Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0233666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233666

Ancient mitochondrial DNA pathogenic variants putatively associated with mitochondrial disease

Draga Toncheva 1,2,*, Dimitar Serbezov 1, Sena Karachanak-Yankova 1,3, Desislava Nesheva 1
Editor: David Caramelli4
PMCID: PMC7514063  PMID: 32970680

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA variants associated with diseases are widely studied in contemporary populations, but their prevalence has not yet been investigated in ancient populations. The publicly available AmtDB database contains 1443 ancient mtDNA Eurasian genomes from different periods. The objective of this study was to use this data to establish the presence of pathogenic mtDNA variants putatively associated with mitochondrial diseases in ancient populations. The clinical significance, pathogenicity prediction and contemporary frequency of mtDNA variants were determined using online platforms. The analyzed ancient mtDNAs contain six variants designated as being “confirmed pathogenic” in modern patients. The oldest of these, m.7510T>C in the MT-TS1 gene, was found in a sample from the Neolithic period, dated 5800–5400 BCE. All six have well established clinical association, and their pathogenic effect is corroborated by very low population frequencies in contemporary populations. Analysis of the geographic location of the ancient samples, contemporary epidemiological trends and probable haplogroup association indicate diverse spatiotemporal dynamics of these variants. The dynamics in the prevalence and distribution is conceivably result of de novo mutations or human migrations and subsequent evolutionary processes. In addition, ten variants designated as possibly or likely pathogenic were found, but the clinical effect of these is not yet well established and further research is warranted. All detected mutations putatively associated with mitochondrial disease in ancient mtDNA samples are in tRNA coding genes. Most of these mutations are in a mt-tRNA type (Model 2) that is characterized by loss of D-loop/T-loop interaction. Exposing pathogenic variants in ancient human populations expands our understanding of their origin and prevalence dynamics.

Introduction

The scarcity of prehistoric human remains hampers obtaining complete picture of disorder incidence in ancient times. Altered or affected bones in skeletal remains might provide information about certain diseases, such as cancers [1, 2] and rheumatic diseases [3]. A lesion on an archaic Homo mandible from Kanam, Kenya (Middle to Late Pleistocene) [4] and a fibrous dysplasia on a Neanderthal rib (older than 120000 years) from the site of Krapina, Croatia [5] are early confirmation of neoplastic disease. Neoplastic tumors have however been detected in early Homo samples as old as 1.7 million years ago, and these provide further insight into the outset of human cancers [6]. Mummified human remains of a 5300-year-old Neolithic man (Ötzi, The Tyrolean Iceman) show hardening of the arteries, suggesting predisposition for coronary heart disease [7]. Based on information on subsistence, geography and sample age, Berens et al (2017) estimate the genetic disease risk for 3180 loci in 147 ancient genomes, and find it to be similar to that of modern day humans [8]. Focusing on individual genomes, however, they estimate that the overall genomic health of the Altai Neanderthal is worse than 97% of present day humans and that Ötzi the Tyrolean Iceman had a genetic predisposition to gastrointestinal and cardiovascular diseases [8].

Data on the prehistoric origin of mitochondrial diseases is however notably lacking. The first disease linked directly to mtDNA mutation was discovered in 1988 [9]. Recently, whole-genome sequencing of mtDNA has led to significant advances in our understanding of mitochondrial diseases. Rare pathogenic mutations in mitochondrial DNA cause monogenic mitochondrial diseases involving multiple systems and are associated with variable clinical phenotypes. The severity of the clinical and biochemical phenotype caused by pathogenic mtDNA mutations has been found to be roughly proportionate to the percent mutant heteroplasmy [10, 11]. The mitochondrial haplogroup harboring the mutation might also alter the penetrance of mitochondrial diseases [12]. Specific subclades of haplogroup J, for example, have been shown to affect the penetrance and pathogenicity of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy [13]. Certain mtDNA mutations and haplogroups are also predictors of both lifespan and risk of various age-associated disease, including degenerative diseases, cancer, diabetes, heart failure, sarcopenia and Parkinson's disease [14].

We had previously performed whole-genome sequencing on 25 Thracian mtDNA samples dated 3000–2000 BCE, and 608 mtDNA variants were detected [15]. Only one of these however, m.15326A>G (rs2853508), is designated as likely pathogenic, associated with familial breast cancer [16]. This variant was found in all analyzed by us samples, and MitoMap (2019, update nr.3) database estimates 0.98 population frequency [17]. Such high frequency indicates that this variant is common and probably not disease related.

The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of pathogenic mutations in ancient mtDNA and to provide further insight into the emergence and dynamics of mitochondrial diseases.

Materials & methods

We used the comprehensive data of the ancient mtDNA genome sequences from the Ancient mtDNA database [18] which compiles human mitochondrial variation studies in ancient populations. We analyzed the fasta files of 1443 samples from different periods: Paleolithic, 10 samples; Mesolithic, 96; Neolithic, 341; Copper, 242; Bronze, 368; Iron, 152 and Middle Ages, 234. The total number of unique variants detected in these samples was 3191.

We used various publicly available databases to collect information on mtDNA variants, including their clinical significance and contemporary population frequencies:

  • MitoMap (2019, update nr.3) is a human mitochondrial genome database that contains 14383 SNVs, 49135 full-length sequences and 72235 control region sequences [17].

    MitoMap classifies a variant as being “confirmed pathogenic” if it meets the set of criteria outlined by Mitchell et al. 2006 [19], Yarham et al. 2011 [20], Wong 2007 [21] and Gonzalez-Viogue et al. 2014 [22]: (1) independent reports of two or more unrelated families with evidence of similar disease; (2) evolutionary conservation of the nucleotide (for RNA variants) or amino acid (for coding variants); (3) presence of heteroplasmy; (4) correlation of variant with phenotype / segregation of the mutation with the disease within a family; (5) biochemical defects in the OXPHOS genes constituent complexes I, III, or IV in affected or in multiple tissues; (6) functional studies showing differential defects segregating with the mutation (cybrid or single fiber studies); (7) histochemical evidence of a mitochondrial disorder; and (8) for fatal or severe phenotypes, the absence or extremely rare occurrence of the variant in large mtDNA sequence databases.

  • MITOMASTER was used to identify, annotate and evaluate the potential biological significance of nucleotide variants [23].

  • GenBank database provides access to up-to-date and exhaustive DNA sequence information, and was used to get information on variant frequencies in contemporary populations [24].

  • MitoTIP is an in silico tool for predicting pathogenicity of novel mitochondrial tRNA variants [25]. It integrates multiple sources of information, including the position of the variant within the tRNA, conservation across species and population frequencies, to provide a prediction for the likelihood that novel single nucleotide variants would cause disease.

  • HmtVar uses algorithms to determine the importance of the variant position in tRNAs and was utilized to predict the pathogenicity and potential impact of mtDNA variants [26].

  • Complementing the information obtained using the abovementioned tools, literature survey was conducted on variants designated as “confirmed pathogenic|” in an effort to acquire a comprehensive picture of the evidence for their disease causing effect.

Results

Out of 3191 unique mtDNA variants established in the 1443 analyzed ancient samples, six are designated as being “confirmed pathogenic” and 10 as “likely/possibly pathogenic” by MitoMap (Table 1). For each of these variants, we review the available evidence in HmtVar and in the scientific literature for their pathogenic effects.

Table 1. Mitochondrial DNA mutations established in ancient samples putatively associated with mitochondrial disease.

Pathogenic mutations
Nr Variants [17, 18]/ Gene product/ Strand Period/Years [18] Hg Freq % in haplogroup Country / Location / Sample GB Freq. Modern populations Mito Tip classification HmtVar Prediction Mitochondrial Disease (MitoMap)
1 m.5703G>A (rs199476130)tRNA Asparagine /L Neolithic (2880–2776 BCE) K1a1b1e 0.0 (K1a) Poland / Koszyce / RISE1170 [27] 0.00% African-American woman [28], 16-year-old Caucasian girl [29], Chinese girl [30] Cfrm Path. Pathogenic (M2-P27) CPEO / MM / COX deficiency (Heteroplasmy)
Iron Age (900–600 BCE) H5a1+152 0.0 (D4b) Russia / Grishkin Log 1 / DA4 [31]
Iron Age (900–600 BCE) U2e1h 0.0 (H2a) Russia / Grishkin Log 1 / DA8 [31]
Iron Age (156–134 BCE) D4b2b2b 0.0 (D4b) Mongolia / Omnogobi / DA45 [31]
Middle Ages (10–375 CE) H28a1 0.0 (H28a) Poland / Kowalewko, Greater Poland / PCA0002 [32]
2 m.3243A>G (rs199474657) tRNA Leucine/H Bronze Age (2029–1911 BCE) T2f8a 1.18 (T2) Germany / Haunstetten, Postillionstr / POST_16 [33] 0.02% 202 symptomatic patients, UK [34], 126 carriers of the mutation, Italy [35], US [16], Netherland [36], Denmark [37], Austria [38] Cfrm Path. Pathogenic (M0-P14) MELAS / LS / DMDF / MIDD / SNHL / CPEO / MM / FSGS / ASD / Cardiac+multi-organ dysfunction (Heteroplasmy)
3 m.5650G>A tRNA Alanine/L Iron Age (900–600 BCE) W1c 0.0 (H2a) Russia / Grishkin Log 1 / DA5 [31] 0.00% UK [39], Germany [40], Finland [41] Cfrm Path. Pathogenic (M2-P6) Myopathy (Heteroplasmy)
Iron Age (766–729 BCE) F1b1+@152 0.0 (H2a) Kazakhstan / Kurgan Borli, Osakarovskij / DA11 [31]
Iron Age (156–134 BCE) D4b2b2b 0.0 (D4b) Mongolia / Omnogobi / DA45 [31]
4 m.8340G>A, tRNA Lysine/H Middle Ages (10–375 CE) HV18 0.0 (H2a) Poland / Kowalewko, Greater Poland / PCA0018 [32] 0.00% Canada [42], UK [43], Denmark [44] Cfrm Path Pathogenic (M2-P51) Myopathy/Exercise Intolerance/Eye disease+SNHL
5 m.14674T>C, tRNA Glutamic acid/L Bronze Age (1592–1591 BCE) U2e1h 0.0 (H2a) Mongolia / Mitjurino / DA231 [31] 0.01% US [16], UK [45], Germany [46], Brazil [47], Italy [47], Sweden [47], Japan [48] Cfrm Path Pathogenic (M2-P73) Reversible COX deficiency myopathy (Homoplasmy)
6 m.7510T>C (rs199474820) tRNA Serine/L Neolithic (5800–5400 BCE) J2b1 0.0 (J2b) Bulgaria / Malak Preslavets / I1109 [49] 0.00% UK [50], Spain [51], Japan [52], Finland [53], Hungary [54], North American Caucasian families [55] Cfrm Path Pathogenic (M1-P5) SNHL (Heteroplasmy)
Likely/Possibly pathogenic
7 m.1624C>T tRNA Valine/H Middle Ages (10–375 CE) T2e 0.0 (U3a) Poland / Kowalewko, Greater Poland / PCA0037 (55) 0.00% Japanese [56] PP Pathogenic (M2-P25) Leigh Syndrome (Homoplasmy)
8 m.4440G>A tRNA Methionine/H Neolithic (2800–2776 BCE) T2b 0.0 (T2b) Poland / Koszyce/ RISE1159 (55) 0.00% Spain [57] PP Pathogenic (M2-P42) MM (Heteroplasmy)
Neolithic (2800–2776 BCE) K1a1b1e 0.0 (K1a) Poland / Koszyce/ RISE1162 (55)
Neolithic (2800–2776 BCE) HV0a 0.0 (V7) Poland / Koszyce/ RISE1163 (55)
Neolithic (2800–2776 BCE) J1c3f 0.0 (J1c) Poland / Koszyce/ RISE1166 (55)
Neolithic (2800–2776 BCE) HV0a 0.0 (V7) Poland / Koszyce/ RISE1173 (55)
Iron Age (900–600 BCE) F1b1b 0.0 (M) Russia / Grishkin Log 1 / DA9 [31]
Iron Age (800–773 BCE) H10 0.0 (D4) Kazakhstan / Birlik, Kurgan 12, Bajanaul DA17 [31]
Iron Age (600–400 BCE) C4a1a 0.0 (H2a) Kazakhstan / Karaganda, Kurgan Sjartas, Shetskiy / DA10 [31]
Iron Age (357–342 BCE) C4a1a+195 0.0 (H2a) Kazakhstan / Kurgan Sjiderti 17, Burial 1, Sjiderte, Pavlodar / DA20 [31]
Iron Age (201–148 BCE) D4b2b4 0.0 (H2a) Mongolia / Hovsgol, Grave #18 / DA38 [31]
Iron Age (49 BCE-53 CE) N9a2a 0.0 (N9a) Mongolia / Arkhangai, Grave #1 / DA39 [31]
Iron Age (47 BCE-24 CE) U4a2 0.0 (H2a) Kazakhstan / Naurzum, Kurgan (3), Naurzumskijzapobednik DA30 [31]
Iron Age (177–190 CE) A16 0.0 (A16) Kazakhstan / Kurgan nr. 50, Japyryk / DA81 [31]
Iron Age (397–570 CE) H13a2a 0.0 (H13a) Kazakhstan / Kurgan nr. 1, Baskya 2 / DA385 [31]
Middle Ages (550–850 CE) A15c 0.0 (A15c) Kazakhstan / Bt, 2015, area 1, element 1, layer 3, skeleton 6/ DA228 [31]
Middle Ages (901–920 CE) F2c1 0.0 (F2c) Kazakhstan / Almaly, Kurgan 1, Object 1, Issyk, Tian Shan / DA126 [31]
9 m.5628T>C, tRNA Alanine/L Iron Age (400–200 BCE) F1d 100 (F1d) Moldova / Glinoe / SCY308 [58] 0.19% Brazilian woman [59], Italy [60], Germany [61], LP Pathogenic (M2-P31) CPEO / DEAF enhancer / gout (Heteroplasmy)
10 m.7543A>G tRNA Aspartic acid /H Neolithic (8200–7700 BCE) R2 3.70 (R2) Iran / Tepe Abdul Hosein, Central Zagros / AH1 [62] 0.09% USA [63], Germany [64] PP Pathogenic (M2-P29) MEPR (Heteroplasmy)
11 m.7554G>A, tRNA Aspartic acid/H Neolithic (8205–7756 BCE) R2 3.70 (R2) Iran / Tepe Abdul Hosein, Central Zagros / AH2 [62] 0.00% UK [65] PP Pathogenic (M2-P40) Myopathy, ataxia, nystagmus, migraines, lactic acidosis (Heteroplasmy)
Middle Ages (10–375 CE) HV18 0.0 (H2a) Poland / Kowalewko, Greater Poland / PCA0018 (55)
12 m.8296A>G tRNA Lysine/H Bronze (2872–2583 BCE) U2d2 41.67 (U2d) Russia / Grachevka, Sok River, Samara / I0371 [49] 0.07% Japan [66] PP Pathogenic (M2-P2) DMDF / MERRF / HCM / epilepsy (Heteroplasmy)
13 m.8328G>A tRNA Lysine/H Middle Ages (80–260 CE) U3a1a 0.0 (U3a) Poland / Kowalewko, Greater Poland / PCA0054 (55) 0.00% UK [67] LP Pathogenic (M2-P39) Mito Encephalopathy / EXIT with myopathy and ptosis (Heteroplasmy)
14 m.8342G>A rs118192103/ tRNA-Lysine/H Middle Ages (10–375 CE) HV18 0.0 (H2a) Poland / Kowalewko, Greater Poland / PCA0018 (55) 0.00% Italy [68] LP Pathogenic (M2-P53) CPEO and Myoclonus (Heteroplasmy)
15 m.12300G>A tRNA Leucine/H Middle Ages (80–260 CE) U3a1a1 0.0 (U3a) Poland / Kowalewko, Greater Poland / PCA0004 (55) 0.00% Spain [69] PP Pathogenic (M0-P36) MERRF (Heteroplasmy)
16 m.15915G>A tRNA Threonine/H Middle Ages (80–120 CE) T2n 0.0 (U5b) Poland / Kowalewko, Greater Poland / PCA0032 (55) 0.00% Japan [70] PP Pathogenic (M2-P30) Encephalomyopathy (Heteroplasmy)

GB Freq—GenBank frequencies; CPEO—Chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia; MM—Mitochondrial myopathies; MERRF—Myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers; MEPR—Myoclonic epilepsy and psychomotor regression; DMDF—Diabetes Mellitus + Deafness. HCM—Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; MELAS—Mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis. and stroke-like episodes; MIDD—Maternally inherited diabetes and deafness; SNHL—Sensorineural hearing loss; NARP–Neuropathy, ataxia and retinitis pigmentosa; Cfrm Path–confirmed pathogenic; LP–likely pathogenic; PP–possibly pathogenic; M—tRNA model; P–position in tRNA model (HmtVar).

Confirmed pathogenic mutations

m.5703G>A (rs199476130)

The variant m.5703G>A was found in five ancient mtDNA samples, one from the Neolithic period, three from the Iron Age and one from the Middle Ages. The two of the Iron Age samples are from the same site and time period in today`s Russia, extracted the aged remains of a male and a female, and they probably related. This is also the pathogenic variant established in ancient mtDNA from archeological sites spanning the widest geographical range, i.e. from Poland to Mongolia. Our literature survey for the m.5703G>A mutation finds that it has been reported to cause mitochondrial myopathy (MM) and ophtalmoplegia [28, 29]. Recently, its phenotypic spectrum was broadened by a report of a patient with typical myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fiber (MERRF) syndrome carrying a heteroplasmic m.5703G>A mutation [30]. In another recent study, however, it has been argued that investigations carried out to confirm the pathogenicity of this variant are insufficient [71].

m.3243A>G (rs199474657)

This variant was detected in a sample from a site in Germany from the Bronze Age (2029–1911 BCE) (Table 1). Population-based studies suggest the m.3243A>G mutation is one of the most common disease-causing mtDNA mutations, with a carrier rate of 1 in 400 people [72, 73]. This mutation has been shown to be associated with a wide range of symptoms, and there is evidence the outcome is also being determined by nuclear genetic factors [34]. It is associated with mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) [74], maternally inherited deafness and diabetes (MIDD) [75] and chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) [76]. Other reported features include renal failure [77], isolated myopathy, cardiomyopathy, seizures, migraine, ataxia, cognitive impairment, bowel dysmotility and short stature [78]. Low to moderate levels of mutant heteroplasmy in the m.3243G>A mutation are often associated with MIDD, whereas higher levels are variably associated with myopathy, high frequency sensorineural hearing loss, short stature, epilepsy, strokes and dementia [11, 79, 80]. Elevated heteroplasmy levels have in general been shown to lead to neurologic, movement, metabolic, and cardiopulmonary impairments [81].

m.5650G>A

This variants was found in 3 samples from the Iron Age, but they are from different Central Asian sites and time periods (ranging from 900 BCE to 134 BCE), so the individuals they were taken from are in all likelihood unrelated. McFarland and colleagues (2008) report a family where proximal myopathy has become increasingly severe with successive generations of the maternal lineage, and this pure myopathy is shown to be caused by the m.5650G>A mutation [39]. Finnila et al. (2001) describe a patient with MERRF, who had a de novo m. 5650G>A mutation in the tRNA Alanine gene [41]. The mutation was heteroplasmic, with the proportions of the mutant genome being up to 99% in muscle. They suggest that the mtDNA mutation is pathogenic as it was associated with relevant clinical phenotype, it is absent in controls, and it alters a structurally important segment in the amino acid acceptor stem in the tRNA Alanine.

m.8340G>A

The variant was found in one sample from the Middle Ages (10–375 CE). A number of studies have established association between the m.8340G>A variant and various clinical conditions. Jeppesen et al. (2014) report two patients with a de novo m.8340G>A variant associated with exercise intolerance, CPEO and myopathy [82]. Gill et al. (2017) report a patient carrying this mutation with cataracts, pigmented retinopathy, rod-cone dysfunction and sensory neural deafness without myopathy [43]. Tamopolsky et al. (2019) report a case with a de novo m.8340G>A DNA mutation associated with mitochondrial myopathy, ptosis and ophthalmoparesis, corroborating the pathogenicity of the m.8340G>A mutation [42]. The collective data is consistent with a categorization of “pathogenic” given that the variant is found in much higher frequency in patients (3 reports) vs a control population, and with much higher heteroplasmy levels reported in ragged blue fibers and COX-negative vs healthy fibers [43, 82].

m.14674T>C

The variant was found in one sample from Poland from the Bronze Age (1592–1591 BCE). A study by Houshmand et al. (1994) describes two patients with Mitochondrial myopathy (MM) that are carriers of the m.14674T>C mutation. Nucleotides that are conserved between species are unaffected by this mutation, and the authors presume that it is unlikely to be pathogenic. This homoplasmic mutation has been identified in reversible infantile cytochrome c oxidase deficiency (or “Benign COX deficiency”) [47]. Carriers of this mutation experience subacute onset of profound hypotonia, feeding difficulties and lactic acidosis within the first months of life. Although recovery may occur, mild myopathy persists into adulthood [45].

m.7510T>C (rs199474820)

This variants was found in one sample from present day Bulgaria from the Neolithic period, estimated to be from 5800–5400 BCE, and is thus the oldest pathogenic variant detected in this study. A number of studies have established association between the m.7510T>C mutation and non-syndromic sensorineural hearing impairment (SNHL) [50, 51, 54, 55]. Review of the published cases suggests that there is interfamilial variability in the age of onset, accompanying symptoms, and haplogroup background [54]. The results of Kytövuori and colleagues (2017) suggest that in addition to sensorineural hearing impairment, the m.7510T>C mutation is associated with a spectrum of mitochondrial disease clinical features including migraine, epilepsy, cognitive impairment, ataxia, and tremor, and with evidence of mitochondrial myopathy [53].

Likely/possibly pathogenic mutations

This group includes ten mutations for which there is discrepancy in their clinical effect designation between the two used platforms. Whereas HmtVar classifies them as pathogenic, MitoMap classifies them as likely or possibly pathogenic (Table 1).

Discussion

This study establishes for the first time the presence of pathogenic mtDNA variants in 1443 ancient mtDNA Eurasian genomes from different periods, publicly available in the AmtDB database. Among the 3191 unique variants detected in the analyzed samples, six are “confirmed pathogenic” with well-established clinical association in contemporary patients. Our results suggest that the prevalence of pathogenic mtDNA mutations might have been far greater in ancient populations, eleven cases of six unique confirmed pathogenic mtDNA mutations were established in 1443 ancient samples, compared to 1.5–2.9 in 100000 in contemporary populations [72]. This marked drop in prevalence might be related to the prevalence of particular mitochondrial haplogroups as there is evidence that certain pathogenic mutations are associated with particular haplogroup background [83].

The m.5703G>A mutation is established in European and Asian ancient samples, whereas in contemporary patients it is detected in a 16-year-old Caucasian girl in Europe and a Chinese girl, along with an African-American woman (cf. Table 1, Fig 1). Contemporary geographic distribution for this variant thus generally corresponds to that in the examined past periods. This variant was established in samples assigned to five different haplogroups (cf. Table 1), implying that it does not associate with a particular haplogroup, and has probably recurred in populations with different haplogroup background.

Fig 1. Geographic location of the Eurasian archaeological sites where mtDNA samples containing “confirmed pathogenic” variants had been found (cf. Table 1).

Fig 1

The variant m.5650G>A is established in three ancient samples from the Asian region (today`s Russia, Kazakhstan and Mongolia), assigned to three different haplogroups, while contemporary patients are all in Europe (cf. Table 1, Fig 1). The sample found in today`s Russia is W1c haplogroup which is determined to have arisen 8 kya [84], and is presently found in Europe, the Near East, Caucasus and India [85]. The samples found in today`s Kazakhstan and Mongolia belong to East Asian haplogroups F1b1 and D4b2b2b, respectively [86]. The estimated distribution of m.5650G>A in ancient times thus generally corresponds to the contemporary distribution of the haplogroups harboring these variant. The incidence of the variant in contemporary European populations, where F1b1 and D4b2b2b lineages are rare, indicates lack of association of the variant with these haplogroups. The presence of m.5650G>A in contemporary European samples, and its absence from ancient European samples, might be the result of de novo mutation or migration and subsequent evolutionary events.

The remaining four ancient pathogenic variants are established in single samples belonging to different mitochondrial haplogroups. The m.14674T>C variant was determined in only one ancient sample from the territory of present day Mongolia, but contemporary carriers of this variant are found in the U.S., Germany, Brazil, Italy, Japan, the UK and Sweden. This ancient sample is classified to haplogroup U2e1h, a sub-branch of haplogroup U2e, presently found at low frequencies in Europe and Western Asia [87]. The correspondence of the contemporary distribution of m.14674T>C with the geographic range of the relatively rare U2e1h lineage indicates possible association between this variant and haplogroup.

Overlap between the geographical location of the ancient sample and the present-day distribution of the corresponding mitochondrial haplogroup is found in three more pathogenic mutations: m.8340G>A established in an ancient sample from present day Poland (assigned to the Western Eurasian haplogroup HV18); m.7510T>C detected in an ancient sample from present day Bulgaria (designated to haplogroup J2b1, found among modern populations in Atlantic Europe, the East European Plain and the Near East); and m.3243A>G found in ancient sample from Germany (belonging to a subclade of T2f, considered almost exclusively European, with rare instances in the Near East) [88].

The established “confirmed pathogenic” mutations are detected in samples estimated to be between 1600 and 7800 years old. The oldest of these, m.7510T>C, is detected in a Neolithic sample (5800–5400 ВСЕ). The m.5703G>A mutation was detected in a Neolithic sample that could be as old as 4800 years, but it is found again in samples from later periods, Iron Age (900–600 BCE) and Middle Age (10–375 CE). Other mutations with established long histories, detected in >4000 years old Bronze Age samples are m.3243A>G, the most common mtDNA mutation with pathogenic effect, present in contemporary populations with 0.02% frequency, and m.14674T>C, found in a 2600 old Bronze Age sample, and also found in contemporary populations with 0.01% frequency (cf. Table 1). The m.5650G>A mutation is detected in an Iron Age sample that could be as old as 2900 years. The low population frequency of these variants in contemporary populations is further corroboration of their pathogenic significance.

Two mutations with likely/possibly pathogenic effect, m.7543A>G and m.7554G>A, detected in Neolithic period samples from the Neolithic period from the same archeological site and time span, are the oldest established mutations with putatively pathogenic effect (10200–10000 years old). Also, two Bronze Age mutations, m.8296A>G and m.4440G>A, could be as old as 4800 years. It is noteworthy that m.4440G>A is detected in as many as 12 ancient samples from different time periods and locations. Its pathogenic effect is corroborated by that, despite it being the most common clinically significant mutation detected in ancient mtDNA samples in this study, it has been described as a novel mutation causing MM in contemporary patients [57].

It is noticeable that all the established ancient mutations putatively associated with diseases are located in tRNA genes, and none is in genes encoding the 13 essential polypeptides of the OXPHOS system, even though tRNAs comprise only about 10% of the total coding capacity of the mitochondrial genome [89]. Epidemiological studies have highlighted that point mutations in the mt-tRNA genes are among the most common defects observed [73, 90]. Mitochondrial tRNA mutations have been shown to be the most prevalent genetic defect by a survey of an adult population with mtDNA disease, accounting for more than 50% of all genetically diagnosed cases [91]. More than 150 different point mutations have been described in mt-tRNA genes including novel disease-causing mutations. Associated pathogenic mechanisms continue to be identified [92], yet mtRNA mutations`role in interfering with the translation mechanism remains unclear.

Ancient mutations putatively associated with mitochondrial diseases are in different tRNA genes and affect nucleotides in different functional parts of the encoded tRNA molecule (Table 2).

Table 2. Nucleotide position in tRNA cloverleaf secondary domains of ancient mutations in tRNAs.

Nr Mutation Gene Nucleotide position in tRNA cloverleaf secondary domains (loops and stems)
Confirmed Pathogenic
1 m.5703G>A MT-TN Position 27 in CS—Anticodon Stem
2 m.3243A>G MT-TL1 Position 14 in DL—Dihydrouridine Loop
3 m.5650G>A MT-TA Position 6 in AS—Acceptor Stem
4 m.8340G>A MT-TK Position 51 in TS—TψC Stem
5 m.14674T>C MT-TE Position 73 in E—3' End
6 m.7510T>C MT-TS1 Position 5 in AS—Acceptor Stem
Likely/Possibly Pathogenic
7 m.1624C>T MT-TV Position 25 in DS—Dihydrouridine Stem
8 m.4440G>A MT-TM Position 42 in CS—Anticodon Stem
9 m.5628T>C MT-TA Position 31 in CS—Anticodon Stem
10 m.7543A>G MT-TD Position 29 in CS—Anticodon Stem
11 m.7554G>A MT-TD Position 40 in CS—Anticodon Stem
12 m.8296A>G MT-TK Position 2 in AS—Acceptor Stem
13 m.8328G>A MT-TK Position 39 in CS—Anticodon Stem
14 m.8342G>A MT-TK Position 53 in TS—TψC Stem
15 m.12300G>A MT-TL2 Position 36 in CL—Anticodon Loop
16 m.15915G>A MT-TT Position 30 in CS—Anticodon Stem

The gene MT-TK coding tRNA Lysine is most commonly affected by mutations putatively associated with mitochondrial diseases in ancient mtDNA samples, i.e. one confirmed pathogenic (m.8340G>A) and three likely/possibly pathogenic (m.8296A>G, m.8328G>A and m.8342G>A). It is conceivable that these mutations have different clinical significance related to their impact on the stability of the tRNA protein.

A recent study on another mtDNA mutation in the same gene - m.8344 A>G, known to be associated with MERRF, has demonstrated that tRNA modifications have distinct effects on the stability and synthesis of mitochondrial proteins [82]. Such regulating mechanisms might play role in the etiology of human disease, and new RNA sequencing approaches to mitochondria should provide insights. Two ancient mutations were established in the MT-TD coding Aspartic acid. Aspartic acid is neurotransmitter and recent studies show that it may be involved in the pathogenesis of a stroke-like episode [43]. The remaining putatively pathogenic mutations established in ancient mtDNA are located in different tRNA genes.

It is notable that the established ancient mutations are located in different cloverleaf models of tRNAs. (Fig 2). The tRNA model indicates one of the four possible groups human mt-tRNAs are classified based on their structural diversity and tertiary interactions [93]. Model 0 represents the quasi-canonical cloverleaf structure, with standard D-loop/T-loop interaction; Model 1- a single tRNA with an atypical anticodon stem; Model 2 –the most common among mt-RNAs, is characterized by loss of D-loop/T-loop interaction and Model 3—lack of D-stem. Thirteen out of the sixteen mutations putatively associated with mitochondrial disease presented in this study are in Model 2.

Fig 2. Location on tRNA nucleotide sequence of ancient Cfrm/LP/PP mutations (HmtVar).

Fig 2

The positions of the tRNA nucleotide sequence affected by mutations are indicated with a black arrows for cfrm mutations and blue arrows for LP/PP mutations.

Seven out of the 16 mutations considered here are located in CS-Anticodon Stem, four in AS-Acceptor Stem, two in TS-TΨC Stem, and single mutations are located in DL-Dihydrouridine Loop, CL-Anticodon Loop and DS-Dihydrouridine Stem (Fig 2).

Confirmed pathogenic mutation m.5703G>A is located on position 27 in Model 2 tRNA which is involved in post-transcriptional modifications and is adjacent to position 26, which participates in tertiary folding and is also subject to posttranscriptional modifications. Confirmed pathogenic mutation m.3243A>G in Model 0 t RNA affects position 14, which is involved in tertiary folding with interactions represented by lines on Fig 2. Mutation m.14674T>C in Model 2 tRNA is in position 73 in 3' End of the acceptor stem, which participates in 3' end-editing in the final stages of tRNA formation. The role of the remaining three confirmed pathogenic mutations is more difficult to be determined. Mutation m.5650G>A is in position 6 of the acceptor stem of a Model 2 tRNA. Pathogenic mutation m.8340G>A in position 51 of a Model 2 tRNA is located next to position 50 nucleotide involved in post-transcriptional modifications.

Three mutations with putatively pathogenic effect are in positions that affect the structure and the function of the tRNA, m.12300G>A in position 36 of the CL-Anticodon Loop, m.8328G>A in position 39 and m.7554G>A in position 40 that all have impact on post-transcriptional modifications.

Mutations in tRNA genes could lead to disturbances of three dimensional structure, the absence of post-transcriptional modifications of the tRNA, rise in the number of errors and thus to tRNA destabilization. This could result in accumulation of cell damaging proteins and cutback of mitochondrial protein synthesis, including reduction of OXPHOS proteins. Despite the clinical significance, the molecular mechanisms leading to such disturbances remain poorly understood.

As often happens in ancient DNA analyses, because the amount of endogenous template DNA is typically very low, the surviving molecules are typically short and affected by post-mortem cytosine deamination damage which appears as C>T and G>A variants in sequence data [94]. It is noteworthy to mention that 12 out of the 19 (63.2%) pathogenic or putatively pathogenic mutations that we detect in the analyzed ancient mtDNA samples are G>A or C>T substitutions. Review of the publications that present the analyzed ancient mtDNA genomes substantiates that the authors have employed adequate analyses to mitigate the effect of post mortem damage (PMD), strengthening our confidence that these are real variants and not the result of PMD [27, 31, 33].

Still, pathogenic mutations in mitochondrial DNA often show highly variable phenotypes for any given point mutation, and severity of the clinical and biochemical phenotype has been roughly proportionate to the percent mutant heteroplasmy [10, 79]. Identifying heteroplasmic variants and establishing the level of heteroplasmy in ancient samples is not a trivial task. Heteroplasmic variants however constitute the bulk of disease-associated mtDNA variants in contemporary humans, and most of the detected confirmed or putatively pathogenic variants in our study have pathogenic effect in heteroplasmic state. Nevertheless due to insufficient phenotypic data about the human remains, there is no way of exactly knowing if disease-associated mutations, or those predicted to have a strong functional effect, were indeed pathogenic in ancient populations.

Conclusion

The established mtDNA pathogenic mutations in the analyzed ancient samples, all in tRNA coding genes, are putatively associated with a wide range of mitochondrial diseases found in contemporary populations. Studying putative pathogenic mutations from ancient mtDNA informs on the mitochondrial disease spectrum in ancient times, and comparing their frequencies among populations separated by significant time periods sheds light on the history of the disease. Our findings suggest that disease associated genes are often genes with long history, and that pathogenic variants in mtDNA exhibit diverse temporal dynamics with regard to their geographic distribution and mitochondrial haplogroup background association. Exposing pathogenic variants in ancient human populations contributes to our understanding of their origin and prevalence dynamics.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Binder M, Roberts C, Spencer N, Antoine D, Cartwright C. On the antiquity of cancer: evidence for metastatic carcinoma in a young man from ancient Nubia (c. 1200 BC). PloS one. 2014;9(3):e90924 10.1371/journal.pone.0090924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Edward JO, Patrick SR-Q, Maryna S, Zach T, Jacqueline SS, Bernhard Z, et al. Earliest hominin cancer: 1.7-million-year-old osteosarcoma from Swartkrans Cave, South Africa. South African Journal of Science. 2016;112(7/8). [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Entezami P, Fox DA, Clapham PJ, Chung KC. Historical perspective on the etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Hand Clin. 2011;27(1):1–10. 10.1016/j.hcl.2010.09.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Phelan J, Weiner M, Ricci J, Plummer T, Gauld S, Potts R, et al. Diagnosis of the pathology of the Kanam mandible. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2007;4(103):e20. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Monge J, Kricun M, Radovčić J, Radovčić D, Mann A, Frayer DW. Fibrous dysplasia in a 120,000+ year old Neandertal from Krapina, Croatia. PloS one. 2013;8(6):e64539 10.1371/journal.pone.0064539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Odes EJ, Randolph-Quinney PS, Steyn M, Throckmorton Z, Smilg JS, Zipfel B, et al. Earliest hominin cancer: 1.7-million-year-old osteosarcoma from Swartkrans Cave, South Africa. South African Journal of Science. 2016;112(7–8):1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Murphy WA Jr, Nedden Dz, Gostner P, Knapp R, Recheis W, Seidler H. The iceman: discovery and imaging. Radiology. 2003;226(3):614–29. 10.1148/radiol.2263020338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berens AJ, Cooper TL, Lachance J. The genomic health of ancient hominins. Human biology. 2017;89(1):7–20. 10.13110/humanbiology.89.1.01 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wallace DC, Singh G, Lott MT, Hodge JA, Schurr TG, Lezza A, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutation associated with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Science. 1988;242(4884):1427–30. 10.1126/science.3201231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jeppesen TD, Schwartz M, Olsen DB, Vissing J. Oxidative capacity correlates with muscle mutation load in mitochondrial myopathy. Annals of Neurology. 2003;54(1):86–92. 10.1002/ana.10594 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van den Ouweland JMW, Lemkes HHPJ, Trembath RC, Ross R, Velho G, Cohen D, et al. Maternally inherited diabetes and deafness is a distinct subtype of diabetes and associates with a single point mutation in the mitochondrial tRNA(Leu(UUR)) gene. Diabetes. 1994;43(6):746 10.2337/diab.43.6.746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ghelli A, Porcelli AM, Zanna C, Vidoni S, Mattioli S, Barbieri A, et al. The background of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup J increases the sensitivity of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy cells to 2, 5-hexanedione toxicity. PloS one. 2009;4(11):e7922 10.1371/journal.pone.0007922 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Caporali L, Maresca A, Capristo M, Del Dotto V, Tagliavini F, Valentino ML, et al. Incomplete penetrance in mitochondrial optic neuropathies. Mitochondrion. 2017;36:130–7. 10.1016/j.mito.2017.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wallace DC. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in disease and aging. Environmental and molecular mutagenesis. 2010;51(5):440–50. 10.1002/em.20586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Modi A, Nesheva D, Sarno S, Vai S, Karachanak-Yankova S, Luiselli D, et al. Ancient human mitochondrial genomes from Bronze Age Bulgaria: new insights into the genetic history of Thracians. Scientific reports. 2019;9(1):5412 10.1038/s41598-019-41945-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM, et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic acids research. 2014;42(Database issue):D980–D5. 10.1093/nar/gkt1113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lott MT, Leipzig JN, Derbeneva O, Xie HM, Chalkia D, Sarmady M, et al. mtDNA variation and analysis using MITOMAP and MITOMASTER. Current protocols in bioinformatics. 2013;44(1):1.23 1–1. 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ehler E, Novotný J, Juras A, Chyleński M, Moravčík O, Pačes J. AmtDB: a database of ancient human mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic acids research. 2018;47(D1):D29–D32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mitchell AL, Elson JL, Howell N, Taylor RW, Turnbull DM. Sequence variation in mitochondrial complex I genes: mutation or polymorphism? Journal of medical genetics. 2006;43(2):175 10.1136/jmg.2005.032474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yarham JW, Al-Dosary M, Blakely EL, Alston CL, Taylor RW, Elson JL, et al. A comparative analysis approach to determining the pathogenicity of mitochondrial tRNA mutations. Human Mutation. 2011;32(11):1319–25. 10.1002/humu.21575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wong L-JC. Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations in protein-coding genes. Muscle & Nerve. 2007;36(3):279–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.González-Vioque E, Bornstein B, Gallardo ME, Fernández-Moreno MÁ, Garesse R. The pathogenicity scoring system for mitochondrial tRNA mutations revisited. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 2014;2(2):107–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Brandon MC, Ruiz-Pesini E, Mishmar D, Procaccio V, Lott MT, Nguyen KC, et al. MITOMASTER: a bioinformatics tool for the analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Human mutation. 2009;30(1):1–6. 10.1002/humu.20801 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic acids research. 2016;44(D1):D67–D72. 10.1093/nar/gkv1276 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sonney S, Leipzig J, Lott MT, Zhang S, Procaccio V, Wallace DC, et al. Predicting the pathogenicity of novel variants in mitochondrial tRNA with MitoTIP. PLOS Computational Biology. 2017;13(12):e1005867 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Preste R, Vitale O, Clima R, Gasparre G, Attimonelli M. HmtVar: a new resource for human mitochondrial variations and pathogenicity data. Nucleic acids research. 2018;47(D1):D1202–D10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schroeder H, Margaryan A, Szmyt M, Theulot B, Włodarczak P, Rasmussen S, et al. Unraveling ancestry, kinship, and violence in a Late Neolithic mass grave. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116(22):10705–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moraes CT, Ciacci F, Bonilla E, Jansen C, Hirano M, Rao N, et al. Two novel pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations affecting organelle number and protein synthesis. Is the tRNA(Leu(UUR)) gene an etiologic hot spot? The Journal of clinical investigation. 1993;92(6):2906–15. 10.1172/JCI116913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vives‐Bauza C, Del Toro M, Solano A, Montoya J, Andreu A, Roig M. Genotype–phenotype correlation in the 5703G> A mutation in the tRNAAsn gene of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of inherited metabolic disease. 2003;26(5):507–8. 10.1023/a:1025133629685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fu J, Ma M-M, Pang M, Yang L, Li G, Song J, et al. Broadening the phenotype of m.5703G>A mutation in mitochondrial tRNAAsn gene from mitochondrial myopathy to myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers syndrome. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019;132(7):865–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Damgaard PdB, Marchi N, Rasmussen S, Peyrot M, Renaud G, Korneliussen T, et al. 137 ancient human genomes from across the Eurasian steppes. Nature. 2018;557(7705):369–74. 10.1038/s41586-018-0094-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stolarek I, Juras A, Handschuh L, Marcinkowska-Swojak M, Philips A, Zenczak M, et al. A mosaic genetic structure of the human population living in the South Baltic region during the Iron Age. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):2455 10.1038/s41598-018-20705-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Knipper C, Mittnik A, Massy K, Kociumaka C, Kucukkalipci I, Maus M, et al. Female exogamy and gene pool diversification at the transition from the Final Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017:201706355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pickett SJ, Grady JP, Ng YS, Gorman GS, Schaefer AM, Wilson IJ, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity in m.3243A>G mitochondrial disease: The role of nuclear factors. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5(3):333–45. 10.1002/acn3.532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mancuso M, Orsucci D, Angelini C, Bertini E, Carelli V, Comi GP, et al. The m.3243A>G mitochondrial DNA mutation and related phenotypes. A matter of gender? Journal of Neurology. 2014;261(3):504–10. 10.1007/s00415-013-7225-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.de Laat P, Janssen MCH, Alston CL, Taylor RW, Rodenburg RJT, Smeitink JAM. Three families with ‘de novo’ m.3243A>G mutation. BBA Clinical. 2016;6:19–24. 10.1016/j.bbacli.2016.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Langdahl JH, Larsen M, Frost M, Andersen PH, Yderstraede KB, Vissing J, et al. Lecocytes mutation load declines with age in carriers of the m.3243A>G mutation: A 10-year Prospective Cohort. Clin Genet. 2018;93(4):925–8. 10.1111/cge.13201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Niedermayr K, Pölzl G, Scholl-Bürgi S, Fauth C, Schweigmann U, Haberlandt E, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutation “m.3243A>G”—Heterogeneous clinical picture for cardiologists (“m.3243A>G”: A phenotypic chameleon). Congenital Heart Disease. 2018;13(5):671–7. 10.1111/chd.12634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McFarland R, Swalwell H, Blakely EL, He L, Groen EJ, Turnbull DM, et al. The m.5650G>A mitochondrial tRNAAla mutation is pathogenic and causes a phenotype of pure myopathy. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 2008;18(1):63–7. 10.1016/j.nmd.2007.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Horváth R, Lochmüller H, Scharfe C, Do BH, Oefner PJ, Müller-Höcker J, et al. A tRNA (Ala) mutation causing mitochondrial myopathy clinically resembling myotonic dystrophy. Journal of medical genetics. 2003;40(10):752 10.1136/jmg.40.10.752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Finnila S, Tuisku S, Herva R, Majamaa K. A novel mitochondrial DNA mutation and a mutation in the Notch3 gene in a patient with myopathy and CADASIL. Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany). 2001;79(11):641–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tarnopolsky MA, Sundaram ANE, Provias J, Brady L, Sadikovic B. CPEO—Like mitochondrial myopathy associated with m.8340G>A mutation. Mitochondrion. 2019;46:69–72. 10.1016/j.mito.2018.02.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gill JS, Hardy SA, Blakely EL, Hopton S, Nemeth AH, Fratter C, et al. Pigmentary retinopathy, rod-cone dysfunction and sensorineural deafness associated with a rare mitochondrial tRNA(Lys) (m.8340G>A) gene variant. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(9):1298–302. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wibrand F, Jeppesen TD, Frederiksen AL, Olsen DB, Duno M, Schwartz M, et al. Limited diagnostic value of enzyme analysis in patients with mitochondrial tRNA mutations. Muscle & Nerve. 2010;41(5):607–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Uusimaa J, Jungbluth H, Fratter C, Crisponi G, Feng L, Zeviani M, et al. Reversible infantile respiratory chain deficiency is a unique, genetically heterogenous mitochondrial disease. Journal of medical genetics. 2011;48(10):660–8. 10.1136/jmg.2011.089995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Horvath R, Kemp JP, Tuppen HAL, Hudson G, Pyle A, Holinski-Feder E, et al. P75 Infantile reversible COX deficiency myopathy caused by the m.14674T>C mutation in mt-tRNA(Glu) in a German family. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2010;20:S25. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Horvath R, Kemp JP, Tuppen HA, Hudson G, Oldfors A, Marie SK, et al. Molecular basis of infantile reversible cytochrome c oxidase deficiency myopathy. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2009;132(Pt 11):3165–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mimaki M, Hatakeyama H, Komaki H, Yokoyama M, Arai H, Kirino Y, et al. Reversible infantile respiratory chain deficiency: A clinical and molecular study. Annals of Neurology. 2010;68(6):845–54. 10.1002/ana.22111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Mathieson I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Posth C, Szécsényi-Nagy A, Rohland N, Mallick S, et al. The genomic history of southeastern Europe. Nature. 2018;555(7695):197–203. 10.1038/nature25778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hutchin TP, Parker MJ, Young ID, Davis AC, Pulleyn LJ, Deeble J, et al. A novel mutation in the mitochondrial tRNASer (UCN) gene in a family with non-syndromic sensorineural hearing impairment. Journal of medical genetics. 2000;37(9):692–4. 10.1136/jmg.37.9.692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.del Castillo FJ, Villamar M, Moreno-Pelayo MA, Almela JJ, Morera C, Adiego I, et al. Maternally inherited non-syndromic hearing impairment in a Spanish family with the 7510T>C mutation in the mitochondrial tRNA(Ser(UCN)) gene. Journal of medical genetics. 2002;39(12):e82-e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Usami SI, Nishio SY. Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss and Deafness, Mitochondrial. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, et al. , editors. GeneReviews(®). Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle Copyright © 1993–2020, University of Washington, Seattle; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kytövuori L, Gardberg M, Majamaa K, Martikainen MH. The m. 7510T> C mutation: Hearing impairment and a complex neurologic phenotype. Brain and behavior. 2017;7(12):e00859 10.1002/brb3.859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Komlósi K, Maasz A, Kisfali P, Hadzsiev K, Bene J, Melegh BI, et al. Non-syndromic Hearing Impairment in a Hungarian Family with the m. 7510T> C Mutation of Mitochondrial tRNA Ser (UCN) and Review of Published Cases JIMD Reports–Case and Research Reports, 2012/6: Springer; 2012. p. 105–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Labay V, Garrido G, Madeo A, Nance W, Friedman T, Friedman P, et al. Haplogroup analysis supports a pathogenic role for the 7510T> C mutation of mitochondrial tRNASer (UCN) in sensorineural hearing loss. Clinical genetics. 2008;73(1):50–4. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00925.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sangatsuda Y, Nakamura M, Tomiyasu A, Deguchi A, Toyota Y, Goto Y-i, et al. Heteroplasmic m.1624C>T mutation of the mitochondrial tRNAVal gene in a proband and his mother with repeated consciousness disturbances. Mitochondrion. 2012;12(6):617–22. 10.1016/j.mito.2012.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Scarpelli M, Carreño-Gago L, Russignan A, de Luna N, Carnicer-Cáceres C, Ariatti A, et al. Identification and characterization of the novel m. 8305C> T MTTK and m. 4440G> A MTTM gene mutations causing mitochondrial myopathies. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2018;28(2):137–43. 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Juras A, Krzewińska M, Nikitin AG, Ehler E, Chyleński M, Łukasik S, et al. Diverse origin of mitochondrial lineages in Iron Age Black Sea Scythians. Scientific reports. 2017;7(1):43950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gamba J, Kiyomoto BH, de Oliveira ASB, Gabbai AA, Schmidt B, Tengan CH. The mutations m.5628T>C and m.8348A>G in single muscle fibers of a patient with chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2012;320(1):131–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Spagnolo M, Tomelleri G, Vattemi G, Filosto M, Rizzuto N, Tonin P. A new mutation in the mitochondrial tRNA(Ala) gene in a patient with ophthalmoplegia and dysphagia. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 2001;11(5):481–4. 10.1016/s0960-8966(01)00195-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lehmann D, Schubert K, Joshi PR, Hardy SA, Tuppen HAL, Baty K, et al. Pathogenic mitochondrial mt-tRNAAla variants are uniquely associated with isolated myopathy. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2015;23(12):1735–8. 10.1038/ejhg.2015.73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Broushaki F, Thomas MG, Link V, López S, van Dorp L, Kirsanow K, et al. Early Neolithic genomes from the eastern Fertile Crescent. Science. 2016;353(6298):499 10.1126/science.aaf7943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shtilbans A, El-Schahawi M, Malkin E, Shanske S, Musumeci O, DiMauro S. A Novel Mutation in the Mitochondrial DNA Transfer Ribonucleic AcidAsp Gene in a Child With Myoclonic Epilepsy and Psychomotor Regression. Journal of Child Neurology. 1999;14(9):610–3. 10.1177/088307389901400910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lehmann D, Schubert K, Joshi PR, Baty K, Blakely EL, Zierz S, et al. A novel m.7539C>T point mutation in the mt-tRNAAsp gene associated with multisystemic mitochondrial disease. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2015;25(1):81–4. 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.09.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Blakely EL, Yarham JW, Alston CL, Craig K, Poulton J, Brierley C, et al. Pathogenic Mitochondrial t RNA Point Mutations: Nine Novel Mutations Affirm Their Importance as a Cause of Mitochondrial Disease. Human mutation. 2013;34(9):1260–8. 10.1002/humu.22358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kameoka K, Isotani H, Tanaka K, Azukari K, Fujimura Y, Shiota Y, et al. Novel Mitochondrial DNA Mutation in tRNALys(8296A → G) Associated with Diabetes. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1998;245(2):523–7. 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Blakely EL, Swalwell H, Petty RKH, McFarland R, Turnbull DM, Taylor RW. Sporadic myopathy and exercise intolerance associated with the mitochondrial 8328G>A tRNALys mutation. Journal of Neurology. 2007;254(9):1283 10.1007/s00415-006-0490-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tiranti V, Carrara F, Confalonieri P, Mora M, Maffei RM, Lamantea E, et al. A novel mutation (8342G→ A) in the mitochondrial tRNALys gene associated with progressive external ophthalmoplegia and myoclonus. Neuromuscular Disorders. 1999;9(2):66–71. 10.1016/s0960-8966(98)00103-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Martín-Jiménez R, Martín-Hernández E, Cabello A, García-Silva MT, Arenas J, Campos Y. Clinical and cellular consequences of the mutation m.12300G>A in the mitochondrial tRNALeu(CUN) gene. Mitochondrion. 2012;12(2):288–93. 10.1016/j.mito.2011.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nishino I, Seki A, Maegaki Y, Takeshita K, Horai S, Nonaka I, et al. A novel mutation in the mitochondrial tRNA(Thr) gene associated with a mitochondrial encephalomyopathy. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1996;225(1):180–5. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Finsterer J. Is the MT-TN variant m.5703G>A truly causative for myoclonic epilepsy with ragged red fibers syndrome plus? Chin Med J (Engl). 2019;132(14):1752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gorman GS, Schaefer AM, Ng Y, Gomez N, Blakely EL, Alston CL, et al. Prevalence of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA mutations related to adult mitochondrial disease. Annals of neurology. 2015;77(5):753–9. 10.1002/ana.24362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Manwaring N, Jones MM, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Howard C, Mitchell P, et al. Population prevalence of the MELAS A3243G mutation. Mitochondrion. 2007;7(3):230–3. 10.1016/j.mito.2006.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kaufmann P, Engelstad K, Wei Y, Kulikova R, Oskoui M, Sproule DM, et al. Natural history of MELAS associated with mitochondrial DNA m.3243A>G genotype. Neurology. 2011;77(22):1965–71. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823a0c7f [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Suzuki S, Hinokio Y, Ohtomo M, Hirai M, Hirai A, Chiba M, et al. The effects of coenzyme Q10 treatment on maternally inherited diabetes mellitus and deafness, and mitochondrial DNA 3243 (A to G) mutation. Diabetologia. 1998;41(5):584–8. 10.1007/s001250050950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Souilem S, Chebel S, Mancuso M, Petrozzi L, Siciliano G, FrihAyed M, et al. A novel mitochondrial tRNAIle point mutation associated with chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia and hyperCKemia. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2011;300(1–2):187–90. 10.1016/j.jns.2010.08.065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Manouvrier S, Rotig A, Hannebique G, Gheerbrandt JD, Royer-Legrain G, Munnich A, et al. Point mutation of the mitochondrial tRNA(Leu) gene (A 3243 G) in maternally inherited hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, and sensorineural deafness. Journal of medical genetics. 1995;32(8):654–6. 10.1136/jmg.32.8.654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Moraes CT, Ciacci F, Silvestri G, Shanske S, Sciacco M, Hirano M, et al. Atypical clinical presentations associated with the MELAS mutation at position 3243 of human mitochondrial DNA. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 1993;3(1):43–50. 10.1016/0960-8966(93)90040-q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Goto Y, Nonaka I, Horai S. A mutation in the tRNA(Leu)(UUR) gene associated with the MELAS subgroup of mitochondrial encephalomyopathies. Nature. 1990;348(6302):651–3. 10.1038/348651a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Montagna P, Sacquegna T, Martinelli P, Cortelli P, Bresolin N, Moggio M, et al. Mitochondrial abnormalities in migraine. Preliminary findings. Headache. 1988;28(7):477–80. 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1988.hed2807477.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tranah GJ, Katzman SM, Lauterjung K, Yaffe K, Manini TM, Kritchevsky S, et al. Mitochondrial DNA m.3243A > G heteroplasmy affects multiple aging phenotypes and risk of mortality. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):11887 10.1038/s41598-018-30255-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Jeppesen TD, Duno M, Risom L, Wibrand F, Rafiq J, Krag T, et al. A novel de novo mutation of the mitochondrial tRNAlys gene mt. 8340G> a associated with pure myopathy. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2014;24(2):162–6. 10.1016/j.nmd.2013.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wei W, Gomez-Duran A, Hudson G, Chinnery PF. Background sequence characteristics influence the occurrence and severity of disease-causing mtDNA mutations. PLOS Genetics. 2017;13(12):e1007126 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Behar DM, van Oven M, Rosset S, Metspalu M, Loogväli E-L, Silva NM, et al. A "Copernican" reassessment of the human mitochondrial DNA tree from its root. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(4):675–84. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Olivieri A, Pala M, Gandini F, Kashani BH, Perego UA, Woodward SR, et al. Mitogenomes from Two Uncommon Haplogroups Mark Late Glacial/Postglacial Expansions from the Near East and Neolithic Dispersals within Europe. PloS one. 2013;8(7):e70492 10.1371/journal.pone.0070492 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Kong Q-P, Yao Y-G, Sun C, Bandelt H-J, Zhu C-L, Zhang Y-P. Phylogeny of east Asian mitochondrial DNA lineages inferred from complete sequences. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73(3):671–6. 10.1086/377718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Derenko M, Malyarchuk B, Denisova G, Perkova M, Litvinov A, Grzybowski T, et al. Western Eurasian ancestry in modern Siberians based on mitogenomic data. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14(1):217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pala M, Olivieri A, Achilli A, Accetturo M, Metspalu E, Reidla M, et al. Mitochondrial DNA signals of late glacial recolonization of Europe from near eastern refugia. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(5):915–24. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Anderson S, Bankier AT, Barrell BG, de Bruijn MHL, Coulson AR, Drouin J, et al. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature. 1981;290(5806):457–65. 10.1038/290457a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Majamaa K, Moilanen JS, Uimonen S, Remes AM, Salmela PI, Kärppä M, et al. Epidemiology of A3243G, the Mutation for Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Strokelike Episodes: Prevalence of the Mutation in an Adult Population. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 1998;63(2):447–54. 10.1086/301959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Schaefer AM, McFarland R, Blakely EL, He L, Whittaker RG, Taylor RW, et al. Prevalence of mitochondrial DNA disease in adults. Annals of Neurology. 2008;63(1):35–9. 10.1002/ana.21217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sacconi S, Salviati L, Nishigaki Y, Walker WF, Hernandez-Rosa E, Trevisson E, et al. A functionally dominant mitochondrial DNA mutation. Human molecular genetics. 2008;17(12):1814–20. 10.1093/hmg/ddn073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Diroma MA, Lubisco P, Attimonelli M. A comprehensive collection of annotations to interpret sequence variation in human mitochondrial transfer RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17(12):338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Thomas M, Gilbert P. Postmortem damage of mitochondrial DNA Human Mitochondrial DNA and the Evolution of Homo sapiens: Springer; 2006. p. 91–115. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

David Caramelli

23 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-13726

Ancient mitochondrial DNA pathogenic variants putatively associated with mitochondrial disease

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Toncheva,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please ensure that your decision is justified on PLOS ONE’s publication criteria and not, for example, on novelty or perceived impact.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 07 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

David Caramelli, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

3. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In the present paper, authors investigated on pathogenic mutations in ancient mtDNA, providing further insight into the emergence of mitochondrial diseases.

Although not all available ancient mitogenomes were considered, sources were reported and the analyses were detailed and appropriate. I have minor concerns regarding this study as it is currently presented and discussed. The authors could make modifications throughout the text to increase the quality of the manuscript and to comply with the standards for publication in Plos One. I suggest authors to improve their discussion by exploring the distribution of the mitochondrial pathogenic variants in modern populations, their geographic distribution and/or their differential distribution in the mitochondrial haplogroups. The latter could be an interesting discussion if compared with the mitochondrial haplogroup found in ancient samples harboring the same pathogenic mutations.

Few minor points to be checked are the following:

Line 44 “Exposing pathogenic variants in ancient human populations expands our understanding of their origin”: Authors could better argue this sentence in the conclusion paragraph and further explain the importance of this study.

Line 115 “confirmed pathogenic|” should modified in “confirmed pathogenic”

Line 135 “mitochondrial myopathy and ophtalmoplegia (MM)” MM is for mitochondrial myopathy thus I suggest to modify as follows: “mitochondrial myopathy (MM) and ophtalmoplegia”.

Line 144 “Population-based studies suggest the m.3243A>G mutation is the most common disease-causing…” Sentence has something wrong, please verify and change.

Line 88: “We used various publicly available databases to gather information to identify mtDNA sequence variants and to gather information about each variant…” Sentence has too much repetitions, please rephrase.

Line 161 I would prefer McFarland and colleagues instead of McFarland et al.

Line 175 Gill et al. Instead of Gill et al

The same for Houshmand et al line 187, and line 202 where “et al” should be “et al.“

Line 188-190. Sentence is confusing. Please rephrase

Table 1: notes are unclear because they are covered by row numbering. If I am right MERRF and

MEPR acronyms are reported twice.

Authors consider samples dated before 375CE as Middle Ages as reported in AmtDB database. As they belong to the Roman period, I think that this historical classification is arguable.

Line 206-209: “Likely/possibly pathogenic mutations” I suggest authors to briefly describe in this paragraph the main results even if they are summarized in the table.

Line 275: “Model 0 model” the word model is present twice.

Line 365 “…mutation in the mitochondrial tRNA <sup>Leu(UUR)</sup> gene. Diabetes. 1994;43(6):746”. Please change in “…mutation in the mitochondrial tRNA(Leu(UUR)) gene. Diabetes. 1994;43(6):746‐751”.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 24;15(9):e0233666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233666.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


30 Jul 2020

Dear Sirs,

Thank you for reviewing our manuscript and for letting us resubmit a revised version. We find all comments to be very helpful and constructive. We have taken up your suggestions, and the manuscript has been thoroughly revised. Notably, following the advice of the reviewer, we now discuss the spatiotemporal dynamics of the putatively pathogenic variants established in ancient samples based on their geographic location, contemporary epidemiological trends and haplogroup affiliation. Below, we explain in detail how we have addressed the various comments and suggestions. We believe that these changes have resulted in a much better version of the manuscript, which we hope is more befitting for publication in PLOS ONE.

Sincerely,

Prof. Draga Toncheva

Academic editor`s comments:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Our Reply: We have acquainted ourselves with PLOS ONE style templates and made sure the manuscript meets the journal`s style requirements

2. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager.

Our Reply: We updated the corresponding author`s information in Editorial Manager and validated the ORCID iD.

3. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

Our reply: We have now replaced this with our own very basic image that we deem sufficient.

REVIEWER(S)' COMMENTS:

Reviewer #1: In the present paper, authors investigated on pathogenic mutations in ancient mtDNA, providing further insight into the emergence of mitochondrial diseases.

Although not all available ancient mitogenomes were considered, sources were reported and the analyses were detailed and appropriate. I have minor concerns regarding this study as it is currently presented and discussed.

The authors could make modifications throughout the text to increase the quality of the manuscript and to comply with the standards for publication in Plos One.

Our Reply: We have thoroughly revised our manuscript to meet the standards for publication in PLOS ONE.

I suggest authors to improve their discussion by exploring the distribution of the mitochondrial pathogenic variants in modern populations, their geographic distribution and/or their differential distribution in the mitochondrial haplogroups. The latter could be an interesting discussion if compared with the mitochondrial haplogroup found in ancient samples harboring the same pathogenic mutations.

Our Reply: We have now added additional text at the beginning of the Discussion section exploring the overlap in distribution of the pathogenic variants in ancient and modern populations, and their differential distribution in the mitochondrial haplogroups.

Few minor points to be checked are the following:

Line 44 “Exposing pathogenic variants in ancient human populations expands our understanding of their origin”: Authors could better argue this sentence in the conclusion paragraph and further explain the importance of this study.

Our Reply: We have now added similar sentence in the “Conclusion” paragraph

Line 115 “confirmed pathogenic|” should modified in “confirmed pathogenic”

Our Reply: We have corrected this.

Line 135 “mitochondrial myopathy and ophtalmoplegia (MM)” MM is for mitochondrial myopathy thus I suggest to modify as follows: “mitochondrial myopathy (MM) and ophtalmoplegia”.

Our Reply: We have corrected this.

Line 144 “Population-based studies suggest the m.3243A>G mutation is the most common disease-causing…” Sentence has something wrong, please verify and change.

Our Reply: The phrase “the most common disease-causing” is changed to “one of the most common disease-causing”, and a reference is added to substantiate this claim.

Line 88: “We used various publicly available databases to gather information to identify mtDNA sequence variants and to gather information about each variant…” Sentence has too much repetitions, please rephrase.

Our Reply: This sentence has now been changed to “We used various publicly available databases to collect information on mtDNA sequence variants, including its clinical significance and contemporary population frequencies”

Line 161 I would prefer McFarland and colleagues instead of McFarland et al.

Our Reply: We have now changed that.

Line 175 Gill et al. Instead of Gill et al

The same for Houshmand et al line 187, and line 202 where “et al” should be “et al.“

Our Reply: We have now corrected these.

Line 188-190. Sentence is confusing. Please rephrase

Our Reply: You are absolutely right! We have now changed this sentence to “Nucleotides that are conserved between species are unaffected by this mutation, and the authors presume that it is unlikely to be pathogenic.”

Table 1: notes are unclear because they are covered by row numbering. If I am right MERRF and

MEPR acronyms are reported twice.

Our Reply: We have now corrected this.

Authors consider samples dated before 375CE as Middle Ages as reported in AmtDB database. As they belong to the Roman period, I think that this historical classification is arguable.

Our Reply: We have used the annotation given in the Ancient mtDNA database (Ehler E, et al. AmtDB: a database of ancient human mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic acids research. 2018;47), where these samples were taken from.

Line 206-209: “Likely/possibly pathogenic mutations” I suggest authors to briefly describe in this paragraph the main results even if they are summarized in the table.

Our Reply: We have now added that they are ten mutations. We choose to concentrate our attention to the group of “confirmed pathogenic” mutations and feel additional mention of these results is unnecessary.

Line 275: “Model 0 model” the word model is present twice.

Our Reply: We have now corrected this.

Line 365 “…mutation in the mitochondrial tRNA Leu(UUR) gene. Diabetes. 1994;43(6):746”. Please change in “…mutation in the mitochondrial tRNA(Leu(UUR)) gene. Diabetes. 1994;43(6):746‐751”.

Our Reply: We have now corrected this.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 1

David Caramelli

11 Aug 2020

Ancient mitochondrial DNA pathogenic variants putatively associated with mitochondrial disease

PONE-D-20-13726R1

Dear Dr. Toncheva,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

David Caramelli, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

David Caramelli

9 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-13726R1

Ancient mitochondrial DNA pathogenic variants putatively associated with mitochondrial disease

Dear Dr. Toncheva:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor David Caramelli

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES