Feline-Human Zoonosis Transmission in North Africa: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Throughout human history, domestic animal species have represented a unique zoonotic disease risk for the transmission of pathogens ranging from viral, bacterial, parasitic, and fungal. In North Africa, cats have a particularly long record and occupy a specialized niche within many communities. This systematic review was conducted to analyze the current and historical literature documenting the breadth and variety of zoonoses in North Africa, specifically relating to the domesticated feline. Multiple electronic databases were searched on January 16, 2019, for published reports on feline zoonoses in North Africa. A total of 76 studies met the inclusion criteria for a full assessment. Articles selected for the review ranged in publication dates from 1939 to 2019 and included a case study, cross-sectional surveys, genomic analyses, and a book chapter. The most commonly studied pathogen was Toxoplasma gondii (n = 17) followed by a variety of helminths (n = 10). Of the countries in the target region, most publications were of studies conducted in Egypt (n = 53) followed by Tunisia (n = 12), Algeria (n = 11), Morocco (n = 5), and Libya (n = 3). The results of this review identify a variety of viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic zoonotic diseases associated with cats in North Africa, ranging from historically endemic diseases in both human and animal populations in the region, to emerging infections with recent confirmatory diagnoses. This review describes reported feline zoonoses in North Africa and provides recommendations for their prevention and control. In addition to vaccination campaigns for domesticated felines and postexposure prophylaxis for humans, prompt veterinary and medical care of exposure risks and subsequent infections are essential in limiting the zoonotic disease burden in North African communities of humans and cats.

Introduction

As long as animals have been living alongside humans, domesticated species have represented a unique risk to humans in the transmission of pathogens ranging from viral, bacterial, parasitic, and fungal. Zoonoses are infectious diseases that spread between animals and humans, and account for nearly 60% of all infectious disease in humans (Salyer et al. 2017). Losses resulting from zoonotic disease span animal and human health, productivity and income for households and communities, and costs associated with human and veterinary treatment (Torgerson and Macpherson 2011). In low-resource countries, zoonotic disease accounts for almost half of all human deaths and make up a significant proportion of disability-adjusted life-years within populations (Torgerson and Macpherson 2011, Salyer et al. 2017). Quantifying the global burden of zoonoses is difficult, particularly in North Africa. However, this region represents a substantial portion of the total zoonotic cases of helminthiasis, leishmaniasis, and leprosy (Hotez et al. 2012).

Research into zoonotic disease risks from companion animals have often focused on canines (Macpherson 2012). Yet the feline has a long history in North Africa and the Middle East, and occupies a unique niche in these communities. Complete domestication of the cat likely occurred in Egypt just 4000 years ago (Faure and Kitchener 2009). In addition to skeletal remains as archaeological evidence, depictions of cats through clay and stone figurines from Syria, Turkey, and Israel, as well as hieroglyphs and decorated cat mummy votive offerings indicate a value of the tamed feline beyond simple rat-catchers and pelt sources (Faure and Kitchener 2009).

In the 1480s, a European traveler wrote about a shelter for street cats in Damascus, describing the phenomenon as something unique to Muslim societies (Alkhateeb Shehada 2012). The shelter had been commemorated in honor of an Islamic tradition, with popular oral versions of the story relating the birth of a litter of kittens on the Prophet Mohammed's robe, who chose to abandon his garment rather than disturb the mother cat (Alkhateeb Shehada 2012). Other histories relating the cat and the prophet are written in the canonical literature, such as the story of a woman being punished for mistreatment of a cat (Sahih al-Bukhari 3318), the disapproval of selling cats and dogs for profit (Sahih Muslim 3808), and of the prophet sanctioning an apostle to perform ablutions with water shared with a cat for drinking (Sunan Abu-Dawud 0075).

Cats are a popular pet globally and there are more domesticated felines than domesticated dogs (Vitale et al. 2019). In 2018, a quarter of all households in the United States owned at least one cat (American Veterinary Medical Association 2018). However, feline contact can put humans and other animals at risk for zoonotic disease transmission (Gerhold and Jessup 2013). For instance, cats are implicated in nearly 40% of all animal bites in the United States, with up to 80% of these bites becoming infected (Kravetz and Federman 2002). In addition to the risk of wound infection and complications such as abscess or septic arthritis, cat bites and scratches are also implicated in the spread of diseases such as rabies, cat-scratch disease (CSD), tularemia, and plague (Kravetz and Federman 2002).

In addition, feline zoonotic transmission may occur through contact with infected saliva or other excretions, contaminated vehicles like food, water, or fomites, and shared vectors or environmental exposures (Tuzio et al. 2005). These diseases and transmission routes are often associated with stray, feral, or community-owned cats, which may be less likely to receive preventive care or veterinary attention (Maia et al. 2014). The aim of this review is to identify, summarize, and describe the published literature linking felines to zoonoses in North Africa and illustrate opportunities for One Health prevention and control strategies that protect the health of humans and cats.

Materials and Methods

Search strategy and selection criteria

Electronic databases were searched on January 16, 2019, for publications on feline zoonoses in North Africa. Databases included the following: ABI/Inform Collection, Agricola, Agriculture Collection, Aquatic Sciences Collection, Biological Sciences, BioOne Complete, Biosis, CABI, Environment Complete, Environmental Science Collection, Environmental Studies and Policy, Google Scholar, Health and Medicine, MEDLINE, Nursing and Allied Health, PubMed, SAGE Journals Online, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink Journals, TOXLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Zoological Record. There were no date restrictions, but publications were limited to English or French due to language abilities of the reviewers. The countries of Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia were selected based on the World Bank's classification of countries that comprise their Middle East and North Africa region (World Bank 2019).

Key words and search terms were developed from larger categories for the host (cat*, feline, pet*, companion animal*, kitten*, and kitty), routes of zoonotic exposure (transmission, respiratory, enteric, fecal-oral, gastrointestinal, airborne, direct contact, bite*, scratch*, wound*, saliva, contact, feces, exposure*, zoonoses, zoonosis, zoonotic, fecal, and urine), and location of interest (Algeria*, Egypt*, Libya*, Morocc*, Tunisia*, North Africa*, and MENA). These terms were used in the creation of search strings that included wildcards (*) and Boolean operators to try to capture all variations and pluralities, based upon the search principles of each database. Each database was examined for publications that contained at least one search term from each category in the title and/or abstract. Search strings included the use of OR between terms within the category and were combined using AND to make sure that the results included the correct host, a route of zoonotic exposure, and a location of interest such as the following:

• 1.Cat[tiab] OR cats[tiab] OR feline*[tiab] OR cats[MeSH] OR pet[tiab] OR Pets[MeSH] OR “companion animal”[tiab] OR kitten*[tiab] OR kitty[tiab]) AND
• 2.(Transmission[tiab] OR respiratory[tiab] OR enteric[tiab] OR “fecal oral”[tiab] OR gastrointestinal[tiab] OR airborne[tiab] OR “direct contact”[tiab] OR bite*[tiab] OR scratch*[tiab] OR wound*[tiab] OR saliva[tiab] OR contact*[tiab] OR feces[tiab] OR exposure*[tiab] OR zoonoses[MeSH] OR zoonotic[tiab] OR zoonosis[tiab] OR fecal[tiab] OR urine[tiab]) AND
• 3.(Algeria*[tiab] OR Egypt*[tiab] OR Libya*[tiab] OR Morocc*[tiab] OR Tunisia*[tiab] OR “North Africa”[tiab] OR “North African”[tiab] OR “North Africans”[tiab] OR “MENA”[tiab])

Publications were included if there was documentation of zoonoses or reverse zoonoses with feline participation in transmission within or in reference to one or more North African country. Only literature that described cases of feline-associated zoonotic transmission or in which the authors described a strong likelihood of transmission were included. Publications were excluded if the study or report referenced the zoonotic disease in only an animal or human population without discussion of confirmed zoonotic transmission or potential exposure risk from cat contact. Broad overviews and reviews were excluded if they did not specifically provide case reports or study details on feline-human zoonosis transmission.

Data screening

Guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) (http://prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram) were followed (Moher et al. 2015). The initial search results combined from all databases (n = 2820) were reduced once duplicates were removed. The nonduplicate results (n = 1270) were then screened for categories (host, route of zoonotic exposure, and location of interest) in the title and abstract of the document. When it was not clear from reading this section of the publication alone, the authors erred on the side of caution and included it for the next round of screening. After exclusion from title and abstract review, 365 works remained for a full-text assessment. The authors first worked independently to read over each accessible document and then merged their findings to form a collective and unanimous decision on each article. Full-text works were excluded (n = 289) based on being a language other than French or English, a duplicate copy that was not discovered using citation management software, inaccessibility, no reference to zoonoses, cats, or cat/human transmission, the study location being outside of North Africa, or the article being a broad overview without specific instances of feline zoonotic transmission. In the end, the search produced 76 studies for review (Fig. 1).

FIG. 1.

North African countries included in review with shading to correspond with published studies. Map created in ArcMap 10.6 (ESRI, Redlands, CA); no copyrighted material was used. ESRI, Environmental Systems Research Institute.

Results

Articles selected for the review ranged in publication dates from 1939 to 2019 and included a case study, cross-sectional surveys, genomic analyses, and a book chapter. The most commonly studied pathogen was Toxoplasma gondii (n = 17) followed by various helminths (n = 10). Of the countries in the target region, most publications were of studies conducted in Egypt (n = 53) followed by Tunisia (n = 12), Algeria (n = 11), Morocco (n = 5), and Libya (n = 3) (Fig. 2). In human studies, the most common study population was patients presenting with clinical signs of infectious disease (n = 15), followed by pregnant women (n = 11). Only four studies specified children in their sample population, and only five involved populations with prior animal contact or occupational exposure to animals. In animal studies, many species beyond cats were researched, including other companion animals, livestock, poultry, and wildlife.

FIG. 2.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram demonstrating selected studies for review.

Zoonotic diseases included in review

The results of this review identify a variety of viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic zoonotic diseases associated with cats in North Africa (Table 1). Articles in this review that discussed viral infections include studies on rabies, rotavirus, avian influenza, and hepatitis E. In regard to bacterial infections, the included studies examined Bartonella spp., Brucella spp., Campylobacter spp., Coxiella burnetii, pathogenic Escherichia coli, Helicobacter pylori, Klebsiella spp., Leptospira spp., Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis, Pasteurella spp., Rickettsia spp., Salmonella, Shigella spp., Staphylococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. Seven studies researched fungal infections, six within the umbrella term of “dermatophytes,” including Trichophyton violaceum, T. rubrum, T. tonsurans, T. mentagrophytes, T. verrucosum, T. terrestre, Microsporum canis, M. gypseum, M. audouinii, M. praecox, and Epidermophyton floccosum, and one on recently re-categorized microsporidia. Many of the included research articles studied parasitic infections in North African cats that pose a risk to humans, which were further categorized as helminths and unicellular parasites. Among the helminths studied, over 17 different genera, including cestodes, trematodes, and nematodes, are included in this review. Additional research on unicellular parasites among the studies in this review included Cryptosporidium spp., Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia spp., Leishmania, and Toxoplasma gondii.

Table 1.

Characteristics of Studies on Feline Zoonoses in North Africa

Author	Yeara	Pathogen	Location	Animal population	Human population
Abdel-Moein and Samir	2011	Staphylococcus aureus	Egypt	Cats, cattle, buffalo, sheep, goat, camel	Dermatology patients with skin lesions and history of animal contact
Abdel-Raouf et al.	2014	Helicobacter pylori	Egypt	Pet and stray cats and dogs	Healthy and sick persons associated with each animal
Aboueisha and El-Mahallawy	2013	Dermatophytes	Egypt	—	Patients diagnosed with dermatophyte lesions
Ahmed et al.	2014	Toxoplasma gondii	Egypt	Sheep	Pregnant women
Al-Herrawy and Gad	2016	Microsporidia	Egypt	Dogs, cats, rabbits, cattle, buffaloes, sheep, goats, donkeys and pigs	—
Al-Kappany et al.	2010	T. gondii	Egypt	Stray cats	—
Al-Kappany et al.	2010	T. gondii	Egypt	Stray cats	—
Arafa et al.	1978	Helminths	Egypt	Stray cats	—
Arrouji et al.	1991	Rabies	Tunisia	Cats, dogs, cows, horses, sheep, and rodents	—
Azzag et al.	2012	Bartonella spp.	Algeria	Stray cats	—
Bakkali	1985	Rabies	Morocco	Cats, dogs, cows, horses, sheep, mules, pigs, donkeys, goats, camels	—
Bassiony et al.	2016	T. gondii	Egypt	—	Pregnant women
Fredj et al.	2013	Rotavirus	Tunisia	—	Case study of infected infant
Benelmouffok et al.	1982	Rabies	Algeria	Dogs, cats, cattle, rats, foxes, jackals, sheep, horses, donkeys, rabbits, guinea pigs, monkeys, pigs, camels,	—
Benhamiche	1977	Rabies	Algeria	Dogs, cats, cows, foxes, jackals, rats, “other animals”	—
Benmezdad et al.	2012	Dermatophytes	Algeria	—	Hospital outpatients presenting with skin lesions
Bessas et al.	2016	Bartonella spp.; Coxiella	Algeria	Stray dogs and cats	—
Boudebouch et al.	2011	Bartonella spp.; Rickettsia spp.	Morocco	Fleas collected from cats, dogs, sheep, and goats	—
Boumhil et al.	2010	Dermatophytes	Morocco	—	Hospital outpatients presenting with skin lesions
Byomi et al.	2018	T. gondii	Egypt	Sheep, cattle	Women 18–40 years of age
Childs et al.	1995	Bartonella spp.	Egypt	Cats	—
ElAshmawy and Ali	2016	Dermatophytes	Egypt	Pet cats, horses, and calves	—
El-Dakhly et al.	2017	Helminths	Egypt	Stray cats	—
El-Gamal et al.	2013	T. gondii	Egypt	—	Pregnant women
El-Gohary	1998	Campylobacter sp.	Egypt	Cattle, horse, sheep, dogs, goats, cats, turkey, pigeons	Hospital outpatients presenting with GI symptoms
El-Hohary and Abdel-Latif	1998	Cryptosporidia	Egypt	Dog, cat, cow, sheep, pigeon, chicken, goat	Hospital outpatients presenting with GI symptoms
El-Jakee	1991	Campylobacter sp.	Egypt	Dogs, cats	Infants
Elkassas et al.	2018	H. pylori; Escherichia coli	Egypt	Dogs and cats	Healthy and GI symptomatic persons
El-Menyawe and Abdel Rahman	2007	Toxocara	Egypt	Stray and pet cats and dogs	—
Elmonir et al.	2017	T. gondii	Egypt	Stray cats	Pregnant women
El-Sayed et al.	2013	Avian influenza	Egypt	Cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, horses, donkey, swine, sewage rats, stray dogs, and stray cats	Humans
El-Seify et al.	2017	Helminths	Egypt	Stray cats	—
El-Shabrawy and Imam	1978	Helminths	Egypt	Stray cats	—
El-Shqanqery et al.	2017	T. gondii	Egypt	—	Pregnant women
Fakhfakh et al.	2013	T. gondii	Tunisia	—	Pregnant women
Felt et al.	2011	Leptospira sp.	Egypt	Rats, dogs, sheep, buffaloes, cattle, donkeys, weasels, and cats	—
Gautret et al.	2010	Rabies	Algeria; Egypt; Libya; Morocco; Tunisia	—	International travelers seeking treatment for animal-related injuries in France
Gharsa et al.	2015	S. aureus	Tunisia	Cow, goat, dog, and cats	—
Ghoneim et al.	2013	Avian influenza	Egypt	Stray dogs and cats, donkeys, rats	—
Ghoneim et al.	1980	S. aureus; Streptococcus spp.; E. coli; Salmonella spp.; Shigella spp.; Pasteurella spp.; Klebsiella spp.	Egypt	Stray cats	—
Grami et al.	2013	E. coli	Tunisia	Chickens, pet dogs, and pet cats	—
Hafez Hassanain et al.	2018	T. gondii	Egypt	—	Pregnant women
Haggag et al.	2016	H. pylori	Egypt	Cattle, buffalo, cat, and dog	Healthy and GI symptomatic persons
Hasslinger et al.	1988	Helminths	Egypt	Stray cats	—
Ibrahim et al.	2017	T. gondii	Egypt	Sheep	Pregnant women
Ibrahim et al.	2006	T. gondii	Egypt	Cattle, sheep, camel	Pregnant women
Kaabia and Letaief	2009	Coxiella	Tunisia	—	—
Kaal et al.	2006	Fleas	Libya	Sheep, goats, cattle, camels, horses, rabbits, gazelle, rats, dogs, and cats	Farm workers
Khalafalla	2011	Helminths	Egypt	Stray cats	—
Khalifa	1999	Giardia	Egypt	Stray dogs and cats; rats and mice	Children 1–10 years of age with diarrhea
Khalil	1977	Toxocara	Egypt	Stray dogs and cats	School children; hospital patients with clinical signs
Khayeche et al.	2014	T. gondii	Tunisia	Sheep	—
Kuntz and Chandler	1956	Helminths	Egypt	Pet cats, dogs, foxes, shrews, rats, and birds	—
Matter et al.	2004	Rabies	Algeria; Egypt; Libya; Morocco; Tunisia	—	—
Messerer et al.	2014	T. gondii	Algeria	—	Pregnant women
Morsy and El Seoud Abou	1994	Leishmania	Egypt	Pet and stray cats	Primary care outpatients
Morsy et al.	1988	Leishmania	Egypt	Stray dogs and cats; rats and mice	—
Mouffok et al.	2008	Rickettsia	Algeria	—	Patients with clinical signs of rickettsioses
Moustafa	1989	Campylobacter sp.; Salmonella spp.	Egypt	Housed cats and stray dogs	—
Reda and Mostafa	1995	Bartonella spp.	Egypt	—	Ophthalmic clinic patients
Rifaat et al.	1976	T. gondii	Egypt	Stray cats	—
Rifaat et al.	1981	T. gondii; Entamoeba; Helminths	Egypt	Stray cats
Romia et al.	1988	T. gondii	Egypt	—	Governorate residents
Salem et al.	2019	Mycobacterium	Egypt	Cattle, camels, cats, rats	—
Sallem et al.	2013	E. coli	Tunisia	Pet dogs and cats
Sbai et al.	2015	Pasteurella	Tunisia	—	Case study of woman with cat bite
Siam et al.	1973	Staphylococcus spp.; Streptococcus spp.; Salmonella spp.	Egypt	Pet cats, stray dogs	—
Stoszek et al.	2006	Hepatitis E	Egypt	—	Pregnant women
Waly et al.	2017	Dermatophytes	Egypt	Pet cats and dogs	—
Wareth et al.	2017	Brucella	Egypt	Cattle, farm dog, and farm cats	—
Younis et al.	2015	E. coli	Egypt	Pet dogs and cats presenting at clinics for GI symptoms	—
Yousfi et al.	1977	Dermatophytes	Egypt	Buffalo, camel, cattle, cat, dog, donkey, goat, horse, sheep, pig	—
Yousfi et al.	2016	E. coli	Algeria	Healthy pet cats and dogs	—
Yousfi et al.	2016	E. coli	Algeria
Zim	1939	Helminths	Egypt	Cats and dogs	—
Zouari et al.	2017	Bartonella spp.	Tunisia	Fleas infesting dogs, cats, goats, and sheep	—

^aYear of publication.

GI, gastrointestinal.

Discussion

North Africa is currently faced with many challenging zoonotic diseases such as echinococcosis in Tunisia, rickettsiosis in Algeria, campylobacteriosis in Egypt, rabies in Morocco, and brucellosis in Libya (Majorowski et al. 2005, Ahmed et al. 2010, Mouffok et al. 2011, Ducrotoy et al. 2015, Helmy et al. 2017). The identified pathogens in this review range from historically endemic diseases in both human and animal populations in the region, to emerging and reemerging infections of veterinary and public health importance. Thus, a review of documented feline-associated zoonoses in these countries provides a valuable tool for comparison and retrospective determination of disease status and risk in cats and humans in North Africa.

Viral infections

Historically, rabies in this region is well recorded and recognized. In 1863, rabies was reported in 2 cats, 5 humans, and 17 dogs in Algeria by the Veterinary Surgeon Delacroix (Matter et al. 2004). In 1917, 5% of reported animal bite victims in Algeria were of cat origin (Matter et al. 2004). In 1933, cats were responsible for 117 cases of human rabies exposure in Algeria, and from 1961 to 1980, in Tunisia, cats were responsible for 8% of treatment sought for human rabies exposure (Matter et al. 2004). Yet, animal rabies vaccination records appear primarily only available for dogs (Matter et al. 2004). Despite this, records from 1970 to 1979 in Algeria show 122 of 333 tested cats (36.6%) were positive for rabies accounting for 10.7% of all positive animal cases during that time (Benelmouffok et al. 1982). This number increased the following year in 1980 when 48.3% of tested cats were positive for rabies (Benelmouffok et al. 1982). The researcher attributed this rise to the difficulty of capturing cats to vaccinate for rabies and that cat bites are typically serious injuries (Benelmouffok et al. 1982).

Between 1976 and 1982, in Morocco, 4.3% of animal rabies cases were in cats (Bakkali 1985). Cats were the origin of 640 rabies postexposure treatments out of nearly 120,000 patients seeking post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in Egypt in 2000. In the same year, over 70,000 stray cats were culled to reduce risk of rabies transmission to humans and other animals (Matter et al. 2004). However, recent data on the number of confirmed rabies cases in humans and animals, as well as the number of those vaccinated against or treated for exposure are lacking in this region compared to the overall global numbers. The lack of current data on rabies infection in the North African region, particularly with a breakdown by animal species, does not indicate a decrease in the public health threat surrounding this pathogen, but rather a potential gap in funding and/or research priority. Many global health and veterinary organizations focus on dog-mediated rabies infection and advocate for canine vaccination campaigns (World Health Organization 2019). Without data on the present state of rabies infection in North African countries, it is difficult to argue for the inclusion of felines in prevailing canine vaccination and public awareness and education campaigns.

A small number of studies were done on viral infections other than rabies, limiting direct comparisons due to inconsistencies in study methods, target populations, and outcomes measured. The two studies concerning avian influenza found disparate seroprevalence in cats ranging from 8% to 56.4% (El Sayed et al. 2013, Ghoneim et al. 2013). Stoszek et al. (2006) concluded that contact with cats was a significant risk factor associated with anti-hepatitis E virus antibody production in pregnant study participants. The single study of rotavirus in the region conducted a phylogenetic analysis on the strain found in an infected infant, which suggests a direct inter-species transmission from cat to human (Fredj et al. 2013) .Viral infections represent a substantial portion of the circulating and novel infectious diseases impacting human and animal health. Viruses have the capability to quickly evolve, appear in new forms and with new properties, infect multiple species, and travel to unexpected parts of the world (Mack et al. 2015). Analysis of published literature illustrates the important role of cats as viral reservoirs and exposure risks for vulnerable populations of children, the elderly, pregnant women, and the immunocompromised.

Bacterial infections

The vector-borne bacterial disease agents researched in the review include Bartonella, Coxiella burnetii, and Rickettsia. These pathogens can be transmitted by feline fleas and ticks. The two direct studies of vector-borne pathogens (VBP) in Egyptian cats produced similar results, 17% and 19% seropositivity for Bartonella spp. (Childs et al. 1995, Azzag et al. 2012). However, they conflicted with an Algerian study that found just 1.87% of sampled cats were seropositive for VBP, including Rickettsia felis, B. henselae, and B. clarridgeia (Bessas et al. 2016). Two additional studies, in Tunisia and Morocco, tested feline fleas for the presence of VBP and found a seropositivity ranging from 33.3% for Bartonella spp. to 77.8% for at least one VBP including Rickettsia spp. and Bartonella spp. (Boudebouch et al. 2011, Zouari et al. 2017). A human study confirmed 14.5% of cases that were examined for CSD were in fact Bartonella spp. Although the authors repeatedly remarked on cat contact as a risk factor, they did not provide any data from their questionnaire to corroborate the association (Reda and Mostafa 1995). Another study of Algerian patients in a teaching hospital presenting with clinical signs of rickettsioses (spotted fevers) confirmed only 2 of the 277 potential cases were true positives and both reported frequent and recent contact with cats (Mouffok et al. 2008). Similarly, the principal risk factor for pregnant women infected with Coxiella burnetii was self-reported contact with domestic animals. Despite the fact that cat contact was implicated, their association was not specified in the study results (Kaabia and Letaief 2009).

In the studies of enteric bacterial infection rates in cats, Campylobacter spp. was found in a range from 3.3% to 10%, Escherichia coli from 36.8% to 79.2%, Helicobacter pylori from 28% to 33.3%, Klebsiella spp. at 6.67%, Leptospira spp. at 50%, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis at 42.8%, Salmonella from 2% to 12%, Shigella spp. at 4%, Staphylococcus spp. from 6% to 21.3%, Streptococcus spp. from 2% to 36%, and Pasteurella spp. at 4% (Siam et al. 1973, Ghoneim et al. 1980, El Gohary 1998, Moustafa 1989, El-Jakee et al. 1991, Abdel-Moein and Samir 2011, Felt et al. 2011, Grami et al. 2013, Sallem et al. 2013, Abdel-Raouf et al. 2014, Gharsa et al. 2015, Sbai et al. 2015, Younis et al. 2015, Haggag et al. 2016, Yousfi et al. 2016, Elkassas et al. 2018, Salem et al. 2019). However, not all of the strains that were found in cats are pathogenic to humans, and the different methodologies among the studies make direct comparisons of prevalence impractical. Brucella spp. was isolated in a cat in a single study from Egypt, which the authors postulate may have an understated impact on the reemergence and transmission of brucellosis on farms (Wareth et al. 2017).

There were limited data available on the association between cat contact in North Africa and subsequent bacterial infections in humans, as either the risk factor was mentioned, but not quantified or the prevalence in humans was not determined. One study on Helicobacter pylori did conclude that persons with cat contact had a higher probability of H. pylori infection than persons with contact with dogs or other animals (Abdel-Raouf et al. 2014). In addition, a case study of a woman with a cat bite was positively identified to have Pasteurella spp. in her infected wound, establishing a direct source of transmission (Sbai et al. 2015).

A substantial number of studies researched the existence of antibiotic resistance genes in samples isolated from their study populations, including cats. Resistant strains of E. coli were isolated in 7.2–36.8% of cat sampled in the relevant studies (Grami et al. 2013, Sallem et al. 2013, Younis et al. 2015, Yousfi et al. 2016). Another study found S. aureus in just 6% of cats, but noted that all isolates from cats showed penicillin resistance (Gharsa et al. 2015).

Research conducted outside of the region has found that antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is increasing within the pathogens infecting companion animals, including cats (Lloyd 2007). As demonstrated by the number of studies on AMR genes in zoonotic bacterial pathogens found infecting cats and humans in North Africa, the risk of AMR is expanding in the domestic animal population, just as in the human population (Lloyd 2007). With such risk identified, measures need to be taken to effectively prevent and control not only bacterial diseases but also the emergence of resistant genes as well.

Fungal infections

In 1977, Yousef et al. found that 18.7% of Egyptian cats were positive for at least one pathogenic fungus, while 40 years later, in 2017, Waly et al. found that 16.7% of healthy cats were positive, suggesting remarkable stability in dermatophyte prevalence. A single study contained definitive prevalence rate numbers relating both human and feline dermatophyte infections, with animal contact a risk factor in 56.7% of positive human cases, but did not differentiate cats from other animals (Boumhil et al. 2010). Several studies commented on the rise of zoophilic species diagnosis in humans, and an increased representation in the isolates from skin lesions taken from dermatological patients (Benmezdad et al. 2012, Aboueisha and El-Mahallawy 2013).

An additional study of note, but not included in the results, is Farag et al.'s (2018) article on dermatophyte infections and associated risk factors in school children from Menoufia, Egypt. Pet contact was one of the leading risk factors for dermatophyte infections, which had a 1.41% overall prevalence in the study population. However, the authors did not specify what animals were included in the category of “pets” and thus the data cannot be stipulated to definitively include cat contact as a risk factor for dermatophyte infection in this population and was disqualified for inclusion in the formal review results (Farag et al. 2018).

Microsporidia, now considered fungi and not protozoa, have a transmission much more akin to enteric parasites than to dermatophyte fungal infections (Hibbett et al. 2007). Microsporidia were found in 23.1% of fecal samples from cats sampled from Egypt, with further analysis identifying them to be Enterocytozoon bieneusi and E. intestinalis species, demonstrating a common co-infection (Al-Herrawy and Gad 2016).

Parasitic infections

Helminths

Helminths are parasitic worms that are primarily intestinal, although some may reside in blood or other tissue. Taxonomically diverse, helminths encompass flatworms like trematodes or flukes, cestodes or tapeworms, and nematodes like roundworms and hookworms. Helminths researched for this study are transmitted to humans primarily through the soil, either through accidental ingestion of contaminated soil or by walking barefoot. While mass deworming campaigns are not uncommon in North Africa, the routine use of veterinary dewormers in the region is unknown. According to World Health Organization (WHO) data from 2016, just 11.2% of school-aged children requiring preventive chemotherapy for soil-transmitted helminths actually received it in the Eastern Mediterranean region, the WHO region, which encompasses North Africa (World Health Organization 2016). The prevalence of certain helminths in the feline population has remained surprisingly consistent according to historical data for this region. For example, Zim (1939) found a 10% prevalence of Taenia spp. in cats in 1938, while a prevalence of 9.6% was recorded in 2017 by El-Dakhly et al. (2017). It is important to note that experimental methods varied widely, as did the locations of the surveys (Table 2).

Table 2.

Zoonotic Feline Helminth Infections in North Africa

Type	Species	Location	Yeara	Prevalence in cats (%)	Author
Trematodes	Heterophyes spp.	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	3.2	El-Dakhly et al.
		Alexandria, Egypt	2017	11.76	El-Seify et al.
		Giza and Cairo, Egypt	1978	1.4	Arafa et al.
		Egypt	1939	90	Zim
	Alaria spp.	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	1.6	El-Dakhly et al.
		Alexandria, Egypt	2017	1.76	El-Seify et al.
	Haplorchis	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	1.6	El-Dakhly et al.
	Pygidiopsis	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	1.6	El-Dakhly et al.
	Proceroverum	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	1.6	El-Dakhly et al.
	Prohemistomum	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	1.6	El-Dakhly et al.
	Echinochasmus	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	6.45	El-Dakhly et al.
	Euparadistomum	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	4.8	El-Dakhly et al.
		Giza and Cairo, Egypt	1978	3.2	Arafa et al.
	Asocotyle	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	1.6	El-Dakhly et al.
		Giza and Cairo, Egypt	1978	1.4	Arafa et al.
Cestodes	Dipylidium caninum	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	62.9	El-Dakhly et al.
		Alexandria, Egypt	2017	18.8	El-Seify et al.
		Giza and Cairo, Egypt	1978	3.2	Arafa et al.
		Egypt	1939	50	Zim
		Cairo, Egypt	1978	45.5	El-Shabrawy and Imam
	Hymenolepis spp.	Alexandria, Egypt	2017	3.52	El-Seify et al.
	Taenia taeniaeformis	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	9.6	El-Dakhly et al.
		Alexandria, Egypt	2017	1.17	El-Seify et al.
		Giza and Cairo, Egypt	1978	9.2	Arafa et al.
		Egypt	1939	10	Zim
		Cairo, Egypt	1978	30.3	El-Shabrawy and Imam
	Diplopylidium spp.	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	8–22.5	El-Dakhly et al
		Giza and Cairo, Egypt	1978	2.7	Arafa et al.
		Cairo, Egypt	1978	24.2	El-Shabrawy and Imam
	Joyeuxiella spp.	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	14.5	El-Dakhly et al.
		Giza and Cairo, Egypt	1978	0.9	Arafa et al.
		Cairo, Egypt	1978	31.8	El-Shabrawy and Imam
Nematodes	Toxascaris leonina	Beni-Suef, Egypt	2017	33.8	El-Dakhly et al.
		Alexandria, Egypt	2017	8.23	El-Seify et al.
	Toxocara cati	Alexandria, Egypt	2017	8.23	El-Dakhly et al.
		Egypt	1939	0	Zim
	Gnathostomata sp.	Giza and Cairo, Egypt	1978	0.5	Arafa et al.

^aYear of publication.

Unicellular parasites

A survey of Cryptosporidium spp. was performed in humans with gastroenteritis and animals they were in contact with, to establish the incidence of cryptosporidiosis in households and animals associated with confirmed human cases. Overall, 6.25% of fecal samples from cats were positive for Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts (El-Hohary and Abdel-Latif 1998). While this does not exclusively imply an etiologic role between species, the high detection of oocysts in the soil establishes the relevance of animal feces as a risk factor for transmission.

Entamoeba histolytica antibodies were found in 14 of 44 stool specimens taken from stray cats, but only one had a titer of 1/128 or greater to indicate a positive diagnosis at the time of sampling (Rifaat et al. 1981). While Giardia spp. was found in only 1% of stray cats in a study conducted in Egypt in 2011, the prevalence of Giardia spp. in fecal samples of stray cats was 11% in Egypt in 1999 (Khalifa 1999, Khalafalla 2011). Within Egypt, the prevalence of Giardia spp. in school-aged children and other stray animals, including dogs, cats, rats, and mice, was also determined, but the association between positive cases across species was not explored (Khalifa 1999). Nonetheless, the author did assert that dogs and cats should be considered reservoirs of infection, while rodents may play a role in the spread of parasites (Khalifa 1999).

Leishmaniasis is a disease caused by subspecies of Leishmania pathogenic eukaryotes and causes two forms of the disease presentation (cutaneous and visceral) in humans (Morsy and el Seoud Abou 1994). The Middle East and North Africa have long been established as a region endemic to leishmaniasis (Morsy et al. 1988). The bacteria are transmitted through the vector species of phlebotomine flies (the sand fly). The sand fly may also bite other mammals, such as rodents, dogs, and cats, and thus has the potential to spread disease from animals to humans, and vice versa (Morsy and el Seoud Abou 1994). Although the main confirmed reservoir host of Leishmania species in North Africa is dogs, contemporary research has suggested the role cats have as more than just an accidental host. Evidence of Leishmania infecting cats dates back to 1912 in Algeria (Maia et al. 2008). More recently, confirmed feline cases have occurred worldwide, including the Middle East, Mediterranean, Europe, and South America (Maia and Campino 2011).

Morsy conducted a study in 1982 that instead focused on ectoparasites on rodents in Egypt, identifying positive reactions for Leishmania antibodies in 16.7% of rodents (Morsy et al. 1982). Researchers have reported human cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis since 1984, and visceral dating back to 1904 (Deperet and Boinet 1884, Nicolle and Cathoire 1905). Morsy published another study 10 years later focusing on the natural infection of Leishmania in domestic felines in Egypt (Morsy and el Seoud Abou 1994). In a survey of three regions, 2 out of 60 stray cats were found positive for Leishmania spp. The authors posit on whether these cats are accidental or reservoir hosts as they, “more or less roam the entire villages” and, unlike rats, are not “unaccepted and hated” (Morsy and el Seoud Abou 1994, p. 202).

The protozoan parasite of Toxoplasma gondii was first discovered in North Africa, so it is not a surprise that this is the pathogen with the most published studies in this review (Rouatbi et al. 2019). A disproportionate amount of T. gondii studies was located in Egypt (14 out of 17), although this trend resembles that of the studies overall (Table 3). One study, not included in the review, argued that ownership or contact with domestic felines is uncommon in Moroccan society and contact with cats is not significantly associated with T. gondii seropositivity (Ouzennou et al. 2019). Another study researched T. gondii in rabbits and found that the presence of cats in rabbit raising areas was significantly associated (odds ratio = 3.39) with T. gondii infection in rabbits (Abou Elez et al. 2017). Human contact with cats was not recorded in the study by Abou Elez et al. (2017) and therefore any attempt to look for an association between cat presence and human infection was inconclusive. Thus, this study was not included in the review results either. However, studies on human T. gondii infection rates in North African represent a prevalence range from 1% to 82% depending upon the country and study population (Rouatbi et al. 2019). And although at least seven wild felid species in this region have the potential to transmit T. gondii, no published data currently exist on their role in toxoplasmosis zoonoses (Rouatbi et al. 2019).

Table 3.

Studies on Feline Zoonotic Toxoplasma gondii in North Africa

Author	Location	Population	Cat contact as a risk factor for human infection
Ahmed et al.	Egypt	Pregnant women	Yes
Al-Kappany et al.a	Egypt	Feral cats	N/A
Bassiony et al.	Egypt	Pregnant women	No
Byomi et al.	Egypt	Women	Yes
El-Gamal et al.	Egypt	Pregnant women	Yes
El-Shqanqery et al.	Egypt	Pregnant women	No
Elmonir et al.	Egypt	Pregnant women; stray cats	No
Fakhfakh et al.	Tunisia	Pregnant women	No
Hafez Hassanain et al.	Egypt	Pregnant women	Yes
Ibrahim et al. (2006)	Egypt	Pregnant women	Yes
Ibrahim et al. (2017)	Egypt	Pregnant women	Yes
Khayeche et al.	Tunisia	Sheep	Yes
Messerer et al.	Algeria	Pregnant women	Yes
Rifaat et al. (1976)	Egypt	Stray cats	N/A
Rifaat et al. (1981)	Egypt	Stray cats	N/A
Romia et al.	Egypt	Humans	Yes

^aWhile two distinct studies were published in 2010 by Al-Kappany et al., only one study presented data with seropositivity rates in cats.

N/A, not available.

Regional trends and recommendations

While the majority of research on this subject has been conducted in Egypt, the assumption that this nation has the majority of pathogens or rates of infection remains unproven. The few studies conducted in each country of this region that allows for comparison of a specific pathogen's prevalence indicate that it is more likely that the countries lacking robust research or public health veterinary surveillance have equal, if not greater, burdens compared with Egypt. In addition, this research cannot encompass the risks posed by undocumented transmission or transmission by sources apart from the domestic feline, which may add an entirely new layer to the surveillance, control, and approach of zoonoses in North Africa. Many of the feline-associated zoonotic pathogens outlined in this review can also be transmitted through contaminated food, water, or soil (i.e., Brucella spp., Giardia spp., and Toxocara spp.), by vectors (i.e., B. henselae), person to person (i.e., Cryptosporidium spp.), and by other animal hosts (i.e., Leishmania spp.).

Although the zoonotic diseases of felines in North Africa are varied and numerous, efforts to prevent and control zoonoses and reverse zoonoses in these countries are ongoing. The first line of defense is a network of veterinary public health professionals. Unfortunately, there is a disparity between access to veterinary care in North African countries, as well as between North Africa and North America. According to the World Organization of Animal Health, in 2018, Egypt had ∼0.64 veterinary professionals per 1000 people, Morocco 0.074/1000, and Tunisia 0.176/1000. For comparison, the United States is around 0.55/1000. No data were available for Algeria or Libya (Veterinarians and Veterinary Para-Professionals 2018).

The most consistent control approach for zoonoses remains vaccination of target domestic species to prevent disease spread to humans or other species (Monath 2013). In addition to vaccination, prompt veterinary and medical care of zoonoses are essential in limiting the disease burden in North African communities. This includes programs aimed at reducing the number of feral and stray populations, which can harbor many zoonotic pathogens.

Cats managed through trap-neuter-return programs and left free roaming had higher incidence of helminth infections and lower incidence of viral and protozoan infections than cats in shelters, sanctuaries, and foster care (Andersen et al. 2018). While the study by Andersen et al. (2018) was conducted in the United States, this difference in enteric pathogens between free-roaming and confined cats could be present in North Africa as well, where the majority of felines live in the community without clear ownership. In regions where dimensions of cat ownership vary and routine veterinary care is improbable, the gap between the expected and actual roles of human and animal health care providers has allowed for a vacuity in zoonotic disease education and prevention. Historically, veterinarians have been seen as the source of information about zoonoses and their prevention for humans as well as their pets. Most physicians in a U.S. survey reported patient education on infectious disease risk should be the role of veterinarians (Grant and Olsen 1999). However, messages surrounding safe animal contact and steps to take to protect people and animals from zoonotic exposure risks should come from both human and animal health care using a collaborative voice.

While this review examined published studies of feline-human zoonotic disease transmission within the region of North Africa, narrative accounts of feline-associated zoonotic pathogens in singular populations of humans or animals without specific mention to transmission or transmission risk were not analyzed. Although literature not meeting the study criteria were omitted to prevent the unintentional interjection of false risk associations into the analysis, several publications were excluded that could provide information on the larger question surrounding the burden of zoonotic pathogens found within human and/or feline inhabitants of North Africa. Additional research on the prevalence of these zoonotic pathogens of public health importance within the region overall is warranted.

Conclusions

Zoonotic diseases shared between humans and felines have been, and continue to be, a public health threat that should be addressed with education and intervention strategies, which take into consideration the welfare of both species. This review has outlined several of the zoonotic feline pathogen risks that have been studied in the countries of Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia, as well as their most significant findings. Yet, despite the published data over the past several decades, many questions still exist on the role of felines in the spread of disease within North Africa. More research in this area is needed to create effective and comprehensive interventions for the protection of residents of this region and their feline counterparts.

Author Disclosure Statement

No conflicting financial interests exist.

Funding Information

No funding received for this study.