Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 2;374(22):2183.

CDX2 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Colon Cancer

Marta Schirripa 1, Fotios Loupakis 2, Heinz-Josef Lenz 3
PMCID: PMC7521111  NIHMSID: NIHMS1623876  PMID: 27248629

The study reported by Dalerba et al. elegantly showed that lack of CDX2 expression might be a negative prognostic factor in colon cancer. It also showed that lack of CDX2 expression may be predictive of the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with stage II cancer.

To underscore the power of these findings, we would more carefully consider the role of microsatellite instability and BRAF status. Associations between a lack of CDX2 expression and microsatellite instability and BRAF mutation are known, and the prognostic and predictive implications of those markers have been extensively studied.1-5 Moreover, microsatellite instability is currently a key factor in decision making regarding the treatment of patients with stage II cancer who have undergone radical resection.

In addition, in the study reported by Dalerba et al., a possible bias in patient selection may have limited the findings on the predictive role of CDX2 expression. The available data were not derived from randomized trials comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone. Given the association between CDX2 and adverse prognostic features, patients with tumors that lacked CDX2 expression, as compared with patients with CDX2-positive tumors, may have had a more aggressive disease. These aspects could have influenced the decision by treating physicians to withhold adjuvant chemotherapy from patients with poor clinical conditions.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Appendix 1

Footnotes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this letter was reported.

Contributor Information

Marta Schirripa, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Fotios Loupakis, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padua, Italy

Heinz-Josef Lenz, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

References

  • 1.Lugli A, Tzankov A, Zlobec I, Terracciano LM. Differential diagnostic and functional role of the multi-marker phenotype CDX2/CK20/CK7 in colorectal cancer stratified by mismatch repair status. Mod Pathol 2008;21:1403–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kim JH, Rhee YY, Bae JM, Cho NY, Kang GH. Loss of CDX2/ CK20 expression is associated with poorly differentiated carcinoma, the CpG island methylator phenotype, and adverse prognosis in microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 2013;37:1532–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Landau MS, Kuan SF, Chiosea S, Pai RK. BRAF-mutated microsatellite stable colorectal carcinoma: an aggressive adenocarcinoma with reduced CDX2 and increased cytokeratin 7 immuno-histochemical expression. Hum Pathol 2014;45:1704–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saridaki Z, Papadatos-Pastos D, Tzardi M, et al. BRAF mutations, microsatellite instability status and cyclin D1 expression predict metastatic colorectal patients’ outcome. Br J Cancer 2010;102:1762–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Souglakos J, Philips J, Wang R, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of common mutations for treatment response and survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2009;101:465–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Appendix 1

RESOURCES