Therapeutic options for Mycobacterium abscessus infections are extremely limited. New or repurposed drugs are needed. The anti-M. abscessus activity of AR-12 (OSU-03012), reported to express broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects, was investigated in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on 194 clinical isolates. Minimum bactericidal concentration and time-kill kinetics assays were conducted to distinguish the bactericidal versus bacteriostatic activity of AR-12.
KEYWORDS: Mycobacterium abscessus, AR-12 (OSU-03012), intracellular, mouse model
ABSTRACT
Therapeutic options for Mycobacterium abscessus infections are extremely limited. New or repurposed drugs are needed. The anti-M. abscessus activity of AR-12 (OSU-03012), reported to express broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects, was investigated in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on 194 clinical isolates. Minimum bactericidal concentration and time-kill kinetics assays were conducted to distinguish the bactericidal versus bacteriostatic activity of AR-12. Synergy between AR-12 and five clinically important antibiotics was determined using a checkerboard synergy assay. The activity of AR-12 against intracellular M. abscessus residing within macrophage was also evaluated. Finally, the potency of AR-12 in vivo was determined in a neutropenic mouse model that mimics pulmonary M. abscessus infection. AR-12 exhibited high anti-M. abscessus activity in vitro, with an MIC50 of 4 mg/liter (8.7 μM) and an MIC90 of 8 mg/liter (17.4 μM) for both subsp. abscessus and subsp. massiliense. AR-12 and amikacin exhibited comparable bactericidal activity against extracellular M. abscessus in culture. AR-12, however, exhibited significantly greater intracellular antibacterial activity than amikacin and caused a significant reduction in the bacterial load in the lungs of neutropenic mice infected with M. abscessus. No antagonism between AR-12 and clarithromycin, amikacin, imipenem, cefoxitin, or tigecycline was evident. In conclusion, AR-12 is active against M. abscessus in vitro and in vivo and does not antagonize the most frequently used anti-M. abscessus drugs. As such, AR-12 is a potential candidate to include in novel strategies to treat M. abscessus infections.
INTRODUCTION
Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are rapidly emerging opportunistic pathogens capable of causing severe lung infections in vulnerable individuals. Most countries report a dramatic increase in lung infections involving NTM in recent years (1). Among NTM species, Mycobacterium abscessus is one of the most challenging etiological agents (2). Infections caused by M. abscessus exhibit high rates of morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, M. abscessus is typically resistant to most chemotherapies; treatment options are limited (3). Current, accepted therapeutic approaches require treatment with multidrug combinations over a long period of time (6 to 12 months). Regardless, treatment remains far from satisfactory (4–7). Furthermore, M. abscessus resistance to most antibiotics has begun to appear (8, 9). New or repurposed drugs are urgently needed.
AR-12 (OSU-03012), a novel celecoxib derivative that lacks cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor activity, exerts a biological effect by a variety of mechanisms that include repressing host cell chaperone machinery, inhibiting kinase pathways, and upregulating autophagy (10–16). AR-12 was initially a small-molecule targeted anticancer agent administered orally (17–19). Recent studies indicate that AR-12 exerts a broad range of biological effects against a variety of microbial pathogens that includes fungi, bacteria, parasites, and viruses (10, 16, 20–27). Notably, AR-12 exhibits significant antimicrobial activity against intracellular bacteria in vitro and in vivo and is effective in eliminating certain multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial pathogens (12–14, 28–30). M. abscessus is a typical, MDR, facultative intracellular bacterium; the sensitivity of M. abscessus to AR-12 remains to be determined.
A detailed evaluation of the anti-M. abscessus activity of AR-12 was undertaken. AR-12 was active against M. abscessus growing in vitro and in vivo and proved especially effective in inhibiting the growth of intracellular organisms. Moreover, AR-12 did not act antagonistically toward the most frequently used anti-M. abscessus drugs. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the anti-M. abscessus activity of AR-12. As such, this work may provide a novel approach to treating M. abscessus infections.
RESULTS
AR-12 is active against M. abscessus.
A total of 194 clinical M. abscessus isolates (148 subsp. abscessus and 46 subsp. massiliense) were collected. AR-12 displayed similar antimicrobial activity against both subspecies. The MICs ranged from 2 to 16 mg/liter, with an MIC50 and an MIC90 of 4 and 8 mg/liter (8.7 and 17.4 μM), respectively, emphasizing the broad sensitivity of M. abscessus to AR-12 (Table 1; see also Table S1 in the supplemental material).
TABLE 1.
MICs of AR-12 for 194 clinical M. abscessus isolates
| M. abscessus subspecies | MIC range (mg/liter) | MIC50 (mg/liter) | MIC90 (mg/liter) | No. (%) of isolates sensitive to the indicated AR-12 concn |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 mg/liter | 4 mg/liter | 8 mg/liter | 16 mg/liter | ||||
| abscessus (n = 148) | 2–16 | 4 | 8 | 9 (6.1) | 72 (48.6) | 64 (43.2) | 3 (2.0) |
| massiliense (n = 46) | 2–8 | 4 | 8 | 2 (4.3) | 27 (58.7) | 17 (37.0) | 0 (0.0) |
AR-12 exhibits bactericidal activity.
The MBC/MIC ratio of AR-12 for all isolates tested ranged from 2 to >4 (Table 2). Most isolates (81.8%, 9/11) exhibited an MBC/MIC ratio of ≤4, which is indicative of bactericidal activity. AR-12 exhibited essentially the same bactericidal activity toward both subspecies. Indeed, no obvious trait (e.g., increased sensitivity to other antibiotics such as amikacin) differentiated the isolates that were and were not subject to the bactericidal activity of AR-12.
TABLE 2.
MBC values and antibacterial activities of AR-12 against M. abscessus complex
| Isolate | Subspecies | Concn (mg/liter) |
MBC/MIC ratio | Antibacterial activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | MBCa | ||||
| G74 | massiliense | 4 | >16 | >4 | Bacteriostatic |
| G203 | massiliense | 4 | 16 | 4 | Bactericidal |
| G124 | massiliense | 2 | 8 | 4 | Bactericidal |
| G137 | massiliense | 4 | 8 | 2 | Bactericidal |
| G141 | massiliense | 4 | 16 | 4 | Bactericidal |
| G142 | abscessus | 4 | 16 | 4 | Bactericidal |
| G164 | abscessus | 4 | >16 | >4 | Bacteriostatic |
| G90 | abscessus | 4 | 16 | 4 | Bactericidal |
| A311 | abscessus | 4 | 16 | 4 | Bactericidal |
| A8 | abscessus | 4 | 8 | 2 | Bactericidal |
| ATCC 19977 | abscessus | 4 | 16 | 4 | Bactericidal |
A value of >16 mg/liter indicates an MBC value greater than the highest AR-12 concentration tested.
AR-12 is comparable to amikacin in bacterial killing kinetics assay.
To determine the potency of the killing kinetics of AR-12 against M. abscessus, AR-12 was tested at 1× and 8× MIC for 7 days; amikacin served as a positive control. At 1× MIC, there was no reduction in log10 CFU of either ATCC 19977 or G137 compared to the untreated, negative control (Fig. 1). Treatment with 1× MIC amikacin yielded comparable results. In contrast, treatment of subsp. abscessus and subsp. massiliense with 8× MIC of AR-12 resulted in ca. 2- and 3.3-log10 reductions in CFU, respectively, relative to the untreated control at 7 days. Amikacin exhibited comparable, concentration-dependent antimicrobial activity. Regrowth occurred after 3 to 7 days of incubation with either AR-12 or amikacin. Prior exposure to 1 mg/liter (0.25 MIC50), AR12 did not affect the MIC calculated subsequently for 16 clinical isolates or the M. abscessus subsp. abscessus reference strain (ATCC 19977) (unpublished data). Thus, it is unlikely that the regrowth shown here is due to increased antibiotic resistance. Rather, regrowth is more likely due to the loss of antibiotic potency with time in culture.
FIG 1.
AR-12 and amikacin (AMK) exhibit comparable capacities to inhibit the extracellular growth of M. abscessus in vitro. (A) subsp. abscessus reference strain, ATCC 19977; (B) subsp. massiliense clinical isolate, G137.
AR-12 is indifferent in its interaction with five clinically important anti-M. abscessus drugs.
Indifference (fractional inhibitory concentration index [FICI] = 0.625 to 1.5) was the most commonly observed interaction (97.14%, 34/35) of all the antimicrobial combinations of AR-12 and the most frequently used anti-M. abscessus drugs (Table 3; Tables S2 and S3). Only the interaction of AR-12 with imipenem in a subsp. abscessus strain showed synergy (FICI = 0.5). No antagonism between drugs was observed.
TABLE 3.
Indifferent interaction of AR-12 with antibiotics frequently used to treat M. abscessus infectionsa
| Isolate | Subspecies | FICIb |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR-12 + CLA | AR-12 + AMK | AR-12 + IPM | AR-12 + CFX | AR-12 + TGC | ||
| G188 | massiliense | 0.75 | 1 | 0.75 | 1 | 1.25 |
| A63 | massiliense | 1 | 0.75 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| G189 | massiliense | 1.5 | 0.625 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| G197 | abscessus | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 |
| G198 | abscessus | 1.25 | 1 | 0.625 | 0.75 | 1 |
| A350 | abscessus | 0.75 | 1 | 0.75 | 1 | 1.5 |
| ATCC 19977 | abscessus | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1 | 1 |
Synergy between AR-12 and the five antibiotics was assessed using the broth microdilution checkerboard titration technique.
Abbreviations: FICI, fractional inhibitory concentration index; CLA, clarithromycin; AMK, amikacin; IPM, imipenem; CFX, cefoxitin; TGC, tigecycline. FICI values: synergy (FICI ≤ 0.5), indifference (0.5 < FICI ≤ 4.0), and antagonism (FICI > 4.0).
AR-12 inhibits the growth of intracellular M. abscessus.
Experiments were undertaken to access and compare the effects of AR-12 and amikacin on the intracellular survival of M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (reference strain ATCC 19977) and subsp. massiliense (clinical isolate G137 chosen at random) in primary peritoneal macrophages. Both AR-12 and amikacin at 0.5× and 1.0× MIC significantly inhibited the intracellular growth of subsp. abscessus relative to the untreated control; AR-12 demonstrated greater inhibition than amikacin (Fig. 2A). AR-12 exerted a far more pronounced effect on subsp. massiliense, which exhibited an ∼0.5 log10 reduction in intracellular organisms during 48 h incubation with 1× MIC (Fig. 2B). Treatment with 1× MIC amikacin, on the other hand, only slowed the intracellular growth M. abscessus subsp. massiliense.
FIG 2.
Relative intracellular antimicrobial activities of AR-12 and amikacin (AMK) expressed in vitro. (A) Subsp. abscessus reference strain ATCC 19977; (B) subsp. massiliense clinical isolate G137. *, P < 0.05 compared to control group.
AR-12 inhibits the replication of M. abscessus in a mouse model of lung infection.
AR-12 exerted a potent inhibitory effect on the intra- and extracellular growth of M. abscessus in vitro. Additional experiments were conducted to evaluate and compare the effects of AR-12 and amikacin in vivo. A study was conducted using a murine respiratory infection model under immunocompromised conditions that mimicked the clinical presentations of NTM lung disease. AR-12 (50 mg/kg) and amikacin (50 mg/kg) caused significant reductions of ∼3.7 log10 CFU and ∼3.0 log10 CFU, respectively, in lungs accessed at 14 days postinfection (Fig. 3A). Immunostaining also revealed a reduction in the inflammatory pathology and bacterial counts in the lungs of AR-12-treated mice compared to untreated mice (Fig. 3B). Overall, AR-12 exhibited bactericidal activity in vivo, which was consistent its effects on the intracellular survival of M. abscessus in vitro.
FIG 3.
AR-12 exhibits anti-M. abscessus activity in a mouse lung infection model. (A) CFU assay, AMK, amikacin; dpi, days postinfection. The data are the mean CFU/lung tissues ± the standard deviations. Relative to the control untreated mice, lung tissues obtained from AMK- or AR-12-treated mice had significantly fewer organisms (**, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001). (B, top row) H&E staining. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B, bottom row) Acid-fast staining. Scale bar, 10 μm.
DISCUSSION
Treatment of M. abscessus infections is particularly difficult, a high rate of failure (45.1 to 46.0%) has been reported (6, 7). Developing new antimicrobial strategies to control M. abscessus is urgently needed. AR-12, used as a host-directed therapeutic or a direct antibacterial agent, is a prospective drug for treatment of multiple pathogens. It offers of variety of advantages such as oral delivery, a broad anti-pathogen spectrum, and effective in treating MDR bacteria (10–30). The efficacy of AR-12 in the treatment of M. abscessus infections remains to be determined.
In the present study, 194 clinical M. abscessus isolates were collected. AR-12 exhibited significant antimicrobial activity against these isolates in vitro; the MIC50 and MIC90 were 4 and 8 mg/liter (8.7 and 17.4 μM), respectively. Pharmacokinetic studies in mice indicated that the peak serum concentration of oral AR-12 administered at 200 mg/kg exceeded 20 μM. At the end of a 28-day period, the mice exhibited no visible signs of toxicity. All the animals maintained stable body weights and lacked gross pathological abnormalities upon necropsy (C.-S. Chen, unpublished data) (18). Similarly, an AR-12 dose of ≤200 mg/kg proved to be safe in mouse models of viral and fungal infections (22, 24).
Data obtained in a phase I clinical trial, exploring the effectivity of AR-12 as a targeted anticancer drug, showed that an 8 μM or 3.7 mg/liter serum concentration was safely attained and well tolerated by patients administered 800 mg twice daily (19). This serum concentration is similar to the MIC50 of AR-12 for M. abscessus in vitro determined here, indicating that a safe and effective dose can be achieved to treat clinical M. abscessus infections. The best dose and formulation of AR-12 required to optimize therapeutic outcomes, however, remain to be determined.
It has been suggested that AR-12 is a host-directed therapeutic rather than an antibiotic. Reportedly, it enhances host-dependent eradication of numerous intracellular infectious agents via multiple mechanisms that culminate in an antiproliferative effect (10–16). AR-12, for example, has no direct effect on Francisella strains but inhibits the intracellular survival of Francisella indirectly by inducing host cell autophagy (13). In a second study, however, AR-12 inhibited ampicillin- and kanamycin-resistant Escherichia coli and MDR N. gonorrhoeae directly by reducing DnaK expression (31). The latter study indicates that AR-12 can target certain bacteria and is a valuable, bioavailable small molecule that should be evaluated for the breadth of its antimicrobial activity. In the present study, AR-12 killed M. abscessus by a direct, concentration-dependent mechanism and was comparable to amikacin in activity expressed in vitro.
AR-12 was effective in inhibiting the growth of intracellular M. abscessus in vitro at concentrations effective in inhibiting organisms growing extracellularly. Similarly, AR-12 inhibited M. abscessus growth in a mouse model of lung infection. Interestingly, AR-12 exhibited a slight advantage over amikacin in these latter two cases, which was not evident when accessing the effects of AR-12 on extracellular growth in vitro. This finding was most likely due to the combined effects of the direct bactericidal activity of AR-12 and its host-directed therapeutic function. This is a significant advantage of AR-12 over other drugs used in treating bacteria, such as M. abscessus, growing intracellularly. It exhibits single-use bactericidal activity and simultaneously enhances bacterial clearance, acting as a small molecule adjuvant.
Hydrophobicity is a major concern associated with AR-12, making it difficult to achieve therapeutic doses. Modification and enhanced delivery systems may be needed to generate higher drug concentrations in vivo (11). In this regard, AR-12 encapsulated in acetalated dextran microparticles maintained pharmaceutical activity while exhibiting reduced cytotoxicity (27–29).
M. abscessus infections generally require treatment with multidrug combinations. AR-12 is an attractive option for treating M. abscessus infections, although its optimal effectiveness may necessitate its incorporation into multidrug therapy. In the present study, no antagonism was observed between AR-12 and five antibiotics (clarithromycin, amikacin, imipenem, cefoxitin, and tigecycline) found to be clinically important in treating M. abscessus infections according to guidelines (4, 5). Although there are currently no reports of AR-12 antagonism, one study showed that AR-12 can potentiate the antibacterial activity of polymyxins purportedly by modifying lipopolysaccharide, altering the bacterial outer membrane, and promoting polymyxin uptake (30). Koselny et al. reported that AR-12 could enhance the activity of fluconazole in a mouse model of cryptococcosis (25). AR-12 also acts as a potentiator in colistin (polymyxin E)-sensitive strains (32). These results indicate that AR-12 does not antagonize other drugs and suggest the ease with which AR-12 could be integrated into current anti-M. abscessus drug combinations.
This study is limited by the fact that all isolates used were obtained from a single hospital, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, a designated treatment center for Chinese tuberculosis and NTM infections, which attracts NTM cases from across the country. Acquisition of M. abscessus from other sources is difficult. Consequently, many of the isolates may be related genetically and/or epidemiologically. In conclusion, AR-12 is active against M. abscessus both in vitro and in vivo and does not antagonize other antibiotics most frequently used to treat M. abscessus infections. As such, AR-12 is a potential candidate to include in novel therapeutic anti-M. abscessus regimens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains.
A total of 194 clinical M. abscessus isolates were acquired retrospectively from sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens that were obtained between January 2014 and December 2017 and stored at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital is one of the designated treatment centers for Chinese tuberculosis and NTM infections, attracting NTM cases from across the country. Both MGIT960 medium culture and p-nitrobenzoic acid testing were used as preliminary screening methods for NTM. The positive isolates were divided into subsp. abscessus and subsp. massiliense based upon multilocus sequencing of the rpoB and erm(41) genes. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Mycobacterium peregrinum (ATCC 700686), and M. abscessus ATCC 19977 reference strains were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA). M. abscessus was grown at 37°C on Middlebrook 7H10 (M7H10) agar plates supplemented with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC) and 0.2% glycerol or with continuous shaking in Middlebrook 7H9 (M7H9) broth supplemented with 10% OADC and 0.05% Tween 80 (7H9sB). Suspensions of all isolates were stored at –80°C and cultured fresh before each assay. Middlebrook 7H9 broth, M7H10 agar, cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton II broth (CAMHB), and OADC supplement were purchased from Becton, Dickinson, and Company (BD; Franklin Lakes, NJ).
Antimicrobial agents.
AR-12 (OSU-03012) was purchased from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ). Clarithromycin, amikacin, imipenem, cefoxitin, and tigecycline were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Stock solutions of AR-12 (128 μg/ml) were dissolved in 32% DMSO (4 μg/ml in 1%). Clarithromycin (2,048 μg/ml) was prepared in 100% DMSO, and other antibiotics at 2,048 μg/ml were prepared in deionized water. All antibiotics were stored as aliquots at –20°C and serially diluted just prior to experimental use.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted in accordance with CLSI document M24-A2. In brief, individual M. abscessus colonies were picked from M7H10 agar plates, grown to logarithmic phase in M7H9 broth, diluted to McFarland 0.5 with sterile saline, and adjusted to 1 × 105 to 5 × 105 CFU/ml using CAMHB. AR-12 was serially diluted 1:2 in a 96-well microtiter plate (final concentrations ranged from 16 to 0.008 μg/ml), and 100 μl of bacteria in suspended CAMH was added to each well. The plates were incubated at 37°C under aerobic conditions for 3 to 4 days until the control wells without AR-12 exhibited visible growth. Mycobacterium peregrinum (ATCC 700686) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213) served as control reference strains. The MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration at which no bacterial growth was observed by visual examination. All assays were repeated twice.
Minimum bactericidal concentration.
The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) was determined in order to distinguish between the bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities of AR-12. M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and subsp. massiliense isolates were selected randomly for determination. After the antimicrobial susceptibility test at day 4 of AR-12 incubation, wells in which the drug concentrations were higher than the MIC were evenly resuspended. Portions (100 μl) of the contents from wells were serially diluted (10-fold) and plated to count the remaining CFU. The CFU were determined after 5 days of incubation at 37°C. The MBC values were defined as the minimum drug concentration with no colony growth. An antibiotic is considered bactericidal when the MBC/MIC ratio is ≤4; otherwise, it is considered bacteriostatic.
Time-kill kinetics assay.
We used the subsp. abscessus ATCC 19977 and a clinical subsp. massiliense isolate (G137) to evaluate the potency of the killing kinetics of AR-12 against M. abscessus. Tubes (5 ml) of 7H9sB containing AR-12 or amikacin at 1× or 8× MIC were inoculated with 5 × 105 CFU of bacteria growing exponentially; the tubes were incubated for 7 days at 37°C with shaking (100 rpm). The bacteria were enumerated on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 by plating serial dilutions on lysogeny broth agar plates; CFU were enumerated after an additional 5 days incubation at 37°C. All assays were performed in duplicate.
Synergy with frequently used antimycobacterial drugs.
Synergy between AR-12 and clarithromycin, amikacin, imipenem, cefoxitin, and tigecycline was assessed in vitro using the broth microdilution chequerboard titration technique. Briefly, serial 2-fold dilutions of AR-12 were added to the columns of wells, and serial dilutions of the five antibiotics were added to the rows of wells in a 96-well microtiter plate, yielding a two-dimensional matrix composed of AR-12 in combination with various antibiotic concentrations. The 2-fold dilutions of AR-12 or each antibiotic alone and the medium without AR-12 or antibiotics were used as controls. Randomly selected M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and subsp. massiliense isolates (∼106 CFU/ml) were added to each well, and the plates were incubated for 3 to 4 days at 37°C. The final MIC of each drug combination was determined as described for antimicrobial susceptibility testing above. The results of synergy testing were interpreted based on the FICI determined according to the following formula: FICI = (MIC of antibiotic A in combination/MIC of antibiotic A alone) + (MIC of AR-12 in the combination/MIC of AR-12 alone). Drug interactions exhibit three patterns: synergy (FICI ≤ 0.5), indifference (0.5 < FICI ≤ 4.0), and antagonism (FICI > 4.0).
Intracellular killing.
Mouse peritoneal macrophages, frequently used in studies undertaken to examine the factors that affect intracellular replication of Mycobacterium species, were obtained by previously described methods (33–35). The cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 5 with M. abscessus ATCC 19977 suspended in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum and no antibiotics. After 4 h of incubation at 37°C in 5% CO2, the cells were washed three times with warm phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove the extracellular organisms. Fresh RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% human serum and then AR-12 or amikacin at 0.5× to 1× MIC was added; infected control cells were treated with culture medium alone. The cells were lysed with 0.05% sodium dodecyl sulfate at various times postinfection, and the numbers of CFU were quantified by plating serial dilutions of lysates on M7H10 agar plates. Cell viability was evaluated by trypan blue exclusion before and after infection and/or drug treatment at each time point. Peritoneal macrophages were 95% viable at 48 h postinfection; drug exposure did not affect cell viability (data not shown).
Animal experiments.
Studies were conducted using an immunocompromised mouse model modified to mimic respiratory infection (36). Briefly, 24 6-week-old male BALB/c mice (20 to 22 g) were rendered neutropenic by intraperitoneal injection of cyclophosphamide at 150 mg/kg administered 4 days and 1 days prior to infection. The mice were then infected intranasally with ∼4 × 107 CFU of M. abscessus ATCC 19977. On day 3 postinfection, three mice were sacrificed, and the CFU/lung were determined to evaluate the model’s efficacy. The remaining 21 infected mice were divided randomly into three groups: group 1 (control administered PBS with 0.5% methylcellulose–0.1% Tween 80 by daily oral gavage for 2 weeks), group 2 (treated with 50 mg/kg AR-12 in PBS with 0.5% methylcellulose–0.1% Tween 80 administered by daily oral gavage for 2 weeks), and group 3 (administered 50 mg/kg amikacin intramuscularly for 2 weeks daily). The dosage of amikacin was selected based upon the report of Das et al. (36). The same AR-12 dose was chosen to facilitate a comparison of antibacterial effects. The mice were sacrificed on day 17 postinfection, and the upper lobes of the right lungs of mice in each group were dissected, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, and sectioned. The tissue sections were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and acid-fast staining, and the bacterial loads were compared by histologic examination. The remaining portions of the lungs were homogenized, and 10-fold serial dilutions of the homogenates were plated on M7H10 agar supplemented with 10% Middlebrook OADC enrichment. The bacterial content of the lungs was estimated from the colonies that grew on plates incubated for 5 days at 37°C. The animal experiments were approved by Tongji University School of Medicine review boards and performed according to established safety protocols in a biosafety level 2 laboratory at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical differences between study groups were determined by a nonpaired Student t test; a P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Computations were performed using Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.
We sincerely thank Stephen H. Gregory (Providence, RI) who helped write and edit the manuscript.
This study was funded by grants provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672063, 81971973, and 81800003), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission (18ZR1431600 and 19ZR1442800), the Medical Guide Program of Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (18411970600 and 19411969600), the New Frontier Technology Joint Project of Municipal Hospital, Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center (SHDC12017113), Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission Excellent Talents Training Program (2018YQ55), General Project of Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission (no. 201940229), and Program and Project of Top Clinical Medicine Centers and Key Disciplines Construction in Shanghai (2017ZZ02012).
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cowman S, van Ingen J, Griffith DE, Loebinger MR. 2019. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J 54:1900250. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00250-2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Griffith DE. 2019. Mycobacterium abscessus and antibiotic resistance: same as it ever was. Clin Infect Dis 69:1687–1689. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nessar R, Cambau E, Reyrat JM, Murray A, Gicquel B. 2012. Mycobacterium abscessus: a new antibiotic nightmare. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:810–818. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Haworth CS, Banks J, Capstick T, Fisher AJ, Gorsuch T, Laurenson IF, Leitch A, Loebinger MR, Milburn HJ, Nightingale M, Ormerod P, Shingadia D, Smith D, Whitehead N, Wilson R, Floto RA. 2017. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD). Thorax 72:ii1–ii64. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Griffith DE, Infectious Disease Society of America, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, Iseman M, Olivier K, Ruoss S, von Reyn CF, Wallace RJ Jr, Winthrop K. 2007. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:367. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen J, Zhao L, Mao Y, Ye M, Guo Q, Zhang Y, Xu L, Zhang Z, Li B, Chu H. 2019. Clinical efficacy and adverse effects of antibiotics used to treat Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease. Front Microbiol 10:1977. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kwak N, Dalcolmo MP, Daley CL, Eather G, Gayoso R, Hasegawa N, Jhun BW, Koh WJ, Namkoong H, Park J, Thomson R, van Ingen J, Zweijpfenning SMH, Yim JJ. 2019. Mycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease: individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 54:1801991. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01991-2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bryant JM, Grogono DM, Rodriguez-Rincon D, Everall I, Brown KP, Moreno P, Verma D, Hill E, Drijkoningen J, Gilligan P, Esther CR, Noone PG, Giddings O, Bell SC, Thomson R, Wainwright CE, Coulter C, Pandey S, Wood ME, Stockwell RE, Ramsay KA, Sherrard LJ, Kidd TJ, Jabbour N, et al. 2016. Emergence and spread of a human-transmissible multidrug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium. Science 354:751–757. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schwartz M, Fisher S, Story-Roller E, Lamichhane G, Parrish N. 2018. Activities of dual combinations of antibiotics against multidrug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacteria recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis. Microb Drug Resist 24:1191–1197. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abdulrahman BA, Abdelaziz D, Thapa S, Lu L, Jain S, Gilch S, Proniuk S, Zukiwski A, Schatzl HM. 2017. The celecoxib derivatives AR-12 and AR-14 induce autophagy and clear prion-infected cells from prions. Sci Rep 7:17565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17770-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hoang KV, Borteh HM, Rajaram MV, Peine KJ, Curry H, Collier MA, Homsy ML, Bachelder EM, Gunn JS, Schlesinger LS, Ainslie KM. 2014. Acetalated dextran encapsulated AR-12 as a host-directed therapy to control Salmonella infection. Int J Pharm 477:334–343. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.10.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chiu HC, Kulp SK, Soni S, Wang D, Gunn JS, Schlesinger LS, Chen CS. 2009. Eradication of intracellular Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium with a small-molecule, host cell-directed agent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:5236–5244. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00555-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chiu HC, Soni S, Kulp SK, Curry H, Wang D, Gunn JS, Schlesinger LS, Chen CS. 2009. Eradication of intracellular Francisella tularensis in THP-1 human macrophages with a novel autophagy inducing agent. J Biomed Sci 16:110. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chiu HC, Yang J, Soni S, Kulp SK, Gunn JS, Schlesinger LS, Chen CS. 2009. Pharmacological exploitation of an off-target antibacterial effect of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib against Francisella tularensis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:2998–3002. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00048-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chen HH, Chen CC, Lin YS, Chang PC, Lu ZY, Lin CF, Chen CL, Chang CP. 2017. AR-12 suppresses dengue virus replication by downregulation of PI3K/AKT and GRP78. Antiviral Res 142:158–168. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Booth L, Roberts JL, Ecroyd H, Tritsch SR, Bavari S, Reid SP, Proniuk S, Zukiwski A, Jacob A, Sepúlveda CS, Giovannoni F, García CC, Damonte E, González-Gallego J, Tuñón MJ, Dent P. 2016. AR-12 inhibits multiple chaperones concomitant with stimulating autophagosome formation collectively preventing virus replication. J Cell Physiol 231:2286–2302. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhu J, Huang JW, Tseng PH, Yang YT, Fowble J, Shiau CW, Shaw YJ, Kulp SK, Chen CS. 2004. From the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib to a novel class of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 inhibitors. Cancer Res 64:4309–4318. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-4063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Johnson AJ, Smith LL, Zhu J, Heerema NA, Jefferson S, Mone A, Grever M, Chen CS, Byrd JC. 2005. A novel celecoxib derivative, OSU03012, induces cytotoxicity in primary CLL cells and transformed B-cell lymphoma cell line via a caspase- and Bcl-2-independent mechanism. Blood 105:2504–2509. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-05-1957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mateo J, De Bono JS, Ramanathan RK, Lustberg MB, Zivi A, Basset D, Ng M, Young A, Garrett M, Decordova S, Raynaud FI, Yap TA, Zukiwski AA, Proniuk S, Shapiro CL. 2013. A first-in-human phase I trial of AR-12, a PDK-1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 31(Suppl, Abstr 2608):2608–2608. doi: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.2608. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mohr EL, McMullan LK, Lo MK, Spengler JR, Bergeron E, Albarino CG, Shrivastava-Ranjan P, Chiang CF, Nichol ST, Spiropoulou CF, Flint M. 2015. Inhibitors of cellular kinases with broad-spectrum antiviral activity for hemorrhagic fever viruses. Antiviral Res 120:40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2015.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reid SP, Shurtleff AC, Costantino JA, Tritsch SR, Retterer C, Spurgers KB, Bavari S. 2014. HSPA5 is an essential host factor for Ebola virus infection. Antiviral Res 109:171–174. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chan JF, Zhu Z, Chu H, Yuan S, Chik KK, Chan CC, Poon VK, Yip CC, Zhang X, Tsang JO, Zou Z, Tee KM, Shuai H, Lu G, Yuen KY. 2018. The celecoxib derivative kinase inhibitor AR-12 (OSU-03012) inhibits Zika virus via downregulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway and protects Zika virus-infected A129 mice: a host-targeting treatment strategy. Antiviral Res 160:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hassandarvish P, Oo A, Jokar A, Zukiwski A, Proniuk S, Abu Bakar S, Zandi K. 2017. Exploring the in vitro potential of celecoxib derivative AR-12 as an effective antiviral compound against four dengue virus serotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2438–2442. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Koselny K, Green J, DiDone L, Halterman JP, Fothergill AW, Wiederhold NP, Patterson TF, Cushion MT, Rappelye C, Wellington M, Krysan DJ. 2016. The celecoxib derivative AR-12 has broad-spectrum antifungal activity in vitro and improves the activity of fluconazole in a murine model of cryptococcosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:7115–7127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Koselny K, Green J, Favazzo L, Glazier VE, DiDone L, Ransford S, Krysan DJ. 2016. Antitumor/antifungal celecoxib derivative AR-12 is a non-nucleoside inhibitor of the ANL-family adenylating enzyme acetyl CoA synthetase. ACS Infect Dis 2:268–280. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kushwaha AS, Sharma P, Shivakumar HN, Rappleye C, Zukiwski A, Proniuk S, Murthy SN. 2017. Trans-ungual delivery of AR-12, a novel antifungal drug. AAPS PharmSciTech 18:2702–2705. doi: 10.1208/s12249-017-0752-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Collier MA, Peine KJ, Gautam S, Oghumu S, Varikuti S, Borteh H, Papenfuss TL, Sataoskar AR, Bachelder EM, Ainslie KM. 2016. Host-mediated Leishmania donovani treatment using AR-12 encapsulated in acetalated dextran microparticles. Int J Pharm 499:186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Johnson MM, Collier MA, Hoang KV, Pino EN, Graham-Gurysh EG, Gallovic MD, Zahid MSH, Chen N, Schlesinger L, Gunn JS, Bachelder EM, Ainslie KM. 2018. In vivo and cellular trafficking of acetalated dextran microparticles for delivery of a host-directed therapy for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi infection. Mol Pharm 15:5336–5348. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hoang KV, Curry H, Collier MA, Borteh H, Bachelder EM, Schlesinger LS, Gunn JS, Ainslie KM. 2016. Needle-free delivery of acetalated dextran-encapsulated AR-12 protects mice from Francisella tularensis lethal challenge. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:2052–2062. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02228-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Krishnamurthy M, Lemmon MM, Falcinelli EM, Sandy RA, Dootz JN, Mott TM, Rajamani S, Schaecher KE, Duplantier AJ, Panchal RG. 2019. Enhancing the antibacterial activity of polymyxins using a nonantibiotic drug. Infect Drug Resist 12:1393–1405. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S196874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Booth L, Roberts JL, Cash DR, Tavallai S, Jean S, Fidanza A, Cruz-Luna T, Siembiba P, Cycon KA, Cornelissen CN, Dent P. 2015. GRP78/BiP/HSPA5/Dna K is a universal therapeutic target for human disease. J Cell Physiol 230:1661–1676. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Barker WT, Nemeth AM, Brackett SM, Basak AK, Chandler CE, Jania LA, Zuercher WJ, Melander RJ, Koller BH, Ernst RK, Melander C. 2019. Repurposing eukaryotic kinase inhibitors as colistin adjuvants in Gram-negative bacteria. ACS Infect Dis 5:1764–1771. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu F, Chen J, Wang P, Li H, Zhou Y, Liu H, Liu Z, Zheng R, Wang L, Yang H, Cui Z, Wang F, Huang X, Wang J, Sha W, Xiao H, Ge B. 2018. MicroRNA-27a controls the intracellular survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by regulating calcium-associated autophagy. Nat Commun 9:4295. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06836-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang L, Wu J, Li J, Yang H, Tang T, Liang H, Zuo M, Wang J, Liu H, Liu F, Chen J, Liu Z, Wang Y, Peng C, Wu X, Zheng R, Huang X, Ran Y, Rao Z, Ge B. 2020. Host-mediated ubiquitination of a mycobacterial protein suppresses immunity. Nature 577:682–688. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1915-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang L, Liu Z, Wang J, Liu H, Wu J, Tang T, Li H, Yang H, Qin L, Ma D, Chen J, Liu F, Wang P, Zheng R, Song P, Zhou Y, Cui Z, Wu X, Huang X, Liang H, Zhang S, Cao J, Wu C, Chen Y, Su D, Chen X, Zeng G, Ge B. 2019. Oxidization of TGFβ-activated kinase by MPT53 is required for immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Microbiol 4:1378–1388. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0436-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Das S, Garg T, Chopra S, Dasgupta A. 2019. Repurposing disulfiram to target infections caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 74:1317–1322. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



