Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2020 Oct 14;28(1):e10–e12. doi: 10.1111/ene.14544

SARS‐CoV‐2–associated Guillain‐Barre syndrome in 62 patients

J Finsterer 1,, F A Scorza 2, A C Fiorini 3,4
PMCID: PMC7537304  PMID: 32978857

Dear Editor,

We read with interest the review article by De Sanctis et al. about 18 patients with Guillain‐Barre syndrome (GBS) associated with the SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (COVID‐19) [1]. Acute, inflammatory, demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) was the most frequent subtype of GBS. We have the following comments and concerns.

The number of patients experiencing GBS in the context of COVID‐19 is much higher than reported by De Sanctis et al. Currently (12 August 2020), at least 62 COVID‐19 patients with polyradiculitis have been reported in 48 articles (Table 1). Ages ranged from 11 to 94 years (Table 1). Twenty patients were female and 36 were male (Table 1). In 58 patients, GBS began after onset of clinical manifestations of COVID‐19. Latency between onset of COVID‐19 and GBS ranged from 3 to 33 days. Forty‐two patients were diagnosed with AIDP, six with acute motor axonal neuropathy, five with Miller‐Fisher syndrome and three with acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy. In six patients, the subtype was not specified (Table 1). SARS‐CoV‐2 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was detected in none of the patients (Table 1). Fifty patients received intravenous immunoglobulin and eight plasmapheresis (Table 1). Two patients received steroids exclusively (Table 1). Eighteen patients required artificial ventilation (Table 1). Twenty‐four patients recovered completely and 23 partially. Only two patients died.

Table 1.

Patients with SARS‐CoV‐2–associated polyradiculitis so far reported

Age (years) Sex Onset LOO (days) Subtype CIC CM IVIG AV Recovery Country
61 F B 9 AIDP NR None Yes No Yes China
65 M A 9 AMSAN ND DM Yes No NR Iran
54 M A 8 AIDP NR None Yes Yes Yes USA
70 F A 23 AIDP ND None Yes Yes NR Italy
66 F A 7 AIDP No NR Yes Yes Yes Italy
54 F A 21 AIDP ND None Yes No Yes Germany
70 F A 3 AMSAN No RA Yes No No Morocco
20 M A 5 AMAN ND None Yes No Yes India
71 M A 4 AIDP No AHT, AAR, LC Yes Yes Death Italy
64 M A 11 AIDP ND None Yes Yes NR France
NR NR A 7 AIDP No NR Yes No No Italy
NR NR A 10 AIDP No NR Yes No Yes Italy
NR NR A 10 AMAN No NR Yes Yes No Italy
NR NR A 5 AMAN No NR Yes No No Italy
NR NR A 7 AMAN No NR Yes, PE No No Italy
50 M A 3 MFS No None Yes No Yes Spain
39 M A 3 MFS No None No No Yes Spain
61 M A 10 MFS No None S No Yes Spain
76 F A 8 GBS* ND None No NR Death Spain
~75 M B 10 AIDP No None Yes No Yes Swiss
43 M A 10 AIDP NR NR Yes No Yes Spain
64 M A 23 AIDP No NR Yes No Yes France
72 M A 7 AIDP No AHT, CHD, AL Yes Yes Partial USA
~65 M A 17 AIDP No None Yes No Yes Italy
67 F A 10 NR No Breast cancer PE Yes Partial USA
54 M A 14 AIDP ND NR Yes No Partial USA
43 M A 21 AIDP No NR Yes No Yes France
71 F A 10 AIDP No NR Yes No Partial France
36 M A 4 MFS NR NR Yes No Yes USA
55 M A 20 AIDP No NR Yes Yes Partial Italy
60 M A 3 AMSAN No NR Yes Yes Partial Italy
58 M B 0 AIDP No No Yes No Partial Canada
52 F A 15 AIDP No NR Yes No Partial Switzerland
63 F A 7 AIDP NR NR Yes No Yes Switzerland
61 F A 22 AIDP No NR Yes No Partial Switzerland
53 F B NR AIDP No No PE No Partial Turkey
51 F A 14 MFS NR NR Yes No Partial Spain
56 F A 15 AIDP No NR Yes Yes Partial Spain
68 M A 14 AIDP NR& NR Yes, PE Yes Partial Austria
55 F A 14 AIDP NR No Yes Yes Partial Spain
53 M A 24 AIDP No No Yes No Yes the Netherlands
57 M A 6 AIDP No AHT, psoriasis Yes Yes Partial UK
21 M A 16 AIDP NR AHT, DM PE No Yes USA
41 M A 10 AIDP NR DM Yes No Partial Iran
38 M A 16 AIDP NR AHT PE No Yes Iran
14 F A NR GBS NR No Yes No Yes Iran
49 M A 14 AIDP No No Yes No Yes UK
68 M A 5 AIDP NR AHT, HLP Yes No Yes Italy
11 M A 21 AIDP NR No Yes No Yes Saudi Arabia
15 M A NR AMAN No No Yes No Partial Brazil
72 M A 18 AIDP No NR Yes Yes Partial Italy
72 M A 30 AIDP No NR Yes Yes Partial Italy
49 F A 14 AIDP No NR Yes No Partial Italy
94 M A 33 AIDP NR NR S No Partial Italy
76 M A 22 AIDP No NR Yes Yes Partial Italy
64 M A NR GBS? NR DM Yes Yes Yes Japan
77 M A NR AIDP NR AHT, HLP Yes No Yes Spain
58 F A 6 AIDP No NR PE No Yes USA
56 F A 7 AIDP No AHT, thyroxin ↓ NR NR Partial Germany
61 F A 14 AMAN No AHT, HLP PE No Yes USA
75 M A NR NR No Spinal trauma Yes No Yes USA
37 NR A 10 NR NR NR NR NR NR Belgium

A, onset of GBS after onset of non‐neurological manifestations; AAR, aortic aneurysm repair; AHT, arterial hypertension; AIDP, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; AL, alcoholism; AMAN, acute motor axonal neuropathy; AMSAN, acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy; AV, artificial ventilation; B, onset of GBS before onset of non‐neurological manifestations; CHD, coronary heart disease; CIC, CoV‐2 in CSF; CM, comorbidities; DM, diabetes mellitus; F, female; GBS, Guillain Barre syndrome; HLP, hyperlipidaemia; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; LC, lung cancer; LOO, latency between onset of GBS and COVID‐19, respectively, vice versa; M, male; MFS, Miller‐Fisher syndrome; NCSs, nerve conduction studies; ND, not done; NR, not reported; PE, plasma exchange; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; S, steroids and antibodies positive in cerebrospinal fluid.

The authors regard SARS‐CoV‐2 as causative for GBS in the 18 included patients. However, proof for this speculation was not provided. They reported that the CSF was negative for the virus in all included cases. Immunological parameters (cytokines, lymphocyte counts and specification) were provided only in one article [2].

A further argument against a causal relation between the virus and GBS is that in four cases, clinical manifestations of GBS started before clinical manifestations of the viral infection (Table 1). However, it cannot be excluded that in these cases the viral infection remained subclinical for several days prior to onset of clinical manifestations.

A further argument against a causal relation between SARS‐CoV‐2 and GBS is that the overall prevalence of GBS did not increase since the outbreak of the pandemic, as was the case with Zika. During the Zika endemic, the prevalence of GBS dramatically increased [3]. Thus, other triggering factors for GBS in COVID‐19 patients should be considered. Frequently, it is not easy to differentiate between concomitant disease and a dominating other disease as may be the case with GBS in COVID‐19 patients.

Whether hypogeusia/hyposmia, frequently observed in COVID‐19 patients, is due to radiculitis of the seventh, ninth, and tenth cranial nerve remains speculative. Considering hypogeusia/hyposmia as a manifestation of a radiculitis, the prevalence of GBS would dramatically increase, as 5.1% to 85% of the COVID‐19 patients reported hypogeusia/hyposmia [4]. Prolonged latency and reduced compound muscle action potentials on nerve conduction studies of the facial nerve argues in favour of polyradiculitis [5].

Overall, this interesting review lacks inclusion of a number of SARS‐CoV–infected patients with GBS. Furthermore, a causal relation between SARS‐CoV‐2 and GBS remains unproven. Whether the immune reaction against SARS‐CoV‐2 triggers the development of GBS requires further investigations.

Disclosure of conflicts of interest

The authors declare no financial or other conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1. De Sanctis P, Doneddu PE, Viganò L, Selmi C, Nobile‐Orazio E. Guillain Barré Syndrome associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. A systematic review. Eur J Neurol 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Finsterer J, Scorza FA, Ghosh R. COVID‐19 polyradiculitis in 24 patients without SARS‐CoV‐2 in the cerebro‐spinal fluid. J Med Virol 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Barbi L, Coelho AVC, Alencar LCA, Crovella S. Prevalence of Guillain‐Barré syndrome among Zika virus infected cases: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Braz J Infect Dis 2018; 22: 137–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Tanasa IA, Manciuc C, Carauleanu A, Navolan DB, Bohiltea RE, Nemescu D. Anosmia and ageusia associated with coronavirus infection (COVID‐19) ‐ what is known? Exp Ther Med 2020; 20: 2344–2347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Manganotti P, Bellavita G, D'Acunto L, et al. Clinical neurophysiology and cerebrospinal liquor analysis to detect Guillain‐Barré syndrome and polyneuritis cranialis in COVID‐19 patients: a case series. J Med Virol 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from European Journal of Neurology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES