Skip to main content
JCI Insight logoLink to JCI Insight
. 2020 Sep 3;5(17):e130182. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.130182

AAV9 gene transfer of cMyBPC N-terminal domains ameliorates cardiomyopathy in cMyBPC-deficient mice

Jiayang Li 1, Ranganath Mamidi 1, Chang Yoon Doh 1, Joshua B Holmes 1, Nikhil Bharambe 1, Rajesh Ramachandran 1, Julian E Stelzer 1,
PMCID: PMC7526450  PMID: 32750038

Abstract

Decreased cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBPC) expression due to inheritable mutations is thought to contribute to the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) phenotype, suggesting that increasing cMyBPC content is of therapeutic benefit. In vitro assays show that cMyBPC N-terminal domains (NTDs) contain structural elements necessary and sufficient to modulate actomyosin interactions, but it is unknown if they can regulate in vivo myocardial function. To test whether NTDs can recapitulate the effects of full-length (FL) cMyBPC in rescuing cardiac function in a cMyBPC-null mouse model of HCM, we assessed the efficacy of AAV9 gene transfer of a cMyBPC NTD that contained domains C0C2 and compared its therapeutic potential with AAV9-FL gene replacement. AAV9 vectors were administered systemically at neonatal day 1, when early-onset disease phenotypes begin to manifest. A comprehensive analysis of in vivo and in vitro function was performed following cMyBPC gene transfer. Our results show that a systemic injection of AAV9-C0C2 significantly improved cardiac function (e.g., 52.24 ± 1.69 ejection fraction in the C0C2-treated group compared with 40.07 ± 1.97 in the control cMyBPC–/– group, P < 0.05) and reduced the histopathologic signs of cardiomyopathy. Furthermore, C0C2 significantly slowed and normalized the accelerated cross-bridge kinetics found in cMyBPC–/– control myocardium, as evidenced by a 32.41% decrease in the rate of cross-bridge detachment (krel). Results indicate that C0C2 can rescue biomechanical defects of cMyBPC deficiency and that the NTD may be a target region for therapeutic myofilament kinetic manipulation.

Keywords: Cardiology

Keywords: Gene therapy, Heart failure


Cardiac function improves following AAV9-mediated delivery of the C0C2 domains of cardiac myosin-binding protein C in a mouse model of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is frequently a result of inherited cardiomyopathies, which are caused by genetic mutations that disrupt cardiomyocyte function (1, 2). Among the inherited cardiomyopathies, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) has been linked to mutations found in over 20 genes but has shown substantial variance in phenotypic presentation and disease severity (2). Since mutations in the MYBPC3 gene, encoding cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBPC), are some of the most frequently implicated in HCM (3), understanding cMyBPC’s role in regulating myocardial contractile function has gained increasing interest in recent years. A great majority of these mutations involve truncation that lead to decreased cMyBPC expression (46). Furthermore, in rare but severe cases, human patients with homozygous or heterozygous compound MYBPC3 mutations lead to rapid neonatal HF within the first year of life (7, 8). Thus, the idea of increasing cMyBPC expression was proposed as a curative strategy and has since produced promising results in small animal studies (9). A similar strategy of increasing full-length (FL) cMyBPC expression using a neonatal homozygous cMyBPC-knockin mouse model has also been investigated with encouraging results (10). The striking suppression of pathogenic remodeling in these studies highlights cMyBPC’s indispensable role in regulating sarcomere contractile function.

cMyBPC is composed of 11 immunoglobulin-like and fibronectin-like domains, numbered C0–C10 (Figure 1A). It is now understood that the C-terminal domains (CTDs) are responsible for tightly anchoring cMyBPC to the thick filament (11). These anchoring sites dictate the stoichiometric distribution of cMyBPC within the sarcomere, restricting cMyBPC to the C zone of the thick filament, with 9–11 stripes regularly spaced ~42 nm apart (12) (Figure 1B). In contrast, in vitro studies have shown that the N-terminal domains (NTDs) of cMyBPC contain the regulatory regions that are both necessary and sufficient to modulate sarcomeric contractility. Early studies of NTDs demonstrated that C1 and C2 domains increased skinned myocyte Ca2+ sensitivity in a dose-dependent manner (13). Other studies have since demonstrated both activating and inhibitory effects of NTDs using various in vitro experimental approaches (1416). The apparent paradox of this dual activating and inhibitory effect has provided mechanistic insight into how cMyBPC functions in the intact cardiomyocyte.

Figure 1. Structure and function of cMyBPC and C0C2.

Figure 1

(A) Schematic representation of full-length cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBPC) showing N-terminal (C0C2) regulatory domains and C-terminal (C8C10) anchoring domains. (B) Illustrated representation of myofilament organization with yellow bars highlighting the C zones where endogenous cMyBPC localize. (C) Illustration of C0C2 N-terminal domains showing possible interactions with thin filament (blue), tropomyosin (red), and thick filament (orange) that have been demonstrated in in vitro assays. It has been proposed that C0C2 can directly bind to the thin filament and displace tropomyosin toward an “open” state, exposing adjacent myosin binding sites to allow cross-bridge formation and effectively activating the thin filament (black arrow) (18). C0C2 has also been implicated in direct binding to the S1 and S2 regions of myosin (purple arrow), shifting some myosin heads into “super-relaxed” states toward the thick filament backbone and rendering them unavailable for cross-bridge formation (20, 72). A reduction in cMyBPC expression has been proposed to cause hypercontractility in HCM by freeing these myosin heads out of the “sequestered” state. Another proposed mechanism is the binding of cMyBPC to myosin heads once they are in the strongly bound state (gray arrow). This has been suggested to provide biomechanical stability to the cross-bridge and increase cross-bridge lifetime (29).

Several studies have confirmed the initial findings in other variations of NTDs, which suggest that the key interactions involve domains C0C2, which demonstrate the greatest effect in activating the thin filament independent of Ca2+ (14). Electron microscopy and fluorescence-based single-molecule microscopy assays have suggested a mechanism by which NTDs bind to the thin filament independent of Ca2+ concentration and displace tropomyosin (Tm) to expose myosin binding sites, facilitating cross-bridge (XB) formation (1719). On the other hand, cMyBPC NTD interactions with myosin subfragment 1 (S1, the head or motor domain) and subfragment 2 (S2) have been proposed as distinct mechanisms wherein cMyBPC inhibits XB cycling, independent of NTD thin filament interactions (15, 20). NTD interactions with S1 and S2 effectively tether S1 heads in a sequestered state, decreasing the net pool of force generating S1 heads (20) (Figure 1C). It is now generally accepted that cMyBPC’s regulatory action relies on key residues in the NTDs. The majority of studies have established that NTDs are sufficient to alter cardiac muscle function in vitro, but little is known about the impact of NTDs on cardiac contractile function in vivo.

We and others have shown that the phosphorylation of cMyBPC during neurohormonal stress dynamically enhances in vivo ventricular contractility and accelerates XB kinetics to meet increased circulatory demand (2125). Similarly, in vitro evidence suggests that C0C2 NTD interactions are also modulated by phosphorylation, with resultant functional effects similar to FL cMyBPC (20). However, it is unknown if C0C2 can affect in vivo contractile function and whether C0C2 would be responsive to adrenergic neurohormonal signaling. Thus, this study investigated the in vivo functional efficacy of C0C2 expression. We hypothesized that the reconstitution of C0C2 NTDs would be as effective as the reconstitution of FL cMyBPC in the neonatal rescue of the HCM phenotype in cMyBPC–/– mice. We present functional evidence that C0C2 reconstitution by gene transfer in cMyBPC–/– mice greatly mitigates the development of the HCM phenotype.

Results

Myofilament protein expression and phosphorylation in virus-treated cMyBPC–/– myocardium.

To determine the relative effectiveness of AAV9 gene transfer in cMyBPC–/– mice, cMyBPC expression levels were quantified in AAV9-FL–, AAV9-C0C2–, or AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– myocardium at 6 weeks. The relative levels of FL and C0C2 were normalized to age-matched WT samples. The absence of cMyBPC in AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– was confirmed by Western blot (Figure 2A). Due to the lack of CTDs, quantification of C0C2 and cMyBPC protein content was performed using whole cell lysates. The average content of cMyBPC in AAV9-FL–treated left ventricular (LV) whole cell lysate samples was 50.1% ± 4.9%, normalized to WT samples (Figure 2B). The average content of C0C2 N-terminal fragment in AAV9-C0C2–treated samples were found to be 45.1% ± 4.1%, normalized to WT (Figure 2B).

Figure 2. Expression of FL and C0C2 6 weeks after gene transfer.

Figure 2

(A) Representative Western blot showing the expression of cMyBPC in myofibrils from WT (lane 1), AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– (lane 2), AAV9-FL–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts (lane 3), and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts (lane 4). (B) Quantification of cMyBPC and C0C2 expression in WT, AAV9-FL–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts, and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts. n = 8 per group. (C) Representative IHC of cMyBPC and α-actinin–stained myofibrils from WT and respective AAV9-treated cMyBPC–/– hearts. Scale bar: 5 μm.

The expression and localization of FL and C0C2 in AAV9-FL– and AAV9-C0C2–treated myocardium were further characterized by IHC. It has been well described in mammalian striated muscles that cMyBPC is localized to the A band, decorating the C zones at ~42 nm repeating transverse bands (26, 27). Confocal microscopy does not provide the resolution down to the 42 nm repeats, but it does allow visualization of cMyBPC decoration within the C zone. As expected, AAV9-FL–treated cMyBPC–/– myocardium showed cMyBPC localization at the C zones of each sarcomere, forming characteristic doublet patterns within each sarcomere (Figure 2C). cMyBPC–/– myocardium treated with AAV9-C0C2 resulted in a diffuse staining pattern lacking distinct doublets. This suggests that C0C2 localization is not restricted to the C zone due to the lack of CTDs that anchor to the thick filament.

The phosphorylation of cMyBPC in response to adrenergic stimulation is a vital response during periods of increased cardiac demand (23, 24). The relative levels of cMyBPC phosphorylation at 3 key phosphorylation sites in the M domain (mouse residues p273, p282, and p302) in FL and C0C2 were characterized to determine whether AAV9-treated cMyBPC–/– myocardium has normalized basal cMyBPC phosphorylation levels. AAV9-FL– and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts showed similar levels of phosphorylation in p282 and p302 when compared with WT hearts (Figure 3, A and B). AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts showed p273 phosphorylation levels that appeared elevated compared with WT hearts, but this was not statistically significant. Overall, this shows that the FL and C0C2 proteins expressed in cMyBPC–/– hearts are competent protein kinase A (PKA) substrates. Analysis of the relative phosphorylation and abundance of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in WT, AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/–, and AAV9-FL– and C0C2-treated cMyBPC–/– myocardium found no significant differences between these groups (Figure 3, C and D).

Figure 3. Phosphorylation of myofibril proteins 6 weeks after AAV9-FL and AAV9-C0C2 gene transfer.

Figure 3

(A) Representative Western blot of cMyBPC phosphorylation at specific phosphoserine residues (p273, p282, p302) from WT and AAV9-treated cMyBPC–/– myofibrils. (B) Quantification of relative site-specific cMyBPC phosphorylation, the signal intensities of non–PKA-treated samples were normalized to signal intensities of PKA-treated samples, and PKA-treated phosphorylation level was set as 1 (n = 6 per group). (C) Representative Pro-Q diamond–stained (left) and Coomassie-stained (right) gel image used to quantify relative phosphorylation and expression of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) from WT (lane 1), AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– (lane 2), AAV9-FL–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts (lane 3), and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts (lane 4). (D) Quantification of relative cTnT (top) and cTnI (bottom) phosphorylation level. The Pro-Q signal intensity of each sample was normalized to the total protein Coomassie band intensity, and WT phosphorylation level was set as 1 (n = 8 per group).

Effect of FL and C0C2 gene transfer on cardiac morphology and in vivo function.

Cardiac morphology was examined to determine the in vivo phenotypic effects of FL cMyBPC and C0C2 gene transfer. Without intervention, cMyBPC–/– mice are born with phenotypically normal hearts but develop cardiac hypertrophy days after birth. Consistent with previous findings (28), AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts displayed severe cardiomegaly at 3 and 6 weeks, whereas AAV9-FL– and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts appeared to be similar in size to WT hearts (Figure 4A). Vehicle-treated cMyBPC–/– mice were found to have significantly higher heart weight/body weight ratios (HW:BW) at 3 (10.49 ± 0.31 mg/g) and 6 (9.12 ± 0.24 mg/g) weeks old when compared with age-matched 3-week-old (5.62 ± 0.16 mg/g, P < 0.05) and 6-week-old (4.92 ± 0.07 mg/g, P < 0.05) WT mice. The HW:BW of AAV9-FL–treated cMyBPC–/– mice were significantly reduced to 6.14 ± 0.31 mg/g and 6.55 ± 0.24 mg/g at 3 and 6 weeks, respectively. Furthermore, the AAV9-FL–treated cMyBPC–/– HW:BW ratio was normalized to WT levels at the 3-week time point. The HW:BW of AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– mice was also significantly reduced to 6.49 ± 0.14 mg/g and 7.16 ± 0.26 mg/g at 3 and 6 weeks, respectively (Figure 4B).

Figure 4. Histologic and gross characterization of 6-week AAV9-treated hearts.

Figure 4

(A) Representative hearts from WT and AAV9-treated cMyBPC–/– mice. Scale bar: 5 mm. (B) Quantification of heart (wet weight) to body weight ratio of WT and AAV9-treated cMyBPC–/– groups (n = 7–10). (C) Representative histologic cross sections of WT and AAV9-treated cMyBPC–/– hearts from the mid-LV and stained with H&E. Scales bars: 1 mm (top) and 20 μm (bottom). (D) As above, stained with Masson’s trichrome. Scale bar: 20 μm. (E) Quantification of fibrosis from Masson’s trichrome cardiac sections, analyzed from 4 mice per group, calculated from 8 areas of interest within a midventricular horizontal section (2 areas each from anterior, lateral, and posterior free walls and septum). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05 versus WT group; #P < 0.05 versus cMyBPC–/– + GFP.

In agreement with previous findings, histological examination showed extensive signs of hypertrophic pathology in vehicle-treated cMyBPC–/– hearts, including myocyte disarray and increased interstitial fibrosis, features that were not observed in the AAV9-FL– and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts (Figure 4C). Cardiac fibrosis, assessed by Masson’s trichrome staining, was significantly higher in AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts (0.065% ± 0.016% versus WT 0.017% ± 0.001% P < 0.05), which were significantly reduced in AAV9-FL–treated (0.019% ± 0.003%, P < 0.05) and AAV9-C0C2–treated (0.026% ± 0.005% P < 0.05) cMyBPC–/– hearts (Figure 4, D and E). Echocardiographic analysis confirmed the reduction of pathologic hypertrophy in the AAV9-FL– and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– mice, as demonstrated by the significant reduction of LV wall thicknesses and chamber dimensions when compared with AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– mice (Table 1 and Table 2). However, AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC did show signs of hypertrophy, as evidenced by significantly increased anterior wall thickness in systole (AWTs) and end systolic diameter (ESD) at the 6-week time point, when compared with WT (Table 2).

Table 1. LV morphology and in vivo cardiac function measured by echocardiography at 3 weeks.

graphic file with name jciinsight-5-130182-g043.jpg

Table 2. LV morphology and in vivo cardiac function measured by echocardiography at 6 weeks.

graphic file with name jciinsight-5-130182-g044.jpg

The effect of AAV9-FL and AAV9-C0C2 gene transfer on in vivo contractile function was also assessed by echocardiography. Consistent with previous studies, vehicle-treated cMyBPC–/– mice showed significantly impaired systolic function, as measured by reductions in ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS) at both time points when compared with WT mice. In contrast, the systolic function of AAV9-FL–treated cMyBPC–/– mice was improved, resulting in significantly higher EF and FS at both time points (Table 1 and Table 2). In the AAV9-C0C2–treated mice, there was a significant recovery of EF and FS at the 6-week time point compared with vehicle-treated cMyBPC–/– mice (Figure 5, A and B). The absence of cMyBPC is also thought to shorten XB lifetime and reduce myofilament rigidity, contributing to reduced systolic tension generation (29). Accordingly, ejection time (ET) was significantly abbreviated in the vehicle-treated cMyBPC–/– mice, contributing to the reduction in cardiac output. In the AAV9-C0C2 and -FL cMyBPC–/– mice, ET was significantly longer (50.49 ± 1.76 ms and 46.74 ± 1.31 ms, respectively) compared with vehicle-treated cMyBPC–/– mice (38.70 ± 0.47 ms, P < 0.05) and normalized to near WT levels (Figure 5C).

Figure 5. Effects of AAV9-FL and –C0C2 gene transfer on cMyBPC–/– in vivo cardiac function at 6 weeks.

Figure 5

(A) Representative 2D echocardiography images acquired in M-mode along the parasternal short-axis view. Scale bar: 1 mm. (B and C) Quantification of basal systolic ejection fraction (B) and ejection times (C) of WT and AAV9-treated cMyBPC–/– mice from 8–11 animals per group. (D) Quantification of net increase in ejection fraction after 10 mg/kg i.p. bolus dobutamine injection to assess acute β-adrenergic stress response from 4–5 animals per group. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05 versus WT group; #P < 0.05 versus cMyBPC–/– +GFP. (E) Representative Western blot showing S273, S282, and S302 phosphorylation of control (Dob–) and dobutamine infused (Dob+) WT and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts. (F) Quantification of relative phosphorylation of AAV9-C0C2–treated control (Dob–) and dobutamine infused (Dob+) hearts at phosphoserines 273, 282, and 302. n = 4 per group. †P < 0.05 by unpaired t test analysis.

Previous work showed that PKA-mediated acceleration of XB kinetics was absent in cMyBPC–/– myocardium and that this effect is largely mediated by phosphorylation of key serine residues within the M domain (Figure 1A). Thus, we investigated whether expressing FL and C0C2 in cMyBPC–/– could augment the limited contractile reserve found in cMyBPC–/– mice. As shown above, the C0C2 protein contains the critical serine phosphorylation sites within the M domain and is competent as a PKA substrate (Figure 3B), suggesting that the expression of C0C2 in cMyBPC–/– hearts could also rescue the diminished contractile reserve of cMyBPC–/– mice. As expected, we found vehicle-treated cMyBPC–/– mice exhibited significantly reduced contractile reserve in response to dobutamine infusion (Figure 5D). In contrast, dobutamine infusion increased WT EF by 27.3% ± 2.1%, which was nearly matched by the AAV9-FL–treated cMyBPC–/– mice (24.4% ± 3.8%, P < 0.05 versus AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/–). Notably, AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– mice also showed significantly greater contractile enhancement compared with AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– (18.3% ± 3.0% versus 7.2% ± 1.8%, respectively; P < 0.05). Comparison of site-specific phosphorylation at p273, p282, and p302 residues in unpaired control and dobutamine-treated hearts demonstrated increased levels phosphorylation at p273 and p282 after dobutamine infusion (Figure 5, E and F). Though p302 changes did not reach statistical significance, this is likely due to variability in basal phosphorylation levels.

To further study the effects of AAV9-FL and AAV9-C0C2 on cMyBPC–/– systolic and diastolic function, we assessed speckle-tracking echocardiography–based (STE-based) global longitudinal strain (GLS), longitudinal strain rate (LSR), and reverse longitudinal strain rate (rLSR) (Figure 6, A and B). Myocardial strain analysis has been well established as a rapid noninvasive technique for assessing intrinsic myocardial contractility in humans and rodents (30, 31). We found GLS to be significantly higher in AAV9-FL– and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– mice, compared with AAV9-GFP cMyBPC–/– (Figure 6C). These results correlate well with our findings by conventional echocardiography: FL cMyBPC and C0C2 reconstitution are of benefit in improving the HCM phenotype. Likewise, rLSR significantly increased after FL and C0C2 reconstitution, indicating partial recovery of diastolic function (Figure 6E).

Figure 6. Speckle-tracking strain analysis of 6-week AAV9-treated mice.

Figure 6

(A) Representative B-mode image in parasternal long-axis view in which myocardium is traced and vector arrows of longitudinal strain along the endocardial border is displayed. (B) Representative average longitudinal strain (black) and strain rate (red) along the left ventricular myocardium. (C–E) Quantification of global longitudinal strain (GLS) (C), peak longitudinal strain rate (LSR) (D), and peak reverse longitudinal strain rate (rLSR) (E) in WT and AAV9-treated cMyBPC–/– mice, from 6 animals per group. Negative values indicate contraction; positive values indicate relaxation. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05 versus WT group; #P < 0.05 versus cMyBPC–/– + GFP.

Effect of FL and C0C2 cMyBPC reconstitution on in vitro myocardial mechanics.

Skinned myocardium was isolated from hearts of each mouse line to determine steady-state force generation and dynamic XB kinetics. The lack of cMyBPC in the sarcomere has been shown to significantly accelerate baseline XB kinetics (32). We previously demonstrated that gene transfer and exogenous cMyBPC protein reconstitution in adult cMyBPC–/– mice resulted in the rescue of myofilament XB dysfunction (9). Here, we investigated the effects of gene transfer by reconstitution of FL and C0C2 cMyBPC in neonatal mice. Consistent with our previous studies, skinned myocardial preparations from AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts showed significantly accelerated rates of stretch-induced XB detachment (krel) and XB recruitment (kdf) (Figure 7 and Table 3). In contrast, preparations from AAV9-FL–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts displayed significantly slower XB kinetics and displayed similar stretch activation properties compared with WT preparations, which correlated well with our previous rescue of adult cMyBPC–/– using cMyBPC reconstitution (9). Interestingly, AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– preparations also displayed significantly slower XB kinetics compared with AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/–, as measured by krel and kdf (Figure 7 and Table 3). No significant differences in maximal Ca2+ activated force (Fmax), Ca2+ sensitivity (pCa [pCa = –log(Ca2+)free] required for the generation of half-maximal force generation; pCa50), or cooperativity (Hill coefficient of the force-pCa relationship; nH) of force production were observed between the groups (Table 4 and Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.130182DS1).

Figure 7. Stretch activation responses in WT and cMyBPC–/– myocardial preparations before and following C0C2 peptide incubation.

Figure 7

(A) Shown is a typical force trace in response to a sudden 2% stretch in muscle length (ML) in an isometrically contracting WT cardiac muscle preparation at a SL of 2.1 μm. Highlighted are the important phases of the force response and various stretch activation parameters that are derived from the response. Phase 1 shows the immediate increase in force in response to the sudden 2% stretch in ML. P1 is the magnitude of the immediate force response that is measured from the prestretch isometric steady-state force to the peak of phase 1. Phase 2 represents the rapid decline in the force with a dynamic rate constant krel, an index of XB detachment rate. Phase 3 represents the delayed force development with a dynamic rate constant kdf, an index of XB recruitment rate (please see Methods for further details). Measurements in the skinned ventricular preparations were first made under basal conditions (no peptide incubation). Measurements were again made on the same preparations following a 10-minute incubation with 1.0 μM C0C2 peptide incubation. (B and C) Percent decreases in the rates of XB detachment (krel) and XB recruitment (kdf) following a 10-minute incubation with 1.0 μM C0C2 peptide incubation. n = 4 hearts per group. Incubation with C0C2 peptide resulted in significant slowing of krel and kdf in cMyBPC–/– but not in the WT preparations. (D and F) Representative WT (D) and in cMyBPC–/– (F) stretch activation traces highlighting the changes in kdf, which was significantly slowed in cMyBPC–/– group, as indicated by a delay in the achievement of peak of XB recruitment phase (red arrow) for trace obtained after C0C2 incubation versus black arrow for trace obtained before C0C2 incubation. No such delay in the achievement of peak of XB recruitment phase was observed in the WT group. (E and G) Expanded views are shown below to demonstrate that krel is significantly slowed following C0C2 peptide incubation in the cMyBPC–/– group but not in the WT group, as indicated by delayed achievement of the nadir of the force decay in cMyBPC–/– preparations following C0C2 incubation. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. *P < 0.05 by paired t test comparing krel and kdf rates before and after incubation with C0C2 peptide.

Table 3. Dynamic stretch-activation parameters in skinned myocardium from 6-week AAV9-treated hearts.

graphic file with name jciinsight-5-130182-g045.jpg

Table 4. Steady-state parameters in skinned myocardium from 6-week AAV9-treated hearts.

graphic file with name jciinsight-5-130182-g046.jpg

Due to the lack of anchoring domains in C0C2 protein, there may be some loss of free-floating C0C2 during the skinning procedure for AAV9-treated samples, thereby reducing the apparent effect on myofilaments. To account for this and to characterize the effect of the C0C2 protein on in vitro XB kinetics in the presence of endogenous cMyBPC, we incubated WT and cMyBPC–/– skinned preparations with 1 μM exogenous recombinant C0C2 protein. In the intact myocyte, endogenous cMyBPC concentration is estimated to be in the low micromolar range (13). Because we found AAV9-driven C0C2 expression did not exceed levels of native cMyBPC found in WT mice, we examined exogenous recombinant C0C2 protein effects at comparable and physiologically relevant concentrations. After C0C2 incubation, Fmax, pCa50, and nH were unchanged compared with respective preincubation WT and cMyBPC–/– groups. We did observe a small but statistically significant increase in Fmin in cMyBPC–/– (4.91% ± 1.66% of Fmax) (Supplemental Table 1). We also examined the effects of exogenous C0C2 on in vitro XB kinetics using stretch activation experiments. Exogenous C0C2 concentration was selected based on previous in vitro motility and binding studies showing that 1 μM C0C2 sensitizes WT myofilament to Ca2+ at short sarcomere length (SL) (33) and inhibits actin-sliding velocity (34). Remarkably, after incubating cMyBPC–/– skinned preparations, krel decreased by 22.6% (P < 0.05) and kdf decreased by 35% (P < 0.05) at matched submaximal levels of Ca2+ activation (pCa 6.1) (Supplemental Table 2). No significant XB kinetic changes were observed in corresponding paired WT groups before and after C0C2 incubation.

Discussion

Autosomal-dominant mutations in MYBPC3 are the most common causes of inheritable HCM (3). Many MYBPC3 mutations are truncations that result in reduced cMyBPC expression in the myocardium, which leads to disrupted actin-myosin interactions and hypercontractility (6, 35). Thus, there is a compelling rationale for restoring cMyBPC regulatory function as the most direct way to normalize contractility in cases where a cMyBPC deficiency is detected. Previous in vitro studies have identified the NTDs of cMyBPC as the regions involved in its interactions with actin and myosin (33, 36, 37). Our current study investigated whether gene transfer of the C0C2 NTD fragment could mitigate the HCM phenotype in cMyBPC–/– mice by normalizing in vivo contractile function in a manner similar to that of FL cMyBPC.

This study is the first to our knowledge to characterize the effects of the C0C2 domains of cMyBPC in vivo using a cMyBPC–/– mouse model of HCM. Previously, we showed that the reconstitution of FL cMyBPC in adult cMyBPC–/– mice can significantly improve contractile function and reduce ventricular hypertrophy. As expected, FL cMyBPC reconstitution by AAV9 gene transfer in cMyBPC–/– neonates significantly reduced the severity and delayed the onset of the HCM phenotype. Importantly, our results show C0C2 to be sufficient in ameliorating the HCM phenotype. We found C0C2 expression in cMyBPC–/– mice significantly altered contractile function at the whole organ and myofilament levels, which greatly reduced LV chamber dimensions and wall thicknesses when compared with AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts (Table 1 and Table 2). The reduction of hypertrophy was accompanied by significant reductions of the HW:BW ratio, enhanced systolic function (EF and FS), and the absence of overt histological signs of HCM (i.e., myocardial disarray and fibrosis). The functional enhancements in C0C2- and FL-treated cMyBPC–/– are likely due, in part, to a recovery of ET. Previous studies have shown that cMyBPC interactions with myosin contribute to XB stability and prolong the XB duty cycle (29, 38). Mechanistically, our data from in vitro skinned fiber experiments support the in vivo findings. Fiber preparations from AAV9-FL– and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts showed significantly slower rates of XB detachment (krel) compared with preparations from AAV-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts. The accelerated krel is likely due to the absence of cMyBPC that would otherwise provide mechanical rigidity to sarcomere lattices, prolonging XB lifetimes. NTD fragments are also known to bind myosin and slow ATPase activity (34), which may result in the slower XB turnover and prolonged ET we observed in AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts. Another possibility that explains the prolonged ET could be NTD interactions with actin, which can displace Tm into its open state (18). Increased actin binding by NTDs could extend the time that Tm is in the open states, since Ca2+ in the myocyte falls in early diastole, delaying the cooperative thin filament deactivation, and prolonging ejection, as suggested by van Dijk et al. (39). We also observed significant increases in GLS in the rescue groups. These parameters are well correlated with the extent of hypertrophy and decreases in intrinsic myocardial contractility, which further validates the effectiveness of C0C2 in reversing systolic dysfunction. We also found the ratio of mitral peak velocity of early to late filling (E/A ratio) to be normalized after AAV9-FL and -C0C2 gene transfer, suggesting there is some improvement in cMyBPC–/– diastolic dysfunction. Furthermore, FL and C0C2 gene transfer resulted in partial recovery of rLSR in the STE analysis, which describes the peak myocardial LSR during early diastolic filling. This parameter has been shown to be a sensitive measure of relaxation that can better detect “subclinical” diastolic dysfunction (40). When compared with AAV9-GFP–treated cMyBPC–/– mice, the significant increases in rLSR in the AAV9-FL– and AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– mice suggest that C0C2-mediated myofilament modulation may improve diastolic ventricular refill in the HCM phenotype driven by cMyBPC–/–.

It is also possible that the changes in cardiac function in AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC are due to mechanisms distinct from that of FL, since NTDs can exert effects outside of the C zone and high concentrations of NTDs (>10 μM) have been shown to significantly increase Ca2+-independent thin filament activation (13, 14, 33). Here, we found that the skinned fibers from AAV9-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– hearts did not show altered isometric steady-state Ca2+-activated maximal force generation or changes in Ca2+ sensitivity (Table 4). We also confirmed our findings in fiber experiments incubated with exogenous recombinant C0C2, where XB kinetics were significantly slower after incubation (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Table 2). The discrepancy described between the results here and previous examination of NTD on cMyBPC–/– fibers are likely due to differences in NTD concentration. Our findings suggest in vivo C0C2 expression did not reach high enough concentrations to significantly activate the thin filament independent of Ca2+, which would lock sarcomeres in a force-generating state, preventing proper relaxation and impairing diastolic filling. Thus, the enhanced in vivo contractile function is most likely a result of a return to normalized XB kinetics, XB duty ratio, and timing of cooperative thin filament deactivation, as opposed to changes in steady-state force production.

cMyBPC phosphorylation is a critical modulator of in vivo contractile acceleration in response to β-adrenergic stimulation (23, 41). We found that AAV-C0C2–treated cMyBPC–/– showed significantly recovered contractile reserve in response to dobutamine, as evidenced by Δ EF (Figure 5D). We hypothesize that this recovery is likely due to the phosphorylation of S273, S282, and S302, which are the most well studied cMyBPC β-adrenergic–mediated PKA phosphorylation sites (23, 4244). The ability of C0C2 to improve contractile reserve is an important property because diminished contractile reserve is thought to be a significant contributor to HF pathogenesis (23, 41) and has been shown to be a poor prognostic indicator in human HF and cardiomyopathies (45). It is promising that these regulatory residues retain their functional response to upstream signaling in vivo and that AAV9-treated hearts have p273, p282, and p302 phosphorylation levels similar to those of WT hearts (Figure 3B). Studies have shown phosphorylation at these residues is cardioprotective (44, 4648), and their phosphorylation levels are decreased in human and experimental HF (4951). Thus, our results support the notion that manipulation of cMyBPC N-terminal phosphorylation has therapeutic potential for the treatment of HF and that this potential may extend to other truncated variants of cMyBPC that retain the M domain.

As mentioned in the introduction, native cMyBPC is anchored to thick filaments in a strict stoichiometric pattern within the C zone, resulting in a relatively low cMyBPC to myosin ratio (~1:8) and cMyBPC to actin ratio (~1:12) (15, 52). The low ratio of cMyBPC to actin is thought to optimize the level of thin filament activation while limiting the competition for XB binding sites with myosin. We and others have shown that cMyBPC cannot be overexpressed beyond native levels due to full occupancy of anchoring sites within the C zone (9, 53). A potential advantage of expressing only the NTDs is to eliminate this restriction, allowing C0C2 to interact with myosin heads and segments of the thin filament normally out of reach of anchored endogenous cMyBPC. Clinically, this feature would be best used in patients with cMyBPC missense mutations, which are found in the majority of childhood-onset HCM (54). The early-onset nature of these missense mutations implies a greater degree of mutation pathogenicity, relative to the truncation mutations predominantly associated with adult-onset HCM. Importantly, missense mutations produce the FL cMyBPC but result in the substitution of one amino acid for another. This would result in a heterogeneous population of WT and mutant cMyBPC decorating the C zone. By using NTDs, transgene products could deliver contractile modulation without having to compete with mutant cMyBPC. It will therefore be of clinical interest to determine the precise mechanisms by which NTDs modulate contractile function so as to design NTD-based treatments to counter specific HCM mutations.

Although this study suggests that FL and C0C2 gene transfer was effective in delaying and significantly mitigating pathologic HCM phenotypes, the following limitations should be considered. The dose of AAV9 chosen for this study was designed to directly compare the effects of FL and C0C2 at equivalent vector dosing and protein expression levels. AAV9 vectors are generally considered to have high safety and tolerability in animal studies and human therapies (10, 55, 56). Based on previous studies, we selected our dose with respect to our viral titer with additional consideration to injection volume. Unfortunately, high-volume (>40 μL) injections resulted in unacceptably high mortality rates. As a result, we did not achieve expression levels of reconstituted protein that were matched to that of WT cMyBPC expression. For this reason, our FL and C0C2 gene transfers did not result in complete rescue of cMyBPC–/– phenotype and restoration of function to WT levels. This is consistent with results of previous studies showing a that threshold cMyBPC expression is needed to maintain normal function without deleterious haploinsufficiency (9, 10, 57). Thus, it is likely our AAV9 gene transfers did not completely rescue the cMyBPC–/– mice due to inadequate levels of FL and C0C2 expression. Additionally, it will be important in future studies to examine the effect of C0C2 gene transfer on adult cMyBPC–/– mice to determine if C0C2 can rescue the HCM phenotype and induce reverse remodeling.

In summary, the idea that NTD fragments can mimic the effects of FL cMyBPC is supported by numerous studies that have characterized NTD functional effects in vitro. For the first time to our knowledge, we show that the C0C2 NTD can exert these effects in vivo and is capable of dynamically regulating contractile function to meet increased cardiac demand. This is evidenced by the fact that AAV9-C0C2 significantly mitigated and delayed development of the HCM phenotype in the cMyBPC–/– mouse model. The above results strongly support the idea that C0C2 domains are sufficient for modulating sarcomeric contractility in a manner similar to that of FL cMyBPC and, therefore, may be useful in treating human cases with reduced cMyBPC expression.

Methods

Transgenic animals.

cMyBPC–/– (28) mice were generated previously and are of the same 129SV background as WT mice used. cMyBPC–/– mice rapidly develop a severe, early-onset HCM-related phenotype that remains relatively stable over time. cMyBPC–/– mice survive well into adulthood (>1 year) and are fertile (28).

AAV9 production and administration.

AAV9 pseudotyped vectors expressing EGFP, FL cMyBPC, and C0C2 cMyBPC were designed under the control of a cTnT promoter (pENN.AAV.cTNT.PI.eGFP.WPRE.rBG). Vectors were produced by the Penn Vector Core at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA), as described previously (58). The specific murine FL and C0C2 sequences used in this study are listed in Supplemental Figure 2. During the first 36 hours following birth, neonatal pups were anesthetized by hypothermia and received i.v. administration of 2 × 1011 genome copy (GC)/mouse via the temporal facial vein using a 33G needle under standard Biosafety Level 1 (BSL-1) and Animal Biosafety Level 1 (ABSL-1) conditions.

In vivo cardiac function.

Noninvasive transthoracic echocardiography was performed by an experienced research technician blinded to the study groups on anesthetized (1%–2% isoflurane) 3-week- and 6-week-old mice as previously described (59) using a Vevo 3100 ultrasonography 40 MHz transducer (Visual Sonics) to acquire 2D B mode, M mode, and Doppler images of the left ventricle. Images were analyzed using Vevo Lab 3.1.1 (Visual Sonics). The LV parameters EF, FS, anterior and posterior wall thickness, diameter, and LV mass were measured over 4–5 cardiac cycles from midventricle M-mode images, using the leading edge method. End-systolic dimensions were measured at the peak of the posterior wall motion; end-diastolic dimensions were measured at the time point corresponding to the start of the QRS complex on simultaneous ECG recordings. ET and MV peak velocities E (mitral peak velocity of early filling) and A (mitral peak velocity of late filling) were measured from apical 4-chamber PW Doppler images. STE-based longitudinal strain parameters (Figure 6, A–E) were measured from parasternal long-axis B mode video using Vevo Lab’s built-in semiautomated Vevo Strain analysis.

Histological analysis of cardiac tissue.

For histological analysis, hearts were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in anesthetized (4% isoflurane) 6-week-old animals from each group. Hearts were excised and further fixed in a solution of 4% PFA for an additional 48–72 hours at room temperature (RT) before embedding in paraffin for 5-μm serial sectioning and staining as previously described (35). Cross sections were stained with H&E and Masson’s trichrome. Quantitative analysis of trichrome-stained sections was performed using ImageJ (NIH) macro by Kennedy el al. that measured pixels where blue intensity exceeded red intensity by > 120% (60, 61). For each heart, the percent area of fibrosis was obtained from 8 total areas of interest from a midventricular section, with 2 areas of each from the anterior, posterior, and lateral free walls and septum. The total percent area of fibrotic area out of total area examined was averaged from 4 hearts for each mouse line.

Western blot and Pro-Q analysis of myocardial samples.

Myocardial proteins were studied as previously described (59). Briefly, hearts were excised from anesthetized (3%–4% isoflurane) mice, flash frozen in liquid N2, and stored at –80°C for later quantification of protein expression and phosphorylation. Frozen ventricular tissues were thawed in homogenization buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (PhosSTOP and cOmpleteULTRA Tablets, MilliporeSigma) at 4°C; they were then homogenized. Myofibril and whole cell fraction protein samples were reduced and heated to 90°C for 5 minutes. Sample protein concentrations were determined by BCA protein colorimetric assay (Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and diluted to 1 μg/μL. A total of 5 μL of solubilized myofibrils was loaded and electrophoretically separated using TruPAGE precast 4%–12% gels (MilliporeSigma) at 180 V for 45 minutes. Proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes for Western blot analysis (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.; cMyBPC, 1:1000, catalog sc-137237; HSC70, 1:2000, catalog sc-7298; custom antibodies by 21st Century Biochemicals, polyclonal rabbit IgG generated against cMyBPC phosphorylated S273 (1:10,000), S282 (1:10,000), and S302 (1:2000) using antigen peptides C-Ahx-AFRRT[pS]LAGAGRR-amide, C-Ahx-GAGRR{T/I}[pS]DSHED{A/T}G-amide, and C-Ahx-SLLKKRD[pS]FRRDSKL-amide, respectively. HSC70 was used as loading control for all Western blots. Control experiments demonstrating stable levels of HSC70 expression in samples from cMyBPC–/– and AAV9-treated hearts was performed by comparison with GAPDH expression (ABclonal, GAPDH, 1:1000 catalog AC002) (Supplemental Figure 4). Samples from 6 mice per group were used in PKA experiments. PKA samples were incubated at 30°C for 1 hour, in a solution containing the catalytic subunit of bovine PKA at a concentration of 0.15 U/μg myofibrils (PKA+) before being reduced and heated to 90°C for 5 minutes, as previously described (41, 62). Control samples were incubated in the same conditions in the absence of PKA (PKA). PKA sample Western blot p273, p282, and p302 phospho-band intensities normalized to total protein (e.g., p273/total cMyBPC) were expressed as a percentage of PKA+-treated phosphorylation. Samples from 4 mice per group were obtained in the dobutamine infusion experiment for representative Western blots of p273, p282, and p302 phosphorylation. To determine cTnT and cTnI expression and phosphorylation, a separate set of gels was stained with Pro-Q diamond phosphoprotein stain (Invitrogen) and Coomassie blue. The relative phosphorylation between different groups was determined by the intensity of the Pro-Q band normalized to the Coomassie band intensity. Densitometric scanning of Western blots and stained gels was performed using ImageJ (61).

IHC staining and fluorescence imaging.

Immunofluorescent determination of cMyBPC and C0C2 fragment localization in myofibrils was performed as previously described (63). Briefly, 2-mm cubes of flash frozen ventricular tissue were thawed in relaxing buffer at 4°C and then placed in rigor buffer for homogenization. Myofibrils were skinned using 1% Triton X-100, centrifuged at 1500g for 10 minutes, and resuspended in fresh rigor buffer containing BSA (1 μg/mL) to prevent clumping.

IHC staining of freshly made myofibril preparations was carried out at ~25°C. A total of 25 μL of myofibril samples was dispersed on microscope slides and allowed to partially dry before fixing for 10 minutes with the addition of 35 μL of 4% PFA. Each sample was washed with PBS 3 times and then incubated with 50 μL of 5% goat serum for 30 minutes for blocking. A total of 50 μL of primary antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., cMyBPC antibody, 1:1000, catalog sc-137237; MilliporeSigma, α-actinin antibody, 1:100, catalog SAB4503474) was added for 1-hour incubation. After washing with PBS 3 times, samples were incubated with secondary antibody (Invitrogen, goat anti–mouse Alexa Fluor 488, 1:500, catalog A-21121; goat anti–rabbit Texas red, 1:500, catalog T2767) for 30 minutes. After washing samples with PBS 3 times, Prolong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen) was used as mountant and allowed to cure overnight. Samples were imaged using an Olympus Fluoview-1000 confocal microscope.

Experimental protocols in skinned myocardium experiments.

Steady-state and XB kinetic measurements in skinned ventricular preparations were performed as described previously (35). Briefly, frozen ventricular tissue was homogenized in a relaxing solution to obtain multicellular ventricular preparations, which were then detergent skinned using 1% Triton X-100 for 1 hour. Multicellular ventricular preparations with dimension of approximately 100 × 400 μm (width by length) were selected for experiments. Ca2+ solutions contained the following (in mM): 14.5 creatine phosphate, 7 EGTA, and 20 Imidazole. Additionally, the maximal activating solution (pCa 4.5; pCa = –log [Ca2+]free) contained 65.45 KCl, 7.01 CaCl2, 5.27 MgCl2, and 4.81 ATP, whereas the relaxing solution (pCa 9.0) contained 72.45 KCl, 0.02 CaCl2, 5.42 MgCl2, and 4.76 ATP. The pH of the Ca2+ solutions was set to 7.0 with KOH, and the ionic strength was 180 mM. A series of submaximal pCa solutions, containing varying amounts of [Ca2+]free, were then prepared by combining appropriate volumes of pCa 9.0 and 4.5 stock solutions, and experiments were conducted at ~25°C ± 1°C.

Skinned multicellular ventricular preparations were securely attached between a motor arm (315C; Aurora Scientific Inc.) and a force transducer (403A; Aurora Scientific Inc.), as described previously (64, 65). Changes in motor arm positions and force transducer signals were sampled at 2000 Hz using a custom-built SL control software (66). For all mechanical measurements, the SL of ventricular preparations was set to 2.1 μm (38). Force-pCa relationships were determined by measuring the forces generated by skinned myocardial preparations isolated from WT and AAV9-treated cMyBPC–/– hearts in a series of pCa solutions that generate submaximal to maximal forces. The apparent cooperativity of force generation was estimated from the steepness of Hill plot transformation of the force-pCa relationships (67). The force-pCa data were fit using the equation P/Po = [Ca2+]nH/(knH + [Ca2+]nH), where nH is the Hill coefficient and k is the pCa needed to elicit half-maximal force (pCa50) (68).

The stretch-activation protocol used in this study was performed as previously described (64, 69). Skinned myocardial preparations were activated in a pCa solution that generated submaximal forces at pCa 6.1 and pCa 6.0. Once the myocardial preparations attained a steady-state force, they were subjected to a sudden 2% stretch of their initial muscle length (ML), held at the new ML for 8 seconds, and returned back to their initial ML. The characteristic features of the cardiac muscle stretch activation responses have been described earlier (68, 70). Briefly, a sudden 2% stretch in ML elicits an instantaneous spike in the force (P1) due to a sudden strain of elastic elements within the strongly bound XBs (Phase 1). Force then quickly falls (phase 2) to a minimum, due to the detachment of strained XBs into a non–force bearing pool, with a dynamic rate constant krel (an index of XB detachment from actin). The lowest point of phase 2 (nadir) is indicated by P2 which denotes the magnitude of XB detachment. Following the nadir, there is a gradual force rise (phase 3), with a dynamic rate constant kdf (an index of XB recruitment to actin), which happens due to stretch-induced recruitment of additional XBs into the force-bearing state (65). Stretch activation amplitudes were normalized to prestretch steady-state Ca2+-activated force as done before (64, 65, 68). The magnitude of new steady-state force (P3) was measured from the prestretch steady-state force to the peak force value attained in phase 3, and P2 was measured from prestretch steady-state force to the nadir of force response in phase 2, while Pdf was measured as the difference between P3 and P2 values (64, 65, 68).

The krel was measured by fitting a single exponential equation to the time course of force decay using the equation: F(t) = a(–1 + exp[–krel × t]) where “a” is the amplitude of the single exponential phase and krel is the rate constant of the force decay, as described earlier (64, 68). The kdf represents the rate of recruitment of all XBs that contribute to the delayed force rise following the sudden 2% stretch in ML and was estimated by linear transformation of the half-time of force redevelopment (64, 68) — kdf = 0.693/t1/2, where t1/2 is the time (in milliseconds) taken from the nadir (i.e., the point of force redevelopment at the end of phase 2) to the point of half-maximal force in phase 3 of the force response, where maximal force is indicated by a plateau region of phase 3 (i.e., P3) (64, 68).

Production of exogenous C0C2 protein.

pET-30a(+) vectors containing DNA encoding C-terminal 6× His-tagged mouse C0C2 was obtained from GeneScript and expressed in E. coli BL21 Star (DE3). Cells were grown in 1 L LB media until OD600 nm reached 0.8–1.0 at 37°C. The culture was cooled on ice for 30 minutes and incubated with shaking at 16°C for 16 hours after induction with 0.5 mM IPTG. Cell pellets were resuspended in 30 mL of cold resuspension buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 500 mM KCl, 10 mM Imidazole, 1 mM AEBSF, and protease inhibitor tablet; cOmpleteULTRA, Roche), flash frozen in liquid N2, and stored at –80°C until purification.

Purification was performed as previously described (71), with the following modifications. Briefly, pellets were thawed and then lysed using an Avestin Emulsiflex C3 homogenizer (ATA Scientific). Clarified lysates were rocked for 2 hours with Ni-NTA resin at 4°C. C0C2 protein was eluted from resin by gravity flow in a fritted column using 3 mL of elution buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 500 mM KCl, 250 mM Imidazole). DTT was added to the eluate to a final concentration of 1 mM. Eluate was then concentrated using a centrifugal concentrator with a 30 kDa molecular weight cut off (Pall) to 500 μL before being passed over an Enrich SEC 70, 10 × 300 mm column (Bio-Rad) equilibrated in rigor buffer. Fractions containing C0C2 were collected (Supplemental Figure 3A) and protein concentration was determined by UV absorbance at 280 nm. Confirmation of C0C2 was performed using SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis as described above. Protein purity was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining and found to be > 95% (Supplemental Figure 3B).

Statistics.

Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons between 2 groups were made using a 2-tailed t test. Statistical comparisons between 3 or more groups were made using a 1-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.01 for Windows (GraphPad Software, www.graphpad.com). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Study approval.

All procedures involving animal care and handling, including viral injections and BSL-1/ABSL-1 practices, were reviewed and approved by the Case Western Reserve University Animal Care and Use Committee.

Author contributions

JL and JES conceived and designed the experiments. JL, RM, CYD, and JBH conducted experiments and analyzed data. NB and RR provided the exogenous C0C2 and commented on the study design. JL and JES wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Gene Therapy Resource Program (GTRP) of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; NIH for providing the gene vectors used in this study (RSA1215); and the University of Pennsylvania Vector Core for help in the design and production of the AAV9 used in this study. We would also like to thank Xiaoqin Chen, Department of Physiology and Biophysics at Case Western Reserve University for assistance with echocardiography, and the Tissue Resources Core Facility of the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (P30CA043703) for assistance with histology. This work was supported by the NIH (R01 HL146676, T32-HL007567, HL-114770, GM007250, and 1S10OD012635-1).

Version 1. 08/04/2020

In-Press Preview

Version 2. 09/03/2020

Electronic publication

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Copyright: © 2020, Li et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: JCI Insight. 2020;5(17):e130182. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.130182.

Contributor Information

Jiayang Li, Email: jxl869@case.edu.

Ranganath Mamidi, Email: rxm456@case.edu.

Chang Yoon Doh, Email: cxd239@case.edu.

Joshua B. Holmes, Email: jbh92@case.edu.

Nikhil Bharambe, Email: nxb274@case.edu.

Rajesh Ramachandran, Email: rajesh.ramachandran@case.edu.

Julian E. Stelzer, Email: julian.stelzer@case.edu.

References

  • 1.Benjamin EJ, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146–e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yotti R, Seidman CE, Seidman JG. Advances in the Genetic Basis and Pathogenesis of Sarcomere Cardiomyopathies. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2019;20:129–153. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marian AJ, Braunwald E. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Genetics, Pathogenesis, Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Circ Res. 2017;121(7):749–770. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.311059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alfares AA, et al. Results of clinical genetic testing of 2,912 probands with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: expanded panels offer limited additional sensitivity. Genet Med. 2015;17(11):880–888. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jacques A, Hoskins AC, Kentish JC, Marston SB. From genotype to phenotype: a longitudinal study of a patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy due to a mutation in the MYBPC3 gene. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2008;29(6-8):239–246. doi: 10.1007/s10974-009-9174-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O’Leary TS, Snyder J, Sadayappan S, Day SM, Previs MJ. MYBPC3 truncation mutations enhance actomyosin contractile mechanics in human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019;127:165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xin B, Puffenberger E, Tumbush J, Bockoven JR, Wang H. Homozygosity for a novel splice site mutation in the cardiac myosin-binding protein C gene causes severe neonatal hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A(22):2662–2667. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zahka K, et al. Homozygous mutation of MYBPC3 associated with severe infantile hypertrophic cardiomyopathy at high frequency among the Amish. Heart. 2008;94(10):1326–1330. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.127241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Merkulov S, Chen X, Chandler MP, Stelzer JE. In vivo cardiac myosin binding protein C gene transfer rescues myofilament contractile dysfunction in cardiac myosin binding protein C null mice. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5(5):635–644. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.968941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mearini G, et al. Mybpc3 gene therapy for neonatal cardiomyopathy enables long-term disease prevention in mice. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5515. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gilbert R, Cohen JA, Pardo S, Basu A, Fischman DA. Identification of the A-band localization domain of myosin binding proteins C and H (MyBP-C, MyBP-H) in skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci. 1999;112(Pt 1):69–79. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.1.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Craig R, Offer G. The location of C-protein in rabbit skeletal muscle. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 1976;192(1109):451–461. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1976.0023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harris SP, Rostkova E, Gautel M, Moss RL. Binding of myosin binding protein-C to myosin subfragment S2 affects contractility independent of a tether mechanism. Circ Res. 2004;95(9):930–936. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000147312.02673.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Razumova MV, Bezold KL, Tu AY, Regnier M, Harris SP. Contribution of the myosin binding protein C motif to functional effects in permeabilized rat trabeculae. J Gen Physiol. 2008;132(5):575–585. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200810013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kampourakis T, Yan Z, Gautel M, Sun YB, Irving M. Myosin binding protein-C activates thin filaments and inhibits thick filaments in heart muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(52):18763–18768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413922112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Previs MJ, et al. Myosin-binding protein C corrects an intrinsic inhomogeneity in cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Sci Adv. 2015;1(1):e1400205. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mun JY, et al. Myosin-binding protein C displaces tropomyosin to activate cardiac thin filaments and governs their speed by an independent mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(6):2170–2175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316001111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Risi C, et al. N-Terminal Domains of Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein C Cooperatively Activate the Thin Filament. Structure. 2018;26(12):1604–1611.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2018.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Inchingolo AV, Previs SB, Previs MJ, Warshaw DM, Kad NM. Revealing the mechanism of how cardiac myosin-binding protein C N-terminal fragments sensitize thin filaments for myosin binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(14):6828–6835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816480116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nag S, et al. The myosin mesa and the basis of hypercontractility caused by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24(6):525–533. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shaffer JF, Kensler RW, Harris SP. The myosin-binding protein C motif binds to F-actin in a phosphorylation-sensitive manner. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(18):12318–12327. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808850200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Colson BA, Thompson AR, Espinoza-Fonseca LM, Thomas DD. Site-directed spectroscopy of cardiac myosin-binding protein C reveals effects of phosphorylation on protein structural dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113(12):3233–3238. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521281113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gresham KS, Stelzer JE. The contributions of cardiac myosin binding protein C and troponin I phosphorylation to β-adrenergic enhancement of in vivo cardiac function. J Physiol (Lond) 2016;594(3):669–686. doi: 10.1113/JP270959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gresham KS, Mamidi R, Li J, Kwak H, Stelzer JE. Sarcomeric protein modification during adrenergic stress enhances cross-bridge kinetics and cardiac output. J Appl Physiol. 2017;122(3):520–530. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00306.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moss RL, Fitzsimons DP, Ralphe JC. Cardiac MyBP-C regulates the rate and force of contraction in mammalian myocardium. Circ Res. 2015;116(1):183–192. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.300561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Flashman E, Redwood C, Moolman-Smook J, Watkins H. Cardiac myosin binding protein C: its role in physiology and disease. Circ Res. 2004;94(10):1279–1289. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000127175.21818.C2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Squire JM, Harford JJ, Edman AC, Sjöström M. Fine structure of the A-band in cryo-sections. III. Crossbridge distribution and the axial structure of the human C-zone. J Mol Biol. 1982;155(4):467–494. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90482-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Harris SP, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in cardiac myosin binding protein-C knockout mice. Circ Res. 2002;90(5):594–601. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000012222.70819.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Palmer BM, et al. Roles for cardiac MyBP-C in maintaining myofilament lattice rigidity and prolonging myosin cross-bridge lifetime. Biophys J. 2011;101(7):1661–1669. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ponikowski P, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(27):2129–2200. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Beyhoff N, et al. Application of Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography in an Experimental Model of Isolated Subendocardial Damage. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30(12):1239–1250.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Stelzer JE, Dunning SB, Moss RL. Ablation of cardiac myosin-binding protein-C accelerates stretch activation in murine skinned myocardium. Circ Res. 2006;98(9):1212–1218. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000219863.94390.ce. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Herron TJ, Rostkova E, Kunst G, Chaturvedi R, Gautel M, Kentish JC. Activation of myocardial contraction by the N-terminal domains of myosin binding protein-C. Circ Res. 2006;98(10):1290–1298. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000222059.54917.ef. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Weith AE, et al. The extent of cardiac myosin binding protein-C phosphorylation modulates actomyosin function in a graded manner. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2012;33(6):449–459. doi: 10.1007/s10974-012-9312-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cheng Y, et al. Impaired contractile function due to decreased cardiac myosin binding protein C content in the sarcomere. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;305(1):H52–H65. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00929.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bhuiyan MS, Gulick J, Osinska H, Gupta M, Robbins J. Determination of the critical residues responsible for cardiac myosin binding protein C’s interactions. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;53(6):838–847. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Belknap B, Harris SP, White HD. Modulation of thin filament activation of myosin ATP hydrolysis by N-terminal domains of cardiac myosin binding protein-C. Biochemistry. 2014;53(42):6717–6724. doi: 10.1021/bi500787f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mamidi R, Gresham KS, Li A, dos Remedios CG, Stelzer JE. Molecular effects of the myosin activator omecamtiv mecarbil on contractile properties of skinned myocardium lacking cardiac myosin binding protein-C. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;85:262–272. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.van Dijk SJ, Kooiker KB, Napierski NC, Touma KD, Mazzalupo S, Harris SP. Point mutations in the tri-helix bundle of the M-domain of cardiac myosin binding protein-C influence systolic duration and delay cardiac relaxation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018;119:116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Schnelle M, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function in mouse models of heart disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018;114:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2017.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tong CW, Stelzer JE, Greaser ML, Powers PA, Moss RL. Acceleration of crossbridge kinetics by protein kinase A phosphorylation of cardiac myosin binding protein C modulates cardiac function. Circ Res. 2008;103(9):974–982. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.177683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang Q, Hewett TE, Klevitsky R, Sanbe A, Wang X, Robbins J. PKA-dependent phosphorylation of cardiac myosin binding protein C in transgenic mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;51(1):80–88. doi: 10.1016/S0008-6363(01)00273-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Colson BA, et al. Myosin binding protein-C phosphorylation is the principal mediator of protein kinase A effects on thick filament structure in myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;53(5):609–616. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rosas PC, et al. Phosphorylation of cardiac Myosin-binding protein-C is a critical mediator of diastolic function. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(3):582–594. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Waddingham PH, Bhattacharyya S, Zalen JV, Lloyd G. Contractile reserve as a predictor of prognosis in patients with non-ischaemic systolic heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Echo Res Pract. 2018;5(1):1–9. doi: 10.1530/ERP-17-0054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sadayappan S, et al. Cardiac myosin binding protein C phosphorylation is cardioprotective. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(45):16918–16923. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607069103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rosas PC, Warren CM, Creed HA, Trzeciakowski JP, Solaro RJ, Tong CW. Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein-C Phosphorylation Mitigates Age-Related Cardiac Dysfunction: Hope for Better Aging? JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2019;4(7):817–830. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2019.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tong CW, et al. Phosphoregulation of Cardiac Inotropy via Myosin Binding Protein-C During Increased Pacing Frequency or β1-Adrenergic Stimulation. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(3):595–604. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.El-Armouche A, et al. Decreased phosphorylation levels of cardiac myosin-binding protein-C in human and experimental heart failure. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007;43(2):223–229. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jacques AM, et al. Myosin binding protein C phosphorylation in normal, hypertrophic and failing human heart muscle. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008;45(2):209–216. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2008.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Barefield D, Sadayappan S. Phosphorylation and function of cardiac myosin binding protein-C in health and disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;48(5):866–875. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Morimoto K, Harrington WF. Isolation and composition of thick filaments from rabbit skeletal muscle. J Mol Biol. 1973;77(1):165–175. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90370-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Razzaque MA, Gupta M, Osinska H, Gulick J, Blaxall BC, Robbins J. An endogenously produced fragment of cardiac myosin-binding protein C is pathogenic and can lead to heart failure. Circ Res. 2013;113(5):553–561. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Morita H, et al. Shared genetic causes of cardiac hypertrophy in children and adults. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(18):1899–1908. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa075463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pattali R, Mou Y, Li XJ. AAV9 Vector: a Novel modality in gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. Gene Ther. 2019;26(7-8):287–295. doi: 10.1038/s41434-019-0085-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bish LT, et al. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 9 provides global cardiac gene transfer superior to AAV1, AAV6, AAV7, and AAV8 in the mouse and rat. Hum Gene Ther. 2008;19(12):1359–1368. doi: 10.1089/hum.2008.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wijnker PJ, et al. Comparison of the effects of a truncating and a missense MYBPC3 mutation on contractile parameters of engineered heart tissue. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;97:82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lock M, et al. Rapid, simple, and versatile manufacturing of recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors at scale. Hum Gene Ther. 2010;21(10):1259–1271. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Li J, et al. Sarcomere-based genetic enhancement of systolic cardiac function in a murine model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2018;273:168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kennedy DJ, et al. Central role for the cardiotonic steroid marinobufagenin in the pathogenesis of experimental uremic cardiomyopathy. Hypertension. 2006;47(3):488–495. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000202594.82271.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gresham KS, Mamidi R, Stelzer JE. The contribution of cardiac myosin binding protein-c Ser282 phosphorylation to the rate of force generation and in vivo cardiac contractility. J Physiol (Lond) 2014;592(17):3747–3765. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.276022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Doh CY, Li J, Mamidi R, Stelzer JE. The HCM-causing Y235S cMyBPC mutation accelerates contractile function by altering C1 domain structure. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2019;1865(3):661–677. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mamidi R, et al. Dose-Dependent Effects of the Myosin Activator Omecamtiv Mecarbil on Cross-Bridge Behavior and Force Generation in Failing Human Myocardium. Circ Heart Fail. 2017;10(10):e004257. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mamidi R, Gresham KS, Li J, Stelzer JE. Cardiac myosin binding protein-C Ser302 phosphorylation regulates cardiac β-adrenergic reserve. Sci Adv. 2017;3(3):e1602445. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Campbell KS, Moss RL. SLControl: PC-based data acquisition and analysis for muscle mechanics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285(6):H2857–H2864. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00295.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mamidi R, Gresham KS, Stelzer JE. Length-dependent changes in contractile dynamics are blunted due to cardiac myosin binding protein-C ablation. Front Physiol. 2014;5:461. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mamidi R, Gresham KS, Verma S, Stelzer JE. Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein-C Phosphorylation Modulates Myofilament Length-Dependent Activation. Front Physiol. 2016;7:38. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ford SJ, Chandra M, Mamidi R, Dong W, Campbell KB. Model representation of the nonlinear step response in cardiac muscle. J Gen Physiol. 2010;136(2):159–177. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201010467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mamidi R, Li J, Doh CY, Holmes JB, Stelzer JE. Lost in translation: Interpreting cardiac muscle mechanics data in clinical practice. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2019;662:213–218. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.12.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bunch TA, Lepak VC, Kanassatega RS, Colson BA. N-terminal extension in cardiac myosin-binding protein C regulates myofilament binding. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2018;125:140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2018.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hooijman P, Stewart MA, Cooke R. A new state of cardiac myosin with very slow ATP turnover: a potential cardioprotective mechanism in the heart. Biophys J. 2011;100(8):1969–1976. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.02.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data

Articles from JCI Insight are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES