Significance
While PIK3CA hotspot mutations frequently occur in solid cancers and in some contexts are therapeutically actionable, numerous other PIK3CA genomic alterations have been observed but remain uncharacterized. The authors identify C-terminal PIK3CA frameshift mutations as oncogenic driver events dependent on p85 binding in breast cancer and other cancers. Breast cell lines and tumors expressing PIK3CA frameshift mutations are sensitive to PI3K inhibition via alpelisib treatment. Patients with tumors characterized by these mutations may derive clinical benefit from p110α-selective inhibition.
Keywords: PI3K, cancer, signal transduction
Abstract
PIK3CA hotspot mutation is well established as an oncogenic driver event in cancer and its durable and efficacious inhibition is a focus in the development and testing of clinical cancer therapeutics. However, hundreds of cancer-associated PIK3CA mutations remain uncharacterized, their sensitivity to PI3K inhibitors unknown. Here, we describe a series of PIK3CA C-terminal mutations, primarily nucleotide insertions, that produce a frame-shifted protein product with an extended C terminus. We report that these mutations occur at a low frequency across multiple cancer subtypes, including breast, and are sufficient to drive oncogenic transformation in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate that the oncogenicity of these mutant p110α proteins is dependent on p85 but not Ras association. P110α-selective pharmacologic inhibition blocks transformation in cells and mammary tumors characterized by PIK3CA C-terminal mutation. Taken together, these results suggest patients with breast and other tumors characterized by PIK3CA C-terminal frameshift mutations may derive benefit from p110α-selective inhibitors, including the recently FDA-approved alpelisib.
The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase gene PIK3CA encodes the p110α catalytic isoform of PI3K and is one of the most frequently mutated genes across cancer subtypes, including 40% of breast cancers (1). While the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) and other sources indicate more than 3,000 somatic DNA aberrations in PIK3CA have been identified in breast cancer, more than 98% of breast cancer-associated PIK3CA mutations occur in two hotspots (2, 3). Located in the helical and kinase domains, E542K/E545K and H1047R mutations, respectively, produce hyperactivated p110α lipid kinases that activate PI3K effector signaling, thereby enhancing cellular proliferation, transformation, and survival (4, 5).
Association of p110α with receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) at the plasma membrane drives PI3K-mediated signal transduction. In the absence of activating signals such as growth factors or chemokines, the N-SH2 domain of regulatory PI3K subunit p85 binds to the helical domain of p110α, and in so doing, inhibits p110α (6). Positive stimuli initiate p85-mediated recruitment of p110α to active RTKs, and upon RTK binding, p110α inhibition by p85 is relieved. Previous research demonstrates that the PIK3CAH1047R protein product is dependent on p85 association for its oncogenic activity (7). In contrast, the helical domain PIK3CAE542K/E545K mutations retain oncogenic signaling in the absence of p85 association and instead are dependent on Ras-GTP binding for oncogenic transformation (8). Moreover, PIK3CAH1047R mutation induces localized structural changes which enhance the accessibility of the C-terminal tail of p110α. It has been shown that increasing the positive charge of the p110α C terminus via PIK3CAH1047R mutation enhances its association with the cellular membrane and lipid kinase activity, which contribute to its oncogenicity (9, 10).
The frequency of PI3K pathway activation across cancers, in part driven by oncogenic PIK3CA hotspot mutation, has fueled the development and testing of PI3K inhibitors. Originally developed as pan-PI3K inhibitors designed to inhibit all class I PI3K isoforms, recent efforts have largely shifted toward the development and testing of isoform-selective inhibitors that target a single PI3K isoform such as p110α, p110β, or p110δ (11, 12). Preclinical and clinical research also indicates that tumors characterized by p110α hotspot mutations such as H1047R are sensitive to PI3K inhibition, and as such, inhibitors designed to selectively inhibit hotspot-mutated p110α are also in clinical development. Recent FDA approval of the p110α-selective inhibitor alpelisib, to be used in combination with fulvestrant for the treatment of PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, advanced or metastatic breast cancer, highlights the clinical utility of this class of therapeutic agents (13). With the development and approval of these highly selective therapeutic agents, identifying patients whose PI3K-activated tumors will respond to alpelisib and other highly selective PI3K inhibitors is a task of critical importance.
Here we identify a series of C-terminal mutations, primarily single nucleotide insertions that occur in the final coding amino acid or the stop codon of PIK3CA, in breast and other cancers. We demonstrate that these mutations transform in vitro and in vivo and define p85 interaction as required for their oncogenicity. Tumors characterized by C-terminal PIK3CA mutation are sensitive to p110α-selective inhibition, suggesting that patients with tumors characterized by these mutations may respond to p110α inhibition. Lastly, next-generation sequencing of patient tumors identifies co-occurring mutations that suggest rational cotherapeutic strategies for patients with tumors characterized by these PIK3CA-activating mutations.
Results and Discussion
Using publicly available datasets, we first observed nucleotide insertions or substitutions in the final PIK3CA amino acid codon 1068 or the stop codon (1069), one of which was previously identified (3, 14). These insertions or substitutions are predicted to produce a frameshifted protein product extending the p110α C terminus three to four amino acids (Fig. 1A). In all cases, nucleotide insertion or substitution heavily biased the resulting amino acids to the positively charged residues arginine and/or lysine.
To determine whether nucleotide insertion and the resulting frameshift mutations at the PIK3CA C terminus function as oncogenic events, a panel of PIK3CA C-terminal mutations (PIK3CA-Ct) were overexpressed in p110αf/f; p110βf/f mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). Endogenous p110α and p110β were then excised via Adeno-Cre infection to yield p110α−/−; p110β−/− knockout MEFs (15). PIK3CA-Ct expression increases PI3K effector activation more efficiently than expression of wild-type p110α, similar to the characterized hotspot PIK3CAH1047R oncogenic mutation, as indicated by AKT and S6 phosphorylation (Fig. 1B). Similar results were obtained in Rat1 cells stably expressing PIK3CA-Ct mutations (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). Expression of PIK3CA-Ct is also sufficient to increase MEF cell proliferation and the ability of MEFs to form foci comparable to PIK3CAH1047R (Fig. 1 C and D and SI Appendix, Fig. S1B).
To address whether PIK3CA-Ct expression transforms in vitro and in vivo, we utilized hTERT immortalized human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs) that express a dominant negative p53 mutant (DD). These HMEC-DD cells are untransformed and cannot participate in anchorage independent growth. The expression of neuT (nT), an activated form of the Her2/neu oncogene, weakly transforms HMEC-DD cells. The addition of PIK3CA oncogenic alleles such as PIK3CAH1047R strongly transforms HMEC-DDnT cells (16). We engineered HMEC-DDnT cells to express the panel of PIK3CA-Ct mutations (SI Appendix, Fig. S1C) to use in in vitro and in vivo oncogenesis assays. PIK3CA-Ct expression is sufficient to enable efficient growth of HMEC-DDnT cells in soft agar (Fig. 1E). Because PIK3CA1068fs2 expression robustly activates PI3K effector signaling and promotes transformation in in vitro assays, HMEC-DDnT cells expressing this mutation were selected for in vivo xenografts. Expression of PIK3CA1068fs2 results in tumor growth in nude mice comparable to PIK3CAH1047R (Fig. 1F and SI Appendix, Fig. S1D). Tumors derived from HMEC-DDnT; PIK3CA1068fs2 mice are characterized by elevated PI3K effector signaling (Fig. 1 G and H).
Oncogenic PIK3CA mutations have been shown to drive oncogenicity through several distinct mechanisms. PIK3CAE542K/E545K helical domain mutations produce a mutant p110α that is dependent on Ras binding to signal to downstream effectors (7). Loss of Ras binding through PIK3CA K227E mutation reduces PIK3CAE542K/E545K-mediated effector phosphorylation and abrogates its ability to transform. In contrast, the oncogenicity of PIK3CA catalytic domain mutations such as PIK3CAH1047R is dependent on p85 association. Loss of p85 binding blocks PIK3CAH1047R-mediated effector phosphorylation and transformation (7, 17). To understand the mechanism by which PIK3CA-Ct is oncogenic, HMEC-DDnT PIK3CA1068fs2 cells, in which the PIK3CA1068fs2 allele contains an additional mutation either abolishing p110α Ras binding (K227E) or p85 association (PBD), were utilized in transformation assays. The results of these assays demonstrate that PIK3CA1068fs2 is dependent on p85 binding, but not RAS binding, to increase effector phosphorylation (Fig. 2 A and B and SI Appendix, Fig. S2A) and enhance anchorage independent growth (Fig. 2 C and D), similar to PIK3CAH1047R.
In recent years, PI3K-targeted therapies, namely isoform-selective PI3K inhibitors, have progressed in phase I to III clinical trials, and several are now FDA approved for specific indications, including alpelisib, idelalisib, and copanlisib (1, 13). However, a limitation in optimizing the clinical utility of these inhibitors is insufficient knowledge of the genomic and proteomic background which modulates sensitivity and resistance to these agents. To determine whether cell lines and tumors characterized by PIK3CA-Ct are sensitive to PI3K inhibition, cells that overexpress PIK3CA-Ct were treated with the pan-PI3K inhibitor pictilisib (pic), the p110α-selective inhibitor alpelisib (alp), or the p110β-selective inhibitor AZD6482 (AZD). PI3K effector phosphorylation is reduced in PIK3CA-Ct expressing p110α−/−; p110β−/− knockout MEFs when treated with pan-PI3K or p110α-selective inhibitors, but as expected, not the p110β-selective inhibitor AZD6482 (Fig. 3A); similar results were obtained in HMECs (SI Appendix, Fig. S3A). Moreover, the ability of these cells to form foci is abrogated following either pan-PI3K or p110α-selective inhibition (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Fig. S3B). To address whether tumors characterized by PIK3CA-Ct are sensitive to PI3K inhibition, HMEC-DDnT PIK3CAH1047R and HMEC-DDnT PIK3CA1068fs2 cells were transplanted into nude mice. Palpable tumors were treated with vehicle or alpelisib. HMEC-DDnT PIK3CA1068fs2 tumors were sensitive to p110α-selective inhibition (Fig. 3C and SI Appendix, Fig. S3C). Alpelisib-treated HMEC-DDnT PIK3CA1068fs2 tumors are significantly smaller (Fig. 3D) and are characterized by reduced AKT and S6 phosphorylation (Fig. 3 E and F). Taken together, our data suggest that tumors characterized by PIK3CA-Ct mutation are sensitive to p110α-selective inhibition and patients with tumors characterized by these mutations may be suitable candidates for clinical trials testing pan-or p110α-selective PI3K inhibitors.
The major limitations of clinical PI3K inhibition include identifying the patient population(s) which may benefit from PI3K-targeted therapy and preventing tumor recurrence or relapse. Next-generation sequence data derived from a comprehensive primary patient tumor dataset consisting of 233,272 unique patient tumors across solid tumor types were analyzed, and we identified 138 patient tumors characterized by 1 of 71 distinct genomic alterations that occur within the last four C-terminal PIK3CA amino acids or the stop codon (Dataset S1). While most detected alterations are nucleotide insertions, nucleotide deletions and substitutions were also observed. Of these distinct genomic alterations, 17 were identified in more than one patient tumor, with the highest frequency being N1068fs*5 (n = 47) (Fig. 4A). While PIK3CA-Ct alteration is frequently observed in breast cancer (n = 56), these genomic alterations were identified in other cancer types including uterine (n = 21), colon (n = 17), and lung cancers (n = 11) (Fig. 4B). These data suggest that tumors characterized by the oncogenic driver PIK3CA-Ct alterations can be detected using commercially available and validated cancer diagnostics at a low, but recurring, frequency in breast and other cancers. More than half of the breast tumors characterized by PIK3CA-Ct alteration lack other known PI3K pathway-activating genomic alterations (Fig. 4 C and D and Dataset S2), and genomic alterations in other key signaling pathways, proteins, or cellular processes including the CyclinD/Cdk4/6 axis, ESR1, FGF/FGFR, or BRCA2 frequently occur (Fig. 4D). Of the breast tumors that contain additional PI3K pathway alterations, detected alterations include PTEN deletion or mutation, PIK3CA hotspot mutation, and amplification of AKT isoforms (SI Appendix, Fig. S4A). Other tumor types showed different propensity to harbor additional alterations in the PI3K pathway (SI Appendix, Fig. S4B). These data support our in vitro and in vivo findings that suggest PIK3CA-Ct genomic alterations are bona fide oncogenic driver events. Moreover, these data identify co-occurring, and in some cases, potentially actionable genomic alterations, in patients whose tumors are characterized by these mutations.
Collectively, our data support the notion that PIK3CA-Ct insertions are oncogenic. At this time, the transforming capacity of several nonhotspot PIK3CA mutations has been studied. Some missense mutations (e.g., N345K and C420R), while also infrequent, transform as efficiently as H1047R or E545K (18). Recently, the short indel PIK3CAdelP447-L455 was identified in a tumor from a patient with an advanced stage ER+/endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer (19). After receiving a combination of alpelisib and the aromatase inhibitor letrozole, the patient exhibited an 11-mo sustained clinical response, a finding which supports the hypothesis that other nonhotspot PIK3CA mutations, including indels, may be sensitive to PI3K-targeted therapies (19). Generally, indels are rare in oncogenes and more frequently occur in tumor suppressors such as TP53 or PTEN, resulting in the functional inactivation of the protein product. However, computational modeling and in vitro experiments demonstrate that because the deleted residues occur in the PIK3CA C2 domain involved in p85 association, PIK3CAdelP447-L455 is oncogenic through the modulation of p85 binding (19). Our results also show that the oncogenicity of PIK3CA-Ct mutants is at least in part dependent on p85 binding (Fig. 2). Of note, the PIK3CA-Ct mutations observed here increase the Ct positive charge via the introduction of R/K residues, as does the H1047R hotspot mutation. We hypothesize that the oncogenicity of PIK3CA-Ct mutants is augmented by the increased local positive charge, which enhances association with the negatively charged inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, thereby increasing the lipid kinase output of the enzyme, similar to what has been reported for PIK3CAH1047R (9, 20).
The identification and characterization of a class of PIK3CA mutations that are sensitive to the FDA-approved, p110α-selective inhibitor alpelisib is timely. In an effort to further increase the selectivity of PI3K inhibitors, many next-generation inhibitors are being designed to selectively target cancer-associated mutant p110α proteins such as PIK3CAH1047R. We do not predict that tumors characterized by PIK3CA-Ct mutations would demonstrate enhanced sensitivity to inhibitors targeting these well-characterized PIK3CA mutations. However, these data suggest that an inhibitor designed to target p110 association with the plasma membrane may exhibit increased efficacy in tumors characterized by this unique class of PIK3CA mutations. Lastly, the data presented here suggest opportunities for the preclinical testing of combination therapies; CyclinD/CDK4/6 or BRCA2 alteration frequently co-occur in breast tumors characterized by PIK3CA-Ct mutations. Thus, it is appropriate to investigate whether patients with breast tumors characterized by these actionable genomic alterations may benefit from combination CDK4/6 or PARP inhibition with alpelisib, as has been evaluated for breast tumors characterized by hotspot PIK3CA mutation.
Materials and Methods
Cell Lines and Inhibitors.
HA-PIK3CA overexpressing p110α−/−; p110β−/− knockout MEFs were generated as previously described (15). HMEC-derived cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Media (DMEM) /F12 supplemented with 0.01 μg/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF), 10 μg/mL insulin, 0.025 μg/mL hydrocortisone, 1 ng/mL cholera toxin, 0.6% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin (pen-strep) and MEFs maintained in DMEM + 10% FBS and 1% pen-strep, each at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Pictilisib, alpelisib, and AZD6482 were purchased from Selleck.
Plasmids.
PIK3CA C-terminal insertion mutants were generated using a two-step site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent) into the wild-type pBabe HA-PIK3CA vector (16). Site-directed mutagenesis was first used to introduce nucleotides from the endogenous Homo sapiens PIK3CA open reading frame (ORF) immediately downstream of the PIK3CA stop codon, to produce pBabe HA-PIK3CA+CT. Point mutations introducing the described nucleotide insertions that occur in the PIK3CA ORF were then generated in the pBabe HA-PIK3CA+CT vector. Plasmids were sequence verified, packaged into retroviral particles, and used to generate stable MEF and HMEC cell lines.
Animal Xenograft Models and In Vivo Treatment Studies.
A total of 4 × 106 HMEC cells were resuspended in 40% Matrigel (BD) and injected into the third mammary fat pads of athymic nude mice and palpable tumors were measured every 3 d. For the PI3K-inhibitor studies, tumors originating in donor mice were harvested and fragments implanted into the third mammary fat pads of recipient athymic nude mice. Where applicable, alpelisib was reconstituted in 0.5% methylcellulose (Sigma) and administered by oral gavage (45 mg/kg) once daily for at least 7 d prior to tumor isolation and preparation. Tumors were isolated and prepared within 3 h of treatment. All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School (HMS).
Immunohistochemistry.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) prepared tumors were sectioned (HMS Rodent Histopathology Core) and mounted. Immunohistochemical staining was performed using a sodium citrate antigen retrieval method (Boston BioProducts). Slides were blocked and incubated in primary antibody overnight (4 °C): AKTS473 (CST 4060), HER2 (Origene UM500036), pS6 (CST 5364), and Ki67 (Vector VP-RM04). Antibody signal was detected using biotinylated secondary antibody, 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) developed (Vector Labs), and counterstained with hematoxylin (Vector Labs). Sections were mounted and imaged (Nikon Eclipse E600).
Cell/Tissue Lysis, Immunoblotting, and Immunoprecipitation.
Cells were lysed in immunoprecipitation buffer (20 mM Tris HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% Nonidet P-40), supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Tissue was homogenized by mixing with lysis buffer with beads and pulsing in a tissue homogenizer (BioRuptor). Cell and tissue lysates were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS/PAGE). Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and blocked in tris buffered saline containing tween-20 (TBST) + 5% milk and proteins of interest were visualized after primary and secondary antibody incubation (Odyssey, Li-Cor). Primary antibodies were as follows: AKT (9272), AKTT308 (13038), AKTS473 (9271), HA (2367), p110α (4249), p110β (3011), HER2 (4290), S6 (2217), S6S240/44 (2215) (CST), p85α (MABS831), and β-actin (MAB1501) (Millipore). For immunoprecipitations, lysates and antibodies were incubated and then conjugated to Protein A/G beads (Invitrogen). Beads were washed and associated proteins separated by SDS/PAGE.
Transformation Assays.
For cell proliferation assays, 14,000 MEFs were initially seeded in 6-well dishes and counted every 3 d, at which time 14,000 cells were reseeded. At the end of the experiment, the total cell numbers were calculated. A total of 4,500 MEFs were seeded in 12-well dishes for focus formation assays and media changed every 3 d. After 2 wk, cells were fixed and crystal violet stained. Crystal violet was quantified by destaining in MeOH and measuring the OD590. Anchorage independent growth was measured by seeding 4,500 HMEC cells in 12-well plates in a solution of 0.3% agar in HMEC media on top of a base layer of 0.6% agar in DMEM. Images of unstained colonies were taken (Nikon) and plates were then stained with 0.5 mg/mL iodonitrotetrazolium chloride (Sigma) and images collected (Alpha Innotech).
Patient Data.
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation-based libraries of n = 219,861 consecutive and research-consented solid-tumor patient specimens using the FoundationOne and FoundationOne CDx platforms, as previously described (21). All tumors characterized by genomic PIK3CA C-terminal frameshift insertions and deletions within or after amino acid Q1064 were deidentified and included in this dataset. The prevalence and identity of additional PI3K pathway alterations were also provided for the solid tumor cohort. The complete genomic profiles for breast tumors which met the above selection criteria were provided.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We apologize to the colleagues whose impactful work we were unable to cite due to space limitations. We thank Drs. Heilmann, Bergholz-Villafane, and Ni for technical advice. This study was supported in part by grants from the NIH (K99 CA204601-01A1 to J.M.S.) and SU2C (SU2C-AACR-DT0209 to T.M.R. and J.J.Z.).
Footnotes
Competing interest statement: T.M.R. has a consulting relationship with Novartis and iKang, is a founder of Crimson Biotech and Geode Therapeutics, and is a member of the corporate boards of Crimson Biotech and Geode Therapeutics. J.J.Z. is a founder and board director of Crimson Biotech and Geode Therapeutics. D.C.P. is an employee of Foundation Medicine and has equity interest in F. Hoffman-La Roche AG.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2000060117/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability.
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study, along with protocols, are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials. Reagents and additional information are available upon request.
References
- 1.Thorpe L. M., Yuzugullu H., Zhao J. J., PI3K in cancer: Divergent roles of isoforms, modes of activation and therapeutic targeting. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 7–24 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dogruluk T. et al., Identification of variant-specific functions of PIK3CA by rapid phenotyping of rare mutations. Cancer Res. 75, 5341–5354 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhang Y. et al., A pan-cancer proteogenomic atlas of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway alterations. Cancer Cell 31, 820–832.e3 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bader A. G., Kang S., Vogt P. K., Cancer-specific mutations in PIK3CA are oncogenic in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 1475–1479 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhao J. J. et al., The oncogenic properties of mutant p110alpha and p110beta phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases in human mammary epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 18443–18448 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang C. H. et al., The structure of a human p110alpha/p85alpha complex elucidates the effects of oncogenic PI3Kalpha mutations. Science 318, 1744–1748 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhao L., Vogt P. K., Helical domain and kinase domain mutations in p110alpha of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase induce gain of function by different mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 2652–2657 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Miled N. et al., Mechanism of two classes of cancer mutations in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase catalytic subunit. Science 317, 239–242 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gkeka P. et al., Investigating the structure and dynamics of the PIK3CA wild-type and H1047R oncogenic mutant. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003895 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mandelker D. et al., A frequent kinase domain mutation that changes the interaction between PI3Kalpha and the membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 16996–17001 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fritsch C. et al., Characterization of the novel and specific PI3Kα inhibitor NVP-BYL719 and development of the patient stratification strategy for clinical trials. Mol. Cancer Ther. 13, 1117–1129 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu P. et al., Oncogenic PIK3CA-driven mammary tumors frequently recur via PI3K pathway-dependent and PI3K pathway-independent mechanisms. Nat. Med. 17, 1116–1120 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.André F. et al.; SOLAR-1 Study Group , Alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1929–1940 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tate J. G. et al., COSMIC: The catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D941–D947 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cizmecioglu O., Ni J., Xie S., Zhao J. J., Roberts T. M., Rac1-mediated membrane raft localization of PI3K/p110β is required for its activation by GPCRs or PTEN loss. eLife 5, e17635 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhao J. J. et al., The p110alpha isoform of PI3K is essential for proper growth factor signaling and oncogenic transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 16296–16300 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhao L., Vogt P. K., Hot-spot mutations in p110alpha of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (pI3K): Differential interactions with the regulatory subunit p85 and with RAS. Cell Cycle 9, 596–600 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gymnopoulos M., Elsliger M. A., Vogt P. K., Rare cancer-specific mutations in PIK3CA show gain of function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 5569–5574 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Croessmann S. et al., PIK3CA C2 domain deletions hyperactivate phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), generate oncogene dependence and are exquisitely sensitive to PI3Kalpha inhibitors. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 1426–1435 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Samuels Y. et al., High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 304, 554 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Frampton G. M., et al. , Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nature Biotechnology, 1023–1031, 10.1038/nbt.2696 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study, along with protocols, are available within the article and/or its supplementary materials. Reagents and additional information are available upon request.