Skip to main content
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2020 Aug 17;10(18):10230–10241. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6685

Linking behavioral thermoregulation, boldness, and individual state in male Carpetan rock lizards

Gergely Horváth 1,, Octavio Jiménez‐Robles 2,3, José Martín 4, Pilar López 4, Ignacio De la Riva 3, Gábor Herczeg 1
PMCID: PMC7520217  PMID: 33005378

Abstract

Mechanisms affecting consistent interindividual behavioral variation (i.e., animal personality) are of wide scientific interest. In poikilotherms, ambient temperature is one of the most important environmental factors with a direct link to a variety of fitness‐related traits. Recent empirical evidence suggests that individual differences in boldness are linked to behavioral thermoregulation strategy in heliothermic species, as individuals are regularly exposed to predators during basking. Here, we tested for links between behavioral thermoregulation strategy, boldness, and individual state in adult males of the high‐mountain Carpetan rock lizard (Iberolacerta cyreni). Principal component analysis revealed the following latent links in our data: (i) a positive relationship of activity with relative limb length and color brightness (PC1, 23% variation explained), (ii) a negative relationship of thermoregulatory precision with parasite load and risk‐taking (PC2, 20.98% variation explained), and (iii) a negative relationship between preferred body temperature and relative limb length (PC3, 19.23% variation explained). We conclude that differences in boldness and behavioral thermoregulatory strategy could be explained by both stable and labile state variables. The moderate link between behavioral thermoregulatory strategy and risk‐taking personality in our system is plausibly the result of differences in reproductive state of individuals or variation in ecological conditions during the breeding season.

Keywords: animal personality, Iberolacertacyreni, individual state, thermal biology, thermoregulatory strategy


Body temperature is a major ecophysiological variable in poikilotherms with a direct link to a variety of fitness‐related traits. As most poikilotherms are capable of maintaining relatively high and constant body temperatures by behavioural adjustments, we tested whether behavioural thermoregulatory strategy are linked to boldness and individual state in adult males of the high mountain Carpetan rock lizard (Iberolacerta cyreni). Our results suggest that even though there is a moderate link between behavioural thermoregulation strategy and among‐individual variation in risk‐taking in this species, behavioural variation is primarily affected by individual state.

graphic file with name ECE3-10-10230-g004.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Heritable interindividual phenotypic variation within a population is essential for adaptive evolutionary change (Botero, Weissing, Wright, & Rubenstein, 2015; Wagner & Wagner, 1996; West‐Eberhard, 1989). Behavior is perhaps the most plastic phenotypic trait (see West‐Eberhard, 2003), which is the main reason why biological and evolutionary significance of consistent interindividual behavioral variation within populations (i.e., animal personality) has been underappreciated for a long time (see Dall, Houston, & McNamara, 2004; Gosling, 2001; Réale, Reader, Sol, McDougall, & Dingemanse, 2007; Sih, Bell, & Johnson, 2004; Sih, Bell, Johnson, & Ziemba, 2004). Nevertheless, studies targeting animal personality have become more common (for reviews and meta‐analyses see Brommer & Class, 2017; Garamszegi, Markó, & Herczeg, 2013; Jandt et al., 2014; Sih et al., 2015; Smith & Blumstein, 2008; Webster & Ward, 2011). Related research revolves around the question of how consistent between‐individual differences emerge against behavioral flexibility (see West‐Eberhard, 2003). A large number of conceptual and empirical studies suggest that consistent between‐individual behavioral differences are linked to differences in both inherently stable (e.g., size, sex differences, brain structure) and labile (e.g., energy reserves, health state, reproductive value) features of individual state (see DiRienzo, Niemelä, Hedrick, & Kortet, 2016; Horváth, Martín, López, Garamszegi, & Herczeg, 2017; Lichtenstein et al., 2016; Luttbeg & Sih, 2010; Mathot & Dall, 2013; Mathot, Dekinga, & Piersma, 2017; Urszán, Török, Hettyey, Garamszegi, & Herczeg, 2015).

In poikilotherms (i.e., animals whose internal temperature varies considerably), body temperature influences virtually all biological processes associated with fitness and behavior (Abram, Boivin, Moiroux, & Brodeur, 2017; Adolph & Porter, 1993; Angilletta, 2001; Huey & Bennett, 1987; Nylin & Gotthard, 1998). Most poikilotherms are capable of maintaining relatively high and constant body temperatures (Cowles & Bogert, 1944) by physiological and (mainly) behavioral adjustments (Angilletta, Cooper, Schuler, & Boyles, 2002; Herczeg, Gonda, Saarikivi, & Merilä, 2006; Herczeg et al., 2008; Huey & Slatkin, 1976; Stevenson, 1985; Van Damme & Bauwens, 1991). To attain and maintain given body temperature, it is important to maximize the efficiency of various physiological and behavioral processes. Thus, one would expect a strong directional selection toward lower interindividual variation in thermal preferences (the “goal” of thermoregulation), but empirical evidence suggests that selected body temperatures might consistently differ between individuals (Angilletta, Hill, & Robson, 2002; Goulet, Thompson, & Chapple, 2017; Stapley, 2006). Further, a growing number of empirical studies suggest a link between components of thermoregulatory strategy and behavioral consistency in poikilotherms. Despite some results indicating a lack of a general pattern of relationship between behavioral thermoregulatory strategy and personality traits (Artacho, Jouanneau, & Le Galliard, 2013; Cerqueira et al., 2016; Goulet, Ingley, Scharf, & Pruitt, 2016; Goulet, Thompson, & Chapple, 2017; Goulet, Thompson, Michelangeli, Wong, & Chapple, 2017; Herrel, James, & Van Damme, 2007; Michelangeli, Goulet, Kang, Wong, & Chapple, 2018; Rey, Digka, & MacKenzie, 2015; Stapley, 2006), lower behavioral predictability (i.e., intraindividual behavioral variation, see Stamps, Briffa, & Biro, 2012) seems to be associated with high ambient temperatures (≈ body temperature) in various poikilotherm taxa (Briffa, Bridger, Biro, & a., 2013; Nakayama, Laskowski, Klefoth, & Arlinghaus, 2016; Velasque & Briffa, 2016).

Ecology of thermoregulation is well studied in reptiles (see Bajer, Molnár, Török, & Herczeg, 2012; Bauwens, Hertz, & Castilla, 1996; Berkel & Clusella‐Trullas, 2018; Herczeg et al., 2004, 2006, 2008; Mészáros, Herczeg, Bajer, Török, & Molnár, 2018; Rusch & Angilletta, 2016), especially in small‐ to medium‐sized heliothermic lizards, whose body temperature is maintained by behavioral (timing of activity, microhabitat use, adopted posture) rather than by physiological adjustments (Angilletta, Cooper, et al., 2002; Bauwens et al., 1996; Huey & Slatkin, 1976; Van Damme & Bauwens, 1991). Differences in individual thermal preferences seem to play a key role for behavioral consistency in reptiles (Goulet, Thompson, Michelangeli, et al., 2017; Mell et al., 2016; Stapley, 2006; Waters, Bowers, & Burghardt, 2017). In addition, differences in time available for thermoregulation (irrespectively of body temperature) could affect behavioral consistency at different levels (Horváth, Mészáros, et al., 2017). As active behavioral thermoregulation has several costs in lizards (e.g., increased risk of predation; Huey & Slatkin, 1976), thermal preferences are particularly expected to be affected by boldness. Recently, Goulet, Thompson, and Chapple (2017) and Michelangeli et al. (2018) reported the existence of individual “thermal types” in Delicate skinks (Lampropholis delicata), with individuals preferring higher body temperatures also showing higher scores of locomotor performance, activity, exploration, and risk‐taking. Similar patterns were found in Namib rock agamas (Agama planiceps) (Carter, Goldizen, & Tromp, 2010), and Eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina) (Kashon & Carlson, 2018). Since behavioral thermoregulatory strategy is expected to depend on the individual state (e.g., size, health), more studies are needed to seek links between thermoregulatory strategy, other personality traits, and physiological state of individuals.

Here, we aimed to test for associations between behavioral thermoregulatory strategy, boldness, and individual state in Carpetan rock lizards (Iberolacerta cyreni), a medium‐sized lacertid endemic to mountain ranges in the center of the Iberian Peninsula. Species in the genus Iberolacerta are cold‐adapted lizards living mainly in low thermal quality environments (Aguado & Braña, 2014; Carrascal, López, Martín, & Salvador, 1992; Jiménez‐Robles & De la Riva, 2019; Monasterio, Salvador, Iraeta, & Díaz, 2009; Ortega, Federal, & Grosso, 2017; Ortega, Mencía, & Pérez‐Mellado, 2017; Žagar, Carretero, Osojnik, Sillero, & Vrezec, 2015). Recent empirical data on I. cyreni indicate the existence of animal personality in different behavioral traits, with short‐term differences in state and environment potentially contributing to between‐individual behavioral variation (Horváth et al., 2016; Horváth, Martín, et al., 2017; Horváth, Mészáros, et al., 2017; López, Hawlena, Polo, Amo, & Martín, 2005). However, whether consistent individual differences are present in thermoregulatory strategy and whether these are linked to other personality traits in I. cyreni are virtually unknown. Here, we studied the potential connections between activity and risk‐taking personality, preferred body temperature, thermoregulatory precision, and various fitness‐linked state variables (body size, relative limb length, color, blood parasite load) applying seminatural and laboratory experiments. Previous empirical results indicate that individuals with proactive personalities (i.e., more active and risk‐prone) select higher body temperatures (Cerqueira et al., 2016; Michelangeli et al., 2018; Stapley, 2006); thus, we expected that bolder individuals would have higher preferred body temperature and higher thermoregulatory precision (i.e., keeping body temperature within a narrow range). It is plausible that different state variables might either constrain or promote thermoregulatory precision, but because the direction of such relationships is difficult to predict, and relevant empirical studies are scarce, we do not have explicit predictions.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Collection and housing

The study used 24 adult male lizards (Figure 1) whose behavior had previously been scored (Horváth et al., 2016). They were captured during early June 2013 at the slopes of “Alto del Telégrafo” (Sierra de Guadarrama National Park, Madrid Province, Spain, 1,900 m asl, approximately). Individuals were transported to the “El Ventorrillo” Field Station (1,500 m asl, approximately), 5 km downhill from the capture site, where they were housed individually outdoors in opaque plastic boxes (56.5 cm × 36.5 cm × 31.4 cm; length, width, height, respectively). In the boxes, we used a thin layer of coconut fiber as substrate and provided a hollow brick as shelter. Water and food (House crickets [Acheta domesticus] and Turkestan cockroaches [Blatta lateralis]) were provided ad libitum during captivity. All lizards were released at the original capture site after the experiments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Adult male Carpetane rock lizard (Iberolacerta cyreni). Photograph by Octavio Jiménez‐Robles

2.2. Individual traits

Upon capture, we measured morphological and color traits, and took blood from each individual to quantify the intensity of blood parasite infection. Snout–vent length (hereafter SVL; 65.52 ± 3.2; mean ± SD) and length of the hind limbs were measured using a digital calliper to the nearest 0.01 mm. Hind limb length was characterized by measuring the left and right femurs and tibias, and then summing the mean femur (10.35 ± 0.5; mean ± SD) and tibia lengths (10.66 ± 0.4; mean ± SD) for every individual. In the analyses (see below), we used residuals from the hind limb length–SVL regression to describe relative hind limb length (hereafter limb length).

We used 25‐G insulin syringes to take blood from a large subcutaneous vessel on the ventral side of each individual. Blood was collected using 60 µl hematocrit capillary tubes, and blood smears were made by blowing a drop of blood onto a microscope slide. Smears were air‐dried until coagulation, then fixed with methanol and stained. For a detailed description of the process, see Molnár, Bajer, Mészáros, Török, and Herczeg (2013). Data on Karyolysus and Schellackia infection intensity (hereafter parasite load; 18 ± 25.87; mean ± SD) were quantified under the microscope at x1000 magnification and normalized using log10 transformation. Only one individual was found uninfected (retained in the analyses); hence, parasite prevalence was 0.95.

Reflectance was measured on the animals’ green‐colored dorsal scales using a spectrometer (USB2000 Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL, USA) with a deuterium‐halogen light source (DT‐MINI‐2GS, OceanOptics). Three different measures were taken from random spots between the 300–700 nm wavelength range. We took the average of every 5 nm; then, we calculated the average of the three measurements. A principal component analysis (PCA) was run on the spectrum data to gather new variables describing dorsal coloration (see Cuthill, Bennett, Partridge, & Maier, 1999; Grill & Rush, 2000; Kopena, López, & Martín, 2014). Based on Kaiser–Guttmann criterion, principal components (PCs) with eigenvalue greater than 1 were retained (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2014). As a result, we obtained a single PC describing the total achromatic brightness of the dorsal scales (hereafter dorsal brightness; proportion of variation explained = 88.41%; factor loadings > 0.982; see Table S1).

2.3. Behavioral assays

Methodology of behavioral assays is described in detail in Horváth et al. (2016). Briefly, activity and risk‐taking of each individual were tested 5 and 6 times (respectively) over a 13‐day period between 13 and 25 June 2013 on alternating days (an activity assay was skipped on 19 June because of thick cloud cover and light rain). Activity was measured in the animals’ home cages by analyzing video recordings and was represented by total distance moved during three 10‐min time slots in each trial. Risk‐taking was measured on every second day in unfamiliar arenas (36.5 cm × 22.4 cm × 25 cm; length, width, height, respectively). First, animals were handled by the experimenter and placed into a smaller “starter box” (11.2 cm × 7.3 cm × 5.4 cm; length, width, height, respectively). Then, after a 5‐min acclimation period, the door of the starter box was opened and the latency time to emerge was recorded for 10 min. Out of 120 assays, individuals did not leave the refuge in 16 cases (13.3% of all assays). These observations received maximum score. Both activity and risk‐taking behaviors were found repeatable (activity: r = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.51 – 0.8; risk‐taking: r = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.11–0.41), indicating the presence of animal personality (Horváth et al., 2016). However, there was no significant between‐individual correlation between the behaviors (Horváth et al., 2016), indicating the lack of a “true” behavioral syndrome (see Dingemanse, Dochtermann, & Wright, 2010; Herczeg & Garamszegi, 2012). Hence, both activity and risk‐taking can be seen as independent traits with clear between‐individual differences. Here, we used the individual means to describe individual behavioral type (hereafter activity and risk‐taking).

2.4. Thermoregulatory strategy

After the behavioral tests, on 27 and 29 June, we measured thermal preferences of the study individuals (using the same setup as in Jiménez‐Robles & De la Riva, 2019). We intended to measure voluntary thermal preference in an ecological cost‐free environment (Hertz, Huey, & Stevenson, 1993), where the only varying environmental factor is the temperature gradient. Hence, experiments were run in a simplified, special enclosure under controlled conditions to minimize confounding factors (e.g., differences in solar radiation and wind, uncontrolled background temperature, heterogeneity of substrates and their thermal properties, etc). We built 12 tracks (100 cm × 16.5 cm × 45 cm; length, width, height, respectively) using smoothened particle board, following a similar laboratory setup as in Paranjpe et al. (2014). With an incandescent light bulb (100 W) over one end of the track and aluminum foil covering the surfaces of walls and top of each bulb, we created a temperature gradient from more than 50°C to <25°C. Thermal ecophysiology in poikilotherms is typically framed around the concept of core body temperatures (intracloacal in lizards), a thermocouple (0.076 mm diameter, 40 AWG gauge; Omega 5SC‐TT‐T‐40‐36) with nail polish‐coated tip (1 mm approximately of final diameter), was inserted 1 cm deep into the cloaca and taped around the tail base of lizards (Aguado & Braña, 2014; Gvoždík, Castilla, & Gvozdik, 2001; Herrando‐Pérez et al., 2019). We placed one lizard in one track. Each thermocouple was connected to a multichannel data logger (Eltek Squirrel 1035, Eltek Ltd., Cambridge, UK) to record body temperatures once per minute for ~2 hr. We discarded the first measures until the lizards could reach the first maximum in their sine‐like thermoregulatory pattern. We also discarded measures when the thermocouples got outside the cloaca or when the lizards entangled in the wire without possibility to move freely (Aguado and Braña, 2016; Jiménez‐Robles & De la Riva, 2019). In spite of potential stress effects, intracloacal thermocouples provide the most accurate method for thermoregulatory measures for lizards (Garcia‐Porta et al., 2019; Sinervo et al., 2010). Nevertheless, as the setup was the same for all the lizards, observed differences in the experiment should reflect differences in personality of thermoregulation.

