezaei Farshid, Salehi-Vaziri Mostafa, et al. Zika virus infection, basic and clinical aspects: a review article. Iran. J. Public Health. 2019;48(1):20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Alzate Daniel, Cajigas Sebastian, Robledo Sara, Muskus Carlos, Orozco Jahir. Genosensors for differential detection of Zika virus. Talanta. 2020;210:120648. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Afsahi Savannah, Lerner Mitchell B., Goldstein Jason M., Lee Joo, Tang Xiaoling, Dennis A., Bagarozzi, Deng Pan, et al. Novel graphene-based biosensor for early detection of Zika virus infection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018;100:85–88. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.08.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ghebremedhin Beniam. Human adenovirus: viral pathogen with increasing importance. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014;4(1):26–33. doi: 10.1556/eujmi.4.2014.1.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Khanal Subrat, Ghimire Pranita, Dhamoon Amit S. The repertoire of adenovirus in human disease: the innocuous to the deadly. Biomedicines. 2018;6(1):30. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines6010030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Jin Xue-Hai, Ishii Atsushi, Aoki Koki, Ishida Susumu, Mukasa Koichi, Ohno Shigeaki. Detection of human adenovirus hexon antigen using carbon nanotube sensors. J. Virol Methods. 2011;171(2):405–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2010.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Ahmed Syed Rahin, Mogus Jack, Chand Rohit, Nagy Eva, Suresh Neethirajan. Optoelectronic fowl adenovirus detection based on local electric field enhancement on graphene quantum dots and gold nanobundle hybrid. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018;103:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Science: Advanced Materials and Devices are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES