Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0239560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239560

Violence against older women: A systematic review of qualitative literature

Sarah R Meyer 1,*, Molly E Lasater 2, Claudia García-Moreno 1
Editor: Stefano Federici3
PMCID: PMC7514024  PMID: 32970746

Abstract

The majority of the existing evidence-base on violence against women focuses on women of reproductive age (15–49), and globally there is sparse evidence concerning patterns of and types of violence against women aged 50 and older. Improved understanding of differing patterns and dynamics of violence older women experienced is needed to ensure appropriate policy or programmatic responses. To address these gaps in the evidence, we conducted a systematic review of qualitative literature on violence against older women, including any form of violence against women, rather than adopting a specific theoretical framework on what types of violence or perpetrators should be included from the outset, and focusing specifically on qualitative studies, to explore the nature and dynamics of violence against older women from the perspective of women. Following pre-planned searches of 11 electronic databases, two authors screened all identified titles, abstracts and relevant full texts for inclusion in the review. We extracted data from 52 manuscripts identified for inclusion, and conducted quality assessment and thematic synthesis from the key findings of the included studies. Results indicated that the vast majority of included studies were conducted in high-income contexts, and did not contain adequate information on study setting and context. Thematic synthesis identified several central themes, including the intersection between ageing and perceptions of, experiences of and response to violence; the centrality of social and gender norms in shaping older women’s experiences of violence; the cumulative physical and mental health impact of exposure to lifelong violence, and that specific barriers exist for older women accessing community supports and health services to address violence victimization. Our findings indicated that violence against older women is prevalent and has significant impacts on physical and mental well-being of older women. Implications for policy and programmatic response, as well as future research directions, are highlighted.

Introduction

Violence against women is a major public health problem, a gender inequality issue and a human rights violation. There are significant serious and long-lasting impacts of violence on women’s physical and mental health, including injuries, unintended pregnancy, adverse birth outcomes, abortion (often in unsafe conditions), HIV and sexually transmitted infections, depression, alcohol-use disorders and other mental health problems [15]. The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals [SDGs] include as one of their targets (5.2) under Goal 5 on gender equality, the elimination of all forms of violence against women and girls. Indicator 5.2.1, measuring intimate partner violence [IPV]: Proportion of ever-partnered women and girls aged 15 years and older subjected to physical, sexual or psychological violence by a current or former intimate partner in the previous 12 months, is proposed to track the measurement of progress in achieving this goal. The indicator does not include an upper age limit, and data on older women (aged 50 and above), including but not limited to intimate partner violence, are needed to support national and global monitoring of violence against women of all ages, including for monitoring of the SDGs.

The majority of existing violence against women surveys and data have focused on women of reproductive age (15–49), as they suffer the brunt of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence [6]. A growing number of surveys are now including women older than 49 years, however globally there is sparse evidence concerning patterns of and types of violence against women aged 50 and older, and limited understanding of barriers to reporting and help-seeking amongst older women who are subjected to violence [7]. Compared to women of reproductive age, women aged 50 and above may experience different relationship dynamics which influence forms of abuse [8, 9], and some evidence indicates that older women experience different types of violence, for example, psychological violence and verbal abuse, compared to younger women’s experiences of physical and sexual violence [10]. For older women, recent exposure to violence may be interlinked with violence victimization at different stages of the life-course [11, 12]. Dynamics of ageing may shape experiences of violence, for example, provision of care to a dependent partner may influence decisions to disclose or report abuse [10]. They are also more likely to experience violence from other family members, including children, and from carers. Currently, the evidence-base of qualitative and quantitative data concerning violence against older women is limited, and a better understanding of these differing patterns and dynamics is needed to ensure appropriate policy or programmatic responses to violence against older women and service development and provision for older women affected by violence [10, 11]. To address these gaps in the evidence, we conducted a systematic review of qualitative literature on violence against older women.

Current frameworks on violence against women and existing evidence

Gaps in research and evidence stem in part from conflicting theoretical approaches, definitions and conceptual frameworks concerning violence against older women. The dominant theoretical frameworks are the older adult mistreatment framework and older adult protection framework [7, 13, 14]. The older adult mistreatment framework conceptualizes violence against older women as a form of elder abuse, focusing on age as the primary factor influencing vulnerability to exposure to violence. The older adult protection framework specifically understands violence within the context of care-giving and institutional arrangements, where older adults’ often be gender neutral, and the adult protection framework can result in a framing of older adults as inherently impaired and vulnerable. In addition, the IPV framework primarily understands vulnerability to violence in terms of gender inequality and partnership dynamics, which may neglect analysis of how ageing and partner violence intersect. These differing frameworks inform multiple aspects of research, including study design, data collection and analysis, and reporting, resulting in fragmented data and evidence. For example, some research utilizing the older adult mistreatment framework lacks a focus on the gendered dimensions of violence [14, 15], and other studies have solely focused on women in institutional settings, neglecting measurement of violence perpetrated by intimate partners and other family members [13].

Existing syntheses of evidence on violence against older women often reflect these differing conceptual frameworks. Employing an older adult mistreatment framework, a systematic review of quantitative studies of elder abuse (against men and women aged 60+) found that the global prevalence of elder abuse in community settings is 15.7% in the past year, with psychological abuse and financial abuse as the most prevalent forms of abuse reported [16]. This review reported prevalence by type of violence, but did not report on perpetrators. Analysis of studies conducted in institutional settings found women, aged 60 and above, to be significantly more vulnerable to abuse, with psychological abuse as the most prevalent form of violence, followed by physical violence, neglect, financial and sexual abuse [17]; this analysis included data reporting staff-to-resident abuse. Analysis of quantitative data of women aged 60 and above in the systematic review of quantitative studies of elder abuse found a global prevalence of elder abuse against women of 14.1% in the past year, with psychological abuse reported as the most prevalent form of violence, followed by neglect [16]. The focus of this review was prevalence of different sub-types of violence, and type of perpetrator was not considered. Another systematic review of quantitative data on interpersonal violence (physical and/or sexual violence) against older women (aged 65 and above) in community dwellings primarily employed an IPV framework, finding prevalence of reported interpersonal violence ranged from 6 to 59% over a lifetime, from 6 to 18% since turning 50, and 0.8 to 11% in the past year, however, results indicated that definitions of violence vary widely and affect prevalence estimates [18]. Syntheses of quantitative literature have identified prevalent forms of violence against older women, highlighting limitations in the evidence-base due to variations in definitions and methodology, and a primary emphasis on populations in high-income, Western countries. These reviews have captured a wide range of types of violence, however, have not considered type of perpetrators or patterns of co-occurring types of violence.

Alongside these systematic reviews of quantitative data, some reviews have included qualitative and mixed methods studies. An empirical review of IPV in later life examined 27 quantitative, 22 qualitative and 7 mixed-methods studies, finding that forms of IPV amongst older women in later life shifted from a higher prevalence of physical and sexual abuse during reproductive years, to a higher prevalence of forms of psychological abuse [19]. A review of qualitative research on IPV amongst older women identified a number of relevant themes, including patterns of abuse that were continuous and consistent with previous experiences of abuse in families of origin and previous relationships [20]. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies of IPV and older women focused on how previous exposure to IPV influenced health-seeking behaviours, specifically mental health care [21]. An empirical review of quantitative and qualitative studies of sexual violence against older people identified widespread variation in prevalence rates across studies, and a range of perpetrators, primarily intimate partners or adult children [22]. A recent narrative review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies of IPV against women aged 45 and above concluded that women’s “age and life transitions mean that they may experience abuse differently to younger women. They also face unique barriers to accessing help, such as disability and dependence on their partners” [23].

However, amongst these existing systematic reviews of qualitative literature, none have focused specifically on older women, while also being inclusive of any form of violence. In order to improve understanding of violence against older women, it is important to explore patterns, dynamics and experiences through examination of the qualitative literature. Qualitative data on violence against older women complements quantitative evidence not only by offering insight into lived experiences of older women subjected to violence, but also by expanding and clarifying types of violence, perpetrators, linkages to particular risk factors, and physical, mental and social impacts of violence against older women.

In the present review, we aimed to build on previous systematic reviews and strengthen the evidence-base by i) including studies and evidence focused specifically on women; ii) including any form of violence against women, rather than adopting a specific theoretical framework on what types of violence or perpetrators should be included from the outset; iii) focusing on women aged 50 and above (as many surveys often specifically focus on women of reproductive age, which is considered to be up to 49 years of age); and iv) focusing specifically on qualitative studies, to explore the nature and dynamics of violence against older women from the perspective of women. We aimed to identify, evaluate and synthesize qualitative studies from all countries, exploring violence against women aged 50 and above, identifying types and patterns of violence, perpetrators of violence, and impacts of violence on various outcomes for older women, including physical and mental health and social support, and women’s responses to experiences of violence. We include the following forms of violence: elder abuse, family violence and intimate partner violence. Elder abuse is defined as “single or repeated act, or lack of appropriate action, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust which causes harm or distress to an older person” [24]. Intimate partner violence is defined as “behaviour by an intimate partner or ex-partner that causes physical, sexual or psychological harm, including physical aggression, sexual coercion, psychological abuse and controlling behaviours” [25]. Family violence is often used interchangeable with intimate partner violence, however, also encompasses abuse and violence perpetrated by other family members, for example, adult children or in-laws. While there is no universal agreed-upon definition of older women, for the purposes of this review, we define older women as women aged 50 and above, while recognizing that aging and age are social phenomenon, and definitions vary across organizations, cultures and communities. The protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO, Registration Number: CRD42019119467, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019119467 (see also [26]).

Methods

Search strategy

In this systematic review, we searched 11 electronic databases–PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, PILOTS, ERIC, Social Work Abstracts, International Bibliography of the Social Sciences, Social Services Abstracts, ProQuest Criminal Justice and Dissertations & Theses Global, from 1990. We conducted searches that combined the following domains as part of the research question: 1) age (50 and above); AND 2) women; AND 3) violence; AND 4) qualitative methodology. For each of these domains, we identified the relevant keywords and search terms, which varied by database; the search strategy was appropriately modified for each database, including syntax and specific terms, topics and/ or headings. The search strategy for PubMed is included in S1 File. Searches were conducted in April 2018 and updated in July 2019. We did not limit the search by year of publication or language.

We also hand searched reference lists of relevant existing systematic reviews, which we identified both through background research and through the formal database searches, and reviewed relevant references (44 identified). We consulted with 49 experts on violence against older women or older adults, including researchers, practitioners and policy makers, from all regions globally. All experts were contacted and followed-up with a minimum of 2 contacts. 26 experts responded with 424 articles, 64 of which were duplicates. We reviewed the full text of 43 articles and ultimately included 2 in the full review. Grey literature was not systematically searched; grey literature submitted by experts was initially considered for inclusion, however, conducting comparable data extraction and quality assessment for grey literature alongside the peer-reviewed literature was not possible.

We identified 18 non-English language articles for full-text review. For 17 of these articles, we identified a native speaker external reviewer who was provided with inclusion and exclusion criteria and consulted with authors regarding final inclusion (4 Portuguese, 7 Spanish, 1 Hebrew, 1 Dutch, 1 German, 1 Danish, 2 French). One non-English article (in Farsi) was not reviewed as the research team could not engage a Farsi speaker to review the article. The external reviewers consulted with SRM to decide on inclusion of full texts, and conducted data extraction and quality assessment on 3 articles identified for inclusion (2 Spanish, 1 Portuguese) [2729].

Study selection and data extraction

After removing duplicates, study selection proceeded in two stages: in the first stage, two authors (SRM and MEL) reviewed titles and abstracts of all identified manuscripts. We included studies that met the following criteria: i) focused on women aged 50 and older, ii) employed qualitative methodology, and iii) focused on women’s experiences of any type of violence perpetrated by any type of perpetrator. Studies including men or also including women aged younger than 50 were included if specific and separate sex and age-specific analyses were included. We included studies employing any type of qualitative methodology, and mixed methods studies were included if qualitative data was presented separately. Studies were excluded if the whole sample was children, adolescents or adults under the age of 50; if the sample only included men; if the methodology was quantitative, or in the case of mixed methods studies, if the qualitative results were not separately presented, and if the data only included the perspectives on violence against women as reported by care providers, health professionals, legal professionals and nursing home managers.

After the first stage of title and abstract review, we reviewed the full text of any manuscript considered relevant by either of the authors. In the second stage, two authors (SRM and MEL) independently reviewed all articles selected for full text review for eligibility, to reach consensus on inclusion. Any discrepancies were resolved with the input of an external reviewer. Fig 1 indicates the full search and study selection process.

Fig 1. Identification of included studies.

Fig 1

From: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(6): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097. For more information, visit www.prisma-statement.org.

We designed a data extraction Excel spreadsheet specifically for the purposes of the review, including characteristics of included studies (location of the research, research question), methodology (conceptual framework or theoretical approach, data collection methods, data analysis methods, sampling), characteristics of the sample (inclusion and exclusion criteria, brief description of the sample), types and nature of violence (context of violence, perpetrator and brief description of impacts of violence). We extracted main findings, participant quotations where possible, and study limitations, if reported. Data extraction was conducted by one author (MEL), and checked for accuracy by a second author (SRM), with discrepancies resolved by discussion to reach consensus.

Quality assessment

All included studies were assessed for quality using an adapted version of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme [CASP] scale. The adapted scale included the following questions [30]:

  1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research?

  2. Is a qualitative methodology appropriate?

  3. Are the setting(s) and context described adequately?

  4. Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research?

  5. Is the sampling strategy described, and is this appropriate?

  6. Is the data collection strategy described and justified?

  7. Is the data analysis described, and is this appropriate?

  8. Are the claims made/findings supported by sufficient evidence?

  9. Is there evidence of reflexivity?

  10. Does the study demonstrate sensitivity to ethical concerns?

Two authors (SRM, MEL) assessed the quality of the studies, assigning a 1 for each affirmative response and 0 for each negative response, for a final score out of 10. Disagreement was resolved by discussion between the two authors. Quality assessment was not used to determine if any studies should be excluded, but rather to assess the strength of each study.

Synthesis

An Excel spreadsheet to compile all relevant findings and quotations from the studies for thematic analysis was developed. Two of the authors (SRM and MEL) coded the main findings extracted from each study. We used line-by-line coding on a sub-set of articles, developing a set of over-arching themes and sub-themes for a draft codebook. The coding proceeded as an iterative process, with the two authors each separately coding the main findings using the draft codebook, discussing coding results, and refining the codebook based on overlap and redundancies identified. After all data were coded, we tallied all occurrences of each code and further explored areas of overlap and merged sub-themes with low numbers of codes, finalizing the broad themes and focused sub-themes. For non-English articles included, the external reviewer translated primary quotations into English and thematic analysis on these articles was conducted alongside the English language articles.

Reporting

The synthesis and all aspects of the systematic review process are reported following the 21-item checklist provided in the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research statement [31] and the PRISMA checklist [S2 and S3 Files].

Results

Studies identified and characteristics

Our searches of 11 databases yielded 9318 articles, with an additional 468 articles identified through cross- referencing and expert recommendation. After removing duplicates, 7834 articles remained. We identified 417 articles that were potentially eligible and included in full text screening. Two of these articles had not yet been published. Additionally, 1 Farsi language study was unable to be translated and assessed against the selection criteria. Fifty-two articles met criteria for inclusion in this systematic review (Fig 1). The 52 included articles represent data from 31 studies.

Overview of study characteristics

Study setting (Table 1)

Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.
First author Publication year Study location–country (region) Research question(s) Sample (number, age range) Data collection method and analysis method Type(s) of violence and perpetrator(s)
Agoff 2006 Mexico (AMRO) To identify personal, cultural, and institutional factors that hinder resolution of domestic violence, to identify factors that facilitate the violence. 26; Age range: 26–72 Open-ended face-to-face interview; analysis guided by grounded theory, focusing on two aspects: subjective perceptions of violence and barriers to overcoming violence IPV–any type
Male partner
Ayres 2001 United States (AMRO) How do you define the concept of abuse within the context of ageing women who are at risk for or experiencing physical or emotional injury inflicted by elderly family members for whom they provide care? 11 Transcripts of first session of a community-based intervention; concept analysis Elder abuse–Verbal, physical, emotional abuse
50 and older for caregiver; 55 and older for elderly family member Elderly family member receiving care (spouses or parents)
Band-Winterstein 2009 Israel (EURO) How is intimate violence shaped and how does it change throughout the lives of older battered women? How is continuous IPV experienced in old age and how age and violence interact and change throughout the life span 40 couples; Age range: 60–84 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; content analysis IPV–Physical, emotional, economic, psychological
Male partner
Band-Winterstein 2010 Israel (EURO) What are the unique experiences of old battered women from the dimensions of intentionality of the body in time and space? 25; Age range: 60–84 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; content analysis IPV–physical, emotional
Male partners
Band-Winterstein 2010 Israel (EURO) What are various perceptions of the attempts to forgive others and the self throughout this lifelong process, as described by older women who have lived with intimate partner violence? What are the lived experiences of forgiveness of older abused women throughout a life of IPV? 21; Age range: 60–80 Face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interviews; content analysis IPV–physical, emotional
Male partners
Band- Winterstein 2012 Israel (EURO) Explore the constructions of aging in intimate partner violence as narratives of couplehood or narratives of old age; explore how couples, who are living in lifelong IPV, constructed aging in IPV. N = 30 (15 couples, n = 15 women) Face-to-face in-depth interviews; dyadic analysis approach focused on identifying overlap and contrast in the couple data; analyzed transcripts as whole life story, then performed separate categorical-content analysis consistent with the narrative approach. IPV–physical, sexual
Male partner Age range: 62–84
Band-Winterstein 2014 Israel (EURO) How do parents experience their aging process in the context of being abused by their adult children with mental disorder? How do they describe the influence of the aging process on the relationship dynamics? How does living in such shared reality impacts their aging needs? 16 parents (11 mothers); Age range: 58–94 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; content analysis in phenomenological method Family violence—physical, emotional abuse, financial, neglect
Adult children with mental disorders
Band- Winterstein 2015 Israel (EURO) What is the lived experience of elderly women with lifelong IPV? 31 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; phenomenological analysis IPV–physical, sexual, emotional, economic
Age range: 60–84 Male partner
Band- Winterstein 2015 Israel (EURO) What are the subjective experiences of family members involved in violent, abusive, and neglecting relationships? 11 dyads (parent and child); Age range of parents: 65–90 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; thematic analysis–identifying the basic components of the experience and placing them into units of meaning according to the study aim, coding and conceptualizing into unique theoretical categories, and organizing main themes and describing the reciprocal relations between them Family violence/ elder abuse–physical violence, verbal aggression, financial exploitation, and forms of neglect.
What is an abusive relationship? What does it mean to suffer? What are the perceptions of those who are being abused? What are the elements that make life in abuse possible? How do actors involved in the drama of abuse give coherence of their life? Child
Band-Winterstein 2019 Israel (EURO) To differentiate between the lived experience of two groups of women caregiving for a partner with dementia; One group was coping with lifelong IPV and dementia-related violence (Group 1); the other group was coping with dementia-related violence only (Group 2). 16; Age range: 63–84 In-depth, semi-structured face-to-face phenomenological interviews; Interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) IPV–physical, sexual, verbal
Male partner
Barbosa 2015 Brazil (AMRO) To understand the impact of sexual violence suffered by women with mental disorders based on self-reports of these experiences. 17; Age range: 18–68 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; structured narration analysis IPV–sexual, physical
Bhatia 2019 India (SEARO) To unearth the causes of partner violence in later life, to understand the patterns of partner violence in later life and to understand psychological and social consequences faced by women undergoing partner violence in later life. 38; Age range: 50 and above Face-to-face in-depth interviews (4) and focus group discussions (2); Analysis methods not described IPV and family violence–physical, emotional, financial
Husband, male partner, other relatives
Buchbinder 2003 Israel (EURO) Describe and analyze the experiences and perceptions of older battered women in coping with and surviving the violence. 20; Age range: 60–80 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; content analysis in phenomenological method IPV–physical, psychological, and sexual
Male partner
Chane 2015 Ethiopia (AFRO) What is the lived experience of abused elders and how can we increase understanding of elder abuse? 15 (9 women); Age range: 64–93 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; interpretative phenomenological analysis informed by hermeneutic phenomenology Family violence/ elder abuse–financial, physical, psychological
Family members, community members
Chane 2015 Ethiopia (AFRO) What are the types and nature of abuse and neglect from the perspective of elders in Ethiopia who experienced abuse in noninstitutional settings? 15 total, 9 women; 64–85 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; coding following interpretative phenomenological analysis approach Family violence/ elder abuse–financial, physical, psychological
Family members, community members
Cheung 2015 Hong Kong (WPRO) How does IPV victimization manifest itself among older women? 2; 63 and 69 Not described; not described IPV–Verbal, physical, controlling behaviours, financial, emotional
Male partners
Cronin 2013 USA (AMRO) How do women make meaning with their experiences with domestic violence; The focus of this study is women’s lives after violence, and the ways in which they have coped with the challenges of living and aging. 15; Age range: 60–89 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; narrative life history approach to coding IPV–Physical controlling behaviours, verbal, emotional, financial control
Male partners
de Menezes 2013 Brazil (AMRO) To analyze the aggressive behavior in the relationship between elderly with symptoms of dementia and their family caregivers. 4 couples–each pair aggressor and caregiver; Age range of caregivers: 68–77 Semi-structured interviews; thematic content analysis IPV and family violence–physical, threats, psychological
Elderly receiving care
Eisikovits 2015 Israel (EURO) What are the ways in which young and old battered women perceive, understand and experience suffering from violence, how do they build these experiences into the central theme of their life and how do they reconstruct them in a manner that makes their lives livable? 17; Age range: 60–84 Semi-structured in-depth interviews; content analysis IPV–physical, psychological
Male partners, husbands
Fakari 2013 Iran (EMRO) Describe daily life experience (of violence against older women) just in the same way they occurred in reality. 13; mean age 62 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; “holistic methods of analysis” IPV and elder abuse–physical and psychological, financial exploitation
Not stated
Grunfeld 1996 Canada (AMRO) How does violence impact the lives of elderly women? 4; Age range: 63–73 Face-to-face open-ended in-depth interviews; thematic analysis IPV and family violence–physical, emotional, financial, controlling behaviours
Husbands, children and grandchildren
Guruge 2010 Canada (AMRO) What are older immigrant women’s experiences and responses to abuse and neglect? 43; Age range: 48–85 In-depth interviews and focus group discussions IPV and family violence–emotional, physical, sexual, financial abuse, neglect, controlling behaviours
Husbands, children, children-in-law
Hightower 2006 Canada (AMRO) What is the experience of violence and abuse of women aged 50 and older? 64; Age range: 50–87 Interviews and group sessions; not described IPV and family violence–financial, sexual, physical, emotional/ psychological, controlling behaviours
Male partners and other family members
Lazenbatt 2013 UK (EURO) How do older women with an abusive partner for more than 30 years cope with domestic violence and how does it affect their wellbeing? 18; Age range: 53–72 Face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interviews; thematic analysis IPV–physical, psychological, controlling behaviours
Male partner
Lazenbatt 2014 UK (EURO) How ‘older women’ cope with domestic violence and how it affects their wellbeing, using a theoretical framework of ‘salutogenesis’ to consider coping resources used in lifelong abuse 18; Age range: 53–72 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; thematic framework analysis based on ‘salutogenesis’ theoretical dimensions were used to explore their ‘wellbeing and coping’ IPV–physical, psychological/ emotional abuse, sexual abuse, financial exploitation
Male partner
Lichtenstein 2009 United States (AMRO) To identify barriers to reporting domestic violence to law enforcement among older African American women in the rural south. How does age, ethnicity, and gender intersect with rurality and systems such as old boys’ networks in creating barriers to reporting domestic violence to law enforcement? 15; Age range: 50–84 Focus group discussions (2); constant comparison method IPV–physical, verbal
Husband
Lowenstein 1999 Israel (EURO) To describe possible reasons for the phenomenon of elder spousal abuse in second marriages, and to identify possible risk factors for abuse based on reports by remarried elderly who were victims of spousal abuse 12 couples, of which 9 of the women were victims of spousal abuse; 60+ Face-to-face in-depth interviews; coding–not described further IPV–physical, controlling/ psychological
Partners
McGarry 2010 United Kingdom (EURO) What are women’s experiences of domestic abuse and what is its effect on their health and lives? 16; Age range: 59–84 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; iterative approach and informed by the analytic hierarchy model IPV–physical, emotional, sexual, Male partner
McGarry 2014 United Kingdom (EURO) What are the service responses to abuse among older people across a range of sectors? What are the perspectives of older people either as survivors of abuse or as older people with an interest in service development? 3; Age range: 60–65 Semi-structured phone interviews; Analytic Hierarchy Mode and constant comparative method Elder abuse, family violence and IPV
Any
Montminy 2005 Canada (AMRO) How is psychological violence against older women experienced in the marital context? 15; Age range: 60–81 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; manifest content analysis IPV–psychological
Male partner
Nahmiash 2004 Canada (AMRO) What is the interacting relationship between the environmental context of care giving and abuse and neglect of older adults. 16 participants (14 victims, 2 abusers); 12 of the 14 victims were female; Age range: 61–78 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; content analysis Elder abuse–sexual, physical
Care-givers and/ or partners
Pillemer 2011 USA (AMRO) What are the major forms of resident to resident aggression that occur in nursing homes? 53 units in 3 facilities, 122 events identified; no age range specified Identified all resident-to-resident aggression events in several nursing homes over 2 week period through resident interview, certified nursing assistant interview, and interviewer observation; sorted events into categories Elder abuse
Other residents or nursing homes
Ramsey-Klawsnik 2003 USA (AMRO) What are the patterns of elder sexual abuse, both marital and incestuous? What are the abuse dynamics, problems confronting victims, and perpetrator characteristics? 130 cases (consultation files); not specified Review of consultation files from Protective Services Program of the Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs; analysis method not described beyond “qualitatively analysed” IPV and elder abuse–sexual
Partner, caregiver, family members
Richards 2013 Uganda (AFRO) How women’s and men’s gendered experiences from childhood to old age have shaped their vulnerability in relation to HIV both in terms of their individual risk of HIV and their access to and experiences of HIV services Total 31; 16 women. Age range: 60 and over Face-to-face in-depth interviews and FGDs; framework approach to coding IPV–physical, sexual and psychological
Male partners
Roberto 2013 USA (AMRO) What are the issues facing rural older women who wish to lead safe and violence-free lives and to identify the com-munity support needed to help them successfully rebuild their lives. 10; Age range: 54–70 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; not described IPV–emotional, physical and sexual
Male partners
Roberto 2018 USA (AMRO) How women experienced IPV over the course of their lives and in different contexts; what resources were helpful when older women exited abusive partnerships 10; Age range: 54–70 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; open coding and focused coding IPV–Emotional, physical, financial exploitation
Male partners
Ron 1999 Israel (EURO) What are the main factors, particularly social factors such as the need for intimacy and sexuality, which cause tension among elderly remarried couples and lead to abuse by the spouses? 12 couples, of which 9 of the women were victims of spousal abuse; 60+ Face-to-face in-depth interviews; coding–not described further IPV–verbal, emotional, physical, financial exploitation, caregiver neglect
Partner
Rosen 2019 United States (AMRO) To analyze legal records to describe in detail acute precipitants of physical elder abuse. 87 cases; Age range: 60–95 Analyzed narratives from police reports of acute physical elder abuse; cross-case analysis of narratives in police reports to identify codes, coded narratives IPV and family violence–physical
Child, spouse/ companion, grand child
Ruelas-Gonzalez 2014 Mexico (AMRO) To analyze health care providers and older patients’ perceptions about elder abuse by health personnel of public health services. 6 older women; Age range: 65–87 Semi-structured interviews; analysis using grounded theory approach, content analysis. Elder abuse–neglect, psychological violence, discrimination
Health care professionals and caregivers
Schaffer 2008 Australia (WPRO) What are the needs of older and isolated women who live with domestic violence? 90; Age range: 50–78 Phone-in–asked women to call in and tell their stories to a nation-wide call in service; some “personal” and “group” interviews; analysis method not described IPV–type(s) not specified
Male partner
Sawin 2011 USA (AMRO) What are the experiences of older women diagnosed with breast cancer while experiencing intimate partner abuse? 11; Age range: 51–84 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; coding following hermeneutic phenomenological strategy of inquiry IPV–financial control, psychological control
Male partner
Smith 2015 USA (AMRO) How older women/mothers understand and respond to their adult children who are abusive and/or “difficult”; How older low-income women make sense of their adult children’s problems. 15; Age Range: 62 and older Face-to-face in-depth interviews; coding (type not specified) Family violence–disrespect, physical and psychological
Adult child
Souto 2015 Brazil (AMRO) What are older Brazilian women’s experiences of psychological domestic violence? How do older Brazilian women experience their daily life when they are victims of psychological domestic violence? How do older Brazilian women respond to psychological domestic violence? What are older Brazilian women’s needs, expectations, and aims in dealing with the psychological domestic violence in their lives? 11; Age range: 66–85 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; Schutz’s motivation theory used as framework for thematic coding Family violence and IPV–psychological violence, including verbal abuse, financial abuse, neglect
Male partner, family members
Souto 2019 Canada (AMRO) How is IPV experienced by Portuguese-speaking older immigrant women? How is women’s daily life related to IPV? How does this group respond to IPV situations? What are these women’s needs, expectations, and aims in dealing with IPV? 10; Age range: 60–81 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; Schutz’s motivation theory used as framework for thematic coding IPV–physical, sexual, emotional, economic abuse, controlling behaviours
Male partner
Spencer 2019 Canada (AMRO) How family carers of persons with cognitive impairment respond to fear, intimidation, and violence, over time and across different settings 10; Age range: 23–83, median age 64 (only results attributed to women aged 50 and above included in review analysis) Participants kept weekly diary of interactions with person for who they provided care, and follow-up interview following completion of diary; narrative analysis IPV and family violence–physical, verbal, emotional
Husband with dementia (7); mother (3)
Teaster 2006 USA (AMRO) What is the trajectory of, and community responses to, violence in late life? Aim is to further understanding of IPV in rural communities by examining responses to violence from the perspective of aging women, as well as those entities intervening in their cases (e.g., APS caseworkers, women’s shelters, law enforcement). 10: Age range: 50–69 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; open coding and then applied coding scheme developed IPV–controlling behaviours, physical, verbal, emotional
Male partners
Tetterton 2011 USA (AMRO) What are effective interventions for women above the age of 60 who have experienced IPV? What are the experiences of older women who experienced IPV? 1; Age range: 63–65 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; generated case studies from data and used phenomenological approach to conduct thematic analysis IPV and family violence–physical, emotional
Male partner and adult son
Yan 2015 Hong Kong (WPRO) What are the factors associated with help-seeking behaviors among mistreated elders in Hong Kong? 40 total, 26 women; Age range: 60–81 Face-to-face in-depth interviews; grounded theory approach to coding IPV and family violence–physical, psychological, neglect, financial exploitation, sexual
Partner, family members
Zink 2003 USA (AMRO) What are older women’s reasons for remaining in abusive relationships? 36; Age range: 55–90 Interviews–some face-to-face, some on telephone; coded using thematic analysis techniques IPV–physical, emotional, sexual, financial abuse
Male partner
Zink 2004 USA (AMRO) What are the experiences and needs of older victims of IPV in the health care setting? 38; Age range: 55–90 Interviews–some face-to-face, some on telephone; coded using immersion crystallization technique IPV–physical, emotional, financial, sexual
Male partner
Zink 2006 USA (AMRO) What are: (a) the types of abuse perpetrated by older men against their spouses or dating partners and (b) the victim’s interpretation of these experiences and behaviors? 38; Age range: 54–90 Interviews–some face-to-face, some on telephone; coded using thematic analysis techniques IPV–physical, emotional, sexual, financial abuse
Male partner
Zink 2006 USA (AMRO) How older women cope in long-term abusive intimate relationships. 38; Age range: 55–90 Interviews–some face-to-face, some on telephone; adapted form of grounded theory IPV–physical, emotional, verbal
Husband, boyfriend, partner

Most studies were conducted in high-income countries (HIC), including the United States of America (n = 16), Israel (n = 12), Canada (n = 7), the United Kingdom (n = 4), Hong Kong (n = 2), and Australia (n = 1). Six articles were from upper-middle income countries–Brazil (n = 3), Mexico (n = 2) and Iran (n = 1); and three articles were from low-income countries–Uganda (n = 1) and Ethiopia (n = 2). One article came from India, a lower-middle income country.

Quality assessment

Application of the adapted version of CASP scale yielded variable results across the 52 articles assessed [see Table 2]. Ratings of research methodology, statement of research aims and selection of appropriate research design were overall high. The majority (46 articles) [29, 3276] gave support for research findings with references to primary data (participant quotations, case study vignettes, case file excerpts). Ten articles [41, 46, 49, 50, 59, 65, 7780] lacked data analysis descriptions.

Table 2.

Title/ author Clear statement of research aims? Appropriate qualitative methodology? Description of setting and context? Appropriate research design to address research aims? Recruitment and sampling strategy is described and appropriate? Data collection strategy described and justified? Data analysis described and appropriate? Findings supported by sufficient evidence? Evidence of reflexivity? Ethical issues taken into consideration? Total score
Agoff, C., Rajsbaum, A., & Herrera, C. (2006). Perspectivas de las mujeres maltratadas sobre la violencia de pareja en México. Salud pública de México, 48(S2), 307–314. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 10
Ayres, M. M., & Woodtli, A. (2001). Concept analysis: abuse of ageing caregivers by elderly care recipients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(3), 326–334. yes yes no no no no yes yes no no 4
Band-Winterstein, T., & Avieli, H. (2019). Women Coping With a Partner’s Dementia-Related Violence: A Qualitative Study. Journal of nursing scholarship. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9
Band-Winterstein, T., & Eisikovits, Z. (2009). “Aging out” of violence: The multiple faces of intimate violence over the life span. Qualitative Health Research, 19(2), 164–180. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes 8
Band-Winterstein, T., & Eisikovits, Z. (2010). Towards phenomenological theorizing about old women abuse. Ageing International, 35(3), 202–214. yes yes no yes no yes yes yes no yes 7
Band-Winterstein, T., Eisikovits, Z., & Koren, C. (2011). Between remembering and forgetting: The experience of forgiveness among older abused women. Qualitative Social Work, 10(4), 451–466. yes yes no yes no yes yes yes yes no 7
Band-Winterstein, T. (2012). Narratives of aging in intimate partner violence: The double lens of violence and old age. Journal of Aging studies, 26(4), 504–514. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes 8
Band-Winterstein, T., Smeloy, Y., & Avieli, H. (2014). Shared reality of the abusive and the vulnerable: The experience of aging for parents living with abusive adult children coping with mental disorder. International Psychogeriatrics, 26(11), 1917–1927. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9
Band-Winterstein, T. (2015). Aging in the shadow of violence: A phenomenological conceptual framework for understanding elderly women who experienced lifelong IPV. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 27(4–5), 303–327. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes 8
Band-Winterstein, T. (2015). Whose suffering is this? Narratives of adult children and parents in long-term abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 30(2), 123–133. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 10
Barbosa, J. A. G., Souza, M. C. M. R. D., & Freitas, M. I. D. F. (2015). Violência sexual: narrativas de mulheres com transtornos mentais no Brasil. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 37, 273–278. yes yes yes yes no yes yes no no yes 7
Bhatia, P., & Soletti, A. B. (2019). Hushed Voices: Views and Experiences of Older Women on Partner Abuse in Later Life. Ageing International, 44(1), 41–56. yes yes no yes no yes no yes no yes 6
Buchbinder, E., & Winterstein, T. (2003). “Like a wounded bird”: Older battered women’s life experiences with intimate violence. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 15(2), 23–44. yes yes no yes no yes yes yes no no 6
Chane, S., & Adamek, M. E. (2015). Factors contributing to elder abuse in Ethiopia. The Journal of Adult Protection, 17(2), 99–110. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no no 8
Chane, S., & Adamek, M. E. (2015). “Death Is Better Than Misery” Elders’ Accounts of Abuse and Neglect in Ethiopia. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 82(1), 54–78. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no no 8
Cheung, D. S. T., Tiwari, A., & Wang, A. X. M. (2015). Intimate partner violence in late life: a case study of older Chinese women. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 27(4–5), 428–437. yes yes no no no no no no no yes 3
Cronin, V. L. (2013). Silence Is Golden: Older Women’s Voices and The Analysis of Meaning Among Survivor’s of Domestic Violence. Syracuse University, Dissertation. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9
do Rosário de Menezes, M., Bastos Alves, M., dos Santos Souza, A., Almeida da Silva, V., Nunes da Silva, E., & Souza Oliveira, C. M. (2013). Aggressive Behavior in the relationship between old and the family caregiver in dementias. Ciencia, Cuidado e Saude, 12(4). yes yes no yes yes yes no yes no yes 7
Eisikovits, Z., & Band-Winterstein, T. (2015). Dimensions of suffering among old and young battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 30(1), 49–62. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes 8
Fakari, F. R., Hashemi, M. A., & Fakari, F. R. (2013). A Qualitative research: Postmenopausal women’s experiences of abuse. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 57–60. R: 1050 yes yes no no no no no no no no 2
Grunfeld, A. F., Larsson, D. M., MacKay, K., & Hotch, D. (1996). Domestic violence against elderly women. Canadian Family Physician, 42, 1485. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes 9
Guruge, S., Kanthasamy, P., Kokarasa, J., Wan, T.Y.W., Chinichian, M.Shirpak, K. R. (2010). Older women speak about abuse & neglect in the post-migration context. Women’s Health and Urban Life, 9(2), 15–41. yes yes yes yes no yes yes yes no yes 8
Hightower, J., Smith, M. J., & Hightower, H. C. (2006). Hearing the voices of abused older women. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 46(3–4), 205–227. no yes no no yes no no yes no yes 4
Lazenbatt, A., & Devaney, J. (2014). Older women living with domestic violence: coping resources and mental health and wellbeing. Current nursing journal, 1(1), 10–22. yes yes no yes yes yes no yes no yes 7
Lazenbatt, A., Devaney, J., & Gildea, A. (2013). Older women living and coping with domestic violence. Community practitioner, 86(2), 28–33. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9
Lichtenstein, B., & Johnson, I. M. (2009). Older African American women and barriers to reporting domestic violence to law enforcement in the rural deep south. Women & Criminal Justice, 19(4), 286–305. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes 9
Lowenstein, A., & Ron, P. (1999). Tension and conflict factors in second marriages as causes of abuse between elderly spouses. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 11(1), 23–45. yes yes no yes no yes yes yes no no 6
McGarry, J., Simpson, C. (2010). How domestic abuse affects the wellbeing of older women. Nursing Older People, 22(5), 33–38. yes yes no yes yes no yes yes no yes 7
McGarry, J., Simpson, C., & Hinsliff-Smith, K. (2014). An exploration of service responses to domestic abuse among older people: findings from one region of the UK. The Journal of Adult Protection, 16(4), 202–212. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes 9
Montminy, L. (2005). Older women’s experiences of psychological violence in their marital relationships. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 46(2), 3–22. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no no 7
Nahmiash, D. (2004) Powerlessness and Abuse and Neglect of Older Adults, Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 14:1, 21–47. yes yes no yes yes no yes yes no no 6
Pillemer, K., Chen, E. K., Van Haitsma, K. S., Teresi, J., Ramirez, M., Silver, S., … & Lachs, M. S. (2011). Resident-to-resident aggression in nursing homes: Results from a qualitative event reconstruction study. The Gerontologist, 52(1), 24–33. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 10
Ramsey-Klawsnik, H. (2004). Elder sexual abuse within the family. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 15(1), 43–58. no yes no no no no no yes no no 2
Richards, E., Zalwango, F., Seeley, J., Scholten, F., & Theobald, S. (2013). Neglected older women and men: Exploring age and gender as structural drivers of HIV among people aged over 60 in Uganda. African journal of AIDS research, 12(2), 71–78. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes 9
Roberto, K. A., Brossoie, N., McPherson, M. C., Pulsifer, M. B., & Brown, P. N. (2013). Violence against rural older women: Promoting community awareness and action. Australasian journal on ageing, 32(1), 2–7. yes yes yes yes yes yes no no no no 6
Roberto, K. A., & McCann, B. R. (2018). Violence and abuse in rural older women’s lives: a life course perspective. Journal of interpersonal violence. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes 8
Ron, P., & Lowenstein, A. (1999). Loneliness and Unmet Needs of Intimacy and Sexuality—Their Effect on the Phenomenon of Spousal Abuse in Second Marriages of the Widowed Elderly. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 31(3–4), 69–89. yes yes no yes no yes yes yes no no 6
Rosen, T., Bloemen, E. M., LoFaso, V. M., Clark, S., Flomenbaum, N. E., Breckman, R., … Pillemer, K. (2019). Acute precipitants of physical elder abuse: qualitative analysis of legal records from highly adjudicated cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(12), 2599–2623. yes yes no yes no yes yes yes no yes 7
Ruelas-González, M. G., Pelcastre-Villafuerte, B. E., & Reyes-Morales, H. (2014). Maltrato institucional hacia el adulto mayor: percepciones del prestador de servicios de salud y de los ancianos. salud pública de méxico, 56(6), 631–637. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no no no 7
Sawin, E. M., & Parker, B. (2011). “If looks would kill then I would be dead”: intimate partner abuse and breast cancer in older women. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 37(7), 26–35. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes 8
Schaffer, J. (1999). Older and isolated women and domestic violence project. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 11(1), 59–77. yes yes no no yes yes no yes no no 5
Smith, J.R. (2015) Expanding Constructions of Elder Abuse and Neglect: Older Mothers’ Subjective Experiences, Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 27:4–5, 328–355. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes 8
Souto, R. Q., Merighi, M. A. B., Guruge, S., & de Jesus, M. C. P. (2015). Older Brazilian women’s experience of psychological domestic violence: a social phenomenological study. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14(1), 44. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes 9
Souto, R. Q., Guruge, S., Merighi, M. A. B., & de Jesus, M. C. P. (2016). Intimate partner violence among older Portuguese immigrant women in Canada. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(5), 961–979 yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes 9
Spencer, D., Funk, L. M., Herron, R. V., Gerbrandt, E., & Dansereau, L. (2019). Fear, defensive strategies and caring for cognitively impaired family members. Journal of gerontological social work, 62(1), 67–85. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes 8
Teaster, P. B., Roberto, K. A., & Dugar, T. A. (2006). Intimate partner violence of rural aging women. Family Relations, 55(5), 636–648. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no yes 8
Tetterton, S., & Farnsworth, E. (2011). Older women and intimate partner violence: Effective interventions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(14), 2929–2942. yes yes no yes no no no no yes yes 5
Yan, E. (2015). Elder abuse and help-seeking behavior in elderly Chinese. Journal of Interpersonal violence, 30(15), 2683–2708. yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes no yes 9
Zink, T., Regan, S., Jacobson Jr, C. J., & Pabst, S. (2003). Cohort, period, and aging effects: A qualitative study of older women’s reasons for remaining in abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 9(12), 1429–1441. R: 347 yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes no no 7
Zink, T., Jacobson, C. J., Regan, S., Fisher, B., & Pabst, S. (2006). Older women’s descriptions and understandings of their abusers. Violence Against Women, 12(9), 851–865. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9
Zink, T., Jeffrey Jacobson Jr, C., Regan, S., & Pabst, S. (2004). Hidden victims: The healthcare needs and experiences of older women in abusive relationships. Journal of Women’s Health, 13(8), 898–908. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes yes 9
Zink, T., Jacobson Jr, C. J., Pabst, S., Regan, S., & Fisher, B. S. (2006). A lifetime of intimate partner violence: Coping strategies of older women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(5), 634–651. yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes yes no 8

Only 12 articles [29, 35, 3840, 45, 51, 58, 7274, 79] reflected on the relationship between the researchers and the participants (reflexivity). Procedures for ethical research were described in 36 articles [27, 29, 3337, 3941, 4552, 54, 55, 58, 60, 61, 63, 64, 6672, 74, 76, 77, 79]. Five articles [43, 44, 56, 73, 75] described obtaining consent, but lacked descriptions of ethical approval, and 10 articles [32, 38, 42, 53, 57, 59, 62, 65, 78, 80] lacked descriptions of both ethical approval and obtaining consent. A significant number of articles [32, 3442, 4547, 4951, 53, 54, 56, 57, 59, 6166, 69, 70, 7275, 7779] lacked adequate descriptions of the study setting and context.

Descriptions and patterns of types of violence

Older women described IPV, family violence and elder abuse of various types, perpetrated by a range of perpetrators [Table 1]. Among the specific types of violence reported in the articles in this review, across IPV, elder abuse and family violence, physical violence was most frequently reported [27, 3254, 57, 6063, 66, 6980], followed by emotional/ psychological [28, 32, 3639, 4151, 53, 54, 56, 6062, 6680], economic/ financial [3436, 39, 41, 4345, 4850, 61, 62, 64, 68, 71, 72, 7478], sexual [27, 33, 34, 40, 42, 49, 50, 54, 57, 59, 60, 67, 72, 7476, 80], verbal [32, 40, 45, 52, 62, 6870, 73, 77], controlling behaviors [45, 48, 49, 51, 53, 64, 67, 70, 76, 77], and lastly, neglect [28, 35, 39, 61, 62, 68, 71, 76].

Older women’s experience of IPV was the most frequent form of violence reported (42 articles) [27, 29, 33, 34, 3638, 4042, 4556, 5965, 6780]. Older women described on-going instances of neglect, verbal abuse and financial exploitation in a study conducted in India [41], in other cases, physical violence characterized earlier and on-going experiences of violence within intimate partner relationships [37, 40, 47, 54]. IPV in particular was described by older women as occurring throughout different stages in the relationship, spanning their youth and into older age. Older women often experienced an escalation of IPV and controlling behaviors despite the age and/ or illness of their partner [36, 40, 46, 61, 69, 77]. Changing relationship dynamics due to ageing–including a husband’s retirement, children leaving the home, women wanting to engage in activities outside of the home, or diagnosis of a chronic or terminal illness–triggered escalating IPV [36, 40, 46, 47, 56, 69]. Shifts in types of violence, from predominantly physical violence to predominant psychological abuse and neglect, were commonly described in studies that encompassed previous and on-going IPV [34, 51]. Studies focused on IPV commonly described both previous and on-going violence, and a smaller number described only or primarily violence experienced while aged 50 or above [64, 69].

Violence occurring within the family was discussed in 15 articles [35, 39, 43, 44, 46, 48, 49, 55, 63, 66, 68, 69, 71, 76, 79], with perpetrators including family members not including children [27, 43, 44, 48, 49, 59, 63, 68, 69, 71] and adult children [35, 39, 48, 66, 76, 79]. Studies captured instances of physical and verbal aggression by mentally ill adult children against older women [66], violence enacted by elderly with dementia against older women who were caregivers [46], and forms of neglect, financial exploitation and emotional abuse enacted by family members, including children [44]. The majority of these studies focused on violence experienced in older age, while one study explored dynamics of abuse between children and mothers across the lifespan [35, 39].

10 articles reported on experiences of elder abuse [28, 32, 35, 43, 44, 55, 5759, 78] with perpetrators including community members [43, 44], caregivers [57, 59], nursing home residents [58] and health care providers [28]. Types of elder abuse included verbal abuse, physical assault and inappropriate sexual advances [58] and sexual assault [59].

Financial control spanned instances of elder abuse, family violence and IPV [43, 53, 62, 64, 76, 78], and was described as co-occurring with and resulting in other forms of violence. Financial exploitation could result in emotional and/ or physical violence if older women resisted control [62, 64]. An older woman explained that in the context of her relationship with her husband, “If I did not follow his control [over money], he would be verbally abusive” [64].

Themes and sub-themes identified through coding are displayed in Table 3.

Table 3. Themes, sub-themes and quotations.

Theme Sub-theme Illustrative quotation[s] Supporting references
Intersection of ageing and violence
Suffering, loneliness, regret and guilt “I lost my whole, beautiful life. I have a lot of anger in my heart…Today, I am real angry about all the years, the good, beautiful years I could have had. I am angry, because I was a good, loyal wife… With the wisdom I have today, I would have gone out with anyone but him. Sixty wasted years” [37] [33, 34, 37, 38, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47, 5052, 54, 56, 62, 66, 75, 78, 79]
"There was violence along with suffering for many years; it was a suffering, but I had a goal behind all this suffering, to have my children grow, get married and get an education…. I don’t know if the suffering was worthwhile for me, I don’t know if it was worthwhile as it was very difficult. Today I look and say that I was a heroine, I was a heroine myself, with all the things I went through during the 40 years." [42]
“When I was bringing up the children, I thought of nothing else… I just wanted to bring them up. Actually, my forgiveness was for the sake of the home and the children, without any consideration for myself; I did not value myself at all. I was the doormat of the entire household… When there was anger and quarrelling, none of the children came to ask about it… They never said anything. When he raised his hands, they did not go and ask him why he was hitting their mother. Nothing. As if they didn’t care. I am real angry. They got used to the fact that mom gets everything done. I had big expectations of life, I gave a lot, and today I am really alone. The worst pain is from the children. Perhaps if I were stronger, I could have changed things around. But I gave up a lot. I gave in." [38]
Violence, ageing and vulnerabilities "When I was younger, I could overcome him faster, save myself, now that I’m old and I have diabetes, now I have to be faster, and I got triglycerides in my blood. Now I’m afraid for my life, afraid he [son with schizophrenia] will kill me." [39] [33, 37, 39, 40, 43, 44, 47, 48, 52, 53, 5557, 59, 61, 62, 64, 66, 76]
"Because of my nerves, my blood pressure was 200/100. My sugar was skyrocketing, my cholesterol also. Since we’ve been living apart, everything has cooled down. When we lived together, my whole body was sick. I was hurting. I was worried that I had cancer. I couldn’t believe what he had done to me. I was going to the doctor for checkups and tests all the time. I was sick with fear. My nerves made me sick. The doctor knew I had problems at home. He would say ‘Ilana, you are nervous.’ He gave me some pills, but nothing helped. I did not sleep. Nerves make a person sick. They make a woman sick. A sick woman without sickness." [37]
“I reached the point where… I didn’t care if I went and got my medicine. I would have to argue with him that I needed $12 just to go to the clinic to get my pills.” [61]
Perpetrator-related factors
Ageing perpetrators and continuity of abuse “Although Mrs. V. had not been hit in many years, she was submissive to her husband and distraught about the continuing marital rape. Among the tactics used by Mr. V. to control his wife were prohibiting her from driving, working outside of the home, or managing money.” [59] [36, 41, 45, 4751, 56, 59, 61, 72, 76, 77]
"Fifty years went by. I lost my whole life. He made me into an imbecile…. When I needed to buy something for the children or for myself, I had to ask him for money and he made me bring him the receipts. I have no friends, no family here; he wouldn’t let the children come into the house… Because of the paralysis (CVA) I walk sort of crooked. He walks behind me, imitating me and calling me names like ‘the limping,’ ‘the paralyzed’. Instead of feeling sorry about what happened to me, he laughs. ‘Old whore’ he called me … A month into my marriage, he beat me. I was pregnant. My mother was standing there and said to me: ‘Be patient with him. Treat him well, take care of him and everything will be OK.” [47]
Perpetrator’s illness as a cause of violence “We couldn’t get into the house one day; the key wouldn’t go in for some reason. He went berserk, kicking the door and I said, “Brian calm down, we’ll go to the other door.” He just kept kicking; he was just in this rage. So I backed off and went around and opened the door and came. It turned out there was damage done; he almost kicked the door in and [doctor] said in hindsight that I could have called the police then. I could have reported that because I was scared." [69] [40, 46, 69]
"Look, I don’t know what’s going on with my husband, he’s never been like that, never hit me before. I’m really worried about him, he’s been changing so much […] We have been married for 47 years. After he assaults me, he behaves as if he had done nothing, he seems another person.” [46]
"He used to work, [he was] a construction worker, and then suddenly he became agitated one day, and threw me against the wall. I cracked my head open; they stitched me up in the hospital and sent me right back home. Sometimes, he grabs me—by the stomach, by the throat, starts running, pushes me aside, and runs from room to room. I can’t rest, can’t watch TV, it bothers him…. He had become someone else, not the person I knew, so we went to the doctor.” [40]
Social and gender norms regarding response to violence
Silence, stigma and family "I had a goal that my children would reach something good, and thank God, there was no other way, there was no other way… what I have suffered for so many years and I didn’t know. I knew how to get out for the kids’ sake, but not for myself. The kids get married, and go on with their lives, and I am left, left with all I have gone through. It is so difficult to speak about it, the same pain and with the same person, and today I look on my plight and I cannot leave him. …" [42] [3335, 38, 4042, 46, 48, 57, 6569, 71, 7376, 79, 80]
“If I complained about him, he said that when I called the police, before the police arrive, I’d be dead. I did not know that there is help for intimate partner violence cases. I did not know because I had no friends; I did not talk to anyone! My life was from home to work and from work to home. He beat me sometimes.” [81]
Perceptions of abuse and violence as normal "I mean I suppose you could say I have been abused, I’ve never been badly beaten, but I have been hit and with all the temper and that sort of thing, but then there was never anywhere to go and I’m really not aware that there’s anywhere specifically for older people and I’m not aware that they even do anything.” [55] [27, 29, 32, 41, 55, 70, 71, 74, 75]
“Most of the time, they [physicians] think you are just getting a little carried away, you are a little high-strung, you are very nervous, you have al- ways been this way, so calm down…So I didn’t go to the doctor when he beat me so badly. It’s a little embarrassing at my age." [74]
Lifelong IPV
Continuation of patterns of IPV in old age "He started beating me on the second day of our marriage, he’s been hitting me all these years." [71] [33, 40, 49, 59, 7072, 77]
Earlier experiences of violence "He started beating me on the second day of our marriage, he’s been hitting me all these years." [71] [48, 49, 57, 61, 70, 71, 80]
Cumulative impacts of violence "The worst thing is that so many years of abuse caused me many health problems, especially with my nerves, and depression. This was due to mistreatment. No one can have happiness or live well dealing with so much trouble. I also have other health problems, but the worst for me are those related to my nerves, depression, and lack of sleep. I have back problems; high cholesterol, ulcers, anemia and I have a liver problem… a lot of problems! It never ends. Even after getting divorce, we still suffer the consequences." [81] [34, 37, 41, 47, 50, 51, 54, 67, 68]
“I have a problem with my stomach. I did five tests and nothing was found! It is the anger I swallow. I have this pain in my stomach because the anger I feel of him.” [68]
“Bruises heal in time but words last forever. When you are told over and over how stupid, ugly, and insane you are, you really believe it. I am not financially or physically capable of going anywhere." [51]
Needs of older women affected by violence
Social and community support “If my friends knew the truth about who I was living with, then they would become really angry with me. I was losing contact with my friends because they were saying, “How could you let him treat you like this, particularly when you are in such dire need of support?” It was easier for me to just be quiet, but it’s very difficult to go through such an abusive situation without having friends to talk with, though I did lose some friends.” [64] [41, 45, 52, 64, 65, 68, 7578]
"I never invite any of my friends or relatives to come home, because of the fear that he will insult them. None comes to visit me, because I have stopped calling them” (Participant in IDI)" [41]
“I have talked to them [my neighbours]. I have asked them to help me. The neighbours know everything, but they keep quiet! They do not want to get involved. No one comes here. No one! Only you came here today [crying]” [68]
Barriers to accessing services “My internist really could not deal much with this [IPV]. I mean he saw my husband as a patient also. He [spouse] was a brittle diabetic, and then he had a heart condition… he was a sick old man.” [74] [28, 29, 52, 54, 55, 57, 74, 76]
"My family doctor is a good friend…didn’t involve him because I didn’t get…really hurt. I mean, I was choked, but I didn’t get my eyes beat up or…but no I wouldn’t have gone to him." [74]
Coping mechanisms
Leaving a relationship “I didn’t like the way my daughter-in-law treated me. So I asked my son to find me another place to stay. Another son of mine was here, so he found a place for both of us to stay.” [76] [33, 34, 37, 38, 42, 4548, 57, 65, 69, 70, 73, 76]
Isolation, substance use and emotion-based coping strategies ‘I coped by going into my own private world; I took Valium … I saw myself as a failure and felt sorry for myself. [50] [33, 34, 3739, 47, 50, 51, 61, 68, 69, 73, 79]
"Why would I need this kind of life? How can a man do things like that? Why did I agree to that? What do I have inside me today? It is all empty; an empty shell. What am I left with? Nothing. All together, my entire life was for nothing, a big loss…I destroyed it all. I gave up on myself, became non-existent. I think I am a lost case. I am the loser in all this. What is left? I am all eaten up. I have no emotional strength left. I don’t feel like doing anything." [47]
Behaviors to enhance safety "The two years were coming up for the restraining order, I start getting these nightmares he’s going to be at my door wanting to move in. I was living here, and he was living in [place] about a mile from home. So I go back to court and apply for renewal of the restraining order, and I am told there is no such thing as a renewal, you just apply again." [70] [36, 67, 69, 70, 75]

Intersection of ageing and violence

A number of sub-themes emerged emphasizing the interconnections between the experience of ageing amongst older women, and dynamics, impacts, experiences and perceptions of violence.

Suffering, loneliness, regret and guilt

Older women emphasized suffering, loneliness, regret and guilt in their accounts of living and coping with violence, particularly psychological violence [34, 37, 38, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47, 5052, 54, 56, 62, 66, 75, 78, 79]. Within the context of IPV, women described experiences of loneliness in terms of detachment from family members, including abusive partners and adult children, who often criticized older women’s responses to violence [33, 34, 37, 38, 40, 42, 56]. Respondents linked regret with time and age, emphasizing previous decisions, lost opportunities, and wasting time due to living with an abusive partner [33, 34, 37, 45]. One respondent said, “I was an idiot woman. No woman lives like that, cooking and serving him after the beating… I say that I was an idiot” [42]. Older women expressed feelings of guilt over the abuse they experienced, and regret and guilt for exposing their children to violence [38, 45, 50, 52, 54, 66, 79]. Several studies linked suffering, regret and loneliness specifically to psychological violence, which was described as more prominent in older age, pervasive and damaging to social relationships and self-esteem [51, 56]. The studies that explored these themes primarily encompassed accounts of violence experienced throughout intimate relationships–while women were younger and through to older age. These experiences were described and conceptualized by older women as interlinked and continuity of victimization by intimate partners was emphasized, rather than viewing women’s experiences of violence in older age as distinct or separate.

Violence, ageing and vulnerabilities

Older women described that ageing diminished their physical and emotional capabilities to cope with experiences of violence [33, 37, 39, 47]. This sub-theme appeared in 12 manuscripts [33, 37, 39, 40, 43, 47, 48, 53, 55, 59, 62, 76] and was expressed in relation to various forms of violence–IPV [33, 37, 47], including violence perpetrated by a spouse due to dementia [40], violence in the context of a new relationship or second marriage [48, 53, 55, 59, 62], violence perpetrated by a mentally ill child [39], violence perpetrated by children-in-law [76], and elder abuse [43]. These studies primarily focused on current experiences of violence of older women, as changes in physical and emotional capacity to cope was described in relation to present victimization. As a result of diminishing physical and cognitive capacities of ageing, old women experienced vulnerabilities and dependency dynamics–with partners, adult children and caregivers–that exposed them to situations of abuse [44, 47, 52, 56, 57, 61, 64, 66]. A mother of an adult son with schizophrenia explained, “When I was younger, I could overcome him faster, save myself, now that I’m old and I have diabetes, now I have to be faster… Now I’m afraid for my life, afraid he will kill me” [39]. Women reported that lack of financial autonomy, often compounded by years of controlling behaviors perpetrated by a violent spouse, was a central factor in women remaining in abusive spousal, caregiving and family relationships [44, 47, 52, 56, 64].

Perpetrator-related factors

Some included studies reported on perpetrator-related factors that initiated or exacerbated forms of violence against older women.

Ageing perpetrators and continuity of abuse

Older women emphasized contexts surrounding IPV in which the perpetrator continues to exercise control, power, and violence, despite their failing health and old age [41, 4749, 51, 56, 59, 72, 76, 77]. Women also described shifting forms of violence, predominantly from physical and/ or sexual to psychological violence and controlling behaviours [36, 45, 50, 51, 61, 72]. While sometimes the experience of physical and/ or sexual violence declined, psychological violence persisted and sometimes escalated [50, 51, 72]. While describing the impacts of continual and intense psychological violence, one woman said, “he destroys you; you are not even a person anymore” [72]. Controlling behaviours were also experienced in the context of cultural norms; for example, in a study of Sri Lankan immigrant women in Canada, older women described forms of control enacted by children and children-in-law. One older women reported, “[h]e [the son-in-law] thinks that I am a widow and why should I have anything on my own name and why can’t I give everything to them and just be a slave to them” [76].

Perpetrator’s illness as a cause of violence

This sub-theme only emerged in three manuscripts [40, 46, 69], however, it is the only instance among the included studies in which older women described first or new experiences of IPV in older age. Older women who provided care for spouses with dementia reported aggressive behavior, physical violence, and verbal abuse [40, 69]. In one study, a woman reported, “I don’t know what’s going on with my husband, he’s never been like that, never hit me before. I’m really worried about him, he’s been changing so much […] We have been married for 47 years…he seems another person [46].” Another study found that women who had experienced lifelong IPV understood dementia-related violence as a continuation of aggression, dominance and abuse, whereas women who had only been exposed to dementia-related violence took solace in a diagnosis, felt grief over the loss of their spouse as he used to be, and tried to maintain intimacy and affection in a previously caring and loving relationship [40].

Social and gender norms regarding response to violence

Older women described the ways in which social and gender norms shaped their experiences of and responses to violence.

Silence, stigma and family

Descriptions of social and gender norms that encouraged women to stay in abusive marriages and prioritize children’s needs above their own were common across studies [3335, 38, 4042, 46, 48, 57, 6569, 71, 7376, 79, 80]. Older women described several social norms that shaped their past decisions in response to violence including: silence surrounding violence and the reporting of violence [41, 80], fears of shame and stigma related to leaving a marriage [65, 69, 73], and ideals of being a good mother by putting up with violence for the sake of her children [38, 42, 74]. One woman explained, “There was violence along with suffering for many years;…but I had a goal behind all this suffering, to have my children grow, get married and get an education…. I don’t know if the suffering was worthwhile for me, I don’t know if it was worthwhile as it was very difficult” [42]. Remaining in a relationship as a strategy was often employed due to older women feeling obligated to care for an abusive partner who was now sick or unable to live alone [33]. One respondent explained, “If I leave him, it’s not good. My conscience won’t allow it. At his age, 76, it’s not nice to leave and neglect him. I don’t have feelings for him (because of the violence). I respect him because he’s old and because he’s my husband, I have to care for him” [33]. These studies primarily focused on previous and current experiences of violence; social norms predominant when women were younger shaped prior and current responses, while one study of Sri Lankan immigrant older women focused on social norms governing current decisions relating to women’s responses to abuse from children and children-in-law [76].

In several cases, remaining in the relationship was a coping mechanism of last resort, given the multiple barriers present to women leaving the relationship, whether with an intimate partner, other family member or caregiver [48]. Women also described strong beliefs in social norms that supported staying with a sick or frail abusive partner or abusive child [33, 35, 40, 46, 57, 66, 76]. Many women viewed seeking help and confiding in others as embarrassing and unacceptable; one woman explained, "I was ashamed. I just didn’t want to admit that’s the situation I was in" [80].

Perceptions of abuse and violence as normal

In some of the included manuscripts, older women perceived violence as normal, sometimes explaining that they preferred not to term their experiences as abuse or violence [32, 41, 55, 70, 71, 74, 75]. Older women infrequently perceived verbal and emotional abuse as violence [32], and some women did not identify as a victim of violence [55, 71]. One woman described her process of realizing that her experiences were forms of abuse, “Well, I really didn’t recognize it as abuse. And as soon as I got that message, I felt that I got on a very clear track….Now, I know what I’m dealing with and I can do something about it” [74]. Moreover, service providers and the legal system, often failed to recognize financial exploitation or verbal abuse as abuse [41, 74], or that older women could be affected by IPV [75]. In rural Kentucky, USA, older women explained that the longer they were in the relationship with their abuser, the more the violence became more normalized and accepted [70]. Studies also emphasized how ageist attitudes normalizes forms of coercive control, enabling abusers to take advantage of older women’s age, frailty, and illness, for example, appropriating part or all of the victims’ property [43, 44, 57].

Lifelong IPV

Many older women described experiences of IPV throughout their life-course. Several sub-themes were identified related to lifelong patterns of violence, cumulative consequences of IPV, and linkages of violence in older age to earlier experiences of violence.

Continuation of patterns of IPV in old age

Older women described experiences of IPV in older age as a continuation of the patterns of violence experienced throughout the relationship [33, 40, 49, 59, 7072, 77]. Several articles described years to decades long relationships characterized by IPV [40, 70, 71, 77]. For example, older women living in rural Kentucky, USA explained that the longer they were in the relationship with their abuser, the more the violence became more normalized and accepted [70].

Earlier experiences of violence

Associations between older women’s earlier experiences with violence, including witnessing of violence as a child, and current experiences of IPV, were discussed in several articles [48, 49, 61, 70, 71, 80]. For example, in a study by Roberto and colleagues, many women who had experienced physical abuse as a child or young woman interpreted controlling behaviors as love, and did not recognize emotional abuse later in life until the abuse became physical or affected their health [61]. Linkages were also uncovered between experiences of abuse as a child or young woman with current abuse by their adult children [57, 71].

Cumulative impacts of violence

Older women described several consequences of experiences of lifelong IPV. In one study, older women related the impacts of lifelong violence to that of a chronic illness, which alters or limits one’s quality of life [47]. Older women frequently linked experiences of violence with physical health consequences, including bodily pain, reduced mobility, and hearing problems, [37, 47, 54, 67], as well as mental health and emotional impacts, including depression [41, 50, 51, 54, 67], anxiety [54, 67], panic attacks [54], suicidal ideation [41], loneliness [34, 51], and loss of self-esteem [34, 50, 51, 54].

Needs of older women affected by violence

Older women who reported exposure to violence described various needs in terms of social support, access to services, and issues accessing these services due to their age.

Social and community support

Older women commonly described isolation from family and friends, and a lack of social and community support as a result of violent and controlling behaviors from an intimate partner [41, 45, 52, 64, 65, 7578]. One older woman stated: “I cannot remember, not one time, not having the hell beat out of me. Black and blue, I wasn’t even allowed outside. I couldn’t open my mouth, I couldn’t talk, I couldn’t have friends. I had neighbors, and they didn’t know me …He threatened to kill me if I ever told anyone what was going on” [70]. Additionally, factors that were reported to impede access to social and community support included being an immigrant with limited language skills [67, 68, 76], and living in rural areas with strong norms against reporting IPV [52].

Barriers to accessing services

Several articles identified specific barriers for older women to access services and for health care utilization, including lack of awareness of services [52, 54, 55, 57, 74, 76]. Older women reported several concerns when interacting with health care providers, including health care providers’ assumptions that older women could not be experiencing violence due to their age, minimization of forms of abuse common to older women, and lack of confidentiality when using the same provider as their spouse [74]. One respondent explained, "And when you go to the doctor…they run down the list…and then it’s always, you know, “Well, is it abuse?” “Well, yes emotional.” “Well, what kind of emotional?” “Verbal.” “Oh, OK.” And they mark it, and that’s it” [74].

Coping mechanisms

Older women reported various approaches to coping with the experience and impacts of different forms of violence, often employing several different coping mechanisms such as leaving relationship with an abuser and emotion-based coping strategies such as alcohol or drug usage, in order to navigate difficult decisions, maintain their health and well-being, and protect other family members in the context of exposure to violence.

Leaving a relationship

In 11 of the included manuscripts older women described remaining in an abusive relationship, family context or caregiver relationship, as a form of coping [33, 34, 38, 42, 45, 46, 48, 57, 65, 70, 73], and in six manuscripts, leaving a relationship was employed as a coping mechanism [42, 45, 61, 69, 76, 77]. In one study, older women explained that they had previously not been able to leave a relationship with an intimate partner for the sake of their children, whereas once their children had left the house, they felt freer to reject violent behavior [42]. Older women’s own health problems were described as a trigger for choosing to leave an abusive relationship [61].

Isolation, substance use and emotion-based coping strategies

Older women described isolating themselves from family, friends and social support, using alcohol or drugs to cope with experiences of violence, and reframing experiences of violence, often through minimizing experiences [33, 34, 3739, 47, 50, 51, 61, 68, 69, 73, 79]. Older women explained that if they were to seek support, family or friends would blame them for their experiences of violence, leading women to choose social isolation as a coping strategy [50, 69]. Older women also described using drugs and alcohol as a means to numb themselves to their daily experiences of violence [50]. One woman explained, “He (my husband) got his medical partner to prescribe Valium for me in the 1970’s and I am still taking it, especially when I feel hopeless and in despair. I know that I am addicted to it and worry that at 68 years I will never be able to survive without them.” [50]. Older women also reported employing forgiveness of violent and controlling intimate partners as a coping mechanism [34, 38]. Older women who remained in a relationship with their abuser often described employing emotional detachment as another coping strategy [33, 37, 47, 69]. Lastly, older women described how they reframed their experiences of abuse, by excusing abusive spouses for their actions or employing strategies to deliberately diminish the severity of abuse, such as forgetting experiences of abuse [34, 38, 61, 68, 73]. While emotional detachment was described as causing isolation and loneliness, older women also perceived it as a form of “inner resistance” [37], a vital means of opposing intimacy and connection with an abusive partner, and as particularly vital in the case of IPV, where the safety of a woman’s home is threatened by violence [47].

Behaviors to enhance safety

Older women described taking actions in order to enhance their own safety in the face of violence [36, 67, 69, 70, 75]. In some instances, older women first called police or applied for formal legal support, such as a protection order, in the face of violence. In one study, a woman explained, “I called the police because he [my partner] pushed me down on the countertop and poured a cup of tea over me. It was as though he wanted to strangle me. They took him into custody for 24 hours” [36]. In several instances, legal authorities, including police, provided limited support, leaving women unable to find long-term solutions to the violence they experienced [70].

Discussion

This systematic review was motivated by a need to improve understanding of similarities and differences in dynamics, patterns and experiences of violence against older women, in a context whereby the vast majority of research, evidence, policy and service provision is targeted towards women of reproductive age. We reviewed available qualitative studies on violence against older women in order to address existing gaps in evidence and data. We also sought to provide insight into the lived experiences of older women experiencing violence, and an understanding of the types and patterns of violence, perpetrators of violence, and health impacts of violence among older women. The included studies primarily address IPV, with fewer emerging from the older adult mistreatment framework. Most research examined specific types of violence in isolation, for example, IPV or abuse from an adult child, and there were no examples of studies that included polyvictimization or experiences of any type of violence against older women. The strong emphasis on older women’s experiences of IPV gives voice to the experiences of older women subjected to violence and shows how it can persist over time; however, some sites, perpetrators and types of violence against older women may be excluded from view, including that of violence enacted by other family members and non-family caregivers and of women living in institutional care.

The findings in our review confirm results from prior reviews, systematic and otherwise, of similar bodies of literature. For example, Pathak et al.’s review of IPV against older women noted a decline in physical violence against older women, whereas other forms of violence remained stable or increased, a finding that was reflected in our data [23]. Some of the studies included in the present review also confirm partners’ retirement and children leaving home as precipitating factors for increase of IPV against older women, indicating points for potential intervention and support for older women. In a review of qualitative literature on IPV against older women, Finfgeld-Connett noted that older women actively choose coping strategies that enable them to “make the best of their situations” [20], a conclusion that is also supported by some of the results of our review. In other cases, staying in a relationship with an abuser appears to be driven by gender norms and feelings of duty towards a partner. In addition [34, 38], coping strategies such as use of alcohol and other harmful substances appeared to result in poor health and lack of well-being [34, 3739, 47, 50, 51, 61, 68, 69, 73, 79]. Recurring themes emphasizing the pervasive impact of violence against older women on physical and mental health, relationships, social networks, hope and sense of well-being, in our systematic review and other previous reviews, indicate the importance of taking violence against older women, in all its manifestations, seriously as a public health and human rights issue. As was identified in previous reviews, there is relatively little evidence concerning the emergence of violence in later life, particularly in the case of IPV. In the case of the majority of studies included in our review, older women described shifting but continuous patterns of violence throughout the life-course, although a small sample of studies identified new relationships and dementia of an intimate partner as factors precipitating the violence [40, 46, 48, 53, 55, 59, 62, 69].

Comparing the IPV-specific evidence generated in this review to the existing evidence-base on IPV against women of reproductive age, some notable continuities and differences are evident. Firstly, our findings confirm the extensive impact of IPV exposure on physical and mental health, which has been widely researched amongst women of reproductive age [2, 8285]. However, our data indicate that IPV amongst older women is commonly experienced in the context of exposure to lifelong IPV, and that the physical and mental health impacts are cumulative, compounded by ageing processes, and often exacerbated by changes in social situation also triggered by ageing. Ability to employ physical or cognitive coping mechanisms that had been effective earlier in life may diminish for older women [33, 37, 39, 47]. In addition, alongside depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder, which are the most commonly measured and reported mental health impacts of IPV amongst women of reproductive age [8688], older women discussed hopelessness and regret as pervasive and important psychosocial impacts of IPV in older age. There may be some similarities between younger women’s experiences of shame and stigma [8993] and older women’s feelings of regret, however, regret and hopelessness may be specifically central to older women’s experiences of violence, particularly IPV. Secondly, our results confirm that exposure to IPV is often linked to experiences of violence in childhood; older women in studies included in this review indicated that growing up in families where violence was commonly witnessed and experienced was interlinked with exposure to IPV in adulthood and through to older age, a finding that is evident in data on women of reproductive-age [9496]. Thirdly, there appear to be common challenges for women of reproductive age and older women in leaving an abusive relationship, including perceptions of the importance of remaining in a relationship for the sake of children, indicating the commonality of the importance of social and gender norms in driving decision-making [97101]. Implications garnered from research with women of reproductive age experiencing IPV are relevant here; similarly, it should not be assumed that older women want to or can leave an abusive situation, and services provided should recognize and be sensitive to this. Finally, our findings highlight specific issues for consideration in the case of violence against older women, including changes in type and prevalence of controlling behaviours [36, 45, 50, 51, 61, 72, 77] and forms of financial control that occur alongside IPV [43, 53, 62, 64, 78]. These behaviours have the potential to significantly restrict options and limit ability for older women experiencing violence, even more than in younger women. Currently however, these may be under-recognized as specific risk factors for older women.

Global research on violence against women has increasingly explored the significant influence of social and gender norms on prevalence of and risk factors for violence against women of reproductive age [102105]. Our findings indicate that social and gender norms also continue to strong influence older women’s responses to and experiences of violence. Older women described social and gender norms as shaping their decisions to stay in relationships, to provide care for an abusive spouse, and often as reinforcing shame and social isolation. There is substantial overlap between norms identified in this review with the existing evidence-base on social and gender norms on women of reproductive age, for example, the norm of keeping violence victimization private and overall injunctions concerning silence surrounding IPV. Some evidence indicates positive impacts of violence prevention interventions focused on changing social and gender norms [106]. However, these programs have not been specifically tested for feasibility and acceptability with older adults, and careful consideration of how and if addressing social and gender norms amongst older adults could result in reduced violence perpetration is needed.

Our review identified significant gaps in the evidence-base concerning older women’s experiences of violence in low and middle-income countries (42 articles in HIC vs. 10 articles LMIC). Within studies conducted in high-income countries, with a few exceptions [52, 61, 70, 76, 80], the focus of the included studies was on older women from Western cultural backgrounds. The sparse coverage of several regions globally, and low and middle-income populations overall, indicates that our findings cannot be generalized to older women globally, and that there are likely important influences on and impacts of violence against older women that are currently missing from view. While we can assume that older women in low and middle-income contexts also experience violence, the existing evidence base, for both qualitative and quantitative data, fails to adequately shed light on patterns and prevalence [16, 17]. In addition, as found in our quality assessment, included articles contained very little detail on the contexts in which the research was conducted [32, 3442, 4547, 4951, 53, 54, 56, 57, 59, 6166, 69, 70, 7275, 7779], which makes it difficult to link the evidence from this review to specific contextual factors. Further exploration of context-specific issues such as living conditions and associated norms, for example, norms governing that older widows live with children and children’s families is needed. In addition, exploration of perceptions of capabilities and appropriate social roles for older women in different socio-cultural contexts is warranted. Perceptions and experiences of ageing processes, and specific issues such as widowhood, differ significantly in different cultural contexts, and existing qualitative and quantitative data do not include these diverse factors or account for their relationship with violence against older women.

Our findings indicate that older women affected by violence need social and community support to help them cope and address the anxiety and stress associated with threats to their safety. Older women affected by violence may be particularly isolated, with social isolation concomitant with ageing compounded by social isolation due to violence victimization. Some of the studies indicated that older women do not understand or define their experiences as abuse or violence, but do seek support regardless. As such, there may be potential for services and interventions designed to address social isolation and targeted for all older women to address violence against older women. Various interventions that have been found to be effective in reducing social isolation and improving social outcomes for older persons, such as group support through discussion groups, individual support through home visiting, and psychosocial education programs, could be effective in improving social support for older women affected by violence [107]. Currently, services for older persons are overall extremely limited in low and middle-income contexts, and dynamics of social and community support for older persons vary considerably in non-Western cultural contexts. The current qualitative evidence-base does not indicate if older women affected by violence in low and middle-income contexts would benefit from similar interventions or if integrating response to and support for violence against older women into aged-care services are a feasible way to reach older women affected by violence.

In the limited number of included studies that addressed older women’s experiences with and expectations of health-care providers, concerns were raised including lack of confidentiality and health care providers not taking women’s abuse seriously [74]. Health care providers are in a unique position to provide support and response for women who have been affected by violence. The World Health Organization’s Clinical and Policy Guidelines and Clinical handbook provide guidance for health care providers in providing woman-centred care, compassionate first-line psychosocial support, and linkages to multi-sectoral services [108]. In the case of older women, women may come in contact with primary, secondary or tertiary health care services for reasons related to chronic disease and ageing-related injuries, for example, or as care-givers for spouses or children. There is a need to explore how and where violence prevention and response for older women in the health system could be feasible and acceptable. For example, gerontologists and other specialists providing elder-care specific services could be provided tools and skills to identify and support women who may be subjected to violence. In addition, as identified in this and other reviews of violence against older women, there are factors that may act as precipitating factors for increase or initiation of violence, including changes in caregiving dynamics or retirement of a spouse, and these could be points of potential intervention and additional support for older women, especially if there is a history of past violence.

Limitations and strengths

Several strengths and limitations should be considered while interpreting the findings of this systematic review. In contrast to previous systematic reviews, we included all qualitative evidence concerning violence against older women, regardless of type of violence and perpetrator, allowing insights into the overall focus of the evidence-base, which revealed limited engagement with elder abuse against women and family violence perpetrated by non-partners, for example, children. Additionally, we followed a rigorous protocol, adhering to a preregistration protocol in line with ENTREQ guidelines [31]. We carried out an extensive systematic review across 11 databases, supplemented by hand searched references lists and article recommendations from 49 experts on violence against women or older adults, and therefore it is unlikely that published articles would have been overlooked in this review. We reviewed all articles in any language, apart from Farsi.

In order to minimize selection bias or for relevant articles to be missed, two authors screened all titles and abstracts and all articles at the full text review stage. At the data extraction phase, only MEL extracted relevant data, introducing the possibility of transcription errors. Despite this limitation, all extracted data was double checked by SRM to minimize potential of missing descriptive data, and both completed independent quality appraisals to minimize potential for biased assessments. Additionally, during the analysis phase, both authors coded article main findings and key quotes, and developed descriptive and analytical themes to strengthen the interpretation and synthesis of findings.

Another limitation of the findings of this review is the concentration of studies in higher-income contexts, which greatly limits the transferability of findings to low- and middle-income populations. In addition, the small number of studies conducted in low and middle-income countries entailed that comparison of patterns between high-income and low and middle-income contexts was not possible. This review was also limited by the quality of included articles. Many articles did not clearly report on study setting and context, sampling procedures, data analysis, reflexivity, and research ethics. Moreover, many articles included samples of older women across wide age ranges (e.g. 65–85 years old). The available evidence does not disaggregate findings to enable understanding of whether or how women in different age groups experience violence differently, despite significant variation in living conditions, employment and health status of women aged 50–64 vs. 65 and up, for example. This lack of specificity limited our ability to understand the differential causes, experiences and impacts of violence among specific age groups of older women.

Implications for future research

In light of the findings from this review, as noted above, there is an urgent need to address the scarcity of research on violence against older women in low and middle-income contexts, and to expand research in high-income contexts to diverse populations and age groups who may have different risk profiles for violence in older age.

Our results indicate that the focus of the existing qualitative evidence-base is primarily on IPV in older age. It is unclear whether this research focus reflects the actual burden of IPV compared to other forms of violence against older women, and if the evidence-base currently adequately includes accounts of types of violence and perpetrators that are most significant for older women. As noted, assessment of polyvicimization in the evidence-base is lacking. As such, further studies of violence against older women that are inclusive of any type of violence, by any perpetrator, or take an open-ended approach to older women’s accounts of violence, are needed. In the quantitative evidence-base, systematic reviews have focused on elder abuse and on IPV. A review of quantitative evidence on IPV identified 19 studies [15] and the review of elder abuse against women included 50 studies; as such, the quantitative evidence-base appears to capture more in terms of forms of violence against older women.

Our findings indicate that for older women who had experienced violence throughout the life-course, aspects of ageing, such as frailty, injuries, chronic disease, and cognitive decline, make coping with different forms of violence more difficult than earlier in life. Qualitative and quantitative research does not currently shed light on associations between types of violence, chronicity of violence, and physical and mental health outcomes for older women, and additional research in this area is warranted. Other themes that emerged in our review call for further research. Regret and hopelessness were commonly described as significant issues for older women; these factors appear to significantly influence well-being, psychosocial health and physical and mental health. However, these outcomes are rarely measured, and these may further impact other specific mental health and psychosocial issues for older women subjected to violence. Further research could explore if and how regret and hopelessness amongst older women differs from shame and stigma as currently measured and reported amongst women of reproductive age, and further elucidate its impacts on psychosocial well-being. In addition, economic and financial abuse appeared to be correlated and interlinked with older women’s experiences of violence, and barriers to leaving abusive relationships; terminology and definitions of these forms of abuse are varied and often unclear, and measures often cover several constructs [109]. While there is some growing consistency in how economic and financial aspects of abuse are conceptualized and measured, there is more work needed on how to assess economic or financial abuse, and understand its linkages with physical and mental health outcomes.

Conclusion

The current qualitative data available on violence against older women has important limitations, including that it is predominantly derived from high-income countries, often does not address context, is focused on IPV to the exclusion of other types of violence and perpetrators, and does not disaggregate by age group. However, our findings highlight some important issues. IPV persists into older age, and shares characteristics and impacts as in younger age groups. In some cases, there may be factors, such as a partner’s retirement or illness such as dementia, which can precipitate or increase violence. As shown in quantitative reviews, physical violence tends to decrease with age while psychological abuse and controlling behaviours increase, and financial and economic abuse are important elements of older women’s experiences of violence and control. Older women described being strongly influenced by social norms that dictate a sense of duty to stay in a relationship with an abusive partner, a desire to protect children, and shame and silence surrounding experiences of violence. More research is needed, particularly from LMICs to fill in the many gaps in the evidence-base. However, it is clear that action to support older women in abusive relationships is needed. Services for older people need to be aware of the prevalence and forms of violence against older women and know when to identify and respond in a sensitive and non-judgmental way, to improve prevention of and response to violence against older women.

Supporting information

S1 File. PubMed search strategy.

(DOCX)

S2 File. ENTREQ checklist.

(DOCX)

S3 File. PRISMA checklist.

(DOC)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study is funded by the Department for International Development, UNWomen-World Health Organization Joint Programme on Strengthening Methodologies and Measurement and building national capacities for Violence against Women data. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.WHO. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization,; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet (London, England). 2008;371(9619):1165–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Valladares E, Ellsberg M, Pena R, Hogberg U, Persson LA. Physical partner abuse during pregnancy: a risk factor for low birth weight in Nicaragua. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2002;100(4):700–5. 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02093-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Devries K, Watts C, Yoshihama M, Kiss L, Schraiber LB, Deyessa N, et al. Violence against women is strongly associated with suicide attempts: evidence from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women. Social science & medicine (1982). 2011;73(1):79–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pallitto CC, Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HA, Heise L, Ellsberg M, Watts C. Intimate partner violence, abortion, and unintended pregnancy: results from the WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2013;120(1):3–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M, Heise L, Watts CH. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1260–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brownell P. Neglect, abuse and violence against older women: Definitions and research frameworks (Review article). South Eastern European Journal of Public Health 2014;1. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Beaulaurier RLS, L. R.; Newman F. L.; Dunlop B. External barriers to help seeking for older women who experience intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence. 2007;22(8):747–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Souto RQ, Guruge S, Merighi MA, de Jesus MC. Intimate Partner Violence Among Older Portuguese Immigrant Women in Canada. J Interpers Violence. 2016. 10.1177/0886260516646101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Crockett C, Brandl B, Dabby FC. Survivors in the Margins: The Invisibility of Violence Against Older Women. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2015;27(4–5):291–302. 10.1080/08946566.2015.1090361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tetterton S, Farnsworth E. Older women and intimate partner violence: effective interventions. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2011;26(14):2929–42. 10.1177/0886260510390962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stockl H, Watts C, Penhale B. Intimate partner violence against older women in Germany: prevalence and associated factors. J Interpers Violence. 2012;27(13):2545–64. 10.1177/0886260512436390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Neglect, Abuse and Violence against Older Women. New York: United Nations; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brownell P. A reflection on gender issues in elder abuse research: Brazil and Portugal. Ciencia & saude coletiva. 2016;21(11):3323–30. 10.1590/1413-812320152111.23142016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Warmling D, Lindner SR, Coelho EBS. Intimate partner violence prevalence in the elderly and associated factors: systematic review. Ciencia & saude coletiva. 2017;22(9):3111–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yon Y, Mikton C, Gassoumis ZD, Wilber KH. The Prevalence of Self-Reported Elder Abuse Among Older Women in Community Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2019;20(2):245–59. 10.1177/1524838017697308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yon Y, Ramiro-Gonzalez M, Mikton CR, Huber M, Sethi D. The prevalence of elder abuse in institutional settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of public health. 2018. 10.1093/eurpub/cky093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cook JM, Dinnen S, O’Donnell C. Older women survivors of physical and sexual violence: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. Journal of women’s health (2002). 2011;20(7):1075–81. 10.1089/jwh.2010.2279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Roberto KA, McPherson MC, Brossoie N. Intimate partner violence in late life: a review of the empirical literature. Violence Against Women. 2013;19(12):1538–58. 10.1177/1077801213517564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Finfgeld-Connett D. Intimate partner abuse among older women: qualitative systematic review. Clinical nursing research. 2014;23(6):664–83. 10.1177/1054773813500301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McGarry JA, Parveen; Hinchliff, Sharron. Older women, intimate partner violence and mental health: a consideration of the particular issues for health and healthcare practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2017;26(15/16):2177–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bows H. Sexual Violence Against Older People: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Trauma, violence & abuse. 2017:1524838016683455. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 23.Pathak N, Dhairyawan R, Tariq S. The experience of intimate partner violence among older women: A narrative review. Maturitas. 2019;121:63–75. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.12.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Perel-Levin S. Discussing screening for elder abuse at primary health care level2008 4 August 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43523/9789241594530_eng.pdf.
  • 25.WHO. Violence against women Intimate partner and sexual violence against women. Geneva: WHO; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meyer SR, Lasater ME, Garcia-Moreno C. Violence against older women: a protocol for a systematic review of qualitative literature. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e028809 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barbosa JAG, Souza MCMRd, Freitas MIdF. Violência sexual: narrativas de mulheres com transtornos mentais no Brasil. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública. 2015;37:273–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ruelas-González MG, Pelcastre-Villafuerte BE, Reyes-Morales H. Maltrato institucional hacia el adulto mayor: percepciones del prestador de servicios de salud y de los ancianos. salud pública de méxico. 2014;56(6):631–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Agoff C, Rajsbaum A, Herrera C. Perspectivas de las mujeres maltratadas sobre la violencia de pareja en México. Salud pública de México. 2006;48(S2):307–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC medical research methodology. 2008;8:45 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC medical research methodology. 2012;12:181 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ayres MM, Woodtli A. Concept analysis: abuse of ageing caregivers by elderly care recipients. Journal of advanced nursing. 2001;35(3):326–34. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01849.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Band-Winterstein T. Narratives of aging in intimate partner violence: The double lens of violence and old age. Journal of aging studies. 2012;26(4):504–14. 10.1016/j.jaging.2012.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Band-Winterstein T. Aging in the shadow of violence: a phenomenological conceptual framework for understanding elderly women who experienced lifelong IPV. Journal of elder abuse & neglect. 2015;27(4–5):303–27. 10.1080/08946566.2015.1091422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Band-Winterstein T. Whose suffering is this? Narratives of adult children and parents in long-term abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence. 2015;30(2):123–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Band-Winterstein T, Eisikovits Z. “Aging out” of violence: The multiple faces of intimate violence over the life span. Qualitative Health Research. 2009;19(2):164–80. 10.1177/1049732308329305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Band-Winterstein T, Eisikovits Z. Towards phenomenological theorizing about old women abuse. Ageing International. 2010;35(3):202–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Band-Winterstein T, Eisikovits Z, Koren C. Between remembering and forgetting: The experience of forgiveness among older abused women. Qualitative Social Work. 2011;10(4):451–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Band-Winterstein T, Smeloy Y, Avieli H. Shared reality of the abusive and the vulnerable: The experience of aging for parents living with abusive adult children coping with mental disorder. International psychogeriatrics. 2014;26(11):1917–27. 10.1017/S1041610214001495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Band-Winterstein T, Avieli H. Women Coping With a Partner’s Dementia-Related Violence: A Qualitative Study. Journal of nursing scholarship. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bhatia P, Soletti AB. Hushed Voices: Views and Experiences of Older Women on Partner Abuse in Later Life. Ageing International. 2019;44(1):41–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Buchbinder E, Winterstein T. “Like a wounded bird”: Older battered women’s life experiences with intimate violence. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 2003;15(2):23–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chane S, Adamek ME. Factors contributing to elder abuse in Ethiopia. The Journal of Adult Protection. 2015;17(2):99–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chane S, Adamek ME. “Death Is Better Than Misery” Elders’ Accounts of Abuse and Neglect in Ethiopia. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 2015;82(1):54–78. 10.1177/0091415015624226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cronin VL. Silence Is Golden: Older Women’s Voices and The Analysis Of Meaning Among Survivor’s Of Domestic Violence. Syracuse University, Dissertation. 2013.
  • 46.do Rosário de Menezes M, Bastos Alves M, dos Santos Souza A, Almeida da Silva V, Nunes da Silva E, Souza Oliveira CM. Aggressive Behavior in the relationship between old and the family caregiver in dementias. Ciencia, Cuidado e Saude. 2013;12(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Eisikovits Z, Band-Winterstein T. Dimensions of suffering among old and young battered women. Journal of Family Violence. 2015;30(1):49–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Grunfeld AF, Larsson DM, MacKay K, Hotch D. Domestic violence against elderly women. Canadian Family Physician. 1996;42:1485 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hightower J, Smith M, Hightower HC. Hearing the voices of abused older women. Journal of gerontological social work. 2006;46(3–4):205–27. 10.1300/J083v46n03_12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lazenbatt A, Devaney J. Older women living with domestic violence: coping resources and mental health and wellbeing. Current nursing journal. 2014;1(1):10–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lazenbatt A, Devaney J, Gildea A. Older women living and coping with domestic violence. Community practitioner. 2013;86(2):28–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lichtenstein B, Johnson IM. Older African American women and barriers to reporting domestic violence to law enforcement in the rural deep south. Women & Criminal Justice. 2009;19(4):286–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lowenstein A, Ron P. Tension and conflict factors in second marriages as causes of abuse between elderly spouses. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 1999;11(1):23–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.McGarry J, Simpson C. How domestic abuse affects the wellbeing of older women. Nursing older people. 2010;22(5). 10.7748/nop2010.06.22.5.33.c7795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.McGarry J, Simpson C, Hinsliff-Smith K. An exploration of service responses to domestic abuse among older people: findings from one region of the UK. The Journal of Adult Protection. 2014;16(4):202–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Montminy L. Older women’s experiences of psychological violence in their marital relationships. Journal of gerontological social work. 2005;46(2):3–22. 10.1300/J083v46n02_02 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nahmiash D. Powerlessness and abuse and neglect of older adults. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 2004;14(1):21–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pillemer K, Chen EK, Van Haitsma KS, Teresi J, Ramirez M, Silver S, et al. Resident-to-resident aggression in nursing homes: Results from a qualitative event reconstruction study. The Gerontologist. 2011;52(1):24–33. 10.1093/geront/gnr107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ramsey-Klawsnik H. Elder sexual abuse within the family. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 2004;15(1):43–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Richards E, Zalwango F, Seeley J, Scholten F, Theobald S. Neglected older women and men: Exploring age and gender as structural drivers of HIV among people aged over 60 in Uganda. African journal of AIDS research. 2013;12(2):71–8. 10.2989/16085906.2013.831361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Roberto KA, McCann BR. Violence and abuse in rural older women’s lives: a life course perspective. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ron P, Lowenstein A. Loneliness and Unmet Needs of Intimacy and Sexuality—Their Effect on the Phenomenon of Spousal Abuse in Second Marriages of the Widowed Elderly. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage. 1999;31(3–4):69–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Rosen T, Bloemen EM, LoFaso VM, Clark S, Flomenbaum NE, Breckman R, et al. Acute precipitants of physical elder abuse: qualitative analysis of legal records from highly adjudicated cases. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2019;34(12):2599–623. 10.1177/0886260516662305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Sawin EM, Parker B. “If looks would kill then I would be dead”: intimate partner abuse and breast cancer in older women. Journal of gerontological nursing. 2011;37(7):26–35. 10.3928/00989134-20110307-01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schaffer J. Older and isolated women and domestic violence project. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 1999;11(1):59–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Smith JR. Expanding constructions of elder abuse and neglect: older mothers’ subjective experiences. Journal of elder abuse & neglect. 2015;27(4–5):328–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Souto RQ, Guruge S, Merighi MAB, de Jesus MCP. Intimate partner violence among older Portuguese immigrant women in Canada. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2019;34(5):961–79. 10.1177/0886260516646101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Souto RQ, Merighi MAB, Guruge S, de Jesus MCP. Older Brazilian women’s experience of psychological domestic violence: a social phenomenological study. International journal for equity in health. 2015;14(1):44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Spencer D, Funk LM, Herron RV, Gerbrandt E, Dansereau L. Fear, defensive strategies and caring for cognitively impaired family members. Journal of gerontological social work. 2019;62(1):67–85. 10.1080/01634372.2018.1505796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Teaster PB, Roberto KA, Dugar TA. Intimate partner violence of rural aging women. Family relations. 2006;55(5):636–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yan E. Elder abuse and help-seeking behavior in elderly Chinese. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2015;30(15):2683–708. 10.1177/0886260514553628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zink T, Jacobson CJ, Regan S, Fisher B, Pabst S. Older women’s descriptions and understandings of their abusers. Violence against women. 2006;12(9):851–65. 10.1177/1077801206292680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zink T, Jacobson CJ Jr, Pabst S, Regan S, Fisher BS. A lifetime of intimate partner violence: Coping strategies of older women. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2006;21(5):634–51. 10.1177/0886260506286878 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zink T, Jeffrey Jacobson C Jr, Regan S, Pabst S. Hidden victims: The healthcare needs and experiences of older women in abusive relationships. Journal of Women’s Health. 2004;13(8):898–908. 10.1089/jwh.2004.13.898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zink T, Regan S, Jacobson CJ Jr, Pabst S. Cohort, period, and aging effects: A qualitative study of older women’s reasons for remaining in abusive relationships. Violence against women. 2003;9(12):1429–41. 21890424 [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Guruge S, Kanthasamy P., Kokarasa J., Wan T.Y.W., Chinichian M. Shirpak K. R. Older women speak about abuse & neglect in the post-migration context. Women’s Health and Urban Life. 2010;9(2):15–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cheung DST, Tiwari A, Wang AXM. Intimate partner violence in late life: a case study of older Chinese women. Journal of elder abuse & neglect. 2015;27(4–5):428–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Fakari FR, Hashemi MA, Fakari FR. A Qualitative research: Postmenopausal women’s experiences of abuse. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;82:57–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tetterton S, Farnsworth E. Older women and intimate partner violence: Effective interventions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2011;26(14):2929–42. 10.1177/0886260510390962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Roberto KA, Brossoie N, McPherson MC, Pulsifer MB, Brown PN. Violence against rural older women: Promoting community awareness and action. Australasian journal on ageing. 2013;32(1):2–7. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2012.00649.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Souto RQ, Guruge S, Merighi MA, de Jesus MC. Intimate Partner Violence Among Older Portuguese Immigrant Women in Canada. J Interpers Violence. 2019;34(5):961–79. 10.1177/0886260516646101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Coker AL, Williams CM, Follingstad DR, Jordan CE. Psychological, reproductive and maternal health, behavioral, and economic impact of intimate partner violence Violence against women and children, Vol 1: Mapping the terrain. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2011. p. 265–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bacchus LJ, Ranganathan M, Watts C, Devries K. Recent intimate partner violence against women and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e019995 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lagdon S, Armour C, Stringer M. Adult experience of mental health outcomes as a result of intimate partner violence victimisation: a systematic review. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014;5 10.3402/ejpt.v5.24794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet (London, England). 2002;359(9314):1331–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Stewart DE, Vigod SN. Mental Health Aspects of Intimate Partner Violence. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2017;40(2):321–34. 10.1016/j.psc.2017.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Devries KM, Mak JY, Bacchus LJ, Child JC, Falder G, Petzold M, et al. Intimate partner violence and incident depressive symptoms and suicide attempts: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001439 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA, Kaufman JS, Lo B, Zonderman AB. Intimate partner violence against adult women and its association with major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms and postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Social science & medicine (1982). 2012;75(6):959–75. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.McCleary-Sills J, Namy S, Nyoni J, Rweyemamu D, Salvatory A, Steven E. Stigma, shame and women’s limited agency in help-seeking for intimate partner violence. Glob Public Health. 2016;11(1–2):224–35. 10.1080/17441692.2015.1047391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.St Vil NM, Carter T, Johnson S. Betrayal Trauma and Barriers to Forming New Intimate Relationships Among Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence. J Interpers Violence. 2018:886260518779596 10.1177/0886260518779596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kennedy AC, Prock KA. "I Still Feel Like I Am Not Normal": A Review of the Role of Stigma and Stigmatization Among Female Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse, Sexual Assault, and Intimate Partner Violence. Trauma, violence & abuse. 2018;19(5):512–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Murray CE, Crowe A, Overstreet NM. Sources and Components of Stigma Experienced by Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence. J Interpers Violence. 2018;33(3):515–36. 10.1177/0886260515609565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Shuman SJ, Falb KL, Cardoso LF, Cole H, Kpebo D, Gupta J. Perceptions and Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157348 10.1371/journal.pone.0157348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.McMahon K, Hoertel N, Wall MM, Okuda M, Limosin F, Blanco C. Childhood maltreatment and risk of intimate partner violence: A national study. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;69:42–9. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.07.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Abajobir AA, Kisely S, Williams GM, Clavarino AM, Najman JM. Substantiated Childhood Maltreatment and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization in Young Adulthood: A Birth Cohort Study. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46(1):165–79. 10.1007/s10964-016-0558-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Richards TN, Tillyer MS, Wright EM. Intimate partner violence and the overlap of perpetration and victimization: Considering the influence of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse in childhood. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;67:240–8. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Jones A, Vetere A. ’You just deal with it. You have to when you’ve got a child’: A narrative analysis of mothers’ accounts of how they coped, both during an abusive relationship and after leaving. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;22(1):74–89. 10.1177/1359104515624131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Baholo M, Christofides N, Wright A, Sikweyiya Y, Shai NJ. Women’s experiences leaving abusive relationships: a shelter-based qualitative study. Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(5):638–49. 10.1080/13691058.2014.979881 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Anderson DK, Saunders DG. Leaving an abusive partner: an empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, violence & abuse. 2003;4(2):163–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wood SN, Kennedy SR, Hameeduddin Z, Asira B, Tallam C, Akumu I, et al. "Being Married Doesn’t Mean You Have to Reach the End of the World": Safety Planning With Intimate Partner Violence Survivors and Service Providers in Three Urban Informal Settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. J Interpers Violence. 2019:886260519879237 10.1177/0886260519879237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Bermea AM, Khaw L, Hardesty JL, Rosenbloom L, Salerno C. Mental and Active Preparation: Examining Variations in Women’s Processes of Preparing to Leave Abusive Relationships. J Interpers Violence. 2020;35(3–4):988–1011. 10.1177/0886260517692332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Heise LL, Kotsadam A. Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys. The Lancet Global health. 2015;3(6):e332–40. 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00013-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sardinha L, Najera Catalan HE. Attitudes towards domestic violence in 49 low- and middle-income countries: A gendered analysis of prevalence and country-level correlates. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206101 10.1371/journal.pone.0206101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Jewkes R, Flood M, Lang J. From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: a conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet. 2015;385(9977):1580–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Shannon K, Leiter K, Phaladze N, Hlanze Z, Tsai AC, Heisler M, et al. Gender inequity norms are associated with increased male-perpetrated rape and sexual risks for HIV infection in Botswana and Swaziland. PloS one. 2012;7(1):e28739–e. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gupta J, Falb KL, Lehmann H, Kpebo D, Xuan Z, Hossain M, et al. Gender norms and economic empowerment intervention to reduce intimate partner violence against women in rural Cote d’Ivoire: a randomized controlled pilot study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2013;13:46 10.1186/1472-698X-13-46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Dickens AP, Richards SH, Greaves CJ, Campbell JL. Interventions targeting social isolation in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):647 10.1186/1471-2458-11-647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.WHO. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines: World Health Organization; 2013. [PubMed]
  • 109.Postmus JL, Hoge GL, Breckenridge J, Sharp-Jeffs N, Chung D. Economic Abuse as an Invisible Form of Domestic Violence: A Multicountry Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2018:1524838018764160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Stefano Federici

23 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-10316

Violence against older women: a systematic review of qualitative literature

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Meyer,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The Reviewers considered the manuscript very positively. They also provided several suggestions to improve the quality of the study and make it suitable for publication.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 06 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Stefano Federici, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

The Reviewers considered the manuscript very positively. They also provided several suggestions to improve the quality of the study and make it suitable for publication.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please cite your published protocol article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6550033/

3. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

5. Please include a caption for figure 1.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

<h1> </h1>

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Recommendation: Publish with minor corrections

1. Summary of Research and Overall Impression

This is an excellent summary of qualitative studies on neglect, abuse, and violence against older women. It makes an important contribution to the literature on this often overlooked population in the domestic violence field. It is well-written and well-researched.

Methodology and selection criteria for studies included in the review are clearly presented. Authors of selected studies are known for their expertise in this area of international domestic violence research on older women. The systematic review presented here complements findings from quantitative including prevalence studies.

This is a particularly appropriate report for UN Women, which has not always been open to considering older women’s experiences with domestic violence as relevant to the field of international domestic violence. The author frames the analysis in a particularly insightful way using a feminist perspective. In doing so, she effectively challenges the ageism inherent in views of older women and domestic violence as “elder abuse” that is disconnected from gender, community, and the life course.

The author chose qualitative research studies that incorporate the words of older women “in their own voices” and use a life course perspective. This very much reflects a feminist perspective. She also makes efforts to include voices of older women from developing countries, which she notes is difficult. Organizations like HelpAge International have done studies on older women and abuse from developing countries, but these studies tend not to reflect the rigor of qualitative studies undertaken by the academy based on her stated selection criteria.

2. Minor issues

101 – Instead of “older adult mistreatment” framework, the author may want to consider substituting “vulnerable older adult” framework and distinguish this from the “intimate partner violence (IPV)” framework and the “active ageing” framework that can incorporate feminist gerontology, although can also reflect a gender neutral perspective. Older adult mistreatment is a generic term, while IPV is more commonly used in domestic violence discussions involving women survivors (and the author makes a point of selecting studies that view older women as women, not elders”). The vulnerable older adult framework reflects a disconnect between women domestic violence survivors and older women, and which this reviewer would argue incorporates an ageist and gender neutral framing of older women survivors. The underlying assumption of this frame is that older victims are frail and dependent by definition: this both narrows the population to be included in the study to a subset of impaired older adults, or alternatively assumes that older women are by definition impaired, care dependent and “vulnerable”. The author has selected studies for the review that quite rightly challenge this assumption.

738 – Under limitations, the author notes that there is a dearth of qualitative studies on older women survivors of domestic violence from developing (low income) countries. This reviewer noted earlier that in fact there may be other studies (for example, those by HelpAge International – Bridget Sleap) but not reflecting the academic rigor sought in this review. However, there are studies conducted in high income countries of older women survivors of domestic violence who are immigrants from low income countries. One example that comes to mind is Guruge et al. (2010), Older women speak about abuse and neglect in the post-immigration context, conducted in Canada with Sri Lankan immigrants.

Polyvictimization is a fairly new concept in older adult abuse, and one that is not prominent in the domestic violence literature to date but is more so in the field of child abuse. Studies by Pamela Teaster and Holly Ramsey-Klawsnik, for example, have found that multiple forms of abuse/multiple abusers experienced by domestic violence victims can lead to increased trauma. If the qualitative studies did not specifically ask about polyvictimization, they may not have captured this.

Overall, these are minor issues. The charts included in the manuscript are very helpful in providing a flavor of the felt experience of older women survivors of domestic violence.

3. Other Points

Overall, an excellent review and one that can serve to educate UN Women staffers, primarily young women, about older women’s lived experience of domestic violence. This will hopefully result in their viewing older women as part of the continuum of “Girls and Women of all Ages” and not “Other”.

Reviewer #2: This is a fascinating study, drawing attention to urgent issues in this field of research and responds to a research gap that it clearly identifies at the outset. It has a well-articulated methodology, discussion and makes powerful conclusions. Further details of the analytical approach would be welcomed, however, as it is currently unclear how themes and sub-themes were reached. There is some overlap between some sub-themes, and in some sub-themes there is a lack of depth where the results could be explored further. Either further details on how the analysis was conducted would address this, or some reorganisation of themes and sub-themes to a smaller number that would allow for exploration of the results in more detail.

Further explanation of why one article in Farsi was not translated and included in the study would also be welcomed.

Reviewer #3: Thank you for giving me the chance to review this important manuscript that addresses a clear gap in the literature. It is very clear that you have done an amazing job in thoroughly going through a vat amount of literature and put a lot of attention in capturing necessary detail. Congratulations on it!

I have some general and specific comments.

General comments:

• The title of the paper is violence against older women and throughout the text you refer to older women. The definition of older women in the text is women aged 50 or older. Is this aligned with existing definition of older or is it a consequence that many other studies have focused on women of reproductive age? Should you not throughout the title and text to simply name them women aged 50 or older or is older women the correct term?

• The review stats that it is “exploring violence against women aged 50 and above, identifying types and patterns of violence, perpetrators of violence, and impacts of violence on various health outcomes for older women”. Reading the review, it seems that much more has been investigated than that, namely associate factors and consequences beyond health outcomes, such as loneliness and social isolation. This could be stated more clearly in the introduction, as I kind of expected it but did not find it reflected in the description of the reviews scope.

• Throughout the results section it was often unclear whether you are summarising violence described actual violence that older women are experiencing now or whether they refer to any violence as it sounds like in the section on loneliness (not only an issue there)? It is important to make that very clear whether women refer to past violence, potentially 20 years ago or current violence. For example, but not only there, in the section “Silence, stigma and family” it is unclear if the women refer to the current violence they experienced or past violence, potentially 20 years ago. The whole paragraph seems to refer to varies time points in which the violence happened and this needs to be clarified, especially since there is a specific sub-section for it

• Have you actually found any differing evidence by different age categories among women aged 50 or above? In the limitation section you mention that the age rages varied widely, but it would be could to situate the results into this as 50 to 64 is quite a different age category than 65 to 99, when women are also more likely to be retired.

• I am a bit surprised by the structuring of the results section and consider reworking it as it jumps from the overview of forms of violence and perpetrators in a summary paragraph to causes, consequences, risk factors to financial abuse- a form of violence experienced, norms, needs, early childhood violence as a risk factor later. While the overall heading make sense, the sub heading sometimes seem to belong somewhere else and do not flow.

• Did you actually find different results by LMIC and HIC?

• The section “Descriptions of types of violence and perpetrators” is actually a quite crucial one, but it is currently very descriptive in terms of numbers. Given that forms of violence and perpetrators are such a key objective, could you expand this section and show what kind of violence was perpetrated by the different perpetrator types or forms of abuse and whether there were any age trends among the older women.

Small, specific comments:

• Abstract p 8, line 31: grammatical mistake

Introduction:

• Page 4, line 77 needs a reference

• Page 6, line 116: Can you state if these systematic reviews said anything about the perpetrators of this violence? Which age ranges did the systematic reviews investigate?

• Page 6, line 128 grammatical error

Method:

• Did you use any time limit for the search?

• Did forms/types of violence cluster in certain countries?

Results:

• On page 14 under the heading “Descriptions of types of violence and perpetrators” you first describe the terms IPV, family violence and elder abuse, but these terms have not been described before in terms of what they mean and how they are different from each other

• On page 15 when you talk about causes of violence, which types of violence were referred to?

• Is the financial abuse section actually referring to tis as a form of violence or a cause for other violence or a co-occurrence of numerous forms of violence?

• In the discussion section you refer to health care providers response and women’s concerns regarding confidentiality, however, this was not brought up in the results at all and should have been mentioned there too.

• Implication for future research – the scarcity of research only relates to qualitative work or more generally? I understand that your review mainly found studies on IPV, but what did the quantitative reviews find? Would they support your claim?

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Heidi Stöckl

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: 2020 Plos One review Sarah.docx

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0239560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239560.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


7 Aug 2020

Authors’ response to reviewers

Manuscript title: Violence against older women: a systematic review of qualitative literature

To the Editors, PLoS One

Thank you for the recognition of the contribution of our manuscript, “Violence against older women: a systematic review of qualitative literature.” In response to the reviewers’ comments, some changes have been made to the manuscript. We appreciate the reviewer’s positive comments and feel that our responses to these helpful suggestions helped improve this manuscript. The reviewers’ comments, as well as journal requirements listed, are addressed point-by-point in turn below.

Reviewer 1:

1. 101 – Instead of “older adult mistreatment” framework, the author may want to consider substituting “vulnerable older adult” framework and distinguish this from the “intimate partner violence (IPV)” framework and the “active ageing” framework that can incorporate feminist gerontology, although can also reflect a gender neutral perspective. Older adult mistreatment is a generic term, while IPV is more commonly used in domestic violence discussions involving women survivors (and the author makes a point of selecting studies that view older women as women, not elders”). The vulnerable older adult framework reflects a disconnect between women domestic violence survivors and older women, and which this reviewer would argue incorporates an ageist and gender neutral framing of older women survivors. The underlying assumption of this frame is that older victims are frail and dependent by definition: this both narrows the population to be included in the study to a subset of impaired older adults, or alternatively assumes that older women are by definition impaired, care dependent and “vulnerable”. The author has selected studies for the review that quite rightly challenge this assumption.

We agree with this reviewer that there are other ways to capture and describe the dominant conceptual frameworks in this literature. We feel that the three frameworks that we describe – older adult mistreatment, older adult protection, and IPV – are one way to capture the approaches on the literature. Rather than substituting a different framework, we have added some comments reflecting the problematic aspects of each of these approaches, including the disconnects and underlying assumptions that this reviewer rightly points out. The section now reads:

“The older adult mistreatment framework conceptualizes violence against older women as a form of elder abuse, focusing on age as the primary factor influencing vulnerability to exposure to violence. The older adult protection framework specifically understands violence within the context of care-giving and institutional arrangements, where older adults’ often be gender neutral, and the adult protection framework can result in a framing of older adults as inherently impaired and vulnerable. In addition, the IPV framework primarily understands vulnerability to violence in terms of gender inequality and partnership dynamics, which may neglect analysis of how ageing and partner violence intersect.”

2. 738 – Under limitations, the author notes that there is a dearth of qualitative studies on older women survivors of domestic violence from developing (low income) countries. This reviewer noted earlier that in fact there may be other studies (for example, those by HelpAge International – Bridget Sleap) but not reflecting the academic rigor sought in this review. However, there are studies conducted in high income countries of older women survivors of domestic violence who are immigrants from low income countries. One example that comes to mind is Guruge et al. (2010), Older women speak about abuse and neglect in the post-immigration context, conducted in Canada with Sri Lankan immigrants.

We appreciate the reviewer pointing out this relevant article, and we have included it in our review.

3. Polyvictimization is a fairly new concept in older adult abuse, and one that is not prominent in the domestic violence literature to date but is more so in the field of child abuse. Studies by Pamela Teaster and Holly Ramsey-Klawsnik, for example, have found that multiple forms of abuse/multiple abusers experienced by domestic violence victims can lead to increased trauma. If the qualitative studies did not specifically ask about polyvictimization, they may not have captured this.

We agree with this comment, and have included the following text in the Discussion section to indicate that polyvictimization is not adequately addressed in this literature:

“The included studies primarily address IPV, with fewer emerging from the older adult mistreatment framework. Most research examined specific types of violence in isolation, for example, IPV or abuse from an adult child, and there were no examples of studies that included polyvictimization or experiences of any type of violence against older women. The strong emphasis on older women’s experiences of IPV gives voice to the experiences of older women subjected to violence and shows how it can persist over time; however, some sites, perpetrators and types of violence against older women may be excluded from view, including that of violence enacted by other family members and non-family caregivers and of women living in institutional care.”

AND

“As noted, assessment of polyvicimization in the evidence-base is lacking.”

Reviewer 2:

1. Further details of the analytical approach would be welcomed, however, as it is currently unclear how themes and sub-themes were reached. There is some overlap between some sub-themes, and in some sub-themes there is a lack of depth where the results could be explored further. Either further details on how the analysis was conducted would address this, or some reorganisation of themes and sub-themes to a smaller number that would allow for exploration of the results in more detail.

We agree that further discussion of the analytical approach is warranted, and have added the following description in the Methods section:

“Two of the authors (SRM and MEL) coded the main findings extracted from each study. We used line-by-line coding on a sub-set of articles, developing a set of over-arching themes and sub-themes for a draft codebook. The coding proceeded as an iterative process, with the two authors each separately coding the main findings using the draft codebook, discussing coding results, and refining the codebook based on overlap and redundancies identified. After all data was coded and we tallied all occurrences of codes, we further explored areas of overlap and merged sub-themes with low numbers of codes, finalizing the broad themes and focused sub-themes, displayed in Table 3.”

Further, in response to this comment and Reviewer 3’s comments regarding the Results section, we have reorganized themes and sub-themes to reduce overlap and provide more detail. The themes and sub-themes are now:

• Descriptions and patterns of types of violence

• Intersection of ageing and violence

o Suffering, loneliness, regret and guilt.

o Violence, ageing and vulnerabilities.

• Perpetrator-related factors

o Ageing perpetrators and continuity of abuse.

o Perpetrator’s illness as a cause of violence.

• Social and gender norms regarding response to violence

o Silence, stigma and family.

o Perceptions of abuse and violence as normal.

• Lifelong IPV

o Continuation of patterns of IPV in old age.

o Earlier experiences of violence.

o Cumulative impacts of violence.

• Needs of older women affected by violence

o Social and community support.

o Barriers to accessing services.

• Coping mechanisms

o Leaving a relationship.

o Isolation, substance use and emotion-based coping strategies.

o Behaviors to enhance safety.

2. Further explanation of why one article in Farsi was not translated and included in the study would also be welcomed.

We have added the following sentence to explain this: “One non-English article (in Farsi) was not reviewed as the research team could not engage a Farsi speaker to review the article.”

Reviewer 3:

1. The title of the paper is violence against older women and throughout the text you refer to older women. The definition of older women in the text is women aged 50 or older. Is this aligned with existing definition of older or is it a consequence that many other studies have focused on women of reproductive age? Should you not throughout the title and text to simply name them women aged 50 or older or is older women the correct term?

We have focused this review on women aged 50 and above as a consequence that many other studies have focused on women of reproductive age. Definitions of old and older women vary across organizations and research. However, we found that using the phrase ‘women aged 50 and older’ throughout the manuscript, while more accurate, was difficult to understand and disrupted flow of the narrative. Therefore, we added a sentence in the introduction to explain this:

“While there is no universal agreed-upon definition of older women, for the purposes of this review, we define older women as women aged 50 and above, while recognizing that aging and age are social phenomenon, and definitions vary across organizations, cultures and communities.”

2. The review stats that it is “exploring violence against women aged 50 and above, identifying types and patterns of violence, perpetrators of violence, and impacts of violence on various health outcomes for older women”. Reading the review, it seems that much more has been investigated than that, namely associate factors and consequences beyond health outcomes, such as loneliness and social isolation. This could be stated more clearly in the introduction, as I kind of expected it but did not find it reflected in the description of the reviews scope.

We have altered this statement to include the wider range of outcomes that are considered in this review. The sentence now reads:

“We aimed to identify, evaluate and synthesize qualitative studies from all countries, exploring violence against women aged 50 and above, identifying types and patterns of violence, perpetrators of violence, and impacts of violence on various outcomes for older women, including physical and mental health and social support, and women’s responses to experiences of violence.”

3. Throughout the results section it was often unclear whether you are summarising violence described actual violence that older women are experiencing now or whether they refer to any violence as it sounds like in the section on loneliness (not only an issue there)? It is important to make that very clear whether women refer to past violence, potentially 20 years ago or current violence. For example, but not only there, in the section “Silence, stigma and family” it is unclear if the women refer to the current violence they experienced or past violence, potentially 20 years ago. The whole paragraph seems to refer to varies time points in which the violence happened and this needs to be clarified, especially since there is a specific sub-section for it

We appreciate this important comment, and recognize that throughout the evidence included in this review, there are manuscripts that focus on previous and current violence or current violence only, and that in some cases, given women’s experiences of violence as continuous and interlinked throughout their lifetimes, the distinction is difficult to identify. We have included references to this issue within the Results section where relevant, such as:

“Shifts in types of violence, from predominantly physical violence to predominant psychological abuse and neglect, were commonly described in studies that encompassed previous and on-going IPV. Studies focused on IPV more commonly described both previous and on-going violence, and a small number described only violence experienced while aged 50 or above.”

In the section on Suffering, loneliness, regret and guilt:

“The studies that explored these themes primarily encompassed accounts of violence experienced throughout intimate relationships – while women were younger and through to older age. These experiences were described and conceptualized by older women as interlinked and continuity of victimization by intimate partners was emphasized, rather than viewing women’s experiences of violence in older age as distinct or separate.”

In the section on Violence, ageing and vulnerabilities:

“These studies primarily focused on current experiences of violence of older women, as changes in physical and emotional capacity to cope was described in relation to present victimization.”

In the section on Silence, stigma and family:

These studies primarily focused on previous and current experiences of violence; social norms predominant when women were younger shaped prior and current responses.”

4. Have you actually found any differing evidence by different age categories among women aged 50 or above? In the limitation section you mention that the age rages varied widely, but it would be could to situate the results into this as 50 to 64 is quite a different age category than 65 to 99, when women are also more likely to be retired.

We found this to be one of the major limitations of the available evidence, and have added a sentence to make this limitation clearer based on this comment:

“The available evidence does not disaggregate findings to enable understanding of whether or how women in different age groups experience violence differently, despite significant variation in living conditions, employment and health status of women aged 50-64 vs. 65 and up, for example.”

5. I am a bit surprised by the structuring of the results section and consider reworking it as it jumps from the overview of forms of violence and perpetrators in a summary paragraph to causes, consequences, risk factors to financial abuse- a form of violence experienced, norms, needs, early childhood violence as a risk factor later. While the overall heading make sense, the sub heading sometimes seem to belong somewhere else and do not flow.

We agree with this comment, which is also in line with Reviewer 2’s feedback regarding structure of the Results section. As such, we have refined our coding structure and made the following changes:

• Substantially expanded on the first section of results, renaming if Descriptions and patterns of types of violence, including integrating the sub-theme on increases of violence into this section;

• Removing the section on causes of elder abuse (as we do not have separate sections on causes of other specific types of abuse);

• Creating a theme on issues relating to the perpetrator, and including the sub-themes Ageing Perpetrators and continuity of abuse and

• Removed Ageing and changes in the nature and patterns of IPV theme (sub-themes moved to Descriptions and patterns of types of violence and Perpetrator related factors)

• Removed Control and financial abuse among older women as a sub-theme and incorporated parts of it into Descriptions and patterns of types of violence

6. Did you actually find different results by LMIC and HIC?

Given the very small number of studies conducted in LMIC, this was not possible and we have added a sentence in the Limitations section to indicate this:

“In addition, the small number of studies conducted in low and middle-income countries entailed that comparison of patterns between high-income and low and middle-income contexts was not possible.”

7. The section “Descriptions of types of violence and perpetrators” is actually a quite crucial one, but it is currently very descriptive in terms of numbers. Given that forms of violence and perpetrators are such a key objective, could you expand this section and show what kind of violence was perpetrated by the different perpetrator types or forms of abuse and whether there were any age trends among the older women.

We appreciate this helpful comment, and have substantially expanded this section. We have renamed it Description and patterns of types of violence, and have a separate section focusing more on perpetrators. The section now reads:

Older women described IPV, family violence and elder abuse of various types, perpetrated by a range of perpetrators [Table 1]. Among the specific types of violence reported in the articles in this review, across IPV, elder abuse and family violence, physical violence was most frequently reported [23, 28-50, 53, 56-59, 62, 65-75], followed by emotional/ psychological [24, 28, 32-35, 37-47, 49, 50, 52, 56-58, 62-75], economic/ financial [30-32, 35, 37, 39-41, 44-46, 57, 58, 60, 64, 67, 68, 70-73], sexual [23, 29, 30, 36, 38, 45, 46, 50, 53, 55, 56, 63, 68, 70, 71, 75], verbal [28, 36, 41, 48, 58, 64-66, 69, 72], controlling behaviors [41, 44, 45, 47, 49, 60, 63, 66, 72], and lastly, neglect [24, 31, 35, 57, 58, 64, 67].

Older women’s experience of IPV was the most frequent form of violence reported (41 articles) [23, 25, 29, 30, 32-34, 36-38, 41-52, 55-61, 63-75]. Older women described on-going instances of neglect, verbal abuse and financial exploitation in a study conducted in India; in other cases, physical violence characterized earlier and on-going experiences of violence within intimate partner relationships. IPV in particular was described by older women as occurring throughout different stages in the relationship, spanning their youth and into older age. Older women often experienced an escalation of IPV and controlling behaviors despite the age and/ or illness of their partner [32, 36, 42, 57, 65, 72]. Changing relationship dynamics due to ageing – including a husband’s retirement, children leaving the home, women wanting to engage in activities outside of the home, or diagnosis of a chronic or terminal illness – triggered escalating IPV [32, 36, 42, 43, 52, 65]. Shifts in types of violence, from predominantly physical violence to predominant psychological abuse and neglect, were commonly described in studies that encompassed previous and on-going IPV. Studies focused on IPV commonly described both previous and on-going violence, and a smaller number described only or primarily violence experienced while aged 50 or above.

Violence occurring within the family was discussed in 14 articles [31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 51, 59, 62, 64, 65, 67, 74], with perpetrators including family members not including children [39, 40, 44, 45, 59, 64, 65, 67] and adult children [31, 35, 44, 62, 74]. Studies captured instances of physical and verbal aggression by mentally ill adult children against older women, violence enacted by elderly with dementia against older women who were caregivers and forms of neglect, financial exploitation and emotional abuse enacted by family members, including children. The majority of these studies focused on violence experienced in older age, while one study explored dynamics of abuse between children and mothers across the lifespan.

10 articles reported on experiences of elder abuse [24, 28, 31, 39, 40, 51, 53-55, 73] with perpetrators including community members [39, 40], caregivers [53, 55], nursing home residents [54] and health care providers [24]. Types of elder abuse included verbal abuse, physical assault and inappropriate sexual advances and sexual assault.

Financial control spanned instances of elder abuse, family violence and IPV [39, 49, 58, 60, 73], and was described as co-occurring with and resulting in other forms of violence. Financial exploitation could result in emotional and/ or physical violence if older women resisted control [58, 60]. An older woman explained that in the context of her relationship with her husband, “If I did not follow his control [over money], he would be verbally abusive” [60].

8. Page 4, line 77 needs a reference

We have added a reference.

9. Page 6, line 116: Can you state if these systematic reviews said anything about the perpetrators of this violence? Which age ranges did the systematic reviews investigate?

We have clarified analysis of perpetrators within these systematic reviews and age ranges investigated. This section now reads:

“Employing an older adult mistreatment framework, a systematic review of quantitative studies of elder abuse (against men and women aged 60+) found that the global prevalence of elder abuse in community settings is 15.7% in the past year, with psychological abuse and financial abuse as the most prevalent forms of abuse reported [15]. This review reported prevalence by type of violence, but did not report on perpetrators. Analysis of studies conducted in institutional settings found women, aged 60 and above, to be significantly more vulnerable to abuse, with psychological abuse as the most prevalent form of violence, followed by physical violence, neglect, financial and sexual abuse [16]; this analysis included data reporting staff-to-resident abuse. Analysis of quantitative data of women aged 60 and above in the systematic review of quantitative studies of elder abuse found a global prevalence of elder abuse against women of 14.1% in the past year, with psychological abuse reported as the most prevalent form of violence, followed by neglect. The focus of this review was prevalence of different sub-types of violence, and type of perpetrator was not considered. Another systematic review of quantitative data on interpersonal violence (physical and/or sexual violence) against older women (aged 65 and above) in community dwellings primarily employed an IPV framework, finding prevalence of reported interpersonal violence ranged from 6 to 59% over a lifetime, from 6 to 18% since turning 50, and 0.8 to 11% in the past year, however, results indicated that definitions of violence vary widely and affect prevalence estimates [17]. Syntheses of quantitative literature have identified prevalent forms of violence against older women, highlighting limitations in the evidence-base due to variations in definitions and methodology, and a primary emphasis on populations in high-income, Western countries. These reviews have captured a wide range of types of violence, however, have not considered type of perpetrators or patterns of co-occurring types of violence.”

10. Did you use any time limit for the search?

No, we did not use and time limit for the search. We have clarified this in the methods section.

11. Did forms/types of violence cluster in certain countries?

The studies were primarily conducted in USA and Israel, followed by UK and Canada. While there are some patterns identified within those countries, we concluded that we could not adequately assess whether this reflected true patterns in violence against older women, or the research focus of the research teams in these countries.

12. Results: On page 14 under the heading “Descriptions of types of violence and perpetrators” you first describe the terms IPV, family violence and elder abuse, but these terms have not been described before in terms of what they mean and how they are different from each other

We agree that the manuscript would benefit from definitions of these terms, and have added these definitions into the description of the objectives of the review:

“We include the following forms of violence: elder abuse, family violence and intimate partner violence. Elder abuse is defined as “single or repeated act, or lack of appropriate action, occurring within any relationship where there is an expectation of trust which causes harm or distress to an older person” Intimate partner violence is defined as “behaviour by an intimate partner or ex-partner that causes physical, sexual or psychological harm, including physical aggression, sexual coercion, psychological abuse and controlling behaviours.” Family violence is often used interchangeable with intimate partner violence, however, also encompasses abuse and violence perpetrated by other family members, for example, adult children or in-laws.”

13. On page 15 when you talk about causes of violence, which types of violence were referred to?

We have removed the theme Causes of Elder Abuse, given we do not have separate themes for causes of other types of violence analysed. We incorporated the analysis regarding ageist attitudes as a cause of violence into the theme, Social and gender norms regarding response to violence; Sub-theme, Perceptions of abuse and violence as normal.

14. Is the financial abuse section actually referring to tis as a form of violence or a cause for other violence or a co-occurrence of numerous forms of violence?

We agree that in its previous format the inclusion of Financial Abuse as a separate section was not clear enough. As such, we have incorporated aspects of this sub-theme into the Description and patterns of types of violence section, to add further detail there and ensure inclusion of this important type of violence, while improving the structure and flow of the Results.

15. In the discussion section you refer to health care providers response and women’s concerns regarding confidentiality, however, this was not brought up in the results at all and should have been mentioned there too.

We have included the following text in the Results section relating to health car providers’ response:

“Older women reported several concerns when interacting with health care providers, including health care providers’ assumptions that older women could not be experiencing violence due to their age, minimization of forms of abuse common to older women, and lack of confidentiality when using the same provider as their spouse [70].”

16. Implication for future research – the scarcity of research only relates to qualitative work or more generally? I understand that your review mainly found studies on IPV, but what did the quantitative reviews find? Would they support your claim?

The quantitative evidence-base includes a systematic review of elder abuse against older women, and much more literature encompassing different forms of violence against older women. We have added the following text to indicate this:

“In the quantitative evidence-base, systematic reviews have focused on elder abuse and on IPV. A review of quantitative evidence on IPV identified 19 studies and the review of elder abuse against women included 50 studies; as such, the quantitative evidence-base appears to capture more in terms of forms of violence against older women.”

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Stefano Federici

9 Sep 2020

Violence against older women: a systematic review of qualitative literature

PONE-D-20-10316R1

Dear Dr. Meyer,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Stefano Federici, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The author responded to suggestions in my first review of this manuscript and I have nothing further to add. I am comfortable with this manuscript moving to publication.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Thank you for addressing all my comments in such a diligent way. The article is a great contribution to the field! Thank you for all your hard work on it

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Heidi Stöckl

Acceptance letter

Stefano Federici

14 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-10316R1

Violence against older women: a systematic review of qualitative literature

Dear Dr. Meyer:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Stefano Federici

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. PubMed search strategy.

    (DOCX)

    S2 File. ENTREQ checklist.

    (DOCX)

    S3 File. PRISMA checklist.

    (DOC)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 2020 Plos One review Sarah.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES