Skip to main content
Microbial Biotechnology logoLink to Microbial Biotechnology
. 2020 Sep 2;13(6):1702–1704. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13662

Mining for novel antibiotics in the age of antimicrobial resistance

Zulema Udaondo 1, Miguel A Matilla 2,
PMCID: PMC7533334  PMID: 32881368

The emergence of antibiotic‐resistant microorganisms urges the development of novel antimicrobials that are effective against new targets and with low rates of resistance appearance. The combined use of modern multidisciplinary approaches including synthetic biology, genomics, metagenomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics and computational tools are enabling progress in this re‐emerging research field.

graphic file with name MBT2-13-1702-g001.jpg

Summary

The misuse of antimicrobials is causing an alarming increase in the appearance of antibiotic‐resistant microorganisms. In this context, the identification of novel antibiotics against new targets and with low rates of resistance development is a major global challenge. In this article, we highlight a number of recent articles that exploit a variety of in vitro, in vivo and in silico state‐of‐the‐art approaches to identify and develop new antimicrobials. Rapid progress in this research field will be crucial to combating a global health problem, antimicrobial resistance, that is expected to be the leading cause of death by 2050.


The COVID‐19 pandemic has brought back into focus the global vulnerability of our society to infectious diseases (Brüssow, 2020). Among them, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is currently one of the major global health concerns, with current predictions indicating that it will cause 10 million deaths annually by 2050 and a global cost of 100 trillion USD (Trotter et al., 2019). The emergence of AMR correlates with the misuse of antibiotics, and its rise is not only restricted to animal and human pathogens but also affects economically relevant phytopathogens (Davies and Davies, 2010; Robbins et al., 2017; Sundin and Wang, 2018). The mechanisms of AMR are generally associated with (i) the acquisition of resistance genes through horizontal gene transfer, (ii) the mutation of cellular targets, (iii) the production of alternative antimicrobial‐insensitive targets, and (iv) the enzymatic inactivation of the antimicrobials (Davies and Davies, 2010; Robbins et al., 2017; Sundin and Wang, 2018). Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop new antibiotics that not only present low rates of resistance development but also have novel mechanisms of action to avoid cross‐resistance with currently used drugs. In fact, more than 70% of the global projects in the preclinical antibacterial pipeline focus on searching for antibiotics with new targets (Theuretzbacher et al., 2020).

Actinobacteria continue to be the main source of clinically used antimicrobials (van Bergeijk et al., 2020), but genome mining strategies are revealing the enormous genetic potential of alternative microbial taxa to discover novel antibiotics (Blin et al., 2019; Sharrar et al., 2020). This fact is exemplified in a recent study in Microbial Biotechnology where the combination of genome mining and phylogenetics of core polyketide synthase domains led to the discovery of an uncharacterized 35 kb biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) in a fungal endophyte isolated from a traditional Chinese medicine plant. Importantly, subsequent high‐resolution mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy analyses linked this BGC to the production of a novel anti‐Candida antifungal polyketide, lijiquinone (Cain et al., 2020). Unfortunately, the majority of the BGCs involved in natural product synthesis remain silent under standard laboratory culture conditions and there is a lack of knowledge on the regulatory mechanisms and environmental cues that activate cryptic BGCs (van Bergeijk et al., 2020). As a result, in the current genomics‐based antimicrobial discovery context, a variety of experimental approaches are employed to awake the expression of cryptic BGCs. For example, recent advances have been focussed on microbial co‐cultivation, high‐throughput elicitor screenings, synthetic biology strategies, the development of new chassis microorganisms for heterologous expression or paired metatranscriptomics and metabolomics of native microbial communities (Rutledge and Challis, 2015; Matilla et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2019; van Bergeijk et al., 2020). In this regard, a recent report published in Microbial Biotechnology used a novel bacteriophage recombinase system, Redαβ7029, to efficiently exchange the natural promoters of the seven cryptic polyketide synthase/non‐ribosomal peptide synthetase BGCs present in the genome of the antimicrobial producer and plant‐growth‐promoting bacterium Paraburkholderia megapolitana DSM 23488 (Zheng et al., 2020). This elegant genome editing strategy resulted in the successful activation of two silent BGCs, BGC5 and BGC9. The subsequent combination of high‐resolution mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy allowed the determination of the chemical structure of the products of BGC9, which were named haereomegapolitanin A and B. These molecules belong to a novel class of lipopeptides and, based on the domain organization of the core biosynthetic proteins encoded in BGC9, the authors proposed a model for the biosynthesis of both haereomegapolitanins. Although the identified haereomegapolitanins did not show antimicrobial properties against the tested bacteria and fungi, the real impact of the study lies in the enormous potential of the Redαβ7029‐based expression strategy for the efficient manipulation of Burkholderiales strains (Zheng et al., 2020). Burkholderiales are emerging as rich sources of natural products (Blin et al., 2019). However, the majority of the BGCs present in their genomes seem to be cryptic (Zheng et al., 2020) and the lack of efficient genetic tools for the manipulation of native Burkholderiales species is currently hindering the identification of bioactive natural products with potential medical and agricultural importance.

On another note, high‐throughput screenings (HTSs) of chemical libraries have been shown to represent efficient approaches for the identification of synergistic combinations of antimicrobials (i.e. the combined efficacy of two antimicrobials is greater than the sum of their individual effects; Wambaugh et al., 2020). Remarkably, given the low rates in the discovery of new antimicrobials nowadays, the synergistic combination therapy not only offers the possibility to revitalize the use of existing antibiotics, but also increases the activity spectrum of the treatment, minimizes host toxicity and reduces the occurrence of AMR as synergistic drugs generally act against different cellular targets (Tyers and Wright, 2019). Indeed, synergistic therapies have been shown to be effective to combat AMR bacteria (Song et al., 2020a). In this context, an article in Microbial Biotechnology revealed that the quinones hypocrellin A, B and C strongly inhibit mycelium formation, biofilm formation and virulence of different Candida species and C. albicans strains (Song et al., 2020b). Importantly, the authors showed that hypocrellins have a synergistic effect with the antifungal nystatin in an AMR C. albicans isolate. In addition, synergistic effects of hypocrellins with additional antifungal compounds (e.g. fluconazole, amphotericin B and voriconazole) were also shown to decrease the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of these antimicrobials by up to 16‐fold. The authors hypothesize that the observed synergistic effect may be a consequence of the effect of hypocrellins on biofilm formation as well as during C. albicans morphological transition, key steps during the infection process of C. albicans (Song et al., 2020b).

High‐throughput screenings have been also successfully used for the discovery of antimicrobials with novel mechanisms of action (Kitamura et al., 2018). In this respect, the screening of a library of 33 000 small molecules resulted in the identification of SCH‐79797 as a potent antibacterial agent against important Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus, Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Enterococcus faecalis with undetectable AMR development (Martin et al., 2020). Significantly, SCH‐79797 effectiveness was demonstrated against several AMR isolates, while the inability to isolate SCH‐79797‐resistant mutants hindered the elucidation of the mechanism of action (MoA) of this antibacterial. To overcome this difficulty, in a recently published Cell article the authors combined quantitative imaging, thermal proteome profiling, CRISPR interference sensitivity, metabolomics, enzymology and quantitative flow cytometry to reveal that SCH‐79797 targets both membrane integrity and folate metabolism (Martin et al., 2020). Subsequent assays demonstrated that this molecule, due to its double antibacterial activities, outperforms the effects of certain different antibiotic combinations in the treatment of AMR bacteria. The chemical basis of the unique dual MoA of SCH‐79797 was elucidated, aspect that was key for the development of chemical derivatives with enhanced antibacterial activities. One of these derivatives, Irresistin‐16 (IRS‐16), exhibited enhanced antibacterial activity in comparison with SCH‐79797, and it was efficient for treating N. gonorrhoeae in a mouse vaginal infection model with low host toxicity. The authors highlighted that combining several MoA in a single chemical scaffold may be an efficient approach to treat infections caused by AMR pathogens (Martin et al., 2020).

Despite AMR being a rising threat, recent efforts aimed at discovering and developing new antimicrobials in public and private sectors have not advanced significantly, with only 12 new antibiotics (or combinations) being approved in the last two decades (Kaufmann et al., 2018). However, the rapid progress in the development of integrative platforms based on the combination of genomics, metagenomics, metabolomics and bioinformatics is facilitating the analysis of thousands of microorganisms in order to mine the antimicrobial biosynthetic potential of specific taxonomic groups and ecosystems (Sharrar et al., 2020; van der Hooft et al., 2020). In addition, recent algorithmic advancements in modelling neural networks have started to influence the paradigm of drug discovery (Stokes et al., 2020). Thus, deep learning approaches on chemical libraries demonstrated that the combination of in silico predictions and empirical methodologies can lead to the discovery of antibiotics with novel scaffolds effective against clinically relevant bacterial pathogens, including AMR bacteria and persister cells (Stokes et al., 2020). Altogether, future research on antimicrobial discovery will benefit from (meta)genomics and metabolomics as well as from modern machine learning approaches. The rapid progress in these methodologies will potentially increase the success rate of antimicrobial discovery and will reduce the total cost of antibiotic development, which is currently estimated at 200 million USD per bioactive molecule (Ribeiro da Cunha et al., 2019).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant PID2019‐103972GA‐I00 to MAM).

Microbial Biotechnology (2020) 13(6), 1702–1704

Funding information

Funding from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant PID2019‐103972GA‐I00).

References

  1. van Bergeijk, D.A. , Terlouw, B.R. , Medema, M.H. , and van Wezel, G.P. (2020) Ecology and genomics of Actinobacteria: new concepts for natural product discovery. Nat Rev Microbiol In press. 10.1038/s41579-020-0379-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blin, K. , Shaw, S. , Steinke, K. , Villebro, R. , Ziemert, N. , Lee, S.Y. , et al (2019) antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 47: W81–W87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brüssow, H. (2020) The novel coronavirus – latest findings. Microb Biotechnol 13: 819–828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cain, J.W. , Miller, K.I. , Kalaitzis, J.A. , Chau, R. , and Neilan, B.A. (2020) Genome mining of a fungal endophyte of Taxus yunnanensis (Chinese yew) leads to the discovery of a novel azaphilone polyketide, lijiquinone. Microb Biotechnol 13: 1415–1427. 10.1111/1751-7915.13568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davies, J. , and Davies, D. (2010) Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74: 417–433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. van der Hooft, J.J.J. , Mohimani, H. , Bauermeister, A. , Dorrestein, P.C. , Duncan, K.R. , and Medema, M.H. (2020) Linking genomics and metabolomics to chart specialized metabolic diversity. Chem Soc Rev 49: 3297–3314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaufmann, S.H.E. , Dorhoi, A. , Hotchkiss, R.S. , and Bartenschlager, R. (2018) Host‐directed therapies for bacterial and viral infections. Nat Rev Drug Discov 17: 35–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kitamura, S. , Owensby, A. , Wall, D. , and Wolan, D.W. (2018) Lipoprotein signal peptidase inhibitors with antibiotic properties identified through design of a robust in vitro HT platform. Cell Chem Biol 25: 301–308.e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Martin, J.K. , Sheehan, J.P. , Bratton, B.P. , Moore, G.M. , Mateus, A. , Li, S.H.‐J. , et al (2020) A dual‐mechanism antibiotic kills gram‐negative bacteria and avoids drug resistance. Cell 181: 1518–1532.e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Matilla, M.A. , Daddaoua, A. , Chini, A. , Morel, B. , and Krell, T. (2018) An auxin controls bacterial antibiotics production. Nucleic Acids Res 46: 11229–11238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ribeiro da Cunha, B. , Fonseca, L.P. , and Calado, C.R.C. (2019) Antibiotic discovery: where have we come from, where do we go? Antibiotics 8: 45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Robbins, N. , Caplan, T. , and Cowen, L.E. (2017) Molecular evolution of antifungal drug resistance. Annu Rev Microbiol 71: 753–775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rutledge, P.J. , and Challis, G.L. (2015) Discovery of microbial natural products by activation of silent biosynthetic gene clusters. Nat Rev Microbiol 13: 509–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sharrar, A.M. , Crits‐Christoph, A. , Méheust, R. , Diamond, S. , Starr, E.P. , and Banfield, J.F. (2020) Bacterial secondary metabolite biosynthetic potential in soil varies with phylum, depth, and vegetation type. mBio 11: 00416‐20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Song, M. , Liu, Y. , Huang, X. , Ding, S. , Wang, Y. , Shen, J. , and Zhu, K. (2020a) A broad‐spectrum antibiotic adjuvant reverses multidrug‐resistant Gram‐negative pathogens. Nat Microbiol 5: 1040–1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Song, S. , Sun, X. , Meng, L. , Wu, Q. , Wang, K. , and Deng, Y. (2020b) Antifungal activity of hypocrellin compounds and their synergistic effects with antimicrobial agents against Candida albicans . Microb Biotechnol In press. 10.1111/1751-7915.13601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stokes, J.M. , Yang, K. , Swanson, K. , Jin, W. , Cubillos‐Ruiz, A. , Donghia, N.M. , et al (2020) A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell 180: 688–702.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sundin, G.W. , and Wang, N. (2018) Antibiotic resistance in plant‐pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 56: 161–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Theuretzbacher, U. , Outterson, K. , Engel, A. , and Karlén, A. (2020) The global preclinical antibacterial pipeline. Nat Rev Microbiol 18: 275–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Trotter, A.J. , Aydin, A. , Strinden, M.J. , and O’Grady, J. (2019) Recent and emerging technologies for the rapid diagnosis of infection and antimicrobial resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol 51: 39–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tyers, M. , and Wright, G.D. (2019) Drug combinations: a strategy to extend the life of antibiotics in the 21st century. Nat Rev Microbiol 17: 141–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wambaugh, M.A. , Denham, S.T. , Ayala, M. , Brammer, B. , Stonhill, M.A. , and Brown, J.C.S. (2020) Synergistic and antagonistic drug interactions in the treatment of systemic fungal infections. eLife 9: e54160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, X. , Hindra , and Elliot, M.A. (2019) Unlocking the trove of metabolic treasures: activating silent biosynthetic gene clusters in bacteria and fungi. Curr Opin Microbiol 51: 9–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zheng, W. , Wang, X. , Zhou, H. , Zhang, Y. , Li, A. , and Bian, X. (2020) Establishment of recombineering genome editing system in Paraburkholderia megapolitana empowers activation of silent biosynthetic gene clusters. Microb Biotechnol 13: 397–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbial Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES