Abstract
The new theory of education suggests that learner should be in the center of the learning process and the instructor playing an advising and facilitating role. Building smart learning environments supported by e-learning platforms is an important area of research. The rapid and continuous development of technology that has brought new learning skills for students forces the educational system to enter into a new era. This change is further justified by some unprecedented events that force students to learn remotely.
QLearn is an e-learning platform developed as a web based application which provides quizzes for students enrolled at Advanced Programming Methods course from Babeş Bolyai University (Romania) as part of their formative and summative assessment. The existing set of quizzes has been proposed by students throughout the last three iterations of the course in a collaborative manner with course instructor, and this data set is expanding continuously with every new generation of students. QLearn is a smart learning environment offering the students valuable feedback and a good preparation for the exam. Some metrics that quantify the coverage rate of the course syllabus attained by students or their understanding level of knowledge are provided by QLearn. The Artificial Intelligent component of QLearn application uses these measures to make predictions for students’ outcomes at the exam, to find out which topics need to be practised more and to recommend learning plans according to students’ individual needs.
The contribution of the paper is therefore twofold. Firstly, we propose a new learning design, based on students’ involvement in a collaborative manner. The second contribution of the paper is QLearn, a software application that provides support (implementation) for the proposed learning process design. Not only does QLearn platform provide a smart learning environment for students, but it also ensures the knowledge transfer from instructors to students in an efficient and effective way.
Keywords: Smart learning environment, E-learning, Active learning methods, Collaboration, Artificial Intelligence, Gamification
References
- 1.Bishop C., Michael C., Cheryl K. Learner-centered environments: Creating effective strategies based on student attitudes and faculty reflection. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2014;14(3):46–63. (2014) [Google Scholar]
- 2.I. Caponetto, J. Earp, and M. Ott. 2014. Gamification and education: A literature review. In European Conference on Games Based Learning. Academic Conferences International Limited. (2014), 50-60.
- 3.M. Dougiamas. Accessed 2020. Moodle, Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment). http://moodle.org/stats
- 4.Doyle Terry, Tagg John. Helping Students Learn in a Learner-Centered Environment: A Guide to Facilitating Learning in Higher Education. Stylus Publishing; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dutt A., Ismail M.A., Herawan T. A Systematic Review on Educational Data Mining. IEEE Access. 2017;5(2017):15991–16005. [Google Scholar]
- 6.S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. (2014), 50 - 62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Hwang G.J. Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments--a context--aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments. 2014;1(2014):1–14. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ibáñez-Espiga M.B., Serio A., Kloos C.D. Gamification for Engaging Computer Science Students in Learning Activities: A Case Study. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2014;7(3):291–301. (2014) [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rich J. An experimental study of differences in study habits and long-term retention rates between take-home and in-class examinations. International Journal of University Teaching and Faculty Development. 2011;2(2):121–129. (2011) [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rich J.D., Jr, Colon A., Mines D., Jivers K.L. Creating learner-centered assessment strategies for promoting greater student retention and class participation. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;5(1):1–3. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00595. (2014) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kim K., Sharma P., Land S.M., Furlong K.P. Effects of active learning on enhancing student critical thinking in an undergraduate general science course. 2013:223–235. [Google Scholar]
- 12.M. Piccioni, H. C. Estler, and B. Meyer. 2014. SPOC-supported introduction to programming. In Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference 2014, ITiCSE ‘14, Uppsala, Sweden, June 23--25, 2014. ACM, 3-8.
- 13.Ratey J.J., Galaburda A.M. A User’s Guide to the Brain: Perception, Attention, and the Four Theaters of the Brain. Pantheon Books; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 14.P. Sankar. Accessed 2020. Piazza).https://piazza.com/
- 15.C. Serban. 2010. A conceptual framework for object-oriented design assessment. In UKSim 4th European Modelling Symposium on Mathematical Modelling and Computer Simulation, Pisa, 17 - 19 November. 90-95.
- 16.C. Serban. Accessed 2020. APM Course Syllabus. https://www.cs.ubbcluj.ro/files/curricula/2019/syllabus/IR_sem3_MLR5008_ro_camelia_2019_4938.pdf
- 17.Serban C., Pop H.F. Software Quality Assessment Using a Fuzzy Clustering Approach. Studia Universitas Babes-Bolyai. Seria Informatica LIII. 2008;2(2008):27–38. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sewagegn A.A., Diale B. Empowering Learners Using Active Learning in Higher Education Institutions. IntechOpen; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Spector J.M. Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart Learning Environments. 2014 (2014) [Google Scholar]