Abstract
Microsporidia, a divergent group of single-celled eukaryotic parasites, harness a specialized harpoon-like invasion apparatus called the polar tube (PT) to gain entry into host cells. The PT is tightly coiled within the transmissible extracellular spore, and is about 20 times the length of the spore. Once triggered, the PT is rapidly ejected and is thought to penetrate the host cell, acting as a conduit for the transfer of infectious cargo into the host. The organization of this specialized infection apparatus in the spore, how it is deployed, and how the nucleus and other large cargo are transported through the narrow PT are not well understood. Here we use serial block-face scanning electron microscopy to reveal the 3-dimensional architecture of the PT and its relative spatial orientation to other organelles within the spore. Using high-speed optical microscopy, we also capture and quantify the entire PT germination process of three human-infecting microsporidian species in vitro: Anncaliia algerae, Encephalitozoon hellem and E. intestinalis. Our results show that the emerging PT experiences very high accelerating forces to reach velocities exceeding 300 μm⋅s-1, and that firing kinetics differ markedly between species. Live-cell imaging reveals that the nucleus, which is at least 7 times larger than the diameter of the PT, undergoes extreme deformation to fit through the narrow tube, and moves at speeds comparable to PT extension. Our study sheds new light on the 3-dimensional organization, dynamics, and mechanism of PT extrusion, and shows how infectious cargo moves through the tube to initiate infection.
Author summary
Microsporidia infect a wide range of hosts: from economically important invertebrates such as silkworms and honey bees, to vertebrates including humans, where infection in immunocompromised patients can be fatal. In order to infect the host, microsporidia utilize a unique harpoon-like invasion organelle called the polar tube (PT), which serves as a pathway for transport of infectious cargo to the host. Knowledge of how the long PT is packaged in the spore, the kinetics of its firing and how the cargo is transported through the PT are still poorly understood. We use electron microscopy techniques to generate 3D reconstructions of intact spores, which reveal the configuration of the PT and other organelles within. Using high-speed live-cell imaging, we capture and quantify the kinetics of PT firing, and how cargo is deformed during transport through the narrow PT. Our study provides new insights into architecture and dynamics of the PT, which serve as foundations for our understanding of microsporidia infection.
Introduction
Intracellular pathogens use a diverse array of mechanisms to enter and infect new host cells[1–3]. Microsporidia are a group of single-celled intracellular parasites that have developed one of the most dramatic, yet poorly understood, mechanisms of host cell invasion. Microsporidia are highly diverged from other extant eukaryotes, and are thought to be an early branching sister group to fungi[4,5]. Microsporidia infect a wide range of hosts, including nematodes[6,7], insects[8,9], and vertebrates[10–12]. In humans, microsporidia are commonly found in immunocompromised patients, and lead to opportunistic infections, such as intestinal[13], ocular[14], respiratory[15], and systemic diseases[16]. As obligate intracellular parasites with reduced genomes[17], they are dependent on the host for replication[18,19]. Prior to exiting the host cell, microsporidia form spores, which are the only form of the organism that can survive outside of a host.
To initiate infection of a new cell, these parasites have evolved a unique, harpoon-like invasion apparatus called the polar tube (PT)[19–21] that is present in all microsporidian species. The PT is tightly coiled within the dormant spore, resembling a spring[22,23]. When triggered, the PT transitions within a few hundred milliseconds from a spring-like coil to an extended linear tube, which in some species is more than 100 μm long[24,25]. The extended tube may penetrate or latch onto the target cell membrane to anchor the spore to the host cell[22,23,26,27]. The hollow PT is then poised to serve as a conduit for infectious material (also called sporoplasm) to enter the host cell and establish a replicative niche[28–30]. The entire process, from initiation of PT firing to the completion of cargo transport through the tube, is called spore germination.
While evolutionarily unrelated, the germination of microsporidian spores is conceptually similar to the rapid discharge of nematocysts from cnidarians and dinoflagellates, which is used to hunt prey[31,32]. The process of PT firing has fascinated biologists for more than 100 years[20], yet many fundamental questions remain largely unexplored. While 2D TEM sections have revealed that parts of the PT are coiled in microsporidian spores[21,22,33], the question of how the entire PT is configured within the spore, and its relation to other organelles in 3D is not well understood. The mechanisms that underlie the reconfiguration from a coil to a linear tube during PT extrusion are also a subject of considerable debate; this process has been challenging to study due to the stochastic firing of individual spores and the very fast (millisecond) timescales on which the germination process occurs[24,34]. Finally, the nucleus and other organelles of the microsporidian spore are thought to be translocated through the PT into the host cell. However, the PT is extremely narrow, raising the question: how does the infectious sporoplasm, 2–3 μm in size, move through a tube that is only 100 nm in diameter? Here we use a combination of serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBFSEM) and live-cell imaging to reveal the packaging of the long PT inside the much smaller spore, and its spatial relation to other organelles prior to PT germination. Furthermore, we unveil the dynamics of PT extrusion, and the mechanism of nuclear transport through the PT.
Results
3D reconstruction of A. algerae spores
2D transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of microsporidia have shown that the PT is arranged as a coil within the spore, alongside other organelles[22,33,35,36]. How the coils of the PT are organized in 3D and its spatial relationship to other organelles within the spore is less well understood. We used SBFSEM[37] to generate 3D reconstructions of the PT in intact dormant spores of the microsporidian species Anncaliia algerae, which can infect both invertebrate and vertebrate hosts, including humans[38–41]. SBFSEM allows us to automate the sectioning and imaging of a series of 50 nm slices through a block of spores in a high throughput manner[42]. A typical field of view contained approximately 50 spores in several different orientations, from which we reconstructed 20 spores in 3D (Fig 1A, S1 Table).
We segmented the outermost layer of the spore, the exospore, as well as the underlying chitinous endospore, which is adjacent to the plasma membrane (Fig 1B, S1 Video). In the egg-shaped A. algerae spores, the exospore layer is uniformly 0.16 ± 0.03 μm thick, and the thickness of the endospore varies from 0.14 μm to less than 0.08 μm towards the anterior tip of the spore. We found that the apical part of the endospore is the thinnest, as previously reported[35,43], and this region has been hypothesized to be the site of initiation for PT firing[23,44] (Fig 1B and 1C). The spores are 3.9 ± 0.4 μm in length along the anterior-posterior (A-P) axis (S1A Fig), consistent with previous work[40], and the average spore volume is 8.8 ± 1.4 μm3 (S1B Fig).
Spatial organization of the polar tube in dormant A. algerae spores
We segmented the entire A. algerae PT to obtain spatial information on how it is organized in the dormant spore (Fig 1C, S1 Video). The PT occupies only ~3.5% of the total spore volume (S1B Fig), yet visually is the most striking feature of the spores when imaged by either SBFSEM or 2D TEM. As previously reported[45], the PT can be divided into two main parts: 1) a linear segment that emanates from the anterior tip of the spore and extends towards the posterior end, and 2) a coil of PT around the middle and posterior end of the spore (Fig 2A). At least two models for the connection between these parts have been proposed (S2 Fig). In the first model, the linear segment extends nearly the length of the spore, and connects to the posterior end of the coiled region[46]. In the second model, the linear segment is shorter, and connects with the anterior end of the coiled region[44]. Our data show that the straight segment connects to the anterior end of the coiled region (Fig 2A), consistent with the second model. The coils of the PT are approximately parallel to each other, but the stack of coils is tilted relative to the A-P axis of the spore (Fig 2B, S1D Fig). Here we found that the coiled segment of the PT consists of 7 turns on average (S1C Fig), in contrast to previous data, which suggested 8–11 coils[40]. The differences may be due to differences in the source of spores or propagation of the spores in different hosts.
Remarkably, in every spore examined the PT takes the form of a right-handed helix (Fig 2C). In the absence of any mechanism to bias PT assembly, the expectation would be a 50:50 mixture of left-handed and right-handed helices. This strong bias towards a right-handed helix implies the presence of an organizing principle. One explanation is that handedness could arise from the physical properties of a polymer, possibly formed by the polar tube proteins (PTPs). Five PTPs have been reported in microsporidia[19,47–49] and three of them (PTP1-3) localize along the entire length of the PT[48], likely acting as key structural elements. The presence of chirality in the PT is consistent with other biopolymers—such as DNA, actin filaments, and microtubules—which adopt superhelical coils with characteristic twist and handedness under strain. Indeed, recent cryo EM images and corresponding Fourier transforms of the PT show clearly repeating patterns along the tube[25]. Alternatively, or in addition, this right-handed bias may arise from asymmetry in the machinery involved in PT assembly.
We observed heterogeneity at the posterior end of the PT among spores, which can be divided into two main classes (Fig 2D). In the majority of spores, the PT terminates abruptly with a clean, blunt posterior end, remaining well-aligned with the preceding coils. However, in a few spores we observed irregular, tangled ends (Fig 2D, S3 Fig). The significance of blunt versus tangled PT ends is unclear, but the tangled ends may, for example, result from different developmental stages of the spores, or from abnormal development of the PT during spore formation[50]. It seems likely that these tangled ends pose a problem for PT extrusion, and if not resolved may result in incomplete germination and failed infection.
Configuration of organelles surrounding the PT in A. algerae
In addition to the PT, we segmented other organelles, including the anchoring disc, vacuole, and posterior polaroplast (Fig 1B and 1C, S1 Video). First, the anchoring disc forms an umbrella-shaped structure at the anterior tip of the spore, underlying the thinnest region of the endospore, as previously described[35,51] (Fig 1B and 1C). The anchoring disc is thought to be the site of spore germination, and thus some rearrangement or disruption of the anchoring disc is required to allow egress of the PT. Second, the vacuole at the posterior end of the spore occupies approximately 6.9% of the spore volume, and is roughly bowl-shaped (Fig 2A, S1B Fig). The vacuole has previously been shown to expand during the germination process, and one possibility is that it plays an active role in facilitating PT extension and the translocation of spore contents through the PT[34,52]. Our 2D TEM sections show that the vacuole is surrounded by a single membrane (Fig 2E). The convex side is in close proximity to the posterior pole, and the concave side faces towards the anterior end of the spore (Fig 2A and 2E). While there is no clear cellular structure interacting with the concave surface of the vacuole in our SBFSEM images, examination of 2D TEM images reveals that the nucleus often rests against this depression in the vacuole (Fig 2E). Interestingly, the vacuolar membrane is tightly interdigitated between PT coils (Fig 2E, S4A Fig). Third, the polaroplast is a multi-layered membranous organelle that is thought to be important during the germination process, perhaps providing membrane to accommodate the increased cell surface area during cargo transport through the PT[52]. Typically, the polaroplast consists of two regions with different morphologies, as observed by 2D TEM[30,33]: anterior polaroplast and posterior polaroplast (S4 Fig). Reconstruction of the posterior polaroplast showed that it snugly surrounds the linear part of the PT (Fig 2A), possibly stabilizing this region and is well-positioned to contribute membrane to the extending tube as it exits the spore.
Comparison of E. hellem and A. algerae 3D reconstructions
To assess whether the PT configuration and the relative orientation of other organelles are conserved in other microsporidian species, we carried out SBFSEM analysis of another human-infecting microsporidian species, Encephalitozoon hellem (Fig 3A, S1 Table). We segmented the spore wall layers, PT, anchoring disc, and anterior polaroplast (Fig 3B, S2 Video). While the overall organization of organelles in E. hellem spores is similar to the organization in A. algerae spores, including a right-handed helical arrangement of the PT (Fig 3C), there are also some notable differences. First, in contrast to the egg-shaped A. algerae spores, the E. hellem spores are more cylindrical (Fig 3C). The length of the E. hellem spores is 2.8 ± 0.3 μm along the A-P axis, and the volume is approximately half that of A. algerae (S1A and S1B Fig). Second, the spacing between PT coils is smaller in E. hellem (an average distance of 0.12 ± 0.03 μm, compared with 0.22 ± 0.02 μm for A. algerae (Fig 3D)), resulting in a more tightly packed coil. Third, in most E. hellem spores, the anchoring disc is located off-center with respect to the apical tip of the spore, rather than at the center of the apical tip as in A. algerae (Fig 3E). The region surrounding the anchoring disc is the thinnest part of the spore wall (Figs 1B and 3B), regardless of whether it is at the apical tip, or off-centered, and this region is where the PT is expected to exit the spore. Overall, the SBFSEM results provide insights into how the PT is packed inside the spore, and these data provide a static snapshot of the PT in its pre-germination state.
Kinetics of polar tube germination
In order to infect the host, microsporidia must first extend the PT to penetrate a target cell. This process occurs extremely rapidly[24,25,34], making it challenging to image in real time. To better understand the kinetics and mechanics of PT germination, we performed high-speed, live-cell imaging to capture in vitro PT germination events in three microsporidian species that infect humans: A. algerae, E. hellem, and Encephalitozoon intestinalis. Although the in vivo triggers for PT firing are not well understood, in vitro triggers have been reported[53–56]. We used small variations of these conditions to optimize PT firing in vitro for our light microscopy assay (see Methods), and captured the entire germination process, including release of the cargo after transport through the PT (Fig 4A, S3–S5 Videos, S2 Table). In all three species, we observed three distinct phases of the germination process: 1) PT elongation, 2) a static phase, where the PT length does not change, and 3) emergence of cargo at the distal end of the PT. PT elongation occurs rapidly (Fig 4B, S5–S7 Figs); the time to reach 90% PT extension (TEXT90) is significantly shorter in E. intestinalis (TEXT90 160 ± 20 ms; Fig 4C) and E. hellem (TEXT90 290 ± 200 ms) compared with A. algerae (TEXT90 830 ± 170 ms). The entire germination process, from the start of PT extrusion to cargo ejection, is completed in less than 500 ms in E. hellem and E. intestinalis, and in approximately 1.6 seconds in A. algerae. We observed that the PT emerges from the center of the apical tip in A. algerae and off-center in E. hellem and E. intestinalis (S8 Fig). This is consistent with the preferential positioning of the anchoring disc in our SBFSEM data, at the center of the apical tip in A. algerae and off-center in E. hellem spores, supporting the idea that the anchoring disc position determines the PT exit site (Fig 3E).
In phase 1, the PT is fired and elongates to its maximum length (Fig 4A, S5–S7 Figs). Our data show that on average, the maximum velocity (Vmax) of PT firing is 235 ± 61 μm⋅s-1 and the maximum acceleration (Amax) is 1,503 ± 1,082 μm⋅s-2 in A. algerae (Fig 4D and 4E). The Vmax we observe is approximately double the previously reported value for this species[24], which may reflect differences in A. algerae spores purified from different sources or more accurate measurements due to higher temporal resolution. In E. hellem and E. intestinalis, Vmax and Amax are higher than that measured for A. algerae. The Vmax and Amax reaches 336 ± 142 μm⋅s-1 and 5,219 ± 2,521 μm⋅s-2 for E. hellem, and 290 ± 38 μm⋅s-1 and 5,045 ± 2,242 μm⋅s-2 for E. intestinalis, respectively (Fig 4D and 4E). In contrast, other cellular processes involving movement are typically slower, such as organelle transport in cells by motor proteins (~0.51 μm⋅s-1 for human kinesin[57], ~1 μm⋅s-1 for porcine dynein[58]), gliding motility of apicomplexan parasites (1–3 μm⋅s-1)[59], and mobility of zoospores from chytrid fungi (~104 μm⋅s-1)[60].
In phase 2, the PT is fully extended and remains static at its maximum length: on average, 101, 53 and 36 μm for A. algerae, E. hellem, and E. intestinalis respectively (S9A Fig). In A. algerae this phase persists for 790 ± 360 ms (S9C Fig), and we hypothesize that during this time, the infectious cargo is traveling through the PT. If cargo transport begins once the tube is fully extended and all the species transport cargo at the same rate, we would expect phase 2 in E. hellem and E. intestinalis to be approximately 400 ms, since their PTs are approximately half the length of the A. algerae PT. However, we observe E. hellem and E. intestinalis spend less time in this phase than predicted (60–140 ms; S9C Fig), suggesting that either cargo transport is faster in these species, or that cargo may begin moving through the PT before extension is completed. Intriguingly, for E. hellem, in which the source of the spores was the same for SBFSEM experiments and light microscopy (LM) experiments, we found that the fully extended PTs observed by LM are more than twice the length of pre-germination PTs packaged inside the spore, as assessed by SBFSEM (Fig 4H, S9D Fig, see Methods). A previous study has also suggested that the PT length outside the spore may be longer than when it is packed inside the spore[22]. The PT is thought to be built of repetitive protein polymers[25], and our observation raises the possibility that a significant conformational change may occur in some or all of these proteins between pre-germination and post-germination states, potentially leading to a change in PT length.
In phase 3, the cargo is expelled at the distal end of the PT, and appears approximately circular in shape (Fig 4A). The cargo remains attached to the tube for the duration of the experiment, and it is unclear what mediates this contact. There may be specific interactions between components of the PT and the cargo, or alternatively, some cargo may remain inside the tube itself, thereby creating a membranous bridge that leads to stable adhesion. When we continued imaging for several seconds after the cargo had been expelled, we observed that the E. hellem PT rapidly shortens (Fig 4F), and a similar observation has been reported for A. algerae[24]. To assess this observation quantitatively, we measured the length of the PT after germination is complete (full PT extension), and also 3 s later. The PT of E. hellem shortens by 24%, while the A. algerae and E. intestinalis PTs shorten by only 3% and 5% respectively (Fig 4G, S9A and S9B Fig, S6 Video). This suggests that there are differences in the mechanics, plasticity and behavior of the PT even between closely related species such as E. hellem and E. intestinalis. Shortening of the E. hellem PT appears to be distributed across the length of the tube, as opposed to shortening due to retraction of the tube back inside the spore coat (S6 Video).
Occasionally, we observed incomplete germination of the PT in all three species, which we define as being stuck in phase 1 or phase 2: the PT may not be fully extended, or it is extended but no cargo is observed at the distal end of the tube (S10A and S10B Fig, S7–S9 videos). In these events, the time to maximum extension of the PT was longer than in productive germination events (S10C Fig). Incomplete PT firing events have been previously described[24], and may represent spores that are not infectious, since cargo does not emerge at the distal end of the tube.
Cargo transport through the tube
An enigma of the microsporidian invasion process is that the cargo to be transported through the tube is much larger than the diameter of the tube itself. While it is unclear precisely what is transferred from the spore to the host cell, at the very least the nucleus containing the parasite genome must be transported through the tube[33,61]. In the case of A. algerae, there are two nuclei[23], and the diameter of each nucleus is about 0.7 μm, while the diameter of the PT is approximately 100 nm, as measured from negative stain images of the PT[25]. The nucleus is at least 7 times larger in diameter than the PT, and this mismatch in scale must be overcome to achieve cargo transport through the tube. As tools for genetic modification and transgenesis are not yet available for microsporidia, labeling specific subcellular structures for live-cell imaging is challenging, and consequently tracking the movement of cargo through the polar tube has not been reported.
To track nuclear movement within the spore body during germination, we used NucBlue to stain the nucleus of intact spores, which yields sufficient signal for live-cell imaging (Fig 5A). We used a modified version of our live-cell imaging assay, in which we pre-incubated dormant A. algerae spores with NucBlue, and tracked the nucleus during PT firing. We used dual detection of fluorescence and transmission to track the nucleus and to visualize the PT, respectively. Prior to nuclear exit from the spore, we clearly observed two distinct fluorescent lobes, corresponding to the two nuclei in A. algerae (Fig 5C, S10 Video). The two nuclei briefly move around and rearrange inside the spore, perhaps in response to the rapid ejection of the PT, then enter the PT together, on a very fast timescale. Interestingly, while TEXT90 is 830 ms in A. algerae on average, nuclear translocation into the PT begins only ~500 ms after the initiation of PT firing, suggesting that the tube is not fully extended prior to cargo transport (Fig 5C, S11A Fig).
Next, we shifted our attention to monitoring the nucleus as it moves through the PT. Given the discrepancy in diameter between the nucleus and the PT, we hypothesized that either 1) the PT is flexible enough that it could deform to accommodate the nuclei, or 2) the nuclei must deform to fit the PT diameter (Fig 5B). To assess which hypothesis may be correct, we performed live-cell imaging of A. algerae PT germination in vitro, and monitored the nuclei as they traversed through the PT. Our results show gross deformation of the nuclei on a millisecond timescale as they travel through the PT (Fig 5D, S11B Fig, S11 Video). However, after exiting the tube, the nuclei return to a globular shape (Fig 5D). To better quantify this nuclear deformation, we calculated the aspect ratio (the shortest dimension divided by the longest dimension) of the nuclei inside the PT and after exit from the PT (Fig 5E). The aspect ratio should be close to 1 for an isotropic object (e.g. circle), whereas an aspect ratio less than 1 indicates an elongated object (ellipse). The average aspect ratio of the paired nuclei is 0.11 ± 0.04 inside the tube and 0.87 ± 0.07 after they are expelled, outside the PT (Fig 5E). The nuclei travel through the tube at remarkable velocities, approaching 270 ± 115 μm⋅s-1 (S11D Fig), which is comparable to PT firing velocities in A. algerae. Of note, the nuclei pause within the PT during translocation in all seven movies we recorded in vitro (Fig 5D, S11B and S11C Fig, S11 Video). This may reflect a change in the forces that are driving cargo transport through the PT, though it remains to be determined whether pausing also occurs during germination in vivo.
Discussion
Mechanistic insights into polar tube germination
Microsporidia comprise an entire phylum of extremely successful parasites, all of which share the common feature of the polar tube infection apparatus. Our data combine spatial and temporal information to provide new insights about how the PT is packed in dormant spores, the PT germination process, and synchronization of PT firing and cargo transport. Synthesizing these data, we present a model for PT germination (Fig 6), in which we can clearly define some aspects of the germination process, while others still remain ambiguous. We focus on A. algerae, as we have the most information for this species. In the dormant spore, the PT is a right-handed helix packed at an angle relative to the A-P axis of the spore, and interacts closely with the vacuole. The two nuclei in A. algerae are nestled in the bowl-shaped vacuole, and surrounded by the coiled PT (Fig 6A). Previous data suggest that initiation of germination is dependent on osmotic pressure buildup within the spore[62], which may trigger the rupture of the spore wall and PT firing[63]. Once triggered, the PT fires and reaches its full length in under 1 second (TEXT90 = ~830 ms). By tracking the nuclei during this germination process, we find that as the germination process initiates, the two nuclei begin to rearrange in the spore (Fig 6B, step 3). Approximately 500 ms after PT firing is initiated, the nuclei exit the spore body together, and deform drastically to fit into the PT. The average time to 50% extension (TEXT50) in A. algerae is approximately 600 ms, suggesting that once the tube has reached ~50% extension, cargo transport is initiated. This observation is consistent with a model in which the PT everts[21,64], which would only allow cargo to enter the tube after 50% extension. The velocity at which the cargo is transported through the tube is comparable to the velocity of PT extension, and the cargo regains a globular shape after exiting the PT. Many open questions remain and further studies will be required to definitively address the mechanistic basis of PT germination.
Rapid nuclear deformation in microsporidia
In our study, we observed incredibly fast and large deformation of the nuclei as they traveled through the PT. This is reminiscent of other cell translocation and migration processes, such as immune cells squeezing through tight junctions to exit the bloodstream, or tumor cells penetrating tissues[65–67]. Nuclear deformation is necessary to facilitate tumor cell invasion, as the cells must adapt their shape to accommodate available space within the three-dimensional architecture of the tissue. Two key differences between the nuclear deformation we observe in microsporidia and analogous processes in tumor cell invasion is that the timescale is much faster in microsporidian nuclear transport (milliseconds compared with minutes/hours), and the microsporidian nuclear distortion is much more severe, as assessed by the aspect ratio. During tumor cell invasion and nuclear deformation, DNA damage is reported to occur[68,69]. Given the extent of microsporidian nuclear deformation during transport, it is plausible that the microsporidian genome may also be subject to shearing and other stresses. In migrating cancer cells, nuclear envelope breakdown has also been noted[68,69], which likely enhances deformability of the packaged DNA. Some cancer cells express lower levels of lamins[70–73], which are known to be important cytoskeletal proteins that rigidify the nuclear envelope. While cells expressing low levels of lamin A show a high migration rate through tissues[74], overexpression of lamin A has been shown to result in reduced nuclear deformability and impaired cell passage through narrow constrictions[75], consistent with the idea that the presence of lamins contributes substantially to rigidity of the nucleus. In agreement with previous reports that lamins are only present in Metazoans[76,77], we were unable to identify any lamins or homologs in fully sequenced microsporidian genomes[17,78,79]. This suggests that microsporidia may lack lamins entirely, perhaps explaining why nuclear deformation occurs to a much higher degree than in mammalian cells, and on a rapid timescale. Future studies will reveal the nature of cargo transport and address questions of the chromatin state during nuclear transport, whether the nuclear envelope is intact, and how cargo is modulated once delivered to the host.
Materials and methods
Propagation of microsporidian parasites
A. algerae was propagated either in Helicoverpa zea larvae or in Vero cells. E. hellem and E. intestinalis were propagated in Vero cells. A. algerae spores propagated in H. zea were purified using a continuous Ludox gradient, as previously described[80], and kindly provided by James J. Becnel and Neil Sanscrainte. To propagate the parasites in Vero cells, microsporidia A. algerae (ATCC PRA-168), E. hellem (ATCC 50504), and E. intestinalis (ATCC 50506) were grown in Vero cells (ATCC CCL-81) using Eagle's Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) (ATCC 30–2003) with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C and with 5% CO2. At 70%-80% confluence, parasites were added into a 25 cm2 tissue culture flask and the media was switched to EMEM supplemented with 3% FBS. Cells were allowed to grow for fourteen days and medium was changed every two days. To purify spores, the infected cells were detached from tissue culture flasks using a cell scraper and placed into a 15 ml conical tube, followed by centrifugation at 1,300 g for 10 min at 25°C. Cells were resuspended in sterile distilled water and mechanically disrupted using a G-27 needle. The released spores were purified using a Percoll gradient[79]. Equal volumes (5 mL) of spore suspension and 100% Percoll were added to a 15 mL conical tube, vortexed and then centrifuged at 1,800 g for 30 min at room temperature. The purified spore pellets were washed three times with sterile distilled water and stored at 4°C in distilled water for further analyses.
Germination conditions for microsporidian spores
Germination conditions, to activate PT firing, are different among microsporidian species[53,54,81]. For A. algerae, the germination buffer was slightly modified from the previously reported condition[53]. Spore germination was triggered by incubating spores at 30°C for 30 min in 10 mM Glycine-NaOH buffer pH 9.0 and 100 mM KCl. These conditions typically yield ~70% germination. For both Encephalitozoon species, spores were incubated at 37°C and spore germination was triggered using germination buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5% (v/v) H2O2 at pH 9.5, as previously described[54]. Germination buffer for Encephalitozoon species was freshly prepared for each experiment.
Electron microscopy
Purified spores from tissue culture were fixed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde. For transmission electron microscopy, fixed spores were post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide (OsO4), embedded in 2% agar, block stained in 1% aqueous uranyl acetate, and dehydrated using a gradient of cold ethanol. The samples were then transferred in propylene oxide and embedded in EMbed 812 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, catalog #14121). 70 nm thin sections were cut, mounted on copper grids and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Stained grids were inspected using a Thermo Fisher Talos 120C electron microscope and imaged with a Gatan OneView camera using a nominal magnification of 22,000x corresponding to a pixel size of 0.652 nm/pixel on the specimen.
For serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBFSEM), the sample block was mounted on an aluminum 3View pin and electrically grounded using silver conductive epoxy (Ted Pella, catalog #16014). The entire surface of the specimen was then sputter coated with a thin layer of gold/palladium and imaged using the Gatan OnPoint BSE detector in a Zeiss Gemini 300 VP FESEM equipped with a Gatan 3View automatic microtome. The system was set to cut 50 nm slices, imaged with gas injection setting at 40% (2.9 x 10−3 mBar) with Focus Charge Compensation to reduce electron accumulation charging artifacts. Images were recorded after each round of sectioning from the blockface using the SEM beam at 1.5 keV with a beam aperture size of 30 μm and a dwell time of 1.0 μs/pixel. Each frame is 22 x 22 μm with a pixel size of 2.2 nm. Data acquisition occurred automatically using Gatan Digital Micrograph (version 3.31) software. A stack of 150 slices was aligned and assembled using Fiji[82]. A total volume of 22 x 22 x 11 μm3 was obtained from the sample block.
Segmentation of organelles of interest, 3D reconstruction, and quantification of the spore size, volumes and PT length in the intact spores were performed using Dragonfly 4.1 software (Object Research Systems, ORS). SBFSEM sections were automatically aligned using SSD (sum of squared differences) method prior to segmentation. Graphic representation of the spores and PT were performed with either Dragonfly software or UCSF Chimera[83].
Measurement of the PT angles and the distance between coils were made in UCSF Chimera[83]. To facilitate this, two atoms were placed as markers on the anterior-posterior ends of the spore to create an A-P axis. 3 more atoms were placed along the PT coil to generate a plane corresponding to the PT. Then, the PT angles were measured between the A-P axis and the PT plane. To measure the distance between the coils, atoms were manually placed at the center of two adjacent coils, and the distance between these was measured.
Optical microscopy
Live-cell imaging of PT firing
2 μl of purified A. algerae spores obtained from H. zea (6x107 spores/ml) or purified E. hellem and E. intestinalis spores from tissue culture (~108 spores/ml) were mixed with 10 μl of germination buffer. The reaction was placed on ice to prevent PT firing prior to imaging. 2 μl was placed on a poly-L-lysine-coated glass slide (Fisher Scientific, catalog #12-545-78) and sealed with a #1.5 18 x 18 mm coverslip (Fisher Scientific, catalog #12-519-21A). Polar tube firing typically occurred ~2–5 minutes after mixing the spores with the germination buffer. PT firing was imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope with a Nikon 60x N.A. 1.4 oil immersion Plan Apochromat Ph3 phase-contrast objective lens. An Andor Zyla 5.5 megapixel sCMOS camera was used, which provided a wide field of view at 14–50 frames per second with 3–35 ms exposure time, no binning was applied. The microscope was equipped with an environmental chamber which was set at 30°C for A. algerae[24] and 37°C for Encephalitozoon species[54].
Fixed cell imaging
4 μl of A. algerae spores purified from infected H. zea (108 spores/ml) was incubated with 20 μl of germination buffer at 30°C for 30 min. 40 μl of NucBlue Live ReadyProbes Reagent (Invitrogen, catalog #R37605) was added and the reaction was incubated at 25°C for 20 min. Spores were pelleted by centrifugation at 1,000 g for 1 min at room temperature and the supernatant was removed. Spores were resuspended in 6 μl of fresh germination buffer. 2 μl of the reaction was placed onto a glass slide and sealed with a #1.5 18 x 18 mm coverslip. Spores were imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope with a Nikon 60x N.A. 1.4 oil immersion Plan Apochromat Ph3 phase-contrast objective lens. A Zyla 5.5 megapixel sCMOS camera was used at 126 ms exposure time, and no binning was applied.
Live-cell imaging of nuclear transport
4 μl of purified A. algerae spores obtained from H. zea (6x107 spores/ml) was mixed with 40 μl of NucBlue (Invitrogen, catalog #R37605) and incubated at 25°C for 40 min. Spores were then centrifuged at 5,000 g for 1 min at room temperature and the supernatant was removed. 10 μl of germination buffer was added to the pre-stained spores and stored on ice prior to imaging. 2 μl of this reaction was added to a poly-L-lysine coated glass slide and covered with a #1.5 18 x 18 mm coverslip. To test the effect of NucBlue on germination, we compared percent germination in the presence and absence of NucBlue for 3 batches of spores. The average percent germination is 51% in the control group (without NucBlue), while it is 40% when pre-incubated with NucBlue. The difference observed is not statistically significant (unpaired Student’s t-test, p = 0.306; S12 Fig).
To image nuclear movement inside the spore coat prior to translocation into the PT, imaging was performed on a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope with Nikon 60x N.A. 1.4 oil immersion Plan Apochromat Ph3 objective lens. Intensity of fluorescent excitation and intensity of transmitted light were balanced to allow simultaneous single channel single camera imaging (Duo-detection). A Zyla 5.5 megapixel sCMOS camera was used, providing a wide field of view at 28 frames per second with 30 ms exposure time, no binning was applied.
To observe nuclear translocation through the PT, imaging was performed on a Zeiss AxioObserver Z1 with 40x N.A. 1.3 EC Plan-Neofluar oil immersion objective lens. An Axiocam 503 Monochrome CCD camera was used, yielding 20 frames per second with 45 ms exposure time, and 3x3 binning was applied.
Image analysis
Kymographs of the PT germination were generated from movies using Fiji software[82] with the straighten function. Measurement of the PT length was quantified from raw time-lapse images using Fiji software[82]. The PT was traced using the segmented line function. The maximum PT length was defined from the exit site from the spore body to the point where the infectious cargo connects to the PT. Velocity and acceleration of the PT firing process were calculated by Δy/Δx, where Δy is the change in PT length or the change in velocities, and Δx is the corresponding time interval. Graphs were plotted using GraphPad Prism 8 software. Fitting of data in Fig 4B was performed using a ‘sigmoidal, 4PL, X is concentration’ equation. R2 values were 0.89 for A. algerae, 0.60 for E. hellem, and 0.93 for E. intestinalis.
For nuclear translocation, the kymographs were analyzed using Fiji software[82]. Speed of nuclear translocation was measured from changes of the distance of nuclear signals divided by the corresponding time interval. The aspect ratio of the nuclear deformation was quantified by the width (W) divided by the height (H) of nuclear signals from seven kymographs. The aspect ratio for the nucleus in the PT is measured during the pause phase of transport to minimize the impact of blurring due to movement, and the aspect ratio for the nucleus outside the tube is measured when it emerges at the distal end of the PT.
Validation of PT length comparison between pre-germination and post-germination states
Our measurements of PT length inside the spore (pre-germination) are made from analyzing SBFSEM data, while measurements of the PT outside the spore (post-germination) are made using optical microscopy. To assess whether measurements from these methods are comparable, we measured the spore length for E. hellem from both these techniques. The spore length obtained from SBFSEM and LM are similar ( 2.8 ± 0.3 μm). These results validate comparing measurements between the two methods.
Statistical analyses
GraphPad Prism 8 software was used for all statistical analyses. In all analyses, we used a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test to compare the difference between two groups, with the exception of two analyses: 1) PT shortening after germination and 2) the nuclear aspect ratio. For PT shortening after germination, both a one sample t-test and a two-tailed paired Student’s t-test were used. For the nuclear aspect ratio, a two-tailed paired Student’s t-test was used. P values are reported in the figure legends.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank James J. Becnel and Neil Sanscrainte for sharing H. zea grown A. algerae spores and expertise for propagation of A. algerae spores; Kristen Dancel-Manning for helping with figure preparation; Chris Petzold at the NYU Microscopy Core for assistance with preparation of EM samples; Huilin Li from the NYU Biostatistics Resource for guidance with statistical analysis and Nicolas Coudray for assistance with analysis in Chimera. We thank Emily Troemel, Louis Weiss, Alex Mogilner, Saima Sidik, Georgia Isom, Juliana Ilmain, Noelle Antao and Frederick Rubino for critical reading and feedback on our manuscript, and all members of the Bhabha/Ekiert labs as well as Manu Prakash for helpful discussions.
Data Availability
All live-cell imaging data have been deposited on an open access digital library in Zenodo, DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3707829.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the American Heart Association (AHA):Pattana Jaroenlak 19POST34430065; HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS):Damian C. Ekiert R35GM128777; Pew Charitable Trusts:Gira Bhabha PEW-00033055; Searle Scholars Program:Gira Bhabha SSP-2018-2737; HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID):Gira Bhabha R01AI147131; HHS | NIH | Office of the Director (OD): Fengxia Liang S10OD019974; HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID): P01AI080192; HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (NCI): Fengxia Liang P30CA016087. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Frénal K, Dubremetz J-F, Lebrun M, Soldati-Favre D. Gliding motility powers invasion and egress in Apicomplexa. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15: 645–660. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pillich H, Puri M, Chakraborty T. ActA of Listeria monocytogenes and Its Manifold Activities as an Important Listerial Virulence Factor. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;399: 113–132. 10.1007/82_2016_30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Epting CL, Coates BM, Engman DM. Molecular mechanisms of host cell invasion by Trypanosoma cruzi. Exp Parasitol. 2010;126: 283–291. 10.1016/j.exppara.2010.06.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Keeling PJ, Doolittle WF. Alpha-tubulin from early-diverging eukaryotic lineages and the evolution of the tubulin family. Mol Biol Evol. 1996;13: 1297–1305. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee SC, Corradi N, Byrnes EJ, Torres-Martinez S, Dietrich FS, Keeling PJ, et al. Microsporidia Evolved from Ancestral Sexual Fungi. Current Biology. 2008. pp. 1675–1679. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Troemel ER, Félix M-A, Whiteman NK, Barrière A, Ausubel FM. Microsporidia are natural intracellular parasites of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol. 2008;6: 2736–2752. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang G, Sachse M, Prevost M-C, Luallen RJ, Troemel ER, Félix M-A. A Large Collection of Novel Nematode-Infecting Microsporidia and Their Diverse Interactions with Caenorhabditis elegans and Other Related Nematodes. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12: e1006093 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fries I, Martín R, Meana A, García-Palencia P, Higes M. Natural infections of Nosema ceranae in European honey bees. Journal of Apicultural Research. 2006. pp. 230–233. 10.3896/ibra.1.45.4.13 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Becnel JJ, Sprague V, Fukuda T, Hazard EI. Development ofEdhazardia aedis(Kudo, 1930) N. G., N. Comb. (Microsporida: Amblyosporidae) in the MosquitoAedes aegypti(L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). The Journal of Protozoology. 1989. pp. 119–130. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1989.tb01057.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Palenzuela O, Redondo MJ, Cali A, Takvorian PM, Alonso-Naveiro M, Alvarez-Pellitero P, et al. A new intranuclear microsporidium, Enterospora nucleophila n. sp., causing an emaciative syndrome in a piscine host (Sparus aurata), prompts the redescription of the family Enterocytozoonidae. International Journal for Parasitology. 2014. pp. 189–203. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Scurrell E, Manning S, Malho P, Civello A, Mould J, Carrozza R, et al. Microsporidial keratopathy in two dogs. Veterinary Ophthalmology. 2019. 10.1111/vop.12726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Croppo GP, Croppo GP, Moura H, Da Silva AJ, Leitch GJ, Moss DM, et al. Ultrastructure, immunofluorescence, western blot, and PCR analysis of eight isolates of Encephalitozoon (Septata) intestinalis established in culture from sputum and urine samples and duodenal aspirates of five patients with AIDS. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36: 1201–1208. 10.1128/JCM.36.5.1201-1208.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cali A, Kotler DP, Orenstein JM. Septata Intestinalis N. G., N. Sp., an Intestinal Microsporidian Associated With Chronic Diarrhea and Dissemination In Aids Patients. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 1993. pp. 101–112. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb04889.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Friedberg DN, Stenson SM, Orenstein JM, Tierno PM, Charles NC. Microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108: 504–508. 10.1001/archopht.1990.01070060052047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Teachey DT, Russo P, Orenstein JM, Didier ES, Bowers C, Bunin N. Pulmonary infection with microsporidia after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;33: 299–302. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yachnis AT, Berg J, Martinez-Salazar A, Bender BS, Diaz L, Rojiani AM, et al. Disseminated microsporidiosis especially infecting the brain, heart, and kidneys. Report of a newly recognized pansporoblastic species in two symptomatic AIDS patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996;106: 535–543. 10.1093/ajcp/106.4.535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Katinka MD, Duprat S, Cornillot E, Méténier G, Thomarat F, Prensier G, et al. Genome sequence and gene compaction of the eukaryote parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Nature. 2001;414: 450–453. 10.1038/35106579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dean P, Sendra KM, Williams TA, Watson AK, Major P, Nakjang S, et al. Transporter gene acquisition and innovation in the evolution of Microsporidia intracellular parasites. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 1709 10.1038/s41467-018-03923-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Han B, Takvorian PM, Weiss LM. Invasion of Host Cells by Microsporidia. Front Microbiol. 2020;11: 172 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kudo R. Experiments on the Extrusion of Polar Filaments of Cnidosporidian Spores. The Journal of Parasitology. 1918. p. 141 10.2307/3271239 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lom J. On the structure of the extruded microsporidian polar filament. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde. 1972. pp. 200–213. 10.1007/bf00329598 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Weidner E. Ultrastructural study of microsporidian invasion into cells. Z Parasitenkd. 1972;40: 227–242. 10.1007/BF00329623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Takvorian PM, Weiss LM, Cali A. The early events of Brachiola algerae (Microsporidia) infection: spore germination, sporoplasm structure, and development within host cells. Folia Parasitol. 2005;52: 118–129. 10.14411/fp.2005.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Frixione E, Ruiz L, Santillán M, de Vargas LV, Tejero JM, Undeen AH. Dynamics of polar filament discharge and sporoplasm expulsion by microsporidian spores. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 1992. pp. 38–50. 10.1002/cm.970210105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Takvorian PM, Han B, Cali A, Rice WJ, Gunther L, Macaluso F, et al. An Ultrastructural Study of the Extruded Polar Tube of Anncaliia algerae (Microsporidia). J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2020;67: 28–44. 10.1111/jeu.12751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Franzen C, Müller A, Hartmann P, Salzberger B. Cell invasion and intracellular fate of Encephalitozoon cuniculi (Microsporidia). Parasitology. 2005;130: 285–292. 10.1017/s003118200400633x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wittner M, Weiss LM. The Microsporidia and Microsporidiosis. Amer Society for Microbiology; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weidner E. The microsporidian spore invasion tube. The ultrastructure, isolation, and characterization of the protein comprising the tube. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1976. pp. 23–34. 10.1083/jcb.71.1.23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bigliardi E, Riparbelli MG, Selmi MG, Lanzarini P, Corona S, Gatti S, et al. Mechanisms of Microsporidial Cell Division: Ultrastructural Study on Encephalitozoon hellem. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 1998. pp. 347–351. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1998.tb04547.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bigliardi E, Sacchi L. Cell biology and invasion of the microsporidia. Microbes Infect. 2001;3: 373–379. 10.1016/s1286-4579(01)01393-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gavelis GS, Wakeman KC, Tillmann U, Ripken C, Mitarai S, Herranz M, et al. Microbial arms race: Ballistic “nematocysts” in dinoflagellates represent a new extreme in organelle complexity. Science Advances. 2017. p. e1602552 10.1126/sciadv.1602552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nüchter T, Benoit M, Engel U, Ozbek S, Holstein TW. Nanosecond-scale kinetics of nematocyst discharge. Curr Biol. 2006;16: R316–8. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cali A, Weiss LM, Takvorian PM. Brachiola algerae Spore Membrane Systems, their Activity During Extrusion, and a New Structural Entity, the Multilayered Interlaced Network, Associated with the Polar Tube and the Sporoplasm. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2002. pp. 164–174. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2002.tb00361.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Troemel ER, Becnel JJ. Genome analysis and polar tube firing dynamics of mosquito-infecting microsporidia. Fungal Genet Biol. 2015;83: 41–44. 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.08.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Franzen C, Fischer S, Schroeder J, Schölmerich J, Schneuwly S. Morphological and molecular investigations of Tubulinosema ratisbonensis gen. nov., sp. nov. (Microsporidia: Tubulinosematidae fam. nov.), a parasite infecting a laboratory colony of Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005;52: 141–152. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.04-3324.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tourtip S, Wongtripop S, Stentiford GD, Bateman KS, Sriurairatana S, Chavadej J, et al. Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei sp. nov. (Microsporida: Enterocytozoonidae), a parasite of the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon (Decapoda: Penaeidae): Fine structure and phylogenetic relationships. J Invertebr Pathol. 2009;102: 21–29. 10.1016/j.jip.2009.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Denk W, Horstmann H. Serial block-face scanning electron microscopy to reconstruct three-dimensional tissue nanostructure. PLoS Biol. 2004;2: e329 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Vavra J, Undeen AH. Nosema algeraen. sp. (Cnidospora, Microsporida) a Pathogen in a Laboratory Colony ofAnopheles stephensiListon (Diptera, Culicidae). The Journal of Protozoology. 1970. pp. 240–249. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1970.tb02365.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sutrave G, Maundrell A, Keighley C, Jennings Z, Brammah S, Wang M-X, et al. Anncaliia algerae Microsporidial Myositis, New South Wales, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24: 1528–1531. 10.3201/eid2408.172002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cali A, Weiss LM, Takvorian PM. An analysis of the microsporidian genus Brachiola, with comparisons of human and insect isolates of Brachiola algerae. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2004;51: 678–685. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00608.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sokolova YY, Weidner E, DiMario PJ. Development of Anncaliia algerae (Microsporidia) in Drosophila melanogaster. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2020;67: 125–131. 10.1111/jeu.12762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Smith D, Starborg T. Serial block face scanning electron microscopy in cell biology: Applications and technology. Tissue Cell. 2019;57: 111–122. 10.1016/j.tice.2018.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bigliardi E, Selmi MG, Lupetti P, Corona S, Gatti S, Scaglia M, et al. Microsporidian spore wall: ultrastructural findings on Encephalitozoon hellem exospore. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1996;43: 181–186. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1996.tb01388.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Franzen C. Microsporidia: how can they invade other cells? Trends Parasitol. 2004;20: 275–279. 10.1016/j.pt.2004.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chioralia G, Trammer T, Maier WA, Seitz HM. Morphologic changes in Nosema algerae (Microspora) during extrusion. Parasitol Res. 1998;84: 123–131. 10.1007/s004360050368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Cali A, Owen RL. Microsporidiosis Laboratory Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases. Springer, New York, NY; 1988. pp. 929–950. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3898-0_98 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Polonais V, Prensier G, Méténier G, Vivarès CP, Delbac F. Microsporidian polar tube proteins: highly divergent but closely linked genes encode PTP1 and PTP2 in members of the evolutionarily distant Antonospora and Encephalitozoon groups. Fungal Genet Biol. 2005;42: 791–803. 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bouzahzah B, Nagajyothi F, Ghosh K, Takvorian PM, Cali A, Tanowitz HB, et al. Interactions of Encephalitozoon cuniculi polar tube proteins. Infect Immun. 2010;78: 2745–2753. 10.1128/IAI.01205-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Han B, Polonais V, Sugi T, Yakubu R, Takvorian PM, Cali A, et al. The role of microsporidian polar tube protein 4 (PTP4) in host cell infection. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13: e1006341 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sokolova Y, Pelin A, Hawke J, Corradi N. Morphology and phylogeny of Agmasoma penaei (Microsporidia) from the type host, Litopenaeus setiferus, and the type locality, Louisiana, USA. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45: 1–16. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sokolova YY, Sakaguchi K, Paulsen DB. Establishing a New Species Encephalitozoon pogonae for the Microsporidian Parasite of Inland Bearded Dragon Pogona vitticeps Ahl 1927 (Reptilia, Squamata, Agamidae). J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2016;63: 524–535. 10.1111/jeu.12296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Weidner E, Byrd W, Scarborough A, Pleshinger J, Sibley D. Microsporidian Spore Discharge and the Transfer of Polaroplast Organelle Membrane into Plasma Membrane. The Journal of Protozoology. 1984. pp. 195–198. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1984.tb02948.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kucerova Z, Moura H, Visvesvara GS, Leitch GJ. Differences between Brachiola (Nosema) algerae Isolates of Human and Insect Origin when Tested Using an In Vitro Spore Germination Assay anda Cultured Cell Infection Assay. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2004. pp. 339–343. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00577.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Leitch GJ, He Q, Wallace S, Visvesvara GS. Inhibition of the spore polar filament extrusion of the microsporidium, Encephalitozoon hellem, isolated from an AIDS patient. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1993;40: 711–717. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb04463.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Aldama-Cano DJ, Sanguanrut P, Munkongwongsiri N, Ibarra-Gámez JC, Itsathitphaisarn O, Vanichviriyakit R, et al. Bioassay for spore polar tube extrusion of shrimp Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP). Aquaculture. 2018. pp. 156–161. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.02.039 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liu H, Chen B, Hu S, Liang X, Lu X, Shao Y. Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Germination of Nosema bombycis Spores under Extremely Alkaline Conditions. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vale RD, Coppin CM, Malik F, Kull FJ, Milligan RA. Tubulin GTP hydrolysis influences the structure, mechanical properties, and kinesin-driven transport of microtubules. J Biol Chem. 1994;269: 23769–23775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Toba S, Watanabe TM, Yamaguchi-Okimoto L, Toyoshima YY, Higuchi H. Overlapping hand-over-hand mechanism of single molecular motility of cytoplasmic dynein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006. pp. 5741–5745. 10.1073/pnas.0508511103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Håkansson S, Morisaki H, Heuser J, Sibley LD. Time-lapse video microscopy of gliding motility in Toxoplasma gondii reveals a novel, biphasic mechanism of cell locomotion. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10: 3539–3547. 10.1091/mbc.10.11.3539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Deacon JW, Saxena G. Orientated zoospore attachment and cyst germination in Catenaria anguillulae, a facultative endoparasite of nematodes. Mycological Research. 1997. pp. 513–522. 10.1017/s0953756296003085 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Weidner E, Manale SB, Halonen SK, Lynn JW. Protein-Membrane Interaction Is Essential to Normal Assembly of the Microsporidian Spore Invasion Tube. Biol Bull. 1995;188: 128–135. 10.2307/1542078 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Undeen AH, Frixione E. The role of osmotic pressure in the germination of Nosema algerae spores. J Protozool. 1990;37: 561–567. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1990.tb01265.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Keohane EM, Weiss LM. Characterization and function of the microsporidian polar tube: a review. Folia Parasitol. 1998;45: 117–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Weidner E. The microsporidian spore invasion tube. III. Tube extrusion and assembly. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1982. pp. 976–979. 10.1083/jcb.93.3.976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Liu T-L, Upadhyayula S, Milkie DE, Singh V, Wang K, Swinburne IA, et al. Observing the cell in its native state: Imaging subcellular dynamics in multicellular organisms. Science. 2018;360 10.1126/science.aaq1392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.de Oliveira S, Rosowski EE, Huttenlocher A. Neutrophil migration in infection and wound repair: going forward in reverse. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16: 378–391. 10.1038/nri.2016.49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Reymond N, d’Água BB, Ridley AJ. Crossing the endothelial barrier during metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13: 858–870. 10.1038/nrc3628 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Denais CM, Gilbert RM, Isermann P, McGregor AL, te Lindert M, Weigelin B, et al. Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration. Science. 2016;352: 353–358. 10.1126/science.aad7297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Raab M, Gentili M, de Belly H, -R. Thiam H, Vargas P, Jimenez AJ, et al. ESCRT III repairs nuclear envelope ruptures during cell migration to limit DNA damage and cell death. Science. 2016. pp. 359–362. 10.1126/science.aad7611 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Matsumoto A, Hieda M, Yokoyama Y, Nishioka Y, Yoshidome K, Tsujimoto M, et al. Global loss of a nuclear lamina component, lamin A/C, and LINC complex components SUN1, SUN2, and nesprin-2 in breast cancer. Cancer Med. 2015;4: 1547–1557. 10.1002/cam4.495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Venables RS, McLean S, Luny D, Moteleb E, Morley S, Quinlan RA, et al. Expression of individual lamins in basal cell carcinomas of the skin. Br J Cancer. 2001;84: 512–519. 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Broers JL, Raymond Y, Rot MK, Kuijpers H, Wagenaar SS, Ramaekers FC. Nuclear A-type lamins are differentially expressed in human lung cancer subtypes. Am J Pathol. 1993;143: 211–220. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wu Z, Wu L, Weng D, Xu D, Geng J, Zhao F. Reduced expression of lamin A/C correlates with poor histological differentiation and prognosis in primary gastric carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28: 8 10.1186/1756-9966-28-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Harada T, Swift J, Irianto J, Shin J-W, Spinler KR, Athirasala A, et al. Nuclear lamin stiffness is a barrier to 3D migration, but softness can limit survival. J Cell Biol. 2014;204: 669–682. 10.1083/jcb.201308029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rowat AC, Jaalouk DE, Zwerger M, Ung WL, Eydelnant IA, Olins DE, et al. Nuclear envelope composition determines the ability of neutrophil-type cells to passage through micron-scale constrictions. J Biol Chem. 2013;288: 8610–8618. 10.1074/jbc.M112.441535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Melcer S, Gruenbaum Y, Krohne G. Invertebrate lamins. Experimental Cell Research. 2007. pp. 2157–2166. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Dittmer TA, Misteli T. The lamin protein family. Genome Biology. 2011. p. 222 10.1186/gb-2011-12-5-222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Aurrecoechea C, Barreto A, Brestelli J, Brunk BP, Caler EV, Fischer S, et al. AmoebaDB and MicrosporidiaDB: functional genomic resources for Amoebozoa and Microsporidia species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39: D612–9. 10.1093/nar/gkq1006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Corradi N, Pombert J-F, Farinelli L, Didier ES, Keeling PJ. The complete sequence of the smallest known nuclear genome from the microsporidian Encephalitozoon intestinalis. Nat Commun. 2010;1: 77 10.1038/ncomms1082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Solter LF, Becnel JJ, Vávra J. Research methods for entomopathogenic microsporidia and other protists. Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology. 2012. pp. 329–371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Weiss LM, Delbac F, Russell Hayman J, Pan G, Dang X, Zhou Z. The Microsporidian Polar Tube and Spore Wall. Microsporidia. 2014. pp. 261–306. 10.1002/9781118395264.ch10 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem. 2004;25: 1605–1612. 10.1002/jcc.20084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]