Abstract
Ultrasound B-mode imaging based on log-compressed envelope data has been widely applied to examine hepatic steatosis. Modeling raw backscattered signals returned from the liver parenchyma by using statistical distributions can provide additional information to assist in hepatic steatosis diagnosis. Since raw data are not always available in modern ultrasound systems, information entropy, which is a widely known nonmodel-based approach, may allow ultrasound backscattering analysis using B-scan for assessing hepatic steatosis. In this study, we explored the feasibility of using ultrasound entropy imaging constructed using log-compressed backscattered envelopes for assessing hepatic steatosis. Different stages of hepatic steatosis were induced in male Wistar rats fed with a methionine- and choline-deficient diet for 0 (i.e., normal control) and 1, 1.5, and 2 weeks (n = 48; 12 rats in each group). In vivo scanning of rat livers was performed using a commercial ultrasound machine (Model 3000, Terason, Burlington, MA, USA) equipped with a 7-MHz linear array transducer (Model 10L5, Terason) for ultrasound B-mode and entropy imaging based on uncompressed (HE image) and log-compressed envelopes (HB image), which were subsequently compared with histopathological examinations. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were used to assess diagnostic performance levels. The results showed that ultrasound entropy imaging can be used to assess hepatic steatosis. The AUCs obtained from HE imaging for diagnosing different steatosis stages were 0.93 (≥mild), 0.89 (≥moderate), and 0.89 (≥severe), respectively. HB imaging produced AUCs ranging from 0.74 (≥mild) to 0.84 (≥severe) as long as a higher number of bins was used to reconstruct the signal histogram for estimating entropy. The results indicated that entropy use enables ultrasound parametric imaging based on log-compressed envelope signals with great potential for diagnosing hepatic steatosis.
Keywords: ultrasound, hepatic steatosis, Shannon entropy, fatty liver
1. Introduction
Hepatic steatosis is a disease in which excessive fat accumulates to form fatty vacuoles in hepatocytes [1,2,3]. Hepatic steatosis is generally a reversible process [1,2], but it may ultimately progress to become steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis [4,5] if no appropriate control and interventions are applied to diet and lifestyle [5]. Consequently, routine examinations of patients with hepatic steatosis are necessary. Conventionally, liver biopsy is the standard method for determining the stage of hepatic steatosis [6,7]. Liver biopsy is not an ideal method for follow-up because it is invasive and causes discomfort, pain, and complications for patients [6]. Thus, noninvasive imaging methods can be used to provide information associated with hepatic steatosis to assist in diagnosis. Currently, computed tomography [8], magnetic resonance imaging [9], and ultrasound B-mode imaging [10,11,12] are widely used to screen and evaluate hepatic steatosis. Of the aforementioned methods, ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality because of its nonionizing radiation, portability, and real-time capability. However, although ultrasound B-scan allows fast screening and evaluation, image brightness and features are strongly dependent on system parameters and operator experiences, resulting in a subjective diagnosis [10,11,12]. Thus, a relatively objective ultrasound evaluation of hepatic steatosis is required.
The appearance of speckle (granular patterns) in the B-mode images of liver tissues is due to ultrasound scattering, which results from the interaction between acoustic scatterers and the incident wave [13,14]. Based on the randomness of ultrasound scattering, the information of backscattered signals can be described using statistical distribution as a clue for characterizing scatterers in tissues [15,16]. The liver is modeled as a collection of hepatocytes and lobules [17]; thus, hepatic steatosis can be treated as a process in which additional fatty scatterers form in liver tissues, resulting in changes in the microstructure and the corresponding statistical distributions of backscattered signals. Thus, studies have attempted to use statistical models, such as Nakagami distribution [15,18], homodyned-K distribution [19], and acoustic structure quantification [16], for hepatic steatosis assessment. The use of statistical models in ultrasound tissue characterization requires two prerequisites: (i) the ultrasound system must provide raw image data, including either radiofrequency (RF) or envelope signals; and (ii) the raw data must follow the used statistical distribution [20]. This limitation motivated researchers to seek nonmodel-based methods as a more flexible solution for characterizing hepatic steatosis.
In fact, several approaches are available for nonmodel-based estimates (e.g., mean, variance, or texture analysis [21,22]). Among all possibilities, Shannon entropy is a widely-known estimate of signal uncertainty and complexity proposed in information theory [23]. Hughes pioneered entropy use to analyze ultrasound backscattered signals for microstructure quantification [24,25]. The feasibility of using ultrasound entropy to characterize tissues has been explored in some clinical topics, such as monitoring progress in Duchenne muscular dystrophy [26] and detecting cataracts [27]. In particular, ultrasound parametric imaging constructed using entropy was shown to have the ability to visually evaluate hepatic steatosis in humans [28]. The theoretical basis of using entropy imaging in ultrasound liver characterization is derived from the fact that entropy is a function of a variable’s probability density function (PDF) to allow descriptions of the statistical properties of signals. Moreover, estimating entropy does not require the data to follow the specific statistical model, providing an opportunity to realize a more flexible analysis approach without considering the signal distribution.
Before ultrasound entropy imaging can be reliably used in practical applications of hepatic steatosis evaluation, we must address some unanswered questions. In previous studies, entropy estimations were based on raw image data [26,27,28], but not on log-compressed envelope signals used for conventional B-mode imaging. However, ultrasound B-scan remains a mainstream in clinical screening, and most commercial B-scan machines do not provide raw data. Thus, the diagnostic performance of entropy estimated using log-compressed envelopes for assessing hepatic steatosis must be investigated. Second, signal PDF reconstruction is necessary for entropy estimation. To reduce the complexity of signal PDF reconstruction, a statistical histogram can be used as an alternative PDF [27,28]. In this condition, the number of bin (NB) is the key factor for determining the shape of the histogram and the corresponding entropy value. The effect of NB on using entropy to characterize hepatic steatosis is unknown.
This study explored (i) the diagnostic performance of ultrasound entropy constructed using envelope and B-scan (log-compressed envelopes) images for evaluating hepatic steatosis, and (ii) the effect of NB on the entropy imaging of hepatic steatosis. In vivo animal experiments were conducted, and the results showed that entropy imaging based on uncompressed envelopes is effective for detecting variations in hepatic steatosis. Entropy imaging using log-compressed envelopes can facilitate the characterization of hepatic steatosis when NB was set to ≥130.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animal Preparations
The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chang Gung University approved the animal study. Forty-eight male Wistar rats weighing 210–250 g (age: six weeks) were used in this study. The rats were housed in standard cages and provided with food and tap water ad libitum. After acclimatization of one week, the rats were divided into four groups (n = 12 in each group): one group was fed a normal diet (as normal control) and three groups were fed a methionine- and choline-deficient (MCD) diet (Baker Amino Acid Diet lacking choline and methionine 578 B; TestDiet, Richmond, IN, USA) [29,30,31] for 1, 1.5, and 2 weeks to induce different degrees of hepatic steatosis.
2.2. Ultrasound Data Acquisition
A commercial ultrasound scanner (Model 3000, Terason, Burlington, MA, USA) equipped with a 7-MHz linear array transducer (Model 10L5, Terason) was used for in vivo scanning of rat livers. The pulse length of the transducer was approximately 0.7 mm, and the sampling rate of RF signals was 30 MHz. Before measurements, each rat was anesthetized with isoflurane, shaved on the abdomen, and placed in a supine position. Ultrasound examination of rat livers was subsequently performed using transhepatic longitudinal scanning to acquire raw image data, which comprised 256 scan lines of backscattered RF signals returned from the liver parenchyma. The imaging depth was 3 cm, and the focal zone was adjusted to be located at the central part of the liver to reduce the effect of beam divergence. Five independent scans were performed for each liver.
2.3. Ultrasound Entropy Imaging
For each raw datum, envelope images were obtained by taking the absolute value of the Hilbert transform of backscattered RF signals [32], and the corresponding B-mode images were formed using logarithm-compressed envelope images with a dynamic range of 40 dB. Subsequently, entropic parametric images were constructed using the sliding window technique to process the envelope and B-mode images. The algorithm of entropy imaging illustrated in Figure 1 comprised the following steps: (i) a square window was placed on the envelope and B-mode images to collect local uncompressed and compressed envelope data. The side length of the window was determined as three times the pulse length (i.e., 2.1 mm), as suggested for ensuring stable estimations of statistical parameters [33]; (ii) the PDFs of local data within the sliding window were obtained using the histograms with different NBs from 10 to 210 in steps of 40 bins for estimating entropy values using Equation (1) [23]:
| (1) |
where ymin and ymax represent the minimal and maximal values of the local data in the window, and w(y) means the PDF of the data. The entropy values obtained using the envelope (denoted by HE) and B-mode images (denoted by HB) were assigned as new pixels located in the center of the window; (iii) the window was moved across the envelope and B-mode images in steps with a 50% window overlap ratio, and Steps (i) to (ii) were repeated to yield HE and HB parametric images; and (iv) because sliding window processing reduces the image size, interpolations of HE and HB parametric images were performed. In general, nearest neighbor interpolation allows relatively simple computations with less time consuming. Nevertheless, it may result in distortion of image patterns. A cubic-based interpolation algorithm provides an improved image quality, but the computations are more complex. Compared with the above two methods, linear interpolation can avoid image discontinuity to generate satisfactory results with an acceptable computational efficiency [34]. For this reason, the linear interpolation method was used. Finally, the entropy images were superimposed onto the corresponding B-mode images to provide structural and parametric information.
Figure 1.
Computational flowchart for ultrasound entropy parametric imaging.
2.4. Histopathological Examinations
After ultrasound scanning, the rats were sacrificed through CO2 asphyxiation, and the livers were immediately excised for preparations of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and Masson trichrome. Histopathological scores were assigned by an experienced veterinarian blinded to the experimental design according to the scoring systems [35]. Steatosis was graded according to the following scoring system: 0, none (<5% of parenchymal involvement by fat droplets); 1, mild (5–33%); 2, moderate (33–66%); and 3, severe (>66%). Lobular inflammation was graded 0–3 based on the number of inflammatory foci per 200× field (0, no foci; 1, 1–2/200× field; 2, up to 4/200× field; and 3, >4/200× field). Hepatocyte ballooning was graded 0–2 based on an estimate of severity (0, none; 1, few ballooning cells; and 2, prominent ballooning cells). Steatohepatitis was evaluated based on the sum of the following individual grading of three features: steatosis grade (0–3), lobular inflammation grade (0–3), and hepatocellular ballooning grade (0–2). Summed scores of 0–2, 3–4, and >4 indicated no steatohepatitis, borderline cases, and steatohepatitis, respectively. Liver fibrosis was staged using the Metavir scoring system [35] on the basis of the patterns of fibrosis and the increase in connective tissue deposition (F0, no fibrosis; F1, portal fibrosis with no septa; F2, portal fibrosis with few septa; F3, bridging fibrosis with many septa; and F4, cirrhosis).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
To avoid interference from large blood vessels, we manually selected a region of interest in the B-mode images to involve corresponding entropy values for averaging. The entropies as a function of steatosis grade were expressed by the box plot, which provides a summary of statistics including median, interquartile range (IQR; a measure of statistical dispersion, being equal to the difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles), range, and data distribution. The diagnostic performances of using HE and HB parametric images to assess hepatic steatosis were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with 95% confidence intervals. A ROC space is defined by the false positive rate (FPR, or 1-specificity) and the true positive rate (TPR, or sensitivity) as x and y axes, respectively. The TPR describes how many correct positive results (i.e., hepatic steatosis at the stage of interest) occur among all positive samples available in the experiments. The FPR describes how many incorrect positive results occur among all negative samples. The ROC curve was plotted in the ROC space by connecting the points located at (FPR, TPR) obtained using different cutoff values of entropy. The best sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were also determined using the closest point to (0, 1) on the ROC curve. All statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot software (Version 12.0, Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
3. Results
Figure 2 shows representative H&E- and Masson-stained images of rat liver sections with different hepatic steatosis scores. The area of fat droplets gradually increased with hepatic steatosis scores, thereby demonstrating the successful induction of hepatic steatosis in rat livers. Table 1 summarizes the changes in the score of each histopathological feature in the normal control and MCD diet-fed groups. Abnormal histopathological features were rarely observed in rat livers in the control group. Hepatic steatosis at scores between 0 and 2 was found after one week of feeding the MCD diet. After 1.5 and 2 weeks of feeding the MCD diet, advanced hepatic steatosis at scores between 1 and 3 were achieved. Concurrently, steatohepatitis scores increased with the duration of feeding the MCD diet; however, they still belonged to mild steatohepatitis. No fibrosis was observed in all the groups.
Figure 2.
Hematoxylin-eosin- and Masson-stained section images of rat livers for different hepatic steatosis scores. (a,e) normal; (b,f) mild; (c,g) moderate; and (d,h) severe hepatic steatosis. The concentration of fat droplets gradually increased with hepatic steatosis scores.
Table 1.
Changes in steatosis score, steatohepatitis score, and fibrosis stage relative to the duration of MCD diet.
| Control Group | MCD for 1 Week | MCD for 1.5 Weeks | MCD for 2 Weeks | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steatosis (score, 0–3) | 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 1, 1, 1, 0, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1 | 3, 1, 3, 2, 2, 1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 | 3, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 3, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2 |
| Lobular inflammation (score, 0–3) | 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0 | 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0 |
| Hepatocyte ballooning (score, 0–2) | 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1 | 1, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 2, 1, 0 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0 | 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1 |
| Steatohepatitis (score, 0–8) | 0, 0, 0, 1, 2, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1 | 3, 3, 2, 1, 4, 2, 3, 1, 3, 4, 2, 1 | 5, 3, 5, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2 | 5, 4, 3, 3, 5, 2, 5, 5, 3, 3, 3, 3 |
| Fibrosis (stage, 0–4) | 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 | 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 |
Note: steatohepatitis = the unweighted sum of the score of steatosis (score, 0–3), lobular inflammation (score, 0–3), and hepatocyte ballooning (score, 0–2) and thus ranges from 0 to 8.