2.5. Statistical analyses

We calculated the median of selected body temperatures (T sel); the voluntary thermal maximum (T Vmax), defined as the highest body temperature, reached during the experiment, as a measure of how much every individual dares to approach potentially deleterious high temperatures, which are usually slightly above the optimum temperature; and the width of the setpoint range (T set) defined as the central 50% of recorded body temperatures as a measure of the precision of thermoregulatory strategy. We note that applying mean and standard deviation of selected body temperatures as alternative indices of thermoregulatory strategy did not change our results qualitatively. Hence, apart from the T Vmax, we chose to stick with Tsel and Tset, as these are more frequently used measures of thermal biology in reptiles. We note that the thermal measurements failed in three individuals and data inspection revealed two additional individuals being extreme outliers (one in selected temperature and one in body size); hence, we excluded these individuals from the analyses.

We should note here that due to laboratory setup capacity, individuals were measured at different time of day during two different days. In order to test whether these differences affected selected temperatures, we ran a general linear mixed model (LMM) with recorded body temperatures as response variable, different dates and time of day and their interaction as fixed effects, and individual identity as a random factor. We applied backward stepwise model selection of all effects of the LMM using the step function available via the lme4 and lmerTest packages (Bates, Mächler, Bolker, & Walker, 2015; Kuznetsova, Brockhoff, & Christensen, 2016). The significance of the fixed effects was estimated based on Satterthwaite approximation, while likelihood‐ratio test was used for the random effects.

Our main goal was to look for relationships among personality traits (activity, risk‐taking), traits describing individual thermoregulatory strategy (T sel, T Vmax, T set) and traits describing individual state (SVL, relative limb length, parasite load, dorsal brightness). In this framework, there are no predictor or response variables. Hence, we applied a PCA to find the “simple structure” behind the variables or, in other words, to find the latent relationships in the data. In this approach, the best original variable—PC correlations—is the achievable goal, which can be reached by rotation techniques. Further, unlike in cases where PCA is used for reducing the number of original variables by collapsing them into independent PCs, here the independence of the PCs is not necessary, because the best simple structure might be found with correlated PCs. Therefore, we used the following strategy. First, we ran our PCA with an oblique rotation (promax) allowing correlations among PCs. Since the correlation coefficients were relatively low (r < |0.2|), we reran the PCA with an orthogonal rotation (varimax) resulting in independent PCs. We note that the loading structure of the two PCAs was qualitatively similar and we report the solution after varimax rotation (Robinson et al., 2018; Schuett & Dall, 2010; Tab achnick & Fidell, 2014). Bartlett tests were significant, indicating that the correlation matrices were significantly different from the identity matrices. Anti‐image correlations were mostly low (see Table S2). PCs with an eigenvalue greater than 1 were retained, based on Kaiser–Guttmann criterion. This initial approach resulted in four PCs, the fourth PC having less than three variables loading on it. Since PCs with less than three original variables loading on them are unreliable and should be discarded (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2014), we reran the analysis and extracted the first three PCs only. For interpreting factor loadings, following the suggestions of Comrey and Lee (2009), Tabachnick and Fidell (2014) recommended a loading above 0.71 (50% overlapping variance) to be considered excellent, 0.63 (40% overlapping variance) very good, 0.55 (30% overlapping variance) good, 0.45 (20% overlapping variance) fair, 0.32 (10% overlapping variance) poor, and anything below 0.32 uninterpretable. However, due to our relatively low sample size, we only interpreted loadings above 0.45. All data analysis was conducted in R version 3.6.2 (R Developmental Core Team, 2019).

3. RESULTS

Our LMM revealed significant differences in selected body temperatures among individuals (χ2 = 358.19, df = 1, p < .001; Figure 2), indicating individually variable thermoregulatory strategy. However, results indicated no significant effect of time of day or date (time of day: F2,19.01 = 0.3, p = .74; date: F1,19 = 1.89, p = .19; time of day × date: F1,19 = 0.06, p = .80). Our PCA resulted in three PCs explaining 63.21% of total variation (Table 1). PC1 explained 23% of the total variation and had excellent positive loadings from activity (0.85) and dorsal brightness (0.91) and a good positive loading from relative hind limb length (0.66) (Figure 3). This indicates a gradient from inactive, short‐legged, and dull‐colored males toward active, long‐legged, and brightly colored males. PC2 explained 20.98% of total variation and had an excellent positive loading from Tset (0.77) (note that it is a variable describing precision; hence, low values mean high precision), a very good positive loading from parasite load (0.73), and a good negative loading from risk‐taking (−0.63) (note that risk‐taking is a latency variable; hence, low values mean high risk‐taking) (Figure 3). This indicates a gradient from lowly parasitised precise thermoregulators with low risk‐taking toward highly parasitized imprecise thermoregulators with high risk‐taking. PC3 explained 19.23% of total variation and had a good positive loading from Tsel (0.67), an excellent positive loading from Tmax (0.81), and a fair negative loading from SVL (−0.52), indicating a gradient from large males with low preferred body temperature to small males with high preferred body temperature (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Individual differences in selected body temperatures of adult male Iberolacerta cyreni. Median of selected body temperatures (represented as dots) with setpoint range (central 50%) and voluntary maximum temperatures (represented as triangles) are shown

Table 1.

Factor loadings of principal component analysis ran on thermal‐ and individual state‐related traits

PC1 PC2 PC3
Activity 0.85 a 0.32 −0.14
Risk‐taking −0.19 −0.63 c 0.37
T sel −0.18 −0.14 0.67 c
T set −0.09 0.77 a 0.34
T max 0.18 0.4 0.81 a
SVL −0.06 0.2 −0.52 d
Relative hind limb length 0.66 c 0.02 0.14
Blood parasite infection −0.002 0.73 b −0.22
Dorsal brightness 0.91 a −0.22 −0.09
% of variance explained 23 20.98 19.23
Total variance explained 63.21

Traits with a loading ≥ 0.45 were considered to contribute to a PC. T sel = median of selected body temperatures; T set = set point range; T max = thermal voluntary maximum; SVL = snout–vent length.

a

Excellent.

b

Very good.

c

Good.

d

Fair; according to Tabachnick and Fidell (2014).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Principal component analysis biplots in rotated space for the 19 individuals (represented as dots). Filled circles represent individual scores and arrows represent factor loadings for original variables in each one of the PCs. Individual scores were divided by 2 for visualizing purposes. Act = activity; Risk‐t = risk‐taking; Tsel = median of selected body temperatures; T set = set point range; T max = thermal voluntary maximum; SVL = snout–vent length, Limb = relative hind limb length; Parasite = blood parasite infection; Bright = dorsal brightness

4. DISCUSSION

In the present paper, in line with accumulating empirical research in various poikilotherm taxa (Cerqueira et al., 2016; Goulet, Thompson, & Chapple, 2017; Rey et al., 2015; Stapley, 2006), we show that there is a link between risk‐taking personality and thermoregulatory strategy in adult males of I. cyreni. However, the link between risk‐taking personality and behavioral thermoregulatory strategy is only moderate, while totally absent regarding activity, in our model system. It has been suggested that linkage between behavior and various aspects of individual physiology is complex and affected by biotic and abiotic factors (Careau et al., 2015; Killen, Marras, Metcalfe, McKenzie, & Domenici, 2013; Le Galliard, Paquet, Cisel, & Montes‐Poloni, 2013), and thus, we can only speculate about the biological background behind the patterns presented here. Previous results on I. cyreni (Horváth, Martín, et al., 2017; Horváth, Rodríguez‐Ruiz, Martín, López, & Herczeg, 2019) and passerines (see Dingemanse, Both, Drent, & Tinbergen, 2004; Garamszegi et al., 2015) indicate that drastic changes in behavioral strategy could occur not just between years, but also among seasons within the same year. Thus, given that our study was conducted on adult males of I. cyreni during the seasonally limited breeding period, we cannot exclude the possibility that the moderate association between risk‐taking personality and behavioral thermoregulatory strategy was the outcome of the different reproductive state (e.g., variation in plasma testosterone levels; see Martín & López, 2010) of the studied individuals, or the ecological conditions during this time of year. In any case, additional, long‐term research involving female specimens and measures in other seasons are needed to verify the true nature of this link in I. cyreni.

Both activity and risk‐taking personality and behavioral thermoregulatory strategy are associated with various state‐linked traits. Links between coloration and personality have been reported in birds and reptiles several times (Ibáñez, Pellitteri‐Rosa, Sacchi, López, & Martín, 2016; Mafli, Wakamatsu, & Roulin, 2011; Mateos‐González and Senar, 2012; Williams, King, & Mettke‐Hofmann, 2012). In our study, males with brighter dorsal coloration and relatively longer hind limbs were more active. In many lacertid lizards, brightness is considered to be an honest signal because the expression of brighter coloration has physiological costs that only males of higher quality (i.e., higher trait value in potentially fitness‐linked traits; see Wilson & Nussey, 2010) and condition can afford (Bajer, Molnár, Török, & Herczeg, 2010; Kopena et al., 2014; Lisboa, Bajer, Pessoa, Huber, & Costa, 2017; San‐José and Fitze, 2013). Although the exact information content of color signals in I. cyreni is not entirely known (Cabido, Galán, López, & Martín, 2009; López, Martín, & Cuadrado, 2004), the species is polygynandric—older, territorial males express turquoise coloration and are preferred by females (Aragón, López, & Martín, 2004; Martín & López, 2013). Also, males with highly saturated green dorsal coloration have higher reproductive success (Salvador, Diaz, Veiga, Bloor, & Brown, 2008). Limb length, in addition, was shown to be strongly correlated with sprint speed (i.e., locomotor performance; Bauwens, Garland, Castilla, & Van Damme, 1995; Vanhooydonck, Van Damme, & Aerts, 2001), which is an important component of life‐history trade‐offs and a suitable proxy for individual quality (Garland, 1984; Husak, Ferguson, & Lovern, 2016; Irschick, Meyers, Husak, & Le Galliard, 2008; Le Galliard, Clobert, & Ferrière, 2004; Winchell, Maayan, Fredette, & Revell, 2018). Hence, males with brighter coloration and longer hind legs could be seen as more attractive, higher‐state individuals. Being more active may allow these males to gain access to territories with abundant resources, while they are most likely protected from predators due to their state (i.e., increased sprint speed). Hence, our results potentially reflect some form of state‐dependent safety, where individuals with higher state are expected to have high behavioral activity for their benefit, because their high state allows them to deal with the increased risk (Luttbeg & Sih, 2010).

Males with high blood parasite infection rate were shown to be imprecise thermoregulators and more risk‐prone than healthier conspecifics. Similarly to previous results (Horváth et al., 2016), this pattern is in line with the asset protection principle (see Clark, 1994), which predicts individuals with low reproductive value to be risk‐prone. Karyolysus and Schellackia (family Karyolysidae, formerly Haemogregarinidae, suborder Adeleorina, subclass Coccidiasina, phylum Apicomplexa) are intracellular protozoans infecting I. cyreni and other reptiles as intermediate hosts (Amo, López, & Martín, 2005; Bouma, Smallridge, Bull, & Komdeur, 2007; Caudell, Whittier, & Conover, 2002; Garrido, Pérez‐Mellado, & Cooper, 2014; Sagonas, Rota, Tsitsilonis, Pafilis, & Valakos, 2016; Smith, Desser, & Martin, 1994; Veiga, Salvador, Merino, & Puerta, 1998). Although infection by Karyolysidae usually does not affect the host's survival directly (Megía‐Palma et al. 2018), blood parasite load in I. cyreni has a negative effect on body condition during the mating season (Amo et al., 2004). A similar negative association between infection rate and thermoregulatory precision was reported by Paranjpe et al. (2014) in side‐blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana) infected by malaria (Plasmodium mexicanum). However, considering the correlative nature of our study, there are several alternative mechanisms explaining the pattern found here. As I. cyreni lives in a low thermal quality environment with considerable daily fluctuation in ambient temperature (Aguado & Braña, 2014; Jiménez‐Robles & De la Riva, 2019; Monasterio et al., 2009), high thermoregulatory precision is expected. However, maintaining high precision has considerable energy and time commitments (Bowker, 1984; Paranjpe et al., 2014; Sartorius, do Amaral, Durtsche, Deen, & Lutterschmidt, 2002); thus, it is somewhat plausible that the decrease of thermoregulatory precision is the result of the energetic constraints of the blood parasite infection. Parasitic manipulation of thermoregulatory behavior of the hosts is another possible option (see Lafferty & Shaw, 2013; Poulin, 2013). However, there is no information in the literature that Karyolysidae are capable to actively alter the behavior of its hosts. Intuitively, infection should increase both body temperature and thermoregulatory precision of the host (Karsten, Ferguson, Chen, & Holick, 2009; Scholnick, Manivanh, Savenkova, Bates, & McAlexander, 2010), but lizards might choose to maintain lower thermoregulatory precision in order to reduce the development of parasites and the physiological costs of infection (Paranjpe et al., 2014).

Larger males preferred lower temperatures than smaller conspecifics. As reptile growth is indeterminate, these males are probably older than their smaller conspecifics (Kozlowski, 1996; Shine & Charnov, 1992). Active thermoregulation is often interpreted to be costly for small heliothermic lizards, mainly because they are exposed to predators during basking (Herczeg et al., 2008); thus, optimization of basking and selection of basking sites have utmost importance, especially in high‐mountain habitats, where time for attaining appropriate body temperatures is limited (Jiménez‐Robles & De la Riva, 2019; Martín & Salvador, 1993). For example, previous studies indicate that I. cyreni usually choose to bask closer to their shelters (e.g., rock crevices; Carrascal et al., 1992; Martín & Salvador, 1997). As small individuals might be less conspicuous to predators than larger ones (Baxter‐Gilbert & Riley, 2018; Martín & López, 2003), they are able to follow a basking strategy resulting in higher body temperatures than larger conspecifics. Previous results in the European adder, Vipera berus, suggest that age groups more vulnerable to predation have lower preferred body temperatures, possibly as a result of predator avoidance (Herczeg, Gonda, et al., 2007). Alternatively, as smaller individuals have lower body mass and higher surface‐to‐volume ratio, they absorb heat faster and can reach high body temperatures within shorter time (Carrascal et al., 1992; Herczeg, Török, & Korsós, 2007; Martín & López, 2003).

Taken together, we found a moderate link between risk‐taking personality and behavioral thermoregulatory strategy in adult male I. cyreni, which might be the outcome of reproductive state of the individuals or ecological conditions during the breeding season. Thus, we suggest that future manipulative experiments should also involve female lizards and consider other seasons for a better understanding of the link between these behavioral traits. We found various connections between activity and risk‐taking personality and individual state or between behavioral thermoregulatory strategy and individual state, supporting the state‐dependence of both. We conclude that even though there is a relationship between interindividual variation in risk‐taking personality and behavioral thermoregulatory strategy in this lizard species, behavioral variation is primarily affected by individual state.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Gergely Horvath: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐original draft (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Octavio Jiménez‐Robles: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). José Martín: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Pilar Lopez: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Ignacio De la Riva: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Gabor Herczeg: Conceptualization (equal); Funding acquisition (equal); Supervision (equal); Writing‐review & editing (equal).

ETHICAL APPROVAL

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The experiment was performed under license (permit number: 10/024398.9/13) from the Environmental Agency of Madrid Government (“Consejería de Medio Ambiente de la Comunidad de Madrid,” Spain).

Supporting information

Table S1‐S2

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful for two anonymous reviewers whose comments helped us to improve our paper. Our sincere thanks go to Péter Bertók, Boglárka Mészáros, and Renáta Kopena for their assistance during the fieldwork and the behavioral assays. We are grateful to “El Ventorrillo” Field Station (MNCN‐CSIC) for use of their facilities. Financial support was provided by the projects Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA‐K 105517; Principal Investigator, GáH), MINECO‐CGL2014‐53523‐P (Principal Investigator, PL), and MICIIN‐CGL2011‐30393 (Principal Investigator, IDlR). GeH was supported by the Hungarian State PhD Scholarship and SYNTHESYS Project #ES‐TAF‐3104 (http://www.synthesys.info) which is financed by European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 “Capacities” Program. OJR was supported by a PhD grant (JAEpre2011‐033‐1) from the Spanish Scientific Research Council (CSIC). GáH was also founded by the János Bólyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. During the preparation of the manuscript, funding was obtained from the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Fund (#PD‐132041 for GeH and #SNN‐125627 for Geh and GáH).

Horváth G, Jiménez‐Robles O, Martín J, López P, De la Riva I, Herczeg G. Linking behavioral thermoregulation, boldness, and individual state in male Carpetan rock lizards. Ecol Evol. 2020;10:10230–10241. 10.1002/ece3.6685

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data are available on DRYAD (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qjq2bvqdd).

REFERENCES

  1. Abram, P. K. , Boivin, G. , Moiroux, J. , & Brodeur, J. (2017). Behavioural effects of temperature on ectothermic animals: Unifying thermal physiology and behavioural plasticity. Biological Reviews, 92, 1859–1876. 10.1111/brv.12312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adolph, S. C. , & Porter, W. P. (1993). Temperature, activity, and lizard life histories. American Naturalist, 142, 273–295. 10.1086/285538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aguado, S. , & Braña, F. (2014). Thermoregulation in a cold‐adapted species (Cyren’s Rock Lizard, Iberolacerta cyreni): Influence of thermal environment and associated costs. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 92, 955–964. 10.1139/cjz-2014-0096 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amo, L. , López, P. , & Martín, J. (2005). Prevalence and intensity of haemogregarine blood parasites and their mite vectors in the common wall lizard, Podarcis muralis . Parasitology Research, 96, 378–381. 10.1007/s00436-005-1354-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Angilletta, M. J. (2001). Thermal and physiological constraints on energy assimilation in a widespread lizard (Sceloporus undulatus). Ecology, 82, 3044–3056. 10.2307/2679833 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Angilletta, M. J. , Cooper, B. S. , Schuler, M. S. , & Boyles, J. G. (2002). The evolution of thermal physiology in endotherms. Journal of Thermal Biology, 2, 249–268. 10.2741/E148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Angilletta, M. J. , Hill, T. , & Robson, M. A. (2002). Is physiological performance optimized by thermoregulatory behavior?: A case study of the eastern fence lizard, Sceloporus undulatus. Journal of Thermal Biology, 27, 199–204. 10.1016/S0306-4565(01)00084-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Aragón, P. , López, P. , & Martín, J. (2004). The ontogeny of spatio‐temporal tactics and social relationships of adult male Iberian rock lizards, Lacerta monticola . Ethology, 110, 1001–1019. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.01046.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Artacho, P. , Jouanneau, I. , & Le Galliard, J.‐F. (2013). Interindividual variation in thermal sensitivity of maximal sprint speed, thermal behavior, and resting metabolic rate in a lizard. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 86, 458–469. 10.1086/671376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bajer, K. , Molnár, O. , Török, J. , & Herczeg, G. (2010). Female European green lizards (Lacerta viridis) prefer males with high ultraviolet throat reflectance. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 2007–2014. 10.1007/s00265-010-1012-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bajer, K. , Molnár, O. , Török, J. , & Herczeg, G. (2012). Temperature, but not available energy, affects the expression of a sexually selected ultraviolet (UV) colour trait in male European green lizards. PLoS One, 7, e34359 10.1371/journal.pone.0034359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. M. , & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bauwens, D. , Garland, T. , Castilla, A. , & Van Damme, R. (1995). Evolution of sprint speed in lacertid lizards: Morphological, physiological and behavioural covariation. Evolution (N.Y.), 49, 848–863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bauwens, D. , Hertz, P. E. , & Castilla, A. M. (1996). Thermoregulation in lacertid lizards: The relative contributions of distinct behavioral mechanisms. Ecology, 77, 1818–1830. 10.2307/2265786 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Baxter‐Gilbert, J. , & Riley, J. L. (2018). Runners and fighters: Clutch effects and body size drive innate antipredator behaviour in hatchling lizards. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, 97 10.1007/s00265-018-2505-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Botero, C. A. , Weissing, F. J. , Wright, J. , & Rubenstein, D. R. (2015). Evolutionary tipping points in the capacity to adapt to environmental change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 184–189. 10.1073/pnas.1408589111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bouma, M. J. , Smallridge, C. J. , Bull, C. M. , & Komdeur, J. (2007). Susceptibility to infection by a haemogregarine parasite and the impact of infection in the Australian sleepy lizard Tiliqua rugosa . Parasitology Research, 100, 949–954. 10.1007/s00436-006-0379-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bowker, R. G. (1984). Precision of thermoregulation of some African lizards. Physiological Zoology, 57, 401–412. 10.1086/physzool.57.4.30163342 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Briffa, M. , Bridger, D. , & Biro, P. A. (2013). How does temperature affect behaviour? Multilevel analysis of plasticity, personality and predictability in hermit crabs. Animal Behavior, 86, 47–54. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.04.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Brommer, J. E. , & Class, B. (2017). Phenotypic correlations capture between‐individual correlations underlying behavioral syndromes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 50 10.1007/s00265-017-2278-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cabido, C. , Galán, P. , López, P. , & Martín, J. (2009). Conspicuousness‐dependent antipredatory behavior may counteract coloration differences in Iberian rock lizards. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 362–370. 10.1093/beheco/arn152 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Careau, V. , Montiglio, P. O. , Garant, D. , Pelletier, F. , Speakman, J. R. , Humphries, M. M. , & Réale, D. (2015). Energy expenditure and personality in wild chipmunks. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69, 653–661. 10.1007/s00265-015-1876-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Carrascal, L. M. , López, P. , Martín, J. , & Salvador, A. (1992). Basking and antipredator behaviour in a high altitude lizard: implications of heat‐exchange rate. Ethology, 92, 143–154. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00955.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Carter, A. J. , Goldizen, A. W. , & Tromp, S. A. (2010). Agamas exhibit behavioral syndromes: Bolder males bask and feed more but may suffer higher predation. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 655–661. 10.1093/beheco/arq036 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Caudell, J. N. , Whittier, J. , & Conover, M. R. (2002). The effects of haemogregarine‐like parasites on brown tree snakes (Boiga irregularis) and slatey‐grey snakes (Stegonotus cucullatus) in Queensland, Australia. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 49, 113–119. 10.1016/S0964-8305(01)00111-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cerqueira, M. , Rey, S. , Silva, T. , Featherstone, Z. , Crumlish, M. , MacKenzie, S. , & Jentoft, S. (2016). Thermal preference predicts animal personality in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Journal of Animal Ecology, 85, 1389–1400. 10.1111/1365-2656.12555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Clark, C. W. (1994). Antipredator behavior and the asset‐protection principle. Behavioral Ecology, 5, 159–170. 10.1093/beheco/5.2.159 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Comrey, A. L. , & Lee, H. B. (2009). A first course in factor analysis , 2nd ed. New York London: Psychology Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cowles, B. , & Bogert, C. (1944). A Preliminary study of the thermal requirements of desert reptiles. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 83, 261–296. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cuthill, I. C. , Bennett, A. T. D. , Partridge, J. C. , & Maier, E. J. (1999). Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian sexual dichromatism. American Naturalist, 153, 183–200. 10.1086/303160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dall, S. R. X. , Houston, A. I. , & McNamara, J. M. (2004). The behavioural ecology of personality: Consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecology Letters, 7, 734–739. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00618.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dingemanse, N. J. , Both, C. , Drent, P. J. , & Tinbergen, J. M. (2004). Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 847–b52. 10.1098/rspb.2004.2680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dingemanse, N. J. , Dochtermann, N. , & Wright, J. (2010). A method for exploring the structure of behavioural syndromes to allow formal comparison within and between data sets. Animal Behavior, 79, 439–450. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.11.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. DiRienzo, N. , Niemelä, P. T. , Hedrick, A. V. , & Kortet, R. (2016). Adult bacterial exposure increases behavioral variation and drives higher repeatability in field crickets. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70(11), 1941–1947. 10.1007/s00265-016-2200-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Garamszegi, L. Z. , Markó, G. , & Herczeg, G. (2013). A meta‐analysis of correlated behaviors with implications for behavioral syndromes: Relationships between particular behavioral traits. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 1068–1080. 10.1093/beheco/art033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Garamszegi, L. Z. , Markó, G. , Szász, E. , Zsebők, S. , Azcárate, M. , Herczeg, G. , & Török, J. (2015). Among‐year variation in the repeatability, within‐ and between‐individual, and phenotypic correlations of behaviors in a natural population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69, 2005–2017. 10.1007/s00265-015-2012-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Garcia‐Porta, J. , Irisarri, I. , Kirchner, M. , Rodríguez, A. , Kirchhof, S. , Brown, J. L. , … Wollenberg Valero, K. C. (2019). Environmental temperatures shape thermal physiology as well as diversification and genome‐wide substitution rates in lizards. Nature Communications, 10, 4077 10.1038/s41467-019-11943-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Garland, T. (1984). Physiological correlates of locomotory performance in a lizard: An allometric approach. American Journal of Physiology, 247, R806–R815. 10.1152/ajpregu.1984.247.5.R806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Garrido, M. , Pérez‐Mellado, V. , & Cooper, W. E. (2014). Complex relationships amongst parasite load and escape behaviour in an insular lizard. Ethology, 121, 116–124. 10.1111/eth.12322 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Gosling, S. D. (2001). From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 45–86. 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Goulet, C. T. , Ingley, S. J. , Scharf, I. , & Pruitt, J. N. (2016). Thermal effects on survival and reproductive performance vary according to personality type. Behavioral Ecology, 27, 1635–1641. 10.1093/beheco/arw084 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Goulet, C. T. , Thompson, M. B. , & Chapple, D. G. (2017). Repeatability and correlation of physiological traits: Do ectotherms have a “thermal type”? Ecology and Evolution, 7, 710–719. 10.1002/ece3.2632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Goulet, C. T. , Thompson, M. B. , Michelangeli, M. , Wong, B. B. M. , & Chapple, D. G. (2017). Thermal physiology: A new dimension of the pace‐of‐life syndrome. Journal of Animal Ecology, 86, 1269–1280. 10.1111/1365-2656.12718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Grill, C. P. , & Rush, V. (2000). Analysing spectral data: Comparison and application of two techniques. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 69, 121–138. 10.1006/bij1.1999.0360 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gvoždík, L. , Castilla, A. M. , & Gvozdik, L. (2001). A comparative study of preferred body temperatures and critical thermal tolerance limits among populations of Zootoca vivipara (Squamata: Lacertidae) along an altitudinal gradient. Journal of Herpetology, 35, 486 10.2307/1565967 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Herczeg, G. , & Garamszegi, L. Z. (2012). Individual deviation from behavioural correlations: A simple approach to study the evolution of behavioural syndromes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 161–169. 10.1007/s00265-011-1291-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Herczeg, G. , Gonda, A. , Perälä, J. , Saarikivi, J. , Toumola, A. , & Merilä, J. (2007). Ontogenetic differences in the preferred body temperature of the European adder Vipera berus. Herpetol. J., 17, 58–61. 10.1080/00306525.1987.9634147 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Herczeg, G. , Gonda, A. , Saarikivi, J. , & Merilä, J. (2006). Experimental support for the cost‐benefit model of lizard thermoregulation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 60, 405–414. 10.1007/s00265-006-0180-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Herczeg, G. , Herrero, A. , Saarikivi, J. , Gonda, A. , Jäntti, M. , & Merilä, J. (2008). Experimental support for the cost‐benefit model of lizard thermoregulation: The effects of predation risk and food supply. Oecologia, 155, 1–10. 10.1007/s00442-007-0886-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Herczeg, G. , Kovács, T. , Tóth, T. , Török, J. , Korsós, Z. , & Merilä, J. (2004). Tail loss and thermoregulation in the common lizard Zootoca vivipara. Naturwissenschaften, 91, 485–488. 10.1007/s00114-004-0555-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Herczeg, G. , Török, J. , & Korsós, Z. (2007). Size‐dependent heating rates determine the spatial and temporal distribution of small‐bodied lizards. Amphibia‐Reptilia, 28, 347–356. 10.1163/156853807781374674 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Herrando‐Pérez, S. , Vieites, D. R. , Monasterio, F. F. C. , Belliure, J. , Chown, S. L. , Beukema, W. , … Herrando‐pérez, S. (2019). Intraspecific variation in lizard heat tolerance alters estimates of climate impact. Journal of Animal Ecology, 88, 247–257. 10.1111/1365-2656.12914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Herrel, A. , James, R. S. , & Van Damme, R. (2007). Fight versus flight: Physiological basis for temperature‐dependent behavioral shifts in lizards. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 1762–1767. 10.1242/jeb.003426 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hertz, P. E. , Huey, R. B. , & Stevenson, R. D. (1993). Evaluating temperature regulation by field‐active ectotherms: The fallacy of the inappropriate question. American Naturalist, 142, 796–818. 10.1086/285573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Horváth, G. , Martín, J. , López, P. , Garamszegi, L. Z. , Bertók, P. , & Herczeg, G. (2016). Blood parasite infection intensity covaries with risk‐taking personality in male carpetan rock lizards (Iberolacerta cyreni). Ethology, 122, 355–363. 10.1111/eth.12475 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Horváth, G. , Martín, J. , López, P. , Garamszegi, L. Z. , & Herczeg, G. (2017). Food and vitamin D3 availability affects lizard personalities: An experiment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 27 10.1007/s00265-016-2257-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Horváth, G. , Mészáros, B. , Urszán, T. J. , Bajer, K. , Molnár, O. , Garamszegi, L. Z. , & Herczeg, G. (2017). Environment‐dependence of behavioural consistency in adult male European green lizards (Lacerta viridis). PLoS One, 12, e0187657 10.1371/journal.pone.0187657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Horváth, G. , Rodríguez‐Ruiz, G. , Martín, J. , López, P. , & Herczeg, G. (2019). Maternal diet affects juvenile Carpetan rock lizard performance and personality. Ecology and Evolution, 9, 14476–14488. 10.1002/ece3.5882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Huey, R. B. , & Bennett, A. F. (1987). Phylogenetic studies of coadaptation:Preferred temperatures versus optimal performance temperature of lizards. Evolution (N. Y.) 41, 1098–1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Huey, R. B. , & Slatkin, M. (1976). Cost and benefits of lizard thermoregulation. Source Quarterly Review of Biology, 51, 363–384. 10.1086/409470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Husak, J. F. , Ferguson, H. A. , & Lovern, M. B. (2016). Trade‐offs among locomotor performance, reproduction and immunity in lizards. Functional Ecology, 30(10), 1665–1674. 10.1111/1365-2435.12653 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Ibáñez, A. , Pellitteri‐Rosa, D. , Sacchi, R. , López, P. , & Martín, J. (2016). Melanin‐based coloration covaries with hiding and exploratory behavior in male Spanish terrapins. Ethology, 122, 30–36. 10.1111/eth.12440 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Irschick, D. J. , Meyers, J. J. , Husak, J. F. , & Le Galliard, J. F. (2008). How does selection operate on whole‐organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 10, 177–196. [Google Scholar]
  64. Jandt, J. M. , Bengston, S. , Pinter‐Wollman, N. , Pruitt, J. N. , Raine, N. E. , Dornhaus, A. , & Sih, A. (2014). Behavioural syndromes and social insects: Personality at multiple levels. Biological Reviews, 89, 48–67. 10.1111/brv.12042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Jiménez‐Robles, O. , & De la Riva, I. (2019). Thermal ecology or interspecific competition: what drives the warm and cold distribution limits of mountain ectotherms? EcoEvoRxiv. 10.32942/osf.io/g8mwu [DOI]
  66. Karsten, K. B. , Ferguson, G. W. , Chen, T. C. , & Holick, M. F. (2009). Panther chameleons, Furcifer pardalis, behaviorally regulate optimal exposure to UV depending on dietary vitamin D3 status. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 82, 218–225. 10.1086/597525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kashon, E. A. F. , & Carlson, B. E. (2018). Consistently bolder turtles maintain higher body temperatures in the field but may experience greater predation risk. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 72, 10.1007/s00265-017-2428-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Killen, S. S. , Marras, S. , Metcalfe, N. B. , McKenzie, D. J. , & Domenici, P. (2013). Environmental stressors alter relationships between physiology and behaviour. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 651–658. 10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kopena, R. , López, P. , & Martín, J. (2014). Relative contribution of dietary carotenoids and vitamin E to visual and chemical sexual signals of male Iberian green lizards: An experimental test. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 68, 571–581. 10.1007/s00265-013-1672-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kozlowski, J. (1996). Optimal Allocation of Resources Explains Interspecific Life‐History Patterns in Animals with Indeterminate Growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society B‐Biological Sciences, 263, 559–566. 10.1098/rspb.1996.0084 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kuznetsova, A. , Brockhoff, P. B. , & Christensen, R. H. B. (2016). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 2.0–33.
  72. Lafferty, K. D. , & Shaw, J. C. (2013). Comparing mechanisms of host manipulation across host and parasite taxa. Journal of Experimental Biology, 216, 56–66. 10.1242/jeb.073668 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Le Galliard, J.‐F. , Clobert, J. , & Ferrière, R. (2004). Physical performance and Darwinian fitness in lizards. Nature, 432, 502–505. 10.1038/nature03057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Le Galliard, J. F. , Paquet, M. , Cisel, M. , & Montes‐Poloni, L. (2013). Personality and the pace‐of‐life syndrome: Variation and selection on exploration, metabolism and locomotor performances. Functional Ecology, 27, 136–144. 10.1111/1365-2435.12017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lichtenstein, J. L. L. , DiRienzo, N. , Knutson, K. , Kuo, C. , Zhao, K. C. , Brittingham, H. A. , … Pruitt, J. N. (2016). Prolonged food restriction decreases body condition and reduces repeatability in personality traits in web‐building spiders. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70, 1793–1803. 10.1007/s00265-016-2184-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lisboa, C. M. C. A. , Bajer, K. , Pessoa, D. M. A. , Huber, M. , & Costa, G. C. (2017). Female Brazilian whiptail lizards (Cnemidophorus ocellifer) prefer males with high ultraviolet ornament reflectance. Behavioural Processes, 142, 33–39. 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. López, P. , Hawlena, D. , Polo, V. , Amo, L. , & Martín, J. (2005). Sources of individual shy‐bold variations in antipredator behaviour of male Iberian rock lizards. Animal Behavior, 69, 1–9. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. López, P. , Martín, J. , & Cuadrado, M. (2004). The role of lateral blue spots in intrasexual relationships between male Iberian rock‐lizards, Lacerta monticola . Ethology, 110, 543–561. 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.00996.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Luttbeg, B. , & Sih, A. (2010). Risk, resources and state‐dependent adaptive behavioural syndromes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365, 3977–3990. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Mafli, A. , Wakamatsu, K. , & Roulin, A. (2011). Melanin‐based coloration predicts aggressiveness and boldness in captive eastern Hermann’s tortoises. Animal Behavior, 81, 859–863. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.01.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Martín, J. , & López, P. (2003). Ontonegenetic variation in antipredator behavior of Iberian rock lizards (Lacerta monticola): Effects of body‐size‐dependent thermal‐exchange rates and costs of refuge use. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81, 1131–1137. 10.1139/z03-094 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Martín, J. , & López, P. (2010). Pheromones and reproduction in reptiles In Norris D. O., & Lopez K. H. (Eds.), Hormones and Reproduction of Vertebrates, Volume 3 ‐ Reptiles (pp. 141–167). San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 10.1016/B978-0-12-374930-7.10006-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Martín, J. , & López, P. (2013). Responses of female rock lizards to multiple scent marks of males: Effects of male age, male density and scent over‐marking. Behavioural Processes, 94, 109–114. 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Martín, J. , & Salvador, A. (1993). Thermoregulatory behaviour of rock lizards in response to tail loss. Behaviour, 124, 1–2. 10.1163/156853993X00533 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Martín, J. , & Salvador, A. (1997). Microhabitat selection by the Iberian rock lizard Lacerta monticola: Effects on density and spatial distribution of individuals. Biological Conservation, 79, 303–307. 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00110-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Mateos‐González, F. , & Senar, J. C. (2012). Melanin‐based trait predicts individual exploratory behaviour in siskins, Carduelis spinus . Animal Behavior, 83, 229–232. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mathot, K. J. , & Dall, S. R. X. (2013). Metabolic rates can drive individual differences in information and insurance use under the risk of starvation. American Naturalist, 182, 611–20. 10.1086/673300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Mathot, K. J. , Dekinga, A. , & Piersma, T. (2017). An experimental test of state–behaviour feedbacks: gizzard mass and foraging behaviour in red knots. Functional Ecology, 31(5), 1111–1121. 10.1111/1365-2435.12827 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Mell, H. , Josserand, R. , Decencière, B. , Artacho, P. , Meylan, S. , & Le Galliard, J.‐F. (2016). Do personalities co‐vary with metabolic expenditure and glucocorticoid stress response in adult lizards? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70, 951–961. 10.1007/s00265-016-2117-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Mészáros, B. , Herczeg, G. , Bajer, K. , Török, J. , & Molnár, O. (2018). Effects of energy and thermoregulation time on physiological state and sexual signal in a lizard. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology, 327(9), 570–578. 10.1002/jez.2143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Michelangeli, M. , Goulet, C. T. , Kang, H. S. , Wong, B. B. M. , & Chapple, D. G. (2018). Integrating thermal physiology within a syndrome: Locomotion, personality and habitat selection in an ectotherm. Functional Ecology, 32, 970–981. 10.1111/1365-2435.13034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Molnár, O. , Bajer, K. , Mészáros, B. , Török, J. , & Herczeg, G. (2013). Negative correlation between nuptial throat colour and blood parasite load in male European green lizards supports the Hamilton‐Zuk hypothesis. Naturwissenschaften, 100, 551–558. 10.1007/s00114-013-1051-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Monasterio, C. , Salvador, A. , Iraeta, P. , & Díaz, J. A. (2009). The effects of thermal biology and refuge availability on the restricted distribution of an alpine lizard. Journal of Biogeography, 36, 1673–1684. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02113.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Nakayama, S. , Laskowski, K. L. , Klefoth, T. , & Arlinghaus, R. (2016). Between‐ and within‐individual variation in activity increases with water temperature in wild perch. Behavioral Ecology, 27, 1676–1683. 10.1093/beheco/arw090 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Nylin, S. , & Gotthard, K. (1998). Plasticity in life‐history traits. Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 63–83. 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Ortega, Z. , Federal, U. , & Grosso, M. (2017). Aspects of the thermal ecology of the lizard Iberolacerta monticola of Serra da Estrela (Portugal). Journal of Herpetology, 27, 239–244. [Google Scholar]
  97. Ortega, Z. , Mencía, A. , & Pérez‐Mellado, V. (2017). Wind constraints on the thermoregulation of high mountain lizards. International Journal of Biometeorology, 61, 565–573. 10.1007/s00484-016-1233-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Paranjpe, D. A. , Medina, D. , Nielsen, E. , Cooper, R. D. , Paranjpe, S. A. , & Sinervo, B. (2014). Does thermal ecology influence dynamics of side‐blotched lizards and their micro‐parasites? Integrative and Comparative Biology, 54, 108–117. 10.1093/icb/icu069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Poulin, R. (2013). Parasite manipulation of host personality and behavioural syndromes. Journal of Experimental Biology, 216, 18–26. 10.1242/jeb.073353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. R Developmental Core Team , (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation of Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  101. Réale, D. , Reader, S. M. , Sol, D. , McDougall, P. T. , & Dingemanse, N. J. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews, 82, 291–318. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00010.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Rey, S. , Digka, N. , & MacKenzie, S. (2015). Animal personality relates to thermal preference in wild‐type Zebrafish, Danio rerio . Zebrafish, 12, 243–249. 10.1089/zeb.2014.1076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Robinson, L. M. , Coleman, K. , Capitanio, J. P. , Gottlieb, D. H. , Handel, I. G. , Adams, M. J. , … Weiss, A. (2018). Rhesus macaque personality, dominance, behavior, and health. American Journal of Primatology, 80(2), e22739 10.1002/ajp.22739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Rusch, T. W. , & Angilletta, M. J. Jr (2016). Competition during thermoregulation altered the body temperatures and hormone levels of lizards. Functional Ecology, 38, 42–49. 10.1111/1365-2435.12869 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  105. Sagonas, K. , Rota, I. A. , Tsitsilonis, O. E. , Pafilis, P. , & Valakos, E. D. (2016). Infection risk dictates immunological divergence among populations in a Mediterranean lizard. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 29(9), 1680–1688, 10.1111/jeb.12903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Salvador, A. , Diaz, J. A. , Veiga, J. P. , Bloor, P. , & Brown, R. P. (2008). Correlates of reproductive success in male lizards of the alpine species Iberolacerta cyreni . Behavioral Ecology, 19, 169–176. 10.1093/beheco/arm118 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  107. San‐José, L. M. , & Fitze, P. S. (2013). Corticosterone regulates multiple colour traits in Lacerta [Zootoca] vivipara males. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26, 2681–2690. 10.1111/jeb.12265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Sartorius, S. S. , do Amaral, J. P. S. , Durtsche, R. D. , Deen, C. M. , & Lutterschmidt, W. I. (2002). Thermoregulatory accuracy, precision, and effectiveness in two sand‐dwelling lizards under mild environmental conditions. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80, 1966–1976. 10.1139/z02-191 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  109. Scholnick, D. A. , Manivanh, R. V. , Savenkova, O. D. , Bates, T. G. , & McAlexander, S. L. (2010). Impact of malarial infection on metabolism and thermoregulation in the fence lizard Sceloporus occidentalis from Oregon. Journal of Herpetology, 44, 634–640. 10.1670/09-092.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  110. Schuett, W. , & Dall, S. R. X. (2010). Appearance, “state”, and behavior in male zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Journal of Ethology, 28, 273–286. 10.1007/s10164-009-0181-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Shine, R. , & Charnov, E. L. (1992). Patterns of survival, growth, and maturation in snakes and lizards. American Naturalist, 139, 1257–1269. 10.1086/285385 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Sih, A. , Bell, A. , & Johnson, J. C. (2004). Behavioral syndromes: An ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 372–378. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Sih, A. , Bell, A. M. , Johnson, J. C. , & Ziemba, R. E. (2004). Behavioural syndromes: An integrative overview. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 79, 241–277. 10.1086/516403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Sih, A. , Mathot, K. J. , Moirón, M. , Montiglio, P. O. , Wolf, M. , & Dingemanse, N. J. (2015). Animal personality and state – behaviour feedbacks: A review and guide for empiricists. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 50–60. 10.1016/j.tree.2014.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Sinervo, B. , Méndez‐de‐la‐Cruz, F. , Miles, D. B. , Heulin, B. , Bastiaans, E. , Cruz, M. V. S. , … Sites, J. W. (2010). Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science, 328, 894–899. 10.1126/science.1184695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Smith, B. R. , & Blumstein, D. T. (2008). Fitness consequences of personality: A meta‐analysis. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 448–455. 10.1093/beheco/arm144 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  117. Smith, T. G. , Desser, S. S. , & Martin, D. S. (1994). The development of Hepatozoon sipedon sp. nov. (Apicomplexa: Adeleina: Hepatozoidae) in its natural host, the Northern water snake (Nerodia sipedon sipedon), in the culicine vectors Culex pipiens and C. territans, and in an intermediate host, the Northern. Parasitology Research, 80, 559–568. 10.1007/BF00933003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Stamps, J. A. , Briffa, M. , & Biro, P. A. (2012). Unpredictable animals: Individual differences in intraindividual variability (IIV). Animal Behavior, 83, 1325–1334. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.02.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Stapley, J. (2006). Individual variation in preferred body temperature covaries with social behaviours and colour in male lizards. Journal of Thermal Biology, 31, 362–369. 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2006.01.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  120. Stevenson, R. D. (1985). The Relative Importance of Behavioral and. American Naturalist, 126, 362–386. [Google Scholar]
  121. Tabachnick, B. G. , & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics , 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  122. Urszán, T. , Török, J. , Hettyey, A. , Garamszegi, L. , & Herczeg, G. (2015). Behavioural consistency and life history of Rana dalmatina tadpoles. Oecologia, 178, 129–140. 10.1007/s00442-014-3207-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. van Berkel, J. , & Clusella‐Trullas, S. (2018). Behavioural thermoregulation is highly repeatable and unaffected by digestive status in Agama atra. Integrative Zoology, 13, 482–493. 10.1111/1749-4877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Van Damme, R. , & Bauwens, D. (1991). behaviour, food consumption time in the lizard Lacerta vivipara Jacquin. Functional Ecology, 5, 507–517. [Google Scholar]
  125. Vanhooydonck, B. , Van Damme, R. , & Aerts, P. (2001). Speed and stamina trade‐off in lacertid lizards. Evolution (N.Y.), 55, 1040–1048. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00620.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Veiga, J. P. , Salvador, A. , Merino, S. , & Puerta, M. (1998). Reproductive effort affects immune response and parasite infection in a lizard: A phenotypic manipulation using testosterone. Oikos 82, 313–318. [Google Scholar]
  127. Velasque, M. , & Briffa, M. (2016). The opposite effects of routine metabolic rate and metabolic rate during startle responses on variation in the predictability of behaviour in hermit crabs. Behaviour, 153, 1545–1566. 10.1163/1568539X-00003371 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Wagner, A. , & Wagner, A. (1996). Does evolutionary plasticity evolve? Evolution (N.Y.) 50, 1008–1023. 10.2307/2410642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Waters, R. M. , Bowers, B. B. , & Burghardt, G. M. (2017). Personality and individuality in reptile behavior In Vonk J., Weiss A., & Kuczaj S. A. (Eds.), Personality in nonhuman animals (pp. 153–184). New York, NY: Springer; 10.1007/978-3-319-59300-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  130. Webster, M. M. , & Ward, A. J. W. (2011). Personality and social context. Biological Reviews, 86, 759–773. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00169.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. West‐Eberhard, M. J. (1989). Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 249–278. 10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001341 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  132. West‐Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution , 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  133. Williams, L. J. , King, A. J. , & Mettke‐Hofmann, C. (2012). Colourful characters: Head colour reflects personality in a social bird, the Gouldian finch, Erythrura gouldiae . Animal Behavior, 84, 159–165. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  134. Wilson, A. J. , & Nussey, D. H. (2010). What is individual quality? An evolutionary perspective. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 25, 207–214. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Winchell, K. , Maayan, I. , Fredette, J. , & Revell, L. (2018). Linking locomotor performance to morphological shifts in urban lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 285, 20180229 10.1098/rspb.2018.0229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Žagar, A. , Carretero, M. A. , Osojnik, N. , Sillero, N. , & Vrezec, A. (2015). A place in the sun: Interspecific interference affects thermoregulation in coexisting lizards. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 69, 1127–1137. 10.1007/s00265-015-1927-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1‐S2

Data Availability Statement

The data are available on DRYAD (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.qjq2bvqdd).


Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES