Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2020 Oct 2;21:100734. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100734

Recently Emerging Nanotechnological Advancements in Polymer Nanocomposite Coatings for Anti-corrosion, Anti-fouling and Self-healing

Christopher Igwe Idumah a,, Chizoba May Obele a, Ezeani O Emmanuel a, Azman Hassan b
PMCID: PMC7531442  PMID: 34957345

Abstract

Recent nanotechnological advancements have enabled novel innovations in protective polymer nanocomposites (PNC) coatings for anti-corrosion, anti-fouling and self-healing services on material surfaces. Nanotechnology encompases research, manufacturing, and application of nanoparticulate architectures, tubular structures, sheets or plates exhibiting sizes below 100 nanometers (nm) in at least a single dimension. Inclusions of nanoparticles into organic entities have demonstrated enhanced properties essential for attainiment of aesthetics, anti-corrosion, thermal stability for high-temperature performances, mechanical strength essential for resisting coating deterioration in harsh environments, nano-architectural cross-linking capable of hindering penetration of corrosive, and biofouling entities. Unlike previously published literature, this paper elucidates very recently emerging important advancements in novel techniques utilized in developing PNC coatings for applications in aerospace, packaging, automotive, biomedicine, maritime, and oil and gas industries for attaining superior anti-fouling, anti-corrosion, and self-healing behaviors on critical material surfaces. Emerging market structures and novel applications are also presented.

Keywords: Nanotechnology, Nanomaterials, PNC nanocoatings, Self-healing, Anti-corrosion, Anti-fouling

Graphical abstract

Image, graphical abstract

1. Introduction

With the recent evolution in nanotechnology, nanomaterials have enabled modification of PNC nanocoatings for efficient suppression of corrosion, fouling, and scratching of metallic materials, in addition to attainment of nanocoating self-healing in varying ethereal and marine architectures with its attendant benefits. Nanomaterials are materials exhibiting at least a single morphological entity such as architectural dimension, granular size, particulate dimension, and so on, at the nanoscale, or below 100 nm [1]. These nanomaterials occur as nil dimensional entities such as nanoparticles, single dimensional entities such as nanorods, nanotubes, and nanowires or two-dimensional entities in form of nanolayers, nanofilms, nanosheets, and nanoplatelets. Nanomaterials demonstrate enhanced behaviors especially electronically, optically, mechanically, thermally, physically, chemically, and magnetically [2]. These behaviors are mainly ascribed to their very small dimensions which enables elevated surface volume unit, and broad surfaces for effective interaction [3]. Nanomaterials exhibit prospects of minimizing corrosion degree on metallic surfaces via surfacial modification using nanocrystalline structural coatings. Fig. 1 schematically elucidates nanomaterial classification, while Fig. 2 schematically elucidates nanomaterial applications in varying vital areas.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Classification of nanomaterials.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Applications of nanomaterials.

Nanocoatings have effectively been utilized in reducing negative effects of corrosion. A PNC coating is defined as a nanocoating exhibiting constituents either at the nanoscale level, or whose constitution is made up of sheets or layerings below 100 nm [4]. Nanomaterials dimension or sizes, in addition to their highly dense layering enhances good bonding, and highly appropriate physical covering of the coated surface. PNC coating is the most commonly available technique for inhibiting, hindering, reducing, or mitigation of the effects of corrosion because of the presence of varying types of coating entities and procedures for numerous environmental parameters and applications. PNCs coatings can be applied to the interior or exterior surfaces of a given material at varying temperature range thereby facilitating critical benefits including very smooth surfaces and interfacial flow efficiency on the surfaces [5]. Nanocoatings may seem expensive in the short term, but in the long run tend to be cheaper, especially in large-scale usages, because of high saving garnered from maximally reduced maintenance cost, safety, protection of equipment damages, natural resources, and so on [6]. Notably, successful utilization of PNCs coatings for hindering or mitigating fouling, corrosion, and scratching from self-healing capabilities is usually inhibited by inherent micro-architectural porosity which demonstrates deficiency at hindering the penetration of extraneous entities detrimental to a given surface. Other parameters include damages induced by scratching, wearing or abrasion [7]. The inclusion of nanomaterials in PNC coatings highly improves their barrier protective performances.

Though, previous decades have withnessed numerous studies on PNC coatings, versatile insights into recently emerging functions of nanocoatings are not well documented. Unlike previously published literature on this subject, this paper presents very recently emerging nanotechnological advancement in PNCs protective coatings, with broad insight into prospects of inorganic and organic hybrid substrates. Exposure is accorded to emerging novel trends in nanotechnological usage for enhancing anti-fouling, self-healing and anti-corrosion behaviors of PNC coatings. This is propelled by in depth elucidation of parameters affecting coating micro-architecture, along with cutting-edge insight into nanocoatings functionalization for effective covering power. Herein, effect of micro-architectures and nano-modification on coating behavior, as well as fabrication techniques relative to corrosion resistance, anti-fouling and self-healing are presented. Insight into past, present and future market structures of PNC coatings are also presented.

2. Emerging Market Structure of PNCs Nanocoatings

In a report released by Future Market Insights [8], within the spectrum of the global market for protection against corrosion, PNCs coatings are forecasted to withness a continual CAGR growth within 2017-2022. By ending of 2022, the global market for polymeric based coatings for enhanced corrosion resistance is anticipated to garner more than US$ 19.5 billion in revenues. Furthermore, the global conductive PNCs market is expected to garner a CAGR of 9.2% during the forecast duration. The market is anticipated to accrue to about USD 10.57 billion towards the end of 2027 from USD 3.16 billion in 2016 [8]. The PNCs abrasion resistant coatings (PNCs-ARCs) market attained USD 8.0 billion in 2019. However, it is anticipated to garner USD 11.1 billion by 2024, at a CAGR growh of 6.5% between 2019 and 2024. Latin America occupied the largest chunk of the global abrasion resistant coatings market [8]. By 2024, Latin America is estimated to garner USD 2.3 billion, attaining a CAGR of 6.3% during duration of forecast. The use of PNCs-ARCs in power generation, oil and gas, mining, transportation, marine, and construction industries are anticipated to drive the highest growth in Latin America in nearest future. Though this forecast was done prior to covid-19 pandemic era along with its attendant severe economic downturn in 2020, it is still anticipated to maintain same value as the pandemic gradually subside. Escalating demand for semi-conducting products including optical devices, sensors, and so on are expected to boost the growth of global conductive polymer coating market. Industries expected to drive this growth include the smart textiles, solar, automotive, locomotive, and electrical and electronics industries. This growth is anticipated to be powered through use of conductive polymer coatings on sensors, fuel cells, cell phones, displays, touch panel, solid state lighting, displays, capacitors, batteries, photovoltaic cells, and so on [8].

3. PNC Coatings Properties and Classification

This section elucidates classification and properties of nanocoatings with special emphasis on varying approaches of applying coatings on surfaces. Generally, coatings are deposited as a multiple layering system composed of primer layering, and an uppercoat. For instance, in automotive coating system, this layering may vary between four to six layerings. Individual coating layerings undergo application to carry out specific functions. Additionally, interfacial interactions within various layering in the system play a key role in the total performance of the multiple-coating system [9]. Over the years, PNC nanocoatings have demonstrated efficiency as very effective approach for attaining anti-corrosion of metallic architectures. Water- and solvent-oriented PNC coatings are effective for protecting metallic architectures against corrosion. This protective propensity of PNCs coatings mainly depends on nanoparticle inclusion, and specialized additives included in the film-formulation, such as anti-corrosive entities, and corrosion inhibitors. Additives utilized as corrosion inhibiting entities in nanocoatings are generally divided into inorganic and organic materials. Inorganic inhibiting entities of the adsorption or oxidative types are majorly utilized in water-oriented PNC coatings [9], while organic inhibiting entities are utilized for solvent based PNC nanocoatings [10]. The adhering behavior of PNC coatings is a critical parameter in achieving strong covering power [9], [10], [11].

PNC coatings are comprised of highly dense grain and interphasial boundaries, dislocations, and so on, where inter-layer spacing between them nearly attains inter-atomic distancing. Hence, PNCs coatings demonstrate varying properties based on highly-grained, traditional coatings enabling their ability to overcome the mechanical and anti-corrosive properties of their neigbours. This predisposes their classification into metallic and ceramic PNC coatings relying on their base materials. PNC coatings are composed of two or more entities in the nanoscale. As a result of inherently fine dimension of nanoparticles used in PNC coatings, void-filling and corrosive entities inhibition from penetrating surface of protected substrate enhances the coating efficiency [11], [12], [13].

Recently evolving nanocoating technology has impacted greatly on paints development with inclusion of properties like self-mending [14], self-cleaning [15], anti-scratching [16], and anti-wearing reppression [17]. Furthermore, smart nanocoatings have proved advantageous in minimizing the effects of corrosion and biofouling on concerned materials. These nano-PNC coatings undergo development to enable responses to outside stimulus including electromagnetic radiation, stress, pH, heat, coating distortion, humidity, and so on, through the release of controlled quantities of inhibitors to enable the repairing and curing of voids and damages [18], [19], [20], [21]. Conventional coatings of micro-sized particles or thicknesses usually present varying corrosion behaviour in comparison with PNC coatings [22]. Due to the superior properties exhibited by PNC, they are utilized in versatile applications including computers, cell phones, clothing, eye-glasses, and so on. In building and construction sectors, they are utilized in air filters, windows, tiles, walls, flooring, and so on. Application of coating nanolayering on the surfaces of these appliances enhances their flame-retardancy, anti-wearing and, anti-scratching, anti-graffiti, corrosion reppression, self-cleaning, as well as electrical conductivity. Moreso, these materials exhibit improved adherence, anti-fogging, optical-clarity, and anti-fouling behavior, and additionally used as photo-voltaic substrates [23], [24], [25]. In the biomedical sector, metallic PNC coatings are used in modifiing material surface disposition when esential. These materials are basically utilized in medicine for protection, surfacial covering, and corrosion suppression. Secondarily, these materials are utilized in biocompatibility, drug delivery, and in other fields such as military, automobile, energy, environment, and so on [26].

PNC coatings are applied on surfaces via three main depositing techniques, vis-a-viz mechanically, physically, as well as chemical depositing techniques [27]. Mechanical depositing technique is relatively low cost, and attained via painting, spraying, dip-coating or spin-coating. Physical depositing technique can be conducted via sputtering, bonding, or condensation. During conduction of physically induced diffusing bonding, a mild pressure and temperature are utilized, in comparison to braze-bonding, where lubricants are included under elevated temperatures. Attaining adherence via surface-activated bonding (SAB) is feasible at lower temperatures and pressures for scrubed atomic flattend, and polished surfaces. Moreso, selective laser sintering (SLS) is a novel additive manufacturing technique inferred as tri-dimensionally (3D) routed printing method where a material is structured in a layering order [27]. Another physical bonding technique is condensation, and conventionally conducted on a vacuum like in physical vapour deposition (PVD), which is conducted at normal pressure parameters, similar to liquid phase epitaxy (LPE). Chemical adhering techniques potend to be lower in cost, however, require expensive precursors, including atomically layered deposition (ALD), Langmuir, and sol-gel [27].

Plasma-enhanced magneto optical chemical vapour deposition is another technique feasible at specific substrate pressure, temperature, and power [28]. Aforementioned methods of coating layering on a substrate surface influence the evenness and surface behavior such as ductility, strength, and fracture toughness [28]. For any coating section, the proper coating technique should be carefully selected considering critical parameters. Regarding traditional coatings, selected methods should be applied using optimised parameters in order to attain excellent surfacial coverage relative to evenness, smoothness, adherence, void-free surfaces, and so on. Types of functional PNCs nanocoatings are schematically represented in Fig. 3 .

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

Types of functional PNCs nanocoatings.

3.1. Functional PNCs Nanocoatings

Fundamentally, coatings are majorly utilized on surfaces for functional, decorative, and protective purposes, and in most instances, a combination of these parameters. Functional coatings are referred to as systems demonstrating decorative and protective functions, in addition to other specific functionalities [29]. Depending on the appropriate use of a coated material, this additional functionality may be versatile. Furthermore, functional coatings are separated into ease of cleaning, self-cleaning, anti-fouling, soft feeling, antibacterial [30], and anti-viral [31]. Aside their unique behavior, PNC functional coatings must satisfy some expectations relative to their behavior, scratch and abrasion resistance. This is in addition to customized surfacial morphology, reproducibility, ease of application, cost effectiveness, and environmental compliancy. Hence, PNC functional nanocoatings are categorized based on their functional behavior. The performance of these coatings depends on their mechanical, chemical, physical, and thermal behavior [32], [33], [34], [35].

Fundamentally, nanofillers undergo inclusion into polymeric matrices so as to improve the material conductivity, stiffness, strength, and thermal resistance, while also reducing permeability, fouling, thermal expansion, solvent attack, and flammability, while retaining processability, elongation, transparency, cost, density, and chemical inhibition. Polymeric materials are highly inhibiting to corrosion, scratching and wearing. The inclusion of ceramic nano-fillers into polymeric matrices enhances self-healing, hydrophilic, and anti-wearing behavior, thereby resulting in enhanced corrosion inhibition. On inclusion of nanoparticles of ceramic-alumina, or silica in paints, anti-scratch behavior is enhanced. Moreso, nanoclay inclusion in polymeric matrices, result in decreased porosity and diffusion route of the fabricated PNC because of enhanced water barrier as well as gas permeability behaviors [35].

PNC processability is highly essential. Based on the procedure of synthesis, a uniform distribution or agglomeration of nanofillers in polymeric matrices is attained. Nanofillers uniform dispersion and distribution in polymeric matrices demonstrate optimal property enhancement in the PNCs. Varying chemical procedures are utilized in combining polymeric matrices with nanoparticles. These procedures include melt and solution intercalation, in situ and emulsion polymerization [36], [37], [38], [39]. Relative to dispersion and distribution of nanoparticles’ in PNCs, both solution intercalation and situ polymerisation are perceived excellent for PNCs fabrication. In some studies, enhancements in corrosion hinderance and mechanical strength have been attained. These enhancements in properties are demonstrated in incremental cohesive and adhesive behaviors of the nano-architecture attributed to appropriate dispersion of nanofillers in the matrix [40], [41], [42], [43]. Additionally, both anti-scratch and anti-wear resistances are enhanced with increasing nanoparticle weight percent in polymeric matrices [44]. Moreso, hydrophobicity behavior is also enhanced through nanoparticles inclusion which in turn improves corrosion inhibition [44].

4. Anti-corrosion coatings

This section presents market structure, preparation, characterization and properties of anti-corrosion coatings. In recent years, organic coatings have increasingly become a higly common and cost-effective route to prolong the shelf life of metallic architectures exposed to weathering environment. The evolution of innovative and more efficient protective coatings are largely linked to rapid evaluation of anti-corrosive resistance prior industrialization. Corrosion is inferred as material deterioration due to chemically interacting with the immediate environment [45]. Metallic structural corrosion highly impact on the global economy. World Corrosion Organisation (WCO) has projected that the global cost of corrosion is presently greater than 1.3 × 1012 €, approximately equal to 3.8 % of the overall global Gross Domestic Product (GDP) [46]. As result of the economic effect of this protective system, there is a rapidly growing research involvement in the development of highly performing coatings, able to simultaneously satisfy safety, environmental, and health essentials [47]. An investigation conducted by National Association in Corrosion Engineers (NACE) approximate the cost implication of corrosion globally to about $255 billion USD accounting for 3.4 % of world gross domestic product (GDP) [47]. The yearly corrosion costs on US economy directly and indirectly, is estimated equal to $552 billion and constitute 6% of annual GDP [48]. Corrosion impacts directly on the cost of managing and instituting repairs on automobiles, household electronics, airplanes, highway-bridges, industrial plants like energy developing and channeling mechanisms, pharmaceutical, desalination, petrochemical, desalination, and so on. Indirect corrosion costs implication includes productivity losses as result of delayal, and outages, in addition to taxes and overhead costs incurred from corrosion, and so on [49].

In order to develop mitigation against the adverse effects of corrosion, protective PNC coatings have sufficed [50]. In accordance with dispersive media classification, anti-corrosion coatings are categorised into solvent, water, and powder-oriented, in addition to other notable formulations of coatings. Due to the enaction and concise implementation of policies and regulations guiding the release of volatile compounds (VOCs) emanating from solvent-oriented coatings, water-borne coatings have attained significant share of the market growth in previous decades [51]. Hence, mitigating routes such as organic/polymer coatings, anodic and cathodic protection, and corrosion inhibiting entities have been developed and versatily utilized in automobiles, pipelines, construction, and marine industries for corrosion alleviation and elimination. Nevertheless, highly effective protective systems aim to impact cost-effective techniques. Additionly, organic-inorganic synergistic coatings, PNC, and hydrophobic coatings, have inculcated durability in shelf-life of varying materials in corrosion prone environments [51].

Corrosion implications are varied and versatile. The adversity of corrosion on safety, reliability, and optimal performances of equipments and/or structures are very critical compared with losing the metallic architecture. Various corrosion-controlling techniques have been innovated such as cathodic and anodic protection [52], use of inhibitors [53], alloying and coating [54]. Polymeric (or organic) coatings have for long been utilized in hindering metallic structures from corroding. The main use of polymeric coating is to act as physical barricade against corrosive entities such as O2− and H+. Main causes of metallic corrosion are linked to atmospheric effects, which are triggered on metallic exposure to weathering parameters and highly affected by prevalent climatic entities such as duration of wetness, relative humidity, and salinity, activities of other pollutants, temperature, and acidity [55].

PNC coatings are complex formulations composed of a mixture of varing pigments, binders as well as functional nanoparticles [56]. Metallic architectural protection using PNC coatings are attained using multipled-layered systems consisting of base primer, and an upper-coat [57]. The base primers in synergy with pigments hinder preliminary corrosion, whilst providing adherence. On the other hand, the upper-coat hinders adverse environmental effects such as microbial attack, UV, mechanical and water, while faciltating aesthetic, and functional essentials [57]. However, fundamental protective properties inhibiting ionic corrosion and moisture are proximally linked to the coating integrity which is commonly influenced by mechanical and environmental parameters [57].

Presently, coating/metallic substrate systems stability to corrosion is garnered through application of enhanced weathering tests [58]. Numerous testing techniques have envolved in the simulation of environmental factors, such as the neutral salt-spraying test (ISO 9227), which entail persistant exposure to salt-fogging, and cyclical corrosion tests, such as QUV® or Prohesion®, or the synergy of both - Prohesion®/QUV® (ASTM D 5894), simulating UV radiation and weathering environment [59], [60], [61].

In a recent study, a multifunctional PNC coating was synthesized through reinforcement of polymeric matrix with halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) included with the corrosion inhibiting entity (NaNO3), and urea formaldehyde microcapsules (UFMCs) utilized for encapsulating the self-healing agent, linseed oil (LO). The PNC coatings developed were applied on a cleaned mild steel surface through use of the doctor's blade method. FTIR, and XPS used for structural analysis, and thermogravimetric (TGA) analyses demonstrate synergy of HNT/NaNO3 with UFMCs encapsulation of linseed oil. Fig. 4 is a schemetic representation of the concept of PNC coating [62]. Fig. 5 represents FESEM analysis of samples.

Fig. 4.

Fig 4

Schematic elucidation of the multifunctional nanocomposite coating concept [62].

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

FESEM analysis of: (a) HNTs (b) HNTs with inclusion of NaNO3, (c) urea formaldehyde microcapsules/linseed oil (UFMC/LO), and (e.g) PNC coatings; and EDX analysis of: (d) HNTs, (f) HNTs with NaNO3 inclusion, and (h) PNC coatings [62].

Results demonstrate that the inhibiting agent self-release from HNTs while responding to variation in pH was a time dependent procedure. The PNC coatings exhibited efficient self-mending while responding to externally influenced mechanical deterioration. Studies using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) demonstrate PNC coatings potential anti-corrosive effect. The corrosion inhibition demonstrated by the developed PNC smart coatings may be attributed to effective release of inhibiting entity and self-mending agent while responding to external stimulation. Therefore, PNC coatings treated with multi-functional entity is a potential steel corrosion inhibitor for the oil and gas industry [62].

When water contact angle (WCA) on a surface is 150° or higher, the surface is said to be a super-hydrophobic (or ultra-hydrophobic) surface (SHS). A good example of a naturally occurring SHS is the lotus leaf, whose WCA is above 150° [63]. This super-hydrophobic impact is caused by both lower surface energy substrates and hierarchical or nano-/macro- architectures characterized by very low water roll-off angle or very low WCA hysteresis [64]. Former study has demonstrated that droplets of water on textured surfaces easily balance on top of nano-architectures because bubbles of air cover the entire contours in the architectures beneath the droplets. Water-droplets on these surfaces are hindered from penetrating into micro- or nano-architectures, wetting the surfaces and causing very high contact-angles. Hence, these leaves demonstrate high super-hydrophobicity. Various techniques such as chemical deposition [65], casting, and chemical etching [66], sol-gel procedure [67], photo-lithography [68], plasma modification [69], templating [70], and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [71], have undergone utilization in fabricating super-hydrophobic surfaces. Numerous investigations have demonstrated application of polymeric matrices, and PNCs in fabricating hydrophobic/superhydrophobic surfaces [72], [73], [74], [75]. Hence, the evolution of hydrophobic/super-hydrophobic polymeric matrices and PNCs has attracted great interests in the field of materials science, and engineering. Recently, very negligible amount of researches have been conducted on use of polymeric matrices and PNC coatings in investigating anti-corrosive behavior of hydrophobic/super-hydrophobic surfaces [72], [73], [74], [75]. Moreover, studies involving organic polymeric inorganic silica composite anti-corrosion coatings exhibiting bio-inspired super-hydrophobic surfaces have never been reported.

Thus, a recent research demonstrated the feasibility of developing advanced PMMA/silica composite (PSC) coatings for anti-corrosive activity [76]. Here, the combination of nano-casting and UV-curing techniques was used in designing and duplicating fresh plant leaf surfaces such as Xanthosoma sagittifolium leaves (XSL). Derived exact imprint of super-hydrophobic XSL was imposed on the composite surface such that the produced material displayed exact super-hydrophobicity required for hindering corrosive activity. An eco-benign procedure was utilized in preparing the PNC anti-corrosion coatings devoid of any solvent usage [76].

Hence, the PNC anti-corrosive coatings fabricated enabled versatile effects in protecting metallic substrate from corrosive activity. Conventionally, some polymeric resins utilized in attainment of anti-corrosive behavior require usage of organic solvents presenting a degree of adversity to human health. However, as a result of introduction of new regulative policies guiding release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), increasing demands for ecobenign coating systems has necessitated replacement of hazardous compounds in these coatings. These replacements have resulted in availability of solvent-free and water-borne coatings. Thus, bio-inspired architecture exhibiting super-hydrophobicity replicating that garnered from Xanthosoma sagittifolium leaf with the capability of repelling moisture, and with improved reduction of the water/corrosive adsorption media on the PMMA surfaces hindering underlying metallic corrosive propensity and derivation of silica nanoparticle improving surface hydrophobicity to a super-hydrophobicity were attained. Fig. 6 (A, B) further elucidates results from this study [76].

Fig. 6.

Fig 6

A. (a). Photograph of Xanthosoma sagittifolium leaves. (b) SEM image of a freshly removed natural leaf. Elucidation reveals Xanthosoma sagittifolium leaf water contact angle. (c) PDMS negative template; B: SEM images for (a, d) the Xanthosoma sagittifolium leaf-like PMMA hydrophobic surface and the super-hydrophobic surface of the nanocomposite. Inserted image reveals the surface contact angle (b, e) Top views of PMMA surface and nanocomposite. Inserted images show (e) silica nanoparticles. (c, f) Sectional views of PMMA surfaces and the nanocomposite [76].

A mixture of organic/inorganic, photocatalytic and hydrophobic nanocomposite coatings including Ce/TiO2 nanoparticles (c-TiO2/NPs) have been developed using the sol-gel technique. The incorporation of c-TiO2 NPs in the hydrophobic coating demonstrated good self-cleaning ability [77]. Moreso, nanoparticles were assembled in a dried film constituting of bio-oriented polymeric matrices. Varying nanoparticles underwent distribution along with hydroxyethyl starch (HES) and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC). Results revealed that morphology of the polymeric substrate exhibited profound impact on the assembly architecture of the nanocomposite. Premised on attained results, a bio-oriented water-based coating system was developed to efficiently repress UV radiation while controlling transparency utilizing ZnO NP. This investigation offer opportunities for usage of sustainable bio-oriented substrates for effective smart coating usages [78].

A PNC coating has been prepared exhibiting effective corrosion resisting and encapsulating attributes, and capacity to control delivery of benzotriazole (BTA) for simultaneous transfer of both active and passive corrosion reppressive attributes to the coating layerings. Subsequently, metallic organic frameworks (MOFs) underwent synthesization and utilized as nano-containing conveyors for BTA loading. Based on this premise, tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) underwent inclusion thereby forming a film for wrapping the MOFs. The incorporation of TEOS conferred pH-responsiveness and active suppressing abilities to the coatings ascribed to the film susceptibility to degrade under acidic, or alkaline environment. Results revealed that the BTA-MOF-TEOS-GO included in the epoxy coatings demonstrated elevated impedance values of about 8.6 × 108 Ω cm2, implying very effective and durable corrosion repressive behaviors [79].

Aniline tetramer (AT) in conjunction with electro-activated imide oligomeric (EIO) anti-corrosive entity has been synthesized successfully in a recent research. The advanced anti-corrosive performance of PI coating behavior on CRS electrodes was ascribed to the redox catalytic affinity of AT entities available in EIO [80]. Figs. 7 and 8 depicts mass, ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, and SEM images of samples.

Fig. 7.

Fig 7

A. Characterization of aniline tetramer by (a) Mass and (b) ATR-FTIR spectroscopies, B; ATR-FTIR spectroscopies of (a) EAAO and (b) EIO, C; UV-Vis spectra monitoring chemical of (a) AT and (b) EAAO [80].

Fig. 7 depicts the mass and ATR-FTIR spectra of AT. AT characterization reveal ion trap-MS m/z: [M + H]+ calculated for C24H20N4 = 365.4. [80]

Fig. 8 (a) shows SEM image of ground CRS surface while Fig. 8 (b) depicts the grinded CRS surface post 30 days duration of immersion in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution, exhibiting a densely, irregularly projected particles. Moreover, Fig. 8 (c–d) depicts CRS surface with elimination of PI, AT, and EIO coatings post saline modification on immersion. Insight from Fig. 8c reveals CRS surface to be covered by sparsely granulated entities. This implies that the coating was not able to exhaustively reppress entry of the harsh corrosive medium constituting of dissolved oxygen ions and chlorine into the material during long-term modification immersion. As depicted from Fig. 8 (d, e) AT and EIO coatings were somewhat purer. This implies that a passive metallic-oxide layering was formed on surface of CRS [80].

Fig. 8.

Fig 8

depicts SEM images of (a) grinded CRS, with coating on CRS surface with (b) pristine, (c) PI, (d) AT and (e) EIO immersion in 3.5 wt. % NaCl solution time-frames for 30 days [80].

The evolution of efficient corrosion suppressive pre-modifications for metallic surfaces is challenging in attaining prolonged shelf-life of metallic architectures, and components. Thus, a recent study enhanced anti-corrosion protection behavior of sol–gel hybrid coatings garnered from synergy of [2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT) and 2-mercaptobenzimidazole (MBI)] in the presence of β-cyclodextrin (β-CD). Synergy of MBI or MBT with β-CD resulted in encapsulative anti-corrosion attainment ascribed to active corrosive electrolytes capable of gradual diffusion from the host material to maintain continual transfer of inhibiting entities to the corrosion locations and ensure durable anti-corrosion activity [81].

Inferior mechanical behavior hinder artificial superhydrophobic coatings from extended application despite availability of these coatings decades earlier, and attraction of broad research awareness. Previous researches from epoxy/nanoparticle delivered a weak nano-architecture and inferior surfacial energy devoid of appropriate and strong micro-architecture to enable protection and strength resulting in poor mechanical adherence, and weak wearing behavior. Hence, an inversely infusive procedure referred as (IIP) was used in constructing hierarchical architectures through novel synthesis of epoxy resin with alumina nanoparticles (NPs). Results revealed that this coating resisted highly corrosive environment, containing sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid solutions with high potentials for use as anti-fouling, self-cleaning, and anti-icing coating system [82].

Epoxy-TiO2 nanocomposite coatings were prepared via solution intercalation technique. Varying concentration of TiO2 nanoparticles ranging from 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 wt. % respectively were used in preparing three types of epoxy nanocomposite coating systems designated as ET1, ET2, and ET3, respectively [83]. Amongst other tests conducted to ascertain anti-corrosion efficiency was atomic force microscopy (AFM) which investigated the topological behavior of the prepared coating systems, in addition to variations in their surface roughness. Fig. 9 depicts 3-D topography of pristine epoxy-TiO2 and nanocomposite coating systems [83].

Fig. 9.

Fig 9

3D AFM images of (A) neat epoxy, E, coating system and (B) ET1, (C) ET2, and (D) ET3 epoxy-TiO2 nanocomposite coating systems [83].

A notable decrease in surface roughness was attained post TiO2 nanoparticles inclusion in epoxy matrix especially within 0.1 to 0.2 wt. % concentration revealing efficient distribution state of TiO2. On the other hand, a higher surface roughness was observed on application of ET3 coating system ascribed to the affinity to agglomeration of TiO2 nanoparticles at higher inclusion, through escalation of nanoparticles clustering. Results exposed capacity of TiO2 nanoparticles at improving the anti-corrosion performance of these coating systems.

5. Anti-fouling coatings

This section provides insight into novel preparation approaches, characterization, properties, and coating techniques of anti-fouling coatings. Marine architectures such as underwater pipelines, oil well-heads, platforms, ship-hulls, barges, jetties and so on are prone to severe and deteriorative biofouling. Notably, most anti-fouling systems are fundamentally based on use of protective coatings. Biofouling adversely and severly impacts on the hydrodynamics of ships hull through escalation of the basic propulsive power, which in turn affect the degree of fuel consumption thereby increasing cost of maintenance [84]. The 2001 prohibition of tributyltin (TBT), a self-polishing copolymeric coating by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), as a result of environmental challenges, and its subsequent replacement with ecobenign anti-fouling coatings, impacted progressively on anti-fouling coatings [85, 86].

Marine engineered architectures including oceanographic-sensors, ships, platforms, heat-exchangers, offshore rigs, jetties and so on, are under consistent attack from marine organisms. For instance, it has been demonstrated that high biofouling agglomerates exhibited by a ship hull is capable of causing 86% penalties at moderate cruising speed [86]. Also, low fouling caused by diatom ‘slimes’ can incur a 10–16% penalty. Hence, speed maintenance becomes difficult with high fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emission, where there is lack of appropriate anti-fouling (AF) regulations [86]. Biofouling development on architectural structures submerged in aquatic environment is an intricate procedure as schematically elucidated in Fig. 10 , comprising mostly of initial formation of biofilm, containing microbes and micro-algae, and subsequent agglomeration of algal-spores and invertebrate-larvae [84], [85], [86]. Biofouling agglomeration onmarine based architectures is composed of millions of marine organisms includingalgae, phyto-plankton, bacteria, ascidians, fungi, barnacles, polychaetes, and molluscsas represented in Fig. 11 .

Fig. 10.

Fig 10

Schematic elucidation of the stages of biofouling development on structural architectures submerged in marine environment.

Fig. 11.

Fig 11

Representation of marine organisms.

These flaws result in increased managerial and monitoring costs, aquacultural productivity losses, and increased shipping fuel costs. Thus, due to the economical repercussions of these marine challenges, varing mitigating strategies are utilized in marine environment as schematically elucidated in Fig. 12 .

Fig. 12.

Fig 12

Various anti-fouling used by different sectors in the marine environment.

Copper paints, despite their elevated toxicity in marine environment were utilized as replacement for TBT containing anti-foulants [87]. Additionally, numerous other compounds have also been used as anti-fouling biocides. These compounds included zinc, dichloroflumid, irgarol-1051-diuron, pyridine, chlorothalonil, and pyrithione [88], [89]. As a result of high toxicity and negative impact on the marine environment or ecosystem, most of these anti-fouling agents are presently placed under strict surveillance and regulation in various countries [90].

5.1. Anti-fouling techniques

Anti-fouling systems include paints, and defined as aesthetic covering composed of materials including stoppers, varnishes, sealers, enamels, lacquers, primers, undercoats, surfacers, fillers, and so on [91]. Anti-foulants are amongst numerous additives included in the formulation of marine protective coating systems. Anti-fouling paints are composed of organic primers forming surface-coatings with anti-corrosive attribute. Antifouling techniques are categorized into three namely chemical, physical, and biological techniques [91].

5.1.1. Chemical anti-fouling techniques

Marine biofouling is a naturally occurring process originating via adsorption of organic and mineral molecules, followed by adhering of micro-fouling such as bacteria and micro-algae, and macro-fouling in form of macro-algae and invertebrates [92]. Varying strategies have been developed in combating fouling based on self-polish-coatings (SPC), and controlled-depletion-paint (CDP) [92]. Many of these strategies are hinged on application of PNC coatings such as polyacrylic resins in blend with metallics including copper and/or toxic organic compounds [93].

A research based on the application of a hemibastadin analog referred as dibromohemibastadin-1 (DBHB), a non-toxic anti-fouling compound suppressing the stability of cyprid larvae of barnacle improvises and byssus which form mytilus edulis on nauplii of Artemia salina has been developed [94]. Results revealed nil effect of DBHB relative to the Minimal Inhibition Concentration (MIC) which was greater than 80 M. With regards to adhesion and biofilm formation, observations were carried out using CLSM in the presence of 16 M DBHB. Bacteria gumming on glass slide was not minimized by the presence of DBHB: nil inhibition was observed as shown in Fig. 13 [94].

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

DBHB impact on the bacterial adhesion on glass surface at 20 C devoid ofof DBHB (Standard) inclusion and composed of DBHB at 16 M (+DBHB). Adherence of Paracoccus sp. (4M6), Pseudolateromonas sp. (5M6) and Bacillus sp. (4J6) was observed by DBHB and detected via cells staining using Syto 9. DBHB: Dibromohemibastadin. Sale bar: 20 m [94].

However, as revealed in Fig. 14 , a notable inhibition of biofilm formation (39.6%) was demonstrated for Paracoccussp. 4M6 [94]. However, nil effect of DBHB on Pseudolateromonas sp. 5M6 and Bacillus sp. 4J6 biofilm formation was recorded. Also, DBHB inclusion resulted in zero mortality in varying biofilms as observed by Syto 9/Sytox red staining. The mortality percent was lower than 1% for the three strains [94].

Fig. 14.

Fig. 14

DBHB effect on bacterial biofilm formation. CLSM observations of the bacterial biofilm developed on glass surface at 20 C under mild flow in absence of DBHB (Standard) and composed of DBHB at 16 M (+DBHB). Biofilms of Paracoccus sp. (4M6), Pseudoalteromonas sp. (5M6) and Bacillus sp. (4J6) were observed through cell staining using Syto 9 [94].

In another antifouling research, it was revealed that inclusion of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) into coatings improved the antifouling performance through enhancement of coating hydrophobicity and reduction in elastic modulus, while PDMS leaching from the coatings enhanced degree of coating fouling elimination. This implies a twin improvement effect on the antifouling propensity of fouling release coatings oriented on PDMS inclusion [95]. Fig. 15 shows the morphologies of varying amounts of PDMS leased on the specimens [95].

Fig. 15.

Fig 15

Morphologies of varying amounts of PDMS leached on specimen [95].

Anti-fouling release coatings made from siloxane are presently the most viable non-toxic commercially available replacement for toxic biocide anti-fouling coatings [96]. Having the objective of improving the degree of bacterial inhibition of siloxane coatings when treated with non-ionic surfactant (NIS), anti-oxidant (AO) or both NIS/AO, the prospects of PEG-silane co-cross-linkage was studied to minimize Cobetia marina adherence and multispecies biofilm formation from naturally occuring sea-water. PEG-silane co-cross-linkage, in combination with NIS and AO can efficiently reduce bio-adherence of Gram-negative marine bacteria and multi-species bio-film formation on siloxane anti-fouling coatings [96].

Microbial clustering on solid surfaces is function of varying surface factors such as topography, hydrophilic/hydrophobic equility, roughness, and surface-tension [97], in addition to other factors including surface mechanical parameters. Placing the expectation of being influenced by the used treatment agents (PEG-silane, NIS and AO), the surface examination of each test surface was conducted prior to examination of the bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. The results are shown in Fig. 16 [97].

Fig. 16.

Fig 16

Nano-topography (49 m 49 m surface area) of the studied coatings, containing: (1) 6 wt % conventional cross-linker, ES 40 (control); (2) 4 wt % ES40 + 2 wt % PEG-silane; (3) 6 wt % ES40 + 2 wt % PEG-silane; (4) 4 wt % ES40 + 2 wt % PEG-silane + 0.5 wt % NIS; (5) 4 wt % ES40 + 2 wt % PEG-silane + 2.0 wt % AO; (6) 4 wt % ES40 + 2 wt % PEG-silane + 0.5 wt % NIS + 1.5 wt % AO [97].

Results revealed enhanced antifouling resistance of the coatings.

Fluorescent microscopy with SYTO-9 staining was utilized in visualizing bacterial biofilms formed after 1 h incubation of C. marina. Images of these biofilms revealing a single layering of cells with some 3-D agglomerates are displayed in Fig. 17 (on glass; 1 on control coating without PEG-silane; 2 and 3 on coatings, composed of 2 wt. % PEG-silane) and Fig. 18 (coatings composed of 2 wt. % PEG-silane and 4–NIS; 5–NAO and 6–NIS/NAO) [98].

Fig. 17.

Fig 17

Fluorescent microscopic pictures of SYTO 9 stained C. marina biofilms formed post 1 h incubating process on (NC) negative control, glass-slide containing stained and unstained bacteria; and on glass specimens with PEG-silane co-cross-linked coatings composed: (1) 6.0 wt. % conventional cross-linker, ES 40 (control, bacteria and staining); (2) 4.0 wt % ES40 + 2.0 wt % PEG-silane; (bacteria and staining); (3) 6.0 wt % ES40 + 2.0 wt % PEG-silane, (bacteria and staining). The yellow arrows imply regions with stained bacteria [98].

Fig. 18.

Fig 18

Fluorescent microscopic pictures of SYTO 9 stained C. marina biofilms formed after a 1 hincubation on (PC) positive control, glass-slide composed of stained and unstained bacteria and glass samples with PEG-silane co-cross-linked coatings containing modifying agent: (4) 4.0 wt % ES40 +2.0 wt % PEG-silane + 0.5 wt % NIS; (bacteria and staining); (5) 4.0 wt % ES40 + 2.0 wt % PEG-silane +2.0 wt % AO; (bacteria and staining); (6) 4.0 wt % ES40 + 2.0 wt % PEG-silane + 0.5 wt % NIS + 1.5 wt %AO, (bacteria and staining). The yellow arrows show regions stained with bacteria [98].

Fluorescent microscopic pictures of SYTO 9 stained C. marina biofilms formed after 1 h incubation on (NC) negative control, glass slide with staining procedure and without bacteria; and on glass samples with PEG-silane co-cross-linked coatings composed of (1) 6.0 wt % conventional cross-linkage, ES 40 (control, bacteria and staining); (2) 4.0 wt % ES40 + 2.0 wt % PEG-silane; (bacteria and staining); (3) 6.0 wt % ES40 + 2.0 wt % PEG-silane, (bacteria and staining). The yellow arrows reveal areas containing stained bacteria. Oil looking blemishes are seen on the pictures of coatings 5 and 6 (Fig. 18), both composed NAO in the corresponding siloxane composition. Most probably, they are formed by NAO migrating to the surface and do not succeed in completely wetting the surface because of relatively low surface energy of the cross-linked siloxane-coating. Fine fibril elements (the longest of about 2–3 m) are observed in all PEG-silane containing coatings (Fig. 17, samples 2, and 3; Fig. 18 [98].

Previously, biofouling was perceived as a challenge and varying forms of anti-fouling techniques have been studied. Organotin substrates such as tributyltin-oxide (TBTO) and tributyltin-fluoride have been applied as anti-foulants. Organotin and its other forms have also been versatily applied as anti-fouling coatings due to their efficiency in repressing a wide range of fouling agglomerates. Those antifouling organotin compounds are powerful fungicides, and will completely inhibit growth of most fouling organisms at a very low concentration [98, 99].

5.1.2. Biological antifouling

Numerous organisms are capable of secreting enzymes or metabolites to hinder development of their competitors [100]. These secretions exhibit minimal-toxicity which are biodegradable, and have garnered much interest recently. Investigators have tried in extracting high concentrations of these secretions for application in biological anti-fouling [100], [101], [102]. The anti-fouling behavior of bioactive compounds separated from marine microbes can be examined in the laboratory against biofilm-forming bacteria, diatoms and barnacle-larvae as instances of organisms under investigation. A naturally occurring antifouling agent will influence these organisms in various ways as schematically elucidated in Fig. 19 . Generally, the agent must hinder biofilms development, perceived as lead for further agglomeration of invertebrate larvae in marine environment.

Fig. 19.

Fig 19

Operational strategies of antifouling agents on fouling organisms.

5.1.3. Physical antifouling techniques

5.1.3.1. Antifouling by electrolysis and radiation

Many techniques for physically inhibiting biofouling have been studied. Anti-fouling can also be attained via micro-cosmic electro-chemical techniques, relying on direct electron exchange between an electrode and the microbial-cells [103]. This results in electro-chemically induced oxidation of inter-cellular substrates, though this is costly and the effectiveness has not been confirmed. Acoustic technology as a form of anti-fouling vibrational technique has been established. Hydroids, mussels and barnacles can also be resisted to a great extent by either exterior vibrational sources or piezo-electric coatings. However, the large power consumption tendencies of these techniques have posed challenges to deal with. However, due to high surface voltage reduction across the surface, some of these mechanisms are not highly effective and this will escalate corrosion issues on the steel substrate. Thus, titanium-enhanced anodic layering has been effectively used due to accruable benefits such as reduced decomposition tension, elevated current effectiveness, and reduced energy consumption although the development has been limited [103].

5.1.3.2. Antifouling via surface topographical and hydrophobic behavior modification

Recently, varying surface behaviors, such as surface roughness, topography, hydrophobic behavior, and lubricity, have been investigated for use in antifouling [104]. Biofilm is mainly formed by micro-organisms such as bacteria and micro-algae, with dimensions of approximately 1–100 µm. At this level, it is feasible to accurately modify the surface micro-structure. An investigation has revealed that fouling diatoms bond strongly to hydrophobic surface of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMSE) than adhering to glass [104]. Additionally, hydrophilic surfaces exhibit antifouling affinity [104], [105], [106].

5.1.3.3. Biomimetics strategy

Biomimetics refer to bio-inspired design instead of direct duplication of natural biological behavior. It presents natural existence as model for engineering development, or as a ‘bottom-up’ route for hierarchical architectures [107]. Usages of biomimetics technique for coatings involve control of inorganic deposition such as silica and silver by biomolecules. The main chemical antifouling systems for marine organisms occur via production of secondary metabolites which hinder fouling. Naturally occuring systems may be applied as focus for biomimetic or bio-inspirational coatings, and significant interests has been alligned for its designing based on topographical behavior.

5.1.4. Physico-chemical antifouling strategies

Interfacial chemistry is a notable parameter determining the formation, gumming release, and stability of fouling organisms on surfaces. A route of varying surface energy lacking bulk material manipulation is via self-arranged monolayering (SAMs). In a study, the potential of different varieties of SAM chemistries to inhibit protein adsorption was undertaken. This research demonstrated that though SAMs, are hydrophilic, with electrical neutrality, and composed of hydrogen bond receivers, they are also very efficient at hindering protein adherence [108], [109], [110], [111].

6. Amphiphilic nanostructured coatings

It has been have proposed that the commonly observed protein resistance of some nano-architectured, amphiphilic di-block copolymers is as a result of the inherently high density of interfacial surface differentials. An instance of amphiphilic coating for use in marine AF is focused on the hyperbranching of fluoropolymers and linear poly (ethylene glycols) (PEG), which self-align on cross-linking thereby forming intricate interfacial topographies and chemical regions of both nanoscopic and microscopic zones [112], [113], [114].

7. Flame and thermal retardant coatings

This section elucidates flame retardant coatings (FRCs), with emphasis on preparation, characterization, properties, and coating techniques of FRCs. In recent years, it has become highly imperative to develop FRCs. The use of FRCs enhance feasibility of delaying fire spread or maintaining material architecture against devasting effect of fire, thereby facilitating enough time for implementation of safety measures, although hindering fire through use of coatings for prolonged duration is not feasible. Presently, varying types of fire additives such as phosphorus based, halogen-oriented, and intumescent fire-repressing systems, operating on varying principles have been established. Phosphorus based additives operate through formation of a barricading protective layering in form of a glass-like surfacial protective covering. Antimony and halogen oriented fire reppresants exhibit toxicity and are environmentally unfriendly. Intumescent coatings exhibit capability of forming a broad carbon-oriented matter acting as a protective barricading layering against heat transport thereby hindering diffusive penetration of combustion prone gases and polymeric melt to the combustion site. Three entities constituting these coatings include: (i) inorganic acid reffered as a dehydrating entity; (ii) a carbon-oriented charring material; and (iii) a blowing entity. The output of intumescent entities is function of the disposition of the ingredients, in addition to their synergistic effect [115].

Recent fire technologies have inculcated expandable graphites as fire retarding entities; composed of chemical matter, such an acid, engulfed within the carbon layering. When exposed to elevated temperatures, graphite exfoliation occurs providing an insulative layering to the given material. Synergy of polyurethane (PU)/phosphate (PT) has demonstrated a fire-suppressing intumescent system [116]. Presently, fire retardant coatings based on silicon/inorganic hydroxide are broadly utilized over a wide range of industrial applications [117]. Recently, polymer clay nanocomposites (PCN) coatings have been developed as FR coatings [118]. Here, PCN coatings were prepared via uniform dispersion of organically treated montmorillonite clay (Cloisite 20A and 30B) in differing concentrations. FR results revealed effective fire reppression [118].

A comparative flame retardant and thermal stability analysis of epoxy-EG and epoxy/halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) nanocomposite coatings have been conducted [119]. Results revealed that the synergy attained between HNTs/EG decreased peak of Heat Release Rate (pHRR), and Total Heat Release (THR), while simultaneously increasing Time-To-Ignition (TTI) of the materials [119]. Also, intumescent coatings composed acrylic/nanoclay nanocomposites coatings have been prepared to enable fire protection of metallic sufaces [120]. Results demonstrated that FR efficiency of the intumescent nanocomposite coating was enhanced by 1.5 % via evenly dispersed nanoclay.

FR acrylic nanocomposite coatings with varying acrylic polymers have been prepared [121]. Influence of molecular architecture, and molecular weight of acrylic nanocomposite in combination with nano-SiO2 on char formation and interaction of ammonium polyphosphate–dipentaerythritol–melamine (APP–DPER–MEL) coating were analysed via TG, DTA, Limiting Oxygen Index (LOI), SEM, XPS, and fire protection test. Results revealed that interaction of APP, DPER, MEL and 3F-1 acrylic resin resulted in creation of a compact intumescent char at 300–450°C which enhanced the material FR. Notably, nanocoating fire hindering behavior of acrylic nanocomposites demonstrated superiority to those of FRCs with traditional acrylic resins [122].

Epoxy/HA nanocomposites intumescent FR has been fabricated [123]. The fabricated PNC coatings resisted a direct flame originating at 1700°C with capacity of self extinguishing. HA nanoplatelets availed a gas phase effect as a result of the emission of active fire scavengers. Moreso HA caused a condensed phase effect by forming a protective char layer on the surface of the material. Generally, intumescent thermosetting nanocomposite coatings reduce heat while forming thick cohesive insulative barrier fire protection on steel surface.

Extremely flammable polyurethane foam (PUF) has posited a highly risky parameter relative to bedding and upholstery furniture, contributing to annual destruction of lives and properties [124]. In a bid to solve this challenge, and evolve a more environmentally benign FR for PUF, a mica oriented nanocomposite was formed via layer-by-layer architecture [125]. Chitosan (CH)/poly (acrylic acid) (PAA) was utilized in stabilizing high-aspect-ratio mica. Modified foam composed of eight bilayerings of CH- and PAA-stabilized mica protected void-filled foam architecture through melt-dripping hindering, and self-extinguishing during a 10s torch testing, while uncoated foam completely burnt. On exposure to 35 kW/m2 heat flux during CCT, the pHRR was minimized by 54% and less-volatile molecules emitted during burning, resulting in a 76% minimization of TSR. This multiple coating barrier offer ecobenign formulation for FR PUF and other 3-D entities.

This is similar to FR coatings preparation using chitosan (CS) and phosphorylated chitosan (PCS) in combination with poly-acrylate sodium (PAS) deposition on surface of polyamide 66 (PA66) fabrics through layer by layer (LbL) assembly technique [126]. Results exposed that only LbL formed fabric exhibited FR in vertical burning test after 5 cycles of washing. LbL fabrics exhibited superior uniformity in the coating architecture. PA66-10BL-UV LbL treated fabric sample with increased weight % gain demonstrated superior FR in LOI test with 23%, and a minimized pHRR of 25%.

A similar study for enhancing FR of PUF using synergy of water-soluble phenolic resin (WSPR) and 0.5 wt% zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) was undertaken [127]. Combustion results revealed that inclusion of WSPR/ZIF-67 FR coating minimized PHRR, THR and smoke release of FPUF and hindered foam melt-drops from occurring during the combustion.

Influence of particulate sized flaky graphite (FG) on FR of intumescent flame retardant (IFR) coatings (polyester resin-ammonium polyphosphate-urea-pentaerythrite) was investigated via CCT, XRD, and SEM, in order to determine best FG for the preparation of FG-IFR coatings [128]. CC results revealed that doped FG1500 possessing average particulate dimension of 1500 mesh exhibited superior FR efficiency, demonstrated by the lowest peak heat release rate (p-HRR) of 23.5 ​kW ​m−2 at 409 ​s and fire growth index (FGI) of 0.06 ​kW ​m−2 ​s−1, attributed to creation of expanded laminar char residue. This study revealed that FG with proper nanoparticulate dimension is best at enhancing flame suppression behavior of IFR coating.

8. Self-healing PNC coatings

Generally, Self-healing materials (SHM) are synthetic materials capable of self-repairing after subjection to damages. Nowadays, SHM have garnered great interests because of their capability to prolong materials shelf-life, minimize costs of maintenance, and improve safety of the citizenry [129]. SHM are categorised into two groups vis-a-viz intrinsic (ISHM) and extrinsic (ESHM) [129]. ISHM possess a latent self-repairing ability initiated by damages. It can also be triggered by external factors, so they can propagate self-mending. In ESHM, damages are recovered through releasing of healing entities from micro-containers engulfed in matrices. ESHM are generally classified into two major groups: capsular SHM (CSHM) and vascular SHM (VSHM). As regards CSHM, on rupturing of capsules by infliction, the healing entity is propagated from ruptured capsules, filling damaged areas thereby triggering healing activities. VSHM reparing activities is quite similar to CSHM however; the capsules here are substituted by a vascular pipeline network occurring in 1D, 2D or 3D. In comparison with ISHM, the ESHM posit advantages in healing a broad zone of the damaged volume [130].

Self-healing coatings (SHC) are potential technique of solving aforementioned challenges, as result of autonomously mending damages without external interferences [131]. Initially, dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) was encased in the interiors of urea–formaldehyde (UF) shells through in situ polymerization to fabricate microcapsules, and discovered that epoxy matrix and Grubbs catalyst demonstrated self-mending after damage infliction [132] Hence, microcapsules loading with healing entities in order to form SH coating has garnered much attention [133]. Additionally, numerous healing entities have undergone microencapsulation for propagation of self-mending, including epoxy [134], [135], [136], polydimethylsiloxane [137], and others.

In a study, linseed oil (LO) went through an oxidative drying procedure on exposure to air, forming a soft film [138]. After 48 h, the reaction conversion attained 88 % and 59 % at ambient temperature and 20 C, respectively. LO-included microcapsules were formed via urea-formaldehyde polymeric material as shell-wall material. The microcapsules were then incorporated into a protecting coating formulation in order to enable preparation of SH coating samples of varying levels of capsular inclusion. Self repair was successfully demonstrated for both scratched and cracked damages in the coatings. Architectural micrographs of the microcapsules were analyzed using SEM as shown in Fig. 20 (a). Optical microscopy was used in analyzing the microcapsular size distribution as depicted in Fig. 20 (b). The microcapsular average diameter was 53 m. The self-mending coating underwent scratching using a 30 m-thick cutter and abandoned for 48 h at ambient temperature to induce self-repair. Another scratched control coating was also fabricated in a likewise manner in absence of microcapsules. SEM images of the scratched zone of LO SH coating demonstrated that the healing entity filled the scratched area, thereby facilitating effective scratch mending as depicted in Fig. 20 (b), while Fig. 20 (a) reveals the scratch was unfilled in the control coating.

Fig. 20.

Fig 20

(a). SEM image of LO microcapsules; (b) LO size distribution; SEM images of the scratched (c) control and (d) self-healing coatings [138].

Polyurea is a potential coating material for effective protection. This is ascribed to its compressive/tensile attributes and capacity to absorb elevated level of energy [139]. Thus, in a recent study, spherical micro-capsules with inclusion of isophorone-diisocyanate (IPDI) as core substrates were fabricated using interfacial polymerization included in an oil-in-water emulsion, utilizing sodium lignosulfonate (NaLS) as an emulsifying agent, and polydiphenylmethane diisocyanate (PMDI) capsule shell reinforcement. Morphological images of the capsules fabricated under varying NaLS composition are shown in Fig. 21 (a, b). Morphological images of the capsules fabricated under varying O/W ratios are shown in Fig. 21 (c). As depicted in Fig. 22 , results exposes spherical capsules as having a mean diameter of 47.8 µm and a shell thickness almost equal to 1.9 µm. The ease of polyurea coating flow, and dispersion is enhanced by the smooth surface of the capsules [139] (Fig. 23).

Fig. 21.

Fig 21

A. Optical microscopic images of IPDI-included O/W emulsions stablized by varying composition of NaLS at a O/W ratio of 1:1. (a) 0.1%, (b) 0.5%, (c) 1%, (d) 2%, B. Optical microscopic images of IPDI-included O/W emulsions stablized by 1 wt. % NaLS under varying O/W ratios. (a) 2:1, (b) 1.6:1, (c) 1.2:1, (d) 0.8:1, (e) 0.4:1 [139].

Fig. 22.

Fig 22

Corrosion rating of steel sheets coated with pure and SH polyureas (SHPU) in 10% NaCl aqueous solution for 48 h. (a, b) Optical images of pure and SHPU coatings; (c) Optical image of SHPU coating with twice NaLS microcapsules; Insert: SEM image of NaLS microcapsules in SHPU; (d, e) Optical images of scratched pure and SHPU; (f) Optical image of SHPU coating with twice NaLS microcapsules post scratching; Insert: SEM image of broken NaLS microcapsules in SHPU; (g) SEM image of crevice in pure polyurea coating; (h, i) Influence of crevice SH in SHPU coating post scratching [139].

Fig. 23.

Fig 23

SEM images of the scratched samples after different time intervals [62].

The future of smart coating is dependent on the multi-operational attributes attained in coating matrices. The development of smart coatings on SH and self-lubricating attributes is highly challenging. Generally, the concept of hindering corrosion via SH facilitates autonomous repairs of cracks and damages in absence of any external intrusion [140]. SH entities encapsulation potending sensitivity to external stimuli such as pH, moisture, light, or crack propagation is critical for inculcating functionalities capable of damage repair. Numerous coating systems included SH agents have been investigated [135], [136], [137], [138], [139], [140], [141]. A commonly studied smart coating system is urea formaldehyde microcapsules (UFMC) with encapsulation of varying inhibitors and SH agents incorporated into polymeric matrix [142]. Varying nanoconveyors have been inculcated for polymeric matrices. They include; halloysite [143], ion exchanging organically based resins [144], nanocontaining materials from polyelectrolyte based shell [145], layered double hydroxide (LDH) conductive polymeric matrix [146], montmorillonite [147], and mesoporous inorganically focused materials [148]. Varing routes of attaining SH behavior have been exposed, relative to encapsulation [149], reversibility chemistry [150], micro-vascular complexes [151], nanoparticulate phasial separation [152], polymeric ionomers [153], hollow fibres [154], and monomeric separation [155].

PNC coatings exhibit satisfactory SH effects while responding to externally controlled mechanically based deterioration. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopic analysis (EIS) exposes potential corrosion restraining effects of PNC coatings. PNC treated with multifunctional entities may demonstrate effective corrosion reppression of steel in the oil and gas sector [156]. In a bid to enhance coatings performance to keep up with industrial standards, coating systems referred to as smart coatings have evolved to interesting multifunctional levels such as SH and self-hinderances [156]. External stimuli including variations in pH, metallic ions, and/or electrochemically based interactions results in propagation of multifunctional effects [157]. The aim of inculcating SH behavior is to attract satisfactory healing of crevices or scratches on the surface of coatings. As regards attainment of this aim, SH behaviors of developed PNC coatings are analysed. In line with this procedure, the coatings were exposed to controlled damages. To study the SH performances of developed PNC coatings, SEM images of the deteriorated PNC coatings were derived at varying durations, as elucidated in Fig. 22 [62].

Results revealed significant SH of PNC coatings with increasing time duration. The potential SH mechanism is such that while responding to mechanical damage, the SH entity as linseed oil (LO) is transported to the crevice from the submerged and encapsulated UFMCs which flows into the crevice, facilitating SH effect [62]. Emitted LO assists in SH of scratched coating while enabling mild layering to hinder direct contact of metallic surface from the adverse environment.

Low-temperature SH abilities are important for SH materials subjected to cold weather. In a recent research, low-temperature SH of a microcapsular protective coating was revealed [158]. Here, silanol-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (STP) was used as a healing entity and dibutyltin dilaurate (DD) was used as catalyst. On damage of SH coatings at low temperature of 20 C, STP/DD were emitted from damaged microcapsules and subsequently filled the damaged crevices. This procedure underwent efficient visualization via fluorescent dye. Results garnered from subjection of SH coatings to scratches, corrosion, electrochemical, and saline solution permeability tests revealed high performances in these areas. The dimension and shape of the microcapsules underwent observation using SEM as shown in (Fig. 24 a, b), and by optical microscopy as revealed in (Fig. 24 c). Spherical microcapsules were formed at an agitation rate of 1000 rpm. The average diameters of STP- and DD-inculcated microcapsules were 240 and 90 m respectively.

Fig. 24.

Fig 24

SEM images of (a) the STP-based microcapsules and (b) the DD-oriented microcapsules; (c) STP and DD size distribution of microcapsules prepared at 1000 rpm [158].

However, on scratching at room temperature, n-hexadecane rapidly flowed from the microcapsules and occupied the damaged area as depicted in Fig. 25 (b). On observation of STP- or DD-oriented coatings at 20 to 17 C, the scratched region was occupied as shown in Fig. 25 (c, d). The STP/DD-oriented coating demonstrated same results as depicted in Fig. 25 (e). The implication of these results is that STP and DD were easily emitted from broken microcapsules and occupied the damaged zone of the SH coating at low temperatures of 20 C [158].

Fig. 25.

Fig 25

Optical micrographic images of scratched areas in comparative coatings and SH coatings beneath white and UV light (a) n-Hexadecane-oriented compared coating analysed at 20 to 17 C; (b) n-hexadecane-focused comparative coating at ambient temperature (23 C); (c) STP-oriented coating at 20 to 17 C; (d) DD-oriented coating at 20 to 17 C; and (e) STP and DD-oriented SH coating at 20 to 17 C [158].

SH STP/DD-oriented coating low-temperature SH mechanism was evaluated using steel corrosion analysis as depicted in Fig. 26 . The SH coating formulation was utilized on steel boards, while the control coating sample was fabricated without microcapsules. On post storage of the coating specimen at 20 C, scratch inculcated damages on the coatings were observed at 20 C within the low-temperature confinement as shown in Fig. 26 (a, c). The scratched STP/DD-oriented SH coatings were maintained at 20 C for 12 h in order to propagate reaction of the emitted healing entity. Results demonstrated that all control specimens underwent corrosion as shown in Fig. 26 (b), but STP/DD-oriented SH coatings revealed nil visual proof of corrosion as shown in Fig. 26 (d). Continual corrosion analysis revealed good reproducibility [158].

Fig. 26

Fig. 26. Optical microscopic images of scratched-control and SH coating specimens prior to- and post immersion for 48 h at 20 C in 25 wt. % NaCl aqueous solution. (a) Control coating prior to immersion; (b) control coating post immersion; (c) SH coating prior to immersion; (d) SH coating post immersion [158].

The SH mechanism and performances of Zn–MCM-41– Mo have been studied via OCP, EIS, and polarization curves [159]. Nanoparticles of mesoporous silica (MCM-41) underwent impregnation with molybdate, a corrosion inhibitor, and used in forming a SH entity to minimize corrosion rate. Results exposed that the protective entities were formed post molybdate release from MCM-41, thereby facilitating enhanced corrosion suppression [159]. Fig. 27 depict FESEM images of MCM-41 nanoparticles functionalized by molybdate. As depicted in the Fig., MCM-41–Mo nanoparticles exhibit spherical mesoporous architecture. Fig. 27 (b) reveals measured SEM image dimensional distribution histograms elucidating the size distribution of meso-porosity in a range below 50 nm expressing an average pore diameter below 5 nm. Size ranges depicted are: MCM-41–Mo nanoparticle size and (ii) mesoporous sizes as shown at the upper panel of Fig. 27 b [159].

Fig. 27.

Fig 27

(A). SEM micrographic images of synthesized MCM-41 nanoparticles functionalized using Mo, B; (a) corresponding mesopore size (upper panel) and (b) particle size (lower panel) distribution histograms [159].

Results revealed that Zn–MCM-41 electrodeposited coating exhibited even distribution and continual adherence to zinc metallic matrix. SEM images picked from cross section of MCM-41–SH–Mo depicted in Fig. 28 shows there was neither aggregation nor damages. However, it is feasible that some routes were attained due to molybdate functionalization with MCM-41–SH [159].

Fig. 28.

Fig 28

SEM images of (a) Zn–MCM-41, (b) Zn–MCM-41–Mo functionalized and (c) Zn–MCM-41–Mo–SH composite coatings electrodeposited at 17.5 A cm_2 with nanoparticulate concentration of 1 g L_1[159].

9. Conclusions

Recent advancements in nanotechnology have engineered novel innovations in conventional techniques of suppressing corrosion at the metallic and/or electrolyte interfacial region. Nanomaterials inclusion in PNC coatings have greatly enhanced their barricading, and protective performances through reduction of porosity and irregularities occuring at diffusion routes of corrosive entities. Nanomaterials expressing varieties of shapes and dimensions have been utilized in fabricating PNC coatings, and other PNC reinforced with natural fibers for versatile applications where flame retardancy, and thermal conductivity are essential through varing approaches including in-situ polymerization, solution exfoliation, and melt intercalation [160], [161], [162], [163], [164], [165], [166], [167], [168], [169], [170], [171], [172], [173], [174], [175], [176], [177], [178], [179], [180], [181], [182], [183]. PNC micro-architectures are classified in accordance to the interaction occurring between polymeric matrices and incorporated nanomaterials relative to phase separation, hybridization phases, intercalation and exfoliative PNC nanocoatings. Nanomaterials cost-efficiency at improving anti-corrosive performances of PNC coatings are based on efficiency of their distribution in the host polymeric matrices. The inclusion of nanomaterials in polymeric matrices presents ecobenign routes of improving durability, and integrity of PNC coating systems. Generally, PNC coatings with inclusion of small quantities of nanomaterials enable enhanced barrier, and protective behavior towards corrosion resistance and minimization of coating propensity towards delamination and blistering. These materials have demonstrated critical efficiency at repairing unseen micro-deterioration occuring in protective coatings. However, effective, ecobenign and simple techniques for fabricating PNC coatings with highly enhanced wettability, hydrophilicity, antifouling, and anti-corrosion performances are envisaged in the nearest future. In addition, aside enhanced corrosion hinderances, prolonged durability in severe media is imperative to applicability of these PNC coatings. Hence, in attainment of prolonged durability during service relative to improved shelf-life, further enhancements in architectural properties and synthesis parameters are essential in developing highly performing PNC protective coatings applicable in varying corrosive, foully, and abrasive environments.

Declaration of Competing Interest

No conflict of interests is availed.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgement

Prof. Charles Esimone, Vice Chancellor, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria, and Prof. Azman Hassan of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia are acknowledged for encouraging and motivating effective academic legacies.

Funding

No funding is reported.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100734.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.xml (219B, xml)

References

  • 1.Rajyalakshmi T, Pasha A, Khasim S. et al. Enhanced charge transport and corrosion protection properties of polyaniline–carbon nanotube composite coatings on mild steel. Journal of Elec Materi. 2020;49:341–352. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Shi Q, Zhu A. Interface regulation of graphene/carbon nanotube on the thermal conductivity and anticorrosion performance of their nanocomposite. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;140 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kumar A, Sharma K, Dixit R. Carbon nanotube- and graphene-reinforced multiphase polymeric composites: review on their properties and applications. J Mater Sci. 2010;55:2682–2724. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sharma V, Sharma V, Goyat MS, Hooda A, Pandey JK, Kumar A, Gupta R, Upadhyay AK, Prakash R, Kirabira J, Mandal P, Bhargav P. Recent progress in nano-oxides and CNTs based corrosion resistant superhydrophobic coatings: A critical review. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;140 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huang WF, Xiao YL, Huang Z, Tsui GP, Yeung KW, Tang CY, Liu Q. Super-hydrophobic polyaniline-TiO2 hierarchical nanocomposite as anticorrosion coating. Materials Letters. 2020;258 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Amirou S, Pizzi A. Biosourced heat resistant coatings by cross-linking of proteins with triethyl Phosphate. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fan H, Shi D, Ding M, Li M, Cheng Y, Li Q. Preparation of (3-mercaptopropyl) trimethoxylsilane film on brass and its corrosion resistance in natural seawater. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Future Market Insights. www.futuremarketinsights.com. Accessed 10/05/2020.
  • 9.Ghadimi MR, Dolati A. Preparation and characterization of superhydrophobic and highly oleophobic FEVE-SiO 2 nanocomposite coatings. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gladkikh N, Makarychev Y, Petrunin M, Maleeva M, Maksaeva L, Marshakov A. Synergistic effect of silanes and azole for enhanced corrosion protection of carbon steel by polymeric coatings. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang H, Li M, Tian Y, Xie Y, Sheng X, Jiang X, Zhang X. Exfoliation and functionalization of a-zirconium phosphate in one pot for waterborne epoxy coatings with enhanced anticorrosion performance. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kaew-on N, Katemake P. Prasongsuk. Primer formulations with antibacterial properties for murals. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen Y, Ding Y, Zheng J. A polymer nanocomposite coating with enhanced hydrophilicity, antibacterial and antibiofouling properties: Role of polymerizable emulsifier/anionic ligand. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020;379 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Torrico R, Harb S, Trentin A, Uvida M, Pulcinelli S, Santilli C, Hammer P. Structure and properties of epoxy-siloxane-silica nanocomposite coatings for corrosion protection. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2018;513:617–628. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sheng X, Cai W, Zhong L, Xie D, Zhang X. Synthesis of Functionalized Graphene/Polyaniline Nanocomposites with Effective Synergistic Reinforcement on Anticorrosion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016;55:8576–8585. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chang KC, Ji WF, Li C, Chang C, Peng Y, Yeh JM, Liu WR. The effect of varying carboxylic-group content in reduced graphene oxides on the anticorrosive properties of PMMA/reduced graphene oxide composites. eXPRESS Polymer Letters. 2014;12:908–919. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao D, Pan M, Yuan J, Liu H, Song S, Zhu L. A waterborne coating for robust superamphiphobic surfaces. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lopes TS, Lopes T, Martins D, Carneiro C, Machado J, Mendes A. aging of anticorrosive coatings: Two-stage approach to the AC/ DC/AC electrochemical method. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hong M, Park Y, Kim T, Kim K, Kim J. Polydopamine/carbon nanotube nanocomposite coating for corrosion resistance. Journal of Materiomics. 2020;6:158–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Prolongo S, Moriche R, Jiménez-Suárez A, Delgado A, Ureña A. Printable self-heating coatings based on the use of carbon nanoreinforcements. Polymer Composites. 2020;41:271–278. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bugatti V, Viscusi G, Bartolomeo A, Iemmo L, Zampino D, Vittoria V, Gorrasi M. Ionic liquid as dispersing agent of LDH-carbon nanotubes into a biodegradable vinyl alcohol polymer. Polymers. 2020;12:495. doi: 10.3390/polym12020495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Alam MA, Samad UA, Sherif E, Poulose A, Mohammed J, Alharthi N, Al-Zahrani S. Influence of SiO2 content and exposure periods on the anticorrosion behavior of epoxy nanocomposite coatings. Coatings. 2020;10:118. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Qian Y, Zhou Y, Li L, Liu W, Yang D, Qiu X. Facile preparation of active lignin capsules for developing self-healing and UV-blocking polyurea coatings. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Huang B, Lai G, Yang T, Tsai M, Chou Y. A novel electroactive imide oligomer and its application in anticorrosion coating. Polymers. 2020;12:91. doi: 10.3390/polym12010091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chang K, Ji W, Lai M, Hsiao Y, Hsu C, Chuang T, Wei Y, Yeh J, Liu W. Correction for synergistic effects of hydrophobicity and gas barrier properties on the anticorrosion property of PMMA nanocomposite coatings embedded with graphene nanosheets. Polym Chem. 2014;5:1049–1056. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dhole G, Gunasekaran G, Naik R, Ghorpade T, Vinjamur M. Fluorescence based corrosion detecting epoxy coating. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shafaamri A, Cheng C, Ma L, Baig S, Kasi R, Subramaniam R, Balakrishnan V. Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on the overall performance and corrosion protection ability of neat epoxy and PDMS modified epoxy coating system. Frontiers in Materials. 2020;6:336. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Othman N, Ismail M, Mustapha M, Sallih N, Kee K, Jaal R. Graphene-based polymer nanocomposites as barrier coatings for corrosion protection. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2019;135:82–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gao J, Li C, Feng H, Li X. In situ and dynamic observation of coating failure behavior. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yuste-Sanchez V, Gonzalez-Gonzalez F, Hoyos M, Manchado M, Verdejo R. Dielectric properties of all-organic coatings: Comparison of PEDOT and PANI in epoxy matrices. J. Compos Sci. 2020;4:26. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Abdeen D, Hachach M, Koc M, Atieh M. A Review on the corrosion behaviour of nanocoatings on metallic substrates. Materials. 2019;12:210. doi: 10.3390/ma12020210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shafique M, Luo X. Nanotechnology in transportation vehicles: An Overview of its applications, environmental, health and safety concerns. Materials. 2019;12:2493. doi: 10.3390/ma12152493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Qin W, Chen C, Zhou J, Meng J. Synergistic effects of graphene/carbon nanotubes hybrid coating on the interfacial and mechanical properties of fiber composites. Materials. 2020;13:1457. doi: 10.3390/ma13061457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fan H, Shi D, Ding M, Li M, Cheng Y, Li Q. Preparation of (3-mercaptopropyl) trimethoxylsilane film on brass and its corrosion resistance in natural seawater. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yu YH, Yeh JM, Liou SJ, Chen CL, Liaw DJ, Lu HY. Preparation and properties of polyimide–clay nanocomposite materials for anticorrosion application. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004;92:3573–3582. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nawaz M, Yusuf N, Habib S, Shakoor R, Ubaid F, Ahmad Z, Kahraman R, Mansour S, Gao W. Development and properties of polymeric nanocomposite coatings. Polymers. 2019;11:852. doi: 10.3390/polym11050852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yang H, Mo Q, Li W, Gu F. Preparation and properties of self-healing and self-lubricating epoxy coatings with polyurethane microcapsules containing bifunctional linseed oil. Polymers. 2019;11:1578. doi: 10.3390/polym11101578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bashir M, Jakobsen M, Farstad V. The effect of extender particle size on the glass transition temperature of model epoxy coatings. Polymers. 2020;12:196. doi: 10.3390/polym12010196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li W, Song B, Zhang S, Zhang F, Liu C, Zhang N, Yao H, Shi Y. Using 3-Isocyanatopropyltrimethoxysilane to decorate graphene oxide with nano-titanium dioxide for enhancing the anti-corrosion properties of epoxy coating. Polymers. 2020;12:837. doi: 10.3390/polym12040837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kozakiewicz J, Trzaskowska J, Domanowski W, Kieplin A, Ofat-Kawalec I, Przybylski J, Wozniak M, Witwicki D, Sylwestrzak K. on synthesis and characterization of aqueous hybrid silicone-acrylic and acrylic-silicone dispersions and coatings. Part II. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rajitha K, Mohana K, Nayak S, Hegde M, Madhusudhana A. An efficient and eco-friendly anti-corrosive system based on beeswax-graphene oxide nanocomposites on mild steel in saline medium Surfaces and Interfaces 2020; 18: 100393.
  • 42.Gladkikh N, Makarychev Y, Petrunin M, Maleeva M, Maksaeva L, Marshakov A. Synergistic effect of silanes and azole for enhanced corrosion protection of carbon steel by polymeric coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Alaneme KK, Bodunrin MO. Self-healing using metallic material systems—A Review. Appl. Mater. Today. 2017;6:9–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hia LL, Vahedi V, Pasbakhsh P. Self-healing polymer composites: Prospects, challenges, and applications. Polym. Rev. 2016;56:225–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bekas DG, Tsirka K, Baltzis D, Paipetis AS. Self-healing materials: A review of advances in materials, evaluation, characterization and monitoring techniques. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016;87:92–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fuente B, Díaz I, Simancas J. Morcillo M Annual atmospheric corrosion of carbon steel worldwide. An integration of ISOCORRAG. ICP/UNECE and MICAT databases. Materials. 2017;10:601. doi: 10.3390/ma10060601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Thanawala K, Khanna AS. Proceedings of the NACE International Corrosion Conference. Vancouver, BC, Canada; March 2016. Development of self-healing coatings using encapsulated linseed oil and tung oil as healing agents. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kim DM, Yu HC, Yang HI, Cho YJ, Lee GM, Chung CM. Microcapsule-type self-healing protective coating with secondary crack preventing ability. Materials. 2017;10:114. doi: 10.3390/ma10020114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chung US, Min JH, Lee PC, Koh WG. Polyurethane matrix incorporating PDMS-based self-healing microcapsules with enhanced mechanical and thermal stability. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017;518:173–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li CH, Wang C, Keplinger C, Zuo JL, Jin L, Sun Y, Zheng P, Cao Y, Lissel F, Linder C, et al. A highly stretchable autonomous self-healing elastomer. Nat. Chem. 2016;8:618–624. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang Y, Pham DT, Zhang Z, Li J, Ji C, Liu Y, Leng J. Sustainable self-healing at ultra-low temperature in structural composites incorporating hollow vessels and heating elements. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2016;3 doi: 10.1098/rsos.160488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kim DM, Yu HC, Yang HI, Cho YJ, Lee GM, Chung CM. Microcapsule-type self-healing protective coating with secondary crack preventing ability. Materials. 2017;10:114. doi: 10.3390/ma10020114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Xing X, Wang J, Li Q, Hu W, Yuan J. A novel acid-responsive HNTs-based corrosion inhibitor for protection of carbon steel. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018;553:295–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lu H, Zhang S, Li W, Cui Y, Yang T. Synthesis of graphene oxide-based sulfonated oligoanilines coatings for synergistically enhanced corrosion protection in 3.5% NaCl solution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:4034–4043. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b13722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.2 El-Mahdy GA. 4-Dihydrazino-6-Morpholino-1, 3, 5-Triaizne (DHMT) and 2,4-Dihydrazino-6-Piperidino1,3,5-Triaizne (DHPT) as promising corrosion inhibitors of steel in acidic media. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2016;11:5459–5472. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mahvash F, Eissa S, Bordjiba T, Tavares AC, Szkopek T, Siaj M. Corrosion resistance of monolayer hexagonal boron nitride on copper. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:42139. doi: 10.1038/srep42139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gao XZ, Liu HJ, Cheng F, Chen Y. Thermoresponsive polyaniline nanoparticles: Preparation, characterization, and their potential application in waterborne anticorrosion coatings. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;283:682–691. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mazumder MJ, Nazal MK, Faiz M, Ali SA. Imidazolines containing single-, twin- and triple-tailed hydrophobes and hydrophilic pendants (CH2CH2NH)nH as inhibitors of mild steel corrosion in CO2–0.5 M NaCl. RSC Adv. 2016;6:12348–12362. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zahidah KA, Kakooei S, Ismail MC, Raja PB. Halloysite nanotubes as nanocontainer for smart coating application: A review. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017;111:175–185. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Shchukina E, Shchukin D, Grigoriev D. Halloysites and mesoporous silica as inhibitor nanocontainers for feedback active powder coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018;123:384–389. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Nazeer AA, Madkour M. Potential use of smart coatings for corrosion protection of metals and alloys: A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2018;253:11–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Habib S, Khan A, Nawaz M, Sliem M, Shakoor R, Kahraman R, Abdullah A, Zekri A. self-healing performance of multifunctional polymeric smart coatings. Polymers. 2019;11:1519. doi: 10.3390/polym11091519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sun M, Luo C, Xu L, Ji H, Oujang Q, Yu D. Chen Y. Artificial lotus leaf by nanocasting. Langmuir. 2005;21:8978–8981. doi: 10.1021/la050316q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lang S, Zhou Q. Synthesis and characterization of poly (urea-formaldehyde) microcapsules containing linseed oil for self-healing coating development. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017;105:99–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nawaz M, Yusuf N, Habib S, Shakoor RA, Ubaid F, Ahmad Z, Kahraman R, Mansour S, Gao W. Development and properties of polymeric nanocomposite coatings. Polymers. 2019;11:1519. doi: 10.3390/polym11050852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Khan A, Ubaid F, Fayyad E, Ahmad Z, Shakoor PA, Montemor F, Kahraman R, Mansour S, Hassan M, Hasan A, et al. Synthesis and properties of polyelectrolyte multilayered microcapsules. J. Mater. Sci. 2019;54:12079–12094. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chang K, Chuang T, Ji W, Chang C, Peng Y, Shih H, Hsu C, Yeh J, Tang W, Su Y. UV-curable nanocasting technique to prepare bioinspired superhydrophobic organic-inorganic composite anticorrosion coatings. eXPRESS Polymer Letters. 2015;9:143–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wang Y, Pham DT, Zhang Z, Li J, Ji C, Liu Y, Leng J. Sustainable self-healing at ultra-low temperature in structural composites incorporating hollow vessels and heating elements. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2016;3 doi: 10.1098/rsos.160488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Haddadi S, Ramazani S, Mahdavian M, Taheri P, Mol J. Fabrication and characterization of graphene-based carbon hollow spheres for encapsulation of organic corrosion inhibitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;352:909–922. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Karekar SE, Bagale UD, Sonawane SH, Bhanvase B.A. Pinjari DV. A smart coating established with encapsulation of Zinc Molybdate centred nanocontainer for active corrosion protection of mild steel: Release kinetics of corrosion inhibitor. Compos. Interfaces. 2018;25:785–808. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ubaid F, Naeem N, Shakoor R, Kahraman R, Mansour S, Zekri A. Effect of concentration of DOC loaded TiO2 nanotubes on the corrosion behavior of smart coatings. Ceram. Int. 2019;45:10492–10500. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shchukina E, Grigoriev D, Sviridova T, Shchukin D. Comparative study of the effect of halloysite nanocontainers on autonomic corrosion protection of polyepoxy coatings on steel by salt-spray tests. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017;108:84–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yang Q, He Y, Xu W, Tang R, Zhang C. pH-Responsive nanovalves based on encapsulated halloysite for the controlled release of a corrosion inhibitor in epoxy coating. RSC Adv. 2015;5:90609–90620. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mamaghani KR, Naghib SM. The effect of stirring rate on electrodeposition of nanocrystalline nickel coatings and their corrosion behaviors and mechanical characteristics. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2017;12:5023–5035. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Li R, Zhu J, Zhou W, Cheng X, Li Y. Thermal properties of sodium nitrate-expanded vermiculite form-stable composite phase change materials. Mater. Des. 2016;104:190–196. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Saba N, Jawaid M, Alothman Y, Paridah M, Hassan A. Recent advances in epoxy resin, natural fiber-reinforced epoxy composites and their applications. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2016;35:447–470. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kesmez Ömer. Preparation of hybrid nanocomposite coatings via sol-gel method for hydrophobic and self-cleaning properties. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2020;120 [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ulaeto Sarah B., Pancrecious Jerin K. Kingsley Kema Ajekwene, Gincy Marina Mathew, T.P.D. Rajan, Chapter 25 - Advanced nanocoatings for anticorrosion, Editor(s): Susai Rajendran, Tuan ANH Nguyen, Saeid Kakooei, Mahdi Yeganeh, Yongxin Li, In Micro and Nano Technologies. Corrosion Protection at the Nanoscale, Elsevier. 2020:499–510. Pages. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cao K, Yu Z, Yin D, Chen L, Jiang Y, Zhu L. Fabrication of BTA-MOF-TEOS-GO nanocomposite to endow coating systems with active inhibition and durable anticorrosion performances. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2020;143 [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Huang BS, Lai GH, Yang TI, Tsai MH, Chou YC. A Novel electroactive imide oligomer and its application in anticorrosion coating. Polymers. 2020;12:91. doi: 10.3390/polym12010091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Binrui W, Jiajie L, Chaoyi P, Dazhi J, Jun Y, Jinshui Y, Suli X, Liping S. Inverse infusion processed hierarchical structure towards superhydrophobic coatings with ultrahigh mechanical robustness. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020;387 [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shafaamri A, Cheng CH, Wonnie Ma IA, Baig SB, Kasi R, Subramaniam R, Balakrishnan V. Effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on the overall performance and corrosion protection ability of neat epoxy and PDMS modified epoxy coating systems. Front. Mater. 2020;6:336. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Cheng Y, Zhang J, Wang Y, Li C, Lu Z, Hu X, Xu L. Deposition of catechol-functionalized chitosan and silver nanoparticles on biomedical titanium surfaces for antibacterial application. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2019;98:649–656. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhang F, Zhang H, Chen R, Liu Q, Liu J, Wang C, Sun Z, Wang J. Mussel-inspired antifouling magnetic activated carbon for uranium recovery from simulated seawater. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2019;534:172–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhao Y, Wen J, Ge Y, Zhang X, Shi H, Yang K, Gao X, Shi S, Gong Y. Fabrication of stable biomimetic coating on PDMS surface: Cooperativity of multivalent interactions. Applied Surface Science. 2019;469:720–730. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hao X, Wang W, Yang Z, Yue L, Sun H, Wang H, Guo Z, Cheng F, Chen S. pH responsive antifouling and antibacterial multilayer films with Self-healing performance. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019;356:130–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chen Y, Liu Q. Oxidant-induced plant phenol surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings: Mechanism and potential applications. Journal of Membrane Science. 2019;570-571:176–183. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Pehkonen S, Yuan S. Chapter 8 - Novel Antibacterial Coatings for Biofouling and Biocorrosion Inhibition, Editor(s): Simo OlaviPehkonen, Shaojun Yuan. Interface Science and Technology, Elsevier. 2018;23:257–372. Pages. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Callow JA, Callow ME. Trends in the development of environmentally friendly fouling-resistant marine coatings. Nat Commun. 2011;2:244. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Liu Y, Shao X, Huang J, Li H. Flame sprayed environmentally friendly high density polyethylene (HDPE)/capsaicin composite coatings for marine antifouling applications. Materials Letters. 2019;238:46–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Silva E, Ferreira O, Ramalho P, Azevedo N, Bayan R, Igartua A, Bordado J, Calhorda M. Eco-friendly non-biocide-release coatings for marine biofouling prevention. Science of The Total Environment. 2019;650:2499–2511. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Vladkova G, Akuzov T, Klöppel A, Brümmer F. Current approaches to reduction of marine biofilm formation. J Chem Technol Metall. 2014;49:345–355. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Becherer T, Vieira M, Sindram J, Noeske M, Wei Q, Haag R, Grunwald I. Fast andeasily applicable glycerol-based spray coating. Prog. Org. Coat. 2015;87:146–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Vijayan, P El-Gawady, Y.M.H.; Al-Maadeed, M.A.S.A A comparative study on long term stability of self-healing epoxy coating with different inorganic nanotubes as healing agent reservoirs. Express Polym. Lett. 2017;11:863–872. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Njoku DI, Cui M, Xiao H, Shang B, Li Y. Understanding the anticorrosive protective mechanisms of modified epoxy coatings with improved barrier, active and self-healing functionalities: EIS and spectroscopic techniques. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:15597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15845-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Feng Y, Cheng YF. An intelligent coating doped with inhibitor-encapsulated nanocontainers for corrosion protection of pipeline steel. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;315:537–551. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rahimi A, Amiri S. Anticorrosion hybrid nanocomposite coatings with encapsulated organic corrosion inhibitors. J Coat Technol Res. 2015;12:587–593. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Akuzov T, Brümmer F, Vladkova G. Some possibilities to reduce the biofilm formation on transparent siloxane coatings. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2013;104:303–310. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.09.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Del Grosso A, McCarthy M, Clark L, Cloud L, Wilker J. Managing the redox chemistry to deter marine biological adhesion. Chem Mater. 2016;28:6791–6796. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bayer M, Hellio C, Maréchal P, Walter F, Lin W, Weber H. ProkschP. Antifouling bastadin congenerstarget mussel phenoloxidase and complex copper (II) ions. Mar. Biotechnol. 2011;13:1148–1158. doi: 10.1007/s10126-011-9378-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Eguia E, Trueba A. Application of marine biotechnology in the production of naturalbiocides for testing on environmentally innocuous antifouling coatings. J Coat Technol Res. 2007;4:191–202. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ahmadi Y, Ahmad S. Surface-active antimicrobial and anticorrosive Oleo-Polyurethane/graphene oxide nanocomposite coatings: Synergistic effects of in-situ polymerization and p-p interaction. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019;127:168–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Akuzov T, Vladkova G, Zamfirova G, Gaydarov V, Naszimento M, Szeglat N, Grunwald I. Polydimetthyl siloxane coatings with superior antifouling efficiency in laboratory and marine conditions. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017;103:126–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Le Norcy T, Niemann H, Proksch P, Linossier I, Vallée-Réhel K, Hellio C. FaÿF.Anti-Biofilm Effect of biodegradable coatings based on hemibastadin derivative in marine environment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1520. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ba M, Zhang Z, Qi Y. Fouling release coatings based on polydimethylsiloxane with the incorporation of phenylmethylsilicone oil. Coatings. 2018;8:153. [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Stupak E, Garcia T, Pérez C. Non-toxic alternative compounds for marine antifouling paints. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2003;52:49–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Acevedo S, Puentes C, Carreno K, Leon G, Stupak M, Garcia M, Pérez M, Blustein G. Antifouling paints based on marine natural products from Colombian Caribbean. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2013;83:97–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Jellali R, Campistron I, Pasetto P, Laguerre A, Gohier F, Hellio C, Pilard F, Mouget L. Antifouling activity of novel polyisoprene-based coatings made from photocurable natural rubber derived oligomers. Prog. Org. Coat. 2013;76:1203–1214. [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Molino J, Childs S, Hubbard E, Carey M, Burgman A, Wetherbee R. Development of the primary bacterial microfouling layer on antifouling and fouling release coatings in temperate and tropical environments in Eastern Australia. Biofouling. 2009;25:149–162. doi: 10.1080/08927010802592917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K. Antifouling technology — past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2004;50:75–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Armstrong E, Boyd KG, Pisacane A, Peppiatt CJ, Burgess JG. Marine microbial natural products in antifouling coatings. Biofouling. 2000;16:215–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Richard J, Ballard E, Huigens W, Melander C. Synthesis and screening of an oroidin library against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Chembiochem. 2008;9:1267–1279. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200700774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Huigens W, Ma L, Gambino C, Moeller R, Basso A, Cavanagh J, Wozniak J, Melander C. of bacterial biofilms with marine alkaloids derivatives. Mol Biosyst. 2008;4:614–621. doi: 10.1039/b719989a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Hellio C, Trepos R, Aguila-Ramirez N, Hernandez-Guerrero J. In: Stengel D.B, Connan S., editors. Methods in Molecular Biology; New York, NY, USA: 2015. pp. 421–435. Eds. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Li L, Cai Z. Flame-retardant performance of transparent and tensile-strength-enhanced epoxy resins. Polymers. 2020;12:317. doi: 10.3390/polym12020317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Movahedifar E, Vahabi H, Saeb MR, Thomas S. Flame retardant epoxy composites on the road of innovation: An analysis with flame retardancy index for future development. Molecules. 2019;24:3964. doi: 10.3390/molecules24213964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Vahabi H, Laoutid F, Movahedifar E, Khalili R, Rahmati N, Vagner C, Cochez M, Brison L, Ducos F, Ganjali MR, et al. Description of complementary actions of mineral and organic additives in thermoplastic polymer composites by flame retardancy index. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019;30:2056–2066. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang ZY, Han EH, Ke W. Fire‐resistant effect of nanoclay on intumescent nanocomposite coatings. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007;103:1681–1689. [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Misra Nilanjal, Kumar Virendra, Bahadur Jitendra, Bhattacharya Shovit, Mazumder S. Lalit Varshney. Layered silicate-polymer nanocomposite coatings via radiation curing process for flame retardant applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2014;77:1443–1451. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Vahabi H, Saeb M, Formela K, Cuesta J. Flame retardant epoxy/halloysite nanotubes nanocomposite coatings: Exploring low-concentration threshold for flammability compared to expandable graphite as superior fire retardant. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018;119:8–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wang Z, Han E, Ke W. Effect of acrylic polymer and nanocomposite with nano-SiO2 on thermal degradation and fire resistance of APP–DPER–MEL coating. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2006;91:1937–1947. [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ahmadi Y. Elsevier; 2020. Ahmad S Chapter 19 - Polymeric nanocomposite coatings, Editor(s): Susai Rajendran, Tuan ANH Nguyen, Saeid Kakooei, Mahdi Yeganeh, Yongxin Li, In Micro and Nano Technologies, Corrosion Protection at the Nanoscale. Pages 363-378. [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Elbasuney S, Maraden A. Novel thermoset nanocomposite intumescent coating based on hydroxyapatite nanoplates for fireproofing of steel structures. J Inorg Organomet Polym. 2020;30:280–830. [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Liu S, Wang C, Hu Q, Huo S, Zhang Q, Liu Z. Intumescent fire retardant coating with recycled powder from industrial effluent optimized using response surface methodology. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020;140 [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Fahami A, Lee J, Lazar S, Grunlan J. Mica-based multilayer nanocoating as a highly effective flame retardant and smoke suppressant. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:19938–19943. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c02397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kundu C, Wang X, Song L, Hu Y. Chitosan-based flame retardant coatings for polyamide 66 textiles: One-pot deposition versus layer-by-layer assembly. International J Bio Macro. 2020;143:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Xu W, Chen R, Du Y, Wang G. Design water-soluble phenolic/zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 flame retardant coating via layer-by-layer assembly technology: Enhanced flame retardancy and smoke suppression of flexible polyurethane foam. Polym Degrad Stab. 2020;176 [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wang Y, Tang G, Zhao J, Han Y. Effect of flaky graphite with different particle sizes on flame resistance of intumescent flame retardant coating. Results in Materials. 2020;5 [Google Scholar]
  • 129.de Cademartori G, Artner MA, de Freitas RA, Magalhaes WLE. Alumina nanoparticles as formaldehyde scavenger for urea-formaldehyde resin: Rheological and in-situ cure performance. Compos. Part B. 2019;176 [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ataei S, Khorasani SN, Neisiany RE. Biofriendly vegetable oil healing agents used for developing self-healing coatings: A review. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019;129:77–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Behzadnasab M, Mirabedini SM, Esfandeh M, Farnood RR. Evaluation of corrosion performance of a self-healing epoxy-based coating containing linseed oil-filled microcapsules via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017;105:212–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zhang F, Ju P, Pan M, Zhang D, Huang Y, Li G, Li X. Self-healing mechanisms in smart protective coatings: A review. Corros. Sci. 2018;144:74–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Nazeer AA, Madkour M. Potential use of smart coatings for corrosion protection of metals and alloys: A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2018;253:11–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Guo M, Li W, Han N, Wang J, Su J, Li J, Zhang X. Novel dual-component microencapsulated hydrophobic amine and microencapsulated isocyanate used for self-healing anti-corrosion coating. Polymers. 2018;10:319. doi: 10.3390/polym10030319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Sun D, Chong YB, Chen K, Yang J. Chemically and thermally stable isocyanate microcapsules having good self-healing and self-lubricating performances. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;346:289–297. [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Zheng N, Liu J, Li W. TO/TMMP-TMTGE double-healing composite containing a transesterification reversible matrix and tung oil-loaded microcapsules for active self-healing. Polymers. 2019;11:1127. doi: 10.3390/polym11071127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Wang Y, Zhao J, Chen J. Effect of polydimethylsiloxane viscosity on silica fume-based geopolymer hybrid coating for flame-retarding plywood. Construction and Building Materials. 2020;239 [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Kim Dong-Min, Song In-Ho, Choi Ju-Young, Jin Seung-Won, Nam Kyeong-Nam, Chung Chan-Moon. Self-healing coatings based on linseed-oil-loaded microcapsules for protection of cementitious. Materials Coatings. 2018;8:404. [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Qian Y, Zhou Y, Li L, Liu W, Yang D, Qiu X. Facile preparation of active lignin capsules for developing self-healing and UV-blocking polyurea coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020;138 [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Dorieh A, Mahmoodi NO, Mamaghani M, Pizzi A, Zeydib MM, Moslemid A. New insight into the use of latent catalysts for the synthesis of urea formaldehyde adhesives and the mechanical properties of medium density fiberboards bonded with them. Eur. Polym. J. 2019;112:195–205. [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Wang H, Zhou Q. Evaluation and failure analysis of linseed oil encapsulated self-healing anticorrosive coating. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018;118:108–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Liu M, Wang Y, Wu Y, Wan H. Hydrolysis and recycling of urea formaldehyde resin residues. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018;355:96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Vahabi H, Saeb MR, Formela K, Cuesta L. Flame retardant epoxy/halloysite nanotubes nanocomposite coatings: Exploring low-concentration threshold for flammability compared to expandable graphite as superior fire retardant. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018;119:8–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Lang S, Zhou Q. Synthesis and characterization of poly (urea-formaldehyde) microcapsules containing linseed oil for self-healing coating development. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017;105:99–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Kozdrach R, Skowronski J. The application of polyvinylpyrrolidone as a modifier of tribological properties of lubricating greases based on linseed oil. J. Tribol. 2018;140:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Zarrintaj P, Sari MG. Transparent nanocomposite coatings based on epoxy and layered double hydroxide: Nonisothermal cure kinetics and viscoelastic behavior assessments. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017;113:126–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Ghazi A, Ghasemi E, Mahdavian M, Ramezanzadeh B, Rostami M, Mahdavian-Ahadi M. The application of benzimidazole and zinc cations intercalated sodium montmorillonite as smart ion exchange inhibiting pigments in the epoxy ester coating. Corros. Sci. 2015;94:207–217. [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Çömlekçi GK, Ulutan S. Encapsulation of linseed oil and linseed oil based alkyd resin by urea formaldehyde shell for self-healing systems. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018;121:190–200. [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Li C, Tan J, Gu J, Qiao L, Zhang B, Zhang Q. Rapid and efficient synthesis of isocyanate microcapsules via thiol-ene photopolymerization in Pickering emulsion and its application in self-healing coating. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2016;123:250–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Ma Y, Jiang Y, Tan H, Zhang Y, Gu J. A rapid and e cient route to preparation of isocyanate microcapsules. Polymers. 2017;9:274. doi: 10.3390/polym9070274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Wang W, Wang H, Zhao J, Wang X, Xiong C, Song L, Ding R, Han P, Li W. Self-healing performance and corrosion resistance of graphene oxide–mesoporous silicon layer–nanosphere structure coating under marine alternating hydrostatic pressure. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;361:792–804. [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Sliem MH, Afifi M, Radwan B, Fayyad EM, Shibl MF, Heakal FT, Abdullah AM. Surfactant as an eco-friendly corrosion inhibitor for carbon steel in HCl solution. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:2319. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37254-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Ubaid F, Radwan AB, Naeem N, Shakoor R, Ahmad Z, Montemor M, Kahraman R, Abdullah AM, Soliman A, Ahmed Z. Multifunctional self-healing polymeric nanocomposite coatings for corrosion inhibition of steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019;372:121–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Navarchian A.H., Najafipoor N. Ahangaran, F. Surface-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) microcapsules containing linseed oil for application in self-healing epoxy-based coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019;132:288–297. [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Li J, Li Z, Feng Q, Qiu H, Yang G, Zheng S, Yang J. Encapsulation of linseed oil in graphene oxide shells for preparation of self-healing composite coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019;129:285–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Lyon S, Bingham R, Mills D. Advances in corrosion protection by organic coatings: what we know and what we would like to know. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017;102:2–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Zhang F, Ju P, Pan M, Zhang D, Huang Y, Li G, Li X. Self-healing mechanisms in smart protective coatings: a review. Corros. Sci. 2018;144:74–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Kim D, Cho Y, Choi J, Kim B, Jin S, Chung C. Low-temperature self-healing of a microcapsule-type protective coating. Materials. 2017;10:1079. doi: 10.3390/ma10091079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Alipour K, Nasirpouri F. Smart anti-corrosion self-healing zinc metal-based molybdate functionalized-mesoporous-silica (MCM-41) nanocomposite coatings. RSC Adv. 2017;7:51879. [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Idumah C, Hassan A, Affam A. A review of recent developments in flammability of polymer nanocomposites. Rev Chem Eng. 2015;31:149–177. [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Idumah C, Hassan A. Characterization and preparation of conductive exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets kenaf fibre hybrid polypropylene composites. Syn Met. 2016;212:91–104. [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Idumah C, Hassan A. Recently emerging trends in thermal conductivity of polymer nano-composites. Rev Chem Eng. 2016;32:413–457. [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Idumah C, Hassan A. Emerging trends in flame retardancy of biofibers, biopolymers, bio-composites, and bionanocomposites. Rev Chem Eng. 2015;32:115–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Idumah C, Hassan A. Emerging trends in graphene carbon based polymer nanocompo-sites and applications. Rev Chem Eng. 2016;32:223–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Idumah C, Hassan A. Effect of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets on thermal and heat deflection properties of kenaf polypropylene hybrid nanocomposites. J PolymEng. 2016;36:877–889. [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Idumah C, Hassan A. Emerging trends in eco-compliant, synergistic, and hybrid assembling of multifunctional polymeric bionanocomposites. Rev Chem Eng. 2016;32:305–361. [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Idumah C, Hassan A, Bourbigot S. Influence of exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets on flame retardancy of kenaf flour polypropylene hybrid nanocomposites. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2017;123:65–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Idumah C, Hassan A. Hibiscus cannabinus fiber/PP based nano-biocomposites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. J Nat Fibers. 2017;14:691–706. [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Idumah CI. Emerging advancements in flame retardancy of polypropylene nanocomposites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2020 doi: 10.1177/0892705720930782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Idumah C, Hassan A, Ogbu J, Ndem J, Oti W, Obiana V. Electrical, thermal and flammabil-ity properties of conductive filler kenaf reinforced polymer nanocomposites. J Thermo-plast Compos Mater. 2018 089270571880795. 10.1177/0892705718807957. [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Idumah C, Hassan A, Bourbigot S. Synergistic effect of exfoliated graphene nanoplatelets and non-halogen flame retardants on flame retardancy and thermal properties of kenaf flour-PP nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s10973-018-7833-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Idumah C, Hassan A, Ihuoma D. Recently emerging trends in polymer nanocomposites packaging materials. Polym-Plast Technol Eng, doi:10.1080/03602559.2018.1542718.
  • 173.Idumah CI. Progress in polymer nanocomposites for bone regeneration and engineering. Polymers and Polymer Composites. 2020 0967391120913658. [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Idumah CI. Recent advancements in self-healing polymers, polymer blends, and nanocomposites. Polymers and Polymer Composites. 2020 0967391120910882. [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Idumah CI, Odera SR. Recent advancement in self-healing graphene polymer nanocomposites, shape memory, and coating materials. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials. 2020:1–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Idumah CI, Hassan A, Ogbu J, Ndem JU, Nwuzor IC. Recently emerging advancements in halloysite nanotubes polymer nanocomposites. Composite Interfaces. 2019;26(9):751–824. [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Idumah C, Zurina M, Ogbu J, Ndem J, Igba E. A review on innovations in polymeric nanocomposite packaging materials and electrical sensors for food and agriculture. Composite Interfaces. 2019;27(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Idumah C, Hassan A, Ihuoma E. Recently emerging trends in polymer nanocomposites packaging materials. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Materials. 2019;58(10):1054–1109. [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Idumah CI. Novel trends in self-healable polymer nanocomposites. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 2020 0892705719847247. [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Idumah CI, Ogbu JE, Ndem JU, Obiana V. Influence of chemical modification of kenaf fiber on xGNP-PP nano-biocomposites. SN Applied Sciences. 2019;1:1261. [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Idumah CI, Nwuzor I. Novel trends in plastic waste management. SN Applied Sciences. 2019;1:1402. [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Idumah C, Zurina M, Hassan A, Norhayani O, Shuhadah I. Recently Emerging Trends in Bone Replacement Polymer Nanocomposites. Nanostructured Polymer Composites for Biomedical Applications. 2019:139–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Idumah CI, Obele CM, Ezeani EO. Understanding interfacial dispersions in ecobenign polymer nano-biocomposites. Journal Polym-Plast Technol Mater. 2020 doi: 10.1080/25740881.2020.1811312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xml (219B, xml)

Articles from Surfaces and Interfaces are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES