Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2020 Oct 1;15(10):e0239058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239058

Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana

MengYing Tong 1, Wen Liu 1, HongSu He 1, HaiYan Hu 1, YuanHao Ding 1, Xinguo Li 1, JiaQuan Huang 1,*, LiYan Yin 1
Editor: Anil Kumar Singh2
PMCID: PMC7529347  PMID: 33001980

Abstract

Magnesium (Mg) plays an irreplaceable role in plant growth and development. Mg transporters, especially CorA/MGT/MRS2 family proteins, played a vital role in regulating Mg content in plant cells. Although extensive work has been conducted in model crops, such as Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, the relevant information is scarce in tropical crops. In this study, 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were isolated from its genome and classified into five distinct clades. The putative physiochemical properties, chromosome location, gene structure, cis-acting elements, and duplication relationships in between these members were analyzed. Complementary experiments revealed that three MaMRS2 gene members (MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), from three distinct phylogenetic branches, were capable of restoring the function of Mg transport in Salmonella typhimurium mutants. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed that MaMRS2 genes were differentially expressed in banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. The result was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis, in addition to tissue specific expression, expression differences among MaMRS2 members were also observed under Mg deficiency conditions. These results showed that Mg transporters may play a versatile role in banana growth and development, and our work will shed light on the functional analysis of Mg transporters in banana.

Introduction

Magnesium (Mg) is essential in plant growth and development, and cannot be substituted [1]. The major function of Mg in green leaves is to form the central atom of chlorophyll. Mg is also involved in protein and nucleic acid synthesis, and it acts as a bridging element for the aggregation of ribosome subunits [2] and a conformation stabilizer [3] respectively. Furthermore, Mg directly participates or increases the reaction rate of key enzymes, such as isocitrate lyase and ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase [4].

A substantial proportion of Mg in a plant cell is involved in the regulation of its cellular pH and cation–anion balance [5]. The concentration of Mg in metabolic pools, such as the cytoplasm and chloroplast, are strictly regulated. And magnesium transporter (MGT) plays a vital role in maintaining the equilibrium and homeostasis of Mg in plants [6, 7].

Mg transporters exist in almost all organisms. So far, four kinds of MGTs—CorA, MgtA, MgtB, and MgtE—have been found in bacteria [8, 9]. Among them, expression of MgtA, MgtB, and MgtE was induced by Mg-deficient conditions and CorA served as the main MGT under normal conditions [6]. The CorA family members contain a 2-TM-GxN domain, and their functional membrane channels are formed by oligomers containing four or five subunits [10, 11]. In yeast, the basic system to maintain Mg cellular homeostasis consists of five MGTs belonging to the CorA superfamily. Among them, the ALR genes (ALR1 and ALR2) are located in the plasma membrane where they mediate the uptake of various divalent cations including Mg [12, 13]. Both MRS2 and LPE10 are located in mitochondrial intima wherein each plays an indispensable role in Mg homeostasis in yeast cells [14]. MNR2 is located in the vacuole membrane, where it regulates the storage of Mg in yeast cells [15].

In plants, extensive study of MGTs has been conducted in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), rice (Oryza sativa), and maize (Zea mays) [1619]. MGTs in sugarcane (Saccharum spontaneum), pear (Pyrus bretschneideri), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and other plant species [2022] have also been characterized recently. A total of 11 MGT genes have been found in Arabidopsis, including nine MGT proteins and two hypothetical ones [16, 17]. In other plants such as rice, maize, pear, and sugarcane, 9, 12, 16, and 10 MGTs were found respectively [1821]. Two transmembrane (TM) domains were present in the plant MGTs studied to date. At the same time, GMN (glycine–methionine–asparagine) domain was also present in most of the identified MGT members of plants [23], although slight variations existed in some members in rice [18] and maize [19]. Beside sequence difference, diverse expression patterns of MGT genes have been detected in plants. For example, in Arabidopsis, AtMGT7b expressed only in roots and flowers [24], AtMGT5/AtMRS2-6 expressed in pollen in the early stages of flower development, while AtMGT9/AtMRS2-2 abundantly expressed in the tapetum. Similarly, rice OsMRS2-5 is expressed in tissues other than flag leaves, and OsMRS2-8 is expressed in all tissues but rarely in leaves [18], and pear PbrMGT4 is expressed only in leaves while PbrMGT16 is expressed solely in pistils [21]. In addition, the expression of MGTs in plants is also affected by circadian rhythm and light [18, 20, 25]. The versatile Mg transporter genes with diverse expression pattern in plants contribute to their functional complexity. And some genes even participate in pollen development [26, 27].

Banana (Musa acuminata) is an important economic crop in tropical regions, where soil acidification is a serious problem [28]. The field of many banana plantations is acidic with a low cation exchange capacity; hence, Mg is highly prone to leaching from soil, especially after heavy rainfall events in the rainy season [29]. Imbalanced fertilization practices aggravates the likelihood of Mg deficiency, as a result, Mg deficiency is now a major contributor to banana yield reduction [30]. Therefore, improving the efficiency of Mg utilization in banana has immediate practical significance. Clearly, MGT plays a vital role in Mg nutrition maintenance in plants. Although the whole-genome sequencing of banana cultivars has been completed [31], the MGT in banana cultivars has not been systematically studied, and the function of different MGT members is not yet clear. The objectives of this study were thus: 1) To isolate the putative members of the banana MaMRS2 genes, and analyze their physical and chemical properties and functional structures via bioinformatics methods; 2) To clone the genes and determine their respective expression patterns; 3) To identify the function of the genes. This study could provide timely clues to better understand the role of different MGTs in banana.

Results

Identification of MRS2 family genes in banana

Ten putative Mg transporter sequences from banana’s genome were obtained using the CorA/MGT/MRS2 sequences of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and yeast as queries. These genes were named according to the nomenclature of Arabidopsis and rice (Table 1). The isoelectric point, the amino acid length and the molecular weight of the predicted proteins ranged from 4.51 to 9.16 (pI), from 379 to 495 (aa), and from 42.57 to 54.83 (kDa), respectively. Subcellular localization of 10 members predicted that seven proteins located on the plasma membrane, while MaMRS2-7 located in the cytoskeleton, MaMRS2-3 and MaMRS2-9 resided on the chloroplast. TM domain analysis of MaMRS2 indicated that all 10 members contain two hypothetical TM domains in the C-terminal (S1 Fig). Sequence alignment of the MaMRS2 proteins showed they had high sequence similarity, with all members having a GMN functional domain except MaMRS2-4, which instead had a mutated motif AMN (alanine–methionine–asparagine) (Fig 1).

Table 1. List of MaMRS2 genes in the banana genome.

Namea Locus tag Names in Banana Hub TM domains pI Mm(kDa) Gene length(bp) Protein length(aa) Chrb Location Putative subcellular localizationc
MaMRS2-1 LOC104000091 GSMUA_Achr10P05520_001 2 4.72 48.1 5914 427 10 15317184~15322824 P
MaMRS2-2 LOC103972475 GSMUA_Achr11P26270_001 2 4.53 49.1 6412 444 11 25114115~25121080 P
MaMRS2-3 LOC103983579 GSMUA_Achr5P01890_001 2 4.92 54.8 4877 495 5 1156746~1163541 Ch
MaMRS2-4 LOC103982423 GSMUA_Achr4P29320_001 2 4.49 42.6 5878 379 4 27328932~27334470 P
MaMRS2-5 LOC103970801 GSMUA_Achr11P09590_001 2 4.81 46.5 3317 414 11 7479204~7483120 P
MaMRS2-6 LOC103993960 GSMUA_Achr8P03230_001 2 9.16 54.6 11794 495 8 2258592~2271181 P
MaMRS2-7 LOC103989965 GSMUA_Achr1P23260_001 2 4.87 49.6 8240 443 1 17454984~17462546 Cy
MaMRS2-8 LOC103986367 GSMUA_Achr5P26100_001 2 4.51 48.6 5909 439 5 27012863~27018813 P
MaMRS2-9 LOC103982990 GSMUA_Achr4P22510_001 2 5.21 47.6 8016 421 4 22793450~22801155 Ch
MaMRS2-10 LOC103997852 GSMUA_Achr9P13370_001 2 4.82 47.8 4812 427 9 8683743~8688133 P

a Names assigned to banana MRS2 genes in this study.

b Chromosomal localization of banana MRS2 genes.

c WoLF PSORT predictions: P (plasma membrane), Ch (chloroplast), Cy (Cytoskeleton).

Fig 1. Multiple sequence alignments of MaMSR2 proteins.

Fig 1

Alignment was performed using DNAMAN software. The identical, conserved and less conserved amino acid residues are indicated by dark, cherry red and cyan background colors, respectively. The conservative GMN motif was indicated and the TM domains are underlined.

Comparative analysis of the MRS2/MGT genes from Arabidopsis, rice, maize, yeast, and banana

Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MGTs of banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize and yeast. Among them, MGTs of yeast was selected as the outgroup (Fig 2). The plant MGT family proteins were divided into five branches, each branch contained a different number of MGT members derived from different plant species. For each species, just one MGT family member was respectively distributed in branch C, which diverged from other MGTs, possibly indicating a unique role of this member protein. The most abundant Mg transporters of banana were distributed in the G and H branches, each having three members. In each group, the similarity of sequences from the same plant species was higher than that from other plant species.

Fig 2. Phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, yeast and banana CorA/MRS2/MGT members.

Fig 2

The Neighbor-Joining tree, which includes 10 MaMRS2 protein from banana, 11 MRS2/MGT proteins from Arabidopsis, 9 MRS2/MGT proteins from rice, 12 MRS2/MGT proteins from maize and 5 MRS2/MGT proteins from yeast, was constructed using MEGA X. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H represent the different clades of the MRS2/MGT family in these five species.

Phylogenetic relationships, gene structure, and motif analysis of MaMRS2 family members

The phylogenetic tree (Fig 3A) and genetic structural analysis of 10 MaMRS2 protein members (Fig 3B) in banana showed that proteins from the same branch had similar structure, but this differed greatly when members from different branches were compared. For example, MaMRS2-10, MaMRS2-1, and MaMRS2-5 were on the same branch, whose number and distribution of exons were similar; conversely, MaMRS2-6 and MaMRS2-4, which were on two different branches, varied greatly in the number of exons and their position. To further understand the relationship between members of the MaMRS2 gene family, motif analysis was performed for each MaMRS2 member (Fig 3C). These results indicated that 10 putative motifs were distributed in the MaMRS2 proteins. Common motifs such as motif 1/2/3/4/5 existed in all Mg transporter members. In particular, motif1 and motif5 near the 3' end contained the CorA/MRS2 functional structure. At the same time, different members contained different motifs. For example, motif 6 was absent from MaMRS2-6 and MaMRS2-9, and motif 10 was found only in MaMRS2-7 and MaMRS2-9. Together, these results clearly indicated the great versatility characterizing banana’s Mg transporters.

Fig 3. Phylogenetic relationships (A), gene structure (B) and motif analysis (C) of MaMRS2 family members.

Fig 3

The Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates in the MEGA X software. Then the gene structure was performed using GSDS program. MEME program and TBTools were used to illustrate the motif analysis results. Yellow boxes and black lines represent exons and introns, respectively, blue boxes indicate 5’ or 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs) and different motif was painted with different color.

Chromosomal location and gene duplication

The position information of a given MaMRS2 gene on a chromosome was obtained from NCBI. The ten MaMRS2 genes were distributed among seven chromosomes of banana: two MaMRS2 genes on the chromosome 4, 5, and 11, while chromosome 1, 8, 9, and 10 each contained a single MaMRS2 gene. To understand the expansion mechanism of these MaMRS2 genes, the collinear relationship between them was analyzed via MCScanX software (Fig 4). These results revealed gene duplication events, in that a total of 12 pairs of duplication relationships between MaMRS2 genes occurred on six chromosomes. No tandem duplication relationships were found, nor was there evidence for duplication between MaMRS2 members on the same chromosome. Collectively, these results indicated that some MaMRS2 genes have duplicated more than once, for which multiple rounds of whole genome duplication events might be responsible. The Ka/Ks of five homologous Mg transporters was less than 0.3 (S1 Table); however, the Ka/Ks ratio of the others was not obtained from the data because the same sense mutation could not be detected, indicating that the MaMRS2 gene evolved mainly under purify selection.

Fig 4. Chromosomal location and gene duplication of MaMRS2 genes in the banana genome.

Fig 4

The MaMRS2 gene is located on different chromosomes. The number of chromosomes is shown on the outside, and the different colors represent different chromosomes. The grey region is the collinearity of the banana genome, highlighting the collinearity between the MaMRS2 genes was highlighted with red lines.

Prediction of cis-acting elements in the promoter region of MaMRS2 genes

To understand the transcriptional regulation of the MaMRS2 family genes in banana, about 2-kb upstream promoter region of MGT genes was selected and submitted to the PlantCARE website for analysis, and their functional regions were visualized with TBTools (Fig 5). The promoter region of the MaMRS2 genes contained cis-acting elements of light response, circadian rhythm, hypothermia, defense and stress responses, and phytohormones, among others. Some cis-acting elements such as light response elements were common to the promoter regions of all MaMRS2 gene members, whereas others were restricted to a certain MaMRS2 member. For example, the circadian rhythms response element is found only in the promoter region of MaMRS2-2, and the defense and stress response element is only found in the promoter region of MaMRS2-9. These results suggested that, even though Mg transport is a light-regulated process, some MaMRS2 genes could also participate in other biological processes involving Mg during banana growth and development.

Fig 5. Analysis of cis-acting elements of members of the MaMRS2 gene family.

Fig 5

Different colors represent cis-acting elements of different functions.

Function complementation of MaMRS2 genes

Based on phylogenetic analysis (Fig 2), three MaMRS2 genes (MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7) in three different branches (H, E, F) were cloned and sequenced (S2 Fig, S1 Test). Their coding regions were amplified and subcloned into pTrc99A for functional analysis by using the Salmonella typhimurium mutant MM281. The positive control S. typhimurium (wild type MM1927) grew well on medium with 0.01 mM of Mg. By contrast, negative controls—MM281, and MM281 transformed with empty pTrc99A—could hardly grow on medium with Mg less than 10 mM. Three MaMRS2 genes (MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7) were transferred into MM281 respectively, and their growth was restored on the medium containing low Mg levels, indicating these MaMRS2 members encoded Mg transporters. Nevertheless, the Mg transfer efficiency of different members varied greatly, as evidenced by the different growth rate of the recovery strains under the same Mg content, both on agar plate and in liquid culture (Fig 6A and 6B).

Fig 6. Complementary analysis of the MaMRS2 genes.

Fig 6

MM1927 was the wild type and used as a positive control, MM281 and MM281 transformed with an empty pTrc99A were used as negative controls. (A) Functional verification on N minimal solid medium containing 20, 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.01 mM MgSO4. The bacterial was diluted sequentially 10-fold from left to right. (B) Growth curves were performed in N-minimal liquid medium containing 10, 1, 0.5 and 0.01mM MgSO4, and the cell density was monitored at OD600 every 2 hours. Data was an average of three independent experiments, and the different icons in the figure represent the average of three repetitions.

MaMRS2 gene expression in different tissues of banana

To further elucidate the function of MaMRS2 genes in banana, their expression in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings were measured via semi-quantitative PCR respectively, in which MaTUB served as the reference gene. The results showed that all MaMRS2 genes could be expressed, but their expression patterns differed markedly. For instance, MaMRS2-2 expression was only detected in corm with low abundance. In stark contrast, MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-8, and MaMRS2-9 were constitutively expressed, although their expression differed slightly among the root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaves (Fig 7).

Fig 7. Expression of MaMRS2 gene in different tissues of Baxijiao seedlings.

Fig 7

UL, LL, PS, C and R represent upper leaf, lower leaf, pseudo stem, corm and root respectively.

MaMRS2 gene expression under Mg deficiency

Gene expression analysis was also carried out via qRT-PCR, in five different tissues (upper leaf, lower leaf, pseudo stem, corm, root) from banana seedlings under normal or Mg-deficient conditions. According to the results, Mg deficiency greatly affected the expression of MaMRS2 genes in the upper leaf, lower leaf, pseudo stem, corm, and root of banana (Fig 8). Compared with their controls, when deprived of Mg, MaMRS2-1 and MaMRS2-10 underwent down-regulated expression in all tissues tested, whereas MaMRS2-5 and MaMRS2-7 were up-regulated in leaves, pseudo stem, and corm parts. The contrasting expression pattern of different Mg transporter genes among differing tissues under Mg deficiency (Fig 8) indicated these genes is probably not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among different tissues.

Fig 8. Relative expression level of MaMRS2 gene in different tissues of Baxijiao seedlings under magnesium deficiency.

Fig 8

The CK indicated the value under normal growth conditions as a control, and the -Mg indicated the relative expression level under the complete absence of magnesium ion condition. UL, LL, PS, C and R represent upper leaf, lower leaf, pseudo stem, corm and root respectively.

Discussion

Mg is the essential nutrient element for plant growth and development and Mg transporter genes played an indispensable role in Mg absorption and transport. In model plants such as Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, Mg transporter genes have been extensive studies [1619]. Recently, they were also functionally analyzed in tomatoes [22], pears [21], and sugarcane [20]. However, little is known about the genes in banana, a tropical crop with high biomass, which is vulnerable to Mg deficiency in the field. In our study, 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana genome were identified based on their sequence similarity, and they could be divided into five evolutionary branches, which was not beyond the range of the phylogenetic relationship using other plant species, such as Arabidopsis and rice [18, 19, 22]. Accordingly, all MaMRS2 members had a two transmembrane domain and a highly conserved GMN domain. The only exception is that MaMRS2-4 had a mutated AMN domain. This phenomenon was also observed in the ZmMGT6 of maize [19] and in OsMRS2-4 and OsMRS2-5 of rice [18]. Genomic collinearity showed that duplication relationships occurred between MaMRS2 family members across chromosomes, but no signs of a tandem duplication relationship (Fig 4), a pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana [32]. The sequence similarity and phylogenetic relationship showed that all Mg transporters analyzed in this study have the same ancestor, and it can be deduced that the main function of these genes is almost the same.

To functionally analyzed the MGTs, both yeast and S. typhimurium complementary experiments can be used although slight differences were observed using these two systems [18, 19]. In maize and Arabidopsis, five MGT members were identified using S. typhimurium complementary experiments respectively [17, 19, 24, 26, 27, 33]. And a total of 9 Arabidopsis and 4 rice MGTs were identified via yeast complementary experiment. In our experiment, three of 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4 and MaMRS2-7) located in different clades were selected, which functionally complemented the Mg transporter genes in S. typhimurium respectively. The affinity of these proteins to Mg was not the same, MaMRS2-1 and MaMRS2-7 have a higher affinity for Mg than MaMRS2-4 (Fig 6). Similar results were obtained in maize in that ZmMGT1 (homologous to MaMRS2-1 in banana) and ZmMGT5 (homologous to MaMRS2-7) had stronger complementary effect than ZmMGT6 (homologous to MaMRS2-4) [19]. These results indicated that the affinity or efficiency of different MGTs during Mg transport, absorption, and storage differed greatly, and each MaMRS2 genes may have a distinctive role. The complementary lines incorporated with MaMRS2-4 and MaMRS2-7 could grow well under low Mg concentration conditions, but they had lower growth rate when compared with the mutant control under solid growth medium with higher Mg concentration (10 mM and 20 mM) (Fig 6A). These results indicated that both MaMRS2-4 and MaMRS2-7 could transport Mg, at the same time, the exogenous Mg transporters from banana might play its role in excessive Mg accumulation and lead to the toxic effect in bacteria under high Mg conditions.

The detailed analysis indicated that although the overall functional similarity presented in MGT genes, the transcriptional changes and the detailed function varied greatly. Some genes seem to play a universal role. For example, MaMRS2-6 was highly expressed in leaves of banana seedlings (Fig 7), and its counterpart, which was deemed to be involved in photosynthesis in maize, Arabidopsis and rice, was also highly expressed in leaves [18, 25, 34]. Similarly, banana MaMRS2-4 gene was significantly up-regulated in the banana roots under Mg-deficiency (Fig 7), MaMRS2-4 is homologous to AtMRS2-4/AtMGT6 in Arabidopsis, ZmMGT10 in maize and SlMGT4-1 in tomato, whose respective up-regulation was observed in the roots when deprived of Mg [22, 33, 35, 36]. However, some homologous genes diverged during their evolution probably because of the plant specific requirement. MaMRS2-2 was specifically expressed in the corm of banana plants under normal Mg supply conditions, and this expression pattern was negligibly changed by the Mg deficiency treatment (Fig 8). While its homologous rice OSMGT1/OsMRS2-2 gene, which linked with the response to salt and aluminum stress [37], was highly expressed in rice roots and leaves. The homologous tomato gene, SlMGT4-1, expressed mainly in roots and shoots under Mg deficiency conditions [22]. The expression difference may be arise from cis-acting elements, for a large variety of regulatory elements, were presented in the promoter region of banana’s MaMRS2 genes (Fig 5). From the above data, we can see that MaMRS2 is similar to the MGT protein of other plant species not only in terms of its sequence structure but also in its expression pattern and function. However, the specific functioning of MaMRS2 in banana’s growth and metabolism and how it affects this plant’s transport and absorption of Mg await further investigation and experimental verification.

Field practice indicates that Mg-deficiency is one of the most common problems during banana’ growth and development [38]. How to improve their Mg nutrient utilization efficiency is thus of vital importance. Despite field or foliar applications of Mg fertilizer being effective means to enhance Mg nutrient status [39], genetic improvement is considered the most cost-effective way, for which MGT is a potential candidate for breeding and engineering. The identification and functional analysis of Mg transporters in this work provides not only clues to Mg absorption and transport mechanisms in banana but also a larger pool for candidate gene selection by crop researchers.

Conclusion

In summary, the MaMRS2 protein family has 10 members with five clades. Each member has two TM domains and a GMN domain, except MaMRS2-4. MaMRS2 genes are unevenly located on six chromosomes, and there are multiple cis-acting elements in their promoters. Three MaMRS2 gene members (MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7) in the three branches (H, E, F) indicated that they are indeed Mg transporters based on functional complementation analysis. The expression of MaMRS2 genes varied greatly in different tissue or under Mg deficiency conditions. Therefore, MaMRS2 genes participate in Mg absorption and transport in banana and each probably played a distinct role during plant growth and development.

Materials and methods

Sequence origin and bioinformatics analysis

The whole genome sequence of dwarf banana (Musa acuminate) and the CorA/MGT/MRS2 protein sequence of yeast were obtained from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The MGT protein sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana, rice (Oryza sativa) and maize (Zea mays) were downloaded from the Phytozome (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html) website. The TBLASTN program, in BioEdit v.7.0.4 software, was used under Windows operation system to obtain candidate Mg transporter protein sequences in banana, for which e-values were set to less than –10 [40]. The redundant sequences were manually removed; the remaining sequence of each candidate member was further queried in the Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/) [41], SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) [42], and the Conserved Domains Servers (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) to find the corresponding CorA/MRS2 domain. Those proteins lacking this functional domain were deleted. Then, the TM of candidate MaMRS2 members was predicted by the TMHMM Server v.2.0 online program (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) [43]. The isoelectric point and molecular mass (kDa) of each candidate protein was calculated with BioXM v.2.6 software [44]. The subcellular localization of MaMRS2 members was predicted by the WolF PSORT program (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/) [45].

The sequences of MaMRS2 proteins were compared by multiple sequence alignment with DNAMAN v.2.6 [46]. A phylogenetic tree was built using the neighbor-joining method in the MEGA X program [4749]. Its bootstrap value was set to 1000, and the output phylogenetic tree file was graphed by the online iTOL program (https://itol.embl.de/) [50].

The downloaded CDs’ sequences and gene sequences, as well as the phylogenetic tree generated by MEGA X software, were then submitted to GSDS2.0 (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) [51] for gene structure analysis. The MaMRS2 protein sequences were submitted to the MEME v.5.1.0 (http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme) [52] to detect their motifs, carried out with default parameters.

To analyze the whole-genome duplication of the banana, MCScanX software in the Linux operating system was used [53]. Collinearity and location mapping of MaMRS2 genes and their corresponding Ka/Ks calculations were performed using TBTools software [54].

The upstream 2-kb sequence of each MaMRS2 gene was downloaded, and then analyzed with the PlantCARE (Plant Cis Acting Regulatory Element) server (bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) to predict its cis-acting element. The cis-acting components of interest were visualized using TBTools [54].

Sample preparation and gene expression analysis

Banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings were sand-cultured in the greenhouse at the Hainan University from July 7th to September 29th, 2018. We use Hoagland’s nutrient solution to treat the control, which contained 6 mM KNO3, 4 mM Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, 2 mM NH4H2PO4, 4 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4·7H2O, 60 μM Fe-EDTA, 25 μM H3BO3, 2 μM MnSO4·H2O, 2 μM ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.5 μM CuSO4·5H2O, and 0.05 μM H2MoO4. For Mg deficiency treatments, 1 mM MgSO4·7H2O in nutrient solution was replaced by 1 mM K2SO4, and 4 mM KNO3 and 1 mM NH4NO3 were used to maintain the same N supply level. Each time of fertilizer application, 500 mL nutrient solution was supplied to each pot. Every seventh day each pot was flushed with deionized water to wash out accumulated nutrients in quartz sand. After 12 weeks of plant growth, the roots, pseudo stem, corms, upper leaves (the second fully-expanded blade from the top), and lower leaves (the sixth fully-expanded blade from the top) were collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C until their RNA extractions.

The RNA from each tissue type sample was extracted with the RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen), and its reverse transcription conducted using FastKing gDNA-dispelling RT SuperMix (Tiangen). The primers designed by Primer Premier 5 software [55] can be found in S2 Table. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed to detect the expression patterns of MaMRS2 genes in different tissues, with a qRT-PCR analysis done to quantify their relative expression levels in five plant tissue types in response to Mg deficiency (0 mM Mg). The qRT-PCRs were all conducted on a PCR automatic serial analysis system LightCycler® 96 (Roche) with TIANGEN SuperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR Green). The expression level of each MaMRS2 gene was calculated using the 2-ΔCt method, for which the TUB gene served as the internal reference [56]. The bar charts were drawn using Microsoft Excel. Means were compared by the Tukey LSD method, in SPSS v.14.0 software [57] with a significant level set at P < 0.05. The data are shown as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates.

Gene cloning and functional complementation analyses of MaMRS2 genes

Three representative genes from the H (MaMRS2-1), E (MaMRS2-4), and F (MaMRS2-7) subfamilies were amplified, by using a gene-specific primer with endonuclease restriction sites at both ends (S3 Table). Each PCR product was then cloned into the pTrc99A vector. The positive clones of each genes were confirmed by sequencing. The complementation experiments [19] were then carried out to test whether three MaMRS2 gene members were able to transport Mg. Salmonella typhimurium wild-type MM1927 served as the control for the mutant S. typhimurium MM281 that had its CorA, MgtA/MgtB gene inactivated (it fails to grow in media with an Mg concentration < 10 mmol/L). The OD600 was measured every 2 h to detect the bacteria growth rate in liquid media. The line charts were drawn using Microsoft Excel. The data are shown as the mean of three biological replicates.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Analysis of Transmembrane (TM) domains of the MaMRS2 family proteins using the TMHMM program, red region indicates transmembrane region.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. RT-PCR amplification of the entire ORF of three MaMRS2 genes.

The root or leaf cDNAs were used as template. The RT-PCR was performed 35 cycles using gene specific-primer pairs.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Ka/Ks of MaMRS2 genes.

(PDF)

S2 Table. PCR primers used for semi-quantitative RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analysis.

(PDF)

S3 Table. PCR primers used for complete CDS amplification.

(PDF)

S1 Test. The nucleotide sequences of the three MaMRS2 genes from sequencing.

(PDF)

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor Legong Li (School of Life Sciences, Capital Normal University of China) for providing the Salmonella typhimurium MM281 strain and the plasmid pTrc99A.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 31971520 and 31460089). This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 31760549) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hermans C, Conn SJ, Chen JG, Xiao QY, Verbruggen N. An update on magnesium homeostasis mechanisms in plants. Metallomics. 2013; 5(9): 1170–1183. 10.1039/c3mt20223b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cammarano P, Felsani A, Gentile M, Gualerzi C, Romeo A, Wolf G. Formation of active hybrid 80-S particles from subunits of pea seedlings and mammalian liver ribosomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972; 281(4): 625–642. 10.1016/0005-2787(72)90160-8 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sreedhara A, Cowan JA. Structural and catalytic roles for divalent magnesium in nucleic acid biochemistry. Biometals. 2002; 15(3): 211–223. 10.1023/a:1016070614042 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cowan JA. Structural and catalytic chemistry of magnesium-dependent enzymes. Biometals. 2002; 15(3): 225–235. 10.1023/a:1016022730880 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Guo WL, Nazim H, Liang ZS, Yang DF. Magnesium deficiency in plants: An urgent problem. Crop J. 2016; 4(2): 83–91. 10.1016/j.cj.2015.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kobayashi NI, Tanoi K. Critical Issues in the Study of Magnesium Transport Systems and Magnesium Deficiency Symptoms in Plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2015; 16(9): 23076–23093. 10.3390/ijms160923076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shaul O. Magnesium transport and function in plants: the tip of the iceberg. Biometals. 2002; 15(3): 309–323. 10.1023/a:1016091118585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Snavely MD, Florer JB, Miller CG, Maguire ME. Magnesium transport in Salmonella typhimurium: 28Mg2+ transport by the CorA, MgtA, and MgtB systems. J Bacteriol. 1989; 171(9): 4761–4766. 10.1128/jb.171.9.4761-4766.1989 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smith RL, Thompson LJ, Maguire ME. Cloning and characterization of MgtE, a putative new class of Mg2+ transporter from Bacillus firmus OF4. J Bacteriol. 1995; 177(5): 1233–1238. 10.1128/jb.177.5.1233-1238.1995 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kehres DG, Lawyer CH, Maguire ME. The CorA magnesium transporter gene family. Microb Comp Genomics. 1998; 3(3): 151–169. 10.1089/omi.1.1998.3.151 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Knoop V, Groth-Malonek M, Gebert M, Eifler K, Weyand K. Transport of magnesium and other divalent cations: evolution of the 2-TM-GxN proteins in the MIT superfamily. Mol Genet Genomics. 2005; 274(3): 205–216. 10.1007/s00438-005-0011-x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu GJ, Martin DK, Gardner RC, Ryan PR. Large Mg(2+)-dependent currents are associated with the increased expression of ALR1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002. August 6;213(2):231–7. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11311.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.MacDiarmid CW, Gardner RC. Overexpression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae magnesium transport system confers resistance to aluminum ion. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273(3): 1727–1732. 10.1074/jbc.273.3.1727 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gregan J, Bui DM, Pillich R, Fink M, Zsurka G, Schweyen RJ. The mitochondrial inner membrane protein Lpe10p, a homologue of Mrs2p, is essential for magnesium homeostasis and group II intron splicing in yeast. Mol Gen Genet. 2001. February;264(6):773–81. 10.1007/s004380000366 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pisat NP, Pandey A, Macdiarmid CW. MNR2 regulates intracellular magnesium storage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2009; 183(3): 873–884. 10.1534/genetics.109.106419 . Drummond MG. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The AtMRS2 gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana. Physical Review D Particles & Fields. 2004; 63(1): 413–416. 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.015006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li L, Tutone AF, Drummond RS, Gardner RC, Luan S. A novel family of magnesium transport genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2001; 13(12): 2761–2775. 10.1105/tpc.010352 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Saito T, Kobayashi NI, Tanoi K, Iwata N, Suzuki H, Iwata R, et al. Expression and Functional Analysis of the CorA-MRS2-ALR-Type Magnesium Transporter Family in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013; 54(10): 1673–1683. 10.1093/pcp/pct112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li HY, Du HM, Huang KF, Chen X, Liu TY, Gao SB, et al. Identification, and Functional and Expression Analyses of the CorA/MRS2/MGT-Type Magnesium Transporter Family in Maize. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016; 57(6): 1153–1168. 10.1093/pcp/pcw064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang Y, Hua X, Xu J, Chen Z, Fan T, Zeng Z, et al. Comparative genomics revealed the gene evolution and functional divergence of magnesium transporter families in Saccharum. Bmc Genomics. 2019; 20(1): 83 10.1186/s12864-019-5437-3 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhao Z, Wang P, Jiao H, Tang C, Liu X, Jing Y, et al. Phylogenetic and expression analysis of the magnesium transporter family in pear, and functional verification of PbrMGT7 in pear pollen. J Hortic Sci Biotech. 2018; 93(5): 51–63. 10.1080/14620316.2018.1501203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Regon P, Chowra U, Awasthi JP, Borgohain P, Panda SK. Genome-wide analysis of magnesium transporter genes in Solanum lycopersicum. Comput Biol Chem. 2019; 80: 498–511. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2019.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Svidova S, Sponder G, Schweyen RJ, Djinovic-Carugo K. Functional analysis of the conserved hydrophobic gate region of the magnesium transporter CorA. BBA-Biomembranes. 2011; 1808(6): 1587–1591. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mao DD, Tian LF, Li LG, Chen J, Deng PY, Li DP, et al. AtMGT7: An Arabidopsis gene encoding a low-affinity magnesium transporter. J Integr Plant Biol. 2008; 50(12): 1530–1538. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00770.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li HY, Liu C, Zhou LN, Zhao Z, Li YH, Qu M, et al. Molecular and functional characterization of the magnesium transporter gene ZmMGT12 in maize. Gene. 2018; 665: 167–173. 10.1016/j.gene.2018.04.068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li LG, Sokolov LN, Yang YH, Li DP, Ting J, Pandy GK, et al. A mitochondrial magnesium transporter functions in Arabidopsis pollen development. Mol Plant. 2008; 1(4): 675–685. 10.1093/mp/ssn031 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen J, Li LG, Liu ZH, Yuan YJ, Guo LL, Mao DD, et al. Magnesium transporter AtMGT9 is essential for pollen development in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 2009; 19(7): 887–898. 10.1038/cr.2009.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sanchez PA, Logan TJ, Lal R, Sanchez PA. Myths and science about the chemistry and fertility of soils in the tropics. 1992, 29, 34–46. 10.2136/sssaspecpub29.c3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nawaz R, Garivait H, Anurakpongsatorn P, editors. Impacts of precipitation on leaching behavior of plant nutrients in agricultural soils of the tropics. International Conference on Chemical; 2010, 336–340. 10.1109/ICBEE.2010.5651678. [DOI]
  • 30.Chalker F. & Turner D. Magnesium deficiency in bananas. Agric. Gaz. N.S.W. 1969, 80, 474–476. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.D’Hont A, Denoeud F, Aury JM, Baurens FC, Carreel F, Garsmeur O, et al. The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature. 2012; 488(7410): 213–217. 10.1038/nature11241 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yan HL, Wu FW, Jiang GX, Xiao L, Li ZW, Duan XW, et al. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of NF-Y gene family in relation to fruit ripening in banana. Postharvest Biol Tec. 2019; 151: 98–110. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mao DD, Chen J, Tian LF, Liu ZH, Yang L, Tang RJ, et al. Arabidopsis transporter MGT6 mediates magnesium uptake and is required for growth under magnesium limitation. Plant Cell. 2014; 26(5): 2234–2248. 10.1105/tpc.114.124628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liang S, Qi YF, Zhao J, Li YF, Wang R, Shao JX, et al. Mutations in the Arabidopsis AtMRS2-11/AtMGT10/VAR5 gene cause leaf reticulation. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8 https://doi.org/ARTN 2007 10.3389/fpls.2017.02007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gebert M, Meschenmoser K, Svidova S, Weghuber J, Schweyen R, Eifler K, et al. A root-expressed magnesium transporter of the MRS2/MGT gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana allows for growth in low-Mg2+ environments. Plant Cell. 2009; 21(12): 4018–4030. 10.1105/tpc.109.070557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li H, Wang N, Ding J, Liu C, Du H, Huang K, Cao M, Lu Y, Gao S, Zhang S. The maize CorA/MRS2/MGT-type Mg transporter, ZmMGT10, responses to magnesium deficiency and confers low magnesium tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2017. October;95(3):269–278. 10.1007/s11103-017-0645-1. Epub 2017 Sep 4. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chen ZC, Yamaji N, Horie T, Che J, Li J, An G, et al. A magnesium transporter OsMGT1 plays a critical role in salt tolerance in rice(1[OPEN]). Plant Physiol. 2017; 174(3): 1837–1849. 10.1104/pp.17.00532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Smithson PC, McIntyre BD, Gold CS, Ssali H, Night G, Okech S. Potassium and magnesium fertilizers on banana in Uganda: yields, weevil damage, foliar nutrient status and DRIS analysis. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. magnesium deficiency in banana. 2004. 69(1): 43–49. 10.1023/b:fres.0000025294.96933.78. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.He HS,Jin X, Ma HZ. Deng Y, Huang JQ, Yin LY. Changes of plant biomass partitioning, tissue nutrients and carbohydrates status in magnesium-deficient banana seedlings and remedy potential by foliar application of magnesium. Scientia Horticulturae. 268 (2020): 109377 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109377.ssss [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tippmann HF. Analysis for free: comparing programs for sequence analysis. Brief Bioinform. 2004; 5(1): 82–87. 10.1093/bib/5.1.82 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Bockler B, Griffiths-Jones S, Hollich V, Lassmann T, et al. Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(Database issue): D247–251. 10.1093/nar/gkj149 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Letunic I, Bork P. 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46(D1): D493–D496. 10.1093/nar/gkx922 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001; 305(3): 567–580. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Huang J, Zhang H. Development of nucleotide sequence analysis software based on windows. Bioinformatiocs. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Horton P, Park KJ, Obayashi T, Fujita N, Harada H, Adams-Collier CJ, et al. WoLF PSORT: protein localization predictor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35(Web Server issue): W585–587. 10.1093/nar/gkm259 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.C W. DNAMAN for windows, version 2.6. LynonBiosoft, Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences. 1994.
  • 47.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018; 35(6): 1547–1549. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4): 406–425. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kaur G, Iyer LM, Subramanian S, Aravind L. Evolutionary convergence and divergence in archaeal chromosomal proteins and Chromo-like domains from bacteria and eukaryotes. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1): 6196 10.1038/s41598-018-24467-z . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47(W1): W256–W259. 10.1093/nar/gkz239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hu B, Jin J, Guo AY, Zhang H, Luo J, Gao G. GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(8): 1296–1297. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu817 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bailey TL, Elkan C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1994; 2: 28–36. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang YP, Tang HB, DeBarry JD, Tan X, Li JP, Wang XY, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(7). 10.1093/nar/gkr1293 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, et al. TBtools-an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data[J]. bioRxiv, 2020: 289660 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Singh VK, Mangalam AK, Dwivedi S, Naik S. Primer premier: program for design of degenerate primers from a protein sequence. Biotechniques. 1998; 24(2): 318–319. 10.2144/98242pf02 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Podevin N, Krauss A, Henry I, Swennen R, Remy S. Selection and validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR expression studies of the non-model crop Musa. Mol Breeding. 30(3): 1237–1252. 10.1007/s11032-012-9711-1 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Coakes SJ, Steed L. SPSS: analysis without anguish using spss version 14.0 for windows: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Anil Kumar Singh

5 May 2020

PONE-D-20-02641

Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Huang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

We would appreciate receiving your revised manuscript by Jun 19 2020 11:59PM. When you are ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). This letter should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. This file should be uploaded as separate file and labeled 'Manuscript'.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Anil Kumar Singh, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2.  PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4. Please ensure that you refer to Figure 1 in your text as, if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the figure.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1. The author said that these genes were not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among banana’s root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaf components,which required more biological experiments to support it

2.need adding bilogical stastics for q-PCR data

3. DISCUSSION should be rewritten.

4. writting and and orgnization should be further improved.

Reviewer #2: The authors characterized the Magnesium transporter MaMRS2 protein family. 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were identified. The physicochemical properties, location on chromosomes, gene structure, cisacting elements, and replication relationships between these ten members were analyzed. The tissue-specific expression pattern was analyzed. Three genes MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, and MaMRS2-7 were cloned and complemented with triple MGT mutant of Salmonella typhimurium. This study could help in understanding the function of each MaMRS2 gene in development or stress conditions.

The manuscript is poorly written and needs to be largely reworked.

1. Rewrite the line: These results should be helpful to further research work on Mg transporters in banana crops.

2. The introduction is very messy, especially the expression summary of MGTs in different plants. Rewrite the introduction.

3. Units are missing: The isoelectric point of the predicted proteins and their corresponding amino acid length ranged respectively from 4.51 to 9.16 (pI) and from 379 to 495 (aa).

4. Rewrite: Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic tree built for Mg transporter protein sequences from banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and yeast, with yeast Mg transporters as the outgroup.

5. Chromosomal location and gene duplication: Authors mentioned gene duplication as gene replication. (5 times). There is a difference between the two terms.

Also, in the discussion part: we found evidence for replication relationships that occurred between MaMRS2 family members across chromosomes but no signs of a tandem replication relationship (Fig. 4). This pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana [32]. It is reasonable to speculate that multiple rounds of whole genome replication events have occurred over evolutionary time in banana.

6. Figure legends are not uploaded properly or incomplete:

Fig. 1 Multiple sequence alignments of MaMSR2 proteins. This alignment was performed using DNAMAN software. The identical, conserved, and less conserved

Fig. 2 Phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, yeast, and banana CorA/MRS2/MGT members. The neighbor-joining tree, which includes 10 MaMRS2

Fig. 3 Phylogenetic relationships (A), gene structure (B), and motif analysis (C) of MaMRS2 family members in banana. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the

Fig. 4 Chromosomal location and gene duplication of MaMRS2 genes in the banana genome. The MaMRS2 gene is located on multiple chromosomes. The chromosome

Fig. 5 Predicted cis-acting elements in the promoter region of the 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana. Different colors represent cis-acting elements associated with different

Fig. 6 Complementary analysis of the MaMRS2 genes. MM1927 is the wild type, used here as a positive control; the MM281 and

Fig. 7 Expression of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. Explain the Abbreviations.

Fig. 8 Relative expression levels of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) Explain the Abbreviations.

7. The author mentioned sequences of 7 genes:

Supplementary Test1 The nucleotide sequences of the seven MaMRS2 genes from sequencing

There are only three sequences >MaMRS2-1, >MaMRS2-4, >MaMRS2-7 as authors clones only three genes.

8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant.

Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines are growing fine in lower concentrations.

Figure 6B: Authors mentioned: The data are shown as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates,

However, no SD is shown on the line charts.

The growth curve at 0.01 mM Mg2+ shows that complementing lines 2-1 and 2-7 are growing better than the wild type, which does not correlate with Figure 6A.

9. qRT-PCR analysis of MaMRS2-9 has no error bars; what does it signify?

Also, many other samples have no or negligible error bar, which cannot be true for three biological replicates. The authors did not mention technical replicates. Tubulin primers used in the current study are new or from the previous study? If from the previous study needs a reference.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Ritesh Kumar

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files to be viewed.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 1;15(10):e0239058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239058.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Jun 2020

Reviewer #1: 1. The author said that these genes were not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among banana’s root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaf components,which required more biological experiments to support it

Response: the original sentences“The contrasting expression pattern of different Mg transporter genes among differing tissues under Mg deficiency (Fig. 8) indicated these genes were not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among banana’s root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaf components”in page 7 line 21 - 24 changed to:

“The contrasting expression pattern of different Mg transporter genes among differing tissues under Mg deficiency (Fig. 8) indicated these genes is probably not only involved in Mg uptake and transport, but also participated in Mg allocation among different tissues.”in page 7 line 13 – 16 in the revised version.

2. need adding bilogical stastics for q-PCR data

Response:We analyzed the significance of q-PCR data, as shown in Figure 8.

3. DISCUSSION should be rewritten.

Response: We changed the 1-8 paragraphs in the original DISCUSSION to the 1-3 paragraphs in the revised version.

4. writting and orgnization should be further improved.

Response: We carefully read the manuscript and improved the writting in the revised version.

In the original version in page 1 line 10 – 11: “and the CorA/MGT/MRS2 family proteins are considered vital to this process.” was change to: “especially CorA/MGT/MRS2 family proteins, played a vital role in regulating Mg content in plant cells” in page 1 line 10 -11;

In the original version in page 1 line 12 – 13: “much less is known about it for tropical crops.” was change to: “the relevant information is scarce in tropical crops.” in page 1 line 11 - 12;

In the original version in page 1 line 15: “chromosomes” was change to: “chromosome” in page 1 line 15;

In the original version in page 1 line 18 – 19: “branches of the phylogenetic tree” was change to: “phylogenetic” in page 1 line 18;

In the original version in page 1 line 22 – 28: “Specifically, among the MaMRS2 genes, MaMRS2-2 was expressed only in the corm, and MaMRS2-6 was most expressed in the leaves. This result was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis which uncovered differential MaMRS2 gene expression under Mg2+ deficiency conditions, in that MaMRS2-5 and MaMRS2-7 were both up-regulated in stems, whereas MaMRS2-1 and MaMRS2-10 were down-regulated in roots, stems, and leaves. These results will contribute to the further study of Mg transporters in banana.”

was change to:

“The result was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis, in addition to tissue specific expression, expression differences among MaMRS2 members was also observed under Mg deficiency conditions. These results showed that Mg transporters may play a versatile role in banana growth and development, and our work will shed light on the functional analysis of Mg transporters in banana.” in page 1 line 21 - 26;

In the original version in page 2 line 1 - 4 “the concentration of Mg in metabolic pools, such as the cytoplasm and chloroplast, are strictly regulated, for which magnesium transporter (MGT) plays a vital role in maintaining the equilibrium and homeostasis of Mg2+ in plants [6, 7].” changed to “The concentration of Mg in metabolic pools, such as the cytoplasm and chloroplast, are strictly regulated. And magnesium transporter (MGT) plays a vital role in maintaining the equilibrium and homeostasis of Mg in plants [6, 7].” in page 1 line 37 – 38 and page 2 line 1 -2 in the revised version.

In the original version in page 5 line 24 - 29 “was” changed to “were” in page 5 line 17 – 19 in the revised version.

Reviewer #2: The authors characterized the Magnesium transporter MaMRS2 protein family. 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were identified. The physicochemical properties, location on chromosomes, gene structure, cis-acting elements, and replication relationships between these ten members were analyzed. The tissue-specific expression pattern was analyzed. Three genes MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, and MaMRS2-7 were cloned and complemented with triple MGT mutant of Salmonella typhimurium. This study could help in understanding the function of each MaMRS2 gene in development or stress conditions.

The manuscript is poorly written and needs to be largely reworked.

Response:the original part in page 1 line 13-29 “In this study, 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were isolated from its sequenced genome and classified into five distinct clades. The physicochemical properties, location on chromosomes, gene structure, cis-acting elements, and duplication relationships between these 10 members were analyzed. Complementary experiments revealed that three MaMRS2 gene members (MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), from three distinct branches of the phylogenetic tree, were capable of restoring the function of Mg2+ transport in Salmonella typhimurium mutants. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed that the 10 members of the MaMRS2 gene were differentially expressed in the root, pseudo stem, corm, and leaves of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. Specifically, among the MaMRS2 genes, MaMRS2-2 was expressed only in the corm, and MaMRS2-6 was most expressed in the leaves. This result was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis which uncovered differential MaMRS2 gene expression under Mg2+ deficiency conditions, in that MaMRS2-5 and MaMRS2-7 were both up-regulated in stems, whereas MaMRS2-1 and MaMRS2-10 were down-regulated in roots, stems, and leaves. These results should be helpful to further research work on Mg transporters in banana crops.” changed to:

“In this study, 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana (Musa acuminata) were isolated from its genome and classified into five distinct clades. The putative physicochemical properties, chromosome location, gene structure, cis-acting elements, and duplication relationships in between these members were analyzed. Complementary experiments revealed that three MaMRS2 gene members (MaMRS2-1, MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), from three distinct phylogenetic branches, were capable of restoring the function of Mg transport in Salmonella typhimurium mutants. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed that MaMRS2 genes were differentially expressed in banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. The result was confirmed by real-time PCR analysis, in addition to tissue specific expression, expression differences among MaMRS2 members was also observed under Mg deficiency conditions. These results showed that Mg transporters may play a versatile role in banana growth and development, and our work will shed light on the functional analysis of Mg transporters in banana.” In page 1 line 13 -29 in the revised version

1. Rewrite the line: These results should be helpful to further research work on Mg transporters in banana crops.

Response:the original “These results should be helpful to further research work on Mg transporters in banana crops” in page 1 line 27 - 29 changed to:

“These results showed that Mg transporters may play a versatile role in banana growth and development, and our work will shed light on the functional analysis of Mg transporters in banana.” in page 1, line 24-26 in the revised version.

2. The introduction is very messy, especially the expression summary of MGTs in different plants. Rewrite the introduction.

Response: we have rewritten the INTRODUCTION.

The original sentence in page 1 line 32 – 33 “ During plant growth and development, magnesium (Mg) is essential and it cannot be substituted[1]” changed to:

“Magnesium (Mg) is essential in plant growth and development, and cannot be substituted[1].” In page 1 line 30 – 31 in the revised version;

The original sentence in page 1 line 34-36 “The major function of Mg in green leaves is forming the central atom of chlorophyll, Mg is also involved in protein synthesis as a bridging element for the aggregation of ribosome subunits [2], and functions as a stabilizer of specific conformation in nucleic acid synthesis [3]” changed to: “Mg is also involved in protein and nucleic acid synthesis, and it acts as a bridging element for the aggregation of ribosome subunits [2] and a conformation stabilizer [3] respectively.” In page 1 line 32 - 34 in the revised version;

The original sentence in page 2 line 1 – 4 “The concentration of Mg in metabolic pools, such as the cytoplasm and chloroplast, are strictly regulated, for which magnesium transporter (MGT) plays a vital role in maintaining the equilibrium and homeostasis of Mg2+ in plants [6, 7].” changed to: “The concentration of Mg in metabolic pools, such as the cytoplasm and chloroplast, are strictly regulated. And magnesium transporter (MGT) plays a vital role in maintaining the equilibrium and homeostasis of Mg in plants [6, 7].” In page 1 line 37 – 38 and page 2 line 1 – 2 in the revised version;

The expression summary of MGTs in different plants in the original part in page 2 second and third paragraphs changed to page 2 second paragraph in the revised version;

The original sentence in page 3 line 6 – 10 “Imbalanced fertilization practices aggravates the likelihood of Mg deficiency occurring in cultivated banana, such that Mg deficiency is now a major reason for reduced banana fruit yield [30]. Therefore, improving the efficiency of Mg utilization in banana has immediate practical significance. Clearly, MGT plays a vital role in Mg nutrition maintence in plant species.” changed to: “Imbalanced fertilization practices aggravates the likelihood of Mg deficiency, as a result, Mg deficiency is now a major contributor to banana yield reduction [30]. Therefore, improving the efficiency of Mg utilization in banana has immediate practical significance. Clearly, MGT plays a vital role in Mg nutrition maintenance in plants.” in page 2 line 41 – 44 and page 3 line 1 in the revised version;

3. Units are missing: The isoelectric point of the predicted proteins and their corresponding amino acid length ranged respectively from 4.51 to 9.16 (pI) and from 379 to 495 (aa).

Response: We have supplemented the corresponding units “Identification of MRS2 family genes in banana” ,the isoelectric point, the amino acid length and the molecular weight of the predicted proteins ranged from 4.51 to 9.16 (pI), from 379 to 495 (aa), and from 42.57 to 54.83 (kDa)” in Page 3 line 15 in the revised version.

4. Rewrite: Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic tree built for Mg transporter protein sequences from banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and yeast, with yeast Mg transporters as the outgroup.

Response:the original sentence in page 5 line 4 - 6 “Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic tree built for Mg transporter protein sequences from banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and yeast, with yeast Mg transporters as the outgroup” changed to:

“Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MGTs of banana, Arabidopsis, rice, maize and yeast. Among them, MGTs of yeast was selected as the outgroup (Fig. 2)”. In Page 5, line 3 – 4 in the revised version.

5. Chromosomal location and gene duplication: Authors mentioned gene duplication as gene replication. (5 times). There is a difference between the two terms.

Also, in the discussion part: we found evidence for replication relationships that occurred between MaMRS2 family members across chromosomes but no signs of a tandem replication relationship (Fig. 4). This pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana [32]. It is reasonable to speculate that multiple rounds of whole genome replication events have occurred over evolutionary time in banana.

Response: we modified “replication” in page 5 line 39 = 42 and page 6 line 1 to “duplication” in page 5 line 37 – 42 (5 times) in the revised version.

Also, the original sentence “This pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana [32]. It is reasonable to speculate that multiple rounds of whole genome replication events have occurred over evolutionary time in banana.” in page 8 line 14 -16 changed to:

“Genomic collinearity showed that duplication relationships occurred between MaMRS2 family members across chromosomes, but no signs of a tandem duplication relationship (Fig. 4), a pattern generally exists among other gene family members of banana” in the revised version.

6. Figure legends are not uploaded properly or incomplete:

Fig. 1 Multiple sequence alignments of MaMSR2 proteins. This alignment was performed using DNAMAN software. The identical, conserved, and less conserved

Fig. 2 Phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, yeast, and banana CorA/MRS2/MGT members. The neighbor-joining tree, which includes 10 MaMRS2

Fig. 3 Phylogenetic relationships (A), gene structure (B), and motif analysis (C) of MaMRS2 family members in banana. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the

Fig. 4 Chromosomal location and gene duplication of MaMRS2 genes in the banana genome. The MaMRS2 gene is located on multiple chromosomes. The chromosome

Fig. 5 Predicted cis-acting elements in the promoter region of the 10 MaMRS2 genes in banana. Different colors represent cis-acting elements associated with different

Fig. 6 Complementary analysis of the MaMRS2 genes. MM1927 is the wild type, used here as a positive control; the MM281 and

Fig. 7 Expression of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) seedlings. Explain the Abbreviations.

Fig. 8 Relative expression levels of 10 MaMRS2 genes in different tissues of banana cultivar ‘Baxijiao’ (Musa spp. AAA Cavendish) Explain the Abbreviations.

Response: We have uploaded the complete Figure legends.

Fig.1 Multiple sequence alignments of MaMSR2 proteins. Alignment was performed using DNAMAN software. The identical, conserved and less conserved amino acid residues are indicated by dark, cherry red and cyan background colors, respectively. The conservative GMN motif was indicated and the TM domains are underlined.

Fig.2 Phylogenetic analysis of Arabidopsis, rice, maize, yeast and banana CorA/MRS2/MGT members. The Neighbor-Joining tree, which includes 10 MaMRS2 protein from banana, 11 MRS2/MGT proteins from Arabidopsis, 9 MRS2/MGT proteins from rice, 12 MRS2/MGT proteins from maize and 5 MRS2/MGT proteins from yeast, was constructed using MEGA X. A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H represent the different clades of the MRS2/MGT family in these five species.

Fig.3 Phylogenetic relationships (A), gene structure (B) and motif analysis (C) of MaMRS2 family members. The Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates in the MEGA X software. Then the gene structure was performed using GSDS program. MEME program and TBTools were used to illustrate the motif analysis results. Yellow boxes and black lines represent exons and introns, respectively, blue boxes indicate 5’ or 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs) and different motif was painted with different color.

Fig.4 Chromosomal location and gene duplication of MaMRS2 genes in the banana genome. The MaMRS2 gene is located on different chromosomes. The number of chromosomes is shown on the outside, and the different colors represent different chromosomes. The grey region is the collinearity of the banana genome, highlighting the collinearity between the MaMRS2 genes was highlighted with red lines.

Fig.5 Analysis of cis-acting elements of members of the MaMRS2 gene family. Different colors represent cis-acting elements of different functions.

Fig.6 Complementary analysis of the MaMRS2 genes. MM1927 was the wild type and used as a positive control, MM281 and MM281 transformed with an empty pTrc99A were used as negative controls. (A) Functional verification on N minimal solid medium containing 20, 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, 0.1, 0.01 mM MgSO4. The bacterial was diluted sequentially 10-fold from left to right. (B) Growth curves were performed in N-minimal liquid medium containing 10, 1, 0.5 and 0.01mM MgSO4, and the cell density was monitored at OD600 every 2 hours. Data was an average of three independent experiments, and the different icons in the figure represent the average of three repetitions.

Fig.7 Expression of MaMRS2 gene in different tissues of Baxijiao seedlings. UL, LL, PS, C and R represent upper leaf, lower leaf, pseudo stem, corm and root respectively.

Fig.8 Relative expression level of MaMRS2 gene in different tissues of Baxijiao seedlings under magnesium deficiency. The CK indicated the value under normal growth conditions as a control, and the -Mg indicated the relative expression level under the complete absence of magnesium ion condition. UL, LL, PS, C and R represent upper leaf, lower leaf, pseudo stem, corm and root respectively.

7. The author mentioned sequences of 7 genes:

Supplementary Test1 The nucleotide sequences of the seven MaMRS2 genes from sequencing

There are only three sequences >MaMRS2-1, >MaMRS2-4, >MaMRS2-7 as authors clones only three genes.

Response: The original “Supplementary Test1 The nucleotide sequences of the seven MaMRS2 genes from sequencing” changed to “Supplementary Test1 The nucleotide sequences of the three MaMRS2 genes from sequencing” see Supplementary test1.

8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant.

Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines are growing fine in lower concentrations.

Response: We speculate that the growth of the transformants has an optimal concentration. the genes from banana may be less efficient under high Mg condition when compared with that from bacteria, while they are similar under low Mg conditions.

Figure 6B: Authors mentioned: The data are shown as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates,

However, no SD is shown on the line charts.

Response: “The data are shown as the mean ± SD of three biological replicates,” in page 12 line 19 changed to “The data are shown as the mean of three biological replicates,” in page 11 line 4 in the revised version.

The growth curve at 0.01 mM Mg2+ shows that complementing lines 2-1 and 2-7 are growing better than the wild type, which does not correlate with Figure 6A.

Response: We carefully checked the original data and found that there were errors in the data processing. Now we have corrected the original data. Figure 6B 0.01mm is corrected (please see the revised figure 6B):

9. qRT-PCR analysis of MaMRS2-9 has no error bars; what does it signify? Also, many other samples have no or negligible error bar, which cannot be true for three biological replicates. The authors did not mention technical replicates.

Response: The histogram in Figure 8 is the average of three technical repetitions with 3 biological replicates, we revised it in the new manuscript with error bars added.

Tubulin primers used in the current study are new or from the previous study? If from the previous study needs a reference.

Response: Tubulin primers used in the current study are from the previous study, The reference was in Page 12, line 29 - 31 “The expression level of each MaMRS2 gene was calculated using the 2-ΔCt method, for which the TUB gene served as the internal reference [56]”. See Reference: 56. Podevin N, Krauss A, Henry I, Swennen R, Remy S. Selection and validation of reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR expression studies of the non-model crop Musa. Mol Breeding. 30(3): 1237-1252.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-012-9711-1 PMID: 23024595.

Also, we carefully read our original article and found some mistakes, as follows:

the original sentences in page 6 line 2“The Ka/Ks of five homologous Mg transporters was < 0.3 (Supplementary Table S1);” have changed to “The Ka/Ks of five homologous Mg transporters was less than 0.3 (Supplementary Table S1);”in page 5 line 43-44 in the revised version.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Anil Kumar Singh

31 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-02641R1

Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Huang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please incorporate suggestions of reviewer 2 in the revised manuscript.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 14 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Anil Kumar Singh, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Authors have addressed all the comments and quality of manuscript is now acceptable. Authors may include this response in Discussion:

Comment8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant.

Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of

magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines

are growing fine in lower concentrations.

Response: We speculate that the growth of the transformants has an optimal

concentration. the genes from banana may be less efficient under high Mg condition

when compared with that from bacteria, while they are similar under low Mg

conditions.

English quality is much better than the first version.

Also statistical analysis is now clear and acceptable.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Ritesh Kumar

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 1;15(10):e0239058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239058.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


12 Aug 2020

Reviewer #2:

1.Authors may include this response in Discussion:

Comment8. The authors did complementation assay with MM281 mutant.

Figure 6A: Why the growth of complemented lines is low in higher concentration of

magnesium as compare to Mutant (MaMRS2-4, MaMRS2-7), as Complemented lines

are growing fine in lower concentrations.

Response:

In the reviewed manuscript at the end of the second paragraph of the discussion, we added the following:

The complementary lines incorporated with MaMRS2-4 and MaMRS2-7 could grow well under low Mg concentration conditions, but they had lower growth rate when compared with the mutant control under solid growth medium with higher Mg concentration (10 mM and 20 mM) (Fig. 6A). These results indicated that both MaMRS2-4 and MaMRS2-7could transport Mg, at the same time, the exogenous Mg transporters from banana might play its role in excessive Mg accumulation and lead to the toxic effect in bacteria under high Mg conditions.

2.Also, we carefully read our original article and found some mistakes, as follows:

The “physicochemical” was changed to “physiochemical” in page 1 line 15;

“was” was changed were” in page 1 line 23;

“isocitrate-lyase” was changed “isocitrate lyase” page 1 line 35;

“RuBP carboxylase” was changed “ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase” in page 2 line 36;

“diversed” was changed “diverse” in page 2 line 35;

“Protiens” was changed “proteins” in page 9 line 6;

“Figure. 6 A” was changed “Fig. 6” in page 9 line 7;

“Ca(NO3)·4H2O” was changed “Ca(NO3)2·4H2O” in page 11 line 20

“Chen C, Xia R, Chen H, He Y. TBtools, a Toolkit for Biologists integrating various HTS-data handling tools with a user-friendly interface. bioRxiv. 2018: 289660. https://doi.org/10.1101/289660.” was changed to “Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, et al. TBtools-an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data[J]. bioRxiv, 2020: 289660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009” in page 16 line 15-17.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Anil Kumar Singh

31 Aug 2020

Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana

PONE-D-20-02641R2

Dear Dr. Huang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Anil Kumar Singh, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Anil Kumar Singh

17 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-02641R2

Identification and functional analysis of the CorA/MGT/MRS2-type magnesium transporter in banana

Dear Dr. Huang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Anil Kumar Singh

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Analysis of Transmembrane (TM) domains of the MaMRS2 family proteins using the TMHMM program, red region indicates transmembrane region.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. RT-PCR amplification of the entire ORF of three MaMRS2 genes.

    The root or leaf cDNAs were used as template. The RT-PCR was performed 35 cycles using gene specific-primer pairs.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Ka/Ks of MaMRS2 genes.

    (PDF)

    S2 Table. PCR primers used for semi-quantitative RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analysis.

    (PDF)

    S3 Table. PCR primers used for complete CDS amplification.

    (PDF)

    S1 Test. The nucleotide sequences of the three MaMRS2 genes from sequencing.

    (PDF)

    S1 Raw images

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES