Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Sep 28;15(9):e0239739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239739

Grain Fe and Zn contents linked SSR markers based genetic diversity in rice

Qasim Raza 1,*, Awais Riaz 1, Hira Saher 1, Ayesha Bibi 2, Mohsin Ali Raza 3, Syed Sultan Ali 1, Muhammad Sabar 1
Editor: Reyazul Rouf Mir4
PMCID: PMC7521695  PMID: 32986755

Abstract

Rice is critical for sustainable food and nutritional security; however, nominal micronutrient quantities in grains aggravate malnutrition in rice-eating poor populations. In this study, we evaluated genetic diversity in grain iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) contents using trait-linked simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in the representative subset of a large collection of local and exotic rice germplasm. Results demonstrated that aromatic fine grain accessions contained relatively higher Fe and Zn contents in brown rice (BR) than coarse grain accessions and a strong positive correlation between both mineral elements. Genotyping with 24 trait-linked SSR markers identified 21 polymorphic markers, among which 17 demonstrated higher gene diversity and polymorphism information content (PIC) values, strongly indicating that markers used in current research were moderate to highly informative for evaluating the genetic diversity. Population structure, principal coordinate and phylogenetic analyses classified studied rice accessions into two fine grain specific and one fine and coarse grain admixture subpopulations. Single marker analysis recognized four ZnBR and single FeBR significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) contributing 15.41–39.72% in total observed phenotypic variance. Furthermore, high grain Fe and Zn contents linked marker alleles from significant MTAs were also identified. Collectively, these results indicate a wide genetic diversity exist in grain Fe and Zn contents of studied rice accessions and reveal perspective for marker-assisted biofortification breeding.

Introduction

Rice is one of the most consumed food crops globally, especially in developing countries [1]. The world population is increasing at an exponential rate; however, current annual genetic gain in rice production is insufficient to meet future food requirements [2], demanding continuous efforts to breed high yielding and more nutritious rice cultivars. Thus, there is an urgent need to boost global rice production, along with nutritional quality, for sustainable food and nutritional security [3].

Among essential micronutrients, iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) are vital for maintaining a healthy lifestyle in both animals and plants [4, 5]. In humans, the 30% of daily estimated average requirement of Fe and Zn is 13–28 μg/g [6]. However, minimal quantities of both of these micronutrients are found in rice grains [7]. Furthermore, the practice of consuming polished rice grains in Asian populations aggravates malnutrition [8]. During recent past, proper attention has been given to improve rice grain Fe and Zn contents, as wide genetic variability for these essential micronutrients have been reported in natural rice germplasms [914]. Plant breeding based biofortification is the most cheaper and sustainable approach to improve grain micronutrient contents and eradicates malnutrition from rice-eating poor populations [15]. Enormous genetic potential of rice germplasms for grain Fe and Zn contents could be exploited through marker-assisted biofortification breeding for development of micronutrient dense rice cultivars.

Systematic understanding of the extent of genetic variability and genetic relationships among different genotypes are pre-requisites for effective plant breeding programs [16]. Evaluation of genetic diversity in local and exotic germplasms could be helpful in crop improvement and sustainable agriculture development. Generally, due to great diversity in climatic and edaphic factors, rice genotypes of South Asia possess some unique characteristics which are of great interest to the modern rice breeders. Some of these beneficial characteristics include aroma [17], relatively higher grain Fe and Zn contents [18], drought and heat tolerance [19], and high rice production [20, 21]. These unique traits could be exploited through conventional and molecular breeding approaches for the development of more nutritious and resilient high yielding cultivars.

Like other crop plants, several studies have been conducted in rice to evaluate genetic diversity in grain Fe & Zn contents, drought tolerant & susceptible genotypes and local & exotic germplasm using molecular markers [10, 13, 22, 23]. Among various molecular markers, simple sequence repeat (SSR) or microsatellite markers are most widely and preferentially employed for genetic diversity studies. SSRs are cost-effective, easy to score, rapid, reliable and require minimal quantities of DNA [24]. They can efficiently establish genetic relationships due to their extensive distribution across genome, relative polymorphic abundance and co-dominant nature [25, 26]. Although, recent studies have evaluated genetic diversity in diverse rice germplasm using several random and trait linked SSR markers [10, 13]; however, none of these have used grain Fe and Zn contents linked SSR markers. The present study was conducted to assess genetic diversity in the representative subset of a large local and exotic rice germplasm collection using grain Fe and Zn contents linked SSR markers. Furthermore, possible population structure, genotypic relationships and marker-trait associations were also investigated, which could facilitate the conservation and utilization of studied germplasm resources.

Material and methods

Plant materials

A total of 56 genetically diverse Indica and/ or Japonica derived rice accessions, representing a large collection of local and exotic rice germplasm, including landraces, farmer field improved cultivars, advance uniform lines in release pipeline, recombinant/near-isogenic/backcross inbred lines, fine grain, coarse grain, aromatic, non-aromatic and few sequenced genome accessions, originating from three major rice producing countries (Pakistan, China and India) were used in this study (S1 Table in S1 File). The seed of these accessions was obtained from Rice Research Institute, Kala Shah Kaku (RRI, KSK), Pakistan and International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Philippines. All accessions were planted under natural field conditions at the experimental area of RRI, KSK during two cropping seasons 2018 and 2019. The seed obtained from these experiments was used for estimation of Fe and Zn contents.

Estimation of Fe and Zn contents

Brown rice samples were prepared for all accessions using paddy dehusker (Satake, Japan). Fe & Zn contents were estimated by following Estefan et al. [27] wet-digestion method. For this, one gram of sample was chemically digested with 10 ml of nitric acid and perchloric acid mixture (2:1). The mixture was heated in a cold-digestion block until turned colourless or white precipitation occurred. Afterwards, double-distilled deionized water was added for dissolving the crystals and diluting the extract to 50 ml. Finally, extract was filtered through Whatman No. 41/42 filter paper before feeding to atomic absorption spectrophotometer (200 Series AA, Agilent Technologies, USA) for quantification of mineral contents. The analysis was repeated thrice for each accession during two cropping seasons separately and mean values were expressed in parts per million (ppm = μg/g). Pearson correlation between grain Fe and Zn contents was computed using Statistix 8.1 and scatter plot was drawn by setting an intercept value of ‘0’ with Microsoft Excel 2016.

DNA isolation and SSR based genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated by following modified cetyl tri-methyl ammonium bromide method [28] from leaf tissues collected during cropping season 2018. DNA quantity and quality were assessed using Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (ND 2000, Thermo Scientific, USA) and 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis with 1X Tris-borate-EDTA buffer and ethidium bromide staining, respectively. Twenty-four SSR marker primer pairs were selected for genotyping based on their inherent association with grain Fe and Zn contents [29]. The detailed information of all SSR markers is given in S2 Table in S1 File. Series of polymerase chain reactions and 8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were performed to detect SSR fingerprints by following our previously published protocol [30]. Molecular marker size of different alleles was determined using a 20 bp DNA ladder (Fermentas, USA).

Genetic diversity analysis

Genetic diversity statistics generated by each SSR marker were estimated using PowerMarker v3.25 [31] and included number of alleles (Na), major allele frequency (MAF), gene diversity (GD), heterozygosity (Het.) polymorphism information content (PIC) and inbreeding coefficient (f). The possible population genetic structure was drawn using a Bayesian clustering method with STRUCTURE v2.3.6 program [32] after setting the burin-in period and MCMC repeats as 100,00 each. The optimal numbers of subpopulations were determined based on STRUCTURE HARVESTER results [33]. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed using DARwin6.5 program [34]. A phylogenetic tree showing genetic relationships among sampled accessions was constructed with MEGA 7 [35] using pairwise dissimilarity matrix and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) statistical method.

Marker trait associations

Associations between markers and grain Fe and Zn contents were assessed by following quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis with single factor ANOVA procedure in excel (https://passel2.unl.edu/view/media?view=animations). Different marker alleles were compared with Fe and Zn contents and box plots were generated using Microsoft Excel 2016.

Results

Fe and Zn contents in rice grains

To determine Fe and Zn contents, brown rice samples of 56 genetically diverse Indica and/ or Japonica derived rice accessions (S1 Table in S1 File) were processed through a wet-chemical digestion method and the extract was fed to atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Significant genetic variability existed among studied accessions for grain Fe and Zn contents (Fig 1A). Fe contents varied from 5.45 ppm (PK 10967) to 52.30 ppm (Basmati 370), with an average of 20.82 ppm. Similarly, Zn contents ranged from 7.39 ppm (UHL17081) to 76.35 ppm (Super Gold), with an average of 25.12 ppm. Fine grain accessions had relatively higher Fe (21.74 ppm) and Zn (26.08 ppm) contents than coarse grain accessions (Fe 18.88 ppm; Zn 23.09 ppm) (Fig 1B). Nearly, 18% and 23% of the total accessions contained > 30 ppm Fe and Zn densities respectively, and the majority of these had fine grains. Furthermore, significant positive correlation (r = 0.757, p < 0.001) was present between grain Fe and Zn contents (Fig 1C). These results indicate availability of significant genetic variation for further simultaneous improvement of both Fe and Zn contents, especially in fine grain rice accessions.

Fig 1. Grain Fe and Zn contents and correlation in studied rice accessions.

Fig 1

(A) Grain Fe and Zn contents in studied rice accessions. Numbers outside the spider graph indicate serial numbers of the genotypes mentioned in S1 File. (B) Comparison between grain Fe and Zn contents in fine and coarse grain accessions. Each dot in box plots represents individual value. (C) Pearson correlation between Fe and Zn contents.

Genetic diversity among rice accessions

DNA fingerprinting of 56 genetically diverse rice accessions was done using 24 trait linked SSR markers. The agarose gel pictures showing banding patterns of some rice accessions and summary statistics of genetic markers used in this study are presented in Fig 2 and Table 1, respectively. Out of 24 SSR markers, 21 (87.5%) were found to be polymorphic and these generated a total of 82 alleles. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 1 (RM 153, RM 1357 and RM 7414) to 9 (RM 335), with an average of 3.5 alleles per locus. Major allele frequency (MAF) of all genetic markers ranged from 0.2679 (RM 335) to 1.0000 (RM 153, RM 1357 and RM 7414), with a mean of 0.5956. Gene diversity and observed heterozygosity varied from 0.1677–0.8182 and 0.0000–0.1964, respectively. Polymorphism information content (PIC) ranged from 0.1630 (RM 439) to 0.7960 (RM 335), with an average of 0.4663. Similarly, inbreeding coefficient (f) varied from 0.7052 (RM 430) to 1.0000 (RM 319, RM 541, RM 560 and RM 439). The summary of genetic diversity parameters of all SSR markers is presented in Table 1.

Fig 2. DNA banding patterns in some rice accessions.

Fig 2

The 8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis pictures showing DNA banding patterns in some rice accessions generated with SSR marker (A) RM 335 and (B) RM 402. A 20 base pair ladder is presented in the middle of each figure.

Table 1. Summary statistics of genetic diversity parameters among 24 SSR markers used in this study.

Marker NA AR MAF GD HO PIC f
RM 319 2 133–142 0.8393 0.2813 0.0000 0.2610 1.0000
RM 152 2 140–151 0.4821 0.5697 0.0179 0.4752 0.9692
RM 444 3 155–240 0.6250 0.5403 0.0357 0.4843 0.9350
RM 7414 1 94 1.0 - - - -
RM 5607 3 90–107 0.7143 0.4224 0.0179 0.3535 0.9585
RM 211 5 140–190 0.6161 0.5778 0.0714 0.5444 0.8785
RM 335 9 80–160 0.2679 0.8182 0.0536 0.7960 0.9357
RM 273 2 200–207 0.8125 0.3047 0.0893 0.2583 0.7114
RM 303 6 150–200 0.4732 0.6386 0.0179 0.5744 0.9725
RM 153 1 201 1.0 - - - -
RM 430 4 140–173 0.5000 0.5965 0.1786 0.5179 0.7052
RM 437 4 250–280 0.5714 0.5383 0.1071 0.4496 0.8042
RM 31 6 130–160 0.5357 0.6634 0.1607 0.6336 0.7616
RM 190 5 110–130 0.4286 0.7329 0.0357 0.6977 0.9521
RM 402 3 110–140 0.5446 0.6041 0.0893 0.5409 0.8547
RM 541 4 158–185 0.5357 0.6346 0.0000 0.5874 1.0000
RM 501 4 160–200 0.3482 0.6905 0.1964 0.6279 0.7199
RM 560 3 239–260 0.6071 0.5032 0.0000 0.4085 1.0000
RM 234 3 130–156 0.5179 0.5466 0.0714 0.4466 0.8715
RM 1357 1 126 1.0 - - - -
RM 331 3 150–176 0.5714 0.5810 0.0714 0.5176 0.8791
RM 242 2 200–225 0.5536 0.5780 0.1250 0.5036 0.7872
RM 439 3 250–300 0.9107 0.1677 0.0000 0.1630 1.0000
RM 3412 6 200–245 0.2857 0.8042 0.0714 0.7765 0.9127
Mean 3.5 - 0.5956 0.5203 0.0588 0.4663 0.8889
SD ± 1.8 - 0.2051 0.2323 0.0577 0.2183 0.0967

NA; the number of alleles, AR; amplicon range, MAF; major allele frequency, GD; gene diversity, HO.; observed heterozygosity, PIC; polymorphism information content, f; inbreeding coefficient, SD; standard deviation.

Grouping of rice accessions by population structure, principal coordinate and phylogenetic analyses

For estimation of probable genetic organisation of studied rice accessions, STRUCTURE v2.3.4 based population structure analysis was carried out and results were further confirmed by comparing with principal coordinate (PCoA) and phylogenetic analyses. The highest value of ΔK was found at K = 3 (S1 Fig in S1 File), grouping all rice accessions into three distinct subpopulations (SPs), designated here as SP1 (red), SP2 (blue) and SP3 (green) (S2 Fig in S1 File). The PCoA (Fig 3) and UPGMA phylogenetic (Fig 4) analyses also supported population structure results. The SP1 and SP2 harboured 20 and 10 fine grain accessions. Likewise, SP3 also harboured 25 fine and coarse grain accessions. Unexpectedly, one Chinese-originated coarse grain genotype (UHL17078; serial # 51) also clustered with fine grain genotypes of SP2 (Figs 3 and 4), which could be due to more similar DNA banding patterns of this genotype with fine grain accessions than with coarse grain genotypes. In UPGMA phylogenetic tree, more than 72% (16) of the total (22) high grain Fe and Zn rice accessions (containing > 30 ppm) were clustered into SP1 and SP2, whereas less than 28% (6) grouped into SP3 (Fig 4). Collectively, these results strongly indicate that fine grain rice accessions contain relatively higher micronutrient contents as compared with coarse grain accessions.

Fig 3. Principal coordinate analysis of 56 rice accessions.

Fig 3

Fig 4. UPGMA phylogenetic tree showing relationships among 56 rice accessions.

Fig 4

Subpopulations are represented with red (SP1), blue (SP2) and green (SP3) node colours. The scale indicates dissimilarity value among rice accessions. Markers with different colours indicate high Fe and Zn (> 30 ppm; black circle), high Fe and medium Zn (Zn 10–30 ppm; red circle), medium Fe and Zn (10–30 ppm; dark yellow square), medium Fe and high Zn (purple triangle), low Fe and high Zn (Fe < 10 ppm, blue triangle) and low Fe and medium Zn accessions or vice versa. The tree was generated with MEGA7 software.

Associations among markers, their alleles and grain Fe-Zn contents

For testing of genetic associations among 21 polymorphic markers and grain Fe-Zn contents, single-factor ANOVA based single marker analysis was accomplished. Statistically significant genetic associations were observed among four polymorphic markers (RM 152, RM 234, RM 335 and RM 5607) and grain Zn contents (Table 2). Similarly, grain Fe contents showed significant association with RM 501 polymorphic marker. These five significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) accounted for 15.41–39.72% of the total observed phenotypic variance (R2). We also compared different alleles of five significantly associated polymorphic markers with their respective Fe and Zn contents to identify high grain micronutrient linked alleles. For grain Zn contents, 142 bp (43 ppm), 130 bp (58 ppm) and 107 bp (29 ppm) alleles of RM 152, RM 234 and RM 5607 respectively, revealed significantly higher contents than all other respective alleles (Fig 5). Similarly, 80 bp (39 ppm) and 150 bp (41 ppm) alleles of RM 335 showed higher grain Zn contents as compared with all other alleles. Likewise, 200 bp (49 ppm) allele of RM 501 exhibited significantly higher Fe contents than three other respective alleles. Overall, significant MTAs indicate potential application of high micronutrients linked alleles for development of biofortified rice cultivars. In future, it would be interesting to validate these marker results using diverse and large germplasm sets and identify high grain Fe and Zn linked alleles for the advancement of marker-assisted biofortification breeding efforts.

Table 2. Summary statistics of MTA analysis.

Marker p-value R2 (%)
Fe Zn
RM 319 0.2857 0.2551 -
RM 152 0.4061 0.0454* 22.71
RM 444 0.6592 0.9847 -
RM 5607 0.4961 0.0129* 15.41
RM 211 0.5035 0.1494 -
RM 335 0.5435 0.0132* 39.72
RM 273 0.6069 0.2841 -
RM 303 0.6041 0.5620 -
RM 430 0.4049 0.0705 -
RM 437 0.2926 0.3223 -
RM 31 0.6692 0.8720 -
RM 190 0.4660 0.9636 -
RM 402 0.2545 0.1092 -
RM 541 0.6139 0.8183 -
RM 501 0.0093* 0.4732 33.52
RM 560 0.0548 0.3315 -
RM 234 0.2323 0.0056* 21.70
RM 331 0.8934 0.7243 -
RM 242 0.2457 0.2292 -
RM 439 0.0593 0.9578 -
RM 3412 0.1024 0.5883 -

Fig 5. Comparison of significant MTA alleles with grain Fe and Zn contents.

Fig 5

Discussion

Knowledge of genetic variation in grain Fe and Zn contents and genetic relationships between genotypes are crucial for their possible utilization in rice grain quality improvement. Like other crop plants, molecular markers have been proved to be most effective in evaluating genetic diversity, structure analysis and phylogenetic relatedness among rice accessions too [10, 36]. During recent years, SSR markers based genotyping has proven to be very useful for exploring a variety of surreptitious information in plants, ranging from domestication traits to crop improvement through marker-assisted breeding [3740]. Although, individual reports on micronutrient density and SSR based genetic diversity in rice have been recently published [10, 12, 13, 36, 41], however, to date, a combined study of grain Fe and Zn contents and trait linked SSR markers based genetic diversity is obscure.

In this study, we assessed genetic diversity in the representative subset of a large collection of local and exotic rice germplasm for grain Fe and Zn contents using trait linked SSR markers. Grain mineral and protein contents change with a change in edaphic factors and genotype x environment interactions [42]. Therefore, pooled grain Fe and Zn data of two years is more reliable than single-year data. Significant genetic variation was observed among 56 studied rice accessions for Fe and Zn contents in brown rice (Fig 1A). Sing and Sing [13] observed wide genetic diversity in dehusked rice seeds for Fe (11.42–252.62 μg/g) and Zn (17.98–75.8 μg/g) contents. Similarly, Bollinedi et al. [36] also reported significant genetic variation in Fe and Zn contents of brown and milled rice samples. These reports support results presented in this study. The Fe and Zn contents in unpolished grains of fine/aromatic rice accessions were relatively higher than coarse grain accessions (Fig 1B). Gregorio et al. [43] and Verma and Srivastav [44] also reported higher Fe and Zn contents in aromatic rice cultivars than non-aromatic cultivars. Significant positive correlation was present between Fe and Zn contents (Fig 1C). Several other studies have also reported a positive association between these two mineral contents [10, 36, 45, 46], which could be explained by co-localization of Fe and Zn responsive QTLs/genes [29] and possible pleotropic effects of metal transporter proteins encoding genes. Overall, these results indicate the prevalence of wide genetic variability in studied rice accessions for grain Fe and Zn contents and possibility of their simultaneous improvement. However, mineral densities in polished or white rice need to be assessed before utilizing these accessions in rice biofortification breeding programs, as loss of significant quantities of both micronutrients have been reported during the polishing process [12, 36, 47].

The studied rice accessions contain considerable genetic diversity as revealed by grain Fe and Zn contents linked SSR markers (Table 1). More than 87% of the total markers used in this study were found polymorphic. The 3.5 average numbers of alleles per locus were comparable with 2.44 and 3.96 previously reported by Pradhan et al. [10] and Upadhyay et al. [48], respectively. However, it was lower than that reported by Singh et al. [13] (6.77 alleles per locus). Yadav et al. [49] reported higher genetic diversity and PIC values in some Indian rice germplasm using trait linked SSR markers. In this study, nearly 70% (17) markers had greater than 0.4085 gene diversity and PIC values, strongly indicating that majority of the markers used in current research are moderate to highly informative for evaluating genetic diversity [50]. These results are further supported by higher inbreeding coefficient values (range; 0.7052–1.0000) (Table 1).

Genetic relationships among fine and coarse grain accessions were assessed through population structure, principal coordinate (PCoA) and phylogenetic analyses. Structure analysis classified studied 56 rice accessions into three (highest ΔK value at K = 3) distinct sub-populations (red, SP1; blue, SP2; green, SP3) (S1 and S2 Figs in S1 File). Similar clustering patterns were revealed by PCoA (Fig 3) and phylogenetic (Fig 4) analyses. Pradhan et al. [10] also clustered a panel population of 102 diverse rice accessions into three subpopulations (SPs). Based upon marker data, the SP1 and SP2 are seems to be fine or aromatic grain specific, except for a Chinese originated coarse grain accession UHL17078. Whereas, SP3 harboured admixture of both fine and coarse grain accessions. These results suggest that trait linked markers used in this study might be also good for genetic differentiation between fine and coarse grain genotypes. Moreover, the majority of the high grain Fe and Zn accessions (containing > 30 ppm) were grouped into SP1 and SP2 (Fig 4), strongly supporting “micronutrients enriched aromatic grain” hypothesis. Previous reports also support our new hypothesis [18, 43, 44]. Although, studies involving F2-derived populations demonstrated no pleiotropic effect of aroma on grain Fe and Zn contents, however, aroma trait may be used for screening of high grain Fe and Zn contents rice germplasm [18]. In future, it would be interesting to investigate comparative micronutrient densities in aromatic and non-aromatic rice accessions along with complex underlying genetic and molecular mechanisms.

Marker-trait associations (MTAs) offer clues about the existence of trait linked QTLs/genes in diverse genetic backgrounds. In marker-assisted breeding programs, a strong MTA is preferred over weak MTA to meritoriously exploit that particular marker for trait improvement [51]. In this research, single-marker analysis exhibited significant (P < 0.05) associations among grain Zn contents and RM 152, RM 234, RM 335 and RM 5607 (Table 2). Whereas, only single marker RM 501 could be significantly associated with grain Fe contents. Their higher phenotypic variance values indicate that they control a considerable amount of genetic variation in grain mineral contents and could be reliable genetic markers for further improvement of Fe and Zn contents in rice grains. All these markers have been variably reported to be linked with grain micronutrients contents [10, 29, 5255].

The co-dominance nature of SSR markers makes them ideal candidates for segregation analysis in large population sets [24, 41, 56]. Different alleles of the same polymorphic marker show variable effects on genetic variation of linked traits [57]. This fact prompted us to compare grain Fe and Zn contents with different alleles of significantly associated polymorphic markers. For grain Zn contents, single alleles of RM 152 (142 bp), RM 234 (130 bp) and RM 5607 (107 bp) and two duplicated alleles of RM 335 (80 bp and 150 bp) demonstrated relatively higher contents than their all other respective alleles (Fig 5). Similarly, significantly higher grain Fe contents were observed in 200 bp allele containing rice accessions, which were genotyped with RM 501. Our results suggest that these alleles could be used for screening of high grain Fe and Zn containing rice germplasm and marker-assisted development of biofortified rice cultivars. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on comparison of SSR marker alleles with grain micronutrient contents in rice. Therefore, these results should be validated using large and diverse germplasm sets before practical application in marker-assisted biofortification breeding in rice.

Conclusions

Rice is one of the major crops for sustainable food and nutritional security. However, trace micronutrients quantities in grains aggregate malnutrition in rice-eating poor populations. Plant breeding based biofortification of edible plant parts can help in eradicating micronutrient deficiencies. In this study, we found wide genetic variation in grain Fe and Zn contents of genetically diverse rice accessions representing a large collection of local and exotic rice germplasm. Significant positive correlation was observed between Fe and Zn contents in unpolished grains, indicating possibility for simultaneous improvement of both mineral elements. Genotyping results revealed that markers used in current research were not only informative for genetic diversity study but can also be employed for genetic differentiation between fine and coarse grain rice accessions. Moreover, population structure, PCoA and phylogenetic analyses clustered studied rice accessions into fine and fine/coarse grain admixture subpopulations. Furthermore, significant marker-trait associations and high grain Fe and Zn contents linked marker alleles were also recognized, which could be exploited through marker-assisted breeding for development of biofortified rice cultivars. However, these results require validation using large and diverse germplasm sets before successful application in marker-assisted biofortification breeding.

Supporting information

S1 File

(RAR)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was financially supported by Punjab Agricultural Research Board Pakistan under a competitive research project grant number PARB 904 to Muhammad Sabar. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Khush GS. What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant molecular biology. 2005;59(1):1–6. 10.1007/s11103-005-2159-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pradhan P, Fischer G, van Velthuizen H, Reusser DE, Kropp JP. Closing yield gaps: How sustainable can we be? PloS one. 2015;10(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tripathy S, Dash M, Behera S. Nutrient rich quality rice-a journey to healthy life. Adv Plants Agric Res. 2017;7(5):364–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salgueiro MJ, Zubillaga MB, Lysionek AE, Caro RA, Weill R, Boccio JR. The role of zinc in the growth and development of children. Nutrition. 2002;18(6):510–9. 10.1016/s0899-9007(01)00812-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tripathi DK, Singh S, Singh S, Mishra S, Chauhan D, Dubey N. Micronutrients and their diverse role in agricultural crops: advances and future prospective. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2015;37(7):139. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bouis HE, Hotz C, McClafferty B, Meenakshi J, Pfeiffer WH. Biofortification: a new tool to reduce micronutrient malnutrition. Food and nutrition bulletin. 2011;32(1_suppl1):S31–S40. 10.1177/15648265110321S105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saleh AS, Wang P, Wang N, Yang L, Xiao Z. Brown Rice Versus White Rice: Nutritional Quality, Potential Health Benefits, Development of Food Products, and Preservation Technologies. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2019;18(4):1070–96. 10.1111/1541-4337.12449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shi Z, El-Obeid T, Li M, Xu X, Liu J. Iron-related dietary pattern increases the risk of poor cognition. Nutrition journal. 2019;18(1):48 10.1186/s12937-019-0476-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brar B, Jain S, Singh R, Jain R. Genetic diversity for iron and zinc contents in a collection of 220 rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 2011;71(1):67. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pradhan S, Pandit E, Pawar S, Naveenkumar R, Barik S, Mohanty S, et al. Linkage disequilibrium mapping for grain Fe and Zn enhancing QTLs useful for nutrient dense rice breeding. BMC plant biology. 2020;20(1):57 10.1186/s12870-020-2262-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rao DS, Babu PM, Swarnalatha P, Kota S, Bhadana V, Varaprasad G, et al. Assessment of grain zinc and iron variability in rice germplasm using Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrophotometer. J Rice Res. 2014;7(1):45–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Raza Q, Saher H, Shahzadi F, Riaz A, Bibi T, Sabar M. Genetic diversity in traditional genotypes for grain iron, zinc and beta-carotene contents reveale potential for breeding micronutrient dense rice. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences. 2019;7(2):194–203. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Singh SP, Singh YT. Rice of Northeast India harbor rich genetic diversity as measured by SSR markers and Zn/Fe content. BMC genetics. 2019;20(1):79 10.1186/s12863-019-0780-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Swamy BM, Rahman MA, Inabangan-Asilo MA, Amparado A, Manito C, Chadha-Mohanty P, et al. Advances in breeding for high grain zinc in rice. Rice. 2016;9(1):49 10.1186/s12284-016-0122-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bouis HE, Welch RM. Biofortification—a sustainable agricultural strategy for reducing micronutrient malnutrition in the global south. Crop Science. 2010;50(Supplement_1):S-20–S-32. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Singh N, Choudhury DR, Tiwari G, Singh AK, Kumar S, Srinivasan K, et al. Genetic diversity trend in Indian rice varieties: an analysis using SSR markers. BMC genetics. 2016;17(1):127 10.1186/s12863-016-0437-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Civáň P, Ali S, Batista-Navarro R, Drosou K, Ihejieto C, Chakraborty D, et al. Origin of the Aromatic group of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) traced to the Indian subcontinent. Genome biology and evolution. 2019;11(3):832–43. 10.1093/gbe/evz039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gregorio GB. Progress in breeding for trace minerals in staple crops. The Journal of nutrition. 2002;132(3):500S–2S. 10.1093/jn/132.3.500S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lawas LMF, Li X, Erban A, Kopka J, Jagadish SK, Zuther E, et al. Metabolic responses of rice cultivars with different tolerance to combined drought and heat stress under field conditions. GigaScience. 2019;8(5):giz050 10.1093/gigascience/giz050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mutert E, Fairhurst T. Developments in rice production in Southeast Asia. Better Crops International. 2002;15(Suppl):12–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reeves T, Thomas G, Ramsay G. Save and grow in practice: maize, rice, wheat—a guide to sustainable cereal production. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. 2016.
  • 22.Donde R, Kumar J, Gouda G, Gupta MK, Mukherjee M, Baksh SY, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity of drought tolerant and susceptible rice genotypes using microsatellite markers. Rice Science. 2019;26(4):239–47. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pathaichindachote W, Panyawut N, Sikaewtung K, Patarapuwadol S, Muangprom A. Genetic Diversity and Allelic Frequency of Selected Thai and Exotic Rice Germplasm Using SSR Markers. Rice Science. 2019;26(6):393–403. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gupta PK, Varshney R. The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica. 2000;113(3):163–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hoshino AA, Bravo JP, Nobile PM, Morelli KA. Microsatellites as tools for genetic diversity analysis. Genetic diversity in microorganisms: InTechOpen; 2012.
  • 26.Mondini L, Noorani A, Pagnotta MA. Assessing plant genetic diversity by molecular tools. Diversity. 2009;1(1):19–35. 10.3390/d1010019 22402990 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Estefan G, Sommer R, Ryan J. Methods of soil, plant, and water analysis. A manual for the West Asia and North Africa region. 2013;3. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bulletin. 1987;19:11–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Raza Q, Riaz A, Sabar M, Atif RM, Bashir K. Meta-analysis of grain iron and zinc associated QTLs identified hotspot chromosomal regions and positional candidate genes for breeding biofortified rice. Plant Science. 2019;288:110214 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sabar M, Akhter M, Bibi T, Riaz A, Haider Z, Khan AR, et al. Basmati rice lines development carrying multiple bacterial blight resistance genes pyramided using the marker-assisted backcross breeding approach. Molecular Breeding. 2019;39(11):155. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu K, Muse SV. PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(9):2128–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155(2):945–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Earl DA. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation genetics resources. 2012;4(2):359–61. 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Perrier X, JP J-C. DARwin software Available at 2006. http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin.
  • 35.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular biology and evolution. 2013;30(12):2725–9. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bollinedi H, Yadav AK, Vinod KK, Gopala Krishnan S, Bhowmick PK, Nagarajan M, et al. Genome-wide association study reveals novel marker trait associations governing the localization of Fe and Zn in the rice grain. Frontiers in genetics. 2020;11:213 10.3389/fgene.2020.00213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bohra A, Jha R, Pandey G, Patil PG, Saxena RK, Singh IP, et al. New hypervariable SSR markers for diversity analysis, hybrid purity testing and trait mapping in Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. Frontiers in plant science. 2017;8:377 10.3389/fpls.2017.00377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fang N, Wei X, Shen L, Yu Y, Li M, Yin C, et al. Fine mapping of a panicle blast resistance gene Pb-bd1 in Japonica landrace Bodao and its application in rice breeding. Rice. 2019;12(1):18 10.1186/s12284-019-0275-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Miah G, Rafii MY, Ismail MR, Puteh AB, Rahim HA, Islam K, et al. A review of microsatellite markers and their applications in rice breeding programs to improve blast disease resistance. International journal of molecular sciences. 2013;14(11):22499–528. 10.3390/ijms141122499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yu X, Ren S, Zhao L, Guo J, Bao Y, Ma Y, et al. Molecular mapping of a novel wheat powdery mildew resistance gene Ml92145E8-9 and its application in wheat breeding by marker-assisted selection. The Crop Journal. 2018;6(6):621–7. 10.1016/j.cj.2018.04.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wattoo JI, Liaqat S, Mubeen H, Ashfaq M, Shahid MN, Farooq A, et al. Genetic Mapping of Grain Nutritional Profile in Rice using Basmati Derived Segregating Population Revealed by SSRs. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY. 2019;21(5):929–35. 10.17957/IJAB/15.0977 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhong M, WANG L-q, YUAN D-j, LUO L-j, XU C-g, HE Y-q. Identification of QTL affecting protein and amino acid contents in rice. Rice Science. 2011;18(3):187–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gregorio G, Senadhira D, Htut T. Improving iron and zinc value of rice for human nutrition. 1999.
  • 44.Verma DK, Srivastav PP. Proximate composition, mineral content and fatty acids analyses of aromatic and non-aromatic Indian rice. Rice Science. 2017;24(1):21–31. 10.1016/j.rsci.2016.05.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Çakmak İ, Torun A, Millet E, Feldman M, Fahima T, Korol A, et al. Triticum dicoccoides: an important genetic resource for increasing zinc and iron concentration in modern cultivated wheat. Soil science and plant nutrition. 2004;50(7):1047–54. 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408573 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Morgounov A, Gómez-Becerra HF, Abugalieva A, Dzhunusova M, Yessimbekova M, Muminjanov H, et al. Iron and zinc grain density in common wheat grown in Central Asia. Euphytica. 2007;155(1–2):193–203. 10.1007/s10681-006-9321-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Paiva FF, Vanier NL, Berrios JDJ, Pinto VZ, Wood D, Williams T, et al. Polishing and parboiling effect on the nutritional and technological properties of pigmented rice. Food chemistry. 2016;191:105–12. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Upadhyay P, Neeraja C, Kole C, Singh VK. Population structure and genetic diversity in popular rice varieties of India as evidenced from SSR analysis. Biochemical Genetics. 2012;50(9–10):770–83. 10.1007/s10528-012-9519-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yadav S, Singh A, Singh M, Goel N, Vinod K, Mohapatra T, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity in Indian rice germplasm (Oryza sativa L.): use of random versus trait-linked microsatellite markers. Journal of genetics. 2013;92(3):545–57. 10.1007/s12041-013-0312-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Freeg H, Anis G, Abo-Shousha A, El-Banna A, El-Sabagh A. Genetic diversity among some rice genotypes with different drought tolerance based on SSR markers. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova. 2016;49(3):39–50. 10.1038/s41598-019-52884-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Breseghello F, Sorrells ME. Association analysis as a strategy for improvement of quantitative traits in plants. Crop Science. 2006;46(3):1323–30. 10.2135/cropsci2005.09-0305 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Anuradha K, Agarwal S, Rao YV, Rao K, Viraktamath B, Sarla N. Mapping QTLs and candidate genes for iron and zinc concentrations in unpolished rice of Madhukar× Swarna RILs. Gene. 2012;508(2):233–40. 10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Garcia‐Oliveira AL, Tan L, Fu Y, Sun C. Genetic identification of quantitative trait loci for contents of mineral nutrients in rice grain. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2009;51(1):84–92. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00730.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jin T, Chen J, Zhu L, Zhao Y, Guo J, Huang Y. Comparative mapping combined with homology-based cloning of the rice genome reveals candidate genes for grain zinc and iron concentration in maize. BMC genetics. 2015;16(1):17 10.1186/s12863-015-0176-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lu K, Li L, Zheng X, Zhang Z, Mou T, Hu Z. Quantitative trait loci controlling Cu, Ca, Zn, Mn and Fe content in rice grains. Journal of genetics. 2008;87(3):305 10.1007/s12041-008-0049-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Guo Y, Wu Y, Anderson JA, Moss JQ, Zhu L. Disomic inheritance and segregation distortion of SSR markers in two populations of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. var. dactylon. PloS one. 2015;10(8). 10.1371/journal.pone.0136332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nauta MJ, Weissing FJ. Constraints on allele size at microsatellite loci: implications for genetic differentiation. Genetics. 1996;143(2):1021–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Reyazul Rouf Mir

24 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-17969

Grain Fe and Zn contents linked SSR markers based genetic diversity reveal perspective for marker assisted biofortification breeding in rice

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Raza,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

The manuscript has scope for publication but reviewer#2 raised some valid questions about the sample size used during the present study. You are therefore requested to revise the manuscript as per suggestions made by both the reviewers and resubmit the manuscript to PLOS ONE

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by %August 20, 2020%. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Reyazul Rouf Mir, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.

PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The manuscript was reviewed by two reviewers. While both reviewers DISCOVERED scope in this work and made some useful suggestions for the improvement of this manuscript, I am PARTICULARLY worried for reviewer # 2 comments where the reviewer suggested less number of genotypes have been used in this study. I am wondering whether authors can use additional genotypes in the study or can they explain in detail if the genotypes used by them in the present study are diverse and represent genetic diversity available in large collection of germplasm. I therefore advise authors to revise the manuscript carefully and address all comments by both the reviewers before re-submission to PLOS ONE.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Title of the manuscript is too long and there is the scope to cut it short

The manuscript has some typing errors and grammatical mistakes. Kindly ensure the correction.

The authors may clarify whether the markers used are sufficient to evaluate the genetic/genomic diversity. Moreover, are these markers distributed throughout the genome or they are located only at certain regions.

In discussion section, simply by saying our findings are in accordance with that of previous workers is not sufficient. Some elaboration of the work of previous researchers need to be carried out.

Conclusion is the weakest section of the manuscript and need to be rewritten

Reviewer #2: In the research article entitled “Grain Fe and Zn contents linked SSR markers based genetic diversity reveal perspective for marker assisted bio-fortification breeding in rice”, authors have studied genetic diversity of 56 indica rice genotypes (both fine and coarse grain type) using 24 previously reported SSR markers linked to Fe and Zn content of rice, estimated Fe & Zn content in two cropping seasons.

I present here some of my observations

� Abstract needs revision and clarity.

� Did authors use known standard check for Fe & Zn estimation, what is the status of polished rice Fe and Zn content of 56 genotypes?

� I think only 56 genotypes for diversity, population structure and phylogenetic analysis is very less number

� Line No: 62 resent to recent

� Line No: 73,124 indica to indica

� Line No 50: The sentence “Rice genotypes of South Asia possess some unique

characteristics which are of great interest to the modern rice breeders” It is a very general statement and authors have listed abiotic stresses like heat and drought tolerance as unique characters. It requires more clarity or detailed explanation.

� Line No 56:

Like other crop plants, several studies have been conducted in rice to evaluate genetic diversity using molecular markers [10, 13, 22, 23]. Specific trait - Fe and Zn genetic diversity is missed in the above sentence.

� Language has scope for further improvement

� Is there any earlier reports available for coarse grains having less Fe & Zn than fine grains may be presented.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr Showkat A Waza, Assistant Professor/ Scientist

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-17969_reviewer.pdf

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 28;15(9):e0239739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239739.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Aug 2020

Editor Comments: The manuscript was reviewed by two reviewers. While both reviewers DISCOVERED scope in this work and made some useful suggestions for the improvement of this manuscript, I am PARTICULARLY worried for reviewer # 2 comments where the reviewer suggested less number of genotypes have been used in this study. I am wondering whether authors can use additional genotypes in the study or can they explain in detail if the genotypes used by them in the present study are diverse and represent genetic diversity available in large collection of germplasm. I therefore advise authors to revise the manuscript carefully and address all comments by both the reviewers before re-submission to PLOS ONE.

Response: Thank you and both reviewers for detailed comments and suggestions. The genotypes used in this study were derived from two major rice groups (Indica and Japonica) and originated from three major rice producing countries (China, India and Pakistan). These included landraces, farmer field improved cultivars, advance uniform lines in release pipeline, recombinant/near-isogenic/backcross inbred lines, fine grain, coarse grain, aromatic, non-aromatic and few sequenced genome accessions. Although, the number of genotypes seems to be less, however these are genetically diverse and representative of a large collection of local and exotic rice germplasm. That’s why we think their numbers are sufficient for carrying out genetic diversity study.

Reviewer 1

Comment 1: Title of the manuscript is too long and there is the scope to cut it short.

Response: Title has been changed to “Grain Fe and Zn contents linked SSR markers based genetic diversity in rice”. Line 1–2 in final manuscript.

Comment 2: The manuscript has some typing errors and grammatical mistakes. Kindly ensure the correction.

Response: Thanks for highlighting the issues. Typing errors and grammatical mistakes were corrected in revised manuscript.

Comment 3: The authors may clarify whether the markers used are sufficient to evaluate the genetic/genomic diversity. Moreover, are these markers distributed throughout the genome or they are located only at certain regions.

Response: Markers used in current research were taken from our previous study (Raza et al. 2019, Plant Science), in which we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis on all grain Fe and Zn contents associated QTLs (reported upto May, 2019) and identified meta-QTLs and candidate genes for breeding of biofortified rice. Although, we selected moderate number of randomly distributed markers across the genome, nevertheless these were trait-specific and demonstrated higher gene diversity and polymorphism information content values, strongly indicating that these were moderate to highly informative for evaluating the genetic diversity.

Comment 4: In discussion section, simply by saying our findings are in accordance with that of previous workers is not sufficient. Some elaboration of the work of previous researchers needs to be carried out.

Response: In revised manuscript, we have incorporated suggested changes which provide elaboration of previous related works. Line 241–244 & 249–251 in final manuscript.

Comment 5: Conclusion is the weakest section of the manuscript and need to be rewritten.

Response: This section was improved in the revised manuscript and conclusions were drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Line 311–326 in final manuscript.

Reviewer 2

Comment 1: Abstract needs revision and clarity.

Response: Abstract has been revised for more clarity. Line 15–32 in final manuscript.

Comment 2: Did authors use known standard check for Fe & Zn estimation, what is the status of polished rice Fe and Zn content of 56 genotypes?

Response: No, sorry we could not afford the price of lab grade standard check material for Fe & Zn estimation. However, for quality control we repeated the analyses thrice separately for Fe & Zn over the two seasons and considered mean values for final analysis. Additionally, few landraces (Basmati 370), Basmati 198, Basmati Pak) and commercial check varieties (Super Basmati, Basmati 515, PK 1121 Aromatic) were also included in studied material for quality comparison.

Results of polished rice Fe and Zn contents are not available; however it is reasonable to assume that genotypes with higher Fe and Zn contents in brown rice might also have adequate contents in polished rice.

Comment 3: I think only 56 genotypes for diversity, population structure and phylogenetic analysis is very less number.

Response: The 56 genotypes used in this study were derived from two major rice groups (Indica and Japonica) and originated from three major rice producing countries (China, India and Pakistan). These included landraces (Basmati 370, Basmati Pak, Basmati 198), farmer field improved cultivars (Basmati 515, Kissan Basmati, Super Basmati 2019), advance uniform lines (PK10683, PK9194, PK10029), recombinant inbred lines (PK10355, PK9533, PK10161), near-isogenic/backcross inbred lines (PKBB15-1, PKBB15-6, PKBB15-116), fine grain (Basmati 385, Super Basmati, PKPB8), coarse grain (SR OP BLB, Madhukar, Teqing), aromatic (Basmati 2000, PK 1121 Aromatic, RRI 3), non-aromatic (PK 386, UHL17019, UHL17067) and few sequenced genome accessions (Basmati 370, Zhenshan 97B, N22). Although, the number of genotypes seems to be less, however these are genetically diverse and representative of a large collection of local and exotic rice germplasm, which we think are sufficient for carrying out genetic diversity, population structure and phylogenetic analyses.

Comment 4: Line No: 62 resent to recent.

Response: Spelling mistake corrected in revised manuscript. Line 72 in final manuscript.

Comment 5: Line No: 73,124 indica to indica.

Response: Suggested changes have been incorporated in revised manuscript. Line 82 & 134 in final manuscript.

Comment 6: Line No 50: The sentence “Rice genotypes of South Asia possess some unique characteristics which are of great interest to the modern rice breeders” It is a very general statement and authors have listed abiotic stresses like heat and drought tolerance as unique characters. It requires more clarity or detailed explanation.

Response: For clarity, the sentence has been revised and now it states “Generally, due to great diversity in climatic and edaphic factors, rice genotypes of South Asia possess some unique characteristics which are of great interest to the modern rice breeders”. Line 58–60 in final manuscript.

Comment 7: Line No 56: Like other crop plants, several studies have been conducted in rice to evaluate genetic diversity using molecular markers [10, 13, 22, 23]. Specific trait - Fe and Zn genetic diversity is missed in the above sentence.

Response: Trait-specific genetic diversity information has been added and the revised sentence states “Like other crop plants, several studies have been conducted in rice to evaluate genetic diversity in grain Fe & Zn contents, drought tolerant & susceptible genotypes and local & exotic germplasm using molecular markers [10, 13, 22, 23]”. Line 65–67 in final manuscript.

Comment 8: Language has scope for further improvement.

Response: We have tried our best to improve the language in revised manuscript.

Comment 9: Is there any earlier reports available for coarse grains having less Fe & Zn than fine grains may be presented.

Response: Yes, Gregorio et al. (1999) and Verma and Srivastav (2017) have previously reported higher Fe and Zn contents in aromatic rice cultivars than non-aromatic cultivars. As majority of the aromatic/basmati cultivars are in fine grain background, it is reasonable to expect that aromatic/fine grain cultivars possess higher Fe & Zn contents than non-aromatic/coarse grain cultivars. Line 246–248 in final manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Reyazul Rouf Mir

14 Sep 2020

Grain Fe and Zn contents linked SSR markers based genetic diversity in rice

PONE-D-20-17969R1

Dear Dr. Raza,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Reyazul Rouf Mir, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The comments raised have been addressed by authors. The manuscript is now in a good shape and should be accepted for publication.

Reviewer #2: In the presented study, though less number of genotypes have been utilized, seems to be genetically diverse origin,hence may be considered for publication

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Reyazul Rouf Mir

16 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-17969R1

Grain Fe and Zn contents linked SSR markers based genetic diversity in rice

Dear Dr. Raza:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Reyazul Rouf Mir

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File

    (RAR)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-17969_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES