Skip to main content
Sage Choice logoLink to Sage Choice
. 2020 Jun 26;15(7):733–742. doi: 10.1177/1747493020937189

Cerebral ischemic and hemorrhagic complications of coronavirus disease 2019

Ahmad Sweid 1, Batoul Hammoud 2, Kimon Bekelis 3, Symeon Missios 3, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris 1, Michael R Gooch 1, Nabeel A Herial 1, Hekmat Zarzour 1, Victor Romo 4, Maureen DePrince 1, Robert H Rosenwasser 1, Pascal Jabbour 1,
PMCID: PMC7534206  PMID: 32501751

Abstract

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 is associated with neurological manifestations including stroke.

Objectives

We present a case series of coronavirus disease 2019 patients from two institutions with acute cerebrovascular pathologies. In addition, we present a pooled analysis of published data on large vessel occlusion in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 and a concise summary of the pathophysiology of acute cerebrovascular disease in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019.

Methods

A retrospective study across two institutions was conducted between 20 March 2020 and 20 May 2020, for patients developing acute cerebrovascular disease and diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019. We performed a literature review using the PubMed search engine.

Results

The total sample size was 22 patients. The mean age was 59.5 years, and 12 patients were female. The cerebrovascular pathologies were 17 cases of acute ischemic stroke, 3 cases of aneurysm rupture, and 2 cases of sinus thrombosis. Of the stroke and sinus thrombosis patients, the mean National Institute of Health Stroke Scale was 13.8 ± 8.0, and 16 (84.2%) patients underwent a mechanical thrombectomy procedure. A favorable thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score was achieved in all patients. Of the 16 patients that underwent a mechanical thrombectomy, the mortality incidence was five (31.3%). Of all patients (22), three (13.6%) patients developed hemorrhagic conversion requiring decompressive surgery. Eleven (50%) patients had a poor functional status (modified Rankin Score 3–6) at discharge, and the total mortality incidence was eight (36.4%).

Conclusions

Despite timely intervention and favorable reperfusion, the mortality rate in coronavirus disease 2019 patients with large vessel occlusion was high in our series and in the pooled analysis. Notable features were younger age group, involvement of both the arterial and venous vasculature, multivessel involvement, and complicated procedures due to the clot consistency and burden.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, cerebrovascular disease, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, angiotensin (1–7), hypercoagulable, stroke, cerebral venous thrombosis, thrombectomy

Introduction

In six months, the number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) cases exceeded six million, with more than 360,000 deaths. The World Health Organization named the disease the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and declared it a pandemic on 11 March 2020.1 Although the lung is the primary affected organ, the virus is neurovirulent and neuroinvasive with a growing recognition of neurological manifestations. The reported incidence of stroke in COVID-19 hospitalized patients is 0.9–2%,2,3 with an increased incidence in the young.4 More important than the increased incidence, is the poor outcome and high mortality rate, even with optimal treatment.5,6 A recent cross-sectional comparative study from New York identified a 7.5-fold higher rate of ischemic stroke in COVID-19 compared to influenza.3

In the current pandemic situation, a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with COVID-19 and characterization of cerebrovascular pathologies and outcomes is critical not only to estimate the risk but also to guide decision making. We present a case series of COVID-19 patients from two different health systems presenting with acute cerebrovascular pathologies. We also reviewed the literature to present a comprehensive summary of the SARS-CoV-2-induced factors that are associated with acute cerebrovascular pathologies. In addition, we performed a pooled analysis of published data on large vessel occlusion strokes in the setting of COVID-19.

Methods

Study design

Institutional review board of Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (12D:534) approved the study protocol and waived the need for informed consent. A retrospective analysis was conducted across two institutions between 20 March and 20 May 2020. Twenty-two patients were identified with the diagnosis of acute cerebrovascular disease and COVID-19 infection. Medical charts were queried for baseline patient characteristics (age, gender), comorbidities (heart disease, lung disease, liver disease, kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, and diabetes mellitus), COVID-19 symptoms (fever, cough, pneumonia), duration between COVID-19 symptoms and the neurological manifestation, cerebrovascular insult (aneurysm rupture, intracranial hemorrhage, and stroke), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at presentation, procedure detail (duration from the sheath into sheath out and thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) score, laboratory results, and mortality.

Additionally, total ischemic stroke admissions, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures, and telestroke consults during the period between 15 March and 30 April 2020 were compared to the mean cases of the previous three years (15 March–30 April 2017, 2018, 2019) at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in one of the institutions, which is a tertiary telestroke referral network.

Lastly, using the PubMed search engine, we performed a literature search on 3 May 2020 with no time limitations for all articles in English, using different combinations of the terms Coronavirus, COVID, SARS-CoV-2, ACE2, stroke, and large vessel occlusion. Abstracts were screened to determine if the study matched our requirements. Then the full-text was read indepth, to determine the correlation between viral infection and stroke, and outcomes of ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the setting of COVID-19. We excluded manuscripts that had grouped transient ischemic attack, small vessel occlusion or hemorrhagic stroke with LVO, as it was not possible to identify the details for patients with LVO.

Variables collected for pooled analysis included number of LVO cases, mean age, male gender, NIHSS at admission, number of involved vessels, MT treatment, usage of Solumbra technique (aspiration with retriever), number of attempts to retrieve the clot, TICI 2B/3, symptomatic ischemic or hemorrhagic complications, and mortality.

Results

The total sample size was 22 patients. The mean age was 59.5 ± 16.0 years, and 12 patients were female (54.4%). Twelve (54.4%) of the patients had no significant prior medical history. Ten patients (45.5%) had a cerebrovascular event as the initial manifestation of COVID-19. For patients who were symptomatic of COVID-19, the duration from symptom onset and neurological manifestation was 8.8 ± 4.4 days. The cerebrovascular pathologies were 17 cases of acute ischemic stroke, 3 cases of aneurysm rupture, and 2 cases of sinus thrombosis. Of the stroke and sinus thrombosis patients, the mean NIHSS was 13.8 ± 8.0, and 16 (84.2%) patients underwent a MT procedure within 6 h of symptom onset. Of the 16 patients who underwent MT, 13/16 (81.2%) patients received general endotracheal anesthesia. A Solumbra technique, aspiration plus stentriever, was used in 13/16 (81.2%) to retrieve the clot completely. The mean number of passes was 2.1, and the average procedure duration from groin access to achieving final TICI score was 42.2 ± 36.3 min. Of note, 3/16 (18.8%) of all patients required intracranial stenting as a rescue measure to maintain the vessel patency. A favorable TICI score (≥2B/3) was achieved in all patients. The mortality incidence was 5/16 (31.3%). Of all patients (22), three (13.6%) patients developed hemorrhagic conversion requiring decompressive surgery. Eleven patients (50%) had poor functional status (mRS 3–6) at discharge, and the total mortality incidence was eight (36.3%) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographics, procedure details, outcomes, and laboratory findings

Variables Mean ± standard deviation; N (%)
Age (years) 59.5 ± 16.0
Female gender 12 (55.5)
Comorbidities
 Hypertension 10 (45.0)
 Chronic heart disease 3 (13.6)
 Chronic lung disease 0 (0.0)
 Chronic kidney disease 1 (4.5)
 Chronic liver disease 0 (0.0)
 Diabetes mellitus 2 (9.1)
 Atrial fibrillation 3 (13.6)
 No comorbidities 12 (54.4)
COVID-19 characteristics
 Neurological insult as initial  manifestation of COVID-19 10 (45.5)
 Duration between COVID-19  symptoms and neurological  insults (days) 8.8 ± 4.4
 Fever 11 (50.0)
 Cough 11 (50.0)
 Pneumonia 9 (40.9)
Cerebrovascular insult
 Hemorrhagic stroke 3 (13.6)
 Ischemic stroke 19 (86.4)
Hemorrhagic stroke characteristics and outcomes
 5.0 mm dissecting PICA aneurysm HH3, flow diversion
 15 mm PCOM aneurysm HH4, clipped
 1.4 mm anterior choroidal  artery aneurysm HH1, flow diversion
Ischemic stroke characteristics and outcomes
 Involved vessels 1.4 ± 0.7
  ICA 3 (15.8)
  M1 11 (57.9)
  M2 1 (5.3)
  Absent LVO 2 (10.5)
  CVT 2 (10.5)
 NIHSS at admission 13.8 ± 8.0
 Onset to groin access (min) 272.2 ± 169.5
 Mechanical thrombectomy 16 (84.2)
  General endotracheal anesthesia 13 (81.3)
  MT technique
   Contact aspiration 2 (12.5)
   Stent retriever 1 (6.25)
   Contact aspiration    + stent retriever 13 (81.3)
  Procedure duration (min) 42.2 ± 36.3
  Number of passes 2.1 ± 1.3
  Rescue stenting 3 (18.8)
  TICI 2B/3 16 (100)
 Symptomatic intracerebral  hemorrhage 3 (13.6)
Laboratory findings
 CRP (mg/dl) 20.8 ± 37.9
 D-dimer (ng/dl) 3497.4 ± 6754.3
 Fibrinogen (mg/dl) 329.5 ± 235.4
 Interleukin-6 (pg/dl) 41.6 ± 62.0
Outcomes at discharge
 mRS 3–6 11 (50)
 Mortality 8 (36.4)

COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; CRP: C-Reactive Protein; CVT: Cerebral Venous Thrombosis; ICA: Internal Carotid Artery; LVO: Large Vessel Occlusion; MT: mechanical thrombectomy; NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; PCOM: Posterior Cerebral Communicating Artery; PICA: Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery; TICI: thrombolysis in cerebral infarction.

Laboratory studies showed an elevated D-dimer (3497.4 ± 6754.3 ng/dl), CRP (20.8 ± 37.9 mg/dl), and IL-6 (41.6 ± 62.0 pg/dl).

Vital stroke metrics across a tertiary telestroke network demonstrated a significant decline in AIS admissions by 23% (p = 0.001) and telestroke consults by 48% (p = 0.001) compared to a similar period in previous years. Conversely, MT procedures showed a non-significant increase by 50% (p = 0.112) during the same period (Table 2).

Table 2.

Frequency of telestroke consults, acute ischemic stroke admissions, and MT

Variable Prior years
2020
P-value Percent change
March–April Total March–April Total
Telestroke consults 202 616 106 496 0.001 48
AIS admission 91 219 70 257 0.001 23
MT procedures 16 31 24 69 0.112 50

AIS: Acute Ischemic Stroke; MT: mechanical thrombectomy.

Bold values indicate significant value (p < 0.05).

The result of the pooled analysis of ischemic stroke due to LVO data is presented in Table 3. In summary, the total sample size was 39 patients. The mean age was 59.4 years with 26 (66.7%) males. The NIHSS at admission was 19.0 with an average of 1.5 involved vessels. 89.7% of the patients underwent MT with the majority (85%) using a Solumbra technique. On average, 2.3 attempts were required to retrieve the clot with 77.1% of cases achieving TICI 2B/3. Notably the complication rate was 15.4%, and the mortality rate was 45.9%.

Table 3.

Pooled analysis: patient characteristics, treatment details, complications, and mortality for patients with LVO in the setting of COVID-19

No. of patients Mean age Male NIHSS Involved vessels MT treatment Solumbra No. of attempts TICI 2b/3 Complications Mortality
Wang et al.5 5 52.8 4 22.8 2.2 5 4 2.8 3 0 3
Escalard et al.7 10 59.5 8 22 1.5 10 NA 3.5 9 4 6
Valderrama et al.8 1 52 1 NA 3 1 NA NA 0 0 0
Avula et al.9 3 78.7 1 26 1.5 0 NA NA NA 0 3
Oxley et al.4 5 40.4 4 16.8 1 4 NA NA NA 0 0a
Current series 15 64.6 8 15.1 1.4 15 13 1.4 15 2 5
Total n 26 35 17 27 6 17
Total N 39.0 39 39.0 38.0 39.0 39.0 20.0 30.0 35.0 39.0 37.0
Percentage/mean 59.4 66.7 19.0 1.5 89.7 85.0 2.3 77.1 15.4 45.9

COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; LVO: Large Vessel Occlusion; MT: mechanical thrombectomy; NIHSS: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; TICI: thrombolysis in cerebral infarction. aTwo patients were still in the hospital.

Discussion

With the paucity of evidence from large cohorts, it is crucial to maintain vigilance in the management of the neurological manifestations of COVID-19, especially for life-threatening pathologies such as AIS.2,4,10 Our data demonstrate multiple critical outcomes that are essential to share. First, the mean age of the patients was 59.5 years, which is lower than historical non-COVID stroke series.11,12 Half of the patients had a stroke as the initial manifestation of COVID-19, and there was a lag period of nine days between COVID-19 symptoms and the cerebrovascular event. Occlusions involved both arterial and venous vasculature (10.5%), and 84.2% of stroke patients had a large vessel occlusion treated with MT. The procedures were complicated due to the clot burden and consistency of the clots. Despite treating all patients within an average of 4.5 h from symptom onset and achieving favorable revascularization outcomes in all stroke patients, mortality reached 31%. Three patients developed hemorrhagic conversion (18.8%), requiring surgical decompression (Figure 1). Inflammatory markers (CRP, IL-6) and d-dimer were elevated, indicating a hypercoagulable state. IL-6 is a potent proinflammatory cytokine and is a marker of the “cytokine storm” seen in patients with COVID-19. The pooled analysis of LVO demonstrated similar outcomes: younger age group (59.5 years), involvement of multiple vessels, complicated MT procedures requiring multiple attempts, high complication rate (15.4%), and a high mortality rate (45.9%). Previous studies have described a similar experience with COVID-19 patients: having a stroke at a younger age, having worse radiographic and clinical outcomes after EVT, multiple vessel occlusion, clot fragility, and high rate of distal embolization with extensive clot burden.3,57

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Fifty-one-year-old male with no past medical concerns developed an acute neurological insult. On admission his NIHSS score was 15, head CT did not show any hemorrhage and tPA was given. The patient underwent a MT procedure within 3 h and 52 min. The patient had a right ICA occlusion from the cervical segment into the supraclinoid segment with a tandem M1 occlusion. The procedure was complicated by ICA re-occlusion and distal embolization occluding the A1. The insult progressed into complete infarct, and the patient passed away three days later. (a) Antero-posterior (AP) digital subtraction angiography (DCA) of a right ICA injection showing complete occlusion at cervical ICA segment; (b) AP DCA view showing an occlusion of the supraclinoid segment of the ICA; (c) AP DCA view showing an M1 occlusion; (d) AP DCA view showing re-occlusion of the cervical ICA segment; (e) AP DCA occlusion of the A1 segment either due to a distal embolization or a dissection; (f) final view showing revascularization of the ICA, M1, and A1 with a TICI 2B result by deploying intracranial and extracranial rescue stents; (g) non-contrast axial view of the brain, day 1 post mechanical thrombectomy showing the progression of the insult into a complete infarct; (h) all the devices in the room are draped; and (i) showing the powered air-purifying respirator used by operators.

The hemorrhagic strokes were due to aneurysm rupture. A PCOM aneurysm (15 mm) ruptured following intense bouts of coughing (Figure 2). The anterior choroidal aneurysm (1.4 mm) ruptured following nine days of sickness due to COVID-19 and nine days post-partum, and the dissecting PICA ruptured following three days of sickness due to COVID-19. It is crucial to modify treatment for patients with cerebrovascular pathologies. Patients undergoing intracranial stent placement may require tighter control of their P2Y12 levels and blood pressure, while patients undergoing thrombectomy may require prolonged observation or aggressive anticoagulation during the time of peak immune response.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Forty-four-year-old male experienced a sudden loss of consciousness following intense bouts of coughing. (a) and (b) He was diagnosed with ruptured 1.5 cm left PCOM aneurysm causing intraventricular, intracerebral, and subdural hemorrhage. (c) Lateral view of a follow-up DCA post-surgical aneurysm reconstruction and decompressive hemicraniectomy showing complete aneurysm obliteration. (d) Axial view of a non-contrast CT head day 1 post op shows decompression of the brain without a midline shift and a 3 cm epidural hematoma. (e) A follow-up non-contrast CT head four days post op showed increasing brain edema with midline shift, extensive bilateral cerebral infarcts with extension of the infarct into the bilateral occipital.

In regards to caseload, we have identified a substantial reduction in total ischemic stroke admissions by 31.8% and telestroke consults by 52.1% compared to previous years, signifying that either the patients are not reporting neurological symptoms due to the fear of the contagion or the stroke incidence has decreased due to other variables. Conversely, MT procedures showed a non-significant increase by 50% during the same period.

It is too early to determine the exact impact of COVID-19 on the incidence of acute cerebrovascular diseases. However, our reported observations provide an opportunity to anticipate and prepare for the challenges in stroke care. The pathophysiology of cerebrovascular disease in COVID-19 patients may be direct or indirect. Direct factors may be related to the SARS-CoV-2 ability to bind to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and reduce its downstream effect. The virus is neuroinvasive and neurovirulent, and has a tropism to endothelial cells and cardiomyocytes.13,14 Indirect factors are mainly due to a systemic process, including a hyperinflammatory response, hypercoagulable state, and coagulopathy (thromboembolic events and microangiopathy) (Figure 3).1519 Additional factors include a prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, which may be associated with hypotension and inadequate cerebral perfusion, stress cardiomyopathy and concomitant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction, and atrial fibrillation.3,20

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(a) and (b) Access route for the SARS-CoV-2 to the CNS via the olfactory route and hematogenous route via direct access or via a Trojan. (c) The hyperinflammatory, hypercoagulable state induced by SARS-CoV-2. (d) The downregulation of ACE2 receptor at the endothelium level. This blocks the conversion of angiotensin I and II into their active metabolites. The decline in Angiotensin (1–7) levels leads to loss of neuroprotective effect and sympathetic hyperactivity. ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; ANG (1–7): angiotensin (1–7); SARS-CoV-2: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

SARS-CoV-2 neurological manifestations

Neurological manifestations caused by the SARS-CoV-2 range from mild symptoms, like anosmia, to severe symptoms, like ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage.2,4,8,2125 Diagnosis and management of neurological complaints may be more challenging in such an uncharted time due to several reasons including staff allocation, lack of hospital beds, delay in patient presentation, delay in imaging acquisition, and the virtual consultations. Mild symptoms may be the tip of the iceberg, and physicians ought to be vigilant as headaches may be a sign of meningitis,26 or hemodynamic alterations, or bradypnea may be a sign of brainstem involvement.27

Neuroinvasion and neurovirulence

Viruses, including coronavirus, can penetrate the central nervous system (CNS) (neuroinvasion), infect neurons and glial cells (neurotropism), and contribute to, or cause neurological disease (neurovirulence).28 Access may be achieved via two main routes: hematogenous or transneuronal through the olfactory bulb.27,29 On the other hand, the hematogenous route involves directly infecting the blood–brain barrier (BBB) or access via a Trojan such as leukocytes.27,30 Human corona virus strains may infect human monocytes/macrophages,31,32 murine dendritic cells expressing the human aminopeptidase N,33 and human endothelial cells of the BBB.30 As for SARS-CoV-2, detection of the virus in the cerebrospinal fluid of COVID-19 patients has been reported in several publications.26,34

ACE2 receptor and angiotensin (1–7) (ANG (1–7))

The second factor that plays a role in the neurological manifestations of SARV-CoV-2 is the ACE2 receptor. ACE2 is a carboxypeptidase that converts angiotensin II into ANG (1–7), which is an essential component of the renin–angiotensin system.35 One of the main sites that ANG (1–7) is synthesized and has a downstream effect on is endothelial cells;36 it stimulates the release of prostaglandin and nitric oxide,37,38 enhances the metabolic actions of bradykinin, and inhibits smooth muscle cell growth.39 Additionally, ANG (1–7) enhances the vagal.40,41 It also induces a decrease in tyrosine hydroxylase expression, the rate-limiting enzyme in catecholamine biosynthesis, decreasing brain catecholaminergic activity; ANG (1–7) is neuroprotective.42 In recent rat models, central administration of ANG-(1–7) reduced neurological deficits and infarct size in ischemic stroke.43,44 Virus-mediated downregulation of ACE2 has been suggested to underlie the pathology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection.45,46 Therefore, binding of SARS-CoV-2 to the ACE2 receptor may similarly inhibit its downstream effect via pathway downregulation or cell lysis, ultimately decreasing ANG (1–7) synthesis. This may counteract its neuroprotective properties and blood pressure autoregulation (increase in sympathetic activity).

Hypercoagulable state

The third component is the hypercoagulable state, caused by the virus-induced cytokine storm. The hyper inflammation phase is characterized by the release of inflammatory markers and a cytokine storm.4752 In retrospective studies, critically ill COVID-19 patients had increased proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-2 and TNF-α4, which can upregulate the coagulation system.2 In a recent Dutch study, there was a 31% incidence of thrombotic complications in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU, mainly consisting of acute pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and systemic arterial embolism.53

Conclusion

Despite timely intervention and favorable reperfusion, the mortality rate in COVID-19 with LVO was high in our series and higher in the pooled analysis. Younger age group, the involvement of both the arterial and venous vasculature, multivessel involvement, and complicated procedures due to the clot consistency and burden are notable features. The virus, through direct and indirect factors, creates a milieu that is proischemic and inhibits neuroprotective factors.

Contributorship

  • Conception or design of the work: AS, SIT, PJ.

  • Data acquisition and analysis: AS.

  • Interpretation of data: AS, MDP, SM, MRG, PJ.

  • Drafting the work: AS, BH, VR, HZ.

  • Revising the work for valuable intellectual content: AS, BH, KB, NAH, RHR, PJ.

  • Final approval of the version: PJ.

Data sharing statement

The relevant anonymized patient-level data are available via request from the authors.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Jabbour is a consultant for Medtronic and MicroVention. Tjoumakaris and Gooch are a consultant for Stryker. The other authors have no personal, financial, or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were per the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Informed consent

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Thomas Jefferson University Institutional Review Board. Following our institutional guidelines, all protected health information was removed, and individual patient consent was not required for the analysis of this case series.

ORCID iD

Pascal Jabbour https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8965-2413

References

  • 1.Bedford J, Enria D, Giesecke J, et al. COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. Lancet 2020; 395: 1015–1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77: 683–690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yaghi S, Ishida K, Torres J, et al. SARS2-CoV-2 and stroke in a New York Healthcare System. Stroke 2020. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oxley TJ, Mocco J, Majidi S, et al. Large-vessel stroke as a presenting feature of covid-19 in the young. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: e60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang A, Mandigo GK, Yim PD, Meyers PM, Lavine SD. Stroke and mechanical thrombectomy in patients with COVID-19: technical observations and patient characteristics. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12(7): 648–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aggarwal G, Lippi G, Michael Henry B. Cerebrovascular disease is associated with an increased disease severity in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a pooled analysis of published literature. Int J Stroke 2020; 15: 385–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Escalard S, Maïer B, Redjem H, et al. Treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion with COVID-19: experience from Paris. Stroke 2020. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030574. . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Valderrama EV, Humbert K, Lord A, Frontera J, Yaghi S. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection and ischemic stroke. Stroke 2020. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Avula A, Nalleballe K, Narula N, et al. COVID-19 presenting as stroke. Brain Behav Immun 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, et al. Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2268–2270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alawieh A, Chatterjee AR, Vargas J, et al. Lessons learned over more than 500 stroke thrombectomies using ADAPT with increasing aspiration catheter size. Neurosurgery 2020; 86: 61–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, et al. Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the ASTER randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 318: 443–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet 2020; 395: 1417–1418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Barnes BJ, Adrover JM, Baxter-Stoltzfus A, et al. Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med 2020, pp. 217(6): e20200652 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lorenzo C, Francesca B, Francesco P, Elena C, Luca S, Paolo S. Acute pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 related hypercoagulability. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2020. 50: 223–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Han H, Yang L, Liu R, et al. Prominent changes in blood coagulation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020; 58(7): 1116–1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tang N, Bai H, Chen X, Gong J, Li D, Sun Z. Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18: 1094–1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Campbell CM, Kahwash R. Will complement inhibition be the new target in treating COVID-19-related systemic thrombosis?. Circulation 2020; 141: 1739–1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tang N, Li D, Wang X, Sun Z. Abnormal coagulation parameters are associated with poor prognosis in patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. J Thromb Haemost 2020; 18: 844–847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Morassi M, Bagatto D, Cobelli M, et al. Stroke in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: case series. J Neurol 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-020-09885-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Beyrouti R, Adams ME, Benjamin L, et al. Characteristics of ischaemic stroke associated with COVID-19. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2020. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Russell B, Moss C, Rigg A, Hopkins C, Papa S, Van Hemelrijck M. Anosmia and ageusia are emerging as symptoms in patients with COVID-19: what does the current evidence say?. Ecancermedicalscience 2020; 14: ed98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Goldberg MF, Goldberg MF, Cerejo R, Tayal AH. Cerebrovascular disease in COVID-19. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hughes C, Nichols T, Pike M, Subbe C, Elghenzai S. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis as a presentation of COVID-19. Eur J Case Rep Intern Med 2020; 7: 001691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Viguier A, Delamarre L, Duplantier J, Olivot JM, Bonneville F. Acute ischemic stroke complicating common carotid artery thrombosis during a severe COVID-19 infection. J Neuroradiol 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurad.2020.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Moriguchi T, Harii N, Goto J, et al. A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-Coronavirus-2. Int J Infect Dis 2020; 94: 55–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Desforges M, Le Coupanec A, Brison E, Meessen-Pinard M, Talbot PJ. Neuroinvasive and neurotropic human respiratory coronaviruses: potential neurovirulent agents in humans. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014; 807: 75–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Giraudon P, Bernard A. Inflammation in neuroviral diseases. J Neural Transm 2010; 117: 899–906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eliezer M, Hautefort C, Hamel A-L, et al. Sudden and complete olfactory loss function as a possible symptom of COVID-19. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Guo Y, Korteweg C, McNutt MA, Gu J. Pathogenetic mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Virus Res 2008; 133: 4–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Desforges M, Miletti TC, Gagnon M, Talbot PJ. Activation of human monocytes after infection by human coronavirus 229E. Virus Res 2007; 130: 228–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Collins AR. In vitro detection of apoptosis in monocytes/macrophages infected with human coronavirus. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2002; 9: 1392–1395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wentworth DE, Tresnan DB, Turner BC, et al. Cells of human aminopeptidase N (CD13) transgenic mice are infected by human coronavirus-229E in vitro, but not in vivo. Virology 2005; 335: 185–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhou L, Zhang M, Wang J, Gao J. Sars-Cov-2: underestimated damage to nervous system. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Turner AJ, Hiscox JA, Hooper NM. ACE2: from vasopeptidase to SARS virus receptor. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004; 25: 291–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hellner K, Walther T, Schubert M, Albrecht D. Angiotensin-(1–7) enhances LTP in the hippocampus through the G-protein-coupled receptor Mas. Mol Cell Neurosci 2005; 29: 427–435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jaiswal N, Diz DI, Chappell MC, Khosla MC, Ferrario CM. Stimulation of endothelial cell prostaglandin production by angiotensin peptides. Characterization of receptors. Hypertension 1992; 19: II49–II55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pörsti I, Bara AT, Busse R, Hecker M. Release of nitric oxide by angiotensin-(1–7) from porcine coronary endothelium: implications for a novel angiotensin receptor. Br J Pharmacol 1994; 111: 652–654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Freeman EJ, Chisolm GM, Ferrario CM, Tallant EA. Angiotensin-(1–7) inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth. Hypertension 1996; 28: 104–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Campagnole-Santos MJ, Diz DI, Santos RA, Khosla MC, Brosnihan KB, Ferrario CM. Cardiovascular effects of angiotensin-(1–7) injected into the dorsal medulla of rats. Am J Physiol 1989; 257: H324–H329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xu P, Sriramula S, Lazartigues E. ACE2/ANG-(1–7)/Mas pathway in the brain: the axis of good. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2011; 300: R804–R817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lopez Verrilli MA, Pirola CJ, Pascual MM, Dominici FP, Turyn D, Gironacci MM. Angiotensin-(1–7) through AT receptors mediates tyrosine hydroxylase degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J Neurochem 2009; 109: 326–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sampaio WO, Nascimento AA, Santos RA. Systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of angiotensin-(1–7) in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003; 284: H1985–H1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mecca AP, Regenhardt RW, O'Connor TE, et al. Cerebroprotection by angiotensin-(1–7) in endothelin-1-induced ischaemic stroke. Exp Physiol 2011; 96: 1084–1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Imai Y, Kuba K, Rao S, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature 2005; 436: 112–116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kuba K, Imai Y, Rao S, et al. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med 2005; 11: 875–879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zheng Y-Y, Ma Y-T, Zhang J-Y, et al. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020; 17: 259–260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Correction to: clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46: 846–848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020; 323: 1061–1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395: 1054–1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395: 497–506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020; 395: 1033–1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Klok FA, Kruip MJHA, van der Meer NJM, et al. Confirmation of the high cumulative incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19: an updated analysis. Thromb Res 2020; 191: 148–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Stroke are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES