Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Sep 29;15(9):e0238311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238311

Length of stay to recover from severe acute malnutrition and associated factors among under-five years children admitted to public hospitals in Aksum, Ethiopia

Wagnew Tesfay 1, Mebrahtu Abay 2, Solomon Hintsa 2, Tekia Zafu 2,*
Editor: Shamala Devi Sekaran3
PMCID: PMC7523984  PMID: 32991575

Abstract

Background

Severe acute malnutrition is defined by <70% weight for length/height, by visible severe wasting, by the presence of pitting edema, and in children 6 to 59 months of age, mid upper arm circumference <110 mm. Severe acute malnutrition remains to be a worldwide problem, claiming lives of millions of children, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia. Though the Ethiopian national guideline states the total length of stay in therapeutic feeding units should not be more than four weeks, there is huge difference, varying from 8 to 47 days of stay. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess length of stay to recover from severe acute malnutrition and associated factors among under five children hospitalized to the public hospitals in Aksum Town.

Methods

Sample size was calculated using STATA version 12.0. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using pretested questionnaire in the public hospitals in Aksum on children aged 0–59 months. Cleaned data was entered to Epi info version 7.1.4 and then exported into SPSS version 21 for analysis. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression models. During bivariable analysis, variables with p-value < 0.05 were selected for multivariable analysis to identify independent factors associated with length of stay.

Results

A total of 564 participants enrolled to the study. The rate of recovery was 56% with median length of stay of 15 days (95% CI: 14.1, 15.9). The independent predictors of length of stay to recovery were presence of diarrhea at admission (AHR = 0.573, 95% CI: 0.415–0.793), being HIV positive (AHR = 0.391, 95% CI: 0.194–0.788), palmar pallor (AHR = 0.575, 95% CI: 0.416–0.794), presence of other co-morbidities at admission (AHR = 0.415, 95% CI: 0.302–0.570) and not being treated with plumpy nut (AHR = 0.368, 95% CI: 0.262–0.518).

Conclusions

Length of stay is in the acceptable range of the international and national set of standards. Nevertheless, the recovery rate was lower compared to the Sphere standard. Presence of diarrhea, palmar pallor, HIV other co-morbidities and not treated with plumpy nut were found independent protective factors for recovery from sever acute malnutrition.

Introduction

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is defined by <70% weight for length/height (WFL/H), by visible severe wasting, by the presence of pitting edema, and in children 6 to 59 months of age, mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) <110 mm [13]. Although there are basic and underlying causes, SAM is an immediate effect of inadequate dietary intake (quality or quantity) and/or infections like tuberculosis (TB), human immune deficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and diarrhea that often lead to nutrient mal-absorptions [4].

Although SAM usually affects all segments of a population, infants and young children are most vulnerable as they have higher nutritional requirements for growth and development [5]. It is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among infants and young children all over the world and more frequently in sub-Saharan Africa and south Asia [6]. The peak age for SAM is 6–18 months, which is the time of fast growth and brain development. However, it is increasingly becoming common that SAM may occur in infants less than six months of age with many disadvantaged populations while starting to feed semi-solid and solid foods to children as young as two months [3].

The 2013 Ethiopian guideline for SAM management states that the total length of stay (LOS) in therapeutic feeding units (TFUs) should not be more than four weeks [7]. But there is huge difference in LOS in studies done in Ethiopia, varying from 8 to 47 days [810].

Severe acute malnutrition is a worldwide problem and one of the top deadly diseases for children less than five years of age. Severely malnourished children have a nine times more mortality rates than well-nourished children [11]. As per the 2018 United Nations’ International Children’s Emergency Fund, World Health Organization and World Bank report, wasting threatened lives of an estimated 50.5 million children under five globally, of which 13.8 million are from Africa[12], and also there are 52 million (about 8.3%) children less than five year suffering from acute malnutrition; out of those affected more than 90 percent are from South and Southeast Asia, and Sub-Saharan Africa [13].

Globally, more than ten million children die due to SAM before celebrating their fifth birthday every year. Huge number of severely malnourished children die at their home without any hospital care, but sometimes even hospital care is given, death rates may be high [7]. In developing countries, under five years children, who are severely malnourished and admitted to hospital, with unacceptably high case fatality rate (30–50%)[14].

In the developing world, where SAM is the most common reason for pediatric hospitalization, it is associated with higher risk of morbidity and mortality, underlying for more than 50 percent of the ten to eleven million children under five years old who die every year from avoidable causes [2, 15, 16]. Despite of such worldwide significance, child recovery programs have not given the required attention for facility based management of SAM [2].

According to studies from Kenya and Niger, recovery rate and LOS are affected by co-morbidities like pneumonia, malaria, altered consciousness, weak pulse, inability to drink, temperature gradient, chest in-drawing, diarrhea & severe pallor [17, 18]. The horn of Africa has identified 6.6 per cent of children less than five years old as wasted. With estimated 10%, Ethiopia has highest rate of wasting (acute malnutrition) in this region [19]. Even though it was not well known in this particular study area, some studies in Ethiopia indicated that there is a big variation in LOS in Ethiopia, ranging from 8 to 47 days [810], that is not congruent with the National SAM management protocol that states the total LOS in TFUs should not be more than four weeks [7]. A study in northwest Ethiopia also revealed that patients admitted with SAM had a case fatality and defaulter rates of 18%, and 9% respectively [20].

UNICEF has conducted an evaluation study in Ethiopia [21] and identified gaps and management errors in the services like not giving routine medicines such as Amoxicillin, children who should be managed in phase two were managed in phase one, and those who could be treated in Outpatient Therapeutic Program (a program where moderately malnourished children get treatment) were being treated in Therapeutic Feeding Unit (TFU), poor medical record handling, late transfer of cases from phase to phase & to discharge, and limited area allowed to the TFU that increase cross infection and raised risk of death, especially for HIV infected children as.

Though the Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH), jointly with its partners, is taking promising actions in reducing SAM, the Ethiopian national underweight and wasting rates among under five children are still high, 24 and 10% respectively. The same is true in Tigray region as the underweight and wasting rates are 23 and 11% respectively [22, 23].

There were couples of researches conducted on malnutrition in the study area, but none of them attempted to assess the length of stay to recover from SAM and associated factors among under five children hospitalized to public hospitals in Aksum town, northern Ethiopia. So, this research was intended to come up with information about length of stay till recovery and associated factors among severely malnourished children admitted to the identified health facilities for the betterment of quality of care. The purpose of this study was therefore, to assess the length of stay to recover from SAM and identify associated factors among under five children admitted to the public hospitals in Aksum, north Ethiopia.

Moreover, coming up with recent information about length of stay till recovery and associated factors among severely malnourished children is enormously relevant to be used as input by clinicians for betterment of quality of care given to clients and as a guide (reference) for academicians who are interested to conduct further related research on the area.

Methods and materials

Study setting, design and ethical issue

Ethical clearance and permission letter were taken from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of Aksum University, College of health science. For the secondary data from patients’ medical registration cards, the IRC waived the requirement for informed consent.

Health facility based retrospective cohort study was conducted in the two public hospitals of Aksum Town, Ethiopia. Aksum is found in Tigray regional state, 1042 km far from the capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa. St. Mary general hospital and Aksum University comprehensive specialized hospital are the two public hospitals found in Aksum town, providing inpatient and outpatient services for approximately 2.8 million catchment population. Medical and health officer (HO) interns, nurses, general practitioners (GPs) and a pediatrician in each hospital are providing medical care and treatment for SAM children admitted to both health institutions. Admission, management and discharge procedures for SAM are compatible with the Protocol developed by Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH), that is updated in 2013 [7].

The study was carried out on those admitted with SAM from September 11, 2016 to February 10, 2019. Data was extracted within 15 days (from March 6–20, 2019).

Source and study population

The source populations were all severely malnourished children, aged 0–59 months, admitted to TFUs of the public hospitals in Aksum and the study populations were all severely malnourished children, aged 0–59 months, admitted to TFUs of the public hospitals in Aksum from September 11, 2016 to February 10, 2019.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Based on the Ethiopian Federal Mistry of Health National protocol for SAM management [7], 1) Infants < 6 months of age or <3 kilogram with median Weight-For-Length of <70% and/or presence of bilateral pitting edema, or visible severe wasting. 2) Children aged 6–59 months with median Weight-For-Length/Height of <70%, and/or bilateral pitting edema, or MUAC <11Centimeter were included to the study. Children whose admission and discharge date was not recorded, as this will not show the outcome variable (LOS), with congenital anomalies (like cleft lip and developmental disorders such as Down’s syndrome), as these can be a confounding with LOS for SAM, and those whose medical records were incomplete for the type of SAM were excluded from the study.

Sample size and sampling procedure

Sample size was calculated based on sample size estimation for survival under the Cox proportional hazards model using the STATA Version 12.0, taking the following assumptions into account: a 1.8 adjusted hazard ratio, 17.1% (0.171) observed prevalence of failure/non-recovery [24], with marginal error of 5% and confidence level of 95%. With the assumption of number of study subjects required to achieve a study power of 80% and 10% incompleteness, the overall sample size became 585.

The actual number of under five children admitted with SAM to the stated hospitals in the study period was estimated to be 700 (280 from Aksum University comprehensive specialized hospital and 420 from St. Mary hospital). Systematic random sampling technique was used to select the 585 study participants from the actual 700 taking each participant consecutively (700/585 = 1.2). With this proportion, 234 participants were selected consecutively from Aksum University comprehensive specialized hospital (AKU-CSH) and 351 from St. Mary General hospital. Out of these eligible study participants, 564 of them were enrolled into the study whereas the remaining 21 (3.6%) children were excluded. Among these excluded, the clinical files for 12 children from St. Mary hospital were not found and one participant was removed during analysis as it was influential extreme value from same institution whereas total of eight children from AKU-CSH were excluded (four were admitted with congenital anomalies and developmental disorders (one with cleft lip and three with Down’s syndrome) and clinical files were incomplete for type of SAM for the remaining four).

Variables and measurement

Dependent/outcome variable

Time till recovery (LOS): refers to the number of days/weeks it takes from hospitalization till when a child recovered from SAM of any kind. Children are called recovered when they got relieved from medical complications, edema and have gained and maintained WFL/WFH of 85% [7].

Event: recovery from sever acute malnutrition

Censored: Not recovered from SAM. (Death, defaulter, medical referral, transferred)

Death: when the SAM child die while receiving treatment in the TFU and registered as dead in the treatment logbook [7].

Defaulters: those who were not found in the NRU for two successive days, or who leave the ward against professional advice while the child is not cured [7, 13, 25].

Independent variables

  • Severe acute malnutrition diagnosis (marasmus, kwashiorkor marasmic-kwashiorkor)

  • Study subject characteristics (age, sex, residence)

  • Routine medications, supplements and therapeutic feedings

  • Common comorbidities (HIV, Anemia, Diarrhea)

  • Other co-morbidities (like malaria, pneumonia, tuberculosis)

Data collection tools and data quality control

A compilation sheet (coding check list) was developed relating to the FMoH standard management protocol for SAM. Then needed individual data was extracted from relevant documents like SAM registration logbook, SAM monitoring multi-chart and patient clinical files.

The compilation sheet (check list) was prepared in English was and then pre-tested in Sehul general hospital, Shire town, Ethiopia in 29 participants (5% of the total sample) and revised for sequence and layout. Four Bachelor of Science degree holder health care professionals were recruited as data collectors with one supervisor. They got one day training on how to fill the check list to minimize errors. The collected data were checked by the principal investigator closely for its accuracy, completeness and consistency.

Data management and analysis process

Then collected data were cleaned, coded and entered to Epi info version 7.1.4.0 and then exported to SPSS version 21 for analysis. The levels of missing values, existence of influential extreme values and multi co-linearity among independent variables was checked before analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed using frequency and median, and presented using tables. Kaplan-Meier & Cox regression models were applied to determine the association of independent variable with length of stay to recovery from SAM. P-value of < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant to identify explanatory factors of LOS in multivariable analysis.

Thirty one independent variables were analyzed in the bivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis; out of which twenty one were suggestive of significance (p-value < 0.05) and entered to multivariable analysis. A stepwise forward likelihood ratio variable selection method, with entry and removal probabilities of 0.05 and 0.1, respectively, was made on significant factors in the bivariable analysis. Accordingly, the final Cox Proportional Hazards Model was fitted on the basis of final step selected variables after model assumption diagnostic procedures. Remedial measures were taken on potential problems found in checking validity of assumptions. In due course, neither multi-collinearity problem nor significant interaction was detected. However, examination of Dfbeta statistics in relation to model coefficients indicated the existence of influential extreme value. Thus, the outlier was found to be the case entry with unique SAM serial number 411 and its removal resulted in magnitudes of 0.16 and 0.26 change to the corresponding model coefficients of HIV Status. As a result, the final model was fitted on 564 observations of selected variables.

The proportionality of hazards assumption was further checked by examining plots of recovery time for model variables. Patterns of the plot were not seemed to cross each other, rather were close to be parallel. This left no doubt about violation of proportionality of hazards assumption. Further this was ascertained by examination of cumulative hazard plot of the Cox-Snell residual. The plotted points nearly lie around a line that has unit slope and zero intercept, which also confirmed validity of proportional hazards assumption. Finally, goodness of the overall fit of the model was assured by Omnibus tests of model coefficients at 5% level of significance.

Results

Out of total 585 eligible severely malnourished children hospitalized to the public hospitals of Aksum, data from 564 children were extracted with retrieval rate of 96.4%. Out of them 56% were recovered from SAM, and the recovery times for the remaining 44% were considered to be censored at the time of analysis.

Socio-demographic characteristics, co-morbidity and type of SAM

More than half (53.9%) of the children enrolled into the study were males with the corresponding median recovery time of 15 days (95% CI: 13.7, 16.3), similar with the overall median LOS of 15 days (95% CI: 14.1, 15.9).

Age was grouped into categories in convenience for analysis. Median survival time was measured in days by sex and age categories of the study participants. The largest percentage of children was categorized under the age group of 12–35 months which accounted for 54.6% of the total subjects with an estimated median recovery time of 15 days in a 95% CI (13.7, 16.3). In contrast, the percentage of children under age group 0–5 months were only 10.8%, the least in percentage comparison despite its association with the highest median recovery time of 20 days with a 95% CI (16.4, 23.6).

The median recovery time for children with Marasmus which accounted for 64.9% of the study participants was found to be 15 days with 95% CI (13.8, 16.2), the same point estimate with those having Kwashiorkor (20.7% of the total). The remaining 14.4% were children with Marasmic-Kwashiorkor having, 17 days of average length of recovery time (95% CI; 13.6, 20.4) (Table 1).

Table 1. Log rank (Mantel-Cox) test of equality of survival distribution for socio-demographic characteristics, type of SAM and co-morbidity at admission in severely malnourished children admitted to public hospitals in Aksum, 2019.

Variable Category Percentage of outcome category Median Survival (days) 95% CI Log-rank test
Cured % Dead % Defaulted % Transferred % Referred % Total % LL UL Chi-square P-value
Sex Male 31.4 2.3 4.8 12.2 3.2 53.9 15 13.7 16.3 2.87 0.090
Female 24.6 3.7 5.0 9.9 2.8 46.1 16 14.6 17.4
Age (in months) 0–5 7.3 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.7 10.8 20 16.4 23.6 8.74 0.033
6–11 10.1 0.5 2.1 5.5 1.6 19.9 14 13.2 14.8
12–35 29.8 3.4 5.5 12.9 3.0 54.6 15 13.7 16.3
36–59 8.9 1.1 1.4 2.7 0.7 14.7 15 13.1 16.9
Name of institution AkUCSH 23.2 2.3 4.6 6.0 3.9 40.1 16 14.1 17.9 7.34 0.007
St. Mary hospital 32.8 3.7 5.1 16.1 2.1 59.9 15 13.9 16.1
Type of SAM Marasmus 35.5 3.5 6.9 14.9 4.1 64.9 15 13.8 16.2 0.384 0.825
Kwashiorkor 11.2 1.1 2.0 5.1 1.4 20.7 15 13.1 16.9
Marasmic-kwash 9.4 1.4 0.9 2.1 0.5 14.4 17 13.6 20.4
Co-morbidity Present 38.8 6.0 5.0 8.7 5.9 64.4 17 15.8 18.2 82.82 <0.001
Absent 17.2 0.0 4.8 13.5 0.2 35.6 11 10.0 12.0
Total 56.0 6.0 9.8 22.2 6.0 100.0 15 14.1 15.9

Treatment, treatment outcomes, routine medications and feedings

Out of the participants enrolled, 56% were discharged cured, 22.2% transferred to nearby health facility, 9.8% defaulted, 6% dead during treatment and 6% were medical referral. 18.3 And 8 per cent of participants received IV fluid and blood transfusion respectively. In Bivariate analysis, not receiving both IV fluid and blood transfusion found significantly associated with shorter LOS till recovery and both were selected for multivariate analysis to check if predictors of LOS to recover from SAM.

Almost all (98.8%) received antibiotics like amoxicillin, ampicillin and gentamycin and higher numbers of children were supplemented folic acid and iron (68.1% and 61.9% respectively). Regarding feedings, F75 was offered for almost all patients (99.8%) followed by F100 (for 81% of participants) and half of them were given plumpy nut. Meanwhile, 31.9 per cent were fed with NG tube. As receiving folic acid, vitamin A, F100, plumpy nut and not being fed with NG tube were suggestive of shorter recovery time in bivariate analysis, these all were selected for further multivariable analysis using Cox regression model. For those discharged cured, the average weight gain was 10.1g/kg/day (Table 1). The overall median recovery time from SAM was also determined to be 15 days with a 95% confidence interval between 14.1 and 15.9 days (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Overall survival function of children with SAM admitted to public hospitals in Aksum, 2019.

Fig 1

Predictors of length of stay to recovery from sever acute malnutrition

After ascertaining validity of the model assumptions and adjustment, five independent significant predictors of LOS for nutritional recovery were found, which are; diarrhea, HIV sero-status, palmar pallor (anemia), other co-morbidities (pneumonia, TB and Malaria), and provision of plumpy nut. Patients with diarrhea at admission were 42.7% (AHR = 0.573; 95% CI: 0.415–0.793) less likely to recover quickly from SAM as compared to those without diarrhea while those HIV positive found to be 60.9% (AHR = 0.391; 95% CI: 0.194–0.788) less likely to get cured fast in comparison with those whose sero-status is unknown. However, no significant difference was obtained in the hazards of non-recovery for children with Non-reactive (AHR = 0.937; 95% CI: 0.714–1.231) and unknown HIV status. The difference in chance of recovery between reactive and non-reactive patients stays significant at 5% level of significance. Children with palmar pallor (anemia) and other co-morbidity at admission were 42.5% (AHR = 0.575; 95% CI: 0.416–0.794) and 58.5% (AHR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.302–0.570) less likely to recover earlier as compared to those who did not have such conditions. Patients who were not treated with plumpy nut were 63.2% (AHR = 0.368; 95% CI: 0.262–0.518) less likely to recover in comparison with those who received plumpy nut (Table 2).

Table 2. Factors associated with LOS to recover from SAM in children admitted to public hospitals in Aksum, 2019.
Variable Category Recovery status CHR (95% CI) P-value AHR (95% CI)
Non-recovered Recovered
N % N %
Age 0–5 20 3.5 41 7.3 0.639(0.421, 0.969) 0.048* 0.702(0.369, 1.334)
6–11 55 9.8 57 10.1 1.105(0.755, 1.616) 1.102(0.711, 1.706)
12–35 140 24.8 168 29.8 0.982(0.715, 1.348) 1.012(0.717, 1.428)
36–59 33 5.9 50 8.9 1 1
Name of institution AKU-CSH 95 16.8 131 23.2 1.354(1.077, 1.702) 0.01* 0.775(0.573, 1.048)
St. Mary hospital 153 27.1 185 32.8 1 1
Other Co-morbidities Present 144 25.5 219 38.8 3.103(2.384, 4.039) <0.001** 0.415(0.302, 0.570)
Absent 104 18.4 97 17.2 1 1
Diarrhea Present 166 29.4 235 41.7 1.973(1.518, 2.565) <0.001** 0.573(0.415, 0.793)
Absent 82 14.5 81 14.4 1 1
Vomiting Present 141 25.0 189 33.5 1.509(1.198, 1.901) <0.001* 0.883(0.684, 1.138)
Absent 107 19.0 127 22.5 1 1
Fever Present 33 5.9 32 5.7 1.515(1.049, 2.187) 0.027* 1.066(0.695, 1.637)
Absent 215 38.1 284 50.4 1 1
Hypothermia Present 39 6.9 43 7.6 1.929(1.391, 2.674) <0.001* 0.767(0.529, 1.112)
Absent 209 37.1 273 48.4 1 1
HIV status Reactive 5 0.9 13 2.3 0.314(0.091, 0.583) 0.004** 0.391(0.194, 0.788)
Non-reactive 107 19.0 174 30.9 0.984(0.087, 0.232) 0.937(0.714, 1.231)
Unknown 136 24.1 129 22.9 1 1
Pulse rate Bradycardic 4 0.8 3 0.6 0.559(0.445, 0.702) <0.001* 2.227(0.676, 7.336)
Normal 124 23.5 160 30.3 0.363(0.054, 0.762) 1.363(1.054, 1.762)
Tachycardic 101 19.1 136 25.8 1 1
Consciousness level Conscious 142 25.2 186 33.0 0.492(0.393, 0.616) <0.001* 14.29(0.00, 93.70)
Lethargic 93 16.5 130 23.0 10.49 (6.78, 13.34) 11.53(0.00, 75.59)
Comatose 13 2.3 0 0.0 1 1
Palmar pallor Present 89 15.8 122 21.6 2.036(1.610, 2.574) <0.001** 0.575(0.416, 0.794)
Absent 159 28.2 194 34.4 1 1
Skin lesion Present 41 7.3 82 14.5 1.80(1.389, 2.332) <0.001* 0.982(0.697, 1.384)
Absent 207 36.7 234 41.5 1 1
Dehydration Present 148 26.2 231 41 2.143(1.645, 2.791) <0.001* 1.107(0.802, 1.528)
Absent 100 17.7 85 15.1 1 1
Shock No 233 41.3 310 55 0.196(0.080, 0.481) <0.001* 1.481(0.584, 3.755)
Yes 15 2.7 6 1.1 1 1
Folic acid No 111 19.7 69 12.2 1.427(1.090, 1.868) 0.010* 1.003(0.670, 1.502)
Yes 137 24.3 247 43.8 1 1
Vitamin A No 110 19.5 76 13.5 1.575(1.214, 2.043) 0.001* 0.881(0.635, 1.223)
Yes 138 24.5 240 42.6 1 1
F-100 No 83 14.7 24 4.3 1.639(1.077, 2.493) 0.021* 1.284(0.779, 2.117)
Yes 165 29.3 292 51.7 1 1
Plumpy nut No 226 40.1 56 9.9 2.774(2.073, 3.711) <0.001** 0.368(0.262, 0.518)
Yes 22 3.9 260 46.1 1 1

Other comorbidities: Malaria, TB, Pneumonia * = significant at p-value < 0.05, Length of stay (LOS)

Discussion

Results of this study were examined for consistency with extensive review of literatures of the title. At admission, 64.4% of participants showed up with other co-morbidities on top of SAM. Majority of children (64.9%) were hospitalized with marasmus (non-edematous) type of SAM, similar with some recent studies in Ethiopia [1, 13, 2531] but in contrary to that of Jimma [32], Hadiya, Ethiopia [33] and Uganda [34], which reported edematous type of SAM was highly encountered. This variation might be attributable to the multi-faceted causes of SAM all over the world.

The median LOS till recovery from SAM was estimated to be 15 days (95% CI: 14.1, 15.9), which is in the acceptable range of international standards set by the SPHERE project [15]. This is similar with the findings from institution based researches in Bahirdar [13, 35] that reported 16 days of recovery time. But this finding is far less than the report from Sidama zone Shebedino district of southern Ethiopia [29] which found the median LOS of 36 days. It is also lower than several studies conducted in the Ethiopia [1, 8, 11, 24, 32] and that of Yemen [36]. However, the median LOS is higher than some study reports from some parts of Ethiopia [25, 26, 33], Ghana [20] and India [37]. This could be due to the differences in underlying co-morbidities, caring practice of healthcare providers, health facility set up and variation in socioeconomic status of the population in these different study areas.

The overall rate of recovery from SAM was found to be 56%, that is consistent with findings from Debrebrhan University that revealed 55.9% rate of recovery [37]. It is significantly higher than that of Ayder hospital (11) other similar studies from Bahirdar [13, 35], Ghana [20] and Yemen [36]. Nevertheless, it is by greater margin below the minimum international standards [15], in comparison with other study findings in Ethiopia [1, 8, 24, 25, 2732] and similar reports from India, Malawi and Uganda [34, 3739] as well. This might be due to the relatively higher rate of transfer out to nearby health facility, which probably would be to prevent patient overload since one of the study area (AKU-CSH) is the only referral hospital in this particular study area. Almost a quarter (22.2%) of patients were transferred out to nearby health facility that is above other recently reported study findings in Ethiopia [1, 13, 25, 27, 35] Ghana [20], Uganda [34] and Yemen [36].

This study shows death rate of 6% from the total participants enrolled, which is acceptable by the SPHERE project minimum international standards for managing SAM in NRU/TFU, and better than the recent study findings from University of Gondar [28] and Hawassa University [31] comprehensive specialized hospitals which found mortality rates of 10.8% for each. It is similar with the findings of two studies done in Ethiopia [25, 26] and one conducted in Nigeria [40]. But the mortality rate is greater than that of some studies done in Ethiopia [11, 13, 35], India [37, 38], Ghana [20] and Yemen [36]. This could be due to lack of close follow up of patients with strict adherence to the national or international SAM management protocols and socioeconomic differences in the different areas.

According to the multivariate analysis, there was significant difference in median LOS till cured from SAM among predictor variables. Participants who showed up with palmar pallor (indicative of anemia) at admission were by 42.5 per cent (AHR = 0.575; 95% CI: 0.416–0.794) less likely to have fast recovery than those who did not have pallor. This is in line with the findings reported from Nekemte and Bahirdar Felegehiwot referral hospitals, Ethiopia [10, 13]. Similarly, not receiving plumpy nut (AHR = 0.368; 95% CI: 0.262–0.518) was observed as strong independent predictor of recovery time, which also is consistent with report from Bahirdar [13]. But other related studies from Ethiopia [9, 32] reported that neither palmar pallor nor plumpy nut as independent predictor of LOS till recovery. This could be due to inter institutional differences in strictly adhering to the national SAM management guideline.

In line with this research findings, studies from different parts of the country [1, 10, 25] and studies from Malawi and Uganda [34, 39] reported that children presented with retroviral infection at hospitalization were less likely to recover from SAM, as being reactive for HIV serostatus among the study participants had negatively affected LOS to recover from SAM (AHR = 0.391; 95% CI: 0.194–0.788).

Probability of getting cured fast was reduced by 58.5% (AHR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.302–0.570) in those admitted with co-morbidity. Consistent with this report, a hospital based retrospective cross-sectional study from Bahirdar and retrospective cohort study in similar setting in Jimma University found less recovery rate of SAM in co-morbid children [1, 32].

Limitations of the study

Even though the strength of this paper comes from its study design (cohort), it totally was based on patients’ secondary data, in which incompleteness was observed to some extent, and lacked control over the quality of measurements taken during hospitalization. It was also impossible to analyze socio-economic characteristics of parents/guardians and factors related to patient treatment (medical/pharmaceutical supplies and healthcare provider expertise) that could have influenced the outcome variable in a desirable or undesirable way.

Conclusion

This research figured out that the median LOS till recovery is in the acceptable range of the national and international standards set to manage SAM as in patient. However, the rate of recovery was lower as compared to the stated standards and other study findings conducted in the nation. It also revealed significant differences in the median LOS to recover among different predictor variables. The study indicates that children that showed up with presence of diarrhea, palmar pallor, retroviral infection, other co-morbidities and those who did not receive plumpy nut have had lower chance of recovering from SAM.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(SAV)

Acknowledgments

We are cordially thankful for the data collectors, the supervisor and staffs of St. Mary general hospital and Aksum University comprehensive specialized hospital for their support during data collection.

Data Availability

All relevant anonymized data present within the manuscript as supplementary file S1.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Desyibelew HD, Fekadu A, Woldie H. Recovery rate and associated factors of children age 6 to 59 months admitted with severe acute malnutrition at inpatient unit of Bahir Dar Felege Hiwot Referral hospital therapeutic feeding unite, northwest Ethiopia. PloS one. 2017;12(2). 10.1371/journal.pone.0171020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Collins S, Dent N, Binns P, Bahwere P, Sadler K, Hallam A. Management of severe acute malnutrition in children. The lancet. 2006;368(9551):1992–2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Williams P, Berkley J. Severe acute malnutrition update: current WHO guidelines and the WHO essential medicine list for children. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Frontières MS. Clinical HIV/AIDS Care Guidelines for Resource-poor Settings. 2006.
  • 5.Gerensea H, Berhe T, Siyum H. Trend of malnutrition in Tigray region from 2011/12-2014/15. Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research. 2017;2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Organization WH. Management of severe malnutrition: a manual for physicians and other senior health workers. 1999.
  • 7.Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia ministry of health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Postnatal Care. 2003.
  • 8.Mengesha MM, Deyessa N, Tegegne BS, Dessie Y. Treatment outcome and factors affecting time to recovery in children with severe acute malnutrition treated at outpatient therapeutic care program. Global health action. 2016;9(1):30704 10.3402/gha.v9.30704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gebremichael DY. Predictors of nutritional recovery time and survival status among children with severe acute malnutrition who have been managed in therapeutic feeding centers, Southern Ethiopia: retrospective cohort study. BMC public health. 2015;15(1):1267 10.1186/s12889-015-2593-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mena MB, Dedefo MG, Billoro BB. Treatment outcome of severe acute malnutrition and its determinants among pediatric patients in West Ethiopia. International journal of pediatrics. 2018;2018 10.1155/2018/8686501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tirore MG, Atey TM, Mezgebe HB. Survival status and factors associated with treatment outcome of severely malnourished children admitted to Ayder referral hospital: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nutrition. 2017;3(1):66 10.1186/s40795-017-0186-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.UNICEF W. World Bank Group, Levels and trends in child malnutrition, 2016. 2018.
  • 13.Asres DT, Prasad RP, Ayele TA. Recovery time and associated factors of severe acute malnutrition among children in Bahir Dar city, Northwest Ethiopia: an institution based retrospective cohort study. BMC Nutrition. 2018;4(1):17 10.1186/s40795-018-0224-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ashworth A, Ashworth A, Khanum S, Schofield C. Guidelines for the inpatient treatment of severely malnourished children: World Health Organization; 2003.
  • 15.Project TS. Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response-Russian: Practical Action Publishing; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Trehan I, Manary MJ. Management of severe acute malnutrition in low-income and middle-income countries. Archives of disease in childhood. 2015;100(3):283–7. 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gachau S, Irimu G, Ayieko P, Akech S, Agweyu A, English M, et al. Prevalence, outcome and quality of care among children hospitalized with severe acute malnutrition in Kenyan hospitals: A multi-site observational study. PloS one. 2018;13(5):e0197607 10.1371/journal.pone.0197607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Besada D, Kerber K, Leon N, Sanders D, Daviaud E, Rohde S, et al. Niger’s child survival success, contributing factors and challenges to sustainability: A retrospective analysis. PloS one. 2016;11(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Awoke A, Ayana M, Gualu T. Determinants of severe acute malnutrition among under five children in rural Enebsie Sarmidr District, East Gojjam Zone, North West Ethiopia, 2016. BMC Nutrition. 2018;4(1):4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Saaka M, Osman SM, Amponsem A, Ziem JB, Abdul-Mumin A, Akanbong P, et al. Treatment outcome of severe acute malnutrition cases at the tamale teaching hospital. Journal of nutrition and metabolism. 2015;2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Case PC. Evaluation of Community Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM). 2012.
  • 22.Mitiku M, Teferi M, Ayalew A, Tesfay M. Determinants of Teenage Pregnancy and Motherhood in Ethiopia: Analysis of the Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey 2016. Research & Reviews: Journal of Medicine. 2019;8(3):47–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang H, Tesfaye R, NV Ramana G, Chekagn CT. Ethiopia health extension program: an institutionalized community approach for universal health coverage: The World Bank; 2016.
  • 24.Girum T, Muktar E, Worku A. Comparative Analysis of the Survival Status and Treatment Outcome of Under-five Children Admitted with Severe Acute Malnutrition Among Hospital-based and Health Center Based Stabilization Centers, South Ethiopia. The Open Public Health Journal. 2018;11(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mekuria G, Derese T, Hailu G. Treatment outcome and associated factors of severe acute malnutrition among 6–59 months old children in Debre Markos and Finote Selam hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Nutrition. 2017;3(1):42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Derseh B, Mruts K, Demie T, Gebremariam T. Co-morbidity, treatment outcomes and factors affecting the recovery rate of under-five children with severe acute malnutrition admitted in selected hospitals from Ethiopia: retrospective follow up study. Nutrition journal. 2018;17(1):116 10.1186/s12937-018-0423-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kabeta A, Bekele G. Factors associated with treatment outcomes of under-five children with severe acute malnutrition admitted to therapeutic feeding unit of Yirgalem hospital. Clinics Mother Child Health. 2017;14(261):2. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wagnew F, Dejenu G, Eshetie S, Alebel A, Worku W, Abajobir AA. Treatment cure rate and its predictors among children with severe acute malnutrition in northwest Ethiopia: A retrospective record review. PloS one. 2019;14(2). 10.1371/journal.pone.0211628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Teshome G, Bosha T, Gebremedhin S. Time-to-recovery from severe acute malnutrition in children 6–59 months of age enrolled in the outpatient treatment program in Shebedino, Southern Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study. BMC pediatrics. 2019;19(1):33 10.1186/s12887-019-1407-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hassen SL, Astatkie A, Mekonnen TC, Bogale GG. Survival Status and Its Determinants among Under-Five Children with Severe Acute Malnutrition Admitted to Inpatient Therapeutic Feeding Centers in South Wollo Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Journal of nutrition and metabolism. 2019;2019 10.1155/2019/2643531 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fikrie A, Alemayehu A, Gebremedhin S. Treatment outcomes and factors affecting time-to-recovery from severe acute malnutrition in 6–59 months old children admitted to a stabilization center in Southern Ethiopia: A retrospective cohort study. Italian journal of pediatrics. 2019;45(1):46 10.1186/s13052-019-0642-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jarso H, Workicho A, Alemseged F. Survival status and predictors of mortality in severely malnourished children admitted to Jimma University Specialized Hospital from 2010 to 2012, Jimma, Ethiopia: a retrospective longitudinal study. BMC pediatrics. 2015;15(1):76 10.1186/s12887-015-0398-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yohannes T, Laelago T, Ayele M, Tamrat T. Mortality and morbidity trends and predictors of mortality in under-five children with severe acute malnutrition in Hadiya zone, South Ethiopia: a four-year retrospective review of hospital-based records (2012–2015). BMC Nutrition. 2017;3(1):18 10.1186/s40795-017-0135-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nyeko R, Calbi V, Ssegujja BO, Ayot GF. Treatment outcome among children under-five years hospitalized with severe acute malnutrition in St. Mary’s hospital Lacor, Northern Uganda. BMC Nutrition. 2016;2(1):19. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gebrezgi D, Teferi D, Reddy PP. Recovery Time From Severe Acute Malnutrition and Development of Complementary Food Supplement For Affected Ethiopian Children. International Journal of Nutrition. 2019;3(3):1. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Muftah S. Outpatient management of severe acute malnutrition among children under five years old, in Yemen: a retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2016;3(2):445. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tiwari AK. A study of clinical profile and outcome of SAM children admitted in nutritional rehabilitation centre, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics. 2018;5(4):1497. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Das S, Paul DK, Bhattacharya M, Basu S, Chatterjee A, Sen S, et al. Clinicoepidemiological Profile, Risk Factors and Outcome of Severe Acute Malnutrition Children at the Nutritional Rehabilitation Centre of a Tertiary Care Centre in Eastern India-A 4 Years Experience. Adv Res Gastroentero Hepatol. 2017;5(2):55–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Trehan I, Goldbach HS, LaGrone LN, Meuli GJ, Wang RJ, Maleta KM, et al. Research Article (New England Journal of Medicine) Antibiotics as part of the management of severe acute malnutrition. Malawi Medical Journal. 2016;28(3):123–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.John C, Diala U, Adah R, Lar L, Envuladu EA, Adedeji I, et al. Survival and nutritional status of children with severe acute malnutrition, six months post-discharge from outpatient treatment in Jigawa state, Nigeria. PloS one. 2018;13(6). 10.1371/journal.pone.0196971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Shamala Devi Sekaran

23 Mar 2020

PONE-D-20-03753

Length of stay to recover from severe acute malnutrition and associated factors among under-five years children admitted to public Hospitals in Aksum, Ethiopia

PLOS ONE

Dear DR Tekia Zafu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by May 07 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Shamala Devi Sekaran

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

 

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and http://www.journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In ethics statement in the manuscript and in the online submission form, please provide additional information about the patient records used in your retrospective study. Specifically, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3.  We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

* In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

 a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

 b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

 We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. Please amend your list of authors on the manuscript to ensure that each author is linked to an affiliation. Authors’ affiliations should reflect the institution where the work was done (if authors moved subsequently, you can also list the new affiliation stating “current affiliation:….” as necessary).

5. ** Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files **. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files.

6. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 3 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

An extensive correction of the language is the first step

Seconding paper not formatted as for PLOS one and many areas incorrectly cited

PLease respond to all queries from both reviewers

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript has not been formatted or written according to the standard of PlosOne.

Some of the words/sentences used clearly reflects that this was taken directly from a thesis without careful revision by all the authors. This is ridiculous.

Although the study has revealed significant differences in the median LOS to recover among different predictor variables nevertheless, in general the findings are highlighting that the length of stay is in the acceptable range of the international and national set of standards. In addition the findings are more relevant to Hospitals in Askum and not sure if the findings will be impactful/relevant to other regions of Africa /countries experiencing SAM children. Probably this should be highlighted further

Reviewer #2: The aim as stated (line106) “this research was intended to come up with information about length of stay till recovery and associated factors among severely malnourished children admitted to the identified health facilities for the betterment of quality of care.” It was however, not clear whether the intention was to see “the effect of associated factors on the length of stay in the hospital” or “to find out what were the associated factors in children who were admitted with severe acute malnutrition”. Of course, on reading the research paper it becomes clear that the objective is to see the effect.

On page 17 under predictors of length of stay : “eight independent significant predictors of LOS for nutritional recovery were found, which are; diarrhea, HIV sero status, palmar pallor, co-morbidity, blood transfusion, IV fluid infusion, provision of plumpy nut and feeding with the help of NG tube”. I would think diarrhea, HIV sero status, palmar pallor should be included under “co-morbidity” and thus “co-morbidity” per se would not be an independent predictor of the length of stay.

Similarly, “deranged pulse rate”, “severe dehydration,” “altered consciousness”, “shock” and “hypothermia” under the heading “Clinical conditions of patients at admission(page 15, lines 295-308)” would all probably be parts of the same clinical spectrum at admission. These are all analyzed separately for incidence.

Since bilateral edema was seen in 90.5% of patients, it will be interesting to find out the cause of unilateral edema in the undernourished children studied (lines 303-304). It will be nice if this was mentioned too. This may not be related to the present research, but if it is due to cellulitis/ lymphadenitis etc. it would impact the length of stay for recovery.

While quick/ early recovery period from other complications (palmar erythema, co-morbidity, diarrhea) was calculated as percentage (of what? Of total, or those who did recover) the recovery in children who did not require NG tube feeding or I.V. fluids was calculated as “1.9 times and 1.55 times more likely”.

Early/quick recovery has not been defined (Line 337 & 344-45).

“Probability of getting cured fast was reduced by 58.5% (AHR = 0.415; 95% CI: 0.302-0.570) in those admitted with co-morbidity” (Line 424). Are the terms “recovery” and “cure” used interchangeably here?

Some abbreviations are not explained, e.g. “OTP (line96) and NRU (205) which I presume is the therapy unit where the children were admitted.

I thought the references should include the names of journals where they are originally published. They are of course easily traceable.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Professor Usha Rani Singh

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-03753_reviewer.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Shamala Devi Sekaran

14 Aug 2020

Length of stay to recover from severe acute malnutrition and associated factors among under-five years children admitted to public Hospitals in Aksum, Ethiopia

PONE-D-20-03753R1

Dear Dr. Tekia Zafu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Shamala Devi Sekaran

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Shamala Devi Sekaran

3 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-03753R1

Length of stay to recover from severe acute malnutrition and associated factors among under-five years children admitted to public Hospitals in Aksum, Ethiopia

Dear Dr. Zafu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Shamala Devi Sekaran

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (SAV)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-03753_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant anonymized data present within the manuscript as supplementary file S1.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES