To the Editor,
The World Health Organization interim guidelines recommend extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). Haiduc et al. 1 reported a detailed perspective of ECMO use in COVID‐19‐associated ARDS.
ECMO systems are clearly a finite resource, and there would be limitations in providing ECMO in the case of an outbreak of COVID‐19. 2 Indeed, there have been several media reports of patients with refractory hypoxemia being unable to receive ECMO because of a shortage of equipment. Such problems tend to be emphasized as social issues, but it should be noted that ECMO is not an active treatment but supportive therapy against ARDS.
To reduce the immunological disadvantages involved in initiation of an extracorporeal circuit 3 and increase the survival rate of these patients, early withdrawal from ECMO must be achieved with preparation of additional therapy while sustaining increased systemic oxygen delivery with ECMO.
Therefore, the use of selective cytokine blockers, such as the IL‐6 receptor blocker, tocilizumab, 4 and direct hemoperfusion therapy with polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber cartridges (PMX‐DHP), which is an extracorporeal circulation therapy similar to ECMO, would be beneficial. 5 Although the efficacy of PMX‐DHP against ARDS due to endotoxic shock induced by gram‐negative bacterial infection remains controversial, it has been reported to be efficacious against ARDS due to cytokine storm It is remarkable that amyopathic dermatomyositis patients with rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia showed a decline in IL‐6 level accompanied with improvement of respiratory condition after treatment with PMX‐DHP. 6
We reported the rapid improvement of oxygenation, i.e., an increase in PaO2/FiO2 ratio from 72.4 to 216.0, with only 4 hours of PMX‐DHP treatment for 2 days in the previous 2009 H1N1 virus pandemic. 7 This accumulation of information on removing cytokines and other circulating mediators during PMX‐DHP treatment would allow its optional use for ARDS raised by the cytokine storm in COVID‐19.
Was it clear whether treatment targeting cytokine storms was performed in each report concerning ECMO use included in the review by Haiduc et al.? Further investigations of the relationship between the presence and absence of such treatment and survival rate, withdrawal rate, and wearing period of ECMO patients would make their review more attractive.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Haruhiko Ogawa and Hidesaku Asakura wrote the manuscript. Haruhiko Ogawa and Yasushi Kakuchi were involved in treating patients.
KEYWORDS
acute respiratory distress syndrome, coronavirus disease 2019, direct hemoperfusion therapy with polymyxin B‐immobilized fiber cartridges, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, selective cytokine blockers
REFERENCES
- 1. Haiduc AA, Alom S, Melamed N, Harky A. Role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in COVID‐19: a systematic review. J Card Surg. 2020;1–9. 10.1111/jocs.14879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ramanathan K, Antognini D, Combes A, et al. Planning and provision of ECMO services for severe ARDS during the COVID‐19 pandemic and other outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:518‐526. 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30121-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Henry BM. COVID‐19, ECMO, and lymphopenia: a word of caution. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:e24. 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30119-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Rilinger J, Kern WV, Duerschmied D. A prospective, randomised, double blind placebo‐controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID‐19 pneumonia (TOC‐COVID): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Version 2. Trials. 2020;21(1):470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ronco C, Klein DJ. Polymyxin B hemoperfusion: a mechanistic perspective. Crit Care. 2014;18(3):309. 10.1186/cc13912 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Yasuda H, Ikeda T, Hamaguchi Y, Furukawa F, Furukawa F. Clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis with rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia: the relation between the disease activity and the serum interleukin‐6 level. J Dermatol. 2017;44(10):1164‐1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Araki T, Ogawa H, Nakashima A. Endotoxin adsorption therapy for a patient with severe pneumonia resulting from novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infection. Ther Apher Dial. 2011;15(2):207‐208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]