Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has produced impressive clinical responses in patients with B-cell malignancies. Critical to the success of CAR-T cell therapies was the achievement of robust gene transfer in T cells mediated by viral vectors such as gamma-retroviral vectors. However, current methodologies of retroviral gene transfer rely on spinoculation and the use of retronectin, which may limit the implementation of cost-effective CAR-T cell therapies. Herein, we describe a low cost, tunable, macroporous, alginate scaffold that transduces T cells with retroviral vectors under static condition. CAR-T cells produced by macroporous scaffold-mediated viral transduction exhibited >60% CAR expression, retained effector phenotype, expanded to clinically relevant cell numbers and eradicated CD19+ lymphoma tumor in vivo. Efficient transduction was dependent on scaffold macroporosity. Taken together, our data shows that macroporous alginate scaffolds serve as an attractive alternative to current transduction protocols and have high potential for clinical translation to genetically modify T cells for adoptive cellular therapy.
Keywords: CAR-T cells, Alginate Scaffold, Viral Transduction, Cell Therapy, Immunotherapy
Introduction:
Adoptive T cellular therapy harnesses and redirects patient's own immune system and has emerged as a promising personalized treatment modality to treat cancer [1-3] and various other diseases.[4,5] The most successful example has been the adoptive transfer of chimeric antigen receptor redirected T cells (CAR-T cells) targeting the CD19 expressed by B-cell-derived malignancies that received FDA approvals in 2017.[6,7] With the compelling success of CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapies, efforts are now being directed towards broadening the application of CAR-T cells to other cancer types.[8-11] One of the key steps involved in CAR T- cell therapy is the genetic modification of T cells ex vivo, which endows T cells with stable expression of the CAR molecule that redirect T-cell specificity towards tumor antigens. However, inexpensive strategies to generate large numbers of genetically modified functional T cells remains a central challenge to the widespread use of CAR-T cells. Thus, development of culture platforms enabling ex vivo genetic engineering of T cells followed by expansion to clinically relevant cell numbers is of immense importance for the success of CAR-T cell therapy.
A number of different approaches are being explored to genetically engineer T cells ex vivo. [12-17] Among them, lentiviral and retroviral vector-based gene transfer represents the most successful approach.[16] When retrovirus is used to generate CAR-T cells, T cells isolated from patients are first stimulated with agonistic anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies and then incubated with retrovirus because quiescent T cells are refractory to retrovirus-mediated insertion.[18,19] Because of the short distance the retrovirus can travel in solution by Brownian motion (less than 600 μm within one half-life)[20,21] activated T cells and retrovirus must be brought into contact either by spinoculation in the presence of transduction-promoting agents such as retronectin or polybrene or by using microfluidic based transduction devices.[22-24] Transduction-promoting agents like polybrene[25] and protamine sulfate[26,27] as well as microfluidic transduction devices have been used with modest success[28], while recombinant fibronectin fragment CH296 (Retronectin) represents the most widely clinically used transduction-promoting reagent for retrovirus.[29] Retronectin binds retrovirus through its heparin-binding domain and T cells via CS-1/RGD domains, bringing cells and retrovirus together and facilitating gene transfer.[30] Retronectin requires to be pre-coated onto a solid surface, such as polystyrene plate, flask or bag for effective co-localization of retrovirus and T cells.[30,31] Even then, gene transfer and subsequent CAR expression remain suboptimal under passive/static condition.[32] To achieve high gene expression, retrovirus is seeded on retronectin coated surfaces and centrifuged at high speed.[32-34] Furthermore, retronectin is a recombinant protein, and it is inherently bioreactive which can influence cell differentiation and proliferation.[35,36] Thus the development of more efficient culture systems enabling a single step ex vivo engineering process of T cells under static conditions without retronectin or spinoculation would significantly reduce the cost of CAR-T cell manufacturing when retrovirus is used as gene delivery system.
We have developed a three dimensional (3D) macroporous scaffold as an efficient, single-step, static platform to engineer T cells with viral vectors. We hypothesized that 3D dimensional scaffolds with macroporosity and high capacity to absorb water [37] would allow colocalization of retrovirus and T cells as achieved by using retronectin. We prepared macroporous scaffolds from calcium-crosslinked alginate, which is a GMP-compliant and FDA-approved biomaterial extensively used for many biomedical applications due to its biocompatibility, low toxicity, low cost, and mild gelation by divalent cations.[38] We observed that dry, hygroscopic and macroporous alginate scaffolds facilitate the interaction of retrovirus and T cells and enables efficient gene transfer in a single step without spinoculation and without affecting functionality and viability of engineered T cells. Thus, these scaffolds represent a simple, cost-effective and tunable platform technology for generating highly functional T cells for adoptive cellular therapy.
The macroporous alginate scaffolds were prepared by mild cryogelation (Figure 1A). Imaging by SEM revealed well connected, 100-200 μm pores throughout the scaffold (Figure 1B,1C). Alginate scaffolds were tested for human T cell transduction using gamma retrovirus. T cells obtained from peripheral blood of three different healthy donors were activated with agonistic anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies. Activated T cells were then seeded on either conventional spinoculated retrovirus- and retronectin-coated plates or retrovirus seeded into the alginate scaffolds. A preliminary screen of transduction efficiency at multiplicities of infection (MOIs) of 1, 2 and 4 (Supplementary Figure 1) using retrovirus encoding GFP demonstrated efficient transduction and an MOI of 2 was chosen for further experiments. As shown in Figure 1D, 72 hours after incubation with equal amounts of retrovirus (MOI 2), T cells expressing GFP on the scaffolds were comparable to those transduced by retronectin coated plates with spinoculation (85±3% vs. 90±5% GFP+ cells). For reasons not completely understood, these results showed improved transduction in both groups as compared to viral transduction in the preliminary experiments (Supplementary Figure 1, 49% vs 73.5%, respectively). Despite this, very little variability was noted across three different PBMC donors (Figure 1D).
Figure 1. Dry macroporous scaffolds mediate retroviral transduction of human activated T cells.
A) Schematic showing the preparation of macroporous alginate scaffolds. B,C) SEM images of dry macroporous scaffolds. D) GFP expression in activated T cells transduced with equal amounts of retrovirus seeded on dry macroporous scaffolds (red) and retronectin-coated plates with spinoculation (blue). Non-transduced control cells are represented in black. E) SEM image of dry nanoporous scaffold. F) GFP expression in T cells transduced with retrovirus seeded on dry macroporous scaffolds (red), hydrated macroporous scaffolds (purple), and dry nanoporous scaffolds (green). Control non-transduced cells are in black. G) Quantification of GFP+ cells (***p<0.0001 with respect to dry macroporous scaffolds, Student’s t-test)
To evaluate whether the macroporosity of the scaffolds affects the interaction between retrovirus and T cells, we fabricated nanoporous scaffolds (Figure 1E), which can absorb retrovirus and T cells, but lack the macroporosity that permits T cell entry into the scaffold. To test whether the sponge-like effect was also needed to create proximity between retrovirus and T cells, we tested hydrated macroporous scaffolds, which have the large pores, but lack the active flow of fluid into the internal pores. We found that neither the dry nanoporous scaffold, nor the hydrated macroporous gel allowed efficient gene transfer as compared to dry macroporous scaffold (Figure 1F,G). In the hydrated macroporous scaffold, only ~12% of cells expressed GFP, indicating that absorption of virus and T cells on the scaffold permit physical contact between retrovirus and T cells, but not nearly as efficiently as the colocalization in the pores accomplished using the dry macroporous alginate scaffold. Future work will explore the use of a chemical kinetics model to further understand the effect of pore size on transduction efficiency of above described alginate scaffolds.
Next, we assessed whether the CAR-T cells generated using the dry macroporous scaffold were functional in vitro. For these experiments we used retrovirus encoding a CAR specific for the CD19 antigen (CD19.CAR). Activated T cells obtained from three healthy donors were seeded on alginate scaffolds or retronectin coated plates loaded with CD19.CAR retrovirus. Upon removal from the scaffold or retronectin, T cells were maintained in culture, and CAR expression was analyzed on day 3 and day 9 after transduction. As shown in Figure 2A, both scaffold and retronectin promoted comparable transduction efficiency, and CAR expression remained unaltered upon expansion through day 9 (Figure 2A, Supplementary Figure 3). CAR-T cells were also analyzed for immune composition by flow cytometry. CAR-T cells generated by conventional means or scaffold showed no differences for expression of CD4, CD8, or memory (CD45RA, CCR7) or exhaustion (PD-1, Lag3) markers (Figure 2C, Supplementary Figures 3,4). Next to evaluate anti-tumor effects in vitro, control non-transduced T cells (NT-cells) and CD19.CAR-T cells generated either by scaffold-mediated or retronectin-mediated transduction were co-cultured with CD19 positive target cells (Daudi) and CD19 negative target cells (U937 CHLA-A2+). Since effector to target ratio is a strong determinant of cytolytic activity, we measured cytotoxicity at two different effector to target ratios (1:2 and 1:5) based on previous literature.[39] NT cells did not eliminate either of the tumor cells, while both CD19.CAR-T cells transduced using either the scaffold or retronectin/spinoculation eliminated CD19+ Daudi cells (Figure 2E and Supplementary Figure 5), but not CD19− U937 cells (Supplementary Figure 6), indicating preserved antigen specificity of redirected T cells. From the same co-culture experiments, cytokines were measured in supernatant collected after 24 h incubation, and CD19.CAR-T cells released IL-2 and interferon IFN-γ in response to Daudi cells (Figures 2F,G). Finally, CD19.CAR-T cells generated using both the scaffold and retronectin methods showed comparable proliferative capacity in response to Daudi cells (Figure 2B). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the alginate scaffold generates highly functional CAR-T cells.
Figure 2. Scaffold-generated CD19.CAR-T cells show similar functional activity to retronectin/spinoculation-derived CAR-T cells in vitro.
A) CD19.CAR expression in T cells transduced on retronectin-coated plates or on macroporous scaffolds in comparison to non-transduced control T cells (NT cells). B) Ex vivo expansion of T cells transduced on retronectin-coated plates or on macroporous scaffolds or NT cells. C, D) Immunophenotypic composition of CAR-T cells obtained via scaffold-mediated or retronectin/spinoculation-mediated transduction and NT cells at day 12 of culture. Analysis was performed gating on CAR-expressing T cells except for NT cells. E) Percentage of CD19+ Daudi cells remaining (tumor cells) when co-cultured with scaffold-generated, retronectin/spinoculation-generated CAR-T cells or control NT cells. Tumor cells and T cells were plated at 1:5 effector to target ratio. T cells and tumor cells were quantified by flow cytometry on day 5 of co-culture. ***P < 0.0001 unpaired Student’s t-test. F) IFN-γ and IL-2 release into co-culture supernatant by scaffold-generated, retronectin/spinoculation-generated CAR-T cells and control NT cells after 24 h of coculture with tumor cells as assessed by ELISA. ***P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with Tukey correction. Data are represented as the mean ± SD from three experiments, each derived from a different PBMC donor.
The antitumor activity of CAR-T cells observed in vitro results was confirmed in an in vivo tumor model. Daudi cells labeled with firefly luciferase (FFLuc) were intravenously (i.v.) injected in nonobese diabetic severe combined immunodeficiency NSG mice, and four days later mice (n=5) were infused i.v. with either control non-transduced (NT) cells or CD19.CAR-T cells generated by either scaffold- or retronectin-mediated transduction. CD19.CAR-T cells generated by either method controlled tumor cell growth as assessed by the measurement of tumor bioluminescence intensity (Figure 3B,C and Supplementary Figure 7). Control of the tumor was associated with an improved overall survival rate (Figure 3E) and without significant toxicity as assessed by changes in body weight (Figure 3D). Thus, scaffold generated CAR-T cells were as equally functional in vivo as CAR-T cells generated by the conventional transduction with retronectin and spinoculation. Future studies will explore the promise of scaffold mediated transduction in solid tumors.
Figure 3. Scaffold-generated CD19.CAR-T cells eradicate tumors in a mouse xenograft model of lymphoma.
A) Experimental timeline of the lymphoma xenograft model in NSG mice using the FFLuc-labeled CD19+ human Daudi tumor cells. B) Representative tumor bioluminescent images (BLI) of NSG mice inoculated with Daudi cells and treated with control NT cells or treated with CD.19.CAR-T cells generated by scaffold-mediated transduction or retronectin/spinoculation-assisted transduction. C) Kinetics of tumor growth measured by quantification of BLI. **p<0.01 when scaffold or CAR-T cells were compared to control NT cells, one way ANOVA. D) Body weight change and E) survival of tumor-bearing mice treated with control NT cells or CD19.CAR-T cells generated by scaffold-mediated or retronectin spinoculation assisted transduction. *p<0.05, log-rank test.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that a biocompatible, macroporous alginate scaffold is as effective in generating T cells engineered with retrovirus as the commercially available retronectin owing to its macroporosity and hygroscopic nature. The dry scaffold we have developed eliminates the need for spinoculation of plates coated with retronectin and seeded with the retroviral particles, thereby simplifying the manufacturing process. CAR-T cells generated through static transduction on the macroporous alginate gel fully maintained their functionality. These data support the potential for the use of an easily synthesizable and low-cost transduction platform to enable generation of highly functional T cells for adoptive cell therapy. This simple platform is also likely to address the need for efficient transduction methods useful with other refractory cell types.
Experimental Section:
Preparation of macroporous alginate scaffold:
Macroporous alginate scaffold was prepared by a procedure reported previously.[40] A 2% solution ultrapure alginate (Pronova, MVG) in water was vigorously stirred with 4% calcium gluconate for 15 mins. The resulting mixture (final calcium concentration 0.01M) was then cast in 24 well plates (1 mL/well), frozen at −20 °C overnight, and lyophilized. The scaffold was either used immediately or stored at 4 °C before use in in vitro or in vivo experiments.
Preparation of dry nanoporous alginate scaffold:
Calcium crosslinked alginate gel was cast in 24 well plates and allowed to gel overnight. The gels were then subjected to multistep solvent exchange with increasing concentrations of ethanol (10, 30, 50, 70, 90, and 100% v/v), followed by drying with supercritical CO2.[41]
Scanning electron microscopy:
Dry macroporous scaffold was cut with a sharp razor, coated with 70 nm AuPd (Au: 60%, Pd: 40%) for 10 minutes at 7 nm/min and analyzed on Hitachi S-3200N Variable pressure SEM. The surface morphology of the nanoporous scaffolds was analyzed by field emission scanning electron microscopy, FESEM (Verios FE1)
Cell lines and retronectin-mediated CAR-T cell generation.
Daudi cells expressing firefly luciferase were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 2 mmol/L GlutaMax (Gibco), penicillin (100 units/mL) and streptomycin (100 mg/mL; Gibco). All cells were maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from buffy coats (Gulf Coast Regional Blood Center) using Lymphoprep medium (Accurate Chemical and Scientific Corporation) and activated on plates coated with 1 mg/mL CD3 (Miltenyi Biotec) and CD28 (BD Biosciences) monoclonal antibodies. GFP.encoded or CD19.CAR encoded retro virus was prepared according to method reported previously.[39] The viral titer was measured by standard flow cytometry assay.[42] Serially diluted viral stocks were added to HEK293T cells. 72 hours later, GFP expression was analyzed by flow cytometry. Population with 5-20% GFP+ cells were used to calculate the viral titer (transducing units/mL) using the following equation: Titer (TU/mL) = (initial cell count * %GFP+)/(volume of virus * dilution factor). MOI was calculated as the ratio of the number of transducing viral particles used to the actual number of cells. Activated T cells (1x106 cells) were transduced with GFP.encoded or CD19.CAR encoded retroviral supernatants[39] (2 mL viral supernatant with ~1 x 106 TU/mL, MOI: 2) on retronectin-coated 24-well plates (Takara Bio Inc.). Two days after activation, transduced T cells were expanded in 50% Click’s Medium (Irvine Scientific) and 50% RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% HyClone fetal bovine serum (GE Healthcare), 2 mmol/L GlutaMax (Gibco). penicillin (100 units/mL), and streptomycin (100 mg/mL; Gibco) with 10 ng/mL IL7 and 5 ng/mL of IL15 (PeproTech) for 10 to 14 days before being used for functional assays
Scaffold-mediated generation of CAR-T cells.
Retroviral supernatant containing GFP-encoded or human CD19.CAR-encoded gamma retrovirus[39] was concentrated 10-fold by Amicon centrifugation (MWCO 100 kDa, Milipore) at 4 °C, 2500 g, 15-20 mins. Dry alginate scaffolds were transferred to non-tissue culture coated 24 well plates (Falcon). Concentrated retrovirus (2 mL of viral supernatant concentrated to 200 μL) and 1 x 106 activated T cells (isolated from Buffy coats and activated on CD3/CD28 coated plates) in a total volume of 300 μl media were pipetted onto each scaffold (MOI: 2, same viral amount as for retronectin (above)). Control scaffolds were seeded with 1 x 106 activated T cells suspended in cell culture medium. The seeded scaffolds were incubated without any additional medium in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C for 1 h, after which 1 ml of complete medium was added. After 3 days of culture, cells were isolated from scaffolds by digesting with 1 mL 0.125 M EDTA (calcium chelator), washed twice with PBS and analyzed for GFP expression or CD19.CAR expression by flow cytometry. More than 95% of cells were recovered and viable.
Flow cytometry and antibodies
Monoclonal antibodies specific for human CD3 (APC-Cy7, 557832), CD4 (APC-Cy7, 561839), CD8 (PerCP-Cy5.5, 565310), CD20 (FITC, 555622), CD45RA (PE, 555489), CD62L (BV421, 563861), LAG3 (PE, 565617), PD-1 (FITC, 561035), and TIM3 (BV421, 565563) were purchased from BD Biosciences, and CCR7 (FITC, FAB197F-100) from R&D Systems. An anti idiotype scFv monoclonal antibody was used to detect the expression of the CD19.CAR as previously described.[39] All samples were analyzed using a BD LSRII, and a minimum of 10,000 events were acquired per sample. Results were analyzed using FlowJo 9 (FlowJo LLC).
Cytokine production by CAR-T cells.
CAR-T cells were cocultured with Daudi tumor cells at 1:5 effector to target [E:T] ratio for 24 hours and the culture supernatant was collected. IL-2 and IFN-γ were quantified by ELISA using the manufacturer’s protocol (R&D Systems).
In vitro cytotoxicity.
Tumor cells (Daudi) were seeded at 1 x 105 cells per well in 24-well plates. CAR-T cells normalized for transduction efficiency were added at 1:5 and 1:2 Effector:Target (E:T) ratio. On day 5 of coculture, cells were collected, and the frequency of T cells and residual tumor (CD20+) cells were measured by flow cytometry.
In vivo antitumor activity.
Eight-to-ten weeks old female, non-obese diabetic severe combined immunodeficiency NSG (NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ) mice were infused with 1 x 106 FFLuc-expressing Daudi cells intravenously. Four days after infusion, each mouse was intravenously injected with either 4 x 106 CD19.CAR-T cells or non-transduced (NT) cells. Tumor burden was monitored using the Xenogen-IVIS Imaging System. Mice were monitored for signs of discomfort and euthanized upon losing more than 15% of initial body weight or the development of hind-limb paresis. All procedures involving animals were done in compliance with the University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Statistical Analysis.
All statistical analysis was done using two-tailed Student’s t-test, one way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc analysis using graph pad prism and noted in figures as *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
This work was supported by the NC Biotech Center Flash Grant 2019-FLG-3812, by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UL1TR002489 and by Start-Up funds provided by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina State University at Raleigh and the Lineberger Cancer Center. We thank the NCSU CVM staff for proper care of animals used in experiments and valuable resources on training. We also thank the NCSU flow cytometry core for training and guidance on flow cytometry analysis. SEM images were provided by James Weaver at the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard as well as the Analytical Instrumentation Facility (AIF) at North Carolina State University, which is supported by the State of North Carolina and the National Science Foundation (award number ECCS-1542015). The AIF is a member of the North Carolina Research Triangle Nanotechnology Network (RTNN), a site in the National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure (NNCI).
References:
- [1].Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP, Science 2015, 348, 62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].June CH, Riddell SR, Schumacher TN, Sci. Transl. Med 2015, 7, 280ps7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Fesnak AD, June CH, Levine BL, Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Patel S, Jones RB, Nixon DF, Bollard CM, Cytotherapy 2016, 18, 931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Seo S, Smith C, Fraser C, Patheja R, Shah SP, Rehan S, Crooks P, Neller MA, Khanna R, Blood Adv 2019, 3, 1774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Prasad V, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 2018, 15, 11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Sharma P, King GT, Shinde SS, Purev E, Jimeno A, Drugs Today 2018, 54, 187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Salter AI, Pont MJ, Riddell SR, Blood 2018, 131, 2621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Watanabe K, Kuramitsu S, Posey AD Jr, June CH, Front. Immunol 2018, 9, 2486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Newick K, O’Brien S, Moon E, Albelda SM, Annu. Rev. Med 2017, 68, 139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Lichtman EI, Dotti G, Transl. Res 2017, 187, 59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Nakazawa Y, Huye LE, Dotti G, Foster AE, Vera JF, Manuri PR, June CH, Rooney CM, Wilson MH, J. Immunother 2009, 32, 826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Nakazawa Y, Saha S, Galvan DL, Huye L, Rollins L, Rooney CM, Wilson MH, J. Immunother 2013, 36, 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Maiti SN, Huls H, Singh H, Dawson M, Figliola M, Olivares S, Rao P, Zhao YJ, Multani A, Yang G, et al. , J. Immunother 2013, 36, 112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Ramanayake S, Bilmon I, Bishop D, Dubosq M-C, Blyth E, Clancy L, Gottlieb D, Micklethwaite K, Cytotherapy 2015, 17, 1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Morgan RA, Boyerinas B, Biomedicines 2016, 4, DOI 10.3390/biomedicines4020009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Zhao Y, Moon E, Carpenito C, Paulos CM, Liu X, Brennan AL, Chew A, Carroll RG, Scholler J, Levine BL, et al. , Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 9053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Verhoeyen E, Costa C, Cosset F-L, Genetic Modification of Hematopoietic Stem Cells 2009, 97. [Google Scholar]
- [19].Korin YD, Zack JA, J. Virol 1998, 72, 3161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Havenga M, Hoogerbrugge P, Valerio D, van Es HH, Stem Cells 1997, 15, 162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Andreadis ST, Palsson BO, J. Theor. Biol 1996, 182, 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Moore N, Chevillet JR, Healey LJ, McBrine C, Doty D, Santos J, Teece B, Truslow J, Mott V, Hsi P, et al. , Sci. Rep 2019, 9, 15101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Tran R, Myers DR, Denning G, Shields JE, Lytle AM, Alrowais H, Qiu Y, Sakurai Y, Li WC, Brand O, et al. , Mol. Ther 2017, 25, 2372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Tran R, Myers DR, Shields JE, Ahn B, Qiu Y, Hansen C, Sakurai Y, Moot R, Spencer HT, Doering CB, et al. , Blood 2015, 126, 4415. [Google Scholar]
- [25].Parker LL, Do MT, Westwood JA, Wunderlich JR, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA, Hwu P, Hum. Gene Ther 2000, 11, 2377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Robinet E, Certoux JM, Ferrand C, Maples P, Hardwick A, Cahn JY, Reynolds CW, Jacob W, Hervé P, Tiberghien P, J. Hematother 1998, 7, 205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Ma Q, Safar M, Holmes E, Wang Y, Boynton AL, Junghans RP, Prostate 2004, 61, 12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Lin P, Correa D, Lin Y, Caplan AI, PLoS One 2011, 6, e23891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Lamers CHJ, van Elzakker P, van Steenbergen SCL, Sleijfer S, Debets R, Gratama JW, Cytotherapy 2008, 10, 406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Hanenberg H, Xiao XL, Dilloo D, Hashino K, Kato I, Williams DA, Nat. Med 1996, 2, 876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Pollok KE, Hanenberg H, Noblitt TW, Schroeder WL, Kato I, Emanuel D, Williams DA, J. Virol 1998, 72, 4882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Tonks A, Tonks AJ, Pearn L, Mohamad Z, Burnett AK, Darley RL, Biotechnol. Prog 2005, 21, 953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Zhou P, Lee J, Moore P, Brasky KM, Human Gene Therapy 2001, 12, 1843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Quintas-Cardama A, Yeh RK, Hollyman D, Stefanski J, Taylor C, Nikhamin Y, Imperato G, Sadelain M, Riviere I, Brentjens RJ, Hum. Gene Ther 2007, 18, 1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].García AJ, Vega MD, Boettiger D, Mol. Biol. Cell 1999, 10, 785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Lan MA, Gersbach CA, Michael KE, Keselowsky BG, García AJ, Biomaterials 2005, 26, 4523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Qin Y, J. Appl. Polym. Sci 2004, 91, 1641. [Google Scholar]
- [38].Lee KY, Mooney DJ, Prog. Polym. Sci 2012, 37, 106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Diaconu I, Ballard B, Zhang M, Chen Y, West J, Dotti G, Savoldo B, Mol. Ther 2017, 25, 580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Shapiro L, Cohen S, Biomaterials 1997, 18, 583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Baldino L, Concilio S, Cardea S, Reverchon E, Polymers 2016, 8, DOI 10.3390/polym8040106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Sastry L, Johnson T, Hobson MJ, Smucker B, Cornetta K, Gene Ther. 2002, 9, 1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



