Skip to main content
Cambridge Open Access logoLink to Cambridge Open Access
. 2020 Jun 18;124(6):631–640. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520001361

Frequent use of selected sugary products associates with thinness, but not overweight during preadolescence: a cross-sectional study

Sohvi Lommi 1,2, Rejane Augusta de Oliveira Figueiredo 2,3, Hely Tuorila 4, Heli Viljakainen 2,4,*
PMCID: PMC7525105  PMID: 32312332

Abstract

Convincing evidence suggests that diets laden with added sugar, specifically sugar-sweetened beverages, associate with excess weight in children. The relationships between sugar consumption frequency and BMI remain less well studied. We, therefore, evaluated children’s consumption frequency of selected sugary products (n 8461; mean age 11·1 (sd 0·9) years) selected from the Finnish Health in Teens cohort study. Using a sixteen-item FFQ including six sugary products (chocolate/sweets, biscuits/cookies, ice cream, sweet pastry, sugary juice drinks and sugary soft drinks), we calculated a Sweet Treat Index (STI) for the frequency of weekly sugary product consumption and categorised children based on quartiles (Q) into low (Q1, cut-off < 4·0), medium (Q2 + Q3, range 4·0–10·5) and high STI (Q4, cut-off > 10·5), and as thin, normal and overweight/obese based on the measured BMI. Through multinomial logistic regression analyses, we found that subjects with a high STI exhibited a higher risk of being thin (OR 1·20, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·41) and lower risk of being overweight (OR 0·79, 95 % CI 0·67, 0·92), while subjects with a low STI were at higher risk of being overweight (OR 1·32, 95 % CI 1·14, 1·53). High consumption frequencies of salty snacks, pizza and hamburgers most closely were associated with a high STI. Our findings suggest that consuming sugary products at a high frequency does not associate with being overweight. The relationship between a low consumption frequency and being overweight suggests that overweight children’s consumption frequency of sugary products may be controlled, restricted or underreported.

Key words: Consumption frequency, Sugary products, BMI, Childhood, Adolescence


Even though mean BMI appears to have recently levelled off in some developed countries(1), childhood obesity remains a major concern given its association with several health risks, such as high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes, and is likely to continue into adulthood(2,3). The causes of obesity remain complex and multifactorial(4). In recent decades, it has been suggested that sugar may play an important role in the obesity epidemic: that is, the prevalence of obesity has increased simultaneously with sugar consumption(5). Yet, the issue remains controversial as recent data suggest that sugar intake is either stable or decreasing worldwide(6). Nonetheless, diets featuring large amounts of sugary foods and drinks predict weight gain, and the intake of sugars and sugar-sweetened beverages associates with BMI in adults, while in children, such associations are primarily limited to sugar-sweetened beverages(7).

One of the main dietary challenges among children and adolescents in many developed countries, including Finland, lies in the high consumption of sucrose-rich drinks and snacks(810). According to estimates, beverages and food consumed as snacks provide as much as 42 % of daily energy intake and two-thirds of the daily sucrose intake in Finnish children(11). Excess sugar deteriorates dietary quality(12,13) and may imperceptibly lead to a positive energy balance. Sugar-sweetened beverages specifically may prove problematic, since energy in liquid form may not provide similar satiety-promoting effects as energy consumed from solid sources(14). The WHO recommends that the intake of free sugars (i.e. mono- and disaccharides added to foods, and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups and fruit juices) should not exceed 10 % of the total energy intake(15).

No specific recommendations exist defining the frequency of consumption of sugary products when considering health outcomes beyond dental health. To minimise the risk of caries, the 2012 Nordic Nutrition Recommendations advise decreasing the consumption frequency of sugar-containing foods and drinks(16), while WHO recommends restricting such consumption to no more than four times daily(17). As a part of efforts to improve children’s oral health and following Sweden’s example, the Finnish Dental Association recommended restricting eating sweets to 1 d/week – designated ‘a candy day’ – already in the 1970s(18,19). Associations between the consumption frequency of sweet products and body weight remain less well studied, however. A meta-analysis indicated that children and adolescents in the highest consumption group, compared with reference consumption, exhibited a lower risk for being overweight(20). However, this meta-analysis combined studies assessing both consumption frequencies and the intake of individual food items. Thus, further evidence of the consumption frequency of sugary products and its association with BMI is needed in order to understand the behavioural dimensions and patterns of sweet foods and drinks consumption and health outcomes. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the relationship between weight status and the frequency of selected sugary product consumption among nearly 9000 Finnish preadolescents. The selected energy-dense and nutrient-poor products are generally consumed as sweet treats. Furthermore, we aimed to understand the relationship between sugary product consumption and the consumption of some non-sweet foods alongside lifestyle factors such as sleep and physical activity (PA).

Methods

Subjects and data collection

This cross-sectional study derives data from the Finnish Health in Teens cohort, which includes approximately 11 400 Finnish children aged 9–12 years. Data were collected during 2013 and 2014 in schools across Finland. Municipalities with high population density and areas surrounding them were selected. In total, 496 (95 %) schools agreed to participate. In schools, all children in grades 3–6 were invited to the study. The response rate was 36 % without sending reminders to the invitees. The study protocol has been described in detail elsewhere(21). Here, we selected 8461 children with information available on fifteen food items from a FFQ, age, sex, BMI, maternal socio-economic status (SES), sleep duration and PA. The research was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and children and one parent per child provided their written informed consent. The Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa approved the study protocol (169/13/03/00/10).

Anthropometric data and questionnaires

Subjects’ weight, height and waist circumference were measured in a standardised way by trained fieldworkers with equipment calibrated daily(21). BMI was calculated as weight (kg)/height squared (m2), and subjects were classified as thin (grade 1, 2 and 3 thinness), normal- or overweight or obese according to age- and sex-specific cut-offs based on the International Obesity Task Force suggestions(22). Because of the low number of obese subjects in the sample (n 208, 2·5 %) and therefore, the lack of statistical power in the multinomial logistic regression analysis, overweight and obese subjects were combined into a single category (hereafter, referred to as overweight). Subjects answered a short FFQ and questions related to sleep and PA. The self-administered FFQ included sixteen items, covering the overall diet and comprising foods typically eaten by young people in Finnish culture. Six items represented sugary products, nine other foods and the final item was water (nonnutritious, excluded from the present analysis). The consumption frequency of each item during the preceding month was rated on a seven-point scale, consisting of ‘not at all’, ‘less than once a week’, ‘once a week’, ‘2–4 times a week’, ‘5–6 times a week’, ‘once a day’ and ‘several times a day’. Our FFQ was adapted from the FFQ used in the WHO’s Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Study (HBSC), conducted in several countries around the world, including Finland. The HBSC FFQ has been validated against a 7-d food diary and a 24-h food behaviour checklist and retested in Belgium and Italy among 11–12-year-old children, showing acceptable validity and reliability(23,24). In addition, the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment used a twenty-three-item FFQ comprising similar food items as ours, and it has been validated against a 3-d pre-coded food diary and retested in three countries, Finland included, confirming validity and reliability(25). Moreover, in the HBSC study, the validity of an index combining sweets and soft drinks was tested, which showed good test–retest reliability (0·82) and moderate correlation (0·53) with the food diary(24).

Sleep duration and PA likely modify the association between the consumption of sugary products and BMI. Thus, we included them in the analysis. Subjects were asked about their bed and wake-up times on weekdays and weekends, and sleep durations during weekdays and weekends were computed separately. We chose to carry out our analysis using sleep duration during weekdays, since sleep during the week appears shorter in duration and associates more strongly with food choices and being overweight than weekend sleep duration(26,27). We categorised children into three groups according to age-specific recommendations: those who sleep the recommended amount of time, those who sleep less than recommended and those who sleep more than recommended(28). The recommended amount of sleep in a 24-h period is 9–12 h for 6–12-year-old children.

In addition, we assessed the level of PA by asking the subjects how many hours a week they exercise during their leisure time. We then categorised them into two groups: those who exercise 7 h or more and those who exercise <7 h. We chose the cut-off of 7 h based on the recommendation of at least 60 min of daily moderate- or vigorous-intensity PA for school-aged children and adolescents(29). Any exercise during leisure time, not including exercise at school or on the way to/from school, was considered PA. Data related to sex and age were obtained from questionnaires or the informed consent form. The occupation of the mother at the time of the child’s birth, used as the indicator of maternal SES, was received from the Medical Birth Register from the National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)(30). The SES groups in the register are: upper-level employees, lower-level employees, manual workers, students, self-employed persons, stay-at-home mothers and others including unemployed and pensioners. Due to small group sizes, we regrouped self-employed persons, stay-at-home mothers and others into one category (named ‘other’).

Sweet Treat Index

We calculated a sum variable Sweet Treat Index (STI) to represent the weekly frequency of selected sugary product consumption. Six foods and drinks represented these products: (1) chocolate and sweets; (2) biscuits and cookies; (3) sweet pastry; (4) ice cream; (5) sugary juice drinks and (6) sugary soft drinks. These were selected as sugary drinks, milk products, chocolate and confectionery are common sources of sucrose in Finnish children’s and adolescents’ diets(8,11,31). Moreover, sweet pastry, cookies, ice cream, sweets and chocolate are consumed 1–2 times/week among secondary school pupils(32). Subjects’ item ratings were further recoded into times/week to better illustrate the weekly consumption frequency: ‘not at all’ as 0, ‘less than once a week’ as 0·5 (we assumed an average consumption of twice per month), ‘once a week’ as 1, ‘2–4 times a week’ as 3, ‘5–6 times a week’ as 5·5, ‘once a day’ as 7 and ‘several times a day’ as 14 times a week (we assumed an average consumption of twice daily). A similar scoring was previously used(26). The total index was based on the sum frequency of the weekly sugary food consumption of the six items, ranging from 0 to 84. The higher the score, the greater the frequency of consumption. Based on the index, we categorised the children into quartiles (Q) to compare subjects with low and high frequencies. The second and third quartiles were further combined, and groups were labelled as low (Q1, cut-off < 4·0), medium (Q2 + Q3, range 4·0–10·5) and high STI (Q4, cut-off > 10·5). We calculated Spearman’s correlations for STI and individual sugary food items and yielded a direct correlation coefficient of >0·5 for each item (Table 1), indicating that all items contributed to STI. The internal consistency was tested using Cronbach’s α coefficient, resulting in a value of 0·73, which is considered good(33). Removing any of the six items would have reduced Cronbach’s α coefficient, indicating that all items should remain in the index.

Table 1.

Spearman coefficients of the correlation between the Sweet Treat Index (STI) and individual food items included in the index

STI
Food items Spearman’s coefficient
Chocolate and sweets 0·550
Sweet pastry 0·556
Biscuits/cookies 0·652
Ice cream 0·514
Sugary juice drinks 0·683
Sugary soft drinks 0·560

Statistical methods

Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test. To evaluate associations between STI groups and BMI groups, we calculated OR and 95 % CI using the multinomial logistic regression, comparing thin and overweight children with normal-weight children. We used medium STI as the reference category. The multinomial logistic regression models were adjusted for sex, age, maternal SES and PA and stratified based on sleep duration during weekdays. The interactions between STI and sleep and STI and PA, respectively, were tested using the likelihood ratio test.

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM’s SPSS version 22 (IBM) and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). We set the level of statistical significance to P < 0·05.

Results

Among all 8461 subjects, 52·5 % (n 4444) were girls and 47·5 % were boys (n 4017), with a mean age of 11·1 (sd 0·9) years. Overall, 11·5 % of the children were thin, 73·9 % were normal weight and 14·7 % were overweight. The average frequency of sugary product consumption was 8·7 (sd 7·6) times/week, ranging from 0 to 84 times/week. Table 2 shows the characteristics of subjects by BMI groups. The distribution of boys and girls differed according to BMI: there were a higher proportion of girls in the thin group compared with overweight group, while for boys, the opposite was observed. Maternal SES differed between BMI groups: manual workers were over-represented and upper-level employees were under-represented in the overweight group. The proportion of subjects who slept less than recommended was highest in the overweight group, as was the proportion of subjects reporting <7 h of PA a week.

Table 2.

Children’s characteristics according to BMI categories (n 8461)*

(Numbers and percentages)

BMI
Thin Normal weight Overweight χ2, P
n % n % n % Total n %
Sex
 Girl 581 60·0 3224 51·6 639 51·4 4444 52·5 <0·001
 Boy 388 40·0 3026 48·4 603 48·6 4017 47·5
Maternal socio-economic status
 Upper-level employees 282 29·1 1961 31·4 313 25·2 2556 30·2 <0·001
 Lower-level employees 398 41·1 2427 38·8 509 41·0 3334 39·4
 Manual workers 100 10·3 680 10·9 209 16·8 989 11·7
 Students 120 12·4 685 11·0 117 9·4 922 10·9
 Other 69 7·1 497 8·0 94 7·6 660 7·8
Physical activity per week
 <7 h 474 48·9 2646 42·3 661 53·2 3781 44·7 <0·001
 ≥7 h 495 51·1 3604 57·7 581 46·8 4680 55·3
Sleep duration during weekdays
 <Recommended 52 5·4 491 7·9 146 11·8 689 8·1 <0·001
 Recommended 897 92·6 5640 90·2 1069 86·1 7607 89·9
 >Recommended 20 2·1 119 1·9 27 2·2 166 2·0
*

The group ‘overweight’ includes obese subjects.

Table 3 provides the distributions for the maternal SES, sleep duration and PA, and for the consumption frequencies of other food items in low, medium and high STI groups. Maternal SES differed by the STI groups: upper-level employees were more common in the low STI group than in the high STI group, while an opposite tendency was observed among lower-level employees and manual workers. The highest consumption frequencies of ‘hamburgers or hot dogs’, ‘pizza’ and ‘salty snacks’ were found in the high STI group, and conversely, the lowest consumption rates of these items were found in the low STI group. We observed a similar trend for ‘fresh juice’. A high consumption of ‘fresh vegetables’ was more common among subjects with a low STI than those with a high STI. The differences in the consumption of ‘dark bread’, ‘cooked vegetables’ and ‘fruits or berries’ were less pronounced, although statistically significant.

Table 3.

Distribution of lifestyle factors and food item frequencies by Sweet Treat Index (STI) groups (n 8461)

(Numbers and percentages)

STI Total n %
Low Medium High χ2, P
n % n % n %
Lifestyle factors
 Maternal socio-economic status
  Upper-level employees 643 34·1 1375 30·2 538 26·5 2556 30·2 <0·001
  Lower-level employees 686 36·4 1786 39·3 862 42·4 3334 39·4
  Manual workers 195 10·4 533 11·7 261 12·8 989 11·7
  Students 232 12·3 492 10·8 198 9·7 922 10·9
  Other 127 6·7 360 7·9 173 8·5 660 7·8
 Sleep duration during weekdays
  <Recommended 115 6·1 328 7·2 246 12·1 689 8·1 <0·001
  Recommended 1726 91·7 4129 90·8 1751 86·2 7606 89·9
  >Recommended 42 2·2 89 2·0 35 1·7 166 2·0
 Physical activity per week
  <7 h 805 42·8 1978 43·5 998 49·1 3781 44·7 <0·001
  ≥7 h 1078 57·2 2568 56·5 1034 50·9 4680 55·3
Food item frequencies
 Dark bread
  Once a week or less 391 20·8 847 18·6 436 21·5 1674 19·8 <0·001
  2–6 times a week 914 48·5 2440 53·7 952 46·9 4306 50·9
  At least once a day 578 30·7 1259 27·7 644 31·7 2481 29·3
 Milk or buttermilk
  ≤4 times a week 263 14·0 615 13·5 302 14·9 1180 13·9 0·247
  5–7 times a week 333 17·7 896 19·7 382 18·8 1611 19·0
  Several times a day 1287 68·3 3035 66·8 1348 66·3 5670 67·0
 Cooked vegetables
  Once a week or less 1057 56·1 2562 56·4 1127 55·5 4746 56·1 <0·001
  2–6 times a week 604 32·1 1617 35·6 659 32·4 2880 34·0
  At least once a day 222 11·8 367 8·1 246 12·1 835 9·9
 Fresh vegetables
  Once a week or less 284 15·1 745 16·4 379 18·7 1408 16·6 <0·001
  2–6 times a week 723 38·4 2040 44·9 855 42·1 3618 42·8
  At least once a day 876 46·5 1761 38·7 798 39·3 3435 40·6
 Fruits or berries
  Once a week or less 430 22·8 939 20·7 391 19·2 1760 20·8 <0·001
  2–6 times a week 768 40·8 2151 47·3 935 46·0 3854 45·6
  At least once a day 685 36·4 1456 32·0 706 34·7 2847 33·6
 Fresh juice
  <1 times a week 745 39·6 964 21·2 257 12·6 1966 23·2 <0·001
  1–4 times a week 715 38·0 2078 45·7 681 33·5 3474 41·1
  At least 5 times a week 423 22·5 1504 33·1 1094 53·8 3021 35·7
 Salty snacks
  None 460 24·4 239 5·3 70 3·4 769 9·1 <0·001
  <1 times a week 1067 56·7 2034 44·7 462 22·7 3563 42·1
  At least once a week 356 18·9 2273 50·0 1500 73·8 4129 48·8
 Pizza
  None 777 41·3 877 19·3 230 11·3 1884 22·3 <0·001
  <1 times a week 1006 53·4 3211 70·6 1237 60·9 5454 64·5
  At least once a week 100 5·3 458 10·1 565 27·8 1123 13·3
 Hamburgers or hot dogs
  None 969 51·5 1057 23·3 257 12·6 2283 27·0 <0·001
  <1 times a week 867 46·0 3042 66·9 1178 58·0 5087 60·1
  At least once a week 47 2·5 447 9·8 597 29·4 1091 12·9

Furthermore, the associations of low, medium and high STI with being thin and overweight appear as OR and 95 % CI in Table 4. A low STI was more common in overweight than in normal-weight or thin subjects. Compared with medium STI, high STI subjects exhibited a higher risk for being thin (OR 1·20; 95 % CI 1·02, 1·41) and a lower risk for being overweight (OR 0·79; 95 % CI 0·67, 0·92), indicating an inverse relationship between sugary food consumption and BMI. Low STI subjects exhibited a higher risk for being overweight (OR 1·32; 95 % CI 1·14, 1·53).

Table 4.

Sweet Treat Index (STI) related to BMI, compared with normal weight, among all subjects (n 8461)*

(Odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)

BMI groups
STI Normal weight Thin Comparison, normal weight × thin Overweight Comparison, normal × overweight
n % n % OR 95 % CI P n % OR 95 % CI P
Low 1338 21·4 215 22·2 1·05 0·89, 1·25 0·551 330 26·6 1·32 1·14, 1·53 <0·001
Medium 3389 54·2 497 51·3 1 660 53·1 1
High 1523 24·4 257 26·5 1·20 1·02, 1·41 0·032 252 20·3 0·79 0·67, 0·92 0·003
*

Results from multinomial logistic regression. Model adjusted for sex, age, maternal socio-economic status, sleep duration during weekdays and physical activity. The group ‘overweight’ includes obese subjects.

In addition, the risk of being thin and overweight was stratified based on the sleep duration categories, since we found an interaction between STI and sleep duration (P = 0·001; Fig. 1). Among children adhering to the recommended amount of sleep, we found results resembling those in the entire sample, although the higher risk of being thin for those in the high STI group was barely significant (95 % CI 1·00, 1·41). Among children sleeping less or more than recommended, we did not find any statistically significant risks for being thin or overweight.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

OR and 95 % CI for the Sweet Treat Index (STI) related to the BMI categories, compared with normal weight, stratified by sleep groups (a, b and c). Results from multinomial logistic regression. Model is adjusted for sex, age, maternal socio-economic status and physical activity. The group ‘overweight’ includes obese subjects. (a) Sleep, less than recommended (n 689); (b) sleep, recommended (n 7606); (c) sleep, more than recommended (n 166).

Discussion

In this study, we observed an inverse relationship between the consumption frequency of selected sugary products and BMI in a large cohort of Finnish preadolescents. Those with a low consumption frequency exhibited a higher risk for being overweight. In contrast, those with a high consumption frequency had a higher risk for being thin and appeared at lower risk for being overweight. We utilised data from the well-defined Finnish Health in Teens cohort, which includes several self-reported lifestyle factors, including sugary product consumption, sleep duration and PA levels, among over 8000 Finnish children aged 9–12 years.

For the study purposes, we created an index to measure the weekly frequency of sugary product consumption and investigated its relationship to being both overweight and thin. Indices combining a variety of sugary foods and drinks have been used in several studies(3436). To the best of our knowledge, ours represents the first study to investigate the association between frequency of consumption based on a sum score of selected sugary products and BMI. In an Italian study with close to 60 000 11–15-year-old subjects, the more frequent consumption of ‘unhealthy foods’ correlated with a lower risk of being overweight among all subjects except 11-year-old girls(37). In that study, unhealthy foods encompassed sweets, soft drinks and crisps, which were combined to create a summed variable. Their index did not include purely sugary foods; nevertheless, their results are similar to ours.

Moreover, previous studies assessed the relationships of the consumption frequencies of individual sugar-rich food items and BMI in children and adolescents worldwide(3840). The results from the large, cross-national HBSC study among 137 593 participants across thirty-four mostly European countries support our findings, whereby a higher consumption frequency of sweets (defined as candy and chocolate) was associated with a lower OR for being overweight in thirty-one of thirty-four countries(39). In addition, a study among 2906 Saudi Arabian adolescents aged 14–19 years with less frequent sugary drink consumption showed a higher risk of being overweight and obese compared with more frequent consumption; moreover, overweight subjects consumed sweets less frequently than normal-weight subjects(38). In a Norwegian study among 2281 children aged 6–16 years, less frequent consumption of sweets was associated with obesity(40).

Several possible explanations exist for our findings. Given the absence of information about portion sizes, we cannot exclude the possibility that children who consumed sugary products less frequently were actually consuming larger portions than children who consumed them more often, thereby resulting in higher energy intake. Furthermore, a child’s consumption frequency of sugary products may be restricted by parents through their attempts to promote healthy eating(41). Controlling and limiting might lead children to eat sugary products in large quantities once the restriction is lifted. In 3–7-year-old children, restricting eating highly palatable foods, such as sweet foods, resulted in a higher intake of those foods following the removal of restrictions(4244).

Another reason for limiting the consumption frequency of sugary products may result from parental efforts to restrict eating in children already considered overweight. Conflicting evidence exists of the association between maternal feeding practices and a child’s later BMI. Specifically, in one study, maternal restriction of a child’s eating at 3–5 years was associated with a higher BMI 2 years later(45), while another study found that only after gaining weight did maternal feeding practices become restrictive(46). Moreover, maternal use of restriction promoted eating in the absence of hunger(41). However, these results focus on children younger than those in our sample. Among older children, parental restriction may no longer prove effective, since adolescents enjoy more freedom to buy snacks and beverages on their own. However, conflicting results have been reported for 12–17-year-old Dutch adolescents, whereby perceived restrictive parenting practices correlated with less soft drink consumption(47). The association between being thin and a high consumption frequency may be explained by parents encouraging or not restricting thin children to eat sugary foods more often in order to gain weight(48).

Contrary to our results, previous studies among 2–19-year-old children and adolescents in Saudi Arabia and Spain found that the frequent consumption of sugary products, including sweets, soft drinks and chocolate, was associated with excess weight(49,50). More frequent consumption of sweets and soft drinks correlated with obesity in 2–14-year-old Spanish children(50). That sample population, however, was recruited during healthcare visits and was also smaller (n 1188) than ours, with a wider age range than in our study, possibly explaining the contradicting results. Moreover, information was reported by parents. Among Saudi Arabian school girls aged 12–19 years, a higher consumption frequency of chocolate and sweets was associated with obesity(49). Again, explanatory factors accounting for these conflicting results may stem from the different age ranges and the smaller sample size (n 512). Furthermore, sex and cultural differences may account for the differing results(51,52).

Along with sugary food items, the self-administered FFQ contained nine other food items. We found that the highest proportion of children consuming fast foods and salty snacks was among those with a high STI, indicating an overall low-quality dietary pattern among them. Frequent consumers of sweet foods were also frequent consumers of high-fat foods such as crisps in a study of 1-year-old children(53). Our results do not support the speculation that the high consumption of sweets associates with eating less fatty foods and, thus, leads to relatively low total energy intake(39).

We did not find a significant association between STI and BMI among those children who slept less than recommended. However, subjects with a high STI were overrepresented in this subgroup. In previous studies, a shorter sleep duration was linked to unhealthy eating habits and more frequent consumption of sugary products such as sweets, chocolate and cakes among school-aged children(26,5456). A short sleep duration was associated with an increased BMI in adolescents(57), and our overall findings indicate that the weight status differs based on sleep duration. When we stratified our analysis by sleep, we found a similar relationship between the STI and BMI groups in those who slept the recommended amount as in the whole sample. This was not surprising as they constituted the majority of the sample. However, no associations were observed in those sleeping less or more than recommended. This could be due to small sample sizes.

Among Finnish children, the prevalence of overweight and obesity in this age group has reported to be similar(58) to or higher(59) than that presented here. The corresponding result, with the combined prevalence of 15·4 % in fifth grade children, was reported in ten school health units during 2007–2008(58), while more recent data from the national THL Avohilmo register from 2014–2015 indicated that roughly 28 % of children aged 7–12 years were at least overweight(59). Regarding the maternal SES at the birth of the child, our sample seems to have slightly different SES compared with data from Statistics Finland concerning all 25–34-year-old women living in Finland in 2010(60). We marked an overrepresentation of upper-level employees (30 v. 18 %) among our mothers, while the proportions of lower-level employees and manual workers among our sample resemble those in the young female population (39 v. 42 % and 12 v. 15 %, respectively). A reason for the overrepresentation of upper-level employees could be due to our sampling which concentrated on densely populated, mostly urban-like areas and lacked subjects living in the most rural, scarcely populated areas. As the maternal SES was associated with both weight status and the STI of the child, it was included in the analysis as a confounder; thus, its effect on the relationship between the STI and weight status has been taken into account. Our findings can be generalised to European populations with high maternal SES living in urban-like areas.

The FFQ we used to assess habitual food choices consisted of sixteen food items. We chose to use a short FFQ as it is easy and less burdensome to complete as a part of a longer survey. Due to the shortness of the FFQ, we were not able to estimate consumption of all possible sugar sources; thus, the STI focused on foods and drinks that are generally consumed as sweet treats. The subjects reported their food choices themselves, which appears more accurate than parental reporting(61). Children are cognitively skilled to self-report from the age of 8 years(62), and as children consume a part of their food outside homes, out of the reach of parental supervision, they are likely more capable to report their food choices than their parents.

The strengths of the present study include its large population-based, geographically diverse sample relying on recent data from the 2010s, and the reliable anthropometric measurements completed by trained fieldworkers. Furthermore, we investigated the associations of consumption frequency not only with being thin and but also with being overweight. Being thin is relatively common in this age group, and including thin children as a separate group helps to identify their specific consumption behaviours and related risks. Moreover, by using an index that covers a group of sugar-rich foods and drinks, we could characterise a dimension of subjects’ eating behaviours instead of the consumption of individual food items alone(34). Our inability to assess all possible sources of dietary sugars, as discussed above, is a limitation. Moreover, the lack of information regarding portion sizes also represents a limitation; nevertheless, a FFQ without information on quantities are considered a fast and useful way to rank subjects(23). Under- and overreporting remain a possibility and, thus, represent a further limitation. Underreporting is of concern in dietary questionnaires, particularly regarding foods considered unhealthy and in studies involving obese subjects(63,64). Overreporting, on the other hand, might be a problem among underweight individuals(64). However, in the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment validation study among 11–12-year-old children, the validity of the FFQ was independent of BMI(25). Moreover, the tendency to misreport might increase with age(62). In general, FFQ may overestimate consumption frequencies(23,24). Due to the lack of information on energy intake, we were not able to estimate the level of misreporting. However, frequent consumption of sweet treats might affect body weight by suppressing appetite without contributing to total energy intake(65). We used the International Obesity Task Force’s BMI classification to define weight status, which may overestimate the prevalence of thinness, and on the other hand, underestimate the prevalence of overweight and obesity when compared with the WHO classification(66). Implications of using different reference systems should be investigated in further studies. The possibility of selection bias due to the low response rate cannot be dismissed. It might have been possible to increase the response rate by sending reminders. However, this would probably not have contributed to the heterogeneity of the sample and thus would have had only minor impact on our conclusions(67,68). Occupation as the indicator of the maternal SES was obtained at the time of child’s birth, which might not reflect the actual situation at the time of data collection and could be considered as a limitation in this study. Finally, a further limitation is the cross-sectional study design where both the outcome and the exposure were measured at the same time, which means that no conclusions regarding causation can be made. Thus, our findings should be confirmed through longitudinal studies with repeated measures of both exposure and outcome.

In conclusion, the frequent consumption of sugary products diminished the risk of being overweight and concurrently increased the risk of being thin among preadolescents. Focusing solely on the consumption frequency of sugar-containing products is reasonable from the viewpoint of dental health, but in dietary counselling and health promotion, it might prove misleading. A whole-diet approach together with portion size should be highlighted.

Acknowledgements

We thank the children and their families for participating in the study. We also thank the teachers and schools and all the fieldworkers and coordinators who assisted in data collection.

This work was supported by Samfundet Folkhälsan r.f., Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation, Medicinska Understödsföreningen Liv och Hälsan r.f. and Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland. The funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.

All authors contributed to the design of the manuscript and interpretation of the results and revised the manuscript critically. S. L. conducted the statistical analyses, designed the tables and figures and drafted the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Abarca-Gómez L, Abdeen ZA, Hamid ZA, et al. (2017) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 390, 2627–2642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kumar S & Kelly AS (2017) Review of childhood obesity: from epidemiology, etiology, and comorbidities to clinical assessment and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 92, 251–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Juonala M, Magnussen CG, Berenson GS, et al. (2011) Childhood adiposity, adult adiposity, and cardiovascular risk factors. N Engl J Med 365, 1876–1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Van Der Klaauw AA & Farooqi IS (2015) The hunger genes: pathways to obesity. Cell 161, 119–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, et al. (2007) Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 899–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wittekind A & Walton J (2014) Worldwide trends in dietary sugars intake. Nutr Res Rev 27, 330–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Te Morenga L, Mallard S & Mann J (2013) Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ 346, e7492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoppu U, Lehtisalo J, Tapanainen H, et al. (2010) Dietary habits and nutrient intake of Finnish adolescents. Public Health Nutr 13, 965–972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mesana MI, Hilbig A, Androutsos O, et al. (2018) Dietary sources of sugars in adolescents’ diet: the HELENA study. Eur J Nutr 57, 629–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Svensson Å, Larsson C, Eiben G, et al. (2014) European children’s sugar intake on weekdays versus weekends: the IDEFICS study. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 822–828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eloranta AM, Lindi V, Schwab U, et al. (2011) Dietary factors and their associations with socioeconomic background in Finnish girls and boys 6–8 years of age: the PANIC Study. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 1211–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alexy U, Sichert-Hellert W & Kersting M (2003) Associations between intake of added sugars and intakes of nutrients and food groups in the diets of German children and adolescents. Br J Nutr 90, 441–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ruottinen S, Niinikoski H, Lagstrom H, et al. (2008) High sucrose intake is associated with poor quality of diet and growth between 13 months and 9 years of age: the Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project. Pediatrics 121, e1676–e1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.DiMeglio DP & Mattes RD (2000) Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. Int J Obes 24, 794–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.World Health Organization (2015) Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: WHO. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2012 (2014) Integrating Nutrition and Physical Activity [Internet]. 5th ed. Copenhagen. http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:704251/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed July 2019).
  • 17.World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no. 916. Geneva: WHO. [PubMed]
  • 18.Finnish Dental Association (2014) Kieltolaista hoitotakuuseen. Suomen Hammaslääkäriliitto 90 vuotta [In Finnish]. https://www.hammaslaakariliitto.fi/sites/default/files/mediafiles/liiton_toiminta/kieltolaista_hoitotakuuseen_web.pdf (accessed July 2019).
  • 19.Krasse B (2001) The Vipeholm Dental Caries Study: recollections and reflections 50 years later. J Dent Res 80, 1785–1788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gasser CE, Mensah FK, Russell M, et al. (2016) Confectionery consumption and overweight, obesity, and related outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 103, 1344–1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Figueiredo RA de O, Simola-Ström S, Rounge TB, et al. (2019) Cohort profile – The Finnish Health in Teens (Fin-HIT) study: a population-based study. Int J Epidemiol, 48, 23–24h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cole TJ & Lobstein T (2012) Extended international (IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity. Pediatr Obes 7, 284–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Vereecken CA & Maes L (2003) A Belgian study on the reliability and relative validity of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children food-frequency questionnaire. Public Health Nutr 6, 581–588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Vereecken CA, Rossi S, Giacchi MV, et al. (2008) Comparison of a short food-frequency questionnaire and derived indices with a seven-day diet record in Belgian and Italian children. Int J Public Health 53, 297–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saloheimo T, González SA, Erkkola M, et al. (2015) The reliability and validity of a short food frequency questionnaire among 9–11-year olds: a multinational study on three middle-income and high-income countries. Int J Obes Suppl 5, S22–S28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Westerlund L, Ray C & Roos E (2009) Associations between sleeping habits and food consumption patterns among 10–11-year-old children in Finland. Br J Nutr 102, 1531–1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Seicean A, Redline S, Seicean S, et al. (2007) Association between short sleeping hours and overweight in adolescents: results from a US Suburban High School survey. Sleep Breath 11, 285–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Paruthi S, Brooks LJ, Ambrosio CD, et al. (2016) Recommended amount of sleep for pediatric populations: a consensus statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med 12, 785–786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, et al. (2018) The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA 320, 2020–2028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.National Institute of Health and Welfare Medical Birth Register. Register description. https://thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en/statistics/information-on-statistics/register-descriptions/newborns (accessed December 2019).
  • 31.Erkkola M, Kronberg-Kippilä C, Kyttälä P, et al. (2009) Sucrose in the diet of 3-year-old Finnish children: sources, determinants and impact on food and nutrient intake. Br J Nutr 101, 1209–1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hoppu U, Kujala J, Lehtisalo J, et al. (editors) (2008) Nutrition and Wellbeing of Secondary School Pupils. Situation at Baseline and Results of the Intervention Study during Academic Year 2007–2008 [In Finnish]. Publications of the National Public Health Institute, B30/2008. http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe201204193417 (accessed December 2019).
  • 33.Bland JM & Altman DG (1997) Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 314, 572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bingham CM, Lahti-Koski M, Puukka P, et al. (2012) Effects of a healthy food supply intervention in a military setting: positive changes in cereal, fat and sugar containing foods. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9, 91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Keskitalo K, Knaapila A, Kallela M, et al. (2007) Sweet taste preferences are partly genetically determined: identification of a trait locus on chromosome 16. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 55–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pieper K, Winter J, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, et al. (2018) Association between a new sugar index and caries experience: results of a Cross-Sectional Field Study. Caries Res 53, 160–167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Borraccino A, Lemma P, Berchialla P, et al. (2016) Unhealthy food consumption in adolescence: role of sedentary behaviours and modifiers in 11-, 13- and 15-year-old Italians. Eur J Public Health 26, 650–656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Al-Hazzaa HM, Abahussain NA, Al-Sobayel HI, et al. (2012) Lifestyle factors associated with overweight and obesity among Saudi adolescents. BMC Public Health 12, 354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, Boyce WF, et al. (2005) Comparison of overweight and obesity prevalence in school-aged youth from 34 countries and their relationships with physical activity and dietary patterns. Obes Rev 6, 123–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kristiansen H, Júlíusson PB, Eide GE, et al. (2013) TV viewing and obesity among Norwegian children: the importance of parental education. Acta Paediatr 102, 199–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Birch L, Fisher J & Davison K (2003) Learning to overeat: maternal use of restrictive feeding practices promotes girls’ eating in the absence of hunger. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 215–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fisher JO & Birch LL (1999) Restricting access to palatable foods affects children’s behavioral. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 1264–1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jansen E, Mulkens S, Emond Y, et al. (2008) From the Garden of Eden to the land of plenty. Restriction of fruit and sweets intake leads to increased fruit and sweets consumption in children. Appetite 51, 570–575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jansen E, Mulkens S & Jansen A (2007) Do not eat the red food!: prohibition of snacks leads to their relatively higher consumption in children. Appetite 49, 572–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Farrow CV, Haycraft E & Blissett JM (2018) Observing maternal restriction of food with 3–5-year-old children: relationships with temperament and later body mass index (BMI). Int J Environ Res Public Health 15, 1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rhee KE, Coleman SM, Appugliese DP, et al. (2009) Maternal feeding practices become more controlling after and not before excessive rates of weight gain. Obesity 17, 1724–1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Van Der Horst K, Kremers S, Ferreira I, et al. (2007) Perceived parenting style and practices and the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages by adolescents. Health Educ Res 22, 295–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Huus K, Brekke HK, Ludvigsson JF, et al. (2009) Relationship of food frequencies as reported by parents to overweight and obesity at 5 years. Acta Paediatr 98, 139–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Musaiger AO, Al-Mannai M & Zagzoog N (2013) Association between food intake frequency and obesity among adolescent girls in Saudi Arabia. Int J Adolesc Med Health 26, 145–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zurriaga O, Quiles Izquierdo J, Gil Costa M, et al. (2010) Factors associated with childhood obesity in Spain. The OBICE study: a case–control study based on sentinel networks. Public Health Nutr 14, 1105–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Al-Hazzaa HM, Abahussain NA, Al-Sobayel HI, et al. (2011) Physical activity, sedentary behaviors and dietary habits among Saudi adolescents relative to age, gender and region. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8, 140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sharara E, Akik C, Ghattas H, et al. (2018) Physical inactivity, gender and culture in Arab countries: a systematic assessment of the literature. BMC Public Health 18, 639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Brekke HK, Van Odijk J & Ludvigsson J (2019) Predictors and dietary consequences of frequent intake of high-sugar, low-nutrient foods in 1-year-old children participating in the ABIS study. Br J Nutr 95, 176–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Börnhorst C, Wijnhoven TMA, Kunešová M, et al. (2015) WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative: associations between sleep duration, screen time and food consumption frequencies. BMC Public Health 15, 442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Córdova FV, Barja S & Brockmann PE (2018) Consequences of short sleep duration on the dietary intake in children: a systematic review and metanalysis. Sleep Med Rev 42, 68–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Franckle RL, Falbe J, Gortmaker S, et al. (2015) Insufficient sleep among elementary and middle school students is linked with elevated soda consumption and other unhealthy dietary behaviors. Prev Med 74, 36–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Garaulet M, Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, et al. (2011) Short sleep duration is associated with increased obesity markers in European adolescents: effect of physical activity and dietary habits. The HELENA study. Int J Obes 35, 1308–1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mäki P, Hakulinen-Viitanen T, Kaikkonen R, et al. (2010) Child Health – Results of the LATE-Study on Growth, Development, Health, Health Behavior and Growth Environment. [In Finnish]. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL). Report 2/2010. Helsinki 2010.
  • 59.Mäki P, Susanna L-J, Vuorela N, et al. (2017) Register of Primary Health Care Visits (Avohilmo) as data source for monitoring the prevalence of overweight among Finnish children. [In Finnish]. Suom Lääkäril 72, 209–222. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Official Statistics of Finland (OFS) Employment [e-publication]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. http://www.stat.fi/til/tyokay/index_en.html (accessed December 2019).
  • 61.Burrows TL, Truby H, Morgan PJ, et al. (2013) A comparison and validation of child versus parent reporting of children’s energy intake using food frequency questionnaires versus food records: who’s an accurate reporter? Clin Nutr 32, 613–618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Livingstone MBE, Robson PJ & Wallace JMW (2004) Issues in dietary intake assessment of children and adolescents. Br J Nutr 92, S213–S222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Andersen LF, Lillegaard ITL, Øverby N, et al. (2005) Overweight and obesity among Norwegian schoolchildren: changes from 1993 to 2000. Scand J Public Health 33, 99–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bel-Serrat S, Julián-Almárcegui C, González-Gross M, et al. (2016) Correlates of dietary energy misreporting among European adolescents: the Healthy Lifestyle in Europe by Nutrition in Adolescence (HELENA) study. Br J Nutr 115, 1439–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Reid M, Hammersley R, Hill AJ, et al. (2007) Long-term dietary compensation for added sugar: effects of supplementary sucrose drinks over a 4-week period. Br J Nutr 97, 193–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rolland-Cachera MF (2012) Towards a simplified definition of childhood obesity? A focus on the extended IOTF references. Pediatr Obes 7, 259–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Christensen AI, Ekholm O, Kristensen PL, et al. (2015) The effect of multiple reminders on response patterns in a Danish health survey. Eur J Public Health 25, 156–161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lallukka T, Pietiläinen O, Jäppinen S, et al. (2020) Factors associated with health survey response among young employees: a register-based study using online, mailed and telephone interview data collection methods. BMC Public Health 20, 184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES