Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Oct 1;15(10):e0239371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239371

Analysis of land cover evolution within the built-up areas of provincial capital cities in northeastern China based on nighttime light data and Landsat data

Zhiwei Xie 1,#, Yaohui Han 1,¤,#, Lishuang Sun 1,*, Jiwei Ping 1
Editor: Bing Xue2
PMCID: PMC7529268  PMID: 33001996

Abstract

Mastering the evolution of urban land cover is important for urban management and planning. In this paper, a method for analyzing land cover evolution within urban built-up areas based on nighttime light data and Landsat data is proposed. The method solves the problem of inaccurate descriptions of urban built-up area boundaries from the use of single-source diurnal or nocturnal remote sensing data and was able to achieve an effective analysis of land cover evolution within built-up areas. Four main procedures are involved: (1) The neighborhood extremum method and maximum likelihood method are used to extract nighttime light data and the urban built-up area boundaries from the Landsat data, respectively; (2) multisource urban boundaries are obtained using boundary pixel fusion of the nighttime light data and Landsat urban built-up area boundaries; (3) the maximum likelihood method is used to classify Landsat data within multisource urban boundaries into land cover classes, such as impervious surface, vegetation and water, and to calculate landscape indexes, such as overall landscape trends, degree of fragmentation and degree of aggregation; (4) the changes in the multisource urban boundaries and landscape indexes were obtained using the abovementioned methods, which were supported by multitemporal nighttime light data and Landsat data, to model the urban land cover evolution. Using the cities of Shenyang, Changchun and Harbin in northeastern China as experimental areas, the multitemporal landscape index showed that the integration and aggregation of land cover in the urban areas had an increasing trend, the natural environment of Shenyang and Harbin was improving, while Changchun laid more emphasis on the construction of artificial facilities. At the same time, the method proposed in this paper to extract built-up areas from multi-source city data showed that the user accuracy, production accuracy, overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient are at least 3%, 1%, 1% and 0.04 higher than the single-source data method.

Introduction

Urbanization is a complex phenomenon that has a profound relationship with land cover evolution (LCE) and social dynamics [1, 2]. As the urbanization process has progressed, it has changed from continuous expansion to compression within compact areas. Compact urbanization mainly reflects land cover evolution within urban built-up areas (UBAs), which is manifested by changes in surface landscape patterns, such as impervious ground, vegetation and water [35]. LCE can directly reflect the trend of urban master planning in a specific period, which has important practical significance for urban planning and management.

LCE is a description of the changing characteristics and patterns of land surface morphology, not only to analyze the shifts between land cover classes, but also to identify the evolutionary patterns implicit [6]. Land cover change detection and evolution pattern analysis are the main research components of LCE [7]. Along with the development of satellite technology and remote sensing image processing technology, remote sensing has played an important role in the analysis of LCE [8]. The main methods for detecting land cover change are the post-classification comparison method and the direct comparison method [9]. Subject to current automatic image change detection techniques, post-classification comparison is still the dominant technical approach, and supervised classification methods are mostly used [10]. Land cover evolution models are used to describe, interpret, predict, optimize, and support decision making on land cover change. The land cover evolution model analysis model mainly includes quantitative analysis model, ecological quality analysis model, land use degree model, spatial transfer change analysis model and change prediction model [11, 12]. Most of the above models use a single or composite index to express land change indicators and pay less attention to the evolution of the spatial distribution pattern.

The urban landscape pattern has a strong correlation with the spatial distribution pattern of impervious ground, vegetation and water, which can be applied to the study of the urban heat island effect, green space optimization, the mechanism of water logging disaster formation, and other issues [13, 14]. For the study of compact urbanization, researchers have analyzed the trends of urban construction by analyzing changes in landscape patterns within built-up areas to quantitatively reflect LCE [15, 16]. The landscape index provides morphological information about highly condensed landscapes that reflects the structural composition and spatial configuration of the landscape elements. Fragstats software is one of the landscape index analysis platforms that is widely used by researchers [17, 18].

Through sprawling urbanization, the rate of urbanization in the post-World War II developing world has been remarkable. However, the sprawling urbanization has resulted in the decay of the original urban areas, and the central urban area at night has become an empty city [19]. This has resulted in a huge waste of land and energy resources, and has caused ecological damage around the city. As a result, there is a trend towards developing compact urbanization and an urgent need to assess the land cover evolution within built-up [20] areas. Using remote sensing image data to determine urban built-up area boundaries (UBAB) is an important process for analysis of LCE and compact urbanization. Depending on the number of data sources used, the methods for extracting UBA can be divided into single-source data and multisource data methods. The single-source data method generally uses nighttime light data or Landsat data separately. In recent years, due to the strong stability of nighttime light data and the high integrity of UBA extraction results, many studies have been conducted, such as those on the neighborhood extreme value method, statistical data reference method and gradient spatial constraint method [2123]. However, nighttime light data can only capture the spatial extent of urban areas with obvious light at night, which does not include factories, development zones and other areas at the edges of cities that are not lit at night [24, 25]. Landsat data are also widely used to extract UBA, but the complexity of spectral features has resulted in the misclassification of some land cover types [26]. In addition, the completeness of the extraction results is insufficient, and the gap areas formed by the vegetation and water need to be filled manually [27]. The combination of nighttime light data and Landsat data can improve the accuracy of UBA extraction, and researchers have proposed methods, such as the fusion variable method, weighted pixel averaging method, and feature fusion method [2830].

China is the second-largest economy in the world and is urbanizing at a remarkable speed. Northeastern China, which is an old industrial base, plays an important role in China's economic structure. Since the implementation of the policy of revitalizing the old industrial base in northeastern China in 2003, the urbanization rate in this area has been the highest in the country. Due to the rapid expansion of urban areas, the quality of urbanization in northeastern China is poor [31, 32]. To develop a compact urbanization, it is of great practical significance to ascertain the landscape pattern changes in the capital cities of northeastern China and to gain insight into the LCE [33].

In this paper, we propose a method for analyzing the land cover evolution within built-up areas that can obtain the tendency of urban land construction and allow a deeper understanding of compact urbanization. First, the neighborhood extreme method and maximum likelihood method are used to extract the UBAB. Second, the single-source UBAB data described above is integrated with the weighted boundary pixel fusion algorithm to build the multisource UBAB. Then, Landsat data within the UBAB are classified into classes, such as impervious ground, vegetation and water, by the maximum likelihood method, and the corresponding landscape pattern indexes are calculated. Finally, the multitemporal landscape pattern indexes are used to obtain the landscape pattern changes and to analyze the land cover evolution trends. To verify the effectiveness of the method, Shenyang, Changchun and Harbin, capital cities in northeastern China, were used as experimental areas and compared with other methods. At the end of this paper, the main advantages and disadvantages of this method are described. The technical flowchart of this paper is shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Analysis of land cover evolution within built-up areas based on nighttime light data and Landsat data.

Fig 1

Materials and methods

Study areas

This study selected three capital cities in northeastern China as the research areas: Shenyang city, Liaoning Province; Changchun city, Jilin Province; and Harbin city, Heilongjiang Province. As China's first heavy industrial and agricultural bases, the capital cities of these three northeastern provinces had earlier economic development and once had the highest level of urbanization in China. In addition, these cities are the political, economic, cultural, educational and transportation centers of the region. Shenyang is the largest city in northeastern China, with a total area of 13,000 square kilometers and a resident population of 8,316,000 in 2019 [34]; Changchun is located in the geographical center of northeastern China, with a total area of 20,500 square kilometers and a resident population of 7,667,000 in 2019 [35]; and Harbin is the northernmost provincial capital city in China, with a total area of 53,100 square kilometers and a resident population of 9,515,000 in 2019 [36].

Data

Nighttime light data

The nighttime light data used in this paper were the DMSP/OLS (Defense Meteorological Satellite Program/Operational Linescan System) published by NOAA. These data have the advantages of long time series and high stability and are widely used to extract urban built-up areas [3739]. The DMSP/OLS data range from 1992 to 2013 and have a spatial resolution of 1000 m. In this study, the DMSP/OLS stable nighttime light data from 2000 to 2012 were selected, and the effects of oversaturation and discontinuity were reduced by relative radiometric correction.

Landsat data

Landsat imagery courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and U.S.

Geological Survey, downloaded from USGS (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/). Landsat data are image data published by NASA and are widely used to analyze urbanization due to their high spatial resolution. In this paper, Landsat TM data from 2000 to 2012 were selected for the extraction of built-up areas; data with interference from the sensors or the atmosphere were excluded. In addition, the reference built-up areas that were consistent with the experimental time period were identified by artificial interpretation [40].

Methodology

Data preprocessing

Nighttime light data

The DMSP/OLS data were set to a Lambert isometric cone projection with a resampling accuracy of 1 km. To address the grayscale saturation of DMSP/OLS, we selected the 2017 F16 data as the baseline data and applied the following one-dimensional quadratic regression model to the other data for saturation correction [39]:

DNb={p*DN2+q*DN+m,DNc,DNc<6363,DNc63, (1)

where DN and DNb represent the grayscale values of the image before and after correction, respectively; p and q are regression coefficients, and m is a constant.

To address the problem of fluctuating gray values in multitemporal nighttime light data, formula (2) was used to perform a relative radiation correction for the image.

sDN(n,i)={DN(n1,i),DN(n1,i)>DN(n,i)DN(n,i),otherwise, (2)

where DN(n−1,i) and DN(n,i) represent the gray values of pixel i in years n−1 and n, respectively.

Landsat data

Landsat imagery courtesy of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and U.S.

Geological Survey, downloaded from USGS (http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/). To eliminate the effects of atmospheric water vapor, oxygen and methane on the radiation from the features [41], the FLAASH model was used for atmospheric correction of the images. Subsequently, the multitemporal remote sensing images were calibrated using a polynomial algorithm.

Urban built-up area extraction based on single source data

Urban built-up area extraction based on the neighborhood extremum method using DMSP/OLS data

The neighborhood extremum method uses the change in grayscale of the nighttime light data from the built-up to the non-built-up areas as the basis, using the locations of gray mutation point as boundary points. The closed curve formed by combining all boundary points is the UBAB. First, the linear filtering method is used to construct the neighborhood difference image. The gray values of the DMSP/OLS data gradually decrease from built-up to non-built-up areas and show a gradient of changes. To enhance the grayscale gradient variation, an 8-neighborhood extremum template was constructed. The template calculates the absolute difference in the gray values between the central image and the rest of the images; the maximum difference is used as the grayscale value of the central image. The template calculates the absolute difference in the gray values between the central pixel and the rest of the pixels, taking the maximum difference as the gray value of the central pixel. The entire image is filtered using the 8-neighborhood extreme template, and a neighborhood difference image reflecting the grayscale variation feature was obtained, as shown in Fig 2. The black and white areas in the figure correspond to areas with small and large changes in gray values, respectively.

Fig 2. Neighborhood difference image.

Fig 2

(a)Shenyang;(b) Changchun;(c) Harbin.

Then, the UBABs were extracted using an extreme value search method. The neighborhood difference pixels at the junction of the built-up and non-built-up areas have the greatest variation in gray values, which can be expressed as follows:

DN(i,j1)<DN(i,j)<DN(i,j+1), (3)

where DN(i,j) is the target pixel and represents the gray value of the pixel in row i, column j. We extracted the pixels that satisfy the above formula, set the remaining pixels to 0, and constructed the boundary extreme image, as shown in Fig 3(A), 3(B) and 3(C). The gray values of the cross section of boundary extreme images are extracted, and they are shown in Fig 3(A), 3(E) and 3(F). The collection of pixels with gray values greater than or equal to the lowest peak point was used as the boundary, resulting in the boundary image. Finally, object-oriented classification was used to extract the built-up areas of the boundary image, and the UBAB extraction from the DMSP/OLS data was achieved.

Fig 3. Boundary extreme images and diagram of cross section line gray values.

Fig 3

(a) Boundary extreme images of Shenyang; (b) Boundary extreme images of Changchun; (c) Boundary extreme images of Harbin; (d) Schematic of cross section line gray values of Shenyang; (e) Schematic of cross section line gray values of Changchun; (f) Schematic of cross section line gray values of Harbin.

Urban built-up area extraction based on the maximum likelihood method using landsat data

Remote sensing image classification methods are divided into supervised classification and unsupervised classification. Unsupervised classification only depends on the distribution of pixel gray value in spectral feature space, which makes it difficult to achieve accurate matching between pixel clusters and ground classes. Because of its simple calculation and strong stability, maximum likelihood method is still widely used in supervised classification algorithm [42]. The maximum likelihood method is an image classification method that combines the distances of samples to the centers of known classes and spectral distribution features. This method is widely used to extract urban built-up area from Landsat data [43]. The image classes were impervious surface, vegetation and water, and 100 training samples were selected for each category through artificial interpretation. The mean vector and covariance matrix of the training samples were calculated to obtain the corresponding probability discriminant function and Bayesian discriminant rule. Finally, the image data were classified, and the classification results were postprocessed with clumping, sieving, removal of outliers, etc. The pixels belonging to the impervious surface class were used as built-up areas, while the water and vegetation (urban green spaces) located within the construction land were also used as built-up areas and the rest as non-built-up areas, thus enabling the UBAB extraction.

Urban built-up areas extraction based on the multisource boundary pixels fusion method

Advantages and disadvantages of urban built-up area extraction using single-source data

The results of the urban built-up area boundary extraction with DMSP/OLS data and Landsat data are shown in Fig 4, and the advantages and disadvantages of the above results were assessed as follows:

Fig 4. Advantages and disadvantages of the urban built-up area boundary extraction based on single source data.

Fig 4

(a) Built-up area extraction results of Shenyang in 2000 based on single source data; (b) Schematic of omissions in the extraction results with Landsat data; (c) Schematic of omissions in the extraction results with the DMSP/OLS data. (USGS/NASA Landsat).

  1. The extraction of the urban built-up area boundaries using DMSP/OLS data had the advantage of stability and high integrity. The light sensitivity of the DMSP/OLS data may be missed in areas with weak lighting, as shown in Fig 4(B). In addition, the light spillover nature of DMSP/OLS data has led to a wide range of UBABs.

  2. The high spatial resolution of the Landsat data makes it possible to better reflect details. Landsat data have difficulty obtaining high-quality time series due to clouds and sensor errors. The spectral complexity of the data also affects the completeness and correctness of the results, as shown in Fig 4(A).

Based on the above analysis, to solve the problem of omission detection in built-up areas extracted from single source data, this paper proposes a multisource boundary pixel fusion method. The method combines the advantages of multisource data to optimize UBAB.

Multisource boundary pixel fusion method. Landsat data and DMSP/OLS built-up area boundaries were used as reference boundaries and target boundaries, as shown in Fig 5.

Fig 5. Schematic of the multisource data boundary fusion method.

Fig 5

First, the tangent L is constructed for each pixel O(x0,y0) in the reference boundary. Next, the normal distribution of point O is constructed; the intersection with the target boundary is points A and B, and the nearest intersection A(x1,y1) is chosen. Finally, the fusion of points O and A is calculated using Eq (4) to obtain the fusion point C(x,y). Multisource data fusion boundaries are formed by the fusion points as follows:

{x=ax0+bx1y=ay0+by1, (4)

where a and b are the fusion weights, a+b = 1 and in general a = b = 0.5.

Analysis of land cover evolution within built-up areas based on landscape index

The urban built-up area boundaries were obtained using the multisource boundary pixel fusion method, and land cover classes, such as impervious surface, water and vegetation, were obtained by classifying the Landsat data within the boundaries by the maximum likelihood method. We calculated the landscape index to reflect land cover evolution. The principle of selecting landscape indexes is that they can represent the characteristics of ecological state and landscape pattern, and have low redundancy [44]. Landscape index can be divided into three categories: overall trend index, fragmentation index and aggregation index [45]. In combination with the research focus of compact urbanization in this paper, Class area (CA), Percent of landscape (PL), Patch density (PD), Aggregation index (AI) were selected from above categories respectively.

(1) Overall trend index

① Class area (CA): CA is the size of the land cover and reflects the overall level of development of the land cover within UBA; it can be expressed as follows:

CA=ai, (5)

where ai is the area of class i.

② Percent of landscape (PL): PL is a measure of the landscape composition that can be used to assess the tendency of land cover change within an UBA. The formula is as follows:

PLAND=j=1naijA, (6)

where aij is the area of patch j that belongs to class i. A denotes the total landscape area and 0<PLAND<1.

(2) Fragmentation index

Patch density (PD): PD is the class number of land cover in a unit area, judging the fragmentation degree of land cover within UBA. The formula is as follows:

PD=bnA, (7)

where bn is the number of patch n, and A is the total area of all patches.

(3) Aggregation index

Aggregation index (AI): AI reflects the aggregation degree of the patches belonging to the same class and the spatial configuration of the land cover. The formula is as follows:

AI=(gimaxgi)×100, (8)

where gi is the number of adjacent patches belonging to class i and max→gi is the largest number of adjacent patches.

Results

Urban built-up area extraction

The DMSP/OLS data and Landsat data from 2000, 2004, 2008 and 2012 were used as experimental data. The extraction results of neighborhood extremum method and maximum likelihood method are shown in Figs 6 and 7.

Fig 6. Extraction results of the urban built-up areas by the neighborhood extremum method.

Fig 6

Fig 7. Extraction results of the urban built-up areas by the maximum likelihood method.

Fig 7

(USGS/NASA Landsat).

The UBABs of Shenyang, Changchun and Harbin were extracted with the multisource boundary pixel fusion method, and the results are shown in Fig 8 and Table 1. The results showed that the UBA in all three cities had shown a clear growth trend. Shenyang, Changchun and Harbin had the fastest growth in the urban built-up areas from 2008 to 2012, 2008 to 2012 and 2000 to 2004, respectively.

Fig 8. Extraction results of the urban built-up areas by the multisource boundary pixel fusion method.

Fig 8

(USGS/NASA Landsat).

Table 1. Statistics of urban built-up areas (km2).

2000 2004 2008 2012 2000–2004 2004–2008 2008–2012 MAX
Shenyang 408 464 495 740 13.70% 6.60% 49.40% 2008–2012
Changchun 288 382 555 848 32.60% 45.20% 52.70% 2008–2012
Harbin 266 427 530 619 60.50% 24.10% 16.70% 2000–2004

Analysis of land cover evolution within urban built-up areas

Land cover classification

The Landsat data were clipped using the urban built-up area boundaries and classified into impervious surfaces, water and vegetation using the maximum likelihood method, and the classification results are shown in Fig 7 and Table 2. As shown in Fig 9, the land cover classes within the three UBAs showed trends of expansion, with a higher degree of expansion in impervious surfaces and vegetation. The average growth rates of the Shenyang land cover classes were above 20%, with the highest growth in vegetation from 2000 to 2004 and in water and impervious surfaces from 2004 to 2008. The average growth rate of the impervious surfaces in Changchun was approximately 50%, with the fastest growth period from 2000 to 2004. The growth rate of land cover in Harbin was approximately 30%, with the fastest growth in vegetation and impervious surfaces occurring from 2000 to 2004 and in water from 2004 to 2008.

Table 2. Statistics of land cover classification from 2000 to 2012 (km2).
Year 2000 2004 2008 2012 2000–2004 2004–2008 2008–2012 Average Max
V 112 161 186 198 43.70% 15.50% 6.40% 21.87% 2000–2004
S W 10 12 20 21 20.00% 66.60% 0.50% 29.09% 2004–2008
I 271 310 391 470 14.30% 26.10% 20.20% 20.20% 2004–2008
V 113 110 197 295 -2.60% 79.00% 49.70% 40.03% 2004–2008
C W 10 11 12 21 10.00% 9.00% 75.00% 31.33% 2008–2012
I 161 259 344 530 60.80% 32.80% 54.00% 49.20% 2000–2004
V 94 154 212 214 63.80% 37.00% 0.90% 33.90% 2000–2004
H W 9 12 17 23 33.30% 41.60% 35.20% 36.70% 2004–2008
I 161 259 298 320 60.80% 15.00% 7.30% 27.70% 2000–2004

S, Shenyang; Changchun; H, Harbin; V, Vegetation; W, Water; I, Impervious Surface.

Fig 9. Land cover class results.

Fig 9

(USGS/NASA Landsat).

Land cover evolution analysis based on landscape pattern index

The landscape indexes of the impervious surfaces, vegetation and water were calculated separately, including the CA, PL, PD and AI, and the statistical results are shown in Table 3. The specific analysis was as follows:

Table 3. Landscape index within urban build-up areas from 2000 to 2012.
Y C Shenyang Changchun Harbin
CA PL PD AI CA PL PD AI CA PL PD AI
2000 I 27089.64 0.69 0.63 85.41 15509.79 0.54 1.12 82.02 16241.51 0.61 0.99 85.60
V 11331.90 0.29 2.25 64.19 11806.10 0.41 2.13 74.80 9403.49 0.35 2.17 74.44
W 1047.33 0.03 0.38 63.21 1192.46 0.04 1.75 43.04 947.93 0.04 0.12 77.77
2004 I 28956.00 0.60 0.92 81.19 25879.19 0.68 0.54 87.82 25928.64 0.61 0.57 85.35
V 18015.00 0.37 1.86 69.74 11094.43 0.29 1.53 69.38 15528.96 0.36 0.83 74.26
W 1374.00 0.03 0.37 62.44 1159.71 0.03 1.15 37.03 1249.92 0.03 0.31 58.14
2008 I 39120.12 0.65 0.38 87.17 28828.80 0.52 0.69 79.21 29808.22 0.56 0.53 83.50
V 18576.48 0.31 0.69 71.32 25053.12 0.45 0.92 73.63 21321.04 0.40 0.69 75.36
W 2077.01 0.03 0.55 50.19 1954.08 0.04 0.55 48.41 1747.46 0.03 0.10 73.54
2012 I 44662.52 0.65 0.34 80.93 52717.86 0.62 0.40 83.53 32146.56 0.57 0.60 82.15
V 22342.04 0.32 1.31 60.64 29852.16 0.35 0.89 70.59 21458.88 0.38 1.06 72.81
W 1926.68 0.03 0.27 57.17 2240.94 0.03 0.40 46.06 2381.76 0.04 0.16 72.54

Y, Year; C, Class; V, Vegetation; W, Water; I, Impervious Surface.

  1. Shenyang: Landscape index trend chart for Shenyang is shown in Fig 10. CA: all land cover classes showed an increasing trend, with the fastest growth in impervious surfaces, which reflected the expansion of the built-up areas; PL: the impervious surfaces covered the largest percentage of the built-up areas and showed a decreasing trend, while vegetation and water occupancy showed increasing trends; PD: all land cover classes showed downward trends, with the largest rate of decline in vegetation, which reflected reduced fragmentation and increased homogeneity of the land cover; AI: all land cover classes showed downward trends, with the highest rate of decline in vegetation, which reflected the increased agglomeration of land cover classes. In general, impervious surface indexes had the highest values, but the occupancy, aggregation and integrity of vegetation increased, and the ecological environment of Shenyang tended to be optimized.

  2. Changchun: Landscape index trend chart for Shenyang is shown in Fig 11. CA: all land cover classes showed increasing trends, with the highest rate of growth in impervious surfaces, which reflected the expansion of built-up areas. PL: the impervious surface showed an upward trend, while vegetation and water showed downward trends, reflecting the fact that the area occupied by impervious surfaces was still increasing; PD: all land cover classes showed a downward trend, with the highest rate of decline in vegetation, reflecting the reduced fragmentation of the land cover; AI: the impervious surface and vegetation show a downward trend and the water showed an upward trend, reflecting increasing aggregation in the former classes and decreasing aggregation in the latter. Overall, the impervious surface of Changchun is being further strengthened, with greater emphasis on the construction of artificial features.

  3. Harbin: Landscape index trend chart for Shenyang is shown in Fig 12. CA: all land cover classes showed growing trends, with impervious surfaces showing the highest growth rate, which reflected their greater contribution to urban expansion. PL: the proportion of impervious surface was the highest, but the proportion of vegetation was increasing, reflecting the improving natural environment of the city; PD: the fragmentation of all land cover classes showed a decreasing trend, with vegetation fragmentation decreasing the fastest, reflecting the increasing homogeneity of land cover; AI: the areas of all land cover classes increased, but the trend towards impervious surfaces was more pronounced. Overall, ecological construction in Harbin was increasing, while the land cover was in an aggregated state.

Fig 10. Landscape index trend chart for Shenyang.

Fig 10

Fig 11. Landscape index trend chart for Changchun.

Fig 11

Fig 12. Landscape index trend chart for Harbin.

Fig 12

In summary, the spatial extent of the land cover classes in Shenyang, Changchun and Harbin all showed growing trends, with increases in both integration and aggregation. In addition, the areas occupied by vegetation in Shenyang and Harbin were increasing, indicating that the natural environment was improving, while Changchun was focused on the construction of artificial facilities.

Discussion

Urban built-up area extraction accuracy

To verify the validity of this paper's method, the built-up areas of Shenyang, Changchun and Harbin were extracted using the artificial interpretation method. The built-up areas of the DMSP/OLS and Landsat data were extracted with the neighborhood extreme value method and the maximum likelihood method, respectively, and compared with the multisource boundary pixel fusion method.

As seen from Table 4 the user accuracy, production accuracy, overall accuracy and kappa coefficients of the boundary image fusion method were 88%, 90%, 99% and 0.88, respectively, which were at least 3%, 1%, 1% and 0.04 better than the other two methods. The method in this paper had higher accuracy than the built-up area extraction method based on single source data.

Table 4. Confusion matrix for the extraction of built-up areas.

C Y Neighborhood extremum method Maximum likelihood method Multi-source Boundary pixel fusion method
2000 2004 2008 2012 Me 2000 2004 2008 2012 Me 2000 2004 2008 2012 Me
S U 74% 71% 67% 90% 76% 96% 90% 96% 88% 93% 88% 91% 92% 92% 91%
M 95% 84% 98% 88% 91% 84% 88% 80% 76% 82% 95% 89% 96% 81% 90%
O 96% 94% 93% 94% 94% 97% 97% 95% 91% 95% 97% 97% 96% 93% 96%
K 0.82 0.74 0.77 0.85 0.80 0.88 0.87 0.85 0.77 0.84 0.90 0.88 0.86 0.83 0.87
C U 84% 83% 83% 64% 79% 86% 89% 93% 97% 91% 86% 88% 91% 90% 89%
M 86% 90% 90% 99% 91% 84% 94% 93% 85% 89% 88% 94% 86% 93% 90%
O 97% 97% 95% 85% 94% 97% 99% 97% 97% 98% 100% 100% 99% 99% 100%
K 0.83 0.85 0.83 0.68 0.80 0.85 0.91 0.88 0.91 0.89 0.87 0.91 0.88 0.91 0.89
H U 88% 88% 87% 87% 88% 83% 72% 62% 57% 69% 89% 85% 80% 83% 84%
M 84% 81% 81% 75% 80% 93% 98% 98% 97% 97% 91% 89% 90% 90% 90%
O 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99%
K 0.86 0.85 0.84 0.80 0.84 0.88 0.83 0.76 0.72 0.80 0.90 0.87 0.85 0.86 0.87
MU 81% 84% 88%
MM 88% 89% 90%
MO 96% 97% 98%
MK 0.81 0.84 0.88

C, City; Y, Year; Me, Mean; S, Shenyang; C, Changchun; H, Harbin; U, user accuracy; M, Mapping accuracy; O, overall accuracy; K, Kappa coefficients; MU, Mean of user accuracies; MM, Mean of mapping accuracies; MO, Mean of overall accuracies; MK, Mean of Kappa coefficients.

Land cover classification accuracy

To assess the accuracy of the land cover classification, the classification results of water, vegetation and impervious surfaces were assessed for accuracy. The 100 validation samples were randomly generated for each class, and their classes were interpreted visually. The interpretation results were compared with the computer classification results, and the average accuracy is shown in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, the overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient of the method used in this paper were above 95% and 0.90, respectively, which meets the accuracy requirements.

Table 5. Confusion matrix for the land cover classification.

City 2000 2004 2008 2012
O K O K O K O K
Shenyang 97% 0.94 95% 0.92 96% 0.95 94% 0.90
Changchun 97% 0.96 96% 0.90 92% 0.84 95% 0.91
Harbin 97% 0.94 97% 0.95 97% 0.96 94% 0.88
Mean 97% 0.95 96% 0.92 95% 0.91 95% 0.90

O, Overall accuracy; K, Kappa coefficients.

Boundary pixel fusion weight analysis

Different combinations of weights for the multisource boundary pixel fusion algorithm can affect the accuracy of built-up area extraction. We set a and b to different values and calculated the Kappa coefficients of the extraction results, which are shown in Fig 13. As seen from Fig 13, setting the weights to a = b = 0.5 give the highest accuracy.

Fig 13. Boundary pixel fusion weight analysis.

Fig 13

Conclusions

Through analyses of provincial capitals in northeastern China, the validity of the proposed method for analyzing land cover evolution within urban built-up areas was demonstrated. We extracted urban built-up areas using DMSP/OLS data and Landsat data and analyzed land cover evolution within built-up areas using landscape indexes. To improve the extraction accuracy of the built-up areas based on single-source remote sensing data, the multisource boundary pixel fusion method was proposed, which effectively integrates the information advantages of multisource data. Using the urban built-up areas as the spatial extent, the land cover evolutions of Shenyang, Changchun and Harbin from 2000 to 2012 were analyzed through the landscape indexes, and the following results were obtained: the built-up areas exhibited clear expansion trends, with increased integration and agglomeration of land cover classes, such as vegetation, water and impervious surfaces; the construction of the ecological environments in Shenyang and Harbin were being strengthened, while Changchun was still focused on the construction of artificial facilities. The pillar industry of provincial capitals in northeastern China is industry. Compact urbanization needs to transfer the industrial facilities in the city center to the periphery, so as to improve the land use efficiency in the main urban area. The paper had shown that the land use efficiency in the main urban areas is improving, and Shenyang and Harbin have advantages in ecological environment. It has been said that further improvement of land use efficiency is very beneficial to the economic development of northeastern China.

Although the method in this paper improves the accuracy of the extraction of urban built-up areas based on remote sensing data, there are still some shortcomings to be studied. First, the analysis of compact urbanization in this paper is limited to the land cover evolution within built-up areas, without considering the impact of other socio-economic factors, and the proposals for the development of compact cities are less well covered. Second, this paper adopted the DMSP/OLS data as a nighttime light data source; these data are subject to certain constraints due to the acquisition time and spatial resolution, and the subsequent consideration would be to select VIIRS/NPP data, which have a higher spatial resolution. Third, the spatial resolution of the Landsat data still poses a disadvantage, and the selection of GF-2, WordView-2 or other high-resolution remote sensing images could improve the extraction accuracy, but the amount of data operations would increase; reasonable classification methods need further study. In addition, this paper only used landscape indexes to describe the land cover evolution and did not predict evolution trends; in future research, integration with cellular automata (CA), Markov, and other predictive models will be the focus of our approach.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank the data distribution agencies who provided the publicly released data used in this study. The DMSP/OLS data and the Landsat data are obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), respectively.

Data Availability

All relevant data in the article can be downloaded at the following URL: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n02v6wwv4.

Funding Statement

1) Specific grant numbers: 2. 2) Grant numbers awarded to each author: lnqn201917; L19AJY008. 3) The full name of each funder: Education Department Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Province (CN); Social Science Planning Fund Project of Liaoning Province (CN). 4) Initials of authors who received each award: Zhiwei Xie; Zhiwei Xie. 5) Full names of commercial companies that funded the study or authors: Education Department of Liaoning Province; Social Science Planning Fund Office of Liaoning Province. 6) Initials of authors who received salary or other funding from commercial companies: Nobody. 7) URLs to sponsors’ websites: http://jyt.ln.gov.cn/; http://www.lnsgdb.com.cn/Lnsgdb/publish/html/103/index/index.html. 8) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Lu Y. Analysis and simulation of land use/Land cover change in Heifei city spatiotemporal data fusion of remote sensing. Doctor, Anhui University, Hefei, China, 2019. (in Chinese)
  • 2.He J, Shi X, Gong J. Modeling the spatial of urban agglomeration considering their spatial interaction: A case study of Wuhan metropolitan area. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2016, 41(06):462–467. 10.13203/j.whugis20140250 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim J, Li W, Newman G, Kil S H, Park S Y. The influence of urban landscape spatial patterns on single-family housing prices. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2018, 745(1): 26–43. 10.1177/0265813516663932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Feng Y, Liu Y, Tong X. Spatiotemporal variation of landscape patterns and their spatial determinants in Shanghai, China. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 87: 22–32. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xiao R, Wang G, Zhang Q, Zhang Z. Multi-scale analysis of relationship between landscape pattern and urban river water quality in different seasons. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 1–10. 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Espinoza-Molina D, Bahmanyar R, Datcu M, et al. Land-cover evolution class analysis in Image Time Series of Landsat and Sentinel-2 based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation. 2017 9th International Workshop on the Analysis of Multitemporal Remote Sensing Images (MultiTemp). IEEE, 2017, 1–4. 10.1109/Multi-Temp.2017.8035261 [DOI]
  • 7.Wang C, Lei S, Ekmore A J, et al. Integrating temporal evolution with cellular automata for simulating land cover change. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(3): 301 10.3390/rs11030301 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Quader M A, Agrawal S, Kervyn M. Multi-decadal land cover evolution in the Sundarban, the largest mangrove forest in the world. Ocean & Coastal Management, 2017, 139: 113–124. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.02.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lu D, Mausel P, Brondizio E, et al. Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004, 25(12): 2365–2401. 10.1080/0143116031000139863 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang C, Yue P, Tapete D, et al. A deeply supervised image fusion network for change detection in high resolution bi-temporal remote sensing images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2020, 166: 183–200. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.06.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Veldkamp A, Lambin E F. Predicting land-use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2001, 85(1–3): 1–6. 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00199-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tao L. Land cover change and its ecological environment response based on"3S" technique in Dongting Lake region. Doctor, Hunan Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China, 2017. (in Chinese)
  • 13.Pan J, Li X, Feng Z. Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of impervious surfaces and vegetation covers in Lanzhou base on the V-I-AP model. Resources Science, 2010, 32(03): 130–137. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nong D H, Lepczyk C A, Miura T, et al. Quantifying urban growth patterns in Hanoi using landscape expansion modes and time series spatial metrics. PloS one, 2018, 13(5): e0196940 10.1371/journal.pone.0196940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu P, Jia S, Han R, et al. Landscape pattern and ecological security assessment and prediction using remote sensing approach. Journal of Sensors, 2018, 2018 10.1155/2018/1058513 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang W, CHEN F. Impacts of grading rule on urban thermal landscape pattern research[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(7): 2514 10.3390/su10072514 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hong J, Xiao C, Zhi L, et al. The investigation of spatiotemporal patterns of landscape fragmentation during rapid urbanization in Changsha city. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2011, 23(1): 133–137. 10.6046/gtzyyg.2011.01.27 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu H, Zhou T, Li A, et al. Landscape changes and ecological effects on Dali city, Yunnan province Geo-Informatics in Resource Management and Sustainable Ecosystem. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015: 22–31. 10.1007/978-3-662-49155-3_3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Y. Thinking of Compact City. Urban Planning Forum 2007, 1: 87–90. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sun C, Lin T, Zhao Q, et al. Spatial pattern of urban green spaces in a long-term compact urbanization process—A case study in China. Ecological indicators, 2019, 96: 111–119. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.043 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun L S, Han Y H, Xie Z W. Neighborhood extremum method of extracting urban built-up areas using night lighting Data. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,2019. 10.13203/j.whugis20190010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Su Y, Chen X, Wang C, et al. A new method for extracting built-up urban areas using DMSP-OLS nighttime stable lights: A case study in the Pearl River Delta, southern China. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2015, 52(2): 218–238. 10.1080/15481603.2015.1007778 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xie Z, Ye X, Zheng Z, Li D, Sun L, Li R, et al. Modeling Polycentric Urbanization Using Multisource Big Geospatial Data. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(3): 310 10.3390/rs11030310 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Proville J, Zavala-Araiza D, Wagner G. Night-time lights: A global, long term look at links to socio-economic trends. PloS One, 2017, 12(3): e0174610 10.1371/journal.pone.0174610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu J, Zhao G, Ni Y. Overview of researches based on urban extracting Via DMSP/OLS night-time light data: Taking Fuzhou as an example. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2017, 40(9), 175–179. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yan M C. Research and Contrast on Several Vegetation Classification Methods of Hight-Resolution Satellite Image Data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2007,11(02): 93–98. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Karanam H K, BabuNeela V. Study of normalized difference built-up (NDBI) index in automatically mapping urban areas from Landsat TM imagery. International Journal of Scientific Research and Review, 2017, 6: 239–248. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang R, Li J, Li X, Chen X. Extraction of built up areas using combination of Landsat and DMSP data—a case study of Jiangxi Province. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Science), 2018, 52(1): 130–136. 10.19603/j.cnki.1000-1190.2018.01.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ma X, Tong X, Liu S, et al. Optimized sample selection in SVM classification by combining with DMSP-OLS, Landsat NDVI and GlobeLand30 products for extracting urban built-up areas. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(3): 236 10.3390/rs9030236 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yao W. Pixel level and feature level remote sensing image fusion methods and applications. Doctor, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China, 2011. (in Chinese)
  • 31.Chen J. Study on the similarity of the industrial structure between the northeastern provinces in China. Master's, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2012. (in Chinese)
  • 32.Zhen X. Strategy research on the development problems of the small and micro Industrial enterprises in Liaoning province. Master, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2014. (in Chinese)
  • 33.Li Y. Analysis on the difference of economic development level in Jilin Province. Master, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2017. (in Chinese)
  • 34.Li X, Hu X M, Ma Y, et al. Impact of planetary boundary layer structure on the formation and evolution of air-pollution episodes in Shenyang, Northeast China. Atmospheric Environment, 2019, 214: 116850 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116850 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wang L, Wang J, Tan X, et al. Analysis of NOx pollution characteristics in the atmospheric environment in Changchun city. Atmosphere, 2020, 11(1): 30 10.3390/atmos11010030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yuan Y, Yang M, Wu J, et al. Assessing bus transit service from the perspective of elderly passengers in Harbin, China[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2019, 13(10): 761–776. 10.1080/15568318.2018.1512691 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shi L, Huang C, Sun H. Research on spatial-temporal pattern of Yulin economic development based on DMSP/OLS nighttime imagery. Journal of Geomatics, 2018. (1): 89–92. 10.14188/j.2095-6045.2016094 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wu J S, Li S and Zhang X W. Research on saturation correction for long-time series of DMSP-OLS nighttime light dataset in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2018, 22(4): 621–632. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu Z, He C, Zhang Q, Huang Q, Yang Y. Extracting the dynamics of urban expansion in China using DMSP/OLS nighttime light data from 1992 to 2008. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 106(1): 62–72. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.02.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhou W, Newsam S, Li C, et al. Learning low dimensional convolutional neural networks for high-resolution remote sensing image retrieval. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(5): 489 10.3390/rs9050489 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jia K, Wei X, Gu X, et al. Land cover classification using Landsat 8 operational land imager data in Beijing, China. Geocarto international, 2014, 29(8): 941–951. 10.1080/10106049.2014.894586 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ali M Z, Qazi W, Aslam N. A comparative study of ALOS-2 PALSAR and landsat-8 imagery for land cover classification using maximum likelihood classifier. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2018, 21: S29–S35. 10.1016/j.ejrs.2018.03.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Henits L, Jürgens C, Mucsi L. Seasonal multitemporal land-cover classification and change detection analysis of Bochum, Germany, using multitemporal Landsat TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, 37(15): 3439–3454. 10.1080/01431161.2015.1125558 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yang X, Zheng X Q, Chen R. A land use change model: Integrating landscape pattern indexes and Markov-CA. Ecological Modelling, 2014, 283: 1–7. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.03.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gong Y. The Spatial-temporal pattern evaluation of wetland landscape and its driving mechanism in Changsha. Doctor, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, China, 2013. (in Chinese)

Decision Letter 0

Bing Xue

30 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-18472

Analysis of land cover evolution within the built-up areas of provincial capital cities in northeastern China based on nighttime light data and Landsat data

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Sun,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 14 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Bing Xue, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Our internal editors have looked over your manuscript and determined that it is within the scope of our Cities as Complex Systems Call for Papers. This collection of papers is headed by a team of Guest Editors for PLOS ONE: Marta Gonzalez (University of California, Berkeley) and Diego Rybski (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research).

The Collection will encompass a diverse and interdisciplinary set of research articles applying the principles of complex systems and networks to problems in urban science.  Additional information can be found on our announcement page: https://collections.plos.org/s/cities.

If you would like your manuscript to be considered for this collection, please let us know in your cover letter and we will ensure that your paper is treated as if you were responding to this call. If you would prefer to remove your manuscript from collection consideration, please specify this in the cover letter.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This research was funded by Liaoning province education department scientific research project (Grant No. lnqn201917), and Liaoning social science planning fund project (Grant No. L19AJY008)"

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

4. We note that Figures 4, 6 and 7 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (a) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (b) remove the figures from your submission:

a) You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 4, 6 and 7 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b) If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

5. Please ensure that you refer to Figures 8-10 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

(1)A professional language editing is required.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The research of this paper is valuable. However, the manuscript does not sufficiently explain the scientific significance of the research presented in the manuscript. Some of my observations are given below:

Line 46: If this paper focuses on land cover evolution, should I expect the introduction to start with previous theories on land cover evolution, rather than those build-up area extraction?

The Landsat data built-up area extraction method using maximum likelihood method is a supervised classification method, which requires manual selection of training samples. Why not use the unsupervised classification method, which can improve the automaticity of the method?

All formulas are edited using the Formula Editor (Mathtype software)

Figure 2 and Figure 3 need to be added the results of the remaining two cities.

The background color of Figure 3 (b) needs to be set to white.

The headings of sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.1 shall be consistent with sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.1.

Table 4: What is the meaning of Me.

In the chapter of discussion and conclusion, I suggest to discuss the significance of studying provincial capital cities in northeastern China and the shortcomings of the method in this paper.

Reviewer #2: The article focuses on an important issue, concerning the assessment of land cover evolution, by using remote sensing data. To describe the approach proposed and the model developed, the Authors have presented a case-study related to three major cities in China, analyzing the time interval from 2000 to 2012.

I only have one major issue in this paper which is about the introduction. The introduction started with general background regarding the impact of urbanization and land use and land cover change. Then, in the same paragraph the authors jumped to the data used to extract built-up areas using satellite data and they deeply discussed advanced information such as selection of threshold and segmentation of the nighttime light data. This information is not linked with the topic sentence in the beginning of the paragraph. I suggest to break down this paragraph to be two paragraphs. The first paragraph provides a general information regarding urbanization and land use and land cover change, and the second paragraph deals with the used method to extract built-up information from satellite data. I suggest that the second paragraph discuss the current research status of land cover evolution analysis.

Line 234: What is the basis of the 5 landscape indexes selected and why other indexes were not selected?

Line 262: It is an important process to extract built-up areas using DMSP/OLS or Landsat data alone, and listing corresponding results is helpful to the integrity of the experiment.

Figure 4 needs to have a geographic grid, compass and scale; the lines of indication in Figure 4 (a) and (b) should not cross; the main figure should have a mark.

Lines 117 and 123: Why the selected data are from 2000 to 2012? Reasons should be mentioned.

Figure 6 and Figure 7. The placement of group figures needs to be adjusted.

Figure 11. Text and curve proportion are not in harmony and need to be adjusted.

Take into account the current state of remote sensing data. The reasonableness of the DMSP/OLS data and Landsat data used in this paper requires further explanation, such as why remote sensing data with higher resolution is not used.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 1;15(10):e0239371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239371.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Sep 2020

Dear Editors and Reviewers,

Thanks very much for the time and effort you spent in reviewing our manuscript entitled “Analysis of land cover evolution within the built-up areas of provincial capital cities in northeastern China based on nighttime light data and Landsat data” (ID: PONE-D-20-18472). We would like to thank the Editors-in-Chief for giving us a chance to resubmit the paper, and also thank the Associate Editor and the two reviewers for giving us constructive and insightful suggestions. These comments would be very helpful in improving the quality of our paper and provide important guidance to our future research.

We studied the comments carefully and revised the manuscript in accordance with the comments of the editor and reviewers exactly. Revised portions were marked in red in the revised manuscript. The following is a point-to-point response to the comments of the Associate Editor and the two reviewers.

………………………………………………………………………………………

Academic Editor:

Comment 1: If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

Response: Thank the Academic Editor very much for his/her constructive comments. We have made changes to the financial disclosure, and updated statement in our cover letter.

Financial Disclosure Statement:

1) Specific grant numbers: 2.

2) Grant numbers awarded to each author: lnqn201917; L19AJY008.

3) The full name of each funder: Education Department Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Province (CN); Social Science Planning Fund Project of Liaoning Province (CN).

4) Initials of authors who received each award: Zhiwei Xie; Zhiwei Xie.

5) Full names of commercial companies that funded the study or authors: Education Department of Liaoning Province; Social Science Planning Fund Office of Liaoning Province.

6) Initials of authors who received salary or other funding from commercial companies: Nobody.

7) URLs to sponsors’ websites: http://jyt.ln.gov.cn/; http://www.lnsgdb.com.cn/Lnsgdb/publish/html/103/index/index.html.

8) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Comment 2: Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

Response: Thank the Academic Editor very much for his/her constructive comments. We have resubmitted the figure files as required.

Comment 3: If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future.

Response: Thank the Academic Editor very much for his/her constructive comments. The DOI of our Protocols.io is dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bifvkbn6.

Journal Requirements:

Comment 1: Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_

sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: Thank the Academic Editor very much for his/her constructive comments. We have ensured that the manuscript meets the journal style requirements.

Comment 2: Our internal editors have looked over your manuscript and determined that it is within the scope of our Cities as Complex Systems Call for Papers. This collection of papers is headed by a team of Guest Editors for PLOS ONE: Marta Gonzalez (University of California, Berkeley) and Diego Rybski (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research).

The Collection will encompass a diverse and interdisciplinary set of research articles applying the principles of complex systems and networks to problems in urban science. Additional information can be found on our announcement page: https://collections.plos.org/s/cities.

If you would like your manuscript to be considered for this collection, please let us know in your cover letter and we will ensure that your paper is treated as if you were responding to this call. If you would prefer to remove your manuscript from collection consideration, please specify this in the cover letter.

Response: Thanks for the internal editor's approval. If our manuscript is lucky enough to be accepted, we hope it will be published in the main PlOS ONE journal. We think our manuscript does not covers the application of complex systems and networks in urban science. I would prefer to remove our manuscript from collection consideration, and specify this in the cover letter.

Comment 3: Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This research was funded by “Liaoning province education department scientific research project (Grant No. lnqn201917), and Liaoning social science planning fund project (Grant No. L19AJY008)"

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

Response: Thank you for your reminding, I would remove any funding-related text from the manuscript. Sorry, we didn't find the Financial Disclosure section of the submission form. We had added the Financial Disclosure Statement in the cover letter. Moreover, we entered our funding information in the Funding Information of the submission form, as shown in Response to Reviewers.docx.

Comment 4: We note that Figures 4, 6 and 7 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (a) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (b) remove the figures from your submission:

Response: Thank the Editor very much for his/her constructive comments. Figures 6 and 7 are not satellite images. Figures 6 is results of the extraction of the urban built-up areas based on our method. Figures 7 is land cover class results extracted by us Therefore, these figures do not involve copyright issues. Moreover, the satellite image included in the submitted Figure 4 is Landsat image which is free to download from http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/.Landsat images are not copyrighted maps.

Comment 5: Please ensure that you refer to Figures 8-10 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

Response: Yes, we ensure that.

Comment 6: Additional Editor Comments (if provided):(1)A professional language editing is required.

Response: Our manuscript had been professionally edited through American Journal Experts AJE, and the editing certificate is cited in Response to Reviewers.docx

………………………………………………………………………………………

Reviewer #1:

Comment 1: If this paper focuses on land cover evolution, should I expect the introduction to start with previous theories on land cover evolution, rather than those build-up area extraction?

Response: Thanks a lot for the very helpful comment. We have added previous theories on land cover evolution in the second paragraph of the introduction.

Comment 2: The Landsat data built-up area extraction method using maximum likelihood method is a supervised classification method, which requires manual selection of training samples. Why not use the unsupervised classification method, which can improve the automaticity of the method?

Response: Thanks very much for the valuable comment. The main difference between supervised and unsupervised classifications is whether or not the training sample is selected. Unsupervised classification does not need to select training samples before classification, but it needs to manually judge the attributes of the classes after classification. In addition, unsupervised classification only depends on the distribution of pixel gray value in spectral feature space, which makes it difficult to achieve accurate matching between pixel clusters and ground classes. Because of its simple calculation and strong stability, maximum likelihood method is still widely used in supervised classification algorithm. We added a statement of the reasons for selecting the maximum likelihood taxonomy in line 238.

Comment 3: All formulas are edited using the Formula Editor (Mathtype software)

Response: Thanks a lot for the very insightful comment. We reedited all the formulas using Mathtype Software.

Comment 4: Figure 2 and Figure 3 need to be added the results of the remaining two cities.

Response: We had added the results of the remaining two cities to Figure 2 and Figure 3.

Comment 5: The background color of Figure 3 (b) needs to be set to white.

Response: We had set the background color of Figure 3 (b) to be set to white.

Comment 6: The headings of sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.1 shall be consistent with sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.1.

Response: Thank you very much for your correction. We changed "Nighttime Light Image" to "Nighttime Light Data", and "Landsat image" to "Landsat Data".

Comment 7: Table 4: What is the meaning of Me.

Response: Thank you very much for your correction. To save space, "Me" is an abbreviation of "Mean". We added the above contents in the corresponding position in Table 4.

Comment 8: In the chapter of discussion and conclusion, I suggest to discuss the significance of studying provincial capital cities in northeastern China and the shortcomings of the method in this paper.

Response: Thanks very much for the helpful comment. At the end of the first paragraph of the conclusions section, we had added the discussion about the significance of studying provincial capitals in northeastern China. In addition, the deficiency regarding the analysis of compact urbanization was added in the second paragraph of the same section.

………………………………………………………………………………………

Reviewer #2:

Comment 1: I only have one major issue in this paper which is about the introduction. The introduction started with general background regarding the impact of urbanization and land use and land cover change. Then, in the same paragraph the authors jumped to the data used to extract built-up areas using satellite data and they deeply discussed advanced information such as selection of threshold and segmentation of the nighttime light data. This information is not linked with the topic sentence in the beginning of the paragraph. I suggest to break down this paragraph to be two paragraphs. The first paragraph provides a general information regarding urbanization and land use and land cover change, and the second paragraph deals with the used method to extract built-up information from satellite data. I suggest that the second paragraph discuss the current research status of land cover evolution analysis.

Response: Thanks very much for the helpful comment. The changes to the manuscript are as follows: (1) we have added previous theories on land cover evolution in the second paragraph of the introduction; (2) the discussion of landscape indices in the introduction section was adjusted to the third paragraph, after the discussion of land cover evolution;(3)The research status of built-up area extraction was adjusted to the fourth paragraph. At the same time, in order to explain the role of the built-up area extraction, the relevant contents of compact urbanization and spread urbanization are added in the fourth paragraph.

Comment 2: What is the basis of the 5 landscape indexes selected and why other indexes were not selected?

Response: Thanks very much for the valuable comment. The principle of selecting landscape indexes is that they can represent the characteristics of ecological state and landscape pattern, and have low redundancy. Landscape index can be divided into three categories: overall trend index, fragmentation index and aggregation index. In combination with the research focus of compact urbanization in this paper, Class area (CA), Percent of landscape (PL), Patch density (PD), Aggregation index (AI) were selected from above categories respectively. We have added the explanation of the reasons for choosing landscape index in line 302 of manuscript.

Comment 3: It is an important process to extract built-up areas using DMSP/OLS or Landsat data alone, and listing corresponding results is helpful to the integrity of the experiment.

Response: We have added the experimental results of built-up area extraction using DMSP/OLS or Landsat data respectively in Figure 6 and 7.

Comment 4: Figure 4 needs to have a geographic grid, compass and scale; the lines of indication in Figure 4 (a) and (b) should not cross; the main figure should have a mark.

Response: Thanks very much for the valuable comment. We had added the geographic grid, compass and scale to Figure 4. The lines of indication in Figure 4 (a) and (b) are redrawn. The main figure has been added the mark (a).

Comment 5: Lines 117 and 123: Why the selected data are from 2000 to 2012? Reasons should be mentioned.

Response: Thanks very much for the helpful comment. Since DMSP/OLS data were collected from 1992 to 2012, and only the built-up area extraction method using DMSP/OLS was extracted in this paper, the relevant algorithms of VIIRS/NPP were not studied. We had explained this shortcoming in line 501.

Comment 6: The placement of group figures needs to be adjusted.

Response: Thanks very much for the valuable comment. We have adjusted the relative positions between the groups in Figure 6,7 and 8.

Comment 7: Text and curve proportion are not in harmony and need to be adjusted.

Response: We had revised Figure 11 of the original manuscript, and modified the text and curves.

Comment 8: Take into account the current state of remote sensing data. The reasonableness of the DMSP/OLS data and Landsat data used in this paper requires further explanation, such as why remote sensing data with higher resolution is not used.

Response: DMSP/OLS Data and Landsat data were selected for the following reasons. The area studied in this paper belongs to the geographical objects of medium scale. High resolution remote sensing image can better describe the details, but it can also increase the difficulty of data processing, such as the large amount of data. Therefore, medium and low spatial resolution remote sensing image is more suitable. In addition, most high resolution remote sensing images are non-open source data, so it is difficult for us to obtain relevant data.

………………………………………………………………………………………

In addition, we proofread the manuscript to minimize the typographical, grammatical, and bibliographical errors. Therefore, some sentences and words were rewritten for a native expression, but the meanings did not change. These revisions were not included in the point-to-point response to the comments of the reviewers. However, all revised portions were marked in red in the revised manuscript.

We appreciate for the warm work of the Editors & Reviewers earnestly, and hope that the corrections will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your thoughtful comments and suggestions. Should you have any questions, please contact us without hesitation. Thanks and best regards!

Yours Sincerely,

Lishuang SUN

July 12, 2020

Attachment

Submitted filename: renamed_d063c.docx

Decision Letter 1

Bing Xue

7 Sep 2020

Analysis of land cover evolution within the built-up areas of provincial capital cities in northeastern China based on nighttime light data and Landsat data

PONE-D-20-18472R1

Dear Dr. Sun,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Bing Xue, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Bing Xue

22 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-18472R1

Analysis of land cover evolution within the built-up areas of provincial capital cities in northeastern China based on nighttime light data and Landsat data

Dear Dr. Sun:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Bing Xue

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: renamed_d063c.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data in the article can be downloaded at the following URL: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.n02v6wwv4.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES