Skip to main content
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Sep 30;46(11):2086–2088. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06256-3

Hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in Mexico

Silvio A Ñamendys-Silva 1,2,, Alan Gutiérrez-Villaseñor 3, Juan P Romero-González 3
PMCID: PMC7527144  PMID: 33000290

Dear Editor,

As of August 13th, 2020, a total of 20,439,814 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been reported to the World Health Organization, and 744,385 lives have been lost [1]. The Americas constitute the current epicentre of the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 505,751 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 55,293 deaths have been reported in Mexico [2], and 2.5% of these patients have required endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation [2]. This report describes the sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities associated with mortality in mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19 in Mexico.

We analysed data collected in the General Epidemiology Directorate of the Mexican Ministry of Heath, which is an open-source dataset comprising of daily updated data of suspected COVID-19 cases that were confirmed by a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 [2]. We used the version released on August 13th, 2020 [2].

A total of 12,018 mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19 were included. The flow chart of the study is shown in Figure S1 (supplemental methods). The median age was 60 years (interquartile range 50–69; range 18–108 years), and 7971 (66.3%) were men (Figure S2) (supplementary material). The sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities of the patients with COVID-19 (according to in-hospital deaths) are shown in Table 1. A total of 57.6% (n = 6928) of the patients were mechanically ventilated outside of the intensive care units (Figure S1) (supplementary material). The overall in-hospital mortality was 73.7% (n = 8861).

Table 1.

Characteristics of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients, according to in-hospital death

Characteristics Total population (n = 12,018) Survivors (n = 3157) Non-survivors (n = 8861) p value*
Age, years, median (interquartile range) 60 (50–69) 56 (46–66) 61 (51–70)  < 0.001
 18–34 581 (4.8) 270 (8.5) 311 (3.5)  < 0.001
 35–54 3740 (31.1) 1188 (37.6) 2551 (28.7)
 55–64 3313 (27.6) 823 (26.1) 2490 (28.1)
  ≥ 65 4384 (36.5) 876 (27.7) 3508 (39.6)
Female, n (%) 4047 (33.7) 1086 (34.4) 2961 (33.4) 0.315
Male, n (%) 7971 (66.3) 2071 (65.6) 5900 (66.6)
Ability to speak a Mexican indigenous language, n (%) 221 (1.8) 41 (1.3) 180 (2) 0.009
Medical treatment in the public healthcare system, n (%) 11,468 (95.4) 2877 (91.1) 8591 (96.9)  < 0.001
Medical treatment in the private healthcare system, n (%) 550 (4.6) 280 (8.8) 270 (3)
Time from illness onset to hospital admission > 6 days, n (%) 3693 (30.7) 1063 (33.7) 2630 (29.7)  < 0.001
Invasive mechanical ventilation outside intensive care unit, n (%) 6928 (57.7) 1714 (54.3) 5214 (58.8)  < 0.001
Invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit, n (%) 5090 (42.3) 1443 (45.7) 3647 (41.1)
Comorbidities, n (%)
 Hypertension 4802 (40) 1109 (35.1) 3693 (41.7)  < 0.001
 Diabetes 4349 (36.2) 1019 (32.3) 3330 (37.6)  < 0.001
 Obesity 3388 (28.2) 895 (28.3) 2493 (28.1) 0.818
 Chronic kidney disease 603 (5) 137 (4.4) 466 (5.3) 0.042
 Cardiovascular disease 590 (4.9) 141 (4.5) 449 (5) 0.180
 Chronic obstructive lung disease 463 (3.9) 85 (2.6) 378 (4.3)  < 0.001
 Immunosuppression 281 (2.3) 62 (2) 219 (2.5) 0.105
 Asthma 237 (2) 55 (1.7) 182 (2) 0.279
 No comorbidities** 3712 (30.9) 1116 (35.3) 2596 (29.3)  < 0.001
  ≥ 1 comorbidity 8306 (69.1) 2041 (64.6) 6265 (70.7)

*Chi-square (categorical variables) or Mann–Whitney (continuous variables) tests (α = 0.05)

**No comorbidities: patients had none of the listed comorbidities

In our report, hospital mortality was higher than mortality in high-income countries such as the United Kingdom (67.4% versus 73.7%, p < 0.001) [3] and Germany (53% versus 73.7%, p < 0.001) [4]. Furthermore, hospitalisation in the public healthcare system presented higher crude mortality compared with the private healthcare system (Figure S3) (supplementary material).

Mexican health authorities have stated that the response to the pandemic has been satisfactory because the health system has not been affected and because sufficient numbers of beds with ventilators are available. As shown in this report, the availability of sufficient numbers of beds with ventilators does not ensure improvement in the prognoses of patients with COVID-19. Beyond the quantity of beds with ventilators, there may also be concerns about the quality of care, as has been suggested by the high mortality rate for intubated COVID-19 patients in Mexico. Health care systems in low- and middle-income countries should be concerned about having sufficient qualified personnel (such as nurses and physicians) and other resources (such as personal protective equipment), which has been one of the main problems worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The main limitation of this study is the use of a nationwide administrative database that was not designed for clinical research. However, it is useful to present the general overview of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in Mexico. Additionally, we excluded patients who died outside of hospitals or who died before intubation.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

This report is dedicated to all patients and health care workers who died due to COVID-19 in Mexico and around the world.

Author contributions

ÑS had full access to all of the data in the report and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Concept and design: ÑS. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors. Drafting of the manuscript: ÑS. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors. Statistical analysis: ÑS. Administrative, technical, or material support: ÑS. Supervision: ÑS.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Intensive Care Medicine are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES