Skip to main content
Royal Society Open Science logoLink to Royal Society Open Science
. 2020 Sep 9;7(9):201201. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201201

Enhancing the expression of ARK1 genes in poplar leads to multiple branches and transcriptomic changes

Xiaozhen Liu 1, Zhiming Zhang 2, Wen Bian 2, Anan Duan 1, Hanyao Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC7540752  PMID: 33047064

Abstract

The ARBORKNOX1 (ARK1) gene is an important gene for regulating plant growth and development; however, transcriptomic responses of enhancing expression of ARK1 gene in poplar are poorly investigated. To provide insight into the gene function of the ARK1 gene in poplar, the ARK1 transgenic poplar ‘717' and ‘84 K' lines were obtained, the morphology of transgenic plants was observed, and transcriptome profiles were compared. The results showed that there were multiple branches in ARK1 transgenic seedlings compared with non-transgenic seedlings. The results of transcriptome analysis showed that there were significant differences in transcriptome profiles between the transgenic lines of ‘717' and ‘84 K', and between non-transgenic lines (CK) and transgenic plants. The real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis confirmed the expression levels of the genes involved in the pathway of zeatin biosynthesis and brassinosteroid biosynthesis. The increase in expression levels of AHP and CYCD3 was related to multiple branches. Enhancing the expression of the ARK1 gene in poplar seedlings leads to multiple branches and transcriptomic changes.

Keywords: poplar, transgenic seedlings, ARK1 gene, transcriptome profile, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis

1. Introduction

Poplar (Populus) is widely used in ecological protection, urban greening, industry and fibre production because of its rapid growth, wide adaptability and wide distribution [1]. The whole-genome sequencing of some species of Populus has been completed, and it is an ideal model plant for forest genetic breeding and improvement [2,3]. Poplar is the natural host of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which is convenient for plant genetic transformation using the A. tumefaciens-mediated method [4]. Besides, poplar is the fastest growing tree species in the temperate zone, with a variety of agronomic characters and advantages [5]. Poplar and its hybrids are considered to be the preferred perennials for the production of bioenergy raw materials [5].

ARK1 is a key transcription factor that regulates the activity of cambium formation and cell differentiation [6]. It belongs to the KNOX gene family (class I KNOX, a subfamily of KNOTTED1-like homeobox genes). The KNOX gene family encodes homeobox proteins, which play an important regulatory role in plant growth and development [6]. KNOX Class I subfamily genes are mainly expressed in the plant meristem and are the key factors necessary for meristem genesis and maintenance [7]. By regulating cell differentiation that related to organogenesis, it finally affects the morphogenesis of lateral organs [6].

The ARK1 gene is known to be important for plant growth and development. Zeatin and brassinosteroids were found to be related to the branching of plants [8,9], and the growth of plant phenotype is affected by phenylpropanoid [10]. In recent years, the shoot development and formation of rice were found to be related to zeatin [8]. Lv et al. [11] found that zeatin is related to the ‘shoot branching' of Cremastra appendiculata. Han et al. [12] also found that the zeatin signalling pathway is related to multiple branches in Betula platyphylla × Betula pendula. Brassinosteroids play important roles in the regulation of shoot branching [9]. That brassinosteroid transcriptional effector BES1 regulates shoot branching was found by Wang et al. [13]. Phenylpropanoid pathway was found to be significantly related to plant development [14]. Merali et al. [15] found that phenylpropanoid-metabolizing enzyme in tobacco reveals essential roles of phenolic precursors in normal leaf development and growth. Lignin is a phenylpropanoid-derived heteropolymer important for the strength and rigidity of the plant secondary cell wall [16]. Hence, the researches on zeatin and brassinosteroids signalling pathways and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways should be focused on, when the ARK1 gene is transformed and transcriptome analysis is conducted in plants.

Hybrid poplar ‘717' (Populus tremula × P. alba) and ‘84 K' (P. alba × P. tremula var. glandulosa) are excellent lines of poplar interspecific hybrids with strong stress tolerance and are of great application value for vegetation restoration, prevention of soil erosion and saline-alkali land restoration, and can also be used for the development of biomass energy and fibre energy [3,17,18]. Hybrid poplar ‘717’ and ‘84 K' are perennials, compared with annual herbs such as rice (Oryza sativa) and Arabidopsis thaliana; they have unique advantages for studying the wood formation and seasonal dormancy. Poplar produces a large number of repeated sequences in its evolutionary process, and its regulation mechanism is more complex, so it is particularly important to use ‘717' and ‘84 K' poplar as research objects for gene function analysis.

The growth of plants, especially that of wood plants, is still very slow and is difficult to meet the needs of industrial development for wood, biomass, paper, fuel and biomaterials [19,20]. The ARK1 gene has been found to be an important gene for regulating plant growth and development in poplar in previous studies [6,7]. To investigate the function of the ARK1 gene may benefit the plant growth to meet the needs. In this study, to analyse the function of the ARK1 gene, the poplar lines ‘717' and ‘84 K' were subjected to gene transform, the morphology and transcriptome profiles were compared between transgenic lines and control plants, and the expression levels of some genes were verified by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

2. Methods

2.1. Plant materials

In this study, leaves of hybrid poplar ‘717' and ‘84 K' from the plant nursery of the Southwest Forestry University were used for gene transformation. Hybrid poplar ‘717' and ‘84 K' were introduced from Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University in March 2015.

2.2. Vector construction

Plant DNA was extracted from a leaf of ‘84 K' using the cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [21]. The primer sequences for the amplification of the ARK1 gene were ARBF: 5′-GGAGAGGACACGCTCGAGATGGAGGGTGGTGATGGTG-3′ and ARBR: 5′-ATCCTTGTAGTCGAATTCAAGCAGTGTGGGAGAGATGTC-3′. After the objective gene was amplified, a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) was used to retrieve the target gene band. Then, the target gene was digested with XhoI and EcoRI and ligated to large fragments of PART-CAM-FLAG digested with XhoI and EcoRI to construct the vector (see electronic supplementary material, figure S1). The ligated recombinant fragments were transformed into DH5α competent cells and screened using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology; the PCR primers were the same as those used in the section of molecular detection of transgenic plants. Positive colonies were sequenced, and constructed vectors and related strains were obtained successfully.

2.3. Vector transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens

The plasmid was extracted from DH5α containing an ARK1 gene vector and transformed into the A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404, and PCR was used to select positive strains.

2.4. Gene transformation and detection of ‘717' and ‘84 K'

The leaves of ‘717' and ‘84 K' poplar infected with A. tumefaciens were inoculated using a callus induction medium (Murashige and Skoog (MS) + naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) 1.0 mg l−1 + 6-benzyl aminopurine (6-BA) 1.0 mg l−1) and co-cultured at 28°C for 2 days. The co-cultured calli were then washed with sterile water approximately three times, dried with aseptic paper, and transferred to the sterile differentiation medium (MS + 6-BA 1.0 mg l−1 + zeatin (ZT) 0.4 mg l−1) with selective pressure (200 mg l−1 carbenicillin + 200 mg l−1 kanamycin). The calli were selectively cultured under a light cycle of 16/8 h at 28°C. After approximately 28 days, when the adventitious buds grew to 2–3 cm, they were transferred to the rooting medium (MS + NAA 0.02 mg l−1 + indole-3-butytric acid (IBA) 0.6 mg l−1) containing selective pressure (200 mg l−1 carbenicillin + 200 mg l−1 kanamycin) for rooting culture. After the adventitious roots were produced, the plants were transplanted to basins in the greenhouse.

2.5. Molecular detection of transgenic plants

DNA was extracted by using the CTAB method from seedlings as described by Ye et al. [22]. The corresponding specific detection primers were designed according to the constructed expression vector. The upstream primer was the internal sequence of the ARK1 target gene, and the downstream primer was the sequence of NPT II. The primer sequences were 5′-AAGATCCAGCCCTTGACCAA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CATTGCCATCACCACAACCA-3′ (reverse). The PCR amplification procedure was as follows: 98°C, 3 min; 35 cycles: 94°C, 30 s, 55°C, 30 s, 72°C, 5 min; 72°C, 10 min. After the PCR reaction was carried out, the PCR products were detected by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis (with 0.5 µg mol−1 ethidium bromide).

BamHI∼XhoI digested fragments of the ARK1 gene were 32P-labelled, and Southern blot analysis was conducted according to the method reported by Liu et al. [23].

2.6. Detection of morphological changes in transgenic plants

After being cultured for approximately 45 days, the morphological differences of tissue culture seedlings between transgenic and non-transgenic poplars of ‘717' and ‘84 K' hybrid poplars were compared.

2.7. Transcriptome sequencing

After 45 days of culture, the stems were harvested, and the mRNA of transgenic and non-transgenic poplar samples of ‘717' and ‘84 K' poplar was extracted using a Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA) and inversely transcribed into cDNA (using the SuperScript™ VILO™ cDNA Synthesis Kit, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The cDNA of transgenic ‘717' and ‘84 K' hybrid poplar and non-transgenic ‘717' and ‘84 K' hybrid poplar was analysed using the sequencing platform Illumina HiSeqTM 2500. Pathway analysis was performed using DEseq2 software [24]. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened with padj <0.05 and abs(log2FoldChange) >1. The genome of ‘717' hybrid poplar was downloaded from http://aspendb.uga.edu/index.php/databases/spta-717-genome to be the reference genome.

2.8. Hormone content determination

After 45 days of culture, three stems of transgenic ‘717' and ‘84 K' poplar and three stems of non-transgenic ‘717' and ‘84 K' poplar were harvested. The contents of zeatin and brassinosteroids were determined according to the method reported by Li et al. [25].

2.9. RT-qPCR verification

After 45 days of culture, the stems were harvested and the mRNA of three transgenic and three non-transgenic ‘717' and ‘84 K' poplars was extracted and reverse transcribed into cDNA. We verified the expression of ARK1, AHP, CYCD3 and PER27 genes in the zeatin biosynthesis pathway, brassinosteroid biosynthesis and the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway. The RT-qPCR analysis was conducted according to a previous report [26]. EF1β was used as the housekeeping gene for normalizing, and the 2(−ΔΔ Ct) method [26] was used to analyse the expression data. The primers used for RT-qPCR analysis are shown in table 1.

Table 1.

Primer sequences of target genes (TG) and reference gene (RG) used in RT-qPCR.

gene name primer sequence (5′-3′) length (bp)
elongation factor EF1β (RG) forward GACAAGAAGGCAGCGGAGGAGAG 269
reverse CAATGAGGGAATCCACTGACACAAG
ARK1 forward CATCCATCACCACAAACTGC 165
reverse ATTGGTGGAGCAGGCATTAC
HAP−84 K forward CCCAGTTGATCGTCTCGTCA 221
reverse TTGGCTTGCTTCAACATCCC
HAP−717 forward ATCAGCTCATTGGAAGCAGC 197
reverse CAGCTGCCAGTACTCTCAGT
CYCD3−84 K forward TAGAACCCAGTCTTGCAGCA 240
reverse GAAGACACGGATGATGCCAC
CYCD3−717 forward TGGAGGTGTGAGCGTTTACT 226
reverse CGTTGGTTTTGACTGCCTGA
PER 27−84 K forward CTTTGTGAGGGGCTGTGATG 175
reverse CCACAATGGCCATGATGTCC
PER 27−717 forward CCCTGCATTTTACGACAGCT 161
reverse TCGTCGAGTAAGATGGAGGC

3. Result

3.1. Transformants of ARK1

The DNA of transgenic ‘717' and ‘84 K' seedlings with the ARK1 gene was detected by PCR. Eleven out of 35 ‘717’ seedlings and 14 out of 41 ‘84 K' seedlings with a transformation marker were identified, and a total of 32.22% plants were found to be PCR positive. It illustrated that the genetic transformation of ‘717' and ‘84 K' poplar with ARK1 overexpression vector was successful. PCR positive ‘717’ and ‘84 K' transgenic lines were selected for Southern blot, and all of them were positive. Part of the Southern blot results is shown in electronic supplementary material, figure S2. The promotor for enhancing ARK1 gene is CaMV 35S. After RT-qPCR analysis, the expression levels of eight transgenic ‘717’ lines and ten ‘84 K' lines were found to be at least twice more than that of the control seedlings. The results of the RT-qPCR analysis showed that the average expression levels of the ARK1 gene in transgenic ‘717' and ‘84 K' lines were approximately 2.95 times (using EF1β as the reference gene, see [22]) and 3.16 times that of the control seedlings (p-value = 0.000028 and 0.000019, significant at p < 0.01, see electronic supplementary material, figure S3).

3.2. Phenotypic changes of transgenic poplars

There were significant differences in appearance between transgenic ‘717' and ‘84 K' poplar seedlings compared with non-transgenic seedlings. The stem segment of transgenic poplar ‘717' and ‘84 K' was slender, usually fascicled, and had multiple branches without a slender petiole or slender leaf shape, and some leaves were not fully developed and curling (as shown in figure 1). After being cultured for approximately 45 days, the branches in all PCR positive ‘717' and ‘84 K' lines were approximately 4.73 times and 5.24 times that of control seedlings (p-value = 0.00516 and 0.00419, significant at p < 0.01, see electronic supplementary material, figure S4). After half a year of culture, the leaves changed back to their original state, but the situation of multiple branching remained unchanged.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phenotype of transgenic plants. (a) Transgenic ‘717'; (b) transgenic ‘84 K'; (c) none-transgenic ‘717'; (d) none-transgenic ‘84 K'. These seedlings were cultured for approximately 45 days.

3.3. Transcriptome profile changes of transgenic poplars

The original data were filtered by quality control, and the results showed that the sequencing quality was good and met the requirements of building the database (see electronic supplementary material, table S1). Six hundred and forty-one DEGs were screened in the ARK1 transgenic poplar ‘717', including 389 upregulated genes and 252 downregulated genes (see [22]). Seven hundred and thirty-six DEGs were screened from ARK1 transgenic poplar ‘84 K', including 382 upregulated genes and 354 downregulated genes. Between transgenic poplar ‘717' and control plants, DEGs were enriched in 25 gene ontology identity document (GOIDs); these GOIDs were described as polysaccharide metabolic process, cellular glucan metabolic process, glucan metabolic process, response to oxidative stress, aminoglycan metabolic process, aminoglycan catabolic process, chitin metabolic process and so on. Upregulated DEGs were mainly involved in hormone (including zeatin and brassinosteroids) metabolic process, translational termination, protein complex disassembly, cellular protein complex disassembly and macromolecular complex disassembly. Downregulated DEGs were mainly involved in phenylpropanoid metabolic process, aminoglycan metabolic process, chitin catabolic process, amino sugar metabolic process, cell wall macromolecule catabolic process, cell wall macromolecule metabolic process, amino sugar catabolic process, glucosamine-containing compound metabolic process and glucosamine-containing compound catabolic process. Between transgenic poplar ‘84 K’ and control plants, DEGs were enriched in 29 GOIDs, these GOIDs were described as cellular polysaccharide metabolic process and monocarboxylic acid metabolic process, response to oxidative stress, aminoglycan metabolic process, aminoglycan catabolic process, chitin metabolic process, and so on. Up-regulated DEGs were mainly involved in hormone (including zeatin and brassinosteroids) metabolic process, translational termination, cellular protein complex disassembly, cellular component disassembly and macromolecular complex disassembly. Downregulated DEGs were mainly involved in phenylpropanoid metabolic process, aminoglycan metabolic process, aminoglycan catabolic process, chitin metabolic process, cell wall macromolecule catabolic process, amino sugar catabolic process, glucosamine-containing compound metabolic process and glucosamine-containing compound catabolic process. Figure 2 shows that there were significant differences in the transcriptome profiles between non-transgenic lines ‘717' and ‘84 K', and between non-transgenic lines (CK) and transgenic plants. In other words, after the transgene was conducted, it was observed that the transcriptional group of upregulated and downregulated genes had undergone great changes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

clustering heatmap of differentially expressed genes. (a) Transgenic ‘717' lines and control plants; (b) transgenic ‘84 K’ lines and control plants; CK, 1-3, ‘717'; CK_1-3, ‘84 K’ lines; TR1-3, transgenic ‘717' lines; T_1-3, transgenic ‘84 K’ lines.

3.4. Changes on pathways in transgenic seedlings

Multiple branches were found in the ARK1 transgenic seedlings. Zeatin and brassinosteroids were found to be related to cell division or shoot initiation [27,28], and phenylpropanoid was found to be related to abnormal growth of plant phenotype [10]. Hence, we inferred that the abnormal growth of the ARK1 transgenic plants is related to gene expression levels changing in the pathways of zeatin and brassinosteroids signalling and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. In the zeatin signalling pathway of transgenic poplars ‘717' and ‘84 K', the expression levels of the AHP gene was upregulated and the expression of other genes remained unchanged (figure 3a); in the pathway of brassinosteroid signalling pathway, the expression of the CYCD3 gene was upregulated and the expression of other genes was unchanged (figure 3b). In the pathway of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, the expression of PER27 [EC:1.11.1.7] of transgenic ‘717’ and ‘84 K' was downregulated, while the expression of β-glucosidase [EC:3.2.1.21] was upregulated, compared with the control plants (figure 3c). However, the expression of trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase [EC:1.14.13.11] was downregulated in transgenic ‘717', and the rest of the genes did not change. The expression of 4-coumarate-CoA ligase [EC:6.2.1.12] in ‘84 K' poplar was upregulated, while that of shikimate O-(hydroxycinnamoyl)transferase [EC:2.3.1.133] was downregulated, and the expression of other genes did not change (figure 3d). It indicated that in different varieties, after the introduction of the ARK1 gene, the gene expression of the same gene regulatory network could also be different.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Gene expression level changes in the pathway. (a) Zeatin biosynthesis pathway; (b) brassinosteroid biosynthesis pathway; (c) phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway of ‘717'; (d) phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway of ‘84 K'; red, upregulated; green, downregulated. AHP upregulated 2.71 times and 2.46 times (p-value = 0.00052 and 0.00122, significant at p < 0.01) in transgenic ‘717' and ‘84 K' lines comparing with control plants; CYCD3 upregulated 1.26 times and 1.48 times (p-value = 0.0076 and 0.00219, significant at p < 0.01) in transgenic lines, respectively; PER27 downregulated 1.56 times and 1.82 times (p-value = 0.00093 and 0.00133, significant at p < 0.01), respectively. (a,b,c,d) were KEGG pathway maps [29].

3.5. Determination of hormone content and RT-qPCR verification of gene expression

The contents of zeatin and brassinosteroids in the stems of transgenic plants were significantly higher than those of non-transgenic plants (figure 4a,b). There was no significant difference in the content of these two hormones between transgenic plants and non-transgenic plants. There was no significant difference between the results of the gene expression of AHP, CYCD3 and PER27 revealed by RT-qPCR analysis and the results of transcriptome analysis (figure 4c). It confirmed that the gene expression levels of AHP and CYCD3 were upregulated, and the expression levels of PER27 were downregulated in the ARK1 transgenic plants, comparing with the non-transgenic plants.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Stem hormone content and RT-qPCR verification of transgenic seedlings and non-transgenic seedlings. (a) Content of zeatin; (b) content of brassinosteroid; (c) comparison of RNA-sequencing and RT-qPCR results of selected DEGs. 1, 5, lines of transgenic ‘717'; 3, 7, lines of transgenic ‘84 K'; 2, 6, none-transgenic ‘717'; 4, 8, none-transgenic ‘84 K'; **, the difference is significant at p-value < 0.01; N, the difference was not significant. The samples were harvested after 45 days of culture, RNA-seq, RT-qPCR. 9–12, AHP; 13–16, CYCD3; 17–20, PER27. 9,13,17, lines of transgenic ‘717'; 10,14,18, lines of transgenic ‘84 K'; 11,15,19, none-transgenic ‘717'; 12,16,20, none-transgenic ‘84 K'. RT-qPCR was performed on three transgenic and three control lines, normalized with housekeeping gene elongation factor EF1β, repeated three times.

4. Discussion

Groover et al. [6] cloned the ARK1, a homologous gene of Arabidopsis SHOOT MERISTEMLESS (STM), in poplar for the first time. It was found that ARK1 was mainly expressed in the cambium. Through the analysis of ARK1 transgenic materials, it was found that ARK1 and STM were expressed in the apical meristem and vascular cambium, but downregulated in the terminal cells of leaf and vascular tissue differentiation. It is speculated that ARK1 may regulate cell fate through extracellular matrix modification [6]. Liu et al. [7] used chromatin co-immunoprecipitation sequencing (chip-seq) to determine the binding sites of ARK1 in the poplar genome and found that ARK1 binds to thousands of sites, which are highly enriched in the transcriptional initiation sites of genes with different functions. Through the experiment, it was found that only 6.2% of the target genes were differentially expressed in the ARK1 overexpression mutants and 73.2% of the differentially expressed target genes were upregulated, indicating that the abnormality of ARK1 had little effect on the target genes and ARK1 was related to transcriptional activation [7]. Ye at al. [22] found that overexpression of ARK1 gene in hybrid poplar ‘717' led to downregulation of lignin synthesis-related genes. In this study, the ARK1 gene of ‘84 K' poplar was constructed into the transgenic vector, and the transgenic plants of ‘717' and ‘84 K' poplar with the ARK1 gene were obtained. There were differences in seedling branches of transgenic hybrid poplars in this study, and the results were consistent with the results of previous studies [6].

There are lots of genes either up- or downregulated in the transgenic lines from RNA-seq data. Although any gene is overexpressed in a plant, it would cause transcriptomic changes. The expression levels of specific genes changed is unique to ARK1 overexpressed. Through the analysis of the DEGs in zeatin and brassinosteroid synthesis pathways, most of the related genes in these two synthesis pathways were upregulated, which means that the growth-related genes were upregulated in ‘717' and ‘84 K' hybrid poplars transformed with ARK1, indicating that the ARK1 gene had a positive regulatory effect on plant growth. The expression of lignin synthesis-related enzymes in the phenylpropane pathway is downregulated (as shown in figure 1), while the decrease of lignin synthesis leads to abnormal growth of plant phenotype in height, diameter and so on [10]. Zeatin is related to cell division and shoots initiation, and brassinosteroids are related to cell division [27,28]. The results of this study showed that the content of zeatin and brassinosteroids in the stem of transgenic plants with the expression levels of the ARK1 gene was higher than that of non-transgenic plants and showed a state of multi-branching and active buds in the stems in the phenotype (figure 1).

Oka et al. [30] found that the Arabidopsis thaliana has five genes named AHP1 to AHP5, and AHP1 to AHP5, each encoded with an HPt factor, are involved in the pathway response to cytokinins. Tanaka et al. [31] found that the HAP is involved in the signal transduction pathway in response to cytokinin. In our study, the results showed that overexpression of the ARK1 gene leads to the upregulation of AHP and the increase of zeatin contents. Wang et al. [32] cloned the CYCD3-1 gene from the A. thaliana genome and inserted it into a plant binary vector pER8, which was controlled by a chimeric transcriptional promoter. A foreign gene was introduced into A. thaliana by the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated vacuum infiltration method. The results showed that the low-level misexpression of CYCD3 would affect the growth and development of plants [32]. In our study, the expression of CYCD3 in transgenic plants was significantly higher than that in non-transgenic plants. Its proteolysis was found to be proteasome-dependent, and the expression levels are dependent on the protein synthesis rate [33]. CYCD3 encoding a highly unstable cyclin D-type protein is transcriptionally regulated by cytokinin and brassinosteroids and plays a role in cell proliferation and differentiation [33]. It interacts with ICK1, which is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Overexpressing CYCD3 in plants could lead to extensive leaf curling, increased leaf number and disorganized meristems [33]. This phenomenon is also reflected in the leaves of our transgenic poplars. Our study showed that overexpression of the ARK1 gene leads to the upregulation of CYCD3, which leads to leaf curling too.

5. Conclusion

Overexpression of the ARK1 gene can upregulate the expression of the AHP gene in the zeatin signalling pathway of the plant stem and CYCD3 gene of the brassinosteroid signalling pathway and leads to the increase of plant branching and the changes of transcriptome profiles. The ARK1 gene is involved in the growth process of poplar.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table1
rsos201201supp1.docx (17KB, docx)
Reviewer comments

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 1
rsos201201supp2.eps (623.9KB, eps)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 2
rsos201201supp3.eps (113.8KB, eps)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 3
rsos201201supp4.eps (281.5KB, eps)

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 4
rsos201201supp5.eps (245.4KB, eps)

Acknowledgements

The manuscript was proofread by Proofed Inc. (UK).

Abbreviations

6-BA: 6-benzyl aminopurine; BIG: Beijing Institute of Genomics; CTAB: cetyl trimethylammonium bromide; DEGs: differentially expressed genes; GO: gene ontology; GOID: gene ontology identity document; IBA: indole-3-butytric acid; MS: Murashige and Skoog; NAA: naphthalene acetic acid; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; RT-qPCR: real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; ZT: zeatin.

Ethics

The experiment materials do not include human being or animal. Hence, ethics approval and consent to participate is not applicable.

Data accessibility

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. RNA-Seq data were presented at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession no. PRJNA633952). The RNA-Seq data of hybrid poplar ‘717' has been published in a previous study [22].

Authors' contributions

H.Z. and A.D. conceived and designed the experiments. X.L., Z.Z. and W.B. performed the experiments. X.L. and Z.Z. analysed the data, and wrote the paper. Z.Z. and W.B. contributed analysis tools. X.L. edited the paper. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

The project was support from the National key R & D Plan for the 13th Five-Year Plan Project of China (grant no. 2016YFD0600102) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31760450). The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Zeng YF, Zhang JG, Abuduhamiti B, Wang WT, Jia ZQ. 2018. Phylogeographic patterns of the desert poplar in Northwest China shaped by both geology and climatic oscillations. BMC Evol. Bio. 18, 75 ( 10.1186/s12862-018-1194-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mousavi M, Tong C, Liu F, Tao S, Wu J, Li H, Shi J. 2016. De novo SNP discovery and genetic linkage mapping in poplar using restriction site associated DNA and whole-genome sequencing technologies. BMC Genomics 17, 656 ( 10.1186/s12864-016-3003-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Qiu D, et al. 2019. The genome of Populus alba × Populus tremula var. glandulosa clone 84 K. DNA Res. 26, 423–431. ( 10.1093/dnares/dsz020) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Beckers B, Op De Beeck M, Weyens N, Van Acker R, Van Montagu M, Boerjan W, Vangronsveld J. 2016. Lignin engineering in field-grown poplar trees affects the endosphere bacterial microbiome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2312–2317. ( 10.1073/pnas.1523264113) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Taylor JS, Koshioka M, Pharis RP, Sweet GB. 2019. Sustainable bioenergy for climate mitigation: developing drought-tolerant trees and grasses. Ann. Bot. 124, 513–520. ( 10.1093/aob/mcz146) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Groover AT, Mansfield SD, Difazio SP, Dupper G, Fontana JR, Millar R, Wang Y. 2006. The Populus homeobox gene ARBORKNOX1 reveals overlapping mechanisms regulating the shoot apical meristem and the vascular cambium. Plant Mol. Biol. 61, 917–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu L, Zinkgraf M, Petzold HE, Beers EP, Filkov V, Groover A. 2014. The Populus ARBORKNOX1 homeodomain transcription factor regulates woody growth through binding to evolutionarily conserved target genes of diverse function. New Phytol. 205, 682–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shang XL, Xie RR, Tian H, Wang QL, Guo FQ. 2016. Putative zeatin O-glucosyltransferase OscZOG1 regulates root and shoot development and formation of agronomic traits in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 58, 627–641. ( 10.1111/jipb.12444) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hu J, Sun S, Wang X. 2020. Regulation of shoot branching by strigolactones and brassinosteroids: conserved and specific functions of Arabidopsis BES1 and rice BZR1. Mol. Plant 13, 808–810. ( 10.1016/j.molp.2020.03.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song J, Wang Z. 2011. RNAi-mediated suppression of the phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene in Salvia miltiorrhiza causes abnormal phenotypes and a reduction in rosmarinic acid biosynthesis. J. Plant Res. 124, 183–192. ( 10.1007/s10265-010-0350-5) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lv X, Zhang M, Li X, Ye R, Wang X. 2018. Transcriptome profiles reveal the crucial roles of auxin and cytokinin in the ‘shoot branching’ of Cremastra appendiculata. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 3354 ( 10.3390/ijms19113354) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Han R, et al. 2019. Characterization and T-DNA insertion sites identification of a multiple-branches mutant br in Betula platyphylla × Betula pendula. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 491 ( 10.1186/s12870-019-2098-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Y, Sun S, Zhu W, Jia K, Yang H, Wang X. 2013. Strigolactone/MAX2-induced degradation of brassinosteroid transcriptional effector BES1 regulates shoot branching. Dev. Cell 27, 681–688. ( 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.11.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sharma D, Tiwari M, Pandey A, Bhatia C, Sharma A, Trivedi PK. 2016. MicroRNA858 is a potential regulator of phenylpropanoid pathway and plant development. Plant Physiol. 171, 944–959. ( 10.1104/pp.15.01831) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Merali Z, Mayer MJ, Parker ML, Michael AJ, Smith AC, Waldron KW. 2012. Expression of a bacterial, phenylpropanoid-metabolizing enzyme in tobacco reveals essential roles of phenolic precursors in normal leaf development and growth. Physiol. Plant. 145, 260–274. ( 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01583.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bonawitz ND, et al. 2014. Disruption of mediator rescues the stunted growth of a lignin-deficient Arabidopsis mutant. Nature 509, 376–380. ( 10.1038/nature13084) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coleman HD, Cánovas FM, Man H, Kirby EG, Mansfield SD. 2012. Enhanced expression of glutamine synthetase (GS1a) confers altered fibre and wood chemistry in field grown hybrid poplar (Populus tremula x alba) (717-1B4). Plant Biotechnol. J. 10, 883–889. ( 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00714.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Feng F, Ding F, Tyree MT. 2015. Investigations concerning cavitation and frost fatigue in clonal 84 K poplar using high-resolution cavitron measurements. Plant Physiol. 168, 144–155. ( 10.1104/pp.114.256271) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harfouche A, Meilan R, Kirst M, Morgante M, Boerjan W, Sabatti M, Scarascia Mugnozza G. 2012. Accelerating the domestication of forest trees in a changing world. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 64–72. ( 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.11.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zong D, Gan P, Zhou A, Li J, Xie Z, Duan A, He C. 2019. Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of seven Populus species: Insights into alternative female parents of Populus tomentosa. PLoS ONE 14, e0218455 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0218455) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li S, Liu X, Liu H, Zhang X, Ye Q, Zhang H. 2019. Induction, identification and genetics analysis of tetraploid Actinidia chinensis. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 191052 ( 10.1098/rsos.191052) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ye Q, Liu X, Bian W, Zhang Z, Zhang H. 2020. Over-expression of transcription factor ARK1 gene leads to down-regulation of lignin synthesis related genes in hybrid poplar ‘717’ Sci. Rep. 10, 8549 ( 10.1038/s41598-020-65328-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu XZ, Liu Z, Yang YM, Zhang HY. 2010. Production of transgenic Pinus armandii plants harbouring btCryIII(A) gene. Biol. Plant. 54, 711–714. ( 10.1007/s10535-010-0126-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Anders S, Huber W. 2010. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Gene Biol. 11, R106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li CY, Xu W, Liu LW, Yang J, Zhu XK, Guo WS. 2015. Changes of endogenous hormone contents and antioxidative enzyme activities in wheat leaves under low temperature stress at jointing stage. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 26, 2015–2022 (in Chinese). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu XZ, Liu XP, Zhang ZM, Sang M, Sun XD, He CZ, Xin PY, Zhang HY. 2018. Functional analysis of the FZF1 genes of Saccharomyces uvarum. Front. Microbiol. 9, 96 ( 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00096) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Taylor JS, Koshioka M, Pharis RP, Sweet GB. 1984. Changes in cytokinins and gibberellin-like substances in Pinus radiata buds during lateral shoot initiation and the characterization of ribosyl zeatin and a novel ribosyl zeatin glycoside. Plant Physiol. 74, 626–631. ( 10.1104/pp.74.3.626) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lipka E, Herrmann A, Mueller S. 2015. Mechanisms of plant cell division. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev. Dev. Biol. 4, 391–405. ( 10.1002/wdev.186) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Morishima K, Tanabe M. 2019. New approach for understanding genome variations in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(D1), D590–D595. ( 10.1093/nar/gky962) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oka A, Sakai H, Iwakoshi S. 2002. His-Asp phosphorelay signal transduction in higher plants: receptors and response regulators for cytokinin signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Genet. Syst. 77, 383–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tanaka Y, Suzuki T, Yamashino T, Mizuno T. 2004. Comparative studies of the AHP histidine-containing phosphotransmitters implicated in His-to-Asp phosphorelay in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosci. Biotechnol., Biochem. 68, 462–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang HB, Zhao JC, Huang SC, Li F, Yu FG. 2007. Cloning and functional studies of CYCD3;1 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Acta Bot. Boreal-Occident Sin. 27, 2153–2157. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Collins C, Maruthi NM, Jahn CE. 2015. CYCD3 D-type cyclins regulate cambial cell proliferation and secondary growth in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 4595–4606. ( 10.1093/jxb/erv218) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table1
rsos201201supp1.docx (17KB, docx)
Reviewer comments
Supplementary Figure 1
rsos201201supp2.eps (623.9KB, eps)
Supplementary Figure 2
rsos201201supp3.eps (113.8KB, eps)
Supplementary Figure 3
rsos201201supp4.eps (281.5KB, eps)
Supplementary Figure 4
rsos201201supp5.eps (245.4KB, eps)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. RNA-Seq data were presented at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession no. PRJNA633952). The RNA-Seq data of hybrid poplar ‘717' has been published in a previous study [22].


Articles from Royal Society Open Science are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES