Skip to main content
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics logoLink to Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
. 2020 Mar 16;66(5):470–478. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmz086

Association of Neonatal Hypothermia with Morbidity and Mortality in a Tertiary Hospital in Malawi

Frank Phoya 1,2, Josephine Langton 1,2, Queen Dube 1,2, Pui-Ying Iroh Tam 1,2,3,4,
PMCID: PMC7532991  PMID: 32176776

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate associations with neonatal hypothermia in a tertiary-level neonatal unit (NU) in Malawi.

Methods

Neonates with a birth weight >1000 g were recruited and temperatures were recorded 5 min after birth, on admission and 4 h thereafter. Clinical course and outcome were reviewed. Data were analysed using Stata v.15 and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Between August 2018 to March 2019, 120 neonates were enrolled, and 112 were included in the data analysis. Hypothermia at 5 min after birth was noted in 74%, 77% on admission to the NU and 38% at 24 h. Neonates who had hypothermia 5 min after birth were more likely to have hypothermia on admission to the NU compared with normothermic subjects (p < 0.01). All neonates with hypothermia on admission to the NU died (100 vs.72%, p = 0.02), but hypothermia at 5 min nor at 24 h were not associated with mortality. After adjusting for potential confounders, the odds ratio of hypothermia at 5 min for hypothermia on admission to NU was 13.31 (95% CI 4.17–42.54).

Discussion

A large proportion of hospitalized neonates is hypothermic on admission and has associated morbidity and mortality. Our findings suggest that a strong predictor of mortality is neonatal hypothermia on admission to the NU, and that early intervention in the immediate period after delivery could decrease the incidence of hypothermia and reduce associated morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: neonatal hypothermia, risk factors, Kangaroo mother care, neonatal morbidity, hospital mortality

BACKGROUND

In keeping with the global trend, Malawi achieved the Millennium Development Goal 4, reducing under five mortality between 1990 and 2015 by two-thirds. However, the neonatal mortality has remained high, and is currently at 27 per 1000 live births. In response to this slow reduction in neonatal mortality rate, Malawi adopted the ‘Newborn Action Plan’ from Every Newborn Action Plan, which was launched at the World Health Assembly in June 2014. This plan puts in place strategies to accelerate the reduction of preventable newborn deaths and stillbirths in Malawi, with the ultimate goal of ending all preventable newborn deaths, including stillbirths.

One of the major risk factors for morbidity and mortality in the first 28 days of life is neonatal hypothermia. Hypothermia has also been shown to be a risk factor for neonatal sepsis, intra-ventricular haemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis [1]. In low resource settings, a high incidence of hypothermia has been documented in hospitals immediately following birth. Studies conducted in Zambia and Zimbabwe in the late 1990s to 2000s identified hypothermia in 44–51% of sick newborns on admission to the neonatal unit (NU) [2, 3]; however, more recent data on hypothermia in NUs in sub-Saharan Africa are lacking. Furthermore, few studies have evaluated whether hypothermia after birth, on admission to the NU, or later, has the most impact on neonatal outcomes.

Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Blantyre Malawi is a government funded tertiary-level referral hospital, serving the southern region of Malawi. Within the NU care delivered to newborns includes: warmth, feeding, intravenous fluids, parenteral antibiotics, oxygen and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). There is no access to more sophisticated interventions such as surfactant therapy and mechanical ventilation. Kangaroo mother care (KMC) is initiated after achieving stabilization, or intermittent KMC is done if the baby is still considered high risk. This study aimed to address this gap by documenting neonatal hypothermia and associated morbidity and mortality in a neonatal care unit in Malawi, and to determine which among hypothermia at 5 min, on admission to the NU, or at 24 h, had the highest association with morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

This prospective observational study recruited neonates from the labour ward who were subsequently admitted to the NU. All newborns with a gestational age of ≥28 weeks, or birth weight of ≥1000 g, were eligible for inclusion. Newborns with congenital abnormalities were excluded. Written informed consent was obtained from the mother. Ethics approval was awarded by the University of Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee.

In accordance to standard unit practice all babies had a temperature recorded within 15 min of delivery and on admission to NU. Temperatures were recorded using a digital axillary thermometer. Babies were recruited following admission into the NU. Anonymized data were collated from the standard daily observation charts. For the first 24 h of admission this comprised 4 h vital signs (temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation) and 6 h blood glucose checks. For the remainder of the admission it comprised 4 h vital signs, 12 h blood glucose checks and daily weight check, in accordance with standard practice. Patients were reviewed by a clinician twice a day or as determined by their clinical condition. Demographic information, concomitant conditions, clinical course and outcome were also recorded on the anonymized case report form. Daily environmental temperature readings were taken on both the NU and labour ward. The WHO definition for hypothermia (<36.5°C) was adopted for this study.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were shown as frequencies and percentages or as a mean (±SD), as appropriate. Primary outcome measures were neonatal temperature at 5 min after birth, on admission to the NU, and at 24 h of life. Secondary outcome measures were associated morbidities, need for respiratory support, hospital length of stay and hospital mortality. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test were used. Linear and logistic regression analyses were conducted using Stata v.15 (Statacorp, College Station, TX) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated after controlling for potential confounders prematurity, sex and low Apgar scores at 1 min. The p values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Between August 2018 and March 2019, a total of 120 newborns were recruited. Eight newborns were lost to follow-up, meaning 112 completed files were included for analysis. Maternal median age was 25 years, and 13% were HIV positive (Table 1). Of the neonates, 48% were male, 55% were low-birth weight (<2.5 kg) and 16% were very low-birth weight (<1.5 kg). In total 74% of neonates had hypothermia 5 min after birth, 77% on admission to NU, 31% at 6 h, 29% at 12 h and 38% at 24 h. Drying after delivery was documented in 96% of cases, 7% received skin-to-skin contact, 4% breastfed immediately after birth, and less than half received KMC, their own bedding or hat (46, 34 and 42%, respectively).

Table 1.

Maternal and neonatal characteristics

n = 112
Maternal characteristics
 Maternal age, years (mean, SD) 25.8 (6.8)
 Maternal HIV status (%)
  Infected 14 (13)
  Unknown 1 (0.9)
 Mode of delivery (%)
  Caesarean section 34 (31)
 Types of pregnancy (%)
  Singleton 98 (88)
 Antenatal visits (%)
  4 complete visits 31 (30)
  ≤3 antenatal visits 71 (69)
 Prematurity (%) 34 (31)
 Steroid use in pregnancy (%) 14 (13)
 Prolonged rupture of membranes (%) 11 (10)
 Infection during pregnancy (%) 5 (4)
 Hypertension in pregnancy (%) 13 (12)
Newborn characteristics
 Male (%) 54 (48)
 HIV Exposed (%) 14 (13)
 Low-birth weight (<2.5 kg, %) 62 (55)
 Very low-birth weight (<1.5 kg, %) 18 (16)
 Apgar score <6 at 1 min (%) 47 (42)
 Apgar score <6 at 5 min (%) 73 (65)
 Apgar score <6 at 10 min (%) 6 (7)
 Small for gestational age (%) 12 (11)
 Intrauterine growth restriction (%) 18 (16)
Inpatient care
 Drying after delivery (%) 108 (96)
 Skin-to-skin contact after birth (%) 8 (7)
 Breastfeeding after birth (%) 4 (4)
 Warm transport to nursery (%) 103 (92)
 NICU room temperature, °C, mean (SD) 29.3 (1.4)
 Hypothermia (%)
  Five minutes after birth 83 (74)
  On admission to NU 86 (77)
  6 h after admission 19/62 (31)
  12 h after admission 13/45 (29)
  24 h after admission 24/63 (38)
  Before death/discharge 40/105 (38)
 Glucose level on admission, mg/dl, mean (SD) 102.8 (34.5)
 Neonatal comorbidity (%)
  RDS 42 (38)
  Transient tachypnoea of the newborn 26 (23)
  Birth asphyxia 12 (11)
  Neonatal sepsis with use of antibiotics 34 (30)
  Neonatal jaundice 8 (7)
  Meconium aspiration 11 (10)
 Received KMC (%) 51 (46)
 Provided own bedding (%) 49 (44)
 Provided own clothing (%) 38 (34)
 Provided own hat (%) 47 (42)
 Respiratory support (%)
  Oxygen supplementation 63 (57)
  CPAP 18 (16)
 Neonatal outcomes
  Length of admission, days, mean (SD) 5.5 (6.3)
  Hospital mortality (%) 15 (14)

The two most common comorbidities were respiratory distress syndrome (RDS, 38%) and transient tachypnoea of the newborn (23%). Over half of the subjects (57%) required oxygen support during their hospital stay, which was a mean of 5.5 days (±6.3 days). Fifteen neonates died (14%), and this number was higher among lower birth weight neonates with hypothermia (Fig. 1). Among the neonates, 38% of the neonates were hypothermic on their last temperature reading before discharge or death.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Frequency of hypothermia at 5 min, on admission to NICU, and at 24 h, by birth weight, stratified by those that died vs. survived. LBW, low-birth weight; VLBW, very low-birth weight.

Neonates who were hypothermic 5 min after birth were more likely to have hypothermia on admission to the NU compared with those that were normothermic (85 vs. 15%, p < 0.01), more likely to have RDS (88 vs. 12%, p < 0.01); more likely to receive KMC (84 vs. 16%, p = 0.02); more likely to be provided a hat (85 vs. 15%, p = 0.02); and more likely to have a longer hospital stay (87 vs. 13%, p = 0.03; Table 2). When compared with those that were normothermic on admission, neonates with hypothermia on admission to the NU were more likely to have a diagnosis of transient tachypnoea of the newborn (62 vs. 38%, p = 0.04) and to receive oxygen supplementation (86 vs. 14%, p = 0.01). Longer hospital stay was documented among neonates with hypothermia on admission to NU (86 vs. 14%), although this was not statistically significant. All the neonates who died had hypothermia on admission (100 vs. 0%, p = 0.02).

Table 2.

Association between neonatal hypothermia at 5 min, on admission to NU and at 24 h, and clinical features and outcomes

At 5 min (n = 112)
On admission (n = 111)
At 24 h (n = 53)
Present (n = 83) Absent (n = 29) p-value Present (n = 86) Absent (n = 25) p-value Present (n = 24) Absent (n = 29) p-value
Perinatal characteristics (%)
 Caesarean section 24/34 (71) 10/34 (29) 0.62 24/34 (71) 10/34 (29) 0.34 8/18 (44) 10/18 (56) 0.60
 Prematurity 29/34 (85) 5/34 (15) 0.07 28/34 (82) 6/34 (18) 0.36 11/24 (36) 13/24 (54) 0.32
 Gestational age <34 weeks 49/62 (79) 13/62 (21) 0.19 49/62 (79) 13 (21) 0.53 15/38 (39) 23/38 (61) 0.78
 Low-birth weight <2.5 kg 33/44 (75) 11/44 (44) 0.06 50/62 (81) 12/62 (19) 0.35 17/40 (43) 23/40 (58) 0.63
 Very low-birth weight <1.5 kg 17/18 (94) 1/18 (6) 0.06 16/18 (89) 2/18 (11) 0.35 7/16 (44) 9/16 (56) 0.63
 Apgar score <6 at 1 min 32/47 (68) 15/47 (32) 0.22 40/47 (85) 7/47 (15) 0.08 8/24 (33) 16/24 (67) 0.54
 Apgar score <6 at 5 min 51/73 (70) 22/73 (30) 0.16 59/73 (81) 14/73 (19) 0.17 15/44 (34) 29/44 (66) 0.32
 Apgar score <6 at 10 min 5/6 (83) 1/6 (17) 0.51 6/6 (100) 0/6 (0) 0.12 0/2 (0) 2/2 (100) 0.29
Neonatal comorbidity (%)
 Hypothermia on admission to NU 73/86 (85) 13/86 (15) <0.01 19/52 (37) 33/52 (63) 0.58
 Suspected sepsis 21/28 (75) 7/28 (25) 0.90 22/28 (79) 6/28 (21) 0.80 6/23 (26) 17/23 (74) 0.14
 RDS 37/42 (88) 5/42 (12) <0.01 35/42 (83) 7/42 (17) 0.20 15/33 (45) 18/33 (55) 0.21
 Birth asphyxia 9/12 (75) 3/12 (25) 0.94 11/12 (92) 1/12 (8) 0.20 0/8 (0) 8/8 (100) 0.02
 Transient tachypnoea of the newborn 16/26 (62) 10/26 (39) 0.10 16/26 (62) 10/26 (38) 0.04 4/9 (44) 5/9 (56) 0.67
Inpatient care (%)
 Received O2 53/63 (84) 10/63 (16) <0.01 54/63 (86) 9/63 (14) 0.01 16/43 (37) 27/43 (63) 0.83
 Received CPAP 16/18 (89) 2/18 (11) 0.12 17/18 (94) 1/18 (6) 0.05 6/16 (38) 10/16 (63) 0.96
 Received KMC 43/51 (84) 8/51 (16) 0.02 42/51 (82) 9/51 (18) 0.20 15/36 (42) 21/36 (58) 0.50
 Provided own bedding 39/49 (80) 10/49 (20) 0.24 40/49 (82) 9/49 (18) 0.26 17/37 (46) 20/37 (54) 0.12
 Provided own clothing 30/38 (79) 8/38 (21) 0.40 29/38 (76) 9/38 (24) 0.93 15/32 (47) 17/32 (53) 0.15
 Provided own hat 40/47 (85) 7/47 (15) 0.02 40/47 (85) 7/47 (15) 0.08 17/35 (49) 18/35 (51) 0.06
Neonatal outcomes (%)
 Duration of stay >5 days 32/37 (86) 5/37 (14) 0.03 32/37 (86) 5/37 (14) 0.08 12/33 (36) 21/33 (64) 0.77
 Hospital mortality 13/15 (87) 2/15 (13) 0.20 15/15 (100) 0/15 (0) 0.02 2/7 (29) 5/7 (71) 0.53

At 24 h of life, the only significant association with neonatal hypothermia was birth asphyxia, and none of the babies with birth asphyxia had hypothermia (0 vs. 100%, p = 0.02). Neonates that were provided their own hat in the NU were less likely to have hypothermia at 24 h (49 vs. 51%), although this was not statistically significant. Hypothermia at 24 h inversely correlated with longer hospital stay (36 vs. 64%) and hospital mortality (29 vs. 71%), although again neither were statistically significant.

Regarding mortality (Table 3), hospital deaths were significantly associated with low Apgar scores <6 at 1 min (73 vs. 63%, p < 0.01) and 10 min (36 vs. 7%, p < 0.01), hypothermia on admission to the NU (100 vs. 72%, p = 0.02), RDS (60 vs. 32%, p = 0.04), birth asphyxia (27 vs. 9%, p = 0.04) and receipt of respiratory support (p < 0.01). A higher proportion of neonates who died had hypothermia at 5 min (87 vs. 29%); however, this was not statistically significant. Hypothermia at 5 min had an OR of 2.65 (95% CI 0.56–12.59) for death that was not statistically significant (p = 0.218).

Table 3.

Neonatal mortality and association with clinical features and management

Characteristic Died (n = 15) Survived (n = 93) p-value
Perinatal characteristics (%)
 Prematurity 9 (60) 41 (44) 0.25
 Low-birth weight <2.5 kg 11 (74) 47 (51) 0.47
 Very low-birth weight <1.5kg 4 (27) 12 (13) 0.19
 Apgar score < 6 at 1 min 11 (73) 59 (63) <0.01
 Apgar score < 6 at 5 min 12 (80) 34 (37) 0.21
 Apgar score <6 at 10 min 5/14 (36) 1/70 (7) <0.01
Neonatal comorbidity
 Hypothermia at 5 min 13 (87) 27 (29) 0.20
 Hypothermia on admission to NU 15 (100) 67 (72) 0.02
 Hypothermia at 24 h 2 (29) 22 (41) 0.54
 Hypothermia before discharge 4/13 (31) 36/89 (40) 0.50
 Suspected sepsis 2 (13) 25 (27) 0.26
 RDS 9 (60) 30 (32) 0.04
 Birth asphyxia 4 (27) 8 (9) 0.04
 Transient tachypnoea of the newborn 0 (0) 26 (28) 0.02
Inpatient care (%)
 Respiratory support
  Oxygen 15 (100) 45 (48) <0.01
  CPAP 7 (47) 9 (10) <0.01
  Received KMC 5 (33) 44 (47) 0.31
  Provided own bedding 7 (47) 39 (42) 0.73
  Provided own clothing 3 (20) 33 (35) 0.24
  Provided own hat 4 (27) 41 (44) 0.20
Outcomes (%)
 Duration of stay >5 days 4 (27) 31 (33) 0.61

After adjusting for low Apgar scores at 1 min, prematurity and sex, hypothermia 5 min after birth had an OR of 13.31 (95% CI 4.17–42.54) for hypothermia on admission to the NU, and hypothermia on admission to the NU had an OR of 0.05 (95% CI 0.02–1.25) for receipt of CPAP. Apgar scores <6 at 1 min had an OR of 5.66 (95% CI 1.55–20.70) for hospital mortality (Table 4), and receipt of CPAP had an OR of 0.05 (95% CI 0.009–0.31) for mortality.

Table 4 Multivariable analysis of association between hypothermia, comorbidity and outcomes

Outcome Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusteda OR (95% CI)
Hypothermia 5 min after birth
 Low-birth weight 2.15 (1.10–4.19) 2.17 (0.91–5.18)
 Hypothermia on NU admission 8.98 (3.35–24.09) 13.31 (4.17–42.54)
 RDS 0.26 (0.09–0.74) 0.26 (0.07–0.99)
 Receipt of O2 0.30 (0.12–0.72) 0.32 (0.13–0.84)
 Receipt of KMC 0.35 (0.14–0.89) 0.38 (0.12–1.21)
Hypothermia on NU admission
 Receipt of O2 0.31 (0.13–0.79) 0.34 (0.12–0.94)
Inpatient neonatal mortality
 Apgar score <6 at 1 min 4.77 (1.34–16.16) 5.66 (1.55–20.70)
 CPAP 0.12 (0.03–0.45) 0.05 (0.009–0.31)

CI, confidence interval; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; KMC, kangaroo mother care; NU, neonatal unit; OR, odds ratio.

a

Adjusted for Apgar score <6 at 1 min, prematurity, sex.

DISCUSSION

The incidence of hypothermia 5 min after birth was extremely high and associated with hypothermia on admission to the NU, RDS, receipt of oxygen supplementation, receipt of KMC and of own hat and longer hospital stay. Hypothermia on admission was associated with receipt of oxygen supplementation and death. The only significant association identified with hypothermia at 24 h was birth asphyxia.

These results demonstrate the high incidence of hypothermia in our setting and that this issue affects a larger population beyond those that are preterm and low-birth weight. These findings support previous studies that highlight the importance of thermal care in the newborn in the immediate period after birth. In other settings, hypothermia on admission to NUs was associated with a 1.26- to 1.72-fold greater risk for hospital mortality [4, 5]. In recognition of the importance of neonatal hypothermia as a risk factor for neonatal morbidity and mortality, WHO introduced practical guidelines for clinicians in 2007 for thermal protection. These emphasize the need for drying the baby immediately after birth, skin-to-skin contact with the mother and immediate breastfeeding. In addition, newborns should be wrapped in a warm cloth and given a hat, and provided warm transportation during transfer from delivery room to the NU [1]. A study in Brazil demonstrated that use of plastic bag/wrap independently decreased chances of hypothermia at 5 min by 47% in preterm infants [5], and a Cochrane review found that hypothermia on admission decreased by 34% in preterm infants with gestational age <28 weeks when a plastic bag wrap was used soon after birth [6]. In preterm infants, the use of a cotton cap after birth decreased hypothermia on admission [5].

In our cohort, we documented drying after delivery in 96% of cases, but only 7% received skin-to-skin contact and 4% breastfed immediately after birth. We did not have sufficient numbers to evaluate the association of these interventions with mortality. Despite the low-resource setting of this study (lack of heating in delivery room, environmental temperature optimized only for the mother and staff, poor hypothermia prevention on delivery, poor baby wrapping, lack of heated transportation to the NU), these results highlight an opportunity for simple, low-cost interventions that can impact clinical outcome.

Although evaluating KMC, hypothermia at 5 min after birth was associated with an OR of 0.34 for receipt of KMC, but after adjusting for potential confounders the association was no longer significant. It may have been that hypothermia reflected other comorbidities that required more intensive monitoring, and therefore KMC could not be practiced; another possibility is that staff shortages mean these results reflect a continuum of resource-constrained care. In particular, KMC has been shown to be a viable intervention for treating hypothermia, and more importantly is a low-cost measure in our setting since we have lack of other thermal care resources (warmed incubator transportation, plastic wrap, enough radiant warmers). A study on implementation of KMC in low resource countries in Africa showed that KMC could be used for management of low-birth weight babies [7]. A multicountry randomized-controlled trial in Africa is currently evaluating the effect of immediate KMC on neonatal survival, and may provide more evidence to support the use of KMC in preventing neonatal hypothermia in low resource settings.

The statistically significant association between low Apgar scores <6 with hospital mortality reaffirms the importance of management during delivery in determining neonatal outcomes. In our setting, management of preterm infants is still lacking (no use of plastic bags, no surfactant treatment available, lack of incubators and intubation not commonly available for preterm infants). A lack of skilled healthcare workers in hospitals means that there are insufficient staff to adequately care for the mother and newborn after delivery, affecting the quality and competence of neonatal resuscitation. Reducing the incidence of hypothermia among preterm and low-birth weight infants has been evaluated in other studies [8–10]; however, while roughly 31–55% of our patients were preterm and/or had low-birth weight, over 70% of neonates were hypothermic at 5 min and on admission to the NU, indicating that there is a generally high incidence of hypothermia affecting newborns in low resource settings such as these. However, thermal care is part of basic newborn care and, if done well, can have an impact on outcomes. Therefore, reduction of neonatal mortality in countries such as Malawi can be attained through optimization of these simple measures.

The most common neonatal morbidities associated with hypothermia were RDS and birth asphyxia, and hypothermia 5 min after birth was associated with a 74% lower risk of RDS, although this association was weak after adjusting for potential confounders. Contrary to other studies, which noted the association between hypothermia and RDS in low-birth weight and preterm infants [8–10], we instead found that hypothermia 5 min after birth had an OR of 0.26 for RDS, although this association was weaker after adjusting for potential confounders [adjusted OR 0.26 (95% CI 0.07–0.99)]. Both hypothermia 5 min after birth and on admission to the NU had an OR of 0.31 and 0.32, respectively, for receipt of oxygen supplementation, although these associations were also weak after adjusting for potential confounders. These findings may reflect the constraints of staffing shortages; however, as the sample size was small, all results should be interpreted with caution. We documented, for both hypothermia at 5 min and on admission, a higher proportion of CPAP usage in both groups, although neither reached statistical significance.

The study is limited by the modest size of our sample size, which made it difficult to identify clear associations between variables, and also means that all results should be interpreted with caution. Although every effort was made to compile a complete dataset, we still had missing data, especially with labour ward temperature, and duration of time between transport from the delivery room to the NU. We did not document maternal temperature, and low staffing levels on the labour ward and NU meant there were challenges with the collection of daily observations. WHO advises rectal temperature measurements as a more accurate measure of body core temperature, when hypothermia is suspected. Given the limited equipment and staffing we were unable to do so, therefore there is a potential for misclassification of hypothermia and normothermia infants. Despite these limitations, this study provides one of the most detailed recent studies on neonatal hypothermia conducted in a low resource setting. Furthermore, we did adjust for potential confounders, and identified potential associations and interventions of significance. We identified a strong association with mortality among all neonates with hypothermia on admission to the NU; however, as all neonates who died had documented hypothermia on admission, we were unable to calculate an OR.

In conclusion, there is a high incidence of hypothermia that affects the majority of newborns at our tertiary-level hospital. Hypothermia at 5 min was associated with an OR of 13.31 for hypothermia on admission to the NU, which was itself significantly associated with mortality. Our findings reiterate the vital importance of addressing the immediate period after birth, and suggest that the use of simple interventions in the immediate period after delivery prior to arrival in the NU could improve neonatal hypothermia, and reduce associated morbidity and mortality.

Acknowledgements

We thank Luis Gadama for his assistance with setting up the study in the labour ward, and labour and delivery nursing staff for support with data collection.

REFERENCES

  • 1.WHO. Thermal control of the newborn: a practical guide. Geneva, Switzerland: Maternal and Safe Motherhood Programme, Division of Family Health, 1997. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/63986/1/WHO_RHT_MSM_97.2.pdf (2 April 2017, date last accessed). [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Christensson K, Bhat GJ, Eriksson B, et al. The effect of routine hospital care on the health of hypothermic newborn infants in Zambia. J Trop Pediatr 1995;41:210–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kambarami RA, Mutambirwa J, Maramba PP.. Caregivers’ perceptions and experiences of ‘kangaroo care’ in a developing country. Trop Doct 2002;32:131–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Costeloe KL, Hennessy EM, Haider S, et al. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies). BMJ 2012;345:e7976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. de Almeida MF, Guinsburg R, Sancho GA,. et al. Hypothermia and early neonatal mortality in preterm infants. J Pediatr 2014164: 271–5.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. McCall EM, Alderdice F, Halliday HL, et al. Interventions to prevent hypothermia at birth in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;2:CD004210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Vesel L, Bergh AM, Kerber KJ, et al. Kangaroo mother care: a multi-country analysis of health system bottlenecks and potential solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15(Suppl. 2):S5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Jensen CF, Ebbesen F, Petersen JP, et al. Hypothermia at neonatal intensive care unit admission was not associated with respiratory disease or death in very preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2017;106:1934–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Laptook AR, Salhab W, Bhaskar B, et al.. Admission temperature of low birth weight infants: predictors and associated morbidities. Pediatrics 2007;119:e643–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lyu Y, Shah PS, Ye XY, et al. Association between admission temperature and mortality and major morbidity in preterm infants born at fewer than 33 weeks’ gestation. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169:e150277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Tropical Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES