Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2020 Oct 5;15(10):e0240122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240122

Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of RTA 408, an activator of Nrf2, in subarachnoid hemorrhage–induced delayed cerebral vasospasm and secondary brain injury

Tai-Hsin Tsai 1,2,3, Szu-Huai Lin 4, Chieh-Hsin Wu 1,2,3, Yi-Cheng Tsai 1,3, Sheau-Fang Yang 5,6, Chih-Lung Lin 1,2,3,*
Editor: Jinglu Ai7
PMCID: PMC7535038  PMID: 33017422

Abstract

Objectives

More and more evidence suggests oxidative stress and inflammation contribute importantly to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-induced cerebral vasospasm and secondary brain injury. Recent evidence indicates Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) increases the expression of antioxidant genes and decreases the expression of pro-inflammatory genes. This study examines the effects of an activator of Nfr2, RTA 408, on SAH-induced cerebral vasospasm and possible mechanism underlying its effect in a two-hemorrhage rodent model of SAH.

Methods

We randomly assigned 60 Sprague-Dawley male rats (350 to 420g) to five groups twelve rats each: one control group (no SAH), one untreated SAH only group and three RTA-408 treatment groups (SAH+ RTA 408 0.5 mg/kg/day, SAH+RTA 408 1 mg/kg/day and a SAH+RTA 408 1.5 mg/kg/day). The treatment groups were administered RTA 408 by intraperitoneal injection thirty min following first induction of SAH for seven days starting with first hemorrhage. Cerebral vasospasm was determined by averaging the cross-sectional areas of basilar artery 7 days after first SAH. Expressions of Nrf2, NF-κB and iNOS in basilar artery and expressions of Nrf2, HO-1, NQO1 and Cleaved caspase-3 were evaluated. Tissue TNF-alpha was assessed by ELISA using the protein sampled from the dentate gyrus, cerebral cortex, and hippocampus.

Results

Prior to perfusion fixation, there were no significant physiological differences among the control and treated groups. RTA 408 treatment attenuated the morphological changes caused by cerebral vasospasm. It mitigated SAH-induced suppression of Nrf2 and increased expression of NF-κB and iNOS in the basilar artery. In dentate gyrus, it reversed SAH-decreases in Nrf2, HO-1, NQO-1 and cleaved caspase-3 and RTA 408 1.5 mg/kg/day reversed SAH increases in TNF-alpha.

Conclusion

It was concluded that RTA 408 reversal vasospasm was achieved via increases in Nrf2 and decreases in NF-κB and iNOS. It exerted a neuron-protection effect by decreasing the apoptosis-related protein cleaved caspase-3 and decreasing the information cytokine TNF-alpha expression, which it achieved by increasing HO-1 and NQO-1 protein found downstream from Nrf2 and Nrf2. We believe that RTA 408 can potentially be used to manage of cerebral vasospasm and secondary brain injury following SAH.

Introduction

Although cerebral vasospasm (CV)-induced delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has been recognized for more than 50 years, its pathophysiology remains unknown, limiting the range of effective treatment strategies [1] Despite advances in the diagnosis and treatment of aneurysmal SAH, CV-induced delayed cerebral ischemia continues to be the leading but potentially treatable cause of death and disability in patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms [2]. Many pathological processes have been proposed as possible mechanisms underlying delayed CV after SAH, including endothelial damage, smooth muscle contraction, changes in vascular responsiveness, and the inflammatory and/or immunological response of the vascular wall [3]. Apoptosis in the vasculature is reported to play a significant role in SAH, and apoptotic cascades may be responsible for vasospasm [4, 5] Therefore, the occurrence of apoptosis after SAH has important implications for both vasospasm and the long-term sequelae of SAH [6]. Furthermore, there is increasing evidence that oxidative stress and inflammation may be the leading causes of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)–induced cerebral vasospasm and secondary brain injury [7].

The transcription factor Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is encoded by the NFE2L2 gene in humans [8, 9]. Nrf2, a basic leucine zipper protein, protects against inflammation and oxidative damage triggered by injury through its regulation of the expression of antioxidant proteins [10]. Antioxidant inflammation modulators (AIMs), including synthetic derivatives of oleanolic acid, have been found to achieve their anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic effects by their activation of Nrf2 and inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activity [10]. AIMs activate Nrf2 by binding to the adaptor protein Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) and blocking its ability to promote Nrf2 degradation [11, 12]. However, when under inflammatory and oxidative stress, activated Nrf2 detaches from Keap1 and moves into the nucleus, there binding to the antioxidant response element [13], a 51-bp DNA element often observed in the promoter region of various genes encoding detoxification enzymes and cytoprotective proteins [14]. Once the Nrf2–ARE signaling pathway is activated, it regulates the expression of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory genes, which translates to cytokines that play a role in antioxidant and anti-inflammatory defense in cells. Newly synthesized Nrf2 collects in the cell nucleus where it exerts antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects by up-regulating antioxidant genes and down-regulating pro-inflammatory genes [15, 16] Nrf2 activation also confers potent anti-inflammatory properties on cells by detoxifying reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in the activation of pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB. Several Nrf2 pathway-stimulating drugs are being investigated as potentially useful in the management of different diseases, including cancer, mitochondrial myopathies, metabolic and neurodegenerative disorders, as well as disorders involving inflammation and oxidative stress [1719].

One recent animal study observed a new second generation semisynthetic oleanane triterpenoid, RTA 408, to activate Nrf2 in rat skin [20, 21]. Several lines of evidence have suggested that RTA 408 possesses antioxidative and anti-inflammatory activities [20, 21] and it has been found able to improve mitochondrial respiration and bioenergetics [22]. The mechanism underlying RTA 408 effects involves combined activation of the antioxidative transcription factor Nrf2 and the inhibition of the pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB, creating an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory phenotype [20].

The role of RTA 408 in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage–induced vasospasm and secondary brain injury has never been studied. The anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of RTA 408 constitute a potential therapeutic strategy in the treatment of oxidative stress and inflammation after SAH. Thus, this study examined the effect that RTA 408 might have on experimentally-induced SAH in rats.

Materials and methods

Animal treatment

All procedures were approved by the Kaohsiung Medical University Animal Care and Use Committee. The animals were purchased from BioLASCO Taiwan Co., Ltd. and individually housed in cages with unlimited access to food and water. Cages were place in a temperature (25°C) and humidity (40–50%)-controlled room with a 12 h light/dark cycle. We randomly assigned 60 Sprague-Dawley male rats (350 to 420g) in one of five groups twelve rats each: a control group (no SAH); 2), an untreated SAH only group and one of three RTA 408 treatment groups SAH+RTA 408 0.5 mg/kg/day, 1 mg/kg/day and 1.5 mg/kg/day. The treatment groups were administered RTA 408 by intraperitoneal injection starting 30 min after the first induction of SAH for 7 days following the first hemorrhage. The RTA-408 was purchased from MedChemExpress (MCE), USA; Cat. No.: HY-12212.

Induction of experimental SAH

A two-hemorrhage rodent model of SAH was adopted in this study. Briefly, under anesthesia and analgesia to minimize pain, the animals were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of 40 mg/kg Zoletil 50® containing a mixture of zolazepam and tiletamine hypochloride (Virbac, Carros, France). The rectal temperature was controlled at 36±1°C with a heating pad (Harvard Apparatus). The tail artery was cannulated with a polyethylene catheter for monitoring blood pressure and heart rate. The cisterna magna was punctured percutaneously with a 25-gauge butterfly needle. About 0.10 to 0.15 ml of cerebrospinal fluid was slowly withdrawn and the junction between the needle and tube was clamped. Fresh autologous, nonheparinized blood (0.3 ml) was withdrawn from the tail artery. Using a needle-in-needle method (inserting a 30-gauge needle into the 25-gauge butterfly needle at the junction of needle and tube), we slowly injected blood into the cisterna magna. The same procedure was repeated 48 hours later. We kept the animals warm using heating pads to avoid burns and thermal bedding during post-surgical recovery. Animals were checked frequently, approximately every 10–15 minutes, and turned side to side until they recovered. Seven days after the first SAH, the animals were deeply anaesthetized before they were euthanized by perfusion and fixation. All rats were humanely euthanized with intraperitoneal injection of Zoletil 50®. The brains were subsequently removed, placed in a fixative solution, and stored at 4°C overnight. We obtained samples of the basilar and brain after intra-cardiac perfusion with normal saline to measure protein contents of Nrf2 and Nrf2 related protein.

Basilar artery morphometric analysis

Tissue morphometric analysis was performed in samples obtained in six animals from each group. The middle third of basilar artery was dissected and cut into thick cross sections (10 μm). They were then placed on glass slides and stained using hematoxylin and cosin for morphometric analysis. We randomly selected four arterial cross-sections from each animal to analyze. These cross-sections were analyzed by computer-assisted morphometry (ImageJ, NIH). ANOVA and the Bonferroni post-hoc test were used to compare groups. A p <0.05 was considered significant.

Western blot analysis of basilar artery Nrf2, NF-κB and iNOS and brain tissue Nrf2, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), NAD(P)H: Quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), and cleaved caspase-3

We randomly selected six rats from each group and collected tissue samples from the basilar artery and brain, including the cortex, hippocampus and dentate gyrus. All samples were homogenized in ice-cold M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo) along with a protease inhibitor (Complete Mini; Roche) and centrifuged 15,000 rpm for 20 min. We measured protein levels by Bio-Rad protein microassay. Briefly, samples were heated in water at boiling for 5 min. Protein samples in equal amounts were loaded onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF; PerkinElmer) membrane electroblotting for 90 min (100V). The membrane was placed a Tween-Tris buffer saline solution (t-TBS; 20mM Tris base, 0.44mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.6) containing 5% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20 overnight at 4°C. The next day the blots were incubated with following primary antibodies at the following dilutions: antibodies against rabbit polyclonal Nrf2 (Proteintech) 1:000, mouse monoclonal NF-κB (Cellsignaling) 1:500, mouse monoclonal iNOS (BD) 1:500, mouse monoclonal HO-1 (Ezno) 1:500, rabbit polyclonal NQO1 (Abcam) 1:1000, rabbit polyclonal cleaved caspase-3 (Cellsignaling) 1:500, and beta-actin (Sigma) 1:20000. They were then rinsed with t-TBS for 30 min and incubated with goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, followed by rinsing with t-TBS for 30 min and incubation with electrochemiluminescence reagent (PerkinElmer) for 2 min, according to manufacturer’s directions.

Measurement of Tumor Neurosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α)

ELISA was performed to assess tissue TNF-α using protein sampled from the cerebral cortex, hippocampus and dentate gyrus of six randomly selected rats in each group. TNF-α was quantified using a commercial kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s directions. Spectrophotometry was used to measure TNF-α, following guidelines for performing the assay. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm.

Statistics

Characteristic data were expressed as mean ± standard error. Images were tested using image assay software: ImageJ, NIH. Experimental group differences were tested using one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post-hoc test by SPSS soft ware. A p <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

General observations

Prior to perfusion, there were no significant differences between the control and treatment groups in body weight, mean arterial blood pressure or heart rate.

RTA 408 reduced SAH-induced basilar artery vasospasm

SAH rats were found to have significantly reduced areas in cross-sections taken from basilar arteries in SAH rats compared to controls (24585.34±4361.925 μm2 vs. (53478.24±5563.646 μm2) (54% reduction; p <0.01) In SAH rats treated with RTA 408 (0.5 mg/kg/day) there was a 41% reduction, compared to controls (31532.49±5716.087 μm2) (p <0.05) (Fig 1). In SAH rats treated with RTA 408 1 mg/kg/day and 1.5 mg/kg/day the areas were measured to be 42256.36±4960.503 μm2 and 50198.01±5835.611 μm2, respectively, significantly different from the untreated SAH rats (p <0.05 and p <0.01, respectively). We found no significant difference between rats treated with 1.5 mg/kg/day of RTA 408 and the controls, suggesting complete reduction.

Fig 1. The anti-spastic effect of RTA 408 of vasospasm of the basilar artery induced by SAH.

Fig 1

Compared with the control group, the areas in the SAH only were reduced by 54% (p <0.01). The cross-sectional areas in the RTA 408 (1 mg/kg/day) treatment group and RTA 408 (1.5 mg/kg/day) treatment group differed significantly from those of the SAH-only group (p <0.05, and p <0.01, respectively). There was no significant difference between the RTA 408 (0.5 mg /kg/day) treatment group and the control group. *p <0.05 and **p <0.01 compared to controls. #p <0.05, and ##p <0.01 compared to SAH only.

RTA 408 up-regulated Nrf2 and down-regulated NF-κB and iNOS in the basilar artery

The SAH group had significantly lower basilar artery levels of Nrf2 protein than the controls (p <0.01), while groups treated with RTA 408 1 and 1.5 mg/kg/day had significantly higher levels of Nrf2 protein than the SAH only group (p <0.05 and p <0.01, respectively). Those treated with RTA 408 0.5, 1, and 1.5 mg/kg/day did not have significantly different Nrf2 protein levels than the controls (p >0.05) (Fig 2A and 2B). All groups treated with RTA 408 had higher levels of Nrf2 protein in the basilar artery than the controls (p <0.01) (Fig 2).

Fig 2. The expression of Nrf2, NF-κB and iNOS in basilar artery after SAH and after RTA treatment.

Fig 2

(A) Western blots of Nrf2, NF-κB and iNOS in the basilar artery. (B) SAH rats had significant reductions in Nrf2, NF-κB and iNOS. RTA 408(1mg/kg/day and 1.5 mg/kg/day) treatment reversed these changes, up-regulating Nrf2 and down-regulating NF-κB and iNOS. *p <0.05 and **p <0.01 compared to controls. #p <0.05, and ##p <0.01 compared to SAH only.

The untreated SAH only rats and the rats treated with RTA 408 0.5 mg/kg/day were both found to have higher levels basilar artery NF-κB than the controls (both, p <0.01). Compared with the untreated SAH only group, all RTA 408 treatment groups had significantly lower basilar artery NF-κB protein levels (RTA 408 0.5 mg/kg/day and 1 mg/kg/day both p <0.05; 1.5 mg/kg/day p <0.01). There was no significant difference found NF-κB protein concentration between either those treated with RTA 408 1 mg/kg/day or 1.5 mg/kg/day and the controls (Fig 2B).

Compared with controls, iNOS protein was increased significantly in the SAH only group and RTA 408 0.5 mg/kg/day group (both, p <0.01) as well as the RTA 408 1.0 mg/kg/day group (p <0.05). Compared with the SAH only group, SAH rats treated with RTA 408 1.5 mg/kg/day had significantly lower levels of basilar artery iNOS protein (p <0.01), but their NF-κB protein levels were not significantly different from the controls (Fig 2B).

RTA 408 exerted its neuroprotective effect by increasing Nrf2 and downstream HO-1 and NQO1

Brain tissue Nrf2

We measured the expression of Nrf2 protein in cortex, hippocampus, and dentate gyrus after SAH in rats treated and untreated with RTA 408 (Fig 3). There was no difference in cortex or hippocampus Nrf2 between either the controls or SAH groups treated or untreated with RTA 408 treatment seven days post first SAH (Fig 3A). However, there was a significant decrease in dentate gyrus Nrf2 in the SAH only group, compared to controls (p <0.05). Treatment with RTA 408 (0.5, 1, 1.5 mg/kg/day) significantly prevented the SAH induced reduction of Nrf2 in the dentate gyrus compared to the SAH only group (p <0.05 in RTA 408 0.5 mg/kg/day and 1 mg/kg/day; p <0.01 RTA 408 1.5 mg/kg/day). Compared to controls, however, there was no significant difference in Nrf2 levels in either those treated with RTA 408 0.5 mg/kg/day or 1 mg/kg/day. In the SAH group treated with RTA 408 1.5 mg/kg/day group, however, there was a significant increase in dentate gyrus Nrf2, compared to controls (p <0.05) (Fig 3B).

Fig 3. Brains tissue expression of Nrf2, HO-1, NQO1 and cleaved caspase-3 protein.

Fig 3

(A) Western blots of Nrf2, HO-1, NQO1, cleaved caspase-3 and beta-action in the cortex, hippocampus, and dentate of rat brain. (B) Nrf2, HO-1 and NQO1 proteins were significantly reduced and cleaved caspase-3 was and the protein content of cleaved caspase-3 was significantly increased in the dentate gyrus untreated SAH rats. RTA-408 significantly increased Nrf2, HO-1 and NQO1 proteins and significantly decreased cleaved caspase 3 in the dentate gyrus of SAH rats.. There was no significant difference in these protein expressions in the cortexes of controls and untreated SAH rats and rats treated with RTA-408. *p <0.05 and **p <0.01 compared to controls. #p <0.05, and ##p <0.01 compared to SAH only.

Brain tissue HO-1

We measured protein levels of HO-1 in the cortex, hippocampus, and dentate gyrus (Fig 3A). Compared to controls, HO-1 was significantly decreased in dentate gyrus (p <0.05 but not in the cortex or hippocampus in SAH rats untreated with RTA 408. HO-1 was significantly increased in the hippocampus and dentate gyrus of SAH rats treated with either RTA 408 0.5, 1 or 1.5mg/kg/day, compared to the untreated SAH only group (both p <0.05. However, we found no significant change in HO-1 in the cortex between SAH rats untreated and treated with RTA 408 treatment, compared to controls (Fig 3B).

Brain tissue NQO1

We also measured protein levels of NQO1 in cortex, hippocampus, and dentate gyrus (Fig 3A). Compared to controls, we found it decreased in the dentate gyrus of the SAH group (p <0.05). Compared to the SAH only group, those treated with RTA 408 1 and 1.5 mg/kg/day had significantly increased NQO1 levels in the dentate gyrus (p<0.05). None of the RTA 408-treated groups had significantly different dentate gyrus levels of NQO1 from the controls. In addition, we found no significant change in the expression of NQO1 in the cortex and hippocampus between controls and untreated SAH rats or SAH rats treated with RTA 408 (Fig 3B).

Anti-apoptotic effect of RTA 408 in dentate gyrus brought about by decreases in the cleaved caspase-3 and TNF-α

Apoptotic protein, cleaved caspase-3 and TNF-α, were measured in the cortex, hippocampus, and dentate gyrus seven days post SAH. Compared to controls, there was no significant difference in either cortex or hippocampus cleaved caspase-3 between either the untreated animals or the animals treated with RTA 408. It was found to be significantly higher in the dentate gyrus in the untreated SAH group (p <0.01) and the SAH groups treated with either RTA 408 0.5 or 1 mg/kg/day (p <0.05) (Fig 3). Comparing the SAH only group with those treated with RTA 408 1.5 mg/kg/day, we found marked attenuation of cleaved caspase-3 induced by SAH in the dentate gyrus (p <0.01), restoring expression to control levels.

The results of our ELISA, revealed no marked differences in TNF-α in either the cortex or hippocampus between controls and untreated SAH rats or those treated with RTA 408. The untreated SAH rats and the SAH rats treated with RTA 408 0.5 mg/kg/day had significantly higher TNF-α expressions in the dentate gyrus group than the controls (p <0.05; Fig 4). In SAH rats treated with RTA 408 1.5 mg/kg/day, there was significant attenuation of SAH induced changes in TNF-α in dentate gyrus (p <0.05 vs. SAH only group).

Fig 4. ELISA assay for TNF-alpha.

Fig 4

TNF-alpha was found to be significantly increased in the dentate gyrus in untreated SAH rats. RTA 408 (1.5 mg/ml/kg) significantly reduced the TNF-alpha in the dentate gyrus in SAH rats. No significant difference TNF-alpha expression was noted in the cortex or hippocampus in control and SAH animals. *p <0.05 and **p <0.01 compared to controls. #p <0.05, and ##p <0.01 compared to SAH only.

Discussion

This study examined the effect of RTA 408 on SAH in experimental rats. We found that RTA 408 attentuated SAH-induced vasospasm, achieving this effect by down-regulating NF-κB and iNOS after SAH. RTA 408 exerted its neuron-protective effect by first increasing the antioxidation protein Nrf2 and two of Nrf2’s downstream proteins, HO-1 and NQO1. This was followed by decreases in SAH-induced protein-cleaved caspase-3 and TNF-α.

Although spontaneous SAH secondary to the rupture of intracranial aneurysms accounts for only 5% of strokes, morbidity and mortality associated with this disease remain high despite advances in the diagnosis and treatment of SAH aneurysms [23]. While SAH-induced CV contributes greatly to prognosis, it cannot alone fully explain the delayed neurological dysfunction that occurs from days 3–14 after an aneurysm rupture [3, 24]. Prior to this study, the pathophysiology underlying SAH-induced CV and secondary brain injury was unclear and adequate strategies for treating it were elusive. Increasing evidence has suggested that excess production of nitric oxide (NO) may contribute significantly to CV secondary to SAH [7]. Although SAH regulates the activity of all three isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), the inducible isoform iNOS accounts for most of the NO-mediated secondary damage after SAH [7]. Our study found SAH increased protein iNOS and it treatment with RTA 408 resulted in significantly decreases both iNOS protein and CV, findings consistent with those of others showing suppression of iNOS expression can alleviate SAH-induced CV [25].

Recent and compelling findings have suggested that inflammation plays an important role in the development of SAH-induced CV, with various aspects of inflammation playing crucial roles its pathogenesis [26]. Specifically, the inflammation response activates iNOS, causing cellular damage through its generation of NO in an oxidative environment; iNOS, in turn, reacts with free radicals to form ROS, further exacerbating vascular inflammation. CV develops once SAH activates the inflammatory cascade [27]. The inflammation contributes to the upregulation of iNOS following SAH through its activation of one or more transcriptional pathways—such as NF-κB, hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1), and the nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT) [7]. NF-κB binds with its inhibitor, an enhancer in B-cell inhibitor (IκB) in the cytosol of cells. IκB can be degraded by several inflammatory signaling pathways which translocate it to the nucleus. Subsequently, the activated NF-κB binds to the promoter region for the iNOS gene and upregulates iNOS. Many pro-inflammatory agents have been reported to induce the expression of iNOS by their activation of NF-κB in various models of SAH [2830]. Our findings as well as others suggest, because NF-kB has anti-spastic effects in SAH-induced CV, it can be targeted therapeutically to reduce SAH-induced increases in iNOS.

Clinically, some SAH patients have mild symptoms, no serious surgical complications, and radiographically no indication of vasospasm, though they have long-term psychological and neurobehavioral effects [31]. Around half of SAH survivors remain permanently disabled by cognitive dysfunction and unable to return to their previous jobs [32]. Because CV alone cannot explain all these changes in behavior and memory, we should consider the possible involvement of global ischemia related apoptosis [6]. Apoptosis has found in the vasculature with varying degrees of necrosis after SAH and has been implicated in the development of CV and smooth muscle cell proliferation in spastic arteries [33]. Furthermore, Zhou et al. have found that both pan caspase inhibitors and p53 inhibitors can attenuate post-SAH vasospasms, which suggests that apoptosis in the vasculature may be responsible for CV [34]. Thus, post-SAH apoptosis may have important implications CV as well as the long-term sequelae of SAH [6].

Various molecular mechanisms have been found to be involved in cellular apoptosis in secondary brain injury after SAH. These mechanisms include global ischemia [35], microcirculatory disturbance [36], and subarachnoid blood toxicity [37]. Apoptosis is activated via an intrinsic pathway mediated by the mitochondrial release of cytochrome C resulting in the activation of caspase-9 [37]. Caspase-9 activates downstream caspase-3, an apoptotic mediator well-known to lead to DNA damage and eventually apoptosis [35, 38]. Apoptosis-related proteins P53, cytochrome C, caspase-3, and caspase-8 have been found to be increased following SAH [38]. One study examining endovascular perforations in SAH rats have found apoptosis in cerebral endothelial cells as well as hippocampus and cortex [35]. SAH-induced apoptosis occurs through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, followed by an increase in the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines—such as iNOS, TNF-α, and the cytochrome c and caspase-3 released from mitochondria—which eventually leads to apoptosis. We found RTA 408 treatment to inhibit the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby reducing apoptosis. It also indirectly inhibited NF-κB by activating the downstream Nrf2 signaling pathway, the anti-inflammatory cytokine HO-1, and the antioxidant NQO1, which also reduces apoptosis.

TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in neuronal inflammation, apoptosis, and necrosis [39]. TNF-α has been found to be upregulated in both the cerebral cortex and hippocampus in an SAH animal model, and it may be responsible for SAH-induced apoptosis [3941]. A variety of TNF-α inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of SAH-induced apoptosis. They include anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody [40], acetylcholine [39], and ethyl pyruvate [41]. We found the treatment with RTA 408 reversed the increased expression of cleaved caspase-3 and TNF-α in the denate gyrus after SAH. We also combined RTA408 with Keap1 to increase the Nrf2 concentration in the cytoplasm and increase the level of downstream protein anti-inflammatory cytokines (such as HO-1). Meanwhile, HO-1 indirectly inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and iNOS. Additionally RTA408 either inhibits the NF-κB signaling pathway or indirectly reduces the decline of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and iNOS, thereby reducing apoptosis. Further studies may want to investigate the molecular mechanisms potentially underlying RTA 408’s inhibition of SAH-induced apoptosis.

Oxidative stress not only causes CV but also causes delayed brain ischemia after SAH. Free haem acts as a catalyst for ROS formation and subsequent oxidative stress [42]. Following the conversion of OxyHb to MetHb, superoxide radicals are released and converted to hydroxyl radicals [43]. ROS causes post-SAH brain injury through the modification of lipids, carbohydrates, and nucleotides, where eventual cell death affects both neurons [44] and endothelial cells [45]. ROS produces vasoactive lipids that cause vasoconstriction and the free radical oxidation of bilirubin results in the formation of bilirubin oxidation products [46]. The accumulation of these products in the CSF has been associated with delayed cerebral ischemia and CV after SAH [47]. Oxidative stress has been linked to Nrf2, which has both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects and plays an important role in neuroprotection. RTA 408, an AIM, has been studied in relation to the treatment of various diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, cancer, metabolic disorders, mitochondrial myopathies, and disorders with inflammatory and oxidative stress components [1719, 48]. However, the clinical benefits of the Nrf2 activator in the treatment of SAH-induced complications remain uncertain.

RTA 408 achieves its effect by activating antioxidative transcription factor Nrf2 and inhibiting pro-inflammatory transcription factor NF-κB. Therefore, we examined its effect in on SAH in experimental rats and found that it decreased SAH-induced CV. SAH was found to downregulate Nrf2, HO-1, and NQO1 and upregulate NF-κB, iNOS, cleaved caspase-3, and TNF-α expression. RTA 408 reversed these SAH-induced changes. These findings indicate that it had anti-inflammation, antioxidation, and antiapoptosis effects (Fig 5). RTA 408 activates Nrf2 and inhibits NF-κB exerting both anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic effects. It increases Nrf2 levels by binding to the adaptor protein Keap1 and blocking its ability to promote Nrf2 degradation through Cul3-Rbx1-mediated ubiquitination and constitutive proteasomal degradation. Once Nrf2 is activated, it then moves to the cell nucleus where it binds to the ARE. This Nrf2–ARE binding regulates the levels of antioxidant genes and anti-inflammatory genes, NQO-1 and HO-1 for cellular antioxidant and anti-inflammatory defense. Nrf2 also inhibits the NF-κB pathway, reducing the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and iNOS, which in turn reduces inflammation and reduces apoptosis through its influence on the production of caspase-3 in the mitochondria In this study, RTA 408reduced the occurrence of CV and the subsequent occurrence of delayed brain ischemia in our SAH rats.

Fig 5. The RTA 408 achieves its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and anti-apoptotic effects via Nrf2 and NF-κB signaling pathway.

Fig 5

This study has several limitations. First, we employed a double injection model to mimic SAH, which usually induces mild secondary brain injury and neurological deficits compared to endovascular perforation model. Another limitation is that the basilar artery is located just below the magna cisterna and so we are now sure what the impact of distribution of blood is into the subarachnoid space. Experimentally, it may have been better to use an endovascular perforation model and tested MCA in our assessment of vasospasm after SAH. However, we still believe that the double injection model holds potential for the study of SAH -induced vasospasm and apoptosis. Another limitation is that we did little to evaluate secondary brain injury. Although cell death assay and TNF alpha in brain tissue were used to detect the brain cell apoptosis, more credible tools such as morphological, neuroimaging, molecular biological and neurobehavioral scores are needed to examine the secondary brain injury are need to monitor the secondary brain injury. Still another limitation is that we attempted to find a clear mechanism underlying the neuroprotective effects of RTA-408. Although we found changes in several Nrf2 downstream of protein levels, a clear mechanism was not elucidated. Therefore, additional intervention studies are still needed to verify the links between RTA408 and Nrf2 and the consequences of SAH. In addition, sham animals with injection of an artificial cerebral spinal fluid are required, at least in part, to evaluate the impact of anesthesia and surgery.

Conclusion

This study found that RTA 408 attenuated SAH-induced vasospasm through its reversal of SAH-induced changes in Nrf2, NF-κB and iNOS. RTA 408 decreased both apoptosis-related protein-cleaved caspase-3 and the information cytokine TNF-α and thus had a neuron-protective effect, which could be further enhanced by Nrf2 and its downstream proteins HO-1 and NQO1. Additional studies are required to evaluate the antispastic and neuroprotective effects of RTA 408 as well as possible complications from its use. The mechanisms through which RTA 408 prevents SAH-induced CS and secondary brain injury also require further elucidation. We concluded that RTA 408, an Nrf2 activator, can potentially be used to manage SAH-induced CV and secondary brain injury, and it should be investigated further.

Supporting information

S1 Data

(PPTX)

Abbreviations

AIMs

Antioxidant inflammation modulators

ARE

Antioxidant response element

CV

Cerebral vasospasm

DCI

Delayed cerebral ischemia

EBI

Early brain injury

HIF-1

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1

HO-1

heme oxygenase-1

iNOS

Inducible nitric oxide synthase

Keap1

Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1

NFAT

Nuclear factor of activated T-cells

NF-κB

Nuclear factor kappa B

NO

Nitric oxide

NQO-1

NADPH quinone oxidoreductase-1

Nrf2

Nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

SAH

Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under Grant MOS 106-2314-B-037-025-MY2.

References

  • 1.Francoeur CL, Mayer SA. Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Critical care (London, England). 2016;20(1):277 10.1212/01.CON.0000415429.99394.e8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nassar HGE, Ghali AA, Bahnasy WS, Elawady MM. Vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: prediction, detection, and intervention. The Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery. 2019;55(1):3 10.1186/s41983-018-0050-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Macdonald RL. Pathophysiology and molecular genetics of vasospasm. Acta neurochirurgica Supplement. 2001;77:7–11. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6232-3_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.El Amki M, Dubois M, Lefevre-Scelles A, Magne N, Roussel M, Clavier T, et al. Long-Lasting Cerebral Vasospasm, Microthrombosis, Apoptosis and Paravascular Alterations Associated with Neurological Deficits in a Mouse Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Molecular neurobiology. 2018;55(4):2763–79. 10.1007/s12035-017-0514-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.He J, Liu M, Liu Z, Luo L. Recombinant osteopontin attenuates experimental cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats through an anti-apoptotic mechanism. Brain research. 2015;1611:74–83. 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cahill J, Calvert JW, Zhang JH. Mechanisms of early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2006;26(11):1341–53. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Iqbal S, Hayman EG, Hong C, Stokum JA, Kurland DB, Gerzanich V, et al. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS-2) in subarachnoid hemorrhage: Regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Brain circulation. 2016;2(1):8–19. 10.4103/2394-8108.178541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chan JY, Cheung MC, Moi P, Chan K, Kan YW. Chromosomal localization of the human NF-E2 family of bZIP transcription factors by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Human genetics. 1995;95(3):265–9. 10.1007/BF00225191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Itoh K, Igarashi K, Hayashi N, Nishizawa M, Yamamoto M. Cloning and characterization of a novel erythroid cell-derived CNC family transcription factor heterodimerizing with the small Maf family proteins. Molecular and cellular biology. 1995;15(8):4184–93. 10.1128/mcb.15.8.4184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hayes JD, Dinkova-Kostova AT. The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism. Trends in biochemical sciences. 2014;39(4):199–218. 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dinkova-Kostova AT, Liby KT, Stephenson KK, Holtzclaw WD, Gao X, Suh N, et al. Extremely potent triterpenoid inducers of the phase 2 response: correlations of protection against oxidant and inflammatory stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(12):4584–9. 10.1073/pnas.0500815102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cleasby A, Yon J, Day PJ, Richardson C, Tickle IJ, Williams PA, et al. Structure of the BTB domain of Keap1 and its interaction with the triterpenoid antagonist CDDO. PloS one. 2014;9(6):e98896 10.1371/journal.pone.0098896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pareek TK, Belkadi A, Kesavapany S, Zaremba A, Loh SL, Bai L, et al. Triterpenoid modulation of IL-17 and Nrf-2 expression ameliorates neuroinflammation and promotes remyelination in autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Sci Rep. 2011;1:201 10.1038/srep00201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nguyen T, Nioi P, Pickett CB. The Nrf2-antioxidant response element signaling pathway and its activation by oxidative stress. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2009;284(20):13291–5. 10.1074/jbc.R900010200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Thimmulappa RK, Lee H, Rangasamy T, Reddy SP, Yamamoto M, Kensler TW, et al. Nrf2 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and survival during experimental sepsis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2006;116(4):984–95. 10.1172/JCI25790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baird L, Dinkova-Kostova AT. The cytoprotective role of the Keap1-Nrf2 pathway. Archives of toxicology. 2011;85(4):241–72. 10.1007/s00204-011-0674-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Buendia I, Michalska P, Navarro E, Gameiro I, Egea J, León R. Nrf2-ARE pathway: An emerging target against oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 2016;157:84–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Joshi G, Johnson JA. The Nrf2-ARE pathway: a valuable therapeutic target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Recent patents on CNS drug discovery. 2012;7(3):218–29. 10.2174/157488912803252023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Probst BL, Trevino I, McCauley L, Bumeister R, Dulubova I, Wigley WC, et al. RTA 408, A Novel Synthetic Triterpenoid with Broad Anticancer and Anti-Inflammatory Activity. PloS one. 2015;10(4):e0122942 10.1371/journal.pone.0122942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Reisman SA, Lee CY, Meyer CJ, Proksch JW, Ward KW. Topical application of the synthetic triterpenoid RTA 408 activates Nrf2 and induces cytoprotective genes in rat skin. Archives of dermatological research. 2014;306(5):447–54. 10.1007/s00403-013-1433-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reisman SA, Lee CY, Meyer CJ, Proksch JW, Sonis ST, Ward KW. Topical application of the synthetic triterpenoid RTA 408 protects mice from radiation-induced dermatitis. Radiation research. 2014;181(5):512–20. 10.1667/RR13578.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Neymotin A, Calingasan NY, Wille E, Naseri N, Petri S, Damiano M, et al. Neuroprotective effect of Nrf2/ARE activators, CDDO ethylamide and CDDO trifluoroethylamide, in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Free radical biology & medicine. 2011;51(1):88–96. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.03.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bederson JB, Connolly ES, Jr, Batjer HH, Dacey RG, Dion JE, Diringer MN, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009;40(3):994–1025. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.191395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tani E. Molecular mechanisms involved in development of cerebral vasospasm. Neurosurgical focus. 2002;12(3):Ecp1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lin CL, Shih HC, Dumont AS, Kassell NF, Lieu AS, Su YF, et al. The effect of 17beta-estradiol in attenuating experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced cerebral vasospasm. Journal of neurosurgery. 2006;104(2):298–304. 10.3171/jns.2006.104.2.298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dumont AS, Dumont RJ, Chow MM, Lin CL, Calisaneller T, Ley KF, et al. Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: putative role of inflammation. Neurosurgery. 2003;53(1):123–33; discussion 33–5. 10.1227/01.neu.0000068863.37133.9e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ding D, Starke RM, Dumont AS, Owens GK, Hasan DM, Chalouhi N, et al. Therapeutic implications of estrogen for cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia induced by aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. BioMed research international. 2014;2014:727428 10.1155/2014/727428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhou ML, Shi JX, Hang CH, Cheng HL, Qi XP, Mao L, et al. Potential contribution of nuclear factor-kappaB to cerebral vasospasm after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage in rabbits. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2007;27(9):1583–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.You WC, Wang CX, Pan YX, Zhang X, Zhou XM, Zhang XS, et al. Activation of nuclear factor-κB in the brain after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage and its potential role in delayed brain injury. PloS one. 2013;8(3):e60290 10.1371/journal.pone.0060290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Simard JM, Geng Z, Woo SK, Ivanova S, Tosun C, Melnichenko L, et al. Glibenclamide reduces inflammation, vasogenic edema, and caspase-3 activation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2009;29(2):317–30. 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hütter BO, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Mayfrank L, Rohde V, Spetzger U, Gilsbach JM. Functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta neurochirurgica Supplement. 1999;72:157–74. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6377-1_13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Edward R. Laws, Jr. Honored Guest 50th Annual Meeting of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons San Antonio, Texas. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(4):840-.
  • 33.Zubkov AY, Ogihara K, Bernanke DH, Parent AD, Zhang J. Apoptosis of endothelial cells in vessels affected by cerebral vasospasm. Surg Neurol. 2000;53(3):260–6. 10.1016/s0090-3019(99)00187-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schievink WI, Riedinger M, Jhutty TK, Simon P. Racial disparities in subarachnoid hemorrhage mortality: Los Angeles County, California, 1985–1998. Neuroepidemiology. 2004;23(6):299–305. 10.1159/000080096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Park S, Yamaguchi M, Zhou C, Calvert JW, Tang J, Zhang JH. Neurovascular protection reduces early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004;35(10):2412–7. 10.1161/01.STR.0000141162.29864.e9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bederson JB, Levy AL, Ding WH, Kahn R, DiPerna CA, Jenkins AL 3rd, et al. Acute vasoconstriction after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery. 1998;42(2):352–60; discussion 60–2. 10.1097/00006123-199802000-00091 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Matz PG, Copin JC, Chan PH. Cell death after exposure to subarachnoid hemolysate correlates inversely with expression of CuZn-superoxide dismutase. Stroke. 2000;31(10):2450–9. 10.1161/01.str.31.10.2450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cheng G, Wei L, Zhi-Dan S, Shi-Guang Z, Xiang-Zhen L. Atorvastatin ameliorates cerebral vasospasm and early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage and inhibits caspase-dependent apoptosis pathway. BMC neuroscience. 2009;10:7 10.1186/1471-2202-10-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang BF, Song JN, Ma XD, Zhao YL, Liu ZW, Li Y, et al. Etanercept alleviates early brain injury following experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage and the possible role of tumor necrosis factor-α and c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway. Neurochemical research. 2015;40(3):591–9. 10.1007/s11064-014-1506-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ma L, Jiang Y, Dong Y, Gao J, Du B, Liu D. Anti-TNF-alpha antibody attenuates subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced apoptosis in the hypothalamus by inhibiting the activation of Erk. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment. 2018;14:525–36. 10.2147/NDT.S154809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lv T, Miao YF, Jin YC, Yang SF, Wu H, Dai J, et al. Ethyl Pyruvate Attenuates Early Brain Injury Following Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Endovascular Perforation Rabbit Model Possibly Via Anti-inflammation and Inhibition of JNK Signaling Pathway. Neurochemical research. 2017;42(4):1044–56. 10.1007/s11064-016-2138-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zolnourian A, Galea I, Bulters D. Neuroprotective Role of the Nrf2 Pathway in Subarachnoid Haemorrhage and Its Therapeutic Potential. Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity. 2019;2019:6218239 10.1155/2019/6218239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Macdonald RL, Weir BK. A review of hemoglobin and the pathogenesis of cerebral vasospasm. Stroke. 1991;22(8):971–82. 10.1161/01.str.22.8.971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wagner KR, Sharp FR, Ardizzone TD, Lu A, Clark JF. Heme and iron metabolism: role in cerebral hemorrhage. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2003;23(6):629–52. 10.1097/01.WCB.0000073905.87928.6D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Balla G, Vercellotti GM, Muller-Eberhard U, Eaton J, Jacob HS. Exposure of endothelial cells to free heme potentiates damage mediated by granulocytes and toxic oxygen species. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology. 1991;64(5):648–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Clark JF, Sharp FR. Bilirubin oxidation products (BOXes) and their role in cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2006;26(10):1223–33. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pyne-Geithman GJ, Morgan CJ, Wagner K, Dulaney EM, Carrozzella J, Kanter DS, et al. Bilirubin production and oxidation in CSF of patients with cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism: official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2005;25(8):1070–7. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nguyen NH, Fumery M, Dulai PS, Prokop LJ, Sandborn WJ, Murad MH, et al. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological agents for management of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and network meta-analyses. The lancet Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2018;3(11):742–53. 10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30231-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jinglu Ai

29 Jul 2020

PONE-D-20-19417

Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of RTA 408, an activator of Nrf2, in subarachnoid hemorrhage–induced delayed cerebral vasospasm and secondary brain injury

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lin,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by August 28th. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jinglu Ai, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. At this time, we request that you please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines:

(1) Please state the source of the rats used in the study  

(2) Please provide details of animal welfare (e.g., shelter, food, water, environmental enrichment)

(3) Please include the method of euthanasia and clarify whether the rats were anaesthetised before they were euthanized by perfusion and fixatiion. Please provide the reagents used in the method of euthanasia.  

(4) Please describe the post-operative care received by the animals, including the frequency of monitoring and the specific clinical, physiological and behavioural criteria used to assess animal health and well-being.

Thank you for your attention to these requests.

3. In the Methods section, please provide the product number and any lot numbers of the primary antibodies used in the Western blot analysis for your study.

4. In the Methods section, please provide the source, product number and any lot numbers of the RTA-408 used in the animal experiments for your study.

5. To comply with PLOS ONE submission guidelines, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding your statistical analyses, including the specific name and version of the software used. For more information on PLOS ONE's expectations for statistical reporting, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines.#loc-statistical-reporting.

6. We noticed minor instances of text overlap with the following previous publication(s), which need to be addressed:

(1) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1878331712001313?via%3Dihub

(2) https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/110/3/article-p457.xml

The text that needs to be addressed involves the (1) Introduction and (2) Results section (pages 8-9).

In your revision please ensure you cite all your sources (including your own works), and quote or rephrase any duplicated text outside the methods section. Further consideration is dependent on these concerns being addressed.

7. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

8. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

9. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have examined the potential efficacy of RTA 408 in attenuating cerebral vasospasm and acute brain injury following SAH in a rodent model.

There are some minor grammatical errors that should be corrected.

How were the dosages of RTA 408 selected?

Did the authors examine Nrf2 nuclear translocation?

A limitations section should be provided.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 5;15(10):e0240122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240122.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


8 Sep 2020

Dear reviewers:

Thank you for the opportunity to revise our paper on ‘Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of RTA 408, an activator of Nrf2, in subarachnoid hemorrhage–induced delayed cerebral vasospasm and secondary brain injury.’ I have included the reviewer comments immediately and responded to them individually, indicating exactly how we addressed each concern or problem and describing the changes we have made. The revisions have been approved by all authors. The changes are marked in red in the paper as you requested, and the revised manuscript is attached to this email message.

Reply to reviewer's comment

Reviewer 1

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

Answer:

The manuscript has meet PLOS ONE's style requirements as the PLOS ONE'S style templates.

2. At this time, we request that you please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines

Answer:

We have been reported the additional details in Methods section regarding animal care such as the source of the rats, animal welfare, the method of euthanasia and postoperative care. Page 4-5

3. In the Methods section, please provide the product number and any lot numbers of the primary antibodies used in the Western blot analysis for your study.

Answer:

We have been provided the product numbers of the primary antibodies used in the Western blot analysis in this manuscript. Page 6

4. In the Methods section, please provide the source, product number and any lot numbers of the RTA-408 used in the animal experiments for your study.

Answer:

We have been provided the source, product number of the RTA 408 used in the animal experiments. Page 5

5. To comply with PLOS ONE submission guidelines, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding your statistical analyses, including the specific name and version of the software used.

Answer:

We have been provided the specific name and version of the software regarding the specific name and version of the software in the Methods section. Page 6

6. We noticed minor instances of text overlap with the following previous publication(s), which need to be addressed involves the (1) Introduction and (2) Results section (pages 8-9).

Answer:

We also noticed the text overlap with the previous publications. Although the previous publications are our own works, we have been rephrased and quoted the duplicate text to avoid plagiarism or self-plagiarism. Page2-3, 7-8

7. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly.

Answer:

Data from this study are available upon request and there are no restrictions on sharing data publicly. We will upload the data set necessary to replicate our study findings as Supporting Information files.

8. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files.

Answer:

We will provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures.

9. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016.

Answer:

We have an ORCID iD for the corresponding author and that it is validated in Editorial Manager.

Reviewer 2:

1. There are some minor grammatical errors that should be corrected.

Answer:

The grammatical errors of the article have been edited.

2. How were the dosages of RTA 408 selected?

Answer:

In this experiment, Group 3-5 received experimental SAH with RTA 408 treatment (Intraperitoneal injection) 30 min after the first induction of SAH for 7 days following the first hemorrhage. The dosages of RTA 408 are 0.5 mg/kg/day, 1 mg/kg/day and 1.5 mg/kg/day. The dosages of RTA 408 were selected according to the previous experiments.Peng Han, et al. RTA-408 Protects Kidney from Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice via Activating Nrf2 and Downstream GSH Biosynthesis Gene. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 24 December 2017. Page 4-5

3. Did the authors examine Nrf2 nuclear translocation?

Answer:

The authors do not examine Nrf2 nuclear translocation, because this experimental design is for the study of downstream protein changes in the Nrf2 pathway caused by RTA 408 treatment. Despite the changes of several Nrf2 downstream of protein levels after RTA-408 treatment, the authors did not directly sought out a clear mechanism for the neuroprotective effects of RTA-408. Therefore, additional intervention studies including Nrf2 nuclear translocation are still needed to verify the links between RTA408 and Nrf2 and the consequences of SAH. This problem was addressed in the limitation section.

4. A limitations section should be provided.

Answer:

A limitation section has been provided. Page 12

We hope the revised manuscript will better suit the PLOS ONE but are happy to consider further revisions, and we thank you for your continued interest in our research.

Sincerely,

Tai-Hsin Tsai, MD

Department of Neurosurgery

Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital

Decision Letter 1

Jinglu Ai

11 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-19417R1

Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of RTA 408, an activator of Nrf2, in subarachnoid hemorrhage–induced delayed cerebral vasospasm and secondary brain injury

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Lin,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Thank you for the revision. Before I accept your revised manuscript. I would like you to revise all your figures to make them look more professional.

E.g., Figure 1, the y-axis label is not centered to the axis, and the labeling of the three doses of the drug is way too long. You could simply label them as 0.5 mg, 1 mg and 1.5 mg, and on top of them use a bracket to include all three, and label the bracket with text, SAH+RTA408. This is the same for the chart labeling as well, and for all the figures. After the modification, and save some spaces, you may want to increase the font size for all the labeling on the charts.

In the PDF file, the figures, especially the charts in the figures are of very bad quality, some are even not readable, especially the last figure with 12 charts. I am not sure whether the journal office has a better version of the figures. It is not publishable as presented in the current PDF version.

Thank you,

Jinglu Ai

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sept 21st. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jinglu Ai, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 5;15(10):e0240122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240122.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


17 Sep 2020

Reply to reviewer's comment

Additional Editor Comments:

1.Please revise all your figures to make them look more professional and I have uploaded a copy o Figure 5.

Answer :

I have revised all figures to make them look more professional.

Reviewer 1

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

Answer:

The manuscript has meet PLOS ONE's style requirements as the PLOS ONE'S style templates.

2. At this time, we request that you please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines

Answer:

We have been reported the additional details in Methods section regarding animal care such as the source of the rats, animal welfare, the method of euthanasia and postoperative care.

3. In the Methods section, please provide the product number and any lot numbers of the primary antibodies used in the Western blot analysis for your study.

Answer:

We have been provided the product numbers of the primary antibodies used in the Western blot analysis in this manuscript.

4. In the Methods section, please provide the source, product number and any lot numbers of the RTA-408 used in the animal experiments for your study.

Answer:

We have been provided the source, product number of the RTA 408 used in the animal experiments.

5. To comply with PLOS ONE submission guidelines, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding your statistical analyses, including the specific name and version of the software used.

Answer:

We have been provided the specific name and version of the software regarding the specific name and version of the software in the Methods section.

6. We noticed minor instances of text overlap with the following previous publication(s), which need to be addressed involves the (1) Introduction and (2) Results section (pages 8-9).

Answer:

We also noticed the text overlap with the previous publications. Although the previous publications are our own works, we have been rephrased and quoted the duplicate text to avoid plagiarism or self-plagiarism.

7. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly.

Answer:

Data from this study are available upon request and there are no restrictions on sharing data publicly. We will upload the data set necessary to replicate our study findings as Supporting Information files.

8. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files.

Answer:

We will provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures.

9. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016.

Answer:

We have an ORCID iD for the corresponding author and that it is validated in Editorial Manager.

Reviewer 2:

1. There are some minor grammatical errors that should be corrected.

Answer:

The grammatical errors of the article have been edited and the editing certificate is attached.

2. How were the dosages of RTA 408 selected?

Answer:

In this experiment, Group 3-5 received experimental SAH with RTA 408 treatment (Intraperitoneal injection) 30 min after the first induction of SAH for 7 days following the first hemorrhage. The dosages of RTA 408 are 0.5 mg/kg/day, 1 mg/kg/day and 1.5 mg/kg/day. The dosages of RTA 408 were selected according to the previous experiments. Peng Han, et al. RTA-408 Protects Kidney from Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice via Activating Nrf2 and Downstream GSH Biosynthesis Gene. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 24 December 2017.

3. Did the authors examine Nrf2 nuclear translocation?

Answer:

The authors do not examine Nrf2 nuclear translocation, because this experimental design is for the study of downstream protein changes in the Nrf2 pathway caused by RTA 408 treatment. Despite the changes of several Nrf2 downstream of protein levels after RTA-408 treatment, the authors did not directly sought out a clear mechanism for the neuroprotective effects of RTA-408. Therefore, additional intervention studies including Nrf2 nuclear translocation are still needed to verify the links between RTA408 and Nrf2 and the consequences of SAH. This problem was addressed in the limitation section.

4. A limitations section should be provided.

Answer:

A limitation section has been provided.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comment.docx

Decision Letter 2

Jinglu Ai

21 Sep 2020

Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of RTA 408, an activator of Nrf2, in subarachnoid hemorrhage–induced delayed cerebral vasospasm and secondary brain injury

PONE-D-20-19417R2

Dear Dr. Lin,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jinglu Ai, M.D., Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Jinglu Ai

25 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-19417R2

Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of RTA 408, an activator of Nrf2, in subarachnoid hemorrhage–induced delayed cerebral vasospasm and secondary brain injury

Dear Dr. Lin:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jinglu Ai

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data

    (PPTX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers comment.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES