Skip to main content
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2020 Aug 25;13(8):1679–1684. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1679-1684

Isolation and characterization of Clostridium perfringens strains isolated from ostriches (Struthio camelus) in Vietnam

Tham Thi Nguyen 1, Hung Vu-Khac 2, Tan Duc Nguyen 1
PMCID: PMC7522951  PMID: 33061245

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Clostridium perfringens can cause enteritis in ostriches. The toxin release is believed to play a major role in determining pathogenesis properties of these pathogenic bacteria. This study was conducted to isolate and characterize C. perfringens strains from ostriches in Vietnam for identifying if particular virulence factors of these pathogenic bacteria are associated with enteritis progress in ostriches.

Materials and Methods:

The prevalence of cpa, cpb, iA, etx, cpe, and cpb2 genes among C. perfringens isolates was determined by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. The NetB toxin-encoding gene was detected by PCR and then sequenced to observe their variation. The expression of NetB toxin was checked by SDS-PAGE.

Results:

A total of 116 C. perfringens isolates were obtained from 318 fecal samples and 105 intestinal organs. Of 80 isolates from fecal samples, 33 isolates were from healthy and 47 isolates were from diseased ostriches. The results of multiplex PCR showed that all 116 C. perfringens strains from healthy and enteric disordered ostriches were positive for the alpha toxin-encoding gene (cpa). The cpe and cpb2 genes were found in only one and five diseased ostriches, respectively. The netB gene was detected in 1/33 (3.03%) C. perfringens isolates from healthy ostriches, in 8/47 (17.05%) isolates from feces, and in 7/36 (19.44%) intestinal contents of diseased ostriches. The full-length sequences of 5 out of 15 netB-positive isolates from diseased ostriches showed 100% identity to each other as well as to the netB sequences available in GenBank. All of these five isolates produced NetB toxin in vitro.

Conclusion:

Type A is the most prevalent among C. perfringens isolates from ostriches in Vietnam. Especially, the study provides data emphasizing the role of NetB toxin in causing necrotic enteritis by C. perfringens in ostriches.

Keywords: Clostridium perfringens, multiplex polymerase chain reaction, ostriches, toxin genes

Introduction

Clostridium perfringens can cause enteritis in ostrich chicks [1,2]. The bacterium is a normal inhabitant of the gut, and predisposing stress factors such as change of diet are thought to lead to its proliferation leading to the disease condition [2]. C. perfringens strains were previously classified into five specific toxinotypes (A-E) [3-5]. However, in a recent study, they have been proposed for seven toxinotypes (A-G) dependent on which major toxins (α - cpa, β - cpb, ε - etx, ι - iap, CPE - cpe, and NetB - netB) they produced [5,6]. The release of these toxins is believed to play a major role in determining pathogenesis properties of C. perfringens [4,7]. The role of other toxins produced by C. perfringens, such as enterotoxin and beta2 toxin, in causing enteritis is considered to be less significant [7,8], whereas the NetB toxin has been implicated as the major contributing factor to enteritis in chickens although other complementary factors may still exist [8-11].

In Vietnam, raising ostriches have been started since 1995, the ostrich breeding was imported from Zimbabwe and Australia [10]. According to data from General Statistics Office of Vietnam, in 2018, there were 56 provinces and cities situated in Vietnam involved in ostrich farming, providing 4660.1 million ostriches to slaughters. The symptoms of enteritis have been reported in ostrich farms in Vietnam; however, there is no report on the prevalence of C. perfringens in ostrich farms and hence no molecular characterization of this bird-derived isolates.

The present study investigated the prevalence of C. perfringens among ostriches raised in Vietnam. Toxinotypes and NetB production of the isolated C. perfringens were characterized to understand their potential pathogenic properties.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

The approval from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee to carry out this study was not required as no invasive technique was used.

Study period and location

The study was conducted from January 2016 to January 2019. We collected fecal and intestinal samples from ostrich farms located at Quang Binh, Quang Nam and Khanh Hoa provinces of Vietnam. The samples were transported on ice to the Department of Technology and Development Product, Institute of Veterinary Research and Development of Central Vietnam for testing.

Sample collection and C. perfringens strains

A total of 318 fecal samples (158 from healthy and 160 from suspected necrotic enteritis [NE] ostriches which showed anorexia, ruffled feathers, depression, diarrhea, and listlessness) and 105 intestinal organs (small intestine, colon, and cecum) with typical lesions (thin intestinal wall, filled with gas, confluent mucosal necrosis of the small intestine, and depressed ulcers in the mucosal surface) were collected. The fecal samples were streaked onto blood agar plates containing 7% sheep blood agar and incubated in an anaerobic chamber at 37°C for 48 h. Colonies which showed dual hemolytic zones were picked and subcultured in Tryptose Sulfite Cycloserine agar (TSC agar, Oxoid, Merck) for purification and were grown in fluid thioglycollate (FTG, Merck) for toxin production. For the intestinal organs, samples were taken by scrubbing the intestinal inner wall of affected ostriches with cotton swabs then processed in the same way as fecal samples. The identity of the isolates was confirmed by their colonial and microscopical morphology, hemolytic pattern, Gram staining, and biochemical tests as previously described [12]. Each C. perfringens isolate from one ostrich was selected for further study.

Determination of toxin-encoding genes of C. perfringens isolates

The multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reactions detecting cpa, cpb, iA, etx, cpe, and cpb2 genes were performed as described by Songer and Bueschel [13]. The PCR reaction for netB detection was carried out as described by Keyburn et al. [10]. All primers applied in this study are listed in Table-1 [11,14,15].

Table-1.

Primers applied in polymerase chain reactions detecting Clostridium perfringens toxin genes.

Toxin Primer Nucleotide sequence Amplicon size (bp) References
α-Toxin Cpa-F GCTAATGTTACTGCCGTTGA 324 [14]
Cpa-R CCTCTGATACATCGTGTAAG
β-Toxin Cpb-F GCGAATATGCTGAATCATCTA 196
Cpb-R GCAGGAACATTAGTATATCTTC
ε-Toxin etx-F GCGGTGATATCCATCTATTC 655
etx-R CCACTTACTTGTCCTACTAAC
ι-Toxin iA-F ACTACTCTCAGACAAGACAG 446
iA-R CTTTCCTTCTATTACTATACG
Cpe Cpe-F GGAGATGGTTGGATATTAGG 233
Cpe-R GGACCAGCAGTTGTAGATA
Cpb2 Cpb2-F AGATTTTAAATATGATCCTAACC 567
Cpb2-R CAATACCCTTCACCAAATACTC
netB netB-F GCTGGTGCTGGAATAAATGC 384 [11]
netB-R TCGCCATTGAGTAGTTTCCC
netB (for sequencing) netB(-100)F CCAGTTATGTATAAATTTTGACCAGTT 1378 [15]
netB(1278)R AAACTTTAGTATTCCTCTCATTTTTTATCCC

Total DNA extraction

A single colony of each C. perfringens strain was suspended in 200 μL distilled water, boiled for 10 min, and then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatants were collected and used as template DNA for PCR reactions.

DNA sequencing of netB gene

The DNA samples were subjected to netB gene amplification reaction using netB(-100) F and netB(1278)R primers (Table-1) [14]. The PCR products were purified using QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN – Germany) according to the manufacture’s instruction and sent to 1st BASE – Singapore for sequencing.

NetB toxin production and purification

C. perfringens isolates were cultured, supernatant harvested, and protein purified as described by Keyburn et al. [10]. The NetB protein (detected at approximately 33 kDa) was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The protocol for SDS-PAGE was used as described in “A Guide to Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Detection, BIO-RAD”.

Results

Isolation of C. perfringens infected in ostrich farms in Vietnam

A total of 116 C. perfringens isolates were obtained from 318 fecal samples and 105 intestinal organs. Of 80 isolates from fecal samples, 33 isolates were recovered from healthy ostriches and 47 isolates came from disordered birds. Only one isolate from each ostrich was considered. The results of biochemical tests proved that all bacterial isolates exhibited the characteristic features of C. perfringens as documented [12].

Prevalence of toxin-encoding genes among C. perfringens isolates

The results of multiplex PCR showed that all C. perfringens strains regardless of sourced from healthy and enteric disordered ostriches were positive for the alpha-toxin gene (cpa) (Figure-1). The cpe gene which encodes C. perfringens enterotoxin was found in only one isolate from the diseased ostrich. As stated by the new typing scheme of Rood et al.[6], this strain belongs to type F as it carried both cpa and cpe genes. The gene encoding CPB2 toxin was detected in five diseased ostriches (three from fecal and two from intestinal samples). The PCR results of netB detection (Figure-2) recognized 16 strains positive for this gene. Except one strain carrying all three genes of cpa, cpe, and netB, 15 left strains were classified as type G following the Rood’s typing [6]. Our study also showed a clear difference of netB prevalence between the C. perfringens isolates from healthy and diseased birds. There were only 1/33 (3%) isolates from healthy ostriches detected for netB gene while 8/47 (17.05%) and 7/36 (19.44%) isolates, respectively, from fecal and intestinal samples of diseased birds positive for this gene.

Figure-1.

Figure-1

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for toxins typing of C. perfringens. M: 100 bp DNA ladder maker, (−) negative control, lane 1: Positive control for type A, lane 2: Positive control for type B, lane 3: Positive control for type C, lane 4: Positive control for type D, lane 5-11: Samples.

Figure-2.

Figure-2

Polymerase chain reaction for netB gene detection. M: 100 bp DNA ladder, (+): Positive control, (−): Negative control, lane 1-11: Samples, lane 7, 10: Positive for netB gene.

Analysis of netB sequences

We selected 5 out of 15 netB-positive isolates from diseased ostriches for netB amplification and sequencing. The analyzed sequences cover both the 969 bp coding sequence (CDS) region and 60 bp upstream promoter region including sequences potentially representing the RNA polymerase/sigma factor recognition sites (35: TTGAAA; 10: TATAAT) as well as the ribosomal binding site (AGGAGG). All the sequences derived from five isolates (GenBank accession number MT 032260-MT 032264) showed 100% identity to each other as well as to the netB sequences presently available in GenBank. No nucleotide variations in the CDS and promoter regions were observed. These results indicated that regardless of their geographic origin, netB gene is conserved among C. perfringens.

Production of NetB toxin in C. perfringens isolates

Five netB-positive isolates from diseased ostriches and one isolate from healthy bird were selected for testing NetB toxin production in vitro. These strains were cultured for supernatant harvest, NetB toxin purified, and inspected on Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel (Figure-3). All five isolates from diseased ostriches showed accumulated amount of NetB toxin in the supernatant with a molecular mass of approximately 33 kDa by SDS-PAGE analysis, whereas the netB-positive isolate from healthy bird did not produce this toxin.

Figure-3.

Figure-3

SDS-PAGE of purified NetB toxin stained with Coomassie blue. M: Pre-stained marker, Lanes 1-2: NetB-positive isolates from diseased ostriches.

Discussion

This study is the first report of the prevalence and toxinotype characterization of C. perfringens isolates from ostriches raised in Vietnam. The strain identification was carried out by conventional morphological biochemical tests and toxin-encoding genes of C. perfringens isolates were detected by multiplex PCR reactions. The results of isolation showed that C. perfringens infection was found in 20.88% (33/158) healthy ostrich-derived fecal samples and 29.37% (47/160) of diseased birds. Especially, the infection percentage of C. perfringens in diseased ostrich intestine was determined to be higher (34.28%). The prevalence of C. perfringens among healthy ostriches in this study is lower than the result of Alimolaei and Ezatkhah study in Iran, where 46/118 (38,98%) samples were positive for C. perfringens [15]. However, this study showed a higher prevalence of C. perfringens in diseased ostriches compared to the result of Keokilwe et al. [16] in South Africa where C. perfringens was detected in only 20% (44/122) samples.

C. perfringens type A is the most common toxinotype in the environment and associated with food poisoning in humans [3]. In this study, we found all 116/116 (100%) C. perfringens strains carrying cpa gene. This finding was in agreement with the previous studies in Iran, where 30/30 C. perfringens isolates [17] and 46/46 C. perfringens isolates [15] were positive with cpa gene. In another study, Keokilwe et al. [16] also found that the cpa gene was the most prevalent (93,2%) among C. perfringens isolates from ostriches which showed enteritis symptoms in South African. Several studies have indicated that cpe-positive strains of C. perfringens from poultry occur in low number and can be less than 5% of global C. perfringens isolates [18-20]. These results are in agreement with our study as we found that only one C. perfringens isolate from ostrich was positive with cpe gene. Several studies have shown that the beta-2 toxin is not a critical factor in C. perfringens infection in particular cases of poultry [7,21] as its prevalence was documented to be low in diseased poultry but quite high in healthy ones [7]. In this study, we found only 5 (4,31%) isolates from diseased ostriches carried cpb2 gene. It has been reported by Keyburn et al. [10] that NetB, a pore-forming toxin, is critical to NE development in chickens. They also reported that netB knockout mutants failed to produce NE in chickens, while such mutants complemented with the wild-type netB gene, caused NE. The present study revealed the prevalence of netB-positive C. perfringens isolates was 17.05% in fecal and 19.44% in intestinal samples of diseased ostriches, while only 3.03% strains from healthy ostriches carried netB genes (Table-2). Our results were in agreement with the investigation carried out in Iran [22], where 8/16 C. perfringens isolates from NE ostriches were positive for netB genes, while none of 20 isolates from healthy birds was positive for this gene. In another study, Keokilwe et al. showed that 7/43 C. perfringens isolates from 1-day to 3-month ostriches with enteritis symptoms were positive with netB genes [16]. The study of Abildgaard et al. has shown that NetB production was only observed in 4 out of 14 netB-positive C. perfringens isolates recovered from healthy chickens, whereas 12 out of 13 netB-positive isolates from NE chickens were determined to produce the NetB toxin [14]. In this study, we also found that all five netB-positive isolates from diseased ostriches accumulated NetB toxin in vitro as analyzed by SDS-PAGE, while the isolate from healthy ostrich did not produce this toxin.

Table-2.

Prevalence of toxin-encoding genes in Clostridium perfringens isolates.

Samples Number of isolates Toxin genes of Clostridium perfringens

Cpa Cpe Cpb2 NetB




No. isolates % No. isolates % No. isolates % No. isolates %
Fecal samples from healthy ostriches 33 33 100 0 0 0 0 1 3.03
Fecal samples from diseased ostriches 47 47 100 1 2.12 3 6.38 8 17.05
Intestinal organs from diseased ostriches 36 36 100 0 0 2 5.55 7 19.44
Total 116 116 100 1 0.77 5 4.31 16 13.79

Our results combined with these referenced ones support the suggestion of Keybum et al. [10] that NetB toxin plays an important role in causing enteritis disease in poultry. However, the present study indicated that there is a large population of C. perfringens isolates from diseased birds that do not carry netB. In agreement with this result, a study in Iran found that only 6.6% of the isolates from NE case of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) positive for netB and all isolates from flocks of mynah (Acridotheres tristis) and partridge (Perdix perdix) with severe NE symptoms negative for netB [23]. In another study, Ezatkhah et al. [24] also reported a low prevalence of netB gene (17.78%) in the isolates from broiler chickens clinically suspected to NE. According to these findings, NetB toxin may not be an obligate requirement for C. perfringens virulence or at least the presence of this toxin may not be essential for the disease process in all C. perfringens isolates. Another possible explanation to consider is that netB-negative isolates can cause disease in the field either by themselves or as part of a wider microbial consortium. Therefore, NE process with the roles of NetB toxin as well as alternative virulence factors and microflora in the association with C. perfringens needs further investigation.

For a better understanding of the role of NetB toxin role in C. perfringens pathogenesis, we sequenced five netB genes of five NetB toxin-producing isolates. The results showed that all of the analyzed sequences showed 100% identity to each other. No nucleotide variations in the CDS and the promoter regions were observed, indicating that netB gene is conserved among C. perfringens isolates in Vietnam. In the case of blasting only the 969 bp CDS region, we found 17 full-length netB gene sequences available in GenBank showing 100% identity to our sequences. However, there was only one sequence from C. perfringens isolate from Denmark (GU433324.1) [14] revealed 100% identity to our sequences that include both the CDS and promoter regions. We analyzed 20 netB gene sequences, including CDS and promoter regions available in GenBank to clarify how the netB genes of C. perfringens isolates in Vietnam are different from them. It is revealed that there is one A nucleotide at −58 bp position deleted in netB sequences of Vietnam isolates compared to other netB genes of C. perfringens isolates from other geographical regions in the world. The effect of this variation could be related to NetB expression regulation and need further studies.

Conclusion

This study is the first report of the prevalence and toxinotype characterization of C. perfringens isolates from ostriches in Vietnam. The data presented in this study confirm that Type A is the most prevalent among C. perfringens isolates from poultry. In addition, the study provides data emphasizing the role of NetB toxin in causing necrotic enteritis in ostriches.

Authors’ Contributions

TTN carried out the experiments and drafted the manuscript. HV and TDN conceived the original idea, supervised the project, and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Bacteriology Department, Institute of Veterinary Research and Development of Central Vietnam for providing C. perfringens isolates for positive controls of different toxinotypes. This study was supported by the Biotechnology Program grant, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Vietnam.

References

  • 1.Zakeri A, Kashefi P. Necrotic enteritis by Clostridium perfringens in Ostrich (Struthio camelus) World Appl. Sci. J. 2012;16(6):842–845. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Razmyar J, Peighambari S.M, Zamani A.H. Detection of a newly described bacteriocin, perfin, among Clostridium perfringens isolates from healthy and diseased ostriches and broiler chickens in Iran. Avian Dis. 2017;61(3):387–390. doi: 10.1637/11580-010517-ResNoteR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Petit L, Gibert M, Popoff M.R. Clostridium perfringens :Toxinotype and genotype. Trends Microbiol. 1999;7(3):104–110. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01430-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prescott J.F, Parreira V.R, Gohari I.M, Lepp D, Gong J. The pathogenesis of necrotic enteritis in chickens: What we know and what we need to know: A review. Avian Pathol. 2016;45(3):288–294. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2016.1139688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kiu R, Hall L.J. An update on the human and animal enteric pathogen Clostridium perfringens. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0144-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rood J.I, Adams V, Lacey J, Lyras D, McClane B.A, Melville S.B. Expansion of the Clostridium perfringens toxin-based typing scheme. Anaerobe. 2018;53:5–10. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ronco T, Stegger M, Ng K.L, Lilje B, Lyhs U, Andersen P.S, Pedersen K. Genome analysis of Clostridium perfringens isolates from healthy and necrotic enteritis infected chickens and Turkeys. BMC Res. Notes. 2017;10(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2594-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smyth J.A, Martin T.G. Disease producing capability of netB positive isolates of C. perfringens recovered from normal chickens and a cow, and netB positive and negative isolates from chickens with necrotic enteritis. Vet. Microbiol. 2010;146(1-2):76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Keyburn A.L, Portela R.W, Sproat K, Ford M.E, Bannam T.L, Yan X, Rood J.I, Moore R.J. Vaccination with recombinant NetB toxin partially protects broiler chickens from necrotic enteritis. Vet. Res. 2013;44(1):54. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Keyburn A.L, Boyce J.D, Vaz P, Bannam T.L, Ford M.E, Parker D, Di Rubbo A, Rood J.I, Moore R.J. NetB, a new toxin that is associated with avian necrotic enteritis caused by Clostridium perfringens. PLoS. Pathog. 2008;4(2):e26. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang W.Y, Chou C.H, Wang C. Characterization of toxin genes and quantitative analysis of netB in recrotic enteritis (NE)-producing and non-NE-producing Clostridium perfringens isolated from chickens. Anaerobe. 2018;54:115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Quinn P.J, Carter M.E, Markey B, Carter G.R. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. London, UK: Wolfe Publishing; 1994. Clostridium species; pp. 191–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Songer J, Bueschel D. USA: University of Arizona; 1999. Multiplex PCR Procedure for Genotyping Clostridium perfringens. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abildgaard L, Sondergaard T.E, Engberg R.M, Schramm A, Højberg O. In vitro production of necrotic enteritis toxin B, NetB, by netB-positive and netB-negative Clostridium perfringens originating from healthy and diseased broiler chickens. Vet. Microbiol. 2010;144(1-2):231–235. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alimolaei M, Ezatkhah M, Bafti M.S. Genetic and antigenic typing of Clostridium perfringens isolates from ostriches. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014;28:210–213. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Keokilwe L, Olivier A, Burger W.P, Joubert H, Venter E.H, Morar-Leather D. Bacterial enteritis in ostrich (Struthio camelus) chicks in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Poult Sci. 2015;94(6):1177–1183. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zandi E, Mohammadabadi M.R, Ezzatkhah M, Esmailizadeh A.K. Typing of toxingenic isolates of Colostridium perfringens by multiplex PCR in ostrich. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2014;4(4):795–801. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heikinheimo A, Korkeala H. Multiplex PCR assay for toxinotyping Clostridium perfringens isolates obtained from Finnish broiler chickens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2005;40(6):407–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01702.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ghoneim N.H, Hamza D.A. Epidemiological studies on Clostridium perfringens food poisoning in retail foods. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2017;36(3):1025–1032. doi: 10.20506/rst.36.3.2734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang T, Zhang W, Ai D, Zhang R, Lu Q, Luo Q, Shao H. Prevalence and characterization of Clostridium perfringens in broiler chickens and retail chicken meat in central China. Anaerobe. 2018;54:100–103. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chalmers G, Bruce H.L, Hunter D.B, Parreira V.R, Kulkarni R.R, Jiang Y.F, Prescott J.F, Boerlin P. Multilocus sequence typing analysis of Clostridium perfringens isolates from necrotic enteritis outbreaks in broiler chicken populations. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008;46(12):3957–3964. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01548-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mirzazadehghassab A, Kalidari G.A, Razmyar J, Tolooe A. Chicago, Illinois, USA: The 12th Biennial Congress of the Anaerobe Society of the Americas; 2014. Prevalence of netb and Tpel Genes among Clostridium perfringens Isolates Obtained from Healthy and Diseased Ostriches (Struthio camelus) [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Razmyar J, Rezaee M, Movassaghi A.R, Shojadust B. NetB negative Clostridium perfringens infection associated with acute necrotic enteritis in mynah (Acridotheres tristis), grey partridge (Perdix perdix) and Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) Iran. J. Vet. Res. 2017;9(2):64–69. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ezatkhah M, Alimolaei M, Shahdadnejad N. The prevalence of netB gene in isolated Clostridium perfringens from organic broiler farms suspected to necrotic enteritis. Int. J. Enteric Pathog. 2016;4(3):e35667. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES