Skip to main content
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment logoLink to Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
. 2020 Oct 1;19:1533033820957622. doi: 10.1177/1533033820957622

Comprehensive Characterization of Circular RNAs in Neuroblastoma Cell Lines

Li Zhang 1,2,3,*, Hangyu Zhou 4,*, Jing Li 5,*, Xinyu Wang 1,2, Xin Zhang 1,2, Tieliu Shi 6,, Guoshuang Feng 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7533920  PMID: 33000697

Abstract

Neuroblastoma (NB) is a rare type of cancer but frequently occurred in children. However, it is still unclear whether circular RNAs (circRNAs) play key roles in NB tumorigenesis or progression. In this study, we identified 39,022 circRNAs across the 39 neuroblastoma and 2 normal cell lines. With the gene and circRNA expression data, we classified the NB cell lines, identified and characterized the functional circRNAs in the 3 NB classes. Specifically, 29 circRNAs were found to be dysregulated in the NB classes. Notably, 7 circRNAs located within MYCN-amplified regions were upregulated in cell lines with the high activities of MYC targets and MYCN amplification, and were highly correlated with expression of their parental gene, NBAS. Subsequently, we constructed ceRNA networks for the functional circRNAs. Specifically, hsa_circ_0005379 was identified as a critical regulator in the ceRNA networks because of targeting 13 genes, which formed a complex competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network. Moreover, hsa_circ_0002343, which was connected with few genes, might regulate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling via RAC1. Furthermore, 3 genes, including NOTCH2, SERPINH1, and LAMC1, involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) were observed to connect with hsa_circ_0001361, suggesting that this circRNA was closely associated with EMT. Consequently, 7 genes, such as DAD1, PPIA, NOTCH2, PGK1, BUB1, EIF2S1, and TCF7L2, were found to be closely associated with both event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). In conclusion, the present study identified functional circRNAs and predicted their functionality in neuroblastoma cell lines, which not only improved the understanding of circRNAs in neuroblastoma, but also provided the evidences for the related researchers.

Keywords: neuroblastoma (NB), circular RNAs, cell lines, competing endogenous RNA network, epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT)

Introduction

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common solid tumor in childhood, which can be diagnosed using a combination of laboratory tests, radiographic imaging and pathology.1 Several genetic alterations have been discovered in neuroblastoma cells,2 including MYCN amplification, 11q loss of heterogeneity (LOH) or deletion, 1p loss, and point mutations in ALK and ATRX, which indicated an unfavorable prognosis. The recent advances in the molecular mechanism reveal that the initiation of NB may be caused by the somatic mutations during the embryonic development period, the frequency of which is relatively lower in NB than adult cancers.3

In the past decade, more and more evidences show that noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) can mediate cellular processes including chromatin remodeling, transcription, post-transcriptional modifications and signal transduction,4 which improved our understanding that ncRNAs can act as functional regulatory molecules. Specifically, miR-204 was identified as a tumor suppressor microRNA (miRNA) that inhibited a subnetwork of oncogenes strongly associated with MYCN-amplified NB and poor outcome.5 Moreover, several miRNAs such as microRNA-497, microRNA-34a, and miR-125b-1-3p were also identified to be involved in NB tumorigenesis or progression.6-9 Unlike the small size of miRNAs, the long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) were also found to drive NB tumorigenesis. For example, 2 lncRNAs located within 6p22 loci, CASC15 and NBAT1, were reported to act as tumor suppressors in NB.10,11 Specifically, NBAT-1 controls neuroblastoma progression by regulating cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation.11 However, the role of circular RNAs (circRNAs) in neuroblastoma is still unclear. In the present study, we for the first time detected the circular RNAs using RNA sequencing data, and investigated their associations with cancer-related pathways in NB. With the competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) hypothesis, we identified circRNAs that potentially acted as ceRNAs and the mediating downstream pathways in NB, which provided circRNA evidences for related researchers.

Materials and Methods

Identification and Quantification of Circular RNAs in Neuroblastoma by RNA-Seq Data

The RNA-seq data of 39 neuroblastoma and 2 normal cell lines were downloaded from Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database with accession number SRP092413.12 The 2 normal cell lines including hTERT-immortalized retinal pigmented epithelial cell line, RPE-1 (n = 1) and fetal brain (n = 1), were used as the normal control. The fastq files were aligned to human UCSC hg19 reference genome by BWA13 0.7.12, and the circRNAs were identified by CIRI14 v2.0. The read counts supporting the junction sites of the circRNAs were used as the expression levels of the circRNAs.

Gene Expression Quantification

The gene expression levels were estimated by hisat-stringtie-ballgown pipeline as proposed by previous study.15 The abundances of the genes were quantified as Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million (FPKM), and transformed to log2 (FPKM + 1).

Estimation of Pathway Activity

The cancer-related hallmark pathways were collected from the MSigDB16 database. Pathway activities were estimated based on the log2 transformed gene expression data by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis17 (ssGSEA).

CircRNA Differential Expression Analysis

The circRNAs detected in less than 10 cell lines were considered as lowly expressed and filtered. The DESeq2 method18 was employed to identify the differentially expressed circRNAs based on the count-based expression matrix.

Predicting miRNA Targets

The miRNA-mRNA interactions were downloaded from the public database,19 miRTarBase, which curated experimentally validated miRNA binding sites of mRNAs. The miRNA binding sites for circRNAs were predicted by miRanda20 with default options.

Survival Analysis

The survival analysis was implemented in R with package survival. The Sequencing Quality Control (SEQC) neuroblastoma gene expression data were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database with accession number GSE49711.21 The samples were stratified into high and low expression groups. The log rank test was used to test the survival difference between the 2 groups.

Results

Identification of Circular RNAs in Neuroblastoma Cell Lines

We collected RNA sequencing data of 39 neuroblastoma (NB) and 2 normal cell lines from publicly available dataset with SRA accession number SRP092413, the cDNA libraries of which were constructed by Ribo-Zero technology, allowing us to identify the circular RNAs in these samples. Totally, we identified 39,022 circRNAs across the 41 samples (read count > 1), and found 2 circRNA hotspots at 2p and 14q (Figure 1A). Particularly, the circRNAs located within the hotspot at 2p were originated from the genes adjacent to MYCN, a well-recognized oncogene amplified in NB, suggesting that frequent detection of these circRNAs might be resulted from the MYCN amplification.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The overview of the circRNAs in neuroblastoma cell lines. (A) The genome-wide visualization of circRNAs identified by RNA-seq. The bars present the number of circRNAs located within this region. (B) The number of circRNAs per million bases (MBases) on the chromosomes. The circRNA count was normalized by dividing their chromosome length. (C) The proportion of exonic, intronic, and intergenic circRNAs. (D) The expression levels of circRNAs and their parental genes.

The normalization of circRNA counts by the chromosome length revealed circRNAs might be more frequently transcribed from the chromosomes 17, 19, 2, 12, and 14, and rarely transcribed from chromosomes Y, X, 4, 21, and 13 (Figure 1B). When annotated by gene models, the circRNAs were found to be principally originated from exonic regions (84.69%), followed by intronic and intergenic regions (Figure 1C). Furthermore, we also investigated whether the circRNA expression was affected by their host genes. Overall, correlation between the expression medians of circRNAs and their host genes was insignificant (Figure 1D), suggesting that circRNA expression was regulated by multiple processes, not only transcription.

Identification of Functional circRNAs Involved in Neuroblastoma

To identify the functional circRNAs, we first characterized the dysregulated pathways for the 39 neuroblastoma (NB) cell lines by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). We observed that the 39 NB cell lines could be clustered into 3 classes by hierarchical clustering analysis (Figure 2A), with 12, 9, 18 cell lines, respectively. Notably, the classes II and III were shown to have higher activities of E2F targets and MYC targets, suggesting that the MYCN amplification might be the major cause of dysregulation of the 3 pathways in these cell lines. However, MYCN amplification was also observed in most of the cell lines, but lower proportion in class I (11/18, 61%). Moreover, Hedgehog signaling was observed upregulated in class I. In addition, the metastasis-related pathways, such as TGF-beta signaling, angiogenesis, and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), were upregulated in class III and a small proportion of cell lines of class I.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Neuroblastoma classes and class-specific pathways and circRNAs. (A) The 3 classes stratified by the pathway activities estimated by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). (B) The class-specific circRNAs by pairwise differential expression analysis.

With the classification for NB cell lines, we conducted pairwise differential expression analysis of the circRNAs stably expressed in the NB cell lines. Totally, 29 circRNAs were found to be dysregulated between the 3 classes (Figure 2B, P-value < 0.001 and fold change >2). Notably, the circRNAs located within MYCN-amplified regions, such as hsa_circ_0003287, hsa_circ_0008083, hsa_circ_0052767, hsa_circ_0000978, hsa_circ_0117720, chr2:15467874|15567918, and hsa_circ_0008261, were upregulated in class II, which were consistent with the high activities of MYC targets in class II. These results suggested that these dysregulated circRNAs might be involved in the tumorigenesis or progression of neuroblastoma.

Parental Genes of the circRNAs Involved in Neuroblastoma

As circRNAs have been found to promote or inhibit transcription of their parental genes,22-25 we first examined their associations with corresponding parental genes. As shown in Figure 3A, all of the functional circRNAs had positive correlation with their parental genes except hsa_circ_0008618. Compared with the insignificant correlation in all circRNAs, the functional circRNAs exhibited high correlation with their parental genes. Remarkably, 7 circRNAs transcribed from NBAS, a neuroblastoma amplified sequence gene adjacent to MYCN, were highly correlated with NBAS expression (Pearson correlation coefficient, PCC > 0.4), further suggesting dysregulation of these circRNAs might be caused by NBAS gene amplification. In addition to NBAS, the remaining circRNAs were not observed to produce circRNA isoforms.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The correlation between circRNAs and parental genes. (A) The Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) between the circRNAs and parental genes were plotted as the nodes. (B) The circRNAs and their mediating pathways predicted by correlation analysis.

Furthermore, the potential signaling pathways that circRNAs were involved in were predicted by the correlation analysis. Given a threshold of 0.5 for the PCCs between circRNAs and pathways, 10 circRNAs were successfully predicted to participate in over 1 pathway (Figure 3B). Particularly, hsa_circ_0002343, hsa_circ_0005379, hsa_circ_0001361, and hsa_circ_0084606 were found correlated with multiple pathways (n > 5). Moreover, hsa_circ_0003611, hsa_circ_0003441, hsa_circ_0000280 were predicted to participate in only 1 pathway, Hedgehog signaling. These results indicated that circRNAs might have multiple biological functions and multiple circRNAs might also be jointly involved in the same pathway. Further analysis revealed that none of the host genes had been found to participate in these pathways, giving us a hint that the circRNAs participated in these pathways not via their parental genes.

The circRNA-Mediated Competing Endogenous RNA Network

As the noncoding RNAs like long noncoding RNAs and circRNAs could act as microRNA sponges to regulate expression of the downstream genes, we then searched for the miRNA binding sites of the circRNAs. It should be noted that the miRNA binding sites must cover the 3 bases at the 2 flanks of the junction site. Moreover, the target genes of circRNAs and the circRNAs should participate in the same pathway. Among the functional circRNAs, 4 were predicted to have the potential to compete with the 21 mRNAs for the miRNAs (Figure 4). Particularly, hsa_circ_0005379 was predicted to regulate 13 target genes, which formed a complex competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network. In addition, hsa_circ_0002343 and hsa_circ_0005598 were found to regulate fewer target genes. Specifically, hsa_circ_0002343 might regulate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling via RAC1. The pathways like MYC targets and mTORC signaling were frequently predicted to be regulated by the ceRNA network. Furthermore, 3 genes involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) were observed to connect with hsa_circ_0001361, suggesting that this circRNA was closely associated with EMT.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network. The color bands connected the circRNA-mRNA and mRNA-pathway relationships.

The Prognostic Values of the circRNA Targets in Neuroblastoma

The target genes in the ceRNA network were subjected to the univariable Cox regression analysis based on the gene expression data from Sequencing Quality Control (SEQC)26 (Sequencing Quality Control) cohort (n = 498). Remarkably, 12 of the 21 target genes were observed highly correlated with both event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) (Figure 5A and B, P-value < 0.05), of which, NOTCH2 and TCF7L2 were positively correlated with EFS and OS, suggesting that their expression indicated a favorable outcome.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The prognostic values of the circRNA target genes. The circRNA target genes with significant correlation with both event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were displayed in (A) and (B). The Cox models were constructed based on the circRNA target genes, and the samples were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves for the EFS-HR vs. EFS-LR and OS-HR vs. OS-LR were plotted in (C) and (D).

Moreover, a stepwise method was used to select these genes in EFS- and OS-based multivariable Cox models. Specifically, 7 genes, such as DAD1, PPIA, NOTCH2, PGK1, BUB1, EIF2S1, and TCF7L2, were selected for construction of either the EFS- or OS-based Cox model (Supplementary Table S1 and Table 1). Particularly, DAD1, PGK1, BUB1, and TCF7L2 were included in both of the Cox models. The 498 samples were then stratified into high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups based on the risk scores estimated by the EFS- or OS-based Cox model. As shown in Figure 5C-D, the EFS-HR and OS-HR groups showed significantly higher risk of poor prognosis than the EFS-LR and OS-LR groups (log-rank test, P < 0.0001), respectively. These results indicated that the target genes mediated by the circRNAs might be indicators of NB prognosis.

Table 1.

The Coefficients and Statistical Significance of the circRNA Target Genes in Event-Free Survival and Overall Survival Based Multivariable Cox Models.

Gene symbol Event-free survival Overall survival
coef exp(coef) se(coef) z Pr(>|z|) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z Pr(>|z|)
DAD1 0.52 1.67 0.19 2.70 6.98E-03 0.62 1.85 0.26 2.40 1.66E-02
PPIA 0.31 1.37 0.20 1.57 1.16E-01 / / / / /
NOTCH2 / / / / / −0.33 0.72 0.23 −1.46 1.45E-01
PGK1 0.55 1.73 0.21 2.63 8.47E-03 1.26 3.52 0.36 3.48 5.11E-04
BUB1 0.67 1.95 0.19 3.55 3.85E-04 1.31 3.69 0.30 4.33 1.47E-05
EIF2S1 / / / / / 0.61 1.84 0.26 2.32 2.02E-02
TCF7L2 −0.30 0.74 0.17 −1.75 8.02E-02 −0.41 0.67 0.25 −1.61 1.08E-01

Discussion

Neuroblastoma (NB) is a rare type of cancer but frequently occurred in children. The circRNAs are implicated in cancers; however, it is still unclear whether circRNAs play key roles in NB tumorigenesis or progression.

In this study, we identified 39,022 circRNAs across the 39 neuroblastoma and 2 normal cell lines (read count > 1). Particularly, the circRNAs located within the hotspot at 2p were originated from the genes adjacent to MYCN, a well-recognized oncogene amplified in NB, suggesting that frequent detection of these circRNAs might be resulted from the MYCN amplification. With the gene and circRNA expression data, we attempted to classify the NB cell lines, identify and characterize the functional circRNAs. Specifically, 29 circRNAs were found to be dysregulated in NB. Notably, the circRNAs located within MYCN-amplified regions, such as hsa_circ_0003287, hsa_circ_0008083, hsa_circ_0052767, hsa_circ_0000978, hsa_circ_0117720, chr2:15467874|15567918, and hsa_circ_0008261, were upregulated in cell lines with the high activities of MYC targets and MYCN amplification. The ncRNAs transcribed from the copy number alteration (CNA) regions were frequently reported as cancer drivers.27,28 Similarly, the 7 circRNAs within MYCN region might also have the potential to drive NB initiation.

As circRNAs have been found to promote or inhibit transcription of their parental genes,22-25 we found the functional circRNAs had positive correlation with their parental genes. Consistently, the 7 circRNAs located within MYCN-amplified regions were transcribed from NBAS, a neuroblastoma amplified sequence gene adjacent to MYCN, and were highly correlated with NBAS expression (Pearson correlation coefficient, PCC > 0.4). NBAS was also identified as an unfavorable indicator of NB due to its co-amplification with MYCN,29 but its functionality in NB is not quite clear. Based on the correlation analysis of the circRNAs and pathway activities, we found that none of the parental genes was involved in the pathway highly correlated with circRNAs, giving us a hint that the circRNAs participated in these pathways not via their parental genes. Subsequently, we constructed ceRNA networks for the functional circRNAs. Specifically, hsa_circ_0005379 was identified as a critical regulator in the ceRNA networks because of targeting 13 genes, which formed a complex competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network. Moreover, hsa_circ_0002343, which was connected with few genes, might regulate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling via RAC1. RAC1 and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling played key roles in neuroblastoma.30,31 Furthermore, 3 genes involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) were observed to connect with hsa_circ_0001361, suggesting that this circRNA was closely associated with EMT. Furthermore, EMT was mediated by Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) via PI3K/Akt signaling in neuroblastoma.32 Similarly, we speculated that EMT might be mediated by hsa_circ_0001361 via NOTCH2, SERPINH1, and LAMC1.

As the lack of circRNA expression data with long-term follow-up, we indirectly investigated the prognostic values of the target genes instead of the functional circRNAs. Seven genes, such as DAD1, PPIA, NOTCH2, PGK1, BUB1, EIF2S1, and TCF7L2, were found to be closely associated with both EFS and OS. Functionally, genes such as NOTCH2, PGK1, and BUB1 have been reported to promote or suppress the neuroblastoma progression.33-35 Prognostically, PGK1 was identified as a predictor of neuroblastoma outcome.36

In conclusion, the present study identified functional circRNAs and predicted their functionality in neuroblastoma cell lines, which not only improved the understanding of circRNAs in neuroblastoma, but also provided the evidences for the related researchers.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Table_S1 - Comprehensive Characterization of Circular RNAs in Neuroblastoma Cell Lines

Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Table_S1 for Comprehensive Characterization of Circular RNAs in Neuroblastoma Cell Lines by Li Zhang, Hangyu Zhou, Jing Li, Xinyu Wang, Xin Zhang, Tieliu Shi and Guoshuang Feng in Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment

Abbreviations

NB

Neuroblastoma

circRNA

circular RNAs

EMT

epithelial mesenchymal transition

ceRNA

competing endogenous RNA

EFS

event-free survival

OS

overall survival

FPKM

Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million

ssGSEA

single-sample gene set enrichment analysis

SEQC

Sequencing Quality Control

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Beihang University & Capital Medical University Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine Plan (BHME-201801).

Supplemental Material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1. Matthay KK, Maris JM, Schleiermacher G, et al. Neuroblastoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2(1):16078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Pugh TJ, Morozova O, Attiyeh EF, et al. The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma. Nat Genet. 2013;45(3):279–284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cheung NK, Dyer MA. Neuroblastoma: developmental biology, cancer genomics and immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(6):397–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Anastasiadou E, Jacob LS, Slack FJ. Non-coding RNA networks in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(1):5–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ooi CY, Carter DR, Liu B, et al. Network modeling of microRNA-mRNA interactions in neuroblastoma tumorigenesis identifies miR-204 as a Direct Inhibitor of MYCN. Cancer Res. 2018;78(12):3122–3134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Leichter AL, Sullivan MJ, Eccles MR, Chatterjee A. MicroRNA expression patterns and signalling pathways in the development and progression of childhood solid tumours. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ayers D, Mestdagh P, Van Maerken T, Vandesompele J. Identification of miRNAs contributing to neuroblastoma chemoresistance. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015;13:307–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Creevey L, Ryan J, Harvey H, et al. MicroRNA-497 increases apoptosis in MYCN amplified neuroblastoma cells by targeting the key cell cycle regulator WEE1. Mol Cancer. 2013;12(1):23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Welch C, Chen Y, Stallings RL. MicroRNA-34a functions as a potential tumor suppressor by inducing apoptosis in neuroblastoma cells. Oncogene. 2007;26(34):5017–5022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mondal T, Juvvuna PK, Kirkeby A, et al. Sense-antisense lncRNA pair encoded by locus 6p22.3 determines neuroblastoma susceptibility via the USP36-CHD7-SOX9 regulatory axis. Cancer Cell. 2018;33(3):417–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Pandey GK, Mitra S, Subhash S, et al. The risk-associated long noncoding RNA NBAT-1 controls neuroblastoma progression by regulating cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation. Cancer Cell. 2014;26(5):722–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Harenza JL, Diamond MA, Adams RN, et al. Transcriptomic profiling of 39 commonly-used neuroblastoma cell lines. Sci Data. 2017;4(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gao Y, Zhang J, Zhao F. Circular RNA identification based on multiple seed matching. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19(5):803–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(9):1650–1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R, Thorvaldsdottir H, Tamayo P, Mesirov JP. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(12):1739–1740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hanzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14(1):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Chou CH, Shrestha S, Yang CD, et al. miRTarBase update 2018: a resource for experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D296–D302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Betel D, Wilson M, Gabow A, Marks DS, Sander C. The microRNA.org resource: targets and expression. Nucleic acids research. 2008;36(Database issue): D149–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Zhang W, Yu Y, Hertwig F, et al. Comparison of RNA-seq and microarray-based models for clinical endpoint prediction. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Kelly S, Greenman C, Cook PR, Papantonis A. Exon Skipping Is Correlated with Exon Circularization. J Mol Biol. 2015;427(15):2414–2417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Li Z, Huang C, Bao C, et al. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(3):256–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ashwal-Fluss R, Meyer M, Pamudurti NR, et al. circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2014;56(1):55–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, et al. Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2013;51(6):792–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Consortium SM-I. A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium. Nat Biotechnol.. 2014;32(9):903–914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Zhang Y, Liao G, Bai J, et al. Identifying cancer driver lncRNAs bridged by functional effectors through integrating multi-omics data in human cancers. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;17:362–373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fu X, Zhu X, Qin F, et al. Linc00210 drives Wnt/beta-catenin signaling activation and liver tumor progression through CTNNBIP1-dependent manner. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 29. Wimmer K, Zhu XX, Lamb BJ, et al. Co-amplification of a novel gene, NAG, with the N-myc gene in neuroblastoma. Oncogene. 1999;18(1):233–238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Mitchell CB, O’Neill GM. Rac GTPase regulation of 3D invasion in neuroblastomas lacking MYCN amplification. Cell Adh Migr. 2017;11(1):68–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Santo EE, Stroeken P, Sluis PV, Koster J, Versteeg R, Westerhout EM. FOXO3a is a major target of inactivation by PI3K/AKT signaling in aggressive neuroblastoma. Cancer Res. 2013;73(7):2189–2198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Tian X, Zhou D, Chen L, et al. Polo-like kinase 4 mediates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in neuroblastoma via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ameis HM, Drenckhan A, Freytag M, et al. Influence of hypoxia-dependent factors on the progression of neuroblastoma. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016;32(2):187–192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Kishida S, Mu P, Miyakawa S, et al. Midkine promotes neuroblastoma through Notch2 signaling. Cancer Res. 2013;73(4):1318–1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. De Preter K, De Brouwer S, Van Maerken T, et al. Meta-mining of neuroblastoma and neuroblast gene expression profiles reveals candidate therapeutic compounds. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(11):3690–3696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ameis HM, Drenckhan A, von Loga K, et al. PGK1 as predictor of CXCR4 expression, bone marrow metastases and survival in neuroblastoma. PLoS One. 2013;8(12): e83701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Table_S1 - Comprehensive Characterization of Circular RNAs in Neuroblastoma Cell Lines

Supplemental Material, Supplementary_Table_S1 for Comprehensive Characterization of Circular RNAs in Neuroblastoma Cell Lines by Li Zhang, Hangyu Zhou, Jing Li, Xinyu Wang, Xin Zhang, Tieliu Shi and Guoshuang Feng in Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment


Articles from Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES