Skip to main content
Journal of Hospital Medicine logoLink to Journal of Hospital Medicine
. 2020 Aug;15(8):489–493. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3497

Effect of Systemic Glucocorticoids on Mortality or Mechanical Ventilation in Patients With COVID-19

Marla J Keller 1,*, Elizabeth A Kitsis 2, Shitij Arora 3, Jen-Ting Chen 4, Shivani Agarwal 5, Michael J Ross 6, Yaron Tomer 5, William Southern 3
PMCID: PMC7518134  PMID: 32804611

Abstract

The efficacy of glucocorticoids in COVID-19 is unclear. This study was designed to determine whether systemic glucocorticoid treatment in COVID-19 patients is associated with reduced mortality or mechanical ventilation. This observational study included 1,806 hospitalized COVID-19 patients; 140 were treated with glucocorticoids within 48 hours of admission. Early use of glucocorticoids was not associated with mortality or mechanical ventilation. However, glucocorticoid treatment of patients with initial C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥20 mg/dL was associated with significantly reduced risk of mortality or mechanical ventilation (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.70), while glucocorticoid treatment of patients with CRP <10 mg/dL was associated with significantly increased risk of mortality or mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.39-5.03). Whether glucocorticoid treatment is associated with changes in mortality or mechanical ventilation in patients with high or low CRP needs study in prospective, randomized clinical trials.


Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the most important public health emergency of the 21st century. The pandemic has devastated New York City, where over 17,000 confirmed deaths have occurred as of June 5, 2020.1 The most common cause of death in COVID-19 patients is respiratory failure from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A recent study reported high mortality rates among COVID-19 patients who received mechanical ventilation (MV).2

Glucocorticoids are useful as adjunctive treatment for some infections with inflammatory responses, but their efficacy in COVID-19 is unclear. Prior experience with influenza and other coronaviruses may be relevant. A recent meta-analysis of influenza pneumonia showed increased mortality and a higher rate of secondary infections in patients who were administered glucocorticoids.3 For Middle East respiratory syndrome, severe acute respiratory syndrome, and influenza, some studies have demonstrated an association between glucocorticoid use and delayed viral clearance.47 However, a recent retrospective series of patients with COVID-19 and ARDS demonstrated a decrease in mortality with glucocorticoid use.8 Glucocorticoids are easily obtained and familiar to providers caring for COVID-19 patients. Hence their empiric use is widespread.8,9

The primary goal of this study was to determine whether early glucocorticoid treatment is associated with reduced mortality or need for MV in COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

Study Setting and Overview

Montefiore Medical Center comprises four hospitals totaling 1,536 beds in the Bronx borough of New York, New York. Based upon early experience, some clinicians began prescribing systemic glucocorticoids to patients with COVID-19 while others did not. We leveraged this variation in practice to examine the effectiveness of glucocorticoids in reducing mortality and the rate of MV in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Study Populations

There were 2,998 patients admitted with a positive COVID-19 test between March 11, 2020, and April 13, 2020. An a priori decision was made to include all hospitalized COVID-19 patients, including children. Because the outcomes of in-hospital mortality and in-hospital MV cannot be assessed in patients still hospitalized, we included only patients who either died or had been discharged from the hospital. Patients who died or were placed on MV within the first 48 hours of admission were excluded because outcome events occurred before having the opportunity for glucocorticoid treatment. To ensure treatment preceded outcome measurement, we included only patients treated with glucocorticoids within the first 48 hours of admission (treatment group) and compared them with patients never treated with glucocorticoids (control group).

Outcomes and Independent Variables

The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality or in-hospital MV. Secondary outcomes were the components of the primary. Timing of MV was determined using the first documentation of a ventilator respiratory rate or tidal volume. The independent variable of interest was treatment with glucocorticoids within the first 48 hours of admission. Formulations included are described in the Appendix.

To compare treatment and control groups and to perform adjusted analyses, we also examined the demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory values of each admission. For the comparison of study populations, missing values for each variable were ignored. In the primary (unstratified) multivariable analysis, continuous variables were categorized, with missing values assumed to be normal when used as an adjustment variable. All variables extracted, number of missing values, candidates for inclusion in the multivariable analysis, and those that fell out of the model are presented in the Appendix. Several subgroup analyses were predefined including age, diabetes, admission glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and troponin T levels.

Statistical Analysis

The treated and control groups were compared with respect to demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and laboratory values. Primary and secondary outcomes in the groups were compared in unadjusted and adjusted analyses using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. All patient characteristics that were candidates for inclusion in the adjustment models are listed in the Appendix. Variables were included in the final model if they were associated with the primary outcome (Wald test P < .20) in univariable regression. A sensitivity analysis excluded all variables missing greater than 10% of data, including CRP. Interactions between treatment and six predefined subgroups were tested using logistic regression with interaction terms (eg, [steroids]*[age]). Stratified logistic regression was used to test the association between treatment and the primary outcome in each of the predefined subgroups. Patients who were missing CRP were excluded from the stratified analysis. Because a significant interaction between treatment and initial CRP level was discovered, we undertook a post hoc adjusted analysis within each of the 15 predefined subgroup variables. Because there were fewer outcome events in each subgroup, we constructed a parsimonious logistic regression model that included all variables independently associated with the exposure (P < .05). The same seven adjustment variables were used in each of the predefined subgroups. The study was approved by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Institutional Review Board. Stata 15.1 software (StataCorp) was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2,998 patients examined, 1,806 met inclusion criteria and included 140 (7.7%) treated with glucocorticoids within 48 hours of admission and 1,666 who never received glucocorticoids. Reasons for exclusion of 1,192 patients are provided in the Appendix. Among patients who remained hospitalized and were excluded, 169 of 962 (17.6%) received glucocorticoids. Characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. Treatment and control groups were similar except that glucocorticoid-treated patients were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, rheumatoid arthritis or lupus, or to have received glucocorticoids in the year prior to admission.

TABLE 1.

Patient Characteristics

No glucocorticoids (N = 1,666) Early glucocorticoids (N = 140) All (N = 1,806)
Age (years; range, 0-101) 62.3 ± 17.9 61.7 ± 15.9 62.2 ± 17.8
Female 772 (46.3) 69 (49.3) 841 (46.6)
Male 894 (53.7) 71 (50.7) 965 (53.4)
White 137 (8.2) 13 (9.3) 150 (8.3)
Black 624 (37.5) 53 (37.9) 677 (37.5)
Latina/Latino 607 (36.4) 45 (32.1) 652 (36.1)
Other/Unknown 298 (17.9) 29 (20.7) 327 (18.1)
First oxygen saturation <90% 63 (3.8) 10 (7.1) 73 (4)
Body mass index >30 kg/m2 638 (38.3) 71 (50.7) 709 (39.3)
Body mass index <20 kg/m2 84 (5.0) 6 (4.3) 90 (5)
Charlson score 1 (0, 3) 1 (0, 4) 1 (0, 3)
Hypertension 1187 (71.2) 101 (72.1) 1288 (71.3)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 191 (11.5) 41 (29.3) 232 (12.8)
Diabetes mellitus 767 (46) 65 (46.4) 832 (46.1)
Coronary artery disease 325 (19.5) 31 (22.1) 356 (19.7)
HIV 37 (2.2) 5 (3.6) 42 (2.3)
Asthma 291 (17.5) 53 (37.9) 344 (19)
Rheumatoid arthritis or lupus 25 (1.5) 16 (11.4) 41 (2.3)
End stage renal disease/Dialysis 56 (3.4) 0 (0) 56 (3.1)
Do not resuscitate/Do not intubate 196 (11.8) 17 (12.1) 213 (11.8)
Presented with acute kidney injury 153 (9.2) 16 (11.4) 169 (9.4)
Previous glucocorticoid use 66 (4) 17 (12.1) 83 (4.6)
White blood cell count (k/μL) 6.6 (5.2, 8.9) 6.8 (4.6, 9.8) 6.7 (5.1, 8.9)
Platelets (k/μL) 221 ± 94 223 ± 83 221 ± 93
Sodium (mEq/L) 138 ± 6 136 ± 5 137 ± 6
Potassium (mEq/L) 4.4 ± 0.7 4.4 ± 0.6 4.4 ± 0.7
Glucose (mg/dL) 173 ± 122 166 ± 110 172 ± 121
C-reactive protein (mg/dL) 8.1 (4.0, 15.0) 10.9 (4.7, 19.2) 8.3 (4.1, 15.6)
D-dimer (μg/dL) 1.3 (0.8, 2.7) 1.3 (0.8, 2.9) 1.3 (0.8, 2.8)
Creatinine (mg/dL) 1.0 (0.8, 1.6) 1.1 (0.8, 1.5) 1.1 (0.8, 1.5)
Troponin T (ng/mL) 0.1 (0.1, 0.2) 0.1 (0.1, 0.1) 0.1 (0.1, 0.2)
Lactate dehydrogenase (μg/L) 358 (276, 473) 391 (313, 516) 360 (278, 477)
Ferritin (ng/mL) 763 (370, 1491) 764 (439, 1506) 763 (378, 1491)
Creatine kinase (U/L) 175 (92, 396) 166 (74, 376) 173 (90, 393)
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L) 39 (28, 63) 39 (26, 53) 39 (27, 62)
Lymphocyte count (k/μL) 1.0 (0.7, 1.4) 0.9 (0.6, 1.3) 1.0 (0.7, 1.3)
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) 0.1 (0.1, 0.5) 0.2 (0.1, 0.5) 0.1 (0.1, 0.5)

Notes: Continuous, normally distributed variables are presented as mean ± SD. Continuous, nonnormally distributed variables are presented as median (interquartile range). Categorical variables are presented as No. (%).

There were 318 who met the primary outcome of death or mechanical ventilation, 270 of whom died and 135 of whom required mechanical ventilation. Overall, early use of glucocorticoids was not associated with in-hospital mortality or MV as a composite outcome or as separate outcomes in both unadjusted and adjusted models (Table 2A). However, there was significant heterogeneity of treatment effect in the sub-groups defined by CRP levels (P for interaction = .008; Figure). Early glucocorticoid use and an initial CRP of 20 mg/dL or higher was associated with a significantly reduced risk of mortality or MV in unadjusted (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.70) and adjusted (aOR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.67) analyses (Table 2B). Conversely, glucocorticoid treatment in patients with CRP levels less than 10 mg/dL was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality or MV in unadjusted (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.39-5.03) and adjusted (aOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.52-6.50) analyses.

TABLE 2A.

Association of Outcomes in Patients Treated With Glucocorticoids Versus No Glucocorticoids

Outcome OR (95% CI) aOR* (95% CI)
Mortality or MV 1.13 (0.73-1.75) 1.12 (0.67-1.88)
Mortality 1.13 (0.71-1.80) 1.20 (0.68-2.10)
MV 1.55 (0.88-2.73) 1.34 (0.71-2.52)
*

Full model adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, low oxygen saturation, body mass index, Charlson score, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, asthma, rheumatologic disease, HIV, previous dialysis, do not resuscitate/do not intubate order, previous glucocorticoid use, white blood cell count, platelets, sodium, potassium, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, creatinine, troponin T, lactose dehydrogenase, ferritin, creatine kinase, aspartate aminotransferase, glucose lymphocyte count, and procalcitonin.

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; MV, mechanical ventilation; OR, odds ratio.

FIG.

FIG

(A) Unadjusted Odds Ratios and 95% CIs for Mortality or Mechanical Ventilation in Predefined Subgroups. For subgroups defined by laboratory values, the combined number (N) may not total 1,806 because of missing data. (B) Adjusted Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for Mortality or Mechanical Ventilation in Predefined Subgroups. For subgroups defined by laboratory values, the combined number (N) may not total 1,806 because of missing data.

TABLE 2B.

Mortality or Mechanical Ventilation by CRP Value

CRP Subgroup OR (95% CI) aOR* (95% CI)
0-9.9 mg/dL (n = 807) 2.64 (1.39-5.03) 3.14 (1.52-6.50)
10-19.9 mg/dL (n = 442) 1.03 (0.47-2.23) 1.05 (0.46-2.39)
≥20 mg/dL (n = 198) 0.23 (0.08-0.70) 0.20 (0.06-0.67)
*

Parsimonious model adjusted for body mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, rheumatologic disease, previous glucocorticoid use, ferritin, and procalcitonin.

Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; OR, odds ratio.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study indicate that early treatment with glucocorticoids is not associated with mortality or need for MV in unselected patients with COVID-19. Subgroup analyses suggest that glucocorticoid-treated patients with markedly elevated CRP may benefit from glucocorticoid treatment, whereas those patients with lower CRP may be harmed. Our findings were consistent after adjustment for clinical characteristics. The public health implications of these findings are hard to overestimate. Given the global growth of the pandemic and that glucocorticoids are widely available and inexpensive, glucocorticoid therapy may save many thousands of lives. Equally important because we have been able to identify a group that may be harmed, some patients may be saved because glucocorticoids will not be given.

Our study reaffirms the finding of the as yet unpublished Randomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) trial that there is a subset of patients with COVID-19 who benefit from treatment with glucocorticoids.10 Our study extends the findings of the RECOVERY trial in two important ways. First, in addition to finding some patients who may benefit, we also have identified patient groups that may experience harm from treatment with glucocorticoids. This finding suggests choosing the right patients for glucocorticoid treatment is critical to maximize the likelihood of benefit and minimize the risk of harm. Second, we have identified patient groups who are likely to benefit (or be harmed) on the basis of a widely available lab test (CRP).

Our results are also consistent with previous studies of patients with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, in which no associations between glucocorticoid treatment and mortality were found.7 However, the results of studies examining the effect of glucocorticoids in patients with COVID-19 are less consistent.8,11,12

Few of the previous studies examined the effects of glucocorticoids in subgroups of patients. In our study, the improved outcomes associated with glucocorticoid use in patients with elevated CRPs is intriguing and may be clinically important. Proinflammatory cytokines, especially interleukin-6, acutely increase CRP levels. Cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) is a hyperinflammatory condition that occurs in a subset of COVID-19 patients, often resulting in multiorgan dysfunction.13 CRP is markedly elevated in CSS,14 and improved outcomes with glucocorticoid therapy in this subgroup may indicate benefit in this inflammatory phenotype. Patients with lower CRP are less likely to have CSS and may experience more harm than benefit associated with glucocorticoid treatment.

Several limitations are inherent to this study. Since it was done at a single center, the results may not be generalizable. As a retrospective analysis, it is subject to confounding and bias. In addition, because patients were included only if they had reached the outcome of death/MV or hospital discharge, the sample size was truncated. We believe glucocorticoid use in hospitalized patients excluded from the study reflects increased use with time because of a growing belief in their effectiveness.

Preliminary analysis from the RECOVERY study showed a reduced rate of mortality in patients randomized to dexamethasone, compared with those who received standard of care.10 These results led to the National Institutes for Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel recommendation for dexamethasone treatment in patients with COVID-19 who require supplemental oxygen or MV.15 Our findings suggest a role for CRP to identify patients who may benefit from glucocorticoid therapy, as well as those in whom it may be harmful. Additional studies to further elucidate the role of CRP in guiding glucocorticoid therapy and to predict clinical response are needed.

Supplementary Materials

Keller_Appendix_.pdf (177.8KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Disclosures: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Funding: Drs Agarwal, Keller, Ross, and Tomer hold NIH grants payable to their institutions for support, but not specifically for this work.

References

  • 1.COVID-19: Data. [Accessed June 5, 2020];New York City Health. 2020 https://www1.nyc.gov/site/doh/covid/covid-19-data.page.
  • 2.Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area JAMA. 2020323202052–2059. 10.1001/jama.2020.6775 10.1001/jama.2020.6775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ni YN, Chen G, Sun J, Liang BM, Liang ZA.The effect of corticosteroids on mortality of patients with influenza pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Crit Care. 201923199. 10.1186/s13054-019-2395-8 10.1186/s13054-019-2395-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arabi YM, Alothman A, Balkhy HH, et al. Treatment of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome with a combination of lopinavir-ritonavir and interferon-beta1b (MIRACLE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Trials. 201819181. 10.1186/s13063-017-2427-0 10.1186/s13063-017-2427-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lee N, Allen Chan KC, Hui DS, et al. Effects of early corticosteroid treatment on plasma SARS-associated Coronavirus RNA concentrations in adult patients J Clin Virol. 2004314304–309. 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.07.006 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lee N, Chan PK, Hui DS, et al. Viral loads and duration of viral shedding in adult patients hospitalized with influenza J Infect Dis. 20092004492–500. 10.1086/600383 10.1086/600383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Russell CD, Millar JE, Baillie JK.Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury Lancet. 202039510223473–475. 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30317-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994. Published online March 13, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China N Engl J Med. 2020382181708–1720. 10.1056/ne-jmoa2002032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson J, et al. Effect of dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: preliminary report. medRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.22.20137273. Preprint posted June 22, 2020. [DOI]
  • 11.Cao J, Tu WJ, Cheng W, et al. Clinical features and short-term outcomes of 102 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa243. Published online April 2, 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Wang Y, Jiang W, He Q, et al. A retrospective cohort study of methylpred-nisolone therapy in severe patients with COVID-19 pneumonia Signal Transduct Target Ther. 20205157. 10.1038/s41392-020-0158-2 10.1038/s41392-020-0158-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen G, Wu D, Guo W, et al. Clinical and immunological features of severe and moderate coronavirus disease 2019 J Clin Invest. 202013052620–2629. 10.1172/jci137244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McGonagle D, Sharif K, O’Regan A, Bridgewood C.The role of cytokines including interleukin-6 in COVID-19 induced pneumonia and macrophage activation syndrome-like disease Autoimmun Rev. 2020196102537. 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102537 10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.The National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel Provides Recommendations for Dexamethasone in Patients with COVID-19. [Accessed June 25, 2020];National Institutes of Health. Updated June 25, 2020. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/dexamethasone/

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Keller_Appendix_.pdf (177.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Hospital Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontline Medical Communications

RESOURCES