Abstract
Background
Bacterial spores displaying heterologous antigens or enzymes have long been proposed as mucosal vaccines, functionalized probiotics or biocatalysts. Two main strategies have been developed to display heterologous molecules on the surface of Bacillus subtilis spores: (i) a recombinant approach, based on the construction of a gene fusion between a gene coding for a coat protein (carrier) and DNA coding for the protein to be displayed, and (ii) a non-recombinant approach, based on the spontaneous and stable adsorption of heterologous molecules on the spore surface. Both systems have advantages and drawbacks and the selection of one or the other depends on the protein to be displayed and on the final use of the activated spore. It has been recently shown that B. subtilis builds structurally and functionally different spores when grown at different temperatures; based on this finding B. subtilis spores prepared at 25, 37 or 42 °C were compared for their efficiency in displaying various model proteins by either the recombinant or the non-recombinant approach.
Results
Immune- and fluorescence-based assays were used to analyze the display of several model proteins on spores prepared at 25, 37 or 42 °C. Recombinant spores displayed different amounts of the same fusion protein in response to the temperature of spore production. In spores simultaneously displaying two fusion proteins, each of them was differentially displayed at the various temperatures. The display by the non-recombinant approach was only modestly affected by the temperature of spore production, with spores prepared at 37 or 42 °C slightly more efficient than 25 °C spores in adsorbing at least some of the model proteins tested.
Conclusion
Our results indicate that the temperature of spore production allows control of the display of heterologous proteins on spores and, therefore, that the spore-display strategy can be optimized for the specific final use of the activated spores by selecting the display approach, the carrier protein and the temperature of spore production.
Keywords: Display platform, Mucosal vaccines, Bacillus subtilis, Probiotics
Introduction
Endospores (spores) are quiescent cell forms produced by over 1000 bacterial species when the environmental conditions do not allow cell growth to continue [1]. In the spore form, these bacterial species can survive conditions, such as the prolonged absence of water and nutrients, the exposure to extremes of temperature and pH, to UV irradiations and to toxic chemicals, that would be lethal for other cell forms [2]. Although metabolically quiescent, the spore is able to sense the environment and respond to conditions that allow cell growth by germinating and generating a new vegetative cell [3]. Spore germination and resistance are in part due to the peculiar structure of the spore, that has been studied in detail in Bacillus subtilis, the model system for spore formers [2, 4]. In B. subtilis, spores are formed by a partially dehydrated cytoplasm (core) surrounded by several protective layers: the thick peptidoglycan-like cortex, the multilayered, proteinaceous coat and the crust, the outermost layer formed of proteins and glycans [4]. In some species, including B. anthracis, B. cereus and B. megaterium, the outermost layer of the coat is the exosporium, a protective shell mainly made of glycoproteins [4].
The rigidity and compactness of the spore suggested the possibility of using this unusual cell as a platform to display heterologous proteins [5]. In a proof-of-concept work, the spore coat protein CotB of B. subtilis was used as a carrier to display the C fragment of the tetanus toxin (TTFC) of Clostridium tetani on the spore surface [5]. To this aim a genetic system was developed to generate gene fusions between the cotB gene and DNA coding for TTFC and to allow expression of the fusion during sporulation [5]. The mucosal administration of recombinant spores displaying TTFC was then shown protective against a challenge with the tetanus toxin and able to induce humoral and cellular immune responses [6, 7]. Over the years, the same approach has been used with other coat proteins as carriers and a variety of other heterologous proteins [8]. However, this display system has the drawback of generating recombinant spores, that in case of a field use could raise safety concerns [9]. To overcome this problem a non-recombinant display system based on the spontaneous and stable adsorption of heterologous proteins to bacterial spores has been also developed [10, 11]. Antigens and enzymes have been efficiently and stably adsorbed to spores [12, 13] and it has been proposed that the adsorption is due to the negative electric charge and the relative hydrophobicity of the spore surface [10, 14]. In addition, studies with B. subtilis and B. megaterium indicated that some proteins were able to infiltrate through "pores" of the outermost spore coat layers and localize in the inner coat of B. subtilis spores [15] or in the interspace between the exosporium and the outer coat in B. megaterium spores [16, 17].
The spore-display system by both the recombinant or non-recombinant approach, provides several advantages with respect to other display systems, such as a high stability even after a prolonged storage, the possibility of displaying large, multimeric proteins and the safety for a human use, demonstrated by the wide use of spores of some species as probiotics [18, 19]. Based on these, the activated spore has been proposed as a mucosal delivery system, as a vaccine vehicle, as a functionalized probiotic and as a platform to display enzymes [8, 20].
Both approaches are quite efficient, and it has been estimated that up to 3.0 × 103 heterologous molecules can be displayed by each recombinant spore of B. subtilis [8, 21]. The efficiency of the non-recombinant approach can be higher than that measured for the recombinant system and depends on the heterologous protein and the Bacillus species used [12, 15, 16, 20]. In spite of the efficiency of these systems, the possibility to increase and/or control the number of heterologous proteins presented on the spore is an important achievement for the full exploitation of this biotechnology tool. In the case of a use as a vaccine vehicle, for example, an increased efficiency of display results in a higher dose of antigen delivered or reduced amounts of spores needed for the immunization.
Based on a recent report showing that B. subtilis builds spores with different structure when grown at 25, 37 or 42 °C [22], we investigated whether the efficiency of spore-display by both recombinant and non-recombinant approaches could be modulated by modifying the temperature of spore production.
Results and discussion
Effects of the temperature on the recombinant display system
CotB, CotC and CotG are abundant coat proteins widely used as carriers to display heterologous proteins on the spore surface [8]. All three proteins have been recently found differentially represented in spores produced at 25, 37 or 42 °C, with CotB and CotG more abundant in spores prepared at 25 °C and CotC more abundant in 42 °C spores [22]. We used isogenic B. subtilis strains carrying DNA coding for the model antigen TTFC (tetC) fused to the gene coding for either CotB (cotB) [5] or CotC (cotC) [23] to evaluate the effect of the sporulation temperature on the fusion proteins. Spores of strains RH103 (cotB::tetC) and RH114 (cotC::tetC) were produced at 25, 37 and 42 °C and purified, as previously reported [22]. Surface proteins were extracted from RH103 and RH115 spores by the SDS-DTT or NaOH treatments, respectively and used for western blotting analysis with anti-CotB [5] or anti-CotC [23] antibodies.
As shown in Fig. 1, specific CotB-TTFC (upper panel) and CotC-TTFC (lower panel) signals were observed in all the samples but not in the negative controls, revealing that the temperature did not affect the self-assembly of the heterologous proteins around the spores. Moreover, we observed that the fusion protein CotB-TTFC was more represented in 25 °C spores than in 37 or 42 °C spores (upper panel), while the fusion CotC-TTFC showed the opposite trend (lower panel).
A flow cytometry approach was used to confirm and quantify the differences in the display of CotB-TTFC and CotC-TTFC at the various temperatures and evaluate their surface exposure. Spores of strains RH103 and RH114 were reacted with anti-TTFC [7] antibodies, then with fluorescently labeled secondary antibody and analyzed by flow cytometry as previously reported [24]. The threshold of positive events was set at 1 × 103 fluorescence intensity and the percentages of fluorescent events for each temperature are indicated in red in each panel. The flow cytometry analysis indicated that CotB-TTFC was displayed with the highest efficiency in spores prepared at 25 °C (86.9% positive events) and that such efficiency decreased in 37 and 42 °C spores (Fig. 2). The efficiency of display was opposite with CotC-TTFC with the highest levels observed with 42 °C spores (90.0% of positive events) and lower levels with 37 and 25 °C spores (Fig. 2). In addition, the fluorescent intensity peak for CotB-TTFC was tenfold higher at 25 °C than at 42 °C while for CotC-TTFC was tenfold higher at 42 °C than at 25 °C, suggesting that the sporulation temperature affected not only the amount of assembled heterologous proteins but also their surface display.
Results of Figs. 1, 2 indicated, respectively, the amounts of fusion proteins extracted and exposed on the spore surface but did not allow to exclude that other amounts of each fusion were actually present (but not extracted or not exposed) on spores produced at different temperatures. To address this issue, we used different isogenic strains of B. subtilis RH238, carrying the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) fused to CotC [23], and RH296, carrying the Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP) fused to CotG [22]. A fluorescence microscopy analysis on spores prepared at 25, 37 or 42 °C and the quantification of the fluorescence signals performed by the ImageJ software, as previously reported [24], indicated that the CotG-based fusion was more abundant at 25 °C, less abundant at 37 °C and almost undetectable at 42 °C while the CotC-based fusion showed an opposite pattern (Fig. 3).
Results of Fig. 3, confirming results of Figs. 1,2, allow to conclude that the CotB- and CotG-based fusions are efficiently displayed when spores are produced at 25 °C, while CotC-based fusions are better displayed when spores are produced at 42 °C and, therefore, that is possible to modulate the amount and the surface exposure of fusion proteins displayed on the spore by changing the temperature of spore production on the base of the carrier protein used for the display.
Effects of the temperature on recombinant spores displaying two fusion proteins
An extension of the recombinant spore-display technology is the use of spores carrying more than one heterologous protein. By chromosomal DNA-mediated transformation [25], the gene fusion carried by strains RH238 (cotC::gfp) was moved into strain RH296 (cotG::rfp) obtaining strain RH406 that carried both fusions. As shown in Fig. 4, spores of strain RH406 presented both fluorescent proteins on their surfaces in similar amounts when spores were grown at 37 °C. When spores were produced at 25 °C the red fluorescent signal (CotG-RFP) was more abundant than the green one (CotC-GFP) that was instead predominant when spores were grown at 42 °C.
Results of Fig. 4 highlight an important improvement for the spore-display technology, showing that it is possible to produce spores that simultaneously display two heterologous proteins and to control which displayed protein has to be more abundantly represented by selecting the temperature of spore production.
Effects of the temperature on the non-recombinant display system
To evaluate the effects of the temperature on non-recombinant spore-display (adsorption) we used three model proteins: the pentapeptide HPHGH (herein PPT) of 0.77 kDa [26], the commercially available lysozyme (herein LYS) of 14.4 kDa (Sigma) and the commercially available bovine serum albumin (herein BSA) of 66.4 kDa (New England-Biolabs). All three proteins were fluorescently labeled with rhodamine as previously described [26] and 10 mM of each model protein independently used for adsorption with 5.0 × 108 purified spores of the B. subtilis strains PY79 [27] produced at 25, 37 or 42 °C. The adsorption reactions were carried out for 1 h at 25 °C in 50 mM Sodium Citrate buffer, pH 4.0, as previously described [11]. Adsorbed spores were collected by centrifugation and analysed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytofluorimetry, as previously described [24]. As shown in Fig. 5, all three proteins were adsorbed to the spores and the fluorescent signal distributed all around the spore surface. The relative fluorescence signals were analyzed by the ImageJ software (NIH), as previously reported [24]. Since the proteins were fluorescently tagged with rhodamine, an amine-specific label, the number of fluorophore molecules attached to each protein was different, impairing a comparison of fluorescence levels between different proteins. However, the analysis allowed to conclude that: (i) PPT adsorbed with similar efficiency to 37 °C and 42 °C and slightly less efficiently to 25 °C spores (37 = 42 > 25); ii) LYS had a pattern of adsorption similar to that described for PPT (37 = 42 > 25); and (iii) BSA adsorbed at similar levels to 25, 37 or 42 °C spores (25 = 37 = 42) (Fig. 5). Adsorbed spores were analyzed by flow cytometry and the percentage of positive-fluorescent events was obtained as described for Fig. 2. This quantitative analysis performed in duplicate on 100,000 spores/each, confirmed the fluorescence microscopy results of Fig. 5, indicating that PPT was absorbed much more efficiently at 37 or 42 °C, with respectively 75.95 and 77.80% positive events (p.e.) than at 25 °C (41.74% p. e.) (Fig. 6). A similar trend was observed with LYS, although the differences were smaller with 74.48, 82.15 and 90.44% p.e. at 25, 37 and 42 °C respectively, while no differences were observed with BSA with spores prepared at the three temperatures (Fig. 6).
Although the molecular mechanism of spore adsorption is not known in detail, it is likely that more factors are involved in the process. The negative electric charge and relative hydrophobicity of the spore surface have both been shown to influence the efficiency of adsorption [10, 14]. Since it has been previously reported that 25 °C spores are more hydrophobic than 37 and 42 °C spores [22], we hypothesized that the different relative hydrophobicity of spores could explain the reduced efficiency of adsorption of PPT and LYS to 25 °C spores. However, the GRAVY value, an estimation of protein hydrophobicity calculated by adding the hydropathy values of each amino acid residue of a protein and dividing by the number of residues in the protein [28], for PPT, LYS and BSA were − 2.32, − 0.15 and − 0.45, respectively, with increasing positive values indicating an increasing hydrophobicity. Therefore, proteins with the least (PPT) and the highest (LYS) hydrophobicity value showed a similar adsorption pattern (Figs. 5,6), making it unlikely that the hydrophobicity is a major determinant of the efficiency of adsorption, in our experiments. Other physical and chemical parameters of the heterologous proteins, including probably the size and the isoelectric point, have to be considered as they may mediate the ability of proteins to cross the outermost spore layers [15–17], resulting in relevant for the efficiency of the process.
Localization of proteins adsorbed on 25, 37 or 42 °C spores
A previous report showed that RFP when adsorbed to spores is able to cross the crust and the outer coat, localizing at the inner coat level [15]. In that study, the RFP fluorescence signal was localized by comparison with the signal due to GFP fused to proteins known to be localized in various spore coat layers [15]. A similar approach was used to evaluate whether the temperature of spore production also affected the localization of the adsorbed proteins within the coat. Since the high red fluorescence signal produced by rhodamine-labeled PPT, LYS or BSA overlapped (and caused interference) with the region of detection for the GFP signal, the localization assays were performed adsorbing RFP to spores carrying the cotC:: gfp fusion [15] and prepared at 25, 37 or 42 °C.
As previously reported [15], in 37 °C spores the red fluorescence signal of RFP was internal to the green signal of CotC-GFP (Fig. 7). While RFP localization did not change with 25 °C spores, it was slightly altered with 42 °C spores where the RFP signal was external with respect to the CotC-GFP signal (Fig. 7). The different localization of RFP is most likely due to the different coat structure of spore produced at the various temperatures and indicates that the lamellar and highly electron-dense outer coat (CotB-CotG rich) produced at low temperatures [22] is somehow a more permeable than the granular and thick coat (CotC rich) produced at 42 °C [22], at least with respect to RFP.
Conclusions
Main conclusion of this study is that the temperature of spore production affects the display of heterologous proteins on the spore surface:
with the recombinant display the temperature modulates the amount and the surface exposure of the displayed proteins with CotB- and CotG-based fusions more efficient at low temperatures and CotC-based fusions are more efficient at high temperatures;
when a recombinant spore carries two heterologous proteins each of them is differentially displayed at different temperatures on the base of the carrier used;
with the non-recombinant display a modest effect is observed with small proteins (PPT and LYS) adsorbed more efficiently by 37 or 42 °C spores than by 25 °C spores;
the localization of adsorbed RFP within the spore surface layers is modified by the temperature, indicating that spores produced at the low temperatures (CotB/CotG type coat) or at high temperature (CotC type coat) [22] have different adsorption properties.
Overall, this study indicates that the temperature of spore production is an essential parameter to be considered in the development of a spore-display system.
Materials and methods
Spore production, extraction of coat proteins and western blot analysis
Sporulation at 25, 37 and 42 °C was induced by the exhaustion method in Difco Sporulation (DS) medium as recently reported [24, 29]. Mature spores were purified by cold-water washing using overnight incubation in H2O at 4 °C to lyse residual sporangial cells. Spore purity (higher than 95%) was checked under optical microscope.
Spore coat proteins were extracted from a suspension of spores by SDS-DTT or NaOH treatment [30]. The concentration of extracted proteins was determined by using Bio-Rad DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad), and 20 μg of total spore coat proteins were fractionated on 12.5% SDS polyacrylamide gels and staining by Brilliant Blue Coomassie or electro-transferred to nitrocellulose filters (Bio-Rad) for western blot analysis following standard procedures. CotC- and CotB- substrate specific antibodies were used at working dilutions 1:7000 for CotC-TTFC and CotB-TTFC detection [5, 21]. Then, a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antirabbit secondary antibody was used (Santa Cruz). Western blot filters were visualized by the electro chemi luminescence method as specified by the manufacturer and processed to improve the contrast level using ChemidocXRS software (Bio-Rad).
The experiments have been repeated twice analyzing two distinct coat protein extractions.
Labeling with Rhodamine
2 mg/ml of pentapeptide HPHGH (PPT), commercially available lysozyme (LYS-Sigma), and bovine serum albumin (BSA-New England-Biolabs) were labeled with 50 µl of Rhodamine B isothiocyanate (Sigma) (1 mg/ml in DMSO) as specified by the manufacturer. The protocol is based on the reaction between the isothiocyanate group of Rhodamine and epsilon-NH2 of Lysine residues of the protein to be labeled in order to obtain a fluorescent complex. Final molar Rhodamine/Proteins ratio was 0.06 and the labeling reactions were performed pH 8.5. The labeling was followed by dialysis in 1×PBS to remove the unbound fluorescent excess and lyophilization.
Binding reaction
10 mM of PPT-Rd, LYS-Rd, BSA-Rd were added to a suspension of 5.0 × 108 wild type spores, produced at different temperatures, in 50 mM sodium citrate pH 4.5 in a final volume of 200 µl. For the reaction with RFP, 1 µg of purified protein was added to the suspension of 1.0 × 108 spores produced at different temperatures, in 1.5 M PBS pH 4.0 in a final volume of 200 µl. After 1 h of incubation at 25 °C, the binding mixtures were washed and centrifuged (10 min at 13,000g) to fractionate adsorbed spores (pellet) from unbound protein (supernatant).
Flow cytometry
Recombinant spores expressing TTFC were analyzed by flow cytometry as previously described [31]. Briefly, 106 purified spores were incubated at room temperature for 30 min at room temperature in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-3% fetal bovine serum (FBS) prior to 1 h-incubation with anti-TTFC polyclonal antibodies diluted at 1:20 in 1×PBS–1%FBS. After three washes in 1×PBS, fluorescein isothiscyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (1:64; Sigma) was added and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at room temperature, followed by four washes in PBS.
For spores adsorbed with PPT-Rd, LYS-Rd and BSA-Rd, a total of 106 spores were resuspended in 0.5 ml of binding buffer and directly analyzed.
Flow cytometry analysis was performed by BD Accuri™ C6 Cytometer and BD Accuri™ C6 Software (BD Biosciences, Inc., Milan, Italy) collecting 100,000 events. Spore without the addition of primary and secondary antibodies or not adsorbed were used to measure the unspecific fluorescence, allowing to set the threshold of positive events at 1 × 103 fluorescence intensity. The experiments were repeated twice analyzing two independently prepared samples.
Fluorescence microscopy
105 adsorbed spores were resuspended in 50 µl of binding buffer and observed with an Olympus BX51 fluorescence microscope fitted with a 100 × objective UPlanF1 and U-MNG or U-MWIBBP cube-filters to detect the red and green fluorescence emission respectively. The exposure times are in the range between 500 and 1000 ms. Captured images were processed with Image Analysis Software (Olympus) for minor adjustments of brightness, contrast and color balance and for creation of merge images. For RFP adsorbed spores, the fluorescence intensities and the distance between two fluorescent peaks were measured using unadjusted merged images with Image J processing software (version 1.48, NIH) as previously described [15]. To obtain the total corrected cellular fluorescence (TCCF), an outline was drawn around several fluorescent spores and area, integrated density and the mean fluorescence measured, along with several adjacent background readings. The TCCF was calculated by subtracting the area of selected cell × mean fluorescence of background readings to the integrated density.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Authors’ contributions
RI, ER, LB, conceived and designed the experiments; CP, SC, carried out most of the experimental work; ML, AS, GD contributed to some of the experiments; RI, ER, LB wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
No specific funds were receive to support this work.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Fritze D. Taxonomy and systematics of the aerobic endospore forming bacteria: Bacillus and related genera. In: Ricca E, Henriques AO, Cutting SM, editors. Bacterial Spore Formers. Norfolk: Horizon Biosience; 2004. pp. 17–34. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Driks A, Eichenberger P. The Spore Coat. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4(2):R17–29. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0023-2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Setlow P. Germination of spores of Bacillus species: what we know and do not know. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:1297–1305. doi: 10.1128/JB.01455-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McKenney PT, Driks A, Eichemberger P. The Bacillus subtilisendospore: assembly and functions of the multilayered coat. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013;11:33–44. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Isticato R, Cangiano G, Tran TH, Ciabattini A, Medaglini D, Oggioni MR, De Felice M, Pozzi G, Ricca E. Surface display of recombinant proteins on Bacillus subtilis spores. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:6294–6301. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6294-6301.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Duc LH, Huynh HA, Fairweather N, Ricca E, Cutting SM. Bacterial spores as vaccine vehicles. Infect Immun. 2003;71:2810–2818. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.5.2810-2818.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mauriello EMF, Cangiano G, Maurano F, Saggese V, De Felice M, Rossi M, Ricca E. Germination-Independent Induction of Cellular Immune Response by Bacillus subtilis Spores Displaying the C Fragment of the Tetanus Toxin. Vaccine. 2007;25:788–793. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Isticato R, Ricca E. Spore surface display. Microbiol Spectr. 2014 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBS-0011-2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Detmer A, Glenting J. Live bacterial vaccines—a review and identification of potential hazards. Microb Cell Fact. 2006;5:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-5-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang JM, Hong HA, Van Tong H, Hoang TH, Brisson A, Cutting SM. Mucosal delivery of antigens using adsorption to bacterial spores. Vaccine. 2010;28:1021–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sirec T, Strazzulli A, Isticato R, De Felice M, Moracci M, Ricca E. Adsorption of beta-galactosidase of Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius on wild type and mutant spores of Bacillus subtilis. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:100. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Isticato R, Sirec T, Treppiccione L, Maurano F, De Felice M, Rossi M, Ricca E. Non-recombinant display of the B subunit of the heat labile toxin of Escherichia coli on wild type and mutant spores of Bacillus subtilis. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:98. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mattossovich R, Iacono R, Cangiano G, Cobucci-Ponzano B, Isticato R, Moracci M, Ricca E. Conversion of xylan by recyclable spores of Bacillus subtilis displaying thermophilic enzymes. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12934-017-0833-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pesce G, Rusciano G, Sirec T, Isticato R, Sasso A, Ricca E. Surface charge and hydrodynamic coefficient measurements of Bacillus subtilis spore by optical tweezers. Colloids Surf, B. 2014;116:568–575. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Donadio G, Lanzilli M, Sirec T, Ricca E, Isticato R. Localization of a red fluorescence protein adsorbed on wild type and mutant spores of Bacillus subtilis. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:153. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0551-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lanzilli M, Donadio G, Addevico R, Saggese A, Cangiano G, Baccigalupi L, Christie G, Ricca E, Isticato R. The exosporium of Bacillus megaterium QM B1551 is permeable to the Red Fluorescence Protein of the coral Discosoma sp. Front Microbiology. 2016;7:1572. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lanzilli M, Donadio G, Fusco FA, Sarcinelli C, Limauro D, Ricca E, Isticato R. Display of the peroxiredoxin Bcp1 of Sulfolobus solfataricus on probiotic spores of Bacillus megaterium. N Biotechnol. 2018;46:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2018.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.D'Arienzo R, Maurano F, Mazzarella G, Luongo D, Stefanile R, Ricca E, Rossi M. Bacillus subtilis spores reduce susceptibility to Citrobacter rodentium-mediated enteropathy in a mouse model. Res Microbiol. 2006;157:891–897. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2006.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cutting SM. Bacillus probiotics. Food Microbiol. 2011;28:214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ricca E, Baccigalupi L, Cangiano G, De Felice M, Isticato R. Mucosal vaccine delivery by non-recombinant spores of Bacillus subtilis. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12934-014-0115-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mauriello EMF, Duc LH, Isticato R, Cangiano G, Hong HA, De Felice M, Ricca E, Cutting SM. Display of heterologous antigens on the Bacillus subtilis spore coat Using CotC as a fusion partner. Vaccine. 2004;22:1177–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.09.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Isticato R, Lanzilli M, Petrillo C, Donadio G, Baccigalupi L, Ricca E. Bacillus subtilis builds structurally and functionally different spores in response to the temperature of growth. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22(1):170–182. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Isticato R, Mase D, Mauriello EMF, De Felice M, Ricca E. Amino terminal fusion of heterologous proteins to CotC increases display efficiencies in the Bacillus subtilis spore system. Biotechniques. 2007;42:151–156. doi: 10.2144/000112329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Isticato R, Ricca E, Baccigalupi L. Spore adsorption as a nonrecombinant display system for enzymes and antigens. J Vis Exp. 2019;19:145. doi: 10.3791/59102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cutting S, Vander Horn PB. Genetic analysis In Molecular Biological Methods for Bacillus. Edited by Harwood C and Cutting S. Wiley, Chichester. 1990; pp. 27–74.
- 26.Donadio G, Di Martino R, Oliva R, Petraccone L, Del Vecchio P, Di Luccia B, Ricca E, Isticato R, Di Donato A, Notomista E. A new peptide-based fluorescent probe selective for zinc (II) and copper (II) J Mater Chem B. 2016;4:6979–6988. doi: 10.1039/c6tb00671j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Youngman P, Perkins JB, Losick R. A novel method for the rapid cloning in Escherichia coli of Bacillus subtilis chromosomal DNA adjacent to Tn917 insertion. Mol Gen Genet. 1984;195:424–433. doi: 10.1007/BF00341443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982;157:105–132. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Crescenzo R, Mazzoli A, Cancelliere R, Bucci A, Naclerio G, Baccigalupi L, Cutting SM, Ricca E, Iossa S. Beneficial effects of carotenoid-producing cells of Bacillus indicus HU16 in a rat model of diet-induced metabolic syndrome. Beneficial Microbes. 2017;8:823–831. doi: 10.3920/BM2017.0025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Isticato R, Sirec T, Giglio R, Crispino A, Baccigalupi L, Rusciano G, Pesce P, Zito G, Sasso A, De Felice M, Ricca E. Flexibility of the programme of spore coat formation in Bacillus subtilis: bypass of CotE requirement by over-production of CotH. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e74949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Santos FDS, Mazzoli A, Maia AR, Saggese A, Isticato R, Leite F, Iossa S, Ricca E, Baccigalupi L. A probiotic treatment increases the immune response induced by the nasal delivery of spore-adsorbed TTFC. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19:42. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01308-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.