Abstract
In Breast cancer, Lung is the second most common site of metastasis after the bone. Various factors are responsible for Lung metastasis occurring secondary to Breast cancer. Cancer cell-derived secretory factors are commonly known as ‘Cancer Secretomes’. They exhibit a prompt role in the mechanism of Breast cancer lung metastasis. They are also major constituents of host-associated tumor microenvironment. Through cross-talk between cancer cells and the extracellular matrix components, cancer cell-derived extracellular matrix components (CCECs) such as hyaluronan, collagens, laminin and fibronectin cause ECM remodeling at the primary site (breast) of cancer. However, at the secondary site (lung), tenascin C, periostin and lysyl oxidase, along with pro-metastatic molecules Coco and GALNT14, contribute to the formation of pre-metastatic niche (PMN) by promoting ECM remodeling and lung metastatic cells colonization. Cancer cell-derived secretory factors by inducing cancer cell proliferation at the primary site, their invasion through the tissues and vessels and early colonization of metastatic cells in the PMN, potentiate the mechanism of Lung metastasis in Breast cancer.
On the basis of biochemical structure, these secretory factors are broadly classified into proteins and non-proteins. This is the first review that has highlighted the role of cancer cell-derived secretory factors in Breast cancer Lung metastasis (BCLM). It also enumerates various researches that have been conducted to date in breast cancer cell lines and animal models that depict the prompt role of various types of cancer cell-derived secretory factors involved in the process of Breast cancer lung metastasis. In the future, by therapeutically targeting these cancer driven molecules, this specific type of organ-tropic metastasis in breast cancer can be successfully treated.
Keywords: Breast cancer lung metastasis, secretory factors, pre-metastatic niche, tumor micro-environment, cell lines and animal models
1. INTRODUCTION
Among females, the most commonly occurring cancers are breast, lung and colorectal [1]. Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women. It is considered the second leading cause of deaths worldwide, with an estimated approximately 40,450 deaths in the year 2016 [2]. Cancer has the highest capability to metastasize to distant body organs. The most common target organs for breast cancer metastasis are lung, liver, bone and brain [3, 4]. Recent advances in breast cancer treatment have estimated that among females with breast cancer, 20-30% have the tendency to develop metastatic disease [5].
1.1. Bone versus Lung Metastasis
The most frequent sites of breast cancer metastasis are the bones and lungs [6]. The reasons due to which metastases to these specific sites differ are their evolution, treatment, morbidity and mortality. The other major reason is the special requirement of the specific organ for disseminated cancer cells for the development of metastasis [7]. Bones (51%) followed by lungs (17%) are the two most common target organs of breast cancer distant metastasis. In fact, nearly 60% of breast cancer patients during the metastasis stage suffer from lung or bone metastasis in their life [8]. In relation to the tendency of breast cancer subtypes for metastasis, luminal subtype breast cancer develops bone metastasis at a higher rate (80.5%) than basal-like (41.7%) and HER2-like tumors (55.6%) [9]. On the contrary, basal-like, luminal B subtype and triple-negative p53 negative subtype are most frequently associated with lung metastasis in invasive ductal breast carcinoma [10, 11].
The clinical presentations of breast cancer patients secondary to metastatic complications are extremely painful. In bone metastasis, the most common complication encountered is osteolytic type metastatic lesions secondary to osteoclast-mediated hyperactive bone resorption. As a consequence, certain growth factors are released from the bone matrix during the resorption process that ultimately leads to initiate a “vicious cycle” of bone destruction culminating in many skeletal-related events [12, 13]. However, in lung metastasis, the clinical presentations and consequences are also extremely serious. The most frequent clinical signs and symptoms which significantly affect a patient’s quality of life and survival are chest pain, cough, hemoptysis, pleural effusion, and pulmonary dysfunction [14].
Minn et al. were the first who identified a set of genes such as epidermal growth factor receptor ligand epiregulin, COX2, MMP-1 and MMP-2 found to be associated with lung metastases in breast cancer. Increased expression of these genes promotes lung metastasis by facilitating tumor angiogenesis, cancer progression, invasion through the tissues and early colonization of DTCs in metastatic niches (lungs) [15]. The said mechanism also involved CSCs (Cancer stem Cells) functions, metabolic alterations and immune response [16, 17]. However, in bone metastasis, integrin complexes play an important role. A study showed that integrin αvβ3 overexpression in tumor cells promotes metastasis to the bone by mediating tumor cell adhesion and signal transmission required for tumor progression [18]. Cytokines, chemokines and other growth factors also promote bone metastasis formation [19]. A 15-gene expression signatures set was analyzed by Van de Vijver group that was specifically associated with the development of bone metastases in breast cancer. The bone metastatic gene signatures (APOPEC3B, ATL2, PH-4, PGD5, SFT2D2 and STEAP3) mostly encode for protein binding membrane-bound molecules [20, 21].
The overall median survival time for bone and lung metastasis is 12 months. However, even after treatment, the overall life expectancy still remains low, with a median survival of only 22 months for lung metastasis [22].
1.2. Rationale for Lung Metastasis
In this article, we have discussed in detail the intracellular and extracellular secretory factors from cancer cells released in the tumor microenvironment, which promotes lung metastasis secondary to Breast cancer. Lungs are the second common reported site of distant metastasis in breast cancer after bone [7]. They are also twice as a commonly reported secondary site of cancer in young females (≤ 50years) [23]. Once metastasized to the organ, a very short median survival time of 12 months duration and 22 months after treatment has been reported [22]. Also, poor survival rate and disease prognosis have been reported by clinical data, referring to the patients diagnosed with primary tumors with LMSs (Lung Metastasis Signatures) expressing genes. In line with these numerous genetic studies based on microarray data, in-vivo experiments in xenograft models and in-vitro analysis in breast cancer cell lines have also been conducted to check the gene and protein expression of cancer cell-derived secretory factors that are associated with Lung metastasis in breast cancer [24, 25]. Till date, no blood biomarker has been reported that could determine breast cancer progression in terms of Lung metastasis. Only a few reports provided updates on the outcome of isolated lung metastases secondary to breast cancer [26]. This compelled us to write a detailed review on this specific subject. Hopefully, the article will help researchers in their related research work, as this review provides an extensive literature on the subject in order to evaluate the secretory factors that are involved in the phenomenon of metastatic organotropism specifically to the lungs in breast cancer.
The phenomenon of Metastatic organotropism (MO) is defined as a selective process of distant metastases to some specific organs. It is regulated by certain factors, including molecular subtypes of breast cancer, cancer cells derived secretory factors (cancer secretomes), immune mechanism of the host, cross-talk between the cells in the tumor microenvironment, genetic alterations and the role of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are considered as the most prominent ones [24, 27]. The metastasis process is also influenced by tumor size, nodal stage, receptor status and histologic grade. Based on biological markers, breast cancer is classified into five molecular subtypes: Luminal A, luminal B, luminal-HER2, HER2-enriched, basal-like and triple-negative (TN) breast cancer [28]. A research-based study has inferred that among the molecular subtypes, triple-negative and basal-like subtypes have the highest tendency to metastasize to the lungs, brain and distal lymph nodes [29]. Also, basal-type breast cancers more commonly tend to metastasize to lungs (52%), as compared to the other visceras [30]. However, histologically, intra-ductal carcinoma (IDC) has three times more potential to metastasize to lungs, CNS and distal lymph nodes [31]. Various studies have been implicated to date, to determine the role of causative factors that are associated with the metastatic organotropism that occur in the lungs [32].
2. MECHANISM OF BREAST CANCER LUNG METASTASIS
Lung metastasis, occurring secondary to breast cancer, involves an intricate mechanism. It is mediated by the contribution of various factors, such as increased expression of specific genes, an active role of cancer stem cells (CSCs), a major contribution of cancer cell-derived secretory factors, enhancement of certain specific signaling pathways, as well as the active implication of the host-derived immune mechanism [14]. Two factors, including the function of cancer cells derived extracellular matrix (ECM) components and the active role of pro-metastatic molecules in the pre-metastatic niche (lungs), provide the basis for the mechanism of Breast cancer lung metastasis [24].
As shown in Fig. (1), at the primary site (breast), the cancer cell-derived ECM components such as hyaluronan, collagens, laminin and fibronectin, by inducing the phenomenon of ECM remodeling in the tumor microenvironment promote cancer cells proliferation, their penetration across the tissues and vessels, followed by their dissemination to the lungs. At the secondary site (lungs), the cancer cell-derived secretory factors such as tenascin C (TNC), periostin (POSTN) and lysyl oxidase (LOX), by modulating the mechanism of ECM remodeling and cancer cells seeding in the pre-metastatic niche, promote efficient early colonization of the disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the lungs [33]. The secretory factors which are released from the cancer cells in the TM also recruit bone-marrow derived cells (BMDC) in the lungs. This process in-turn further promotes the mechanism of Breast cancer lung metastasis [34].
Fig. (1).
At the primary site (breast), the Cancer Cells Derived ECM Components (CCECs), hyaluronan, collagens, laminin and fibronectin induces the phenomenon of ECM remodeling in the tumor microenvironment. This promotes cancer cell proliferation, their penetration across the tissues, followed by their dissemination to the Lungs. At the secondary site (lungs), cancer cell-derived secretory factors such as tenascin C (TNC), periostin (POSTN) and lysyl oxidase (LOX) promote ECM remodeling and efficient colonization of the breast cancer metastatic cells. This contributes to pre-metastatic niche formation in the lungs. Also, at the pre-metastatic niche (PMN), the cancer cell-derived Coco, reactivates the dormant cancer cells by inhibiting the anti-metastatic signals from the lung-derived bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). GALNT 14 enhances the infiltration of metastasis-associated macrophages (MAMs) and also potentiates the self-activating property of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in the lungs.
New insights into the underlying molecular mechanisms of breast cancer lung metastasis have also identified the significant role of two pro-metastatic molecules, Coco and GALNT14. The cancer cell-derived Coco (a secretory antagonist of TGF-β ligand) has the characteristic to reactivate the dormant cancer cells present in the lungs by inhibiting anti-metastatic signals that are generated from the lung-derived bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) [35]. The second pro-metastatic molecule is N-acetyl-galactosaminyl- transferase 14 (GALNT 14). This cancer cell-derived polypeptide enzyme serves to enhance the infiltration of metastasis-associated macrophages (MAMs) in the lungs and also potentiates the self-activating property of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in the pre-metastatic niche (lungs). The above stated three mechanisms induced by these two pro-metastatic molecules thus provide the basis for the mechanism of Breast cancer-derived lung metastasis [36].
3. RATIONALE FOR SECRETORY FACTORS
The macromolecules secreted by the cells are collectively termed as secretomes. They are the major source of cell-cell communication in eukaryotes [37]. Cancer cell-derived secretomes exhibit altered composition as compared to the normal tissue. These altered secretions thus provide the basis for the characteristic hallmarks of cancer [38]. The reason for focusing on secretory factors is that the cancer cell derived-secretory factors are released in the tumor microenvironment, which ultimately ends up in one of the body fluids in a measurable concentration. Hence, they have an edge over the cellular proteome. In the current era, where cancer research is on hype, the discovery of cancer biomarkers, which will be utilized as blood-based diagnostics is currently focused. In this regard, secretome analysis serves as a promising approach to be applied for prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers as well as future therapeutic targets [39]. The second advantage of secretome analysis is that it offers reduced sample complexity co-aided with a dynamic range of detection. In addition, secretome-based researches also provide an in-depth understanding of the biology of tumor micro-environment, cancer cell progression, mechanisms of invasion and the process of metastasis [40]. The current literature search also provides evidence that cancer cell-derived secretory factors derived from cancer stem cells, non-stem cells and the surrounding stroma play a deterministic role in cancer progression, and in the future, they would be of great help in the field of cancer biomarker discovery [41].
4. ROLE OF SECRETORY FACTORS IN BREAST CANCER LUNG METASTASIS
Under normal circumstances, the secretory products that are released by the cells of the extracellular matrix serve to provide structural as well as the functional support to the tissues. However, the same secretory factors when released from the cancer cells have an ultimate aim to propagate these cells to distant sites, a mechanism known as metastasis. Interestingly, most of these studies related to cancer secretomes are conducted in breast cancer cell lines and animal models [42]. The three main factors responsible for altering these secretions in cancer are genetic mutations, the role of microRNAs and the contributing factors from the host-associated tumor microenvironment [43].
As shown in Fig. (2), cancer cell-derived secretory factors (CCSFs) perform the function of cancer cell propagation by mediating the crosstalk between the cancer cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM) components in the tumor microenvironment. This cross-talk by inducing angiogenesis, inflammatory cell recruitment and the phenomenon of ECM remodeling, ultimately favors the oncogenic process [44, 45]. As these secretory factors lie in close vicinity to the cancer cells, they may constitute some important proteins that correlate with the disease state hence, they can also serve as novel biomarkers [46, 47]. Currently, the secretory factors are the active source of research in the field of biomarker discovery and are also considered as the prime targets for future therapeutic strategies against breast cancer [48]. The methods, on the basis of which these secretory factors have been studied, are largely categorized into two groups; i) Genome-based computational prediction and ii) Proteomic approaches [38, 49].
Fig. (2).
Genetic mutations, microRNAs and tumor microenvironment associated factors (hypoxia, cancer-associated fibroblast), altered the secretions in cancer. Secondary to the crosstalk between the cancer cells and extracellular matrix components in the TM, cancer cell-derived secretory factors (CCSFs) are released, which cause angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, inflammatory cell recruitment and ECM remodeling. This mechanism ultimately favors the oncogenic process. Cancer cell-derived secretory factors (CCSFs) are released via the classical pathway (mostly secretory proteins) and non-classical pathway (via exosomes).
Among these secretory factors, the known proteins which were analyzed are the cell surface receptors, cytokines, chemokines, cell motility factors, proteases and growth factors [25]. There are two modes of secretions that are employed by cancer cell-derived secretory factors. The first, is the ER- Golgi pathway or ‘classical’ pathway. The second is the Golgi-independent or ‘non-classical’ pathway [43].
The first method is traditionally considered as the one which is mostly employed for the secretion of proteins. Majority of the cytokines, cell surface receptors and ECM derived components opt for this method of secretion [50]. The Golgi-independent pathway is characterized by secretion in the form of micro-vesicles such as exosomes. This form of secretion besides proteins (transmembrane receptors and cytosolic proteins), also consists of lipids and nucleic acids (such as micro-RNAs, messenger-RNAs and DNA) [51, 52]. Therefore, on the basis of the biochemical structure, the cancer cells derived secretory factors are broadly classified as proteins and non-proteins. The following are the studies on various types of cancer cell-derived secretory factors that promote lung metastasis in breast cancer.
4.1. Proteins
Several different studies have been conducted on various types of secretory proteins, which have an important role in mediating Breast cancer lung metastasis. These proteins are classified in terms of structural and functional aspects and are also summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Secretory proteins associated with breast cancer lung metastasis.
| Proteins | Protein Classification | Major Findings | Study Type | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nidogen-1 (NID-1) | Glycoprotein | It promotes the mechanism of lung metastasis in breast cancer via its five pro-metastatic functions. Increase expression of NID-1 is associated with poor clinical outcome in BC | Cell lines, breast cancer animal model | [33] |
| Tenascin C (TNC) | Glycoprotein (GP) | The GP in the pre-metastatic niche (lung) by potentiating the NOTCH and WNT signaling pathways, increases the colonization of lung metastatic cells that are derived from BC | Cell lines, breast cancer animal model | [35] |
| Serglycin | Proteoglycan (PG) | The PG by stimulating the secretion of a cytokine (TNF-α) from the metastasis-associated macrophages (MAMs), potentiates lung metastasis in BC | Breast cancer animal model | [38, 39] |
| Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) | Proteolytic enzymes | Increased expression of these enzymes (MMP2 and MMP9), by causing ECM remodeling at the pre-metastatic niche (lung) promotes lung metastasis in BC | Cancer cell lines, breast cancer animal model | [42, 43] |
| Transforming growth factor-Beta (TGF –β) | Cytokine | By inducing the expression of another cytokine, angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) in cancer cells through Smad signaling pathway, TGF –β also promotes the permeability of cancer cells through lungs in BC | Cell lines, breast cancer animal model | [47] |
| Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) | Cell surface receptor | By suppressing the tumor-suppressing microRNA and by activating an onco-protein, the receptor promotes the metastatic potential of the breast cancer cells to the lungs | Cell lines, breast cancer animal model | [52] |
| L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM1) | Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) | This specific CAM, by mediating the cancer cells adhesion to the lung endothelial cells via the cell surface receptor promotes metastasis. Integrin-αvb3 also promotes BC cells extravasation into the lungs | Cell lines, breast cancer animal models | [56, 57] |
| Rho-associated kinase protein (ROCK-1) | Cytoskeletal associated protein | Increased expression of ROCK-1 is associated with tumor growth and metastasis in BC. Melatonin, by inhibiting the ROCK-1 expression, prevents BCLM. | Cell lines, breast cancer animal models | [66] |
| Lysyl oxidase-like protein (LOXL2) | ECM crosslinking enzyme | Increased expression of LOXL2 in the TM, by transducing the EMT phenomenon and by contributing to the formation of PMN (lungs), promotes lung metastasis in BC | Cell lines, breast cancer animal models | [60] |
| SNAIL 1 | Transcription factor | Transient overexpression of SNAIL1 that can be achieved by the stimulation of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), also increases the potential of lung metastasis in BC. | Cell lines, breast cancer animal models | [70] |
| HIF-1 | Hypoxia-induced factor (HIF) | The protein (HIF-1) stimulates the transcription of PLOD gene that encodes for procollagen lysyl hydroxylase (LOX). Increased LOX in the TM promotes the mechanism of lung metastasis in BC | Cell lines, breast cancer animal models | [74] |
4.1.1. Glycoproteins
This refers to the fibrous proteins that along with proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), form the most essential, non-cellular component of the extracellular matrix. These macromolecules do not only provide physical support to the tissues, but also transduce various biochemical reactions, which serve to mediate cellular functions at a molecular level [53].
Nidogen 1 (NID-1), a glycoprotein and a normal constituent of the basement membrane, is also responsible for its integrity. As a Lung metastatic secretome signature (LMSS), NID1 promotes the mechanism of lung metastasis in Breast cancer via its five pro-metastatic functions. In vitro functional analysis has revealed that increased expression of this glycoprotein (NID-1) is associated with poor clinical outcome in Breast cancer. Therefore, the protein in the future may serve as a new predictive biomarker, in-order to determine the risk of lung metastasis in breast cancer [54].
Tenascin C (TNC), another extracellular matrix glycoprotein, classified as an adhesion modulating protein, has a prompt role in the mechanism of cellular signaling as well [55]. Increased expression of this glycoprotein in the metastatic niches has been found to be directly proportional to the magnitude of lung metastasis. The glycoprotein, in the lung microenvironment, by potentiating the NOTCH and WNT signaling pathways, increases the colonization of Lung metastatic cells that are derived from Breast cancer. Therefore, by therapeutically targeting this glycoprotein and indirectly by inhibiting the specific signaling pathways that are involved in Breast cancer Lung metastasis, disease progression can come to a halt [56].
4.1.2. Proteoglycans
They are specialized glycoproteins that are bound to glycosaminoglycans. Besides performing the function of space-filling and serving as lubricants within the extracellular matrix, they also contribute to mediate the molecular movements within the matrix [57, 58].
Serglycin is a proteoglycan, which is constitutively secreted by the breast cancer cells. It stimulates the secretion of a cytokine, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF α) from the metastasis-associated macrophages (MAMs). This cytokine (TNFα), in-turn, by enhancing the Snail expression (an EMT program modulator) in the cancer cells, potentiates their motility as well as their invasive phenomenon. A proven animal study has suggested that genetic deletion of serglycin, as a future therapeutic strategy, will yield a fruitful outcome in the context of breast cancer lung metastasis [59, 60].
4.1.3. Proteolytic Enzymes
Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs), also known as matrixins, are a group of proteolytic enzymes that are associated with the family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases. The enzymes on the basis of the targeted substrate, are categorized into six major classes. Collagenases, gelatinases, stromelysins, matrilysins, membrane-type MMPs, and other non-classified MMPs: being widely expressed in the body tissues, they are largely responsible for ECM protein remodeling, a mechanism that is required during various physiological processes such as organogenesis, morphogenesis and tissue repair.
Increased expression of these enzymes is associated with numerous pathological mechanisms such as maintenance of the tumor microenvironment, formation of pre-metastatic niche (PMN) at distant sites and cancer cell dissemination [61, 62]. A study based on breast cancer cell lines and animal models came up with the result that there is a significant decrease in the Breast cancer volume as well as its associated Lung metastasis, after treatment with the herbal medicine, Plantamajoside (PMS). The herb (PMS) serves as an antitumor agent by reducing the activity of two specific MMPs, MMP2 & MMP9 (gelatinases). The enzymes (MMP2 and MMP9), by causing ECM remodeling at the site of pre-metastatic niche (lung) in breast cancer, contribute to metastatic cell colonization. The herb, by inhibiting the role of these specific MMPs, indirectly reduces cancer cell growth as well as their ability to invade and metastasize in the Lungs. In the future, based on these results, the herb (PMS) can therefore be used as a potent anticancer agent, along with the other chemotherapeutic drugs, in-order to combat breast cancer lung metastasis [63, 64].
4.1.4. Cytokines
This refers to the biomolecules (peptides) that are secreted by the cells of the immune system. Their main function is to mediate intercellular communication at the molecular level. The proteins are required for the various body functions such as growth, maturation and immune response. Chemokines, interleukins, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF α) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) are some of the important protein families that lie under the umbrella of cytokines [65, 66].
A study conducted in the Breast cancer animal model has revealed the importance of transforming growth factor-Beta (TGF-β), a chief cytokine that is predominantly found in the tumor microenvironment (TM) of the breast cancer. This multifunctional cytokine under normal circumstances mediates a vast range of functions such as immune mechanism, synthesis and degradation of ECM and tissue response to injury [67]. The cytokine, by inducing the expression of another cytokine, that is angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) in the cancer cells through the Smad signaling pathway, promotes permeability through lung capillaries in breast cancer, thus promoting lung metastasis [68]. This cell-signaling protein (TGF-β) also induces the cancer cells to undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a phenomenon that promotes the cancer cells to adapt the property of invasion followed by extravasation. The study by highlighting the role of TGF-β- ANGPTL4 cytokine relay system, provides another opportunity to determine the therapeutic strategy, in order to fight against breast cancer lung metastasis [69].
4.1.5. Cell Surface Receptors
They are specialized transmembrane proteins, which serve to mediate cell signaling mechanism, necessary for cell-ECM communication. Once activated by ligand binding, signal transduction occurs through various mechanisms, depending upon the type of receptor. An important example is of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a transmembrane protein and a member of Erb B family of proteins. After binding to its specific ligands (EGF and TGF α), through tyrosine kinase activity, the receptor mediates various intracellular functions. Altered or increase expression of this receptor is associated with multiple cancers [70-72].
In vitro study has highlighted the role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in Breast cancer Lung metastasis. Once dysregulated, the protein (EGFR), by suppressing the tumor-suppressing microRNA (miRNA-338-3p) and by activating an onco-protein (EYA2), promotes the metastatic potential of Breast cancer cells to the Lungs. This finding, therefore, suggests that by targeting EGFR/miR-338-3p/ EYA2 axis, a new horizon will be explored in treating Lung metastatic Breast cancer [22].
4.1.6. Cell Adhesion Molecules (CAMs)
This refers to the glycoproteins that are located at the cell surface and are enrolled for the formation of various types of complexes and junctions that are meant to form different types of connections (cell-cell, cell-ECM and cell cytoskeleton-ECM). At the molecular level, nearly all of the fundamental cellular processes (cell proliferation, cell migration and signal transduction) across the cell are mediated through these cell-ECM interactions via cell adhesion molecules [73]. If they get dysregulated, they ultimately result in the initiation or progression of various diseases [74].
Physical contact between the cancer cells via vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM1) and the macrophages via α4-integrin, also aid the lung metastatic cells from breast cancer to colonize within the leukocytes enriched lung parenchyma. This interaction triggers PI3K/Akt signaling within the cancer cells, which in turn, promotes their survival within the lung parenchyma [75]. Another cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM), which is expressed on breast cancer cells, serves as a ligand for the cell surface receptor, integrin-αvb3. The cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM), by mediating the cancer cells adhesion to lung endothelial cells, also promotes their extravasation into the lungs [76, 77]. The pro-metastatic effects of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in breast cancer when therapeutically targeted by succinobucol (SCB), a potent and a selective inhibitor of VCAM-1 expression, showed a significant reduction in lung colonization, occurring secondary to breast cancer. The results of all these recent researches have clearly pointed out that the breast cancer lung metastasis can be treated, if integrin-VCAM-1 interaction that is held between the macrophages and the cancer cells can be targeted via effective therapeutic means [32].
4.1.7. ECM Crosslinking Enzymes
The most abundant protein of the extracellular matrix is collagen. It has approximately 28 types and it is expressed by 44 genes. In order to transform from premature to mature state and for the purpose of crosslinking, the protein requires various enzymes among which one of them is, Lysyl oxidase-like protein (LOXL2). It is an enzyme that belongs to the family of lysyl oxidase (LOX). By serving as a catalyst, the enzymes serve to crosslink the fibrous components, mainly collagens and elastin within the extracellular matrix [78, 79]. A study conducted in the Breast cancer animal model has revealed that increased expression of LOXL2 in the tumor microenvironment, by transducing the epithelial to mesenchymal transition phenomenon and by contributing to the formation of pre-metastatic niche (lungs), promotes the mechanism of Breast cancer Lung metastasis. Therefore, on the basis of this informative pre-clinical model study, effective therapeutic strategies could therefore be designed that should be aimed to target the intra-tumor LOXL2. This could also turn a milestone in the treatment of breast cancer lung metastasis in the near future [79, 80].
4.1.8. Cytoskeletal Associated Proteins
Cytoskeletal proteins represent the cellular scaffold or a framework of protein fibers within the cell. They do not only maintain the cellular shape but also anchor the intracytoplasmic organelles. The proteins also serve to provide the key cellular functions such as cell division and growth, cell motility and contraction. The three main components attributed to the cytoskeletal proteins are the microtubules, microfilaments and intermediate filaments [81, 82].
An important cytoskeletal associated protein, Rho-associated kinase (ROCK) and its associated pathway (c-Myc), by regulating the actin rearrangement (cytoskeleton) within the cell and by mediating the intra-cellular signals, play a central role in cellular morphology, adhesion and its motility. Increased expression of this protein is said to be associated with tumor growth and metastasis in Breast cancer [83, 84]. This metastatic effect secondary to an increase in ROCK expression can, therefore, be nullified by ROCK inhibitors [85]. An animal-based research study has recently explored the function of melatonin, serotonin derived secretory biomolecule that by inhibiting the ROCK-1 expression in the metastatic cancer cells, prevents lung metastasis, occurring secondary to breast cancer. It is thus concluded that inhibition of cytoskeletal associated proteins (ROCK-1) and its associated pathway, through an effective therapeutic strategy, could, therefore, set an advent in the field of breast cancer lung metastasis [86].
4.1.9. Transcription Factors
It refers to the family of proteins that modulates the mechanism of gene expression either by stimulating or suppressing it. The protein after binding to the short DNA sequences, regulates the process of information transfer from DNA to the messenger RNA [87]. The Snail family of proteins, important transcription factors and transcriptomic repressors to be more specific, are said to be co-related with epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer cells. The protein associated gene, when deleted in mouse models of Breast cancer, reduces the lung metastatic foci in mice substantially, thus exhibiting its profound role in breast cancer lung metastasis [88].
Cancer cells secreting SNAIL 1, by influencing the infiltration of tumor-associated immune cells, potentiates the formation of tumor microenvironment [89]. An animal-based study has revealed that transient overexpression of SNAIL1 that can be achieved by the stimulation of transforming growth factor β (TGF β), also increases the potential of lung metastasis in breast cancer [90, 91]. The metastatic potential of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to lungs has been found to be regulated by another transcription factor, forkhead box C1 (FOXC1). This protein, by increasing the expression of chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4), also promotes the Lung metastatic capability of Breast cancer cells in vivo [92]. In conclusion, Snail 1 and forkhead box C1 that influence the immune microenvironment in Breast cancer, if targeted therapeutically, the desired results to overcome breast cancer lung metastasis in the future, can, therefore, be accomplished.
4.1.10. Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIF)
This refers to the secretory factors that are released by the breast cancer cells in response to hypoxia. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) is a secretory protein that is secreted by breast cancer cells [93]. The protein stimulates the transcription of PLOD gene, which encodes for an enzyme, procollagen lysyl hydroxylase (LOX). The enzyme (LOX) has a key function in the biosynthesis of collagen. High PLOD expression secondary to HIF-1 leads to increased secretion of LOX in the tumor micro-environment. LOX, in turn, contributes to the formation of pre-metastatic niche (lungs), thus promoting the mechanism of lung metastasis in Breast cancer [94].
Another mouse-based study has concluded that when the activity of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1), along with the expression of angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) and L1-cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM) is blocked, secondary to RNA interference, vascular metastasis by the breast cancer cells to the lungs is compromised [77]. Emerging evidence also suggests that increased expression of Lysyl oxidase (LOX) along with fibronectin, crosslinks collagen IV and also recruits the bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs) in the lungs. This mechanism also contributes to the formation of PMN (pre-metastatic niche) in the lungs. Therefore, by therapeutically targeting these hypoxia-induced secretory factors that are released from the Lung metastatic breast cancer cells, two chief processes that are ECM remodeling and formation of pre-metastatic niche, the ultimate requirements for the process of Lung metastasis, are affected [95].
4.2. Non-Proteins
This refers to the non-protein secretory factors that are also released from the cancer cells as the constituents of exosomes, which is also shown in Table 2. The exosomes are extremely small nano-sized vesicles (30nm-100 nm in diameter) that are released from the cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment and in addition to proteins, also consist of lipids and nucleic acids such as RNA (microRNA, mRNA), DNA and even sequences of mutated or amplified oncogenes. The presence of nucleic acids within the exosomes also represents the genetic status of the tumor. Currently, they serve as the most potent cancer biomarkers. The acquired genetic information from these micro-structures is available for the horizontal gene transfer within the tumor micro-environment [96, 97]. These also contribute greatly to the mechanism of Breast cancer Lung metastasis, as proven by various animal studies.
Table 2.
Secretory factors (non-proteins) associated with breast cancer lung metastasis.
| Non Proteins | Classification | Major Findings | Study Type | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exosomes | Extracellular vesicles (EVs) | By blocking Rab27a (GTPase enzyme) dependent exosome secretion, the neutrophilic infiltration in the PMN is compromised | Cell lines, breast cancer animal models | [83, 84] |
| - | - | Exosomes derived from fibroblasts, by inducing Wnt-PCP signaling within the breast cancer cells, potentiate their capability to metastasize to lungs | Cell lines, breast cancer animal models | [85] |
| Long non-coding RNA | LacRNA | The molecule serves to inhibit lung metastatic cascade that is occurring secondary to breast cancer | Breast cancer animal models | [101] |
| miR-200s | microRNAs | Overexpression of miR-200s is associated with lung colonization by the murine type of breast cancer cells | Breast cancer animal models | [94] |
| mRNA-122 | microRNAs | The nucleic acid by providing the energy reserves (glucose) to the niche cells, promotes the mechanism of lung metastasis | Breast cancer animal models | [95] |
| miRNA-203 | microRNAs | Expression of miRNA-203, inhibits breast cancer cells invasion in lungs both in vitro as well as in vivo | Breast cancer animal models | [97] |
| miR-9 | microRNAs | By blocking the effects of miR-9 in breast cancer animal models, lung metastasis is compromised | Breast cancer animal models | [97, 99, 100] |
| Circulating or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) | DNA | Circulating or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration and cell-free DNA integrity (cfDI), can also serve as important diagnostic as well as prognostic biomarkers in primary and metastatic BC. | Human blood samples |
[106] |
| Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) | DNA | Horizontal transfer of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) via exosomes in the TM, is required for the metabolic revival of the breast cancer cells | Xenograft models | [103] |
| - | - | A delayed tumor growth is observed in the cell lines that are grown from primary tumor cells of breast cancer that lacks mtDNA. Lung metastatic cells from BC, do not show any change in their growth and proliferation in the absence of mtDNA. | Breast cancer cell lines | [107] |
Exosomes are released by various types of cells such as immune, mesenchymal and cancer. They are a major source of cell-cell communication via cargo that has been transferred through them from the donor to recipient cells in the tumor micro-environment. However, recent researches in cancer biology have introduced their major role in the mechanism of organ- tropic metastasis by their evident contribution in the formation of pre-metastatic niche [98-100]. Recent research studies came up with the conclusion that cancer cell-derived exosomes, by mediating the crosstalk between the cells of the tumor microenvironment, by transducing the mechanism of extracellular matrix remodeling and by inducing the invasive potential within the recipient cells of the host, significantly contribute to cancer cell propagation as well as in the mechanism of distant dissemination [101, 102].
A study conducted in a murine based breast cancer model showed that exosome secretion from the breast cancer cell is Rab27a (GTPase enzyme) dependent. When exosome secretion is blocked by inhibiting Rab27a, neutrophilic infiltration in the pre-metastatic niche (PMN) is also compromised. This ultimately decreases the primary tumor growth, along with the capability of the breast cancer cells to metastasize to Lungs [103, 104]. In another animal-based study, it has been revealed that exosomes derived from fibroblasts, by inducing Wnt-PCP signaling within the breast cancer cells, stimulate their invading potential as well as their capability to metastasize to the lungs [105]. The following constituents present within the exosomes also contribute significantly to breast cancer lung metastasis.
4.2.1. RNAs
Exosomes constitute all types of RNAs however, microRNAs (miRNA) and non-coding RNAs are considered as the predominant ones [106]. The microRNAs are 21 nucleotides, endogenous, non-coding RNA molecules that serve to regulate the gene expression at a post-transcriptional level. MicroRNA-messenger RNA pairing, resulting in either mRNA translational repression or cleavage. The outcome is reduced levels of the target protein [107, 108]. Lu et al. in 2005, for the first time discovered the altered expression of miRNA in cancer along with its co-relation with the tumor origin as well as with its differentiation stage [109]. Abnormal expression of this type of nucleic acid is reciprocal to an altered gene expression, leading to the phenomenon of tumorigenesis [110]. Emerging as cancer biomarkers, these cancer driven molecules are specialized in mediating ECM remodeling at the distant sites, resulting in the process of cancer progression as well as metastasis [111, 112].
Various studies have proven results that show the association of miRNAs with Breast cancer Lung metastasis. A short, metastasis-free survival time is associated with high levels of specific miRNAs, miR-200s. However, overexpression of the same type of microRNAs potentiates the mechanism of Lung colonization by the murine type of breast cancer cells [113, 114]. High miR-122 levels, secreted by the breast cancer cells, are also said to be associated with Lung and Brain metastasis. This specific miRNA (miRNA-122), by providing the energy reserves in the form of glucose to the niche cells, promotes the mechanism of metastasis [115]. The expression of miRNA-203 inhibits Breast cancer cells invasion in the lungs both in vitro as well as in vivo [116-118]. On the contrary, by blocking the effects of miR-9 in breast cancer animal models, metastasis formation in the lungs has also been found to be compromised [117, 119, 120]. Another in vitro animal study has also revealed the role of long non-coding RNA (LacRNA) in breast cancer lung metastasis. The study showed that increased expression of LacRNA is associated with better clinical results. The molecule serves to inhibit lung metastatic cascade that occurs secondary to Breast cancer [121]. Recent advances in the field of cancer has therefore, embarked on a new metastatic regulatory role of miRNAs. Hence, in the future, this new emerging role of miRNAs will hopefully set up a new example in the field of cancer biology.
4.2.2. DNAs
The discovery of single-stranded DNA, followed by the double-stranded DNA took place as constituents of exosomes [96, 122]. Emerging as the representatives of the whole genome, the exosomal DNA (exoDNA) originates from both the cell nucleus (nDNA) as well as from the mitochondria (mtDNA) [122, 123]. They are present in significantly high concentrations in cancer cells derived exosomes as compared to the ones that are released from the non-cancerous cells. Increased concentration of exoDNA actually represents genomic instability and is secondary to the increased concentration of cytosolic DNA (cytDNA) within the cancer cells. They are ultimately liberated as constituents of exosomes in the tumor microenvironment [124]. Increased mutational allelic frequency in the exoDNA pool is correlated with poor cancer prognosis and survival [125].
A study conducted on human blood samples of Breast cancer has revealed that circulating or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration and cell-free DNA integrity (cfDI) can also serve as important diagnostic as well as prognostic blood biomarkers in primary breast cancer (PBC) as well as in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [126]. Another study based on xenograft models and patients has concluded that horizontal transfer of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) via exosomes in the tumor microenvironment is required for the metabolic revival of the breast cancer cells. This also potentiates their oncogenic potential as well as their capability to metastasize to distant sites [123]. A study conducted on breast cancer cell lines came up with this view that mitochondrial DNA is an essential requirement for cancer cell growth as well as for metastasis. Delayed tumor growth is observed in the cell lines that are grown from the primary tumor cells of breast cancer that lacks mtDNA. On the contrary, the lung metastatic cells from breast cancer do not show any halt in their growth and proliferation in the absence of mtDNA [127]. By causing EMT (epithelial to mesenchymal transition) phenomenon, the cancer cells with deficient mtDNA copy number are also said to promote the mechanism of metastasis [128].
5. MECHANISMS OF FEW SECRETORY FACTORS INVOLVED IN BREAST CANCER LUNG METASTASIS
5.1. Tenascin C
Being a widely expressed extracellular matrix glycoprotein, Tenascin C (TNC) is found at two important sites in adults, a region of stem cell niches and at sites of epithelial –mesenchymal transition [129]. Expression levels of TNC are found to be elevated secondary to mechanical stress and inflammation in conditions such as wound healing and in connective tissue associated with tumors [130]. The glycoprotein (TNC) was introduced as one of the members of lung metastasis gene by Minn et al. Its mRNA expression levels in breast cancer are directly proportional to lung relapse as well as predictable of overall poor prognosis of the disease [15, 131].
Cancer cells expressing TNC have an edge in the lung micro-environment. When its underlying mechanism was explored, integral links were evolved between TNC and NOTCH and WNT, the known stem and progenitor cell pathways, which are associated with pro-metastatic role in stem cell niches [56]. The hexabrachion complex molecular structure of TNC normally interacts with various ECM proteins such as fibronectin, periostin, integrins, EGF receptors, syndecan-4 and other membrane-associated proteins [55]. Most of these proteins are also found to be expressed in the CN34 and MDA231 breast cancer cells, known for their high metastatic potential [132, 133]. This extensive molecular interactions of extracellular proteins also lead to affect the growth and survival pathways within the cell. Tenascin C, by directly enhancing the expression of some of the key components of these pathways such as LGR5, and MSI1, indirectly potentiates the pro-metastatic functions of these pathways in the metastatic niches (Lungs). One of the key target genes of WNT pathway in adult stem cells is LGR5, leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 [134]. By potentiating the effect of this G protein-coupled receptor gene, TNC promotes the supportive function of WNT pathway for early colonization of DTCs in the pre-metastatic niche. In parallel to WNT, NOTCH pathway also contributes significantly in supporting the fitness and metastasis initiating capacity of disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the lungs. MSI1 (musashi homolog 1) is a positive regulator of NOTCH signaling [135, 136]. By enhancing the expression of MSl1in stem cell niches, TNC also promotes the pro-metastatic role of this pathway in Breast cancer lung metastasis. Knockdown studies of TNC in animal models, which decrease the signaling functions of WNT and NOTCH, further validate its pro-metastatic role associated with these pathways [137]. It also emphasizes Tenascin C supporting role as an ECM protein in the Lung metastatic niche [33].
5.2. MicroRNAs
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are known for their specific role in gene expression [43]. In cancer, genomic instability leads to altered miRNAs expression with resultant biochemical changes [109]. On the contrary, recent studies have embarked a new role of miRNAs in cancer. By altering the secretome in cancer, these small, non-coding RNA molecules drive cancer cell progression. On the basis of biological functions, microRNAs are classified broadly into two groups. Tumor suppressor and oncogenic miRNAs [138].
The tumor suppressor miRNAs are themselves downregulated in cancers. They target cellular oncogenes. The classical example is of Lung cancer, targeting KRAS (oncogene) gene, whereas let-7 family is the tumor suppressor miRNAs [139]. Oncogenic miRNAs such as miR-17/92 cluster, also known as oncomir-1, control tumor suppressor genes and are found to be overexpressed in cancer [140]. MicroRNAs, by significantly contributing to mediating the crosstalk between cancer and stromal cells in the host associated-tumor micro-environment, also played a vital role in cancer cell progression and metastasis [141]. In cancer, dysregulated miRNAs execute various mechanisms that facilitate the adaptation and modulation of the primary tumor microenvironment. The following mechanisms are proposed and validated by cancer researches that have labelled the prompt role of miRNAs in the mechanism of metastasis.
i. MicroRNAs regulate the phenomenon of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a phenomenon not only considered as a migratory strategy adopted by the cancer cells but also crucial for the maintenance of cancer cell stemness [142].
ii. They significantly contribute to ECM remodeling, a key mechanism that facilitates the process of cancer cell progression and metastasis [33].
iii. MiRNAs, as constituents of exosomes, have also acquired the capability to change the gene expression of the recipient cells in the host associated-microenvironment hence directly influencing the process of metastasis by inducing tumor-stromal interactions [112].
iv. By changing the expression levels of specific chemokines, miRNAs regulate the recruitment of several stromal cell types such as inflammatory, mesenchymal, endothelial and immune into the primary tumor microenvironment [143, 144].
v. Recent studies have also highlighted the role of microRNAs, in controlling the hypoxia- inducible transcription factors to regulate oxygen homeostasis within the hypoxic tumor microenvironment in cancer [145, 146].
vi. In cancer, dysregulated miRNAs also facilitate immune surveillance mechanism, greatly required by the cancer cells for their propagation as well as for the mechanism of metastasis [147, 148].
vii. They greatly influence the preparatory mechanism in the distant organs by the name of pre-metastatic niche which is required for the early colonization of the DTCs (Disseminated Tumor Cells) in cancer [149, 150].
5.3. CfDNA/ctDNA (Cell-Free/Circulating DNA)
Mandel and Metais in 1948 were the first ones to report the presence of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in human blood [151]. Till date, various researches have been established that have focused on molecular profiling and kinetic analysis of cfDNA in cancers and various other diseases [152]. However, the origin of cfDNA is still not clear and declared as controversial. The proposed two main origins of cfDNA are:
i. Secondary to the cellular breakdown process.
ii. Release/secretion of active DNA into the circulation.
However, this mechanism also includes the transport of cfDNA via a vesicular mechanism such as via exosomes. When the cause of secretion was analyzed, it was found that the release was as a result of various biological and pathological mechanisms such as phagocytosis mediated release from dead cells, autophagy, aging, exercise, inflammation, immune reaction, sepsis, oxidative stress and cancer [153]. In addition, another hypothesis has also explained that cfDNA in cancer are derived from both necrotic and apoptotic cells whereas in healthy controls, it originates predominantly from apoptotic cells [154]. Generally, circulating DNA is described as cell-free DNA (cfDNA) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) that is released in serum or plasma of cancer patients [155]. Its levels in the blood directly correlate with tumor genetics, tumor burden, mechanism of cancer progression and drug resistance. The analysis of cfDNA in the body fluids of cancer patients will, therefore, serve as a novel, noninvasive method, which is not only an inexpensive approach but also provides an easy screening and monitoring modality in order to determine tumor progression [156].
5.4. MtDNA (Mitochondrial DNA)
Altered energy metabolism is one of the characteristic hallmarks of cancer [157]. Genetic mutations secondary to alteration of nDNA (nuclear DNA) are not the only causative factor but mutations related to mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) along with the changes in its copy number are equally involved [158, 159]. One of the typical features that lead to cancer towards metastatic progression is the shift to aerobic glycolysis, which occurred secondary to mtDNA mutation [157, 160]. In various human pathological conditions such as diabetes, obesity, neurodegenerative disorders, aging and cancer, mtDNA mutations along with the reduction in mtDNA copy number have also been reported. In breast cancer, mtDNA mutations and low mtDNA copy number are associated with poor prognosis and increased incidence of metastasis [161]. Also evident from studies conducted in cancer cell lines and animal models that cancer cells are devoid of mtDNA, are initially dependent on mtDNA of host origin, followed by a gradual recovery of respiration as they are gradually promoted from primary to metastatic cancer cells [162]. Also postulated from other mouse exogenous tumor model study was that when mtDNA depleted cancer cells were injected in mice, a higher tumor burden (related to incidence and size) was evident as compared to the control group, which was injected with parental cells [163].
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
In this review, we have discussed in detail the role of various cancer cell-derived secretory factors that are involved in lung metastasis occurring secondary to Breast cancer. Till date, numerous genomic, proteomic and computational based studies have been conducted to get insight related to the intricate mechanism acquired by cancer cell-derived secretory factors, which are involved in the mechanism of breast cancer lung metastasis. Nearly all these studies have implicated the complex interlinked molecular mechanisms that were altered in this process. This altered mechanism involves specific genes, stromal cells, cancer cells-derived secretory factors and signaling pathways, which provide the basis for the underlying mechanism involved in the process of breast cancer lung metastasis.
An expert collaboration of all these molecular events, along with the clinical correlation, is the dire need to understand the underlying complex mechanism of lung metastasis. An implication of all these studies conducted in cell lines and animal models should also be validated in humans. Use of secretory factors as predictive, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as well as future therapeutic targets in the future, will hopefully prevent this type of metastatic organotropism occurring secondary to Breast cancer. Table 3 shows a few of the secretory factors that are recently identified and may be used as biomarkers or therapeutic targets. It has, therefore, become evident through all these secretome-based researches that the cancer secretomes played a crucial role in Breast cancer Lung metastasis. Effective therapeutic strategies and core understanding of the chemistry of these cancer-associated biomolecules that are involved in this mechanism will greatly help the oncologists in the future to halt the devastating cascade of lung metastasis occurring secondary to Breast cancer progression.
Table 3.
List of factors which serves as a biomarker or therapeutic targets.
| Secretory Factors | Role as Biomarker or Therapeutic Targets | Uses of Biomarker | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nidogen-1 (NID-1) | Biomarker and therapeutic target to prevent breast cancer lung metastasis | For breast cancer prognosis | [54] |
| Tenascin C (TNC) | Biomarker | Patient selection for adjuvant therapy, for cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) and for breast cancer stroma | [164-166] |
| Serglycin | Therapeutic target to prevent breast cancer lung metastasis | - | [59] |
| Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) | Biomarker and therapeutic target | For breast cancer prognosis | [167, 168] |
| Transforming growth factor-Beta (TGF-β) | Biomarker | For breast cancer prognosis | [169, 170] |
| Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) | Biomarker | for selection of targeted therapy in TNB (triple negative-breast cancer) | [171] |
| L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1-CAM1) | Therapeutic target to prevent breast cancer lung metastasis | - | [76, 77] |
| Rho-associated kinase protein (ROCK-1) | Biomarker | For breast cancer prognosis | [172] |
| Lysyl oxidase-like protein (LOXL2) | Biomarker | For breast cancer prognosis | [173, 174] |
| SNAIL 1 | Therapeutic target to prevent metastatic breast cancer | - | [175] |
| HIF-1 | Therapeutic target for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer lung metastasis | - | [95, 94] |
| Exosomes | Biomarker and therapeutic target | For breast cancer prognosis | [176, 177] |
| Long non-coding RNA (LacRNA) | Biomarker and therapeutic target | For breast cancer prognosis | [178, 179] |
| miR-200s (microRNA) | Biomarker and therapeutic target | For breast cancer prognosis | [180, 181] |
| mRNA-122 | Biomarker and therapeutic target | Potential and predictive biomarker for breast cancer | [115] |
| miRNA-203 | Biomarker and therapeutic target | Potential and predictive biomarker for breast cancer | [117] |
| miR-9 | Biomarker and therapeutic target | Potential and predictive biomarker for breast cancer | [119, 120] |
| Circulating or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) | Biomarker | For breast cancer prognosis | [182, 183] |
| Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) | Biomarker | Potential and predictive biomarker for breast cancer | [184] |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are thankful of Mr. Tashfeen Hashmi who has helped us in the development of the figures/artwork for this article and we would also like to acknowledge the efforts of Ms. Atifa Rahman for language editing of this article.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
- ANGPTL4
Angiopoietin-Like 4
- BCLM
Breast Cancer Lung Metastasis
- BMDC
Bone-Marrow Derived Cells
- BMPs
Bone Morphogenetic Proteins
- CCECs
Cancer Cell-derived Extracellular Matrix Components
- CCSFs
Cancer Cell-derived Secretory Factors
- cfDI
Cell-free DNA Integrity
- cfDNA
Circulating or Cell-free DNA
- CSCs
Cancer Stem Cells
- CXCR4
Chemokine Receptor-4
- cytDNA
Cytosolic DNA
- ECM
Extracellular Matrix
- EGFR
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
- EMT
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
- exoDNA
Exosomal DNA
- FOXC1
Forkhead box C1
- GAGs
Glycosaminoglycans
- GALNT 14
N-Acetyl-galactosaminyltransferase 14
- HIF-1
Hypoxia-inducible Factor 1
- IDC
Intra-ductal Carcinoma
- LacRNA
Long Non-coding RNA
- LOX
Lysyl Oxidase
- LOXL2
Lysyl Oxidase-like Protein
- MAMs
Metastasis Associated Macrophages
- MBC
Metastatic Breast Cancer
- miRNA
microRNA
- MMPs
Matrix Metalloproteinases
- MO
Metastatic Organotropism
- mtDNA
Mitochondrial DNA
- NID-1
Nidogen-1
- PBC
Primary Breast Cancer
- PMN
Pre-Metastatic Niche
- PMS
Plantamajoside
- POSTN
Periostin
- ROCK
Rho-associated kinase
- SCB
Succinobucol
- TGF-β
Transforming Growth Factor-β
- TM
Tumor Microenvironment
- TNBC
Triple Negative Breast Cancer
- TNC
Tenascin C
- TNF-α
Tumor Necrosis Factor-α
- VCAM1
Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
Not applicable.
FUNDING
This article is funded and supported by Ziauddin Uni- versity.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
REFERENCES
- 1.Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wei S., Siegal G.P. Seminars in diagnostic pathology. Vol. 35. Elsevier; 2018. Surviving at a distant site: The organotropism of metastatic breast cancer. pp. 108–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lyden D., Hoshino A., Matei I. Organtropic Metastatic Secretomes and Exosomes in Breast Cancer. Joan and Sanford I Weill Medical College of Cornell University New York United States; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mills R.C. III Breast cancer survivors, common markers of inflammation, and exercise: A narrative review. Breast Cancer (Auckl.) 2017;111178223417743976 doi: 10.1177/1178223417743976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rugo H.S. The importance of distant metastases in hormone-sensitive breast cancer. Breast. 2008;17(Suppl. 1):S3–S8. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9776(08)70002-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Solomayer E-F., Diel I.J., Meyberg G.C., Gollan C., Bastert G. Metastatic breast cancer: Clinical course, prognosis and therapy related to the first site of metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2000;59(3):271–278. doi: 10.1023/A:1006308619659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Patanaphan V., Salazar O.M., Risco R. Breast cancer: Metastatic patterns and their prognosis. South. Med. J. 1988;81(9):1109–1112. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198809000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leone B.A., Romero A., Rabinovich M.G., Vallejo C.T., Bianco A., Perez J.E., Machiavelli M., Rodriguez R., Alvarez L.A. Stage IV breast cancer: Clinical course and survival of patients with osseous versus extraosseous metastases at initial diagnosis. The GOCS (Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo del Sur) experience. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1988;11(6):618–622. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198812000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Waning D.L., Guise T.A. Molecular mechanisms of bone metastasis and associated muscle weakness. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20(12):3071–3077. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gao D., Du J., Cong L., Liu Q. Risk factors for initial lung metastasis from breast invasive ductal carcinoma in stages I-III of operable patients. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009;39(2):97–104. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Smid M., Wang Y., Zhang Y., Sieuwerts A.M., Yu J., Klijn J.G., Foekens J.A., Martens J.W. Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse. Cancer Res. 2008;68(9):3108–3114. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roodman G.D. Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350(16):1655–1664. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra030831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Weilbaecher K.N., Guise T.A., McCauley L.K. Cancer to bone: A fatal attraction. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11(6):411–425. doi: 10.1038/nrc3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jin L., Han B., Siegel E., Cui Y., Giuliano A., Cui X. Breast cancer lung metastasis: Molecular biology and therapeutic implications. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2018;19(10):858–868. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1456599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Minn A.J., Gupta G.P., Siegel P.M., Bos P.D., Shu W., Giri D.D., Viale A., Olshen A.B., Gerald W.L., Massagué J. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung. Nature. 2005;436(7050):518–524. doi: 10.1038/nature03799. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03799#supplementary-information [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Buck M.B., Knabbe C. TGF-beta signaling in breast cancer. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006;1089(1):119–126. doi: 10.1196/annals.1386.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Christen S., Lorendeau D., Schmieder R., Broekaert D., Metzger K., Veys K., Elia I., Buescher J.M., Orth M.F., Davidson S.M., Grünewald T.G., De Bock K., Fendt S.M. Breast cancer-derived lung metastases show increased pyruvate carboxylase-dependent anaplerosis. Cell Rep. 2016;17(3):837–848. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kwakwa K.A., Sterling J.A. Integrin αvβ3 signaling in tumor-induced bone disease. Cancers (Basel) 2017;9(7):84. doi: 10.3390/cancers9070084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kang Y., Siegel P.M., Shu W., Drobnjak M., Kakonen S.M., Cordón-Cardo C., Guise T.A., Massagué J. A multigenic program mediating breast cancer metastasis to bone. Cancer Cell. 2003;3(6):537–549. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00132-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Savci-Heijink C.D., Halfwerk H., Koster J., van de Vijver M.J. A novel gene expression signature for bone metastasis in breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016;156(2):249–259. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3741-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.van der Weyden L., Arends M.J., Campbell A.D., Bald T., Wardle-Jones H., Griggs N., Velasco-Herrera M.D., Tüting T., Sansom O.J., Karp N.A., Clare S., Gleeson D., Ryder E., Galli A., Tuck E., Cambridge E.L., Voet T., Macaulay I.C., Wong K., Spiegel S., Speak A.O., Adams D.J. Sanger Mouse Genetics Project. Genome-wide in vivo screen identifies novel host regulators of metastatic colonization. Nature. 2017;541(7636):233–236. doi: 10.1038/nature20792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liang Y., Xu X., Wang T., Li Y., You W., Fu J., Liu Y., Jin S., Ji Q., Zhao W., Song Q., Li L., Hong T., Huang J., Lyu Z., Ye Q. The EGFR/miR-338-3p/EYA2 axis controls breast tumor growth and lung metastasis. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(7):, e2928. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McGuire A., Brown J.A., Malone C., McLaughlin R., Kerin M.J. Effects of age on the detection and management of breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2015;7(2):908–929. doi: 10.3390/cancers7020815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen W., Hoffmann A. D., Liu H., Liu X. Organotropism: New insights into molecular mechanisms of breast cancer metastasis. NPJ precision oncol. 2018;2(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41698-018-0047-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Papaleo E., Gromova I., Gromov P. Gaining insights into cancer biology through exploration of the cancer secretome using proteomic and bioinformatic tools. Expert Rev. Proteomics. 2017;14(11):1021–1035. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2017.1387053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schlappack O.K., Baur M., Steger G., Dittrich C., Moser K. The clinical course of lung metastases from breast cancer. Klin. Wochenschr. 1988;66(17):790–795. doi: 10.1007/BF01726581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lu X., Kang Y. Organotropism of breast cancer metastasis. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia. 2007;12(2-3):153–162. doi: 10.1007/s10911-007-9047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Voduc K.D., Cheang M.C., Tyldesley S., Gelmon K., Nielsen T.O., Kennecke H. Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28(10):1684–1691. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kennecke H., Yerushalmi R., Woods R., Cheang M.C.U., Voduc D., Speers C.H., Nielsen T.O., Gelmon K. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28(20):3271–3277. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dent R., Hanna W.M., Trudeau M., Rawlinson E., Sun P., Narod S.A. Pattern of metastatic spread in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2009;115(2):423–428. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0086-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Arpino G., Bardou V.J., Clark G.M., Elledge R.M. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(3):R149–R156. doi: 10.1186/bcr767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cao H., Zhang Z., Zhao S., He X., Yu H., Yin Q., Zhang Z., Gu W., Chen L., Li Y. Hydrophobic interaction mediating self-assembled nanoparticles of succinobucol suppress lung metastasis of breast cancer by inhibition of VCAM-1 expression. J. Control. Release. 2015;205:162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xiong G-F., Xu R. Function of cancer cell-derived extracellular matrix in tumor progression. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2016;2:358. doi: 10.20517/2394-4722.2016.08. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Peinado H., Lavotshkin S., Lyden D. The secreted factors responsible for pre-metastatic niche formation: old sayings and new thoughts. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2011;21(2):139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2011.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gao H., Chakraborty G., Lee-Lim A. P., Mo Q., Decker M., Vonica A. The BMP inhibitor Coco reactivates breast cancer cells at lung metastatic sites. cell. 2012;150(4):764-779. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Song K-H., Park M.S., Nandu T.S., Gadad S., Kim S-C., Kim M-Y. GALNT14 promotes lung-specific breast cancer metastasis by modulating self-renewal and interaction with the lung microenvironment. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13796. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tjalsma H., Bolhuis A., Jongbloed J.D., Bron S., van Dijl J.M. Signal peptide-dependent protein transport in Bacillus subtilis: A genome-based survey of the secretome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2000;64(3):515–547. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.64.3.515-547.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hathout Y. Approaches to the study of the cell secretome. Expert Rev. Proteomics. 2007;4(2):239–248. doi: 10.1586/14789450.4.2.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ludwig J.A., Weinstein J.N. Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2005;5(11):845–856. doi: 10.1038/nrc1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rifai N., Gillette M.A., Carr S.A. Protein biomarker discovery and validation: The long and uncertain path to clinical utility. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006;24(8):971–983. doi: 10.1038/nbt1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stastna M., Van Eyk J.E. Secreted proteins as a fundamental source for biomarker discovery. Proteomics. 2012;12(4-5):722–735. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201100346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cox T.R., Schoof E.M., Gartland A., Erler J.T., Linding R. Dataset for the proteomic inventory and quantitative analysis of the breast cancer hypoxic secretome associated with osteotropism. Data Brief. 2015;5:621–625. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.09.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Paltridge J.L., Belle L., Khew-Goodall Y. The secretome in cancer progression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1834(11):2233–2241. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wu C-C., Hsu C-W., Chen C-D., Yu C-J., Chang K-P., Tai D-I., Liu H.P., Su W.H., Chang Y.S., Yu J.S. Candidate serological biomarkers for cancer identified from the secretomes of 23 cancer cell lines and the human protein atlas. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2010;9(6):1100–1117. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900398-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang L., Lin P.C. Mechanisms that drive inflammatory tumor microenvironment, tumor heterogeneity, and metastatic progression. Semin Cancer Biol. Vol. 47. Elsevier; 2017. pp. 185–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Makridakis M., Vlahou A. Secretome proteomics for discovery of cancer biomarkers. J. Proteomics. 2010;73(12):2291–2305. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Shin J., Kim G., Lee J.W., Lee J.E., Kim Y.S., Yu J.H., Lee S.T., Ahn S.H., Kim H., Lee C. Identification of ganglioside GM2 activator playing a role in cancer cell migration through proteomic analysis of breast cancer secretomes. Cancer Sci. 2016;107(6):828–835. doi: 10.1111/cas.12935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Severino V., Farina A., Chambery A. Analysis of secreted proteins. Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery. Springer; 2013. pp. 37–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xue H., Lu B., Lai M. The cancer secretome: A reservoir of biomarkers. J. Transl. Med. 2008;6(1):52. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-6-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mellman I., Warren G. The road taken: Past and future foundations of membrane traffic. Cell. 2000;1000(1):99–112. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81687-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chua C.E.L., Lim Y.S., Lee M.G., Tang B.L. Non-classical membrane trafficking processes galore. J. Cell. Physiol. 2012;227(12):3722–3730. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Lee T.H., D’Asti E., Magnus N., Al-Nedawi K., Meehan B., Rak J. Microvesicles as mediators of intercellular communication in cancer-the emerging science of cellular ‘debris. Seminars in immunopathology. Vol. 33. Springer; 2011. pp. 455–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim Y., Ko H., Kwon I.K., Shin K. Extracellular matrix revisited: roles in tissue engineering. Int. Neurourol. J. 2016;20(Suppl. 1):S23–S29. doi: 10.5213/inj.1632600.318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Alečković M., Wei Y., LeRoy G., Sidoli S., Liu D.D., Garcia B.A., Kang Y. Identification of nidogen 1 as a lung metastasis protein through secretome analysis. Genes Dev. 2017;31(14):1439–1455. doi: 10.1101/gad.301937.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kii I., Nishiyama T., Li M., Matsumoto K., Saito M., Amizuka N., Kudo A. Incorporation of tenascin-C into the extracellular matrix by periostin underlies an extracellular meshwork architecture. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285(3):2028–2039. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.051961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Oskarsson T., Acharyya S., Zhang X.H., Vanharanta S., Tavazoie S.F., Morris P.G., Downey R.J., Manova-Todorova K., Brogi E., Massagué J. Breast cancer cells produce tenascin C as a metastatic niche component to colonize the lungs. Nat. Med. 2011;17(7):867–874. doi: 10.1038/nm.2379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hynes R.O., Naba A. Overview of the matrisome-an inventory of extracellular matrix constituents and functions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012;4(1):, a004903. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a004903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Iozzo R.V., Murdoch A.D. Proteoglycans of the extracellular environment: Clues from the gene and protein side offer novel perspectives in molecular diversity and function. FASEB J. 1996;10(5):598–614. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.10.5.8621059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Roy A., Femel J., Huijbers E.J., Spillmann D., Larsson E., Ringvall M., Olsson A.K., Åbrink M. Targeting serglycin prevents metastasis in murine mammary carcinoma. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):, e0156151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Xie H.Y., Shao Z.M., Li D.Q. Tumor microenvironment: Driving forces and potential therapeutic targets for breast cancer metastasis. Chin. J. Cancer. 2017;36(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40880-017-0202-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Hrabec E., Naduk J., Strek M., Hrabec Z. Type IV collagenases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) and their substrates--intracellular proteins, hormones, cytokines, chemokines and their receptors. Postepy Biochem. 2007;53(1):37–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Jabłońska-Trypuć A., Matejczyk M., Rosochacki S. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the main extracellular matrix (ECM) enzymes in collagen degradation, as a target for anticancer drugs. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2016;31(1):177–183. doi: 10.3109/14756366.2016.1161620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gilkes D.M., Semenza G.L., Wirtz D. Hypoxia and the extracellular matrix: Drivers of tumour metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2014;14(6):430–439. doi: 10.1038/nrc3726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pei S., Yang X., Wang H., Zhang H., Zhou B., Zhang D., Lin D. Plantamajoside, a potential anti-tumor herbal medicine inhibits breast cancer growth and pulmonary metastasis by decreasing the activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and -2. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1960-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Karin M., Greten F.R. NF-kappaB: Linking inflammation and immunity to cancer development and progression. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2005;5(10):749–759. doi: 10.1038/nri1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Purohit A., Newman S.P., Reed M.J. The role of cytokines in regulating estrogen synthesis: Implications for the etiology of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2002;4(2):65–69. doi: 10.1186/bcr425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Bierie B., Moses H.L. Tumour microenvironment: TGFbeta: The molecular Jekyll and Hyde of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006;6(7):506–520. doi: 10.1038/nrc1926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Padua D., Zhang X. H.-F., Wang Q., Nadal C., Gerald W.L., Gomis R.R. TGFβ primes breast tumors for lung metastasis seeding through angiopoietin-like 4. . cell. 2008;133(1):66-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Massagué J., Obenauf A.C. Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature. 2016;529(7586):298–306. doi: 10.1038/nature17038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Riese D.J., II, Cullum R.L. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. Vol. 28. Elsevier; 2014. Epiregulin: Roles in normal physiology and cancer. p. 49-56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Singh B., Carpenter G., Coffey R.J. EGF receptor ligands: Recent advances. F1000 Res. 2016;5:5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9025.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zeng F., Harris R.C. Epidermal growth factor, from gene organization to bedside. Seminars in cell & developmental biology. Vol. 28. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 2–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Huang S., Ingber D.E. The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999;1(5):E131–E138. doi: 10.1038/13043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Khalili A.A., Ahmad M.R. A review of cell adhesion studies for biomedical and biological applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16(8):18149–18184. doi: 10.3390/ijms160818149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chen Q., Zhang X.H-F., Massagué J. Macrophage binding to receptor VCAM-1 transmits survival signals in breast cancer cells that invade the lungs. Cancer Cell. 2011;20(4):538–549. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Seguin L., Desgrosellier J.S., Weis S.M., Cheresh D.A. Integrins and cancer: Regulators of cancer stemness, metastasis, and drug resistance. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25(4):234–240. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zhang H., Wong C.C., Wei H., Gilkes D.M., Korangath P., Chaturvedi P., Schito L., Chen J., Krishnamachary B., Winnard P.T., Jr, Raman V., Zhen L., Mitzner W.A., Sukumar S., Semenza G.L. HIF-1-dependent expression of angiopoietin-like 4 and L1CAM mediates vascular metastasis of hypoxic breast cancer cells to the lungs. Oncogene. 2012;31(14):1757–1770. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 78.Gelse K., Pöschl E., Aigner T. Collagens-structure, function, and biosynthesis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2003;55(12):1531–1546. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Molnar J., Fong K.S., He Q.P., Hayashi K., Kim Y., Fong S.F., Fogelgren B., Szauter K.M., Mink M., Csiszar K. Structural and functional diversity of lysyl oxidase and the LOX-like proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2003;1647(1-2):220–224. doi: 10.1016/S1570-9639(03)00053-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Salvador F., Martin A., López-Menéndez C., Moreno-Bueno G., Santos V., Vázquez-Naharro A. Lysyl oxidase-like protein LOXL2 promotes lung metastasis of breast cáncer. Cancer res. 2017. p. 3152.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 81.Akhshi T.K., Wernike D., Piekny A. Microtubules and actin crosstalk in cell migration and division. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2014;71(1):1–23. doi: 10.1002/cm.21150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bezanilla M., Gladfelter A.S., Kovar D.R., Lee W-L. Cytoskeletal dynamics: A view from the membrane. J. Cell Biol. 2015;209(3):329–337. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201502062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Bourguignon L.Y., Zhu H., Shao L., Zhu D., Chen Y.W. Rho-kinase (ROK) promotes CD44v (3,8-10)-ankyrin interaction and tumor cell migration in metastatic breast cancer cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 1999;43(4):269–287. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1999)43:4<269:AID-CM1>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lane J., Martin T.A., Watkins G., Mansel R.E., Jiang W.G. The expression and prognostic value of ROCK I and ROCK II and their role in human breast cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2008;33(3):585–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Liu S., Goldstein R.H., Scepansky E.M., Rosenblatt M. Inhibition of rho-associated kinase signaling prevents breast cancer metastasis to human bone. Cancer Res. 2009;69(22):8742–8751. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Borin T.F., Arbab A.S., Gelaleti G.B., Ferreira L.C., Moschetta M.G., Jardim-Perassi B.V., Iskander A.S., Varma N.R., Shankar A., Coimbra V.B., Fabri V.A., de Oliveira J.G., Zuccari D.A. Melatonin decreases breast cancer metastasis by modulating Rho-associated kinase protein-1 expression. J. Pineal Res. 2016;60(1):3–15. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Latchman D.S. Transcription factors: An overview. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1997;29(12):1305–1312. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(97)00085-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ye X., Brabletz T., Kang Y., Longmore G.D., Nieto M.A., Stanger B.Z., Yang J., Weinberg R.A. Upholding a role for EMT in breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2017;547(7661):E1–E3. doi: 10.1038/nature22816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ni T., Li X-Y., Lu N., An T., Liu Z-P., Fu R., Lv W.C., Zhang Y.W., Xu X.J., Grant Rowe R., Lin Y.S., Scherer A., Feinberg T., Zheng X.Q., Chen B.A., Liu X.S., Guo Q.L., Wu Z.Q., Weiss S.J. Snail1-dependent p53 repression regulates expansion and activity of tumour-initiating cells in breast cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 2016;18(11):1221–1232. doi: 10.1038/ncb3425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Brenot A., Knolhoff B.L., DeNardo D.G., Longmore G.D. SNAIL1 action in tumor cells influences macrophage polarization and metastasis in breast cancer through altered GM-CSF secretion. Oncogenesis. 2018;7(3):32. doi: 10.1038/s41389-018-0042-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Tran H.D. Luitel, K.; Kim, M.; Zhang, K.; Longmore, G. D.; Tran, D. D. Transient SNAIL1 expression is necessary for metastatic competence in breast cancer. Cancer Res, Canre. 2014. p. 0923.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 92.Pan H., Peng Z., Lin J., Ren X., Zhang G., Cui Y. Forkhead box C1 boosts triple-negative breast cancer metastasis through activating the transcription of chemokine receptor-4. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(12):3794–3804. doi: 10.1111/cas.13823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Lan J., Lu H., Samanta D., Salman S., Lu Y., Semenza G.L. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent expression of adenosine receptor 2B promotes breast cancer stem cell enrichment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115(41):E9640–E9648. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809695115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Gilkes D., Bajpai S., Wong C. C.-L., Chaturvedi P., Hubbi M. E., Wirtz D. Procollagen lysyl hydroxylase 2 is essential for breast cancer metástasis. Mol. Cancer. Res. 2013. p. 0629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Retracted]
- 95.Erler J.T., Bennewith K.L., Cox T.R., Lang G., Bird D., Koong A., Le Q.T., Giaccia A.J. Hypoxia-induced lysyl oxidase is a critical mediator of bone marrow cell recruitment to form the premetastatic niche. Cancer Cell. 2009;15(1):35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Balaj L., Lessard R., Dai L., Cho Y-J., Pomeroy S.L., Breakefield X.O., Skog J. Tumour microvesicles contain retrotransposon elements and amplified oncogene sequences. Nat. Commun. 2011;2:180. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Théry C., Zitvogel L., Amigorena S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002;2(8):569–579. doi: 10.1038/nri855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kalluri R. The biology and function of exosomes in cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126(4):1208–1215. doi: 10.1172/JCI81135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Mathieu M., Martin-Jaular L., Lavieu G., Théry C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21(1):9–17. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wortzel I., Dror S., Kenific C.M., Lyden D. Exosome-mediated metastasis: Communication from a distance. Dev. Cell. 2019;49(3):347–360. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Fu H., Yang H., Zhang X., Xu W. The emerging roles of exosomes in tumor-stroma interaction. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2016;142(9):1897–1907. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2145-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Tang M.K., Wong A.S. Exosomes: Emerging biomarkers and targets for ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;367(1):26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Bobrie A., Krumeich S., Reyal F., Recchi C., Moita L.F., Seabra M.C., Ostrowski M., Théry C. Rab27a supports exosome-dependent and independent mechanisms that modify the tumor microenvironment and can promote tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2012;72(19):4920–4930. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-0925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Kahlert C., Kalluri R. Exosomes in tumor microenvironment influence cancer progression and metastasis. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 2013;91(4):431–437. doi: 10.1007/s00109-013-1020-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Luga V., Zhang L., Viloria-Petit A.M., Ogunjimi A.A., Inanlou M.R., Chiu E. Exosomes mediate stromal mobilization of autocrine Wnt-PCP signaling in breast cancer cell migration. Cell. 2012;151(7):1542–1556. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Wei Z., Batagov A.O., Schinelli S., Wang J., Wang Y., El Fatimy R., Rabinovsky R., Balaj L., Chen C.C., Hochberg F., Carter B., Breakefield X.O., Krichevsky A.M. Coding and noncoding landscape of extracellular RNA released by human glioma stem cells. Nat. Commun. 2017;8(1):1145. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01196-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Bartel D.P. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116(2):281–297. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Paladini L., Fabris L., Bottai G., Raschioni C., Calin G.A., Santarpia L. Targeting microRNAs as key modulators of tumor immune response. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;35(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13046-016-0375-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Lu J., Getz G., Miska E.A., Alvarez-Saavedra E., Lamb J., Peck D., Sweet-Cordero A., Ebert B.L., Mak R.H., Ferrando A.A., Downing J.R., Jacks T., Horvitz H.R., Golub T.R. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature. 2005;435(7043):834–838. doi: 10.1038/nature03702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Cortez M.A., Anfossi S., Ramapriyan R., Menon H., Atalar S.C., Aliru M., Welsh J., Calin G.A. Role of miRNAs in immune responses and immunotherapy in cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019;58(4):244–253. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Skog J., Würdinger T., van Rijn S., Meijer D.H., Gainche L., Sena-Esteves M., Curry W.T., Jr, Carter B.S., Krichevsky A.M., Breakefield X.O. Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10(12):1470–1476. doi: 10.1038/ncb1800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Valadi H., Ekström K., Bossios A., Sjöstrand M., Lee J.J., Lötvall J.O. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9(6):654–659. doi: 10.1038/ncb1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Korpal M., Ell B.J., Buffa F.M., Ibrahim T., Blanco M.A., Celià-Terrassa T., Mercatali L., Khan Z., Goodarzi H., Hua Y., Wei Y., Hu G., Garcia B.A., Ragoussis J., Amadori D., Harris A.L., Kang Y. Direct targeting of Sec23a by miR-200s influences cancer cell secretome and promotes metastatic colonization. Nat. Med. 2011;17(9):1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nm.2401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Pencheva N., Tavazoie S.F. Control of metastatic progression by microRNA regulatory networks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013;15(6):546–554. doi: 10.1038/ncb2769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Fong M.Y., Zhou W., Liu L., Alontaga A.Y., Chandra M., Ashby J., Chow A., O’Connor S.T., Li S., Chin A.R., Somlo G., Palomares M., Li Z., Tremblay J.R., Tsuyada A., Sun G., Reid M.A., Wu X., Swiderski P., Ren X., Shi Y., Kong M., Zhong W., Chen Y., Wang S.E. Breast-cancer-secreted miR-122 reprograms glucose metabolism in premetastatic niche to promote metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015;17(2):183–194. doi: 10.1038/ncb3094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Ding X., Park S.I., McCauley L.K., Wang C-Y. Signaling between transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and transcription factor SNAI2 represses expression of microRNA miR-203 to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor metastasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288(15):10241–10253. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.443655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Peng Y., Croce C.M. The role of MicroRNAs in human cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2016;1:15004. doi: 10.1038/sigtrans.2015.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Zhang Z., Zhang B., Li W., Fu L., Fu L., Zhu Z., Dong J.T. Epigenetic silencing of miR-203 upregulates SNAI2 and contributes to the invasiveness of malignant breast cancer cells. Genes Cancer. 2011;2(8):782–791. doi: 10.1177/1947601911429743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Almeida M.I., Reis R.M., Calin G.A. MYC-microRNA-9-metastasis connection in breast cancer. Cell Res. 2010;20(6):603–604. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ma L., Young J., Prabhala H., Pan E., Mestdagh P., Muth D., Teruya-Feldstein J., Reinhardt F., Onder T.T., Valastyan S., Westermann F., Speleman F., Vandesompele J., Weinberg R.A. miR-9, a MYC/MYCN-activated microRNA, regulates E-cadherin and cancer metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12(3):247–256. doi: 10.1038/ncb2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Guo R., Su Y., Xue J., Si J., Chi Y., Wu J. Abstract P6-05-01: A novel cleaved cytoplasmic lncRNA LacRNA interacts with PHB2 and suppresses breast cancer metastasis via repressing MYC targets. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 122.Thakur B.K., Zhang H., Becker A., Matei I., Huang Y., Costa-Silva B., Zheng Y., Hoshino A., Brazier H., Xiang J., Williams C., Rodriguez-Barrueco R., Silva J.M., Zhang W., Hearn S., Elemento O., Paknejad N., Manova-Todorova K., Welte K., Bromberg J., Peinado H., Lyden D. Double-stranded DNA in exosomes: A novel biomarker in cancer detection. Cell Res. 2014;24(6):766–769. doi: 10.1038/cr.2014.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Sansone P., Savini C., Kurelac I., Chang Q., Amato L.B., Strillacci A., Stepanova A., Iommarini L., Mastroleo C., Daly L., Galkin A., Thakur B.K., Soplop N., Uryu K., Hoshino A., Norton L., Bonafé M., Cricca M., Gasparre G., Lyden D., Bromberg J. Packaging and transfer of mitochondrial DNA via exosomes regulate escape from dormancy in hormonal therapy-resistant breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114(43):E9066–E9075. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704862114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Bakhoum S.F., Ngo B., Laughney A.M., Cavallo J-A., Murphy C.J., Ly P., Shah P., Sriram R.K., Watkins T.B.K., Taunk N.K., Duran M., Pauli C., Shaw C., Chadalavada K., Rajasekhar V.K., Genovese G., Venkatesan S., Birkbak N.J., McGranahan N., Lundquist M., LaPlant Q., Healey J.H., Elemento O., Chung C.H., Lee N.Y., Imielenski M., Nanjangud G., Pe’er D., Cleveland D.W., Powell S.N., Lammerding J., Swanton C., Cantley L.C. Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response. Nature. 2018;553(7689):467–472. doi: 10.1038/nature25432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Bernard V., Kim D.U., San Lucas F.A., Castillo J., Allenson K., Mulu F.C. Circulating nucleic acids are associated with outcomes of patients with pancreatic cáncer. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(1):108-118. e104. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Madhavan D., Wallwiener M., Bents K., Zucknick M., Nees J., Schott S., Cuk K., Riethdorf S., Trumpp A., Pantel K., Sohn C., Schneeweiss A., Surowy H., Burwinkel B. Plasma DNA integrity as a biomarker for primary and metastatic breast cancer and potential marker for early diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2014;146(1):163–174. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-2946-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Tan A.S., Baty J.W., Dong L-F., Bezawork-Geleta A., Endaya B., Goodwin J., Bajzikova M., Kovarova J., Peterka M., Yan B., Pesdar E.A., Sobol M., Filimonenko A., Stuart S., Vondrusova M., Kluckova K., Sachaphibulkij K., Rohlena J., Hozak P., Truksa J., Eccles D., Haupt L.M., Griffiths L.R., Neuzil J., Berridge M.V. Mitochondrial genome acquisition restores respiratory function and tumorigenic potential of cancer cells without mitochondrial DNA. Cell Metab. 2015;21(1):81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Guha M., Avadhani N.G. Mitochondrial retrograde signaling at the crossroads of tumor bioenergetics, genetics and epigenetics. Mitochondrion. 2013;13(6):577–591. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2013.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Orend G., Chiquet-Ehrismann R. Tenascin-C induced signaling in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2006;244(2):143–163. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.von Holst A. Tenascin C in stem cell niches: Redundant, permissive or instructive? Cells Tissues Organs (Print) 2008;188(1-2):170–177. doi: 10.1159/000112848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Tavazoie S.F., Alarcón C., Oskarsson T., Padua D., Wang Q., Bos P.D., Gerald W.L., Massagué J. Endogenous human microRNAs that suppress breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2008;451(7175):147–152. doi: 10.1038/nature06487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Minn A.J., Kang Y., Serganova I., Gupta G.P., Giri D.D., Doubrovin M., Ponomarev V., Gerald W.L., Blasberg R., Massagué J. Distinct organ-specific metastatic potential of individual breast cancer cells and primary tumors. J. Clin. Invest. 2005;115(1):44–55. doi: 10.1172/JCI22320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.O’Connell J.T., Sugimoto H., Cooke V.G., MacDonald B.A., Mehta A.I., LeBleu V.S., Dewar R., Rocha R.M., Brentani R.R., Resnick M.B., Neilson E.G., Zeisberg M., Kalluri R. VEGF-A and Tenascin-C produced by S100A4+ stromal cells are important for metastatic colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108(38):16002–16007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109493108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Barker N., van Es J.H., Kuipers J., Kujala P., van den Born M., Cozijnsen M., Haegebarth A., Korving J., Begthel H., Peters P.J., Clevers H. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449(7165):1003–1007. doi: 10.1038/nature06196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Imai T., Tokunaga A., Yoshida T., Hashimoto M., Mikoshiba K., Weinmaster G., Nakafuku M., Okano H. The neural RNA-binding protein Musashi1 translationally regulates mammalian numb gene expression by interacting with its mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001;21(12):3888–3900. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.12.3888-3900.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Okano H., Kawahara H., Toriya M., Nakao K., Shibata S., Imai T. Function of RNA-binding protein Musashi-1 in stem cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2005;306(2):349–356. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Sun Z., Velázquez-Quesada I., Murdamoothoo D., Ahowesso C., Yilmaz A., Spenlé C., Averous G., Erne W., Oberndorfer F., Oszwald A., Kain R., Bourdon C., Mangin P., Deligne C., Midwood K., Abou-Faycal C., Lefebvre O., Klein A., van der Heyden M., Chenard M.P., Christofori G., Mathelin C., Loustau T., Hussenet T., Orend G. Tenascin-C increases lung metastasis by impacting blood vessel invasions. Matrix Biol. 2019;83:26–47. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2019.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Catela Ivkovic T., Voss G., Cornella H., Ceder Y. microRNAs as cancer therapeutics: A step closer to clinical application. Cancer Lett. 2017;407:113–122. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Takamizawa J., Konishi H., Yanagisawa K., Tomida S., Osada H., Endoh H., Harano T., Yatabe Y., Nagino M., Nimura Y., Mitsudomi T., Takahashi T. Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival. Cancer Res. 2004;64(11):3753–3756. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Mendell J.T. miRiad roles for the miR-17-92 cluster in development and disease. Cell. 2008;133(2):217–222. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Zhang Y., Yang P., Wang X-F. Microenvironmental regulation of cancer metastasis by miRNAs. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(3):153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Mani S.A., Guo W., Liao M-J., Eaton E.N., Ayyanan A., Zhou A.Y. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell. 2008;133(4):704–715. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Karnoub A.E., Dash A.B., Vo A.P., Sullivan A., Brooks M.W., Bell G.W., Richardson A.L., Polyak K., Tubo R., Weinberg R.A. Mesenchymal stem cells within tumour stroma promote breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2007;449(7162):557–563. doi: 10.1038/nature06188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Qian B-Z., Li J., Zhang H., Kitamura T., Zhang J., Campion L.R., Kaiser E.A., Snyder L.A., Pollard J.W. CCL2 recruits inflammatory monocytes to facilitate breast-tumour metastasis. Nature. 2011;475(7355):222–225. doi: 10.1038/nature10138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Ho A.S., Huang X., Cao H., Christman-Skieller C., Bennewith K., Le Q-T., Koong A.C. Circulating miR-210 as a novel hypoxia marker in pancreatic cancer. Transl. Oncol. 2010;3(2):109–113. doi: 10.1593/tlo.09256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Semenza G.L. Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell. 2012;148(3):399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Smyth M.J., Dunn G.P., Schreiber R.D. Cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting: the roles of immunity in suppressing tumor development and shaping tumor immunogenicity. Adv. Immunol. 2006;90:1–50. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(06)90001-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Vesely M.D., Kershaw M.H., Schreiber R.D., Smyth M.J. Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011;29:235–271. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Kogure A., Kosaka N., Ochiya T. Cross-talk between cancer cells and their neighbors via miRNA in extracellular vesicles: An emerging player in cancer metastasis. J. Biomed. Sci. 2019;26(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12929-019-0500-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Zhang Z., Qiao J., Zhang D., Zhu W., Zhu J., Leng X., Li S. Noncoding RNAs act as tumor-derived molecular components in inducing premetastatic niche formation. BioMed Res. Int. 2019;20199258075 doi: 10.1155/2019/9258075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 151.Mandel P., Metais P. Les acides nucléiques du plasma sanguin chez l’homme. C. R. Seances Soc. Biol. Fil. 1948;142(3-4):241–243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Anker P., Stroun M., Maurice P.A. Spontaneous release of DNA by human blood lymphocytes as shown in an in vitro system. Cancer Res. 1975;35(9):2375–2382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Aucamp J., Bronkhorst A.J., Badenhorst C.P.S., Pretorius P.J. The diverse origins of circulating cell-free DNA in the human body: A critical re-evaluation of the literature. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2018;93(3):1649–1683. doi: 10.1111/brv.12413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Jahr S., Hentze H., Englisch S., Hardt D., Fackelmayer F.O., Hesch R-D., Knippers R. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: Quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61(4):1659–1665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Leon S.A., Shapiro B., Sklaroff D.M., Yaros M.J. Free DNA in the serum of cancer patients and the effect of therapy. Cancer Res. 1977;37(3):646–650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.De Mattos-Arruda L., Cortes J., Santarpia L., Vivancos A., Tabernero J., Reis-Filho J.S., Seoane J. Circulating tumour cells and cell-free DNA as tools for managing breast cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2013;10(7):377–389. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Ralph S.J., Rodríguez-Enríquez S., Neuzil J., Saavedra E., Moreno-Sánchez R. The causes of cancer revisited: “mitochondrial malignancy” and ROS-induced oncogenic transformation - why mitochondria are targets for cancer therapy. Mol. Aspects Med. 2010;31(2):145–170. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2010.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Hanahan D., Weinberg R.A., Hanahan P.D. 2 Biological hallmarks of cáncer. 2017.
- 160.Ishikawa K., Takenaga K., Akimoto M., Koshikawa N., Yamaguchi A., Imanishi H., Nakada K., Honma Y., Hayashi J. ROS-generating mitochondrial DNA mutations can regulate tumor cell metastasis. Science. 2008;320(5876):661–664. doi: 10.1126/science.1156906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Petros J.A., Baumann A.K., Ruiz-Pesini E., Amin M.B., Sun C.Q., Hall J., Lim S., Issa M.M., Flanders W.D., Hosseini S.H., Marshall F.F., Wallace D.C. mtDNA mutations increase tumorigenicity in prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102(3):719–724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408894102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Tan A.S., Baty J.W., Berridge M.V. The role of mitochondrial electron transport in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1840(4):1454–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Tang W., Chowdhury A.R., Guha M., Huang L., Van Winkle T., Rustgi A.K., Avadhani N.G. Silencing of IkBβ mRNA causes disruption of mitochondrial retrograde signaling and suppression of tumor growth in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(9):1762–1768. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Brellier F., Martina E., Degen M., Heuzé-Vourc’h N., Petit A., Kryza T., Courty Y., Terracciano L., Ruiz C., Chiquet-Ehrismann R. Tenascin-W is a better cancer biomarker than tenascin-C for most human solid tumors. BMC Clin. Pathol. 2012;12(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-12-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Jahkola T., Toivonen T., Virtanen I., von Smitten K., Nordling S., von Boguslawski K., Haglund C., Nevanlinna H., Blomqvist C. Tenascin-C expression in invasion border of early breast cancer: a predictor of local and distant recurrence. Br. J. Cancer. 1998;78(11):1507–1513. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Rudnick J.A., Kuperwasser C. Stromal biomarkers in breast cancer development and progression. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2012;29(7):663–672. doi: 10.1007/s10585-012-9499-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Radisky E.S., Radisky D.C. Matrix metalloproteinases as breast cancer drivers and therapeutic targets. Front. Biosci. 2015;20:1144–1163. doi: 10.2741/4364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Vihinen P., Kähäri V.M. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: Prognostic markers and therapeutic targets. Int. J. Cancer. 2002;99(2):157–166. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Dave H., Trivedi S., Shah M., Shukla S. Transforming growth factor β 2: A predictive marker for breast cancer. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2011;49(11):879–887. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Ivanović V., Todorović-Raković N., Demajo M., Nesković-Konstantinović Z., Subota V., Ivanisević-Milovanović O., Nikolić-Vukosavljević D. Elevated plasma levels of transforming growth factor-β 1 (TGF-β 1) in patients with advanced breast cancer: association with disease progression. Eur. J. Cancer. 2003;39(4):454–461. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(02)00502-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Rydén L., Jirström K., Haglund M., Stål O., Fernö M. Epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 are specific biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer. Results from a controlled randomized trial with long-term follow-up. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010;120(2):491–498. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0758-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Bottino J., Gelaleti G.B., Maschio L.B., Jardim-Perassi B.V., de Campos Zuccari D.A.P. Immunoexpression of ROCK-1 and MMP-9 as prognostic markers in breast cancer. Acta Histochem. 2014;116(8):1367–1373. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2014.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Janyasupab M., Lee Y-H., Zhang Y., Liu C.W., Cai J., Popa A., Samia A.C., Wang K.W., Xu J., Hu C.C., Wendt M.K., Schiemann B.J., Thompson C.L., Yen Y., Schiemann W.P., Liu C.C. Detection of lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2), a biomarker of metastasis from breast cancers using human blood samples. Recent Pat. Biomark. 2015;5(2):93–100. doi: 10.2174/2210309005666150804195033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Kirschmann D.A., Seftor E.A., Fong S.F., Nieva D.R., Sullivan C.M., Edwards E.M., Sommer P., Csiszar K., Hendrix M.J. A molecular role for lysyl oxidase in breast cancer invasion. Cancer Res. 2002;62(15):4478–4483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Côme C., Magnino F., Bibeau F., De Santa Barbara P., Becker K.F., Theillet C., Savagner P. Snail and slug play distinct roles during breast carcinoma progression. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12(18):5395–5402. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Hesari A., Golrokh Moghadam S.A., Siasi A., Rahmani M., Behboodi N., Rastgar-Moghadam A., Ferns G.A., Ghasemi F., Avan A. Tumor-derived exosomes: Potential biomarker or therapeutic target in breast cancer? J. Cell. Biochem. 2018;119(6):4236–4240. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Jia Y., Chen Y., Wang Q., Jayasinghe U., Luo X., Wei Q., Wang J., Xiong H., Chen C., Xu B., Hu W., Wang L., Zhao W., Zhou J. Exosome: Emerging biomarker in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(25):41717–41733. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Iranpour M., Soudyab M., Geranpayeh L., Mirfakhraie R., Azargashb E., Movafagh A., Ghafouri-Fard S. Expression analysis of four long noncoding RNAs in breast cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(3):2933–2940. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4135-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Zhang X-F., Liu T., Li Y., Li S. Overexpression of long non-coding RNA CCAT1 is a novel biomarker of poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015;8(8):9440–9445. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Ahmad A., Aboukameel A., Kong D., Wang Z., Sethi S., Chen W., Sarkar F.H., Raz A. Phosphoglucose isomerase/autocrine motility factor mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulated by miR-200 in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2011;71(9):3400–3409. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Ye F., Tang H., Liu Q., Xie X., Wu M., Liu X., Chen B., Xie X. miR-200b as a prognostic factor in breast cancer targets multiple members of RAB family. J. Transl. Med. 2014;12(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Canzoniero J.V., Park B.H. Use of cell free DNA in breast oncology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016;1865(2):266–274. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2016.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Schwarzenbach H. Circulating nucleic acids as biomarkers in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(5):211. doi: 10.1186/bcr3446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Hsu C.W., Yin P.H., Lee H.C., Chi C.W., Tseng L.M. Mitochondrial DNA content as a potential marker to predict response to anthracycline in breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2010;16(3):264–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00908.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


