Highlights
-
•
Pregnant and recently delivered women reported behavior changes due to COVID-19.
-
•
Preventive measures (e.g. social distancing) were used by respondents.
-
•
Negative changes in mental health, such as increased stress, were also reported.
-
•
Employment and fiscal security decreased; postpartum alcohol consumption increased.
-
•
Healthcare access remained stable for most.
Keywords: Maternal and infant health, Behavior changes, COVID-19, Pregnancy, Mental health, Healthcare access
Abstract
Objective
Better understand knowledge, attitudes and practices of pregnant women and mothers of infants around coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods
A 58-item electronic survey was distributed to pregnant and postpartum women (infants <12 months) who were >15 years, English-speaking and enrolled in prenatal programs. Data is summarized using central tendency, frequencies and nonparametric statistics.
Results
Of 114 (51 % response rate) participants, 82.5 % reported negative changes in mental status measures (e.g. stress, anxious thoughts, changes in sleep patterns). All reported risk-reduction behavior changes (e.g. handwashing/use of sanitizer, social distancing). Significant changes were reported in employment and financial status due to the pandemic. Increases in alcohol consumption among postpartum women were also reported. Few reported changes in prenatal, infant or postpartum healthcare access.
Conclusion
This study provides initial insight into the knowledge, attitudes and practices of pregnant and postpartum women during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study is limited as participants represent a single Midwest community and social desirability response bias may have impacted responses. However, results may inform future interventions to support pregnant women and mothers of infants during pandemics.
Practice implications
Providers should consider the impact of such events on mental status, access to resources and changes in behaviors.
1. Introduction
First identified in Wuhan, China, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is novel enough that minimal information is known regarding impact on pregnant women and infants [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]]. The CDC recommends pregnant women protect themselves from exposure to COVID-19 [8] as early data suggests negative outcomes for infants of COVID-19-infected women may include preterm birth, fetal distress, premature labor, respiratory distress and perinatal death [[9], [10], [11], [12]]. With overwhelming misinformation regarding COVID-19 [13] and females expressing significantly higher levels of stress, anxiety and depression [14], it is crucial to assess the impact on perinatal women. The purpose of this study is to better understand knowledge, attitudes and practices of perinatal women regarding COVID-19.
2. Methods
This observational cohort study utilized a convenience sample of pregnant women or mothers of infants <12 months enrolled in programs serving women at high-risk for poor birth outcomes (e.g. low income, uninsured). Participants were >15 years, residing in Sedgwick County and English speaking.
A brief study overview and the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) [15] survey link and informed consent information were emailed on April 22, 2020. Two reminders were sent at 1-week intervals. The 58-item survey included demographics, pandemic-related behaviors [16], pregnancy, infant and self-care, access to healthcare, mental health, and financial stability [17]. Due to skip logic most participants were not asked all items. Response time was <30 min. Respondents received a $25 gift card.
Relationships between demographic and other variables were evaluated by McNemar’s Test, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Chi Squared Likelihood-Ratio Test using SPSS for Windows, Version 23.0. Comparison of behaviors by distress and knowledge level violated assumptions due to low response rates in some categories, even when categories were truncated. The study was approved by the University of Kansas Medical Center Institutional Review Board.
3. Results
3.1. Participants
Of 222 potential participants, 114 (51 %) completed the survey; 46 (40.4 %) were pregnant and 68 (59.6 %) postpartum. No significant demographic differences were identified between pregnant and postpartum respondents; therefore, data is combined (Table 1 ).
Table 1.
Mean (SD); range | |
Woman’s Age (years) | 25.3 (SD = 6.0); 16 to 38 |
Infant’s Age (months) | 3.3 (SD = 2.4); 0 to 10 |
Children (not including pregnancy) | 1.2 (SD = 1.2); 0 to 5 |
N (%) | |
Race/Ethnicity | |
Non-Hispanic White | 49 (43.0) |
Non-Hispanic Black | 22 (19.3) |
Hispanic | 30 (26.3) |
Multi-racial | 6 (5.3) |
Other | 7 (6.1) |
Relationship Status | |
Married | 44 (38.6) |
Partnered | 26 (22.8) |
Single | 41 (36.0) |
Separated/Divorced | 3 (2.6) |
Education Level | |
Some High School | 18 (15.8) |
High School Graduate/GED | 50 (43.9) |
2-year Community College | 18 (15.8) |
4-year College | 14 (12.3) |
Graduate Degree | 8 (7.0) |
Other | 6 (5.3) |
Insurance | |
Medicaid | 65 (57.5) |
Private Insurance | 28 (24.8) |
Managed Care Org./Marketplace | 4 (3.5) |
Military | 4 (3.5) |
Self-pay | 12 (10.6) |
Mental Health Diagnoses | |
Anxiety | 11 (9.6) |
Depression | 9 (7.9) |
Both | 34 (29.8) |
Missing: Insurance, n = 1.
3.2. Knowledge and direct experience
Participants reported knowing a lot (n = 41; 36.0 %) or a little about COVID-19 (n = 71; 62.3 %), with few knowing nothing/being unsure (n = 2; 1.8 %). Most reported being very concerned (n = 48; 42.1 %) or somewhat concerned (n = 48; 42.1 %), with a minority not very/not at all concerned about COVID-19 (n = 17; 14.9 %). Three (13.6 %) had been tested for COVID-19.
Significant reductions in financial status and employment were reported during the pandemic (Table 2 ). Unmet needs (n = 23; 20.2 %) included lack of essential items (e.g. diapers) due to low stock in stores or finances, reduced social support and inability to access lactation, therapy and other support services.
Table 2.
Pre-pandemic |
Current |
|
---|---|---|
N (%) | N (%) | |
Employment Status* | ||
Full-time | 46 (40.4) | 29 (25.4) |
Part-time/Seasonal | 23 (202) | 17 (14.9) |
Not Employed – Not Looking | 26 (22.7) | 44 (38.6) |
Not Employed - Looking | 19 (16.7) | 24 (21.1) |
Working in Healthcare (if employed) | 13 (19.1) | 11 (23.9) |
Financial Status* | ||
Struggling to keep up with the costs of living | 29 (25.9) | 57 (50.4) |
Comfortable meeting the costs of living | 66 (58.9) | 45 (39.8) |
Keeping up with the costs of living with extra money | 17 (15.2) | 11 (9.7) |
Missing: Working in healthcare pre-pandemic (n = 1).
Indicates statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between pre-pandemic and current responses based on the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test.
Few participants experienced changes in healthcare access (Table 3 ). For those who did, it was at the physician’s request prenatally, but the woman’s preference for infant and postpartum appointments.
Table 3.
Pregnancy | Infant | Postpartum | |
---|---|---|---|
N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |
Change in in-person appointments | |||
Increased | 2 (2.4) | 1 (0.9) | -- |
Decreased | 9 (10.7) | 7 (6.3) | -- |
Stayed the Same | 56 (66.7) | 79 (71.2) | -- |
Don’t know | 17 (20.2) | 24 (21.6) | -- |
Change or plan to change appointments | |||
Plan to and still plan to | -- | -- | 84 (75.0) |
Plan to but do not plan to | -- | -- | 3 (2.7) |
Did not plan to and do not plan to | -- | -- | 6 (5.4) |
Did not plan but now plan to | -- | -- | 1 (0.9) |
Don’t know | -- | -- | 18 (16.1) |
Decision to change appointments | |||
Mother, alone | 3 (27.3) | 5 (62.5) | 2 (50.0) |
Doctor requested | 7 (63.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Both, Mother and Doctor | 0 (0.0) | 3 (27.5) | 1 (25.0) |
Don’t know | 1 (9.1) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) |
Offered telehealth appointment | 4 (36.4) | 4 (50.0) | 30 (26.8) |
Attended telehealth appointment | 2 (50.0) | 4 (100) | 16 (53.3) |
Satisfaction with telehealth appointment | |||
Very satisfied | 0 (0.0) | 2 (50.0) | 11 (68.8) |
Satisfied | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 5 (31.3) |
Neutral | 1 (50.0) | 1 (25.0 | 0 (0.0) |
Dissatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Ver dissatisfied | 1 (50.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
3.3. Mental health
Participants reported changes in mental status related to the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 94, 82.5 %), including increased stress (n = 72; 63.2 %), increased anxious thoughts (n = 57; 50.0 %), changes in sleep patterns (n = 54; 47.4 %), reduced motivation (n = 53; 46.5 %), increased fearful thoughts (n = 46; 40.4 %), changes in appetite (n = 46; 40.4 %), racing thoughts (n = 41; 36.0 %), difficulty in focus and concentration (n = 42; 36.8 %), depressed mood (n = 33; 28.9 %) and increased tearfulness (n = 23; 20.2 %).
Most reported no change (n = 79; 69.3 %) or increases (n = 5; 4.4 %) in social support. However, 24.6 % (n = 28) reported decreases in support from family, friends, coworkers, and support services.
Many (n = 62; 54.4 %) described self-care strategies such as focusing on things they can control, daily physical activity (e.g., walking, yoga), cleaning and organizing, meditation, reaching out to family and friends on the phone and limiting exposure to the news.
3.4. Risk reduction behavior changes
All (n = 114; 100 %) participants reported behavior change due to the COVID-19 pandemic, including frequent hand washing/use of sanitizer (n = 113; 99.1 %), reducing time in places with >10 people (n = 113; 99.1 %), reducing contact with people outside of own household (n = 112; 98.2 %), avoiding contact with others who had symptoms (n = 111; 97.4 %), avoiding touching eyes, nose or mouth (n = 105; 92.1 %), and purchasing or making a face mask (n = 79; 69.3 %). Additional behaviors are in Table 4 .
Table 4.
Pregnant |
Postpartum |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Increased | Remained the Same | Decreased | Increased | Remained the Same | Decreased | |
N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |
Engage in Moderate Physical Activity | 6 (13.0) | 24 (52.2) | 15 (32.6) | 12 (17.6) | 30 (44.1) | 25 (36.8) |
Eat Unhealthy Foods | 14 (30.4) | 21 (45.7) | 10 (21.7) | 17 (25.0) | 31 (45.6) | 17 (25.0) |
Tobacco Use | 1 (2.2) | 3 (6.5) | 2 (4.3) | 8 (11.9) | 7 (10.4) | 2 (3.0) |
Alcohol Use* | 0 (0.0) | 3 (6.5) | 1 (2.2) | 7 (10.4) | 9 (13.4) | 6 (9.0) |
Marijuana Use | 0 (0.0) | 3 (6.7) | 2 (4.4) | 1 (1.5) | 4 (6.1) | 2 (3.0) |
Other Substance Use | 0 (0.0) | 3 (6.5) | 1 (2.2) | 1 (1.5) | 1 (1.5) | 2 (3.0) |
N/A responses: Physical Activity, pregnant (n = 1; 2.2 %), postpartum (n = 1; 1.5); Unhealthy foods, pregnant (n = 1; 2.2 %); postpartum (n = 3; 4.4 %); Tobacco use, pregnant (n = 40; 87 %), postpartum (n = 50; 74.6 %); Alcohol use, pregnant (n = 42; 91.3); postpartum (n = 45; 67.2 %); Marijuana use, pregnant (n = 40; 88.9 %), postpartum (n = 59; 89.4 %); Other substance use, pregnant (n = 42; 91.3 %), postpartum (n = 63; 94 %).
Missing: Tobacco use (n = 1); Alcohol use (n = 1); Marijuana use (n = 3); Other substance use (n = 1).
Indicates statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between pregnant and postpartum respondents based on the Chi Squared Likelihood-Ratio Test.
The majority reported following the State and County Stay-at-Home orders (enacted 3/23/2020 and 3/25/2020 respectively) all (n = 70; 61.4 %) or most of the time (n = 40; 35.1 %), and fewer some of the time or not at all (n = 4; 3.5 %).
3.4.1. Pregnancy behaviors
Of those currently pregnant or recently delivered, half expressed concerns about their partner’s ability to attend the delivery (n = 43; 51.2 %). Some changed their birth plan (n = 18; 21.4 %), reducing to one support person due to hospital limitations, requesting induction, or reducing elective procedures. Other pregnancy changes included canceled events (e.g. baby showers, parent courses) and not allowing visitors after infant is home.
3.4.2. Infant care behaviors
Changes in infant sleep practices were reported with 39.5 % (n = 45) following or planning to follow the American Academy of Pediatrics Safe Sleep Guidelines (alone, on the back, in a clutter-free crib) [18] prior to the pandemic compared to 36 % (n = 41) at time of survey (p = 0.219). Increased unsafe practices were related to bedsharing.
For most, breastfeeding behavior/plans did not change (68.5 % (n = 76) breastfeeding; 9.9 % (n = 11) not breastfeeding). However, two (1.8 %) not planning to breastfeed decided to, six (5.4 %) who planned to breastfeed decided not to and eight (7.2 %) were unsure. Other infant care behavior changes included limiting contact with infant, scheduling appointments to avoid sick patients and taking precautions such as hand washing and protective barriers when leaving the house.
3.4.3. Postpartum behaviors
Most (n = 80; 72.1 %) reported no change in family planning strategies. Of those who reported a change (n = 9; 8.1 %), reasons included missed appointments delaying receipt of contraception and deciding to postpone subsequent pregnancies; the remainder (n = 22; 19.8 %) were unsure. Due to COVID-19 women also reported decreased likelihood of talking to doctor about medications and mental health concerns.
3.5. Acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination
If a COVID-19 vaccination became available, 47.8 % would be interested in receiving it (n = 54); 23.0 % (n = 26) would not and 29.2 % (n = 33) were unsure. Concerns included side effects or sickness (n = 33; 55.9 %), cost (n = 3; 5.1 %), allergy to vaccines (n = 1; 1.7 %) and perception it is unnecessary (n = 2; 3.4 %).
4. Discussion and conclusion
This exploratory study identified behavior changes of perinatal women specifically attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. Surveys were collected while cases of COVID-19 were increasing daily [19]. The State and County Stay-at-Home orders expired May 3, 2020 [20] but were in effect for most of the data collection. Positive behaviors, such as adherence to the stay-at-home orders and following CDC risk reduction recommendations [8], were reported by most participants. In addition, smaller numbers reported positive impacts such as increased physical activity and decreased consumption of unhealthy foods or use of substances. For most, no changes in frequency of healthcare visits were reported.
Some participants reported negative behaviors attributed to the pandemic, including decreased physical activity or increased unhealthy behaviors; increased alcohol use was significantly higher postpartum. A few reported engaging in bedsharing due to the pandemic, which increases risk of sleep-related infant death [21].
Some of these behavior changes may be a direct result of increased stress and anxiety due to the pandemic. In general, up to one quarter (25 %) of women experience psychological distress during pregnancy which can lead to poor birth outcomes [22,23]. Stressful events also have significant deleterious effects on birth outcomes [24]. In the current study, most participants (82.5 %) reported changes in mental status, such as increased stress and anxious thoughts. When a physician struggles with anxiety related to pregnancy during the COVID-19 pandemic [25], it is unsurprising survey respondents also reported such feelings.
4.1. Practice implications
The continuity of clinical care reported presents an opportunity for providers to assess mental status, as well as unmet needs during the pandemic. It also offers opportunity to reinforce risk reduction behaviors (e.g. infant safe sleep) and areas within the women’s control (e.g. handwashing, limiting exposure, individual stress reduction activities). Providers should consider addressing social support concerns as nearly a quarter of participants reported decreases due to the pandemic. Social support may provide a buffering affect against preterm birth for women with high stress [26] and lack of support has been linked to increased levels of antenatal anxiety and depression [27]. As such, helping women identify strategies to maintain social support systems is of utmost importance.
4.2. Limitations
This study is limited as participants represent a single Midwest community and were enrolled in perinatal programs, so may not reflect women not engaged in services. Self-report data may reflect social desirability response bias. Behavior change was assessed specifically as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and due to lack of time-frame-specific information it was not possible to compare breastfeeding and sleep practice data to those normally observed in the postpartum period.
4.3. Conclusion
This study provides initial insight into the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of perinatal women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Providers should consider the impact such events may have on mental status, access to resources and social supports, and changes in behaviors. Providers should establish screening, education and referral procedures to help mitigate these negative outcomes.
Funding
This work was funded in part by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment’s Bureau of Family Health Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant #B04MC30614 funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U. S. Government.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Carolyn R. Ahlers-Schmidt: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition. Ashley M. Hervey: Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Project administration. Tara Neil: Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Stephanie Kuhlmann: Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Zachary Kuhlmann: Methodology, Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jenni Harshbarger, PhD for her assistance with questionnaire development and Center for Research for Infant Birth and Survival (CRIBS) program staff for their assistance with recruitment including Martha Henao, Amy Knutsen, Marcela Cousens, Susana Estrada, Atlantis Mitchell and Caitlyn Haynes.
References
- 1.Rashidi Fakari F., Simbar M. Coronavirus pandemic and worries during pregnancy; a letter to editor. Arch. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2020;8:e21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rasmussen S.A., Jamieson D.J. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: responding to a rapidly evolving situation. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020;135:999–1002. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xia H., Zhao S., Wu Z., Luo H., Zhou C., Chen X. Emergency Caesarean delivery in a patient with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 under spinal anaesthesia. Br. J. Anaesth. 2020;124:e216–e218. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang X., Zhou Z., Zhang J., Zhu F., Tang Y., Shen X. A case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in a pregnant woman with preterm delivery. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020:ciaa200. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang S., Guo L., Chen L., Weiyong L., Yong C., Zhang J., Feng L. A case report of neonatal COVID-19 infection in China. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020:ciaa225. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang S.S., Zhou X., Lin X.G., Liu Y.Y., Wu J.L., Sharifu L.M., Hu X.L., Rong Z.H., Lu W., Luo X.P., Chen Z., Zeng W.J., Chen S.H., Ma D., Chen L., Feng L. Experience of clinical management for pregnant women and newborns with novel coronavirus pneumonia in Tongji Hospital, China. Curr. Issues Pharm. Med. Sci. Pract. 2020;40:285–289. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2174-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ma X.L., Chen Z., Zhu J.J., Shen X.X., Wu M.Y., Shi L.P., Du L.Z., Fu J.F., Shu Q. Management strategies of neonatal jaundice during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak. World J. Pediatr. 2020:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s12519-020-00347-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Coronavirus Disease 2019 . 2020. (COVID-19): Pregnancy and Breastfeeding.https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/pregnancy-breastfeeding.html (Accessed 23 April 2020) [Google Scholar]
- 9.Di Mascio D., Khalil A., Saccone G., Rizzo G., Buca D., Liberati M., Vecchiet J., Nappi L., Scambia G., Berghella V., D’Antonio F. Outcome of Coronavirus spectrum infections (SARS, MERS, COVID 1-19) during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM. 2020;25:100107. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zaigham M., Andersson O. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with COVID-19: a systematic review of 108 pregnancies. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2020 doi: 10.1111/aogs.13867. 10.1111/aogs.13867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhu H., Wang L., Fang C., Peng S., Zhang L., Chang G., Xia S., Zhou W. Clinical analysis of 10 neonates born to mothers with 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Transl. Pediatr. 2020;9:51–60. doi: 10.21037/tp.2020.02.06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Al-Tawfiq J.A. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and COVID-19 infection during pregnancy. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020:101641. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mian A., Khan S. Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation. BMC Med. 2020;18:89. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang C., Pan R., Wan X., Tan Y., Xu L., Ho C.S., Ho R.C. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:1729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harris P.A., Taylor R., Thielke R., Payne J., Gonzalez N., Conde J.G. Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inform. 2009;42:377–381. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Immunization Surveys: National 2009 . 2015. H1N1 Flu Survey.https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nis/data_files_h1n1.htm (Accessed 6 April 2020) [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ayres A., Chen R., Mackle T., Ballard E., Patterson S., Bruxner G., Kothari A. Engagement with perinatal mental health services: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2320-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, SIDS and Other Sleep-Related Infant Deaths: Updated 2016 Recommendations for a Safe Infant Sleep Environment. Pediatrics. 2016;5:138. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.2020. Sedgwick County Health Department, Sedgwick County COVID-19 Dashboard.https://sedgwickcounty.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/7b2b4364a5fa4ba3a015d52450acfe0d (Accessed 14 May 2020) [Google Scholar]
- 20.2020. Kansas’ Statewide Stay-at-Home Order Actually Only Lasts Until May 1, Fox 4.https://fox4kc.com/news/kansas-statewide-stay-at-home-order-actually-only-lasts-until-may-1/ (Accessed 14 May 2020) [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moon R.Y. TASK FORCE ON SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME, SIDS and other sleep-related infant deaths: evidence base for 2016 updated recommendations for a safe infant sleeping environment. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20162940. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tomfohr-Madsen L.M., Campbell T.S., Giesbrecht G.F., Letourneau N.L., Carlson L.E., Madsen J.W., Dimidjian S. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for psychological distress in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:498. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1601-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dhillon A., Sparkes E., Duarte R.V. Mindfulness-based interventions during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness (NY) 2017;8(6):1421–1437. doi: 10.1007/s12671-017-0726-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Novak N.L., Geronimus A.T., Martinez-Cardoso A.M. Change in birth outcomes among infants born to Latina mothers after a major immigration raid. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017;46:839–849. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Olazagasti C., Seetharamu N. Facing a pandemic while pregnant. JAMA Oncol. 2020 doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hetherington E., Doktorchik C., Premji S.S., McDonald S.W., Tough S.C., Sauve R.S. Preterm birth and social support during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2015;29:523–535. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Biaggi A., Conroy S., Pawlby S., Pariante C.M. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: a systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2016;191:62–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]