Effects of local dexmedetomidine administration on the neurotoxicity of ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block in rats

Abstract

Dexmedetomidine, used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics (LAs), may prolong the duration of peripheral nerve block. However, the effect of dexmedetomidine on the neurotoxicity of LAs is not completely understood. The present study was designed to investigate the efficacy of two doses of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine and its protective effect against the neurotoxicity of LAs. Paw withdrawal thermal latency testing was used to detect the sensory blockade. Extensor postural thrust testing was used to detect the motor blockade. The results demonstrated that the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine prolonged the duration of sensory and motor blockade in a dose-dependent manner compared with ropivacaine alone. TUNEL staining was performed to examine apoptosis. Western blotting was used to detect the Cleaved caspase-3 expression levels. The results showed that the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine decreased the rate of apoptosis and caspase-3 expression levels in a dose-dependent manner compared with ropivacaine alone (P<0.05). In addition, the rate of apoptosis and caspase-3 expression levels were significantly lower in the high-dose dexmedetomidine group compared with the low-dose dexmedetomidine group (P<0.05). The results suggested that the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block in rats not only prolonged the duration of sensory and motor block of the sciatic nerve, but also markedly alleviated ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity by decreasing caspase-3-dependent sciatic nerve cell apoptosis. Furthermore, the present study indicated that dexmedetomidine was more effective at a dose of 20 µg/kg compared with 6 µg/kg.

Introduction

Local anesthetics (LAs) are widely used to relieve acute, intraoperative and postoperative chronic pain (1). Ropivacaine is a novel type of amide LA that blocks fewer motor fibers than sensory fibers, and is less cardiotoxic and neurotoxic compared with other Las (2). Therefore, ropivacaine is commonly selected instead of bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia (3).

The relatively short duration of the effects of a single LA injection frequently leaves the patient in pain when the block wears off, particularly for postoperative analgesia; therefore, prolonging the duration of analgesia is a priority (4). An increase in the dose and/or volume of LA administered may prolong the duration of analgesia but may also increase the risk of neurotoxicity (5). Although continuous catheter-based nerve blocks can extend postoperative analgesia, their placement requires additional time, cost and skill (4).

Several perineural adjuvants have been studied with the goal of prolonging the duration of analgesia, reducing the dose of LA and improving analgesia with fewer adverse effects (6–8). Dexmedetomidine is a potent, highly selective α₂-adrenoceptor agonist and its α₂/α₁ selectivity is eight times greater than that of clonidine (9). A study reported that dexmedetomidine enhances the duration of bupivacaine anesthesia and analgesia of sciatic nerve block in rats (10). In addition, dexmedetomidine possesses neuroprotective properties in various experimental models (11). LAs are generally thought to be relatively safe and the potential neurotoxicity of LAs has been investigated for a number of years (12). Ropivacaine has been documented to be less cardiotoxic and neurotoxic compared with other Las (13). However, there have been a number of reports on the neurotoxicity of ropivacaine (14,15). LA-induced direct nerve injury can occur following the administration of LAs at clinical concentrations (16), and the mechanism underlying neurotoxicity induced by LAs is complex and not completely understood (14,17,18). Evidence of neuronal apoptosis has been observed in a number of animal models and the mitochondrial pathway has been demonstrated to be involved in LA-mediated apoptosis (17). The degree of LA toxicity has been demonstrated to be concentration- or dose-dependent (19).

A previous study has demonstrated that the addition of dexmedetomidine to an LA extends the duration of blockade in the peripheral nerves (20); however, the effect of dexmedetomidine on neurotoxicity is not completely understood. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block, to explore whether it can mitigate the toxic effect of LAs and to identify the mechanisms underlying dexmedetomidine.

Materials and methods

Animal selection and housing

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University (approval no. LDYYLL2019-111)and the procedures were performed according to routine animal care guidelines. Healthy male adult SPF Wistar rats (n=40; age 8–10 weeks; weight, 180–220 g) were provided by the Experimental Animal Center of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Lanzhou, China). The rats were housed in separate cages in temperature-controlled rooms (20–24°C; relative humidity, 50–60%) with 12-h light/dark cycles, and free access to food and water until the time of experimentation.

Groups and treatment

The rats were randomly divided into the following five groups (n=8): i) Control (group C); ii) sham (group S); iii) ropivacaine (group R); iv) low-dose dexmedetomidine group (group D1); and v) high-dose dexmedetomidine group (group D2).

Sciatic nerve block was performed according to the procedure described by Kim et al (21), but in the present study the drug was injected into the perineural space under the fascia covering the nerve. Following anaesthetization with 1.2–1.5% isoflurane in oxygen using a mask, the bilateral sciatic nerve was exposed by a gluteal muscle-splitting incision. The rats in group C underwent bilateral sciatic nerve exposure only. The rats in group S received a bilateral injection of 0.2 ml 0.9% NaCl. The rats in group R received a bilateral injection of 0.2 ml 0.5% ropivacaine hydrochloride (batch number: LBDZ; AstraZeneca). The rats in group D1 received a bilateral injection of 0.2 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus 6 µg/kg dexmedetomidine hydrochloride (batch number: 16110732; Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Ltd.), whereas rats in group D2 received a bilateral injection of 0.2 ml 0.5% ropivacaine plus 20 µg/kg dexmedetomidine hydrochloride. A nonabsorbable muscle fascia suture was placed at the midpoint of the injection site as a marker for subsequent nerve removal. Following the injection, the incision was sutured layer by layer, penicillin powder was applied to the surgical wound to prevent infection and the rats were placed into individual feeding chambers.

Paw withdrawal thermal latency (PWL) testing

The time at which the righting reflex returned was recorded to the nearest minute (0 min) and the rats were then placed in a chamber for the PWL test, which was performed with an RB-200 intelligent hot plate (Shanghai Uilian, Inc.) at 55±1°C every 30 min for 330 min. The PWL indicated deficiencies in sensory function. The mean value of three measurements at each time point was calculated. A cut-off time of 15 sec was used to avoid tissue damage. If no withdrawal was observed after 15 sec, the stimulus was removed and the PWL was recorded as 15 sec.

Extensor postural thrust (EPT) testing

To measure the rat hindfoot EPT (22), each rat was held upright with its hindlimb extended such that the body's weight was supported by the distal limb and toes. The extensor thrust, the force that resisted contact of the heel with the platform, was measured as the force applied to the digital platform balance (cat. no. JY303; Shanghai Puchun Measure Instrument Co., Ltd.). A reduction in this force, which represented reduced extensor muscle tone, was considered a deficiency in motor function. Once the sensory and motor function of each rat had returned to baseline, the rat was returned to its home cage.

Histopathological evaluation

For histopathological assessment, at 24 h post-drug administration, the rats were anaesthetized with 1.2–1.5% isoflurane and the sciatic nerves were removed from the injection site. Each sciatic nerve was fixed with 10% formaldehyde solution for 24 h at room temperature, sequentially dehydrated with grade ethanol (70, 80, 95, 100 and 100%), cleared in xylene and embedded in paraffin. Sections (thickness, 5 µm) were prepared and deparaffinized at 40°C in a water bath and rehydrated. Samples were then washed with distilled water and dried. 2% hematoxylin was added for 5 min at room temperature and rinsed with water. Subsequently 1% HCl ethanol solution (1 ml HCl added to 99 ml 70% ethanol) was added for 10 sec in triplicate to remove excess haematoxylin. Following this, sections were washed using distilled water for 25 min, then 0.5% eosin was added at room temperature for 2 min and slices were dehydrated with 95 and 100% ethanol. Dimethylbenzene (Absin Bioscience, Inc.) was added for 5 min twice and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Finally, pathological changes were observed under an optical microscope (magnification, ×400; Olympus Corporation). The rats were euthanized by overdose of isoflurane.

Apoptosis of sciatic nerve cells

TUNEL staining was performed to examine apoptosis. Samples of sciatic nerve were fixed in 10% formalin for 20 min at room temperature and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 µm) were deparaffinized, rehydrated and incubated for 15 min at 37°C with proteinase K working solution (Shanghai Xiangsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). The sections were rinsed twice with PBS (pH 7.4) and incubated in a 0.3% hydrogen peroxide blocking solution for 15 min at room temperature. Subsequently, 50 µl TUNEL reaction reagent was then added to the sections, which were incubated for 60 min at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere in the dark. Following rinsing with PBS (pH 7.4) three times, 50 µl converter peroxidase was added to the sections, which were incubated for 30 min at 37°C, and 50 µl diaminobenzidine substrate was added to the sections prior to incubation for 10 min at 25°C. The sections were rinsed with PBS (pH 7.4) three times and analyzed under a light microscope (magnification, ×400). According to the distribution of apoptotic positive cells, three unrepeated visual fields of each section were observed under a light microscope and the percentage of positive cells was calculated as the apoptosis rate (number of apoptotic cells/total number of cells in the field).

Cleaved caspase-3 expression in the rat sciatic nerve

Cleaved caspase-3 expression was detected via western blotting. The samples were cut into small pieces (2 mm long; 2 mm thick) and homogenized in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris HCl (pH 7.6), 20 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton-X, 5 U/ml aprotinin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride]. Lysate protein levels were determined using a BCA protein assay kit (Shanghai Qcbio Science & Technologies Co., Ltd.). Equal amounts of protein (30 µg) were separated via 10% SDS-PAGE and subjected to gel electrophoresis. The separated proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, which were blocked with 5% nonfat dried milk in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (137 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM Tris, 0.1% Tween 20; Absin Bioscience, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies targeted against cleaved caspase-3 (1:1,000; cat. no. bsm-33199M; Beijing Biosynthesis Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and β-actin (1:1,000; cat. no. bsm-33036M Beijing Biosynthesis Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) diluted in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 overnight at 4°C. The membranes were then incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (1:1,000; cat. no. bs-40296G-HRP; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature and the reactive bands were detected following incubation with nitroblue tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) for 5 min at room temperature. The bands were scanned, their densities were assessed using an imaging densitometer (cat. no. GS-800; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and the optical densities were quantified using Image-Pro Plus software (version 7.0; Media Cybernetics, Inc.) with β-actin as the loading control.

Statistical analysis

Data were statistically analysed using SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Corp.). All data are presented as the mean ± (SD) of five experimental repeats (n=6 in each group). One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was performed to determine overall differences in PWLs and EPTs at each time point, as well as the differences in the levels of apoptosis and expression of cleaved caspase-3 among all experimental groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Neurobehavioral evaluation

Compared with group R, groups D1 and D2 displayed an increased duration of analgesia against a heat stimulus. The time taken to return to baseline sensory function (defined as P≥0.05 compared with group C) was longer in groups D1 and D2 compared with group R. The time to return to baseline sensory function was longer in group D2 compared with group D1. No significant difference was observed between groups C and S (P>0.05; Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Right hindlimb PWL of the five groups at different time points (n=8). The times required for group R, group D1 and group D2 to return to baseline sensory function were 180, 240 and 300 min, respectively. The time to return to baseline sensory function was defined as P≥0.05 vs. group C. *P<0.05 vs. group C. PWL (s), paw withdrawal thermal latency (sec); group R, ropivacaine group; group D1, low-dose dexmedetomidine group; group D2, high-dose dexmedetomidine group; group C, control group; group S, sham group.

Groups D1 and D2 increased the duration of motor blockade compared with group R. The time to return to baseline motor function (defined as P≥0.05 compared with group C) was longer in groups D1 and D2 compared with group R. The time to return to baseline motor function was longer in group D2 compared with group D1. No significant difference was observed between groups C and S (P>0.05; Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Right hindlimb EPTs of the four groups at different time points (n=8). The times required for group R, group D1 and group D2 to return to baseline motor function were 180, 240 and 270 min, respectively. The time to return to baseline motor function was defined as P≥0.05 vs. group C. *P<0.05 vs. group C. EPT, extensor postural thrust; group R, ropivacaine group; group D1, low-dose dexmedetomidine group; group D2, high-dose dexmedetomidine group; group C, control group; group S, sham group.

Histopathologic evaluation

Histopathologic analysis indicated that groups D1 and D2 displayed alleviated nerve injury compared with group R. In groups S and C, the sciatic nerve was intact, the nerve fibers were arranged tightly and neatly, the morphology was normal, the staining was uniform and the structures of the axons and myelin sheath were clear. In group R, certain sciatic nerve fibers were disordered and interrupted, and certain axons and nerve sheaths displayed edema. Compared with group R, group D1 displayed markedly less disorder and discontinuity in the nerve fiber structure, and axonal and myelin edema in the nerve fibers. Compared with group D1, the fibers of the sciatic nerve in group D2 were arranged more neatly, and myelin sheath and axon edema was milder (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Histopathological alterations in the sciatic nerves of rats from the four groups were examined by conducting hematoxylin and eosin staining (n=8). (A) control, (B) sham, (C) ropivacaine, (D) low-dose dexmedetomidine and (E) high-dose dexmedetomidine groups (magnification, ×400).

Alterations in apoptosis

The TUNEL assay was used to observe neuronal apoptosis under a light microscope. The results show that the nerve cell apoptosis rate was significantly higher in groups R, D1 and D2 compared with group S (P<0.05). Furthermore, the nerve cell apoptosis rate was significantly lower in groups D1 and D2 compared with group R (P<0.05). Finally, the nerve cell apoptosis rate was significantly lower in group D2 compared with group D1 (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the nerve cell apoptosis rate between groups C and S (P>0.05; Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Comparison of the rate of apoptosis in the rats as measured via TUNEL staining (n=8). (A) Control, (B) sham, (C) ropivacaine, (D) low-dose dexmedetomidine and (E) high-dose dexmedetomidine groups (magnification, ×400). (F) Quantification of the rate of apoptosis. *P<0.05 vs. group C; ^#P<0.05 vs. group S; ^&P<0.05 vs. group R; ^∆P<0.05 vs. group D1. Group C, control group; group S, sham group; group R, ropivacaine group; group D1, low-dose dexmedetomidine group; group D2, high-dose dexmedetomidine group.

Cleaved caspase-3 expression

Alterations in the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 were detected via western blotting. The expression of cleaved caspase-3 was significantly higher in group R compared with groups S and C (P<0.05), and the expression of cleaved caspase-3 was significantly lower in groups D1 and D2 compared with group R (P<0.05). In addition, the expression of cleaved caspase-3 was significantly lower in group D2 compared with group D1 (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in cleaved caspase-3 expression levels between groups C and S (P>0.05; Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Comparison of the expression of cleaved caspase-3, as measured via western blotting (n=8). *P<0.05 vs. group C; ^#P<0.05 vs. group S; ^&P<0.05 vs. group R; ^∆P<0.05 vs. group D1. Group C, control group; group S, sham group; group R, ropivacaine group; group D1, low-dose dexmedetomidine group; group D2, high-dose dexmedetomidine group.

Discussion

In the present study, a rat model of sciatic nerve block was established according to the method described by Kim et al (21). In the study conducted by Kim et al (21), 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine was added to ropivacaine. However, Brummett et al (23) demonstrated that dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine increases the duration of sensory blockade in a dose-dependent manner. The aforementioned study also identified that the highest dose of dexmedetomidine (20 µg/kg) used in the study displayed the greatest effects, but there were no significant differences in motor function between (0.5, 2.0 and 6.0 µg/kg, respectively) doses of dexmedetomidine. Therefore, in the present study, 20 mg/kg dexmedetomindin was used in the high dose group and 6.0 µg/kg dexmedetomindin was used in the low dose group. The present study demonstrated that, compared with group S, the PWL of group R was increased, whereas the EPT of group R was decreased, suggesting the successful establishment of a rat model of sciatic nerve block.

To enhance and prolong the anesthetic and analgesic effects of LAs, a variety of LA adjuvants have been investigated, and used in single-shot and continuous peripheral nerve blocks (24–26). α₂-adrenergic receptors are widely distributed throughout the peripheral and central nervous systems (27). A previous study demonstrated that the use of α₂-adrenoreceptor agonists in peripheral nerve blocks is safe and beneficial (28). Dexmedetomidine, a potent and highly selective agonist of α₂-adrenergic receptors, has been used as an analgesic and antinociceptive adjuvant (29).

Previous study has demonstrated that the addition of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant for nerve block prolongs the duration of analgesia and increases the speed of analgesia onset (30). The present study indicated that dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of sciatic nerve block and enhanced the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine in rats. However, the mechanism underlying α₂-adrenergic receptor agonist-induced analgesia and sedation remains to be elucidated. A previous study demonstrated that dexmedetomidine binds α₂-adrenoceptors on the cell membranes of neurons, which leads to the activation of G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K⁺ channels and inhibition of I_h channels, resulting in hyperpolarization of the membrane (31). By contrast, another study demonstrated that α₂ agonists produce analgesia and sedation by inhibiting substance P release in the nociceptive pathway at the level of the dorsal root neuron (32). The mechanism underlying α₂ agonist activity is not fully understood but is probably multifactorial.

In the present study, the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block shortened sensory and motor block onset time, and extended motor and sensory block duration, particularly sensory duration, compared with ropivacaine alone. When ropivacaine was combined with 6 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, the sensory block duration was prolonged from 150 to 240 min, whereas combination treatment with 20 µg/kg dexmedetomidine prolonged the sensory block duration to 300 min, suggesting that the effect of 20 µg/kg dexmedetomidine was more pronounced compared with 6 µg/kg dexmedetomidine.

Although ropivacaine has been considered a relatively safer LA than bupivacaine in recent years due to its lower degree of motor block and decreased tendency to cause neurotoxicity, a previous study demonstrated that ropivacaine at a clinical concentration (2.5 mg/ml) is neurotoxic to isolated sensory neurons (33). Ropivacaine can induce the apoptosis of rabbit annulus fibrosus cells in vitro, which involved the mitochondrial signaling pathway (17). The results of the present study suggested that the nerve cell apoptosis rate was increased and the expression of cleaved caspase-3 was upregulated in group R compared group S, which indicated that ropivacaine induced sciatic nerve toxicity in rats and that the mechanism underlying this effect may be associated with caspase-3-dependent apoptosis.

A previous study has demonstrated that dexmedetomidine can serve as a neuroprotective agent against brain injury via the inhibition of neuronal apoptosis (34). Sun et al (35) identified that dexmedetomidine confers neuroprotection against spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury via the suppression of spinal cord inflammation and apoptosis. Another study demonstrated that dexmedetomidine attenuates neuronal injury induced by maternal propofol anesthesia in fetal brains (36). The mechanism underlying dexmedetomidine may be associated with inhibition of propofol-induced caspase-3 activation and the microglial response in fetal brains (37). Kim et al (21) demonstrated that dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine significantly reduces IL-6 and IL-1β mRNA levels compared with ropivacaine alone at 60 min post-intraneural injection. However, the exact effect of dexmedetomidine on the neurotoxicity of LAs is not completely understood. In the present study, the effect of dexmedetomidine on the neurotoxicity of ropivacaine was observed. The results indicated that, compared with group R, the apoptosis rate and caspase-3 expression levels were significantly reduced in groups D1 and D2. The results of the present study also suggested that dexmedetomidine reduced ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity for sciatic nerve block and that the efficacy of 20 µg/kg dexmedetomidine was greater compared with 6 µg/kg dexmedetomidine.

In conclusion, the present study suggested that dexmedetomidine may serve as a potential LA adjuvant that can prolong the sensory and motor block time of the sciatic nerve, enhance the effect of nerve block and reduce ropivacaine-induced neurotoxicity in rats. Furthermore, the effects of dexmedetomidine were greatest at a dose of 20 µg/kg. The results of the present study provided novel insight into the clinical use of dexmedetomidine, suggesting that dexmedetomidine not only provided the longest duration of analgesia but also reduced the neurotoxicity of LAs.

However, the current understanding of the clinical use of dexmedetomidine is not sufficient. In the present study, only two doses were studied, thus, whether further increasing the dose may have a protective effect requires further investigation.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81960345) and the Gansu Province Health Industry Plan (grant no. GSWSKY2017-18).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

XX wrote the manuscript. XX, JF and YL conceived and designed the present study. XX, JF, XM, YL, XH and JY performed the experimental procedures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University (Gansu, China; approval no. LDYYLL2019-111).

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.