Abstract
Objective
Recent studies carried out on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients suggest that the disease might initiate in the motor cortex and spread to its targets along the corticofugal tracts. In this study, we aimed to test the corticofugal hypothesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis experimentally.
Methods
Sod1 G86R and Fezf2 knockout mouse lines were crossed to generate a model that expresses a mutant of the murine Sod1 gene ubiquitously, a condition sufficient to induce progressive motor symptoms and premature death, but genetically lacks corticospinal neurons and other subcerebral projection neurons, one of the main populations of corticofugal neurons. Disease onset and survival were recorded, and weight and motor behavior were followed longitudinally. Hyper‐reflexia and spasticity were monitored using electromyographic recordings. Neurodegeneration and gliosis were assessed by histological techniques.
Results
Absence of subcerebral projection neurons delayed disease onset, reduced weight loss and motor impairment, and increased survival without modifying disease duration. Absence of corticospinal neurons also limited presymptomatic hyper‐reflexia, a typical component of the upper motoneuron syndrome.
Interpretation
Major corticofugal tracts are crucial to the onset and progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In the context of the disease, subcerebral projection neurons might carry detrimental signals to their downstream targets. In its entirety, this study provides the first experimental arguments in favor of the corticofugal hypothesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:688–702
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating neurodegenerative disease characterized by rapidly progressing muscle atrophy and paralysis, leading to death within only 2 to 5 years of diagnosis. Clinically and histologically, ALS is defined as the progressive loss of two neuronal populations: corticospinal and corticobulbar neurons (CSN) in the motor cortex, and spinal and bulbar motoneurons (MN) in the brainstem and spinal cord. 1 This duality has fostered a long‐standing debate regarding the disease origin along the corticospinomuscular axis. 2
Jean‐Martin Charcot, who first described ALS, suggested a cortical origin and a propagation from the motor cortex to the spinal cord. 3 Comprehensive clinical examination of patients unraveled signs highly suggestive of a cortical origin, such as the split hand syndrome and typical gait abnormalities. 4 Meanwhile, transcranial magnetic stimulation studies identified early hyperexcitability of the motor cortex that is negatively correlated with survival and manifests before disease onset, pointing again to a potentially initiating role of the motor cortex. 5 Cortical hyperexcitability has been proposed to translate into glutamatergic excitotoxicity to downstream targets of the CSN, ie, spinal and bulbar MN, providing a first possible mechanism for propagation. 4 More recently, staging of the TAR DNA binding protein (TARDBP; also known as TDP‐43) pathology, 6 a histopathological burden that characterizes most ALS patients, led to the emergence of the so‐called corticofugal hypothesis, which proposes a motor cortical origin of the disease and a direct, monosynaptic dissemination of misfolded TDP‐43 proteins in a prion‐like manner. 7 Although supported by several neuroimaging studies (reviewed by Brunet and colleagues 8 ), corticofugal propagation cannot be assessed in patients. We thus reasoned that mouse genetics could prove useful to address a potential cortical origin and corticofugal propagation of ALS directly.
In rodents, as in humans, corticofugal projections arise from two populations: corticothalamic projection neurons and subcerebral projection neurons (SubCerPN) that include the disease‐relevant CSN. 9 , 10 Although major differences exist between primates and rodents regarding the route of the corticospinal tract and the connectivity of CSN onto alpha motoneurons, many mouse models of ALS recapitulate CSN or SubCerPN degeneration (reviewed by Brunet and colleagues 8 ). Likewise, we recently showed that Sod1 G86R mice display presymptomatic CSN degeneration and a somatotopic relationship between CSN and spinal motoneuron degeneration, 11 as reported in ALS patients. 12
Here, we sought to test the contribution SubCerPN to ALS by taking advantage of the Fezf2 knockout mice that develop in the absence of SubCerPN. 13 These animals lack the gene encoding the transcription factor Fezf2 (Fezl, Zfp312) that is both necessary 14 and sufficient to instruct birth and specification of CSN and other SubCerPN. 15 , 16 Fezf2 −/− mice are hyperactive, 13 present defects of cortical interneuron lamination and unbalanced cortical activity, 17 and fail to feed on solid food. 13 However, when fed soft food, Fezf2 −/− mice do not display any major motor phenotype: they walk and reproduce. We crossbred the Sod1 G86R and Fezf2 −/− mouse lines to generate a model ubiquitously expressing the Sod1 G86R transgene, a condition sufficient to develop an ALS‐like phenotype, 18 but entirely lacking CSN and other SubCerPN, hence challenging the definition of ALS.
An initial report of the findings presented here was published as a preprint on bioRxiv. 19
Materials and Methods
Animals
All animal experiments were performed by authorized investigators and approved by the local ethical committee of Strasbourg University (CREMEAS, agreement #00738.01). Animals, kept 2 to 5 per cages, were housed in the animal facility of the Faculty of Medicine of Strasbourg, with a regular 12 hour/12 hour light/dark cycle, in constant conditions (21 ± 1°C; 60% relative humidity). Food and water were accessible ad libitum. Fezf2 −/− mice 13 were obtained from the Arlotta Laboratory. Sod1 G86R males 18 were crossed with Fezf2 +/− females, and F1 Fezf2 +/−/Sod1 G86R males were crossed with Fezf2 +/−/WT females to obtain Fezf2 +/+/WT (WT, n = 23); Fezf2 −/−/WT (KO, n = 22); Fezf2 +/+/Sod1 G86R (Sod1, = 14); and Fezf2 −/−/Sod1 G86R (KO/Sod1, n = 17). Males were used for survival, behavior, and histology. Males and females, in equal proportions, were used for H‐reflex (n = 6 WT, n = 6 KO, n = Sod1, and n = KO/Sod1) and histology (75 days: n = 6 WT, n = 5 KO, n = 6 Sod1, and n = 3 KO/Sod1; and 105 days: n = 6 WT, n = 4 KO, n = 8 Sod1, and n = 5 KO/Sod1).
Quantitative PCR Analyses
Tissue harvesting, RNA extraction, and qPCR were performed as described by Scekic‐Zahirovic and colleagues 20 using the following primers: Gusb, forward, 5′‐CGAGTATGGAGCAGACGCAA‐3′ and reverse, 5′‐AGCCTTCTGGTACTCCTCACT‐3′; Actb, forward, 5′‐ATGTGGATCAGCAAGCAGGA‐3′ and reverse, 5′‐AGCTCAGTAACAGTCCGCCT‐3′; Hsp90ab1, forward, 5′‐TACTACTCGGCTTTCCCGTCA‐3′ and reverse, 5′‐CCTGAAAGGCAAAGGTCTCCA‐3′; Fezf2, forward, 5′‐GTGCGGCAAGGTGTTCAATG‐3′ and reverse, 5′‐CAGACTTTGCACACAAACGGT‐3′; Sod1, forward, 5′‐GAGACCTGGGCAATGTGACT‐3′ and reverse, 5′‐GTTTACTGCGCAATCCCAAT‐3′; and ChAT, forward, 5′‐CTGGCCACCTACCTTCAGTG‐3′ and reverse, 5′‐CCCCAAACCGCTTCACAATG‐3′.
Motor Tests and Regression Analyses
Mice were trained from 5 to 8 weeks of age and followed from 9 weeks until death. Motor coordination, endurance, muscle strength, and mouse gait were assessed as previously described. 20 Multiple linear regression analyses were run on R v.3.4.3 with all the relevant packages to include weight and speed as confounding variables. Normality of distributions was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk or the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and assessed graphically using a normal quantile plot.
Electromyography, H‐Reflex, and Tail Long Lasting Reflex Recordings
All recordings were performed with a standard electromyographic apparatus (Dantec Dynamics, Skovlunde, Denmark) as previously described. 21 Tail spasticity of end‐stage mice was determined and quantified as previously described. 22 Signal intensities were measured before and after stimulation, using ImageJ (US, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The H‐reflex was assessed on presymptomatic mice aged 80 and 105 days (first and second hindlimb, respectively), by modifying a previously described method, 23 with stimulation of the sciatic nerve and recording in the abductor digiti minimi muscles. The amplitude of the H‐reflex, as the peak–trough value of the recording on a 1 millisecond window situated at the expected latency for the H‐reflex, was measured between 5 and 8 milliseconds after stimulation. Mice were considered to display an H‐reflex when at least 1 of the 2 hindlimbs was positive.
Retrograde Labeling of the CSN and Histological Procedures
CSN were retrogradely labeled with Fluorogold as previously described. 14 Animals were transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) as described. 20 Nervous tissues were cut into 40‐μm‐thick vibratome sections (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Sections were blocked for 30 minutes with 5% horse serum and 0.5% Triton X‐100, incubated with primary antibody overnight, rinsed in phosphate‐buffered saline and incubated for 2 hours with secondary antibody (1/500, Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA).
For immunohistochemistry, sections were pretreated for 10 minutes in 3% H2O2 and revealed upon 1 hour incubation in Vectastain ABC Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) with 0.075% 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine (Sigma‐Aldrich, St Louis, MO) and 0.002% H2O2 in 50mM Tris–HCl. Primary antibodies were as follows: goat anti‐ChAT (AB144P, 1/50), mouse anti‐parvalbumin (MAB1572,1/500), and goat anti‐calretinin (AB1550,1/1000) (Millipore, Burlington, MA); rat anti‐CTIP2 (AB18465, 1/100), mouse anti‐P62 (AB56416, 1/100), goat anti‐TPH2 (AB121013, 1/500), and goat anti‐Iba1 (AB5076, 1/100) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); rabbit anti‐synaptophysin (578, 1/100) and rabbit anti‐neurofilament (NF575, 1/100) (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium); mouse anti‐CRYM (AA215‐314,1/100, Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan); rabbit anti‐GFAP (Z0334, 1/200, Dako, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA); rat anti‐TDP‐43 (10782‐2‐AP,1/500, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL); and mouse anti‐calbindin (C9848,1/500) and rhodamine‐conjugated α‐bungarotoxin (T0195, 1/500) (Sigma‐Aldrich). Lumbar MN were counted on six sections, interneurons on four sections, and serotonergic neurons on one coronal section (bregma −4.72mm). Approximately 100 NMJ were examined per animal. Images were captured using an AxioImager M2 microscope equipped with a structured illumination system (Apotome, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and a high‐resolution B/W camera (Hamamatsu, Iwata, Shizuoka, Japan), and run by the ZEN 2 software (Zeiss).
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism v.6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA), using Student t test, 1‐way and 2‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey's multiple comparisons post hoc test, the log‐rank test (Mantel–Cox), Grubbs' test and Fischer's exact test. Results were considered significant when p < 0.05.
Results
Generation of the Fezf2−/−; Sod1G86R Mice
To test the contribution of the cerebral cortex to ALS, we generated a mouse line overexpressing the mutant Sod1 G86R transgene but lacking SubCerPN, by crossbreeding Sod1 G86R to Fezf2 −/− mice. We obtained four genotypes: Fezf2 +/+ and non‐transgenic (WT), Fezf2 −/− and non‐transgenic (KO), Fezf2 +/+ and Sod1 G86R (Sod1), and Fezf2 −/− and Sod1 G86R (KO/Sod1) (Fig 1). Fluorogold injection into the cervical portion of the dorsal funiculus confirmed the absence of retrogradelly labeled CSN, a subpopulation of SubCerPN, in the motor cortex of KO mice compared with WT. Immunostaining of CTIP2 further confirmed the absence of layer V SubCerPN in KO and KO/Sod1 animals compared with their WT and Sod1 littermates. To verify that absence of Fezf2 expression had no effect on Sod1 expression or on spinal MN generation, we ran qPCR analyses. Upregulation of Sod1 expression was verified in Sod1 and KO/Sod1 animals and did not differ between the two genotypes, neither in the cerebral cortex nor in the spinal cord. Expression of the motoneuronal marker Chat was not significantly different between any of the four genotypes. Together, the data suggest that KO/Sod1 mice represent a good model to study the impact of SubCerPN on the onset and progression of the ALS‐like phenotype, and to test the corticofugal hypothesis.
Absence of SubCerPN Delays Disease Onset and Death
To examine the consequences of the absence of projections from the cerebral cortex to its main subcerebral targets, we followed Sod1 and KO/Sod1 mice and their controls (Fig 2). The 75‐day‐old KO and KO/Sod1 mice were lighter than WT and Sod1 mice, but their body mass index was comparable (data not shown), indicating that KO and KO/Sod1 mice were smaller but not thinner than their WT and Sod1 littermates. As opposed to WT and KO mice, Sod1 and KO/Sod1 mice prematurely stopped gaining weight. Using weight peak as the disease onset, we observed that KO/Sod1 mice presented a significant delay of disease onset compared with their Sod1 littermates (median: 107.5 vs 159 days; p = 0.0070). Likewise, survival of the KO/Sod1 mice was increased compared with that of Sod1 mice (median: 130 vs 183 days; p = 0.0083), but the overall disease duration was not significantly different. Finally, the weight loss during the course of the disease was significantly smaller for the KO/Sod1 mice than for the Sod1 mice (36.45 ± 1.82 vs 25.07 ± 1.68%; p < 0.0001), in accordance with an arrest of weight gain rather than a clear weight loss and an increased survival. Together, the data indicate that in the Sod1 G86R mouse model of ALS the absence of SubCerPN is beneficial.
Absence of SubCerPN Attenuates Motor Impairment
Next, we tested whether absence of SubCerPN could ameliorate motor performances and used linear regression analysis with the weight as a covariable to compare the animals both at the beginning and over the course of the experiment (origin and slope, respectively; Table S1). On the grip test and rotarod, Sod1 and KO/Sod1 mice rapidly showed reduced performances, but KO/Sod1 mice were affected later than their Sod1 littermates and maintained higher performances over time than their Sod1 littermates (Fig 2). On the inverted grid, KO and KO/Sod1 mice initially displayed more difficulties in opposing their gravitational force compared with WT and Sod1 mice. Yet, although WT and KO animals maintained their hanging time throughout all the repetitive assessments, Sod1 and KO/Sod1 gradually decreased their performances. However, this decrease occurred later and in a more moderate manner in KO/Sod1 versus Sod1 animals.
Linear regression analyses of the gait recorded on a CatWalk device using weight and speed as covariates identified 3 parameters significantly different between WT and KO animals over time, and not between WT and Sod1 animals, probably reflecting the consequences of the absence of CSN (WT versus KO; see Table S1). We also identified 15 parameters significantly altered in Sod1 versus WT mice during disease progression (see Table S1). Amongst them, 10 were also significantly different in Sod1 versus KO/Sod1 animals (Fig 3). Of those, two parameters showed opposite effects between absence of Fezf2 and overexpression of Sod1 G86R, whereas eight parameters instead showed a genuine amelioration of the Sod1 phenotype in the absence CNS (KO/Sod1 vs Sod1). Overall, CatWalk analysis indicated that the absence of CSN ameliorated a set parameters affected in Sod1 G86R animals as disease progressed. Together, the data confirmed the beneficial effects of the absence of SubCerPN on motor impairment in Sod1 G86R mice.
Absence of CSN Minimizes Spinal MN Loss and Neuromuscular Junction Denervation without Modifying Other Pathological Hallmarks of ALS
We also investigated the spinal cord of end‐stage animals, for its relevance to ALS but also as the target of CSN. Staining for GFAP and IBA1 revealed astrogliosis and microgliosis in the lumbar spinal cord of Sod1 and KO/Sod1 animals, without any difference between the two genotypes (Fig 4). Labeling of the autophagy marker P62/SQTM1 revealed a healthy, homogeneous cytoplasmic staining in both WT and KO mice and large, stellate‐like inclusions in Sod1 and KO/Sod1 mice, with similar occurrence and intensity. Immunolabeling and counting of the ChAT+ MN revealed a mild decrease of their somas in Sod1 mice, as reported, 21 and maintenance of a bigger pool of MN in KO/Sod1 versus Sod1 animals (8.456 ± 0.49 vs 6.152 ± 0.57; p = 0.0306). Neuromuscular junction (NMJ) labeling and rating indicated that KO/Sod1 animals had 2 times as many innervated NMJ as Sod1 animals by disease end‐stage (23.8 ± 4.87% vs 11.34 ± 3.12%; p = 0.0239). Overall, the data show that the absence of cortical afferents to the spinal cord partly protects against Wallerian degeneration of the MN without modifying levels of spinal gliosis and dysregulation of autophagy.
Neither Sod1G86R Overexpression nor Absence of SubCerPN Modifies TDP‐43 Subcellular Localization
The corticofugal hypothesis of ALS was proposed upon staging of the TDP‐43 pathology. 6 , 7 Although TDP‐43 aggregates have not been reported in SOD1 ALS patients,24 their putative occurrence in Sod1 G86R mice has, to our knowledge, not been evaluated. To test whether increased survival and partial protection of MN in KO/Sod1 animals was correlated with altered TDP‐43 subcellular localization, we performed immunolabeling on end‐stage animals and controls. Colocalization analyses in CRYM+ SubCerPN of the motor cortex of WT and Sod1 animals indicated that Sod1 G86R overexpression was not associated with nuclear depletion of TDP‐43 or occurrence of TDP‐43+ aggregates (Fig 5). No difference in TDP‐43 immunoreactivity could be observed in the surrounding cortical environment either. In the spinal cord, we failed to detect any difference in TDP‐43 immunoreactivity in CHAT+ MN or in their surrounding environment across genotypes. Together, the data suggest that in the Sod1 G86R mouse model of ALS, the detrimental message carried along the corticofugal tracts probably does not take the form of TDP‐43+ aggregates.
Absence of CSN Positively Impacts Hyper‐Reflexia but Not Spasticity
In humans, degeneration or lesion of the corticospinal tract results in appearance of the upper motoneuron syndrome, 25 a series of signs that include muscular weakness, decreased motor control, hyper‐reflexia, including spasticity, and clonus. 26 In ALS patients, spasticity is typically evaluated using the modified Ashworth Scale, which measures the resistance to a passive soft‐tissue stretching performed by the physician. 27 Hyper‐reflexia instead is observed clinically as a hyperactive deep tendon reflex and electrophysiologically as an increase of the monosynaptic spinal reflex activity revealed by an increase of the ratio between the short‐latency Hoffman's reflex, or H‐reflex, to compound muscle action potentials (H/M ratio). 28 In rodents, assessment of the tail long lasting reflex (LLR) after cutaneous stimulation is accepted as a simple method to assess spasticity in awake animals, 29 and the H/M ratio is used to evaluate hyper‐reflexia and is correlated with spasticity. 29 , 30 We reasoned that the mouse line that we generated could contribute to evaluate the role of CSN in the modulation of spinal network excitability involved in hyper‐reflexia and spasticity in an ALS‐related context.
We ran electromyographic analyses on presymptomatic anesthetized mice to detect the H‐reflex upon stimulation of the sciatic nerve and recording of the abductor digiti minimi muscle. We detected an H‐reflex in fractions of Sod1 and KO/Sod1 groups of animals, but never in the WT or KO animals (Fig 6). Thus, the H‐reflex developed only in Sod1 G86R animals, independently of the presence of CSN and, counterintuitively, the absence of CSN, per se, was not sufficient to trigger an H‐reflex. Evaluation of the proportions of animals presenting an H‐reflex did not reveal any significant difference between Sod1 and KO/Sod1 at this age. However, measurement of the H/M ratio among the animals displaying an H‐reflex showed a significant reduction in KO/Sod1 animals compared with their Sod1 littermates. This suggests that, at presymptomatic ages, absence of CSN limits hyper‐reflexia. To further evaluate spasticity, we assessed the tail LLR in awake and fully paralyzed (end‐stage) animals. 22 , 29 , 31 Sod1 and KO/Sod1 animals could be subdivided into spastic and nonspastic, but the relative proportions of each or intensity of the response to the stimulation were not significantly different between Sod1 and KO/Sod1 mice, suggesting that absence of CSN is not sufficient to prevent the manifestation of spasticity in end‐stage animals. Together, the data indicate that hyper‐reflexia arises presymptomatically in Sod1 G86R mice and that absence of CSN decreases this particular feature of spasticity. In contrast, spasticity assessed by LLR in end‐stage Sod1 G86R animals does not appear to be modulated by CSN. In addition to the absence or the gradual loss of CSN, other mechanisms might account for the occurrence of hyper‐reflexia and spasticity in mice.
End‐Stage Spasticity is Correlated with Loss of Serotonergic Neurons and of Recurrent Inhibition onto MN
Emergence of spasticity could arise from altered supraspinal controls, and more particularly serotonergic inputs, and from spinal network rearrangements. 22 , 31 , 32 , 33 We thus tested whether absence of SubCerPN could affect the population of TPH2+ neurons present in the raphe nuclei throughout the course of the disease in Sod1 and KO/Sod1 animals compared with controls (Fig 7). As reported, 31 end‐stage Sod1 mice displayed significant loss of TPH2+ neurons compared with WT. Likewise, we observed significant loss of TPH2+ neurons in end‐stage KO/Sod1 mice compared with WT, but no significant difference between Sod1 and KO/Sod1 animals. At younger ages, no significant difference could be detected across the different groups of mice. Together, the data indicate that absence of CSN and other SubCerPN does not affect survival of the serotonergic neurons and that occurrence of LLR in end‐stage animals could, at least in part, result from the late loss of serotonergic neurons.
To determine whether absence of CSN could affect the populations of inhibitory spinal IN in KO and KO/Sod1 animals compared with controls, we labeled and quantified parvalbumin‐ (PV), calretinin‐ (CR) and calbindin‐ (CB) positive IN present in the lumbar spinal cord of 105day‐old and end‐stage animals and their age‐matched control littermates. The populations of PV+ and CR+ IN in laminae IV–IX were found to be unchanged across genotypes and ages (Fig 8A–D). In contrast, CB+ IN present in the ventral horn of the spinal cord, which include the subpopulation of Renshaw cells that exert recurrent inhibition onto MN, 34 were decreased in end‐stage Sod1 and KO/Sod1 animals in comparison to their WT and KO littermates (p = 0.0110 between KO and KO/Sod1 and p = 0.0900 between WT and Sod1; see Fig 8E,F). Overall, the results indicate that the absence of CSN does not modify the populations of spinal inhibitory IN and that Sod1 G86R transgene expression leads to a late loss of CB+ IN, which could account for spasticity at late stages of the disease.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that absence of SubCerPN delayed disease onset, extended survival, and improved clinical conditions of a mouse model of ALS, providing the first experimental arguments in favor of the corticofugal hypothesis.
Contribution of the Cerebral Cortex and its Outputs to ALS
Although the origin of ALS remains debated, 2 evidence from neurophysiological and pathological studies conducted on patients 4 , 5 are nourishing a revival of interest in Charcot's initial view of ALS as a primary cortical impairment. 3 Whether disease propagation relies on altered neuronal excitability and subsequent excitotoxicity 5 or on prion‐like propagation of misfolded proteins, 7 both schools of thought agree on a common cortical origin and propagation along the corticofugal tracts. 4 However, the hypothesis cannot be tested directly in patients. Although the corticomotoneuronal system has undergone major modifications with evolution, 4 corticothalamic and SubCerPN populations are remarkably well conserved between mice and humans, as opposed to the commissural and associative projection neuron populations. 35 Further support for the appropriateness of rodents to study the cortical contributions to ALS is provided by their ability to recapitulate CSN or SubCerPN degeneration. 8 In the Sod1 G86R mouse model, CSN precedes MN degeneration and NMJ denervation. 11 Thus, rodent models and Sod1 G86R mice in particular seem suitable to assess the contribution of SubCerPN to ALS.
Absence of SubCerPN Delays Onset and Extends Survival without Increasing Disease Duration
Crossbreeding of Sod1 G86R and Fezf2 −/− mouse lines generated animals ubiquitously expressing Sod1 G86R but lacking SubCerPN, including CSN, hence challenging the definition of ALS. Absence of SubCerPN delayed disease onset and increased survival without modifying disease duration. The results are highly reminiscent of an elegant study by Thomsen and colleagues, 36 who knocked down SOD1 G93A in the posterior motor cortex of transgenic rats using AAV9–SOD1–shRNA injections and reported delayed disease onset, extended survival and unchanged disease duration. The similarity of these and our results is remarkable given the differences in the approaches. Together, the two studies suggest that absence of diseased CSN or instead maintenance of genetically corrected CSN might be equally beneficial and that Sod1/SOD1 mutant transgene‐expressing CSN might be detrimental to their downstream targets. Yet, it is worth mentioning that AAV9 is likely to have targeted all types of cortical excitatory and inhibitory neurons, potentially contributing to correct cortical circuit dysfunctions such as those reported in Sod1 G93A and TDP‐43 A315T mouse models of ALS. 8 Cell type‐specific genetic ablation experiments could provide further information on the contribution of individual neuronal and glial populations to cortical circuit dysfunction and consequences for corticofugal targets. Such approaches allow better definition of the contributions of MN, microglia, astrocytes, and muscles to ALS onset and progression. 37 Together, these studies and ours indicate that the cerebral cortex and SubCerPN might be involved in disease onset, whereas MN and glia might modulate disease progression.
Absence of CSN Improves Motor Performances and Minimizes MN Degeneration
Although Fezf2 −/− mice lack CSN and other SubCerPN and display altered cortical development, 13 , 14 , 17 they remarkably do not present any major motor phenotype. In mice, CSN make mostly indirect or polysynaptic connections and few direct or monosynaptic connections onto MN. 38 It is possible that in Fezf2 −/− mice the majority of indirect connections are less affected, or better compensated, and the minority of direct connections are more affected but translate into a phenotype that is harder to reveal. In the Celsr3/Emx1 mice, CST genetic ablation is correlated with increased numbers of rubrospinal and monoaminergic projections to the spinal cord. 39 Although the Celsr3/Emx1 mice display proper locomotion, they show difficulties in fine motor tests. 39 In the present study, we found that Fezf2 −/− mice, although smaller and lighter than controls, performed less well on the inverted grid test, possibly owing to defects in proper grip to the grid. In addition, the sensitive CatWalk gait analysis device revealed decreased performances of Fezf2 −/− mice. Together, these data indicate that Fezf2 −/− mice do present a discrete motor phenotype, which could possibly be further revealed by dedicated fine motor tests. Importantly, we found that absence of CSN and other SubCerPN improved the motor phenotype of the Sod1 G86R mice and limited the denervation of the NMJ and ultimate loss of MN. This indicates that, although CSN might not be of great importance for locomotion in rodents, or their agenesis well compensated by other descending tracts, their presence in a context of ALS is detrimental to their downstream MN targets, whether direct or indirect.
Absence of CSN Limits Hyper‐Reflexia
Absence of SubCerPN in Sod1 G86R mice ameliorated hyper‐reflexia, a feature of the upper motoneuron syndrome. 26 The absence of H‐reflex recording in WT animals does not rule out the existence of a small‐amplitude H‐reflex in these animals, below the detection threshold, as already observed. 30 In contrast, the presence of an H‐reflex in subgroups of presymptomatic Sod1 animals suggests that hyper‐reflexia precedes the appearance of motor symptoms in these animals and is correlated with the presymptomatic degeneration of the CSN. 11 Absence of an H‐reflex in KO animals suggests that developmental absence of CSN and other SubCerPN could have been compensated by other supraspinal controls or by spinal network rearrangements, or both. Finally, decreased H/M ratios in KO/Sod1 compared with Sod1 animals indicate decreased hyper‐reflexia and possible mitigation of the upper motoneuron syndrome in the absence of CSN and other SubCerPN. In contrast, LLR of the tail muscle of fully paralyzed end‐stage mice was neither prevented nor even slightly modulated by absence of SubCerPN. But given that evaluation of the LLR can be performed only in paralyzed animals, our study did not allow us to test whether spasticity could have arisen later in KO/Sod1 than in Sod1 mice. Supraspinal controls, and more particularly serotonergic inputs, and spinal network rearrangements could account for the emergence of spasticity. 22 , 31 , 32 , 33 We failed to detect any difference in TPH2+ serotonergic neurons in the raphe nuclei and in PV+, CR+, and CB+ inhibitory spinal IN at the time when presymptomatic hyper‐reflexia was detected. However, an altered contribution of these neuronal populations to spinal circuits at this presymptomatic age could take the form of neuronal plasticity, which we did not test. At disease end‐stage, we observed decreased amounts of serotonergic neurons in the raphe nuclei and of CB+ IN in the ventral spinal cord of Sod1 mice, in accordance with formerly published work, 22 , 30 , 31 , 34 and no difference between Sod1 and KO/Sod1 mice, suggesting that both mechanisms could account for the emergence of the LLR in these transgenic animals.
Possible Propagation Mechanisms and Perspectives
We demonstrated that absence of SubCerPN was beneficial in a mouse model of ALS, suggesting that major corticofugal projections might be detrimental to their downstream targets in the context of ALS. But whether corticofugal propagation of the disease relies on prion‐like transmission of misfolded proteins 7 or on altered neuronal excitability and subsequent excitotoxicity 5 remains an open question. As opposed to most ALS patients and like SOD1 patients, Sod1 G86R mice do not seem to present any TDP‐43 pathology. However, they do present P62+ aggregates, and the presence of misfolded proteins remains possible. Nevertheless, we did not observe any difference in P62 staining between KO/Sod1 and Sod1 animals that could be correlated with the extended survival of the double transgenic mice. In a recent study, we genetically ablated the SOD1 G37R transgene from corticofugal projection neurons. This was sufficient to prevent CSN degeneration in a cell‐autonomous manner but had no impact on disease onset and survival, ruling out a major contribution of misfolded protein propagation from the corticofugal neurons to their targets on disease occurrence and progression in this mouse model. 40 On the contrary, knock‐down of the SOD1 G93A mutant transgene in the posterior motor cortex of a rat model of ALS using AAV9 delayed disease onset and extended survival. 36 It is possible that this beneficial effect arose from targeting cortical IN that modulate the excitability and activity of corticofugal neurons. 41 Given the reported alterations in excitability of cortical neuron populations in different mouse models of the disease, 8 , 42 comparison between silencing and genetic ablation of adult corticofugal neurons would be particularly informative to gain a better understanding of the mechanism by which these neurons might contribute to disease onset and progression. Finally, deep molecular analysis of CSN dysfunction in ALS 11 might in the future provide a better understanding of the role of the cerebral cortex and its outputs to ALS and potentially unravel new therapeutic targets.
Author Contributions
T.B., C.B., M.C.‐E., and C.R. contributed to the conception and design of the study; all authors contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the data; T.B., C.B., F.L., M.C.‐E., and C.R. contributed to drafting the text and preparing the figures.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Nothing to report.
Supporting information
Acknowledgment
The work has been supported by a European Research Council (ERC) starting grant (#639737), a Marie Sklodowska‐Curie career integration grant (#618764), an “Association Française contre les Myopathies” (AFM)‐Telethon trampoline grant (#16923), a “Fédération pour la Recherche sur le Cerveau” (FRC) grant, and a Neurex grant to C.R., PhD fellowships from the French Ministry of Research to T.B., C.B., and A.B., and from the “Association de Recherche sur la Sclérose Latérale Amyotrophique” (ARSLA) to C.B., and by a postdoctoral fellowship from the AFM‐Telethon to J.C.Z (#21993).
We are extremely thankful to Véronique Marchand‐Pauvert, Pascal Branchereau, Pierre Veinante, and Luc Dupuis for critical reading of the manuscript and insightful comments.
References
- 1. Brown RH, Al‐Chalabi A. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2017;377:162–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ravits JM, La Spada AR. ALS motor phenotype heterogeneity,focality, and spread. Neurology 2009;73:805–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Charcot JM. Sclérose latérale amyotrophique: oeuvres complètes. Paris: Bureaux du Progrès Medical, 1874. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Eisen A, Braak H, Del Tredici K, et al. Cortical influences drive amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2017;88:917–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Vucic S, Kiernan MC. Transcranial magnetic Stimulationfor the assessment of neurodegenerative disease. Neurotherapeutics 2017;14:91–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Brettschneider J, Del Tredici K, Toledo JB, et al. Stages of pTDP‐43 pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2013;74:20–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Braak H, Brettschneider J, Ludolph AC, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis‐a model of corticofugal axonal spread. Nat Rev Neurol 2013;9:708–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Brunet A, Stuart‐Lopez G, Burg T, et al. Cortical circuit dysfunction as a potential driver of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurosci 2020;14:363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Mancinelli S, Lodato S. ScienceDirectDecoding neuronal diversity in the developing cerebral cortex: from single cells to functional networks. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2018;53:146–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Tomassy GS, Lodato S, Trayes‐Gibson Z, Arlotta P. Development and regeneration of projection neuron subtypes of the cerebral cortex. Sci Prog 2010;93:151–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Marques C, Fischer M, Keime C, et al. Early alterations of RNA metabolism and splicing from adult corticospinal neurons in an ALS mouse model. bioRxiv 2019. 10.1101/667733. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Zhang Q, Mao C, Jin J, et al. Side of limb‐onset predicts laterality of gray matter loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Hirata T, Suda Y, Nakao K, et al. Zinc finger genefez‐like functions in the formation of subplate neurons and thalamocortical axons. Dev Dyn 2004;230:546–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Molyneaux BJ, Arlotta P, Hirata T, et al. Fezl is required for the birth and specification of corticospinal motor neurons. Neuron 2005;47:817–831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Rouaux C, Arlotta P. Direct lineage reprogramming of post‐mitotic callosal neurons into corticofugal neurons in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 2013;15:214–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rouaux C, Arlotta P. Fezf2 directs the differentiation of corticofugal neurons from striatal progenitors in vivo. Nat Neurosci 2010;13:1345–1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lodato S, Rouaux C, Quast KB, et al. Excitatory projection neuron subtypes control the distribution of local inhibitory interneurons in the cerebral cortex. Neuron 2011;69:763–779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ripps ME, Huntley GW, Hof PR, et al. Transgenic mice expressing an altered murine superoxide dismutase gene provide an animal model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. PNAS 1995;92:689–693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Burg T, Bichara C, Scekic‐Zahirovic J, et al. Absence of subcerebral projection neurons delays disease onset and extends survival in a mouse model of ALS. bioRxiv 2019. 10.1101/849935. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Scekic‐Zahirovic J, Oussini El H, Mersmann S, et al. Motor neuron intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms contribute to the pathogenesis of FUS‐associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol 2017;133:887–906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Rouaux C, Panteleeva I, Rene F, et al. Sodium valproate exerts neuroprotective effects in vivo through CREB‐binding protein‐dependent mechanisms but does not improve survival in an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model. J Neurosci 2007;27:5535–5545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Oussini El H, Scekic‐Zahirovic J, Vercruysse P, et al. Degeneration of serotonin neurons triggers spasticity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2017;82:444–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lee S, Toda T, Kiyama H, Yamashita T. Weakened rate‐dependent depression of Hoffmann's reflex and increased motoneuron hyperactivity after motor cortical infarction in mice. Cell Death Dis 2014;e1007:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mackenzie IRA, Bigio EH, Ince PG, et al. Pathological TDP‐43 distinguishes sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with SOD1 mutations. Ann Neurol 2007;61:427–434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D, et al. Neuroscience. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ivanhoe CB, Reistetter TA. Spasticity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:S3–S9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ashworth NL, Satkunam LE, Deforge D. Treatment for spasticity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;2:CD004156. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Simon NG, Lin CSY, Lee M, et al. Segmental motoneuronal dysfunction is a feature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 2015;126:828–836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bennett DJ, Gorassini M, Sanelli L, et al. Spasticity in rats with sacral spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 1999;16:69–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Modol L, Mancuso R, Ale A, et al. Differential effects on KCC2 expression and spasticity of ALS and traumatic injuries to motoneurons. Front Cell Neurosci 2014;8:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Dentel C, Palamiuc L, Henriques A, et al. Degeneration of serotonergic neurons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a link to spasticity. Brain 2013;136:483–493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Martin LJ, Chang Q. Inhibitory synaptic regulation of motoneurons: a new target of disease mechanisms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Mol Neurobiol 2011;45:30–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Mukherjee A, Chakravarty A. Spasticity mechanisms – for the clinician. Front Neurol 2010;1:149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wootz H, FitzSimons‐Kantamneni E, Larhammar M, et al. Alterations in the motor neuron‐renshaw cell circuit in the Sod1G93A mouse model. J Comp Neurol 2013;521:1449–1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Miller DJ, Bhaduri A, Sestan N, Kriegstein A. ScienceDirectShared and derived features of cellular diversity in the human cerebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2019;56:117–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Thomsen GM, Gowing G, Latter J, et al. Delayed disease onset and extended survival in the SOD1G93A rat model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis after suppression of mutant SOD1 in the motor cortex. J Neurosci 2014;34:15587–15600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ilieva H, Polymenidou M, Cleveland DW. Non–cell autonomous toxicity in neurodegenerative disorders: ALS and beyond. J Cell Biol 2009;187:761–772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. D'Acunzo P, Badaloni A, Ferro M, et al. A conditional transgenic reporter of presynaptic terminals reveals novel features of the mouse corticospinal tract. Front Neuroanat 2014;7:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Han Q, Cao C, Ding Y, et al. Plasticity of motor network and function in the absence of corticospinal projection. Exp Neurol 2015;267:194–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Scekic‐Zahirovic J, Fischer M, Lopez GS, et al. Genetic ablation of SOD1G37R selectively from corticofugal projection neurons protects corticospinal neurons from degeneration without affecting ALS onset and progression. bioRxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.01.09.900944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Tremblay R, Lee S, Rudy B. GABAergic interneurons in the Neocortex: from cellular properties to circuits. Neuron 2016;91:260–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Gunes ZI, Kan VWY, Ye XQ, Liebscher S. Exciting complexity: the role of motor circuit elements in ALS pathophysiology. Front Neurosci 2020;14:573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.