Ultrasound HE and HB images with scores of hepatic steatosis ranging from 0 to 3 constructed using different NBs are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. Using different NBs, the brightness of the HE images increased with the scores of hepatic steatosis, but the HB image could not show changes in the degree of hepatic steatosis when NB was <130. Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the quantitative analysis of the medians and IQRs of HE and HB as a function of steatosis score obtained using different NBs. Although NB affects the estimations of HE and HB values, the HE value always monotonically increased with the stage of hepatic steatosis, regardless of the NB. However, no significant relationship between HB value and the stage of steatosis was found when NB was <130, implying that the diagnostic performance of the HB image is sensitive to NB, as supported by the results in Figure 7 and Figure 8. Using NB = 10, the AUCs of (HE, HB) were (0.93, 0.75), (0.89, 0.51), and (0.89, 0.63) for diagnosing the steatosis stages of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. The AUCs of (HE, HB) were (0.93, 0.74), (0.89, 0.74), and (0.89, 0.84) for diagnosing the steatosis stages of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively, when NB was 130. Table 2 and Table 3 summarize the diagnostic performance of the HB and HE images. The results suggested that ultrasound entropy imaging using HE performed effectively in hepatic steatosis assessment. The diagnostic performance of the HB image remained stable if NB was ≥130.
Figure 3.
Entropy images obtained using uncompressed envelope images of rat livers with different hepatic steatosis scores and NB. The brightness of the entropy images increased with hepatic steatosis scores. The size of each image is 30 mm (depth) × 38.3 mm (width).
Figure 4.
Entropy images obtained using log-compressed envelope images of rat livers with different hepatic steatosis scores and NB. The brightness of the entropy images increased with the hepatic steatosis score when NB ≥ 130. The size of each image is 30 mm (depth) × 38.3 mm (width).
Figure 5.
Median and IQR of entropy obtained using uncompressed envelope images with different hepatic steatosis scores and NB. The entropy values increased with hepatic steatosis score regardless of the settings of NB. (a) NB = 10; (b) NB = 50; (c) NB = 90; (d) NB = 130; (e) NB = 170; (f) NB = 210.
Figure 6.
Median and IQR of entropy obtained using log-compressed envelope images with different hepatic steatosis scores and NB. The values increased with hepatic steatosis scores when NB ≥ 130. (a) NB = 10; (b) NB = 50; (c) NB = 90; (d) NB = 130; (e) NB = 170; (f) NB = 210.
Figure 7.
ROC curves of entropy imaging obtained using uncompressed envelopes for diagnosing different steatosis scores. Using NBs from 10 to 210 in steps of 40 bins, the AUCs of (≥mild, ≥moderate, ≥severe) were (0.9302, 0.8987, 0.8952), (0.9316, 0.8979, 0.8952), (0.9302, 0.8979, 0.8952), (0.9302, 0.8979, 0.8952), (0.9302, 0.8979, 0.8952), and (0.9302, 0.8979, 0.8952), respectively. Diagnostic performance is less affected by the settings of NB. (a) NB = 10; (b) NB = 50; (c) NB = 90; (d) NB = 130; (e) NB = 170; (f) NB = 210.
Figure 8.
ROC curves of entropy imaging obtained using log-compressed envelope images for diagnosing different steatosis scores. Using NBs from 10 to 210 in steps of 40 bins, the AUCs of (≥mild, ≥moderate, ≥severe) were (0.7489, 0.51, 0.629), (0.7352, 0.6425, 0.6129), (0.7056, 0.6575, 0.6237), (0.7359, 0.7425, 0.8351), (0.7446, 0.75, 0.8172), and (0.7593, 0.7475, 0.8136), respectively. The improved diagnostic performances can be obtained when NB ≥ 130. (a) NB = 10; (b) NB = 50; (c) NB = 90; (d) NB = 130; (e) NB = 170; (f) NB = 210.
Table 2.
Performance levels of entropy in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis (obtained using uncompressed envelope images).
| Cut off Value | AUC (95% CI) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bin number = 10 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 2.5093 | 0.9302 (0.8106–1) | 88.8889 | 91.4286 | 72.7273 | 96.9697 | 90.9091 |
| ≥moderate | 2.6468 | 0.8979 (0.8029–1) | 83.3333 | 95 | 95.2381 | 82.6087 | 88.6364 |
| ≥severe | 2.6945 | 0.8952 (0.7984–0.992) | 80 | 100 | 100 | 56.25 | 84.0909 |
| Bin number = 50 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 4.7636 | 0.9316 (0.8106–1) | 88.8889 | 91.4286 | 72.7273 | 96.9697 | 90.9091 |
| ≥moderate | 4.9913 | 0.8979 (0.8029–0.9929) | 83.3333 | 95 | 95.2381 | 82.6087 | 88.6364 |
| ≥severe | 4.9616 | 0.8952 (0.7984–0.992) | 80 | 100 | 100 | 56.25 | 84.0909 |
| Bin number = 90 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 5.5846 | 0.9302 (0.8106–1) | 88.8889 | 91.4286 | 72.7273 | 96.9697 | 90.9091 |
| ≥moderate | 5.7329 | 0.8979 (0.8029–0.9929) | 83.3333 | 95 | 95.2381 | 82.6087 | 88.6364 |
| ≥severe | 5.784 | 0.8952 (0.7984–0.992) | 80 | 100 | 100 | 56.25 | 84.0909 |
| Bin number = 130 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 6.0903 | 0.9302 (0.8106-1) | 88.8889 | 91.4286 | 72.7273 | 96.9697 | 90.9091 |
| ≥moderate | 6.2392 | 0.8979 (0.8029–0.9929) | 83.3333 | 95 | 95.2381 | 82.6087 | 88.6364 |
| ≥severe | 6.2901 | 0.8952 (0.7984–0.992) | 80 | 100 | 100 | 56.25 | 84.0909 |
| Bin number = 170 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 6.4544 | 0.9302 (0.8106–1) | 88.8889 | 91.4286 | 72.7273 | 96.9697 | 90.9091 |
| ≥moderate | 6.6021 | 0.8979 (0.8029–0.9929) | 83.3333 | 95 | 95.2381 | 82.6087 | 88.6364 |
| ≥severe | 6.6535 | 0.8952 (0.7984-0.992) | 80 | 100 | 100 | 56.25 | 84.0909 |
| Bin number = 210 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 6.6027 | 0.9302 (0.8106-1) | 88.8889 | 91.4286 | 72.7273 | 96.9697 | 90.9091 |
| ≥moderate | 6.7518 | 0.8979 (0.8029-0.9929) | 83.3333 | 95 | 95.2381 | 82.6087 | 88.6364 |
| ≥severe | 6.8022 | 0.8952 (0.7984-0.992) | 80 | 100 | 100 | 56.25 | 84.0909 |
PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value, AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristics curve.
Table 3.
Performance levels of entropy in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis (obtained using log-compressed envelope images).
| Cut off Value | AUC (95% CI) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Accuracy (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bin number = 10 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 2.9578 | 0.7489 (0.5231–0.9747) | 100 | 63.6364 | 36.8421 | 100 | 70 |
| ≥moderate | 2.9683 | 0.51 (0.3246–0.6954) | 85 | 45 | 60.7143 | 75 | 65 |
| ≥severe | 2.9511 | 0.629 (0.4074–0.8507) | 66.6667 | 74.1935 | 42.8571 | 88.4615 | 72.5 |
| Bin number = 50 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 5.1926 | 0.7532 (0.5286–0.9979) | 85.7143 | 57.5758 | 30 | 95 | 62.5 |
| ≥moderate | 5.1926 | 0.6425 (0.467–0.818) | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 | 65 |
| ≥severe | 5.1936 | 0.6129 (0.4071–0.8187) | 61.2903 | 66.6667 | 86.3636 | 33.3333 | 62.5 |
| Bin number = 90 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 5.9331 | 0.7056 (0.4701–0.9411) | 57.1429 | 75.7576 | 33.3333 | 89.2857 | 72.5 |
| ≥moderate | 5.9463 | 0.6575 (0.4841–0.8308) | 60 | 70 | 66.6667 | 63.3636 | 65 |
| ≥severe | 5.9467 | 0.6237 (0.4201-0.8272) | 51.6129 | 66.6667 | 84.2105 | 28.5714 | 55 |
| Bin number = 130 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 6.2553 | 0.7359 (0.5069–0.965) | 85.7143 | 66.6667 | 35.2941 | 95.6521 | 70 |
| ≥moderate | 6.2253 | 0.7425 (0.5857–0.8993) | 70 | 85 | 82.3529 | 73.913 | 77.5 |
| ≥severe | 6.3475 | 0.8351 (0.7033–0.967) | 83.871 | 77.7778 | 92.8571 | 58.3333 | 82.5 |
| Bin number = 170 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 6.2879 | 0.7446 (0.5176–0.9715) | 85.7143 | 66.6667 | 35.2941 | 95.6522 | 70 |
| ≥moderate | 6.2879 | 0.75 (0.595–0.905) | 70 | 85 | 82.3529 | 73.913 | 77.5 |
| ≥severe | 6.3914 | 0.8172 (0.6771–0.9573) | 80.6451 | 77.7778 | 92.5926 | 53.8461 | 80 |
| Bin number = 210 | |||||||
| ≥mild | 6.2907 | 0.7593 (0.5069–0.965) | 85.7143 | 63.6364 | 33.3333 | 95.4545 | 67.5 |
| ≥moderate | 6.2907 | 0.7475 (0.5919–0.9031) | 70 | 80 | 77.7778 | 72.7273 | 75 |
| ≥severe | 6.3946 | 0.8136 (0.6719-0.9553) | 80.6452 | 77.7778 | 92.5926 | 53.8462 | 80 |
PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value, AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristics curve.
4. Discussion
4.1. Significance of This Study
Entropy is a nonmodel-based approach that allows the analysis of signal uncertainty and complexity. In the past, entropy was not applied to ultrasound parametric imaging using log-compressed backscattered signals, which are typically used for general B-mode imaging of livers. In this study, we performed animal experiments in vivo to explore the feasibility of using ultrasound entropy imaging based on uncompressed and compressed envelopes for quantifying hepatic steatosis. As revealed in the Results section, HE imaging is less affected by the effect of NB for detecting variations in the stage of hepatic steatosis. More importantly, HB imaging also performed effectively in hepatic steatosis assessment as long as a higher NB was used to construct the signal PDF. This is the first study to demonstrate that information entropy enables ultrasound parametric imaging based on log-compressed envelope data with the ability to characterize hepatic steatosis.
4.2. Effects of Hepatic Steatosis On Entropy
The sources of ultrasound scattering in the liver tissue are both diffuse and coherent. Hepatocytes (side lengths of 20–30 μm) and many small vessels within the liver are only several tenths of a millimeter in diameter and are diffuse scattering objects [36,37]. The portal triads (each of which contains a bile duct, a portal venule, a portal arteriole, and lymphatic vessels) are considered a source of coherent ultrasound scattering in the liver [17]. The liver lobule is a polygonal mass with three to six portal triads and comprises a central vein surrounded by plates and hepatocytes. Therefore, the liver lobule may be considered the most active scattering unit, comprising both simultaneous diffused and coherent scatterers, when interpreting interactions between ultrasound waves and the liver tissue [17]. During hepatic steatosis formation, the vacuole of fat fills the hepatocytes and displaces the nuclei to the periphery; thus, hepatic steatosis is similar to a process of increasing the scatterer number within the liver parenchyma [15,28]. Under this condition, various echo amplitudes exist and signal uncertainty and unpredictability (entropy) increase. This is why the results showed that the entropy values (HE and HB) are proportional to the hepatic steatosis score.
4.3. Effects of NB on Entropy
The current results indicated that the estimated entropy value depends on the setting of the NB. The diagnostic performances of HE and HB imaging are also different. As shown in Table 2 and Table 3, the AUCs of HE imaging in identifying different stages of hepatic steatosis are almost independent of NB (at least in the range we tested in this study) and remained the same when NB ≥ 90. However, the setting of NB strongly affects HB imaging to characterize hepatic steatosis. Before explaining how NB affects the performance of entropy imaging based on log-compressed envelopes, we should first discuss the role of NB in signal PDF reconstruction. In principle, a histogram is an accurate representation of the distribution of numerical data and is an estimate of the probability distribution of a continuous variable. To ensure that the shape of a histogram approximates that of the signal PDF, appropriate settings of NB are necessary to avoid distorting the reconstructed histogram. Essentially, NB plays the role of the sampling rate for the probability distribution of a signal. According to the sampling theory (i.e., Nyquist theory), twice the signal frequency is the minimum sampling rate required for capturing all the information from a signal [38,39]. The concept of sampling theory provides us with more profound understanding that using a higher NB facilitates reconstructing the signal histogram to improve entropy imaging performance in tissue characterization, although determining the cutoff NB that maximizes entropy diagnostic performance is currently difficult. Moreover, according to observations of the experimental results, the minimum requirement of NB seemingly also depends on the dynamic range of envelope signals. Compared with the compressed envelope data, the uncompressed envelopes have a larger dynamic range in amplitude, which is favorable for using a lower NB to satisfy a correct description of the signal amplitude distribution. In this condition, increasing the NB only influences the values of estimated entropies, but does not contribute any improvements on diagnostic performances. Contrarily, the compressed envelopes have a smaller dynamic range in amplitude due to the log transformation processing of the backscattered data for enhancing the contrast of weak echoes [40,41]. As expected, the resolution of the histogram constructed using a low NB may be insufficiently high to describe the PDF of the signal amplitude. This is why the diagnostic performance of ultrasound entropy imaging based on HB in evaluating hepatic steatosis is more sensitive to the NB.
While increasing the NB for improving the performance of ultrasound entropy imaging, we should also note that the NB cannot be set too large. The data in Table 3 showed that accuracies slightly decreased when using NB > 130. In the present work, very large bin numbers were not used; however, continuously increasing the NB to infinity will make the signal statistics approximate the uniform distribution [42], which is unworkable in tissue characterization. In other words, besides the minimum requirement of NB, the upper limit for the NB may also be a critical consideration.
4.4. Future Challenges and Work
Typically, real-time access of ultrasound RF data in the hardware is difficult because it needs sufficient memory and a transfer rate between the acquisition board and the workstation. However, the data access of log-compressed envelopes is relatively simple because techniques of down-sampling have been frequently used in modern system design. The current study enables visualizing changes in the microstructures of the liver parenchyma with steatosis using entropy of log-compressed backscattered data. Thus, ultrasound entropy imaging may be more suitable to be combined with general B-scan machines for routine examinations and follow-up of patients with hepatic steatosis. Prior to applying entropy imaging to clinical examinations, some challenges must be overcome in the future. Different systems may use different techniques to perform log-compression (e.g., using a look-up table or real-time computation on a chip). Some specifications (e.g., the bit number of the analog-to-digital converter for data acquisition) and parameters for postprocessing (e.g., scan conversion and gray-level adjustment) also affect the dynamic range of signals. Further investigations of ultrasound entropy imaging using different data formats are necessary.
5. Conclusions
In this study, we applied Shannon entropy to ultrasound parametric imaging based on log-compressed backscattered signals as a new solution for assessing hepatic steatosis. The effects of NB on the diagnostic performances of entropy imaging in scoring the stage of hepatic steatosis were also explored. The results obtained from the in vivo model highlighted two key findings: (i) ultrasound entropy imaging constructed using uncompressed backscattered envelopes (HE image) is less affected by the NB, providing a promising ability to differentiate different stages of hepatic steatosis, and (ii) entropy use allows ultrasound parametric imaging based on log-compressed envelope data, which performs effectively in characterizing hepatic steatosis as long as a high NB is used to reconstruct the signal histogram for estimating entropy. This study facilitates the statistical analysis of ultrasound backscattering for hepatic fat characterization using log-compressed backscattered data. Future work on ultrasound entropy imaging using different formats of compressed data is suggested before clinical applications in practice.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan (grant no. 106-2221-E-182-023-MY3 and 106-2218-E-182-006) and the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou in Taiwan (grant no. CIRPD1E0023 and CMRPD1F0311).
Author Contributions
Jui Fang and Ning-Fang Chang conceived and designed the experiments; Ning-Fang Chang performed the experiments; Jui Fang analyzed the data; Po-Hsiang Tsui contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Jui Fang and Po-Hsiang Tsui wrote the paper. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Zelber-Sagi S., Ratziu V., Oren R. Nutrition and physical activity in NAFLD: An overview of the epidemiological evidence. World J. Gastroenterol. 2011;17:3377–3389. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i29.3377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Straub B.K., Schirmacher P. Pathology and biopsy assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig. Dis. 2010;28:197–202. doi: 10.1159/000282086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Subramanya M.B., Kumar V., Mukherjee S., Saini M. A CAD system for B-mode fatty liver ultrasound images using texture features. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 2015;39:123–130. doi: 10.3109/03091902.2014.990160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Neuschwander-Tetri B.A., Caldwell S.H. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Summary of an AASLD Single Topic Conference. Hepatology. 2003;37:1202–1219. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Raff E.J., Kakati D., Bloomer J.R., Shoreibah M., Rasheed K., Singal A.K. Diabetes mellitus predicts occurrence of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer in alcoholic liver and non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases. J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol. 2015;3:9–16. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2015.00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bravo A.A., Sheth S.G., Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:495–500. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102153440706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wieckowska A., McCullough A.J., Feldstein A.E. Noninvasive diagnosis and monitoring of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Present and future. Hepatology. 2007;46:582–589. doi: 10.1002/hep.21768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wilkins T., Tadkod A., Hepburn I., Schade R.R. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Diagnosis and management. Am. Fam. Phys. 2013;88:35–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meisamy S., Hines C.D.G., Hamilton G., Sirlin C.B., McKenzie C.A., Yu H., Brittain J.H., Reeder S.B. Quantification of hepatic steatosis with T1-independent, T2-corrected MR imaging with spectral modeling of fat: Blinded comparison with MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2011;258:767–775. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mehta S.R., Thomas E.L., Bell J.D., Johnston D.G., Taylor-Robinson S.D. Non-invasive means of measuring hepatic fat content. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008;14:3476–3483. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Loomba R., Sirlin C.B., Schwimmer J.B., Lavine J.E. Advances in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2009;50:1282–1293. doi: 10.1002/hep.23119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schwenzer N.F., Springer F., Schraml C., Stefan N., Machann J., Schick F. Non-invasive assessment and quantification of liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. J. Hepatol. 2009;51:433–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Destrempes F., Clotier G. 2010 A critical review and uniformized representation of statistical distributions modeling the ultrasound echo envelope. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2010;36:1037–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rubert N., Varghese T. Mean scatterer spacing estimation using multi-taper coherence. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2013;60:1061–1073. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wan Y.L., Tai D.I., Ma Y.H., Chiang B.H., Chen C.K., Tsui P.H. Effects of fatty infiltration in human livers on the backscattered statistics of ultrasound imaging. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H. 2015;229:419–428. doi: 10.1177/0954411915585864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Son J.Y., Lee J.Y., Yi N., Lee K.W., Suh K.S., Lee J.M., Han J.K., Choi B.I. Hepatic steatosis: Assessment with acoustic structure quantification of US imaging. Radiology. 2016;278:257–264. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015141779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsui P.H., Zhou Z., Lin Y.H., Hung C.M., Chung S.J., Wan Y.L. Effect of ultrasound frequency on the Nakagami statistics of human liver tissues. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0181789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ho M.C., Lee Y.H., Jeng Y.M., Chen C.N., Chang K.J., Tsui P.H. Relationship between ultrasound backscattered statistics and the concentration of fatty droplets in livers: An animal study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ghoshal G., Lavarello R.J., Kemmerer J.P., Miller R.J., Oelze M.L. Ex vivo study of quantitative ultrasound parameters in fatty rabbit livers. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2012;38:2238–2248. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tsui P.H., Huang C.C., Sun L., Dailey S.H., Shung K.K. Characterization of lamina propria and vocal muscle in human vocal fold tissue by ultrasound Nakagami imaging. Med. Phys. 2011;38:2019–2026. doi: 10.1118/1.3562899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bibicu D., Moraru L., Biswas A. Thyroid nodule recognition based on feature selection and pixel classification methods. J. Digit. Imaging. 2013;26:119–128. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9475-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moraru L., Moldovanu S., Culea-Florescu A.-L., Bibicu D., Ashour A.S., Dey N. Texture analysis of parasitological liver fibrosis images. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2017;80:862–869. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shannon C.E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948;27:379–423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hughes M.S. Analysis of ultrasonic waveforms using Shannon entropy. IEEE Ultrason. Symp. Proc. 1992;1:1205–1209. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hughes M.S. Analysis of digitized waveforms using Shannon entropy. II. High speed algorithms based on Green’s functions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994;95:2582–2588. doi: 10.1121/1.409828. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hughes M.S., Marsh J.N., Wallace K.D., Donahue T.A., Connolly A.M., Lanza G.M., Wickline A.S. Sensitive ultrasonic detection of dystrophic skeletal muscle in patients with duchenne muscular dystrophy using an entropy-based signal receiver. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2007;33:1236–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhou Z., Huang C.C., Shung K.K., Tsui P.H., Fang J., Ma H.Y., Wu S., Lin C.C. Entropic imaging of cataract lens: An in vitro study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e96195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tsui P.H., Wan Y.L. Effects of fatty infiltration of the liver on the Shannon entropy of ultrasound backscattered signals. Entropy. 2016;18:341. doi: 10.3390/e18090341. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hebbard L., George J. Animal models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011;8:35–44. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2010.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dongiovanni P., Lanti C., Riso P., Valenti L. Nutritional therapy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2015;29:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2015.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kanuri G., Bergheim I. In vitro and in vivo models of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14:11963–11980. doi: 10.3390/ijms140611963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Azhari H. Basics of Biomedical Ultrasound for Engineers. Wiley; New York, NY, USA: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tsui P.H., Chang C.C. Imaging local scatterer concentrations by the Nakagami statistical model. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2007;33:608–619. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Han D. Comparison of commonly used image interpolation methods; Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering; Los Angeles, CA, USA. 1–2 July 2013; pp. 1556–1559. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kleiner D.E., Brunt E.M., Van Natta E., Behling C., Contos M.J., Cummings O.W., Ferrell L.D., Liu Y.C., Torbenson M.S., Umalp-Arida A., et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321. doi: 10.1002/hep.20701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pike R., Sabatier P. Scattering and Inverse Scattering in Pure and Applied Science. Academic Press; Burlington, MA, USA: 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shung K.K., Thieme G.A. Ultrasonic Scattering in Biological Tissues. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nyquist H. Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory. J. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. 1928;47:617–644. doi: 10.1109/T-AIEE.1928.5055024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shannon C.E. Communication in the presence of noise. Proc. Inst. Radio Eng. 1949;37:10–21. doi: 10.1109/JRPROC.1949.232969. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ortiz S.H.C., Chiu T., Fox M.D. Ultrasound image enhancement: A review. Biomed. Signal Process. Control. 2012;7:419–428. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2012.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Oelze M.L., Mamou J. Review of quantitative ultrasound-Envelope statistics and backscatter coefficient imaging and contributions to diagnostic ultrasound. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2016;63:336–351. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.2513958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Suffern K. Ray Tracing from the Ground Up. A K Peters; Natick, MA, USA: 2007. [Google Scholar]








