Abstract
Solar panel surfaces, although subjected to a range of extreme environmental conditions, are inhabited by a diverse microbial community adapted to solar radiation, desiccation and temperature fluctuations. This is the first time a new bacterial species has been isolated from this environment. Strain R4DWNT belongs to the genus Sphingomonas and was isolated from a solar panel surface in Boston, MA, USA. Strain R4DWNT is a Gram-negative, non-motile and rod-shaped bacteria that tested positive for oxidase and catalase and forms round-shaped, shiny and orange-coloured colonies. It is mesophilic, neutrophilic and non-halophilic, and presents a more stenotrophic metabolism than its closest neighbours. The major fatty acids in this strain are C18:1ω7c/C18:1ω6c, C16:1ω7c/C16:1ω6c, C14:0 2OH and C16:0. Comparison of 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that the closest type strains to R4DWNT are Sphingomonas fennica , Sphingomonas formosensis , Sphingomonas prati , Sphingomonas montana and Sphingomonas oleivorans with 96.3, 96.1, 96.0, 95.9 and 95.7 % pairwise similarity, respectively. The genomic G+C content of R4DWNT is 67.9 mol%. Based on these characteristics, strain R4DWNT represents a novel species of the genus Sphingomonas for which the name Sphingomonas solaris sp. nov. is proposed with the type strain R4DWNT (=CECT 9811T=LMG 31344T).
Keywords: Sphingomonas solaris, solar panel
In 1990, Yabuuchi et al. [1] described the genus Sphingomonas for the first time, with the type species being Sphingomonas paucimobilis . This genus is classified in the class Alphaproteobacteria [2] and is characterized by having ubiquinone Q-10 as the major respiratory quinone and by having an outer membrane that contains glycosphingolipids but lacks lipopolysaccharides [1, 3]. A total of 122 different Sphingomonas species have been described up to date (EzBioCloud [4]). They are Gram-negative, rod shaped, non-sporulating, strictly aerobic and display pigmented colonies that range from light yellow/whitish, to intense yellow and orange. Several members of the genus Sphingomonas have been shown to hold promise in bioremediation applications, including degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, bisphenol A and heavy metal pollutants [5–7].
In this study we have characterized a new isolate belonging to the genus Sphingomonas from the surface of a solar panel. Solar panels from the Hunnewell Building at The Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA (42° 18′ 28.3″ N, 71° 07′ 14.5″ W), were sampled by cleaning the surfaces with sterile PBS and using a sterile window cleaner. The resulting liquid was collected in sterile tubes and transported to the laboratory on ice. The samples were then left to settle for 5 min in order to allow fungi to sediment, and serial dilutions were performed and plated on Luria–Bertani agar and Reasoner's 2A (R2A) agar. After incubation at room temperature for 6 days, individual colonies were selected and restreaked on fresh medium in order to obtain pure cultures. Strain R4DWNT was among the isolates selected from the R2A agar plates.
The complete sequence of the 16S rRNA gene of the isolate was extracted from the draft genome and, according to the EZBioCloud online tool [4], the closest type strains to R4DWNT are Sphingomonas fennica (96.3 %), Sphingomonas formosensis (96.1 %), Sphingomonas prati (96.0 %), Sphingomonas montana (95.9 %) and Sphingomonas oleivorans (95.7 %). With the aim of establishing the accurate taxonomic position of R4DWNT, this isolate was characterized using a polyphasic approach. For this, the reference strains of the two closest species, S. fennica and S. formosensis , were acquired from the DSMZ Collection (Leibniz Institute DSMZ, Germany) with reference numbers DSM 13665T and DSM 24164T, respectively. All three strains were grown on R2A medium at 25 °C for all studies (unless specified otherwise).
For temperature growth tests, all three strains were grown on R2A medium and incubated at 4, 15, 25, 30 and 37 °C. Salt tolerance was determined by cultivating the three strains on R2A medium supplemented with NaCl 0, 1, 2 and 3 % (w/v). pH tolerance (between pH 4.0 and 11.0) was determined by cultivating the strains in liquid R2A media buffered with MES (pH 4–6), HEPES (pH 7–8) or CHES (pH 9–11). Catalase activity was determined by detecting bubble production when colonies were mixed with 30 % (v/v) hydrogen peroxide. Oxidase activity was determined using Oxidase Sticks for microbiology (PanReac AppliChem), and Gram type was determined by assessing cell lysis in KOH 3 % (w/v). All three strains were characterized using API 20NE and API ZYM strips (bioMérieux), as well as Biolog GENIII MicroPlates. The differential phenotypic characteristics between strain R4DWNT and its closest species are shown in Table 1, and the detailed results obtained from the API galleries and Biolog GEN III utilization tests are detailed in the species description and in Table S1 (available in the online version of this article).
Table 1.
Phenotypic comparisons of strain R4DWNT and the type strains of closely related Sphingomonas species
Strains: 1, R4DWNT; 2, Sphingomonas fennica DSM 24164T; 3, Sphingomonas formosensis DSM 24164T; 4, Sphingomonas prati DSM 103336T; 5, Sphingomonas montana DSM 103337T; 6, Sphingomonas oleivorans HAMBI 3659T. Analysis of strains 1, 2 and 3 was conducted under the same conditions in this study, whereas data from strains 4, 5 and 6 was taken from the original species description papers [27–29]. All strains were positive for the following characteristics: alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, acid phosphatase and naphtol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase. All strains were negative for the following characteristics: Gram reaction, nitrate reduction, glucose fermentation, activity of arginine dihydrolase, urease, gelatin hydrolysis, assimilation of adipic acid, trisodium citrate and phenylacetic acid, lipase (C14), N-acetyl-β-glycosaminidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. +, Positive; –, negative; w, weakly positive.
|
Characteristic |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Isolation source |
Solar panel surface |
Groundwater* |
Soil† |
Soil |
Soil |
Soil |
|
Motility |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
Cell size (µm) |
1.2–4.5×1.2 |
0.9–1.5×0.5–0.9* |
1.4×0.4† |
1.1×0.7 |
1.2×0.9 |
1.6–2.4×0.4–0.85 |
|
Colour |
Orange |
Light yellow |
Yellow |
Orange |
Orange |
Light yellow |
|
Catalase |
+ |
+ |
+ |
w |
+ |
− |
|
Oxidase |
+ |
+ |
− |
w |
+ |
− |
|
Growth temperature (°C) |
4–25 |
4–30 |
4–37 |
4–30 |
4–30 |
4–37 |
|
pH range for growth |
6–9 |
6–7 |
5–11 |
5–10 |
5–9 |
5–9 |
|
NaCl tolerance (%, w/V) |
0–1 |
0 |
0–3 |
0–1 |
0–1 |
0–2 |
|
Enzymatic activity (API 20NE): | ||||||
|
Indole production |
− |
− |
− |
w |
− |
− |
|
Aesculin hydrolysis |
w |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
β-Galactosidase |
+ |
− |
− |
w |
+ |
− |
|
Enzymatic activity (API ZYM): | ||||||
|
Valine arylamidase |
w |
− |
− |
w |
w |
+ |
|
Cystein arylamidase |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Trypsin |
− |
w |
+ |
+ |
− |
+ |
|
α-Chymotrypsin |
− |
− |
− |
w |
− |
− |
|
α-Galactosidase |
− |
− |
− |
w |
w |
− |
|
β-Galactosidase |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
+ |
|
β-Glucuronidase |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
α-Glucosidase |
− |
− |
w |
− |
− |
+ |
|
β-Glucosidase |
+ |
− |
+ |
+ |
+ |
− |
|
Carbon source utilization (API 20NE): | ||||||
|
Glucose |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
Arabinose |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
|
Mannose |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Manitol |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
|
N-Acetyl-glucosamine |
+ |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Maltose |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Potassium gluconate |
w |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
|
Capric acid |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
|
Malic acid |
w |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
Strain R4DWNT cells were observed to be Gram-negative, non-motile and rod-shaped (1.2–4.5 µm length x 1.2 µm wide). In old cultures, some cells grew in the form of a long rod shape of approximately 30 µm. Colonies were found to be round-shaped, shiny, orange-coloured, convex and 1 mm in diameter after 7 days of incubation at 25 °C. Strain R4DWNT displayed several characteristics that allows it to be differentiated from other closely related species of the genus (Table 1), including growth at a smaller range of temperatures (growing only up to 25 °C as opposed to the 30 or 37 °C of other species), assimilation of potassium gluconate and malic acid, and valine arylamidase and β-glucosidase activities. Furthermore, Biolog assays revealed that strain R4DWNT is only able to assimilate seven out of the 71 tested carbon sources, mainly organic acids and simple sugars (glucuronamide, acetoacetic acid, d-fructose-6-PO4, l-malic acid, l-galactonic acid lactone, β-hydroxy-d,l-butyric acid and d-glucose-6-PO4), whereas S. fennica DSM 13665T and S. formosensis DSM 24164T are able to assimilate 19 and 39 out of the 71 tested carbon sources, respectively. This suggests that strain R4DWNT displays a more stenotrophic metabolism than its closest neighbours.
For fatty acid analysis, the three strains were grown on R2A plates at 25 °C for 5 days. Then, the cells were harvested and fatty acid profiles were obtained using the standard midi Microbial Identification System protocol [8]. Fatty acids were analysed on an Agilent 6850 gas chromatography system and using the midi method (TSBA6) [9]. The major fatty acids in strain R4DWNT were C18 : 1 ω7c/C18 : 1 ω6c (48.9 %), C16 : 1 ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c (21.2 %), C14 : 0 2OH (12.0 %) and C16 : 0 (10.3 %) (Table 2), a profile that is consistent with other members of the genus Sphingomonas [10, 11]. Nevertheless, the lack of C17 : 1ω6c differentiates R4DWNT from the type species S. fennica DSM 13665T, whereas the large amount of C16 : 1ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c differentiates R4DWNT from the type species S. formosensis DSM 24164T, which displayed only low amounts of these fatty acids.
Table 2.
Cellular fatty acid composition (%) of strain R4DWNT and related type strains
Strains: 1, R4DWNT; 2, Sphingomonas fennica DSM 13665T; 3, Sphingomonas formosensis DSM 24164T; 4, Sphingomonas prati DSM 103336T; 5, Sphingomonas montana DSM 103337T; 6, Sphingomonas oleivorans HAMBI 3659T. Data from strains 1, 2 and 3 are from this study, whereas data from 4, 5 and 6 are from the original species description papers [27–29]. tr, <1.0 %; –, not detected
|
Fatty acid |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Saturated | ||||||
|
C14 : 0 |
1.6 |
1.1 |
5.3 |
tr |
tr |
tr |
|
C16 : 0 |
10.3 |
15.6 |
12.6 |
4.5 |
7.0 |
14.6 |
|
C17 : 00 |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
1.1 |
|
C18 : 0 |
– |
– |
1.1 |
– |
tr |
tr |
|
Unsaturated | ||||||
|
C16 : 1 ω5c |
1.2 |
1.1 |
4.7 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
tr |
|
C17 : 1 ω6c |
– |
2.8 |
– |
– |
tr |
14.0 |
|
C18 : 1 ω7c 11-methyl |
3.5 |
1.5 |
10.3 |
1.5 |
3.1 |
4.0 |
|
C18 : 1 ω5c |
– |
tr |
tr |
– |
1.3 |
1.0 |
|
C18 : 1 ω6c |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
43.1 |
|
C19 : 0 cyclo ω8c |
– |
6.9 |
tr |
– |
tr |
tr |
|
Hydroxy | ||||||
|
C14 : 0 2OH |
12.0 |
12.5 |
8.2 |
14.9 |
4.5 |
11.1 |
|
C16 : 0 iso 3OH |
1.3 |
1.0 |
– |
– |
– |
|
|
C15 : 0 2OH |
– |
tr |
– |
– |
– |
3.2 |
|
C16 : 0 2OH |
– |
– |
– |
1.5 |
– |
1.3 |
|
C16 : 1 2OH |
– |
1.0 |
– |
|||
|
C18 : 0 2OH |
– |
– |
– |
1.1 |
– |
– |
|
C18 : 1 2OH |
– |
1.3 |
tr |
|||
|
iso-16 : 0 3-OH |
– |
– |
– |
2.3 |
1.4 |
– |
|
Summed features* | ||||||
|
3 |
21.2 |
14.7 |
1.3 |
48.1 |
36.7 |
tr |
|
8 |
48.9 |
41.3 |
54.0 |
21.9 |
39.2 |
– |
*Summed features represent groups of two or three fatty acids that could not be separated by GLC with the midi system. Summed feature 3 contains C16 : 1 ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c; and summed feature 8 contains C18 : 1 ω7c/C18 : 1 ω6c.
The total DNA of strain R4DWNT was extracted using the protocol described by Latorre et al. [12], quantified using the qubit dsDNA HS-high sensitivity kit (Invitrogen), and the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR reaction using the following primers [13]: 8F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′), 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′), 1055F (5′-ATGGCTGTCGTCAGCT-3′) and 341R (5′-CTGCTGCCTCCCGTAGG-3′). The almost-complete sequence of the 16S rRNA gene of the isolate was obtained through Sanger sequencing. The sequence length was 1470 base pairs, and it can be accessed in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases under accession number MK569518. The online sina (silva) tool [14] was used to perform a multiple alignment of the sequences, and the maximum-likelihood (ML) (Fig. 1) and neighbour-joining (NJ) (Fig. S1) trees were reconstructed using RaxML [15] and mega6 [16], respectively. The GTR algorithm was used for the ML tree, whereas Kimura's two-parameter model was used for the NJ tree. Reliability of the branch patterns was assessed using bootstrap analyses based on 1000 resamplings. Based on the 16S rRNA sequence analysis, R4DWNT does not have a clear phylogenetic position within the genus Sphingomonas . The closest neighbour is S. formosensis in both the ML (Fig. 1) and NJ (Fig. S1) trees, whereas S. fennica (the closest neighbour according to the 16S rRNA sequencing) appears grouped with S. oleivorans forming an external group. Nevertheless, these branches are not supported by high bootstrap values.
Fig. 1.
Maximum-likelihood tree illustrating the phylogenetic position of strain R4DWNT and related members of the genus Sphingomonas based on almost-complete 16S rRNA gene sequences. The optimal evolutionary model of nucleotide substitution applied is GTR. Bar, 0.02 expected nucleotide substitutions per site. Neorhizobium alkalisoli was used as an outgroup. Only bootstrap values above 50 % are indicated (1000 resamplings) at branchings.
The draft genome of strain R4DWNT was sequenced using the MiSeq sequencer (Illumina), and the Nextera XT Prep Kit protocol was used for library preparation. FastQC was utilized to assess the quality of the sequence reads. Genome assembly of 284 541 paired reads was performed using SPAdes 3.12.0 [17]. The draft genome of R4DWNT consists of 229 contigs yielding a total length of 4 444 219 bp, with a G+C content of 67.9 mol% and an N50 value of 38 937 bp. This genomic G+C content is in agreement with the closest neighbours and confirms the adscription of R4DWNT to the genus Sphingomonas [10, 11]. The maximum contig length was 136 617 bp, and all the contigs were annotated using the rast tool kit (RASTtk) integrated in patric version 3.5.41 (www.patricbrc.org). A total of 4455 coding sequences (CDS) were predicted, of which 2602 were proteins with functional assignments. A total of 45 tRNA and three rRNA genes (one single ribosomal operon) were identified. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ under the accession VNIM00000000. The version described in this paper is version VNIM01000000. The completeness and levels of contamination of the genome were analysed with the bioinformatic tool CheckM v1.0.6 [18], revealing values of 99.095 % and 0.603, respectively. Therefore, the draft genome showed enough quality for further analyses [19]. The complete 16S rRNA gene was extracted from this draft genome and, according to the EZBioCloud online tool [4], the closest type strains of R4DWNT are S. fennica K101T, S. formosensis CC-Nfb-2T, S. prati W18RDT, S. montana W16RDT and S. oleivorans FW-11T with 96.3, 96.1, 96.0, 95.9 and 95.7 % pairwise similarity, respectively. Taking into account that the similarity between R4DWNT and the closest type strain ( S. fennica ) is lower than 98.7 %, this isolate can be considered a new species [19, 20].
With the purposes of obtaining a more accurate phylogenetic inference of strain R4DWNT, a phylogenomic tree based on nucleotide sequences was generated. The ubcg version 3.0 pipeline (up-to-date bacterial core gene set) [21] was used to reconstruct an ML tree based on a multiple alignment of a set of 92 universal and single copy gene sequences with the tool FastTree version 2.10.1 (Fig. 2). According to the phylogenomic tree, the closest neighbour to R4DWNT is S. montana , and this is supported by high bootstrap values. S. fennica and S. olveirans, two of the closest neighbours according to the 16S rRNA gene sequence, have an external position with regards to the clade formed by S. montana and R4DWNT, along with other species.
Fig. 2.
Phylogenomic tree of strain R4DWNT. Unrooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on a multiple alignment of a set of 92 gene sequences (concatenation of 85 764 nucleotides) from using the ubcg version 3.0 pipeline [21]. Bootstrap analysis was carried out using 100 replications. Gene support indices (max. value 92 genes) and percentage bootstrap values (max. value 100%) are given at branching points. Bar, 0.10 substitutions per position.
In order to investigate if our isolate belongs to a known species, pairwise average nucleotide identity values (ANIb) [22] were calculated between strain R4DWNT and its closest type strains, by using the JSpeciesWS online tool [23]. Additionally, digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) pairwise values were also obtained using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator 2.1 (GGDC) tool [24]. As recommended for incompletely sequenced genomes, formula 2 was used for calculating the dDDH values [24]. The ANI and dDDH values between strain R4DWNT and the type strains of phylogenetically close species were higher than the threshold established to circumscribe prokaryotic species (Table S2), namely 95 % for ANI values [25] and 70 % for dDDH [24]. Therefore, both genome-related indexes [26] confirmed the adscription of strain R4DWNT to a hitherto unknown species.
Analysis of the draft genome of strain R4DWNT allowed to predict its ability to synthesize phosphatidylethanolamine, diphosphatidilglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerolphosphate and a sphingolipid, due to the presence of genes coding for phosphatidylserine decarboxylase [EC 4.1.1.65], cardiolipin synthase A/B [EC:2.7.8.-], ribosomal-protein-serine acetyltransferase [EC 2.3.1.-], CDP-diacylglycerol-glycerol-3-phosphate 3-phosphatidyltransferase [EC 2.7.8.5] and serine palmitoyl transferase [EC 2.3.1.50]. This polar lipids profile is in agreement with the polar lipid analyses available for other species of the genus Sphingomonas with validly published names [10, 11]. As described previously in S. fennica [10], strain R4DWNT is not able to synthesize phosphatidylcholine due to the absence of phosphatidylcholine synthase [EC 2.7.8.24], a unique feature of these closely related strains. Furthermore, spermidine synthase [EC 2.5.1.16] was detected in the draft genome of strain R4DWNT, suggesting that this strain could produce spermidine as the major polyamine. On the other hand, no genes related to homospermidine synthesis were detected. Strain R4DWNT has all the enzymatic repertory, including the enzymes 2-methoxy-6-polyprenyl-1,4-benzoquinol methylase [EC 2.1.1.201], ubiquinone biosynthesis monooxygenase Coq6 [EC 1.14.13.-] and 3-demethylubiquinol 3-O-methyltransferase [EC 2.1.1.64], to synthetize ubiquinones as the main isoprenoid quinone.
The comparison of the phenotypic, genomic and phylogenetic characteristics of strain R4DWNT with those of its closes phylogenetic neighbours revealed that this strain represents a new species belonging to the genus Sphingomonas for which the name of Sphingomonas solaris sp. nov. is proposed.
Description of Sphingomonas solaris sp. nov.
Sphingomonas solaris (so.la.ris. N.L. fem. adj. solaris, pertaining to the sun, referring to the origin of the type strain, isolated from the surface of solar panels).
Cells are Gram-negative, non-motile and rod-shaped (1.2–4.5 µm long × 1.2 µm wide). In old cultures, some cells grow in the form of a long rod shape of approximately 30 µm. After 7 days of incubation at 25 °C, colonies are round-shaped, shiny, orange-coloured, convex and 1 mm in diameter. This species is able to grow between 4 and 25 °C (optimum, 15–25 °C), and tolerates up to 1 % NaCl (w/v), with optimum at 0 % NaCl (w/v). The pH for optimum growth ranges between 6 and 9, and oxidase and catalase tests were positive. Alkaline phosphatase, esterase (C4), esterase lipase (C8), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, β-galactosidase and β-glucosidase activities are detected, whereas lipase (C14), cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, α-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase and α-fucosidase activities are not detected. Using API 20NE test kit, this species is positive for the assimilation of glucose, arabinose, mannitol, N-acetyl-glucosamine and maltose; weak for the assimilation of potassium gluconate and malic acid; and negative for the assimilation of mannose, capric acid, adipic acid, trisodium citrate and phenylacetic acid. Using Biolog GENIII MicroPlates, this species is positive for the utilization of glucuronamide, acetoacetic acid, d-fructose-6-PO4 and l-malic acid; weakly positive for the utilization of l-galactonic acid lactone, β-hydroxy-d,l-butyric acid and d-glucose-6-PO4; and negative for the utilization of raffinose, α-d-glucose, d-sorbitol, gelatin, pectin, p-hydroxy-phenylacetic acid, Tween 40, dextrin, lactose, d-mannose, d-mannitol, glycyl-l-proline, d-galacturonic acid, methyl pyruvate, ɣ-amino-butyric acid, maltose, melibiose, d-fructose, d-arabitol, l-alanine, d-lactic acid methyl ester, α-hydroxy-butyric acid, trehalose, methyl β-d-glucoside, d-galactose, myo-inositol, l-arginine, d-gluconic acid, l-lactic acid, cellobiose, d-salicin, 3-methyl glucose, glycerol, l-aspartic acid, d-glucuronic acid, citric acid, α-keto-butyric acid, gentiobiose, N-acetyl-d-glucosamine, d-fucose, l-glutamic acid, α-keto-glutaric acid, sucrose, N-acetyl-β-d-mannosamine, l-fucose, l-histidine, mucic acid, d-malic acid, propionic acid, turanose, N-acetyl-d-galactosamine, l-rhamnose, d-aspartic acid, l-pyroglutamic acid, quinic acid, acetic acid, stachyose, N-acetyl neuraminic acid, inosine, d-serine, l-serine, d-saccharic acid, bromo-succinic acid and formic acid. The major fatty acids are C18 : 1 ω7c/C18 : 1 ω6c, C16 : 1 ω7c/C16 : 1 ω6c, C14 : 0 2OH and C16 : 0. The type strain is R4DWNT (= CECT 9811T=LMG 31344T), isolated from the surface of a solar panel in Boston, MA, USA. The genomic G+C content of the type strain is 67.9 mol%.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
Financial support from the Real Colegio Complutense at Harvard University (Visiting Research Fellowship) is acknowledged. Kristie Tanner is a recipient of a Doctorado Industrial fellowship from the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Spain), with reference DI-16-08976. Financial support from Spanish Government (grant Helios. reference: BIO2015-66960-C3-1-R co-financed by FEDER funds and Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) is acknowledged. Financial support from the European CSA on biological standardization BIOROBOOST (EU grant number 820699, http://standardsinsynbio.eu) is acknowledged. This work was supported by DARPA BRICS grants HR0011-15-C-0091 and HR0011-18-2-0014 (to A.S.K.) and IARPA FELIX grant N66001-18-C-4503 (to A.S.K.). A.S.K. also acknowledges funding from the NIH Director’s New Innovator Award (1DP2AI131083-01) and an NSF CAREER Award (MCB-1350949).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University for providing access to the solar panels sampled in this project. We thank Manuel Porcar for his help in writing this manuscript and his continuous support throughout this project.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ANIb, average nucleotide identity; CDS, coding sequences; dDDH, digital DNA–DNA hybridization; GGDC, Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator; ML, maximum-likelihood; NJ, neighbour-joining; R2A, Reasoner's 2A; UBCG, up-to-date bacterial core gene set.
Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo (CECT), Belgian Co-ordinated Collections of Micro-organisms (BCCM/LMG). The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain R4DWNT is MK569518, and the genome accession number is VNIM00000000.
Two supplementary tables and one supplementary figure are available with the online version of this article.
References
- 1.Yabuuchi E, Yano I, Oyaizu H, Hashimoto Y, Ezaki T, et al. Proposals of Sphingomonas paucimobilis gen. nov. and comb. nov., Sphingomonas parapaucimobilis sp. nov., Sphingomonas yanoikuyae sp. nov., Sphingomonas adhaesiva sp. nov., Sphingomonas capsulata comb. nov., and two genospecies of the genus Sphingomonas . Microbiol Immunol. 1990;34:99–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1990.tb00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Takeuchi M, Sawada H, Oyaizu H, Yokota A. Phylogenetic evidence for Sphingomonas and Rhizomonas as nonphotosynthetic members of the alpha-4 subclass of the Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44:308–314. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-2-308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.White DC, Sutton SD, Ringelberg DB. The genus Sphingomonas: physiology and ecology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1996;7:301–306. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(96)80034-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhao Q, Yue S, Bilal M, Hu H, Wang W, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of 26 Sphingomonas and Sphingobium strains: Dissemination of bioremediation capabilities, biodegradation potential and horizontal gene transfer. Sci Total Environ. 2017;609:1238–1247. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fujiwara H, Soda S, Fujita M, Ike M. Kinetics of bisphenol A degradation by Sphingomonas paucimobilis FJ-4. J Biosci Bioeng. 2016;122:341–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gatheru Waigi M, Sun K, Gao Y. Sphingomonads in microbe-assisted phytoremediation: tackling soil pollution. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35:883–899. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark: DE: MIDI Inc; 1990. [Google Scholar]
- 9.MIDI Sherlock Microbial Identification System Operating Manual. version 6.1. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wittich R-M, Busse H-J, Kämpfer P, Macedo AJ, Tiirola M, et al. Sphingomonas fennica sp. nov. and Sphingomonas haloaromaticamans sp. nov., outliers of the genus Sphingomonas . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:1740–1746. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64835-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lin S-Y, Shen F-T, Lai W-A, Zhu Z-L, Chen W-M, et al. Sphingomonas formosensis sp. nov., a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium isolated from agricultural soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:1581–1586. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.034728-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Latorre A, Moya A, Ayala FJ. Evolution of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila subobscura . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:8649–8653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.22.8649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pascual J, Wüst PK, Geppert A, Foesel BU, Huber KJ, et al. Novel isolates double the number of chemotrophic species and allow the first description of higher taxa in Acidobacteria subdivision 4. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2015;38:534–544. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. Sina: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1823–1829. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable, and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. bioRxiv. 2018 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich A, Korobeynikov A, et al. Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads; pp. 158–170. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:461–466. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:346–351. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059774-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I, et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol. 2018;56:280–285. doi: 10.1007/s12275-018-8014-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Richter M, Rosselló-Mora R, Glöckner FO, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2015:pii: btv681. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the bacteria and archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:316–324. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.054171-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Manandhar P, Zhang G, Hu Y, Lama A, Gao F, et al. Sphingomonas prati sp. nov., isolated from alpine meadow soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:4269–4275. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Manandhar P, Zhang G, Lama A, Liu F, Hu Y. Sphingomonas montana sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample from the Tanggula mountain in the Qinghai Tibetan Plateau. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:1659–1668. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0915-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen L, Chen W-F, Xu Z-L, Li W, Zhang X-Y, et al. Sphingomonas oleivorans sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:3720–3725. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


