Abstract
CD4+ T helper cells are responsible for orchestrating diverse, pathogen-specific immune responses through their differentiation into a number of subsets, including T helper 1 (TH1), TH2, TH9, T follicular helper (TFH), T follicular regulatory (TFR), and regulatory T (TREG) cells. The differentiation of each subset is guided by distinct regulatory requirements, including those derived from extracellular cytokine signals. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) has emerged as a critical immunomodulatory cytokine that both positively and negatively affects the differentiation of individual T helper cell subsets. IL-2 signals, in part, via activation of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 (STAT5), which functions as a key regulator of CD4+ T cell gene programs. In this review, we discuss current understanding of the mechanisms that allow IL-2-STAT5 signaling to exert divergent effects across CD4+ T cell subsets and highlight specific roles for this pathway in the regulation of individual T helper cell differentiation programs.
Introduction
The cytokine interleukin-2 (IL-2) was first discovered in 1976 as a T cell growth factor (1). Subsequently, a large body of literature has identified IL-2 as a pivotal cytokine responsible for the formation and function of lymphocyte populations, including CD4+ T helper cells. IL-2 exhibits a broad range of functions across T helper cell populations and is an essential regulator of numerous signaling pathways, including those underlying cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, and effector functions. Thus, predictably, dysregulation of IL-2 signaling has been identified as a key factor in the genesis of autoimmune disorders and immunodeficiency. Here, we discuss basic aspects of the IL-2 signaling pathway and its pleiotropic effects on the differentiation of effector and regulatory CD4+ T cell populations.
Structure, binding affinity, and regulation of the IL-2 receptor
IL-2 signals through a heterotrimeric receptor composed of IL-2Rα, IL-2Rβ, and the gamma common (γc) chain subunits (2–8). Expression of individual subunits varies across immune cell populations, and expression levels are dependent upon both immune cell activation state and cytokine signals. In CD4+ T cells, while the γc chain is expressed constitutively, IL-2Rα and IL-2Rβ expression are upregulated following T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation and further induced by STAT5 activity downstream of IL-2 signaling (2, 9–12). In the presence of environmental IL-2, assembly of the trimeric form of IL-2R occurs sequentially, beginning with IL-2/IL-2Rα binding, followed by association with IL-2Rβ and subsequent γc chain recruitment. Formation of this heterotrimeric receptor results in high-affinity IL-2 signaling (12, 13). While the trimeric receptor combination predominates, weaker signals may be relayed through IL-2Rβ/γc, though downstream mechanisms are altered due to diminished IL-2-receptor binding affinity (14, 15).
Highlighting the importance of effective IL-2 signaling in immune function, mutations in IL-2R and downstream signaling molecules have been implicated in the generation of disrupted immune cell responses in humans. For example, mutations in the γc receptor subunit or JAK3 result in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) diseases (16–19). Conversely, patients with IL-2Rα or IL-2Rβ mutations develop autoimmune disease, due to disrupted immune tolerance, while paradoxically also exhibiting immunodeficiency (2, 20–23). Given its role in such disease states, the IL-2 signaling pathway is an attractive target for a number of immunotherapies, which focus on modulation of IL-2 responses to target individual T cell populations for the treatment of not only autoimmune disease, but also graft versus host disease (GVHD) and cancer. Different strategies to manipulate IL-2 signaling for therapeutic benefit will be briefly discussed below and have also been extensively reviewed elsewhere (2, 12, 24).
IL-2 signaling pathways
IL-2 signaling is propagated through a number of signaling cascades, including the Janus Kinase (JAK)/STAT pathway (12, 13). Upon high-affinity IL-2 signaling, JAK1 and JAK3 associate with IL-2Rβ and γc, respectively, resulting in cross-phosphorylation and JAK activation (18, 25–30). Next, JAK1 and JAK3 phosphorylate specific tyrosine resides on IL-2Rβ, allowing for recruitment of members of the Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) family via their conserved SH2 domain (27, 31) (Fig. 1). While IL-2 has been shown to activate several STAT family members, including STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5, STAT5 is the predominant IL-2 signaling molecule (32, 33). Upon recruitment, two STAT5 isoforms are activated via JAK-mediated phosphorylation of the tyrosine 694 (STAT5A) and 699 (STAT5B) residues (34, 35) (Fig. 1). This results in STAT5 dimerization, nuclear translocation, and downstream transcriptional activities via direct DNA binding and co-factor recruitment (30). It is important to note that in addition to IL-2, signals from other cytokines, including IL-7, IL-9, and IL-15, are also propagated through STAT5. While this review focuses on the role of STAT5 downstream of signals from IL-2, these other STAT5-dependent pathways have been expertly discussed elsewhere (36–40).
Figure 1. Schematic depicting the key domains and phosphorylation sites of STAT5A and STAT5B.
IL-2 signaling through the high-affinity, trimeric IL-2R complex results in STAT5 activation via tyrosine phosphorylation at Y694 (STAT5A) and Y699 (STAT5B). Tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT5 dimerizes and translocates to the nucleus where it performs diverse functions to directly regulate the expression of individual target genes. STAT5 activity can also been modulated via phosphorylation of specific serine residues, detailed above. In addition to dimerization, STAT5 is also capable of forming tetramers mediated via STAT5 N-terminal domain interactions. Tetramerization requires specific isoleucine, tryptophan, lysine, phenylalanine, and leucine residues, as noted, as well as DNA binding at sequential GAS motifs (sequence provided above). Other domains involved in STAT5 function are also highlighted.
The expression and function of both STAT5 isoforms are critical for immune cell development and function, as their loss, similar to γc and JAK3, has been shown to result in SCID in mice (41). Curiously, in humans, individual mutations in STAT5A and STAT5B have highlighted their distinct roles in immune cell development and function, as STAT5B defects alone are sufficient to drive autoimmunity (42). Subsequent studies have since determined that these differential functions can be attributed to distinct gene targets for each isoform, discussed further below (43, 44).
While STAT5 is a critical downstream mediator of IL-2 signaling, studies utilizing expression of constitutively active STAT5 have demonstrated that its activity alone is insufficient to reproduce the full biological effects of IL-2 (45). Indeed, IL-2 has also been shown to signal via the Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway, via extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), as well as the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway (12, 14, 46). IL-2-dependent activation of PI3K results in subsequent activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and protein kinase B (AKT) (46). Collectively, these pathways have been implicated in regulating aspects of CD4+ T cell differentiation, effector function, metabolism, and survival.
Mechanisms by which STAT5 activity is regulated
STAT5 broadly influences the development of a number of immune cell populations through a diverse set of regulatory mechanisms. Such functional diversity is in turn mediated via mechanisms that control STAT5 activities. This includes alterations in STAT5 activation status mediated by post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation. First, as discussed briefly above, phosphorylation at Y694/9 (STAT5A/B) by JAK1/3 downstream of IL-2 signaling leads to its dimerization and subsequent transcriptional activity (35, 46). In addition to Y694/9, a number of serine residues have also been identified as phosphorylation sites within STAT5A and B, including S127/8 (STAT5A), S725 (STAT5A), S730 (STAT5B), and S780 (STAT5A) (Fig. 1) (46–49). While IL-2-dependent phosphorylation of these sites has been suggested to modulate STAT5 transcriptional activity, their precise functions and roles in T helper cell regulation are areas of active investigation (50, 51).
Given the requirement for STAT5 phosphorylation in propagating its function, predictably, dephosphorylation of STAT5 also regulates its activity by diminishing phosphorylation-dependent mechanisms. Enzymes identified as mediators of this process include the SH2 domain-containing protein (SHP-2), and low molecular weight protein tyrosine phosphatases (LMW-PTPs), which have both been shown to dephosphorylate STAT5 tyrosine residues (52, 53). Additionally, the dual-specificity phosphatase (DUSP) family member DUSP4 has been shown to dephosphorylate both tyrosine and serine residues to regulate STAT5 activity (54, 55).
Beyond phosphorylation, STAT5 activity is also modulated via differential oligomerization states. Following dimerization, STAT5 is capable of forming tetramers at specific tandemly linked gamma-activated sequence (GAS) DNA binding motifs (56–59). Tetramer formation is dependent upon conserved isoleucine 28 (I28), tryptophan 37 (W37), lysine 70 (K70), phenylalanine 81 (F81), and leucine 82 (L82) residues in the N-terminal domain of both STAT5A and STAT5B (57, 58, 60) (Fig. 1). Functionally, it has been established that mice incapable of forming STAT5 tetramers exhibit a reduced ability to generate a number of immune cell populations, including CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (TREG) cells (57). Mechanistically, STAT5 tetramerization is essential for the direct regulation of a specific subset of genes activated in response to IL-2 signals, including the IL-2 receptor subunit Il2ra (CD25) and effector cytokines Ifng, and Tnf (57). The mechanisms underlying dimeric and tetrameric STAT5 function also appear to be distinct, as tetrameric STAT5 has been observed predominantly within intronic regions, while dimers are found proximal to the transcriptional start sites (TSS) of target gene loci (57). To date, much of the mechanism underlying STAT5 tetramer function, including the identity of recruited co-regulators in T helper cells, remains unclear. However, in B cells, tetrameric STAT5 has been shown to recruit the histone methyltransferase Ezh2, which works in concert with the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) to regulate histone modifications (61). While this role has not been directly demonstrated in CD4+ T cells, Ezh2 is known to regulate TH1, TH2, and TREG programs, suggesting a potential mechanism by which STAT5 tetramerization may regulate gene expression patterns in these populations (62).
In addition to Ezh2, interactions between STAT5 and other transcriptional regulators are known to influence STAT5 transcriptional activity and downstream functions. In regulatory T cell populations, STAT5 has been shown to recruit the ten-eleven translocation enzymes Tet1 and Tet2, which function to demethylate target gene loci (63). Additionally, STAT5 has been shown to interact with a number of other co-regulators, including the transcriptional co-activators p300/CREB-binding protein, (p300/CBP) and nuclear receptor coactivator 1 (NcoA-1)/steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1), as well as co-repressors, such as silencing mediator for retinoic acid receptor and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT), Sac3 domain-containing protein (SHD1), and suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) family member SOCS7 (64, 65). Ultimately, such interactions result in alterations to gene expression via changes in cytokine signaling and the accessibility of target gene loci. It is important to note that while much of the work defining STAT5 interaction with these factors was performed outside of the context of CD4+ T cells, it is possible that these interactions are conserved within T helper cell subsets. Thus, they may represent mechanisms underlying differential STAT5 activities across T helper gene programs.
Divergent roles for IL-2 signaling in CD4+ T helper cell differentiation and function
CD4+ T cells are essential to the adaptive immune response as they coordinate the pathogen-specific effector functions of an array of immune cell populations. Central to this process is the ability of naïve CD4+ T cells to differentiate into distinct subsets that perform individual functions during the course of immune responses to allergens, infection, and cancer. Key determinants of CD4+ T cell differentiation include signals from environmental cytokines, which drive the differentiation and function of individual subsets. Of these, IL-2 has been found to promote or repress the expression of specific T helper cell gene programs (12, 66, 67). The dynamic nature of this regulation is dependent upon diverse mechanisms including modulation of both cytokine and cytokine receptor expression, as well as positive and negative regulation of cell-type specific transcription factor expression and metabolic programs. The collective effects of IL-2-STAT5 signaling are summarized in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Functional regulation of individual T helper cell gene programs by IL-2-STAT5 signaling.
IL-2-STAT5 signaling has been shown to modulate CD4+ T helper cell differentiation by both activating and repressing the expression of subset-specific gene programs. Notable genes regulated by STAT5, including those encoding cytokines, cytokine receptors, and key transcription factors are highlighted above. Starred genes are those induced/repressed in response to IL-2 signaling but, to our knowledge, STAT5 has not been found to directly associate with these target gene loci.
Effector CD4+ T helper cell subsets positively regulated by IL-2
TH1 cells
T helper 1 (TH1) cells coordinate immune responses to intracellular pathogens and promote anti-cancer immunity through production of effector molecules, including the inflammatory cytokine interferon gamma (IFN-γ) (68, 69). TH1 differentiation is driven by signals from the cytokine IL-12, which are propagated through a heterodimeric receptor consisting of IL-12Rβ1 and IL-12Rβ2. This results in the activation of STAT4 and subsequent induction of the transcriptional activator T-bet (70–72). T-bet, the lineage-defining transcription factor for the TH1 cell type, drives expression of IFN-γ, which further promotes T-bet expression via STAT1 activation in a feed-forward fashion (73–76). TH1 differentiation also relies on expression of the transcriptional repressor Blimp-1, which promotes a terminal effector state and suppresses alternative T cell fates (77).
In addition to the above, IL-2 has well-characterized roles in the positive regulation of TH1 differentiation. This has been demonstrated by studies illustrating that CD4+ T cells lacking either IL-2 or IL-2Rα display marked deficiencies in TH1 development (12, 78, 79). Mechanistically, STAT5 activated downstream of IL-2 binds to gene-specific regulatory elements to directly induce the expression of IL-12Rβ2, Blimp-1, and IFN-γ to support both TH1 cell differentiation and effector cytokine production, as well as cytotoxic function in a subset of cells (78, 80, 81). In this context, IL-2-STAT5 signals are amplified through a feed-forward mechanism, as STAT5 directly induces expression of IL-2Rα. Conversely, IL-2-activated STAT5 directly represses expression of Bcl-6, which drives the differentiation of the alternative TFH cell gene program (66, 82–85).
IL-2 signaling has also been implicated in regulating T helper cell differentiation via modulation of subset-specific metabolic pathways. In TH1 cells, IL-2 signals promote glycolytic metabolism by both governing the activity of the transcriptional regulators c-Myc and HIF-1α and by repressing the glycolytic pathway antagonist Bcl-6 (86). Increased glycolysis further supports TH1 effector function by enhancing the production of IFN-γ (87, 88). Additionally, IL-2 signaling in TH1 cells promotes activation of the serine-threonine kinase Akt and the metabolic regulator mTOR. These factors drive the expression of T-bet and Blimp-1, clonal expansion, nutrient uptake, cellular growth, and alterations to epigenetic marks and chromatin accessibility to support effector differentiation in TH1 cells (89–91). Finally, IL-2 drives the accumulation of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), a metabolite generated during glutaminolysis, which supports TH1 differentiation via CCCTC-Binding Factor (CTCF)-mediated restructuring of the chromatin landscape (92). Thus, IL-2 signals drive TH1 differentiation by supporting TH1 gene expression patterns and metabolic function, while also repressing alterative gene programs.
TH2 cells
T helper 2 (TH2) cell populations are critical for immune responses to extracellular parasites and have also been implicated in the development of asthma and other allergic disorders (93). TH2 cells secrete a number of effector cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13, which exhibit various functions including the modulation of B cell immunoglobin class switching, activation of eosinophils and basophils, and macrophage polarization (94). Differentiation of TH2 cells requires signals from IL-4, which are propagated via activation of STAT6 (95, 96). IL-4-STAT6 signaling drives expression of the TH2 lineage-defining transcription factor GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3), which stabilizes the TH2 program by directly inducing the expression of key TH2 target genes, including those encoding the effector cytokines discussed above (97–102).
IL-2-STAT-5 signaling positively regulates TH2 differentiation, as studies have shown that IL-2 neutralization disrupts expression of the TH2 gene program, while conversely, expression of constitutively active STAT5 is sufficient to induce a subset of TH2 genes (93, 103). Functionally, IL-2-STAT5 signaling promotes TH2 differentiation in part by inducing expression of the IL-4 receptor subunit, IL-4Rα, thereby increasing TH2 responsiveness to IL-4 signals (104). Additionally, STAT5 has been shown to bind to and modulate accessibility of the Il4 cytokine locus (105). STAT5 also regulates Il4 expression by promoting expression of the transcription factor cMAF and NLR Family Pyrin Domain Containing 3 (NLRP3), which are both direct inducers of IL-4 expression (93, 105–108). Beyond cytokine regulation, IL-2 signaling supports the TH2 program by promoting the expression of Blimp-1, which represses key aspects of alternative T helper cell gene programs, including expression of the TFH lineage-defining transcription factor Bcl-6 (77, 109, 110). Collectively, IL-2-STAT5 signaling promotes TH2 differentiation by modulating both effector cytokine and key transcription factor expression.
TH9 cells
IL-9 producing T helper 9 (TH9) cells have been implicated in the clearance of extracellular pathogens including parasites, inflammatory allergic responses, and anti-tumor immunity (111–115). While the mechanisms underlying their formation are still being characterized, their differentiation is induced at least in part via signals received from the cytokines TGF-β1 and IL-4, which promote the expression of downstream TH9-associated transcription factors PU.1 and IRF4 (115–117). TH9 cells share developmental requirements with TH2 cells, including a dependence on both IL-4-STAT6 signaling and the subsequent induction of GATA3.
A number of studies have identified IL-2 as a positive regulator of TH9 effector function, as IL-9 production is disrupted upon the addition of IL-2- and/or IL-2Rα-neutralizing antibodies (118, 119). A recent study by Warren Leonard’s laboratory expanded upon this understanding to define the mechanisms underlying IL-2 function in TH9 cells (120). Briefly, this study established that addition of IL-2 to TH9 cell cultures augments expression of IRF4, which directly associates with the Il9 promoter to induce its expression. Further, IL-2-dependent STAT5 activation is required for mediating IL-9 production, as deletion of STAT5A, STAT5B, or both, resulted in a marked decrease in IL-9 expression (120). Mechanistically, in the presence of IL-2 signaling, both STAT5B and STAT6 were found to directly associate with the Il9 locus. Curiously, however, association of both STAT factors was reduced in the absence of IL-2 (120). As such, it has been suggested that IL-2 signals may also support IL-4-STAT6 signaling via positive regulation of IL-4 receptor expression, as previously observed in other T helper cell populations (104). Finally, opposition between STAT5 and Bcl-6 is also a key aspect of TH9 differentiation (as with TH1 and TH2 populations), as STAT5 induces, while Bcl-6 represses, IL-9 production. These factors exhibit adjacent binding sites not only at the Il9 locus, but also within additional gene loci differentially expressed in TH9 populations exposed to IL-2 versus the Bcl-6-promoting cytokine IL-21. These findings suggest that STAT5 and Bcl-6 may regulate the TH9 program more broadly (120). Together, these data support roles for IL-2 in promoting TH9 differentiation and function via cytokine receptor, transcription factor, and effector cytokine-mediated mechanisms.
Effector T helper cell subsets negatively regulated by IL-2
TH17 cells
TH17 cells secrete interleukin 17 (IL-17) and promote inflammatory responses that are key for the clearance of extracellular pathogens and mucosal immunity. Their differentiation is dependent upon combined signals from TGF-β and IL-6, which result in expression of the lineage-defining transcription factor RORγt and production of the cytokine IL-23, which further augments TH17 differentiation (121–123). Both IL-6 and IL-23 signal via activation of STAT3, which is a key transcriptional activator of both RORγt and IL-17 expression (124, 125).
A number of studies have demonstrated that the IL-2-STAT5 pathway negatively regulates TH17 differentiation and effector functions (124, 126, 127). For example, IL-2 signaling represses expression of the IL-6 receptor subunit IL-6Rα, thus diminishing the sensitivity of activated CD4+ T cells to signals received from IL-6 (78). IL-2-STAT5 signaling also results in reduced expression of the TH17 lineage-defining transcription factor RORγt, which promotes expression of a number of TH17 genes including the Il17a/f cytokine locus (124, 126). Mechanistically, STAT5 has also been shown to repress expression of IL-17 by competing with STAT3 for binding sites located within the Il17a/f locus (124, 126, 128).
Although the role for IL-2-STAT5 in TH17 differentiation seems relatively straightforward, a recent study determined that ablation of IL-2Rα or STAT5 reduced TH17 generation in vivo (128). This may be explained by another study demonstrating that IL-2 signaling, while repressing the differentiation of TH17 populations, may also support their expansion (129). Collectively, the current literature suggests that IL-2 may exert nuanced, stage-specific control over TH17 differentiation, function, and proliferation.
TFH cells
T follicular helper (TFH) cells support humoral immunity by both interacting directly with B cells and producing cytokines, including IL-21, to promote B cell activation, germinal center (GC) formation, and high-affinity antibody production (130). TFH cell differentiation from naïve CD4+ T cell progenitors is driven by a number of cytokines, including IL-6 and autocrine signals from IL-21, which are propagated via STAT3 activation to promote expression of the TFH lineage-defining transcription factor Bcl-6. Bcl-6 broadly supports expression of the TFH gene program by repressing expression of the TFH antagonist Blimp-1, as well as other transcription factors that promote the differentiation of additional T helper cell subsets (77, 131–133).
The IL-2-STAT5 signaling axis is a well-established negative regulator of TFH cell differentiation and function (82–85). In vivo, IL-2-deficient mice exhibit enhanced TFH cell generation and GC formation, even in the absence of infection (134). Conversely, systemic administration of IL-2 during influenza infection results in deficient TFH cell responses and GC formation (82). Similarly, the absence of regulatory T cells, which function to deplete environmental IL-2, has been shown to reduce the number of TFH cells during influenza infection (135). These phenotypes have been attributed to repression of the TFH gene program via STAT5-dependent mechanisms. First, IL-2-STAT5 signaling has been shown to repress expression of the IL-6R subunits IL-6Rα and gp130, leading to a reduction in IL-6 responsiveness and STAT3 activation (78, 83, 136). STAT5 also competes directly with STAT3 for binding at the Bcl6 promoter to repress its expression. In the absence of Bcl-6, the TFH antagonist Blimp-1 is released from Bcl6-mediated repression and directly suppresses expression of TFH target genes, including Cxcr5 (77, 83). In the absence of Cxcr5, TFH cells are incapable of homing to the B cell follicle to interact with B cells and support GC formation. Finally, loss of Bcl-6 expression also permits both STAT5 binding and reduced DNA methylation within gene loci associated with non-TFH gene programs, allowing for their expression (137). Thus, IL-2-STAT5 signals repress TFH differentiation and activity by suppressing both TFH-associated cytokine receptor and transcription factor expression.
IL-2 signaling and Regulatory T cell populations
Regulatory T cells (TREG)
Regulatory T cell populations comprise a unique compartment of T helper cells that modulate immune responses, reduce inflammation, and prevent potential autoimmunity mediated by effector T cell (TEFF) populations (138, 139). These cells are subdivided into thymically-derived nTREG cells, and those induced in mature CD4+ T cells in the periphery (iTREG) (140, 141). Differentiation of TREG populations is dependent upon signals from TGF-β1 and expression of the lineage-defining transcription factor Foxp3, which performs both activating and repressive functions to support expression of the TREG gene program (142). A hallmark of TREG populations is their constitutive expression of IL-2Rα, which allows TREGS, but not other T cell populations, to respond to low doses of IL-2 via constitutive high-affinity IL-2 signaling (143). Unlike effector T helper cell subsets, TREG populations do not produce IL-2 and, indeed, one function of Foxp3 is to repress Il2 expression (2, 13, 144). Instead, TREG cells depend upon paracrine IL-2 signals from effector T helper cells (13, 139).
It is well-established that TREG deficiency results in the development of severe autoimmune phenotypes. Similarly, early studies utilizing germline knockouts for IL-2, IL-2Rα, or IL2Rβ revealed that germline disruptions in the IL-2 signaling pathway result in an absence of TREG generation and suppressive function, leading to the development of autoimmune disorders (139, 145–150). However, conditional deletion of IL-2Rα exclusively in TREG populations results in a comparatively more severe phenotype, due to the aforementioned IL-2 requirements for specific effector populations as well (151). Functionally, IL-2 signaling is required for the early induction of Foxp3 via activation of STAT5, which directly binds to both promoter and enhancer elements to induce its expression (139, 146, 152–156). Thus, unsurprisingly, loss of STAT5A/B has been shown to result in a significant reduction in murine Foxp3+ T helper cells in vivo (157). In humans, this effect may be STAT5B specific, as STAT5B defects, in the presence of normal STAT5A expression, result in reduced Foxp3 expression and TREG cell suppressive function, and are consequently sufficient to induce autoimmune disease (44).
Mechanistically, Foxp3 induction has been attributed to collaborative STAT5 and TGF-β-Smad3-dependent recruitment of the ten-eleven translocation (Tet) methylcytosine dioxygenases Tet1 and Tet2 to the Foxp3 locus, which results in decreased DNA methylation and stable Foxp3 expression (158). Further emphasizing the importance of STAT5 activity in TREG development, a recent study found that inhibition of the cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)8 and its paralog CDK19 prevented repressive serine phosphorylation of STAT5 (Fig. 1). This resulted in enhanced STAT5 tyrosine phosphorylation and allowed for conversion of CD4+ T cells into Foxp3+TREG cells (48). Furthermore, overexpression of a STAT5B mutant incapable of such phosphorylation promoted Foxp3+TREG differentiation to a much higher degree than WT STAT5B. Together, these findings support the need for enhanced STAT5 activation signals for the differentiation of TREG populations (48). Finally, much like TH1 populations, IL-2 signaling has been found to support TREG differentiation via STAT5 activation and Blimp-1 expression, as well as by supporting glycolytic metabolism, which is induced by IL-2-induced PI3K signaling in this population (159–163).
Expanding upon early global knockout studies, recent work has begun to define dichotomous roles for IL-2 signaling in early TREG development versus the stability and suppressive capabilities of mature TREG populations. First, in contrast to germline knockout studies, inducible deletion of IL-2Rα after thymic development or exclusively in mature pTREG cells revealed that mature TREG populations require IL-2 for long-term survival and homeostasis, but not to maintain Foxp3 expression (151, 160). Additionally, these cells exhibit reduced expression of the co-inhibitory receptor CTLA4, as well as disrupted metabolic and biosynthetic pathways, further supporting a role for IL-2 in TREG differentiation via metabolic modulation (151, 160). While the precise roles of IL-2 during each stage of TREG development are still being elucidated, these findings collectively suggest that IL-2 signaling is required for differentiation and functional maturation in early TREG stages, and helps to maintain survival, homeostatic proliferation, and metabolic function in mature TREG cell populations.
Due to their central role in regulating immune tolerance and their dependence upon IL-2 signaling, TREG cells have been the target of a number of IL-2-based immunotherapeutic strategies to treat both autoimmune disorders and cancer (2, 164, 165). These include the use of IL-2 targeting antibodies, such as JES6–1, which selectively induce TREG proliferation in efforts to treat a number of autoimmune diseases (166, 167). Conversely, antibodies that target IL-2 and/or modulate IL-2R subunit interactions have been used to limit TREG responses and thus promote inflammatory environments that are beneficial in tumor immunotherapy approaches (166, 168, 169). Furthermore, the elevated expression of IL-2Rα on TREG cells has been leveraged in therapies utilizing low doses of the IL-2 cytokine itself to preferentially enhance TREG populations (170–173). Finally, efforts have been made to engineer altered versions of IL-2 or IL-2Rα that exhibit differential binding affinities and thus preferentially induce or limit TREG responses in treatments of autoimmune disease and cancer, respectively (174–176).
T follicular regulatory (TFR) cells
In addition to their modulation of pro-inflammatory TEFF responses, Foxp3+TREG cells have also been shown to suppress germinal center responses and B cell antibody production via differentiation into the T follicular regulatory (TFR) cell type (159, 177–180). These cells can also arise directly from naïve CD4+ T cell precursors, in response to either self- or foreign antigen (181). TFR cells exhibit both TREG- and TFH-associated traits, including expression of both Foxp3 and Bcl-6, as well as Cxcr5 (159, 177, 179–181). While IL-2 is needed for initial TREG development as discussed above, it is perhaps unsurprising that strong signals from IL-2 have been shown to repress the differentiation of the Bcl-6-dependent TFR population (159). Specifically, IL-2 signaling results in activation of STAT5, upregulation of Blimp-1, and subsequent repression of Bcl-6 (159). Thus, as IL-2 production wanes during the resolution of infection, loss of IL-2 signaling allows for the downregulation of IL-2Rα, upregulation of Bcl-6, and subsequent differentiation of the Foxp3+Treg population into TFR cells (159, 182, 183). This is consistent with studies demonstrating that, while IL-2 is required for the initiation of Foxp3 in TREG populations, its expression can be maintained in mature TREG cells even in the absence of further IL-2 signals (151, 160). Thus, it would seem that this mechanism allows for concurrent Foxp3 and Bcl-6 expression in the TFR compartment. This stage-specific, IL-2-dependent generation of TFR populations thus functions to protect against autoimmunity, as humoral immune responses are directly suppressed during the resolution of infection (184).
Conclusions
IL-2 signaling has emerged as an essential and multi-functional regulator of an array of immune cell populations, including effector and regulatory CD4+ T cell subsets. As such, it is no surprise that this pathway has long been the target of therapeutic strategies to treat diseases ranging from cancer to autoimmunity. While the many, and sometimes counterintuitive, roles of IL-2 signaling have made this a challenging endeavor, these efforts have been aided by decades of work that have provided insight into the IL-2-dependent regulatory mechanisms that govern these critical immune responses. Continued research into the mechanisms that govern the IL-2-STAT5 signaling pathway and its subsequent effects on subset-specific cytokine pathways and transcription factors are thus an important avenue for further study moving forward. Such understanding will provide routes for more specific manipulation of IL-2 signals to augment T helper cell responses in immunotherapy approaches to treat human disease.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by NIH grant AI134972 to K.J.O.
Abbreviations
- α-KG
α-ketoglutarate
- AKT
protein kinase B
- CBP
Creb-binding protein
- CCT
CCCTC-binding factor
- CDK
Cyclin dependent kinase
- CXCR5
C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 5
- DNA
deoxyribonucleic acid
- DUSP4
dual-specificity phosphatase family 4
- ERK
extracellular signal-regulated kinase
- EZH2
Enhancer of zeste homologue 2
- F
phenylalanine
- GAS
gamma-activated sequence
- GATA3
GATA binding protein 3
- GC
germinal center
- HIF-1α
hypoxia inducible factor
- I
isoleucine
- IFN-γ
interferon gamma
- IL
Interleukin
- IRF4
interferon regulatory factor 4
- Jak
Janus Kinase
- K
lysine
- L
leucine
- LMW-PTP
low molecule weight protein tyrosine phosphatase
- MAPK
mitogen activated protein kinase
- mTOR
mammalian target of rapamycin
- NcoA-1
nuclear receptor coactivator 1
- NLRP3
NLR family pyrin domain containing 3
- PI3K
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
- PRC2
polycomb repressive complex 2
- RORγt
RAR-related orphan receptor gamma
- S
Serine
- SCID
Severe combined immunodeficiency
- SHD1
Sac3-domain containing protein
- SHP-2
SH2 domain containing protein
- SMRT
silencing mediator for retinoic acid receptor and thyroid hormone receptor
- SOCS7
suppressor of cytokines signaling 7
- SRC-1
steroid receptor coactivator 1
- STAT
signal transducer and activator of transcription
- TCR
T cell receptor
- TEFF
T effector
- TFH
T follicular helper
- TFR
T follicular regulatory
- TGF-β1
transforming growth factor beta 1
- TH1
T helper 1
- TH2
T helper 2
- TH9
T helper 9
- TREG
Regulatory T cells
- TSS
Transcriptional start site
- W
Tryptophan
- Y
Tyrosine
Footnotes
Disclosures
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Morgan DA, Ruscetti FW, Gallo R, Selective in vitro growth of T lymphocytes from normal human bone marrows. Science 193, 1007–1008 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Spolski R, Li P, Leonard WJ, Biology and regulation of IL-2: from molecular mechanisms to human therapy. Nat Rev Immunol 18, 648–659 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nikaido T, Shimizu A, Ishida N, Sabe H, Teshigawara K, Maeda M, Uchiyama T, Yodoi J, Honjo T, Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding human interleukin-2 receptor. Nature 311, 631–635 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Leonard WJ, Depper JM, Crabtree GR, Rudikoff S, Pumphrey J, Robb RJ, Kronke M, Svetlik PB, Peffer NJ, Waldmann TA, et al. , Molecular cloning and expression of cDNAs for the human interleukin-2 receptor. Nature 311, 626–631 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hatakeyama M, Tsudo M, Minamoto S, Kono T, Doi T, Miyata T, Miyasaka M, Taniguchi T, Interleukin-2 receptor beta chain gene: generation of three receptor forms by cloned human alpha and beta chain cDNA’s. Science 244, 551–556 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sharon M, Klausner RD, Cullen BR, Chizzonite R, Leonard WJ, Novel interleukin-2 receptor subunit detected by cross-linking under high-affinity conditions. Science 234, 859–863 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sugamura K, Takeshita T, Asao H, Kumaki S, Ohbo K, Ohtani K, Nakamura M, The IL-2/IL-2 receptor system: involvement of a novel receptor subunit, gamma chain, in growth signal transduction. Tohoku J Exp Med 168, 231–237 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takeshita T, Asao H, Ohtani K, Ishii N, Kumaki S, Tanaka N, Munakata H, Nakamura M, Sugamura K, Cloning of the gamma chain of the human IL-2 receptor. Science 257, 379–382 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Depper JM, Leonard WJ, Drogula C, Kronke M, Waldmann TA, Greene WC, Interleukin 2 (IL-2) augments transcription of the IL-2 receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82, 4230–4234 (1985). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kim HP, Kelly J, Leonard WJ, The basis for IL-2-induced IL-2 receptor alpha chain gene regulation: importance of two widely separated IL-2 response elements. Immunity 15, 159–172 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li P, Mitra S, Spolski R, Oh J, Liao W, Tang Z, Mo F, Li X, West EE, Gromer D, Lin JX, Liu C, Ruan Y, Leonard WJ, STAT5-mediated chromatin interactions in superenhancers activate IL-2 highly inducible genes: Functional dissection of the Il2ra gene locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, 12111–12119 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liao W, Lin JX, Leonard WJ, Interleukin-2 at the crossroads of effector responses, tolerance, and immunotherapy. Immunity 38, 13–25 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Malek TR, Castro I, Interleukin-2 receptor signaling: at the interface between tolerance and immunity. Immunity 33, 153–165 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gonzalez-Garcia A, Merida I, Martinez AC, Carrera AC, Intermediate affinity interleukin-2 receptor mediates survival via a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem 272, 10220–10226 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.H. M. Wang, K. A. Smith, The interleukin 2 receptor. Functional consequences of its bimolecular structure. J Exp Med 166, 1055–1069 (1987). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Macchi P, Villa A, Giliani S, Sacco MG, Frattini A, Porta F, Ugazio AG, Johnston JA, Candotti F, O’Shea JJ, et al. , Mutations of Jak-3 gene in patients with autosomal severe combined immune deficiency (SCID). Nature 377, 65–68 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Noguchi M, Yi H, Rosenblatt HM, Filipovich AH, Adelstein S, Modi WS, McBride OW, Leonard WJ, Interleukin-2 receptor gamma chain mutation results in X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency in humans. Cell 73, 147–157 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Russell SM, Johnston JA, Noguchi M, Kawamura M, Bacon CM, Friedmann M, Berg M, McVicar DW, Witthuhn BA, Silvennoinen O, et al. , Interaction of IL-2R beta and gamma c chains with Jak1 and Jak3: implications for XSCID and XCID. Science 266, 1042–1045 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Russell SM, Tayebi N, Nakajima H, Riedy MC, Roberts JL, Aman MJ, Migone TS, Noguchi M, Markert ML, Buckley RH, O’Shea JJ, Leonard WJ, Mutation of Jak3 in a patient with SCID: essential role of Jak3 in lymphoid development. Science 270, 797–800 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sharfe N, Dadi HK, Shahar M, Roifman CM, Human immune disorder arising from mutation of the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 3168–3171 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gilmour KC, Fujii H, Cranston T, Davies EG, Kinnon C, Gaspar HB, Defective expression of the interleukin-2/interleukin-15 receptor beta subunit leads to a natural killer cell-deficient form of severe combined immunodeficiency. Blood 98, 877–879 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang Z, Gothe F, Pennamen P, James JR, McDonald D, Mata CP, Modis Y, Alazami AM, Acres M, Haller W, Bowen C, Doffinger R, Sinclair J, Brothers S, Zhang Y, Matthews HF, Naudion S, Pelluard F, Alajlan H, Yamazaki Y, Notarangelo LD, Thaventhiran JE, Engelhardt KR, Al-Mousa H, Hambleton S, Rooryck C, Smith KGC, Lenardo MJ, Human interleukin-2 receptor beta mutations associated with defects in immunity and peripheral tolerance. J Exp Med 216, 1311–1327 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Caudy AA, Reddy ST, Chatila T, Atkinson JP, Verbsky JW, CD25 deficiency causes an immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked-like syndrome, and defective IL-10 expression from CD4 lymphocytes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 119, 482–487 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Spangler JB, Moraga I, Mendoza JL, Garcia KC, Insights into cytokine-receptor interactions from cytokine engineering. Annu Rev Immunol 33, 139–167 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nelson BH, Willerford DM, Biology of the interleukin-2 receptor. Adv Immunol 70, 1–81 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu KD, Gaffen SL, Goldsmith MA, Greene WC, Janus kinases in interleukin-2-mediated signaling: JAK1 and JAK3 are differentially regulated by tyrosine phosphorylation. Curr Biol 7, 817–826 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Friedmann MC, Migone TS, Russell SM, Leonard WJ, Different interleukin 2 receptor beta-chain tyrosines couple to at least two signaling pathways and synergistically mediate interleukin 2-induced proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 2077–2082 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Boussiotis VA, Barber DL, Nakarai T, Freeman GJ, Gribben JG, Bernstein GM, D’Andrea AD, Ritz J, Nadler LM, Prevention of T cell anergy by signaling through the gamma c chain of the IL-2 receptor. Science 266, 1039–1042 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Miyazaki T, Kawahara A, Fujii H, Nakagawa Y, Minami Y, Liu ZJ, Oishi I, Silvennoinen O, Witthuhn BA, Ihle JN, et al. , Functional activation of Jak1 and Jak3 by selective association with IL-2 receptor subunits. Science 266, 1045–1047 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moriggl R, Sexl V, Piekorz R, Topham D, Ihle JN, Stat5 activation is uniquely associated with cytokine signaling in peripheral T cells. Immunity 11, 225–230 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gaffen SL, Lai SY, Ha M, Liu X, Hennighausen L, Greene WC, Goldsmith MA, Distinct tyrosine residues within the interleukin-2 receptor beta chain drive signal transduction specificity, redundancy, and diversity. J Biol Chem 271, 21381–21390 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hou J, Schindler U, Henzel WJ, Wong SC, McKnight SL, Identification and purification of human Stat proteins activated in response to interleukin-2. Immunity 2, 321–329 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lin JX, Migone TS, Tsang M, Friedmann M, Weatherbee JA, Zhou L, Yamauchi A, Bloom ET, Mietz J, John S, et al. , The role of shared receptor motifs and common Stat proteins in the generation of cytokine pleiotropy and redundancy by IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-13, and IL-15. Immunity 2, 331–339 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Beadling C, Ng J, Babbage JW, Cantrell DA, Interleukin-2 activation of STAT5 requires the convergent action of tyrosine kinases and a serine/threonine kinase pathway distinct from the Raf1/ERK2 MAP kinase pathway. EMBO J 15, 1902–1913 (1996). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Johnston JA, Bacon CM, Finbloom DS, Rees RC, Kaplan D, Shibuya K, Ortaldo JR, Gupta S, Chen YQ, Giri JD, et al. , Tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of STAT5, STAT3, and Janus kinases by interleukins 2 and 15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92, 8705–8709 (1995). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Demoulin JB, Uyttenhove C, Lejeune D, Mui A, Groner B, Renauld JC, STAT5 activation is required for interleukin-9-dependent growth and transformation of lymphoid cells. Cancer Res 60, 3971–3977 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Leonard WJ, Lin JX, O’Shea JJ, The gammac Family of Cytokines: Basic Biology to Therapeutic Ramifications. Immunity 50, 832–850 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Raeber ME, Zurbuchen Y, Impellizzieri D, Boyman O, The role of cytokines in T-cell memory in health and disease. Immunol Rev 283, 176–193 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kaplan MH, Hufford MM, Olson MR, The development and in vivo function of T helper 9 cells. Nat Rev Immunol 15, 295–307 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Barata JT, Durum SK, Seddon B, Flip the coin: IL-7 and IL-7R in health and disease. Nat Immunol 20, 1584–1593 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yao Z, Cui Y, Watford WT, Bream JH, Yamaoka K, Hissong BD, Li D, Durum SK, Jiang Q, Bhandoola A, Hennighausen L, O’Shea JJ, Stat5a/b are essential for normal lymphoid development and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 1000–1005 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nadeau K, Hwa V, Rosenfeld RG, STAT5b deficiency: an unsuspected cause of growth failure, immunodeficiency, and severe pulmonary disease. J Pediatr 158, 701–708 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Villarino A, Laurence A, Robinson GW, Bonelli M, Dema B, Afzali B, Shih HY, Sun HW, Brooks SR, Hennighausen L, Kanno Y, O’Shea JJ, Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) paralog dose governs T cell effector and regulatory functions. Elife 5, (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jenks JA, Seki S, Kanai T, Huang J, Morgan AA, Scalco RC, Nath R, Bucayu R, Wit JM, Al-Herz W, Ramadan D, Jorge AA, Bacchetta R, Hwa V, Rosenfeld R, Nadeau KC, Differentiating the roles of STAT5B and STAT5A in human CD4+ T cells. Clin Immunol 148, 227–236 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hand TW, Cui W, Jung YW, Sefik E, Joshi NS, Chandele A, Liu Y, Kaech SM, Differential effects of STAT5 and PI3K/AKT signaling on effector and memory CD8 T-cell survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 16601–16606 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ross SH, Cantrell DA, Signaling and Function of Interleukin-2 in T Lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol 36, 411–433 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Xue HH, Fink DW Jr., Zhang X, Qin J, Turck CW, Leonard WJ, Serine phosphorylation of Stat5 proteins in lymphocytes stimulated with IL-2. Int Immunol 14, 1263–1271 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Akamatsu M, Mikami N, Ohkura N, Kawakami R, Kitagawa Y, Sugimoto A, Hirota K, Nakamura N, Ujihara S, Kurosaki T, Hamaguchi H, Harada H, Xia G, Morita Y, Aramori I, Narumiya S, Sakaguchi S, Conversion of antigen-specific effector/memory T cells into Foxp3-expressing Treg cells by inhibition of CDK8/19. Sci Immunol 4, (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yamashita H, Xu J, Erwin RA, Farrar WL, Kirken RA, Rui H, Differential control of the phosphorylation state of proline-juxtaposed serine residues Ser725 of Stat5a and Ser730 of Stat5b in prolactin-sensitive cells. J Biol Chem 273, 30218–30224 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Park SH, Yamashita H, Rui H, Waxman DJ, Serine phosphorylation of GH-activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5a (STAT5a) and STAT5b: impact on STAT5 transcriptional activity. Mol Endocrinol 15, 2157–2171 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Beuvink I, Hess D, Flotow H, Hofsteenge J, Groner B, Hynes NE, Stat5a serine phosphorylation. Serine 779 is constitutively phosphorylated in the mammary gland, and serine 725 phosphorylation influences prolactin-stimulated in vitro DNA binding activity. J Biol Chem 275, 10247–10255 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yu CL, Jin YJ, Burakoff SJ, Cytosolic tyrosine dephosphorylation of STAT5. Potential role of SHP-2 in STAT5 regulation. J Biol Chem 275, 599–604 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rigacci S, Talini D, Berti A, LMW-PTP associates and dephosphorylates STAT5 interacting with its C-terminal domain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 312, 360–366 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Huang CY, Lin YC, Hsiao WY, Liao FH, Huang PY, Tan TH, DUSP4 deficiency enhances CD25 expression and CD4+ T-cell proliferation without impeding T-cell development. Eur J Immunol 42, 476–488 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hsiao WY, Lin YC, Liao FH, Chan YC, Huang CY, Dual-Specificity Phosphatase 4 Regulates STAT5 Protein Stability and Helper T Cell Polarization. PLoS One 10, e0145880 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Soldaini E, John S, Moro S, Bollenbacher J, Schindler U, Leonard WJ, DNA binding site selection of dimeric and tetrameric Stat5 proteins reveals a large repertoire of divergent tetrameric Stat5a binding sites. Mol Cell Biol 20, 389–401 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lin JX, Li P, Liu D, Jin HT, He J, Ata Ur Rasheed M, Rochman Y, Wang L, Cui K, Liu C, Kelsall BL, Ahmed R, Leonard WJ, Critical Role of STAT5 transcription factor tetramerization for cytokine responses and normal immune function. Immunity 36, 586–599 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.John S, Vinkemeier U, Soldaini E, Darnell JE Jr., Leonard WJ, The significance of tetramerization in promoter recruitment by Stat5. Mol Cell Biol 19, 1910–1918 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Meyer WK, Reichenbach P, Schindler U, Soldaini E, Nabholz M, Interaction of STAT5 dimers on two low affinity binding sites mediates interleukin 2 (IL-2) stimulation of IL-2 receptor alpha gene transcription. J Biol Chem 272, 31821–31828 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Meyer T, Hendry L, Begitt A, John S, Vinkemeier U, A single residue modulates tyrosine dephosphorylation, oligomerization, and nuclear accumulation of stat transcription factors. J Biol Chem 279, 18998–19007 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mandal M, Powers SE, Maienschein-Cline M, Bartom ET, Hamel KM, Kee BL, Dinner AR, Clark MR, Epigenetic repression of the Igk locus by STAT5-mediated recruitment of the histone methyltransferase Ezh2. Nat Immunol 12, 1212–1220 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Karantanos T, Chistofides A, Barhdan K, Li L, Boussiotis VA, Regulation of T Cell Differentiation and Function by EZH2. Front Immunol 7, 172 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yang R, Qu C, Zhou Y, Konkel JE, Shi S, Liu Y, Chen C, Liu S, Liu D, Chen Y, Zandi E, Chen W, Zhou Y, Shi S, Hydrogen Sulfide Promotes Tet1- and Tet2-Mediated Foxp3 Demethylation to Drive Regulatory T Cell Differentiation and Maintain Immune Homeostasis. Immunity 43, 251–263 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wingelhofer B, Neubauer HA, Valent P, Han X, Constantinescu SN, Gunning PT, Muller M, Moriggl R, Implications of STAT3 and STAT5 signaling on gene regulation and chromatin remodeling in hematopoietic cancer. Leukemia 32, 1713–1726 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Martens N, Uzan G, Wery M, Hooghe R, Hooghe-Peters EL, Gertler A, Suppressor of cytokine signaling 7 inhibits prolactin, growth hormone, and leptin signaling by interacting with STAT5 or STAT3 and attenuating their nuclear translocation. J Biol Chem 280, 13817–13823 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.DiToro D, Winstead CJ, Pham D, Witte S, Andargachew R, Singer JR, Wilson CG, Zindl CL, Luther RJ, Silberger DJ, Weaver BT, Kolawole EM, Martinez RJ, Turner H, Hatton RD, Moon JJ, Way SS, Evavold BD, Weaver CT, Differential IL-2 expression defines developmental fates of follicular versus nonfollicular helper T cells. Science 361, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pepper M, Pagan AJ, Igyarto BZ, Taylor JJ, Jenkins MK, Opposing signals from the Bcl6 transcription factor and the interleukin-2 receptor generate T helper 1 central and effector memory cells. Immunity 35, 583–595 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hsieh CS, Macatonia SE, Tripp CS, Wolf SF, O’Garra A, Murphy KM, Development of TH1 CD4+ T cells through IL-12 produced by Listeria-induced macrophages. Science 260, 547–549 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Seder RA, Gazzinelli R, Sher A, Paul WE, Interleukin 12 acts directly on CD4+ T cells to enhance priming for interferon gamma production and diminishes interleukin 4 inhibition of such priming. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90, 10188–10192 (1993). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Carter LL, Murphy KM, Lineage-specific requirement for signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat)4 in interferon gamma production from CD4(+) versus CD8(+) T cells. J Exp Med 189, 1355–1360 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kaplan MH, Sun YL, Hoey T, Grusby MJ, Impaired IL-12 responses and enhanced development of Th2 cells in Stat4-deficient mice. Nature 382, 174–177 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Thierfelder WE, van Deursen JM, Yamamoto K, Tripp RA, Sarawar SR, Carson RT, Sangster MY, Vignali DA, Doherty PC, Grosveld GC, Ihle JN, Requirement for Stat4 in interleukin-12-mediated responses of natural killer and T cells. Nature 382, 171–174 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Abbas AK, Murphy KM, Sher A, Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature 383, 787–793 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Murphy KM, Ouyang W, Farrar JD, Yang J, Ranganath S, Asnagli H, Afkarian M, Murphy TL, Signaling and transcription in T helper development. Annu Rev Immunol 18, 451–494 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.O’Garra A, Cytokines induce the development of functionally heterogeneous T helper cell subsets. Immunity 8, 275–283 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Szabo SJ, Kim ST, Costa GL, Zhang X, Fathman CG, Glimcher LH, A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell 100, 655–669 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Johnston RJ, Poholek AC, DiToro D, Yusuf I, Eto D, Barnett B, Dent AL, Craft J, Crotty S, Bcl6 and Blimp-1 are reciprocal and antagonistic regulators of T follicular helper cell differentiation. Science 325, 1006–1010 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Liao W, Lin JX, Wang L, Li P, Leonard WJ, Modulation of cytokine receptors by IL-2 broadly regulates differentiation into helper T cell lineages. Nat Immunol 12, 551–559 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Fujimura K, Oyamada A, Iwamoto Y, Yoshikai Y, Yamada H, CD4 T cell-intrinsic IL-2 signaling differentially affects Th1 and Th17 development. J Leukoc Biol 94, 271–279 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Szabo SJ, Dighe AS, Gubler U, Murphy KM, Regulation of the interleukin (IL)-12R beta 2 subunit expression in developing T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells. J Exp Med 185, 817–824 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sledzinska A, Vila de Mucha M, Bergerhoff K, Hotblack A, Demane DF, Ghorani E, Akarca AU, Marzolini MAV, Solomon I, Vargas FA, Pule M, Ono M, Seddon B, Kassiotis G, Ariyan CE, Korn T, Marafioti T, Lord GM, Stauss H, Jenner RG, Peggs KS, Quezada SA, Regulatory T Cells Restrain Interleukin-2- and Blimp-1-Dependent Acquisition of Cytotoxic Function by CD4(+) T Cells. Immunity 52, 151–166 e156 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ballesteros-Tato A, Leon B, Graf BA, Moquin A, Adams PS, Lund FE, Randall TD, Interleukin-2 inhibits germinal center formation by limiting T follicular helper cell differentiation. Immunity 36, 847–856 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Oestreich KJ, Mohn SE, Weinmann AS, Molecular mechanisms that control the expression and activity of Bcl-6 in TH1 cells to regulate flexibility with a TFH-like gene profile. Nat Immunol 13, 405–411 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Nurieva RI, Podd A, Chen Y, Alekseev AM, Yu M, Qi X, Huang H, Wen R, Wang J, Li HS, Watowich SS, Qi H, Dong C, Wang D, STAT5 protein negatively regulates T follicular helper (Tfh) cell generation and function. J Biol Chem 287, 11234–11239 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Johnston RJ, Choi YS, Diamond JA, Yang JA, Crotty S, STAT5 is a potent negative regulator of TFH cell differentiation. J Exp Med 209, 243–250 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Oestreich KJ, Read KA, Gilbertson SE, Hough KP, McDonald PW, Krishnamoorthy V, Weinmann AS, Bcl-6 directly represses the gene program of the glycolysis pathway. Nat Immunol 15, 957–964 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Peng M, Yin N, Chhangawala S, Xu K, Leslie CS, Li MO, Aerobic glycolysis promotes T helper 1 cell differentiation through an epigenetic mechanism. Science 354, 481–484 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chang CH, Curtis JD, Maggi LB Jr., Faubert B, Villarino AV, O’Sullivan D, Huang SC, van der Windt GJ, Blagih J, Qiu J, Weber JD, Pearce EJ, Jones RG, Pearce EL, Posttranscriptional control of T cell effector function by aerobic glycolysis. Cell 153, 1239–1251 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ray JP, Staron MM, Shyer JA, Ho PC, Marshall HD, Gray SM, Laidlaw BJ, Araki K, Ahmed R, Kaech SM, Craft J, The Interleukin-2-mTORc1 Kinase Axis Defines the Signaling, Differentiation, and Metabolism of T Helper 1 and Follicular B Helper T Cells. Immunity 43, 690–702 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Johnson MO, Wolf MM, Madden MZ, Andrejeva G, Sugiura A, Contreras DC, Maseda D, Liberti MV, Paz K, Kishton RJ, Johnson ME, de Cubas AA, Wu P, Li G, Zhang Y, Newcomb DC, Wells AD, Restifo NP, Rathmell WK, Locasale JW, Davila ML, Blazar BR, Rathmell JC, Distinct Regulation of Th17 and Th1 Cell Differentiation by Glutaminase-Dependent Metabolism. Cell 175, 1780–1795 e1719 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lee K, Gudapati P, Dragovic S, Spencer C, Joyce S, Killeen N, Magnuson MA, Boothby M, Mammalian target of rapamycin protein complex 2 regulates differentiation of Th1 and Th2 cell subsets via distinct signaling pathways. Immunity 32, 743–753 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chisolm DA, Savic D, Moore AJ, Ballesteros-Tato A, Leon B, Crossman DK, Murre C, Myers RM, Weinmann AS, CCCTC-Binding Factor Translates Interleukin 2- and alpha-Ketoglutarate-Sensitive Metabolic Changes in T Cells into Context-Dependent Gene Programs. Immunity 47, 251–267 e257 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zhu J, T helper 2 (Th2) cell differentiation, type 2 innate lymphoid cell (ILC2) development and regulation of interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 production. Cytokine 75, 14–24 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Walker JA, McKenzie ANJ, TH2 cell development and function. Nat Rev Immunol 18, 121–133 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Ansel KM, Djuretic I, Tanasa B, Rao A, Regulation of Th2 differentiation and Il4 locus accessibility. Annu Rev Immunol 24, 607–656 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Swain SL, Weinberg AD, English M, Huston G, IL-4 directs the development of Th2-like helper effectors. J Immunol 145, 3796–3806 (1990). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Wei G, Abraham BJ, Yagi R, Jothi R, Cui K, Sharma S, Narlikar L, Northrup DL, Tang Q, Paul WE, Zhu J, Zhao K, Genome-wide analyses of transcription factor GATA3-mediated gene regulation in distinct T cell types. Immunity 35, 299–311 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Yamashita M, Ukai-Tadenuma M, Kimura M, Omori M, Inami M, Taniguchi M, Nakayama T, Identification of a conserved GATA3 response element upstream proximal from the interleukin-13 gene locus. J Biol Chem 277, 42399–42408 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hou J, Schindler U, Henzel WJ, Ho TC, Brasseur M, McKnight SL, An interleukin-4-induced transcription factor: IL-4 Stat. Science 265, 1701–1706 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Zheng W, Flavell RA, The transcription factor GATA-3 is necessary and sufficient for Th2 cytokine gene expression in CD4 T cells. Cell 89, 587–596 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Kurata H, Lee HJ, O’Garra A, Arai N, Ectopic expression of activated Stat6 induces the expression of Th2-specific cytokines and transcription factors in developing Th1 cells. Immunity 11, 677–688 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zhu J, Min B, Hu-Li J, Watson CJ, Grinberg A, Wang Q, Killeen N, Urban JF Jr., Guo L, Paul WE, Conditional deletion of Gata3 shows its essential function in T(H)1-T(H)2 responses. Nat Immunol 5, 1157–1165 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Cote-Sierra J, Foucras G, Guo L, Chiodetti L, Young HA, Hu-Li J, Zhu J, Paul WE, Interleukin 2 plays a central role in Th2 differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 3880–3885 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Liao W, Schones DE, Oh J, Cui Y, Cui K, Roh TY, Zhao K, Leonard WJ, Priming for T helper type 2 differentiation by interleukin 2-mediated induction of interleukin 4 receptor alpha-chain expression. Nat Immunol 9, 1288–1296 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Zhu J, Cote-Sierra J, Guo L, Paul WE, Stat5 activation plays a critical role in Th2 differentiation. Immunity 19, 739–748 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Rani A, Afzali B, Kelly A, Tewolde-Berhan L, Hackett M, Kanhere AS, Pedroza-Pacheco I, Bowen H, Jurcevic S, Jenner RG, Cousins DJ, Ragheb JA, Lavender P, John S, IL-2 regulates expression of C-MAF in human CD4 T cells. J Immunol 187, 3721–3729 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Ho IC, Hodge MR, Rooney JW, Glimcher LH, The proto-oncogene c-maf is responsible for tissue-specific expression of interleukin-4. Cell 85, 973–983 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Bruchard M, Rebe C, Derangere V, Togbe D, Ryffel B, Boidot R, Humblin E, Hamman A, Chalmin F, Berger H, Chevriaux A, Limagne E, Apetoh L, Vegran F, Ghiringhelli F, The receptor NLRP3 is a transcriptional regulator of TH2 differentiation. Nat Immunol 16, 859–870 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Kallies A, Hawkins ED, Belz GT, Metcalf D, Hommel M, Corcoran LM, Hodgkin PD, Nutt SL, Transcriptional repressor Blimp-1 is essential for T cell homeostasis and self-tolerance. Nat Immunol 7, 466–474 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Fu SH, Yeh LT, Chu CC, Yen BL, Sytwu HK, New insights into Blimp-1 in T lymphocytes: a divergent regulator of cell destiny and effector function. J Biomed Sci 24, 49 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Veldhoen M, Uyttenhove C, van Snick J, Helmby H, Westendorf A, Buer J, Martin B, Wilhelm C, Stockinger B, Transforming growth factor-beta ‘reprograms’ the differentiation of T helper 2 cells and promotes an interleukin 9-producing subset. Nat Immunol 9, 1341–1346 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Dardalhon V, Awasthi A, Kwon H, Galileos G, Gao W, Sobel RA, Mitsdoerffer M, Strom TB, Elyaman W, Ho IC, Khoury S, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK, IL-4 inhibits TGF-beta-induced Foxp3+ T cells and, together with TGF-beta, generates IL-9+ IL-10+ Foxp3(−) effector T cells. Nat Immunol 9, 1347–1355 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Goswami R, Kaplan MH, A brief history of IL-9. J Immunol 186, 3283–3288 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Rivera Vargas T, Humblin E, Vegran F, Ghiringhelli F, Apetoh L, TH9 cells in anti-tumor immunity. Semin Immunopathol 39, 39–46 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kaplan MH, Th9 cells: differentiation and disease. Immunol Rev 252, 104–115 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Chang HC, Sehra S, Goswami R, Yao W, Yu Q, Stritesky GL, Jabeen R, McKinley C, Ahyi AN, Han L, Nguyen ET, Robertson MJ, Perumal NB, Tepper RS, Nutt SL, Kaplan MH, The transcription factor PU.1 is required for the development of IL-9-producing T cells and allergic inflammation. Nat Immunol 11, 527–534 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Campos Carrascosa L, Klein M, Kitagawa Y, Luckel C, Marini F, Konig A, Guralnik A, Raifer H, Hagner-Benes S, Radler D, Bock A, Kang C, Lohoff M, Garn H, Schaub B, Berberich-Siebelt F, Sakaguchi S, Bopp T, Huber M, Reciprocal regulation of the Il9 locus by counteracting activities of transcription factors IRF1 and IRF4. Nat Commun 8, 15366 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Schmitt E, Germann T, Goedert S, Hoehn P, Huels C, Koelsch S, Kuhn R, Muller W, Palm N, Rude E, IL-9 production of naive CD4+ T cells depends on IL-2, is synergistically enhanced by a combination of TGF-beta and IL-4, and is inhibited by IFN-gamma. J Immunol 153, 3989–3996 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Kajiyama Y, Umezu-Goto M, Kobayashi N, Takahashi K, Fukuchi Y, Mori A, IL-2-induced IL-9 production by allergen-specific human helper T-cell clones. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 143 Suppl 1, 71–75 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Liao W, Spolski R, Li P, Du N, West EE, Ren M, Mitra S, Leonard WJ, Opposing actions of IL-2 and IL-21 on Th9 differentiation correlate with their differential regulation of BCL6 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111, 3508–3513 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Yang XO, Pappu BP, Nurieva R, Akimzhanov A, Kang HS, Chung Y, Ma L, Shah B, Panopoulos AD, Schluns KS, Watowich SS, Tian Q, Jetten AM, Dong C, T helper 17 lineage differentiation is programmed by orphan nuclear receptors ROR alpha and ROR gamma. Immunity 28, 29–39 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Ciofani M, Madar A, Galan C, Sellars M, Mace K, Pauli F, Agarwal A, Huang W, Parkhurst CN, Muratet M, Newberry KM, Meadows S, Greenfield A, Yang Y, Jain P, Kirigin FK, Birchmeier C, Wagner EF, Murphy KM, Myers RM, Bonneau R, Littman DR, A validated regulatory network for Th17 cell specification. Cell 151, 289–303 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Zhang F, Meng G, Strober W, Interactions among the transcription factors Runx1, RORgammat and Foxp3 regulate the differentiation of interleukin 17-producing T cells. Nat Immunol 9, 1297–1306 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Yang XP, Ghoreschi K, Steward-Tharp SM, Rodriguez-Canales J, Zhu J, Grainger JR, Hirahara K, Sun HW, Wei L, Vahedi G, Kanno Y, O’Shea JJ, Laurence A, Opposing regulation of the locus encoding IL-17 through direct, reciprocal actions of STAT3 and STAT5. Nat Immunol 12, 247–254 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Yang XO, Panopoulos AD, Nurieva R, Chang SH, Wang D, Watowich SS, Dong C, STAT3 regulates cytokine-mediated generation of inflammatory helper T cells. J Biol Chem 282, 9358–9363 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Laurence A, Tato CM, Davidson TS, Kanno Y, Chen Z, Yao Z, Blank RB, Meylan F, Siegel R, Hennighausen L, Shevach EM, O’Shea J J, Interleukin-2 signaling via STAT5 constrains T helper 17 cell generation. Immunity 26, 371–381 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Luo J, Ming B, Zhang C, Deng X, Li P, Wei Z, Xia Y, Jiang K, Ye H, Ma W, Liu Z, Li H, Yang XP, Dong L, IL-2 Inhibition of Th17 Generation Rather Than Induction of Treg Cells Is Impaired in Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome Patients. Front Immunol 9, 1755 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Kotov JA, Kotov DI, Linehan JL, Bardwell VJ, Gearhart MD, Jenkins MK, BCL6 corepressor contributes to Th17 cell formation by inhibiting Th17 fate suppressors. J Exp Med 216, 1450–1464 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Amadi-Obi A, Yu CR, Liu X, Mahdi RM, Clarke GL, Nussenblatt RB, Gery I, Lee YS, Egwuagu CE, TH17 cells contribute to uveitis and scleritis and are expanded by IL-2 and inhibited by IL-27/STAT1. Nat Med 13, 711–718 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Crotty S, T Follicular Helper Cell Biology: A Decade of Discovery and Diseases. Immunity 50, 1132–1148 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Nurieva RI, Chung Y, Martinez GJ, Yang XO, Tanaka S, Matskevitch TD, Wang YH, Dong C, Bcl6 mediates the development of T follicular helper cells. Science 325, 1001–1005 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Yu D, Rao S, Tsai LM, Lee SK, He Y, Sutcliffe EL, Srivastava M, Linterman M, Zheng L, Simpson N, Ellyard JI, Parish IA, Ma CS, Li QJ, Parish CR, Mackay CR, Vinuesa CG, The transcriptional repressor Bcl-6 directs T follicular helper cell lineage commitment. Immunity 31, 457–468 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Vogelzang A, McGuire HM, Yu D, Sprent J, Mackay CR, King C, A fundamental role for interleukin-21 in the generation of T follicular helper cells. Immunity 29, 127–137 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Xie MM, Liu H, Corn C, Koh BH, Kaplan MH, Turner MJ, Dent AL, Roles of T Follicular Helper Cells and T Follicular Regulatory Cells in Autoantibody Production in IL-2-Deficient Mice. Immunohorizons 3, 306–316 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Leon B, Bradley JE, Lund FE, Randall TD, Ballesteros-Tato A, FoxP3+ regulatory T cells promote influenza-specific Tfh responses by controlling IL-2 availability. Nat Commun 5, 3495 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.McDonald PW, Read KA, Baker CE, Anderson AE, Powell MD, Ballesteros-Tato A, Oestreich KJ, IL-7 signalling represses Bcl-6 and the TFH gene program. Nat Commun 7, 10285 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Liu X, Lu H, Chen T, Nallaparaju KC, Yan X, Tanaka S, Ichiyama K, Zhang X, Zhang L, Wen X, Tian Q, Bian XW, Jin W, Wei L, Dong C, Genome-wide Analysis Identifies Bcl6-Controlled Regulatory Networks during T Follicular Helper Cell Differentiation. Cell Rep 14, 1735–1747 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Toomer KH, Malek TR, Cytokine Signaling in the Development and Homeostasis of Regulatory T cells. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 10, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Josefowicz SZ, Lu LF, Rudensky AY, Regulatory T cells: mechanisms of differentiation and function. Annu Rev Immunol 30, 531–564 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Mempel TR, Marangoni F, Guidance factors orchestrating regulatory T cell positioning in tissues during development, homeostasis, and response. Immunol Rev 289, 129–141 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Sakaguchi S, Yamaguchi T, Nomura T, Ono M, Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 133, 775–787 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Rudensky AY, Regulatory T cells and Foxp3. Immunol Rev 241, 260–268 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Malek TR, The biology of interleukin-2. Annu Rev Immunol 26, 453–479 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Pan F, Yu H, Dang EV, Barbi J, Pan X, Grosso JF, Jinasena D, Sharma SM, McCadden EM, Getnet D, Drake CG, Liu JO, Ostrowski MC, Pardoll DM, Eos mediates Foxp3-dependent gene silencing in CD4+ regulatory T cells. Science 325, 1142–1146 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Willerford DM, Chen J, Ferry JA, Davidson L, Ma A, Alt FW, Interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain regulates the size and content of the peripheral lymphoid compartment. Immunity 3, 521–530 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY, A function for interleukin 2 in Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol 6, 1142–1151 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Horak I, Lohler J, Ma A, Smith KA, Interleukin-2 deficient mice: a new model to study autoimmunity and self-tolerance. Immunol Rev 148, 35–44 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Klatzmann D, Abbas AK, The promise of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol 15, 283–294 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Chinen T, Kannan AK, Levine AG, Fan X, Klein U, Zheng Y, Gasteiger G, Feng Y, Fontenot JD, Rudensky AY, An essential role for the IL-2 receptor in Treg cell function. Nat Immunol 17, 1322–1333 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Sakaguchi S, Naturally arising CD4+ regulatory t cells for immunologic self-tolerance and negative control of immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol 22, 531–562 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Toomer KH, Lui JB, Altman NH, Ban Y, Chen X, Malek TR, Essential and non-overlapping IL-2Ralpha-dependent processes for thymic development and peripheral homeostasis of regulatory T cells. Nat Commun 10, 1037 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Feng Y, Arvey A, Chinen T, van der Veeken J, Gasteiger G, Rudensky AY, Control of the inheritance of regulatory T cell identity by a cis element in the Foxp3 locus. Cell 158, 749–763 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Shan J, Feng L, Sun G, Chen P, Zhou Y, Xia M, Li H, Li Y, Interplay between mTOR and STAT5 signaling modulates the balance between regulatory and effective T cells. Immunobiology 220, 510–517 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Josefowicz SZ, Rudensky A, Control of regulatory T cell lineage commitment and maintenance. Immunity 30, 616–625 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Burchill MA, Yang J, Vogtenhuber C, Blazar BR, Farrar MA, IL-2 receptor beta-dependent STAT5 activation is required for the development of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol 178, 280–290 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Nasrallah R, Imianowski CJ, Bossini-Castillo L, Grant FM, Dogan M, Placek L, Kozhaya L, Kuo P, Sadiyah F, Whiteside SK, Mumbach MR, Glinos D, Vardaka P, Whyte CE, Lozano T, Fujita T, Fujii H, Liston A, Andrews S, Cozzani A, Yang J, Mitra S, Lugli E, Chang HY, Unutmaz D, Trynka G, Roychoudhuri R, A distal enhancer at risk locus 11q13.5 promotes suppression of colitis by Treg cells. Nature, (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Yao Z, Kanno Y, Kerenyi M, Stephens G, Durant L, Watford WT, Laurence A, Robinson GW, Shevach EM, Moriggl R, Hennighausen L, Wu C, O’Shea JJ, Nonredundant roles for Stat5a/b in directly regulating Foxp3. Blood 109, 4368–4375 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Rasmussen KD, Helin K, Role of TET enzymes in DNA methylation, development, and cancer. Genes Dev 30, 733–750 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Botta D, Fuller MJ, Marquez-Lago TT, Bachus H, Bradley JE, Weinmann AS, Zajac AJ, Randall TD, Lund FE, Leon B, Ballesteros-Tato A, Dynamic regulation of T follicular regulatory cell responses by interleukin 2 during influenza infection. Nat Immunol 18, 1249–1260 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Fan MY, Low JS, Tanimine N, Finn KK, Priyadharshini B, Germana SK, Kaech SM, Turka LA, Differential Roles of IL-2 Signaling in Developing versus Mature Tregs. Cell Rep 25, 1204–1213 e1204 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Gerriets VA, Kishton RJ, Johnson MO, Cohen S, Siska PJ, Nichols AG, Warmoes MO, de Cubas AA, MacIver NJ, Locasale JW, Turka LA, Wells AD, Rathmell JC, Foxp3 and Toll-like receptor signaling balance Treg cell anabolic metabolism for suppression. Nat Immunol 17, 1459–1466 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Newton R, Priyadharshini B, Turka LA, Immunometabolism of regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol 17, 618–625 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Cretney E, Leung PS, Trezise S, Newman DM, Rankin LC, Teh CE, Putoczki TL, Gray DH, Belz GT, Mielke LA, Dias S, Nutt SL, Characterization of Blimp-1 function in effector regulatory T cells. J Autoimmun 91, 73–82 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Boyman O, Kovar M, Rubinstein MP, Surh CD, Sprent J, Selective stimulation of T cell subsets with antibody-cytokine immune complexes. Science 311, 1924–1927 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Letourneau S, van Leeuwen EM, Krieg C, Martin C, Pantaleo G, Sprent J, Surh CD, Boyman O, IL-2/anti-IL-2 antibody complexes show strong biological activity by avoiding interaction with IL-2 receptor alpha subunit CD25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 2171–2176 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Spangler JB, Tomala J, Luca VC, Jude KM, Dong S, Ring AM, Votavova P, Pepper M, Kovar M, Garcia KC, Antibodies to Interleukin-2 Elicit Selective T Cell Subset Potentiation through Distinct Conformational Mechanisms. Immunity 42, 815–825 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Webster KE, Walters S, Kohler RE, Mrkvan T, Boyman O, Surh CD, Grey ST, Sprent J, In vivo expansion of T reg cells with IL-2-mAb complexes: induction of resistance to EAE and long-term acceptance of islet allografts without immunosuppression. J Exp Med 206, 751–760 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Arce Vargas F, Furness AJS, Solomon I, Joshi K, Mekkaoui L, Lesko MH, Miranda Rota E, Dahan R, Georgiou A, Sledzinska A, Ben Aissa A, Franz D, Werner Sunderland M, Wong YNS, Henry JY, O’Brien T, Nicol D, Challacombe B, Beers SA, Melanoma TC, Renal TC, Lung TC, Turajlic S, Gore M, Larkin J, Swanton C, Chester KA, Pule M, Ravetch JV, Marafioti T, Peggs KS, Quezada SA, Fc-Optimized Anti-CD25 Depletes Tumor-Infiltrating Regulatory T Cells and Synergizes with PD-1 Blockade to Eradicate Established Tumors. Immunity 46, 577–586 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Arenas-Ramirez N, Zou C, Popp S, Zingg D, Brannetti B, Wirth E, Calzascia T, Kovarik J, Sommer L, Zenke G, Woytschak J, Regnier CH, Katopodis A, Boyman O, Improved cancer immunotherapy by a CD25-mimobody conferring selectivity to human interleukin-2. Sci Transl Med 8, 367ra166 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Grinberg-Bleyer Y, Baeyens A, You S, Elhage R, Fourcade G, Gregoire S, Cagnard N, Carpentier W, Tang Q, Bluestone J, Chatenoud L, Klatzmann D, Salomon BL, Piaggio E, IL-2 reverses established type 1 diabetes in NOD mice by a local effect on pancreatic regulatory T cells. J Exp Med 207, 1871–1878 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.He J, Zhang X, Wei Y, Sun X, Chen Y, Deng J, Jin Y, Gan Y, Hu X, Jia R, Xu C, Hou Z, Leong YA, Zhu L, Feng J, An Y, Jia Y, Li C, Liu X, Ye H, Ren L, Li R, Yao H, Li Y, Chen S, Zhang X, Su Y, Guo J, Shen N, Morand EF, Yu D, Li Z, Low-dose interleukin-2 treatment selectively modulates CD4(+) T cell subsets in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Med 22, 991–993 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Koreth J, Matsuoka K, Kim HT, McDonough SM, Bindra B, Alyea EP 3rd, Armand P, Cutler C, Ho VT, Treister NS, Bienfang DC, Prasad S, Tzachanis D, Joyce RM, Avigan DE, Antin JH, Ritz J, Soiffer RJ, Interleukin-2 and regulatory T cells in graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med 365, 2055–2066 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Tang Q, Adams JY, Penaranda C, Melli K, Piaggio E, Sgouroudis E, Piccirillo CA, Salomon BL, Bluestone JA, Central role of defective interleukin-2 production in the triggering of islet autoimmune destruction. Immunity 28, 687–697 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Levin AM, Bates DL, Ring AM, Krieg C, Lin JT, Su L, Moraga I, Raeber ME, Bowman GR, Novick P, Pande VS, Fathman CG, Boyman O, Garcia KC, Exploiting a natural conformational switch to engineer an interleukin-2 ‘superkine’. Nature 484, 529–533 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Mitra S, Ring AM, Amarnath S, Spangler JB, Li P, Ju W, Fischer S, Oh J, Spolski R, Weiskopf K, Kohrt H, Foley JE, Rajagopalan S, Long EO, Fowler DH, Waldmann TA, Garcia KC, Leonard WJ, Interleukin-2 activity can be fine tuned with engineered receptor signaling clamps. Immunity 42, 826–838 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Sockolosky JT, Trotta E, Parisi G, Picton L, Su LL, Le AC, Chhabra A, Silveria SL, George BM, King IC, Tiffany MR, Jude K, Sibener LV, Baker D, Shizuru JA, Ribas A, Bluestone JA, Garcia KC, Selective targeting of engineered T cells using orthogonal IL-2 cytokine-receptor complexes. Science 359, 1037–1042 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Linterman MA, Pierson W, Lee SK, Kallies A, Kawamoto S, Rayner TF, Srivastava M, Divekar DP, Beaton L, Hogan JJ, Fagarasan S, Liston A, Smith KG, Vinuesa CG, Foxp3+ follicular regulatory T cells control the germinal center response. Nat Med 17, 975–982 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Xie MM, Dent AL, Unexpected Help: Follicular Regulatory T Cells in the Germinal Center. Front Immunol 9, 1536 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Chung Y, Tanaka S, Chu F, Nurieva RI, Martinez GJ, Rawal S, Wang YH, Lim H, Reynolds JM, Zhou XH, Fan HM, Liu ZM, Neelapu SS, Dong C, Follicular regulatory T cells expressing Foxp3 and Bcl-6 suppress germinal center reactions. Nat Med 17, 983–988 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Wollenberg I, Agua-Doce A, Hernandez A, Almeida C, Oliveira VG, Faro J, Graca L, Regulation of the germinal center reaction by Foxp3+ follicular regulatory T cells. J Immunol 187, 4553–4560 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Aloulou M, Carr EJ, Gador M, Bignon A, Liblau RS, Fazilleau N, Linterman MA, Follicular regulatory T cells can be specific for the immunizing antigen and derive from naive T cells. Nat Commun 7, 10579 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Wing JB, Kitagawa Y, Locci M, Hume H, Tay C, Morita T, Kidani Y, Matsuda K, Inoue T, Kurosaki T, Crotty S, Coban C, Ohkura N, Sakaguchi S, A distinct subpopulation of CD25(−) T-follicular regulatory cells localizes in the germinal centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, E6400–E6409 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Ritvo PG, Churlaud G, Quiniou V, Florez L, Brimaud F, Fourcade G, Mariotti-Ferrandiz E, Klatzmann D, Tfr cells lack IL-2Ralpha but express decoy IL-1R2 and IL-1Ra and suppress the IL-1-dependent activation of Tfh cells. Sci Immunol 2, (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Fazilleau N, Aloulou M, Several Follicular Regulatory T Cell Subsets With Distinct Phenotype and Function Emerge During Germinal Center Reactions. Front Immunol 9, 1792 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


