Abstract
Distant metastases occur when non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is at late stages. Bone metastasis is one of the most frequent metastases of NSCLC and leads to poor prognosis. It has been reported that high expression of BMP2 in NSCLC correlates with poor survival, but whether BMP2 contributes to NSCLC bone metastasis remains largely unknown. The activation of BMP signalling is found in metastatic bone tumours of mice Lewis lung carcinoma and predicts poor survival in human NSCLC. BMP2 signalling activation can enhance bone metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma. Moreover, BMP2 secreted by stroma fibroblasts can promote the migration and invasion of NSCLC cells. Besides, in combination with pre‐osteoblast and LLCs, BMP2 could enhance the differentiation of macrophages into osteoclasts to play roles in the osteolytic mechanism of NSCLC bone metastasis. Interestingly, NSCLC cells can also enrich BMP2 to pre‐osteoblasts to function in the osteoblastic mechanism. Our results firstly demonstrate the detailed mechanisms about what roles BMP2 signalling play in enhancing NSCLC bone metastases. These findings provide a new potential therapy choice for preventing bone metastases of NSCLC via the inhibition of BMP2 signalling.
Keywords: BMP2 signalling, bone metastases, NSCLC, osteoblastic mechanism, osteolytic mechanism
Highlights.
BMP signalling is activated in mice NSCLC bone metastases,
BMP2 signalling correlates with poor survival in human NSCLC.
BMP2, majorly derived from stroma fibroblast cells, enhances migration and invasion of NSCLC cells.
BMP2 signalling is associated both osteolytic and osteoblastic mechanisms of NSCLC bone metastases.
1. INTRODUCTION
Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. 1 , 2 , 3 Distant metastasis frequently occurs when NSCLC is at late stages, which may result in poor prognosis. It has been reported that the median survival time of patients with NSCLC metastases is between 14 and 17 months. 4 Following breast cancer and prostate cancer, NSCLC is the third most common cancer type that can lead to bone metastasis. About 30%‐40% NSCLC patients are diagnosed with bone metastases at late stages. 5
The high expression of bone morphogenic protein 2 (BMP2) has been reported in NSCLC. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 The activation of BMP2 signalling is also found to enhance cell proliferation, migration, invasion and lung metastases of lung adenocarcinoma. 9 , 11 , 12 In addition, the high expression of BMP2 in the stroma indicates poor prognosis in NSCLC. 13 However, the roles that BMP2 plays in NSCLC bone metastases still remain largely unknown and the detailed mechanisms are unclear.
Usually, according to the effect of cancers on normal bone remodelling, bone metastases can be further classified into osteolytic, osteoblastic or mixed subtypes. 14 , 15 Osteolytic, which is characterized by bone resorption induced by activated osteoclasts, has been reported to play roles in NSCLC bone metastases. 16 , 17 Parathyroid hormone‐related peptide (PTHrP) and receptor activator of nuclear factor‐kappa‐B ligand (RANKL), which play significant roles in osteoclasts activation and bone metastases, 17 , 18 are found to be associated with NSCLC bone metastases. 19 , 20 Moreover, miRNA‐33a, targeting PTHrP, is confirmed to reduce bone resorption in NSCLC. 20 In addition, matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) and their upstream signalling pathways, like transforming growth factor (TGF‐β), Wnt, chemokine (C‐X‐C Motif) receptor 4 (CXCR4) and nuclear factor kappa‐B (NFκB), may also contribute to NSCLC bone metastases via MMPs. 5 , 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24
The osteoblastic mechanism is usually found in prostate cancer. 25 Osteogenesis‐associated factors, such as TGF‐β, BMPs and endothelin‐1, play important roles in immature bones formation within tumours. 18 , 26 , 27 Although the preliminary osteolytic mechanism of NSCLC bone metastases has been revealed, it is still unclear about whether the osteoblastic mechanism also occurs in NSCLC bone metastases.
Here, we investigate how BMP2 signalling activation functions in bone metastases of NSCLC. In this study, BMP signalling is found to be activated in bone metastasis of mice Lewis lung carcinoma and correlates with poor survival in human NSCLC. BMP2, derived from the stroma fibroblasts, promotes the migration and invasion of NSCLC cells. Besides, BMP2 plays role in both osteolytic mechanism and osteoblastic mechanism of Lewis lung carcinoma bone metastasis. Taken together, inhibition of BMP2 signalling may be a new therapy choice for the NSCLC bone metastasis patients.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Antibodies and reagents
Antibodies were used in this study: monoclonal anti‐Smad1/5 (Cell Signaling Technology, 6944); anti‐pSmad1/5 (Cell Signaling Technology, 9516); anti‐Smad1 (Abcam, ab63356); anti‐Keratin 18 (CK18) (MutiSciences, 70‐ab36769‐050); anti‐p‐Akt (Cell Signaling Technology, 4060); anti‐Akt (Cell Signaling Technology, 2920); anti‐p‐Erk (Cell Signaling Technology, 4370); anti‐Erk (Cell Signaling Technology, 4695); anti‐Osteocalcin (OCN) (Biorbyt, orb259644); anti‐Ki67‐FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) (Biolegend, 652 409); anti‐BMP2 (Servicebio, GB11252); TRITC (Tetramethylrhodamine)‐conjugated anti‐Rabbit antibody (abclonal, AS040); FITC‐conjugated anti‐Mouse antibody (abclonal, AS001) and anti‐β‐Actin (Sigma, A1978). Reagents: BMP2 (R&D, 355‐BM‐100); 4',6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) (Solarbio, C0060) and carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl amino ester (CFSE) (eBioscience, 65‐0850‐84). Tris‐HCl, NaCl and other chemicals were from Sigma.
2.2. Cells
NSCLC cell lines: Lewis lung cells, NCIH‐1373, A549; the macrophage cell line: Raw 264.7, and the pre‐osteoblast cell line: MC3T3‐E1 cells were from ATCC. The ATCC number of Lewis lung cells (LLCs) was CRL‐1642. The ATCC number of NCI‐H1373 cells was CRL‐5866. The ATCC number of A549 cells was CCL‐185. The ATCC number of Raw264.7 cells was TIB‐71. The ATCC number of MC3T3‐E1 cells was CRL‐2594. Lewis lung cells and NCIH‐1373 cells were cultured in RMPI1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Hyclone, Utah, USA); A549 and Raw 264.7 cells in DMEM (Invitrogen) with 10% FBS (Hyclone) and MC3T3‐E1 cells in α‐MEM (Invitrogen) with 10% FBS (Hyclone). Mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells were extracted from 13.5 days embryos of C57BL/6 mice and cultured in DMEM (Invitrogen) with 10% FBS (Hyclone). The MEF cells used were less than five passages.
2.3. Mice
C57BL /6 mice, female, 6‐8 weeks, used in this study were bred and maintained in a specific pathogen‐free animal facility at Fujian Medical University. Mice were killed with carbon dioxide asphyxiation. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Fujian Medical University (2018‐039).
2.4. Lewis lung carcinoma metastasis
1 × 106 LLCs were injected into the tail veins of C57/BL6 mice to make the model of metastasis. LLCs usually tend to metastasize to the lungs and bones. 35 days after injection, mice were killed with carbon dioxide asphyxiation to get the metastatic tissues.
1 × 106 the vehicle or 20 ng/mL BMP2 pre‐treated LLCs were injected into the left lung lobes of C57BL/6 mice to establish the orthotopic model. LLCs usually tend to colonize in lungs and bones. 35 days after injection, mice were killed with carbon dioxide asphyxiation and tissues were harvested for the following analyses.
For the invasive model, 1 × 105 the vehicle or 20 ng/mL BMP2 pre‐treated LLCs were injected into the left hind legs of C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously. To retain the BMP2 signalling activation in the hind leg muscles, 3 μg/kg vehicle or BMP2 was further injected into the left hind leg subcutaneously per week. 35 days after injection, mice were killed with carbon dioxide asphyxiation and tissues were harvested for the following analyses.
2.5. Haematoxylin and eosin stain (HE)
The tissues were embedded in paraffin to be cut into 2.5μm tissue sections. Tissue sections were dewaxed with xylene. Then, sections were rehydrated with 100% −95% −75% alcohol gradients. Haematoxylin was stained for 20 minutes, and then, sections were differentiated with 1% hydrochloric acid for 30s. Then, after 15 minutes of PBS blue staining, eosin was stained for 3 minutes. After rinsing, sections were dehydrated with a gradient of 95% to 100% alcohol, and cleared the sections with xylene for two times. Then, sections were mounted with a neutral resin. Photographs were taken by Olympus microscope BX53.
2.6. Immunohistochemistry
The tissues were embedded in paraffin to be cut into 2.5 μm tissue sections. Tissue sections were dewaxed with xylene. Then, sections were rehydrated with 100% −95% −75% alcohol gradients. After antigens were retrieved, the sections were incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Then, the sections were incubated with secondary antibodies after briefly washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) at room temperature for 2 hours. Finally, the sections were incubated with HRP (horseradish peroxidase)‐conjugated streptavidin for 10 minutes before diamino benzidine (DAB)/H2O2 was used as the substrate for detection reaction. Photographs were taken by Olympus microscope BX53.
2.7. Immunofluorescence
For tissue sections, the protocol was the same with immunohistochemistry before the primary antibodies incubated. For cells, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) for 20 minutes. Then, cells were permeated with 0.5% Triton X‐100 for five minutes at room temperature. 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used to block the cells for 20 minutes at room temperature. After that, cells were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. At the second day, cells and sections were incubated with TRITC‐ or FITC‐conjugated secondary antibody for one hour at room temperature. DAPI (Solarbio, C0060) was used to stain the nucleus. Images were taken by Zessis LSM 800 Laser scanning confocal microscope.
2.8. Immunoblotting
Cells and tissues were lysed with TNE buffer (10 mM Tris‐HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.5% nonidet P 40 (NP40) and pH = 7.5). For immunoblotting assay, cell lysates were mixed with 4 × loading buffer (40 mM Tris‐HCl, 200 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 4% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), 40% glycerol, 0.032% bromophenol blue, pH = 8.0). The samples were run with 4% stacking gel and 10% separating gels. Then, proteins on the gels were transferred to nitrocellulose filter membranes for antibodies incubated. The membranes’ exposure was done with Thermo Pierce ECL and FluorChem E (Protein Simple).
2.9. CFSE‐labelled LLC cells
LLCs were resuspended in 1 mL PBS with 2.5 μM CFSE. LLCs dyed in CFSE solution were vortex in 37℃ water bath for 10 min. Cells were washed with complete RPMI‐1640 culture medium for twice before cultured.
2.10. Cell migration assays
1 × 104 cells in culture media without FBS were placed on the upper layer of Corning cell culture insert with polycarbonate membrane (Transwell@, 8.0 μm pore size, Corning). The complete culture media with or without 20 ng/mL BMP2 were placed below the cell permeable membrane. Following an incubation period (24 hours) in 37 ℃, 5% CO2, the cells that had migrated through the membrane were stained with 0.1% crystal violet and counted.
2.11. Cell invasion assays
Corning cell culture insert with polycarbonate membrane (Transwell@, 8.0 μm pore size, Corning) were pre‐treated with 10:1 DMEM and matrigels (BD BioSciences). 1 × 105 cells in culture media without FBS were placed on the upper layer of the diluted matrigels. The complete culture media with or without 20 ng/mL BMP2 were placed below the cell permeable membrane. Following an incubation period (48 hours) in 37℃, 5% CO2, the cells that had migrated through the membrane were stained with 0.1% crystal violet and counted.
2.12. Cell proliferation and apoptosis assays
LLCs or MC3T3‐E1 cells were placed on the upper layer of Corning cell culture insert with polycarbonate membrane (Transwell@, 3.0μm pore size, Corning). MC3T3‐E1 cells were cultured in media with or without 200 ng/mL BMP2 for 24 hours. MC3T3‐E1 cells were harvested and stained with the Ki67‐FITC antibody (eBioscience, 11‐5698‐80) or the Allophycocyanin (APC) Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit with 7‐AAD (Biolegend, 640 930). Flow cytometric analysis was performed with BD FACS C6 Flow Cytometer. The results were analysed by the software FlowJo 7.6.1.
2.13. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining
LLCs or MC3T3‐E1 cells were placed on the upper layer of Corning cell culture insert with polycarbonate membrane (Transwell@, 3.0 μm pore size, Corning). MC3T3‐E1 cells below were cultured in media with or without 200 ng/mL BMP2 to be differentiated for seven days. ALP staining was conducted with BCIP/NBT Alkaline Phosphatase Color Development Kit (Beyotime).
2.14. Alizarin red staining
LLCs or MC3T3‐E1 cells were placed on the upper layer of Corning cell culture insert with polycarbonate membrane (Transwell@, 3.0μm pore size, Corning). MC3T3‐E1 cells below were cultured in media with or without 200 ng/mL BMP2 to be differentiated for 14‐21 days. After cells were fixed with 95% Ethanol for five minutes, 1% Alizarin red (pH = 4.2) was stained for 15 minutes.
2.15. Tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining
Murine pre‐osteoclast RAW 264.7 cells (3 × 104 cells/well) were seeded directly into the wells of the 6‐well co‐culture plates, and murine pre‐osteoblast MC3T3‐E1 cells (3 × 104 cells/well) were seeded into the Corning cell culture inserts with polycarbonate membrane (Transwell@, 0.4μm pore size) of the co‐culture 6‐well plates. After MC3T3‐E1 cells were attached to the membrane of the inserts, lung cancer cells (3 × 104 cells/well) were added on top of MC3T3‐E1 cell layer in triplicate and treated with 20 ng/mL BMP2 or vehicle. The co‐culture assays were performed in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and changed every two days. TRAP staining was performed on day 6 using a leucocyte acid phosphatase kit (Sigma, 387A). TRAP+‐multinucleated cells were scored as mature osteoclasts and quantified.
2.16. ELISA assay
Tumour tissues were homogenized in PBS to be samples. All samples originated from tumours were quantified to the concentration 10 mg/mL by BCA assay. The BCA kit was from Byeotime (P0009). Samples from tumours or supernatant from cell cultures were subjected to BMP2 ELISA assay (R&D, DBP200).
2.17. RNA‐SEQ and bioinformatics analysis
RNA library preparation was performed as described in the QIAseq Stranded RNA Library Kits (QIAGEN). Total RNA was extracted from mice tissues. The mRNA was fragmented to an average insert size of 200‐400 bp. The cleaved RNA fragments were copied into first‐strand cDNA using reverse transcriptase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and random primers. The first‐strand cDNA was converted into double‐stranded DNA in the presence of dUTP. These cDNA fragments were subjected to the addition of a single ‘A’ base and subsequent ligation of the adapter. The products were purified and enriched via PCR to generate the final library. After testing quality using Qubit2.0 Fluorometer and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies), the libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina Inc). Raw sequences were mapped to mouse genome mm10 by STAR (v2.5.4b) 28 with key parameters setting of ‐‐readMatesLengthsIn Equal ‐‐outFilterMultimapNmax 20 ‐‐alignEndsType Local ‐‐al ignSJDBoverhangMin 10 ‐‐alignMatesGapMax 10 000 ‐‐alignIntronMax 100 000 ‐‐alignSJstitchMismatchNmax 5 −1 5 5 ‐‐outFilterScoreMinOverLread 0.3 ‐‐outFilterMatchNminOverLread 0.3. The expression level FPKM values were obtained from Cuffnorm in Cufflinks package (v2.2.1); 29 further, significant differential expressed genes (BM vs Parent, LM vs Parent and BM vs LM) were called by Cuffdiff in Cufflinks packages, requiring P value < =0.01 and fold change>= 1; all significant differential expressed genes were compiled together to show clusters in Figure 1A. The full dataset can be accessed online at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The GEO number is GSE148101. The find GO.pl implemented in HOMER 30 was used to test the enriched GO terms for the target gene lists identified from comparison, with option of human to map mouse genes to human's. Top 10 enriched terms from KEGG pathways were selected to show in figures with requiring of P value < 1e‐5, and there are fewer than 3000 genes in the term. Expression profiles and clinical data of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamouse cell carcinoma (LUSC) were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). 31 The survival analysis was carried based on mean expression for the gene list of different modules.
2.18. Statistical analysis
Student's t test, one‐way ANOVA test, Wilcoxon rank‐sum test, Fisher's exact test and log‐rank test were used as indicated in the figure legends. P < .05 were considered statistically significant.
3. RESULTS
3.1. BMP signalling signature was up‐regulated in Lewis lung carcinoma bone metastases and predicted poor survival in NSCLC
Lewis lung carcinoma originated from a spontaneous lung adenocarcinoma of a C57BL/6 mouse. 32 , 33 Tail vein injection of carcinoma cells was a classical method to establish models of metastasis. 34 , 35 , 36 We injected the Lewis lung carcinoma cells (LLCs) into tail veins of six C57BL/6 mice, resulting in two lung metastases and three bone metastases. RNA‐seq was carried for metastatic bone tumours, metastatic lung tumours and parental Lewis lung cells to analyse the transcriptome differences. The compiled significant differential expressing genes (DEGs) could be classified into five clusters C0, C1, C2, C3 and C4, indicating different expression patterns (Figure 1A). The C0 module showed high expressing level in both metastases, meanwhile C1 and C2 showed higher expressing level in bone metastasis than in lung metastasis and parental cells, and the C3 and C4 module showed the unique highly expressed genes in lung metastasis or parental cells (Figure 1A). Thus, genes in C1 and C2 were more likely to contribute to Lewis lung carcinoma bone metastasis. Consistently, Angiopoietin 1 (ANGPT1) in C1, and MMPs and Endothelin 1 (EDN1) in C2 had been reported to take part in prostate or breast cancer bone metastasis. 23 , 24 , 37 , 38 Several KEGG 39 pathways were significantly enriched in C0, C2 and C4 modules but not C1 and C3, as shown in Figure 1B. Enriched KEGG pathways for different modules indicated that Jak‐Stat signalling, and PI3K‐Akt might contribute to lung carcinoma metastasis while VEGF signalling, NF‐κB signalling and HIF‐1α signalling were enriched in parental Lewis lung cells (Figure 1B). Extracellular matrix (ECM)‐receptor interaction and amoebiasis‐associated genes were up‐regulated in the C2 module, indicating that cell deformation and invasion might be significant in the formation of bone metastatic lesions (Figure 1B). Furthermore, we analysed the homologous gene expression features of human based on TCGA data (NSCLC subtypes: LUSC and LUAD) 31 and found that high expression of bone metastasis‐associated genes in cluster C2 correlated with poor survival in human NSCLC (Figure 1C). What's more, ANGPT1, MMPs and EDN1, majorly up‐regulated in C2, were found as downstream targets of BMP signalling. 40 , 41 , 42 Thus, we speculated that BMP signalling might contribute to Lewis lung carcinoma bone metastasis. Besides, TGF‐β signalling was also important in inducing bone metastasis of various types of cancer, like prostate cancer and breast cancer, 43 and we went further to analyse the activation of TGF‐β signalling in Lewis lung carcinoma bone metastasis. Average expression of TGF‐β or BMP signalling targeted genes in LLCs were defined as TGF‐β or BMP signalling signatures to characterize the activation of TGF‐β or BMP signalling in bone metastases derived from Lewis lung carcinoma. The TGF‐β target gene list was from KEGG, and BMP target gene list was from our own RNA‐seq results. The RNA‐seq data of LLC with or without BMP2 treatment could be accessed online at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The GEO number is GSE148101. We found that only BMP signalling signature was up‐regulated in bone metastasis than in lung metastasis and parental Lewis lung cells (Figure 1D). More importantly, up‐regulation of BMP signalling signature genes could predict poor survival in human NSCLC (Figure 1F). In addition, we confirmed that human and mice NSCLC cell lines responded to BMP signalling in vitro (Figure 1E). Taken together, activation of BMP signalling was found in Lewis lung carcinoma bone metastases and correlated with poor survival in NSCLC.
3.2. BMP signalling activation was higher in bone metastasis than in lung metastasis of lewis lung carcinoma
We found that LLCs could metastasize to both limbs and spines to form metastatic lesions (Figure 2A). When BMP signalling is activated, Smad1/5/8 is phosphorylated and translocated into nucleus with Smad4. 44 , 45 In our results, we found that Smad1 was expressed in the nucleus of Lewis lung carcinoma cells at the invasive sites, where bone resorption and destruction occurred (Figure 2B‐C). Those results suggested that BMP signalling was activated in metastatic bone tumours derived from Lewis lung carcinoma. CK18, as a kind of cytokeratin, frequently expressed in NSCLC. 46 , 47 , 48 We stained Lewis lung carcinoma cells with CK18 and Smad1 to further confirm that BMP signalling was activated in Lewis lung carcinoma cells rather than other cell types of metastatic bone tumours. As shown in Figure 2C, nuclear Smad1 staining was usually found in CK18+ LLCs in metastatic bone tumours, indicating that BMP signalling of Lewis lung carcinoma cells were activated in bone metastases.
Smad1 was expressed both in lung metastasis and bone metastasis. However, the location of Smad1 within the two metastatic tissues was different (Figure 2B‐C). Smad1 majorly located in the nucleus at the invasive boundaries in bone metastasis, while it diffused in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of carcinoma cells in lung metastasis (Figure 2B‐C, Figure S1A‐B). Moreover, higher phosphorylated Smad1/5 was found in bone metastasis in comparison with lung metastasis (Figure S1C‐D). Therefore, the activation of BMP signalling was higher in bone metastasis than in lung metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma. Our results indicated that BMP signalling may probably play a more important role in bone metastasis than in lung metastasis of NSCLC.
3.3. BMP2 signalling activation enhanced bone metastasis of lewis lung carcinoma in vivo
BMP signalling was found activated in bone metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma according to the results above, and the high expression of BMP2 has been reported in NSCLC. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 Thus, we focused on the direct roles of BMP2 in bone metastasis of NSCLC. We pre‐treated LLCs with vehicle or 20 ng/mL BMP2 for 24h. After that, we injected the vehicle or 20 ng/mL BMP2 pre‐treated LLCs into the left lung lobes of C57BL/6 mice. We found that BMP2‐treated LLCs were more likely to colonize in left ribs and shoulders while vehicle treated LLCs were more likely to colonize in lungs (Figure 3A‐C).
We went further to investigate the roles of BMP signalling playing in the bone invasion of NSCLC cells in vivo. We pre‐treated LLCs with vehicle or 20 ng/mL BMP2 for 24 hours. After that, we injected the vehicle or 20 ng/mL BMP2 pre‐treated LLCs into the left hind legs of C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously to analyse the direct invasion of Lewis lung carcinoma in the hind legs. To retain the BMP2 signalling activation in the hind leg muscles, we repetitively injected 3 μg/kg vehicle or BMP2 into the left hind leg subcutaneously per week for three weeks. In the vehicle group, we found that the carcinomas majorly colonized subcutaneously and grew separately from the muscles and bones, indicating that Lewis lung carcinoma did not invade into muscles and bones (Figure 3D‐F). Differently, in the BMP2 group, the muscles had been destructed and the carcinoma had invaded into the bones (Figure 3E‐F). Although the difference was not statistically significant in numbers which could be attribute to the small number of mice investigated, BMP2 still had the trend to enhance the migration and invasion of Lewis lung carcinoma cells in vivo. The activation of BMP2 signalling was confirmed by nuclear Smad1 staining and the expression of phosphorylated Smad1/5 (Figure 3F, Figure S2A‐C).
3.4. BMP2 signalling enhanced migration and invasion of NSCLC cells
According to our transcriptome results, ECM‐receptor interaction and amoebiasis‐associated genes were up‐regulated in bone metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma, indicating that cell deformation, migration and invasion might play significant roles in the formation of bone metastasis (Figure 1B). And BMP2 could enhance the migration and invasion of Lewis lung carcinoma in vivo (Figure 3F). Therefore, we examined whether BMP2 signalling could enhance migration and invasion of NSCLC cells in vitro via the transwell assay. We found that BMP2 could enhance the migration of NSCLC cells, like LLCs, NCI‐H1373 cells and A549 cells in vitro (Figure 4A‐C). What's more, the invasive ability of LLCs and A549 cells was also promoted by BMP2 (Figure 4D‐E).
3.5. Stroma fibroblasts would be the nature source to secret BMP2 in bone metastasis of lewis lung carcinoma
As BMP2 signalling played an important role in bone metastases, exploring the nature source of BMP2 in bone metastasis was an important issue that needed to be validated. Rajski et al had reported that high BMP2 derived from stroma cells correlated with poor outcome in lung adenocarcinoma. 13 Tumour stroma fibroblast cells secreted diverse cytokines to enhance cancer progression. 49 , 50 In our result, we found that MEF (mice embryonic fibroblast) could secrete much more BMP2 than LLCs and the pre‐osteoblast cells MC3T3‐E1(Figure 5A). Moreover, the conditional media of MEF could promote the migration of LLCs (Figure 5B). Furthermore, in consistent with the migration phenomena, the conditional media of MEF could enhance the invasion of LLCs (Figure 5C). Interestingly, we found that the bone morphogenetic protein receptor type I (BMPRI) inhibitor LDN‐193189 could inhibit the migration and invasion of LLCs induced by MEF conditional media (CM) (Figure 5B‐C), indicating that MEF enhance migration of LLCs via secreting BMP2. As numerous cell types were growing within the metastatic bone tumours, we investigated the expression of BMP2 in bone metastasis through immunofluorescence assay. We also found that α‐Sma+ marked fibroblasts expressed more BMP2 than other cell types in bone metastases of Lewis lung carcinoma (Figure 5D). The results above indicated that fibroblast cells might be the major source of BMP2. BMP2 originated from stroma fibroblasts contributed to the migration and invasion of Lewis lung carcinoma cells.
3.6. BMP2, in combination with NSCLC cells and osteoblast cells, regulated the osteolytic and osteoblastic mechanisms of bone metastasis
In osteolytic metastases, the destruction of bone was mediated by osteoclasts rather than tumour cells. 51 , 52 BMP2 alone generally could not induce osteoclast‐genesis, but it had also been reported to stimulate the activation of osteoclasts in combination with titanium particles or chondrocytes through inducing the expression of RANKL. 53 , 54 Osteoblasts and NSCLC cells in tumour microenvironment could cooperate with each other to induce macrophages differentiation into osteoclasts. 51 Thus, we continued to examine whether BMP2 could contribute to this process with NSCLC and osteoblast cells synergistically. We co‐cultured the macrophage cell line RAW264.7 with LLC and MC3T3‐E1 or A549 and MC3T3‐E1 cells to induce its osteoclasts differentiation for 7 days. We found that without BMP2 stimulation, few macrophages could differentiate into TRAP+ osteoclast cells (Figure S3A‐B). However, BMP2 could strongly enhance the differentiation of macrophages into osteoclasts under the co‐culture condition, indicating that BMP2 signalling contributed to osteolytic metastasis (Figure S3A‐B). The bi‐directional interactions between tumour cells and osteoclasts led to both osteolysis and tumour growth. 51 , 55
However, in bone metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma, we could see both the destruction of mature bone tissues and the formation of immature bone tissues, indicating that osteoblastic mechanisms might also play roles in bone metastases of Lewis lung carcinoma (Figure 6A). Although BMP2 was a well‐known protein with bone inductivity, how BMP2 in combination with NSCLC cells to regulate the osteoblastic mechanism in bone metastases of Lewis lung carcinoma was largely unknown. We co‐cultured LLCs in the Corning cell culture insert with polycarbonate membranes (Transwell@, 3.0μm pore size, Corning) with BMP2 and pre‐osteoblasts MC3T3‐E1 below in the plates to mimic the neoplastic osteogenesis in vivo. In the co‐culture system, LLCs could not contact MC3T3‐E1 cells directly but the vesicles and cytokines secreted by LLCs could contact MC3T3‐E1 cells through the 3μm pores. We found that BMP2 could induce ALP+ differentiated MC3T3‐E1 cells, while LLCs could further enhance this process (Figure 6B‐C). However, the formation of calcium nodes induced by BMP2, which indicated the mature osteocytes, was inhibited by LLCs (Figure 6D‐E). In addition, we found that LLCs alone could enhance the expression of the proliferation marker Ki67 in MC3T3‐E1 cells and attenuate MC3T3‐E1 apoptosis independent of BMP2, which might be another mechanism supporting neoplastic osteogenesis (Figure S4A‐B). The results above revealed that BMP2 induced immature osteoblasts differentiation with NSCLC cells synergistically.
We went further to study how LLCs enhanced BMP2 to induced osteoblasts differentiation. We co‐cultured LLCs with MC3T3‐E1 cells directly. LLCs were stained with CFSE (green), and MC3T3‐E1 cells were stained with the anti‐OCN antibody (red, TRITC‐conjugated secondary antibody labelled). Interestingly, under BMP2 treatment, LLCs could secrete substances (green stained), which subsequently attached to MC3T3‐E1 cells (red stained) (Figure 6F). Moreover, we indirectly co‐cultured LLCs in the Corning cell culture insert with polycarbonate membranes (Transwell@, 3.0 μm pore size, Corning) and found that the substance (green stained) that secreted by LLCs could pass through the 3.0 μm pores and attached to the MC3T3‐E1 cells below (Figure 6F). Furthermore, we found that BMP2 co‐localized with the substance secreted by LLCs (Figure 6G). Taken together, the results above indicated that LLCs enriched BMP2 to pre‐osteoblast cells to induce the early osteoblast differentiation, which might be a potential mechanism about how BMP2 induced immature osteogenesis with LLCs synergistically.
4. DISCUSSION
NSCLC is the third most common bone metastasis carcinoma, following breast cancer and prostate cancer. 56 , 57 However, different from breast cancer and prostate cancer, researches focused on mechanisms of NSCLC bone metastases are rare. Therefore, new mechanisms about NSCLC bone metastases and new targets for NSCLC bone metastasis therapy need to be researched. In our present work, we find that BMP2 signalling plays roles in NSCLC bone metastasis.
Formation of bone metastatic lesions needs collaboration of lung cancer cells and the microenvironment. 18 , 55 We find that BMP2 signalling can promote bone metastases of lung carcinoma from multiple directions (Figure 7). At the early stage, BMP2 enhances lung cancer cells to migrate and invade to the bone tissues. BMP2 signalling regulates the interaction among lung cancer cells, osteoblasts and macrophages to promote the osteoclasts differentiation, further enhancing osteolysis in bone metastases. BMP2 signalling can also play roles in the osteoblast differentiation to induce the immature bone formation within the bone metastases. Nevertheless, the osteoblasts cannot form mature bone tissues. It has been reported that cancer cells rely on direct calcium influx from osteogenic cells to form bone metastatic lesions. 58 , 59 Thus, the immature bone tissues induced by BMP2 signalling may be the source of cytokines or matrix for the metastatic lesions maintaining.
The osteoclastic bone resorption is significant to make the skeleton a permissive environment in most bone metastases. 60 Osteoclasts, the only cells capable of bone resorption, derived from myeloid lineage, were reported to be controlled by RANKL, PTHrP and Jagged 1. 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 In a recent report, LIGHT (tumour necrosis factor superfamily member 14, TNFSF14), derived from monocytes, was shown to promote osteolysis in NSCLC bone metastases and could be a new therapy target. 65 RANKL can be secreted by osteoblast lineages or stromal cells, and PTHrp can be derived from tumour cells. 61 , 66 , 67 , 68 Although PTHrP and RANKL have been reported to be associated with NSCLC bone metastasis, 69 , 70 therapy efficiency of treatment targeting RANKL on NSCLC bone metastases is extremely limited. Thus, mechanisms about how RANKL is expressed and secreted need to be researched. 67 In our study, BMP2 is found to promote osteoclast differentiation of macrophages in cooperation with pre‐osteoblasts and NSCLC cells, indicating its roles in osteolytic mechanism of NSCLC bone metastases. It has been reported that BMP2 properly enhances osteoclast activation indirectly through inducing secretion of RANKL. 53 , 54 , 67 It needs to be further researched whether this mechanism works in NSCLC‐associated osteolysis.
Osteoblastic mechanism of bone metastasis remains much more unexplored than osteolysis mechanism. We firstly report the osteoblastic mechanism of NSCLC bone metastasis and find that BMP2 signalling plays significant roles in the formation of immature bone tissues within NSCLC bone metastatic lesions. Membrane‐associated microvesicles from stromal cells or other cells in the osteogenesis niche are important carriers for BMP2 delivered to mesenchymal stem cells or pre‐osteoblasts. 71 In prostate cancer bone metastasis, cancer cells release BMP2 via microvesicles to promote pre‐osteoblasts differentiation. 72 Interestingly, according to our results, fibroblasts are the origination of BMP2 rather than NSCLC cells and osteoblasts. However, NSCLC can collect BMP2 from the environment and deliver to pre‐osteoblast cells via a substance to enhance the osteoblasts differentiation, which may be a new mechanism about how NSCLC cells interact with pre‐osteoblast cells. Furthermore, it needs further research whether the substances with BMP2 secreted by LLCs are microvesicles.
BMPs belong to TGF‐β superfamily, including BMP2, BMP4, BMP6, BMP7 and so on. 73 The roles of other BMP family members in lung cancer have also been reported. Different from BMP2, BMP6 has been reported to be a tumour suppressor in lung cancer, which may be epigenetically silenced in lung cancer. 74 The roles of BMP4 and BMP7 in lung cancer may be controversial. Some researches demonstrate that BMP4 and BMP7 enhance invasion and metastasis of lung cancer while others do not, which may need to be further confirmed. 75 , 76 , 77
In the future, different inhibitors targeting BMP signalling factors can be developed for the therapy of NSCLC bone metastasis. As various kinase inhibitors have been developed, BMP type I receptors ALK2/3/6, and BMP type II receptors BMPRII, ActRII and ActRIIB, can be good targets. 78 Besides, BMP2 antagonisms or antibodies targeting BMP2 can also be tried in the treatment of NSCLC bone metastasis.
5. CONCLUSIONS
BMP2 signalling is activated in bone metastases of NSCLC. Moreover, BMP2 signalling activation correlates with poor survival in human NSCLC. Furthermore, BMP2, majorly derived from stroma fibroblasts, enhances bone metastases of NSCLC not only through promoting migration and invasion of cancer cells, but also through both osteolytic and osteoblastic mechanisms. Altogether, inhibition of BMP2 signalling can be a potential therapy choice for preventing bone metastases of NSCLC patients.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS
Fei Huang: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; funding acquisition; roles/writing – original draft. Yaqiang Cao: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; writing – review and editing. Gui Wu: Data curation; formal analysis; writing – review and editing. CaihongWang: Data curation. Junying Chen: Data curation. Wanzun Lin: Data curation. Ruilong Lan: Investigation. Bing Wu: Investigation. Xianhe Xie: Investigation. Jinsheng Hong: Investigation. Lengxi Fu: Investigation.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We thank the Fujian Platform for Medical Research, First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University.
Huang F, Cao Y, Wu G, et al. BMP2 signalling activation enhances bone metastases of non‐small cell lung cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:10768–10784. 10.1111/jcmm.15702
Fei Huang and Yaqiang Cao authors contributed equally to this work.
Funding information
We thank the grants from National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scholars of China (81702913) and Project for Distinguished Young Scholars in Fujian Province (2018B051).
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.
REFERENCES
- 1. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646‐674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Vargas AJ, Harris CC. Biomarker development in the precision medicine era: lung cancer as a case study. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:525‐537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Herbst RS, Morgensztern D, Boshoff C. The biology and management of non‐small cell lung cancer. Nature. 2018;553:446‐454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Juan O, Popat S. Ablative therapy for oligometastatic non‐small cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017;18:595‐606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. McAllister SS, Weinberg RA. The tumour‐induced systemic environment as a critical regulator of cancer progression and metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:717‐727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fei ZH, Yao CY, Yang XL, Huang XE, Ma SL. Serum BMP‐2 up‐regulation as an indicator of poor survival in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients. Asian Pacific J Cancer Preven. 2013;14:5293‐5299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Choi YJ, Kim ST, Park KH, et al. The serum bone morphogenetic protein‐2 level in non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2012;29:582‐588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bieniasz M, Oszajca K, Eusebio M, Kordiak J, Bartkowiak J, Szemraj J. The positive correlation between gene expression of the two angiogenic factors: VEGF and BMP‐2 in lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer. 2009;66:319‐326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Langenfeld EM, Calvano SE, Abou‐Nukta F, Lowry SF, Amenta P, Langenfeld J. The mature bone morphogenetic protein‐2 is aberrantly expressed in non‐small cell lung carcinomas and stimulates tumor growth of A549 cells. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24:1445‐1454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Langenfeld EM, Bojnowski J, Perone J, Langenfeld J. Expression of bone morphogenetic proteins in human lung carcinomas. Ann Thoracic Surg. 2005;80:1028‐1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hsu YL, Huang MS, Yang CJ, Hung JY, Wu LY, Kuo PL. Lung tumor‐associated osteoblast‐derived bone morphogenetic protein‐2 increased epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition of cancer by Runx2/Snail signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:37335‐37346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Chu H, Luo H, Wang H, et al. Silencing BMP‐2 expression inhibits A549 and H460 cell proliferation and migration. Diagnostic Pathology. 2014;9:123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Rajski M, Saaf A, Buess M. BMP2 response pattern in human lung fibroblasts predicts outcome in lung adenocarcinomas. BMC Med Genomics. 2015;8:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Quayle L, Ottewell PD, Holen I. Bone metastasis: molecular mechanisms implicated in tumour cell dormancy in breast and prostate cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2015;15:469‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Selvaggi G, Scagliotti GV. Management of bone metastases in cancer: a review. Crit Rev Oncol/hematol. 2005;56:365‐378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Sathiakumar N, Delzell E, Yun H, et al. Accuracy of medicare claim‐based algorithm to detect breast, prostate, or lung cancer bone metastases. Med Care. 2017;55:e144‐e149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Popper HH. Progression and metastasis of lung cancer. Cancer Meta Rev. 2016;35:75‐91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Macedo F, Ladeira K, Pinho F, et al. Bone metastases: an overview. Oncol Rev. 2017;11:321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Nakamura ES, Koizumi K, Kobayashi M, et al. RANKL‐induced CCL22/macrophage‐derived chemokine produced from osteoclasts potentially promotes the bone metastasis of lung cancer expressing its receptor CCR4. Clin Exp Metas. 2006;23:9‐18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kuo PL, Liao SH, Hung JY, Huang MS, Hsu YL. MicroRNA‐33a functions as a bone metastasis suppressor in lung cancer by targeting parathyroid hormone related protein. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2013;1830:3756‐3766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wood SL, Pernemalm M, Crosbie PA, Whetton AD. The role of the tumor‐microenvironment in lung cancer‐metastasis and its relationship to potential therapeutic targets. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40:558‐566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Massague J, Obenauf AC. Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature. 2016;529:298‐306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhang XX, Yu XY, Zhao ZG, et al. MicroRNA‐429 inhibits bone metastasis in breast cancer by regulating CrkL and MMP‐9. Bone. 2019;130:115139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ganguly SS, Hostetter G, Tang L, et al. Notch3 promotes prostate cancer‐induced bone lesion development via MMP‐3. Oncogene. 2020;39:204‐218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. An H, Tao N, Li J, et al. Detection of prostate cancer metastasis by whole body magnetic resonance imaging combined with bone scintigraphy and PSA levels. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;40:1052‐1062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Keller ET, Zhang J, Cooper CR, et al. Prostate carcinoma skeletal metastases: cross‐talk between tumor and bone. Cancer Meta Rev. 2001;20:333‐349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Feeley BT, Gamradt SC, Hsu WK, et al. Influence of BMPs on the formation of osteoblastic lesions in metastatic prostate cancer. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:2189‐2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA‐seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15‐21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA‐seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562‐578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, et al. Simple combinations of lineage‐determining transcription factors prime cis‐regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576‐589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N , Weinstein JN, Collisson EA, et al. The cancer genome atlas pan‐cancer analysis project. Nat Genet. 2013;45:1113‐1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bertram JS, Janik P. Establishment of a cloned line of Lewis Lung Carcinoma cells adapted to cell culture. Cancer Lett. 1980;11:63‐73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhu H, Kauffman ME, Trush MA, Jia Z, Li YR. A simple bioluminescence imaging method for studying cancer cell growth and metastasis after subcutaneous injection of lewis lung carcinoma cells in syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. Reactive Oxygen Species. 2018;5:118‐125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wang CH, Zhang SS, Liu J, et al. Secreted pyruvate kinase M2 promotes lung cancer metastasis through activating the integrin Beta1/FAK signaling pathway. Cell Rep. 2020;30(6):1780‐1797.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lu HY, Zu YX, Jiang XW, et al. Novel ADAM‐17 inhibitor ZLDI‐8 inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of chemo‐resistant non‐small‐cell lung cancer by reversing Notch and epithelial mesenchymal transition in vitro and in vivo. Pharmacol Res. 2019;148:104406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Brady JJ, Chuang CH, Greenside PG, et al. An Arntl2‐driven secretome enables lung adenocarcinoma metastatic self‐sufficiency. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:697‐710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Larson SR, Zhang X, Dumpit R, et al. Characterization of osteoblastic and osteolytic proteins in prostate cancer bone metastases. Prostate. 2013;73:932‐940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Colden M, Dar AA, Saini S, et al. MicroRNA‐466 inhibits tumor growth and bone metastasis in prostate cancer by direct regulation of osteogenic transcription factor RUNX2. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large‐scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D109‐D114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Suliman S, Sun Y, Pedersen TO, et al. In vivo host response and degradation of copolymer scaffolds functionalized with nanodiamonds and bone morphogenetic protein 2. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2016;5:730‐742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Su YP, Chen CN, Huang KC, et al. Leptin induces MMP1/13 and ADAMTS 4 expressions through bone morphogenetic protein‐2 autocrine effect in human chondrocytes. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119:3716‐3724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Alexander C, Zuniga E, Blitz IL, et al. Combinatorial roles for BMPs and Endothelin 1 in patterning the dorsal‐ventral axis of the craniofacial skeleton. Development. 2011;138:5135‐5146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Juarez P, Guise TA. TGF‐beta in cancer and bone: implications for treatment of bone metastases. Bone. 2011;48:23‐29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Miyazono K, Maeda S, Imamura T. BMP receptor signaling: transcriptional targets, regulation of signals, and signaling cross‐talk. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:251‐263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wu M, Chen G, Li YP. TGF‐beta and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease. Bone Research. 2016;4:16009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zhang B, Wang J, Liu WR, et al. Cytokeratin 18 knockdown decreases cell migration and increases chemosensitivity in non‐small cell lung cancer. J Cancer Res Clin. 2016;142:2479‐2487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Chen Y, Cui TT, Yang LL, et al. The diagnostic value of cytokeratin 5/6, 14, 17, and 18 expression in human non‐small cell lung cancer. Oncology‐Basel. 2011;80:333‐340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. De Petris L, Branden E, Herrmann R, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic role of plasma levels of two forms of cytokeratin 18 in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:131‐137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Rasanen K, Vaheri A. Activation of fibroblasts in cancer stroma. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:2713‐2722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Xouri G, Christian S. Origin and function of tumor stroma fibroblasts. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21:40‐46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Mundy GR. Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:584‐593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Li LC, Ameri AH, Wang SM, et al. EGR1 regulates angiogenic and osteoclastogenic factors in prostate cancer and promotes metastasis. Oncogene. 2019;38:6241‐6255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Sun SX, Guo HH, Zhang J, Yu B, Sun KN, Jin QH. BMP‐2 and titanium particles synergistically activate osteoclast formation. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2014;47:461‐469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Usui M, Xing L, Drissi H, et al. Murine and chicken chondrocytes regulate osteoclastogenesis by producing RANKL in response to BMP2. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23:314‐325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Labelle M, Begum S, Hynes RO. Direct signaling between platelets and cancer cells induces an epithelial‐mesenchymal‐like transition and promotes metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:576‐590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Oliveira MB, Mello FC, Paschoal ME. The relationship between lung cancer histology and the clinicopathological characteristics of bone metastases. Lung Cancer. 2016;96:19‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Santini D, Barni S, Intagliata S, et al. Natural history of non‐small‐cell lung cancer with bone metastases. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Wei F, Zhou Y, Wang J, Liu C, Xiao Y. The immunomodulatory role of BMP‐2 on macrophages to accelerate osteogenesis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2018;24:584‐594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wang H, Tian L, Liu J, et al. The osteogenic niche is a calcium reservoir of bone micrometastases and confers unexpected therapeutic vulnerability. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(5):823–839.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Croucher PI, McDonald MM, Martin TJ. Bone metastasis: the importance of the neighbourhood. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:373‐386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Esposito M, Guise T, Kang Y. The Biology of Bone Metastasis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018;8(6):a031252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Fu LJ, Pan F, Jiao Y. Crocin inhibits RANKL‐induced osteoclast formation and bone resorption by suppressing NF‐kappa B signaling pathway activation. Immunobiology. 2017;222:597‐603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Coelho RM, Lemos JM, Alho I, et al. Dynamic modeling of bone metastasis, microenvironment and therapy Integrating parathyroid hormone (PTH) effect, anti‐resorptive and anti‐cancer therapy. J Theor Biol. 2016;391:1‐12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Sethi N, Dai XD, Winter CG, Kang YB. Tumor‐derived jagged1 promotes osteolytic bone metastasis of breast cancer by engaging notch signaling in bone cells. Cancer Cell. 2011;19:192‐205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Brunetti G, Belisario DC, Bortolotti S, et al. LIGHT/TNFSF14 promotes osteolytic bone metastases in non‐small cell lung cancer patients. J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35:671‐680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Mancino AT, Klimberg VS, Yamamoto M, Manolagas SC, Abe E. Breast cancer increases osteoclastogenesis by secreting M‐CSF and upregulating RANKL in stromal cells. J Surg Res. 2001;100:18‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ando T, Ichikawa J, Wako M, et al. TWEAK/Fn14 interaction regulates RANTES production, BMP‐2‐induced differentiation, and RANKL expression in mouse osteoblastic MC3T3‐E1 cells. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Kir S, White JP, Kleiner S, et al. Tumour‐derived PTH‐related protein triggers adipose tissue browning and cancer cachexia. Nature. 2014;513:100‐104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Peters S, Meylan E. Targeting receptor activator of nuclear factor‐kappa B as a new therapy for bone metastasis in non‐small cell lung cancer. Curr Opin Oncol. 2013;25:137‐144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. De Castro J, Garcia R, Garrido P, et al. Therapeutic potential of denosumab in patients with lung cancer: beyond prevention of skeletal complications. Clin Lung Cancer. 2015;16:431‐446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Maredziak M, Marycz K, Lewandowski D, Siudzinska A, Smieszek A. Static magnetic field enhances synthesis and secretion of membrane‐derived microvesicles (MVs) rich in VEGF and BMP‐2 in equine adipose‐derived stromal cells (EqASCs)‐a new approach in veterinary regenerative medicine. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Animal. 2015;51:230‐240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Itoh T, Ito Y, Ohtsuki Y, et al. Microvesicles released from hormone‐refractory prostate cancer cells facilitate mouse pre‐osteoblast differentiation. J Mol Histol. 2012;43:509‐515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Guo X, Wang XF. Signaling cross‐talk between TGF‐beta/BMP and other pathways. Cell Res. 2009;19:71‐88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Xiong W, Wang L, Yu FL. Expression of bone morphogenetic protein 6 in non‐small cell lung cancer and its significance. Oncol Lett. 2019;17:1946‐1952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Chen J, Ye L, Xie F, Yang Y, Zhang L, Jiang WG. Expression of bone morphogenetic protein 7 in lung cancer and its biological impact on lung cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:1113‐1120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Kim JS, Kurie JM, Ahn YH. BMP4 depletion by miR‐200 inhibits tumorigenesis and metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Mol Cancer. 2015;14:173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Fang WT, Fan CC, Li SM, et al. Downregulation of a putative tumor suppressor BMP4 by SOX2 promotes growth of lung squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:809‐819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Huang F, Chen YG. Regulation of TGF‐beta receptor activity. Cell Biosci. 2012;2:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author.