Abstract
Increasing costs of chemical fertilizers, environmental concerns of their application and demand for protein foods, placed an extensive interest in growing of legume crops for human nutrition, and soil fertility replenishment. This study was conducted to investigate the effects of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizers on parameters of phenology, growth performance, grain yield, yield components, grain protein content of groundnut, and residual soil nitrogen content in the northern Ethiopia during the growing season of 2017. Three levels of N (0, 15 and 30 kg ha−1) and four levels of P2O5 (0, 23, 46 and 69 kg ha−1) were set in factorial combinations of randomized complete block design with three replications. Results showed that an average total biomass yield increased by 22.5% for separate individual application of 15 kg N ha−1 and by 16.6% for 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 compared to control plots. Haulm yield increased by 29.17% for plots treated with N fertilization compared to control plots. Average pod yield increased by 85.4% for a combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 fertilizers compared to the control plots. Plots fertilized with the highest combined rates of N and P have attained lower grain yield compared to the combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1. The highest grain protein contents were obtained for a combined application of 30 kg N ha−1 and zero P, and 15 kg N ha−1 plus 46 kg P2O5 ha−1. The highest N harvest index was obtained for control treatments and for plots treated with combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1. Residual soil N content increased by 119% on plots with combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 P2O5 ha−1 compared to control plots. Based on our results, combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 was recommended for increasing grain yield, grain protein content and residual soil nitrogen. The results of this study are crucial to improve groundnut productivity, grain protein content and also to provide implication on soil fertility management in a crop rotation system.
Keywords: Biological nitrogen fixation, Groundnut, Nitrogen and phosphorus, Grain protein content, Residual soil nitrogen, Food science, Agricultural science
Biological nitrogen fixation, Groundnut, Nitrogen and phosphorus, Grain protein content, Residual soil nitrogen; Food science; Agricultural science
1. Introduction
Groundnut stands thirteenth in terms of food crops, 4th in terms oilseed and 3rd in terms of protein sources for humans worldwide (Taru et al., 2008). Farming of groundnut probably originated in South America (Hammons et al., 2016). This farming was introduced to Africa in the 15th and 17th century by Portugal and Spain, respectively (Nigam, 2014). Groundnut farming was introduced to Ethiopia in 1920 by Italian explorers Yebio (1984), and then widely disseminated to the warm lowlands of the country where it fits well to the prevailing agro-ecological conditions.
Groundnut was grown on 27.94 million hectares of land with annual production estimated at 47.1 million tons and an average productivity of 1.7 t ha−1 globally, whereas its average productivity in Africa was estimated 1.10 t ha−1 (FAOSTAT, 2017). In Ethiopia for instant, during the growing season in 2018/2019, the total area coverage of groundnut was estimated to be 84,237 ha and the total grain yield was 144,091.3 tons with an average productivity of 1.70 t ha−1 (CSA, 2019). In Tigray region, where this specific study was conducted, groundnut is produced in the warm lowland agro-ecologies zones having dominantly sandy soils such as Merebleke, and Tanqua-Abergelle districts (Assefa et al., 2012; Sibhatu et al., 2016).
Groundnut gives better yield and yield quality when good cultivars are planted on soils with an optimal soil nutrients management system (Veeramani and Subrahmaniyan, 2011). By far, N is the most needed mineral nutrient in all cropping systems, due to its key roles in different biochemical and physiological processes of the plant (Leghari et al., 2016; Pourranjbari Saghaiesh et al., 2019). Foliar or soil application of N fertilizers has been shown to significantly influence the growth, yield and quality of many crops (Dehnavard et al., 2017; Souri et al., 2019). Holl and Vose (1980) found low pea seed protein content from N deficient soils. Fields with low soil N level (<10 kg ha−1) prior to planting, required application of supplementary starter N for better yield and yield quality of dry pea (Huang et al., 2017). Results from field experiment reported by Mckenzie et al. (2001) revealed that when soil N was less than 20 kg N ha−1, application of starter N fertilizer improved pea yield. Conversely, the application of a higher dose of N fertilizer inhibits BNF through the development of ineffective nodules (Prasad et al., 2011). In general, higher rate of N fertilizer negatively affects nodulation and BNF of legumes crops (Dogra and Dudeja, 1993; Souri, 2016; Huang et al., 2017; Aslani and Souri, 2018). Phosphorus is also another important mineral nutrient that has different roles in plant functional metabolism (Pourranjbari Saghaiesh et al., 2019), including energy transferring of legume crops during BNF (Hussain, 2017). Hence, P can promote legume crops to produce their own N sources, but at the time of P deficiency, rates of BNF can be negatively affected due to reduced number of effective root nodules (Malhotra et al., 2018). Phosphorus nutrition is also important for groundnut crop since it improves nodulation, BNF and increase residual soil nitrogen content (Yakubu et al., 2010) and significantly contributes for healthy and efficient root growth (Mitran et al., 2018).
Farmers of the study area have long experience and interest in growing of groundnut, primarily for food, protein sources (which is equivalent protein obtained from meat and eggs) (Arya et al., 2016), and as legume-cereal crop rotation system for soil fertility restoration (Van Kessel and Hartley, 2000). Thus, poor farmers having no access to meat and egg in the study area can compensate for protein needs by integrating groundnut in their diet. However, research on groundnut is very limited as compared to most commonly grown and produced cereal crops and subsistent legume crops such as chickpea, faba bean, and lentil in Ethiopia (Asfaw et al., 2011). A few previous studies conducted on groundnut in Ethiopia have focused mainly on evaluating the adaptability of improved seeds (Ahmed et al., 2016) and management of aflatoxin (Gebreselassie et al., 2014). It has been emphasized that in the cropping systems, rotation with N fixing legume is a good strategy for replenishing soil fertility and in particular for soil N sources (Gathumbi et al., 2003; Aslani and Souri, 2018). Crop production system in a rotation where legumes are integrated is ecologically sustainable, but the amount of yield obtained from the crops is low due to limited fertilizer inputs, low inherent soil fertility and high rates of nutrient (nitrogen) leaching from sandy soils. Soils of the study area are found to be deficient with essential macronutrients such as N, P, sulfur (S), and exchangeable potassium (K) and micronutrients such as iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) (EthioSIS, 2014). Considering soil nutrient deficiency, balanced fertilizer types composed of NPKSZnB and NPKSFeZnB were recommended for the study area (EthioSIS, 2014). Furthermore, there is no documented information available regarding the responses of groundnut crop to N and P fertilizers and their rates application in the study area. Hence, this study was conducted to investigate and better understand the effects of various levels of starter N and P fertilizers in a separate individual and in combined applications on growth performance, grain yield, yield components, grain protein content of the groundnut and residual soil N content after harvest.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study area
The study was conducted at Merebleke district, northern Ethiopia during the growing season of 2017 (Figure 1). The study area is located in a warm semi-arid agro-climatic zone with well-drained sandy loam soil texture and typical soil type of luvisols. It is situated at an altitude of 1390 m above sea level and at a distance of 42 km from the historical city of Axum to the north. The farming system of the study area can be characterized as mixed farming involving both crop and livestock production on the same land unit. In the area, the most dominant crops are sorghum, finger millet, groundnut and tef that are grown in a rotation system. Several vegetable types and fruits are also grown and produced in irrigated farming. The rainfall distribution of the study area is a mono-modal, with an average annual rainfall depth of 636 mm concentrated within June to September. The average monthly minimum and maximum temperatures were estimated at 15 and 35.6 °C, respectively with an average monthly temperature of 25.3 °C (Figure 2). According to Prasad et al. (2011), the optimum rainfall depth and temperature for the growing and production of groundnut are from 200 to 1000 mm and 20 to 30 °C, respectively. Therefore, the current weather data (Figure 2) of the study site was within the proposed suitable ranges of rainfall depth and temperature for groundnut production.
Figure 1.
Location of the study area: in Ethiopia (a), in Tigray (b), in Merebleke (c) and (d) the specific study site Medhin tabia (‘tabia’ is the smallest administration unit).
Figure 2.
Monthly rainfall depth, maximum and minimum temperatures measured during the growing season (Sources: National Metrology Agency of Ethiopia, Tigray, Mekelle branch, 2017).
2.2. Experimental design and treatments
The experiment was conducted on selected farmer's field where no groundnut has been grown prior to the experiment to observe the actual effect of the treatments on groundnut production and residual soil nitrogen. The field experiment consists of a total of 12 treatments composed of three levels of N at 0, 15, and 30 kg ha−1 and four levels of P2O5 at 0, 23, 46, and 69 kg ha−1. These treatments were arranged in a 3 × 4 factorial combinations and laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications (Figure 3). The treatments with each zero level of N and P fertilizer was designated as a control treatment. All treatments were also received uniformly applied fertilizers of K at the rate of 30 kg K2O ha−1, S at the rate of 30 kg ha−1, Zn at the rate of 2 kg ha−1 and B at the rate of 0.5 kg ha−1 to avoid yield loss due to a limited supply one of those nutrients from the soil. Fertilizers of N, P, K, and S were applied at the planting time, but the micronutrients (Zn and B) were applied later as foliar at the blooming stage of groundnut. The sources of these nutrients were urea for N, tri-superphosphate (TSP) for P2O5, KCl for K2O, CaSO4 for S, ZnSO4 for Zn and borax (Na2B4O7·10H2O) for B. A local groundnut variety ‘Sedi’ was planted at a seed rate of 80 kg ha−1 using a recommended spacing between plants and rows. The size of each plot in this experiment was 3.6 m∗4 m (14.4 m2) with 9.6 m2 net harvestable area per plot, and the spacing between blocks, plots, rows and plants was set at 1.5, 1, 0.6 and 0.1 m, respectively. In one plot, there were 6 rows and a total of 240 plants population (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Experimental design, plots layout and illustration of field performance of groundnut.
2.3. Soil sampling and analyzed parameters
Before planting and after harvesting of groundnut, one and thirty-six disturbed composite soil samples were collected from 0 to 20 cm soil depth following zigzag sampling methods, respectively. These samples were air-dried, crushed by grinding and allowed to pass through 2 mm sieve size for analysis of selected soil physical and chemical properties. One undisturbed soil sample was also collected using core sampler for estimating dry soil bulk density. The collected disturbed samples were analyzed for soil texture, pH, electrical conductivity (EC), organic carbon (OC) content, total N, available P, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and exchangeable bases (K, Na, Ca and Mg). Soil texture was determined using the Bouyoucos hydrometer method (Bouyoucos, 1962). Soil pH was measured in the supernatant suspension of a 1:2.5 soil to water ratio using pH meter (Rhoades et al., 1999). Electrical conductivity of the soil solution was measured in the saturated extract of 1:2.5 soil to water ratio using EC meter (Richards et al., 1954). Percentage of soil organic carbon (SOC) content was determined following the wet oxidation method as proposed by Walkley and Black (1934). Total N was determined using the Kjeldahl method as described by Bremner and Mulvaney (1982). Available P was determined using the Olsen method (Olsen et al., 1954). Cation exchange capacity, and exchangeable base of the soil were extracted by leaching using ammonium acetate solution and the exchangeable bases were measured by atomic absorption spectrophotometry for Ca and Mg and flame photometer for that of Na and K (Polemio and Rhoades, 1977). The soil physical and chemical properties were summarized with ratings according to different studies in (Table 1).
Table 1.
Physiochemical properties of the soil at experimental site before planting (NA- not applicable).
| Parameters | Values | Rating | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| %Clay | 8 | NA | |
| %Silt | 39 | NA | |
| %Sand | 53 | NA | |
| Textural Class | Sandy loam | NA | |
| Bulk density (g cm−3) | 1.46 | Moderate | Jones (1983) |
| pH | 5.5 | Moderately acid | Tekalign (1991) |
| ECe (dS m−1) | 2.94 | Slightly saline | Hazelton and Murphy (2007) |
| OC (%) | 0.61 | Low | Hazelton and Murphy (2007) |
| Total N (kg ha−1) | 15.5 | Low | Hazelton and Murphy (2007) |
| Available P (ppm) | 6.92 | Low | Hazelton and Murphy (2007) |
| CEC (cmol (+) kg−1) | 13.2 | Moderate | Hazelton and Murphy (2007) |
|
Exchangeable Bases | |||
| Exc. K (cmol (+) kg−1) | 0.21 | Low | Hazelton and Murphy (2007) |
| Exc. Na (cmol (+) kg−1) | 0.16 | Low | Hazelton and Murphy (2007) |
| Exc. Ca (cmol (+) kg−1) | 5.8 | Moderate | Hazelton and Murphy (2007) |
| Exc. Mg (cmol (+) kg−1) | 6.8 | High | Hazelton and Murphy (2007) |
2.4. Residual soil nitrogen
After harvesting groundnut crop, residual soil nitrogen content of the experimental site was determined. Total nitrogen stock within sampling depth (20 cm) was then calculated to quantify the nitrate contribution of groundnut crop to the soil due to BNF.
Residual soil N after harvest (kg ha−1) = area (ha)sampling soil depth (m)bulk density (t ha−1)N (%)
2.5. Agronomic data collected and analyzed parameters
Agronomic data such as days to 50% flowering, days to 90% physiological maturity, plant height, number of branches per plant, haulm yield (t ha−1), total biomass yield (t ha−1), pod yield (t ha−1), grain yield (t ha−1), shelling percentage, nitrogen harvest index in percent (NHI%) and grain protein content (%) were recorded at the appropriate growth stage of groundnut crop. Flowering was measured from the day of emergence to the date when 50% of the plants opened their flower. Maturity was recorded from the day of emergence to the date when 90% of the plants attained physiological maturity. To measure plant height and number of branches per plant, five plants were randomly selected from each plot using non-destructive sampling methods at the maximum vegetative growth stage of groundnut. Plant height was measured using a ruler and the number of branches per plant were determined through counting of the main branches and recorded for each of the selected plant. Haulm yield (t ha−1), biomass yield (t ha−1), pod yield (t ha−1) and grain yield (t ha−1) were measured for each plot after harvesting. Biomass yield was recorded from each plot, and converted into t ha−1 basis. Haulm yield was measured after pod yield was separated from the total biomass yield and converted into t ha−1 basis. Pod yield was measured by weighing the pods obtained from each harvestable net area after separating the pod from the pegs, and finally, the result was converted into t ha−1 basis. Grain yield for each plot was also recorded by weighing the grain obtained from each harvestable net area after separating the seeds from its pod, and finally, the grain yield was converted into t ha−1 basis. The shelling percentage was calculated as the ratio of grain yield to the total pod yield and multiplied by hundred.
Using sampled groundnut plants, haulm and grain were collected for determination of N content and then grain protein content and nitrogen harvest index (NHI%) were estimated. Grain protein content was calculated using the formula proposed by FAO (1970) for the N to grain protein content universal conversion factor of 6.25 was applied. Percentage nitrogen harvest index is defined as the ratio between N uptake in grain and N uptake in grain plus straw multiplied by hundred (Fageria, 2014). Samples of groundnut haulm and grain were collected at harvesting time from five non-border plants to avoid border effects. These samples were thoroughly washed using distilled water to remove adhering soils and dust particles, and then placed in a paper envelope and oven-dried at 60 °C for 68 hours. After oven drying, haulm and grain were grinded to powder and allowed to pass through a 0.5 mm mesh sieve. Determination of total N content from the plant samples was conducted using Kjeldahl methods by means of treating plant material and oxidized with concentrated sulfuric acid and distillation of an aliquot from the digest with NaOH, collecting the distillate in boric acid and titrating with 0.01 N HCl to the endpoint of the mixed indicator (Plank, 1992).
The collected soil nitrogen content and agronomic data were subjected to statistical analysis of a two-way analysis of variance. Before data analysis, the collected data was carefully checked for normality and homogeneity of variance across the separate individual levels and combination of N and P fertilizer treatments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SAS software. A significant difference among treatment means was assessed using the least significant difference (LSD) at 0.05 level of probability.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Phenological parameters
The results indicated that separate individual levels and combinations of N and P fertilizers rates did not affect phenological parameters of groundnut such as time of flowering and maturity (Table 2). This might be due the fact that biological N fixation produced enough N for groundnut plants to initiate flowering and maturation. Nevertheless, these phenological traits are more under genetic control and adaptation in some plant species to environmental stresses, and less responsive to management practices (Souri and Hatamian, 2019; Fattahi et al., 2019). Similarly, application of P fertilizer and manure had no significant effect on flowering and maturity of Werer 962 and Oldhale groundnut varieties (Melese and Dechassa, 2017). In eastern Ethiopia (Babile) application of manure alone has no significant effect on flowering and maturity of Werer 962 and Oldhale groundnut varieties (Melese and Dechassa, 2017). This indicated that phenological parameters of groundnut are independent of mineral and organic fertilizer applications and controlled by other factors.
Table 2.
Effect of N and P fertilizers on days to 50% flowering and days to 90% maturity of groundnut plant.
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Flowering (days) | |||||
| 0 | 53 | 52 | 51.3 | 51.7 | 52 |
| 15 | 52.7 | 52 | 51.3 | 52.7 | 52.2 |
| 30 | 51.7 | 53.3 | 53 | 52.7 | 52.7 |
| Mean | 52.5 | 52.4 | 51.9 | 52.3 | |
| CV (%) | 2 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.30) for N | NS | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.65) for P | NS | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.18) for N∗P | NS | ||||
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) | ||||
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Maturity (days) |
|||||
| 1 | 85 | 85 | 85.3 | 84.7 | 85 |
| 15 | 86.3 | 86.7 | 85 | 85.7 | 85.9 |
| 30 | 86.3 | 85 | 86.7 | 85 | 85.6 |
| Mean | 85.9 | 85.6 | 85.7 | 85.1 | |
| CV (%) | 2.3 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.49) for N | NS | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.86) for P | NS | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.87) for N∗P | NS | ||||
3.2. Growth parameters
The average height of groundnut plant was significantly affected by separate individual applications of each the N and P fertilizer levels and their combinations (Table 3). Combined application of N and P significantly increased plant height. At the highest levels of both N and P2O5 (30 and 69 kg ha−1), plant height increased by 11.10 cm compared to average plant height from the control treatments. A similar increase in plant height, but in a lower scale, was also observed for other N and P combinations (except 0 levels). This is mainly due to growth promotion via rapid meristematic activities induced by the application of combined N and P in a nutrient deficient soil. Balanced fertilizers application can promote plant cell division and cell elongation, resulting in improved vegetative growth and ultimately increase plant height, number of branches per plant and number of nodules per plant. Here, the most deriving force for increasing plant height was N fertilizer through increased vegetative growth. Nitrogen is the most highlighted nutrient in increasing plant height as it enhances vegetative growth through cell division and cell elongation (Souri and Hatamian, 2019; Souri et al., 2019). Besides, it has also been shown that application N fertilizer can significantly improve the uptake and assimilation of other nutrients and internal re-translocations (Souri and Hatamian, 2019). An increased plant height for groundnut was also reported because of increased application of NPK fertilizer when applied either at basal or split doses together with farmyard manure (Sengupta et al., 2016). Better plant height of soybean was also observed when 11.5 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5ha−1are applied in a combination and inoculated with Bradyrhizobium Japonicum used in an integrated manner (Tarekegn and Kibret, 2017).
Table 3.
Plant height and number of branches per plant for the various levels of N and P fertilizer treatments.
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Plant height (cm) | |||||
| 0 | 45.0E | 50.1CD | 50.7DC | 49.3D | 48.8C |
| 15 | 50.7CD | 52.3BC | 52.9BC | 55.1AB | 52.7B |
| 30 | 54.7AB | 53.8AB | 54.5AB | 56.1A | 54.8A |
| Mean | 50.2B | 52.1A | 52.7A | 53.5A | |
| CV (%) | 3.2 | ||||
| LSD (P < 0.0001) for N | 1.4 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.002) for P | 1.6 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.04) for N∗P | 2.8 | ||||
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) | ||||
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Number of branch per plant (Numbers) |
|||||
| 0 | 6.7C | 10.0B | 11.0B | 11.0B | 9.7B |
| 15 | 11.0B | 11.0B | 14.0A | 12.0AB | 12.0A |
| 30 | 12.0AB | 11.3B | 12.0AB | 11.0B | 11.6A |
| Mean | 9.9C | 10.8BC | 12.3A | 11.3AB | |
| CV (%) | 11.3 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.0003) for N | 1.1 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.0003) for P | 1.2 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.04) for N∗P | 2.1 | ||||
Where, means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).
Our results show that the highest average plant height of 54.8 cm was recorded for plots treated with 30 kg N ha−1compared to average height for control plots (no N) and plots treated with 15 kg N ha−1. The shortest average plant height of 48.8 cm was recorded for the control plots without N fertilization. Gohari and Niyaki (2010), and Tenywa et al. (2016) reported that the application of N fertilizer remarkably increased the plant height of groundnut. Nitrogen fertilizer has a pronounced effect on the plant height of pea due to increased growth performances (Achakzai, 2012). When plots of groundnut were fertilized with 23, 46 and 69 kg P2O5 kg ha−1 average values of plant height were clearly increased when compared to an average plant height from the control plots (no P), though the differences remain statistically insignificant. Erman et al. (2009) also reported a taller plant height of field pea with fertilization of P2O5 as it enhances nitrogen fixation. The results indicate that P fertilizer enhance vigorously and healthy plant growth performance and yield and yield components.
The number of branches per plant were significantly affected by the application of N and P fertilizers at a separate individual and combined rates (Table 3). The combined application of N and P fertilizers at the rate of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 has resulted in largest number of branches per plant (Table 3). The smallest average numbers of branches per plant of 6.7 was measured from the control plots. The average number of branches per plant for plots treated with a combined rate of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 fertilizers exceeded the corresponding average number of branches per plant from control treatments by 52.4%. The results revealed that starter N at 15 kg ha−1 combined with 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 promoted cell division and cell elongation, ultimately increased the number of branches per plant, nodulation and yield of groundnut. The N requirement of legume is low compared to non-nitrogen fixing crops while their requirement for P is high. This is because, legume crops can fix atmospheric nitrogen into ammonia form through BNF processes for which application of P is required in large amount as sources of ATP for BNF. The research results reported by Achakzai (2012) showed that significantly increasing number of branches per plant of pea crop with an increased rate of N fertilizer application. Plant growth, in terms of plant height or number of branches, is a function of the interaction and balance of physiologically important metabolites such as carbohydrates and phytohormones toward induction of dominant apical growth or branching (Mardanluo et al., 2018; Souri, 2016). Several studies also reported an increased number of branches per plant for faba bean due to soil fertilization and management through application of both organic and inorganic soil amendments (Fekadu et al., 2018). Applications of 15 kg N ha−1 has a similar effect on number of branches per plant of groundnut compared to application of 30 kg N ha−1. The results indicated that average number of branches per plant are also significantly affected by a separate individual application of P (Table 3). This is related to the contribution of P in plant nutrition and growth performances. In line with our results, Majeed et al. (2014) and Shafi et al. (2015) also reported that the number of valuable tillers of the wheat crop was appreciably enlarged as the rates of P fertilizer increases.
3.3. Yield and yield attributes
The yield and yield attribute results showed that the total biomass yield of groundnut was significantly affected by separate individual rates of N and P fertilizer application, but there was no interaction effect (Table 4). Average total biomass recorded from plots treated with 15 kg N ha−1 and 30 kg N ha−1 were significantly different compared to average biomass yield from the control plots. The maximum total biomass yield of 7.73 t ha−1 was obtained from 15 kg N ha−1, but it was insignificant when compared to the biomass yield obtained from 30 kg N ha−1 i.e.7.46 t ha−1. The minimum average biomass yield was achieved without N fertilizer application and was 6.31 t ha−1. This entails that effect of N and P was independent for the observed variation in total biomass yield. Similar to our findings, Melese and Dechassa (2017) also reported that combined application P and manure have a non-significant effect on biomass when applied to the Werer 962 and Oldhale groundnut varieties. Nitrogen application enhances the number of meristematic cells, and cell growth, consequently results in large plant biomass production (Lawlor, 2002). Too much application of N and K often resulted in excessive vegetative growth of groundnut and larger biomass yield (Annadurai et al., 2009). Blumenthal et al. (2008) reported that adding N fertilizer to crop resulted in higher biomass yields, protein content of the yield and N concentration in plant tissue. Similar to our findings, Meena et al. (2011) also reported an enhanced biomass yield of groundnut from plots treated with higher doses of N fertilizer compared to the condition without N fertilizer application. Research results reported by Tarekegn and Kibret (2017) also confirm that the application of 23 kg N ha−1 resulted in higher biomass yield of groundnut when compared to average biomass yield from control plots and plots treated with 11.5 kg N ha−1. The results also indicated that application of P fertilizer had a significant effect on total biomass yield when applied at 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 compared to control treatments (Table 4). Similar to the case with effect of N fertilizer, the smallest biomass yield for groundnut was also measured for control plots compared to the plots treated with P indicating that P is also a limiting nutrient in the soils of the study area. Singh (2004) stated that P application had brought a significant increase in total biomass yield of groundnut in calcareous soil receiving 50 kg P2O5 ha−1. Vegetative and reproductive growth and development of crops are negatively affected when planted on soils deficient in P (Zhang et al., 2014).
Table 4.
Total biomass and haulm yield of groundnut at different rates of separate N and P fertilizers and combined applications.
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Total biomass yield (t ha−1) | |||||
| 0 | 5.47 | 6.32 | 6.91 | 6.54 | 6.31B |
| 15 | 7.11 | 7.74 | 8.59 | 7.46 | 7.73A |
| 30 | 7.24 | 7.64 | 7.62 | 7.35 | 7.46A |
| Mean | 6.61B | 7.23AB | 7.71A | 7.12AB | |
| CV (%) | 10.8 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.0003) for N | 0.7 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.05) for P | 0.8 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.81) for N∗P | NS | ||||
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) | ||||
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Haulm yield (t ha−1) | |||||
| 0 | 2.86 | 3.14 | 3.2 | 3.28 | 3.12B |
| 15 | 4.04 | 4.12 | 3.75 | 4.1 | 4A |
| 30 | 4.3 | 3.78 | 3.91 | 4.13 | 4.03A |
| Mean | 3.73 | 3.68 | 3.62 | 3.84 | |
| CV (%) | 13.7 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.0002) for N | 0.4 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.84) for P | NS | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.80) for N∗P | NS | ||||
Where, means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).
Haulm yield of groundnut was significantly affected by the application N fertilizer, but not affected due to the applications of N in combinations with P and separate individual application of P (Table 4). Treatments with separate individual applications of N fertilizer at 15 and 30 kg N ha−1 had a significant advantage over the control treatments. The maximum average haulm yield of 4 t ha−1 was recorded from treatments with 30 kg N ha−1 and 15 kg N ha−1 application rates, whereas; the minimum average haulm yield of 3.1 t ha−1 was recorded for the control (no N) treatments. Similarly, the highest haulm yield of groundnut was obtained from the application of N at 40 kg ha−1 (Meena et al., 2011). Most of the time haulm yield of groundnut consistently increased with increasing application rates of N fertilizer up to 30 kg N ha−1, after which haulm yield starts declining slightly (Lombin et al., 1985). Similarly, Singh et al. (2007) reported that application of 30 kg N ha−1 significantly increased straw yield of cowpea compared to the yield from the corresponding control plots.
The results of pod yield for groundnut revealed a significant effect of N and P fertilizers both in separate individual and in combined applications (Table 5). The highest average pod yield of 4.84 t ha−1 was obtained from plots treated with combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 P2O5 kg ha−1 and followed by the combined application of 30 kg N ha−1 and 23 kg P2O5 ha−1 (Table 5). The lowest average pod yield of 2.61 t ha−1 was recorded from the control treatments. Average pod yield produced from the combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 P2O5 kg ha−1 was the highest and exceeded the average pod yield obtained from control plots by 130.5%. It is clear from the results that groundnut crop requires starter N to initiate nodulation and BNF, which ultimately enhances the yield and yield components including pods. Starter N played a critical role in plant growth leading to higher photosynthetic activity and translocation of photosynthates to the sink and pods. Similarly, Kumar et al. (2015) also reported that combined application of N and P fertilizers significantly affected the pod yield of groundnut. It was also reported that promising pod yield of groundnut was obtained from a combined application of organic, inorganic and bio-fertilizers (Vala et al., 2017). Separate individual application of N fertilizer also brought a significant effect on pod yield of groundnut (Table 5). Pod yield from plots treated with N fertilizer at 15 kg ha−1 brought higher pod yield as compared to controlled plots and plots treated with 30 kg N ha−1. Similar to the effects of N, pod yield of groundnut is also significantly affected by the separate individual application of P fertilizer (Table 5). The application of P fertilizer at the level of 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 has resulted in highest pod yield and significantly higher compared to the other levels of P2O5 applications. Similar to our results, Kabir et al. (2013) also reported the highest pod yield for groundnut from plots treated with the application of 50 kg P2O5 ha−1 compared to the control treatments, which is probably due to differences in soil fertility status of the experimental sites.
Table 5.
Effect of N and P fertilizers on pod and grain yields of groundnut.
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Pod yield (t ha−1) | |||||
| 0 | 2.61E | 3.19CD | 3.71BC | 2.99DE | 3.12C |
| 15 | 3.067DE | 3.62BC | 4.84A | 3.37BCD | 3.72A |
| 30 | 2.94DE | 3.86B | 3.71BC | 3.22CD | 3.43B |
| Mean | 2.87D | 3.56B | 4.09A | 3.19C | |
| CV (%) | 9.6 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.0007) for N | 0.3 | ||||
| LSD (P < 0.0001) for P | 0.3 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.05) for N∗P | 0.6 | ||||
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) | ||||
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Grain yield (t ha−1) | |||||
| 0 | 1.78E | 1.91DE | 2.22BCD | 1.81E | 1.93B |
| 15 | 1.98DE | 2.01CDE | 2.66A | 1.98DE | 2.16A |
| 30 | 2.48AB | 2.27ABCD | 2.40ABC | 1.68E | 2.21A |
| Mean | 2.08B | 2.06B | 2.43A | 1.82C | |
| CV (%) | 11.4 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.02) for N | 0.2 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.0002) for P | 0.2 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.04) for N∗P | 0.4 | ||||
Where, means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).
The results in Table 5 revealed that application of N and P fertilizer at separate individual rates and different combinations significantly increased grain yield of groundnut crop. The highest average grain yield of 2.66 t ha−1 was attained from the combined applications of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 P2O5 kg ha−1 followed by average yield obtained from plots treated with 30 kg N ha−1and no P application i.e. 2.48 t ha−1. Combined application of 30 kg N ha−1and 69 P2O5 kg ha−1 fertilizers resulted in lowest grain yield of 1.68 t ha−1 which was lower by 59% compared to grain yield obtained from plots treated with combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 P2O5 kg ha−1. It was also observed that the effect of N and P fertilizers on growth performance and grain yield largely depend on each other. Application of balanced nutrients played a very important role in enhancing grain yield, developing prolific nodule and healthy root system for better BNF and enhanced absorption of soil water and nutrients. This in turn gives better plant growth leading to higher photosynthetic activity and translocation of photosynthates products to the sink. Similarly, it was also reported that integrated application of mineral fertilizers with manure enhanced grain yield of groundnut (Melese and Dechassa, 2017). Bala and Nath (2015) also indicated that integrated soil nutrient management as strategy to optimize groundnut productivity. Similar to our findings, the research results reported by Vala et al. (2017) also revealed that integrated application of organic, inorganic and bio-fertilizers as nutrient sources resulted in higher grain yield of groundnut compared to the condition without fertilizer applications. Our results indicated that the highest grain yield i.e. 2.66 t ha−1 obtained at experimental site is even higher when compared to the average national grain yield of 1.72 t ha−1 for groundnut reported by CSA (2019).
The result of grain yield obtained in this study is in line with the results reported for different leguminous crops from different parts of the world. This indicates that even nitrogen-fixing leguminous crops require starter nitrogen to produce higher yield compared to the yield condition without fertilizer application. Nitrogen-deficient soils can result in low grain yield of legume crops and therefore application of starter N can enhance yield of legume, but when the soil has enough N level (equivalent to starter nitrogen) there is no need of supplementing legumes with N fertilizer (Huang et al., 2017). As the application rates of N fertilizer increases there is a tendency for reduced pod and grain yield even though this enhances haulm production (Lombin et al., 1985). Similarly, when soils contain less than 20 kg N ha−1, application of N fertilizer increased pea yield (Mckenzie et al., 2001). A higher kernel yield of groundnut was found from plots treated with N fertilizer (Gohari and Niyaki, 2010). Annadurai et al. (2009) found that application of 25 kg N ha−1 to groundnut plots as an optimal and cost-effective rate.
Nitrogen requirement of groundnut crop is supplied through BNF, but at low soil fertility a starter N at the rate of 20–30 kg ha−1 is desirable to feed the plant until the plant develops nodule formation and harbor bacteria for BNF (Roy et al., 2006). Promising grain yield of cowpea was also found with the application of 30 kg ha−1 starter N compared to the condition with no N fertilizer application (Singh et al., 2007). When only P fertilizer is applied to the plots of groundnut, the highest grain yield of 2.43 t ha−1 was obtained from plots treated with 46 kg P2O5 ha−1. The smallest average grain yield of 1.82 t ha−1 was attained with no P application i.e. control plots. In addition to N, Annadurai et al. (2009) reported that grain yield and yield attributes of groundnut were significantly increased with application of P2O5 up to 40 kg ha−1.
N and P fertilizers significantly affected the shelling percentage of groundnut when applied as a separate individual and in combined applications (Table 6). Combined application of 30 kg N ha−1 without P fertilizer had the highest shelling percentage of 85% compared to all other treatments. It is known that shelling percentage increase when the numbers of the sound kernel or filled pod increase, thus a combination of 30 kg N ha−1 without P fertilizer application had brought filled pod, i.e. a pod with a marketable grain of groundnut. This revealed that N fertilizer had a greater influence on the shelling percentage of groundnut in the absence of P containing fertilizer. Gohari and Niyaki (2010) also conducted that addition of N fertilizer in combination with iron (Fe) fertilizer have resulted in a better shelling percentage of groundnut in northern Iran. The main effect of N and P fertilizers had revealed a significant effect on the ratio of grain to pod yield. Accordingly, plots treated with N fertilizer at the rate of 30 kg N ha−1 have resulted in highest shelling percentage of 65%; however, it was not statistically different compared to the shelling percentage obtained from control plots (without N fertilizer). In line with our findings, Meena et al. (2011) also reported that the highest shelling percentage of groundnut was observed for application of large amount of N fertilizer than a relatively smaller rates. Control plots of groundnut (without P fertilizer) application resulted in highest shelling percentage of 73% compared to plots treated with application of P at 23, 46 and 69 kg P2O5 ha−1.
Table 6.
Shelling percentage and grain protein content of groundnut under different rates of N and P fertilizers application.
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Shelling percentage (%) | |||||
| 0 | 68B | 60BCD | 60BCD | 62BCD | 63AB |
| 15 | 65BC | 55CD | 55CD | 59BCD | 58B |
| 30 | 85A | 59BCD | 64BC | 52D | 65A |
| Mean | 73A | 58B | 60B | 58B | |
| CV (%) | 10.2 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.05) for N | 5.4 | ||||
| LSD (P < 0.0001) for P | 6.2 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.02) for N∗P | 10.7 | ||||
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) | ||||
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Grain protein content (%) | |||||
| 0 | 26.39H | 29.51CDE | 29.85CD | 28.54EF | 28.57B |
| 15 | 28.09FG | 28.85DEF | 33.11A | 30.40BC | 30.11A |
| 30 | 33.75A | 31.17B | 27.70FG | 27.08GH | 29.92A |
| Mean | 29.41B | 29.84AB | 30.22A | 28.67C | |
| CV (%) | 2.37 | ||||
| LSD (P < 0.0001) for N | 0.6 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.006) for P | 0.7 | ||||
| LSD (P < 0.0001) for N∗P | 1.2 | ||||
Where, means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).
The results of grain protein content of groundnut treated with different separate individual levels and combined application of N and P fertilizers are presented (Table 6). Grain protein content of groundnut was significantly affected by N and P fertilizers applications. The highest grain protein content of 33.75% was recorded from plots treated with 30 kg N ha−1 and without P application, but this was not statistically different compared to grain protein content from plots treated with combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 P2O5 kg ha−1. The smallest average grain protein content of 26.39% was recorded from the grains harvested from the controlled treatments. Our result showed that, the grain protein content of groundnut was in the range of 26.39–33.75% for the different treatments with a general increasing trends with increasing N fertilizer rates. Groundnut production in developing countries is increasingly attractive as income, food and protein sources where protein from animal sources is less accessible by the community. Nitrogen and phosphorus are necessary for protein biosynthesis in plant tissues. There is always positive response of grain or leaf protein content to N application particularly under soil with N deficiency (Souri and Aslani, 2018; Aghayie Noroozlo et al., 2019). Integrated fertilizer application and soil management improved protein content of the groundnut (Ola et al., 2013). Similarly, Daramy et al. (2016) indicated that the highest total grain N and crude protein content of groundnut were recorded from a combined application of 30 kg N ha−1and without P application. Inoculation of Rhizobium and P application increased the crude protein content of cowpea grain (Kyei-Boahenet al., 2017). Application of P and foliar spraying of Zn fertilizers to plots of groundnut have exerted a positive effect on grain protein content (Gobarah et al., 2006). In contrast, keeping N at zero level and increasing the levels of P2O5 from (0–46) kg ha−1 showed slightly increasing trends of average grain protein content, but it decreased at the level of 69 kg P2O5 ha−1 (Table 6). In line with our results, Awadalla and Abbas (2017) also reported that grain protein content of groundnut increased with increasing rates of N fertilizer. Havlin et al. (2005) also reported that P also improves crop quality through increased grain protein contents and improved proportion of marketable yields.
Similarly, application of N and P fertilizers at separate individual rates significantly affected grain protein content of groundnut (Table 6). This is attributed to the fact that N is a key component of amino acid, which is the building block of protein. Higher grain protein content of dry pea was also reported from application higher rate of N as urea and slow-release polymer-coated N fertilizers (Huang et al., 2017). Plots fertilized with 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 had highest grain protein content of 30.22% and significantly larger compared to plots without P and plots treated with 69 kg P2O5 ha−1. The highest grain protein content obtained from 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 was attributed to enhanced BNF and its utilization by the groundnut. Cowpea grain protein content also increased with increasing rates of P fertilization due to the fact that P is crucial in the process of biological N fixation (Singh et al., 2007).
The nitrogen harvest index (NHI%) was significantly affected by single and combined application of N and P fertilizers (Table 7). The results also showed that the interaction effect of N and P at the rate of 15 kg N ha−1and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 had the largest NHI of 58.4%. However, this effect of combined N and P applications remain statistically insignificant compared to treatments with no N and 23 kg P2O5 ha−1, no N with 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 and including control treatments. The highest NHI for control treatments is attributed to assimilation of large part of biologically fixed ammonia to grain nitrogen by the groundnut (Table 7). The largest N content in the grain also indicate the conversion of N from the haulm to grain is higher.
Table 7.
Nitrogen harvest index (NHI) and residual soil nitrogen content of groundnut as affected by N and P fertilization.
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Nitrogen Harvest Index (%) | |||||
| 0 | 58.2A | 54ABC | 55.5AB | 48.9CDEF | 54.1A |
| 15 | 47.9DEF | 46.4EF | 58.4A | 46.3EF | 49.8B |
| 30 | 52.8BCD | 51.6BCDE | 45.6F | 38.1G | 47.0C |
| Mean | 53A | 50.7A | 53.1A | 44.4B | |
| CV (%) | 6.3 | ||||
| LSD (P < 0.0001) for N | 2.7 | ||||
| LSD (P < 0.0001) for P | 3.1 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.0003) for N∗P | 5.4 | ||||
| N (kg ha−1) | P2O5 (kg ha−1) | ||||
| 0 |
23 |
46 |
69 |
Mean | |
| Soil Nitrogen (kg ha−1) | |||||
| 0 | 25.7DE | 27.4CD | 30.4BC | 26.0ED | 27.4B |
| 15 | 30.7ABC | 31.2AB | 33.9A | 24.5DEF | 30.1A |
| 30 | 22.2F | 23.7EF | 23.1F | 22.8EF | 22.8C |
| Mean | 26.3BC | 27.4AB | 29.2A | 24.5C | |
| CV (%) | 7.6 | ||||
| LSD (P < 0.0001) for N | 1.8 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.0005) for P | 2 | ||||
| LSD (P = 0.013) for N∗P | 3.5 | ||||
Where, means followed by the same letters are not significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).
However, NHI decreased when plots were treated with the highest level of combined application of N and P fertilizers. Treatments with small values of NHI may indicate that the largest portion of N content is stored in the haulm of the plant than in the grain. Bulman and Smith (1994) reported that the larger NHI shows increased conversion of N from the haulm to the grain. Nitrogen harvest index is a useful indication of N partitioning in the crop and gives an indication of how efficiently the crop is in utilizing obtained N for grain production (Fageria, 2014). Enhanced N use efficiency of grain is fundamental in reduce cost of crop production and also environmental pollution resulting from nitrate leaching or nitrate loading in surface water while at the same time maintaining high quality grain production (Fageria, 2014). In view of soil fertility, Peoples and Craswell (1992) observed that a higher value of NHI resulted in a lower amount of residual soil N to be returned to the soil through addition of crop residue as the N stored in the grain is completely harvested and removed from the field.
3.4. Residual soil nitrogen
The results of residual soil N after harvest are presented (Table 7). The results showed that the total N content of the soil after harvest was significantly affected by a separate individual and combined applications of N and P fertilizers (Table 7). The highest soil N of 33.9 kg ha−1 was observed from plots treated with combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1, and followed by plots treated with a combined application of 15 kg N ha−1 and 23 kg P2O5 ha−1. There was no significant difference among treatments combination with respect of residual soil nitrogen among 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1, 15 kg N ha−1 and 23 kg P2O5 ha−1, and 15 kg N ha−1 and without P. The lowest residual soil N content of 22.2 kg ha−1 was recorded for plots treated with combined application of 30 kg N ha−1and without P. This implied that groundnut crop satisfies its N requirement from the applied N fertilizer, until BNF starts, but application of large amount of N fertilizer inhibit BNF through development ineffective nodules and leadings to lower residual soil nitrogen after harvest. The average soil N of the experimental site before planting of groundnut crop was found to be 15.5 kg ha−1 (Table 1). After crop harvest the level of soil nitrogen content increased by 119% indicating that groundnut crop plays an important role in BNF and increase soil nitrogen content after harvest favoring subsequent crops.
In general, soil N content after harvesting groundnut showed increasing trends in all experimental plots compared to the soil N content before planting. This is due to the application of starter N and combined P fertilizers that have promoted BNF by groundnut crop. Application of increasing levels of P2O5 fertilizer from 0 to 46 kg ha−1, while keeping N at 15 kg ha−1 resulted into consistently increasing residual soil N content after harvest. Total amount soil N content ranging from 14.6 to 43.8 kg ha−1 is considered as low level of soil N (Hazelton and Murphy, 2007; Tekalign, 1991). Hence, the highest total N content of the soil in the study area was low even after harvesting of groundnut. This is attributed to sandy soils with low soil organic matter content and leaching of nitrate below the rooting depth. Previous studies e.g. Adeleke and Haruna (2012) indicated that residual soil N content after harvesting of groundnut crop can reach up to 200% compared to the level of soil N before planting. Similarly, it has been shown that residual soil N increased significantly with the application of DAP fertilizer i.e. 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 combined with 18 kg N ha−1 at Babile site in Ethiopia (Argaw, 2017). Chalk (1991) indicated that when N fixing crops are included in crop rotation system, the plant can satisfy all or at least part of its N requirements through BNF and the amount of fixed N in excess of the current plants requirement will be stored in the soil and benefit subsequent corps. The amount of residual nitrate recorded for plots treated with 15 kg N ha−1resulted into higher residual soil N of 30.7 kg ha−1 compared to the application of 30 kg N ha−1 and no N application. Similarly, separate individual application of P fertilizer at the rate of 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 resulted in average soil N content of 29.2 kg ha−1. It is a fact that under poor soil conditions, application of N and P fertilizers at small rates can increase plant root growth and development, as well as BNF efficiency (Pourranjbari Saghaiesh et al., 2019; Aslani and Souri, 2018; Naiji and Souri, 2018). Our results indicated that with the application of starter N and P fertilizers residual soil N is enhanced after harvesting of groundnut. Similar, to our results the study conducted by Eisa et al. (2011) was also indicated that with application of P fertilizer and fertilizers containing micronutrients such as Fe, Zn and Mn, the residual soil N is enhanced after harvesting groundnut. Including legumes in crop rotation system has multiple advantages from the point of views of cropping diversification, improved diet and nutrition and ecologically sustainable soil fertility restoration.
4. Conclusions
The plant phenology was not affected by single or combined application of N and P fertilizers. However, plant growth was significantly affected by separate and combined application of N and P fertilizers. Plant growth parameters such as plant height and number of branches were increased by higher N and P fertilizers application rates. Plant biomass yield significantly increased when higher doses of both N and P fertilizers were separately applied. Haulm yield was only increased by higher rates of N application. Combination of N and P at 15 kg N ha−1 and 46 kg P2O5 ha−1 resulted in higher pod yield, grain yield, grain protein content and residual soil N contents after harvest. Nitrogen harvest index was also found to be significantly affected by the main and interaction effect of both N and P fertilizers. The results indicate that increased productivity, grain quality of groundnut and enhancing the soil nitrate content after harvest with application of both N and P fertilizers. In addition to enhancing productivity and grain quality of groundnut, the study is also very relevant in demonstrating ecological soil fertility replenishment in a crop rotation system involving legumes.
Declarations
Author contribution statement
Kinfe Tekulu: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Collected the data; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.
Gebeyehu Taye: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Wrote the paper.
Dereje Assefa: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments.
Funding statement
This work was supported by the Tigray Agricultural Research Institute (TARI), Ethiopia.
Competing interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
No additional information is available for this paper.
Acknowledgements
We thank TARI and in particular Dr. Abbadi Girmay for inspiring the authors and moral support. We would also like to extend our thanks to thank Shire Soil Research Center and Mekelle Soil Research Center for allowing the authors to use laboratory facilities for soil analysis and Mekelle University is also appreciated for providing an opportunity for Mr. Kinfe to study his master in Soil Science Program. Finally, we appreciate local farmers for their support in providing us with land for experimentation and also for their labor contribution.
References
- Achakzai A.K.K. Effect of various levels of nitrogen fertilizer on some vegetative growth attributes of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars. Pakistan J. Bot. 2012;44(2):655–659. [Google Scholar]
- Adeleke M.A., Haruna I.M. Residual nitrogen contributions from grain legumes to the growth and development of succeeding maize crop. ISRN Agron. 2012;5 [Google Scholar]
- Aghayie Noroozlo Y., Souri M.K., Delshad M. Stimulation effects of foliar applied glycine and glutamine amino acids on lettuce growth. Open Agric. 2019;4(1):164–172. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed M.H., Mesfin H.M., Abady S., Mesfin W., Kebede A. Adoption of improved groundnut seed and its impact on rural households’ welfare in Eastern Ethiopia. Cogent Econ. Finance. 2016;4(1):1268747. [Google Scholar]
- Annadurai K., Puppala N., Angadi S., Masilamani P. Agronomic management technologies for peanut production : a review. Agric. Rev. 2009;30(4):235–261. [Google Scholar]
- Argaw A. Organic and inorganic fertilizer application enhances the effect of bradyrhizobium on nodulation and yield of peanut ( Arachis Hypogea L .) in nutrient depleted and sandy soils of Ethiopia. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 2017;6:219–231. [Google Scholar]
- Arya S.S., Salve A.R., Chauhan S. Peanuts as functional food: a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016;53(1):31–41. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-2007-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asfaw S., Shiferaw B., Simtowe F., Hagos M. Agricultural technology adoption, seed access constraints and commercialization in Ethiopia. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 2011;3(9):436–447. [Google Scholar]
- Aslani M., Souri M.K. Growth and quality of green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under foliar application of organic chelate fertilizers. Open Agric. 2018;3:146–154. [Google Scholar]
- Assefa D., Teare M., Skinnes H. Natural occurrence of toxigenic fungi species and aflatoxin in freshly harvested groundnut kernels in Tigray, northern Ethiopia. J. Drylands. 2012;5(1):377–383. [Google Scholar]
- Awadalla A.O., Abbas M.T. Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) Yield and its components as affected by N-fertilization and Diazotroph inoculation in Toshka desert soil-south valley-Egypt. Environ. Risk Assess Remediat. 2017;1(3):49–55. [Google Scholar]
- Bala M., Nath K. Maximization of groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L) yield by nutrient management practices. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci. 2015;3(3):241–245. [Google Scholar]
- Blumenthal J.M., Baltensperger D.D., Cassman K.G., Mason S.C., Pavlista A.D. Nitrogen in the Environment. 2008. Importance and effect of nitrogen on crop quality and health; pp. 51–70. [Google Scholar]
- Bouyoucos G.J. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agron. J. 1962;54(5):464–465. [Google Scholar]
- Bremner J.M., Mulvaney C.S. Total nitrogen. In: Miller R.H., Page A.L., Keeney D.R., editors. Methods of Soil Analysis. 1982. pp. 595–624. Madison, Wisconsin USA. [Google Scholar]
- Bulman P., Smith D.L. Post-heading nitrogen uptake, retranslocation, and partitioning in spring barley. Crop Sci. 1994;34:977–984. [Google Scholar]
- Chalk M. The contribution of associative and symbiotic nitrogen fixation to the nitrogen nutrition of non-legumes. Plant Soil. 1991;132:29–39. [Google Scholar]
- CSA . 2019. Report on Area and Production for Major Crops (Private Peasant Holdings, Meher season).Statistical Bulletin No.584. Addis Abeba, Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
- Daramy M.A., Addo J.S., Dumbuya G. The effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application on crude protein, nutrient concentration and nodulation of cowpea in Ghana. ARPN J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2016;11(12):470–480. [Google Scholar]
- Dehnavard S., Souri M.K., Mardanlu S. Tomato growth responses to foliar application of ammonium sulfate in hydroponic culture. J. Plant Nutr. 2017;40(3):315–323. [Google Scholar]
- Dogra R.C., Dudeja S.S. Fertilizer N and nitrogen fixation in legume-- Rhizobium symbiosis. Ann. Biol. 1993;9(2):149–164. [Google Scholar]
- Eisa A.I., Taha M.B., Abdalla A.M. Amendment of soil fertility and augmentation of the quantity and quality of soybean crop by using phosphorus and micronutrients. Int. J. Acad. Res. 2011;3(2):800–808. [Google Scholar]
- Erman M., Yildirim B., Togay N., Cig F. Effect of phosphorus application and rhizobium inoculation on the yield, nodulation and nutrient uptake in field pea (Pisum Sativum Sp. Arvense L.) J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2009;8(2):301–304. [Google Scholar]
- EthioSIS . Addis Ababa; Ethiopia: 2014. Soil fertility status and fertilizer recommendation atlas for Tigray regional state , Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
- Fageria N.K. Nitrogen harvest index and its association with crop yields. J. Plant Nutr. 2014;37(6):795–810. [Google Scholar]
- FAO . 1970. Amino Acid Content of Foods and Biological Data on Proteins. FAO Nutritional Studies No. 24, Rome. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FAOSTAT . 2017. Statistical Databases and Data-Sets of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.http://www.fao.org/faostat/ [Google Scholar]
- Fattahi B., Arzani K., Souri M.K., Barzegar M. Effects of cadmium and lead on seed germination, morphological traits, and essential oil composition of sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) Ind. Crop. Prod. 2019;138:111584. [Google Scholar]
- Fekadu E., Kibret K., Melese A., Bedadi B. Yield of faba bean (Vicia Faba L.) as affected by lime, mineral p, farmyard manure, compost and rhizobium in acid soil of Lay Gayint district, northwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Agric. Food Secur. 2018;7(16):1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Gathumbi S.M., Cadisch G., Buresh R.J., Giller K.E. Subsoil nitrogen capture in mixed legume stands as assessed by deep nitrogen-15 placement. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2003;67(2):573–582. [Google Scholar]
- Gebreselassie R., Dereje A., Solomon H. On farm pre harvest agronomic management practices of aspergillus infection on groundnut in Abergelle, Tigray. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 2014;5(2):1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Gobarah M.E., Mohamed M.H., Tawfik M.M. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer and foliar spraying with zinc on growth, yield and quality of groundnut under reclaimed sandy soils. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2006;2(8):491–496. [Google Scholar]
- Gohari A.A., Niyaki N.A.S. Effects of iron and nitrogen fertilizers on yield and yield components of peanut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) in astaneh ashrafiyeh , Iran. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2010;9(3):256–262. [Google Scholar]
- Hammons R.O., Herman D., Stalker H.T. Origin and early history of the peanut. In: Thomas Stalker H., Wilson Richard F., editors. Peanuts Genetics, Processing, and Utilization. Elsevier Inc 478; 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Havlin J.L., Beaton J.D., Tisdale S.L., Nelson W.L. Pearson Prentice Hall; New Jersey: 2005. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers: an Introduction to Nutrient Management. [Google Scholar]
- Hazelton P., Murphy B. Csiro Publishing; Austria: 2007. Interpreting Soil Test Results what Do All the Numbers Mean ? [Google Scholar]
- Holl F.B., Vose J.R. Carbohydrate and protein accumulation in the developing field pea seed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1980;60(4):1109–1114. [Google Scholar]
- Huang J., Afshar R.K., Tao A., Chen C. Efficacy of starter n fertilizer and rhizobia inoculant in dry pea (Pisum Sativum Linn.) production in a semi-arid temperate environment. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017;63(3):248–253. [Google Scholar]
- Hussain R.M. The Effect of phosphorus in nitrogen fixation in legumes. Agric. Res. Technol. Open Access J. 2017;5(1):12–14. [Google Scholar]
- Jones C.A. Effect of soil texture on critical bulk densities for root growth. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1983;47(6):1208–1211. [Google Scholar]
- Kabir R., Yeasmin S., Islam A.K.M.M., Sarkar M.A.R. Effect of phosphorus , calcium and boron on the growth and yield of groundnut effect of phosphorus , calcium and boron on the growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis Hypogea L.) Int. J. Bio-Sci. Bio-Technol. 2013;5(3):51–60. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar L.S., Radder B.M., Malligawad L.H., Manasa V. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus levels and ratios on yield and nutrient uptake by groundnut in northern transition zone of Karnatak. Int. Q. J. Life Sci. 2015;9(4):1561–1564. [Google Scholar]
- Kyei-Boahen S., Savala C.E.N., Chikoye D., Abaidoo R. Growth and yield responses of cowpea to inoculation and phosphorus fertilization in different environments. Front. Plant Sci. 2017;8:646. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawlor D.W. Carbon and nitrogen assimilation in relation to yield: mechanisms are the key to understanding production systems. J. Exp. Bot. 2002;53(370):773–787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leghari S.J., Wahocho N.A., Laghari G.M., HafeezLaghari A., MustafaBhabhan G., HussainTalpur K., Bhutto T.A., Wahocho S.A., Lashari A.A. Role of nitrogen for plant growth and development: a review. Adv. Environ. Biol. 2016;10(9):209–219. [Google Scholar]
- Lombin G., Singh L., Yayock J.Y. A decade of fertilizer research on groundnuts (Arachis Hypogaea L. ) in the savannah zone of Nigeria. J. Fertilizer Res. 1985;6(2):157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Majeed M.A., Ahmad R., Tahir M., Tanveer A., Ahmad M. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer sources and rates on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Asian J. Agric. Biol. 2014;2(1):14–19. [Google Scholar]
- Malhotra H., Sharma V.S., Pandey R. Phosphorus nutrition: plant growth in response to deficiency and excess. In: Hasanuzzaman M., editor. Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd; 2018. pp. 171–190. [Google Scholar]
- Mardanluo S., Souri M.K., Ahmadi M. Plant growth and fruit quality of two pepper cultivars under different potassium levels of nutrient solutions. J. Plant Nutr. 2018;41(12):1604–1614. [Google Scholar]
- Mckenzie R.H., Middleton A.B., Solberg E.D., DeMulder J., Flore N., Clayton G.W., Bremer E. Response of pea to rhizobia inoculation and starter nitrogen in alberta. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2001;81:637–643. [Google Scholar]
- Meena B.P., Kumawat S.M., Yadav R.S. Effect of planting geometry and nitrogen management on groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L) in loamy sand soil of Rajasthan. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2011;86(1):86–88. [Google Scholar]
- Melese B., Dechassa N. Seed yield of groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) as influenced by phosphorus and manure application at Babile, eastern Ethiopia. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res. 2017;6(1):399–404. [Google Scholar]
- Mitran T., Meena R.S., Lal R., Layek J., Kumar S., Datta R. Role of soil phosphorus on legume production. In: Meena R.S., editor. Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management. Springer Nature; Al. Singapore: 2018. pp. 487–510. [Google Scholar]
- Naiji M., Souri M.K. Nutritional value and mineral concentrations of sweet basil under organic compared to chemical fertilization. J. Hortorum Cultus. 2018;17(2):167–175. [Google Scholar]
- Tigray . Mekelle branch; 2017. National Metrology Agency of Ethiopia. [Google Scholar]
- Nigam S.N. 2014. Groundnut at a Glance 121. [Google Scholar]
- Ola B.L., Pareek B.L., Rathore P.S., Kumawat A. Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity of groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) in arid western Rajasthan. 2013;1(1):13–15. [Google Scholar]
- Olsen S.R., Cole C.V., Watandbe F.S., Dean L.A. Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S. Dept. Agric. Circular. 1954;9:18. [Google Scholar]
- Peoples M.B., Craswell E. Biological nitrogen fixation: investments, expectations and actual contributions to agriculture. Plant Soil. 1992;141:13–39. [Google Scholar]
- Plank C.O. Reference plant analysis procedures for the southern region of the united states. Southern Co-operative Seri. Bull. 1992:368. [Google Scholar]
- Polemio M., Rhoades J.D. Determining Cation exchange capacity: a new procedure for calcareous and gypsiferous soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1977;41(3):524–528. [Google Scholar]
- Pourranjbari Saghaiesh S., Souri M.K., Moghaddam M. Characterization of nutrients uptake and enzymes activity in Khatouni melon (Cucumis melo var. inodorus) seedlings under different concentrations of nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus of nutrient solution. J. Plant Nutr. 2019:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Prasad P.V.V., Kakani V.G., Upadhyaya v. The Origin and History of the Groundnut 26. 2011. Growth and production of groundnut. [Google Scholar]
- Rhoades J.D., Chanduvi F., LeschS . 1999. Soil Salinity Assessment Methods and Interpretation of Electrical Conductivity Measurments. FAO irigation and drainage paper 57, Rome. [Google Scholar]
- Richards L.A., Allison L.E., Bernstein L., Bower C.A., Brown J.W., Fireman M., Hatcher J.T., Hayward H.E., Pearson G.A., Reeve R.C., Wilcox L.V. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. In: Richards L.A., editor. USDA, Agriculture Handbook No. 60, Washington. 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Roy R.N., Finck A., Blair G.J., Tandon H.L.S. Plant nutrition for food security. a guide for integrated nutrient management. FAO Fertil. Plant Nutr. Bull. 2006;16 Rome. [Google Scholar]
- Sengupta A., Gunri S.K., Basu T.K. Performance of short duration groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) Variety (TG 51) as Influenced by nutrient management strategy under new alluvial zone of West Bengal. Legume Res. 2016;39(1):91–95. [Google Scholar]
- Shafi M., Zaman R., Bakht J., Hayat Y., Shah S. Dry matter partitioning and grain yield of wheat as affected by phosphorus and its applications. Pakistan J. Bot. 2015;47:281–287. [Google Scholar]
- Sibhatu B., Tekle G., Harfe M. Response of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) to different rates of phosphorus fertilizer at Tanqua-Abergelle district, northern Ethiopia. Basic Res. J. Agric. Sci. Rev. 2016;5(1):24–29. [Google Scholar]
- Singh A.L. Mineral nutrient requirement, their disorders and remedies in groundnut. Groundnut Res. India. 2004:137–159. [Google Scholar]
- Singh A.K., Tripathi P.N., Singh R. Effect of Rhizobium inoculation , nitrogen and phosphorus level on growth , yield and quality of kharif cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L . Walf.) Crop Res. 2007;33(1):71–73. [Google Scholar]
- Souri M.K. Aminochelate fertilizers: the new approach to the old problem; a review. Open Agric. 2016;1:118–123. [Google Scholar]
- Souri M.K., Aslani M. Beneficial effects of foliar application of organic chelate fertilizers on French bean production under field conditions in a calcareous soil. Adv. Hortic. Sci. 2018;32(2):265–272. [Google Scholar]
- Souri M.K., Hatamian M. Aminochelates in plant nutrition: a review. J. Plant Nutr. 2019;42(1):67–78. [Google Scholar]
- Souri M.,K., Naiji M., Kianmehr M.H. Nitrogen release dynamics of a slow release urea pellet and its effect on growth, yield, and nutrient uptake of sweet basil (Ocimum Basilicum L.) J. Plant Nutr. 2019;42(6):604–614. [Google Scholar]
- Tarekegn M.A., Kibret K. Effects of Rhizobium, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on growth, nodulation, yield and yield attributes of soybean at Pawe northwestern Ethiopia. Int. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;2(1):34–42. [Google Scholar]
- Taru V.B., Kyagya I.Z., Mshelia S.I., Adebayo E.F. Economic efficiency of resource use in groundnut production in Adamawa state of Nigeria post primary schools management board yola, Adamawa state, Nigeria. World J. Agric. Sci. 2008;4:896–900. [Google Scholar]
- Tekalign T. International Livestock Research Center for Africa; Addis Ababa: 1991. Soil, Plant, Water, Fertilizer, Animal Manure and Compost Analysis. Working Document No. 13. [Google Scholar]
- Tenywa J.S., Muwanga S., Owuor C., Esele J.P., Woomer P.L. Response of sorghum-groundnut to row arrangement and orientation under nominal nitrogen management. J. Agric. Ecol. Res. Int. 2016;6(3):1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Vala F.G., Vaghasia P.M., Zala K.P., Buha D.B. Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity of summer groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L.) Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2017;6(10):1951–1957. [Google Scholar]
- van kessel C., hartley C. Agricultural management of grain legumes: has it led to an increase in nitrogen fixation? Field Crop. Res. 2000;65(2-3):165–181. [Google Scholar]
- Veeramani P., Subrahmaniyan K. Nutrient management for sustainable groundnut productivity in India. A review. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2011;3(11):8138–8153. [Google Scholar]
- Walkley A., Black I.A. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and proposed chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37(1):29–38. [Google Scholar]
- Yakubu H., Kwari J.D., Sandabe M.K. Effect of phosphorus fertilizer on nitrogen fixation by some grain legume varieties in Sudano-Sahelian zone of north eastern Nigeria. Nigerian J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2010;18(1):19–26. [Google Scholar]
- Yebio W. Proceedings of the First Oil Workshop, Cairo, Egypt. 1984. Groundnut and sesame in Ethiopia: history, research and improvement prospects; pp. 75–82. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z., Liao H., Lucas W.J. Molecular mechanisms underlying phosphate sensing, signaling, and adaptation in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2014;56:192–220. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



