Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 16;26(19):5232–5245. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3874

Advanced Age Increases Immunosuppression in the Brain and Decreases Immunotherapeutic Efficacy in Subjects with Glioblastoma

Erik Ladomersky 1, Lijie Zhai 1, Kristen L Lauing 1, April Bell 1, Jiahui Xu 2, Masha Kocherginsky 2, Bin Zhang 3,4, Jennifer D Wu 5, Joseph R Podojil 4, Leonidas C Platanias 3,6, Aaron Y Mochizuki 7, Robert M Prins 8, Priya Kumthekar 9, Jeffrey J Raizer 9, Karan Dixit 9, Rimas V Lukas 9, Craig Horbinski 1,10, Min Wei 11, Changyou Zhou 11, Graham Pawelec 12, Judith Campisi 13,14, Ursula Grohmann 15, George C Prendergast 16, David H Munn 17, Derek A Wainwright 1,5,7,8
PMCID: PMC7541490  NIHMSID: NIHMS1605097  PMID: 32546647

Abstract

Purpose:

Wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase-expressing glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor with a median age at diagnosis of ≥65 years. It accounts for ~90% of all GBM and has a median overall survival (OS) of <15 months. Although immune checkpoint therapy has achieved remarkable survival benefits in a variety of aggressive malignancies, similar success has yet to be achieved for GBM among phase III clinical trials to-date. Our study aimed to understand the relationship between subject age and immunotherapeutic efficacy as it relates to survival from glioma.

Experimental Design:

1) Clinical data: Glioblastoma patient datasets from the cancer genome atlas, Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse, and clinical studies evaluating immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) were stratified by age and compared for OS. 2) Animal models: Young, middle-aged and older adult wild-type and IDO knock-out syngeneic mice were intracranially-engrafted CT-2A or GL261 glioma cell lines and treated with or without CTLA-4/PD-L1 mAbs, or radiation, anti-PD-1 mAb and/or a pharmacologic IDO enzyme inhibitor.

Results:

Advanced age was associated with decreased GBM patient survival regardless of treatment with ICB. The advanced age-associated increase of brain IDO expression was linked to the suppression of immunotherapeutic efficacy and was not reversed by IDO enzyme inhibitor treatment.

Conclusions:

Immunosuppression increases in the brain during advanced age and inhibits anti-glioma immunity in older adults. Going-forward, it will be important to fully understand the factors and mechanisms in the elderly brain that contribute to the decreased survival of older GBM patients during treatment with ICB.

Keywords: Senescence, neuroimmunology, immunotherapy, brain tumor, IDO

INTRODUCTION

As complex organisms age, there are changes in the architecture and function of the immune system. These changes are collectively termed ‘immunosenescence’, which reflects the dysregulation of an organism’s capacity for responding to novel immunological challenges, as well as a diminished capacity to initiate long-term immunological memory. Progressive immune aging is associated with the long-term sequelae of thymic involution1 and T cell lymphopenia25, loss of T cell receptor diversity6, an increased inequality of clonal leukocyte pools7, as well as a higher regulatory T cell (CD4+CD25+FoxP3+):CD8+ cytolytic T cell ratio in the peripheral blood8. In addition to altering the lymphoid compartment, progressive aging also alters myeloid cell development in the bone marrow9,10. In the central nervous system (CNS), bone marrow-derived dendritic cells take up residency in the parenchyma1113, microglia express higher basal levels of MHCII and CD11b14, and the potential for microglia to express immunosuppressive TGFβ and IL-10 is increased15,16. Senescent astrocytes increase in the aged brain and release higher levels of pro-inflammatory factors as part of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)17,18. Notably, the eradication of senescent cells improves the healthspan in mouse models of premature aging19.

Cancer is the second most lethal disease associated with advanced aging in the United States. Although the general mortality rate for individuals with cancer has declined over the past 40 years, it has steadily risen for those diagnosed with primary brain and other CNS cancers8. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor, accounting for ≥50% of malignant brain tumors with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years old20. The median overall survival (mOS) for patients with GBM is 15–20 months2123, but is significantly lower among elderly individuals8,24. It has been suggested that CD8+ recent thymic emigrants (RTEs) account for the prognostic power of age on clinical outcome in GBM patients25 because they are significantly decreased in older individuals, perhaps due to the synergy between glioma-induced- and advanced age-induced thymic atrophy26. Also notable is that long-term survivorship (LTS) is negligible among wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) elderly GBM patients27, which characterize the majority of diagnoses. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has provided a survival benefit, and in some cases, durable LTS in patients with end-stage melanoma28, non-small cell lung carcinoma29, renal cell cancer30 and a growing list of other malignancies. In contrast, phase III studies treating with anti-PD-1 mAb, nivolumab, in recurrent GBM patients [NCT02017717], and nivolumab in combination with standard radiotherapy in patients with newly-diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated GBM [NCT02617589], failed to demonstrate an improved mOS. We recently hypothesized that one reason for the dismal outcomes of GBM patients is the under-appreciation for- and the unique interactions between-the CNS, immune system, and advanced age in subjects with glioma.

We previously found a higher mortality rate among older C57BL/6 mice with intracranial syngeneic GL261 glioma as compared to younger counterparts31. We then discovered a suppression of treatment efficacy in older adult mice with brain tumors that were simultaneously treated with radiation, anti-PD-1 mAb, and an indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase 1 (IDO) enzyme inhibitor; a strategy now undergoing phase I clinical evaluation [NCT04047706]32. Strikingly, there were no differences in the intratumoral leukocyte populations when comparing young and older subjects treated with trimodal immunotherapy. However, there was an increase in the expression of immunosuppressive IDO in the older adult brain regardless of tumor burden31,32. Importantly, IDO expression also increases in the human brain during advanced age and independent of whether there is a pre-existing brain tumor8. IDO is a rate-limiting enzyme that metabolizes the essential amino acid tryptophan into kynurenines. The associated enzyme activity is thought to be the primary mechanism of how IDO mediates immunosuppression, although it can also suppress the immune response independent of enzyme activity33. Arising from this multi-mechanistic immunosuppressive potential, we questioned the nature of increased IDO expression in the brain and its relationship to immunotherapeutic efficacy in older adults with malignant glioma.

Here, we confirm a strong association between advanced age and decreased mOS in patients with GBM, demonstrating that the decreased mOS is also observed among older recurrent GBM patients treated with adjuvant ICB therapy. A lifespan analysis of syngeneic mice engrafted with glioma showed a selective dependence on CD4+ and/or CD8+ T cells for modulating the magnitude of LTS among the different age groups. This T cell dependence was particularly pronounced among older adult mice that lacked any LTS and died faster as compared to younger counterparts. We next evaluated the immunosuppressive contribution and targetability of IDO among young and older adult mice with intracranial glioma treated with immunotherapy. Strikingly, IDO exerted an overarching suppressive action on immunotherapeutic efficacy in older adults as compared to younger counterparts with glioma. Unexpectedly, the advanced age-mediated suppressive effect of IDO was not reversed by treatment with a potent IDO metabolic inhibitor. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to describe an increased level of IDO-mediated immune suppression during advanced age and reflects a new targetable mechanism for enhancing immunotherapeutic efficacy in elderly patients with incurable GBM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)

Survival data for GBM patients was accessed from the TCGA using the University of California Santa Cruz Xena portal on 02-01-2019. All GBM patient analyses associated with the TCGA analysis were performed in a de-identified fashion and this work therefore neither requires informed patient consent nor approval by the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board (NU IRB).

Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse (NM EDW)

Patient medical records from the Northwestern Medicine Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW) were accessed for individuals diagnosed with GBM, or those with lung, breast, kidney or colon cancer CNS metastases. Inclusion criteria for patients with GBM are included in Supp. Fig. 1 and as described34. For lung, breast, kidney or colon cancer CNS metastases, only subjects with an initial diagnosis at Northwestern and a reported date of death were analyzed. This study was granted exemption status from the NU IRB based on the de-identified GBM patient records provided for analysis and did not require informed patient consent.

Recurrent GBM (rGBM) patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)

Data on rGBM patient age, sex, MGMT promoter methylation status, IDH status and median overall survival (mOS) were extracted and analyzed from three independent clinical data sets including: (i) the Ivy Consortium’s multi-institution, randomized, open-label pilot study of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent, surgically resectable GBM35; (ii) the Northwestern University-sponsored study entitled, ‘tremelimumab and durvalumab in combination or alone in treating patients with recurrent malignant glioma’ [NCT02794883]; (iii) a patient cohort treated with pembrolizumab or nivolumab at Northwestern University and Columbia University, made available by Zhao et al., 201936.

Mice and cell lines

Wild-type C57BL/6 (Cat#000664) and IDOKO (Cat#005867; C57BL/6 background) mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories and maintained in the Northwestern University Center for Comparative Medicine (CCM). Wild-type mice were purchased at 4-, 6-, 8-, 23-, 47-, 60-, or 75-weeks of age, while IDOKO mice were maintained and aged in the CCM facility. All procedures involving animals were conducted in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Northwestern University. Unmodified GL261 cells were obtained from the NIH/NCI at Frederick (Frederick, MD), luciferase-expressing GL261 (GL261.fl) were provided by Dr. Orin Bloch’s laboratory, and CT-2A cells were provided by Dr. Thomas Seyfried (Boston College, Boston, MA). Cell lines were authenticated prior to use. All cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 μg/mL) and streptomycin (100 mg/mL) at 37°C. All products used for cell culture were purchased from Gibco Invitrogen.

Orthotopic intracranial injection model

Mice were intracranially injected at 6-, 8-, 23-, 47- or 72–86-weeks of age with 5×102 - 5×104 syngeneic glioma cells and is further elucidated for each experiment in the figure legends. NIH guidelines on the care and use of laboratory animals were followed for all surgical procedures. Mice were anesthetized with 0.1 mL/g solution containing ketamine HCl (90 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection, and subcutaneously injected with meloxicam (2 mg/kg) prior to surgery and 24 hours following surgery for pain management. The surgical site was shaved and prepared with iodine followed by 70% ethanol. A 1 cm midline incision was made, followed by drilling a parietal burr hole 2 mm posterior to the coronal suture and 2 mm lateral to the sagittal suture. Injections were conducted with a stereotactic frame and a 2.5 μL volume of glioma cells reconstituted in PBS and intracranially-injected (i.c.) to a depth of 3 mm using a 22-gauge Hamilton syringe. The skin was stapled after removal of the needle.

In vivo treatments

Mice were treated with whole brain radiation (RT; 2 Gy/day × 5 days), intraperitoneal anti-PD-1 mAb or PD-L1 mAb (clone J43 and 10F.9G2, respectively; 500 mg loading dose followed by a 100 mg maintenance dose every 3 days for 3 treatments total; BioXCell), and oral gavage suspended in ORAplus (Perrigo) with daily BGB-5777 or BGB-7204 (100 mg/kg; BeiGene). Mice were anesthetized with 0.15 mL solution containing ketamine HCl (90 mg/mkg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg) with an intraperitoneal injection prior to subject placement in a lead box with head-only exposure and irradiation with 2 Gy via cesium-137. For leukocyte depletion, mice were injected with 200 mg anti-CD4 mAb (clone GK1.5; InVivoMab), anti-CD8 mAb (clone YTS 169.4; InVivoMab), or anti-NK1.1 mAb (clone PK136; InVivoMab) every 3 days, beginning at 3 days prior to intracranial (i.c.) engraftment with glioma cells and continuing until study removal due to endpoint criteria and/or death.

Depletion of gut microbiota

Mice were treated daily with an antibiotic cocktail through oral gavage containing 500 mg/L Vancomycin (Sigma), 1 g/L Metronidazole (Sigma) and 1 g/L Neomycin (Sigma) as described37. Additionally, the mice were placed in cages with water bottles containing 1 g/L Ampicillin (Sigma). The water was changed weekly and the cages were changed every 3 days. Antibiotic treatment began 4 weeks prior to intracranial injection and continued until the experimental endpoint. Gut depletion was confirmed by quantifying mouse fecal samples for 16S RNA with RT-PCR.

Bone marrow chimeras

The bone marrow of recipient mice was ablated with 4.75 Gy irradiation, twice during the same day, with a 4-hour rest period between doses. During the rest period, cells were collected from the femurs and tibias of age- and sex-matched donor mice by flushing the bones with cold DMEM lacking FBS. A single cell suspension was generated by filtering the bone marrow through a 100 μm filter. Cells were counted and re-suspended in cold PBS at a final concentration of 5×106 cells/100 μL. After the final irradiation, recipient mice received 200 μL (1×107 cells) of donor bone marrow cells with a 30-gauge needle through the tail vein. Mice then received antibiotic-containing 2 g/L of Neomycin Sulfate for 8 weeks. Approximately 3 months after BM engraftment, the recipient mice were intracranially-injected with 5×104 GL261 cells.

Statistical analysis

Overall survival (OS) for cancer patients was defined as the time from diagnosis to death or last known alive time. For mouse studies, overall survival was defined as the day of tumor cell engraftment until reaching endpoint criteria and/or death. OS was estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Median survival and its confidence intervals were estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier estimates. OS was compared between groups using logrank test or Cox proportional hazards regression models. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Proportional hazards assumption was checked. For predictors with multiple group levels (e.g. age groups) pairwise comparisons between groups were made based on the fitted Cox model, and p-values were adjusted for multiple pairwise comparisons using Scheffe’s method because group sizes were unequal. Overall statistical significance of multi-level predictors was assessed using Wald test based on the fitted Cox model. Multivariable Cox models were fitted to obtain adjusted effects of age on overall survival. IDO mRNA expression relative to GAPDH (Fig. 5B) was summarized using mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) and compared between age, genotype, and treatment groups using a linear regression model which included a 3-way interaction term. Pairwise comparisons of the 6 resulting groups were made based on the fitted model and the p-values were adjusted using Scheffe’s method. Statistical analyses were conducted using RStudio and R v. 3.6.1 statistical software; Cox models were fitted using the survival package in R; emmeans package was used to calculated adjusted p-values.

Figure 5. Advanced aging licenses non-tumor cell IDO to decrease overall survival (OS) despite the treatment with a pharmacologic IDO enzyme inhibitor in subjects with malignant glioma.

Figure 5.

(A) Timeline and OS analysis of 8 week old wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice intracranially-engrafted with 2.0×105 GL261 cells and treated with IgG Abs, or with 2 Gy whole brain radiation (RT) × 5 days total, one 500 μg loading dose followed by three 100 μg maintenance doses of anti-PD-1 mAb (clone J43) and combined with either BGB-5777 (tool compound IDO enzyme inhibitor which we previously published with36) or BGB-7204 (clinical grade IDO enzyme inhibitor) beginning at day 14 after tumor cell injection. (B-F) IDO expression- and OS-analysis of 8–12 week old and 72–78 week old, WT and IDOKO (C57BL/6 background) mice, pre-treated with vehicle alone or with BGB-7204 (IDOi), followed by the intracranial-engraftment with 5.0×104 GL261.fl cells modified to express luciferase. (B) IDO mRNA expression reflects the levels in the contralateral brain without tumor, as well as the syngeneic brain tumor. (E) Bioluminescence of GL261.fl brain tumors expressed as a percentage of the final radiance for each mouse. Overall survival estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier; age groups compared using Cox proportional hazards models; pairwise groups comparisons unadjusted (A) or adjusted using Scheffe’s (C, D). Mean ± SEM; groups compared using linear regression model; pairwise groups comparisons adjusted using Scheffe’s method. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ****p<0.0001

RESULTS

Overall survival is decreased among older adults with GBM but not in those with brain metastases arising from other cancers

We analyzed overall survival and estimated median OS (mOS) across age groups for (n=535) GBM patients from the TCGA (Fig. 1A,B), as well as n=499 with indications of de novo GBM from the NM EDW (Fig. 1C,D). Older subjects had decreased OS and shorter mOS. TCGA-associated GBM patients of the age groups <20–34 (n=39), 35–44 (n=47), 45–54 (n=121), 55–64 (n=151), 65–74 (n=115) and 75–84+ (n=62) years old have a mOS of 748, 618, 476, 442, 327 and 211 days, respectively (Fig. 1A). NM EDW-associated GBM patients of the age groups <20–34 (n=29), 35–44 (n=36), 45–54 (n=107), 55–64 (n=148), 65–74 (n=119) and 75–84+ (n=59) have a mOS of 1281, 831, 654, 510, 456 and 306 days, respectively. The TCGA- and NM EDW-associated median survival of GBM patients <65 years of age is 485 days (TCGA; Fig 1B and Supp. Fig. 2A) and 636 days (Fig. 1D and Supp. Fig. 2B), respectively. This survival is significantly better compared to TCGA and NM EDW-associated GBM patients ≥65 years of age, which is 290 days (p<0.0001, logrank test) and 383 days (p<0.0001, logrank test), respectively. Similar decreases in mOS were observed across both sexes with progressive aging although this was more pronounced among females in the oldest age groups (Supp. Fig. 3A,B). To determine if this same trend was present in other highly aggressive malignancies occurring within the CNS, we analyzed data from various CNS brain metastases. While these metastases each represent distinct, highly aggressive malignancies, the trend for lower survival among older individuals is not observed. The mOS for patients with lung cancer CNS metastases is 305 days for patients <65 years of age and 257 days for patients ≥65 years of age (p=0.081; Fig. 1E). For breast cancer CNS metastases, mOS is 341 days for patients <65 years of age and 268 days for patients ≥65 years of age (p=0.215; Fig. 1F). These figures are 243 days for patients <65 years of age and 336 days for patients ≥65 years of age for patients with kidney cancer CNS metastases (p=0.670; Fig. 1G). Finally, the mOS for patients with colon cancer CNS metastases is 168 days for patients <65 years of age and 150 days for patients ≥65 years of age (p=0.755; Fig. 1H). Collectively, these data suggest that advanced age is a significant negative factor in patients with GBM but is not generalizable to all types of cancer in the CNS.

Figure 1. Advanced aging is associated with decreased overall survival (OS) among glioblastoma (GBM) patients, but not in human subjects with lung-, breast-, kidney-, or colon- metastases in the brain.

Figure 1.

Human subject OS analyzed from the medical records (A,B) for the wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase (wtIDH) cohort of GBM patients in the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) and (C,D) GBM patients in the Northwestern Enterprise Data Warehouse (NW EDW) and analyzed as described in Supp. Fig. 1. Subjects were stratified by (A,C) <20–34 (blue)-, 35–44 (red)-, 45–54 (green)-, 55–64 (purple)-, 65–74 (orange)-, and 75–84+ (black)-years of age, or by (B,D) <65 (blue)- or ≥65 (red)-years of age. The NW EDW database was also evaluated for the OS of human subjects with brain metastases originating from the (E) lung, (F) breast, (G) kidney, and (H) colon and stratified by <65 (blue)- or ≥65 (red)-years of age. Overall survival estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier (A, C, E-H). Age groups compared using Cox proportional hazards models; pairwise groups comparisons adjusted using Scheffe’s method (A, C). Median OS with 95%CI (B, D). Age groups compared using logrank test (E-H). *p<0.05; **p<0.01 ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001

To determine whether the negative effects of advanced age in human GBM patients can be experimentally recapitulated, we analyzed the mOS and LTS of C57BL/6 mice intracranially-engrafted with CT-2A glioma cells at 6, 23, 47 and 75 weeks of age. The mOS and LTS were 39 days and 13%, 43 days and 40%, 41.5 days and 27% and 40.5 days and 0%, respectively, among 6, 23, 47 and 75 week-old animals treated with control IgG (Fig. 2A,C,D,E,F; n=15/group). To determine whether different subsets of host T cells affect the survival of mice challenged with CT-2A glioma, similar age groups were intracranially-engrafted with 500 CT-2A glioma cells and co-depleted of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells based on independent confirmatory experiments that our depletion strategy was highly effective (Supp. Fig. 4). The mOS and LTS was 38 days and 13%, 40 days and 13%, 41 days and 14%, and 25.5 days and 0%, respectively, in 6, 23, 47, and 75 week-old mice co-treated with CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-depleting antibodies (Fig. 2B,C,D,E,F; n=15/group). These data collectively suggest three primary conclusions: (i) T cells provide different levels of protection that depend on host age; (ii) older adult T cells are critical for preventing a catastrophic decrease of mOS from glioma; (iii) older adults with glioma have poorer LTS outcomes as compared to younger counterparts.

Figure 2. Advanced aging limits sporadic long-term survivor (LTS) generation in syngeneic mice with intracranial CT-2A glioma.

Figure 2.

Timeline and overall survival analysis of 6-, 23-, 47-, and 75-week old C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) mice intracranially-engrafted with 500 CT-2A cells and administered (A) non-specific IgG Ab or (B) CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-depleting Abs. Individual age groups treated with IgG Ab or T cell-depleting Abs were further stratified by (C) 6-, (D) 23-, (E) 47-, and (F) 75-week old subjects, respectively. Overall survival estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier; age groups compared using Cox proportional hazards models (A-F).

Advanced age is associated with decreased survival of human patients and mice with malignant glioma treated with ICB

Because we had identified an age-associated lower mOS in two independent GBM patient databases, we next questioned whether this effect extended to subjects with GBM treated with immunotherapy. Relevant information was extracted from patient medical records including age, sex, MGMT promoter methylation status, and IDH status for recurrent GBM (rGBM) in patients treated with various forms of ICB in the adjuvant setting (Fig. 3A). Ninety-two patients were dichotomized into groups defined as <65 years of age (n=65) and ≥65 years of age (n=27; Fig. 3B). rGBM patients <65 years of age and treated with ICB had a higher mOS of 278 days compared to patients ≥65 years of age treated similarly with a mOS of 154 days (Fig. 3A; p=0.024). This negative association between older age and shorter OS among subjects treated with ICB, combined with the negative effect of age in preclinical models (Fig. 2A,B,F), prompted us to generate a table of analogous age groups between C57BL/6 mice and humans, including weaning, puberty, sexual maturity/growth plate closure, reproductive senescence, and life expectancy (Fig 3C). Based on our previous work evaluating anti-CTLA-4 mAb/anti-PD-L1 mAb treatment in syngeneic mice, we asked whether age negatively affects the survival benefit of this treatment. Similar to the clinical setting, 78–82 week old mice (n=14) with syngeneic glioma have a mOS of 25.5 days and 27% LTS compared to 8–12 week old mice (n=15) treated similarly with a mOS not reached and 67% LTS (Fig 3D; p=0.0097). The outcomes collectively suggest that: (i) advanced age negatively affects mOS in human GBM patients treated with ICB; (ii) older adult mice with glioma treated with ICB recapitulate the negative survival outcomes of human subjects with GBM.

Figure 3. Advanced aging is associated with decreased overall survival (OS) of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) patients and syngeneic mice treated with immune checkpoint blockade therapy.

Figure 3.

(A) OS and (B) patient demographics of rGBM patients treated with adjuvant nivolumab (anti-PD-1 mAb), pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 mAb), libtayo (anti-PD-1 mAb), durvalumab (anti-PD-L1 mAb), tremelimumab (anti-CTLA-4 mAb), or a combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab, and ultimately stratified by <65 (blue)- or ≥65 (red)-years of age. (C) Schematic illustration (created with biorender.com) of lifespan milestones and comparative ages between humans and C57BL/6 mice at the time of birth, weaning, puberty, sexual maturity, reproductive senescence, and life expectancy. The first dotted red line denotes the analogous mouse and human age range for common syngeneic mouse glioma modeling at 6–12 weeks old, which corresponds to the age of 11.5–16 year old human. The second dotted red line denotes the analogous mouse and human age ranges for the median age of a human GBM patient diagnosis at 64 years old in humans, which corresponds to 87 weeks old in mice. (D) Treatment timeline and OS of C57BL/6 WT mice intracranially-engrafted with 5×104 GL261 cells and simultaneously treated with anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-L1 mAbs beginning at day 14 after tumor cell injection. Overall survival estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier; age groups compared using Cox proportional hazards models (A, D); *p<0.05; **p<0.01

Advanced age suppresses immunotherapeutic efficacy through a non-tumor, non-hematopoietic mechanism

To explore the basis for how advanced age negatively affects immunotherapeutic efficacy in subjects with glioma, we considered developing a bone marrow chimeric mouse model with different ages of host non-tumor stroma and hematopoietic cells. However, previous work in melanoma suggested that the gut microbiota play an important role in immunotherapeutic efficacy38,39. Combined with the required use of antibiotics during generation of bone marrow chimeric mice, we first evaluated the effects of antibiotic treatment on immunotherapeutic efficacy. Given our previous work validating the combination of radiation (RT), anti-PD-1 mAb and an IDO enzyme inhibitor to improve the survival of mice with well-established glioma36, which serves as the basis of our ongoing clinical trial in newly-diagnosed GBM patients [NCT04047706], we investigated the effects of antibiotics in animals using this strategy. Eight week-old WT mice with intracranial GL261 treated with RT, anti-PD-1 mAb and IDO enzyme inhibitor had a mOS of 36 days and a 45% LTS compared to the control group with a mOS of 24 days and no LTS (Fig. 4A; p=0.01). Antibiotic-mediated gut microbiota depletion (Supp. Fig. 5) had no effect on OS of immunotherapy-treated subjects with a mOS=31.5 days and 44% LTS (p=0.907) compared to similarly treated mice not administered antibiotics (mOS=36.0 days). Armed with confirmatory evidence that antibiotics do not disable this immunotherapeutic approach, we next generated young and older adult chimeric WT mice reconstituted with either young or older adult bone marrow.

Figure 4. Advanced aging licenses non-tumor-, non-hematopoietic-stroma to suppress immunotherapeutic efficacy in subjects with malignant glioma.

Figure 4.

(A) Timeline and overall survival (OS) analysis of 8–12 week old C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) mice treated with or without intraperitoneally (i.p.)-administered vancomycin, metronidazole, and neomycin, as well as ampicillin via the water supply, beginning at day -35, followed by intracranial-engraftment with 2.0×105 GL261 cells at day 0, and treatment with 2 Gy whole brain radiation (RT) × 5 days total, one 500 μg loading dose followed by three 100 μg maintenance doses of anti-PD-1 mAb (clone J43), and the IDO enzyme inhibitor (IDOi; BGB-7204), beginning at day 14 after tumor cell injection and as previously described32. (B) Timeline for the mixed age bone marrow chimeric mouse experiment. Briefly, 4–6 week old and 62–64 week old C57BL/6 WT mice were sublethally irradiated with 9 Gy whole body radiation (WBRT) and reconstituted with the bone marrow from either 4–6 week old or 62–64 week old C57BL/6 WT mice during the same day. Mice received treatment with neomycin between days -84 to -56. Approximately three months later, all groups were intracranially-engrafted with 5.0×104 GL261 cells, and treated with RT, anti-PD-1 mAb, and IDO1 enzyme inhibitor, beginning at day 14 after tumor cell injection and as described in (A). The resulting OS analysis is presented as Kaplan Meier survival curves. Overall survival estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier (A, B). Age groups compared using Cox proportional hazards models; pairwise groups comparisons adjusted using Scheffe’s method (A, B). **p≤0.01; ***p≤0.001

There was no difference in the OS of young WT mice with young or older adult bone marrow and treated with trimodal immunotherapy (Fig. 4B; p=0.972). Similarly, there was no difference in the OS between older adult WT mice with young or older adult bone marrow and treated with trimodal immunotherapy (p=0.190). In contrast, there was an increase in mOS and LTS in young mice given young or older adult bone marrow, compared to older adult mice with young (not significant) or older (p=0.019 and 0.004; respectively) adult bone marrow (p<0.05). These data collectively suggest that advanced age suppresses immunotherapeutic efficacy through a non-hematopoietic-, non-tumor stroma-dependent mechanism.

IDO lowers mOS in older mice through a mechanism that is not reversed by pharmacologic IDO enzyme inhibitor treatment

We previously validated the therapeutic effects of combined RT, anti-PD-1 mAb and IDO inhibitor treatment in multiple glioma models utilizing the IDO enzyme inhibitor BGB-577732. To determine how therapeutic efficacy of BGB-5777 compares to that of a novel clinical-grade IDO enzyme inhibitor, BGB-7204, OS was evaluated in 8 week-old C57BL/6 mice with GL261 treated with RT and anti-PD-1 mAb combined with either BGB-5777 or BGB-7204. Both IDO inhibitors synergized with RT and anti-PD-1 mAb to improve OS and LTS compared to the control group with a mOS of 30 days and no LTS (Fig. 5A; p=0.05). There was no difference in OS between mice with intracranial glioma treated with either BGB-5777 or BGB-7204 in combination with RT and anti-PD-1 mAb (p=0.999). Because there was no difference in therapeutic efficacy and given the superior PK/PD properties of BGB-7204 (Supp. Fig. 6), all subsequent experiments utilizing the IDO enzyme inhibitor employed the clinical-grade compound.

We next confirmed our previous observations of higher IDO expression levels in the older adult brain compared to younger counterparts (Fig. 5B). Interestingly, the age-associated higher IDO expression was more marked in the non-tumor sample taken from the contralateral hemisphere, than in intratumoral areas. To determine the significance of this observation, we evaluated the effect of IDO inhibitor pre-treatment on OS in young and older WT mice. IDO inhibitor pre-treatment began at 7 days prior to intracranial engraftment with GL261 in 8–12 week-old WT mice. This resulted in a trend for increased survival with mOS = 19 days, longer than in the young control group with mOS = 15 days (Fig. 5C; n=15 mice/group). In contrast, older adult WT mice pre-treated with IDO enzyme inhibitor had mOS = 15 days, identical to the older control group that also had mOS = 15 days (Fig. 5D; n=11–13 mice/group). Given the unexpected age-dependent differences in survival, we asked whether IDO differentially affected the OS of young and older adult animals by evaluating IDO-KO mice injected with GL261. As expected from the results of the IDO inhibition experiments, 8–12 week-old IDOKO mice had significantly longer OS (mOS = 21 days) than the young WT group (mOS = 15 days) (Fig. 5C; p=0.014; n=14–15 mice/group). Unexpectedly, 72–78 week old IDOKO mice also had a significantly longer OS (mOS = 19 days) than the older WT group with a mOS = 15 days (Fig. 5D; p=0.027; n=9–11 mice/group). These data suggest that the pre-treatment efficacy of pharmacologic IDO enzyme inhibition is absent in older adults with glioma.

To ensure that the older animals succumbed to brain tumor burden, and not other aging-related factors, bioluminescence imaging evaluated brain tumor growth (Fig. 5BD). The steady increase in luminescence intensity and visualization of tumor luminescence in young and older adult animals suggested that mice succumbed to the brain tumor and not to other unexpected co-morbidities (Fig. 5E, Supp. Fig. 7).

IDO suppresses immunotherapeutic efficacy during advanced age and is not reversed by pharmacologic enzyme inhibitor treatment

With the discovery that IDO levels are higher in older adult brains, but that the negative survival-associated effects of IDO are not reversed by enzyme inhibition, we evaluated whether IDO behavior differ in a more therapeutically-relevant model. Accordingly, 8–12 and 78–86 week-old WT and IDOKO mice injected with GL261 were simultaneously treated with RT, ant-PD-1 mAb and the IDO inhibitor (Fig. 6A). In-line with our previous findings36, there was a greater improvement in OS in young than older WT mice with brain tumors (p<0.0001; n=19–20 mice/group). However, there was no significant difference in OS between GL261-bearing young WT and IDOKO mice treated with trimodal immunotherapy. Older adult IDOKO mice with brain tumors treated with RT, anti-PD-1 mAb and the IDO inhibitor showed a marked improvement in OS with mOS = 19.5 days and 29% LTS, relative to older treated WT mice with a mOS = 16 days and 0% LTS (P<0.0001; n=19–21 mice/group). Notably, however, the older IDOKO mice with glioma treated with immunotherapy still did not exhibit OS rescued to the level of younger counterparts, suggesting there are additional age-dependent immunosuppressive factors contributing to suppression of the anti-glioma immune response and/or responsiveness to glioma immunotherapy. There were no sex differences among the different groups treated with trimodal immunotherapy (Fig. 6B). Thus, the advanced age-mediated increase of brain IDO levels suppresses immunotherapeutic efficacy in both sexes and independent of its ability to suppress the immune response through enzyme activity. A working hypothesis for current and independent observations is presented in Fig. 6C.

Figure 6. Advanced aging enhances the immunosuppressive effects of IDO, which is not reversed during the treatment with a pharmacologic enzyme inhibitor in subjects with malignant glioma.

Figure 6.

(A) Timeline and overall survival (OS) analysis of 8–12 week old- and 78–86 week old-C57BL/6 wild-type (WT) and IDOKO (C57BL/6 background) mice intracranially-engrafted with 5.0×104 GL261 cells and treated with 2 Gy whole brain radiation (RT) × 5 days total, one 500 μg loading dose followed by three 100 μg maintenance doses of anti-PD-1 mAb (clone J43), and IDO enzyme inhibitor (IDOi; BGB-7204) beginning at day 14 after tumor cell injection. (B) Composition and numbers of young and older adult male and female WT mice that are represented in (A) and their association with median and long-term OS. (C) A working hypothesis for how IDO suppresses: (i) the anti-glioma immune response; (ii) responsiveness to glioma immunotherapy, in subjects with malignant glioma. Greater than 90% of human patient-resected glioblastoma (GBM) is IDO positive and for which, intratumoral IDO expression levels increase with higher tumor-infiltrating T cell levels63 but are not changed with aging8. Glioma cell IDO increases intratumoral immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs; CD4+FoxP3+)64 regardless of the treatment with an IDO enzyme inhibitor65 and the absence of IDO metabolism by glioma cells66,67. In contrast, IDO metabolism is detectable in the brain tumor-draining cervical lymph nodes (cLN)66. Advanced age increases IDO expression in the brain (Fig. 5B)8,31,36 and decreases immunotherapeutic efficacy against glioma despite IDO enzyme inhibitor treatment. Given their association with mediating inflammation, senescent cells with the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) indirectly upregulate immunosuppressive IDO expression in the brain during advanced aging59,61, due to the high sensitivity for IDO expression by pro-inflammatory molecule expression68. Overall survival estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier (A). Age groups compared using Cox proportional hazards models; pairwise groups comparisons adjusted using Scheffe’s method (A). *p<0.05; ****p<0.0001

DISCUSSION

The most prominent feature of aging is a gradual loss of functional reserve that results in degeneration at the molecular, cellular, tissue and organismal levels40. In mammals, age-related degeneration gives rise to well-recognized pathologies, including sarcopenia, atherosclerosis and heart failure, osteoporosis, macular degeneration, pulmonary insufficiency, renal failure, and neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, stroke, dementia and many others. Although species vary in their susceptibility to specific age-related pathologies, collectively, these pathologies arise with almost exponential kinetics beginning at approximately 50–60 years of age in humans41,42.

Deleterious alterations in the immune system that accompany human aging are commonly referred to as ‘immunosenescence’43. It is clear that aging does not always lead to an inevitable decline in immunological functions but rather causes modifications. During development, thymic involution at puberty drastically reduces the output of naïve T cells and during aging, after long-term residence in the host, the remaining naïve T cells exhibit impaired functionality, such as differentiation into effector cells after antigen stimulation, reduced production of cytokines, and a more restricted T-cell receptor repertoire44,45. Epigenetic age-related changes include the methylation of cytokine gene promoters that impair optimal immune functions46 and decrease the potency of T lymphocytes in aged individuals as compared to cells of the same phenotype from younger counterparts.

Despite an aggressive standard of care treatment that includes maximal surgical resection, stereotactic radiation, and chemotherapy with the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide, mOS is ~15 months and ~31 months for individuals with de novo and secondary GBM, respectively47. Among elderly patients, mOS is markedly reduced to only 4–5 months, according to population-based studies48. Attempts to explain the shorter survival of elderly GBM patients include (i) less favorable tumor biology; (ii) less aggressive care due to older patient frailty; (iii) greater treatment toxicity due to less physiological reserve; (iv) competing comorbidities that may shorten life48. Based on the overwhelming majority of de novo GBM diagnoses, its associated onset during advanced aging, the promising outcomes that immunotherapy has yielded for many cancer patients but not for individuals with GBM49,50, and the well-established relationship between advanced age, immunosenescence and neuroimmunological changes in the brain, we explored the relationship between age-dependent increases in CNS immunosuppression with outcome for subjects with glioma during immunotherapeutic treatment.

We evaluated two independent databases (TCGA and the NM EDW) for the relationship between de novo GBM patient mOS and subject age. Our analysis showed both databases indicated a progressive decrease in mOS with increasing subject age. This finding was most obvious upon gross stratification of elderly human patients with GBM as compared to younger counterparts. Given the rapid course of disease often observed among individuals with brain metastases, we expected a similarly negative association of elderly individuals with CNS metastatic infiltration. In contrast, individuals ≥65 years of age with lung, breast, kidney or colon CNS metastases did not have decreased OS as compared to younger counterparts. These conflicting outcomes may reflect a different malignant sensitivity to aging in the brain that is attributable to the parenchymal source of immunosuppression in the CNS and its negative relationship to a wholly parenchymal-resident tumor (ie. GBM), as compared to metastatic disease that is less protected by the blood brain barrier due to its partial residence in the perivascular space51.

While there is a paucity of comprehensive datasets arising from the study of immunological protection during tumor challenge, there exists a large amount of information related to vaccine efficacy across the lifespan, albeit, segmented across large categories52. The data suggest that, while early- and mid-life vaccination-mediated immunological protection is strongest, the robustness of immune defenses lessen during advanced aging. We therefore questioned whether mice at different ages would show differences in mOS and/or long-term survival (LTS) after intracranial engraftment of a highly aggressive immune checkpoint therapy-resistant murine glioma cell line. Strikingly, the highest level of survival was observed among middle-aged 23- and 47-week old mice as compared to 6-week old mice, which are age analogous to ~28–30-, ~38–40- and ~14–15-year old humans respectively. We hypothesize that the lack of immune system maturity of the 6-week old mice plays a role in the decreased survival as compared to 23- and 47- week old mice. In the 75-week old setting, we hypothesize that the aging immune system as well as the enhanced immunosuppression in the brain are synergistic factors contributing to the decreased survival as compared to younger counterparts. Notably, the simultaneous depletion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells ablated the survival advantage among middle-aged subjects. Interestingly, at least 13% of subjects from the 6-, 23-, and 47-week old groups survived long-term regardless of T cell lymphopenia, suggesting the existence of a T cell-independent protective mechanism to glioma challenge among these age groups. Most dramatically, the 75-week old mice with glioma which are age-analogous to ~58–59 year old humans, had 0% LTS and a mOS that was further decreased when co-depleted of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. These findings show for the first time that there are age-dependent changes in OS from malignant glioma that depend in part but not exclusively on the normal presence of CD4+ and/or CD8+ T cells, and highlight subject age as an important factor for survival outcomes in the lymphopenic setting during advanced age.

With subject age confirmed to play a role in immune-mediated survival among adult subjects with glioma, and our new findings that older individuals exhibited poorer survival from GBM as compared to younger counterparts, we next questioned whether recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade have a survival difference that can be stratified by age. Similar to our TCGA and NM EDW analysis, elderly rGBM patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade had a significant decrease in mOS as compared to younger counterparts. An age-associated decrease in OS was also observed in older adult syngeneic mice with intracranial glioma treated simultaneously with anti-CTLA-4 mAb/anti-PD-L1 mAb.

Nearly 40 years ago, Flood et al. were among the first to describe an aging-dependent decreased capability of mounting idiotypic and anti-idiotypic responses required for controlling the growth of ultraviolet light-induced fibrosarcomas in syngeneic mice53. More recently, it was discovered that relapse-free destruction of large long-established tumors expressing a very high-affinity tumor-specific antigen can be achieved through adoptive transfer of splenocytes from young 6-month old, but not 16-month old mice54. In each of these studies, the tumor was highly immunogenic; in contrast, GBM is well recognized for its low immunogenicity55. We therefore questioned whether the hematopoietic compartment or non-hematopoietic non-tumor stroma was primarily responsible for suppressing anti-glioma immune responses during advanced age. Unexpectedly, it was the aged non-hematopoietic non-tumor stroma that primarily prevented immunotherapeutic efficacy. These data collectively suggest that a non-hematopoietic factor, not of tumor cell origin, suppresses the anti-glioma immune response at advanced age, but the nature of this factor remains unknown thus far.

Multiple findings of increased IDO expression in the normal human and mouse brain during advanced age make this factor a good candidate for the source of non-hematopoietic non-tumor stroma-mediated immune suppression31,32. This hypothesis prompted us to question the role of IDO in suppressing the anti-glioma immune response during aging. When expressed, IDO suppresses immune responses both by acting as a rate-limiting enzyme that converts tryptophan into kynurenines56, as well as through non-enzyme-mediated intracellular signaling33. Given the dual immunosuppressive mechanisms attributed to IDO, we addressed the potential role of tryptophan metabolism in suppressing the elderly glioma immune response by studying young and older adult subjects treated with or without a pharmacologic IDO enzyme inhibitor. Rather unexpectedly, the data collectively suggest that IDO suppresses the anti-glioma immune response independent of its enzymic function. This observation raises multiple intriguing questions including (i) how does IDO suppress the anti-GBM immune response; (ii) what is the cellular origin of immunosuppressive IDO during advanced age; (iii) and is this generalizable to other age-related diseases of the central nervous system? These questions remain unanswered at this time.

Among the resident cell types in the brain, astrocytes are the most abundant. They possess proliferative capacity, are crucial for neuron survival57, mediate ion homeostasis, growth factor responses, and neurotransmitter functions58. Previous work demonstrated that astrocyte dysfunction is associated with multiple advanced aging-associated neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD)59,60. Importantly, senescent astrocytes have been associated with aged- and AD-brain tissues61, while other studies have identified factors capable of inducing astrocyte senescence59,61,62. These studies provide a potential link between aging and senescent astrocytes that release inflammatory molecules. Given the exquisite sensitivity of IDO to inflammatory signals, it is tempting to hypothesize that senescent astrocytes increase brain IDO expression, thereby indirectly contributing to the suppression of anti-glioma immunity in elderly subjects.

Together, our novel observations highlight a negative effect of advanced age in subjects with malignant glioma that is partly dependent on IDO. They also suggest that the current generation of IDO enzyme inhibitors will be ineffective at reversing the full extent of immunosuppressive IDO effects during advanced age and provides the rationale for designing and creating next generation modalities that fully reverse IDO-mediated immune suppression. Targeting the non-enzymic function(s) including the IDO immunoreceptor tyrosine signaling motifs that control protein stability and promote non-canonical NF-κB activation33 could prove to be more effective than targeting the catalytic domain. Finally, our work highlights an important implication in the field of neuro-oncology seeking to improve care and outcomes in elderly GBM patients – current preclinical modeling that takes place in young subjects and/or subjects ablated for the immune system do not fully mimic the differential effects of age across the lifespan, nor do they allow for understanding the advanced age-associated consequences on GBM initiation, growth, and/or response to therapy. Ultimately, our work supports the future evaluation of age-appropriate glioma models to fully understand the biological underpinnings that contribute to the negative effects of immune aging in elderly individuals with GBM.

Supplementary Material

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE.

Adult glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor, divided into two distinct subtypes: (i) de novo GBM, which comprises ~90% of diagnoses and possesses wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH); (ii) secondary GBM, which accounts for the other ~10% of diagnoses and has mutated IDH. De novo GBM arises without any previous history of glioma, whereas secondary GBM transforms from a lower grade glioma into GBM. Individuals with de novo GBM have a median age of ~68–70 years, whereas individuals with secondary GBM have a median age of 48 years. Based on the majority of GBM diagnoses presenting as de novo cases, onset at advanced age and the promising outcomes that immunotherapy has yielded for many different cancers, we focused on the outcomes and effects of advanced age on treatment with immune checkpoint blockade in subjects with malignant glioma. We found that: (i) contrary to emerging reports for treatment of metastatic melanoma and certain other solid tumors by checkpoint blockade, GBM patient survival is inversely correlated with age such that elderly patients have worse survival than younger patients regardless of treatment by checkpoint blockade; (ii) older adults with glioma do not become long-term survivors and depend on T cells for maximal survival; (iii); IDO (indoleamine 2,3 dioxygenase) is relatively increased in the elderly brain and decreases immunotherapeutic efficacy against glioma. These data collectively suggest that future therapeutic efforts should focus on reversing the maladaptive effects of aging in GBM patients to enhance immunotherapeutic efficacy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants T32CA070085 (E.L.), R01NS113425 (L.C.P.), R01NS102669 (C.H.), P50CA221747 (L.C.P., R.V.L., C.H., P.K., D.A.W.), R01NS097851 (D.A.W.), BrainUp grant 2136 (R.V.L. and D.A.W.), the Gail Boyter Magness (GBM) Foundation (D.A.W.), and the Grace Giving Foundation (D.A.W.).

Footnotes

COI: Min Wei and Changyou Zhou possess financial interests and are paid employees of BeiGene, Ltd.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • 1.Lynch HE et al. Thymic involution and immune reconstitution. Trends Immunol 30, 366–373, doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.04.003 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aw D & Palmer DB The origin and implication of thymic involution. Aging Dis 2, 437–443 (2011). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.den Braber I et al. Maintenance of peripheral naive T cells is sustained by thymus output in mice but not humans. Immunity 36, 288–297, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.02.006 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bourgeois C, Kassiotis G & Stockinger B A major role for memory CD4 T cells in the control of lymphopenia-induced proliferation of naive CD4 T cells. J Immunol 174, 5316–5323, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.9.5316 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cicin-Sain L et al. Loss of naive T cells and repertoire constriction predict poor response to vaccination in old primates. J Immunol 184, 6739–6745, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0904193 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Messaoudi I, Lemaoult J, Guevara-Patino JA, Metzner BM & Nikolich-Zugich J Age-related CD8 T cell clonal expansions constrict CD8 T cell repertoire and have the potential to impair immune defense. J Exp Med 200, 1347–1358, doi: 10.1084/jem.20040437 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Qi Q et al. Diversity and clonal selection in the human T-cell repertoire. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 13139–13144, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409155111 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ladomersky E et al. The Coincidence Between Increasing Age, Immunosuppression, and the Incidence of Patients With Glioblastoma. Front Pharmacol 10, 200, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00200 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T, Pirtskhalava T, Han J & Karagiannides I Adipogenesis and aging: does aging make fat go MAD? Experimental gerontology 37, 757–767 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Leins H et al. Aged murine hematopoietic stem cells drive aging-associated immune remodeling. Blood 132, 565–576, doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-02-831065 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bulloch K et al. CD11c/EYFP transgene illuminates a discrete network of dendritic cells within the embryonic, neonatal, adult, and injured mouse brain. The Journal of comparative neurology 508, 687–710, doi: 10.1002/cne.21668 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.D’Agostino PM, Gottfried-Blackmore A, Anandasabapathy N & Bulloch K Brain dendritic cells: biology and pathology. Acta neuropathologica 124, 599–614, doi: 10.1007/s00401-012-1018-0 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaunzner UW et al. Accumulation of resident and peripheral dendritic cells in the aging CNS. Neurobiol Aging 33, 681–693 e681, doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.06.007 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rogers J, Luber-Narod J, Styren SD & Civin WH Expression of immune system-associated antigens by cells of the human central nervous system: relationship to the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of aging 9, 339–349 (1988). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Henry CJ, Huang Y, Wynne AM & Godbout JP Peripheral lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge promotes microglial hyperactivity in aged mice that is associated with exaggerated induction of both pro-inflammatory IL-1beta and anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokines. Brain, behavior, and immunity 23, 309–317, doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2008.09.002 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sierra A, Gottfried-Blackmore AC, McEwen BS & Bulloch K Microglia derived from aging mice exhibit an altered inflammatory profile. Glia 55, 412–424, doi: 10.1002/glia.20468 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chung HY et al. Molecular inflammation: underpinnings of aging and age-related diseases. Ageing research reviews 8, 18–30, doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2008.07.002 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Franceschi C et al. Inflammaging and anti-inflammaging: a systemic perspective on aging and longevity emerged from studies in humans. Mechanisms of ageing and development 128, 92–105, doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.11.016 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baker DJ et al. Clearance of p16Ink4a-positive senescent cells delays ageing-associated disorders. Nature 479, 232–236, doi: 10.1038/nature10600 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wen PY & Kesari S Malignant gliomas in adults. N Engl J Med 359, 492–507, doi:359/5/492 [pii] 10.1056/NEJMra0708126 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Stupp R et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. The New England journal of medicine 352, 987–996, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stupp R et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. The Lancet. Oncology 10, 459–466, doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Stupp R et al. Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama 318, 2306–2316, doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gately L, Collins A, Murphy M & Dowling A Age alone is not a predictor for survival in glioblastoma. Journal of neuro-oncology 129, 479–485, doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2194-x (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wheeler CJ et al. Thymic CD8+ T cell production strongly influences tumor antigen recognition and age-dependent glioma mortality. J Immunol 171, 4927–4933 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Andaloussi AE, Han Y & Lesniak MS Progression of intracranial glioma disrupts thymic homeostasis and induces T-cell apoptosis in vivo. Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII 57, 1807–1816, doi: 10.1007/s00262-008-0508-3 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hartmann C et al. Patients with IDH1 wild type anaplastic astrocytomas exhibit worse prognosis than IDH1-mutated glioblastomas, and IDH1 mutation status accounts for the unfavorable prognostic effect of higher age: implications for classification of gliomas. Acta neuropathologica 120, 707–718, doi: 10.1007/s00401-010-0781-z (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Larkin J, Hodi FS & Wolchok JD Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. The New England journal of medicine 373, 1270–1271, doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1509660 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Antonia SJ et al. Nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet Oncol 17, 883–895, doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30098-5 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Motzer RJ et al. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. The New England journal of medicine 373, 1803–1813, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ladomersky E et al. Advanced age negatively impacts survival in an experimental brain tumor model. Neurosci Lett 630, 203–208, doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.08.002 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ladomersky E et al. IDO1 Inhibition Synergizes with Radiation and PD-1 Blockade to Durably Increase Survival Against Advanced Glioblastoma. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 24, 2559–2573, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3573 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pallotta MT et al. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase is a signaling protein in long-term tolerance by dendritic cells. Nature immunology 12, 870–878, doi: 10.1038/ni.2077 [pii] (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Otto-Meyer S, DeFaccio R, Dussold C Ladomersky E, Zhai L, Lauing KL, Bollu LR, Amidei C, Lukas RV, Scholtens DM, Wainwright DA A retrospective survival analysis of Glioblastoma patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Brain, behavior, and immunity, 100025 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cloughesy TF et al. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma. Nature medicine 25, 477–486, doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0337-7 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhao J et al. Immune and genomic correlates of response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in glioblastoma. Nature medicine 25, 462–469, doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0349-y (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Reikvam DH et al. Depletion of murine intestinal microbiota: effects on gut mucosa and epithelial gene expression. PLoS One 6, e17996, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017996 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sivan A et al. Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy. Science 350, 1084–1089, doi: 10.1126/science.aac4255 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vetizou M et al. Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science 350, 1079–1084, doi: 10.1126/science.aad1329 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Campisi J Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annual review of physiology 75, 685–705, doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183653 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Research, A. f. A. The Silver Book - Chronic Disease and Medical Innovation in an Aging Nation, <http://www.silverbook.org/> (2009).
  • 42.Prevention, C. f. D. C. a. Health, United States, 2007 - with Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans, <https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus07.pdf> (2007). [PubMed]
  • 43.Pawelec G Age and immunity: What is “immunosenescence”? Exp Gerontol 105, 4–9, doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.10.024 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nikolich-Zugich J The twilight of immunity: emerging concepts in aging of the immune system. Nature immunology 19, 10–19, doi: 10.1038/s41590-017-0006-x (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Goronzy JJ & Weyand CM Understanding immunosenescence to improve responses to vaccines. Nat Immunol 14, 428–436, doi: 10.1038/ni.2588 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Calvanese V, Lara E, Kahn A & Fraga MF The role of epigenetics in aging and age-related diseases. Ageing research reviews 8, 268–276, doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2009.03.004 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yan H et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med 360, 765–773, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808710 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Arvold ND & Reardon DA Treatment options and outcomes for glioblastoma in the elderly patient. Clinical interventions in aging 9, 357–367, doi: 10.2147/CIA.S44259 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Weller M et al. Rindopepimut with temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed, EGFRvIII-expressing glioblastoma (ACT IV): a randomised, double-blind, international phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18, 1373–1385, doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30517-X (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kurz SC et al. PD-1 inhibition has only limited clinical benefit in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Neurology 91, e1355–e1359, doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006283 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fecci PE et al. The Evolving Modern Management of Brain Metastasis. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 25, 6570–6580, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1624 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Osterholm MT, Kelley NS, Sommer A & Belongia EA Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. Infectious diseases 12, 36–44, doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70295-X (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Flood PM, Urban JL, Kripke ML & Schreiber H Loss of tumor-specific and idiotype-specific immunity with age. J Exp Med 154, 275–290, doi: 10.1084/jem.154.2.275 (1981). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Schreiber K et al. Spleen cells from young but not old immunized mice eradicate large established cancers. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 18, 2526–2533, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0127 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hodges TR et al. Mutational burden, immune checkpoint expression, and mismatch repair in glioma: implications for immune checkpoint immunotherapy. Neuro Oncol 19, 1047–1057, doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox026 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Munn DH et al. Prevention of allogeneic fetal rejection by tryptophan catabolism. Science 281, 1191–1193, doi: 10.1126/science.281.5380.1191 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jakel S & Dimou L Glial Cells and Their Function in the Adult Brain: A Journey through the History of Their Ablation. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience 11, 24, doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00024 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Devinsky O, Vezzani A, Najjar S, De Lanerolle NC & Rogawski MA Glia and epilepsy: excitability and inflammation. Trends in neurosciences 36, 174–184, doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.11.008 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bitto A et al. Stress-induced senescence in human and rodent astrocytes. Experimental cell research 316, 2961–2968, doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.06.021 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Maragakis NJ & Rothstein JD Mechanisms of Disease: astrocytes in neurodegenerative disease. Nature clinical practice. Neurology 2, 679–689, doi: 10.1038/ncpneuro0355 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bhat R et al. Astrocyte senescence as a component of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 7, e45069, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045069 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mombach JC, Vendrusculo B & Bugs CA A Model for p38MAPK-Induced Astrocyte Senescence. PLoS One 10, e0125217, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125217 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhai L et al. Infiltrating T Cells Increase IDO1 Expression in Glioblastoma and Contribute to Decreased Patient Survival. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 23, 6650–6660, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0120 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wainwright DA et al. IDO expression in brain tumors increases the recruitment of regulatory T cells and negatively impacts survival. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 18, 6110–6121, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-2130 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ladomersky E et al. IDO1 Inhibition Synergizes with Radiation and PD-1 Blockade to Durably Increase Survival Against Advanced Glioblastoma. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3573 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhai L et al. Non-tumor cell IDO1 predominantly contributes to enzyme activity and response to CTLA-4/PD-L1 inhibition in mouse glioblastoma. Brain, behavior, and immunity 62, 24–29, doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.01.022 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhai L et al. Tumor cell IDO1 increases intratumoral immunosuppressive Tregs independent of enzyme activity. The Journal of Immunology 202, 137.132–137.132 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhai L et al. Molecular Pathways: Targeting IDO1 and Other Tryptophan Dioxygenases for Cancer Immunotherapy. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0420 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

RESOURCES